<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: LCD]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/lcd</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'lcd']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[LG Hopes To Sell Ambitious 3.8m 3D TVs in Next 2 Years, But Who's Buying?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/lg-3dtv.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_lg-3dtv.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>LG's just stolen ahead in the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #3dtv" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/3dtv/">3D TV</a> wars, claiming it will sell 400,000 3D TVs during 2010, and in the following year a mahoosive 3.4 million units.</p>
<p>Putting its money where its mouth is, LG's also joined forces with the Korean SkyLife, one of the largest 3D TV broadcasters in the world. Aiming to create industry standards, and do for 3D TV what Sony did for Blu-ray, they'll work together to ensure those ambitious sales targets are met.</p>
<p>Ultra-slim bezels are part of LG's hook, which supposedly help the 3D image pop with more effect. No doubt we'll be seeing more products launch next month at CES, such as these 42-72-inch models and 150-inch projectors which LG's been spouting off about, as so far it's only launched the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5295217/lg-brings-its-first-3d-lcd-tv-to-market-in-korea">47-inch 47LH50</a> and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5417838/lg-guzzling-the-soju-after-releasing-worlds-first-commercial-full-hd-3d-monitor">23-inch LCD monitor</a> in Korea. [<a href="http://us.aving.net/news/view.php?articleId=141888&mn_name=">AVING</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5426650/lg-hopes-to-sell-ambitious-38m-3d-tvs-in-next-2-years-but-whos-buying]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5426650]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[3d tv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3d]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lg 3d tv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 15 Dec 2009 05:15:17 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kat Hannaford]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5426650&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Best Buy Finally Offers Legitimate Sale Prices]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/best-buy-logo-415.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Our friend Gary over at <a href="http://hdguru.com/">HD Guru</a> just dissected next week's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #bestbuy" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/bestbuy/">Best Buy</a> ad, and guess what? 17 out of the 28 deals up for grabs tomorrow are, in his words, "outstanding." Whodathunk? Here's some of the good stuff:</p>

<p><br clear="all">
<br>
• Samsung LN40B530 40″ 1080p 60 Hz LCD $699.99<br>
• Sony KDL-52S5100 52″ 1080p 60 Hz LCD $1039.99<br>
• Sony KDL-32L5000 32″ 720p 60 Hz LCD$399.99<br>
• Panasonic TC-P50X1 50″ 720p 600 Hz Plasma $779.99<br>
• Samsung LN32B640 1080p 32″ 60 Hz LCD $709.99</p>
<p>Head on over for the full list of deals and price comparisons. Looks like anytime next week (starting tomorrow) would be a good time to buy an HDTV. [<a href="http://hdguru.com/best-buy-pulls-out-all-the-stops-on-hdtv-prices/994/">HD Guru</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5424975/best-buy-finally-offers-legitimate-sale-prices]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5424975]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[dealzmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[best buy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[plasma]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 12 Dec 2009 13:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5424975&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Remainders - The Good, Bad and Ugly Things We Didn't Post (and Why)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p>Today in the last frontier otherwise known as Remainders, we've got a mysterious (possibly viral) video involving an apartment stowaway, a prank featuring gay porn and an LCD TV, and a surefire way to kill your Facebook self.</p>
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/06X9qXTvKNQ&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/06X9qXTvKNQ&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object></p>
<h2>Video Shows Mysterious Stranger Hiding Out in NYC Apartment Crawlspace</h2>
<p>This is a video that's been making the rounds lately, but I've never seen it and it sparked a lot of discussion amongst the staff this morning. That it's fake we could all agree on, but exactly why&mdash;that we couldn't decide. A viral video? But for what? What could be the purpose of faking such an odd thing, besides hundreds of thousands of YouTube views? Take a look and see for yourself. [<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06X9qXTvKNQ&feature=player_embedded">YouTube</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/3k03m83p25te5pe5sc9c75bb36fd9c30512c7.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>Free LCD TV&mdash;Nevermind the Burned-In Gay Porn</h2>
<p>This is a pretty great prank. I'll let the Craigslist listing explain it:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>My room mate thought it would be "hysterical" to pause gay porn on my TV while my girlfriend and I were on vacation for 2 weeks, thus burning and image into the screen. So...If you dont mind a sillouette of a skinny white guy taking a load in the face from the biggest black penis in recorded history forever adorning your new TV, Its yours.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Childish, yes. Hilarious, also yes. [<a href="http://chicago.craigslist.org/chc/ele/1498514993.html">Craigslist</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/897-1254348793-image..jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>Facebook Allows Users to Gift iTunes Giftcards to Other Users</h2>
<p>This ends up in Remainders because I am literally snoring right now, as I type this, but Facebook is now allowing users to buy and deliver iTunes giftcards through the site. You can choose which date the gift will be delivered (like, say, a birthday), which is actually a pretty nice feature. This is, unfortunately, US-only for now, because people who hate freedom enough to resist living in the Land of the Free don't deserve iTunes gift cards. [<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2009/12/10/facebook-gains-itunes-gift-card-feature-just-in-time-for-christm/">TUAW</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/main.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>Seppukoo Lets You Kill Your Facebook Self</h2>
<p>It sounds kind of interesting in theory: An entire site dedicated to eradicating Facebook profiles. It must be some kind of statement on avoiding association with social networking, right? Well, no; it's actually just another social networking site, trying to get you to cancel your account with the most popular one. It's not going so well, either&mdash;apparently only six people "killed" their profiles yesterday. [<a href="http://www.techie.com.ph/news/848">Techie</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5424006/remainders-+-the-good-bad-and-ugly-things-we-didnt-post-and-why/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5424006]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apartment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[craigslist]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gift card]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gizmodo remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[itunes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nsfw]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[stranger]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 11 Dec 2009 02:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5424006&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Taiwanese LCD Maker Must Pay $220 Million for Price-Fixing Conspiracy]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #chimeioptoelectronics" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #chimeioptoelectronics" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/chimeioptoelectronics/">Chi Mei Optoelectronics</a>, a major LCD maker who sells to companies including Apple, HP and Dell, has admitted to a wide-scale <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #pricefixing" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #pricefixing" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/pricefixing/">price fixing</a> conspiracy between late 2001 and late 2006. The details are being kept under wraps, but Chi Mei has pled guilty to the charges in a San Francisco court, and in addition to the monetary penalty, nine executives are also under investigation. [<a href="http://sanfrancisco.fbi.gov/dojpressrel/pressrel09/sf120909.htm">FBI</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5423020/taiwanese-lcd-maker-must-pay-220-million-for-price+fixing-conspiracy]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5423020]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chi mei optoelectronics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[conspiracy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hp]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd price fixing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[price fixing]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 09 Dec 2009 23:15:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5423020&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[TV Makers, Please Stop Putting Bullshit in Your TVs]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_samsung_widget_tv.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /> I love TV technology, but wince when I see an $11K Japan-only Toshiba stuffed with a <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/12/08/toshiba-finally-dates-and-prices-flagship-tv-cell-regza-55x1/">3TB DVR</a>. And adding internet widgets, like Samsung's, is even worse. I hate this trend&mdash;TVs just need great picture and lower cost.</p>

<p>TV makers may think we want these things, and I think they're right we want content on our sets, but I don't want it from them. I'd believe that such extras might help sales in a world where ever ad says their set is the prettiest in picture. I believe that they believe that extras like this help sales. But I don't think a smart TV buyer would want these extras, or use them very often.</p>
<p>Several months ago, I reviewed the pinnacle of junk extra content in a Samsung LCD TV, which I didn't love but earned much critical acclaim. The 7000 and 8000 series in this line up had identical specs to the 6000, more or less, but for a few hundred dollars more, you could get WIDGET-FIED. There was a menu, hidden, that when you found it had an astounding amount of content. Insane, weirdo content. Receipes for dinner, lunch, desert annotated, step by step. Over 15 creepy children's songs, by a big yellow and short blue cartoon character. Bowling and a Galaga type game. Yahoo Widgets: An open API system that allows for weather, tweeting and flickr photos. Only 8 had been developed and so the openness was a joke. So was the performance. It was heartbreakingly slow to load, and therefore useless. Like all the other extras, they were poorly implemented, added cost to the set, and were instantly outdated. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5320720/samsung-led-lcd-un46b7000-hdtv-lightning-review-avoid">Here's the review</a>, or just watch this ridiculous video:</p>
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5720367&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5720367&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/5720367.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_5720367.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display: none;"/></a></p>
<p>I think some basic media playback in a TV is fine. I'll take that. Though so many Blu-ray players and set-top boxes are doing the same thing, it's almost certain to be redundant. And it's better to keep all that outside the TV itself, anyway. If you have to add processors and Ethernet connections to a TV to run shitty software and content, I'd rather they didn't.</p>
<p>Because here's the thing: People keep TVs for a long time, and building TVs is serious business. They should focus on the set itself. And they can't beat the content in my Xbox, and even if they did for a second, an Xbox is replaceable rather easily, compared to a HDTV set that costs thousands of dollars. I plan to get one TV and have it last over several generations of Xboxes.</p>
<p>TV makers, please stick to making the pixels more pretty. We'll get our content from who we want, the way we want to.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5421748/tv-makers-please-stop-putting-bullshit-in-your-tvs]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5421748]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtvs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[extras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[plasmas]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[widgets]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5421748&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Inside Sharp's Newest LCD Factory]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/sharptop.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_sharptop.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>This is some testing equipment inside Sharp's new LCD plant in Sakai City. The rest of the facility doesn't look quite as ominous though. In fact, it kinda resembles an air traffic center with some robots tossed in for fun.</p>
<p>Eco-friendly is the general theme of Sharp's facility because it's all about creating and saving energy. From the energy-conserving LCD displays and solar panels being produced to the technology being used around the actual factory, Mama Nature's got plenty to smile about here.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5415492,4,'');
</script></p>
<p>Ok, maybe the whole place is a bit eerie with those hallways, but did anyone really think that LCDs would be built in a cheery-looking factory?</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5415503/inside-sharps-newest-lcd-factory]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5415503]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[lcds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[factory]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd factory]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sharp]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sharp sakai city lcd factory]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5415503&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The 5 Best HDTV Deals Under $1000]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_pana_50x1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><i>We teamed with HD Guru Gary Merson <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5409025/the-5-best-tvs-you-can-buy">again</a>, this time to find the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #besttvs" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/besttvs/">best TVs</a> under $1000. This economy has really shocked prices. Forget the off-brands. You can now get a top-name good-looking 50" TV for $700, and more...</i></p>
<p><i>Note: Due to the unprecedented price fluctuations seen on TV pricing this week from online retailers, don't be startled if the prices we brazenly quoted here are off&mdash;by pennies or by hundreds. The model numbers are there for a reason, so you can check prices yourself when you're ready to cash out.</i></p>
<h2>Panasonic X1 Plasma Series</h2>
<p>Plasma HDTVs provide the best picture performance and these 720p Panasonics&mdash;shown up top&mdash;are the value champs. Plasma screens have a wider viewing angle than any LCD panel, excellent contrast and color fidelity. The X1s include 600Hz refresh for full motion resolution, an SD card reader for digital photos and an anti-reflective screen coating (the shiny one). Available in 42-inch and 50-inch screen sizes. If you're going to set it up at <a href="http://hdguru.com/lechner-distance-the-number-you-need-to-know-before-buying-an-hdtv/21/">a distance of 9 feet or more</a>, it's almost silly to spend extra for more resolution.</p>
<p>The best deal is the TC-P50X1, a 50 incher selling for $689.98 at Electronics Expo (via Amazon).</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_pana_42s1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<h2>Panasonic S1 Plasma Series</h2>
<p>The S1s are Panasonic's least expensive 1080p line to feature its energy saving, high contrast, deep black level Neo PDP plasma technology. In addition to the full 1080 line motion resolution and an anti-reflective screen coating (the shiny one), there's an SD card reader. If you're looking for a Full HD 1080p TV with the excellent performance and don't care about features like internet connectivity or THX-certified picture and sound modes (which the step-up G10 line has), these are the HDTVs for you. Available from 42-inch to 65-inch screen sizes.</p>
<p>Under $1,000, your best shot is the TC-P42S1, a 42-inch set now selling for $797.95 at Amazon.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_lg-47lh30.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<h2>LG LH30 Series</h2>
<p>LG's LH30 is the first step-up from the baseline, maintaining a nice low price but delivering surprisingly good picture quality. This model has a wide-viewing-angle IPS LCD panel, dull-finish anti-glare screen coating (better than the shiny anti-reflective coating at cutting down natural-light reflections, but at a slight cost of contrast), pro color-calibration mode and "Picture Wizard." They add 1080p resolution and Smart Energy Savings for low power consumption. Offered in a range from 32 inches to 47 inches.</p>
<p>We were impressed to find the 47-inch 47LH30 locally for $900, and on Amazon for $938.15.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_lg_42lh40_lilypads.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<h2>LG LH40 Series</h2>
<p>The LH40 line adds 120Hz to plenty of models below $1000. If that's something you value, this is your best bet. Everything else here comes in the LH30 line, too. It's available in screen sizes ranging from 32 inches to 55 inches.</p>
<p>Locally, we spotted a 47-inch 47LH40 for $980, though it was over $1000 on Amazon. The 42-inch 42LH40 may be the best pick: It's currently $823 on Amazon.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_samsung_46b550.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<h2>Samsung B550 Series</h2>
<p>This series represents Samsung's top 60Hz 1080p HDTVs. They provide excellent overall performance without any of the fancy features found on its higher-end models. They incorporate Samsung's Touch of Color bezel and its 6ms response time LCD panel, and are available in 32-inch to 52-inch sizes. Currently, the 46-inch LN46B550 is priced at $999 on Amazon.</p>
<p><i>For this story, Gary picked out 10 total deals. He is running the other five on <a href="http://hdguru.com/the-10-best-hdtv-deals-under-1000/647/">HD Guru</a>, so go have a look. If you came across any other good deals lately, let us know in comments, but be ready to defend the quality, not just the super sick price.</i></p>
<p><i>Gary Merson is the <a href="http://hdguru.com/">HD Guru</a>, the industry's leading HDTV journalist. He's been reviewing TVs for well over a decade, and recently wrote a <a href="http://hdguru.com/choosing-the-hdtv-that%E2%80%99s-right-for-you/603/">guide to choosing an HDTV</a>.</i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5412450/the-5-best-hdtv-deals-under-1000]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5412450]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[tvs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[42LH40]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[47LH30]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[47LH40]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[B550]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[best tv deals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[best tvs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[giftguide2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtv buyer's guide]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtvs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[LH30]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[LH40]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[LN46B550]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[panasonic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[plasma]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[s1]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[TC-P42S1]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[TC-P50X1]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[x1]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Merson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5412450&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Pixel Qi Dual-Mode LCD Ships Next Month; $100, 10-Watt HDTV Up Next]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/R7ZErQ5Kl6w&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/R7ZErQ5Kl6w&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object>One is a rough manufacturing start date for a display component, and the other is an announcement so vague it barely means anything. But <em>lest you forget</em>: <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #pixelqi" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/pixelqi/">Pixel Qi</a>'s multi-mode, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5273300/pixel-qi-the-display-that-will-make-you-want-an-e+reader">e-ink-shaming</a> LCD technology is <em>amazing</em>.</p>

