<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: Analysts]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/analysts</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'analysts']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Remainders - Stuff We Didn't Post (and Why)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p>Analysts Talk <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #appletablet" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/appletablet/">Apple Tablet</a>, Make Ever More Predictions...<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #madcatz" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/madcatz/">Mad Catz</a> Brings Cheaper <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #xbox360" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/xbox360/">Xbox 360</a> Wi-Fi Adapter, Still About $50 Too Expensive...<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #sonyreader" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/sonyreader/">Sony Reader</a> Firmware Upgrade Is Surprisingly Difficult...B&N Giftcards Will Work for Nook Ebook Purchases, Soon...</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/500x_apple-tablet-natgeo.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>Analysts Talk Apple Tablet, Make Ever More Predictions</h2>
<p>CNN Money rounded up a bunch of analysts to basically talk about how great the Apple Tablet is, how it's going to cure cancer and save the publishing industry and keep your girlfriend from leaving you, and it's mostly a rehash of what we've already heard before with a dash of a few inane statements that are almost certainly not true. Check this one:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The device will come in several different models that offer varieties of Internet connections, such as Wi-Fi or 3G, perhaps through a contract with AT&T.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Oh, really? Several different models, with varying internet connections? That sure sounds like Apple&mdash;they love confusing lineups that differ by virtue of technical specifications that only tech dorks like you and I understand.</p>
<p>Otherwise, nothing to see here, just more analyst talk. When something solid on the Apple Tablet leaks out, you'll know&mdash;and it ain't to be found in this article, which is why it lands, with a distinct PLOOP sound, into Remainders. [<a href="http://money.cnn.com/2009/11/16/technology/apple_tablet/">CNN</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/madcatz-wirelessn-11-16-09.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>Mad Catz Brings Cheaper Xbox 360 Wi-Fi Adapter, Still About $50 Too Expensive</h2>
<p>I just got an Xbox 360 this weekend, and somehow did not realize that not only does the console not ship with included Wi-Fi, but an external Wi-Fi adapter costs about as much as my drinking budget for the month&mdash;in other words, way too much money. Luckily Microsoft's first-party adapter isn't the only game in town anymore: Mad Catz is entering the ring with an adapter of their own. Great news, right? Except not really, because while the Mad Catz adapter is $20 cheaper than Microsoft's that's still an $80 pricetag on an item that should be included in the first place. This thing should cost $30 at the most, not half the price of the console. It's in Remainders for that very reason: Yeah, it's a price cut, but it's still way too damned expensive. [<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/16/mad-catz-takes-aim-at-microsoft-with-its-own-wireless-n-gaming-a/">Engadget</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/sony-prs-500-11-16-09.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>Sony Reader Firmware Upgrade Is Surprisingly Difficult</h2>
<p>The Sony Reader PRS-500 may not have the cachet of the Kindles and Nooks of the world, but Sony did just release an upgraded firmware supporting the soon-to-be-standard ePub format. Except I guess the upgrade is seriously difficult, because instead of, you know, pressing a button, like every other firmware upgrade for every other gadget in the history of the world, you have to mail the Reader back to Sony to get this one updated. What? Well, Sony's got an offer in case you find that as silly as I do: A trade-in program that gives you either $50 or $75 off the purchase of one of Sony's brand-new readers! Eesh, Sony. At least take us out to dinner before trying to screw us with our pants on. [<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/16/sony-offering-epub-upgrade-trade-in-program-for-prs-500-e-read/">Engadget</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/500x_fbd7939d674997cdb4692d34de8633c4.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>B&N Giftcards Will Work for Nook Ebook Purchases, Soon</h2>
<p>Remember when <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5404533/remainders-+-stuff-we-didnt-post-and-why/gallery/2">we reported</a> that Barnes & Noble's popular giftcards would, for some unknown reason, not be allowed to be spent on ebook purchases? Well, our reporting did its job, and B&N has decided to change its ways and allow ebook giftcard purchases starting in mid-December. We did it, people! High fives and ass-slaps all around! [<a href="http://bookclubs.barnesandnoble.com/t5/Unbound-The-eReading-Blog/Coming-Soon-Gift-Card-Purchases-for-eBooks/ba-p/413018">Barnes & Noble</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5406258/remainders-+-stuff-we-didnt-post-and-why/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5406258]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[analysts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple tablet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[barnes noble]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ebook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[giftcards]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gizmodo remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mad catz]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony reader]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wi-fi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xbox 360]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5406258&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Analysts Say Nokia Really Is Doomed by 2013, Apple to Pass It in 2011]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/n97main_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_n97main_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></a>We're not the only ones who <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5308440/nokia-n97-review-nokia-is-doomed">think Nokia is doomed</a> if they keep turning out smartphones like the N97. Generator Research says that Nokia's smartphone marketshare will plummet from over 40 percent today to only 20 percent by 2013.</p>
