<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: Camera]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/camera</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'camera']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Here We Go Again: Camera Equipped iPod Touch This Spring?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/ipodtouch-camera.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Just when you thought you could forget about the elusive bugger, rumors about an iPod Touch with a built-in camera start up again. The latest report points to a Spring 2010 refresh that will finally include a video camera.</p>
<p>The latest rumor reads like it's August all over again, but it does have one particularly disappointing aspect. According to the source, the iPod touch camera will match the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5401862/ultimate-pocket-camcorder-comparison">not-so-hot quality</a> of the nano's.</p>
<p>Here's to hoping the engineers can somehow stuff the iPhone's camera into an iPod Touch. Sure, there's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5355753/why-there-is-no-camera-in-the-ipod-touch-and-why-that-sucks">not much space</a> to work with in the Touch. And Apple releases iPods in fall, not spring, but we can <i>believe</i>. [<a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-11295-LA-Gadgets-Examiner%7Ey2009m11d20-Apple-to-release-iPod-Touch-with-camera-this-Spring">The Examiner</a> via <a href="http://www.9to5mac.com/ipod_touch_camera_for_spring_30099">9 to 5 Mac</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5410013/here-we-go-again-camera-equipped-ipod-touch-this-spring]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5410013]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipodtouch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipodtouchcamera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipodtouchvideo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumors]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5410013&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Real Reason the Droid's Camera Fixed Itself]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_droidcamera.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />When the Droid was shipped, it was plagued with a lousy autofocus bug. But then, it magically seemed to fix itself. Did Verizon secretly update all the phones from afar? Nope. The explanation is much weirder than that.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>There's a rounding-error bug in the camera driver's autofocus routine (which uses a timestamp) that causes autofocus to behave poorly on a 24.5-day cycle. That is, it'll work for 24.5 days, then have poor performance for 24.5 days, then work again.</p>
<p>The 17th is the start of a new "works correctly" cycle, so the devices will be fine for a while. A permanent fix is in the works.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>But of course! I understand perfectly why a camera would be dependent on the date. Chances are good that this will have a legit fix before 24.5 days are up, but man, what a weird bug. [<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/motorola-droid-camera-autofocus-fixed-in-secrecy/">Engadget</a> via <a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/11/verizon-accused-of-remote-controlling-droid-truth-somewhat-stranger">GadgetLab</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5407482/the-real-reason-the-droids-camera-fixed-itself]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5407482]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[fixes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[droid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:41:27 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5407482&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Remainders - Stuff We Didn't Post (and Why)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p>AT&T's 3G Network Sees 2,000% Increase Since iPhone 3G Release...Droid Camera Fixed, Without Explanation?...<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #geniusbar" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/geniusbar/">Genius Bar</a> App Won't Help if Your iPhone Is Broken...Samsung Beats out Vizio for Top LCD Seller...</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/iphone-3g-nextmonth.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>AT&T's 3G Network Sees 2,000% Increase Since iPhone 3G Release</h2>
<p>In the wake of a big $65 million upgrade to its network here in the San Francisco Bay Area, AT&T revealed that the improvement was due to 3G usage being up 2,000% after the release of the iPhone 3G last year. That sounds like a crazy number for which the iPhone deserves all kinds of high fives, but it's really not surprising&mdash;how many AT&T 3G phones were there before the iPhone 3G, even? And of course 3G use across the board is up in crazy numbers, since smartphones have really started taking off in the last year or so&mdash;so to be honest, the number doesn't really mean all that much. Hence its ending up here in the sad pit of Remainders. [<a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091117/thanks-iphone-2000-percent-increase-in-bay-area-data-traffic-since-2008-says-att/">All Things D</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/500x_drooooooid__011.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>Droid Camera Fixed, Without Explanation?</h2>
<p>The Motorola Droid camera is a serious problem. I can't compete with Matt's angry poetry on the subject, so here it is, clipped from <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5396168/motorola-droid-review">his review</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The camera is complete garbage. It takes 10 years to start up, 2 to focus, and another 4 to actually take the goddamn picture. And there's no distinct visual feedback to let you know a photo's been snapped. And the photos suck. That pumpkin shot, in decent lighting, is as good as it gets. Like I said in the Android 2.0 review, I don't know if it's the hardware or the software, but it's inexcusably bad.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yow. But users have spontaneously been reporting that the camera, all of a sudden, has stopped sucking&mdash;what's the deal? Apparently there was some kind of bug wherein a particular state of the clock (meaning, time of day) screws with the Droid's autofocusing, which sounds insane to me, but what do I know? Apparently it should work okay now, and while it's temporary, the incoming Dec. 11th bug fix should take care of things. [<a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/09/11/17/droid.autofocus.suddenly.cured.for.users/">Electronista</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/geniusbarreservation098345.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>Genius Bar App Won't Help if Your iPhone Is Broken</h2>
<p>Rumor has it that Apple is planning to add a Genius Bar app to the App Store (appappappapp) that will let you make appointments, track your place in line, and curse the world when you realize you can't use the app because your iPhone is broken, which is the whole reason you need to make the appointment in the first place. Catch 22 apps are the very best kind of apps. [<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2009/11/17/rumor-apple-to-release-concierge-app/">TUAW</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/samsung1.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>Samsung Beats out Vizio for Top LCD Seller</h2>