<p>Pixel Qi's last announced manufacturing date&mdash;residue of which still graces their website&mdash;was "the second half of 2009." In big, bold type, they've updated the claim: "We are starting mass production of this screen in December 2009," is proudly emblazoned on Pixel Qi's worryingly retro website, while "We totally totally promise this time," a comforting, if slightly desperate adjunct, is not. But <em>this</em> is:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>We have begun design of a sub-10 watt HDTV that can be used in hundreds of millions of households that don't have steady, if any, access to electrical power. The typical HDTV uses more than 100 Watts and often draws several hundred watts. We are working on a way to massively lower the power consumption, and significantly lower the price with a target price of $100. Thus this HDTV can run off of battery that can be charged up when the power is on, or charged with a small solar panel, crank, or so forth.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I'm sure there are about a million different applications for a low-power screen tech that displays full-motion color, static e-ink and works in the sunlight, but don't get ahead of yourselves: we haven't seen a single non-prototype device yet. Throw us a bone, guys! And by bone, I mean the name of <em>any hardware partner</em> who's willing to make a product with this screen tech once it starts shipping. [<a href="http://www.pixelqi.com/products">Pixel Qi</a> via <a href="http://www.blogeee.net/2009/11/production-en-masse-decrans-pixel-qi-des-decembre/">Blogeee</a> via <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/pixel-qi-developing-sub-10w-100-hdtv-2564437/">Slashgear</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5412650/pixel-qi-dual+mode-lcd-ships-next-month-100-10+watt-hdtv-up-next]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5412650]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[displays]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[100w]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[display]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dual-mode]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[e]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ereaders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtvs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ink]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcds screens]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pixeel qi hdtv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pixel qi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tranflective]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:46:57 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5412650&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Remainders - Stuff We Didn't Post (and Why)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p>Apple Patent Describes iPod UI "Pushed" to Other Devices...Philips Announces Very Pretty Pro LCD Line...NYTimes Columnist Proposes Boycott of "Pro-Communist China" Bing...Ooma Adds New Handsets and International Plan...</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/110925-gui_pushing_accessory_500.png" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>Apple Patent Describes iPod UI "Pushed" to Other Devices</h2>
<p>An Apple patent filed in May 2008 describes a way of pushing whatever UI Apple wants to non-Apple hardware, for consistency's sake. That non-Apple hardware could include car stereos or something like the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5403517/chumby-one-review-totally-frivolous-but-totally-adorable">Chumby One</a> (which has iPod functionality, but with a lookalike UI). It's a nice idea for Apple, but could be tricky given the myriad different hardware that might want to take advantage. What if the hardware has a resistive touchscreen, or a shitty processor? Might it just be better to use a custom interface for iPod integration? Regardless, it's in Remainders because it's not really that unexpected or interesting in its implications. [<a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2009/11/19/apple-researching-methods-for-pushing-user-interfaces-to-accessories-from-media-devices/">MacRumors</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/philipsledpronovember09.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>Philips Announces Very Pretty Pro LCD Line</h2>
<p>Philips' new high-end LCD line looks pretty fantastic, with two important caveats. First, let's drool a little: The two models (40- and 46-inch) have a 5,000,000:1 contrast ratio, 1ms response time, 5 HDMI ports (not sure why you'd need that many, but whatever) and a 200Hz refresh rate, with a nice brushed-aluminum look. Now, the caveats. First, they're UK only, and second, they're prohibitively expensive at about $3,000 and $4,100, respectively. Still, drool-worthy. [<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/20/philips-launches-9704-led-pro-televisions-in-the-uk/">Engadget</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/051201_tiananmen-square_ex.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>NYTimes Columnist Proposes Boycott of "Pro-Communist China" Bing</h2>
<p>NY Times columnist Nicholas Kristof has proposed a boycott of Microsoft's Bing search engine due to its supposed pro-Chinese-government censorship of search terms like "Dalai Lama" and "Tienanmen" when searched in simplified Chinese characters. In English and other non-Chinese languages, the results you'd expect from "Tienanmen" show up, but in Chinese, apparently it returns sanitized results (no massacre, in that case). Since I'm not really sure how to type simplified Chinese characters on an all-Amurrican MacBook Pro keyboard, I haven't tested it myself&mdash;but if true, it's a little underhanded on Microsoft's part, although certainly paling in comparison to, you know, the Chinese government. What's odd is that Google's Chinese search also returns censored results, but "to a much lesser extent," so I guess it's okay. Weird stuff. [<a href="http://www.techflash.com/seattle/2009/11/nyts_kristof_calls_for_bing_boycott.html">TechFlash</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/oomatelo-lg.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>Ooma Adds New Handsets and International Plan</h2>
<p>Internet phone company Ooma began shipping its new Telo handset as well as offering a very cheap international calling plan (500 minutes for $5 per month). Ooma, for those who don't know (I assume this includes everyone) varies from other VoIP services like Vonage by cutting out the monthly fees, instead packing them into a fairly expensive set-top box, at $250. So this international plan requiring a monthly fee is a big deal for them, but it winds up in Remainders because I honestly had not even heard of Ooma until this morning. Oops. [<a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/09/11/20/ooma.telo.adds.handsets.international.plan/">Electronista</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5409786/remainders-+-stuff-we-didnt-post-and-why/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5409786]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gizmodo remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ooma]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[philips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5409786&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The 5 Best TVs You Can Buy]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/5_best_tvs_2009.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_5_best_tvs_2009.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><i>We've teamed up with the <a href="http://hdguru.com/">HD Guru</a> himself, Gary Merson, to publish the absolute best five TVs you can buy right now. As you'll see (and might already notice above), there are some surprises on the list.</i></p>
<h2>Panasonic Z1</h2>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_panasonic_z1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<p>Panasonic's flagship HDTV is its thinnest 54-inch plasma HDTV ever, with only 1-inch depth. They did it by eliminating a third sheet of glass found in all other plasmas except Pioneer's Kuro, and bonding the anti-reflective coating directly top glass. The Z1 employs SiBEAM's 60GHz 1080p for wireless glitch-free images sent via the included transmitter/media box from up to 30 feet away. The Z1 has THX picture mode and a custom calibration mode, plus nice bonus features including VieraCast Internet connectivity for YouTube and Amazon VOD and an SD card reader for photos. The Z1 delivers amazing performance with full 1080 line motion resolution, accurate HD color, deep black levels and 96Hz for judder free movie viewing.</p>
<p>The sexiest HDTV of 2009, the TC-P54Z1 will set you back $4000.</p>
<p><i><b>Update:</b> Many of you have commented that you prefer Panasonic's excellent <a href="http://www2.panasonic.com/consumer-electronics/shop/Televisions/VIERA-2009-HDTVs-Series/VIERA-V10-Series-Plasma-1080p-HDTVs.list.134502_11002_7000000000000005702">Viera V10 series</a>, and to Gary's credit, he gave the TV his highest rating, and is including it in his top 10 list, which he'll publish next week. There's nothing wrong with that TV, and if we indicated six here, it would certainly be shown. It has the same NeoPDP panel as the Z1, but it's not the same picture, because it has the third separate piece of glass with anti-reflective coating.</i></p>
<h2><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #pioneerkuro" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/pioneerkuro/">Pioneer Kuro</a> Signature</h2>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_pioneer_kuro_signature.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<p>You know it's been a weird year for TVs when not one but two of our top picks are no longer being manufactured, but are still being sold. Pioneer's sweetest (and last) Kuro line is technically a monitor: There's no tuner or audio. But the Signature models offer the deepest black of any high definition display on the market&mdash;without any white-letter-on-black-background halos occasionally seen on LED-based LCD TVs. The Signature models features hand selected parts, 2.5-in. depth, Custom Calibration, 72Hz refresh and control over the internet via its Ethernet connection. The Pioneer uses a single top sheet of glass to minimize internal reflections, with the anti-reflection coating bonded directly to the surface.</p>
<p>The Signature models are available at scattered retailers around the country in the 50-inch size (PRO-101FD) for about $3000 to $3500, and 60-inch size (PRO-141FD) for $4000 to $4800.</p>
<h2>Samsung LNB8500</h2>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_samsung_8500_series.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<p>The 8500 series is Samsung flagship LED LCD TV. It feature packed with thin 1.6-inch depth, white LED local dimming backlights for improved uniformity, dual-chip 240 Hz plus a scanning backlight for excellent motion resolution and the best black level of any LED LCD observed to date. The 8500 features four HDMI inputs plus internet connectivity with Flickr, YouTube, weather, news and other widgets. It also has a PV+C input for connection to your computer or HTPC. This is a benchmark LED LCD to judge against every other make and model.</p>
<p>All this performance comes at a price. The LNB8500 series comes in 46-inch (UN46B8500) and 55-inch (UN55B8500) screen sizes, currently on Amazon for $2620 and $4020, respectively.</p>
<h2>LG LH90</h2>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_lg_lh90.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<p>This LG has all the hot LCD performance features video freaks crave, including white LED dimming backlights for excellent black levels, wide viewing angle LCD IPS panel, accurate color, and 240Hz (120 refresh + scanning backlight) for excellent motion resolution. This LG also has all the tweaks anyone could ask for including ISF CCC mode for calibration, THX certification and LG's "picture wizard" for user set-up without calibration discs or external test signals. The LH90 isn't the thinnest LED LCD, but it more than makes up for it with its price.</p>
<p>The LG LH90 series is available in 42-, 47- and 55-inch screen sizes at street prices that are considerably lower than many competitors' edge lit 120 Hz LED edge lit models. The 42LH90 is online for $1200 to $1500; the 47LH90 sells in the $1700 range; and the 55LH90 goes for $2200 to $2800. In case you couldn't tell, the LH90 series is the value/performance leader of the pack.</p>
<h2>Sony XBR8</h2>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_sony_xbr8.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<p>A comparable model never replaced Sony's 2008 flagship model in 2009. It is the only HDTV available with separate red, green and blue LED backlights (rather than all white), with local dimming for deep black levels. Though slightly thicker than other TVs in its class, the XBR8 has accurate HDTV color, enough brightness for a beach house, a non-glossy anti-glare screen coating (rare for 2009), 120Hz refresh rate and Sony's Bravia Engine 2 signal processing.</p>
<p>You can still find the XBR8s&mdash;we spotted the 46-inch KDL-46XBR8 for under $2200 and the 55-inch KDL-55XBR8 for under $4000.</p>
<p><i>Gary Merson is the <a href="http://hdguru.com/">HD Guru</a>, the industry's leading HDTV journalist. He's been reviewing TVs for well over a decade, and recently wrote a <a href="http://hdguru.com/choosing-the-hdtv-that%E2%80%99s-right-for-you/603/">guide to choosing an HDTV</a>.</i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5409025/the-5-best-tvs-you-can-buy]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5409025]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[tvs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[42LH90]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[47LH90]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[55LH90]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[best tvs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[giftguide2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtv buyer's guide]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtvs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[KDL-46XBR8]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[KDL-55XBR8]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lh90]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[LNB8500]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[panasonic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pioneer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pioneer kuro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[plasma]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pro-101fd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pro-141fd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tc-p54z1]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tc-pz1]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[un46b8500]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[un55b8500]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xbr8]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Merson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5409025&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Giz Explains: The Difference Between a $600 TV and a $6000 TV]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_tvs_600and6000.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />You can buy an HDTV, a nice big one, for six hundred bucks. Or you can pay six <em>thousand</em>. It's presumably somehow <em>better</em>. You're probably wondering, "What the hell makes it better?" Here's the breakdown:</p>
<p>To be clear, we're only looking sets that are at least 46 inches&mdash;go big or go home. And though there are some nice 720p plasmas out there for amazing prices, the majority of TVs we're concerned with are 1080p&mdash;it's the standard now, even in cheap HDTVs, and probably the only resolution you'll see next year.</p>
<p>We focus on LCDs quite a bit here, not because we prefer them, but because there are key enhancements that can be put in LCD technology to make them look better. With plasma, the problems&mdash;energy consumption, weight, thickness&mdash;are more of an evolutionary, year-to-year thing. A cheaper plasma often is one that's just using older technology.</p>
<p>Also, we're using Amazon as our pricing base line, since it's on average a good standard for low but legitimate street prices, and we use Samsung examples a lot because they have a <i>ton</i> of different models on the market, so it was easier to isolate individual features, and to gauge subtle differences in pricing.</p>
<h2>Size Matters</h2>
<p>The first, and most obvious thing that'll cost you is more screen real estate. There's not an absolute inches to dollars ratio, but generally speaking, the first step up is the cheapest, and somewhere in the middle, there's a sweet spot, after which you basically lose money by upgrading. The funny thing is, each maker seems to have a different idea of where the sweet spot is, which you could play to your advantage:</p>
<p>Take for instance, Panasonic's plasma G10 series. It's $200 to go from the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-VIERA-TC-P42G10-42-Inch-Plasma/dp/B001UAEWSU/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1258557735&sr=8-2">42-inch model</a> to <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-VIERA-TC-P50G10-50-Inch-Plasma/dp/B001UAEWUS/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1258557735&sr=8-1">50</a>, and then $400 to go up to <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-VIERA-TC-P54G10-54-Inch-Plasma/dp/B00267PY6K/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1258557735&sr=8-4">54</a>. So the sweet spot is at 50 inches. Similar thing happening with Vizio's XVT line: Going from <a href="http://www.amazon.com/VIZIO-SV421XVT-42-Inch-XVT-HDTV/dp/B002JPCVBK/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1258558539&sr=8-4">42</a> to <a href="http://www.amazon.com/VIZIO-SV471XVT-47-Inch-XVT-HDTV/dp/B002JPEQNG/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1258558539&sr=8-2">47 inches</a> is just $250, though going up to 55 from 47 costs about a <a href="http://www.amazon.com/VIZIO-VF551XVT-55-Inch-XVT-TruLED/dp/B002JPEWOO/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1258558539&sr=8-3">a grand</a>. Hence 47 inches makes the most dollar-per-inch sense if you like that TV.</p>
<p>With Sony and Samsung, though, it pays to keep going up. In Sony's top-of-the-line Bravia XBR9 series, the hop from <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Sony-BRAVIA-KDL-40XBR9-40-Inch-1080p/dp/B001VITUJ2/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1258557472&sr=8-3">40</a> to <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Sony-BRAVIA-KDL-46XBR9-46-Inch-1080p/dp/B0021LT066/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1258557472&sr=8-2">46</a> is $360, but going from 46 to <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Sony-BRAVIA-KDL-52XBR9-52-Inch-1080p/dp/B001VFMA5Q/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1258557472&sr=8-1">52</a> is just $250. Samsung's LED-backlit TV costs $350 to go from <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-UN40B6000-40-Inch-1080p-HDTV/dp/B001UHMV90/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1258558324&sr=8-2">40</a> to <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-UN46B6000-46-Inch-1080p-HDTV/dp/B001UHMVC2/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1258558324&sr=8-1">46</a>, and just $500 to go from there to <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-UN55B6000-55-Inch-1080p-HDTV/dp/B001UHMVDQ/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1258558324&sr=8-3">55 inches</a>. (There's a limit, of course, <a href="http://www.samsung.com/us/consumer/tv-video/televisions/lcd-tv/LN65B650X1FXZA/index.idx?pagetype=prd_detail">Samsung's 65-inch LN65B650</a> doesn't have many of the frills discussed below, but still lists for $6000.)</p>
<p>The real lesson here: Don't think of size as a foregone conclusion. When you've narrowed down your options using all the criteria, go back and check the sizes and relative prices. There may be a surprise, hopefully good but possibly bad.</p>
<h2>Vroom, Vroom</h2>
<p>Everything after size you can roughly sweep everything you'd pay more for into the category of performance. The grand trick of buying TVs though, according to our friend Gary Merson of <a href="http://hdguru.com">HD Guru</a>, is that "the TV industry is setup like the car industry." Just like buying a Corvette to battle your mid-life crisis because it vrooms real good, when you pay extra money for extra horsepower, you're also going to get leather bucket seats and the in-dash GPS. It's hard to buy a stripped-down car that <em>just</em> delivers better performance, and the same goes when you're trying to scrimp on a TV without compromising picture. In the case of TVs, a higher performer might come with a million HDMI jacks or integrated Wi-Fi and video on demand, and you never know exactly what you're paying for.</p>
<p>Fortunately, we can break performance into a two major categories so it's slightly easier to interpret those price differentials: Backlight (for LCDs) and panel quality.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_samsung8500.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_504x_samsung8500.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<h2>Fancy Backlighting</h2>
<p>The single most expensive upgrade for LCD TVs right now is LED backlighting. As <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5271493/giz-explains-whats-so-great-about-led+backlit-lcds">we explain here</a>, there are a bunch of advantages to LED over conventional CCFL backlighting for LCD TVs. Which particular advantages you pick up depends on the kind of LED backlighting in the set. While both offer instant on and power savings, <em>edge-lit</em> models mainly deliver serious thinness, while <em>backlit</em> sets can offer local dimming, which delivers noticeably better black levels and contrast.</p>
<p>How much will it cost you? Well, comparing two Samsung sets with fairly equivalent panels, the price difference is about $500. The CCFL-backlit LN46B650 <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-LN46B650-46-Inch-1080p-Touch/dp/B001ULBP8E/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1258649269&sr=8-2">is $1360</a>, while the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-UN46B6000-46-Inch-1080p-HDTV/dp/B001UHMVC2/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1258649256&sr=8-1">UN46B6000 is $1850</a>. Because it's got LED edge lighting, the B6000 is only 1.2 inches thick, compared to the B650's 3.1 inches. When you step up and compare Samsung's edge-lit to back-lit, the difference isn't as great: A <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-UN46B8000-46-Inch-1080p-240Hz/dp/B001ZUZ10I/ref=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1258648855&sr=8-7">46-inch 8000 series edge-lit model</a> goes for $2300, while the <a ref="http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-UN46B8000-46-Inch-1080p-240Hz/dp/B001ZUZ10I/ref=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1258648855&sr=8-7">8500 series</a> with local-dimming is $2600. (If you're already paying for LED technology, you definitely want to step up.)</p>
<p>So yes, backlit LED sets with local dimming tend to cost more. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Sony-Bravia-KDL-46XBR8-46-Inch-Triluminos/dp/B001GIPMNU/ref=sr_1_13?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1258649650&sr=8-13">Sony's year-old Bravia XBR8</a> uses tri-color LEDs to improve color accuracy over the most LED sets, which use white ones. Though its production is discontinued, it's <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Sony-Bravia-KDL-46XBR8-46-Inch-Triluminos/dp/B001GIPMNU/ref=sr_1_13?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1258649650&sr=8-13">still nearly $2200</a> at 46 inches. However, Toshiba consistently delivers cheaper sets than most of its fellow "name" brands, and their <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Toshiba-46SV670U-46-Inch-Backlight-ClearScan/dp/B001TOD3K0/ref=sr_1_14?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1258649650&sr=8-14">46-inch LED backlit set with local dimming</a> is just $1700.</p>
<h2>Panels and Oh, It Hertz</h2>
<p>The panel is the other major thing that determines how good an HDTV actually is, and it applies to both LCDs and plasmas. Typically, as you move up in price, you get a better panel. Cheaper sets generally use older panels with previous-generation tech that Merson says have a poorer viewing angle, so there's a smaller area you can actually stare at on your TV to get a good picture. The problem is that no TV manufacturer actually declares its panel attributes on the box, so you're often on your own to figure it out. The best way is to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5099489/how-to-buy-an-hdtv-today-or-any-day">go to the store and check out the viewing angles</a>.</p>
<p>Hertz, for the uninitiated, is simply the number of times per second that LCD TVs refresh their picture. (Plasma isn't part of this discussion because phosphor pixels work differently than liquid crystal ones, and plasma's "refresh rate" would be way higher&mdash;to the point of irrelevance.) A 60Hz LCD refreshes the picture 60 times a second, 120Hz is 120 times a second, and so on, up to 240Hz in the top-priced LCD sets. A higher refresh rate is supposed to increase the ability to see fast-moving video at its highest intended resolution, and works well in theory, though there are <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5397893/why-you-dont-need-to-spend-extra-money-on-a-240-hz-lcd-tv">issues with 240Hz execution</a>. At this point, a minimum of 120Hz is a given on all premium LCDs, says Merson. There isn't one LED-backlit set that doesn't have it.</p>
<p>Here's how the refresh-rate step-ups look: The <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-LN46B550-46-Inch-1080p-Touch/dp/B001UE6HPM/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1258649122&sr=8-4">46-inch Samsung B550</a> is a standard 1080p CCFL-backlit set for $1020. Moving up to <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-LN46B650-46-Inch-1080p-Touch/dp/B001ULBP8E/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=tv&qid=1258650863&sr=1-2">the same size B650 for $1360</a>&mdash;$300 more&mdash;gets you 120Hz (plus a higher contrast ratio). Going up again, to the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-LN46B750-46-Inch-1080p-Charcoal/dp/B001UVEZFE/ref=sr_1_44?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1258649013&sr=8-44">B750 for $1630</a>, another $300, you get 240Hz, and again even better contrast ratio. That's about the top of Samsung's CCFL-backlit line.</p>
<p>You can see the same thing with their LED sets: The <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-UN46B6000-46-Inch-1080p-HDTV/dp/B001UHMVC2/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1258649256&sr=8-1">46-inch B6000</a> is a 120Hz LED edge-lit set for $1850. The <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-UN46B8000-46-Inch-1080p-240Hz/dp/B001ZUZ10I/ref=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1258648855&sr=8-7">46-inch LED edgel-lit B8000</a> goes to 240Hz, and it costs $2300, about $450 more.</p>
<h2>What About Plasma?</h2>
<p>As we mentioned, plasmas are a little less complicated, since there's nothing like refresh rates to deal with. On the other hand, the situation may be more obtuse, since you don't always know what the real differences are. Merson says there are a few basic levels of plasma performance. On Black Friday, Walmart is selling a 50-inch plasma <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5407643/walmart-black-friday-ad-leaks-with-78-blu+ray-player">for $598</a> if you don't mind the fact that it's 720p (and branded Sanyo, which is probably Panasonic-based but who knows?). Stepping up to the 50" 1080p plasmas will generally cost $300 to $400 more.</p>
<p>There are more issues, however. Panasonic has a new panel called NeoPDP that's more energy efficient, but it's sometimes hard to tell which models have it and which don't. (Hint: Look for the Energy Star sticker.) Finally, you have THX-certified panels that offer nearly perfect calibration right out of the box. Beyond that, contrast ratios do tend to get better over time, but it's relative: At the low end of the HDTV price spectrum, plasma sets have generally delivered better picture than LCD anyway.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_xbr_sony.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<h2>Frills and Other Stuff</h2>
<p>The funny thing about TVs nowadays is that there's more to them than the screen. Like inputs. Until recently, one thing you got more of by paying more money were more holes to stick things into. That's not really the case once you get up into 46-inch sets&mdash;you're gonna get 4 HDMI slots in a set that big no matter what. But, there are other things nowadays. Like video services that come in through other holes, or maybe without wires at all.</p>
<p>An example, to use our old friends at Samsung: The <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-UN46B6000-46-Inch-1080p-HDTV/dp/B001UHMVC2/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1258649650&sr=8-2">B6000</a> looks a lot like the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-UN46B7000-46-Inch-1080p-HDTV/dp/B001UHMVKY/ref=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1258650566&sr=1-7">B7000</a>, but with the B7000, for $180 more, you get online video services via Yahoo's widget engine, like YouTube.</p>
<p>Or, let's look at the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5356862/the-best-of-lcd-new-led+lit-tvs-from-lg-samsung-and-sony-compared">upcoming crop of LED TVs</a> that aren't even out yet, or are in limited distribution for now. LG's 55LHX and Sony's Bravia XBR10 both have wireless HDMI and 240Hz, but with Bravia Internet Widgets and Slacker radio, the Bravia is $5000, $200 more than 55LHX. Wireless HDMI itself is a pretty pricey feature. Same Sony, compared to Samsung's 8500. The 8500 has built-in video services, but no wireless HDMI, and it's $500 cheaper, at $4500. Oh, and did I mention that the Sony is even 3 inches smaller than the Samsung and LG?</p>
<p>Wireless is still in the gimmick phase, but next year, we assume we'll be able to track its price premium as well as we can track size, refresh rate, backlighting and other factors today, $300 to $400 at a time. How do you get from $600 to a $6000? You just add, add some more, and then keep adding.</p>
<p><i>Still something you wanna know? Send questions about addition, subtraction, hertz, aches, pains and LEDs <a href="mailto:tips@gizmodo.com">here</a>, with "<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #gizexplains" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/gizexplains/">Giz Explains</a>" in the subject line.</i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5408494/giz-explains-the-difference-between-a-600-tv-and-a-6000-tv]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5408494]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[giz explains]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtvs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[plasma]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[TV buyer's guide]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tv technology]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5408494&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[A Guide To Choosing The HDTV That's Right For You]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/led.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_led.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>If your holiday plans involve buying a new HDTV, <a href="http://hdguru.com/choosing-the-hdtv-that%E2%80%99s-right-for-you/603/">HD Guru</a> has put together a quick and dirty guide to help you avoid some of the pitfalls many consumers fall into.</p>
<p>You will learn important lessons like: <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5280355/guess-what-many-of-you-wasted-money-on-your-1080p-tv-but-theres-hope">sizing your TV to optimize resolution</a>, whether to choose LCD vs plasma vs LED and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5397893/why-you-dont-need-to-spend-extra-money-on-a-240-hz-lcd-tv">why you don't need to spend money on a 240 Hz TV</a>. So, make sure to check out the following link before you shop. [<a href="http://hdguru.com/choosing-the-hdtv-that%E2%80%99s-right-for-you/603/">HDGuru</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5407745/a-guide-to-choosing-the-hdtv-thats-right-for-you]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5407745]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[black]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[black friday 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackfriday]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackfriday 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[buying guide]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[friday]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtv buying guide]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[home]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[led]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[plasma]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shopping]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[theater]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5407745&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Remainders - Stuff We Didn't Post (and Why)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p>AT&T's 3G Network Sees 2,000% Increase Since iPhone 3G Release...Droid Camera Fixed, Without Explanation?...<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #geniusbar" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/geniusbar/">Genius Bar</a> App Won't Help if Your iPhone Is Broken...Samsung Beats out Vizio for Top LCD Seller...</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/iphone-3g-nextmonth.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>AT&T's 3G Network Sees 2,000% Increase Since iPhone 3G Release</h2>
<p>In the wake of a big $65 million upgrade to its network here in the San Francisco Bay Area, AT&T revealed that the improvement was due to 3G usage being up 2,000% after the release of the iPhone 3G last year. That sounds like a crazy number for which the iPhone deserves all kinds of high fives, but it's really not surprising&mdash;how many AT&T 3G phones were there before the iPhone 3G, even? And of course 3G use across the board is up in crazy numbers, since smartphones have really started taking off in the last year or so&mdash;so to be honest, the number doesn't really mean all that much. Hence its ending up here in the sad pit of Remainders. [<a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091117/thanks-iphone-2000-percent-increase-in-bay-area-data-traffic-since-2008-says-att/">All Things D</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/500x_drooooooid__011.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>Droid Camera Fixed, Without Explanation?</h2>
<p>The Motorola Droid camera is a serious problem. I can't compete with Matt's angry poetry on the subject, so here it is, clipped from <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5396168/motorola-droid-review">his review</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The camera is complete garbage. It takes 10 years to start up, 2 to focus, and another 4 to actually take the goddamn picture. And there's no distinct visual feedback to let you know a photo's been snapped. And the photos suck. That pumpkin shot, in decent lighting, is as good as it gets. Like I said in the Android 2.0 review, I don't know if it's the hardware or the software, but it's inexcusably bad.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yow. But users have spontaneously been reporting that the camera, all of a sudden, has stopped sucking&mdash;what's the deal? Apparently there was some kind of bug wherein a particular state of the clock (meaning, time of day) screws with the Droid's autofocusing, which sounds insane to me, but what do I know? Apparently it should work okay now, and while it's temporary, the incoming Dec. 11th bug fix should take care of things. [<a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/09/11/17/droid.autofocus.suddenly.cured.for.users/">Electronista</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/geniusbarreservation098345.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>Genius Bar App Won't Help if Your iPhone Is Broken</h2>
<p>Rumor has it that Apple is planning to add a Genius Bar app to the App Store (appappappapp) that will let you make appointments, track your place in line, and curse the world when you realize you can't use the app because your iPhone is broken, which is the whole reason you need to make the appointment in the first place. Catch 22 apps are the very best kind of apps. [<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2009/11/17/rumor-apple-to-release-concierge-app/">TUAW</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/samsung1.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>Samsung Beats out Vizio for Top LCD Seller</h2>
<p>I bet you've been waiting by your computer, eager to see who managed to eke out the top spot in the LCD sales wars this fiscal quarter. Will it be Vizio, the low-priced upstart who took the LCD world by storm? Or Samsung, the crafty veteran with the quality sets and sleek design? Looks like this quarter, Samsung took the prize&mdash;and it's in Remainders because honestly who cares, at all. [<a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/11/17/samsung-overtakes-vizio-as-top-lcd-seller/">CrunchGear</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5407193/remainders-+-stuff-we-didnt-post-and-why/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5407193]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[droid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[genius bar]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gizmodo remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tvs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vizio]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5407193&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[BeoVision 7 LCD Gets Bigger, Pricier, and Blu-rayier]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/beovision_7.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_beovision_7.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Previously available as a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/268998/bo-beovision-7-fully-satisfies-the-snob-in-you">40-inch model</a> in the States, Bang & Olufsen have upgraded their <a href="http://gizmodo.com/search/beovision">BeoVision</a> 7 with a 55-inch LCD, direct-type LED-backlight with local dimming for greater contrast, two motorized floor stand options and room for a Blu-ray player.</p>
<p>They have also significantly upped the price to $18,700&mdash;and that's just for the TV, stand and center speaker. Of course, just because you can afford a TV like this doesn't mean you should. Consider the following blurb from the press release:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #beovision7" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/beovision7/">BeoVision 7</a>-55 integrates the sophisticated Bang & Olufsen BeoSystem 3 video engine, which delivers superior signal processing due to the VisionClear package of picture improvement technologies. In addition, Bang & Olufsen has included double frame rate technology, also known as 120 Hz, with motion compensation and progressive scanning backlight. These technologies significantly reduce the inherent blur typical of LCD screens. With BeoVision 7-55 the picture is clear and sharp even during fast-moving scene</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Just the other day we were considering the issue of motion blur in LCDs and how <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5397893/why-you-dont-need-to-spend-extra-money-on-a-240-hz-lcd-tv">the problem has been all but eliminated in most mid to high end sets</a>. Who knows how much they tacked on to the price tag by exaggerating the importance of technology that probably doesn't do any better than an LCD you bought for a fraction of the price. I mean it's a good looking piece of equipment, but it's not worth all that money just because it looks cool and it was made in Denmark. [<a href="http://www.bang-olufsen.com/page.asp?id=330">Bang & Olufsen</a> via <a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/bang--olufsen-announces-beovision-7-55-inch-with-improved-lcd-picture-technology-69738567.html">PR Newswire</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5402309/beovision-7-lcd-gets-bigger-pricier-and-blu+rayier]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5402309]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[home theater]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bang and olufsen]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[beovision]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[beovision 7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5402309&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[World's Largest Bathtub. Just that: World's Largest Bathtub]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/world___s_largest_bathtub.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_world___s_largest_bathtub.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>I wanted so badly to have a large, English-style, only-nose-out, soak-like-a-hippo bathtub in my new apartment. I settled for a large shower, but at 72 by 12 feet, maybe I should have rented the world's largest bathtub instead.</p>
<p>This 4-food deep naffness is indeed the world's largest and tackiest bathtub, needing 6,340 gallons (24,000 liters) of water. It has sauna boxes&mdash;whatever that means&mdash;LCD screens, jacuzzi area, and built-in showers. All that is fine, but can I lift it up <a href="http://gizmodo.com/309708/mont-blanc-jacuzzi-party-at-15711-feet-was-low-on-oxygen-high-on-booze">to the top of the Mont Blanc</a>? I didn't think so. [<a href="http://www.luxurylaunches.com/fittings/worlds_largest_bathtub_sets_the_new_trend_of_bathtub_parties.php">Luxury Launches</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5401314/worlds-largest-bathtub-just-that-worlds-largest-bathtub]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5401314]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[bathtubs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jacuzzi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sauna]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5401314&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[WSJ Confirms Barnes & Noble "Nook" Reader Price at $259]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/bereader2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_bereader2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>According to the WSJ, the Barnes & Noble reader will be announced tomorrow at $259. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5380942/exclusive-first-photos-of-barnes--nobles-double-screen-e+reader">The descriptions match our exclusive photos exactly</a>. They found the device through a premature ad shown on the NYTimes website! Who scooped who here?</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Features of the Nook include a wireless connection to download books from the retailer's online e-bookstore and an e-paper display from E-Ink Corp. that is separate from the color controls.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The only discrepancy we've found with our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5380942/exclusive-first-photos-of-barnes--nobles-double-screen-e+reader">original story</a> is that B&N was not priced lower than the Kindle, as our sources said it might be. It's tied at $259. But given the lending feature and color screen, a price match may be more than enough to compete with.</p>
<p>They also reveal the name as "Nook". It's kind of a dumb name. [<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703816204574483790552304348.html?ru=MKTW&mod=MKTW">WSJ</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/barnes-and-noble-nook-color-e-reader-out-tuesday-for-259-says/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5385319/wsj-confirms-barnes--noble-nook-reader-price-at-259]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5385319]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ebooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[barnes and noble]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Barnes and Nobles reader]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[e-ink]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[eink]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[reader]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:38:05 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5385319&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Exclusive: First Photos of Barnes & Noble's Double Screen E-Reader]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/2VIEWS_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_2VIEWS_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #barnesandnoble" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/barnesandnoble/">Barnes and Noble</a>'s late to e-books. But the company's new gadget&mdash;first seen here&mdash;should address the weaknesses of all other readers with screens evoking a Kindle and an iPhone. A source from within reveals.</em></p>

