<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: AOL]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/aol</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'aol']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[AOL's New Bland Logo Won't Save It From Irrelevancy]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/aol-logo.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_aol-logo.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Oh, AOL, American Online, Aol. Whatever the fuck you call yourself now. Does your new bland logo&mdash;the one to which you switched today, with the annoying punctuation&mdash;come with a floppy disk? No? Whatever. I'm still not interested.</p>
<p>And what's with the clipart background, anyway. Consider yourself ironbarred. [<a href="http://www.aol.com/">AOL</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5423264/aols-new-bland-logo-wont-save-it-from-irrelevancy]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5423264]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aol new logo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:38:52 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5423264&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[AOL's Slow Death Continues: A Third of Staff Must Go]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/aolfire3.jpg" height="120" width="160" />After telling its investors that $200 million has been put aside to jettison a third of its payroll, AOL is looking for 2,500 staff to take voluntary redundancies&mdash;jump now, or be pushed later. It's all designed to shave about $300 million off its annual 1.8 billion operating expenses. Instant messaging client, ICQ, is also up for sale, and Mapquest could be next. As always, we're surprised that AOL still even exists. [<a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/aol-asks-2500-employees-to-quit-2009-11">Business Insider</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5408329/aols-slow-death-continues-a-third-of-staff-must-go]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5408329]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[AOL Layoffs]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 19 Nov 2009 10:07:14 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5408329&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Remainders - Things We Didn't Post]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p>Verizon's Android Lineup Gets an Addition With HTC Sense...Yahoo Starts News Blog, Contributes to Death of Legitimate Journalism...Vuzix New Video Glasses Look Like Oakleys, Not as Hip as Wayfarers...AOL Hints at Some Mysterious Surprise, I'm Surprised AOL Still Exists...</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/htc-desire-itw-rm-eng.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><br>
Remember when Verizon had the best network and the worst phones? Actually, you don't have to remember, since that's still (subjectively) true right now, but not for long&mdash;the Big Red's upcoming Android lineup is looking outrageously promising, with the Hero, Sholes, Droid, Calgary, and now a mysterious new handset called the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #htcdesire" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/htcdesire/">HTC Desire</a>. We spied the name on a Verizon inventory list a month and a half ago, and now we've got a photo of it&mdash;and it looks, well, sort of like the Hero. It's clearly boasting HTC's Sense UI and we can very faintly make out a trackball. The only other thing we're pretty sure about is that the Desire will be a touchscreen-only phone: No keyboard here, folks. Honestly it looks a lot like the Hero, but it may have some distinguishing feature we just don't know about yet. [<a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/10/22/verizons-htc-desire-spotted-in-the-wild-lauching-soon/">Boy Genius Report</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/yahoo-office.png" class="left image340" width="340" /><br>
Yahoo is getting ready to launch a new news blog, which will consist of both original reporting and linking out to other sites, because that's how journalism is done nowadays. They've recruited Andrew Golis, publisher of Talking Points Memo, and will incorporate the new blog into the already popular Yahoo News page. Why's it in Remainders? Because I really, really doubt anyone bothered to read this far into a post about a Yahoo news blog. [<a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/10/21/yahoo-will-launch-a-new-news-blog/">Giga Om</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/Visor01.jpeg.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><br>
Vuzix's new <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5360006/vuzix-wrap-310-video-sunglasses-look-less-dorky-than-ever">Wrap 310</a> video glasses, which begin shipping today, are much in the same vein as Vuzix's previous products, only slightly less silly-looking. This time, they've opted for the "dorky Oakleys" look, while giving a 16:9 picture that appears the same size as a 55-inch picture at ten feet. It also includes, in case you forget, noise-isolating earbuds and compatibility with a whole mess of different video sources (including all iPhone and iPod with video models). It ended up in Remainders because who wears video glasses besides that Reading Raindbow guy? As a side note, sort of, did you guys know that Reading Rainbow has left this mortal coil? Usually I scoff at old people who get teary-eyed about the way things used to be (ha, newspapers!) but seriously you guys we will have to officially cede the title of Greatest Country in the Universe if our bright-eyed children don't have access to Reading Rainbow. [<a href="http://www.vuzix.com/iwear/products_wrap310.html">Vuzix</a>, <a href="http://videogum.com/archives/death/heaven-just-got-a-little-more-reading-rainbow_087021.html">Videogum</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/aol_01.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><br>
AOL hinted, at the Web 2.0 Summit today, that they've got something big up their sleeves. "We have been working on something for the last three months that I think is a fairly substantial shift in our technology," said Tim Armstrong. CNET surmises that this big shift is something to do with their extensive roster of blogs, since Armstrong mentioned AOL has been poaching writers from respectable publications like the Wall Street Journal and ESPN. Thrilling stuff, you guys. If you have to ask why this is in Remainders, congratulations for not falling asleep already. [<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13577_3-10381597-36.html">CNET</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5388213/remainders-+-things-we-didnt-post/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5388213]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gizmodo remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc desire]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vuzix]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vuzix wrap 310]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 23 Oct 2009 01:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5388213&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Let's Look At Credit Score Rankings by Email Domains]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/credit.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_credit.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Ranking the highest according to a sample of 20,000 <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #creditscores" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/creditscores/">credit scores</a> and their corresponding email addresses are BellSouth and Comcast, with Gmail trailing right behind. Reasonable enough, but what's AOL doing anywhere but at the bottom? [<a href="http://mashable.com/2009/10/18/credit-scores-email/">Mashable</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5385411/lets-look-at-credit-score-rankings-by-email-domains]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5385411]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[image cache]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bellsouth]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chart]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[comcast]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[credit]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[credit scores]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gmail]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hotmail]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[msn]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5385411&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[AOL Tries to Extort Bogus Fees From Wall Street Journal Writer]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5307594/aol-tries-to-extort-bogus-fees-from-wall-street-journal-writer">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a>AOL tried to squeeze a little over $100 in fees from a customer for upgrades he hadn't asked for, hadn't approved, hadn't used and of which he hadn't even been notified. Unluckily for AOL, that customer is a professional writer.</p>
