<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: BlackBerry]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/blackberry</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'blackberry']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[AT&T Cuts BlackBerry Prices in Half, Including the Nice New Ones]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Had enough holiday smartphone deals? Of course you haven't. AT&T's <a href="http://www.wireless.att.com/cell-phone-service/cell-phones/blackberry.jsp">cutting prices</a> on pretty much their entire line of BlackBerrys, including the recently released <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5397391/blackberry-bold-9700-impressions-small-and-chirpy-like-a-black-hummingbird">Bold 9700</a> and Curve 8900. The sale starts today, December 4th, and doesn't seem to have a definite end date. [<a href="http://www.wireless.att.com/cell-phone-service/cell-phones/blackberry.jsp">AT&T</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5418650/att-cuts-blackberry-prices-in-half-including-the-nice-new-ones]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5418650]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[deals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry att]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bold 9700]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 04 Dec 2009 01:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5418650&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[First 3G BlackBerry Pearl 2 Video Leaks, Earns 'Striker' Codename]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_blackberry500x_9100-1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Whatever you call the upcoming <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5409104/first-3g-blackberry-pearl-9100-pics-leak">3G BlackBerry Pearl 2</a> in your head&mdash; 9100/Stratus/Striker/slinky little minx, it's just been given another fondling, and this time, on video.</p>
<p>Claiming it's a "little too tiny," fondler Salomondrin says it's still slightly bigger than previous Pearl models, keeping in mind it's been styled after the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5397391/blackberry-bold-9700-impressions-small-and-chirpy-like-a-black-hummingbird">latest Bold</a>. The camera has been updated to 3.2-megapixels with a flash, and has Wi-Fi along with that much-needed 3G. Running on BlackBerry OS 5.0.0.350 in the video below, you can see the trackball has been swapped for the optical trackpad seen on the Curve 8530 and Bold 9700, and it's also got the new multimedia buttons on the right side.</p>
<p>I'm far too attached to QWERTY to even consider this new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #pearl2" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/pearl2/">Pearl 2</a>, but if you're looking for something slimmer and more candybar-like, schedule April in for a potential launch date. [<a href="http://www.salomondrin.net/2009/11/27/overview-blackberry-stratus-9100/">Salomondrin</a> via <a href="http://www.phonearena.com/htmls/New-BlackBerry-Stratus-Pearl2-is-focus-of-video-article-a_8141.html">PhoneArena</a> and <a href="http://crackberry.com/blackberry-pearl-9100-images">CrackBerry</a>]</p>
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/vm71Rps9LN4&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/vm71Rps9LN4&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5417932/first-3g-blackberry-pearl-2-video-leaks-earns-striker-codename]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5417932]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry pearl 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry pearl 9100]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pearl 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pearl2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[stratus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[striker]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 Dec 2009 09:26:01 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kat Hannaford]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5417932&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Patch Your Blackberry Server Software, Lest a PDF Take Over]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>A new exploit allows PDFs attached to emails opened on a BlackBerry to take over Blackberry servers. Luckily, a fix is already out for Enterprise Server and Professional software, available <a href="http://www.blackberry.com/btsc/search.do?cmd=displayKC&docType=kc&externalId=KB19860">here</a>. [<a href="http://www.blackberry.com/btsc/search.do?cmd=displayKC&docType=kc&externalId=KB19860">RIM</a> via <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/12/02/blackberry_pdf_security_patch/">The Register</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5416996/patch-your-blackberry-server-software-lest-a-pdf-take-over]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5416996]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry pdf]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pdf]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 02 Dec 2009 08:59:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5416996&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The iPhone Is an Affront to Language]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/iphonelanguage.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_iphonelanguage.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>I dislike capital letters. I dislike <em>exceptional</em> capital letters even more. The iPhone, and indeed most Apple products, suffer from "camel case," as the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/29/magazine/29FOB-onlanguage-t.html?_r=1">NYT's On Language calls it</a>. "Steep is the descent into orthographic antinomianism." He's right.</p>
<p>There's a historical reason in tech for products with camel case, like QuickTime or WordPerfect, as Crain, channeling New Scientist lays out: Often, spaces had to be dropped in programming languages, so capital letters were used in compound words to make them easier to read. That's fine, but in today's world, I agree very much with this sentiment:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>In my considered opinion, the juxtaposition of majuscule and minuscule in a personal name may be safely indulged as a prerogative of the human being, with all his individual strangeness, but to extend the same license to the fruits, literal and figurative, of human labor is another matter.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Now, we have brands and products like TiVo, NVIDIA*, iEverythingapplemakes, BlackBerry, eXpo, eBook, eMachines, <strike>iRiver</strike> (it's iriver, oops), PlayStation and way, way more that insist on being special through forcing you to stretch your pinky finger over to the shift key at odd intervals, following their rhythm, dancing to their tune. It's a form of control.</p>
<p>Historically, Crain says, word spacing didn't really become standard for the modern world until the 13th century, after disappearing for a millennium. So camel case, he says, "is regressive &mdash; in fact medieval. It harks back to an era when reading was effortful, public and loud - like a visit to a contemporary shopping mall." Yep, that's the point. [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/29/magazine/29FOB-onlanguage-t.html?_r=1">NYT</a>]</p>
<p>*I hate all caps, too, unless it's an acronym.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5415432/the-iphone-is-an-affront-to-language]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5415432]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[on language]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tivo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:04:12 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5415432&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Best Smartphones on Every Carrier]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/smartphoooones.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_smartphoooones.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>For the first time ever, every major carrier in the US actually has smartphones worth buying, meaning you don't have to break up to get a good phone. Here's the best phones on each one, along with the best deals.</p>

<p>If you hate the gallery format, click <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5411351/the-best-smartphones-on-every-carrier/">here</a>.</p>
<p><em>All pricing shown is with a new 2-year contract, and some deals may be temporary.</em></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/topshot2.jpg" width="804" height="565"></p>
<h1>AT&T</h1>
<p><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #iphone3gs" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphone3gs/">iPhone 3GS</a></strong><br>
The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5293388/iphone-3gs-review">iPhone 3GS</a> is the best overall smartphone you can buy. It's really that simple. Best user interface, best internet, best apps, best media support&mdash;the list goes on. Okay, not the best network, but nothing's perfect. <a href="http://www.wireless.att.com/cell-phone-service/packages/packages-details.jsp?q_package=sku3790236&amp;_requestid=120494">$199</a></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/bbold9700__088.jpg" width="804" height="537"><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #blackberrybold9700" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/blackberrybold9700/">BlackBerry Bold 9700</a></strong><br>
I miss the original BlackBerry Bold's king-sized keyboard, but <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5397391/blackberry-bold-9700-impressions-small-and-chirpy-like-a-black-hummingbird">the Bold 9700</a> squeezes the best of the BlackBerry for CEOs into an impressively tight form factor&mdash;faux leather back included&mdash;making it very possibly the best BlackBerry you can buy. <a href="http://walmart.letstalk.com/product/product.htm?prId=35946">$10</a></p>
<p><strong>Bonus: <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #nokiae71x" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/nokiae71x/">Nokia e71x</a></strong><br>
It's free, and an actually good smartphone&mdash;my favorite Nokia phone on the planet. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Nokia-E71x-Phone-Black-AT/dp/B0027A7XWE/ref=amb_link_84232451_4?pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_s=auto-sparkle&pf_rd_r=03BG5E6P2DMXF74VG9M6&pf_rd_t=301&pf_rd_p=475996731&pf_rd_i=e71x">Free</a></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/drooooooid__002.jpg" width="804" height="536"></p>
<h1>Verizon</h1>
<p><strong>Droid</strong><br>
It's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5396168/motorola-droid-review">a terminator</a>. A huge, disgustingly high-res screen, Batman-worthy industrial design, and the full power <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5395801/android-20-review-almost-human">of Android 2.0</a> make it the best phone on Verizon&mdash;and the fact that it's running on arguably the best network in the US make it the second best smartphone you can buy, period. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Motorola-Droid-A855-Verizon-Wireless/dp/B002UUTCKC/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=wireless&qid=1259070645&sr=1-2">$150</a></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/bbtour.jpg" width="504" height="482"><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #blackberrytour" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/blackberrytour/">BlackBerry Tour</a></strong><br>
Sure, it's notorious for trackball problems and it's missing Wi-Fi, but this is the BlackBerry of choice for email warriors if they're not on AT&T or T-Mobile&mdash;and it sure as hell beats anything running Windows Mobile. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/BlackBerry-Tour-Phone-Verizon-Wireless/dp/B002GJTS3I/ref=sr_1_13?ie=UTF8&s=wireless&qid=1259070717&sr=8-13">$50</a></p>
<p><strong>Bonus: <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #droideris" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/droideris/">Droid Eris</a></strong><br>
If you're desperate to save $100 over the Droid, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5401220/droid-eris-review">Droid Eris</a> will run Android 2.0 soon enough, and is smoother, smaller, and friendlier, if a little blander. <a href="http://www.verizonwireless.com/b2c/store/controller?item=phoneFirst&action=viewPhoneDetail&selectedPhoneId=5070">$100</a></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/bodysmall.jpg" width="504" height="399"></p>
<h1>Sprint</h1>
<p><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #palmpre" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/palmpre/">Palm Pre</a></strong><br>
<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5277499/palm-pre-review">The Pre</a> offers one of the best user experiences of any smartphone with Palm's webOS, and it's probably the best phone on Sprint, hardware build issues and comparatively dinky App Catalog aside. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Palm-Pre-100-Phone-Sprint/dp/B002JIO4JY/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&s=wireless&qid=1259070251&sr=8-4">$80</a></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/DSC_1100.jpg" width="1024" height="683"><strong>HTC Hero</strong><br>
The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5361245/sprint-hero-review-faster-stronger-uglier">best Android phone</a> not running Android 2.0, HTC's Sense UI makes the sometimes confusing Android interface more digestible and has a few nifty tricks of its own, like integrated social networking. <a href="http://wireless.bestbuy.com/specialoffer.aspx?cid=34308_a5abbe52b26b4c05afe33717acc0697f">$100</a></p>
<p><strong>Bonus</strong>: There is none. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5406001/palm-pixi-review">The Pixi's</a> close (<a href="http://wsf0-walmart.letstalk.com/product/product.htm?prId=35990">$25</a>), but the fact that you can get the Pre for nearly as cheap undercuts a lot of the value, as much as we like the design and form factor.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/thescreen.jpg" width="800" height="533"></p>
<h1>T-Mobile</h1>
<p><strong>Motorola Cliq</strong><br>
<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5381995/motorola-cliq-review">Motorola's other Android phone</a> is gussied up with Blur, a custom interface that's bright and friendly, with widgets for keeping track of everything happening on your social network. It's our favorite Android phone on T-Mobile. <a href="http://wsf0-walmart.letstalk.com/product/product.htm?prId=35848">$100</a></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/IMG_4739.jpg" width="804" height="536"><strong>Unlocked iPhone</strong><br>
No, I'm not kidding. A <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5302123/jailbreak-and-unlock-iphone-30/gallery/">jailbroken and unlocked</a> iPhone, even without 3G powers, is the second best smartphone you can use on T-Mobile.</p>
<p><strong>Bonus: BlackBerry <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #bold9700" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/bold9700/">Bold 9700</a></strong><br>
