• more about

    #32inch

    JVC 32-inch LCD Prototype's 11-pound Weight and 7mm Thickness To Be Ogled At CES

    World's Largest: Smartparts 32-Inch Digital Picture Frame is Aptly Named

    Hollandia Platinum-Luxe Elite Sleep System Lets You Do Everything But

    read more: #features, #32inch, #frankenfight, #hd, #lcd, #sharp, #tvs, #televisions, #viewsonic, #vizio, #westinghouse, #frankenreview, #homeentertainment

    Frankenfight: Cheap, 32-inch HD LCDs

    LCDs have plummeted in price over the last year, so much so, that if you are willing to sacrifice a bit of quality and maybe go generic, you can snag a 32-inch HD for under $1000, and often far less. But you aren't like the rest of the cheapos out there, grabbing the first bargain LCD you see. You are a cheap aficionado who wants the absolute best...for whatever pittance you are willing to pay.

    We took PCMag's and CNET's top four rated LCDs in the price range (by Westinghouse, Vizio, Viewsonic and Sharp) and let them duke it out battle royal style in the Frankenreview.

    FrankTVgraph.jpg
    0%2C1425%2Csz%3D1%26i%3D137292%2C00.jpg
    Design
    Winner: Sharp
    "Sharp dropped the silver coloring..."
    "I took a moment to admire the display's all-black styling, which features a gloss-finished bezel inset within a matte-finished frame..."
    "...the oversized power button would be easy to locate and operate with your eyes closed."


    Inputs
    Winner: Sharp
    "...including two HDMI ports, two component-video connections, and a single RF input that feeds the TV's analog (NTSC), digital (ATSC), and Clear QAM (unencrypted digital cable) tuners."
    "...the biggest omission is a dedicated PC input...no mention of using one of the HDMI inputs with PC sources, although dedicated users can probably find a way."

    0%2C1425%2Csz%3D1%26i%3D119050%2C00.jpg
    Features
    Winner: Vizio
    "... boasts a versatile picture-in-picture control. One option lets you view standard-def—but not high-def—inputs in a smaller window while using the PC input for the main screen.
    "There are four aspect-ratio modes available for both HD and standard-def sources."

    Display
    0%2C1425%2Csz%3D1%26i%3D137294%2C00.jpg
    Winner: Sharp
    "...summed up with one word, wow."
    "...Sharp was able to coax a relatively deep color of black compared to other LCDs we've reviewed recently."
    "...has superior representation of color and dark detail."
    "Color tracking was admirably linear too compared with the Westinghouse and ViewSonic 32-inch models."
    "its less-saturated color was visible...reds are too garish in comparison with other colors."
    "...picture was almost perfectly calibrated right out of the box."

    Overall Winner: Sharp0%2C1425%2Csz%3D1%26i%3D137295%2C00.jpgWe were surprised that the Sharp's black levels and contrast ratios held up to TVs far more expensive than those compared here. So while the Sharp may be the most expensive in the competition, it not only looks to be a good TV for under $1,000, but a decent TV in general.

    Runner Up: Vizio
    For $250 less than the Sharp, you get a PC-input and a decent display save for some color temperature problems...just utilize HDMI and avoid component inputs. If you are sub $700 cheap, we can forgive you for choosing the Vizio.

    Sharp LC-32D40U Specs:
    LCD TV
    TFT active matrix
    Image aspect ratio - 16:9
    Series: Aquos
    Width: 32.3 in
    Depth: 10.7 in
    Height: 25.6 in
    Weight: 43 lbs

    Video System
    Resolution: 1366 x 768
    Image contrast ratio - 1200:1
    Viewing angle: 176 degrees
    Brightness: 450

    Television Features
    Backlight life: 60,000 hour(s)

    Connections / Cables / Slots
    Input/Output connections: 2 x HD component input (RCA phono x 3), 2 x HDMI (19 pin HDMI Type A), 1 x S-Video input (4 pin mini-DIN), Audio line-in, 3 x Composite video input (RCA phono)


    CNET Westinghouse

    CNET Vizio
    CNET ViewSonic
    CNET Sharp
    CNET Sharp 2
    PCMag Westinghouse
    PCMag Vizio
    PCMag ViewSonic
    PCMag Sharp



    Contact information for this author is not available.