<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: Advertising]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/advertising</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'advertising']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New Iron Man 2 Poster Reveals Villain Whiplash]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/ironmanposterwhiplashhires_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_ironmanposterwhiplashhires_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Mickey Rourke wants to kill <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #ironman" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ironman/">Iron Man</a> but is doing his part to save print journalism in this new teaser for <i><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #ironman2" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ironman2/">Iron Man 2</a></i>. Hold tight&mdash;every day that passes is a day closer to May 7. [<a href="http://io9.com/5423635/in-new-iron-man-poster-whiplashs-weapons-look-more-dangerous-for-him-than-us">io9</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5423694/new-iron-man-2-poster-reveals-villain-whiplash]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5423694]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iron man]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iron man 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ironman]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movie posters]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[whiplash]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:43:31 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kyle VanHemert]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5423694&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Brutally Honest Ads: A More Honest Luke Wilson Shills for AT&T]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=8036327&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=8036327&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/8036327_01.jpg"></a>The original <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #lukewilson" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/lukewilson/">Luke Wilson</a> AT&T ads always struck me as a bit sketchy, like they weren't really telling the whole truth. So I fixed that. Here's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5420022/headless-luke-wilson-continues-the-great-attverizon-ad-war-of-2009">the original for reference</a> if you're lucky enough to be unfamiliar.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5420765/brutally-honest-ads-a-more-honest-luke-wilson-shills-for-att]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5420765]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Brutally Honest Ads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[luke wilson]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[luke wilson ad]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 07 Dec 2009 15:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5420765&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Droid Commercial Paints iPhone as "Digitally Clueless Beauty Pageant Queen"]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/sLDxv9ohH2s&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/sLDxv9ohH2s&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object>Ohhh shit, y'all. This is getting dirty. Motorola/Verizon's newest Droid ad not only depicts the iPhone as a tiara-wearing, Sandra-Bullock-worshipping Barbie doll, it actually <em>shows a clearly identifiable iPhone</em>. It's both inflammatory and in your face. Right up in it!</p>
<p>I have a Droid, and like it a lot, but I'm a little concerned that these ads are alienating buyers by making the phone seem a lot more complex and threatening than it really is. To a first-time buyer, smartphones are a pretty intimidating purchase, and while I understand the impulse to differentiate the Droid from the cute-as-a-button, simple-as-can-be iPhone commercials, the Droid commercials may be going too far in the opposite direction with the whole DROID SMASH aesthetic. But that's just me, and, well, I bought one anyway&mdash;what do you guys think? [<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLDxv9ohH2s&feature=player_embedded">YouTube</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5418653/droid-commercial-paints-iphone-as-digitally-clueless-beauty-pageant-queen]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5418653]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[commercial]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[droid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[droid commercial]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 04 Dec 2009 01:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5418653&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Spectacular Stop Motion Book Ad Make eBooks Seem Downright Soulless]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/F_jyXJTlrH0&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/F_jyXJTlrH0&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object>This stop-motion ad by the New Zealand Book Council makes me glad I don't own a Kindle or a Nook, and it makes me want to go grab a book immediately. Preferably a gritty New Zealand western. [<a href="http://arbroath.blogspot.com/2009/11/animated-commercial-for-new-zealand.html">Arbora</a> via <a href="http://thedw.us/post/256374264/stop-motion-ad-campaign-of-the-day-breathtaking">TDW</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5412652/spectacular-stop-motion-book-ad-make-ebooks-seem-downright-soulless]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5412652]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[reading]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5412652&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Verizon Whines About Sprint's "Most Dependable" Claims]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/verizonmappy.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Apparently Verizon has gotten cocky after its <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5407902/judge-tells-att-to-stop-whining-as-the-verizon-ads-will-stay">court victory over AT&T</a> and decided it wants an encore. This time the wireless provider is playing the bully as it demands that Sprint cease claiming that it's "America's most dependable 3G network."</p>
<p>Sprint isn't giving in to the request and is proceeding to argue independent test results. I quite frankly don't care whether they give in, keep the claim, or change it to say that they're the best thing since sliced bread. I just want reliable service and calls that actually go through. [<a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/09/11/24/verizon.argues.sprints.best.network.claims/">Electronista</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5412286/verizon-whines-about-sprints-most-dependable-claims]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5412286]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[commercials]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sprint]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sprint vs verizon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:31:14 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5412286&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Google and TiVo Team Up To Ruin TV's Day]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/tivopad.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />With <em>data</em>, of course! Google, which sells TV ads, is now <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2009/11/google-teams-up-with-tivo-to-give-advertisers-a-clearer-picture.html">subscribing to TiVo's user data</a>, so they can make ads more "accountable," just like online. This is good, right? Depends on who you ask.</p>

<p>Google's game here is obvious: by analyzing this anonymized sea of TiVo viewer data, they can help customers target their ads more accurately. Ad buyers also win, because they have a better sense of exactly how many people are actually <em>seeing</em> their ads. Guess who <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2009/11/google-teams-up-with-tivo-to-give-advertisers-a-clearer-picture.html">doesn't like this plan</a>!:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Now, with TiVo's data, collected from millions of digital video recorders across the country, Google can tell exactly which of those commercials are being bypassed. If all the commercials are being skipped, the channel gets no money. It's easy to see why TV executives get heartburn over this.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Between my cable box's DVR function and my computer, I rarely watch live TV. And when I do, I usually end up flipping around during commercials. I know I'm not alone, and I know this is causing problems for networks, who are pushing more and more of their advertising into show, instead of between them.</p>