<p>I bet you've been waiting by your computer, eager to see who managed to eke out the top spot in the LCD sales wars this fiscal quarter. Will it be Vizio, the low-priced upstart who took the LCD world by storm? Or Samsung, the crafty veteran with the quality sets and sleek design? Looks like this quarter, Samsung took the prize&mdash;and it's in Remainders because honestly who cares, at all. [<a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/11/17/samsung-overtakes-vizio-as-top-lcd-seller/">CrunchGear</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5407193/remainders-+-stuff-we-didnt-post-and-why/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5407193]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[droid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[genius bar]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gizmodo remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tvs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vizio]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5407193&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[DSi Studio Kit Can Start Your Kid On a Path of Photography and Drugs Early]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/studiokit.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_studiokit.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The DSi's camera is probably the lowest-quality camera device you can buy today that can still counts as a camera. But, it's still a camera, and your kids might enjoy making their photos slightly more interesting than the default shots.</p>
<p>Thrustmaster's $20 kit offers variable color filters, a macro lens, a telephoto lens and a wide angle lens. It's great for illustrating the fact that lenses change the way a camera works, since it's not quite something that clicks solidly in your brain until you see it firsthand. But it's only $20, so it's not too much to waste when your kid loses all the pieces. [<a href="http://www.thrustmaster.com/product.aspx?ProductID=175&PlatformID=9">Thrustmaster</a> via <a href="http://www.ubergizmo.com/15/archives/2009/11/nintendo_dsi_studio_kit.html">Ubergizmo</a> via <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/11/12/the-nintendo-dsi-studio-kit-takes-it-a-little-too-far/">Crunchgear</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5404465/dsi-studio-kit-can-start-your-kid-on-a-path-of-photography-and-drugs-early]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5404465]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[add-on]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[DSI]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dsi camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dsi studio kit]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nintendo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nintendo ds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Nintendo DSi]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:35:08 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5404465&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[GoPro Hero HD Camera Review]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/ggoproherohdcam.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_ggoproherohdcam.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The GoPro Hero is my favorite sports cam. Cheap, impossibly rugged, with endless mounts for cars, bikes, helmets, chests, surf and snowboards. The new HD version does HD, 60FPS and recharges. I love it even more now.</p>

<h1>Kinda Like the Old One</h1>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5397292,6,'');
</script><br>
The GoPro Hero HD is squarely based off the old model. It has the same mounting system, case, physical shape and user interface. It is so similar, I suggest you read the original short review I did and then come back here for the low down on what makes this one better. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5181155/gopro-hero-wide-sports-camera-lightning-review">Here's the link</a>. Or you could just take these basic points as a foundation.<br>
&bull; Awesome mounts for everything.<br>
&bull; Meant to be semi cheap so you don't sweat it, yet capable.<br>
&bull; It has a 170 degree field of vision and the case makes it waterproof to 100 feet. Very rugged.<br>
&bull; Two buttons for controlling the basic UI. Shoot, toggle modes. The UI is so rudimentary you'll often forget how to use it, but all you need to do is turn it on and shoot.<br>
&bull; There's no native LCD for viewing replays.<br>
&bull; It's not tiny.</p>
<h1>The Video is Now HD</h1>
<p><object width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7396887&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7396887&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/7396887.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_7396887.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display: none;"/></a><br>
Instead of the paltry 512x384, the $270 camera with surf mount has several modes, most HD. On the silky smooth 60 frame per second mode there are standard definition resolutions of 848x480 or HD at 720p/1280x720. Both are 16:9 ratio, which is recommended only for motorsports or other activites where you're not trying to catch yourself in frame standing up. The 60 frames per second modes are noticeably smoother in normal playback but they're meant to also look better if you slow down the frame rate playback for slow motion in your favorite video editor. The grain was noticeably worse when using 60FPS indoors, but not a deal breaker.</p>
<p>In 30 frame per seconds, there are modes for 720p again, but also a 1280x960 which is 4:3 high def. That's the default and I used that for surfing which is (usually, if you do it right) something you do while standing. The 1080p mode is 16:9, and 30 frames per second but limits the field of vision from 170 to 127 degrees. Again, the 16:9 modes are used less than you'd expect in sports shots. There's also a center weighted mode for exposing the road when shooting from inside a car, and leaving the dashboard underexposed properly.</p>
<p>The bottom line is that this new camera is in HD. That's the big improvement</p>
<h1>Quality</h1>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/Screen_shot_2009-11-02_at_6.41.36_PM.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_Screen_shot_2009-11-02_at_6.41.36_PM.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
<em>This is a still of the movie at full res, not the actual 5MP stills.</em><br>
First, <a href="http://www.goprocamera.com/hdheropreview/">watch the movies the guys at the company produced here</a>. Then watch my shitty one filled with shitty surfing. Colors were a little washy/green but the ocean and the sky together, with the lens collecting droplets, well, that isn't an idea situation. Watch it for yourself and form your own conclusions, but note the reflections off the water which will inform you of pretty decent autoexposure and sharpness. It's a vast improvement over other sports cams and the standard def version. Oh a little thing held over from the last generation that isn't a ding or a plus: the 170-degree angle is great for reducing apparent vibration and for making sure what you want in shot is in the frame, but has the unfortunate side effect of making things like waves and jumps and other otherwise impressive looking things seem smaller.</p>
<h1>Storage Capacity</h1>
<br>
The 51 minutes of video I took were 4.6GB big in the standard 4:3 ratio 1280x960 video. That was enough res for me to enjoy it on the screen. Here's what Justin at GoPro told me the camera would store, which is a little more generous than what I found but still in the same ballpark.