The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5397391/blackberry-bold-9700-impressions-small-and-chirpy-like-a-black-hummingbird">BlackBerry Bold 9700 is</a> the first BlackBerry with 3G on T-Mobile, which is reason enough, really, but it's good the reasons listed above, too. <a href="http://wsf0-walmart.letstalk.com/product/product.htm?prId=35982">$130</a></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5411351/the-best-smartphones-on-every-carrier/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5411351]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry bold 9700]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry tour]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bold]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bold 9700]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cliq]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[droid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[droid eris]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[e71x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gift guide]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gift Guide 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone 3gs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nokia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nokia e71x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm pixi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm pre]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pixi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pre]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sprint]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tour]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5411351&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[BlackBerry Bold 9700 Finally Available at AT&T Stores Nationwide]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>After teasing BlackBerry lovers with a limited "premier" customer release earlier in the week, AT&T has let loose with the BlackBerry <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #bold9700" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #bold9700" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/bold9700/">Bold 9700</a>. It's now available for anyone and everyone who loves all things BlackBerry. T-Mobile users, who;ve had access to this phone for a while, can yawn at this post at their leisure. [<a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/11/22/blackberry-bold-9700-now-available-from-att/">BGR</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5410290/blackberry-bold-9700-finally-available-at-att-stores-nationwide]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5410290]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bold]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bold 9700]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Loftus]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5410290&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[First 3G BlackBerry Pearl 9100 Pics Leak]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/9100-1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_9100-1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The true successor to the compact BlackBerry <a href="http://gizmodo.com/200244/gizmodo-frankenreview-blackberry-pearl-8100">Pearl 8100</a> is styled like a slimmed-down <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5397391/blackberry-bold-9700-impressions-small-and-chirpy-like-a-black-hummingbird">Bold 9700</a>. And while it ditches the "pearl" trackball for RIM's new optical touchpad, the QWERTY keyboard has made way for a reworked SureType setup.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5409105,2,'BlackBerry Pearl 9100 Gallery');
</script></p>
<p><em>CrackBerry</em> says it's been sitting on the photos for a while, but was waiting for its tipster's go-ahead to run them. No specs yet, but we're told they're coming soon. Stay tuned. [<a href="http://crackberry.com/blackberry-pearl-9100-images">CrackBerry</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5409104/first-3g-blackberry-pearl-9100-pics-leak]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5409104]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry pearl 9100]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Pearl 9100]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[RIM BlackBerry Pearl 9100]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Nov 2009 07:57:54 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5409104&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[BlackBerry Internet Service's Data Is Down Across the Globe]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/bbstorm2_01.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />There are reports that <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #blackberryinternetservice" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/blackberryinternetservice/">BlackBerry Internet Service</a>, which is sort of a portal monitored by RIM (so it's not carrier-specific) through which BlackBerry data runs, is down worldwide. That could affect email, BlackBerry Messenger, web browsing and maps, to start.</p>
<p>According to comments on various messageboards, BlackBerry data is either out or patchy at least in the States and Canada, with users unable to access BlackBerry services&mdash;but not necessarily third-party software like Opera Mini or Google Maps, although some, like Facebook, use BIS and are thus having problems. It's not carrier-specific, with problems being reported on Verizon, T-Mobile, Telus and Rogers, but it's also not universally down like the Great Sidekick Outage of 2009&mdash;some users are reporting no problems at all, while others are completely unable to access data. We'll keep you updated, but in turn, why don't you keep us updated: Any BlackBerry users out there having data problems? [<a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/11/16/blackberry-internet-service-hit-with-data-outages-worldwide/">Boy Genius Report</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5406262/blackberry-internet-services-data-is-down-across-the-globe]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5406262]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bis]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry data outage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry internet service]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[outage]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:20:52 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5406262&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Year Apple and RIM Ate Everyone Else's Lunch]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/smartphonemarkshare.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_smartphonemarkshare.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>For today's data dump: the iPhone now accounts for nearly a fifth of new smartphones, and BlackBerrys are on a surprisingly serious tear, passing a 20% in world <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #marketshare" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/marketshare/">market share</a>. So, uh, who's losing?</p>

<p>Well, for one, Nokia, whose smartphones have failed to penetrate <em>at all</em> in the US, despite massive popularity overseas, and whose Symbian OS is starting to look downright old. Manufacturers like LG and Motorola, who for the last year were depending mostly on the waning Windows Mobile 6.1, have had a rough time of it, while Palm, presumably included in the "Other" category, consolidated its line to one phone for the duration of 2009, which has done wonders for its image, but unfortunately not for its sales.</p>
<p>Interestingly enough, Apple and RIM are doing spectacularly well for similar reasons: both have appealed to mainstream consumers with new products&mdash;the marked-down iPhone 3G and cheap-but-decent BlackBerry Curve line, respectively&mdash;while pushing app stores as a selling point. And honestly, look around. Smartphones are decidedly a <em>thing</em> right now.</p>
<p>I'll be interested to see what happens next year, when Android's had a little time to spread its wings. It looks like Google helped buoy HTC a <em>little</em> bit this year, but Android phones are still a rare sight. [<a href="http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2009/11/apple-grabs-17-of-smartphone-market-in-latest-quarter.ars?utm_source=microblogging&utm_medium=arstch&utm_term=Main%20Account&utm_campaign=microblogging">Ars</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5404274/the-year-apple-and-rim-ate-everyone-elses-lunch]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5404274]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[market share]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone market share]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:28:24 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5404274&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[BlackBerry App World Gets Carrier Billing Next Year]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Next year, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #blackberryappworld" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #blackberryappworld" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/blackberryappworld/">BlackBerry App World</a>'s getting carrier billing, meaning app purchases will show up on your phone bill, so it'll be a little easier to buy apps since you don't have to jump through using PayPal. Which is good for <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #appworld" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #appworld" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/appworld/">App World</a>, since the easier it is to spend your money, the more likely you'll spend it. [<a href="http://www.wirelessweek.com/News/2009/11/BB-App-World-Carrier-Billing-2010/">WirelessWeek</a> via <A href="http://www.phonescoop.com/news/item.php?n=5113">PhoneScoop</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5404160/blackberry-app-world-gets-carrier-billing-next-year]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5404160]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Blackberry Apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[app world]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry app world]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:35:40 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5404160&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Walmart Offers $100 Gift Card With Any BlackBerry Purchase on November 14th - 21st]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/bbstorm2.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />You'll be getting a shiny $100 gift card if you buy any BlackBerry device through Walmart during the week of November 14th. The deal's valid both in stores and online with the usual catch of a 2-year contract applying.</p>
<p>Walmart's BlackBerry selection includes:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>* AT&T Curve 8310<br>
* AT&T Bold 9000<br>
* Sprint Curve 8330 (Red & Titanium colors)<br>
* T-Mobile 8520 (Black, White, and Frost)<br>
* T-Mobile Pearl 8120 (Emerald)<br>
* Verizon Storm<br>
* Verizon Storm II</p>
</blockquote>
<p>So, if any of those phones are on your "must buy" list, then this'll be a good week for it. Keep in mind that while you'll get the gift card immediately with an in store purchase, online shoppers will wait four to six week for the gift cards to arrive in the mail. [<a href="http://www.walmart.com/wireless">Walmart</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5401762/walmart-offers-100-gift-card-with-any-blackberry-purchase-on-november-14th-+-21st]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5401762]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[dealzmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[deals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[giftcard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[giftcards]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[walmart]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[walmart blackberry offer]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:01:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5401762&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[LG Chocolate Touch, BlackBerry Curve 8530, and Samsung Convoy: Verizon's Second-String Lineup]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/Untitled_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_Untitled_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The Motorola Droid and HTC Droid Eris may get all the buzz, but what about Verizon's less glamorous new phones? The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #lgchocolatetouch" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/lgchocolatetouch/">LG Chocolate Touch</a>, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #blackberrycurve8530" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/blackberrycurve8530/">BlackBerry Curve 8530</a> and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #samsungconvoy" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/samsungconvoy/">Samsung Convoy</a> were all introduced today, and they too deserve a look.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/LG_Chocolate_Touch_Front_hr_02.jpg" width="160" height="292"><br>
The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5364044/verizon-lg-chocolate-touch-inches-toward-unexciting-arrival-with-leaked-photos">LG Chocolate Touch</a> is the latest iteration of the Chocolate line, and brings with it some new music features: FM radio, dedicated key for favorites, Dolby Mobile sound enhancements, and an unexpected and downright weird "Join the Band" feature. Join the Band features a virtual drum kit and scrolling 88-key keyboard so you can tap along with your music. Of course, it also offers Twitter, Facebook and MySpace integration, a 3.2MP camera and one-touch uploading. It's not a super exciting phone like the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5326249/first-lg-chocolate-bl40-official-shots-dont-surprise-still-stun">BL40</a>, but at least it's odd enough to be sort of interesting. It's available today and costs $80 after a $50 mail-in rebate.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/BlackBerry_Curve_8530_FrontNoShadow_03.jpg" width="160" height="249"><br>
On the BlackBerry side of things, we have yet another 'Berry with the Curve moniker (if you're confused about the multitude of identically-named but different-numbered Curves, check out <a href="http://crackberry.com/blackberry-curve-8530-review">this handy chart</a>). The Curve 8530 is the followup to Verizon's Curve 8330, and has features more in line with the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/blackberry-curve-8520-lightning-review-cheap-not-the-good-kind/">GSM Curve 8520</a> than the Curve 8900. If you're still following me, great, because this is one of the best Curves out there: It's got Wi-Fi, 3G <em>and</em> GPS. It's the only Curve with 3G, and improves on <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5323639/blackberry-curve-8520-officially-cheap-and-ball+less">its GSM brother</a> by offering GPS. Other than that, it's the same 85xx Curve that Matt <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/blackberry-curve-8520-lightning-review-cheap-not-the-good-kind/">already reviewed</a>. It'll cost $100 after a $100 mail-in rebate when it's released on November 20th.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/Samsung_Convoy__closedfront_03.jpg" width="160" height="294"><br>
And bringing up the rear, we've got the Samsung Convoy, a burly push-to-talk flip-phone that meets military specification, unlike me. It's got a 1300 mAh battery, which is bigger than some smartphones, and is built to withstand shock, dust, vibration, salt fog, humidity, and solar radiation. It'll probably survive until the end of the Iraq War. The Samsung Convoy will be available November 15th for $50 after a $50 mail-in rebate.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5397796,4,'');