<p>The Barnes and Nobles e-reader project, set <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5377505/barnes--nobles-mysterious-ereader-could-land-next-month">to be</a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5380759/barnes--noble-major-event-next-tuesday">revealed next week</a>, has been under development for years, with several devices of varying size and capability in the pipeline. First rumors said it would have a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5377855/video-barnes-and-noble-ebook-will-be-color">color e-ink screen</a>. Then people said it didn't. They were both kind of right: The layout will feature a black and white e-ink screen like the Kindle has&mdash;<em>and a multitouch display like an iPhone underneath other.</em> Pow!</p>
<p><strong><em>More hardware details of the Barnes and Noble E-Ink/LCD reader here:</em></strong><br>
<script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5381149,6,'');
</script></p>
<p>What's interesting is that B&N will sell the books it also publishes (yes, remember, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barnes_&_Noble">they are also a publisher</a> and not just a store) at a deep discount compared to print editions. And the device will have some sort of access to all books scanned by the <a href="http://books.google.com/books">Google Books project</a>; probably books that are out of print.</p>
<p>The name of the gadget, which I cannot reveal and may have changed anyhow, is freaking terrible. I hope they change it before it ships. Oh and yeah, it <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5377516/rumor-barnes--nobles-ereader-will-run-android">runs Android</a>.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5380942/exclusive-first-photos-of-barnes--nobles-double-screen-e+reader]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5380942]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ebooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[barnes and noble]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Barnes and Nobles nook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[e-ink]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[eink]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[exclusive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[reader]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 14 Oct 2009 07:40:43 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Anti LumberJack]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5380942&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Qualcomm's Mirasol Ultra Low Power Display Is Almost Magic]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/Qualcomm_Mirasol_display.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_Qualcomm_Mirasol_display.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged EBOOK READERS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ebook-readers/">Ebook readers</a> suffer because they use E-Ink, which isn't in color and doesn't refresh fast enough to do video. Qualcomm is quietly showing off its Mirasol display, now in full color with 30-frame-per-second video. See for yourself:</p>
<p><object width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=6955767&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=6955767&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/6955767.jpg"></a></p>
<p>The video was shot by <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2009/10/07/qualcomm-shows-off-30fps-color-video-on-mirasol-display.html">IntoMobile</a>. As they describe it, the tech sounds like a massive DLP chip&mdash;that is, a panel covered with tiny reflective mirrors. Each mirror can change color but it's a passive screen, with no backlight (like most LCDs) and no self-illumination (a la OLED). They get lit up by whatever light is in the room. Saving energy is the key here&mdash;anytime you eliminate a light source, you cut way down on the juice. No word on when this will appear on devices, but it's Qualcomm, so you can bet there will at least be some experimental products before too long.</p>
<p>Speaking of experimental products, Time's Josh Quittner points out, <a href="http://thethirdscreen.wordpress.com/2009/10/08/a-full-color-passive-display-that-does-video-thats-a-giant-step-for-e-readers/">on his blog</a>, that several of Qualcomm's components could go together to make a formidable ebook device. Besides this screen, they've got the multi-network mobile chipset (Gobi), a respectable mobile CPU (Snapdragon), and a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5375872/qualcomm-flo-tv-personal-television-hands-on-250-to-shut-up-the-kids">powerful media delivery system</a> (MediaFLO). Forget the Kindle&mdash;who needs Amazon? Oh right, books. [<a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2009/10/07/qualcomm-shows-off-30fps-color-video-on-mirasol-display.html">IntoMobile</a> via <a href="http://thethirdscreen.wordpress.com/2009/10/08/a-full-color-passive-display-that-does-video-thats-a-giant-step-for-e-readers/">Netly</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5377250/qualcomms-mirasol-ultra-low-power-display-is-almost-magic]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5377250]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[qualcomm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[displays]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[e-ink]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ebook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ebook readers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gobi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[kindle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mirasol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[qualcomm mirasol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[snapdragon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 08 Oct 2009 12:50:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5377250&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[3D Hits Home: Snap Judgments on 3 Different Technologies]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/3dguy.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_3dguy.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>With the the big 3D push coming in 2010, I planted my eyes on three types of 3D technologies displayed at CEDIA (home theater expo) that you may have in your next TV...and passed some judgments without pulling any punches.</p>