<p>Current <em>Wall Street Journal</em> writer <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged JASON ZWEIG" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/jason-zweig/">Jason Zweig</a> used to work for a Time-Warner-owned magazine, and when Time Warner merged with AOL, he and his colleagues all received free AOL email accounts. Zweig gave his to his wife, who used it up until last year.</p>
<p>But recently, Zweig started receiving phone calls from AOL's customer service reps in India, saying he owed $103.60 for an upgrade he knew nothing about. Turns out the terms of agreement he signed years ago may (or may not) have included a section allowing AOL to upgrade his service and charge him for it. Zweig point-blank refused to pay for any ridiculous upgrade that may well not exist, and AOL tried to bargain him down to $85.</p>
<p>The argument devolved into AOL insisting they would attempt to collect through legal channels, and Zweig welcoming them to, as he plans to file a fraud report before they'd be able to do anything of the sort. We guess when you've floundered as much as AOL has in recent years, all you can do is try to extort old customers. It's just bad luck one of their targets happens to write for one of the country's largest news organizations. [<a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/wallet/2009/07/02/youve-got-blackmail-the-aol-account-that-wouldnt-die/">Wall Street Journal</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5307594/aol-tries-to-extort-bogus-fees-from-wall-street-journal-writer]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5307594]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[extortion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[america online]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aol wall street journal]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jason zweig]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[payment]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 04 Jul 2009 21:15:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5307594&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[iPhone AIM and Beejive IM Apps With Push Notifications Are Live]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5300371/iphone-aim-and-beejive-im-apps-with-push-notifications-are-live">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a>There are two versions of the AIM app in the App Store right now. The free one, with ads, and the $2.99 one, with no ads. They both have <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged PUSH NOTIFICATIONS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/push-notifications/">push notifications</a>.</p>
<p>The app does what was touted this year at the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged IPHONE 3.0" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphone-3%270/">iPhone 3.0</a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5170767/iphone-os-30-liveblog-archive">event</a>: display notifications when the app is closed, show you how many outstanding messages you have and basically keep you "connected" to the AIM service even when you're not actively using the app. The free version is <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=281704574&mt=8">here</a> and the pay version is <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=306610781&mt=8">here</a>.</p>
<p>We personally would go with the free version until the pay version of the <i>better</i> IM apps (Beejive, for example) go live. Boy Genius <a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/06/22/apple-approving-apps-with-push-beejive-goes-live/">says it's live now</a>, but we're still seeing the old version in the store. [<a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/22/now-were-talking-aim-with-push-support-hits-the-app-store/?awesm=tcrn.ch_4Ov&utm_campaign=techcrunch&utm_content=techcrunch-autopost&utm_medium=tcrn.ch-twitter&utm_source=direct-tcrn.ch">TechCrunch</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5300371/iphone-aim-and-beejive-im-apps-with-push-notifications-are-live]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5300371]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[im]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[instant messenger]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iPhone 3.0]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone aim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[push notifications]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:58:12 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5300371&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[AOL and Time Warner to Break Up]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>AOL and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged TIME WARNER" title="Click here to read more posts tagged TIME WARNER" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/time-warner/">Time Warner</a> will split into two distinct entities by the end of the year. What AOL will do out in the cold without Time Warner's blanket, only time will tell. [<a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/28/splitsville-for-aol-and-time-warner/">NYT</a>]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5272004/aol-and-time-warner-to-break-up]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5272004]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aol time warner]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[time warner]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 28 May 2009 11:59:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5272004&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Six Technologies That Passed America By]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/03/honestabe.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/honestabe.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a>With America's status as a technological superpower comes a tendency to occasionally straight <em>ignore</em> the rest of the world. For better or for worse, here are technologies we've all but completely missed out on.<br clear="all"></p>

<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/ld.jpg" width="250" height="187"><strong>Laserdiscs</strong><br>
<br>
When Laserdisc player production <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5130944/pioneer-stops-making-new-laserdisc-players-finally-concedes-to-vhs">finally spun down</a> a month or so ago, it wasn't much of an occasion. I mean, aside from inspiring a little grade-school nostalgia and upsetting a hobbyist or three, the event wasn't materially notable. For us, that is. It turns out that Laserdiscs were much more popular in Japan than America during their heyday&mdash;about 500% more popular.</p>
<p>Why? The Japanese success of the Laserdisc (or Videodisc, as they were marketed there) comes down to the two things: money and anime. From launch, Laserdisc prices were lower in Japan than in most other markets, which accelerated adoption. Anime fans appreciated the format's improved fidelity, which drove sales at the time and eventually led to the still-active secondhand LD market. Laserdisc players, though no longer produced, are still available in the shops of Akihabara and elsewhere. At a Best Buy in Akron? Not so much.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/nokia.jpg" width="250" height="167"><strong>Nokia Phones</strong><br>
<br>
When Nokia does something interesting, <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5150444/nokia-5800-xpressmusic-to-come-stateside-on-feb-26-for-399">we take notice</a>. Otherwise, in the US the company exists in an awkward netherworld of ultra-high name recognition and almost infinitesimal relevance. To most Americans, Nokia looks like a budget-phone maker. To most of the rest of the world, they're the undisputed king of cellphonery, and not just in name&mdash;they're by far the largest manufacturer of handsets on the planet. They literally dwarf their competition, selling <em>double</em> the volume of their nearest competitor, Samsung.</p>
<p>By the numbers: Nokia moved 113 million mobile devices in the last quarter <em>alone</em>, their entry-level 1100 handset has <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2007/05/07/nokia-1100-over-200-million-sold.html">sold over 200m units</a>, and at one point the N95, a precocious, clunky do-it-all handset <a href="http://www.esato.com/news/article.php/id=1638">topped the mobile phone sales charts</a> in the UK. Where does the US stand in all of this? Of those 113 million mobile devices sold last quarter, just <em>five million</em> found their way to North America. Even the <a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/rbssConsumerGoodsAndRetailNews/idUKLN32302420090123">iPhone matched those numbers</a> while RIM's BlackBerry nearly doubled them. Nokia is the gadget equivalent of the BBC&mdash;most Americans know about it, but the rest of the world <em>depends</em> on it.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/1seg.jpg" width="250" height="250"><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MOBILE TV" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/mobile-tv/">Mobile TV</a></strong><br>