<blockquote>
<p>Average recording times:<br>
1080p: 12 min/GB<br>
960p: 14 min/GB<br>
720p: 16min/GB @30fps; 11 min/GB @ 60fps</p>
</blockquote>
<p>GoPro recommended you use fast SDHC cards to save battery life. And that on a 32GB card you can get almost 6 hours of recordings, although you'd be constrained by battery life. Oh one annoyance &mdash; every time you clear the card, the files are named from 001, 002, again. So if you copy them over to the same location, they'll ask you if you want to overwrite. I wish the camera kept its file name numbers in series.</p>
<h1>Battery Life</h1>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_PB020091_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
The other big change is that instead of being powered by a pair of AAAs, GoPro jammed a 1100Mah 3.7 volt battery in the case. I did not do a full run down test, but shooting 51 minutes of video didn't reduce the charge one notch; GoPro estimates you can get 2.5 hours of battery life from the camera in normal climates, regardless of the definition of video you're shooting. The old model died quickly in the cold if you weren't using rechargeables but this camera's housing retains a bit more heat making it better for the winter. You charge it by USB. Unfortunately you can't charge it while doing a USB transfer, yet. They hope to fix this by firmware later.</p>
<h1>Sound</h1>
<br>
Sound quality during dry sports is aided by an open back housing door. But even with the closed door during surfing, the sound was fine. A benefit of the closed housing door is that wind noise is nil.
<h1>Stills</h1>
<p>I didn't test this mode, but GoPro claims the 5MP shots are better due to better processing. There are several still modes, as before: Single shot, triple shot that takes three shots over 2 seconds and a time lapse mode that can be set to record a shot every 2, 5, 10, 30 or 60 seconds. And a 10 second delay timer. For me, this is not why you get a sports camera.</p>
<h1>The Surf Mount, in Particular</h1>
<p>Oh it's 3M double sticky and it seems to hold up just fine. You clean your board of wax and then use a bit of rubbing alcohol to apply it. Let it settle overnight. To get it off (permanently) you use a hair dryer, which sounds a bit scary when it comes to something nice and fiberglass, but what do I know? (That's why I put this one on a pop out longboard.</p>
<h1>The Future</h1>
<p>Another big but so far not useful thing on the new camera is the expansion port. they plan on offering a bigger back door for the case, so you can fit in an external LCD screen for replays or an extra battery pack. I like the idea. I'm thinking they could probably go ahead and work on making the camera smaller even if it costs a bit more, in the next generation, though. I like GoPro enough to use it, even though gadgets on the mountain or in the surf piss me off by way of distraction. Now that they've got mounts, higher resolutions and battery endurance covered, I think making it even smaller is the next step to making it more enjoyable.</p>
<p><br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplusplus.jpg" width="40" height="20">High def modes<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplusplus.jpg" width="40" height="20">Best mounting options in the business<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplusplus.jpg" width="40" height="20">Rugged, yet affordable case good for bumps and waterproof to 100 feet<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3_01.jpg" width="20" height="20">Wide angle lens captures 170 degrees of motion so you fit in the shot and vibration is dampened.<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3_01.jpg" width="20" height="20">Smooth 60 frames per second great for action shots<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3_01.jpg" width="20" height="20">Relatively cheap for what you get<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/giznormal_01.jpg" width="20" height="20">Case kind of biggish<br>
[<a href="http://goprohero.com/">GoPro</a>]<br>
<object width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_1"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7407076&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7407076&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/7407076.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_7407076.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display: none;"/></a></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396576/gopro-hero-hd-camera-review]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396576]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bestmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cam]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camcorder]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gopro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gopro hero HD wide camera review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[helmet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hero]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[outdoor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[outdoors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sport]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sports]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:50:37 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396576&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Next-Generation Flip MinoHD: Sleeker Design, Double the Memory]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/100_0856.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_100_0856.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The newest <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged FLIP MINOHD" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/flip-minohd/">Flip MinoHD</a> was just announced, and it's a lot like the first-gen, but with upgrades all around. You've got double the memory, a much sleeker aluminum design, bigger screen and HDMI port. Sweet!</p>
<p>It's been upgraded to 8GB of memory, up from 4GB, which gives it about two hours of 720p video recording. The aluminum shell feels great: Much more solid and smaller in the hand than the previous plastic version. The screen is also significantly bigger, feeling much less puny at 2-inches. The Flip software has also seen an update, with some nice minor editing and trimming features, and features automatic uploading to Facebook, Myspace and Youtube.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5381116,4,'');
</script></p>
<p>I haven't gotten the chance to play around with it too much, but video quality seems okay&mdash;about the same as past MinoHDs, and not as good as the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5328408/kodak-zi8-1080p-pocket-camcorder-review-your-move-flip">Kodak zi8</a>. The new MinoHD will sell for $230, while the original MinoHD will remain at $199 for 4GB. [<a href="http://www.google.com/aclk?sa=L&ai=COC8H5VHVSorjBIeWtQPIiN2WDd3GiYsBx5X8jA2dx86PKAgAEAEgtlQoAlCIxrptYMn2-IbIo6AZyAEBqgQcT9BSPTaFX82U_YQqyXjOhU94_WIUiWNx2b9JlA&sig=AGiWqtzkjiNgDL5HWJWZT162WVOYP77q8A&q=http://www.theflip.com/products_flip_mino.shtml">Flip</a>]</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Flip MinoHD, 2nd Generation Camcorder Features:</p>