<p>It should be noted, all designs require glasses. (More technical background on the types of glasses <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5084121/giz-explains-3d-technologies">here</a>.)</p>
<p><strong>Panasonic's 3D Plasma Concept</strong><br>
<em>The Tech</em>: Plasma with Active Shutter (alternating left eye, right eye progressive frames)<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/DSC_0881.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_DSC_0881.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>As a baseline reference to get our bearings, I took yet another look at Panasonic's 103-inch plasma display that we've seen <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5342104/3d-tv-blu+ray-looks-great-but-whats-next">twice</a> before. My <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5125971/panasonic-3dhd-decent-3d-video-thats-as-impractical-as-any-3d-ever">original impressions stand</a>. It's decent&mdash;and definitely the best technology of the three that we saw at CEDIA. Why? There's virtually no flicker in the image because of plasma's instantaneous response times/ability to push legitimate high frame rates. Plus, it probably helps that we're talking about a 103-inch display (that has its own trailer). The bigger a 3D display, the better the illusion. But glasses aside, it's not what I'd deem a perfect experience. You see ghosting around some objects. And...OK, I still can't ignore the damned glasses. It creates an inherent distance from the image inducing an unintentionally ephemeral viewing experience.</p>
<p><strong>Sony's LCD Concept</strong><br>
<em>The Tech</em>: 240Hz LCD with Active Shutter (alternating left eye, right eye progressive frames)<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/sonyhd.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_sonyhd.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Even Panasonic will tell you that 240Hz is the baseline speed needed for an LCD to pull off 3D. But you know what? 240Hz isn't enough. Watching Pixar's <em>Up</em>, the color and sharpness are both great, but there's an absurd level of flicker that's nominally better than on old timey crank projector. And on this normal-sized LCD, it's incredibly obvious when 3D objects break the illusion by reaching the TV's frame. Granted, we're not talking about a final product here, but the specs seem pretty much identical to what consumers can expect to see in the high-end display market next year.</p>
<p><strong>JVC's GD-463D10 LCD</strong><br>
<em>The Tech</em>: Polarized filter (two images are interlaced on the screen, each eye sees half the data, glasses don't need power)<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/DSC_0853.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_DSC_0853.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Of the three technologies here, JVC's is the only final product that's actually available now. And it costs $9,153. It's also easily the worst of the three&mdash;completely unwatchable, in fact. The interlaced 3D means that the resolution takes a huge hit. But it's worse than just a 1080i picture. Your brain can almost make out these lines. I could say more about the tech, but I honestly couldn't stand to look at the screen for more than 10 seconds at once. Oh, and the kicker? For nine thousand bucks, you still only get two pairs of the cheap, polarized glasses. Sorry kids, Mommy and Daddy are watching TV tonight.</p>
<p>There's no doubt that some home theater enthusiasts will go out and plop down $5k or more on a commercially available 3D display when they enter the TV lines of major manufacturers like Sony and Panasonic in 2010. But I'm hoping, really hoping, that the public can resist the gimmick until the technology is perfected. To me, that means when we don't need to deal with these silly glasses at all. But for whatever it's worth, plasma is definitely looking like the clear front runner in execution. [<a href="http://blogs.amctv.com/future-of-classic/creature.jpg">Image</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5357383/3d-hits-home-snap-judgments-on-3-different-technologies]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5357383]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[3d]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3d tvs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cedia 09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cedia 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[displays]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gd-463d10]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jvc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[panasonic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[plasma]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5357383&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Local Dimmed LCD vs Normal LCD]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/DSC_0448.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_DSC_0448.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>In the words of Jerry Seinfeld, "What's the deal with <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged LOCAL DIMMING" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/local-dimming/">local dimming</a> LCDs?" In the words of one Toshiba rep, "it finally allows us to compete with plasma."</p>

<p>On the left, the recently announced <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5286083/toshibas-first-led-lcd-hdtvs-the-regza-xv648-zv650-sv670">Toshiba SV670</a>, a locally dimmed LED LCD. On the right, Toshiba's last gen, CCFL LCD display (click image for full size pop-up). Both were promised to be configured with the default "sports" settings&mdash;no special engineer tweaking.</p>
<p>Local dimming is one of the catchwords of CEDIA&mdash;the US's big home theater trade show. It's basically when a backlit LED display <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5271493/giz-explains-whats-so-great-about-led+backlit-lcds">completely turns off backlighting</a> in the dark parts of the image, pretty much making black as black as it can be.</p>
<p>Seeing Toshiba's side-by-side, the TVs produced pretty much identical images in terms of color, sharpness and dark details. But the blacks were way blacker, even when the lights in the room were turned on. And the difference is even more pronounced in person.</p>
<p>In other words, from Toshiba or any other company, this what "local dimming" really means when you read it on a spec sheet. The more you know, kids!</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5356411/local-dimmed-lcd-vs-normal-lcd]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5356411]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[image cache]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cedia 09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cedia 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[local dimming]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[plasma]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[SV670]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[televisions]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[toshiba]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[toshiba sv670]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tvs]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5356411&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[JVC's LT-32WX50 Is Insanely Thin, Insanelier Expensive]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/JVCmon2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_JVCmon2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>I'm not sure you could ever call a 32-inch monitor portable, but if you could, the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged JVC LT-32WX50" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/jvc-lt_32wx50/">JVC LT-32WX50</a> fits the bill. Aside from the LCD's 1/4-inch (6.4mm) depth, the display weighs but 12.5 pounds.</p>