<br>
I'm not talking about expensive, pixelated video-over-3G services here. No, I mean full-fledged digital TV streamed straight to your handset, PC or PMP. Brazil has it, South Korea has it, and of course, so does Japan. The tech used in Japan and Brazil is known as 1seg, and it broadcasts over UHF alongside regular HD content. In Japan, more than two thirds of new mobile phones support the standard, which is a part of daily life for many people. Here, it's basically unheard of.</p>
<p>DMB is a alternative standard, targeted at a much wider audience. Developed in South Korea, the satellite and terrestrial version of the tech (S-DMB and T-DMB, respectively) are already in widespread use there and T-DMB is being deployed across much of Western Europe&mdash;trials appear to be going fairly well. Unfortunately for us, the VHF and UHF bands used by the T-DMB standard have already been claimed by preexisting TV programming and the military, so don't expect to see terrestrial TV on AT&T or Verizon phones anytime soon, though yours might be capable of the <a href="http://www.moconews.net/entry/419-mwc-mediaflo-as-a-paid-service-is-struggling-qualcomm-wont-own-and-oper/">pay-for-play MediaFlo service that nobody uses</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/ewallet.jpg" width="250" height="141"><strong>Osaifu-Keitai, or, Your Phone Is Your Wallet</strong><br>
<br>
In much of the world, including the US of A, mobile payment systems have been ignored or abandoned after fitful starts. Not in Japan (if you're noticing a trend here, <em>good job!</em>). Osaifu-Keitai, the e-wallet standard adopted by Japanese telecom heavyweights NTT DoCoMo, SoftBank and au, essentially renders wallets obsolete. Phones equipped with Osaifu-Keitai can be charged with money, download tickets for anything from a sporting event to a plane trip, serve as official identification or link to a credit card.</p>
<p>Due to uncertainties about demand for such a service and <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5138793/red-tape-greed-blocking-widespread-us-cell-phone-credit-card-transactions">loads of red tape</a> , no comparable standard has emerged stateside, and it's a shame: If you can come to terms with the nebulous privacy issues associated with carrying so much private information on a losable device, it does seem like the plain, obvious and fundamentally <em>good</em> type of technological progress that is probably, with or without our assent, inevitable. Oh well.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/windowslive.jpg" width="250" height="250"><strong>Next-Gen Instant Messaging</strong><br>
<br>
AOL (emphasis on the <em>A</em>), burdened with decades-old stereotypes about its tech-tarded users and a persistent association with both geriatrics and late-'90s Meg Ryan movies, doesn't have the best public image. But they do still run the nation's most popular messaging platform! AIM, despite being a vestige of a service that its parent company doesn't really care much about anymore, is the de facto standard for messaging in the US (and Israel, strangely). As we saw earlier though, that doesn't always mean much.</p>
<p>Worldwide AIM/ICQ/iChat numbers are massively outclassed by MSN, or Windows Live as it's been called for the last few years. In China, the largest IM market, most people don't bother with either, opting for the Tencent QQ service. Both were born a solid five years after AIM, but their extra features&mdash;mostly messaging add-ons meant to appeal to a younger set&mdash;are questionably useful. It's not so much that sticking with AIM has left Americans on an inferior service, it's that it has isolated us, in a small way, from the rest of the messaging world.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/md.jpg" width="250" height="276"><strong>MiniDisc</strong><br>
<br>
The story of the MiniDisc epitomizes tech regionalism: A solid, capable contender for recordable audio format dominance, the MD was met with enthusiasm in Japan. It was <em>extremely advanced</em> for its time, rolling fantastic, CD-like audio quality with the recording abilities of a cassette, all in a package that was more portable than either. Despite being introduced in the early '90s, the format held up well against the first generation of MP3 players, which, with their limited capacities, slim feature sets and high prices, didn't really provide a perceptible advantage over the venerable MD units. Sony had a solid product&mdash;and even a bit of a hit&mdash;on its hands.</p>
<p>At least, that's how the story went in Tokyo. Despite Sony's best efforts&mdash;and what seemed like an endless string of product revamps&mdash;the MiniDisc was never more than a marginal player in the US. Sure, it earned plaudits from audiophiles and musicians (check out the recording information for the thousands of concerts on <a href="http://www.archive.org">Archive.org</a> if you don't believe me), but the format never took off, either as a recording medium or, due to risk-averse record companies and the high cost of the actual media, as a competitor for the CD. When MP3 players came of age, the MD's door to America finally latched shut for good. Sony, of course, took a while to get the message, and Steve Jobs was laughing the whole time.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5162719/six-technologies-that-passed-america-by]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5162719]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[usa! usa!]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[1seg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[america]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dmb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[e-payment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[e-wallet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ewallets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[japan]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[korea]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laserdiscs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mobile tv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[msn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nokia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Osaifu-Keitai]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[qq]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[s-dmb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-dmb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[technology america doesn't have]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[usa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows live messenger]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5162719&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[RIM Bringing AOL Mail, AIM and ICQ to All BlackBerry Smartphones]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/09/thumb160x_aol-bold_01.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />I know all of you BlackBerry fans have been waiting forever for the true <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #aolmail" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/aolmail/">AOL Mail</a> experience on your cellphone right? Right? Yeahhhhhh! Seriously though, if you would prefer true AIM and ICQ as opposed to third-party IM clients, now is your chance to get a deeply integrated, feature-rich AOL experience on the go. Hit up the BlackBerry website to grab the new software. [<a href="http://na.blackberry.com/eng/devices/features/im/">BlackBerry</a> via <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/09/10/rim-to-include-aim-aol-mail-and-icq-on-all-smartphones/">CrunchGear</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5048181/rim-bringing-aol-mail-aim-and-icq-to-all-blackberry-smartphones]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5048181]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aol mail]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[icq]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[im]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5048181&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[AIM Finally Released for Windows Mobile]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/08/thumb160x_aim_winmo.