</script>[<a href="http://www.verizonwireless.com/">Verizon</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5397559/lg-chocolate-touch-blackberry-curve-8530-and-samsung-convoy-verizons-second+string-lineup]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5397559]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry curve 8530]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chocolate]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lg chocolate touch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung convoy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 05 Nov 2009 09:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5397559&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[BlackBerry Bold 9700 Impressions: Small and Chirpy, Like a Black Hummingbird]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/bbold9700__088.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_bbold9700__088.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5386509/blackberry-bold-9700-on-t+mobile-and-att-in-november">BlackBerry Bold 9700</a> in a word? Compact. It's efficient, almost cramped, like a Japanese car from the 80s.</p>

<p>Succinctly, it's the new BlackBerry to buy if you're on T-Mobile or AT&T. Doubly so on T-Mo, since it's their first 3G BlackBerry.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/bbold9700__099.jpg" width="804" height="536">It's not very much like <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5075236/att-blackberry-bold-review-best-blackberry-yet">the original Bold</a> at all, which was the Escalade of BlackBerrys: big, obnoxious, but seriously comfortable to drive because it gave you tons of room to spread your legs (err, thumbs). If you're used to that, at first the 9700&mdash;which is even smaller and lighter than the Tour on Sprint and Verizon&mdash;feels like you've been shoved inside of a clown car because the keyboard and screen, while retaining the same shape and resolution, respectively, have been shrink-rayed. (<strong>Update</strong>: Actually, the resolution's been bumped up 40 pixels, to 480x360, from 480x320.)</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/bbold9700__090.jpg" width="804" height="536">But, then you realize you're not typing any slower, or less precisely. The 9700's keyboard isn't as flat out <em>comfortable</em> as the original Bold&mdash;purely a matter of physics&mdash;but it's a minor marvel of ergonomics that RIM has recession-sized the keyboard this effectively. They're simply brilliant at building keyboards. The screen has the same resolution as the Bold's, but in a smaller size, meaning it has a higher pixel density. Despite that extra clarity, I felt a bit constrained by it, especially browsing the web.</p>
<p>It's the second BlackBerry to ditch all-too-easily-slain-by-lint trackball for an optical trackpad, and the first that's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5331885/blackberry-curve-8520-lightning-review-cheap-not-just-the-good-kind">not built for Walmart</a>. You'll miss the trackball for about 15 seconds. Like I said before, the trackpad's 90 percent as good as the ball. You might miss the physical feedback, and it sometimes doesn't totally accurately interpret a diagonal swipe that you know wouldn't be a problem with the ball but it's good enough, and by far the most accurate and responsive trackpad I've used on a phone.</p>
<p>It's running BlackBerry OS 5.0 which isn't <em>tons</em> different than the OS that shipped on the original Bold or Curve 8900, but it's definitely springier and it has a few brushstrokes of added polish here and there. One place you notice is the browser&mdash;while not as fast as the iPhone 3GS or Android, it has some extra zip to it, and it even sped past the Storm 2 loading pages, despite racing on T-Mobile's 3G network vs. Verizon's.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5397352,12,'');
</script><em>Note: In the gallery, the T-Mobile one is the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #bold9700" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/bold9700/">Bold 9700</a>, the AT&T phone is the original Bold.</em></p>
<p>Basically, barring any major bugs that pop up over the next couple of days, this is the BlackBerry you probably wanna bug your corporate overlords to handcuff to your pants if you're on AT&T or T-Mobile, since it'll slide into them easier than any BlackBerry yet. I just hope you enjoy the feel of faux leather. [<a href="http://www.blackberry.com/">BlackBerry</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5397391/blackberry-bold-9700-impressions-small-and-chirpy-like-a-black-hummingbird]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5397391]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry bold]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry bold 9700]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bold]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bold 9700]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:01:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5397391&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[RIM Is Definitely Developing a WebKit (Read: Decent) Browser]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_blackberryb.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />It wasn't a huge leap to take RIM's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5344237/rim-gobbles-up-torch-mobile-translation-blackberrys-getting-webkit-thank-god">purchase of Torch Mobile</a>, a software company known exclusively for making a WebKit mobile browser, as a sign that the company was considering taking the dive. Today, though, we can be sure.</p>
<p>BlackBerry just put out a call for WebKit developers, for a very specific reason:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Utilizing their knowledge in C++ programming, the successful candidate will be working in a fast-paced, dynamic development environment to develop a WebKit-based browser for the BlackBerry Platform.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Ok! The only question now is, when? Normally the initial hiring of a core developer could be taken to mean that the project is embryonic, and the final product still months away, but keep in mind: In Torch Mobile's Iris, RIM bought an entire, <em>complete</em> browser. In other words, this may just be an optimization project, not a full-on browser development, so decent browsing on BlackBerry could be closer than we thought. [<a href="http://www.careerbeacon.com/search/en/-1/-1/14/-1/0/0/0/0/0/0/3/MB0910303813">CareerBeacon</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/01/rim-posts-job-listing-for-webkit-developer-gets-one-step-clos/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5395158/rim-is-definitely-developing-a-webkit-read-decent-browser]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5395158]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry webkit]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mobile Browsers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[webkit]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 02 Nov 2009 10:18:33 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5395158&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[BlackBerry Storm 2 Review: Improving, But Still Mostly Cloudy]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/storm__056.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_storm__056.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Take <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5093715/blackberry-storm-review-verdict-not-quite-a-perfect-storm">the BlackBerry Storm</a>. Now imagine a phone that's basically exactly the same, but does everything better. That's the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #storm2" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/storm2/">Storm 2</a>.</p>

<p>It's the same phone, essentially, just refined in nearly every way. It's not the Storm reinvented, it doesn't shoot lasers, and it's not going to kill anything. It's just better than before.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/storm__059.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_storm__059.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<h1>Sure, Press Me Anywhere</h1>
<p>SurePress, RIM's "the whole screen's a button!" touchscreen technology, lives on. But now it's four buttons. Four <em><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5343612/blackberry-storm-2-explainer-features-piezo-electronics-wifi">piezo-electric buttons</a></em> that live under the screen, to be precise. What that means for you is that wherever you press on the screen, it feels way more localized, like the screen's only being pushed in exactly where you click it. Before, it was like the whole screen was on a see-saw.</p>
<p>The re-balancing of the screen lets you go far more smoothly and efficiently from one letter to another while typing, rather than waiting for it to pop back up every time. A software change&mdash;which is <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5389114/blackberry-storm-os-50-update-coming-tomorrow">available for the first Storm too</a>&mdash;enables true multitouch typing (for two fingers, but that's enough). You can actually take advantage of the new screen and type much faster than you could on the original Storm. In other words, the mechanics of SurePress actually work now.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/storm__064.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_storm__064.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The entire build of the mechanism is less janky too&mdash;the giant chasms between the screen and the rest of the phone begging for turkey jerky bits to get sucked like a gaping maw have been closed, and the four main buttons are now a seamless part of pushscreen. Oh, and one clever touch is that the screen's dead stiff whenever the phone's off&mdash;if it doesn't press down, you can tell the phone's off (though it does mean one less thing to fiddle with).</p>
<p>SurePress, while vastly more usable and comfortable now, is still flawed as a touchscreen navigational concept: It's predicated on literally putting an obstacle in front of you that has to be smashed in every time you want to do something. It's not an optimal experience. And it ultimately fails in what it supposedly sets out to do by "separating navigation from confirmation," to use RIM's verbiage: To make you type more accurately. It just makes you type slower and wonder why you can't use the Storm's quite dandy touchscreen like any other touchscreen, since the keyboard and screen are otherwise great.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/storm__068.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_storm__068.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<h1>Speed Isn't Everything</h1>
<p>The Storm 2 is quicker all around. The response of nearly every element is just so much springier than the first Storm&mdash;I'm talking versus the launch software to be clear, since frankly, that was the last time I used the Storm. Apps pop up instantly most of the time, hang-ups are a rare occasion, the accelerometer kicks in quickly to rotate the keyboard, and it moves with the kind of speed you expect it to. The phone feels way more like it should. This extends in some respects to the browser, too, which seems a little more capable&mdash;though by no means as stacked as a WebKit browser. I wish the camera was faster to start up though; it's still sluggish most of the time.</p>
<p>There are a few slight visual tweaks to the OS since last year as well that make it more look more polished (I'm very surprised I noticed). For instance there's a more matte, almost Apple-like gradient for highlighted items, like in Messages. Icons are a little more sober, which reflects the darker, slightly more understated look of the phone itself. My favorite software tweak is probably the true QWERTY keyboard in portrait mode, instead RIM's SureType system that previously foisted in front of your thumbs. It's better than Android's&mdash;and HTC's reskin of Android's on the Hero&mdash;though not quite as good as the iPhone's.</p>
<p>While it's got a speed boost and a bit of extra iconographic spitshine, it is still fundamentally the same experience&mdash;the Storm 2 touchscreen interface still feels like it was designed by people with physical keyboards soldered into their brains. From the grand scheme of the UI, the standard BlackBerry setup re-jiggered for touch rather than a ground-up design, to the BlackBerry apps that clearly aren't designed with Storm in mind, there's a definite sense of non-belonging with the Storm 2, like when all of the puzzle pieces don't quite fit together and you jam them together to make it work anyway. In other words, it tries real hard to be a touch phone and a BlackBerry, but it doesn't do either of them exceptionally well.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5393131,12,'');
</script></p>
<p>The Storm 2 is where the Storm should've started, but at the same time, it's coming into a different world than a year ago&mdash;even on its own carrier&mdash;where not breaking new ground is simply moving too slow. More than that, while the Storm is overall a good phone, unless you have a very specific set of criteria for your phone&mdash;that is, a touchscreen BlackBerry&mdash;you probably shouldn't settle for a phone that doesn't do the touch or BlackBerry aspects (read: typing) spectacularly. There are phones that do each of those things better. If you want a BlackBerry on Verizon, get a BlackBerry Tour, which has an awesome keyboard, if a few trackball problems. If you want a touchscreen smartphone on Verizon, you should get a Droid. At least, that's how it's looking so far&mdash;come back early next week for our full in-depth Droid review.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizplus3_06.jpg" width="20" height="20">SurePress actually works now<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizplus3_06.jpg" width="20" height="20">Wi-Fi!<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/giznormal_13.jpg" width="20" height="20">It's pretty quick, most of the time<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizminus_13.jpg" width="20" height="20">SurePress is still a mediocre concept, at best<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizminus_13.jpg" width="20" height="20">Still doesn't fit in as a BlackBerry<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizminus_13.jpg" width="20" height="20">There are phones that do what it's good at much better</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5393132/blackberry-storm-2-review-improving-but-still-mostly-cloudy]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5393132]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry storm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry storm 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[storm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[storm 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5393132&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Stuff We Didn't Post Today (and Why)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p>Dudes Who Can See Future Say <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windows7" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows7/">Windows 7</a> Will Help PC Sales...There's Peek With Twitter, Then There's Peek That ONLY Does Twitter...iPhone Breathing Down BlackBerry's Neck...Google Welcomes You to the Social, But the Google Social, Which Will Be Cooler, Seriously</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/Dan_Mansion_Win_7.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><br>
Analysts who I won't name in order to preserve their most holy humility said that Windows 7 will help PC sales. We've been under the impression that this kind of prediction would fall into the "yeah no shit" category, but it's hard to prove, because a) Christmas is coming and b) the economy may be on the mend. Of course, on the not-so-outside chance that the economic Sarlacc is still slurping us toward its thousand-year stomach, Microsoft and the major PC makers refuse to predict what Windows 7 will mean for sales. So in the end, this "news" is just a chance for some stock brokers to make recommendations to rich speculators, and for analysts to get their names in the paper (whoops!). [<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20091027-707359.html">WSJ</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/Peek_Twitter_box.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><br>