<p>They predict that Apple, on the other hand, will hit 33 percent marketshare by that point, matching Nokia sometime in 2011&mdash;just two years away&mdash;with 77 million phones.<br clear="all">
<br>
<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5309470/analysts-say-nokia-really-is-doomed-by-2013-apple-to-pass-it-in-2011">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a>That scenario, though, depends on some awesome conditions for Apple (think about 77 million iPhones!) on top of some truly horrific ignorance from Nokia, letting the smartphone market go almost entirely with a half-assed defense of its position as it focuses on profits from its mass volume low-cost wares in developing countries.</p>
<p>I don't really think it'll get <em>that</em> far, honestly, even if that's sorta kinda what Nokia seems to be doing right now. Besides, when have we ever listened to analysts? [<a href="http://macnn.com/rd/135154==http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.generatorresearch.com%2F&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNH6k6C89-Hjsz9R71aXS0p8twOWSw">Generator Research</a> via <a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/09/07/07/apple.may.overtake.nokia/">Electronista</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5309470/analysts-say-nokia-really-is-doomed-by-2013-apple-to-pass-it-in-2011]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5309470]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nokia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[analysts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 07 Jul 2009 19:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5309470&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Pre Hits 300,000 Sales In June, Dwarfs Palm's Previous Totals]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_palmpre_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;">We'll see plenty of "Pre sells X units in Y amount of time; not as many as iPhone" stories in the next year&mdash;in fact, we <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=19374">already have</a>. That <em>may</em> be the wrong way to look at it.</p>

<p><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged CHARTER EQUITY RESEARCH" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/charter-equity-research/">Charter Equity Research</a> is now saying that Palm has pushed over 300k Pres into sales channels in June alone, setting them on a pace to sell a million units in the first quarter. Set in the context of the iPhone 3G and 3GS's million-in-a-weekend sales pace, this doesn't sound like a ton. Set in the more meaningful context of Palm's sales last quarter, it's huge. As John Paczkowski <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090630/palm-sold-300000-pres-in-june/">points out</a>, the company sold just 351,000 phones <em>total</em> in the quarter preceding the launch of the Pre.</p>
<p>Palm may be waiting to release official numbers until supply issues are sorted out and they can claim a more flattering number, but this right here? Pretty impressive. If there was any lingering doubt that a single phone could salvage this ailing company (and assuming these numbers are right), it's gone now. [<a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2009/06/30/palm-pre-sales-topped-300000-in-june-analyst-says/">Barrons</a> via <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090630/palm-sold-300000-pres-in-june/">AllThingsD</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5304542/pre-hits-300000-sales-in-june-dwarfs-palms-previous-totals]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5304542]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[palm pre]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[analysts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[charter equity research]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm pre 300k]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm pre sales]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pre]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5304542&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Great Moments in Apple Analysis]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5280530/great-moments-in-apple-analysis">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged BENJAMIN REITZES" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/benjamin-reitzes/">Benjamin Reitzes</a> of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged BARCLAYS CAPITAL" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/barclays-capital/">Barclays Capital</a> drops this insightful load in a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/05/technology/companies/05apple.html?_r=2&hpw">NYT</a> piece on Apple strategy:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>If they start making products people don't want, and start losing users, then Apple's strategy will run into problems.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I'm going to have to say that this is the best quote I've ever seen. [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/05/technology/companies/05apple.html?_r=2&hpw">NYT</a> - <i>Thanks ponies!