<p>* SRP: $229.99<br>
* Now Available at leading retailers and online retailers<br>
* Colors: Brushed Metal or personalized at theflip.com<br>
* Video Resolution: High Definition, 1280 x 720<br>
* Records: 2 hours (8 GB built-in memory)<br>
* Screen: 2 inch – transflective (anti-glare); 960 x 240 pixels<br>
* Audio: Built-in wide-range, omni-directional microphone; built-in speaker with software volume control<br>
* Battery: Built-in rechargeable (Lithium Ion); up to 2 hours use<br>
* TV Output: Widescreen with HDMITM output<br>
* Zoom: 2 x Digital</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5381130/next+generation-flip-minohd-sleeker-design-double-the-memory]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5381130]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[flip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camcorders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flip minohd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mini camcorders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[minohd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:01:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5381130&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[This Digital Camera Prints Photos Using Holes]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/punchcamera.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_punchcamera.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>This is the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged PUNCH CAMERA" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/punch-camera/">Punch Camera</a> by designer Matty Martin, which was featured at the Intel University Design Expo. And I want it. Instead of using ink, it actually punches images on blank paper. And that's just the beginning of it.</p>
<p>After converting the image into a half-tone, the puncturing mechanism moves dot by dot. When all dots are precisely aligned reproduce the image, the camera screen tells you it's ready. Insert the paper in the slot, punch firmly as instructed, and get this:</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/The-Punch-Camera-2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_The-Punch-Camera-2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>Not only that, but apparently you can show the photo to a webcam, and it will automatically take you to a gallery with more&mdash;normal&mdash;images associated with the paper one.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5372421,11,'Punch Camera Gallery');
</script></p>
<p>We will probably never see it in the market, but I would really really reeeeelee love to have one of the prototypes. [<a href="http://www.coroflot.com/public/individual_file.asp?portfolio_id=2339174&individual_id=258968">matty martin</a> via <a href="http://www.likecool.com/The_Punch_Camera&mdash;Design--Gear.html">Likecool</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5372437/this-digital-camera-prints-photos-using-holes]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5372437]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[punch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Punch Camera]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 01 Oct 2009 20:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5372437&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[How to Trick Your Cameraphone Into Taking Non-Crappy Shots]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/2009-08-25_094952.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Today's Lifehacker Top Ten list shows a half-score ways to get the most out of that most humble of lenses (short of the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5356015/ipod-nano-5th-gen-review">iPod Nano</a>): The cameraphone. From DVD-laser macro lenses to editing tricks, it's a great guide. [<a href="http://lifehacker.com/5368294/top-10-ways-to-get-more-from-a-cameraphone">Lifehacker</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5368489/how-to-trick-your-cameraphone-into-taking-non+crappy-shots]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5368489]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[guides]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera phone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameraphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 26 Sep 2009 15:45:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5368489&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Samsung Intros Processors, Cameras and Chipsets for Mobile Devices]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/samsung-sign-1.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Samsung introduced a mess of new components for mobile devices that we're likely to start seeing in early 2010, including a 5MP camera capable of taking 1080p video and a couple powerful yet efficient chipsets.</p>
<p>There's a ton of stuff here, some of it quite similar, but it's pretty certain these'll be popped into smartphones and other mobile devices come next year. The most interesting to me is that "5 megapixel <a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20090921006616&newsLang=en">CMOS system on a chip camera</a>, which can process 1080p at 30 fps," which could make for a pretty badass lens in a smartphone&mdash;I don't think we've ever seen video recording that sharp. But they've also got a slew of ARM processors and a few low-power 1GHz chipsets called OneDRAM, along with a lot of other internals that may not be flashy but will doubtless be powering our mobile gadgets. [<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/22/samsung-randd-goes-bananas-for-mobile-intros-1ghz-processor-5-me/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5364737/samsung-intros-processors-cameras-and-chipsets-for-mobile-devices]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5364737]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[components]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[1080p]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[arm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chipsets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cortex a8]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[onedram]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 22 Sep 2009 06:45:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5364737&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[That Beat Up Leaked iPod Touch Prototype With Camera Was Real]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/thumb160x_192808-camreal_01.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged IPOD TOUCH" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ipod-touch/">iPod touch</a> (lack of a) camera mystery deepened this weekend after evidence surfaced that seemingly confirmed those <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5337718/is-this-beat+up-ipod-really-the-next-touch-updated-with-video">Covino & Rich radio pics and video</a>&mdash;purportedly revealing a touch with a camera&mdash;were in fact the real deal.</p>