Peek, the mute man's BlackBerry, was spotted today at Best Buy with a box proclaiming its Twitterificness to all the world in bold new packaging (shown at left). But we were under the impression that Peek users <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5363017/peek-joins-the-application-game-with-peek-apps">got Twitter last month</a>. <b>Update: So you're telling me this piece of %&#;$%& <i>only</i> does Twitter? Well then good day to you, Peek Incorporated. I said GOOD DAY!!</b> [<a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/10/27/peek-goes-twitter-and-is-now-available-at-blockbuster/">CrunchGear</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/iPhone_vs_BB.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><br>
From the younger, fresher (but paradoxically Mossbergier) quadrant of Mr. Murdoch's <em>Journal</em> comes the startling declaration that the iPhone might overtake the BlackBerry in US market share. The evidence is a graph by a research firm called ChangeWave. At the moment, BlackBerry accounts for 40% of the nation's smartphones while iPhones account for 30%, with stronger upward momentum. But in the next three months 36% of some relevant cluster of Americans plan to buy an iPhone, while 27% plan to buy a BlackBerry. I love a good stat as much as the next guy, but in the end, they don't mean a lot, and these mean even less when juxtaposed. If I were an analyst, this would be my soundbite: "I won't be surprised if iPhone overtakes BlackBerry, but it may not happen." (I think you know why I'm not an analyst.) [<a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091027/changewave/">AllThingsD</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/Google_Social_hellooo.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><br>
If Google launches something called Social Search, we pay attention. But what the hell is it? Google's own blog's headline includes the baffling declaration "I finally found my friend's New York blog!" Wouldn't good old-fashioned Google show you your friend's blog? And more importantly, what kind of a friend is it who doesn't tell you how to find his or her New York blog?</p>
<p>At the outset, it sounds dumb, and digging deeper it sounds dumber: Though it proclaims to give you "relevant public content from your friends and contacts and highlights it for you at the bottom of your search results," all it gives me are links to stuff already in my RSS feeds. Because despite the fact that I'm logged into Google all day long, I haven't manually inputted my Twitter and Facebook information into my public profile, nor do I have plans to. Without heavy user input, it becomes a social with no people, hence my Zune 1.0 reference in the teaser. [<a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/10/introducing-google-social-search-i.html">Official Google Blog</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5391431/stuff-we-didnt-post-today-and-why/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5391431]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[changewave]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gizmodo remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Google Social Search]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[peek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sarlacc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5391431&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Still Want a BlackBerry Storm 2 Review?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/blackberry-storm-21.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Hey guys and gals, we just got a BlackBerry <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #storm2" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/storm2/">Storm 2</a> loaner&mdash;and an explanation for the delay. Still interested in a review?</p>

<p>Apparently, midway through pre-briefing reporters and handing out review units, there was a disagreement between <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #verizonwireless" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/verizonwireless/">Verizon Wireless</a> and RIM over the readiness of the phone (which Verizon just "<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS87541+26-Oct-2009+PRN20091026">announced</a>"). We can't discuss details, but the communication breakdown&mdash;which involved a few days of unanswered emails&mdash;had nothing to do with dissing you readers. The phone, Matt Buchanan says, is far better than the Storm 1, which makes me think its still worth a review despite it being very late, but you get the final say. What do you think?</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8" src="http://static.polldaddy.com/p/2171384.js">
</script><noscript><br>
<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/2171384/">Do you still want us to review the Blackberry Storm 2?</a><span style="font-size:9px;">(<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com">opinion</a>)</span><br></noscript></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5390267/still-want-a-blackberry-storm-2-review]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5390267]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry storm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[storm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[storm 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon wireless]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:20:57 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5390267&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[BlackBerry Storm 2 Thunders Over to Verizon Oct. 28]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/blackberrystorm2overview.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />After a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5381996/the-heavily-leaked-blackberry-storm-2-gets-unofficially-officially-announced">messy launch</a>, the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #storm2" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/storm2/">Storm 2</a>'s finally hitting Verizon&mdash;on Wednesday. You can check out some of the early reviews <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5384482/blackberry-storm-2-review-roundup">here</a>, though Wi-Fi automatically makes it better than the first Storm in my book.</p>

<blockquote>A POWERFUL NEW STORM ROLLS ONTO VERIZON WIRELESS' NETWORK ON OCT. 28
<p>New Operating System for Existing BlackBerry Storm Customers</p>
<p>BASKING RIDGE, N.J., and WATERLOO, Ontario – Verizon Wireless and Research In Motion (RIM) (NASDAQ: RIMM; TSX: RIM) today announced that the BlackBerry® Storm2™ smartphone will be available in Verizon Wireless Communications stores, online at www.verizonwireless.com, and through business sales channels beginning Oct. 28. The BlackBerry Storm2 with BlackBerry® OS 5.0 evolves the BlackBerry® touchscreen platform with hundreds of hardware and software enhancements – including new SurePress™ "clickable" display technology and built-in Wi-Fi® – delivering the exceptional multimedia experience and communications capabilities customers have come to expect from their BlackBerry smartphones.</p>
<p>Key Features:<br>
· Smooth design and premium finish with sloped edges, chrome accents, glass lens and stainless steel backplate<br>
· Large (3.25"), dazzling high-resolution 480 x 360 display at 184 ppi<br>
· Capacitive touchscreen with integrated functions (Send, End, Menu, Escape) and new SurePress technology that makes clicking the display practically effortless<br>
· 3G and global connectivity support for making phone calls in more than 220 countries and accessing data in more than 185 countries (with more than 80 destinations in 3G)<br>
· Network Connectivity: EV-DO Revision A; UMTS/HSPA (2100 MHz); and quad-band EDGE/GPRS/GSM networks<br>
· Supports Wi-Fi (802.11 b/g)<br>
· 256 MB of Flash memory<br>
· 2 GB of onboard media storage and a microSD™/SDHD memory card slot with a 16 GB card included</p>
<p>Software Updates on BlackBerry Storm2:<br>
· Features BlackBerry OS 5.0, which includes typing accuracy and selection improvements, as well as usability and visual enhancements such as inertial scrolling, spin boxes that make it easier to set dates and times, gradient shading on buttons, and more use of animation<br>
· BlackBerry® Browser is improved with faster JavaScript and CSS processing as well as support for Gears and BlackBerry Widgets<br>
· Customers running BlackBerry® Enterprise Server 5.0 will gain the ability to set follow-up flags, manage e-mail folders, access remote files (Windows Shares), forward appointments, view calendar attachments, and more</p>
<p>Additional Features and Specifications:<br>
· 3.2 megapixel camera with autofocus, Image Stabilization (IS), flash and video recording capabilities<br>
· Premium and easy-to-access phone features, background noise suppression technology, loud distortion-free speakerphone and face detection (proximity sensor) that prevents accidental clicks and blanks the screen while the customer is on the phone<br>
· Media player for videos, pictures and music, plus support for BlackBerry Desktop Manager for both PCs and Macs, and BlackBerry® Media Sync, for easily syncing Windows Media® Player music with the smartphone*<br>
· 3.5 mm stereo headset jack and dedicated volume controls<br>
· Bluetooth® (v2.1) capable with support for Secure Simple Pairing, hands-free headsets, stereo headsets, car kits and other Bluetooth peripherals<br>
· Built-in GPS for maps and other location-based applications, as well as photo geotagging; and Verizon Wireless' VZ NavigatorSM service is pre-loaded<br>
· V CAST Music with Rhapsody<br>
· Access to BlackBerry App World™, featuring a broad and growing catalog of third-party mobile applications developed specifically for BlackBerry smartphones, with categories including games, entertainment, IM and social networking, news, weather, productivity and more<br>
· Support for Verizon Wireless' Mobile Broadband Connect tethering service<br>
· Removable, rechargeable 1400 mAhr battery that provides up to 5.5 hours of talk time or up to 11.2 days of standby time</p>
<p>Pricing and Availability:<br>
· The BlackBerry Storm2 smartphone is available beginning Oct. 28 for $179.99 after a $100 mail-in rebate with a new two-year customer agreement on a voice plan with an Email and Web feature or an Email and Web for BlackBerry plan. Customers will receive the mail-in rebate in the form of a debit card; upon receipt, customers may use the card as cash anywhere debit cards are accepted. Data plans for the BlackBerry Storm2 smartphone begin at $29.99 when added to any Nationwide voice plan.</p>
<p>New Operating System for Existing BlackBerry Storm Customers<br>
· Existing BlackBerry Storm customers will be able to update their handsets to the new BlackBerry OS 5.0 software via Web software load (www.blackberry.com/update), BlackBerry Desktop Manager, or from Verizon Wireless' download site (www.verizonwireless.com/storm). The software is available today.<br>
· For additional information on Verizon Wireless products and services, visit a Verizon Wireless Communications Store, call 1-800-2 JOIN IN or go to www.verizonwireless.com. Business customers can contact their Business Sales Representatives at 1-800-VZW-4BIZ.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>[<a href="http://verizon.com">Verizon</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5389898/blackberry-storm-2-thunders-over-to-verizon-oct-28]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5389898]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry storm 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[storm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[storm 2]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:09:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5389898&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Blackberry Storm OS 5.0 Update Coming Tomorrow]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/BB-Storm-9530-OS-5-Changelog.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_BB-Storm-9530-OS-5-Changelog.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Storm owners&mdash;head <a href="www.BlackBerry.com/storm/updates">here</a> tomorrow for the latest OS update. No OTA option, you'll have to go through the website or <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #desktopmanager" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/desktopmanager/">Desktop Manager</a>. Expect some new features on top of the kicker: better text input. [<a href="http://erictric.com/technology/os-5-0-for-blackberry-storm-9530-to-be-released-on-october-25th#more-8372">Erictric</a> via <a href="http://www.unwiredview.com/2009/10/24/blackberry-storm-os-5-0-firmware-coming-sunday/">Unwired View</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5389114/blackberry-storm-os-50-update-coming-tomorrow]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5389114]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[5.0]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry os 5.0]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry storm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[desktop manager]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[storm]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 24 Oct 2009 13:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5389114&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Remainders - Things We Didn't Post]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p>Apple Unleashes Billboard So Large It's Actually Illegal...<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #win7" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/win7/">Win 7</a> Touchscreen Commits Seppuku on Live Japanese TV...Wal-Mart Gets a Gear Installer Squad of Its Own...RIM Kills Our Dreams, Says No To Smartwatch...</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/Apple_ad_huge.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><br>
I don't know what's funnier, that Apple has the balls to erect a billboard so large it's illegal, or that Apple has such pull&mdash;financial and political&mdash;that they can get away with it. Since 2007 the 13,750-square-foot billboard has been up in a Boston-based storage facility, and the state has argued that it should come down. Protected in part by Boston hizzoner Thomas M. Menino and others, the ad remains, but after a temporary permit ran out, its owners had to pay a $110,000 "settlement." Sounds like a fine to me. Either way, the mofo is still standing. [<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/10/23/apples_illegal_boston_billboard_at_center_of_political_controversy.html">AppleInsider</a>]</p>
<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/DbJGzyYV_X8&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/DbJGzyYV_X8&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><br>
On what looks like the Japanese equivalent of <i>Regis and Kelly</i>, a TV presenter showing off a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5376704/sony-vaio-l-all+in+one-the-high+def-living-room-touchscreen-pc">Sony Vaio L</a> touchscreen Win 7 PC can't quite get it to work. It's not fully frozen&mdash;it's the IR touch interface that seems to be the problem. Whatever the case, you can see this poor bastard visibly mourning his own rapidly decreasing family honor. And as for Reeg-san and JKelly, I don't know what they're saying, but I am pretty sure I've heard it all before. [<a href="http://www.macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/microsofts_windows_7_epic_fail_on_live_tv_as_commentators_laugh/">MacDailyNews</a> via <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/10/23/fail-windows-7-crashes-during-live-tv-demo/">CrunchGear</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/Walmart_geek_car.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><br>