</i>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5280530/great-moments-in-apple-analysis]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5280530]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blockquote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[analyst]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[analyst quote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[analysts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple quote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[barclays]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[barclays capital]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[benjamin reitzes]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5280530&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[WTF: Bad Economy Actually Slowing HDTV Price Drops]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/12/LGTVS_cheaper.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/LGTVS_cheaper.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>One would think that a shitty economy = more cheap stuff for us consumers, right? You know, the whole "go out and shop!" brand of problem-solving we've become accustomed to? Not this time.</p>
<p>Analysts at DisplaySearch have told <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/19/technology/19flat.html?_r=1&ref=technology">Eric Taub at the NYTimes</a> that they are projecting a dismal year for TV sales in 2009: not only are sales of all TVs expected to decline in all of North America by 4%, LCD TV sales are expected to grow only 2%. That's compared to a 22% gain in 2008 and 77% in 2007. Always thought to be recession proof, TVs are getting hit.</p>
<p>But why the slowdown on continuously plunging prices? Expecting reduced sales, panel factories are cutting back on production. And if you've been paying attention, you know that production efficiencies at high volume (via things like <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5057047/incredible-secrets-of-the-worlds-largest-plasma-tv">150-inch panels of mother glass</a>) are what drives prices down.</p>
<p>DisplaySearch is seeing panel factories in Taiwan and Korea are currently scaled back to 80% capacity; pair that with cancelled plans for new, more efficient manufacturing plants, and you've got the recipe for a halt to the downward pricing trend on HDTVs:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Mr. Semenza [of DisplaySearch] expects that prices for LCD sets 32 inches and smaller will remain fairly stable. Retail prices on TVs 42 inches and larger will not decline as fast as they have in years past.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Bummer. [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/19/technology/19flat.html?_r=1&ref=technology">NYTimes</a>, Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/minthu/2572031979/">mgminthu/Flickr</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5114159/wtf-bad-economy-actually-slowing-hdtv-price-drops]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5114159]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Financiapocalypse]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[analysts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtvs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[home entertainment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd tvs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tvs]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Mahoney]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5114159&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Rumor Smash: No Zune Phone at CES]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/12/340x_no-zune-phone-ces2.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/>Sorry dudes. Just heard it first hand from Brian Seitz, Group Manager of Zune: "No Zune phone at CES."</p>
<p>Well, at least no Zune Phone as we're hearing it. A few days ago, some analysts stirred up the rumors of a Zune specific piece of hardware this week, complete with hardware details, which Barrons quoted. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5099004/cnbc-zune-phone-is-real-codenamed-pink">CNBC declared that a Zune Phone, called Project Pink</a>, was slated for CES. Mary Jo Foley at ZDNet, who separated the Zune Phone hardware from the Pink project <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1618">weeks ago</a> reminded us that Pink is not a piece of hardware but a platform of services that could allow Zune like services to run on platforms like Windows Mobile. (Although Mary Jo Foley told me today that she thinks that it would be powerful if Pink services ran on other devices, and I agree.) So leave the hardware and Pink apart for a moment. Mary Jo believes Pink could come at CES and with it, a platform for Zune like content on mobile devices, but in line with what Seitz has said on behalf of Microsoft and what Mary Jo Foley believes, I think the Analyst and CNBC have the details slightly skewed.</p>
<p>Both CNBC and the analyst <a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2008/12/08/microsoft-to-unveil-zunedanger-device-at-ces-keynote/">Barrons quoted</a> could have been talking to a manufacturer of a phone, describing a specific implementation of Zune like features on a given set of hardware, via Pink components. But coming from a company that builds their best devices in house, I don't think we can call a Zune Phone a Zune Phone until we see actual devices designed in house design by the Entertainment and Devices team. (To me, this stands in contrast with Google and its Android platform, where every implementation of the OS is a Google Phone, since they have no claim to making great hardware.)</p>