<p>The ah-ha moment comes once one compares the exposed internals of the just released iPod touch with the internals put on display back in mid-August. For all intents and purposes they are identical. Additionally, both of the internals differ, "convincingly," from the guts in the iPod touch second generation unit, notes <a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2009/09/12/leaked-ipod-touch-with-camera-photos-were-real/">MacRumors</a>.</p>
<p>So we know the camera was there, then it wasn't. And we know there's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5357667/new-ipod-touch-teardown-reveals-80211n-fm-transmission-hardware-plus-room-for-nano-camera">plenty of room</a> left in there for at least an iPod nano-level cam.</p>
<p>We also know sources said this week that a camera could pop back in there <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5356769/ipod-touch-camera-could-happen-without-warning">without warning.</a></p>
<p>Regardless, this is all a rather peculiar development, no matter how Apple tries to spin things. It leads me, at least, to believe the rumors that said something happened at the very last minute. I'd also wait on picking one up just yet if you're holding out hope for an iPod touch w/camera. [<a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2009/09/12/leaked-ipod-touch-with-camera-photos-were-real/">MacRumors</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5358327/that-beat-up-leaked-ipod-touch-prototype-with-camera-was-real]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5358327]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod touch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[touch]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 13 Sep 2009 12:45:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Loftus]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5358327&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[iPod Touch Camera "Could Happen Without Warning"]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/ipodtouch-camera_01.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />According to <a href="http://www.ipodnn.com/articles/09/09/10/change.in.production.very.recent/">vague ipodnn sources</a>, Apple's camera-less <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged IPOD TOUCH" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ipod-touch/">iPod touch</a> could have been a last minute decision. They also suggest that Apple is still committed to delivering a camera on the touch "as soon as possible."</p>
<p>Apparently, this adjustment could come before next year's hardware refresh&mdash;"without warning" as one source put it. The source also claimed that the upgrade would happen only with the 32 and 64GB versions of the touch and would not affect current pricing. Should this information affect your buying decision? No, it's just a rumor after all. But chances are Apple will end up caving on this sooner or later. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5355959/steve-jobs-gives-his-reasons-for-lack-of-camera-in-ipod-touch">Jobs claims that the decision was about keeping costs down</a>, but all of the chatter seems to indicate that having <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5355750/are-you-disappointed-that-the-ipod-touch-didnt-get-a-camera">a camera on the touch might be a dealbreaker</a>. [<a href="http://www.ipodnn.com/articles/09/09/10/change.in.production.very.recent/">ipodnn</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5356769/ipod-touch-camera-could-happen-without-warning]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5356769]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod touch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipods]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 10 Sep 2009 17:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5356769&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Drunk Driver Caught Using Cellphone While Speeding, Fishtailing, and Running Red Lights]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/imbecil-volante.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_imbecil-volante.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Hookay. So we knew <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5344638/study-finds-that-more-than-half-of-drivers-are-idiots-and-text">that texting while driving is stupid</a>. But what about using your cellphone to take photos of yourself while driving. Drunk. Speeding. Fishtailing. Running red lights. Crashing against a police car. <i>And</i> with no driver's license.</p>
<p>Yes. That definitely goes beyond the general area of stupidity straight into the <i>I'm a Bloody Moron, Please Shoot Me</i> Dimension. It had to be a dumb Spaniard, of course, for this Euro-African country&mdash;alongside Italy and France&mdash;produces the biggest driving&mdash;and regular&mdash;dumbasses in the planet (I know because I was born there).</p>
<p>The 18-year-old driver&mdash;identified as J.C.R&mdash;was caught by the Spanish police while racing through the streets of the Northwest city of Vigo. The police noticed the speeding car at 2:50am. According to them, the guy was fishtailing, and running red lights while <i>taking photos</i> of himself using a cellphone.</p>
<p>When the police tried to stop him, the moron accelerated and tried to escape, only to be intercepted in another street. <i>Then</i> he tried to escape running and, when he realized he couldn't make it, he <i>returned</i> to his car, and crashed against one of the police vehicles that was chasing him.</p>
<p>Adding to this list of idiotic things, when the police tested his alcohol levels, he was off of the scale. In Spanish law, that means that you will get your driver's license automatically revoked. But then again&mdash;as the police discovered later&mdash;this guy doesn't even have a driver's license, so it's not that he's going to care about that. Not that he will need one in jail, anyway. [<a href="http://es.noticias.yahoo.com/5/20090831/tes-detenido-en-vigo-un-joven-por-conduc-44b36e8.html">Yahoo! Noticias (in Spanish)</a>&mdash;Thanks Mariló]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5349683/drunk-driver-caught-using-cellphone-while-speeding-fishtailing-and-running-red-lights]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5349683]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[car]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[photo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sms]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[texting]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 31 Aug 2009 18:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5349683&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Draganfly X4 UAV: Tiny, Camera-Packing, UFO-Looking 'Copter Is Cheaper Than Ever]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/x-4-techspecs-hero.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/504x_x-4-techspecs-hero.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></a>Draganfly's series of photo/video-based UAVs have always been awesome, but they've also been more of a pipe dream than anything else. The X4 is smaller than the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5042268/draganfly-x6-uav-ufo-thingy-packed-with-carbon-fiber-hdnight-cameras-and-gps">X6</a>, but the smaller size also comes with a 25% price cut. Yes!</p>
