<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: Aircraft]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/aircraft</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'aircraft']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[This Is What a Helicopter Firing High-Speed Rockets Looks Like]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/helicopterrockets.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_helicopterrockets.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Here's something you don't see every day: a Mi-24 helicopter firing off dozens of rockets at once. This one is Macedonian, and is from a "training exercise." All bow before the might of the Macedonian army! [<a href="http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/08/in_flight.html">Big Picture</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5344427/this-is-what-a-helicopter-firing-high+speed-rockets-looks-like]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5344427]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[image cache]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aviation]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[helicopter]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rockets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[weapons]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5344427&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Need To Fly A Military Drone? Yep, There's An iPhone App For That]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/RavenUAV.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/504x_RavenUAV.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></a><br>
MIT Professor Missy Cummings (a former F-18 Hornet Navy Pilot), and her team of 30 students and undergrads, have successfully demonstrated how an iPhone could be used to control an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle, or UAV.</p>
<p>As part of their work at MIT's <a href="http://web.mit.edu/aeroastro/labs/halab/index.shtml">Humans and Automation Lab</a> (HAL, heh), the team thought about ways to improve on the suitcase-sized controller that soldiers must currently lug around to control hand-thrown Raven UAVs.</p>
<p>The iPhone app they developed sends GPS coordinates to the craft, which then in turn can send photos and video back to the iPhone.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>We had the idea in June," Cummings told Danger Room. "In six weeks, we went from the idea to a real flight test," using MIT's indoor robot range. (See video.) The total cost? $5,000 for a new, commercially available, quad-rotor robot - plus the cost of iPhones for her crew.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>[<a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/08/new-use-for-your-iphone-controlling-drones/">Wired Danger Room</a>] <a href="http://www.defenselink.mil/photos/newsphoto.aspx?newsphotoid=6781">DoD photo</a> by Tech. Sergeant Russell E. Cooley IV, U.S. Air Force.</p>
<p><object width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/YlbEbQ6TJMc&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/YlbEbQ6TJMc&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo"></object></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5333641/need-to-fly-a-military-drone-yep-theres-an-iphone-app-for-that]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5333641]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[uavs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[app]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[drone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone drone control]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mit]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[robots]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Spy Drones]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 10 Aug 2009 00:40:30 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5333641&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[World's Largest RC Chopper Is Probably Big Enough for a Very Short Pilot]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5310466/worlds-largest-rc-chopper-is-probably-big-enough-for-a-very-short-pilot">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a>This <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged RC HELICOPTER" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/rc-helicopter/">RC helicopter</a> is a scale model of a Russian Mi-24 chopper, a monstrous beast that's 55 feet long. The scale version looks about 1/8th the size, and still scares the crap out of us. Check out the video below.</p>
<p>We don't really know anything about the giant "toy" helicopter, except the model it's based on, but the video below shows that it really works, and that we really don't want it falling into the hands of any kids. [<a href="http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=85a_1246854193">LiveLeak</a> via <a href="http://craziestgadgets.com/2009/07/08/worlds-largest-rc-helicopter/">Craziest Gadgets</a>]</p>
<p><object width="450" height="370"><param name="movie" value="http://www.liveleak.com/e/85a_1246854193">
<param name="wmode" value="transparent">
<embed src="http://www.liveleak.com/e/85a_1246854193" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="450" height="370"></object></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5310466/worlds-largest-rc-chopper-is-probably-big-enough-for-a-very-short-pilot]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5310466]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chopper]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[helicopter]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rc chopper]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rc helicopter]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[remote controlled]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[scale models]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[toys]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[world's largest rc helicopter]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 08 Jul 2009 19:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5310466&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Man Builds 747 Flight Simulator in His Warehouse, Earns Guinness Record]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/03/flight-sim-1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/flight-sim-1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a>Flight enthusiast Matthew Sheil has built a 747-400 <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged FLIGHT SIMULATOR" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/flight-simulator/">flight simulator</a> in his Sydney warehouse that can stand up to any $40 million training version&mdash;and he did it for under $200,000.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('homebrewflightsim', 3, '');
</script></p>
<blockquote>
<p>Thanks to 45 different software programs running on 14 different computers, the simulator allows Sheil to fly to and from 27,000 different airports around the world with breathtaking realism.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Sheil is part of a growing network of enthusiasts from around the globe that serve as pilots and air traffic controllers in a virtual word. This network is amazingly complex:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>In Sheil's simulator, computer screens replace the windows and if he is flying in the virtual world behind a person in Melbourne, and they are using a Qantas 767, "we actually see a Qantas 767 out the window - the software puts it in there for us - and he sees us".</p>
<p>Moreover, if Sheil flies through Russia, he is greeted by a volunteer Russian air traffic controller. Cars can be seen on the road when he comes in to land and people wave at him from the terminals.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>What's even more amazing is that he managed to build the simulator for around $300,000 AUD (around $197,000 US) whereas professional training simulators can cost upwards of $40 million. This was made possible largely through donated parts given to Sheil because of his charity work. In return, all of the money he earns renting out the simulator is donated to the Royal Flying Doctor Service (RFDS). Still, this remarkable feat earned him the Guinness record for the "world's most expensive home flight simulator" (because Guinness will give out records for anything nowadays). As far as the cheapest is concerned, it would be hard to beat the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/bedroom-747/man-builds-30000-jumbo-jet-simulator-in-his-bedroom-312735.php">$30,000 bedroom 747 simulator</a> in terms of value. [<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2009/03/13/1236447451617.html?page=fullpage">SMH</a> via <a href="http://www.fark.com/cgi/comments.pl?IDLink=4265143">Fark</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5169495/man-builds-747-flight-simulator-in-his-warehouse-earns-guinness-record]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5169495]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[diy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[747]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flight simulator]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[homebrew flight simulator]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[simulator]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5169495&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Photos of Plane Being Lifted From the Hudson Are Staggering]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/01/hudson_plane_retrieval_0000.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/hudson_plane_retrieval_0000.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>We've seen plenty of photos of <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5132435/us-airways-waterlanding-close-up-image-of-inflatable-rafts">the plane that landed in the Hudson</a>, but none quite like these, which were taken by the crane operator who lifted the downed craft from the chilly waters.</p>

<p><iframe src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http://digg.com/odd_stuff/Photos_of_Plane_Being_Lifted_from_the_Hudson_are_Staggering" align="right" frameborder="0" height="82" scrolling="no" width="55"></iframe><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('hudsonplaneretrievalwatermark', 21, 'Plane Crane');
</script>Thanks to Travis Cole for the photos and to the crane operator for taking them!</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5139339/photos-of-plane-being-lifted-from-the-hudson-are-staggering]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5139339]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[airplanes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[disasters]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Flight 1549]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gallery]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hudson crash]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:09:01 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5139339&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Insane Unmanned 'Mule' Drone Can Fly at 289MPH]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/01/340x_mule.gif" class="left image340" width="340" />This Mule unmanned aerial vehicle is huge, fast and crazy. It's just going through its first wind tunnel testing, but it might someday be hauling injured troops back to base with no pilot involved.</p>