<p>Based on all this, I reiterate that my best guess is that we have is a good chance of seeing Pink, but not a Zune Phone, at CES 2009. [<a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1618">Thanks to Mary Jo Foley for her expertise</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5107042/rumor-smash-no-zune-phone-at-ces]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5107042]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[zune phone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[analysts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ces]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ces 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[media players]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pink]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[project pink]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor smash]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[zune]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:35:56 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5107042&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Analyst: Apple Getting Crazy With Huge Deals This Black Friday?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/11/apple_blackfriday.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/apple_blackfriday.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Apple generally tends to merely dip its Designed in California toe into the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/black-friday">Black Friday</a> blackwaters, usually offering a one-day $100-off promotion on a single product family via online and in-store purchases. But analysts at Barclay Capital and the folks at Apple Insider are projecting bigger things this year, which could include more aggressive one-time prices slashes across multiple families (iPhone potentially included).</p>
<p>The evidence seems to be in line: Apple Insider points at Apple's crazy-aggressive (for Apple) back-to-school promotion this year that offered a free iPod touch ($300 value) with a new notebook purchase (over previous years' Nanos), and a general feeling in the air that <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #blackfriday" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/blackfriday/">Black Friday</a> is going to be batshit crazy this year across the board. Also cited is Orange's plan to slash iPhone prices by &euro;50 for <em>Noël</em> in France—but take that with a bit more skepticism, because the international carriers have more lee-way over their localized pricing. So is this just stating the obvious? We shall see what happens. [<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/11/12/apple_may_launch_most_aggressive_black_friday_sale_yet.html">Apple Insider</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5085688/analyst-apple-getting-crazy-with-huge-deals-this-black-friday]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5085688]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[future dealzmodo?]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[analysts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple black friday]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[black friday]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dealzmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:50:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Mahoney]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5085688&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Analysts Predict Apple 2013: That's One Wonky Crystal Ball]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/05/340x_applefuture.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;float:none;"/>Foretelling Apple's next grooves is the national pastime for (some) geeks and an occupational obssession for analysts, who trip over themselves with crazy predictions in "notes" and reports to people with lots of money who want to make more. Forrester just released its big report on what Apple will be like in 2013, and it's a doozy&mdash;their crystal ball must be a Chinese knockoff, because it completely ignores the actual direction of not just Apple's wares, but gadgets and media as a whole. An Apple clock radio? <em>Really</em>?</p>
<p>To start, for people who supposedly have " years of tracking [Apple's] strategic product moves" they seem woefully unaware of products that Apple has out <em>right now</em>, much less where Apple is heading. For instance, they predict a whole new "home server" product/market to dish out your movies and music. Time Capsule could do that with a couple of firmware updates. And it's already out there.</p>
<p>The biggest thing is that they're seeing seven or eight major products at Apple's core where really there's just a few, at most. The illogic of Apple doing Geek Squad-style home installs or pumping out digital picture frames and media-streaming clock radios aside (yes Forrester really suggests all of those things), stuff is converging (or trying to), not multiplying and splintering. Macs, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #appletv" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/appletv/">Apple TV</a> and the iPhone cover most of what Forrester is proposing is the future of Apple and in a far less complicated way than they're imagining&mdash;what's missing is the content, but that's a wider problem, beyond and outside of Apple (and anyone else trying to make god boxes for the living room).</p>
<p>Here's our take on 2013: Fewer boxes and gadgets, more integration, more seamlessly. Can we get our six figures now? [<a href="http://forrester.com/rb/research">Forrester</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/392725/analysts-predict-apple-2013-thats-one-wonky-crystal-ball]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-392725]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[analysts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple tv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[home entertainment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 22 May 2008 14:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=392725&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple's Stock Drops 5.15%, Low Boom Count to Blame?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/09/Apple%20Stock%20Watch.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Wall Street can be such a fickle beast sometimes. Today, Apple revealed what could only be referred to as a monstrous unveiling of iPod-related material, and how do the investors repay them? With a 5.15% drop in the stock price. (Although we've done a few of our own calculations and have come to a striking realization.)</p>