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />It's been <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5018809/aol-blesses-windows-mobile-with-new-aim-client">in beta</a> for the last few months, but for <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windowsmobile" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windowsmobile/">Windows Mobile</a> users who'd rather not risk their phone to be a lab rat in a suit, AIM for Windows Mobile is now in final release form. If you are on your mobile now, just go to <a href="http://wap.aol.com/,">this link</a> and hit "products" to make the download. If you are on a Windows Mobile device and you don't want AIM, then we are truly, truly sorry for wasting your time. Feel free to drop by Brian Lam's place for a personal apology via back rub any time. No, it won't be strange at all. [<a href="http://mobile.aol.com/aolproducts/aim-for-windows-mobile">AOL</a> via <a href="http://www.mobileburn.com/news.jsp?Id=5152">MobileBurn</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5040602/aim-finally-released-for-windows-mobile]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5040602]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[aim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[instant messenger]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows mobile AIM]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 22 Aug 2008 14:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5040602&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Google to Mask Data Before Handover, YouTubers Now Safe From Viacom]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/07/340x_yoouuttuubbee.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />In the ongoing legal kerfuffle between Viacom and Google, it was beginning to look like Youtube users were going to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5021838/youtube-forced-to-reveal-username-and-ip-address-of-every-video-watched">take the fall</a> for the Goog. Privacy advocates cried foul when a judge ruled that Google had to turn over the IP addresses and user IDs of the viewers for every YouTube video to Viacom, but in a document filed yesterday both companies agreed to mask the user data, assigning arbitrary identifiers to users in lieu of actual info. The masking system will likely be similar to AOL's hilarious botched search dataset experiment two years ago, but I'd say a public release of this data is unlikely. [<a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080715-viacom-google-agree-to-mask-12tb-of-youtube-user-data.html">Ars</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5025503/google-to-mask-data-before-handover-youtubers-now-safe-from-viacom]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5025503]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[viacom]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:56:35 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5025503&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[AOL Raises Dial-up Prices For Luddites]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/07/06/ad/340x_06ade59dee2ddadac1aa687a405cd8e5.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/></p>
<p>Going through our logs we can tell that nearly a dozen of you are still using AOL via dial-up. For lots of people in remote locales it's their only choice, and starting at the end of the month their bills are going to be going up a whopping $2 a month from $9.99 to $11.99. That's about 20%, but they don't <i>have</i> to pay it; AOL is offering users the chance to keep their $9.99 plans if they pinky swear to not call technical support if its not a connection-related issue. How exactly does this work?</p>
<p>Does AOL give them a different support number so they can tell who's who? Does the technician's caller-ID pop up and display, "This is a $9.99 customer, do not help"? Are they shunned in AOL chatrooms as being unclean? We're not sure.</p>
<p>We're pretty sure AOL is doing this because there are many people who would call AOL support for non-dial-up related problems. Grandma knows they can help with some problems and assumes they're there to help with all problems. While it's weird making customers choose a different plan to avoid this problem, we can completely understand. [<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-9980905-93.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-20">CNet</a>, via <a href="http://consumerist.com/tag/aol/?i=5021630&t=aol-just-wants-to-be-left-alone">Consumerist</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5021667/aol-raises-dial+up-prices-for-luddites]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5021667]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dial-up]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[isps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[luddites]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wtf]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 02 Jul 2008 22:43:49 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Hickey]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5021667&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Blackberry OS 4.5 Not Officially Arriving Until September]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/06/97/b3/thumb160x_97b3e0d7bd8e807a4cec3d81df7bef7b.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5018636/rims-blackberry-bis-v25-due-on-june-28-will-include-html-email-support">Blackberry Internet Services 2.5 upgrade</a> (and subsequent downtime) is still go for a June 29 launch, but there's a catch. According to the Boy Genius Report, some of the "sexiest" 2.5 features won't be available until <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #blackberryos45" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/blackberryos45/">Blackberry OS 4.5</a> arrives—in September. From the looks of the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #bis25" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/bis25/">BIS 2.5</a> presentation they got their boy-sized mitts on, at least one of those features is push AOL email and Hotmail/MSN accounts. Of course, if you have a newer Blackberry handset, or plan on buying one before September, it will come with 4.5 OS already installed. [<a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2008/06/28/blackberry-bis-25-presentation-os-45-not-coming-til-september/">Boy Genius Report</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5020493/blackberry-os-45-not-officially-arriving-until-september]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5020493]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bis]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[BIS 2.5]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Blackberry OS 4.5]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[crackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hotmail]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[msn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[push mail]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Loftus]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5020493&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[AOL Blesses Windows Mobile With New AIM Client]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/06/0e/68/thumb160x_0e68605e98c1db7d20141b64a5e2c5e2.png" class="left image158" width="158" /> After years of neglect, AOL has apparently remembered that <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windowsmobile" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windowsmobile/">Windows Mobile</a> exists and just released a new official AIM client. Though still in beta, it's supposedly compatible with all WinMo 5 and 6 devices. It looks pretty swank, at least as far as WinMo apps go, and more than satisfying for a mobile AIM client. Hopefully this means they're cooking up one for the iPhone too. [<a href="http://beta.aol.com/projects.php?project=aimwinmobile">AOL</a> via <a href="http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=402140">XDA Developers</a> via <a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2008/06/23/aol-releases-new-windows-mobile-aim-client-hell-freezes-over/">BGR</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5018809/aol-blesses-windows-mobile-with-new-aim-client]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5018809]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[windows mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[instant messaging]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5018809&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[AOL Desktop 1.0 Comes to Mac]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/05/340x_aolscreen.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Things I'd do before installing AOL Desktop software onto my Mac:</p>
<p>1. Eat a live cockroach.<br>
2. Get a Darth Maul facial tattoo.<br>
3. Start running.<br>
4. Date any of the contestants from The Bachelor.</p>
<p>For those who have already completed alternatives 1-4, feel free to hit the jump to scope the details.</p>

<blockquote>Speed Installs in seconds and launches fast &mdash; so you can begin browsing immediately, without signing in. The new browser has been completely rebuilt to allow for maximum compatibility and quicker page loading.
