You can read about it all you want, but to be in its presence is another thing altogether. And no, I'm not talking about Frucci. We gave you a sugary lick of its sweetness last Friday on site, but now here are some of the technical details and a nerdier gallery of our experience with Panasonic's 103-inch $70,000 1080p plasma wunderscreen.
Its official name is TH-103PZ600U, and it's technically part of a plasma line that emerged last year. If you want to buy what could be more or less considered a 50-inch version of it—screen wise one quarter of the area—you'd pay just $2,100 at Amazon.
But as you have already seen, that extra 53 diagonal inches came straight from heaven, and with it came some burdens. It's the same 4,000:1 contrast ratio, nice and rich as plasma tends to be when compared to similar LCD technologies. Live action is great with no blur or jitters, as we had expected given what we've seen of Panasonic's smaller plasmas.
But those smaller plasmas didn't require 12 low-RPM fans running at all times, like this bad boy did. To be fair, I've had desktop computers with noisier fans, and the 8" wall mount didn't have any sort of special exhaust system to help the heat dissipate. In fact, as you can see in the gallery, Panasonic national product manager Karl DeManss had no problem standing up inside the wall mount:

Nevertheless, the TV does take a 220V wall socket, like a freakin' clothes dryer, so you gotta consider the impact to the electrical bill. (Then again, if you're in the market for a $70,000 TV, maybe you don't.)
Input-wise, the unit we got to play with had RGB, component video and DVI/HDMI, but picture only. There are no speakers, though it does have little 3-watt amps for BYO speakers. As I noted in the uncrating, it is a modular system, much like the commercial displays from Panasonic and Pioneer: you tell them which inputs you want, and they sock them in. I believe there were four proprietary slots in the strip, which you can see in the gallery. Each slot could take at least one input.
Contrary to our own concerns, the warm-up time was imperceptible—the screen went on straight away. Also, the pixels themselves were not as visible as we had feared. I was anticipating "screen door" like crazy, but for most of us, the pixels disappeared at about 70 inches of distance (for me, they disappeared around 80 inches). And you're definitely not going to want to stand as close as Adam was during his Bioshock frenzy. After a while, he had to sit down to keep from falling over.
Have a look at the gallery to see some of the specifics of our hands-on. Note the hallowed "dime test" to gauge pixel size, and the tape measure—held by Panasonic displays president Andrew Nelkin and me—to guarantee that it was in fact 103", when we had heard through the grapevine that it may, in reality, be a 102-incher. (The overall dimensions are 56" high by 95" across by 5" deep.)
Bottom line: Would I want one? Nope. WHAAA?? Okay, so yeah, I would love one. But Sharp told me that its goal is to have wall-sized LCDs in the coming years. And if Panasonic is as competitive as I think, it will start pushing the limits too. Bottom line is either bigger sets or cheaper 103s. Either way, we win. Hang on tight, cuz it's going to be a wild ride.
In case you missed the "uncrating" feature over the weekend, check it out.









Comments
it's still not big enough
If a 50" plasma costs $2500... shouldn't a 100" plasma cost $5000?
This 103" plasma costs $70,000. That's a huge premium for just three more inches.
:p
@Windhawk:
If you are going by raw surface area, it should be roughly $10k (four times the surface area). But that doesn't take into consideration the waaaaay lower yield these TVs have pure unit of raw materials, etc.
Plus, let's face it, its a super luxury item, so let Panny eat all the money it can :).
@bignaz2k: *per unit
@Windhawk: My in-box is full of friendly proposals offering three more inches for a whole lot less.
ok, but did you actually test anything useful, like blastin on fools in San Andreas?
whats funny is that the dime test shows that the pixels are about as large as they are in a 15 inch sd tv I have.
i hope the "proyector fanboys" dont try troll this post with "why not use a 1,000 usd proyector on a 200in white board"....
because its garbage!!! this 103" LCD does not need a dark room, nor a huge distance to the proyection screen to get 100+ in.
If proyectors are so convenient, why does people buy $1,700 40in LCD or maybe $3,000 52in LCD, they should use a $500 proyector on a 60in screen right?... nooo because is garbage!!! got it? nice!
now.. swallow this
@EL_RIEL:
Ah yes, having 70 large is pretty convenient too!
Or pay $1350 @ TigerDirect.
This little brother plasma has gotten great reviews, so I'm sure the 103" is nothing short of dazzling.
Now all I need to figure out is how to put 4 of em together to get 103" of screen area...for ~1/7th the price.
Hey, why not use a 1,000 usd proyector on a 200in white board?
Or, better yet, a projector.
Then, with the 69,000 usd left over, you can go buy a car or two. Or even three.
did you get to play Halo on it?
@goatiiee:
Agreed there, still waiting for the 200" myself
@seyo: San Andreas? Damn bro, that's getting pretty long in the tooth.
I'd hope for some um, true hi-def content to get played on that set. Not some 3 year old PS2 game.
The 300 HD DVD would have been alright I bet ...
You don't need any house lights after buying that.
Though it lacks audio, it is truly a multi-function device, as it can provide all the lighting you'll ever need in your TV room, all from one outlet, no extra cabling needed in the walls! AND it'll heat your house, so you'll never need to spend a dime on heating anymore!
ok... list of things to get..
1.my powerchair
2.this bohemoth!
Start a discussion:
Login with your username and password below. Or comment on this post via email.
Forgot your username or password? New User?