<p>If you add the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #stevejobs" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/stevejobs/">Steve Jobs</a> <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #boomcount" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/boomcount/">boom count</a> (1 boom, 36 minutes into the presentation) to the number of hardware announcements (5-iPhone, touch, classic, nano & shuffle), then subtract the closing day stock price at WWDC '07 ($120.19) divided by the opening day stock price ($145.12), and then finally subtract our two cents, you get 5.15&mdash;the same as the percentage drop in Apple's stock today.</p>
<p>1+5-($120.19/$145.12)-.02=5.15 (rounded off)</p>
<p>See, we can be analysts too! [<a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http://finance.google.com/finance%3Fclient%3Dob%26q%3DAAPL&sa=X&oi=stock&ct=title&usg=AFQjCNHcdFowyunj3Wsh1U7wXvxbmgsEfA">AAPL</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/296868/apples-stock-drops-515-low-boom-count-to-blame]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-296868]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[stock]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[analysts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[boom count]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[classic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nano]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[steve jobs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[touch]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 05 Sep 2007 21:16:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[blongo3]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=296868&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[iPhone Software Update 'Arriving Shortly', Says VP of iPod Product Marketing]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2007/07/smallish_IMG_0518.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Greg Joswiak, Apple's VP of iPod Product Marketing, tells a bunch of analysts that the first iPhone <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #softwareupdate" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/softwareupdate/">software update</a> will be coming soon. Analysts then went on to speculate that the update could bring:</p>
<blockquote>new widgets, peer-to-peer applications (chat, picture messaging, social networking), location-based services, MMS support, home networking, and possibly some integration with Mac OS X Leopard.</blockquote>
<p>Of course, all of that is unconfirmed since it came from analysts, not Apple. These analysts also claimed that both lower priced ($349-$399) and higher priced (something more than $599) iPhone models are coming, differentiated not by features, but on storage. The one thing we do know: the software update is coming soon. [<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/07/07/31/apples_first_iphone_software_update_to_arrive_shortly.html">Apple Insider</a> via <a href="http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2007/07/rumors-iphone-s.html">Wired</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/284528/iphone-software-update-arriving-shortly-says-vp-of-ipod-product-marketing]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-284528]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[analysts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software update]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 31 Jul 2007 16:19:44 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=284528&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Rumor: Apple Bombarding Market With 3 Million iPhones At Launch, Plus More Ridiculous Numbers]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/06/jesus_phone.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Businessweek claims two sources told them Apple will have 3 million iPhones ready for the launch on June 29. This is an absurdly high number. For comparison, Nintendo's Wii had <a href="http://kotaku.com/gaming/sony/1-million-wii-at-north-america-launch-202977.php">1 Million units</a>. The PS3? 400,000. Xbox 360? Around 300,000. So Apple's going to have about twice as much as all of them put together? Amazing. And probably unlikely.</p>
<p>Here are some more unlikely numbers.</p>

<p>Analyst Gene Munster from Piper Jaffray projects that Apple will sell 40 million iPhones in 2009. (A similar article on macnn.com actually claims that he says 45 million iPhones in 2009.) Plus, other analysts are saying 3 million iPhones in 2007 and 10 to 12 million in 2008.</p>
<p>To put all this guesswork into perspective, it helps to know that Apple doesn't give any extra access to analysts. Which means they're pretty much in the same boat the rest of us are when it comes to predictions. <span class="byline">&ndash; Jason Chen</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jun2007/tc20070606_154290.htm">How Big Will the iPhone Be?</a> [Businessweek]</p>
<p><a href="http://www.macnn.com/articles/07/06/07/45m.iphone.sales.by.2009/">Analyst predits 45m iPhone sales by 2009</a> [Macnn]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/266967/rumor-apple-bombarding-market-with-3-million-iphones-at-launch-plus-more-ridiculous-numbers]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-266967]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[analysts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[predictions]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:00:41 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=266967&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Analyst: The iPhone Really Is the Jesusphone]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/05/zoidberg%20jesus.jpg" class="right image158" width="158" />Tomi T Ahonen, self-proclaimed "world's leading 3G strategy consultant," unabashedly declares:</p>
<blockquote>Much like the Western calendar marks time from before and after Jesus Christ, and how the computer world changed totally by the Macintosh&mdash;remembering that Windows is Microsoft's copy of the Mac operating system&mdash;I am certain that the mobile telecoms world will count its time in two Eras. The Era BI: time Before the iPhone, and the ERA AI: time After the iPhone.</blockquote>
Hit the jump for more of his predictions.