<p>Like the X6&mdash;featured in Giz Gallery 2008&mdash;the X4 is a carbon fiber-bodied UAV with four carbon fiber rotating blades. The 680-gram (with battery) copter is capable of using a still/video camera (in this case, a Panasonic Lumix point-and-shoot), an infrared camera and a low-light camera, all of which can be controlled from the ground. The X4 also features three accelerometers, three gyroscopes, three magnetometers and a barometric pressure sensor, and the controller is based on an OLED touchscreen. The X4 only has four motors to the X6's six, but that comes at a big boon to the pricey 'copter: The X6 checked in at about $15,000, and the X4 should be more like $10,000.</p>
<p>So yeah, this thing is still super expensive. But it's also just about the best heli-cam we've ever seen, capable of flying both indoors and in inclement weather (up to 18mph of wind). Check out <a href="http://www.draganfly.com/uav-helicopter/draganflyer-x4/gallery/videos/">these videos</a> at Draganfly's site to get a real sense of the true badassery of the copter. [<a href="http://www.draganfly.com/uav-helicopter/draganflyer-x4/">Draganfly</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5334419/draganfly-x4-uav-tiny-camera+packing-ufo+looking-copter-is-cheaper-than-ever]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5334419]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[helicopters]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[copter]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Draganfly]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[draganfly x4]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[draganflyer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[heli-cam]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[uav]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[x4]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 10 Aug 2009 20:49:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5334419&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Front-Facing Cameras to Debut on BlackBerrys Next Year]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/thumb160x_2ac94c25f02ea71ef8dfd20b47238758.jpg" class="left image158" width="158">In an informal interview, a RIM executive strongly hinted that the company's BlackBerry line would be getting a front-facing camera for videoconferencing in early 2010. It's still officially unconfirmed, but totally plausible. Anybody out there dying for some videoconferencing? [<a href="http://tinycomb.com/2009/07/31/rim-to-launch-front-facing-camera-on-blackberry-lineup-early-next-year/">TinyComb</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5327590/front+facing-cameras-to-debut-on-blackberrys-next-year]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5327590]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[unconfirmed]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[front-facing camera blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[videoconferencing]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 31 Jul 2009 22:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5327590&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Thanko's USB Mouth Microscope Camera Shows You The Horrible Truth]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/thanko-dental-microscope.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_thanko-dental-microscope.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></a>Haven't gone to the dentist in awhile? Worried what might be going on in there? Some mysteries are better left unsolved&mdash;but if you must know, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/thanko">Thanko's</a> USB microscope camera can shed some light (and some video) on the subject.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/thanko_dental_microscope_2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_thanko_dental_microscope_2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></a>The device features six LEDs, a small CMOS camera that shoots photos in 640×480 resolution or video in 1280×1024. Then you can upload your media files via USB for easy archiving. If only keeping stool samples was this easy. [<a href="http://www.thanko.jp/product/dental_microscope/">Thanko</a> via <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/07/31/thanko-sells-dental-usb-microscope/">Crunchgear</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5327153/thankos-usb-mouth-microscope-camera-shows-you-the-horrible-truth]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5327153]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[thanko]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dental microscope]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5327153&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Brooklyn Couple Snags Nikon Traffic Cameras With Cherry Picker]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/trafficCam.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_trafficCam.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></a>Some people see those automated traffic light cameras and hate them for privacy reasons. Others, like this couple from Brooklyn we're about to tell you about, take a look and see nothing but dollar signs.</p>

<p>The thieving pair, Anthony Cintorrino and Tara Laburt, were the beneficiary of what those in the biz call an "inside job."</p>
<p>Cintorrino, a contractor who recently installed and maintained a number of the cameras, had intimate knowledge of where they were and how they could be taken down quickly and quietly. All he and Laburt needed was a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged CHERRY PICKER" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/cherry-picker/">cherry picker</a> and some time, and the valuable Nikon cameras housed within were theirs for the taking. Sadly for we gadget geeks, no Nikon model number was given&mdash;anyone out there know which Nikon camera body/lens is best for snagging license plates at 50 feet? <strong>Update:</strong> It's a Nikon D2x, apparently. Thanks, snarky commenter!</p>