Wal-Mart is sticking it to Best Buy with their own army of overpriced teenage-son replacements. You pay anywhere from $99 to $339 for, as Reuters puts it, "basic television installation on the low end to setting up a home theater, wireless router network or a home office computer network" on the high end. So let me get this straight, somebody paying <a href="http://www.walmart.com/RCA-40-LCD-TV/ip/10913073">$600 for a 40" LCD TV</a> is going to pay $100 for it to be setup? Better yet, someone paying <a href="http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=10730619">$30 for a wireless router</a> will pay 10 times that for some dude to come install it? I mean, I know we're a service economy, but this is ridiculous. [<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSTRE59L54J20091023">Reuters</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/BB_watch_busted.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><br>
My favorite Canadian co-CEO, RIM's Mike Lazaridis, did a kind of evasion/denial response to questions about the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5385044/this-folks-is-the-blackberry-smartwatch">gloriously hideous Bluetooth BlackBerry smartwatch</a>, a kind of wristborne <a href="http://gizmodo.com/264550/palm-foleo-a-laptop-for-your-smartphone">Foleo</a>, if you will. He kinda just giggled and said that the accessories they release are generally accessories that keep the BlackBerry handset at the center. Clearly this would be different&mdash;and <a href="http://crackberry.com/first-images-blackberry-watch-real">CrackBerry maintains</a> that it still may come out, designed and built for BlackBerrys by a firm unaffiliated with RIM. Sounds like a recipe for awesome to me. [<a href="http://www.techdigest.tv/2009/10/rim_co-ceo_mike.html">TechDigest</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5388861/remainders-+-things-we-didnt-post/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5388861]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[billboards]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry watch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bluetooth watch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[boston]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[geek squad]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gizmodo remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[japan]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lazaridis]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[touchscreen]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[walmart]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[watch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[win 7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 23 Oct 2009 23:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5388861&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Lala iPhone App And Its 10-Cent Songs Might Be Reality By Year End]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/lala.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />We heard of Lala's iPhone app <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5066225/lala-unveils-iphone-app-unusual-10+cent-song-sales">a year ago</a>, but now, along with their <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5386856/first-screenshots-of-googles-music-service">connection to Google's music service</a>, we're hearing that the app is going through the approval process with hopes of availability by year end.</p>

<p>Songs are a mere ten pennies through Lala because they would be streamed to your phone, but there's more to the app than streaming. It would allow for your own music collection to be uploaded to and accessed through the cloud for <i>free</i>. No more fretting over music storage.</p>
<p>There's good news for the non-iPhone users too. Lala intends on coming out with an app for Android, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #palmpre" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/palmpre/">Palm Pre</a>, and Blackberry phones as well. [<a href="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/10/lala-iphone-app/">Wired</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5388091/lala-iphone-app-and-its-10+cent-songs-might-be-reality-by-year-end]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5388091]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lala]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lala iphone app]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm pre]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pre]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:44:05 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5388091&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Ballmer on the Smartphone Race: "It Doesn't Matter What the Critics Say"]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("/ballmerwinmo65_giz.flv", 500, 280,"");
</script><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/stills/ballmerwinmo65_giz.flv.jpg"></a> In this segment of my exclusive interview series with Microsoft boss <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #steveballmer" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/steveballmer/">Steve Ballmer</a>, I brought up the sore subject of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windowsmobile65" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windowsmobile65/">Windows Mobile 6.5</a>. After defending it, he cited another product that did well but suffers mounting criticism: Nokia smartphones.</p>
<p>As you can see in the video, Ballmer acknowledges that <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windowsmobile" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windowsmobile/">Windows Mobile</a> 6.5 is receiving negative reviews, but I never get him to actually admit that the platform still needs work. He says, "reviews aside," he's happy with what Windows Phones (running 6.5) can do now.</p>
<p>And faced with competition of iPhone, BlackBerry and others, he contends it's currently "kind of a horse race." The only clear leader, market-share wise, is Nokia, and they're losing ground. When I said that Nokia was another developer currently lambasted by reviewers, Ballmer replied:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>At the end of the day, it doesn't really matter what the critics say, it matters what the customers say.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Perhaps given the power of advertising (still mighty, even if it's on the decline), there may still be a way for a product to get positive sales despite negative reviews. But the internet has changed that landscape, and the lines between critic and customer blur more every day. We all share knowledge in order to make better choices. So who, in the end, is this customer, who is so different from the critic? Not anyone who reads Gizmodo, that's for sure.</p>
<p>Stay tuned for more exciting Ballmer moments (and facial expressions) over the next day, and then the full uncut interview video on Friday. <i>Video by <a href="http://www.vimeo.com/6145633">Mike Short</a></i></p>
<p><b>Steve Ballmer Exclusive Interview Series:</b><br>
Part 1: <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5387238/ballmer-talks-natal-says-blu+ray-add+on-for-xbox-coming">Ballmer Talks Natal, Says Blu-ray Add-On for Xbox Coming</a><br>
Part 2: <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5387329/ballmer-on-the-smartphone-race-it-doesnt-matter-what-the-critics-say">Ballmer on the Smartphone Race: "It Doesn't Matter What the Critics Say"</a><br>
Part 3: <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5387753/ballmer-on-zune-sometimes-you-get-it-right-the-third-time">Ballmer on Zune: Sometimes You Get It Right The Third Time?</a></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5387329/ballmer-on-the-smartphone-race-it-doesnt-matter-what-the-critics-say]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5387329]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ballmer interview]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[exclusive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nokia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[steve ballmer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[steve ballmer fall 2009 interview]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7 liftoff]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Windows Mobile 6.5]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[winmo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5387329&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Blackberry Storm 2 Dummy Units Arrive At Best Buy and Verizon Stores]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/Storm2-best-buy.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />As this spy shot confirms, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/storm2/">Blackberry Storm 2</a> dummy units have started to arrive on <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #bestbuy" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/bestbuy/">Best Buy</a> shelves&mdash;and word is that Verizon has received them as well. In other words, the launch is imminent.</p>
<p>How iminient? Well, If you believe <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5371918/blackberry-storm-2-arriving-at-best-buy-in-late-october">earlier reports</a>, there is a good chance that the launch could take place as early as October 25th. [<a href="http://crackberry.com/storm2-dummy-unit-spotted-best-buy">Crackberry</a> via <a href="http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/10/21/verizon-stores-best-buy-have-blackberry-storm-2-dummy-units-launch-imminent/">MobileCrunch</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5386693/blackberry-storm-2-dummy-units-arrive-at-best-buy-and-verizon-stores]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5386693]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[storm 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[best buy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry storm 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[storm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:34:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5386693&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[BlackBerry Bold 9700 on T-Mobile and AT&T in November]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_BlackBerryBold9700-2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />The Bold 9000's successor is now official. As a reminder: The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/search/9700">9700</a> has a slimmer design, optical trackpad, 3.2-megapixel camera (up from 2Mp), and a higher-resolution display (480 x 320). Like the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5384482/blackberry-storm-2-review-roundup">Storm 2</a>, it runs BlackBerry OS 5.0.</p>
<p>OS 5.0 includes a faster browser, threaded text messaging, and BlackBerry maps.</p>
<p>The 9700 keeps the fret-style keyboard dividers, but the slimmer design means you'll probably want to try it in the store first. Both phones also use the same 624MHz processor.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.att.com/gen/press-room?pid=4800&cdvn=news&newsarticleid=27289">AT&T says</a> they'll be selling the 9700 for $200 (after $100 mail-in rebate). T-Mo hasn't discussed dollars, but <a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20091021005393&newsLang=en">confirms</a> the 9700 will support UMA Wi-Fi calling (as part of the carrier's HotSpot@Home service), visual voicemail, and corporate email. [<a href="http://na.blackberry.com/eng/devices/blackberrybold9700/">Bold 9700 Page</a> | <a href="http://na.blackberry.com/eng/newsroom/news/press/release.jsp?id=2567">RIM</a>]</p>
<p><iframe src="http://na.blackberry.com/eng/devices/blackberrybold9700/boldVideoPlayer.jsp?i=1&l=0&url=http://na.blackberry.com/eng/devices/blackberrybold9700/bold_videos.jsp?i=1" width="500" height="310" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5386509/blackberry-bold-9700-on-t+mobile-and-att-in-november]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5386509]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry bold 9700]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[BlackBerry Bold 9700 Headed to T-Mobile and AT&T in November]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bold 9700]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[RIM BlackBerry Bold 9700]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 21 Oct 2009 07:25:56 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5386509&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[This, Folks, Is the BlackBerry Smartwatch]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/bbwatch.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_bbwatch.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Early <a href="http://www.techradar.com/news/phone-and-communications/mobile-phones/rim-planning-a-blackberry-watch--626451">rumors</a> of a BlackBerry-branded watchphone/smartwatch/wrist messenger/Bluetooth bracelet seemed a little far-fetched&mdash;RIM is all about business, and watchphones are pure, distilled gadget novelty. Nonetheless, here we stand, gazing upon the the <a href="http://crackberry.com/first-images-blackberry-watch-real">BlackBerry companion watch</a>. Here's what we know.</p>

<p>According to <a href="http://crackberry.com/first-images-blackberry-watch-real">CrackBerry</a>:</p>
<p>• It was designed "specifically for BlackBerry from the ground up," by a "new BlackBerry-dedicated accessory company," and could be branded as the "inPulse." This sounds suspiciously like BlackBerry wanting a watchphone, and outsourcing the design and manufacturing expertise.</p>
<p>• It's got a large (but hopefully not too large) OLED screen, with a high enough resolution to display text clearly</p>
<p>• Its primary purpose is to display messages from a paired BlackBerry, meaning it's strictly an accessory device like <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5054017/sony-ericsson-pretties+up-its-bluetooth-watches-mbw+200s-for-the-ladies">Sony Ericsson's pieces</a>, not a standalone watchphone like the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5278299/lg-gd910-watchphone-hitting-european-stores-in-july-spy-powers-sold-separately">LG GD910</a>.</p>
<p>This is an early glimpse in all senses&mdash;Crackberry describes the shots rather wonderfully as "<em>actual</em> renderings of the real deal"&mdash;meaning that there's no info on tech specs, nor indication as to how much this thing might cost, whether it'll carry BlackBerry branding, or when we could expect it to actually ship. The announcement, though, is expected "soon," whatever that means. [<a href="http://crackberry.com/first-images-blackberry-watch-real">Crackberry</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5385044/this-folks-is-the-blackberry-smartwatch]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5385044]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry smartwatch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry watch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartwatches]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[watches]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[watchphones]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:49:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5385044&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[BlackBerry Storm 2 Review Roundup]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/blackberrystorm2overview.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5383539/blackberry-thinks-youre-all-motherfckers">We weren't able</a> to bring you guys a kickass, timely BlackBerry <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #storm2" href="http://gizmodo.comhttp://gizmodo.com/tag/storm2/">Storm 2</a> review like we wanted&mdash;and we're sorry about that. Check out a roundup of other reviews below; it's the least we can do.</p>