<p>Google, which already licenses similar data from Dish Network, is giving us a preview of how this kind of thing will work for everyone in the future&mdash;soon, data detailing what people are and aren't watching will be too present, too <em>obvious</em> to ignore, and networks will have to acknowledge that hey, <em>nobody is watching ads anymore.</em> In the long term this will make advertising more effective and efficient, but it could also kneecap TV ad sales as a whole. Or not! Says Google:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Our system makes it easy for people to buy TV ads. We're lowering the barriers to entry, which has the effect of growing the market.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Somehow I imagine "lowering the barriers for entry" isn't on the top of NBC's to-do list right now. Google will kill <em>all</em>. [<a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2009/11/google-teams-up-with-tivo-to-give-advertisers-a-clearer-picture.html">LAT</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5411953/google-and-tivo-team-up-to-ruin-tvs-day]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5411953]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google tivo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google tv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tivo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:54:19 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5411953&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Best Buy's Holiday Carolers Make Me Want to Murder]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/zBKOrZNrjLc&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/zBKOrZNrjLc&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object>It's not even Thanksgiving yet, but already <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #bestbuy" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/bestbuy/">Best Buy</a> seems to have won the "most annoying holiday ad of the season" award. Seriously, try to sit through one of these without squirming around uncomfortably and wanting to punch the screen.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5411132/best-buys-holiday-carolers-make-me-want-to-murder]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5411132]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[badvertising]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[best buy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[christmas]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5411132&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[PSA: Applebee's Gift Card Are Not Redeemable on iTunes]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_applebees.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />To whom it may concern: Applebee's gift cards, while appropriately monolithic, are not redeemable at Apple Stores or on iTunes. [<em>Thanks Nicholas!</em>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5409366/psa-applebees-gift-card-are-not-redeemable-on-itunes]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5409366]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[applebee's]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5409366&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[All Barcodes Should Be This Creative]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/barcodesnew.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_barcodesnew.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>There's no reason for barcodes to be so drab and utilitarian when the sky's the limit.</p>

<p>(Click image for big-i-fied version.)</p>
<p>For a few thousand dollars, Japanese design firm D-Barcode will make your business a custom barcode, incorporating these simple vertical lines into pretty much any type of scene you can imagine (the code serves as everything from noodles to trees to rain to strands of melty cheese in the work we've seen)...which makes us ask, why is our packaging so lame?</p>
<p>If you'd like to see more D-Barcode work, hit these links: [<a href="http://www.barcoderevolution.com/gallery/index.php?c=all">Bar Code Revolution</a> and <a href="http://www.thedieline.com/blog/2009/11/unique-japanese-barcodes.html">TheDieline</a> via <a href="http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/cliff-kuang/design-innovation/japan-even-barcodes-are-well-designed">FastCompany</a> via <a href="http://www.newlaunches.com/archives/japan_has_some_of_the_best_designed_barcodes_in_the_world.php">NewLaunches</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5405593/all-barcodes-should-be-this-creative]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5405593]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[barcodes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[d-barcode]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[packaging]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 16 Nov 2009 08:59:31 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5405593&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Velcro Bus Ads Are Bound to End In Disaster]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/velcroads.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_velcroads.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>I don't know what Coca-Cola was thinking when they used these ads to promote their Grip Bottle in bus stops. They are made with velcro, so if you lean or get anywhere near them wearing woolly cloths, you'd get stuck.</p>
<p>The ads were designed to highlight the better grip the new bottles offer. They placed them in bus stop shelters in Paris, ready to rip cashmere sweaters and expensive clothes. But instead of hating them, the French bought 3.8% more of their sugar water.</p>
<p>What I want to see is an image of one of these ads after a week of being there. I can imagine giant balls of dust with cats and drunk people inside. [<a href="http://www.directdaily.com/?p=5834">Daily</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5403505/velcro-bus-ads-are-bound-to-end-in-disaster]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5403505]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[coca-cola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Velcro Ads]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:20:07 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5403505&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Nokia N900 Isn't A Phone, It's A Psychotic Shapeshifter]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/WxiOKKF721U&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/WxiOKKF721U&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object>While we've been sitting, waiting, wishing for the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5389075/waiting-for-a-nokia-n900-keep-waiting">Nokia N900</a>, we missed something very important: It's not a phone. As this Nokia ad shows, it's actually a psychotic shapeshifter. At least I think that's the message they're trying to send.</p>
<p>If you don't feel like watching the whole ad, jump to about 1:50. It's where the truth is revealed. It's also the moment when I began to daydream about the days when ads actually showed the product for more than a few seconds. [<i>Thanks, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/people/GitEmSteveDave/">GitEmSteveDave</a>!</i>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5401888/the-nokia-n900-isnt-a-phone-its-a-psychotic-shapeshifter]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5401888]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nokia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ad]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[commercial]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[commercials]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nokia n900]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nokia n900 commercials]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[videos]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5401888&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Google Buys AdMob, Secures Strength in Mobile Advertising]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/mobileads.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_mobileads.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Today, Google purchased AdMob for $750 million. AdMob provides mobile advertisements in places Google doesn't, like in apps or while web-browsing, but what it really means is that Google is staking its claim in the mobile ad world.</p>