<p>And with a 4000:1 contrast ratio along with a 90 percent of Adobe RGB color gamut, the picture should be pretty great, too, fed into 2 HDMI inputs along with a VGA if you'd prefer.</p>
<p>Of course, there's always a catch.</p>
<p>For one, we don't know the resolution beyond that it's "exceptionally high." That could mean 1080P. That could mean 4-bajillion-K. That could mean...you know, it's not defined. Plus, it's $3,000 this November. I'm can't know the precise amount of satisfaction you receive after inviting friends into your office only to turn your monitor on its side so that your guests can pretend to ooh and ahh at your extravagance, but it can't be better than what $3,000 can buy you in the recreational chemical and escort industries. Trust me.<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/jvcmon2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_jvcmon2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<blockquote>
<p>JVC Announces Super Slim & Light Flat Panel Monitor</p>
<p>32-inch LED backlit monitor measures just ¼-inch deep</p>
<p>ATLANTA, September 10, 2009 – JVC today announced a super slim LCD monitor for home theater use that measures a mere ¼-inch (6.4mm) deep across most of the panel and weighs just 12.5 pounds (5.7kg). The new 32-inch class LT-32WX50 will be available in the U.S. in November.</p>
<p>The new monitor's super slim profile is made possible by the use of JVC's edge LED backlighting system.<br>
It offers a 4000:1 contrast ratio and wide color gamut for exceptionally high resolution of both video and still images.</p>
<p>The monitor's shallow depth makes it ideal for consumers who want the design flexibility such a slim design allows. It also lends itself to a variety of commercial applications. Another attribute is that fewer material resources are used in making the monitor, reducing the product's environmental impact.</p>
<p>Key features of the LT-32WX50 are:<br>
• Taking advantage of JVC's unique LCD panel edged-light LED backlight system, the LT-32WX50 is stunningly thin - just 1/4-inch* (6.4mm) deep at its thinnest point, with a slim module inset along the bottom third that houses the monitor's inputs and other connections;<br>
• Six picture settings: home, retail, movie, monitor, SLR photo mode, game;<br>
• It covers a wide color gamut – 100 percent of sRGB and 90 percent of Adobe RGB;<br>
• It uses approximately 50 percent fewer material resources and eliminates the use of mercury;<br>
• JVC's high definition picture engine is designed for reproducing both video and still images;<br>
• It includes two HDMI connections along with analog RGB (D-Dub, 15-pin); the display can be controlled externally via RS-232C;</p>
<p>* When measured from the front surface of LCD panel to the rear surface of the cabinet.<br>
The JVC LT-32WX50 will be available in November for less than $3,000.00.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5356062/jvcs-lt+32wx50-is-insanely-thin-insanelier-expensive]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5356062]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[displays]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cedia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cedia 09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cedia 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jvc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jvc LT-32WX50]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lt-32wx50]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5356062&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Epson's Home Theater 8100 Projector Boasts 1080p And a $1599 Price Tag]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/HC8100_Head_On_804x328.shkl.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_HC8100_Head_On_804x328.shkl.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Today Epson announced four new 1080p projectors at CEDIA, including the PowerLite Home Cinema 8100 that comes in at an "affordable" $1599.</p>
<p>The 3LCD-based 8100 features a contrast ratio of 36,000:1 and a brightness bump to 1800 lumens. It also includes a Dynamic Iris system that allows for frame by frame light control (up to 60 frames per second)&mdash;helping to smooth out movies with fast scene changes. Of course, the $1599 price tag doesn't quite compare to the new crop of <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5328998/1080p-projectors-finally-sink-past-1000">sub-$1000 1080p projectors</a> that are starting to hit the market, but Epson's 8100 does represent a second tier of affordability with specs that would probably have cost you at least twice as much a year ago. Of course the game is about more than just impressive contrast ratios, but even without a review these shrinking price points are encouraging. Expect the 8100 to arrive sometime in late October along with a $100 rebate offer that would bring the price down to $1499.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5354690,3,'Epson');
</script></p>
<blockquote>
<p>Epson Adds Two High-Performance 1080P Projectors to<br>
Award-Winning <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged HOME THEATER" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/home-theater/">Home Theater</a> Lineup</p>
<p>Feature-Packed PowerLite Home Cinema 8100 and 8500 UB Offer Home Theater Enthusiasts Unsurpassed Image Quality and Affordability</p>
<p>ATLANTA (CEDIA Expo 2009, Booth 3353) – Sept. 8, 2009 – Epson America today announced two 1080p front projectors, the PowerLite® Home Cinema 8100 and 8500 UB, expanding its award-winning line of 3LCD™ home theater projectors. Featuring D7 technology for brilliant color and detail, and higher contrast, the Home Cinema 8100 reaches a 36,000:1 dynamic contrast ratio and the Home Cinema 8500 UB achieves an unprecedented 200,000:11. The Home Cinema 8100 and 8500 UB also offer the latest in real color reproduction capabilities for more natural and precise colors, delivering an outstanding viewing experience for <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged HOME ENTERTAINMENT" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/home-entertainment/">home entertainment</a> and AV enthusiasts.</p>
<p>With pricing of $1,599 (plus an additional $100 rebate at launch) and sub-$3,000, respectively, the Home Cinema 8100 and 8500 UB offer consumers affordable high-definition 3LCD home entertainment, delivering bright and natural color, crisp image detail, and unsurpassed light efficiency and reliability. These 3LCD projectors use an advanced, three-chip optical engine for brilliant color and image quality without the possibility of color break-up, unlike DLP projectors that generate images using a spinning color wheel with a white segment.</p>
<p>"Epson is committed to leading the market when it comes to home theater performance and value," said Marge Ang, senior product manager, Epson America. "These new models take advantage of Epson's latest technology to offer consumers the highest-performing1080p solutions available at their respective price points."</p>
<p>Epson Home Cinema 8100<br>
The value-packed Home Cinema 8100 features an improved contrast ratio of up to 36,000:1 (double that of previous models) and higher brightness – 1,800 lumens color and white light output - for outstanding image quality in dark or lighted rooms. The projector's exclusive Dynamic Iris system contributes to the dramatic contrast improvement, allowing light to be controlled on a frame-by-frame basis at up to 60 times per second, making it ideal for fast-action movies with frequent scene changes. Designed for home entertainment and AV enthusiasts on a budget, this projector offers high-quality home entertainment for enjoying movies, video games, sports, and more.</p>
<p>Epson Home Cinema 8500 UB<br>
Along with the latest D7 chip set, this high-quality projector adds Epson's C2Fine® and UltraBlack™ technology for superb black levels and vivid images. Further boosting black levels, the Home Cinema 8500 UB includes brightness of 1,600 lumens color and light output and new dual-layered auto iris technology, allowing for an impressive contrast ratio of up to 200,000:1. As a result, the projector controls light intensity more effectively, causing dark images to appear even darker and blacks to appear even richer and deeper.</p>
<p>The projector also features Epson's new Super-resolution™ technology to create a sharper, more detailed picture resolution ideal for broadcast signal noise reduction or enhancing the quality of poor DVD transfers. Super-resolution technology improves the resolution of a blurred image, allowing consumers to fully enjoy high-definition quality at all times. Epson has also added new real color reproduction capabilities, which delivers more natural and precise colors, allowing viewers to experience the true-to-life colors filmmakers intended.</p>
<p>To ensure sharp, clear images, the projector features Epson's 12-bit 3LCD driver technology and a built-in Silicon Optix HQV Reon-VX scaling and de-interlacing video processor. This processor reduces mosquito and block noise and augments multi-level contrast enhancement to further improve picture quality. The Home Cinema 8500 UB also features enhanced FineFrame™ technology resulting in smoother frame interpolation, sharper video quality and the elimination of judder.<br>
Shared Features of the Home Cinema Line – The Home Cinema 8100 and 8500 UB share features designed to improve image quality and total cost of 3LCD projector ownership, including:</p>
<p>*<br>
Cinema Filter: Delivers larger color space for improved color fidelity.<br>
*<br>
Fujinon OptiCinema™ Multi-Lens Optics System: Projects clean, precise edges with consistent image quality across the entire screen, expanding installation flexibility.<br>
*<br>
Pre-set Color Modes: Features seven color modes (Dynamic, Living Room, Natural, Theatre, Theatre Black 1, Theatre Black 2, x.v.Color) for optimal viewing in any environment.<br>
*<br>
E-TORL® (Epson Twin Optics Reflection Lamp): Provides optimum light uniformity and increased light output for screen sizes larger than ten feet with exclusive 200 watt high efficiency design; uses less energy for up to 4,000 hours of lamp lifeiii.<br>
*<br>
Advanced Dust Filtration System: Ensures efficient power use, reduced cool-down periods, lower fan speeds, quieter operation (only 22 db), and 98 percent efficiency for longer filter life.<br>
*<br>
Input Options: Features two HDMI 1.3a inputs with Deep Color support, high definition component video input, S-video input, composite video input, and VGA-type RGB input (D-sub 15).</p>
<p>Availability and Support<br>
The Epson Home Cinema 8100 will be available in late-October and the Home Cinema 8500 UB will be available in November through authorized Epson projector dealers and select retail outlets, and come with Epson's industry leading service and support. Pricing for the Home Cinema 8500 UB will be released at that time. This includes a two-year limited warranty with access to Epson PrivateLine® priority toll-free support, 90-day limited lamp warranty, and free two-business day exchange with Extra CareSM Home Service.</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>Epson's Latest 1080P Pro Cinema Projectors Bring Custom Installers High<br>
Performing<br>
PowerLite Pro Cinema 9100 and 9500 UB Offer New Levels of Image Quality, Detail and Performance</p>
<p>ATLANTA (CEDIA Expo 2009, Booth 3353) – Sept. 8, 2009 – Epson America today announced two native 1080p 3LCD™ home theater projectors designed for custom installers and home theater buffs, the PowerLite® Pro Cinema 9100 and 9500 UB. These projectors feature the latest 3LCD chips with D7 technology for amazing color and detail, and significantly higher contrast ratios – the Pro Cinema 9100 achieves a 36,000:1 dynamic contrast ratio and the Pro Cinema 9500 UB attains an unprecedented 200,000:1 in its class . With professional-level color tools including ISF calibration and color isolation, the Pro Cinema 9100 and 9500 UB offer professional installers full-featured solutions.</p>
<p>Available for $2,599 and sub-$4,000 respectively, the Pro Cinema 9100 and 9500 UB offer state-of-the-art image quality and performance in each of their respective categories with enhanced color reproduction capabilities and 3LCD technology to deliver bright and natural color, crisp image detail and reliability. As Epson's flagship home theater model, the Pro Cinema 9500 UB brings several technology enhancements to the market, including a new dual-layered auto-iris to control light reduction rates, Super-resolution™ technology for enhanced picture quality and improved FineFrame™ technology.</p>
<p>"Epson understands the needs of the custom installation channel and is committed to providing high-quality products that meet the needs of dealers in today's competitive market," said Marge Ang, senior product manager, Epson America. "These latest Pro Cinema projectors have been packed with a range of value-add features and technology refinements that allow custom installers to build a customized high-performance, home entertainment system for their discerning customers."</p>
<p>Epson Pro Cinema 9100<br>
The Pro Cinema 9100 offers a high-value, customizable home entertainment experience. The projector includes ISF Day and Night modes for switching between picture modes and lamp output, as well as Epson's Color Isolation system for fine-tuning of color saturation and hue without the need for blue and red optical filters, making set-up and calibration quick and simple. With a contrast ratio of up to 36,000:1 and brightness of 1,800 lumens color and white light output , this projector offers amazing big-screen image quality. Housed in a stylish black and silver design, the Pro Cinema 9100 features an exclusive Dynamic Iris system which contributes to the improvement in contrast. It controls light on a frame-by-frame basis at up to 60 times per second, making it ideal for fast-action movies with frequent scene changes.</p>
<p>Epson Pro Cinema 9500 UB<br>
The flagship Pro Cinema 9500 UB offers custom installers the ultimate in image quality, combining Epson's C2Fine® and UltraBlack™ technology with 3LCD and D7 technology to produce superb black levels and vivid images. The projector also features a dual-layered auto iris to control light reduction rates more effectively, contributing to its astounding contrast ratio – up to 200,000:1. With brightness of 1,600 lumens color and white light output, the projector delivers deeper blacks and crystal clear detail.</p>
<p>Adding to its high-quality performance, the Pro Cinema 9500 UB features Epson's improved FineFrame technology for smoother frame interpolation, sharper video quality and the elimination of judder for viewing sports and fast-action movie scenes, and playing video games. Epson has also added new Super-resolution technology to sharpen blurry images or low-resolution pictures. This new technology is ideal for high-definition content, addressing broadcast signal noise reduction or improving the quality of poor DVD transfers.</p>
<p>The Pro Cinema 9500 UB also features new real color reproduction capabilities for more natural and precise colors, while Epson's 12-bit 3LCD driver technology and a built-in Silicon Optix HQV Reon-VX video processor and PW390 scaler ensure a smoother picture. It also includes pre-set color space selection to set color gamut according to geography and source material, a feature typically found only on high-end high-definition broadcast monitors. And, with an optional external anamorphic lens (available from Epson) and "vertical stretch" picture mode, the Pro Cinema 9500 UB enables anamorphic viewing without an external processor for a full theatrical image – projecting true 2.35:1 and 2.40:1 ultra widescreen images without the black bars above and below the picture.</p>
<p>Shared Features of the Pro Cinema Line – Epson's Pro Cinema projectors share a range of value-add features designed to further enhance performance, image quality and total cost of ownership, including:</p>
<p>*<br>
3LCD Technology: Delivers bright and natural color, amazing detail and road-tested reliability; uses an advanced, 3-chip optical engine for full-time color without the possibility of color break-up.<br>
*<br>
Cinema Filter: Delivers larger color space for improved color fidelity.<br>
*<br>
Fujinon OptiCinema™ Multi-Lens Optics System: Projects clean, precise edges with consistent image quality across the entire screen.<br>
*<br>
E-TORL® (Epson Twin Optics Reflection Lamp): Provides optimum light uniformity and increased light output for screen sizes larger than ten feet with exclusive 200 watt high efficiency design; uses less energy for up to 4,000 hours of lamp life ; both models include a spare lamp.<br>
*<br>
ISF Certification: Allows installers and calibrators to fine-tune picture quality and match output with front projection screens.<br>
*<br>
Input Selections: Features two HDMI 1.3a inputs with Deep Color support, high definition component video input, S-video input, composite video input, and VGA-type RGB input (D-sub 15).<br>
*<br>
Installation Options: Includes ceiling mount, reversible front panel Epson logo for various mounting positions, rear panel cable cover to hide wires and cable hook to ensure connections remain secure.</p>
<p>Availability and Support<br>
Available in October and November respectively, the Pro Cinema 9100 and 9500 UB can be purchased through authorized Epson projector dealers and select retail outlets. Both models come with Epson's industry leading service and support, including a three-year limited warranty with toll-free access to Epson's PrivateLineSM priority technical support, 90-day limited lamp warranty, and free two-business day exchange with Extra CareSM Home Service.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>[<a href="http://epson.ipressroom.com/pr/epson/home-entertainment/Home_Cinema_8100_8500UB_Press_Release.aspx">Epson</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5354619/epsons-home-theater-8100-projector-boasts-1080p-and-a-1599-price-tag]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5354619]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[projectors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[1080p]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[8100]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[8500ub]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[9100]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[9500ub]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[epson]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[home entertainment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[home theater]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[powerlite 8100]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[powerlite home theater 8100]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 08 Sep 2009 13:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5354619&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Xperia Pureness Is Just Several Steps from Invisible]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/XperiaTM_Pureness_Front_40Angle_BLACK_lit_500_02.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_XperiaTM_Pureness_Front_40Angle_BLACK_lit_500_02.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Points for being different, I guess. <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SONY ERICSSON" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/sony-ericsson/">Sony Ericsson</a>'s Xperia Pureness spruces up an otherwise ordinary phone with an extraordinary, clear LCD.</p>