<p>Reviews vary widely in verdict, just like the original Storm (CNET gives it two out of five stars, while PC Mag gives it four out of five) but on the whole everybody agrees that it's a definite step up, fixing most of the issues users had with the original (most notably that lag problem). Some of the reviews, particularly PC Mag and IntoMobile, are downright glowing, which is unexpected given the critical response to the original Storm, but certainly welcome. Note: The two British publications, TechRadar and Times UK, reviewed the 9520, which is the Vodafone version. All others reviewed the 9550 (the Verizon version we'll see in the States).</p>
<p><a href="http://crackberry.com/blackberry-storm2-review">CrackBerry</a>: "The Storm2 fixes many of the BlackBerry Storm's outstanding issues and makes a ton of incremental improvements, all of which add up to something that feels noticeably better."<br>
<a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/smartphones/rim-blackberry-storm-2/4505-6452_7-33776074.html">CNET</a>: "The RIM BlackBerry Storm 2 brings some welcome additions, such as Wi-Fi, updated software, and a better touch interface, but it's going to face some serious competition from Verizon's upcoming touch-screen smartphones."<br>
<a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2354222,00.asp">PC Mag</a>: "The BlackBerry Storm2 9550 finally delivers on the original Storm 9530's promise."<br>
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/15/AR2009101500114.html">Washington Post</a>: "Definitely an upgrade from the first Storm in design and usability"<br>
<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704107204574473423239117900.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">Wall Street Journal</a>: "Fixes all those [hardware] flaws [in the Storm]," but "the traditional BlackBerry interface cries out for a major overhaul"<br>
<a href="http://www.laptopmag.com/review/cell-phone/blackberry-storm2-verizon-wireless.aspx">Laptop Magazine</a>: "It's really more like a do-over than a sequel."<br>
<a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2009/10/16/blackberry-storm2-review.html">IntoMobile</a>: "I might find something to nag about on the Storm2 after putting it through the gauntlet, but right now, <em>I just really like this thing</em>. All of the gaps have been plugged."<br>
<a href="http://www.techradar.com/news/phone-and-communications/mobile-phones/hands-on-blackberry-storm-2-review-642761">TechRadar</a> (9520): "Overall, the Storm 2 is very much an improvement over the original Storm, but it's evolutionary rather than revolutionary, despite overhauling the SurePress interface."<br>
<a href="http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/gadgets_and_gaming/article6875300.ece">Times UK</a> (9520): "For all its attempts to court a new customer base, the core market for the Storm 2 remains the business user"</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5384482/blackberry-storm-2-review-roundup]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5384482]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[storm 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry storm 2 review roundup]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[review roundup]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[storm]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 18 Oct 2009 20:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5384482&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Crackberry's Take on Why Verizon Didn't Launch the Storm2 With RIM]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/verizonstorm2release_01.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />The BlackBerry <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #storm2" href="http://gizmodo.comhttp://gizmodo.com/tag/storm2/">Storm 2</a> is the followup to Verizon's most buzzed-about phone of last year, but Verizon didn't help with the news. CrackBerry says the phone didn't pass Verizon's quality assurance. [<a href="http://crackberry.com/wheres-verizon-blackberry-storm2-announcement">CrackBerry</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5384070/crackberrys-take-on-why-verizon-didnt-launch-the-storm2-with-rim]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5384070]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[storm 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry storm 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[release]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rollout]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 17 Oct 2009 18:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5384070&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Remainders - Things We Didn't Post]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p>Baby Gets Hit By Train, Strolls Away...There's a Hole In My Heart That Can Only Be Filled By&mdash;<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #stemcells" href="http://gizmodo.comhttp://gizmodo.com/tag/stemcells/">Stem Cells</a>?...Beware Bobbies Bearing BlackBerries...Science Figures Out Why We Break Out Bubbly</p>
<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_tlrMwWU5ZQ&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_tlrMwWU5ZQ&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><br>
Sure it's been the lead story on CNN and a big story on Gawker, but there just wasn't enough DIY mechanics or cellphone-related mayhem for us to pounce on this little gem. As a dad, I don't like seeing shit like this, but knowing there's a happy ending made it a bit easier to view. Oops, did I give too much away? [<a href="http://gawker.com/5383040/forget-balloon-boy-todays-all-about-train-baby">Gawker</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/Extreme_Hole_Hearted.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><br>
Hairband balladeers from the roaring '80s will be disappointed to learn that holes in the heart previously only able to be filled by some girl who is already dating some other guy can now be filled by a patch made of stem cells. As for the rest of us, we naturally assumed that if stem cells could give Christopher "Butthole" Reeve real Superman strength and build replica's of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #shakeyspizza" href="http://gizmodo.comhttp://gizmodo.com/tag/shakeyspizza/">Shakey's Pizza</a>, well, of <em>course</em> they can patch heart holes. [<a href="http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2009-10/patch-uses-stem-cells-plug-holes-heart">PopSci</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/Hot_Fuzz_BlackBerry.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><br>
By March of next year, many <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #britishpolice" href="http://gizmodo.comhttp://gizmodo.com/tag/britishpolice/">British police</a> officers will be handed a smartphone in order to maintain communication while increasing time in the field. It may work, assuming they block like a million distractions. Frankly, the only reason I wanted to even mention this in Remainders was to remind the world of that stroke of British police genius, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #hotfuzz" href="http://gizmodo.comhttp://gizmodo.com/tag/hotfuzz/">Hot Fuzz</a>, through Photoshop. It was that or an image of the gmilfy <em>Prime Suspect</em> herself, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #helenmirren" href="http://gizmodo.comhttp://gizmodo.com/tag/helenmirren/">Helen Mirren</a>. Did I <a href="http://www.topsocialite.com/helen-mirren-bikini-bod/">choose wrong</a>? [<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8310277.stm">BBC</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/16/blackberrys-for-coppers-uk-law-enforcement-to-smarten-up/">Engadget</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/Soda_smile_tongue.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><br>
Science produces explanations great and small, and finally got around to one we've been waiting for since Heinrich "Coca" Cola invented the fizzy beverage: Why do we love the carbonation? Everyone used to think it was the exploding carbonation bubbles, but sure enough, it's the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #carbondioxide" href="http://gizmodo.comhttp://gizmodo.com/tag/carbondioxide/">carbon dioxide</a> itself&mdash;you listening, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #algore" href="http://gizmodo.comhttp://gizmodo.com/tag/algore/">Al Gore</a>???&mdash;that sends a message to open up the sour <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #tastebuds" href="http://gizmodo.comhttp://gizmodo.com/tag/tastebuds/">taste buds</a>, delivering a genuine flavor change. Sure, it's not gadget news, but now, when you head out to the bars, you can order beer <em>in the name of science</em>. [<a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1220674/Explosive-findings-Scientists-discover-real-reason-fizzy-drinks-tingle-tongue.html?ITO=1490">Daily Mail UK</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5383738/remainders-+-things-we-didnt-post/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5383738]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[al gore]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[australia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[baby]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[britain]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[british police]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[carbonation]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[christopher reeve]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[coca cola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[extreme]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gizmodo remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[helen mirren]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hole hearted]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hot fuzz]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shakey's pizza]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[soda]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[south park]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[stem cells]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[stroller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[taste buds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tongue]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[train]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[uk]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 16 Oct 2009 23:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5383738&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[BlackBerry Thinks You're All MotherF*ckers]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/bbstorm2-7.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_bbstorm2-7.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Hey there. It's me, with another apology. I'm sorry we didn't review the BlackBerry Storm 2. It's because RIM doesn't care about you guys.</p>

<p>It's been total radio silence from them regarding a review unit, so we're late with a review. I'm sorry we can't provide our usual level of speed and depth on the device; normally, we're provided with a review unit at or ahead of release and have the time to put it through its paces. But apparently we've been blacklisted. <i>This is not about that.</i></p>
<p>RIM's never really liked Gizmodo or Engadget, or blogs in general. They gave review units to the NYT and WSJ, who went ahead and panned the phone, just like we would have. I don't mind when we get put to the back of the list for that reason, the preference of old media over new. But this wasn't just an anti-online decision&mdash;they also gave a phone to Crackberry, which far fewer people read. I don't mind that website at all, but clearly RIM is pissed about something we specifically did.</p>
<p>Since they're not responding to phone calls or emails now, I can only guess its because Engadget (god bless them for breaking the news on this) did a hands on of a Storm 2 Handset <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/25/blackberry-storm-2-and-its-piezoelectric-soul-finally-diss/">6 months before it launched</a>. Before it was even acknowledged that it <em>existed</em>. (UPDATE: Crackberry did, too, make a common practice of handling unreleased phones on blog. Good on them!)Understandably, RIM got pissed, although you'd think they'd get pissed at themselves for allowing the leak. But that doesn't explain why we weren't allowed to check it out. My hunch is that they knew we'd savage it. That's OK, it's not their responsibility to hand out review units to us if they don't want to. We're a small publication in the grand scheme of media. <i>This is not about that.</i></p>
<p>But it does send a very clear message to me: Blackberry couldn't give a shit about you guys, our readers. You're so unimportant to them that they don't care if you get a review from the people you read every day at Gizmodo. I think it's a mistake on their part, but if they don't want you to buy their phone, that's fine. <strike>Because the Storm 2 is garbage, and you shouldn't buy it. I mean, these guys clearly have no idea how to make a phone for anyone but their original market of old dudes in suits, nor how to market to anyone but them. And that's their problem, not yours or ours.</strike> [I shouldn't get into product jokes in a post that many people have, surprisingly, taken seriously.]</p>
<p>The bottom line is that I'm sorry we couldn't tell you this based off our own in house review. Now you know why.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5383539/blackberry-thinks-youre-all-motherfckers]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5383539]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[crackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[meta]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sorry]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:19:53 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5383539&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Why Didn't Verizon Announce the Storm 2 When RIM Did?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #blackberrystorm2" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #blackberrystorm2" href="http://gizmodo.comhttp://gizmodo.com/tag/blackberrystorm2/">BlackBerry Storm 2</a>'s had a pretty weird debut. The original launched with a ton of coordinated fanfare from Verizon and RIM, but this time around, it's a murky, limbo launch, basically <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5381996/the-heavily-leaked-blackberry-storm-2-gets-unofficially-officially-announced">announced by Walt Mossberg</a>.  </p>