<p>AdMob is one of the most dominant players in the mobile advertising arena&mdash;you've probably seen their ads in iPhone apps and things like that, as a bar on the top or bottom of the screen. AdMob isn't restricted to one platform; they're on pretty much all of the major consumer mobile OSes, including both iPhone and Android. What does this mean for you? Nothing, yet, since it's going to take at least a few months for the deal to go through. But it means that Google will have a huge influence in mobile advertising, way beyond Android. [<a href="http://www.google.com/press/admob/">Google</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5401044/google-buys-admob-secures-strength-in-mobile-advertising]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5401044]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[admob]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google admob]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:30:40 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5401044&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Subway Ad Makes It Look Like the Tunnel Is About to Collapse]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/2012TheMovie.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_2012TheMovie.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>This freaky subway ad for upcoming disaster porn 2012 is currently up in Rio de Janeiro's subway systems. Get it, it looks like the tunnels have ruptured and are flooding and everybody is about to die! Ha...ha? [<a href="http://copyranter.blogspot.com/2009/11/this-2012-subway-takeover-would-maybe.html">Copyranter</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5398010/subway-ad-makes-it-look-like-the-tunnel-is-about-to-collapse]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5398010]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[bad ideas]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398010&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New Droid Commercial Turns to All-Out Sci-Fi]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/o9fXYQjwR0w&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/o9fXYQjwR0w&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object>The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5396168/motorola-droid-review">Motorola Droid</a>! It's a robot from space, shot to Earth from fighter jets, letting you check Facebook! Or something like that. Apparently, this ad that shows you nothing about the phone itself will start running next week. [<a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/11/03/another-verizon-droid-commercial-stealth-and-its-awesome/">BGR</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396966/new-droid-commercial-turns-to-all+out-sci+fi]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396966]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[droid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Motorola Droid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396966&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[DirecTV Uses a Few Other Dead Celebrity Spokesmen]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/mwgxFCq1gbw&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/mwgxFCq1gbw&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object>Man, if you thought it was tacky and gross when DirecTV used Chris Farley in their ads, you probably won't like the Heath Ledger, JFK or Jesus Christ spots. [<a href="http://landlinetv.com/videos/directv-hires-more-dead-celebrity-spokesmen">LandlineTV</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396093/directv-uses-a-few-other-dead-celebrity-spokesmen]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396093]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[batman]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[directv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:27:11 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396093&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Ad God Lee Clow: "I'm Not Going Anywhere"]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5393855/apple-ad-god-lee-clows-work--a-look-back">We discussed</a> how <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #leeclow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #leeclow" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/leeclow/">Lee Clow</a>, the man behind Apple's most popular advertisements, is stepping down from his position as chief creative officer of TBWA/Media Arts Lab. Turns out that Lee's not really  leaving, he's just getting annoyed at the blogosphere.</p>
<p>According to this note he supposedly wrote and sent to his staff, Lee's figuring out other people's positions, not his own:</p>
<blockquote><p>Hey Everyone:</p>
<p>So we tried to promote Duncan Milner because of the great job he's been doing leading the Media Arts Lab and look at how the blogosphere decided to make it a conversation about me.</p>
<p>As you all know, I'm here every day meddling in everything that goes on, pushing the creative on many brands including keeping an eye on Apple.</p>
<p>I remain Chairman of MAL, Global Creative Director of Media Arts and Chief Creative Officer of TBWA Worldwide.</p>
<p>I'm not going anywhere.</p>
<p>Love, Lee</p></blockquote>
<p>There you have it. We can stop fearing that <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #appleads" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #appleads" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/appleads/">Apple ads</a> will start sucking. [<a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/agencyspy/tbwachiat_day/lee_clows_not_going_anywhere_141843.asp#more">Media Bistro</a> via <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20091030/apple-ad-guru-im-not-going-anywhere/">All Things D</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5394060/apple-ad-god-lee-clow-im-not-going-anywhere]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5394060]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blockquote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[adverts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple ads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lee clow]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[TBWM/Media Arts Lab]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 31 Oct 2009 00:04:57 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5394060&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Ad God Lee Clow's Work &mdash; A Look Back]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_f_02.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #leeclow" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/leeclow/">Lee Clow</a> stepped down as the chief creative officer of TBWA/Media Arts Lab, <a href="http://adage.com/agencynews/article?article_id=140070">Ad Age reports</a>. Clow and TBWA/Media Arts were responsible for many of Apple's most popular advertisements.</p>

<p>So, while he's probably not a household name with the Apple faithful like Steve Jobs, or even Jonathan Ive, Clow left an indelible stamp on the company.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.businessinsider.com"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/thumb160x_40b73624ed47a836c6882a101c6c7e92.gif"></a>From its "1984" TV ad to the current Mac vs. PC ads, Clow has played a huge part in shaping the public perception of Apple.</p>
<p>Of all his big branding campaigns, it appears Clow thinks the most highly of the Apple store, saying, "The Apple Store was probably the best ad we ever did.... Everything a brand does is advertising," according to <a href="http://twitter.com/printmag/statuses/4942898464">Print Mag</a>. (via <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/30/lee-clow-apples-think-dif_n_339805.html">HuffPo</a>).</p>
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5393901/lee-clow-gallery">Here's a look at some of his work</a>.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5393901,12,'Lee Clow Gallery');