<p>Tabbed IM and Browser<br>
Tabs on the browser and instant messages give you easy access and an uncluttered, organized view for all of your windows. AOL Desktop for Mac &mdash; Your Online Life Organized.</p>
<p>Custom Toolbar<br>
Keep your favorite AOL sites right at your fingertips. You can select from more than 25 different AOL channels and features to add to your AOL toolbar. Want to add a "Write Mail" icon to your toolbar? No problem!</p>
<p>Easy Transition<br>
New functionality allows for fast, easy transfer of your AOL Favorites and mail (from AOL for Mac OS X personal filing cabinets) plus icon tooltips, a new AOL Support Portal for Mac and the Mac@AOL product blog to guide you through all the cool new features.</p>
<p>Tiger and Leopard Compatible<br>
AOL Desktop for Mac runs natively on your PowerPC or Intel-based Mac. The all-new AOL application runs at full speed on any Mac that supports Tiger or Leopard (Mac OS X 10.4.8 or higher).</p>
<p>System Requirements<br>
PowerPC G4 or Intel Macintosh (minimum)<br>
Mac OS X 10.4.8 or higher<br>
Minimum of 256MB of physical RAM<br>
Minimum of 60MB of available hard disk space<br>
28.8 Kbps or faster modem/existing Internet connection</p>
</blockquote>
[<a href="http://daol.aol.com/software/mac">discover AOL</a> via <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2008/05/15/aol-desktop-1-0-now-shipping-for-mac-users/">TUAW</a>]]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/390918/aol-desktop-10-comes-to-mac]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-390918]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 15 May 2008 15:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=390918&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Yahoo Flirting With AOL Something Fierce, Microsoft Still On Doorstep With Flowers]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/04/thumb160x_Dumb_Dumber_MSFT_AOL.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />An unnamed source (aren't they all?) confirmed <a href="http://gizmodo.com/364027/yahoo-flees-microsoft-runs-to-time-warners-aol">a rumor</a> that had been floating before: that Yahoo, in order to escape being grabbed by Microsoft, would hurl itself at the second-ugliest suitor in the room, AOL. The new details say that <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #timewarner" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/timewarner/">Time Warner</a> would pay some cash up front for a 20% stake in a joint AOL-Yahoo program. The AOL side, valued at $10 billion, would include all properties (such as our worthy competitor Engadget) but not the dial-up service that your grandma and pretty much no one else still has. Microsoft still may get its way, though: Word is that it's teaming with MySpace-owner News Corp for some kind of a three-way proposition. [<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSN0942900520080410">Reuters</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/378266/yahoo-flirting-with-aol-something-fierce-microsoft-still-on-doorstep-with-flowers]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-378266]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[merger]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[time warner]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:24:51 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=378266&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ICQ, the Toothpaste]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/03/icq_wh.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Everyone remembers ICQ, the first widely-used instant messaging application that's all but dead in most of the world now. The Israeli software company that developed the suite before it was purchased by AOL has just partnered with a big Israeli pharmacy company called CTS to release this <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #icqtoothpaste" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/icqtoothpaste/">ICQ toothpaste</a>, which our tipster claims will "help P2P communication (person to person) while reducing bad breath." Weird, yet really really cool. On a related note, I've got a low six-digit ICQ number. How long is yours? [<i>Thanks Nir!</i>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/368311/icq-the-toothpaste]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-368311]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[icq]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[icq toothpaste]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[toothpaste]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[weird]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=368311&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Yahoo Flees Microsoft, Runs to Time Warner's AOL?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/03/Dumb_Dumber_MSFT_AOL.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Microsoft hating is something of a national pastime, but Yahoo's desire to avoid a Redmond takeover has apparently driven them to seek a cozy relationship with <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #timewarner" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/timewarner/">Time Warner</a>. Yes, some geniuses out there are actually concocting "a deal that would fold Time Warner's AOL Internet unit into Yahoo." I'm sorry, but hasn't history proven that working with Time Warner on internet stuff is the business equivalent of trying to conquer Russia in the winter? The joke is, we were actually relieved to hear that the same unnamed people familiar with this deal still think Microsoft's Yahoo buyout will happen. [<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSN0555400320080305">Reuters</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/364027/yahoo-flees-microsoft-runs-to-time-warners-aol]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-364027]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[time warner]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 05 Mar 2008 08:54:21 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=364027&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[AOL Launching 'Open Mobile Platform,' Allows Homebrewed Programs on Any Phone]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/02/aolphone.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />AOL, the company you haven't patronized since 1996, has announced that it's launching an "Open Mobile Platform" to help developers get mobile programs across multiple platforms. Despite the name, it's not a full mobile OS like Android, rather a protocol for building and distributing applications across multiple mobile OSes. Think of it like Android's API, but for all phone platforms rather than just for one.</p>
<blockquote>The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #aolopenmobileplatform" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/aolopenmobileplatform/">AOL Open Mobile Platform</a> is based on proven technology acquired by AOL that has been deployed across more than 150 different handsets on carrier networks in the U.S. The platform will consist of three components: an XML-based, next-generation markup language; an ultra-lightweight mobile device client; and an application server. A dynamic presentation layer will allow for rapid deployment of new features and easy optimization for a wide variety of mobile devices, allowing developers to build and update applications once, and then distribute them across all supported devices and platforms.