<p>So what happened? <em>Officially</em>, the reason that Verizon hasn't announced the Storm 2 is that "it's not available yet," and when it is, they'll "share that like normal." O-kay. Unofficially, well, we just think it's weird, but why <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5382440/now-you-can-contribute-and-comment-to-gizmodo-directly">you tell us</a>? [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/storm-2">Storm 2 Coverage @ Giz</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5382455/why-didnt-verizon-announce-the-storm-2-when-rim-did]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5382455]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[huh]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry storm 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[storm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:02:48 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5382455&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Heavily Leaked BlackBerry Storm 2 Gets Unofficially Officially Announced]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/BB_Storm_2_official_upscaled_340wd.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Well, everyone knew it was coming, thanks to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/storm-2/">heavy and repeated leaks</a>, but Walt Mossberg just unofficially officially published a little hands-on preview, with an official photo, of the device. So what didn't we know?</p>
<p>In a phrase, not much. Mossberg likes the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged STORM 2" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/storm-2/">Storm 2</a> much more than the maligned Storm, that's for sure, but we don't have too much new insight. Looks like the Storm 2 fixes some of the more glaring flaws of its predecessor: Wi-Fi and a full QWERTY keyboard in portrait mode are two features we're glad to see confirmed. Looks like <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5343612/blackberry-storm-2-explainer-features-piezo-electronics-wifi">we've also got confirmation</a> that the Storm 2 does away with the tactile clicky keyboard as well, instead providing some kind haptic feedback that should confirm a touch selection, a technique that's been used (in various forms) by companies like LG and Samsung for years. But this is RIM's first BlackBerry with the feature, and hopefully it's easier to use than the Storm's clickscreen.</p>
<p>Mossberg also hints at the device's launch date and price:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Verizon hasn't set a launch date or price for the Storm2, but it's likely to appear in November at around $200.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>....which, of course, was pretty obvious. Walt actually says the Storm 2 "worked well" in his preview, which is something not said by too many about the original Storm, but we'll have to wait until we can play with it ourselves to be sure. [<a href="http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20091014/the-cliq-storm2-join-long-parade-of-iphone-threats/">WSJ</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5381996/the-heavily-leaked-blackberry-storm-2-gets-unofficially-officially-announced]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5381996]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry storm 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[storm 2]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:15:30 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5381996&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New York Times: BlackBerry Storm 2 Coming "This Week"]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/odinwifi.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_odinwifi.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Tucked <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/14/technology/companies/14rimm.html?ref=technology">in a NYT story</a> about RIM trying to keep up in this crazy world of iPhones and Androids is a mention that "this week, Verizon and R.I.M. are trying again with a Storm do-over, the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged STORM 2" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/storm-2/">Storm 2</a>."</p>
<p>The Times mentions its <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5319812/blackberry-storm-2-in-action-surepress-click-screen-and-all">redesigned screen</a>, that it <em>actually</em> "gives the user the sensation of pushing a physical button when pressing a number on the glass touch screen" and relates a really curious anecdote from Verizon Wireless CEO Lowell McAdams, who let some students play with it: "They came back and said ‘Oh, my gosh.' They were very excited. This is what they hoped the original Storm should be." Oh, I'm <em>very sure</em> it was.</p>
<p>We'd hear from a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5371918/blackberry-storm-2-arriving-at-best-buy-in-late-october">Best Buy</a> and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5375702/details-on-verizons-holiday-phone-lineup">Verizon leak</a> it was coming soon, so no surprise, really.</p>
<p>What I find interesting, and telling about RIM's mindset is how much the brass emphasizes that they save carriers money and let them make a bigger profit. If you wanna win the consumer war, that's totally not the point, guys. [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/14/technology/companies/14rimm.html?ref=technology">NYT</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5381326/new-york-times-blackberry-storm-2-coming-this-week]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5381326]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry storm 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[storm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[storm 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:32:57 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5381326&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Design Your Own Laptop, Phone or Kindle GelaSkin]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gela.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_gela.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>GelaSkins makes stylish, reusable skins for iPhones/iPods, Blackberries laptops and Kindles. But now, instead of choosing from their designs, you can upload your own art to customize your gear.</p>

<p>(Disregard the indescribable ugliness of the lead shot and reach out with your imaginations.)</p>
<p>While GelaSkins can't come out and make this point, their new design process is probably the best way to get your favorite niche, licensed art wrapped around your gadgets. (It's easier for me to just rip and upload what I want than GelaSkins cutting more deals with companies like Dark Horse.)</p>
<p>The most enticing piece, however, is that the customization process doesn't seem to run a price premium over standard GelaSkins. Phone skins still hover around $15 with laptop skins running $30. [<a href="https://www.gelaskins.com/create.php">GelaSkins</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5380503/design-your-own-laptop-phone-or-kindle-gelaskin]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5380503]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[skins]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gelaskin]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gelaskins]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:10:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5380503&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The JD Power Smartphone Satisfaction Ratings Give Apple a Win, Motorola a Big Lose]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/jdpower.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_jdpower.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged JD POWER" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/jd-power/">JD Power</a>'s annual ratings put Apple on top with an 811, beating the industry average of 765. What's surprising is that only Apple and LG are above the average, whereas <b>everyone else</b> is below.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/jdpoweeerr.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />What's not surprising is that Motorola is dead last. Up until their <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/cliq">Android Cliq</a> they really didn't have much going for them&mdash;and neither did Palm, until their Pre. So our guess is that these ratings will look a little different next year with Palm moving up a slot or two, and Motorola pulling out of the shame spot.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/dumphones.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_dumphones.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Motorola doesn't do too bad on the dumbphone ratings, on the other hand.</p>
<p>Also, LG? [<a href="http://www.jdpower.com/corporate/news/releases/pressrelease.aspx?ID=2009224">JD Power</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5377572/the-jd-power-smartphone-satisfaction-ratings-give-apple-a-win-motorola-a-big-lose]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5377572]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ratings]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jd power]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jd power 2009 ratings]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 08 Oct 2009 19:50:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5377572&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[BlackBerry Bold Debuts in Soft, Virginal White]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/bberryboldbackwhite.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_bberryboldbackwhite.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>RIM very quietly just showed off the new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #blackberrybold" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/blackberrybold/">BlackBerry Bold</a> in white, with a white leather back that somehow manages to outdo the previous version in tackiness. It's due out on AT&T for $200, as usual, on October 18th.</p>
<p>We knew it was coming, so this is just some concrete confirmation. The RIM rep told me it'll be out on the 18th only online and in "select stores," which look restricted to LA and Phoenix, for some reason. One more shot:</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/bberryboldwhite.jpg" width="800" height="600"></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5376796/blackberry-bold-debuts-in-soft-virginal-white]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5376796]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry bold]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bold]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[white]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[white blackberry bold]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 07 Oct 2009 22:22:07 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5376796&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Details on Verizon's Holiday Phone Lineup]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/verizonlineup_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_verizonlineup_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>A reliable source just sent us this list with the 12 new phones that Verizon will release this shopping season, along with an approximate timeframe. It includes Android and other phones from HTC, Motorola, LG, RIM, Casio and Pantech:</p>
<p>• RIM <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged BLACKBERRY CURVE 2" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/blackberry-curve-2/">BlackBerry Curve 2</a>, before Black Friday<br>
• RIM <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged BLACKBERRY STORM 2" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/blackberry-storm-2/">BlackBerry Storm 2</a>, before Black Friday<br>
• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5370365/verizons-htc-imagio-is-just-the-blunted-tip-of-the-windows-mobile-65-iceberg">HTC Imagio</a>, on October 20<br>
• <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SAMSUNG SAGA 2" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/samsung-saga-2/">Samsung Saga 2</a>, early November<br>
• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5291053/samsung-omnia-ii-has-biggest-ever-phone-amoled-display-coming-to-verizon">Samsung Omnia 2</a>, early November<br>
• Pantech TXT8030 Razzle, early October<br>
• Casio C731 Rock, mid-November<br>
• Casio C741 Brigade, late October<br>
• Motorola V860 Barrage, "soon" (it's already available online in Verizon)<br>
• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5364044/verizon-lg-chocolate-touch-inches-toward-unexciting-arrival-with-leaked-photos">LG VX8575 Chocolate Touch</a>, first or second week of November</p>
<p>On the Android front:<br>
• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5350356/verizon-outed-with-yet-another-android-phone-this-time-from-htc">HTC Desire</a>, which will be available before Black Friday. <i>Note: This may be the Verizon Android phone <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5375490/verizons-htc-and-motorola-android-phones-caught-red-handed">sighted today</a>, though Boy Genius says that <a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/10/06/htc-hero-hitting-verizon-in-november/">might be called the Hero</a>.</i></p>
<p>• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5373372/more-details-surface-on-motorolas-verizon-android-phone">Motorola Tao or Droid</a> (possibly the phone currently <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5374358/verizon-motorola-sholes-with-android-will-be-on-sale-by-the-holidays">codenamed Sholes</a>?) will also be available before Black Friday.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5375702/details-on-verizons-holiday-phone-lineup]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5375702]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[unconfirmed]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry curve 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry storm 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[casio]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chocolate touch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[exclusive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pantech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Samsung Saga 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:09:54 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5375702&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[First Look At Blackberry's Essex and Rumors About the Dakota]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/essex2.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Forget the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5350386/blackberry-essex-the-tour-plus-wi+fi-and-a-trackpad">mockups of the Blackberry Essex</a>, what may be a picture of the real thing has leaked along with news of Dakota, RIM's first phone with a "touchscreen in a conventional shape" and a "<a href="http://gizmodo.com/368309/varioptic-and-seiko-to-bring-liquid-lenses-to-cellphones-finally">liquid lens</a>."</p>
<p>Yeah, it's a blurry pic and it vaguely looks like the Tour (as expected), but then again we did expect the Essex to be just that: an upgraded Tour.</p>
<p>What we're more interested in is all the rumors floating around about the Dakota. Aside from the info about the touchscreen and "liquid lens," Electronista says that "little else is known about the Dakota other than that it would have the now-standard trackpad and work on GSM (and likely HSPA) networks." So, CDMA carriers get a little upgrade while GSM carriers might get a new toy? Typical. [<a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/09/10/05/blackberry.dakota.and.essex.get.early.info/">Electronista</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5374936/first-look-at-blackberrys-essex-and-rumors-about-the-dakota]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5374936]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry dakota]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry essex]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cdma]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dakota]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[essex]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gsm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 05 Oct 2009 21:22:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5374936&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Verizon Motorola Sholes With Android Will Be On Sale By The Holidays]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/verizon-sams-1-small.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />'Tis going to be the season of new cell phones. <a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/10/05/verizon-wireless-sams-club-target-gearing-up-to-launch-motorola-droid-blackberry-storm-2-blackberry-curve-2-more/">Boy Genius Report</a> has gotten a hold of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged HOLIDAY INVENTORY" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/holiday-inventory/">holiday inventory</a> lists from Target and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SAM'S CLUB" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/sam.s-club/">Sam's Club</a>. The details are juicy and include the rumored <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/motorola-sholes/">Verizon Motorola Sholes Android</a> phone.</p>