<p>We have no details other than its "talk, text, time" theme and what we can('t) see: the Xperia is a no-frills candybar with a transparent, monochrome LCD screen.<br>
<object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/6x-tVUHAcAI&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/6x-tVUHAcAI&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/6x-tVUHAcAI.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display: none;"/><br>
You'll notice that in the video, the black buttons aren't even labeled with numbers. I actually prefer this absurdly minimal design to the still product render, however impractical, as it takes a phone designed purely to be striking and makes it even more striking.</p>
<p>The Pureness will be available in unspecified but select cities this November. And while I can resist the gimmick this time around, the first 100% transparent phone, no matter how crappy it may be, will be rewarded with my highly sought $300 w/ 2-year contract. [<a href="http://www.sonyericsson.com/cws/corporate/press/pressreleases/pressreleasedetails/websitecopy-20090903">Sony Ericsson</a> via <a href="http://www.unwiredview.com/2009/09/03/sony-ericsson-xperia-pureness-unveiled-video/">unwired view</a> via <a href="http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/09/03/sony-ericsson-unveils-the-xperia-pureness-should-have-been-called-the-weirdness/">MobileCrunch</a>]<br>
<script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5351964,3,'Xperia Pureness');
</script></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5351981/the-xperia-pureness-is-just-several-steps-from-invisible]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5351981]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pureness]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony ericsson]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xperia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xperiea pureness]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 Sep 2009 13:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5351981&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sony Plans to Introduce 3D LCD Television by End of 2010]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The Wall Street Journal reports that Sony is planning to introduce a 3D LCD TV by the end of 2010. Sony's been in <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5340445/plasma-hdtv-sales-soar-lcd-sales-steady-sony-loses-ever-more-market-share">a bit of a slump</a> lately, and a push to 3D would certainly provide some excitement.</p>
<p>This leak is all according to an unnamed source, so don't get too worked up, but supposedly Sony is set to announce the product at next week's IFA in Berlin. Panasonic has <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5342104/3d-tv-blu+ray-looks-great-but-whats-next">already committed</a> to work on 3D TVs, but Sony could still be the first to get a product out the door. We'll have to wait until next week to find out if there's any truth to the rumor. [<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125185525139778163.html?mg=com-wsj">Wall Street Journal</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5350607/sony-plans-to-introduce-3d-lcd-television-by-end-of-2010]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5350607]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[unconfirmed]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3d]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony 3d tv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 02 Sep 2009 01:15:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5350607&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Best Buy Slashing Big-Screen HDTV Prices Next Week]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/best-buy-logo.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Since 2009 sales have leaned toward smaller screened HDTVs, meaning less revenue, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged BEST BUY" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/best-buy/">Best Buy</a> is taking action by slashing prices on HDTVs with screen sizes larger than 39", according to a leaked circular obtained by <a href="http://hdguru.com/christmas-in-august-best-buys-big-hdtv-price-drop/477/">HDGuru</a>.</p>
<p>A whopping 33 HDTV models are on sale in the August 30th circular, including $1100 off several high-end Samsung LCDs. There are some nice Blu-Ray and stereo packages as well, sometimes up to $1500 off the regular price.</p>
<p>Apparently the start of football season is also the start of the big-screen buying season, although we wonder what Best Buy'll have to cut come Black Friday. Still, if you're in the market for a giant TV, next week might be the time to make the plunge. [<a href="http://hdguru.com/christmas-in-august-best-buys-big-hdtv-price-drop/477/">HDGuru</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5348486/best-buy-slashing-big+screen-hdtv-prices-next-week]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5348486]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[dealzmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[best buy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[best buy hdtv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 29 Aug 2009 14:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5348486&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Non Review: I Love You, Sony XBR8 Triluminos LED LCD HDTV]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/sidebar_promotion/2009/08/IMG_9051.JPG"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_IMG_9051.JPG" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The delivery guy just picked up the XBR8&mdash;Sony's tri-color LED Backlit HDTV. I'm a bit sad because I'd never seen an LCD shine like that before.</p>

<p>I only had it set up in my living room for a short while. A little HBO, some movies, not much gaming at all. But it would have been long enough to pick apart a TV by just watching it. And during that time Sony's picture defied any major complaints. Standard definition TV looked colorful, clear and without too many artifacts, reminiscent of how good it did on ye old standard def CRTs, before flat panels started hamfisting the upscaling. On the high end, High definition content from a Blu-ray disc felt like pricks from hypodermic needles, 1920 x 1080 of them, filled with a solution of video joy suspended in photons, as well as some unknown meds that made my chest tighten and my eyes unable to blink. It was by far the best LCD I'd ever seen, and as David Katzmeier from CNet <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/flat-panel-tvs/sony-bravia-kdl-55xbr8/4505-6482_7-33060615.html?tag=txt%3bpage">said when he reviewed it</a>, one of the best sets ever, although not as fine of a picture as the now extinct Pioneer Kuro plasma sets.</p>
<p>Sony's engineers went to remarkable lengths to create it, almost as if the ghost of Sony's founding fathers came down and rekindled the engineering pride of the company, telling them to spare no measure to create the TV. "Use LEDs! Use three or four of them for every one those bastards in Korea do!" What resulted was a unique set of discrete red, green and blue LEDs&mdash;two of the dimmer greens in every triad&mdash; repeating the set up into a backlighting array. Each of the different color LEDs would be calibrated <em>in real time</em>, adjusting for color and brightness output. And that's after they were matched for similar qualities. Apply localized dimming, for a set only an LED fanatic could dream of. And the result was fantastic but without implying anything about its reliability, it is curiously prototype-like in many ways.</p>
<p>The set's large number of discreet color LEDs makes it heavier, more power hungry and thicker than most LED LCD sets, fitting somewhere in physical profile between other LED LCD sets and plasmas. A year and change after its revolutionary release, the set finds itself in murkier waters that make it impossible to justify its extravagance&mdash;another hallmark of cutting edge prototype-like technology. And there's competition. Kind of!</p>
<p>Having said how wonderful it looks, this set is a strange creature, born right before the economic crash wiped out the chance that high end sets, like Mitsu's laser TV or Pioneer's Kuros, would sell well. Yet it exists at the same time as its cheaper and poorer performing successors like the Non-LED XBR9.</p>
<p>Markets equalize all. Right now, the XBR8 still has a wildly expensive, with an MSRP of almost $4000 for a 46-incher. Thankfully, because of the set's age, they're going for $2600 on Amazon, which is better, but still over the MSRP of some competing sets that look almost&mdash;almost&mdash;as good. The XBR9 is $2600 MSRP and can be had for under 2 grand. For about the same price as the XBR9, you can get the LG LH90 in a 47 inch size, backlit by white LEDs with localized dimming. David K. over at CNet says <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/flat-panel-tvs/lg-47lh90/4505-6482_7-33485570.html?tag=contentMain;contentBody">its almost as good</a>, visually.</p>
<p>Somehow, I'm still drawn to the only shipping LCD that uses separate red, green, and blue LEDs. Maybe once the retailers forget how special it is, and the final units are put on clearance as last year's model, I'll pick one up at a steal. More than likely, that sub $2k price point will fill up with better and better sets using simpler and more production friendly technology that'll make me wonder what I was lusting about in the first place. Until then, I still love the XBR8. And without any benchmarks, you'll just have to take my word for it that this set is something special, if not also an unrealistic set to own.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5341202/non-review-i-love-you-sony-xbr8-triluminos-led-lcd-hdtv]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5341202]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtvs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[1080p]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[led]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony xbr8]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5341202&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Plasma HDTV Sales Soar, LCD Sales Steady, Sony Loses Ever More Market Share]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/Picture_1_09.png" class="left image340" width="340" /><a href="http://hdguru.com/q2-plasma-hdtv-sales-surge-lcd-40-size-sales-flat-vizio-maintains-no-1-lcd-volume/468/">HDGuru</a> has some notes from the now-concluded second quarter <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged HDTV SALES" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/hdtv-sales/">HDTV sales</a>, and they show some interesting movement: With dirt-cheap prices, high end plasmas (42"-50") surged almost 40%, though LCD sales merely held steady. The big loser? Sony.</p>
<p>Total plasma sales went up 31% compared to the first quarter, mostly due to the high value attached to them in this economic downturn. In terms of LCDs, Vizio continues its hold as the number 1 maker, and in fact grew their market share, as did Samsung, Toshiba and Panasonic. Sony, unfortunately, lost more than 3% of the market&mdash;a huge piece of its share&mdash;though the Japanese giant did retain its third place position. Check out <a href="http://hdguru.com/q2-plasma-hdtv-sales-surge-lcd-40-size-sales-flat-vizio-maintains-no-1-lcd-volume/468/">HDGuru</a> for more info and analysis of the numbers. [<a href="http://hdguru.com/q2-plasma-hdtv-sales-surge-lcd-40-size-sales-flat-vizio-maintains-no-1-lcd-volume/468/">HDGuru</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5340445/plasma-hdtv-sales-soar-lcd-sales-steady-sony-loses-ever-more-market-share]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5340445]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtvs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtv sales]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[panasonic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[plasma]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[toshiba]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vizio]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5340445&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Even Vampires Think Plasma TVs Are Heavy]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("/truebloodplasma.flv", 506, 300,"");
</script><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/stills/truebloodplasma.flv.jpg"></a>Even the vampires who've been around hundreds of years in <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged TRUE BLOOD" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/true-blood/">True Blood</a> are confused by HDTVs. It's <em>LCDs</em> that are thin and light, not plasmas. Of course, if you wanted to brain somebody, plasma would <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5099489/how-to-buy-an-hdtv-today-or-any-day">be a better choice</a>.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5333911/even-vampires-think-plasma-tvs-are-heavy]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5333911]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[home entertainment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[plasma]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[True Blood]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tvs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vampires]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5333911&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Hey Everybody, Take a Cue from Sharp]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/sharp-dx2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/504x_sharp-dx2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></a>Electronics manufacturers, if you insist on releasing 100 infinitesimally differing televisions, camcorders or back shavers, take a cue from Sharp. They laid out their entire new <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5332134/aquos-dx2-blu+ray-tvs-improve-image-quality-record-times-in-japan">DX2 line</a> (LCD TVs with integrated BD-R) in one handy graphic. [<a href="http://www.akihabaranews.com/en">AkihabaraNews</a> via <a href="http://www.ubergizmo.com/15/archives/2009/08/sharp_dx2_series_lcd_tvs.html">Ubergizmo</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5332407/hey-everybody-take-a-cue-from-sharp]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5332407]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aquos]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blu-ray]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dx2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sharp]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sharp aquos dx2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tvs]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5332407&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Samsung 8500 Series Local-Dimming LED TVs Have a Sweet Base]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/samsung8500.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_samsung8500.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></a>Yeah, the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged 8500 SERIES" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/8500-series/">8500 series</a> is Samsung's first set of LED-backlit LCDs with <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5271493/giz-explains-whats-so-great-about-led+backlit-lcds">local dimming</a> <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5124124/samsung-goes-full-led-backlight-with-luxia-series-6000-7000-and-8000-high+end-ultra+thin-lcds">this year</a> and has the Yahoo widget engine for streaming video, but all I really care about is that awesome looking blue stick holding it up.</p>

<p>I mean just look at it. It's from the future or something .</p>
<p>The obviously 1080p set is using white LEDs, along with local dimming, unlike say, Sony's which use tri-color LEDs for better color. You can cue up the usual so-great-they're-meaningless measurements you get with LEDs though: 7,000,000: 1 contrast ratio, 2ms, Auto Motion Plus frame interpolation, and an Ultra Clear Panel that "works to improve image clarity and brightness regardless of a room's ambient lighting." But it is only 1.6 inches thick.</p>
<p>There are two models, the 46-inch class (45.9 inches) set for $3600, and the 55-inch class (54.6 inches) for $4500, both out in September.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>AMSUNG INTRODUCES STYLISH NEW LED HDTV THAT DELIVERS EXCELLENT PICTURE QUALITY, CONNECTIVITY AND INTERACTIVE FEATURES</p>
<p>Joining Samsung's Award-winning <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged LED TV" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/led-tv/">LED TV</a> Line, 8500 Series Offers Consumers Supreme HD Experience</p>
<p>RIDGEFIELD PARK, N.J. – July 30, 2009 – Samsung Electronics America, Inc., a market leader and award-winning innovator in consumer electronics, today unveiled the flagship model of its expanded LED HDTV lineup with the all-new 8500 Series. The new HDTVs combine the award-winning picture quality and thinness of Samsung's previous LED HDTVs, with the latest networking and interactive features, to provide an ideal option to all TV connoisseurs.</p>
<p>"For consumers who are looking for the ultimate HD centerpiece and high-level performance in their home theater, the Samsung 8500 Series delivers break-through quality and design," said John Revie, senior vice president of Visual Display Marketing, Samsung Electronics America. "The 8500 Series underscores Samsung's dedication to providing a full range of HDTVs that not only achieve the highest levels of picture quality, but also provide unique and immersive entertainment experiences through our Medi@2.0ä suite."</p>
<p>Samsung 8500 LED HDTV Series Pricing and Availability<br>
- Price: 46-inch class: $3,599.99 / 55-inch class: $4,499.99<br>
- Availability: September 2009</p>
<p>Picture Quality and Control<br>
With Samsung's innovative use of white LEDs as a backlight source, the 8500 Series is capable of a stunning 7,000,000:1 dynamic contrast ratio for extreme detail and image depth. Its Wide Color Enhancer Pro ensures that colors are consistently vibrant, while Samsung's Ultra Clear Panel works to improve image clarity and brightness regardless of a room's ambient lighting. The 8500 Series is also compliant with the latest Energy Star® v3.0 ratings, and includes an optimized energy savings mode that adjusts the backlight and picture quality, without sacrificing the overall viewing experience. Additionally, its "Natural" mode optimizes picture settings to model the brightness advantage of LCD displays and the cinema-like richness of plasma displays with any content.</p>
<p>The 8500 Series incorporates an ultra-quick 2ms panel response time, combined with Samsung's latest version of its Auto Motion Plus™ frame interpolation technology that has a true 240Hz refresh rate to significantly improve playback of fast-paced content. Going beyond the three standard Auto Motion Plus™ presets, users can also separately adjust the levels of judder and motion blur reduction for superior picture control.</p>
<p>Connectivity and Content<br>
The new 8500 Series features Samsung's Medi@2.0ä suite, allowing users to access content from more sources than ever before. The Internet@TV - Content Service, developed in association with Yahoo!, provides onscreen access to popular web-based content from Yahoo! (Flickr, Video, News, Weather, and Finance), USA Today (Sports), Twitter, YouTube, and others. The widgets-based interface and scrollbar are activated with the push of a button, and run along the bottom of the screen for easy browsing of the latest programs and content available.</p>
<p>Even after purchase, consumers will be able to use a growing library of widgets, as the widget development kit is available for other content providers to develop new offerings. Samsung's Medi@2.0ä suite provides wired and wireless DLNA compatibility to enjoy photos, music and videos from a networked PC right on the television. Pre-loaded photos, artwork, games, and recipes are also included for entertaining, and two USB 2.0 connections can be used for playing a plethora of video, photo, and audio files from portable devices, including external hard memory.</p>
<p>Designed to Stand Out<br>
Measuring at just 1.6 inches deep and featuring Samsung's Touch of Color™ (ToC™) bezel, the 8500 Series provides consumers with style and flexibility in an HDTV. Additionally, both the 46-inch and 55-inch models come with a built-in tuner and an array of multimedia connections. Samsung's innovative, ultra-slim wall-mount solution (sold separately) makes installation akin to hanging a picture frame, by reducing the gap between the TV and the wall to a mere 0.6 inches – a major improvement over traditional mounting systems.</p>
<p>Samsung Electronics America's press releases, video content and product images are available at www.samsung.com/newsroom.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5326286/samsung-8500-series-local+dimming-led-tvs-have-a-sweet-base]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5326286]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[home entertainment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[8500 series]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtvs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[l]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[led]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[led tv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung 8500 series led tv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5326286&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Samsung LED LCD UN46B7000 HDTV Lightning Review: Avoid!]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_IMG_9034.JPG" class="left image500" width="500">Generally, I love LED LCDs. The UN46B7000 is Samsung's set with 120Hz refresh and internet widgets. It's not backlit, like the XBR8, but sidelit, and is as thin as two of your fingers. You should avoid buying this set.</p>