<p>He views the iPhone model of mobile multimedia, multitasking thingamajigger as a new paradigm, on top of which a new Silicon Valley bubble will be built, since "Microsoft, Dell, HP, Intel, IBM, any IT company will suddenly want a cellphone strategy. Mobile experts will suddenly be in short supply," making this "the new dawn of the computer age. The real revival after the dot-com bust."</p>
<p>For all of his hyperbolic bombast, however, he's more than likely spot on in one respect: mobile advertising will probably become more aggressive post-iPhone and iClones, given the range of content that will ostensibly be viewed on them, and to nod his way, the size of the screen.</p>
<p>What do you guys think? Dawn of a new era or over-hyped blip on the gadget radar? How bonkers (or not) is Tomi? <span class="byline">&ndash; Matt Buchanan</span></p>
<p><a href="http://communities-dominate.blogs.com/brands/2007/05/entering_iphone.html">Entering iPhone Era: Marking Time in Mobile</a> [Communities Dominate Brands via <a href="a%20href=">Smart Mobs</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/261886/analyst-the-iphone-really-is-the-jesusphone]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-261886]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[analyst antics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[analysts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 19 May 2007 16:30:49 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=261886&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Forbes Analyst: 10 Million iPhones? Good Luck]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2007/03/340x_jobsbling.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/> Taesik Yoon, an <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/analyst-apple-will-release-flashbased-subnotebook-flash-ipods-free-puppies-243105.php">analyst</a> over at Forbes, rolls off why investors shouldn't gleefully pump money into Apple stock betting on the <a href="http://stage.gizmodo.com/gadgets/iphone/">iPhone</a> to return their investment in gold bullion. A lot of it's familiar&mdash;high price point, ill fit with the smart phone market despite its potential growth&mdash;but some of it's a bit newish.</p>
<p>For one, even if it does blow up the smart phone market, that market is less than 10 percent of the total mobile market, and much of its growth has been spurred, in fact, by cheaper smart phones.</p>

<p>The other point is that even though the "new AT&T" has nearly 70 million subs, the iPhone's only going to grab new or renewing customers&mdash;it doesn't necessarily have access to that whole base. Yoon speculates that this exclusivity could be a way for Apple to draw envious eyes while working out the kinks, before rolling it out in a broader fashion, much like it did with the original iPod.</p>
<p>Regardless, his best point, which gets at the real question of how successful the iPhone can or will be, is that "a product, no matter how promising, can easily fail to live up to expectations if the market is just not there."</p>
<p>Is the market there? If so, where&mdash;between smart and high-end phones, or in an altogether heretofore undefined one in the US? Can Apple simply create the market if it doesn't already exist? <span class="byline">&ndash; Matt Buchanan</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.forbes.com/personalfinance/2007/03/08/apple-nokia-motorola-pf-ii-in_ty_0308soapbox_inl.html">Beware Apple's iPhone Froth</a> [Forbes via <a href="http://ilounge.com/index.php/news/comments/apple-could-struggle-to-sell-10-million-iphones-by-2008/">iLounge</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/243567/forbes-analyst-10-million-iphones-good-luck]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-243567]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[analysts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cingular]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[forbes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 12 Mar 2007 17:20:44 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=243567&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Cell Phones Grimier Than Public Toilets]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/01/Dirty%20Cell.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /> All you mysophobes out there may wanna listen to this. A new study reveals that your cell phone carries more muck on it than the bottom of your shoe. Researchers at Dial-a-Phone collected swabs from everyday objects like keyboards, shoes, and even toilet seats and in each case, the swab that was exposed to the surface of a cell phone was the dirtiest of the bunch. Apparently phones are perfect bacteria carriers since we tend to keep them warm and toasty inside our pockets. Their advice: "wipe!" Couldn't have said it better myself, though this makes me hesitate about lending out my cell and using other people's mobiles when my battery goes dead. <span class="byline">&ndash; Louis Ramirez</span><a href=""></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2007/1/prweb497735.htm">Press Release</a> [via <a href="http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2007/01/cell_phones_fil.html">Gadget Lab</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/229685/cell-phones-grimier-than-public-toilets]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-229685]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[analysts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dial-a-phone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dirty]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:00:04 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Louis Ramirez]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=229685&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Egg-Headed Analysts: Sony PS3 to Win Console War]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2007/01/ps3_xbox360_wii.jpg"><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/01/ps3_xbox360_wii.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>Navel-gazing think tankers at Research and Markets say even though the Sony PS3 has lost the opening battle, it will still win the console war, predicting an installed base of 75 million PS3s around the world by 2010. Researchers at the Yankee Group echo that, predicting the PS 3 up top by 2011 with a 44% <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MARKET SHARE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/market-share/">market share</a>, <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged XBOX 360" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/xbox-360/">Xbox 360</a> in second at 40% and the Nintendo Wii trailing with 16%.</p>