<p>In the end, the couple was nabbed by <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged NEW YORK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/new-york/">New York</a> police, but not before they had stolen and resold $88,000 worth of hot goods with their cherry picker truck. Unfortunately for any New York drivers out there, everything was recovered, and the camera rigs were put back into place a mere 48 hours after the crimes were committed. [<a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/07222009/news/regionalnews/brooklyn/spy_camera_snatch_shot_180660.htm">New York Post</a> via <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/07/25/nypd-arrests-pair-for-stealing-red-light-cameras-w-cherry-picker/">Autoblog</a> - Thanks for the pic, Derek]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5323076/brooklyn-couple-snags-nikon-traffic-cameras-with-cherry-picker]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5323076]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[traffic cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[brooklyn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cherry picker]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[new york]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nikon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ny]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 26 Jul 2009 10:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Loftus]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5323076&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Rumor: iPod Touch with Camera and Microphone Coming]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_ipod-touch-video.jpg" class="left image500" width="500">According to a "well-connected Wired's source," Apple's Chinese contractors are already churning out <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged IPOD TOUCH" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ipod-touch/">iPod touch</a> units with integrated cameras and microphones. A classic rumor that may transform the smart media player into almost-an-iPhone, thanks Wi-Fi hotspots and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5256825/verizon-mifi-2200-3g-portable-wi+fi-hotspot-review">3G-to-Wi-Fi</a> hubs.</p>
<p>According to Wired's source, they will go on sale in "two to three months." If I were AT&T, I would be <i>very</i> nervous about the prospect of Apple <i>eventually</i> gaining carrier independence with a 100% VoIP solution. The plot, boys and girls, is thickening. [<a href="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/07/apple-preparing-ipod-touch-with-camera-microphone-source/">Wired</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5319358/rumor-ipod-touch-with-camera-and-microphone-coming]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5319358]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod touch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 21 Jul 2009 09:28:03 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5319358&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Camera Sees the World Through Human Eyes]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/humaneyecam.png" class="left image340" width="340" />With the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged HUMAN EYE CAMERA" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/human-eye-camera/">Human Eye Camera</a> you won't need a DIY lobotomy to see how the world would look without your brain flattening the images. With three arrangeable sensors, it's as if your eyes had RAW output. [<a href="http://fourfifthsdesign.com/2009/07/20/human-eye-camera/">Four Fifths Design</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5319050/camera-sees-the-world-through-human-eyes]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5319050]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[human eye camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[optics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[perspective]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 20 Jul 2009 22:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5319050&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Digital Cams Still Haven't Caught Up to Film's Resolution: Does it Matter?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/CAMERA_BUFF_1979.jpg" class="left image160" width="160" />Lenses being equal, a large format 8x10 piece of film can capture the equivalent of 800 Megapixels. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_versus_film_photography">Just saying</a>. But does it matter? Discuss!</p>
<p><i><a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/gizmodo-79/">Gizmodo '79</a> is a week-long celebration of gadgets and geekdom 30 years ago, as the analog age gave way to the digital, and most of our favorite toys were just being born.</i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5316613/digital-cams-still-havent-caught-up-to-films-resolution-does-it-matter]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5316613]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gizmodo 79]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Film vs Digital]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[giz 79]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[retromodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 18 Jul 2009 06:46:48 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5316613&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Someone Finally Figured Out What a 600FPS Camera Is For]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/boobs.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />This 600FPS video of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SLOW MOTION" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/slow-motion/">slow motion</a> Japanese boobs is mesmerizing. <b>Update: video's back.</b></p>
<p><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" bgcolor="undefined" height="339" src="http://www.muchosucko.com/watch/61031" width="425"></p>
<p>There's a reason why both Canon and Nikon are both made in Japan. And if you're asking how I know this is Japanese without seeing the faces? Trust me, I can tell. [<a href="http://www.boobieblog.com/boob-videos/boobs-in-slow-motion/">Boobieblog (NSFW)</a> via <a href="http://fleshbot.com/5313739/the-hypnotic-powers-of-beautiful-boobs">Fleshbot (NSFW)</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5313807/someone-finally-figured-out-what-a-600fps-camera-is-for]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5313807]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nsfw]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[slow motion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[slow motion boobs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[slowmo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5313807&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[How to: Make a Fisheye DSLR Lens for $16]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_F0BGC38FWS6LNIA.MEDIUM.jpg" class="left image500" width="500">Over at Instructables, user Banjomaster shows <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged HOW TO MAKE A FISHEYE LENS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/how-to-make-a-fisheye-lens/">how to make a fisheye lens</a> for his Nikon D90 for just $16, with the help of one of those wide-angle doorway peephole lenses.