</script></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5393855/apple-ad-god-lee-clows-work--a-look-back]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5393855]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[1984]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[adverts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Apple Ad]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lee clow]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[TBWM/Media Arts Lab]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:18:05 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Business Insider]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5393855&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Watch these Real Flies Carrying Real Ad Banners]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ldC7FQiUJ6s&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ldC7FQiUJ6s&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object> Someone thought that the best way to promote their company was by attaching paper ad banners to real flies. I tried this at school, to pass notes to a pretty girl called Carla. It ended in pain.</p>
<p>My math teacher wasn't amused. And Carla was grossed out. A clear lose-lose-lose situation. German company Eichborn, however, thought it was the best way to promote themselves at the 2009 Frankfurt Book. Look Eichborn, it didn't work with me, it's not going to work with you. [<a href="http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2009-10/29/tiny-banner-ads-attached-to-flies-generate-buzz.aspx">Wired</a> via <a href="http://mashable.com/2009/10/29/banner-ads-on-flies/">Masahable</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5393104/watch-these-real-flies-carrying-real-ad-banners]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5393104]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[banner ads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[banners]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5393104&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[There Is Something Very, Very Wrong with This Ad]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/HundforumDogCare.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_HundforumDogCare.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Duh, this old school Mac is way too ancient to surf the web for porn! Stupid dog. [<a href="http://adsoftheworld.com/media/print/stockholms_hundforum_daytime_dog_care_wanking_dog">Ads of the World</a> via <a href="http://copyranter.blogspot.com/2009/10/boxer-chokes-chicken.html">Copyranter</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5391904/there-is-something-very-very-wrong-with-this-ad]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5391904]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dogs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macintosh]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[masturbating animals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[porn]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5391904&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Beezag Reaches Back 10 Years For Its Business Model Of Paying People to Watch Ads]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/beezag.png" class="left image340" width="340" />When I was in college, I spent a good month <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #watchingads" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/watchingads/">watching ads</a> on my computer in exchange for swag, gift cards and other rewards. Then those companies went out of business. Beezag is doing the same model a decade later.</p>
<p>Beezag's premise is to target 18-24 year olds&mdash;makes sense, since they're the poorest people with the most amount of free time to watch ads for cash&mdash;and give them prizes in return. The prizes?</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Beezag then rewards them with discounts and cash which can be paid into accounts like iTunes, PayPal™, their favorite charity or even their personal bank account.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Unfortunately, payout rates were absolute garbage back then, and I don't imagine they're any better now. The best thing I got out of it was a shirt for GarageBand.com.</p>
<p>It's fine if you want to revisit an old business model that takes advantage of kids with no money, but don't pretend that it's some revolutionary thing you came up with now. The only thing new that we see is the Beezag bracelet they're giving away with an ID on it, plus an iPhone app that you can watch ads with on the go. [<a href="http://www.beezag.com/">Beezag</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5385181/beezag-reaches-back-10-years-for-its-business-model-of-paying-people-to-watch-ads]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5385181]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[companies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ad watching]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[beezag]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[watching ads]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:29:57 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5385181&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sony Converts Iceland Town Into Massive Soundsystem]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/soRTHMEf0wY&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/soRTHMEf0wY&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object> Back in March 2009, Seydisfjordur, Iceland, was invaded by the weirdest and most zowielala plague there could be: Music. Sony installed a ton of speakers of all shapes and forms everywhere, some of which I've never seen.</p>
<p>Created by Juan Cabral, the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SONY SOUNDVILLE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/sony-soundville/">Sony Soundville</a> campaign played music from the likes of Death in Vegas, Bob Dylan, and the Guillemots for a week. Cool stuff, Sony, but where's the Abba, the Chic, and the rest of the disco love? [<a href="http://www.likecool.com/Sony_Soundville_Campaign&mdash;AD--Gear.html">Likecool</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5381369/sony-converts-iceland-town-into-massive-soundsystem]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5381369]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[audio]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[installation]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sony Soundville]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5381369&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Amazing Multi-function Absolute Outdoor Essentials]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/stick.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_stick.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>According to the packaging, this outdoor essential product can be used as a ladle, toothbrush, toothpick, pen, shovel, paddle, torch, fishing rod, firewood, weapon, back scratcher, and wrist splint. Totally free! And they got toilet paper that can whistle too!</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5377196,3,'Outdoor Essentials');
</script></p>
<p>This is one of those genius guerrilla advertising campaign that it's silly, absurd, and absolutely effective, increasing The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged NORTH FACE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/north-face/">North Face</a> products sales by 38 percent. Of course, these weren't the products&mdash;which apparently many people still wanted to buy. They are actually products used as advertising for their brand, placed in retail racks and shelves. [<a href="http://directdaily.blogspot.com/2009/10/north-face-outdoor-essentials.html">Direct Daily</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5377224/the-amazing-multi+function-absolute-outdoor-essentials]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5377224]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[north face]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[North Face Outdoor Essentials]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 08 Oct 2009 13:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5377224&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Unfortunate Corporate Slogans, Nokia Edition: TAG YOUR IT!]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/100_0814_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_100_0814_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>No, this slogan isn't a typo, and yes, the English-speaking Nokia reps were extremely embarrassed about it. The best part? The phrase is written <em>everywhere</em> at this booth, from t-shirts to rebranded cans of soup. More idiom-related wackiness post-jump.</p>
<p>The tagline is actually advertising Nokia's "Point and Find" service, which is a sort of user- or corporate-generated phototagging system combined with a barcode tagger. Take a picture of your shoes, or a painting, or whatever, add in a link to its Wikipedia page or shopping link, and then whenever anyone snaps a photo of that item, they'll see your links. But retail companies can also tag their own products, so the system can be used for any item in their stores, and if worse comes to worst, you can always just scan a 2D barcode.</p>
<p>The slogan idea is kind of a ripoff of those eBay ads from three years ago that used the tagline "Find Your It." Unfortunately, whoever decided on "<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #tagyourit" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/tagyourit/">TAG YOUR IT</a>" evidently did not go to elementary school in an English-speaking country.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5376636,4,'');
</script></p>
<p><strike>The service itself isn't nearly as useful as, say, a barcode scanner, and</strike> relying on users to supply those links (instead of just going all augmented reality with Google or Wikipedia) is sort of cheating in my book, but the service isn't really the point here. The point is that there's a box of macaroni and cheese that says TAG YOUR IT on it. [<a href="http://pointandfind.nokia.com/">Point and Find</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5376637/unfortunate-corporate-slogans-nokia-edition-tag-your-it]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5376637]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[oops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nokia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[slogans]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tag your it]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[taglines]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 07 Oct 2009 21:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5376637&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[44 PlayStation 3 Ads Too Offensive For Even Sony To Use]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/ps3adstop.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_ps3adstop.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Sony has a penchant for making questionable or offensive ads. But man, nothing they've done comes close to some of the stuff you guys came up with. You've been warned; no whining about being offended allowed.</p>
<p><b>First Place</b>&mdash;Brian Garten<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/BrianGarten_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_BrianGarten_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
<b>Second Place</b>&mdash;Jairo Filho<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/JairoFilho_01.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><br>
<b>Third Place</b><br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/JefferMitchell_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_JefferMitchell_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5375401,44,'Offensive PS3 Ads');
</script></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5375411/44-playstation-3-ads-too-offensive-for-even-sony-to-use]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5375411]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[photoshop contest]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[contests]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[photoshop]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[playstation]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[playstation 3]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 06 Oct 2009 14:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5375411&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Help Sony Create Even More Upsetting and Controversial Ads]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/wtfplaystation3.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_wtfplaystation3.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Sony <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5370197/new-sony-ad-play-playstation-3-save-a-nazis-life">loves to make unsettling ads</a> that appear designed to offend rather than sell video games. Fair enough, Sony! But I think we can beat them at their own game.</p>
<p>Create a twisted <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged PLAYSTATION 3" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/playstation-3/">PlayStation 3</a> ad for Sony, and send it to me at <a href="mailto:contests@gizmodo.com?subject=Sony%20Ad">contests@gizmodo.com</a> with <b>Sony Ad</b> in the subject line. Save your files as JPGs or GIFs, and use a FirstnameLastname.jpg naming convention using whatever name you want to be credited with. Send your work to me by next Tuesday morning, and I'll pick three top winners and show off the rest of the best in our Gallery of Champions. Get to it! [Original image from <a href="http://www.charliewhite.info">Charlie White's "Understanding Joshua" series</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5372116/help-sony-create-even-more-upsetting-and-controversial-ads]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5372116]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[photoshop contest]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[playstation]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[playstation 3]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 01 Oct 2009 12:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5372116&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New Sony Ad: Play PlayStation 3, Save a Nazi's Life]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/PS3-Rommel.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_PS3-Rommel.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Apparently, if you play the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged PLAYSTATION 3" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/playstation-3/">PlayStation 3</a>, you'll give a blood transfusion to a Nazi, or a heart transplant to Joan of Arc. What in holy hell do these mean, Sony? <b>Updated</b></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/PS3-Joan-of-Arc.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_PS3-Joan-of-Arc.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>We've seen a large number of creepy as hell Sony ads, and these seem to be just about at the same level as <a href="http://gizmodo.com/389972/the-most-horrifying-playstation-3-ad-ever-makes-me-loyal-to-the-xbox-360-for-life-nsfw">the dude with a thumb for a penis</a>. And gee whiz, the whole "creepy ad" strategy seems to be working, as Sony is absolutely <i>dominating</i> the gaming marketplace. Right? Keep on keeping on, Sony! [<a href="http://copyranter.blogspot.com/2009/09/erwin-rommel-joan-of-arc-resurrected-by.html">Copyranter</a>]</p>
<p><b>Update:</b> Sony sends along this note from the president of BBDO Chile, the ad house responsible for these things:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>This creative design did not involve and was never approved by Sony Computer Entertainment or Sony. This "mock campaign" was developed by BBDO Chile staff and was submitted to various creative competitions/festivals without prior notification or approval from SCE/Sony, and it is not representative of the views or advertising policies of SCE/Sony. BBDO Chile apologizes for using this creative concept without authorization or prior approval, and for its misrepresentation of the PlayStation brand and its values.</p>
<p>Cristián Lehuedé B.<br>
Presidente Ejecutivo<br>
BBDO Chile</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Oops! Sony can't be happy with BBDO over that one.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5370197/new-sony-ad-play-playstation-3-save-a-nazis-life]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5370197]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[badvertising]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[playstation 3]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5370197&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Microsoft's New Windows 7 Ads: Colorful!]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/46BrgXXXzW8&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/46BrgXXXzW8&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object>Microsoft let loose with a crop of new ads for <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged WINDOWS 7" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows-7/">Windows 7</a>, and they're actually not bad, aside from that weird line about "waiting for a spaceship" in the first one.</p>
<p>They focus on the new UI elements (Aero Shake, new Start Bar, themes), which is probably smart given that Windows 7's main competition, Snow Leopard, has barely any visible changes from its predecessor. I like the emphasis on Windows 7's bright shiny colors, too. Will the ads convince people to go out and buy the OS? Who knows; I'm not really sure there's a lot of mainstream enthusiasm or knowledge about upgrading an OS. But these ads probably won't hurt matters. Check out a couple more over at <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17852_3-10362247-71.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-20">CNET</a>. [<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17852_3-10362247-71.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-20">CNET</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5368536/microsofts-new-windows-7-ads-colorful]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5368536]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[advertisements]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7 ads]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 26 Sep 2009 17:15:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5368536&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[This Incredible Windows 7 Launch Party Video Is Either the Best or Worst Microsoft Ad This Year]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/win7party.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_win7party.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Holy Steve Ballmer. This set of Launch Party videos are incredible for its nostalgia sake. No, they're not old videos; I just thought the whole advertising industry moved past fake setups like this back in the '90s.</p>
<p>Give it a watch and see. My god. They're talking about having a party for <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged WINDOWS 7" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows-7/">Windows 7</a>. And the cast? It looks like a guy, his mom, his sister, and his sister's rebellious college fling that turned into a long term relationship.</p>
<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/1cX4t5-YpHQ&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/1cX4t5-YpHQ&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object>But seriously. You know how you're watching something that's so surprising that you can't believe what you're seeing that you literally have nothing to add to the visuals? This is it. It's like if you took a man from the 1400s and showed him a plasma TV.</p>
<p>If you want to kill another 3 hours at work today, there's a whole <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/LaunchParties">series of these</a> videos about Windows 7. [<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1cX4t5-YpHQ&feature=player_embedded">YouTube</a> - <i><a href="http://lifehacker.com/">Thanks Adam and Kevin!</a></i>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5366105/this-incredible-windows-7-launch-party-video-is-either-the-best-or-worst-microsoft-ad-this-year]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5366105]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7 launch party]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5366105&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[First Zune HD Commercial Underwhelms, Teases]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/3psd0AFAquU&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/3psd0AFAquU&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object>The first <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged ZUNE HD" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/zune-hd/">Zune HD</a> commercial came out today, and it's an extremely brief look (more like a list, really) at a few of the PMP's main features. I <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5360126/zune-hd-review-the-pmp-evolved?skyline=true&s=x">really like the Zune HD</a>, but this ad doesn't get me excited.</p>
<p>This is especially disappointing not just because the Zune HD is a great device that deserves a great commercial but also because Microsoft is definitely capable of pumping out interesting, memorable advertising. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWnRAmjYmAw">This older Zune ad</a> has great visuals, a killer soundtrack ("Lake Michigan" by Rogue Wave) and a high adorability factor. The new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged ZUNE HD AD" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/zune-hd-ad/">Zune HD ad</a> glosses over the killer design of the device and very prominently (and mysteriously) features "Games," accompanied by a racing game that definitely isn't actually available.</p>
<p>The ad is so short that I'm sure it's just a teaser, to be upstaged by a legit ad soon, but seriously, Microsoft: The Zune HD has a ton of personality. Show it off. [<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3psd0AFAquU">YouTube</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/zune-hd-commercial-hits-major-selling-points-forgets-to-include/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5361278/first-zune-hd-commercial-underwhelms-teases]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5361278]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ad]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pmps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[zune]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[zune hd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[zune hd ad]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5361278&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Bud Light's 'Grooler' Is Actually a Real Product]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/grooler.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_grooler.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>If you watched any football this weekend, you saw But Light's "Tailgate Approved" parody infomercials. But hey, maybe they weren't parodies; you can buy all that stuff, including the awesome-looking Grooler, online.</p>
<p>For $125 you get two coolers with a grill in the middle. Awesome, right? I mean, sure, you can toss a grill and two coolers in the back of your car for cheaper and with less lugging, but this is still a fun gimmick. Although if we're discussing practicality the real winner is the Foozie, which is a combo of a foam hand and a beer coozie. Only $10 for 2 of them! That's impulse purchase territory, folks. [<a href="http://www.tailgateapproved.com">Tailgate Approved</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5359818/bud-lights-grooler-is-actually-a-real-product]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5359818]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[grilling]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[beer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bud light]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cooler]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[grooler]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5359818&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Adventures in Ad Placement, Steve Jobs Edition]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/adplacement.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_adplacement.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Was placing this ad next to this picture of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged STEVE JOBS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/steve-jobs/">Steve Jobs</a> an intentional joke or an honest mistake? You decide. [<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/elithebearded/3909120059/">Flickr</a> via <a href="http://www.iphonesavior.com/2009/09/wall-street-journal-achieves-ad-placement-fail.html">iPhone Savior</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5357593/adventures-in-ad-placement-steve-jobs-edition]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5357593]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[steve jobs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wall street journal]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 11 Sep 2009 20:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5357593&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[How Motorola's Clumsy Keynote Hurt the Cliq]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/motomobilize26.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_motomobilize26.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Everyone's been waiting for <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5356696/motorola-cliq-quick-hands-on-impressions?skyline=true&s=x">the Cliq</a>, Motorola's desperate-but-anticipated dive into Androidery, and we were <em>ready</em> to be excited about it. Problem is, you wouldn't have known from the launch, which was somewhat mishandled.</p>
<p>As far as fumbles go, confusing people about your new product's name ranks pretty high, and that's exactly what they did&mdash;<a href="http://live.gizmodo.com">we were there</a>, and at first we thought the phone was called the Blur, then the Click, <em>then</em> the Cliq, as did pretty much the entire internet. Exhibit A, above.</p>
<p>Lance Ulanoff at PCMag took particular offense to the whole show, and went so far as to pen a <a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2352751,00.asp">takedown piece</a> on the entire event:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The keynote did convey Motorola's sense of urgency. In fact, the whole event felt rushed. Motorola never stopped long enough to give us a good look at the CLIQ. It was like the Cliffs Notes version of a product launch. Major product points were glossed over or never explained. I don't think anyone specifically said that the big touch screen phone was hiding a QWERTY keyboard. Instead, you just kind of noticed it as the presentation went along.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Implied QWERTY! This is one of the most brutal hatchet jobs I've ever seen inflicted on a non-human, but it's probably deserved. Which is a shame, because the Cliq turned out to be a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5356943/motorola-cliq-gallery-and-impressions?skyline=true&s=x">pretty swell little phone</a>, actually! [<a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2352751,00.asp">PCMag</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5357395/how-motorolas-clumsy-keynote-hurt-the-cliq]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5357395]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bad things]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cliq]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola cliq]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pr]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 11 Sep 2009 11:54:02 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5357395&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Cutest PC Spokestoddler Returns In New Windows 7 Spot]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><br clear="all">
<object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ssOq02DTTMU&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ssOq02DTTMU&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object> <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5149071/latest-im-a-pc-ad-entices-new-windows-users-with-cuteness">Kylie</a>'s back, and apparently she's learning to read by skimming positive reviews of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged WINDOWS 7" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows-7/">Windows 7</a>&mdash;including our own. She makes a slideshow (app not included in Windows 7), and gives us a piglet with bunny ears. Thanks, Kylie!</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5356883/cutest-pc-spokestoddler-returns-in-new-windows-7-spot]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5356883]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ad]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[commercial]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[I'm a PC]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[kylie]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5356883&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Speed Limit Sign Displays Days In Hospital Based On Your Car Speed]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/hospital_0.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_hospital_0.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>These 25mph <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SPEED LIMIT" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/speed-limit/">speed limit</a> signs are equipped with a speed radar and a number display. Nothing strange about that, really. Until you notice that the billboard displays horrible figures&mdash;like days in hospital or crash bills&mdash;based on your speed.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/accidentbills.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_accidentbills.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>I don't know how it calculates the numbers. Maybe it's just a speed display, maybe it uses some logic to come up with the accident bills costs or the chance of a crash. I do know, however, that people respond to fear more than to fines. 46 days in the hospital won't be fun at all, so grab your steering wheel with <i>both hands</i>, and please drive safely. [<a href="http://directdaily.blogspot.com/2009/09/elm-grove-police-department-slower-is.html">Direct Daily</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5352242/speed-limit-sign-displays-days-in-hospital-based-on-your-car-speed]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5352242]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[displays]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cars]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[speed limit]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5352242&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[No Wonder Darth Vader Has Such a Bad Attitude]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/McDsDarth.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_McDsDarth.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>It's not that his soul has been overtaken with darkness, it's that he's just really gassy! Those movies make so much more sense now. [<a href="http://copyranter.blogspot.com/2009/09/his-subsequent-bowel-movement-will-be.html">Copyranter</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5352155/no-wonder-darth-vader-has-such-a-bad-attitude]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5352155]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[darth vader]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mcdonalds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star wars]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 Sep 2009 18:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5352155&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Windows 7 House Party: Everybody Gather Around the Computer]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/Screen_shot_2009-09-02_at_5.22.28_PM.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_Screen_shot_2009-09-02_at_5.22.28_PM.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Microsoft teamed up with <a href="http://houseparty.com/">HouseParty</a> for one of the most headscratching promotions we've seen: They want you to throw a party for the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged WINDOWS 7" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows-7/">Windows 7</a> launch. We love Windows 7 and all, but Microsoft might be overestimating its party potential.</p>
<p>The idea is to get people together in the week following Windows 7's launch to throw a party in which you "Pick a theme, then upload photos and videos, chat with other hosts, blog your experience, and download fun favors all from your personal <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged HOUSE PARTY" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/house-party/">House Party</a> page." Lucky party-throwers selected by House Party will receive a "signature" version of Windows 7 Ultimate as well as a Windows 7 Party Pack, because those people really love to party. Get it?</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/thumb160x_Screen_shot_2009-09-02_at_5.23.30_PM.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /></p>
<p>It's a ridiculous advertising ploy, of course&mdash;you apply to be a party thrower in exchange for compensation from the companies in the form of free samples. But when we see what other House Party brand house parties are offered, a Windows 7 party sounds sort of appealing. I'd rather sit around and watch someone slowly install an OS than go to a <a href="http://houseparty.com/splash/metabolife">Metabolife</a> weight-loss party where there's guaranteed to be no good snacks. [<a href="http://houseparty.com/windows7">House Party</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5351384/windows-7-house-party-everybody-gather-around-the-computer]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5351384]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[house party]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7 house party]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 02 Sep 2009 21:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5351384&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Wait, Did This Bell Palm Pre Video Just Diss Americans?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged BELL CANADA" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/bell-canada/">Bell Canada</a>'s latest Pre promo video is intended to illustrate the phone's ease of use in a tongue-in-cheek way. But its opening line certainly caught our attention: "Unlike our neighbors to the south, Canadians are an active people…"</p>
<p>It's a lighthearted dig for those with a sense of humor. But comes after Bell seemingly <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5342316/look-familiar-bell-canadas-palm-pre-ad-mimics-the-iphone">ripped off Apple's iPhone ads</a> last week. So friendly neighbors to the north, what gives, eh? [Thanks Denis!]</p>
<p><object width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ihTz5Q9Nx8s&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ihTz5Q9Nx8s&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo"></object></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5349170/wait-did-this-bell-palm-pre-video-just-diss-americans]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5349170]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bell canada]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bell palm pre americans]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canada]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone 3g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone 3gs]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 31 Aug 2009 04:06:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5349170&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Robert Loggia Is the PC's New Personal Trainer]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/VN3x3yoQN_8&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/VN3x3yoQN_8&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo"></object>After Puddy's ho-hum appearance earlier this month, the revolving celebrity door that is the Apple <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged I'M A MAC" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/i.m-a-mac/">I'm a Mac</a> ads now feature the gruff and tough Robert Loggia as the PC's personal trainer.</p>

<p>Now, I'm a Mac user (surprise!), but I think I'm starting to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5344749/patrick-warburton-wastes-considerable-talents-in-new-im-a-mac-ad">agree with Dan</a> on these commercials. They're getting a bit long in the tooth and a bit forced, no? [<a href="http://www.apple.com/getamac/ads/">Apple</a> via <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/08/29/robert-loggia-hired-to-whip-pc-into-shape-in-latest-apple-commercial/">CrunchGear</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5348820/robert-loggia-is-the-pcs-new-personal-trainer]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5348820]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[i'm a mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[videos]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 30 Aug 2009 14:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Loftus]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5348820&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Are Asus and Moko Teaming Up to Sell Underwear?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/asus05_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_asus05_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Is this weird marketing campaign between Moko and Asus encouraging me to buy an EeePC or Calvin Klein undies? Or am I supposed to donate some shirts to these girls so they don't have to wear those tiny things?</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5348151,9,'');
</script></p>
<p>Seriously. What are they selling here? [<a href="http://www.moko.cc/post/50937.html">moko</a> via <a href="http://www.netbookreviews.net/asus/eee-pc-moko-models/">NetbookReviews</a> - <i>Thanks, Matt!</i>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5348164/are-asus-and-moko-teaming-up-to-sell-underwear]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5348164]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[asus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[asus eee pc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[boobs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[eee pc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[half-naked]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[models]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[moko]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[netbooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nsfw]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 28 Aug 2009 20:20:10 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5348164&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New PS3 Ads Tease Internet Rumors, Lazy Boyfriends]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/PS3-2.jpg" width="160" height="120" />Amazingly enough, Sony's new U.S PlayStation 3 ads actually make sense, and have a sense of humor. The first spot is a tongue-in-cheek look at pricing rumors (hey!), while the second spruiks the joys of the Interwebs.</p>
<p>Maybe this might finally shake my nightmares of that freaky <a href="http://gizmodo.com/210784/the-weirdest-ps3-commercial-yet">Sony devil baby</a>.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" width="500" height="303" id="viddler"><param name="movie" value="http://www.viddler.com/simple_on_site/f147d319" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><embed src="http://www.viddler.com/simple_on_site/f147d319" width="500" height="303" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowScriptAccess="always" allowFullScreen="true" name="viddler" ></embed></object></p>
<p>Sony's corp-speak for its campaign is "<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged IT DOES EVERYTHING" title="Click here to read more posts tagged IT DOES EVERYTHING" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/it-does-everything/">It Does Everything</a>". Yeah, it's got Blu-ray and Wi-Fi&mdash;but as Adam noted yesterday&mdash;it all depends on your setup. And anyway, the games are what's important. See: <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5346969/ps3-slim-vs-xbox-360-elite-hardware-pretty-cut-and-dry">PS3 Slim Vs. Xbox 360 Elite Hardware: Pretty Cut and Dry</a>. [<a href="http://blog.us.playstation.com/2009/08/27/it-only-does-everything/">Sony</a>]</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" width="500" height="303" id="viddler"><param name="movie" value="http://www.viddler.com/simple_on_site/cb99617f" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><embed src="http://www.viddler.com/simple_on_site/cb99617f" width="500" height="303" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowScriptAccess="always" allowFullScreen="true" name="viddler" ></embed></object></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5347722/new-ps3-ads-tease-internet-rumors-lazy-boyfriends]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5347722]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[commercials]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[internet rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[it does everything]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[playstation]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ps3]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[PS3 Slim Ad]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 28 Aug 2009 09:50:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5347722&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