<p>In addition, it will be possible to integrate applications built using the AOL Open Mobile Platform with third-party APIs, as well as with AOL's open APIs for AIM, AOL Mail, AOL Video, MapQuest, Userplane, Truveo, Winamp, and others. The AOL Open Mobile Platform will also give developers the ability to monetize their mobile applications by utilizing advertising resources, such as clickable banner ads, provided by AOL's Platform-A.</p>
</blockquote>
So essentially it's like an API for all phones, rather than just for the iPhone or for Android like the current ones floating around. It's actually pretty cool, offering amateurs the opportunity to try their hand at creating, say, a custom AIM client for a pretty wide variety of phones.
<p>The goods should be available later this summer for your tinkering pleasure. [<a href="http://dev.aol.com/openmobile/pr02112008">AOL Dev Network</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/355923/aol-launching-open-mobile-platform-allows-homebrewed-programs-on-any-phone]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-355923]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aol open mobile platform]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:20:07 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=355923&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Afternoon News: Goodbye Netscape, Hello Kitty For Men and More]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/capt.9ff49d5a04fd4a59bc2f5379ee13f128.japan_hello_kitty_for_men_tok108.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />&bull; A new law in <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #newjersey" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/newjersey/">New Jersey</a> willl ban internet <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #sexoffenders" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/sexoffenders/">sex offenders</a> from the web. But then who will read Gizmodo? [<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/12/28/new_jersey_sex_offenders_internet_ban/">The Register</a>]<br>
&bull; AOL will discontinue development of the Netscape browser early next year. RIP Netscape, you were the original IE alternative. [<a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/12/28/a-sad-milestone-aol-to-discontinue-netscape-browser-development/">TechCrunch</a>]<br>
&bull; Once upon a time, Google went by the name BackRub. Yuck. [<a href="http://valleywag.com/338426/before-google-was-google-it-was-more-than-a-bit-naughty">Valleywag</a>]<br>
&bull; A line of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #hellokitty" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/hellokitty/">Hello Kitty</a> clothing for men will go on sale in Japan next month. If you're looking for me, I'll be scraping my eyes out with rusty nails. [<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071228/ap_on_fe_st/japan_hello_kitty_for_men;_ylt=Av3zh88qNcJWT9Ijuu9FMoas0NUE">AP</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/338606/afternoon-news-goodbye-netscape-hello-kitty-for-men-and-more]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-338606]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[roundup]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[backrub]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hello kitty]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ie]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[japan]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[netscape]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[new jersey]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sex offenders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[things that make me cringe]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 28 Dec 2007 16:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benny Goldman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=338606&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[AIM 6.5, out today, includes the AIM Tunes...]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>AIM 6.5, out today, includes the AIM Tunes plug-in: you'll be able to listen to any music your online buddies put into playlists, provided of course that the tracks are not locked by DRM. Net radio, we hardly knew ye. [<a href="http://www.aim.com">AIM</a>]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/306567/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-306567]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[im]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital music]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[drm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[non-drm]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 03 Oct 2007 11:09:03 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=306567&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Everyone and Their Mother Teams Up to Form GooTube Competitor]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><object width="520" height="390" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=8,0,0,0" id="videoModule" align="middle"><param name="flashVars" value="videoURL=nbc_fox_gawker.flv"/><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="sameDomain" /><param name="movie" value="/assets/util/videoModule.swf" /><param name="quality" value="best" /><param name="scale" value="noscale" /><param name="salign" value="lt" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><embed flashVars="videoURL=nbc_fox_gawker.flv" src="/assets/util/videoModule.swf" quality="best" scale="noscale" salign="lt" bgcolor="#000000" width="520" height="390" name="videoModule" align="middle" allowScriptAccess="sameDomain" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" /></object><br/><br/><iframe src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http://digg.com/tech_news/Everyone_and_Their_Mother_Teams_Up_to_Form_GooTube_Competitor" align="right" frameborder="0" height="82" scrolling="no" width="55"></iframe>The equivalent of the 1992 US Men's Olympic basketball team has just gotten together to develop a competitor to <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/gootube">GooTube</a>. That's right, NBC, Fox, AOL, MSN, MySpace and Yahoo! have united Captain Planet style and formed a web video site <i>not</i> made up of crappy clips people don't want to watch. Broken by CNBC&mdash;with snide commentary about Fox and Google thrown in &mdash;this site has already secured advertisers and will theoretically reach 90 percent of US Internet users. </p>

<p>The content? Well, it's going to have TV clips from NBC and Fox, plus films from their respective movie studios. You'll be able to watch ad-supported shows like <i>24</i> and <i>Heroes</i> for free, and they're working on more deals with Sony and Time Warner to supply shows and clips. Sounds like we've finally got someone to stand up with GooTube in a non-theoretical way. <span class="byline">&ndash; Jason Chen</span></p>

<p><a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/15838381/site/14081545/">Squawk on the Street</a> [CNBC]</p>

<p><i>Thanks <a href="http://www.jalopnik.com">Ray!</a></i></p></embed>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/246258/everyone-and-their-mother-teams-up-to-form-gootube-competitor]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-246258]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[home entertainment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gootube]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[msn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[myspace]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nbc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[streaming]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:58:58 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=246258&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[AOL Sniffing Around Movie Downloads]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2007/01/easy_rider_aol.jpg"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/01/easy_rider_aol.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>You know the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/search/movie%20downloads">movie download</a> market is heating up when AOL decides to get into the act. A tipster showed us <a href="http://beta.aol.com/projects.php?project=video_download">this site</a> where the ancient AOL walled garden for noobs is beta testing the downloads, offering such gems as <em>Eight Crazy Nights, Can't Hardly Wait, Easy Rider, Flat Liners</em>, and <em>Muppets Take Manhattan</em>. Could they have found any older or shittier movies than this? Not unless they rummaged around my uncle Harry's bottom drawer.</p>
<p>Of course, there's DRM involved in the form of AOL's comically-named "Hi-Q Delivery Manager," and it only works with Windows XP and Internet Explorer 6.0 or 7.0. Hey, you better hurry, because the whole beta experiment ends on Groundhog Day. You wouldn't want to miss out on all those great free movies, now would you? <span class="byline">&ndash; Charlie White</span></p>
<p><a href="http://beta.aol.com/projects.php?project=video_download&loc=4#faq2">Video Beta</a> [AOL]<br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/232810/aol-sniffing-around-movie-downloads]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-232810]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[home entertainment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[beta]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[downloads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[drm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movie downloads]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:42:05 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie White]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=232810&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[AOL, Haier Partner for Wi-Fi Media Player]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/01/aol_smd.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Continuing with the trend seen at CES this year, AOL and Haier have teamed to release another Wi-Fi player. This player, currently named the Smartscreens Media Device, will include Wi-Fi (obviously), Bluetooth, 30GB hard drive and support MPEG4 and WMV for video on its Linux-based operating system.</p>
<p>The Wi-Fi will allow you to download music suggested to you and even allow for streaming Internet radio. And best of all&mdash;it appears that this player has a stainless steel look to it, which is sexy. This player is just in the initial phases, so don't expect to see it on the shelves until the second or third quarter of 2007. <span class="byline">&ndash;Travis Hudson</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.dapreview.net/comment.php?comment.news.3838">AOL's Upcoming Wi-Fi Player</a> [dapreview]<br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/228760/aol-haier-partner-for-wi+fi-media-player]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-228760]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[portable media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bluetooth]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[haier]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mp3 player]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pmp]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wi-fi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:25:01 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Travis Hudson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=228760&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sonos Now Supports Zune, Napster, Yahoo!, AOL, and MTV]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/01/sonosupdate.png" class="left image158" width="158" />Sonos is spending like Web 2.0 Bubble money is going out of style, and announcing they've bought support for almost all the major internet music stores. Along with Zune, there's Napster, Yahoo, AOL and MTV support, which makes streaming pretty simple.</p>
<p>Current owners can download Sonos 2.1 software which adds support for these new music stores as well as Apple iTunes 7 volume normalization and Windows Vista and WMP11 support. <span class="byline">&ndash; Jason Chen</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.sonos.com/support/software_updates/?tref=home">Product Update Page</a> [Sonos]<br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/227134/sonos-now-supports-zune-napster-yahoo-aol-and-mtv]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-227134]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[home entertainment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ces2007]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mtv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[napster]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[streaming]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[urge]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[zune]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:00:11 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=227134&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Store Robbed, AOL Rubs It In Contextually]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2006/10/apple.jpg"><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/10/apple.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>A case of poor timing for contextual ads, or is AOL rubbing it in? <span class="byline">&ndash; Jason Chen</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/article.php?id=2172">Thieves raid Apple employee store for third time</a> [AppleInsider]</p>
<p>Thanks Edward!</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/210138/apple-store-robbed-aol-rubs-it-in-contextually]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-210138]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[portable media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[theft]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 25 Oct 2006 21:00:06 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=210138&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[AOL Goes Mobile]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/images/2006/05/aol-guy-9-30-03.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />No longer will your mobile love for AOL be limited to constant IM on your sidekick. AOL Germany CEO, Charles Frankle, announced that AOL will be launching a mobile phone service in Germany later this year. This is becoming the latest trends among mobile giants. Apparently combining social web interaction and mobile telephony becoming this year's hot trend&mdash;re: Helio. No word if AOL will be launching the service in the States. <span class="byline">&ndash; Travis Hudson</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.berlinonline.de%2Fberliner-zeitung%2Fwirtschaft%2F553941.html&langpair=de%7Cen&hl=en&ie=UTF8">Berliner Zeitung (Translated)</a> [Via <a href="http://www.i4u.com/article5726.html">I4U</a>]<br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/176762/aol-goes-mobile]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-176762]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[germany only]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[service]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 27 May 2006 19:30:51 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Travis Hudson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=176762&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[World's Worst Tech Products. Ever.]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2006/05/ibm_pcjr.jpg"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/images/2006/05/ibm_pcjr.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Since Memorial Day is right around the corner, let's let PCWorld help us remember the 25 Worst <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #techproducts" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/techproducts/">Tech Products</a> of All Time. A lot of the products on the list are software-related&mdash;in fact, we have to wait until number 13 before we see the first item that might have felt at home on shiny-techno-obsessed Gizmodo: the IBM PC Jr. from 1984 with its roundly-hated "Chiclet" keyboard. Another notable hardware flop was number 15, the Iomega Zip drive from 1998, which victimized countless users with the click, click, click of its dying drives. And before you Mac snobs start getting all uppity, holding down spot number 17 is the worthless, anvil-like 16-pound Macintosh "Portable" from 1989.</p>
<p>What's the worst product, sitting at the top of the shitlist? Wait for it&mdash;it's the loathsome, noob-infested AOL, bringing home the bacon for Worst Tech Product of All Time. The runner-up was one of our most-despised annoyances: the nagging, presumptuous and obnoxious RealNetworks RealPlayer.</p>
<p>May this entire rogue's gallery rest in peace atop the ash heap of history, never to be seen or heard from again. <span class="byline">&ndash; Charlie White</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.pcworld.com/resource/article/0,aid,125772,pg,1,RSS,RSS,00.asp">The 25 Worst Tech Products of All Time</a> [PC World]<br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/176664/worlds-worst-tech-products-ever]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-176664]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm pcjr.]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tech products]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top 25 worst]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 26 May 2006 13:51:18 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie White]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=176664&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[AOL, Dodo Soon To Be Roommates (??)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/images/thumbs/438d0027e8bc369cb1f565c1fd812ef5.jpg" class="right image158" width="158" />An irate tipster notified us that the AOL call center in Jacksonville, Florida is shutting down and the company is cutting 1,200 employees this week. Why? Because the company has lost 3 million subscribers in the past year&mdash;a mere 800,000 in the past three months&mdash;and isn't quite making the numbers, you know, to pay people.</p>