<p>You can check out the raw material in the leaked documents below, but here is the most interesting stuff to me:</p>
<p>• The Sam's Club document includes the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged VERIZON MOTOROLA SHOLES" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/verizon-motorola-sholes/">Verizon Motorola Sholes</a> (also been rumored to be called the Droid or Tao). From the tiny picture, the Android phone seems to have a front-facing camera. We already know a good deal of the rest of <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5326435/motorola-sholes-android-phone-may-show-up-on-verizon/gallery/">the specs</a>. Say it is so: Verizon is finally going to get some 'droid!<br>
• The Verizon <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged BLACKBERRY STORM 2" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/blackberry-storm-2/">BlackBerry Storm 2</a> is finally on its way to Sam's Club, Target and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged BEST BUY" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/best-buy/">Best Buy</a>. It will be joined <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged BLACKBERRY CURVE 2" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/blackberry-curve-2/">BlackBerry Curve 2</a> or <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged LG CHOCOLATE TOUCH" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/lg-chocolate-touch/">LG Chocolate Touch</a>.<br>
• Don't forget yesterday's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5373850/best-buy-employee-holiday-guide-reveals-blackberry-nokia-android-launches">Best Buy leaks</a>: the Nokia Booklet 3G netbook is listed and launching on October 25 with the option of AT&T activation. The retailer will also have the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged PALM PIXI" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/palm-pixi/">Palm Pixi</a> and plans to have "new BlackBerry devices across multiple carriers."</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5374375,3,'');
</script></p>
<p>That could be all the exciting holiday phone news we see and not to mention lots of them will be <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5374115/flash-101-full-flash-for-everyone-but-iphone-actually-playable-hd-vids?skyline=true&s=x">able to run full Flash</a>! Not a bad way to start off the week. [<a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/10/05/verizon-wireless-sams-club-target-gearing-up-to-launch-motorola-droid-blackberry-storm-2-blackberry-curve-2-more/">Boy Genius Report</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5374358/verizon-motorola-sholes-with-android-will-be-on-sale-by-the-holidays]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5374358]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Android Verizon Motorola Sholes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[best buy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry curve 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry storm 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[holiday inventory]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lg chocolate touch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola sholes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm pixi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sam's club]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[target]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Verizon Motorola Sholes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Verizon Motorola Sholes with Android]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 05 Oct 2009 09:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joanna Stern]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5374358&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Vonage VoIP Apps Arrive for iPhone/iPod Touch and BlackBerry]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/Vonage.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_Vonage.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>As <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5350575/apple-approves-vonage-mobile-voip-app">expected</a>, Apple and AT&T have barred Vonage's international calling app from VoIP over 3G/EDGE. When you're out of Wi-Fi range, it instead redirects your call to local access numbers, where you're charged AT&T minutes as you access Vonage's rates.</p>
<p>On the iPhone, Vonage calls can be made by dialing in the app, or from your imported address book&mdash;but you need to have the app open. The BlackBerry version only works over the voice network, and the iPod touch version is obviously limited to Wi-Fi.</p>
<p>Available now, the app is only pay-as-you-go for the moment. Support for Vonage World subscribers is expected by the end of the year. The limitations suck, but it's better than the outright rejection that <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/Google-voice/">Google Voice</a> received. [<a href="http://www.vonagemobile.com/index.html">Vonage</a> via <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/05/vonage-releases-calling-apps-for-iphone-and-blackberry/">New York Times</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5374321/vonage-voip-apps-arrive-for-iphoneipod-touch-and-blackberry]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5374321]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[vonage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[app store]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google voice]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Vonage VoIP Apps iPhone BlackBerry]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 05 Oct 2009 07:45:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5374321&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Flash 10.1: Full Flash for Everyone But iPhone, Actually Playable HD Vids]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/iphone-flash-coming.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />A ton of good news about <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged ADOBE FLASH 10.1" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/adobe-flash-10%271/">Adobe Flash 10.1</a>: <em>Full</em> Flash is coming to Android, BlackBerry, Symbian, WebOS and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged WINDOWS MOBILE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows-mobile/">Windows Mobile</a>. and it'll be actually GPU accelerated, meaning you can play back YouTube in HD <em>perfectly</em>. But the bad news?</p>
<p>Nothing for the iPhone. "Still a closed device and not much progress there," Adobe told us as they gleefully detailed that Flash was invading basically every other smartphone. Also, we gotta wait until mid-2010 for the full rollout.</p>
<p>But, betas for Windows Mobile and WebOS are coming this year, with Android and Symbian early next, meaning you can get your mobile Hulu on before then. BlackBerry will be a bit longer, since RIM just joined Adobe's Open Screen project. Supposedly, Flash won't run like total garbage on phones, either, like Flash Lite. Fingers crossed, guys!</p>
<p>The GPU acceleration for Flash is the real deal, for sure, though&mdash;I watched <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ETDE0VGJY4">a Star Trek trailer</a> on YouTube HD on an <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged NVIDIA ION" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/nvidia-ion/">Nvidia Ion</a>-powered <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5359449/hp-mini-311-comes-original-with-nvidia-ion-transistor-graphics-powah-for-400">HP Mini 311</a> output to an external monitor, even, and it ran flawlessly. Which, if you've ever tried to play an HD Flash clip, even on full-fledged systems it molests CPU cycles, so just working on a $400 netbook very nearly deserves applause.</p>
<p><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged FLASH 10.1" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/flash-10%271/">Flash 10.1</a> has a few other tricks too with full support for multitouch, gestures and accelerometer input&mdash;meaning it'd be perfect on the iPhone, if Apple would ever let it through. And make no mistake, Apple is the roadblock there, since Adobe said engineering work has continued (<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5143766/flash-on-iphone-is-coming-up-to-adobe-to-clear-tech-hurdles">10,000 years later</a>). The fact that full Flash will be on basically every single smartphone platform also makes that pretty clear.</p>
<p>If you want to spin that positively (my coffee cup is half-full, after all) the iPhone is now basically the only place you can go to flee from Flash, which basically covers everything like a pulsating squid thing with icky tentacles and stuff, ceaselessly stretching out to ensnare more. There is no escape. Except the iPhone. (Which kinda makes no Flash a feature, right?)</p>
<p>Oh, and the new Adobe AIR&mdash;TweetDeck, the NY Times Reader and other software runs on top of it&mdash;will slightly be less abominable, gobbling less memory and acting more like a real application, with USB mass storage support, multitouch and gesture input, and p2p powers for stuff like Skype and gaming.</p>
<p>Bottom line, It's a Flashy world, we just live in it.</p>

<blockquote>Adobe Unveils First Full Flash Player for Mobile Devices and PCs
<p>Close to 50 Open Screen Project Participants Support New Browser Runtime for Multiple Platforms</p>
<p>LOS ANGELES - Oct. 5, 2009 - Adobe Systems Incorporated (Nasdaq:ADBE) today unveiled Adobe® Flash® Player 10.1 software for smartphones, smartbooks, netbooks, PCs and other Internet-connected devices, allowing content created using the Adobe Flash Platform to reach users wherever they are. A public developer beta of the browser-based runtime is expected to be available for Windows® Mobile, Palm® webOS and desktop operating systems including Windows, Macintosh and Linux later this year. Public betas for Google® Android™ and Symbian® OS are expected to be available in<br>
early 2010.</p>
<p>In addition, Adobe and RIM announced a joint collaboration to bring Flash Player to Blackberry® smartphones, and Google joined close to 50 other industry players in the Open Screen Project initiative.<br>
Flash Player 10.1 is the first consistent runtime release of the Open Screen Project that enables uncompromised Web browsing of expressive applications, content and high definition (HD) videos across devices. Using the productive Web programming model of the Flash Platform, the browser-based runtime enables millions of designers and developers to reuse code and assets and reduce the cost of creating, testing and deploying content across different operating systems and browsers. Flash Player 10.1 is easily updateable across all supported platforms to ensure rapid adoption of new innovations that move the Web forward.</p>
<p>The browser-based runtime leverages the power of the Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) for accelerated video and graphics while conserving battery life and minimizing resource utilization. New mobile-ready features that take advantage of native device capabilities include support for multi-touch, gestures, mobile input models, accelerometer and screen orientation bringing unprecedented creative control and expressiveness to the mobile browsing experience. Flash Player 10.1 will also take advantage of media delivery with HTTP streaming, including integration of content protection powered by Adobe® Flash® Access 2.0. This effort, code-named Zeri, will be an open format based on industry standards and will<br>
provide content publishers, distributors and partners the tools they need to utilize HTTP infrastructures for high-quality media delivery in Flash Player 10.1 and Adobe® AIR® 2.0 software.</p>
<p>"With Flash Player moving to new mobile platforms, users will be able to experience virtually all Flash technology based Web content and applications wherever they are," said David Wadhwani, general manager and vice president, Platform Business Unit at Adobe. "We are excited about the broad collaboration of close to 50 industry leaders in the Open Screen Project and the ongoing collaboration with 19 out of the top 20 handset manufacturers worldwide. It will be great to see first devices ship with full Flash Player in the first half of next year."</p>
<p>"We are excited to join Adobe and other industry leaders in the Open Screen Project," said Sundar Pichai, vice president of Product Management at Google. "This initiative supports our common goal to move the Web forward as a platform and to spur innovation in the industry through technology such as Adobe Flash."</p>
<p>"Adobe Flash technology provides a key experience on new Windows phones, enabling people to enjoy rich Flash based games, videos and other interactive Web content on the go," said Stephanie Ferguson, general manager, Product Management, Microsoft Corp. "We look forward to bringing in the new capabilities of Adobe Flash Player 10.1 to the Windows phone browser when it becomes available."</p>
<p>"Motorola is excited to be one of the first handset manufacturers to ship Android based devices with Flash Player support early next year," said Christy Wyatt, vice president of software applications and ecosystem at Motorola. "As the No.1 platform for video on the Web, uncompromised browsing of Flash technology based content is essential for a rich mobile experience and something users expect from Motorola today."</p>
<p>"As a longtime partner of Adobe, and more than 400 million Nokia phones shipped with existing Flash technology to date, we are excited to see Flash Player becoming a reality for mobile phones and other mobile devices," said Purnima Kochikar, vice president, Forum Nokia. "Nokia is excited about full Flash Player coming to devices and we are committed to supporting Flash Player 10.1 on mobile devices in 2010."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>[<a href="http://www.adobe.com">Adobe</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5374115/flash-101-full-flash-for-everyone-but-iphone-actually-playable-hd-vids]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5374115]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[adobe]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[adobe flash 10.1]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flash 10.1]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nvida]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nvidia ion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphoens]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[symbian]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[webos]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows mobile]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 05 Oct 2009 00:01:59 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5374115&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