<p>Tossing out on their asses those who forecast gaming console sales by throwing darts at a dartboard, let's take a look at the real numbers: Xbox 360 has sold 9.44 million units so far, the Wii has moved 2.2 million, compared to the measly 854,627 units of the PS3. Maybe those researchers aren't paying any attention to which gaming consoles are actually fun to play. Who's your daddy, PS3? <span class="byline">&ndash; Charlie White</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.playfuls.com/news_05674_Research_and_Markets_PS3_To_Win_The_Console_War.html">Research and Markets: PS3 To Win The Console War</a> [Playfuls.com, via <a href="http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=8932">Dvorak Uncensored</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/225655/egg+headed-analysts-sony-ps3-to-win-console-war]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-225655]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[home entertainment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Gaming]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ Microsoft Nintendo PS3 Sony Wii]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[360"]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[analysts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[console wars]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[consoles]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[share]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xbox]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 03 Jan 2007 09:35:12 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie White]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=225655&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Mac Users Are a Bunch of Geezers]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/12/mac_users_older.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /> I've never been a fan of "analyst studies." They're usually so out of touch with reality that there's no point to them. Take this one for instance. Market research firm MetaFacts did some investigative reporting and found out that almost half (46%) of Mac users are 55 or older, whereas only 25% of the Wintel crowd hits that age bracket. Who has the 18-24 demographic? Gateway. I can see the Gateway part having some credibility (I got my first Gateway Pentium II when I was that age), but the Mac part? C'mon. <span class="byline">&ndash; Louis Ramirez</span><a href=""></a></p>
<p>Hey, Gramps, Can I Borrow Your Mac? [via <a href="http://www.therawfeed.com/2006/12/mac-users-are-old-pc-users-young-study.html">The Raw Feed</a> via <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=EDKCRBZEJQTPMQSNDLRCKH0CJUNN2JVN?articleID=196600880&subSection=">InformationWeek</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/218756/mac-users-are-a-bunch-of-geezers]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-218756]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[analysts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[metafacts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[old]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 01 Dec 2006 16:55:34 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Louis Ramirez]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=218756&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Zune's Brown Color Sucks, Analyst Says]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/11/zuneplayers_stink.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Microsoft marketing geniuses figured out that brown is the new black (or white), painting up the Zune in a color that a lot of people associate with a brick of shit. Now here come the second-guessing analysts, and one named Rob Enderle from the Enderle Group says that Microsoft stands alone in its edgy choice of brown as a hot new color. Is brown cool? "No other hardware company has come to that conclusion," he said, blaming the color for the player's somewhat slow intro.</p>
<p>So let's vote on it. Our earlier <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/portable-media/brown-zune-looks-like-its-made-of-swamp-water-jello-214509.php">poll just at the Zune's launch</a> showed mild acceptance of the brown Zune, rejection of white, and a preference for black. Now that many of you have had a chance to actually see the brown one, we put this more-specific question to you, dear readers:<br></p>

<p><script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript" src="http://polls.gawker.com/poll.js.php?key==QTNxMTM">
</script><noscript>
<p><b>Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.</b></p>
</noscript></p>
<p>We've seen all three colors of the Zune, and I actually like the brown one best. With its painted-on-the-inside translucent weirdness, I only wish it were a bit more rounded and smaller, not a different color. <span class="byline">&ndash; Charlie White</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nbc11.com/news/10417822/detail.html">TechTrends: Microsoft Zune Fails With Color, Sex Appeal</a> [NBC11.com]<br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/218274/zunes-brown-color-sucks-analyst-says]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-218274]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[portable media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[analysts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[brown]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[colors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft zune]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 30 Nov 2006 10:12:58 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie White]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=218274&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