<p>They still have an India and Albuquerque call centers, but things are looking rough across the board. In another striking cost-saving move, AOL is also refraining from giving out free trial subscriptions&mdash;they're still sending out some CDs, said the tipster, but not nearly as many as they used to&mdash;and going to charge folks immediately. Perhaps the AOLCD and/or AOL itself will also hit the dustbin of history?</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/172149/aol-dodo-soon-to-be-roommates-]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-172149]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aol cds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cost-cutting]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 08 May 2006 09:58:07 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[johnb]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=172149&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[AOL to Launch VOIP Service]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/images/thumbs/fb80bcc541f6ddf7c336103564b0d834.jpg" class="right image158" width="158" />There's not a lot of detail on this, but AOL will be launching some sort of VOIP service linked with AIM. The service will offer a unique, free phone number where your friends and relations can leave messages. We doubt very much that this is a unique phone number and that instead they've created a call center to accept voice messages via an 800-number and PIN combo.</p>
<p>The incoming calls are transferred through the AIM service and for $14.95 you can make unlimited calls to anywhere in the US.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.com.com/2100-1032_3-6068922.html?part=rss&tag=6068922&subj=news">AOL to launch free AIM phone service</a> [News.com.com.com]<br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/171836/aol-to-launch-voip-service]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-171836]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[skype]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 05 May 2006 11:00:07 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[johnb]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=171836&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[AOL/Yahoo Email Tax to Stop Spam: Why It Won't Work]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://us.gizmodo.com/gadgets/images/arizona.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />There's been quite a bit of media play about AOL and Yahoo's plans to adopt a quarter-cent "email tax" or "stamp" or whatever you want to call it, and we're here to tell you it's horseshit. While this utopian vision of data exchange for pennies a day&mdash;the price of a cup of coffee&mdash;makes for nice Business Section copy, this will fail in practice. And by "fail in practice" we mean "never, ever get off the ground."</p>
<p>Their theory is this: if you have to pay to send email, you won't send spam. This theory has a gaping hole&mdash;spammers will pay to send you spam. It all depends on your definition of "spam"&mdash;and how lax AOL or Yahoo's definition will be.</p>
<p>Our thoughts after the jump.</p>

<p>The only true anti-spam method is challenge-response, AKA the spammer Turing test. ("Hi, this is Joe's mailbox. Just hit reply to prove you exist and you'll never see this message again.") This test already costs plenty in terms of CPU cycles and bandwidth and the pay-for-play vision is a distant cousin to this same process. ("Hi, this is Joe's mailbox. Pay me to send this message.")</p>
<p>The way AOL's system works is frustratingly similar to the <a href="http://kissaneonline.com/marijuana_tax_stamps.htm">Marijuana Tax</a>&mdash;you pay for "stamps" in order to access AOL's bulk email system. If they pay, organizations like the Red Cross and Red Envelope can spam you willy-nilly while the rest of the po' folks with the penis pills will have to contend with spam filters&mdash;the same filters which they have been bypassing quite handily already. This sounds like a way for these big guys to get a little cash and for the other big guys to feel like their doing their part in not pissing you off.</p>
<p>Trust us, guys, you are pissing us off.</p>
<p>It's the mail handling protocols that are broken. The creators designed them to ensure ease of use, which led to the rise of spam. What we need here aren't ways for AOL and Yahoo to bankroll their next corporate retreat in Bali, but an entirely new system of email "subscriptions" which ensures that email to and from the folks from whom you want to receive email makes it to your mailbox, and everyone else's is buffeted back. This will take a concerted effort by open source/academic folks to adopt and maintain this new system which will then trickle down to the corporate level. Of course, new systems for spam-resistant email have been in the cards for years, but no one&mdash;even people not trying to make money on the side&mdash;have been able to come to any sort of agreement.</p>
<p>Let's talk about next-gen mail handling protocols in the comments, because there has to be a better way.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4684942.stm">E-mail charging plan to beat spam</a> [BBC]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/152917/aolyahoo-email-tax-to-stop-spam-why-it-wont-work]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-152917]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 06 Feb 2006 02:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[johnb]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=152917&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[AOL Embraces its Gay Side]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://us.gizmodo.com/gadgets/images/gay%20music.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /></p>
<p>The gay community has so much of its own culture at this point, so why not a music channel on AOL? No reason at all, it seems. Looks like AOL has launched a site called "G-Sides, Music for the GLBT Community," which features all the "gay and lesbian artists we love." Obviously, lots of Boy George and Melissa Etheridge, and today's launch also includes an interview and DJ session from Cyndi Lauper and videos of the Strokes. So there's that.<br></p>
<blockquote>"This site will talk about all different facets: gay artists, music that has a strong LGB fan base, and even videos that you might not think have relevance to the gay and lesbian community &mdash; but do."</blockquote>
<p>...says M. Tye Comer, senior programming manager for AOL Music. Oh, and expect a bunch of Madonna links as well. To check it out, click <a href="http://music.aol.com/feature/gay_music">here</a>. Not that there's anything wrong with that.</p>
<p><a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/NewsArticle.aspx?type=internetNews&storyID=2006-01-24T155550Z_01_N23205289_RTRUKOC_0_US-GAY-AOL.xml">AOL Music launches gay music site</a> [Reuters]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/150363/aol-embraces-its-gay-side]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-150363]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[g-sides]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gay music site]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 25 Jan 2006 06:27:10 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[tgrumet]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=150363&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Mobile Internet Search With AOL]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://us.gizmodo.com/gadgets/images/aol.JPG" class="left image158" width="158" /></p>
<p>If you've been dying to perform Web searches on your cell or PDA, AOL believes it has the magic bullet. The recently announced AOL Mobile Search Service actually adapts your search to the smaller LCD screens using content-analysis and transcoding tech from a company called InfoGin. The differences between this and other mobile services, if you're wondering, is that before, you could only download full web pages that were WAP-enabled. This works like any search would on a desktop computer.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.com.com/AOL+develops+new+mobile+search+feature/2100-1046_3-5977693.html?tag=nefd.top">AOL develops new mobile search feature</a> [Cnet]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/140353/mobile-internet-search-with-aol]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-140353]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 01 Dec 2005 09:11:56 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[tgrumet]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=140353&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