<p><br clear="all">
<br>
<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5320720/samsung-led-lcd-un46b7000-hdtv-lightning-review-avoid"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/smallish_IMG_9037.JPG" alt="
" title="
" align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2"/></a><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5320720/samsung-led-lcd-un46b7000-hdtv-lightning-review-avoid"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/smallish_IMG_9039.JPG" alt="
" title="
" align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2"/></a><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5320720/samsung-led-lcd-un46b7000-hdtv-lightning-review-avoid"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/smallish_IMG_9041.JPG" alt="
" title="
" align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2"/></a><br clear="both" /><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5320720/samsung-led-lcd-un46b7000-hdtv-lightning-review-avoid"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/smallish_IMG_9035.JPG" alt="
" title="
" align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2"/></a><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5320720/samsung-led-lcd-un46b7000-hdtv-lightning-review-avoid"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/smallish_IMG_9042.JPG" alt="" title="" align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2"/></a><br>
<br clear="all">
<br>
<strong>The Price:</strong> $3000</p>
<p><strong>The Verdict:</strong> The problem is that this set dims the sidelights whenever the program material gets dark, and it does it in the most ungraceful way ever. Check out the menu that I popped on screen, merely to show you what happens to white material on screen when the backlight is dimmed to increase black level.</p>
<p>See how everything white goes dark, too?<br>
<object width="502" height="377" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5531885&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5531885&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="377" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_5531885.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display: none;"><br>
So, if there's a scene in a movie where there's a moonlit night, the lighting in this set would crank everything down, including the moon itself. Backlit LED tvs can turn off individual lights to increase blacks, yet keep LEDs lit in the area around the on screen moon; this set idiotically turns everything off. (*Some other sets do this for energy savings, but there's always a way to set the backlight to a consistent brightness level.)</p>
<p>I didn't even benchmark the set after this, as there was no need for me to measure other features when the set had such a glaring problem, which Samsung claims is not a bug. Oddly, many technical reviewers glossed over this fact, giving this set editor choice awards while brushing away the issue.</p>
<p>My impressions of the rest of the set are here, however:<br>
&bull; The TV's colors are inflated like a lot of LCDs but the picture and motion handling are pretty damn comparable to any modern late model LCD.<br>
&bull; There are no buttons on the set, so if you lose your remote, you're fucked.<br>
&bull; The TV is about 1.2 inches thick, and all the ports are tucked nicely away on the side. But because the case is so thin, the speakers sound terribly thin. Worse than on an old 22 inch TV I have in the back of the house.<br>
&bull; The case's translucent edges are among the best designed cases of any modern gadget, in my opinion.<br>
&bull; The internet widgets and content take a long minute to boot up and include Flickr, twitter and weather apps. They aren't worth the $150-$200 over the 6000 series which eliminate these extras. There's a media streamer (which I didn't test) recipes, simple video games, exercises, art and animated children's songs, like this really freaky one about having the munchies.</p>
<p><object width="502" height="377" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_1"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5720367&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5720367&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="377" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_5720367.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display: none;"></p>
<p>&bull; Off axis viewing isn't great, but isn't bad.<br>
&bull; If you have noise reduction on on this set, it will strip the grain from movies, practically, making everything look like it was shot on a cheap digital camcorder. Turn it off.<br>
&bull; It's worth repeating that this set is generally gorgeous.<br>
&bull; Like all LED sets, they're energy efficient. But again, there's no localized dimming with this set, which is side, not backlit.</p>
<p>The good news is that Samsung can fix this dimming issue by firmware. The bad news is that I haven't heard they even believe its an issue yet. I've never been so irritated by such a beautiful TV and recommend you steer clear.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/gizplus3.jpg"> A nice picture<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/gizplus3.jpg"> Super thin<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/gizminus_01.jpg"> Dimming sidelight issues.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/gizminus_01.jpg"> Sounds thin<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/gizminus_01.jpg"> Expensive<br clear="all"></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5320720/samsung-led-lcd-un46b7000-hdtv-lightning-review-avoid]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5320720]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtvs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gallery]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[led]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lightning review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung un46b7000]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tvs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[un46b7000]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5320720&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[LCD Market Turns Around, Jumps 41% In Second Quarter]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.isuppli.com/NewsDetail.aspx?ID=20557">iSuppli</a> just reported that the LCD panel market (any LCD of 10-inches or larger, which includes TVs as well as computers) jumped 41% from 91.7 million to 129.7 million.</p>
<blockquote><p> This follows sequential declines of 2.3 percent in the third quarter, of 18.6 percent in the fourth quarter of 2008 and 2 percent in the first quarter of 2008.</p></blockquote>
<p>That's quite a big jump for a supposedly lousy market. [<a href="http://www.isuppli.com/NewsDetail.aspx?ID=20557">iSuppli</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5319818/lcd-market-turns-around-jumps-41-in-second-quarter]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5319818]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd sales]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:52:25 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5319818&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Philips Brilliance LCD Computer Display Knows If You Are There or Not]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5303051/philips-brilliance-lcd-computer-display-knows-if-you-are-there-or-not">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a>The new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged PHILIPS BRILLIANCE LCD" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/philips-brilliance-lcd/">Philips Brilliance LCD</a> computer display has a sensor that can detect people in front. While TVs like the latest Sony Bravias can detect people too, this seems to be the first for a desktop monitor.</p>
<p>Their PowerSensor function works independently of the operating system, and basically allows you to save energy: Everytime you go away from your computer, the monitor will dim and reduce its power consumption by 50%. Hopefully, this simple but great technology will become a standard feature in every monitor in a not-so-distant future. [<a href="http://www.pocket-lint.com/news/news.phtml/25124/philips-launches-powersensor-lcd-monitor.phtml">PocketLint</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5303051/philips-brilliance-lcd-computer-display-knows-if-you-are-there-or-not]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5303051]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[displays]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[philips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Philips Brilliance LCD]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5303051&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[This is What 50,000 Cellphone LCDs Looks Like]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p>Sometimes even spam is useful. This is a set of images we got from a junk email trying to sell us 50,000 pieces of Asian LCDs. <strong>CDMA only</strong>, they claim in bold. [<i>Thanks spammer!</i>]</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/lcds2.JPG"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_lcds2.JPG" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></a><br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/lcds1.JPG"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_lcds1.JPG" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></a><br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/lcds3.JPG"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_lcds3.JPG" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></a></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5302505/this-is-what-50000-cellphone-lcds-looks-like/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5302505]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[image cache]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphone lcds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5302505&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Samsung's New 24-Inch Monitor Comes With an Epic 5 Megapixel Webcam Tacked On]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_samsung_video_confrencing_LCD.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;">Samsung's gone and pasted a 5-megapixel webcam on the <a href="http://onlygizmos.com/samsung-scopia-vc240-has-integrated-video-confrencing/2009/06/">24-inch Scopia VC240 monitor</a>. Now we can finally see <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5271880/peek+o+matic-strips-pinups-hunks-flabby-gizmodo-editors">topless Jesus</a> in all his HD glory!</p>
<p>The Scopia webcam captures 720p video at 30fps with a bitrate of 2 megabits. It also supports V2oIP conferencing technology and uses h.264 compression. Obviously, this thing will never win any design awards, but considering this is an enterprise-oriented product and is far more powerful than any comparable product, I'm not sure Samsung cares.</p>
<p>As for actual monitor specs, the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SCOPIA VC240" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/scopia-vc240/">Scopia VC240</a> has 1920x1080p full HD resolution, 1000:1 contrast ratio, and a 170 degree viewing angle. It will also be available in the fall. Oh, did I mention it costs $2000. Well it does.</p>
<p>Question: what video conference software works with such high resolutions?<br>
[<a href="http://onlygizmos.com/samsung-scopia-vc240-has-integrated-video-confrencing/2009/06/">Only Gizmos</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5294611/samsungs-new-24+inch-monitor-comes-with-an-epic-5-megapixel-webcam-tacked-on]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5294611]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[webcams]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[monitors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Samsung Scopia VC240]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung vc240]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[scopia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[scopia vc240]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vc240]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Covert]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5294611&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The World's Tiniest VGA Display Uses Pixels the Size of Cells]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/ViewMedia.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_ViewMedia.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></a>This 0.27-inch LCD display has a 600x480 resolution...so what good does that do you? Potentially quite a bit.</p>

<p>It's proof that microdisplays are getting sharper, as Kopin Corporation, the company behind this prototype, had to shrink the individual color dots to just 2.9 x 8.7 µm apiece to reach this standard. (Keep in mind that a human hair is 100 µm wide, meaning these dots are much smaller&mdash;more on par with red blood cells, actually.)</p>
<p>While we're fairly certain that the image you see here is but a simulation, Kopin promises that the development is a necessary step in creating a "2048 x 2048-resolution display in a size smaller than a typical postage stamp." Yes, even postage stamps will soon dwarf the 1080p (1920x1080) resolution of your fancy television. [<a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20090611006064&newsLang=en">BW</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/12/kopin-crafts-worlds-smallest-vga-microdisplay-2k-x-2k-postage/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5288296/the-worlds-tiniest-vga-display-uses-pixels-the-size-of-cells]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5288296]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[displays]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[kopin]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nano]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotechnology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:19:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5288296&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Vizio Unveils a Whopping 31 New HDTVs]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_vx240m_summer_angled-vizio.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;">Vizio's been awfully busy since we last heard from them, updating three product lines with a total of 31 new HDTVs. The XVT series are more high-end, the M series is more about style, and the E is eco-friendly.</p>
<p>The XVT line will use some new Vizio tech to get the sharpest picture possible, including "Smooth Motion" and "Smart Dimming" technology as well as something called "TruLED." They'll range from 32-inch to 55-inch and will probably be the priciest in the family.</p>
<p>The M series, with a JAVA design, is modeled after wood picture frames and are a mere quarter-inch thick, clearly attempting to be Vizio's style line. And finally, the E series is Vizio's most energy-efficient line yet, as much as 20% below Energy Star standards. Full presser below. [<a href="http://www.vizio.com/">Vizio</a>]</p>
<blockquote>
<p>VIZIO America's #1 HDTV Company Delivers NEW High Performance TV Collection</p>
<p>- Number One shipper of Flat Panel HDTVs in USA unveils wide range of high-<br>
performance, high-value televisions<br>
- Flagship Extreme VIZIO Technology, XVT™ Series advances television's state of the<br>
art with NEW TruLED™ and 240Hz SPS™ (scenes per second), and Thin Line™ 120Hz<br>
models. (New XVT Models are in 55 - 32" screen sizes)<br>
- JAVA™ designer collection within the NEW "M" Series combines high style with Full HD<br>
1080P resolution and 120Hz with Smooth Motion™ LCD HDTVs (New M Series Models<br>
are in 47 - 32" screen sizes)<br>
- "E" Series provide energy efficient EcoHD™ (20% below Energy Star 3.0), essential<br>
performance and exceptional value in small to mid screen sizes (New E Series Models<br>
are in 42 – 19" sizes)</p>
<p>- All models are energy efficient, meeting and exceeding Energy Star 3.0 requirements<br>
Irvine, CA – June 8, 2009 &mdash; VIZIO, America's #1 HDTV and Consumer Electronics<br>
Company, has unveiled its 2009 TV product lineup, with 31 new models in three product<br>
groups. With a comprehensive range that includes cutting-edge Smart Dimming™<br>
backlight TruLED™ LCD technology, high-style/high performance products, and the best<br>
everyday value HDTVs, VIZIO's products are energy efficient, with each earning and<br>
exceeding Energy Star 3.0 qualification. Product releases are scheduled throughout the<br>
year, with numerous products now in-store and due to hit shelves soon.</p>
<p>"VIZIO's 2009 line of LCD HDTVs advances our mission to deliver the most advanced<br>
video and audio technologies to our customers with unequalled value and style," says<br>
Laynie Newsome, VIZIO Co-Founder and VP Sales and Marketing Communications.<br>
"Our customers have come to expect superior performance and design from VIZIO, and<br>
this new line has unprecedented value in every screen size."</p>
<p>Superior Performance Video & Audio<br>
This year's Extreme VIZIO Technology XVT™ series again advances VIZIO performance<br>
with a Full HD 1080p lineup featuring both 120Hz with Thin Line™ stylish designs and<br>
240Hz SPS models using Smooth Motion™ technology, with the most sophisticated<br>
models incorporating TruLED and Smart Dimming™ backlight technology. In all models,<br>
VIZIO has integrated USB video inputs that are enhanced and offer high quality 1080p<br>
video playback, along with Mega Dynamic Contrast Ratio™ of up to 2,000,000:1 makes<br>
for incredible black levels and almost three-dimensional imagery, they also include<br>
advanced user interface control with picture in picture and picture on picture<br>
functionality. VIZIO XVT models all include a universal learning backlit remote control.</p>
<p>All models have superior audio, thanks to SRS Labs Technology with TruSurround<br>
HD™, which enhances clarity and produces surround sound without external speakers,<br>
and TruVolume™, which eliminates annoying volume fluctuations when switching<br>
channels or when commercials come on and off.</p>
<p>Full HD in New Colors and Styles<br>
VIZIO's designer lines combine 1080p Full HD performance with distinctive looking<br>
designs such as the VL series brushed JAVA™ color treatment, and VT series TVs that<br>
resemble luxurious wood picture frames to bring a stylish touch to consumers' viewing<br>
environments. Select models feature a 120Hz refresh rate with Smooth Motion<br>
technology, as well as VIZIO's new USB Multi-Media Feature that can display MPEG-2,<br>
H.264 and WMV9 video, JPEG photos, and MP3 music from a thumb drive or FAT32<br>
hard drive. Many models have VIZIO's new "Pause Live TV" feature, which allows<br>
viewers to pause their programs without the need for a separate cable or satellite box.<br>
VIZIO's Mega Dynamic Contrast Ratio™ of up to 50,000:1 increases contrast ratio and<br>
picture quality, providing incredibly deep blacks. Each model also has multiple HDMI<br>
inputs and many include a side panel HDMI Game or Camera Input Port.</p>
<p>HDTV Value in Every Size<br>
With screen sizes ranging from 19" to 32", VIZIO's "E" series HDTVs provide incredible<br>
value in small to midsized packages with stylish white or black piano colored bezels.<br>
Many of these sets offer Full HD 1080p performance, and all utilize SRS Labs'<br>
TruSurround technology to provide superior audio. Some models feature VIZIO's<br>
EcoHD™ technology, which lowers energy consumption as much as 20% below Energy<br>
Star 3.0 standards.</p>
<p>About VIZIO<br>
VIZIO, Inc., "Where Vision Meets Value," headquartered in Irvine, California, is<br>
America's HDTV Company and Consumer Electronics Company. In 2007, VIZIO<br>
skyrocketed to the top by becoming the #1 selling brand of flat panel HDTVs in North<br>
America and became the first American brand in over a decade to lead major categories<br>
in U.S. TV sales. Since 2007 VIZIO HDTV shipments remain in the TOP ranks in the<br>
U.S. and are again #1 in Q1, 2009 with over 20% market share. VIZIO is committed to<br>
bringing feature-rich flat panel televisions to market at a value through practical<br>
innovation. VIZIO offers a broad range of award winning Plasma and LCD HDTVs<br>
including the new XVT series. VIZIO's products are found at Costco Wholesale, Sam's<br>
Club, Sears, Walmart, Target, BJ's Wholesale, and other retailers nationwide along with<br>
authorized online partners. VIZIO has won numerous awards including a #1 ranking in<br>
the Inc. 500 for Top Companies in Computers and Electronics, Good Housekeeping's<br>
Best Big-Screens, CNET's Top 10 Holiday Gifts and PC World's Best Buy among others.<br>
For more information, please call 888-VIZIOCE or visit on the web at www.VIZIO.com.</p>
<p>The V, VIZIO, XVT, TruLED, 240Hz SPS, Thin Line, Smooth Motion, JAVA, Where<br>
Vision Meets Value names, phrase and symbols are trademarks or registered<br>
trademarks of VIZIO, Inc. All other trademarks may be the property of their respective<br>
holders.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5282877/vizio-unveils-a-whopping-31-new-hdtvs]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5282877]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtvs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[e]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[e-series]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[java]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[led]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[m]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[m-series]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vizio]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xvt]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xvt-series]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 08 Jun 2009 08:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5282877&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Flexible OLED Screens Are Really Coming Now]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/FDC13_OLED_1.JPG"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_FDC13_OLED_1.JPG" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></a>Making a regular <a href="http://gizmodo.com/393734/giz-explains-oled-the-future-of-tv">OLED display</a> is, like, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/our-oled-odyssey/exclusive-the-secret-sauce-that-goes-into-an-oled-high-def-tv-328733.php">hard</a>. So you can imagine making <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5070275/flexible-oled-display-is-05mm-thick-flaps-around-in-the-wind">a flexible one</a> just totally sucks. Arizona State's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged FLEXIBLE DISPLAY" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/flexible-display/">Flexible Display</a> Center and Universal Display Corporation have a new way to make bendy OLED screens that might make mass production possible in just a few years.</p>