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5311312/how-to-make-a-fisheye-dslr-lens-for-16">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a>It looks like a pretty simple mod, both in materials required and construction method: It only needs a couple pieces of particle board, the aforementioned peephole lens, the spare lens shield that came with his camera, and of course some duct tape. The only possible caveat: The replacement wide-angle lens is significantly smaller than the camera's lens, so there's a circle around all of the shots. On the other hand, it's sort of cool; it makes everything look like you shot it through a hotel door. Check it out, we're sure it can be modified for other makes and models of DSLR. [<a href="http://www.instructables.com/id/How-to-make-a-fish-eye-lens-for-a-Nikon-D-90-Digit/">Instructables</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5311312/how-to-make-a-fisheye-dslr-lens-for-16]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5311312]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[diy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fisheye lens]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[how to make a fisheye lens]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[instructables]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lens]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mods]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nikon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[peephole]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5311312&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[This May Be Nikon's 2009/2010 Roadmap]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5310373/this-may-be-nikons-20092010-roadmap">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a>Nikon's 2009 AND 2010 roadmap may have been leaked on <a href="http://forum.grafika.cz/read.php?51,2892399,3061050,quote=1">Grafika</a>, detailing the upcoming bodies and lenses the company is working on.</p>
<p>Head to Nikon Rumors for the full list, but the short of it is that the D3000 and the D300 with HD movie are coming in August, D700X in October, D4 and D400 in Q2 2010, and D4X in late 2010. Supposedly. [<a href="http://nikonrumors.com/2009/07/08/nikon-roadmap-leaked.aspx">Nikon Rumors</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5310373/this-may-be-nikons-20092010-roadmap]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5310373]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nikon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[d300]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[d3000]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[d4]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[d400]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[d4x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[d700x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nikon roadmap]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[unconfirmed]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 08 Jul 2009 16:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5310373&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[8 Ways to Get More Battery Life Out of Your Digital Camera]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_digitcam.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;">Sure, you know how to squeeze more <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged BATTERY LIFE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/battery-life/">battery life</a> out of your notebook&mdash;dim the lights, kill the wireless&mdash;but what about your camera? Photography Bay has 8 tips: buying a faster memory card is the most surprising. [<a href="http://www.photographybay.com/2009/07/07/8-great-tips-to-get-more-out-of-your-camera-batteries/">Photography Bay</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5309167/8-ways-to-get-more-battery-life-out-of-your-digital-camera]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5309167]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[batteries]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[battery]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[battery life]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[kodak]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nikon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[olympus]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 07 Jul 2009 10:50:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5309167&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Factron iPhone Case Features Interchangeable Lenses]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_factron-iphone-06-07-09.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;">The new Factron case for the iPhone looks to beef up the iPhone's camera capacity considerably with <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged INTERCHANGEABLE LENSES" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/interchangeable-lenses/">interchangeable lenses</a> that screw onto the already sweet-looking metal and leather case.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_factron-iphone-01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;">It's compatible with the iPhone 3G only, for some reason, but 3G owners should be pretty excited&mdash;the case features wide-angle, closeup, and fisheye lenses that screw on to the back, in case you want all your contacts to look like they're in a late '90s rap and/or skateboard video. But it doesn't come cheap, at $200 for the case and $15-55 for each additional lens, and the company even warns that reception may not be so hot, considering all that metal between the receiver and signal. [<a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ja&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Ffactron.net%2Fquattroforiph_SP.html">Factron</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/factron-iphone-case-packs-interchangeable-camera-lenses-built-i/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5308739/factron-iphone-case-features-interchangeable-lenses]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5308739]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[accessories]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[factron iphone case]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[interchangeable lenses]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone cases]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lenses]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5308739&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Even Thanko Makes Sorta Decent Cheapo HD Camcorders Now]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_thankcam.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;">How easy is it to make an HD camcorder? