<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: 108 inch]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/108 inch</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged '108 inch']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sharp's 108-Inch LCD Heading For The US in September]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/06/c7/1e/thumb160x_c71eebfd87f65bf7dfb35dc98e84822d.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />If you have $100,000+ to blow on a TV (I envy you) you will be happy to know that the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5016122/sharps-108+inch-lcd-behemoth-going-on-sale-next-month-for-100k">Sharp LB-1085</a> 108-inch LCD TV will be heading to the States in September. [<a href="http://www.sharpusa.com/about/AboutPressKits/0,1108,795,00.html">Sharp</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5017628/sharps-108+inch-lcd-heading-for-the-us-in-september]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5017628]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[home entertainment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[108-inch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[expensive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[LB-1085]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sharp]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tvs]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:50:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5017628&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sharp's 108-Inch LCD Behemoth Going On Sale Next Month for $100K]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/06/sharp.jpg"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/06/sharp.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Remember the 108-incher from Sharp, that Leviathan of the LCD world? It's ready to be flogged to those of you who can afford it&mdash;in Japan. Weighing 430 pounds, and with a 176º viewing angle, the LB-1085 can be yours for just 11 million yen. That's $101,832.99 to you, guv. [<a href="http://66.102.9.104/translate_c?hl=en&langpair=ja%7Cen&u=http://www.watch.impress.co.jp/av/docs/20080613/sharp.htm">Impress</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5016122/sharps-108+inch-lcd-behemoth-going-on-sale-next-month-for-100k]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5016122]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[sharp]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[108-inch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[displays]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[expensive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[home entertainment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[LB-1085]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sharp 108-inch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tvs]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 13 Jun 2008 04:45:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[AddyDugdale]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5016122&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sizemodo: The 108-inch TV]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/01/sizmodo108.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />If you're thinking about rounding up your own Ocean's 13 posse to break into CES and steal the 108-inch TV, you should probably know how big it is. Here's a Sizemodo so you know just how large of a truck you'll have to commandeer to fit Sharp's fattest baby on board. <span class="byline">&ndash; Jason Chen</span></p>
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/home-entertainment/sharp-and-the-108inch-lcd-say-bigger-is-better-226828.php">Sharp and the 108-inch LCD Say: Bigger Is Better</a> [Gizmodo]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/227811/sizemodo-the-108+inch-tv]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-227811]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[home entertainment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[108-inch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sharp]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sizemodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:00:40 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=227811&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sharp and the 108-inch LCD Say: Bigger Is Better]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/01/sharpbigger.JPG"><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/01/sharpbigger.JPG" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a></p>
<p>Sharp! We never saw you as so obsessed with imposing figures, like your gaudy rivals Sony, Samsung, and Panasonic are. But you've come out as a lover of the bada-bing! with this big, <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/home-entertainment/sharp-rolls-out-gigantic-108inch-lcd-226761.php">108-inch LCD</a> that crushes even the largest Plasmas. What a beautiful model. (And the TV isn't bad, either.)</p>
<p>Sharp's flashy presentation of technology, as well as babe-age, marks a turning point. The title of biggest TV has always gone to plasma&mdash;with good reason. It used to be far cheaper to manufacture than LCD. Before the show, I thought that the upcoming 70-inch Samsung and Sony TVs would take the world's largest record for LCDs. But today Sharp bested the previous record holder&mdash;the 103-inch plasma that Panasonic showed off last year (and again this year).</p>

<p>And Sharp plans to really sell this giant TV, along with a 65-inch model, and a slew in the now-modest 40-some and 50-some inch range. LCD is still pricier than plasma&mdash;especially in the giant sizes. And plasma can whip LCD's butt in areas such as black levels and viewable angle. But LCD has come a lot farther than anyone expected. And it's enjoying the kind of buzz that plasma hasn't had for a long time.</p>
<p>LCD is now the sexy bling-bing technology. And plasma is looking like a dowdy old maid. <span class="byline">&ndash; Sean Captain</span><a href=""></a></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/226828/sharp-and-the-108+inch-lcd-say-bigger-is-better]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-226828]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[home entertainment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[108-inch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[panasonic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[plasma]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sharp]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 07 Jan 2007 20:53:01 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[www.gizmodo.com]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=226828&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