<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/FDC13_OLED_4.JPG"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_FDC13_OLED_4.JPG" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></a><br clear="all">
It's simpler than the crazy ion blaster technique Samsung used to produce their <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged FLEXIBLE OLED" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/flexible-oled/">flexible OLED</a> display, adapting the "traditional" process of manufacturing OLED displays (UDC <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/our-oled-odyssey/exclusive-the-secret-sauce-that-goes-into-an-oled-high-def-tv-328733.php">uses vacuum thermal evaporation</a>) in a more "benign" way so that it can be implemented directly on a soft piece of plastic, hence the potential for mass production. Essentially, the plastic substrate is glued to a piece of glass while they process it, and then it's carefully peeled off. What you end up with is an OLED implemented directly on plastic.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/FDC13_OLED_3.JPG"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_FDC13_OLED_3.JPG" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></a><br clear="all">
That said, while FDC believes "most of the key manufacturing roadblocks have been addressed and it's time to start thinking seriously about commercial production," commercial gadgets with flexible OLED displays are still a few years away. And we're talking like 4-6 inches, not even 8-10 for a bendy tablet thing. On the upside, they think they can get the price premiums down to "no more than 10 percent" above existing display prices within the first 5 years of commercial production. We'll see.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>FDC and Universal Display Corporation Make Breakthrough in Flexible Display Manufacturing Process; Advance Flexible OLEDs Closer to Mass Market</p>
<p>TEMPE, Ariz. – June 1, 2009 - The Flexible Display Center (FDC) at Arizona State University and Universal Display Corporation (NASDAQ: PANL), today introduced the first a-Si:H active matrix flexible organic light-emitting diode (OLED) display to be manufactured directly on DuPont Teijin's polyethylene naphthalate (PEN) substrate. Implementing Universal Display Corporation's phosphorescent organic light-emitting diode (PHOLED) technology and materials and the FDC's proprietary bond-debond manufacturing technology, the 4.1-inch monochrome quarter video graphics array (QVGA) display represents a significant milestone towards achieving a manufacturable solution for flexible OLEDs.</p>
<p>Flexible OLEDs are designed to target a number of military and commercial applications that require more rugged displays. With Universal Display's PHOLED technology and materials, the new display achieves the same brightness as traditional displays with extremely low power consumption. Additional advantages of the technology include lower operating temperature due to less heat being generated, easier to drive, longer battery life, and more stable transistors.</p>
<p>"Being a founding member of the Flexible Display Center, Universal Display is pleased to see the significant progress enabled by our cooperation," said Mike Hack, Vice President of Strategic Product Development at Universal Display. "Together, the FDC and Universal Display have demonstrated technology paths which will accelerate the introduction of exciting new flexible OLED displays on plastic substrates."</p>
<p>"This development of flexible AMOLED technology gives the industry a solid starting point towards manufacturing, mass production and commercialization of flexible OLEDs," said Shawn O'Rourke, director of engineering for the FDC. "The fact that we have achieved a functional flexible OLED manufactured directly on plastic using the Center's manufacturing process represents a significant achievement, and continued developments over the next few years will lead to full color, full motion video flexible displays."</p>
<p>The flexible backplane display was manufactured at the Flexible Display Center utilizing a 180°C thin film transistor process. The FDC's facility implements traditional flat panel and semiconductor tools and processes to achieve flexible displays, enabled by its proprietary bond-debond technology to secure the plastic substrate to a rigid carrier during manufacture.</p>
<p>The integration of Universal Display's PHOLED frontplane delivers a key enabling technology for the flexible OLED. The PHOLED materials allow the OLED to convert up to 100 percent of the electrical energy into light, as opposed to traditional fluorescent OLEDs which convert only 25 percent, providing up to four times more energy efficiency. Universal Display integrated the FDC backplane designed for its PHOLED frontplane to produce the display.<br>
The FDC and Universal Display will present a paper discussing the active matrix flexible OLED on Friday June 5th in session 65.4 at SID 2009. Additionally, the FDC will demonstrate this device and other flexible display technologies in booth # 523 at the show. Universal Display, located at booth #676 at the show, and DuPont Teijin are members of the Flexible Display Center.</p>
<p>About the Flexible Display Center at Arizona State University<br>
The FDC is a government – industry – academia partnership that's advancing full-color flexible display technology and fostering development of a manufacturing ecosystem to support the rapidly growing market for flexible electronic displays. FDC partners include many of the world's leading providers of advanced display technology, materials and process equipment. The FDC is unique among the U.S. Army's University centers, having been formed through a 10-year cooperative agreement with Arizona State University in 2004. This adaptable agreement has enabled the FDC to create and implement a proven collaborative partnership model with over 20 engaged industry members, and to successfully deploy world class wafer-scale R&D and GEN-II display-scale pilot production lines for rapid flexible display technology development and manufacturing supply chain commercialization. More information on the Flexible Display Center can be found at www.flexdisplay.asu.edu.</p>
<p>About Universal Display Corporation</p>
<p>Universal Display Corporation is a world leader in developing and commercializing innovative OLED technologies and materials for use in flat panel displays, solid-state lighting products, electronic communications and other opto-electronic devices. Universal Display is working with a network of world-class organizations, including Princeton University, the University of Southern California, the University of Michigan, and PPG Industries, Inc. Universal Display has also established numerous commercial relationships with companies such as Chi Mei EL Corporation, DuPont Displays, Inc., Konica Minolta Technology Center, Inc., LG Display Co., Ltd., Samsung SMD Co., Ltd., Seiko Epson Corporation, Sony Corporation, Tohoku Pioneer Corporation and Toyota Industries Corporation. Universal Display currently owns or has exclusive, co-exclusive or sole license rights with respect to more than 940 issued and pending patents worldwide.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/IMG_1710.JPG"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_IMG_1710.JPG" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></a></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5273364/flexible-oled-screens-are-really-coming-now]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5273364]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[oled]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[display]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[displays]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flexible display]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flexible oled]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tvs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[udc]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 01 Jun 2009 13:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5273364&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Samsung's 240Hz HDTV Is the Best LCD Around]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/05/504x_url-3.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;">HD Guru just scored the <a href="http://hdguru.com/samsung-un46b8000-240hz-lcd-led-tv-exclusive-first-review/429/">first review</a> with the $3,200 46-inch <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SAMSUNG UN46B8000" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/samsung-un46b8000/">Samsung UN46B8000</a>. It's an LED-backlit LCD that measures just over an inch thick and refreshes images at <em>240Hz</em>. HD Guru loved the display, calling it the best LCD ever.</p>

<blockquote>
<p>The full motion resolution and overall excellent performance places the UN46B8000 at the top of all the LCD HDTVs tested....this Samsung is the first HDTV to deliver the dream of a thin, light weight, bright, clear 46″ large screen HDTV that you can easily hang on the wall like a painting.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Interesting factoid: If you're watching 24fps content (like a movie), each frame plays 10 times on a 240Hz display. Read that tidbit and lots more in HD Guru's meticulously detailed review of the world's new bestest LCD. [<a href="http://hdguru.com/samsung-un46b8000-240hz-lcd-led-tv-exclusive-first-review/429/">HD Guru</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5271914/samsungs-240hz-hdtv-is-the-best-lcd-around]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5271914]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[home theater]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[plasma]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung UN46B8000]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[un46b8000]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 28 May 2009 11:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5271914&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Giz Explains: What's So Great About LED-Backlit LCDs]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/ledlighting.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/05/504x_ledlighting.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></a>LED-backlit LCDs are where TV's future and present meet&mdash;they're the best LCDs you've ever seen, but they're not as stunning as OLED displays, which <a href="http://gizmodo.com/393734/giz-explains-oled-the-future-of-tv">will one day dominate all</a>. They're <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/flat-panel-tvs/sony-bravia-kdl-46xbr8/4505-6482_7-33060616.html">not cheap</a>, but they're not <a href="http://gizmodo.com/393724/first-photos-of-sonys-03mm-thin-oled-screen-coming-in-27+inch-screen-soon-at-ridiculous-prices">ludicrous</a> either. Most importantly, they're <em>actually</em> here.</p>

<p><strong>I'll CC You in the FL</strong><br>
With LCDs, it's all about the backlighting. This defines contrast, brightness and other performance metrics. When you watch plasma TVs, OLED TVs or even old tube TVs, there's light emanating from each pixel like it was a teeny tiny bulb. Not so with LCD&mdash;when you watch traditional LCD TV, you're basically staring at one big lightbulb with a gel screen in front of it.</p>
<p>The typical old-school LCD backlighting tech is CCFL&mdash;a cold cathode fluorescent lamp&mdash;which is an array of the same kind of lights that make people's lives miserable in offices around the world. The reason they aren't the greatest as backlights for TV watching is that they light up the whole damn display. Because LCD is just a massive screen of tiny doors that open and close, light inevitably leaks through the closed doors, when they're trying to show black, resulting in more of a glowy charcoal. Check out this shot <a href="http://hometheatermag.com/gearworks/108gear2/">from Home Theater mag</a> to see what I mean:</p>
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5271493/giz-explains-whats-so-great-about-led+backlit-lcds">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a></p>
<p>LEDs (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LED">light emitting diodes</a>) are different from say, an old school incandescent bulb, which heats up a filament to generate light, in that they're electroluminescent&mdash;electricity passes <a href="http://lighting.sandia.gov/XlightingoverviewFAQ.htm#led">through a semiconductor</a> and the movement of the electrons just lights it up. Instead of having one lightbulb in the bottom of the screen, shining up through all of the LCD pixels, you can have arrays of LEDs that shine through smaller portions of the LCD screen, leaving other portions in the dark, so to speak.</p>
<p>OLED&mdash;"organic light emitting diode"&mdash;is slightly different. Since the electroluminescent component is organic and not a chip, each point of light can be <i>much</i> tinier. That's why an LED TV still needs the LCD screen in front: there's no way to have a single LED per pixel unless the screen is huge, and mounted to the side of a building in Times Square. OLEDs don't: HD OLED displays are made up of red, green and blue dots, no LCD panel required.</p>
<p><strong>LED Is As LED Does</strong><br>
So, Samsung's term "LED TV" is more accurately&mdash;and more commonly&mdash;described as an LED-backlit LCD. But not all LED displays are created equal.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/05/504x_edgelit.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;">There are two major kinds of LED backlighting: Edge-lit and local dimming. Edge-lit displays are what they sound like&mdash;the <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10208593-1.html?tag=contentMain;contentBody">LEDs are arranged</a> in strips running along all four edges of the TV, like you can see in this <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/2300-12982_7-10000628-2.html?tag=mncol;txt">gut shot from Cnet</a>. A light guide directs the glowyness toward the center of the screen. The advantage of edge-lit displays is that they can get incredibly thin, are 40 percent more power-efficient than regular LCDs and are a bit cheaper than local-dimming TVs. But because they're still shooting light indiscriminately across the LCD panel, they can't pull off the black levels that a local dimming backlight setup can.</p>
<p>LED backlighting of the local dimming variety is <a href="%3Ca%20href=">how you build</a> the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5013722/sony-hosts-xbr8-led-lcd-vs-plasma-shootout-youll-never-guess-who-wins">best LCD TV in the world</a>. It's called local dimming, as you probably guessed, because there are a bunch of LED bulbs&mdash;hundreds in the Sony XBR8&mdash;arranged in a grid behind the screen. They can all be dark or brightly lit, or they can turn off individually or in clusters, making for the actual <i>Dark Knight</i>, rather than the <i>Grayish Knight</i> you'd see on many cheaper CCFL LCDs. Sets with local dimming are pricier than edge-lit&mdash;the Samsung's local-dimming 46-incher started at $3,500, versus $2800 for one of their edge-lit models. They are thicker too.</p>
<p><b>What Color Is Your LED?</b><br>
The color of the LEDs matters too, separating the best LED-backlit LCDs from the the merely great. Most LED sets just use white bulbs. The reason Sony's XBR8 started out at $5,000&mdash;as much as Pioneer's king-of-TVs Kuro&mdash;is because it uses tri-color LEDs in an RGB array. In each cluster, there are two green bulbs next to one red and one blue (greens aren't as bright). The result is <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/flat-panel-tvs/sony-bravia-kdl-55xbr8/4505-6482_7-33060615.html?tag=contentMain;contentBody">high contrast plus super clean, incredibly accurate color</a>.</p>
<p>LED displays are getting cheaper, more quickly than originally expected, so we could see them go mainstream sooner. You already see the lower-end edge-lit LED tech used in mainstream stuff&mdash;MacBook Pro and Dell's Mini 9 to name a couple. Which is a good thing, since the prophesied ascendancy of OLED in 2009 <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5127668/what-the-hell-happened-to-oled-tv-in-2009/feed/">completely failed to happen</a>. So we'll have to make do with LED in the meantime. Just be sure to find out what <i>kind</i> when you're buying.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5271493/giz-explains-whats-so-great-about-led+backlit-lcds]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5271493]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[giz explains]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cinema display]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[led]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[led display]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[monitor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[oled]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 27 May 2009 15:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5271493&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