<p>This is one serious UAV, one that puts most others to shame. Just look at these specs:<br></p>
<blockquote>With a payload of 318kg (700lb) per single 31km (57nm) radius sortie, each Mule will be capable of delivering about 3,180kg over 24h, including the ferrying on return trips of casualties where medevac flights are needed. Mule's maximum operating altitude is 12,000ft (3,660m).</blockquote>
<p>[<a href="http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2009/01/07/320698/urban-conducts-high-speed-mule-windtunnel-test.html">FlightGlobal</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5125839/insane-unmanned-mule-drone-can-fly-at-289mph]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5125839]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[drones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[uav]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vehicles]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:20:04 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5125839&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Britain Building Next-Generation Aircraft Carriers for F-35 Fighters]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/12/article-1100714-02D5F12D000005DC-289_634x430_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/article-1100714-02D5F12D000005DC-289_634x430_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>Britain is not only getting a whole lotta lot of <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5062451/awesome-f%2035b-video-shows-us-marines-already-have-transformers">F-35B STOVL fighters</a>, but two new 60,000-ton state-of-the-art aircraft carriers. Apparently, according to Dr Lee Willett, it's all part of a new World arms race:</p>

<blockquote>
<p>All the major navies in the world are now building them. The Russians have one of their big carriers, the Admiral Kuznetsov, back at sea and have stated that they plan to build 12 carrier battle groups. The Chinese and the Indians are also under way with plans, the Japanese are building a destroyer that will act as a helicopter carrier and the US are working on new-generation carriers. We’re an island nation and we have global interests so we need these four acres of moveable sovereign airfield that we can deploy wherever we want, whenever we need them.</p>
<p>The world is an unstable place and, post-Iraq and the global war on terror, access to other nation’s territory or airspace is more difficult.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Great. When have I heard this before? Maybe knowing that Dr Willett is head of the Maritime Studies Programme at the Royal United Services Institute, helps in understanding that maybe he has an special interest in this two mobile naval airbases.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/article-1100714-02E1CE0F000005DC-536_634x286_popup.jpg" width="964" height="307" style="display:block;float:none;"></p>
<p>The carriers—which will cost $5.9 billion, a lot less than the $14 billion that the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5068686/death-and-taxes-shows-fascinating-terrible-view-on-military-tech-spending">US spends on their super-carriers</a>—will host 36 F-35s and two EH-101 Merlin multi-purpose helicopters each.</p>
<p>Constructed in modules all across Britain, which will be later assembled in a very complicated process in a central shipyard—will be almost fully automated, requiring only a 1,500 crew. Here is the fact sheet:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>• The surface of the16,000sqm flight deck is covered in a grainy,heat-resistant paint,similar to very coarse sandpaper. The entire painted surface amounts to 370 acres - slightly bigger than Hyde Park.<br></p>
<p>• Two huge lifts, each with a 70-ton capacity, are capable of transporting two aircraft from the hangar to the flight deck in 60 seconds.<br></p>
<p>• The ground-breaking twin-island layout allows more deck space for aircraft and better visibility of the flight deck. The forward island is for navigating the ship; flight control is based in the aft island.<br></p>
<p>• The ship's 29,000 sq m hangar is 150 metres in length and has 20 slots for aircraft maintenance.<br></p>
<p>• There are 11 full-time medical staff on board managing an eight-bed medical suite, operating theatre and dental surgery.<br></p>
<p>• Onboard water treatment plant produces over 500 tons of fresh water daily.<br></p>
<p>• Two Rolls-Royce MT30 gas turbines and four diesel generator sets produce 109MW.<br></p>
<p>• Cabins are spacious and cruise-liner style, with en-suite toilets and shower facilities. Officers and senior ratings have single or two-berth cabins. The maximum number of crew in a cabin is six.<br></p>
<p>• The carrier will carry more than 8,600 tons of fuel, enough for the average family car to travel to the Moon and back 12 times. This gives a range of up to 10,000 nautical miles.<br></p>
<p>• Top speed will be in excess of 25 knots, sufficient to cross from Dover to Calais in an hour.<br></p>
<p>• The two five-blade propellers are each 30ft in diameter - that's one-and-a-half times the height of a double-decker bus.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Head to the Daily Mail for more details. [<a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-1100714/The-4billion-Airfix-Kit-Behind-scenes-Britains-biggest-warships.html?ITO=1490">Daily Mail</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5119343/britain-building-next+generation-aircraft-carriers-for-f+35-fighters]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5119343]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft carrier]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[f-35]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[f35]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[HMS Prince Of Wales]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[HMS Queen Elizabeth]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 28 Dec 2008 18:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5119343&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[12 Jet Engine Test Videos Will Have You Yelling "More Power!"]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/10/340x_jetengines.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Good ol' Frank Whittle: he dreamed up a device that can both deafen and thrill you at the same time. And you don't even have to be an aircraft fanatic to enjoy these jet engine test videos put together by OObject...the engineering, the noise and general "but what if it blows up?" bonkersness of running a chained-down jet engine to maximum power while it's inside a test shed will get you. Best watched from the comfort of your net surfin' armchair. Wait... what am I saying? That's clearly not true, but if you're unable to get close to a jet test site, you'll just have to make do. [<a href="http://www.oobject.com/category/jet-engine-test-videos/">OObject</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5066483/12-jet-engine-test-videos-will-have-you-yelling-more-power]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5066483]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[jet engines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[engineering]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[engines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[oobject]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[roar]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kit Eaton]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5066483&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Declassified UFO Files Reveal Military Engagement, Near-Collision]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/10/pewpewpewsabre.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/pewpewpewsabre.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The UK <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #ministryofdefense" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ministryofdefense/">Ministry of Defense</a> has just declassified nineteen secret files detailing UFO encounters over the past decades, one of them involving a USAF Sabre fighter pilot who was ordered to fire at will against an unidentified flying object in British airspace. Unfortunately—or fortunately—lieutenant Milton Torres lost the contact after the UFO left the scene at a whooping <i>9,941 miles per hour</i>. According to him, it had the proportions of an <i>aircraft carrier</i>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The blip was burning a hole in the radar with its incredible intensity. It was similar to a blip I had received from B52s and seemed to be a magnet of light. It had the proportions of a flying aircraft carrier.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>According to the Ministry of Defense, it all happened over Norwich in 1957. The 26-year-old Torres was called along with his wingman, taking off the Royal Air Force base in Kent. But something strange was happening: He was ordered to shoot the UFO down <i>before</i> they scrambled off to intercept it, something that had never occurred before.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>I shall never forget it, and for the last 50 years I have been waiting for an explanation, but I've never had one. On that night I was ordered to open fire even before I had taken off. That had never happened before. I was ready to hit the target with all 24 rockets: it would have been like buckshot out of a shotgun. I asked for authentication of the order to fire and I received it.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>To make things even stranger, the now 77-year-old Torres has declared now that he received a visit the next day from an American. The man, wearing a trench coat, waved his badge and claimed to be working for the National Security Agency. He said to him that what happened the day before was to be kept under complete secret. Or else.</p>
<p>UFO experts say that, while all this could be explained by the existence of Project Palladium—the experiments that the CIA was conducting during those years to create false radar readings in the Soviet Union—this won't explain why the pilots were ordered to fire all the rockets loaded in their planes. Or why the blip appeared over British air space in the first place.</p>
<p>There's another interesting case in the newly-declassified files: An account of a near-fatal accident at 22,000 feet, 17 years ago. In this file, Alitalia Flight AZ 284 almost had a direct collision with an UFO while approaching London's Heathrow airport. Fortunately, nothing happened because the object vanished just before the impact. [<a href="http://news.theage.com.au/world/us-pilot-told-to-shoot-down-ufo-20081020-54l8.html">The Age</a> and <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7679145.stm">BBC</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5065747/declassified-ufo-files-reveal-military-engagement-near+collision]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5065747]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Military secrets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ministry of defense]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[secrets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ufo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 20 Oct 2008 01:43:30 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5065747&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[First Production VH71, Future Presidential Helicopter, Takes to the Air in England]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/09/340x_PP1_1stFlt_stbd1.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />That plain old yellowish-green helicopter is the really the first production version of the VH71... the future Presidential <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #marineone" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/marineone/">Marine One</a>. It's been a year since the prototype <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/notag/next+gen-presidential-helicopter-now-flying-george-w-wont-get-one-275623.php">took flight</a>, but apparently PP-1 (the first of five in phase one) performed "exceptionally during its 40-minute flight."</p>

<p>That was yesterday at the AugustaWestland facility in Yeovil, UK. It'll be shipped stateside by a C17 to U.S. Naval Air Station Patuxent River sometime in October for more outfitting and testing. Phase two production is due to total 23 more choppers with "increased range and upgraded navigation and communications systems." Who knew the Pres needed 28 helicopters? [<a href="http://www.lockheedmartin.com/news/press_releases/2008/0922si-vh-71.html">LockheedMartin</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5053489/first-production-vh71-future-presidential-helicopter-takes-to-the-air-in-england]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5053489]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[marine one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[first production model]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flight]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[helicopters]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[presidential helicopter VH71]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 23 Sep 2008 07:15:33 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kit Eaton]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5053489&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Eclipse 400 Personal Airplane Is True Sports Skycar]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("/eclipse400_gizmodo.flv", 640, 384,"");
</script><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/09/eclipse400_gizmodo.flv.jpg"></a>The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #eclipse400" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/eclipse400/">Eclipse 400</a> looks is one of those airplanes that you can only imagine in movies or comicbooks. But this is not the Avenger's Quinjet, it is <i>very</i> real, as the video shows. Right now it's being perfected and will be delivered to Tony Starks wannabes in just three years. Its four-seat interior looks more like an expensive sports car than a plane, and it has me saying "want":</p>
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/thumbnail-7.php.jpeg" width="800" height="560" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"></p>
<p>A very expensive one: The 330-knots single-engine jet won't come cheap at $1.35 million, so it's not the skycar we were all hoping for.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('eclipse400', 11, '');
</script></p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.redferret.net/?p=10912">Red Ferret</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5046346/eclipse-400-personal-airplane-is-true-sports-skycar]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5046346]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Eclipse 400]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Airplanes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Airplanes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gallery]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[plane]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[private]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 06 Sep 2008 21:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5046346&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[10 Ejection Seat Tests in Sloooowww Moooootion]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/09/340x_ejection-seat-tests.JPG" class="left image340" width="340" />From <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5034458/slow-motion-lightning-video-is-mindblowing-will-sell-a-thousand-slo+mo-cameras">lighting strikes</a>, to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/386936/mentos-and-diet-coke-explosion-at-1200fps-casio-ex+f1-strikes-again">Mentos explosions</a>, the bottom line is that everything is cooler in <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #slowmotion" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/slowmotion/">slow motion</a>. In this case OObject has collected 10 <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #ejectionseattests" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ejectionseattests/">ejection seat tests</a> that are enjoyable to watch at any speed&mdash;but in slo-mo it's like watching a nerdy ballet of planes, fire and rockets. [<a href="http://www.oobject.com/category/10-videos-of-ejection-seat-tests/">OObject</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5045631/10-ejection-seat-tests-in-sloooowww-moooootion]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5045631]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[super slo-mo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[airplanes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ejection]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ejection seat]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ejection seat tests]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[oobject]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[slomo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[slow motion]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 04 Sep 2008 18:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5045631&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Stanford's UAV Helicopters Learn to Fly Themselves by Watching]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/09/340x_stanfordsaut.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />They may not look as mean as the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5042268/draganfly-x6-uav-ufo-thingy-packed-with-carbon-fiber-hdnight-cameras-and-gps">Draganfly</a>, but these research UAV 'copters are one step closer to Skynet: they learn to fly complex stunts by just "watching" another aircraft do the same. Dubbed "<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #apprenticeshiplearning" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/apprenticeshiplearning/">apprenticeship learning</a>," by the Stanford team which developed it, the system gets its flight plan by recording an expert human operator fly a vehicle. Then its onboard gyros and GPS systems and avionics communicate with a ground-based computer which looks at the human-derived data and decides how to fly the vehicle. It's all very tricky, due to the inherent instability of helicopter. Apparently UAVs like this may one day help firefighters track wildfires, or be sent to see out landmines in battlefield situations... and do other "spying" of course. Creepy. [<a href="http://www.physorg.com/news139501522.html">Physorg</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5044128/stanfords-uav-helicopters-learn-to-fly-themselves-by-watching]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5044128]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[uavs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apprenticeship learning]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[learning helicopters]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[stanford]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 02 Sep 2008 05:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kit Eaton]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5044128&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Researchers Invent Nanotech Waterproofing for Planes]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/08/340x_droplets.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #airforce" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/airforce/">Air Force</a>'s Office of Scientific Research has funded a study that's found a novel waterproofing technique that could prevent ice formation and corrosion from damaging parts of an aircraft, like optical sensors. The transparent coating has a nanoporous surface that is superhydrophobic, which makes water droplets form and roll or bounce-off the aircraft's skin rather than collecting, which is how ice formations happen. Better still it can becrafted to send the droplets in particular pathways across the coating, meaning it may also work as a cheap and simple water-collection system for desert environments: this was inspired by the way the Namib Desert beetle gathers moisture. We wonder though... is it as good as <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5028927/golden-shellback-hands+on-phones-can-make-calls-while-underwater">Golden Shellback</a>? [<a href="http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123110839">AirForceLink</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5037404/researchers-invent-nanotech-waterproofing-for-planes]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5037404]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof coating for aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[drip drop]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[air force]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[beetle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[coating]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[desert]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[drip drop]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[droplets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotechnology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproofing]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 15 Aug 2008 06:37:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kit Eaton]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5037404&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Bed Made of DC-9 Fins Lets You Join Mile High Club at Sea Level]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/08/340x_milehighbed.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />A chair made of <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5033240/chair-made-from-torpedo+lifting-jaws-from-a-nuclear-sub-will-cradle-your-explosive-parts">torpedo-launcher</a> parts just wouldn't say "come hither" to techy ladies in the same way as this bed from <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/motoart/">Motoart</a>. Dubbed <i>Mile High</i>, you can tell it's aimed at the sexier end of the geek furniture market, partly as it's marketed with a "a wonderful playground for you and your co-pilot" slogan, and especially when you notice the line of glowing red LEDs that pimp the frame's lower edge. The 11- by 7.5-foot bed is made of two DC-9 stabilizer fins and a C-130 inner flap. And if there's a particular aviator you want to attract between the sheets, you'll likely have to save up: it's price on application only, which generally means lots of dollars. [<a href="http://www.motoart.com/">MotoArt</a> via <a href="http://nexus404.com/Blog/2008/08/13/kinky-motoart-mile-high-bed-with-led-lighting-flaps-down-coming-in-for-an-approach/">TFTS</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5036409/bed-made-of-dc+9-fins-lets-you-join-mile-high-club-at-sea-level]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5036409]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[whoosh]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mile high bed]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bed]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[furniture]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[home]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[house]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mile high bed]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motoart]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[parts]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 13 Aug 2008 07:10:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kit Eaton]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5036409&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Tailcam Video Shows Awesome Plane's-Eye-View of A380 in Flight]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="494" height="278" data="http://www.flickr.com/apps/video/stewart.swf?v=55430" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000"><param name="flashvars" value="intl_lang=en-us&photo_secret=4050d8abba&photo_id=2736241144"></param><param name="movie" value="http://www.flickr.com/apps/video/stewart.swf?v=55430"></param><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.flickr.com/apps/video/stewart.swf?v=55430" bgcolor="#000000" allowfullscreen="true" flashvars="intl_lang=en-us&photo_secret=4050d8abba&photo_id=2736241144" height="278" width="494"></embed></object>This video is a feed from the Tailcam in an <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/a380/">A380</a> as the aircraft takes-off. The cam feed can be shown on the seat-back displays and gives you an almost Superman-like view of the aircraft from 79-feet up at the top of the tail. It's pretty amazing watching the behemoth aircraft surge slowly down the runway and into the air... and there's another vid, showing it landing in to SFO as part of the recent Emirates tour.</p>
<p><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="494" height="371" data="http://www.flickr.com/apps/video/stewart.swf?v=55430" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000"><param name="flashvars" value="intl_lang=en-us&photo_secret=4a96b6e56d&photo_id=2734259995"></param><param name="movie" value="http://www.flickr.com/apps/video/stewart.swf?v=55430"></param><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.flickr.com/apps/video/stewart.swf?v=55430" bgcolor="#000000" allowfullscreen="true" flashvars="intl_lang=en-us&photo_secret=4a96b6e56d&photo_id=2734259995" height="371" width="494"></embed></object>This amazing system can also show you a view forward from the nose, and straight down beneath the plane. I'm pretty sure if you're trapped in a center-aisle seat it may well make up for your lack of window view. And it's a great chance to freak out (just a little bit) your nervous-flyer partners or parents... well, if your Mom is like mine, anyway. [<a href="http://www.irintech.com/x1/blogarchive.php?id=3530">Irintech</a> via <a href="http://www.newlaunches.com/archives/tailcam_view_of_the_airbus_a380.php">New Launches</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5033659/tailcam-video-shows-awesome-planes+eye+view-of-a380-in-flight]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5033659]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[birds eye view]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[a380]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[airbus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[display]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[emirates]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[external view camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flying]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tailcam]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 06 Aug 2008 10:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kit Eaton]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5033659&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Jet Explodes in Midair, Leaves Us Scratching Our Heads]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><object width="494" height="406"><param name="movie" value="http://www.liveleak.com/e/963_1217594028"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.liveleak.com/e/963_1217594028" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="494" height="406"></embed></object>Even while I knew what was going to happen when I saw this video, it shocked me when I saw it exploding the way it did, with no warning whatsoever. To be honest, I don't know if this Saudi fighter jet is a <i>real</i> fighter jet or not. It sounds like one, it looks like one, and it explodes like one, so it must be an airplane or a duck. But somehow, some people think it may be an RC model. Still, the idea of the plane just exploding like that reminds you how fragile our technological world is—says the guy taking a plane on Monday. What do you people think? Real or model?</p><p>[Editor's Note: Definitely a jet RC model!]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5031997/jet-explodes-in-midair-leaves-us-scratching-our-heads]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5031997]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ka-boom]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[explosion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mirage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[saudi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[videos]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5031997&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Photos Emerge of Emirates A380 Showers: Tiny, But Luxurious]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/07/340x_A380shower.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;float:none;"/>See that happy-looking lady in the pic? She's standing in an Emirates A380 in-flight shower room, details of which have emerged after we <a href="http://gizmodo.com/371820/emirates-air-in+flight-showers-cost-18000-plus-enviro-guilt">first alerted</a> you to this airborne luxury. The "shower spas" are pretty decently kitted-out, and the aircraft carries an extra 1,100-pounds of water to allow every one of the 14 first-class passengers to have a splash. As a result, the shower only runs for five minutes, and there's a traffic-light system to let you know how the time's going. And if you're planning on trying to form a new "mile-high, in the shower" club, you'd better forget it: the showers are small, "designed for single usage."</p>

<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/07/A380shower2.jpg" class="center" width="494" height="412" style="display:block;float:none;"><br>
That extra 1,000 pounds of water (25% more than usual) means the aircraft will have to carry more fuel, which may weigh heavy on your environmental conscience. Or maybe lying in your massage bed in the private <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged FIRST CLASS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/first-class/">first class</a> room, with remote-control doors and mini bar will make you forget your woes. [<a href="http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1039398/Just-shower-away-First-class-Emirates-air-passengers-enjoy-minute-soak-4-737.html?ITO=1490">Mail on Sunday</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5030839/photos-emerge-of-emirates-a380-showers-tiny-but-luxurious]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5030839]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[showers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[a380]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[airbus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[emirates]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[first class]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flying]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[luxury]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[spa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[superjumbo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:44:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kit Eaton]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5030839&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Orlens Glider Concept is Green, Recyclable Air Transport of the Future]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/07/340x_glider11.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />This concept glider, dubbed Orlens, is attention-grabbing through its rather beautiful shape alone. But when you look into how it would work, you can see that designer <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #rolandcernat" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/rolandcernat/">Roland Cernat</a> has put a lot of thought into its greenness. It would be made of entirely recycled materials, and be recyclable itself, would have photovoltaic cells atop the wings for energy for eco-friendly propulsion and have an aerodynamically-efficient body. The body too would be made from a flax-based bio-compound that would be CO2 neutral. It's pretty much what green personal air-transport of the future should look like, which is why it's just won Roland the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #luckystrikejuniordesigner" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/luckystrikejuniordesigner/">Lucky Strike Junior Designer</a> Competition. Impressive, and I'd love to take it up and give it a spin, were it not just a concept. [<a href="http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/07/15/roland-cernats-energy-efficient-oriens-glider/">Inhabitat</a>]<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('orlensglider', 3, '');
</script></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5026602/orlens-glider-concept-is-green-recyclable-air-transport-of-the-future]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5026602]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[glider]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[concept]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[eco-friendly]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flying]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lucky strike junior designer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[orlens glider]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[roland cernat]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 18 Jul 2008 07:16:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kit Eaton]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5026602&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Buy Your Own V22, Kinda: Bell 609 Civilian Tiltrotor Gets Rolled-Out]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/07/340x_bell6091.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Forget the improbable promises of the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/385236/falx-promises-private-tilt+rotor-aircraft-verdict-improbable">Falx tiltrotor</a>: Bell aircraft has rolled out its 609 civilian tiltrotor for real. Looking and flying like a smaller cousin of the military V22 Osprey, also a Bell vehicle, the 609 will undoubtedly please millionaire business people since it can perform all the rooftop-landing duties of a normal helicopter, but flies twice as fast and can fly 9 passengers up to 25,000 feet altitude. Plus, it'd be undeniably cooler to turn up at your meetings in something that looks like it belongs in a sci-fi flick versus something that reminds people of <i>Magnum, PI</i>.</p>

<p>From the sales pitch: "an executive could conceivably take off from the helipad of a country house outside London, fly in comfort to a meeting in Frankfurt in just 60 minutes, then fly on to Zurich, Milan and back home for early dinner" you can guess that these luxury choppers are going to cost quite the packet. Somewhere between a corporate helicopter (which is simpler in design) and a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #corporatejet" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/corporatejet/">corporate jet</a> (which is more complex.) So, tens of millions then, but you'll have to wait a bit as the aircraft isn't yet certified.</p>
<p>Plus, with all that rotating-engine tech aboard, they'll cost more to maintain than your average helicopter. And if you're a rich business type thinking of buying one, you'd better get your pilots well trained. Remember how tricky the V22 has been to develop?<br>
<object width="494" height="413"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hn-Ssbs0x3g&hl=en&fs=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hn-Ssbs0x3g&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="494" height="413"></embed></object><br>
[<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/07/15/bell_agusta_609_farnborough/">TheRegister</a> via <a href="http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/07/buy-your-own-os.html"></a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5026154/buy-your-own-v22-kinda-bell-609-civilian-tiltrotor-gets-rolled+out]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5026154]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[tiltrotor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[609]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[business jet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[corporate jet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flying]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[helicopter]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[osprey]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[transport]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[v-22]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 17 Jul 2008 05:58:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kit Eaton]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5026154&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Lego Concorde Can Brick the Speed of Sound]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/07/swooshconcorde.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/>This Lego Concorde may not be as big as the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5018359/lego-airbus-a380-is-biggest-lego-airplane-in-the-world">Lego Airbus A380</a>, the biggest Lego airplane in the world, but it's still huge. It's not only pretty, but this huge plane can maintain its structural integrity while being <i>swooshed</i> around by Ed Diment. It also allowed me to easily make bad headline puns, which is always a plus. As you can see in the gallery, its nose and landing gear are fully articulated, like the real one. [<a href="http://www.brothers-brick.com/2008/07/12/ed-diment-flies-to-france-on-his-lego-concorde-at-mach-2/">Brothers Brick</a>]</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('legoconcorde', 3, '');
</script></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5024772/lego-concorde-can-brick-the-speed-of-sound]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5024772]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[lego]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[a380]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[airbus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[airplanes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[concorde]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 14 Jul 2008 05:45:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5024772&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Air Force Dismantles Crashed C-130 in Military-Style: With Lots of Explosives]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><object width="494" height="413"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/S-xxPHStprk&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S-xxPHStprk&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="494" height="413"></embed></object>What do you do with a C-130 cargo aircraft that has made a crash-landing in an insecure area of Iraq? If you're the 447th Expeditionary Operations Support Squadron you wire it with explosives and you <i>blow it up</i>. Again and again and again... until it's in small enough bits to load onto a flatbed and ship back to an air base. Apparently it's pretty rare for an aircraft to make emergency landings in the field, which is good news. Though if it resulted in more videos like this, we wouldn't complain. [<a href="http://www.pointniner.com/2008/07/c-130-blown-up-by-good-guys.html">PointNiner</a> via <a href="http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/07/video-air-force.html">Danger Room</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5024771/air-force-dismantles-crashed-c+130-in-military+style-with-lots-of-explosives]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5024771]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[boom]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[447th EOSS]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[c-130]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[crash]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[detonation]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dismantle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[explosives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iraq]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 14 Jul 2008 05:32:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kit Eaton]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5024771&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Armchair UAV Pilots Striking Afghanistan in Las Vegas, Taco Bell Fueled Comfort]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/07/cf/48/340x_cf4885ecd765c6df220f8c03bbb014de.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/>We all know about how the military is utilizing <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/uav">UAV's</a> in an ever increasing amount of missions. And why not? Unmanned aircraft represent a safer and more cost efficient approach to aerial combat. However, we rarely get to see what it is like on the other side of these aircraft—to see the job through the eyes of a UAV pilot. Apparently, it's much like any other job—except you get to kill things in Afghanistan from the air-conditioned <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged CREECH AIR FORCE BASE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/Creech-Air-Force-Base/">Creech Air Force Base</a> in Nevada.</p>
<p>In an interview with CNN, Captain Matt Dean noted that "Seeing bad guys on the screen and watching them possibly get dispatched, and then going down to the Taco Bell for lunch, it's kind of surreal." In fact, their entire workday is fairly normal with shifts that rotate around the clock to prevent fatigue. Seems pretty cushy...if blowing terrorists up doesn't make you lose your appetite for the cheesy gordita crunch, that is. [<a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/07/09/remote.fighters/index.html?eref=rss_tech">CNN</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5023495/armchair-uav-pilots-striking-afghanistan-in-las-vegas-taco-bell-fueled-comfort]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5023495]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[uavs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[air force]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[combat]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Creech Air Force Base]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[defense]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[unmanned aerial vehicles]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[weapons]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 09 Jul 2008 18:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5023495&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Boeing JHL-40 Heavy-Lift Rotorcraft Is Massive Floating Crane]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/07/804x_skyhook1_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/07/804x_skyhook1_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>This stunning aircraft—that looks straight out of a science-fiction movie in which the Nazis won WWII—is the Boeing SkyHook JHL-40. A <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged HEAVY-LIFT ROTORCRAFT" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/Heavy_Lift-Rotorcraft/">heavy-lift rotorcraft</a> designed to lift 40 tons, it can transport its cargo across 200 miles without refueling in adverse environments like the Arctic. According to Boeing, it will be able to reach where no other kind of transport can go, at a fraction of the cost, with less environmental impact, and without danger to the crew. Seeing it carrying massive tree trunks makes the JHL-40 look even more impressive:</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/07/804x_skyhook2.jpg" class="center image804" width="804"></p>
<p>As you can see, the eight-engine aircraft has four vertical rotors to lift its neutrally buoyant body, plus four directional propellers under each rotor to direct it. Boeing says that it will be very popular in the energy, mining, and logging industries. Their pitch to environmentalists is that the JHL-40 has a very reduced carbon footprint, and it doesn't require to disturb remote lands with roads or other destructive transport methods (that way, the aforementioned industries will be able to properly disturb remote lands only by mining and logging, as it should be.) [<a href="http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2008/q3/080708c_nr.html">Boeing</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5023148/boeing-jhl+40-heavy+lift-rotorcraft-is-massive-floating-crane]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5023148]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[boeing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Heavy-Lift Rotorcraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jhl-40]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[skyhook]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 08 Jul 2008 20:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5023148&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Lego Airbus A380 Is Biggest Lego Airplane in the World]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("legoa380_gizmodo.flv", 520, 410,"");
</script><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/06/legoa380_gizmodo.flv.jpg"></a><iframe src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http://digg.com/odd_stuff/Lego_Airbus_A380_Is_Biggest_Lego_Airplane_in_the_World" align="right" frameborder="0" height="82" scrolling="no" width="55"></iframe>Behold the <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged BIGGEST LEGO AIRPLANE IN THE WORLD" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/Biggest-Lego-Airplane-in-the-world/">biggest Lego airplane in the world</a>, made after the largest passenger airplane in the world, the Airbus A380. Made at a 1:25 scale-9.5-foot long, 10.5-foot wingspan, 3.2-foot tall&mdash;the Lego A380 uses 220 pounds (100kg) of bricks. That's a mindblowing 75,000 pieces in eight colours&mdash;<a href="http://gizmodo.com/335673/sorting-the-5195-pieces-of-the-millennium-falcon-gives-strange-pleasure-back-pain">15 Lego Millennium Falcons</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/legotrip"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/06/legotrip.jpg" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="2"></a>With that amount of bricks, and knowing how long my Falcon is taking, I'm not surprised that it took <i>600 hours</i> for the entire team of professional Legoland model builders to assemble this beast. [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/legotrip">Giz's Lego Trip</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5018359/lego-airbus-a380-is-biggest-lego-airplane-in-the-world]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5018359]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Biggest Lego Airplane in the world]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[a380]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[airbus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lego]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Lego Airbus 380]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[legoland]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[legotrip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[videos]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Jun 2008 20:10:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5018359&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Dreamliner First Power-On, All Systems Nominal]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/06/b6/49/83c0945f3b7e16f84a0ba228c6e67c9b.jpg"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/06/imageView.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a>After all <a href="http://gizmodo.com/379003/boeing-dreamliner-turns-into-nightmareliner-after-new-delay">the problems and delays</a> with in the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/dreamliner/boeing-787-lego+like-building-begins-kicks-airbus-nuts-262412.php">787's manufacturing</a>, they have finally powered-on the aircraft and completed all the start up tests. In this picture you can see Boeing's test technician Dave Haskell plugging the aircraft to an external power line. The power-on of all the electrical systems in the aircraft, including the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/383486/dreamliners-secret-crew-quarters-should-be-called-orgy-room">orgy room</a> and the cockpit&mdash;which you can see up and running after the jump&mdash;is a major milestone towards the completion of the plane and its first flight later this year.</p>
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/06/imageView-2_01.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" style="display:block;"></p>
<p>The testing sequence lasted for a week, and was designed to "demonstrate the distribution, conversion, control and consumption of electric power on board the airplane. Completion also verifies the accuracy of the installation of systems on the first 787."</p>
<p>[<a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/dreamliner">Dreamliner in Gizmodo</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5018368/dreamliner-first-power+on-all-systems-nominal]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5018368]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[boeing 787 dreamliner]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[787]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[787 dreamliner]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[boeing]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:59:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5018368&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Chinese UFO Looks Like Emergency Life Raft, Spies on You]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/06/1b/0a/340x_1b0a6135f1d1c7f7a1dcc4ccac7e9f33.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Chinese company <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #harbinsmartspecialaerocraft" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/harbinsmartspecialaerocraft/">Harbin Smart Special Aerocraft</a> has spent 12 years and over $4 million developing its unmanned flying saucers. Somewhat reminiscent of the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/372263/spy-drones-coming-soon-to-the-us-at+st-walkers-to-follow-next">Honeywell Micro Air Vehicle</a>, the unmanned drone has propellers that run on methanol, a top speed of around 50mph, and can stay at an altitude of around 1,000 yards up for 40 minutes or so. Expect to see it being used for aerial photography, geological surveys and in people's LSD-fueled weird-outs. [<a href="http://dvice.com/archives/2008/06/chinese_company.php">DVICE</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5017856/chinese-ufo-looks-like-emergency-life-raft-spies-on-you]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5017856]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[drones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[harbin smart special aerocraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[propeller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ufo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[unmanned aircraft]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:10:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[AddyDugdale]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5017856&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Berkeley Group Uses iPhone to Control UAV Squadron]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><object width="494" height="391"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/CRcld5aAN2E&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/CRcld5aAN2E&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="494" height="391"></embed></object>The Center for Collaborative Control of Unmanned Vehicles (C3UV—the "3" makes it hip) at the University of California, Berkeley has developed a system that uses the iPhone to develop tasks, set coordinates and send orders to a fleet of UAVs. Naturally, this development is interesting because it allows a single person to control a large number of small, unmanned aircraft at one time using a cellphone. But, as Wired points out, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5015389/iphone-sdk-agreement-prohibits-real+time-route-guidance-and-saving-lives">clause in the SDK agreement</a> clearly states that "autonomous control of vehicles, aircraft, or other mechanical devices" is a big no-no. So the future of this type of technology is unclear.[<a href="http://www.calccit.org/c3uv/index.html">C3UV</a> via <a href="http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/06/video-iphone-co.html">Wired</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5016947/berkeley-group-uses-iphone-to-control-uav-squadron]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5016947]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[berkeley]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[c3uv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[drones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[uavs]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5016947&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[United Airlines Offering iPod/iPhone Connectivity on International Flights]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/06/fb/5d/thumb160x_fb5dca002db32be59c65441536317fe1.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #unitedairlines" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/unitedairlines/">United Airlines</a> may be screwing passengers with hefty ticket prices and bag fees, but if you are an iPod/iPhone user, the friendly skies just got a little friendlier. A new deal makes United the first U.S. carrier to offer iPod and iPhone connectivity to its in-flight entertainment system.</p>
<p>Passengers will be able to plug in and enjoy personal content on their own 15.4-inch television while their device charges. The first Apple-enabled aircraft is set to take off from Washington today, and there are plans to have these entertainment centers installed on all first and business class international flights within the next two years. [<a href="http://www.united.com/press/detail/0,6862,59591,00.html">United</a> via <a href="http://crave.cnet.com/8301-1_105-9969405-1.html">Crave</a> via <a href="http://www.electronichouse.com/article/united_to_install_ipod_iphone_connectivity/">Electronic House</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5016895/united-airlines-offering-ipodiphone-connectivity-on-international-flights]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5016895]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod friendly skies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone 3g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[united]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[united airlines]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:50:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5016895&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[DARPA Technology Autonomously  Lands Severely Damaged Aircraft]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/06/b4/a6/340x_43208b2ead3afc7787f7adcdcc6c3802.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/>DARPA, the Pentagon's source for R&D (and lovers of acronyms big and small) have released a video illustrating the <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged DAMAGE TOLERANCE AND AUTONOMOUS LANDING SOLUTION" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/Damage-Tolerance-and-Autonomous-Landing-Solution/">Damage Tolerance and Autonomous Landing Solution</a> they developed alongside Athena Technologies. Basically, DTALS is designed to take over for a pilot in the event that the aircraft sustains heavy damage. The system automatically detects the damage and adjusts the flight control system to land the aircraft safely.</p>
<p>In the demo video, a scale model F-18 manages to return safely to the earth despite the loss of over 60% of its wing. At this point, the DTALS system is being confined to UAVs and other unmanned aircraft, but it seems that it could be applicable to manned an commercial aircraft somewhere down the line. Hit the following link to see the full video. [<a href="http://www.rockwellcollins.com/news/video/damage-tolerance.html">Rockwell Collins</a> and <a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/template.MAXIMIZE/permalink/?javax.portlet.tpst=109286a930d73fc47972709ddb808a0c_ws_MX&javax.portlet.prp_109286a930d73fc47972709ddb808a0c_viewID=news_view&javax.portlet.prp_109286a930d73fc47972709ddb808a0c_newsLang=en&javax.portlet.prp_109286a930d73fc47972709ddb808a0c_ndmHsc=v2*N1000837&javax.portlet.prp_109286a930d73fc47972709ddb808a0c_newsId=20080610005059&beanID=1995963876&viewID=news_view&javax.portlet.begCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken&javax.portlet.endCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken">Business Wire</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5015908/darpa-technology-autonomously--lands-severely-damaged-aircraft]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5015908]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[athena]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Damage Tolerance and Autonomous Landing Solution]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[darpa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dtals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[uavs]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5015908&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Boeing Working on Real-Life Colonial Marines Dropship]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/06/95/e4/95e474ebddb115b57ba26dc0f699d269.jpg"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/06/speed-agile.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>The US Air Force wants a new cargo aircraft, a pressurized airplane capable of carrying 65,000 pounds for 1,500 nautical miles without refueling. They call it the Speed Agile Concept Demonstrator&mdash;it's supposed to travel at a minimum Mach .8 at 30,000-feet&mdash;but they may as well have called it the UD-4L Dropship, because it looks like the Colonial Marines' Cheyenne in Aliens. Boeing is going to get a mere $7.5M to work on it to get the technology ready for 2010&mdash;which doesn't mean having the airplane by then, just the pretty drawings for us to post about. [<a href="http://www.defensetech.org/archives/004237.html">Defense Tech</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5015796/boeing-working-on-real+life-colonial-marines-dropship]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5015796]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[airplane]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aliens]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[boeing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cargo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dropship]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lift]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[marines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Speed Agile Concept Demonstration]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Transonic Lift Aircraft]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5015796&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New Secret X-Bomber Is Not So Secret Anymore]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/05/x-bomber.jpg"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/05/x-bomber.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a><a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged NORTHROP GRUMMAN" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/northrop-grumman/">Northrop Grumman</a> is working on a new classified bomber prototype for the Air Force, at an estimated cost&mdash;according to their financial statements&mdash;of $2 billion. Apparently, the first version will require human/clone/Cylon pilots, with a high-endurance unmanned model possibly following after that. According to military industry magazine DTI, there is a high probability that the New Generation Bomber&mdash;concept above&mdash;will be following the success of the X-47B unmanned bomber aircraft.</p>
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/05/60763653_804eb38587.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="500" height="375" style="display:block;float:none;"></p>
<p>Obviously, the X-Bomber will be much bigger, capable of delivery nuclear payloads, and more conventional bombs than the X-48B in the photo.</p>
<p>Really, these Pentagon people should talk with Steve Jobs. [<a href="http://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/aw/dti0608/">DTI</a> via <a href="http://www.defensetech.org/archives/004201.html">Defense Tech</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/393554/new-secret-x+bomber-is-not-so-secret-anymore]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-393554]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[northrop grumman]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[x-48b]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[x-bomber]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 28 May 2008 07:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=393554&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Future of Aviation Isn't Coming Soon Enough]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/05/BWBlarge.jpg"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/05/BWBlarge.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>We have mentioned the increased efficiency and lower emissions of <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/the-right-stuff/first-flight-of-x+48b-blended-wing-body-aircraft-prototype-283547.php">blended wing body aircrafts</a> before&mdash;like the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/372838/x+48b-video-shows-worlds-biggest-rc-model-plane-in-action">X-48B, now in its prototype testing</a> phase. Seeing two of them getting ready to take off, however, pushes the concept from the <i>That's Pretty Cool</i> to the <i>Geezussrollerbladingchrist, We Want These So Badly</i> category. Even if it's just a synthetic image, they look absolutely stunning. [Note: I heard somewhere that the reason why commercial wings didn't fly is that people don't want to fly on things without passenger windows; Trust issues and the like. - B.L.][<a href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/aircraft-pictures/2008/05/blended-wing-body-concept.html">Flight Global</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/393167/the-future-of-aviation-isnt-coming-soon-enough]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-393167]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[futuremodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blended wing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[boeing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[image]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nasa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[x-48b blended wing body]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 25 May 2008 18:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=393167&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Israeli Institute Plans Battlefield Medevac UAVs]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/05/340x_MedevacUAV.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />You may think someone over in Israel's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #fisherinstitute" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/fisherinstitute/">Fisher Institute</a> for Air and Space Strategic Studies had been watching one too many episodes of The Jetsons, but no... this is a real project. It looks like an Israeli consortium, led by the Fisher Institute, is attempting to put together the world's first unpiloted battlefield resupply and evacuation aircraft, dubbed "MedUAV." And as the strangely 1960s sci-fi concept drawing shows, it could take the form of a ducted-fan VTOL air car.</p>

<p>The landing-to-evacuation time could be as short as 45 seconds, which would be good news for battlefield casualties needing attention, and for medics who'd otherwise risk coming under fire when attending the conventional way. The patient pod could even include sensors and a comms system so that doctors could interact with the patient mid-flight.</p>
<p>The Fisher institute is planning on achieving initial test-flights in just 24 months, which sounds like a pretty aggressive schedule, though the first model may start off as a fairly simple UAV. The vehicle would have a 4-person payload and fly up to 10,000 feet, managing speeds of 150 kts. Does that sound like a safe operational envelope given what we know can <a href="http://gizmodo.com/382454/georgian-uav-films-its-own-demise-in-russian-mig-attack">happen to</a> UAVs? [<a href="http://www.fisherinstitute.org.il/Eng/_Articles/Article.asp?CategoryID=91&ArticleID=256">Fisher Institute</a> via <a href="http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/05/the-potential-o.html">Danger room</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/392022/israeli-institute-plans-battlefield-medevac-uavs]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-392022]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[uavs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ambulance]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fisher institute]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[israeli meduav]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[medevac uavs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[meduav]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[robot ambulance]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 20 May 2008 12:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kit Eaton]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=392022&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Plasma-Powered Hovercraft Patent]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/05/plasma_saucer_patent.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />The patent shown is for an aircraft to be powered off the ground using a plasma technology. Subrata Roy, a University of Florida aerospace engineer, proposes the existing technique of passing a magnetic wave through a conducting fluid can produce a force strong enough to lift an aircraft off the ground. Granted, the example in the patent is only 15 cm, and attempts by others haven't gone particularly well. But with phrases like magnetohydrodynamics being thrown around, I keep flashing back to the space travel scene in Contact and getting excited. Subrata Roy must be a poet. [<a href="http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/fetch2.jsp?LANG=ENG&DBSELECT=PCT&SERVER_TYPE=19-00+&SORT=41227222-KEY&TYPE_FIELD=256&IDB=0&IDOC=-1&C=00&ELEMENT_SET=FILENAME,IMAGEROOT-ENG&RESULT=12&TOTAL=81&FORM=SEP-0/&START=1&DISP=25&QUERY=pa%2funiversity+AND+DP%2f07%2f02%2f2008&SEARCH_IA=US2007074874&REDIR=1">WIPO</a> via <a href="http://www.ubergizmo.com/15/archives/2008/05/engineer_believes_in_plasmapowered_vehicle.html">Ubergizmo</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/389145/plasma+powered-hovercraft-patent]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-389145]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flying saucers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hovercraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[magnetics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[magnetohydrodynamics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[plasma]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 09 May 2008 19:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Covert]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=389145&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Joint Strike Fighter Technology May Have Been Compromised...Whoops!]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/05/joint-strike-fighter.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />It appears that the geniuses at the Defense Department have been asleep at the wheel of their new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #jointstrikefighter" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/jointstrikefighter/">Joint Strike Fighter</a> program, leading some to believe that its super valuable aviation and weapons technology may have been compromised. The crux of the problem involves the fact that the Pentagon's Defense Security Service (DSS) has had a difficult time monitoring the contractors working on the aircraft. While no specific breaches have come to light regarding the classified information, an audit has uncovered that the DSS cut corners and the DoD suffered lapses in its controls designed to evaluate and protect the sensitive information from unauthorized access.</p>
<p>The audit also uncovered that the most significant of these lapses involved the DoD's handling of London-based weapons maker BAE Systems. According to the report, DSS failed to collect the company's internal audits&mdash;information that is crucial to determining potential weaknesses at the plant. The DSS responded saying that they have "a thorough and fundamentally sound facility inspection process which was only marginally diminished by the failure to systematically collect, analyze, and retain BAE's required reports" and that they have "taken action to resolve this shortcoming." However, a recent House Armed Services Committee hearing revealed that the DSS has been significantly understaffed for some time. Currently, around 750 people work for DSS and a rep claimed to be short staffed by "well over a hundred" persons.</p>
<p>So rest easy folks. Once again, you can be secure in the knowledge that our government has everything under control. <em>UPDATE</em>: BAE systems has responded to claims that their facility is not secure stating that "there is no basis whatsoever for that conclusion." [<a href="http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/05/jsf-security-co.html">Wired</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/386357/joint-strike-fighter-technology-may-have-been-compromisedwhoops]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-386357]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA['defense]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[department of defense]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dss]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[joint strike fighter]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[service"]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[steath]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 01 May 2008 19:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=386357&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Falx Promises Private Tilt-Rotor Aircraft. Verdict: Improbable]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/04/FalxSaker1.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />This small <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #v22osprey" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/v22osprey/">V-22 Osprey</a> lookalike looks like a sleek and sexy machine, doesn't it? The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #falxsalker" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/falxsalker/">Falx Salker</a> is a VTOL aircraft and is designed to be a hybrid electric vehicle, with solar energy augmenting the 100hp engine to achieve a fuel efficiency of 10 liters per hour of flight. According to their website, Falx Air Vehicles is "set to release its first 100% scale platform during 2008 leading to certification during the next 3 years."<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('falxsaker', 3, '');
</script></p>

<p>It will apparently weigh in at 770 and 990 pounds for the single- and dual-seat versions, and Falx sees it having many applications, including as a police vehicle (visions of the hover cars from Bladerunner zipped through your head then didn't they?)</p>
<p>So why are we skeptical? Well, sure, the V-22 is a military vehicle and it's highly sophisticated&mdash;but it's been under development for over 20 years. Longer, if you include all the X-aircraft that preceded it. Two of the prototypes crashed, and two early production models crashed too. So can this small UK company really overcome the same tricky engineering obstacles faced by the V22, including that difficult transition between the hover and forward flight? We're not sure&mdash;it seems rather a lot of advanced engineering and control design. We'd love for it to be real, though. [<a href="http://www.falxair.com/about.htm">Falx</a> via <a href="http://www.gizmag.com/falx-to-debut-hybrid-electric-tilt-rotor-aircraft-with-inbuilt-solar-c/9234/">Gizmag</a> via <a href="http://www.uberreview.com/2008/04/solar-assisted-aircraft-coming-soon-from-falx.htm">Uberreview</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/385236/falx-promises-private-tilt+rotor-aircraft-verdict-improbable]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-385236]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[tilt-rotor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[falx]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[falx salker]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[salker]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[solar powered]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[v-22]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[v-22 osprey]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kit Eaton]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=385236&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[A10 RC Model vs the Real Thing at Top Gun 2008]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("A102_gizmodo.flv", 494, 390,"");
</script>Here's the 1:5 scale A-10 Warthog remote control model in some video action at <a href="http://gizmodo.com/382748/top-gun-2008-biggest-rc-airplane-competition-in-the-world">Top Gun 2008, in Lakeland, FL.</a>&mdash;the biggest remote controlled airplane competition in the world. And to match it, a <i>real</i> A-10 appeared on the scene, taking off from a parallel runway. We interviewed <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #mikeselby" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/mikeselby/">Mike Selby</a>, one of the model creators, and got all the technical details about this amazing $12,000 beast, with two jet turbines, three on-board microprocessors, 24 servos, a 1" OLED display in its cockpit and a fully-functional gatling gun. Jump to see all its amazing details in a 26-photo gallery. [Video and images courtesy of <a href="mailto:rod@rodfury.com">Bob Parrish</a>]<br>
<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('a10topgun2008', 9, '');
</script></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/384601/a10-rc-model-vs-the-real-thing-at-top-gun-2008]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-384601]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[exclusive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[a-10]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[a10 rc model]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[airplane]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bill davidson]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mike selby]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pornchai saechou]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ray johns]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top gun 2008]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[videos]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[warthog]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=384601&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[How to Equip Your Dreamliner (Including 23" Displays for First Class Seats)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("dreamshop_giz.flv", 494, 296,"");
</script>Probably trying to polish its <a href="http://gizmodo.com/379003/boeing-dreamliner-turns-into-nightmareliner-after-new-delay">current poor image</a>, Boeing invited Fortune Magazine to get an inside look into the Dreamliner factory, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/383486/dreamliners-secret-crew-quarters-should-be-called-orgy-room">secret orgy quarters</a>, and the <i>showroom</i>, in which&mdash;after spending $150 million on an <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/out-the-hangar/787-dreamliner-doesnt-have-seats-yet-kicks-airbus-nuts-anyway-276153.php">empty aircraft</a>&mdash;you have to pick the seats, including their A/V entertainment equipment (like whopping 23" LCD monitors in first class), and even the coffee maker. Head to Fortune to see the entire video and gallery. [<a href="http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2008/fortune/0804/gallery.boeing_dreamliner.fortune/29.html">Fortune</a>]<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('insidedreamliner', 6, '');
</script></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/383871/how-to-equip-your-dreamliner-including-23-displays-for-first-class-seats]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-383871]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[boeing dreamliner]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[airplanes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[boeing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[crew]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[crew quarters]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dreamliner]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 26 Apr 2008 11:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=383871&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Dreamliner's Secret Crew Quarters Should be Called Orgy Room]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("orgyroom_giz.flv", 494, 296,"");
</script>Here's one of <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/out-the-hangar/787-dreamliner-doesnt-have-seats-yet-kicks-airbus-nuts-anyway-276153.php">Boeing Dreamliner's</a> most closely guarded secrets: the Orgy Room. Boeing likes to call it "the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #crewquarters" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/crewquarters/">Crew Quarters</a>" but, come on, what images does this cozy compartment, hidden in the top of the composite fuselage bring to mind? Here's a hint: it has six tightly packed beds for flight attendants, who use them to "have siestas" when the flights are too long. What. Ever. [<a href="http://money.cnn.com/video/ft/#/video/fortune/2008/04/21/fortune.500.boeing.fortune">Fortune</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/383486/dreamliners-secret-crew-quarters-should-be-called-orgy-room]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-383486]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[hidden high mile club]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[airplanes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[boeing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[boeing dreamliner]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[crew]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[crew quarters]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dreamliner]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:10:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=383486&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
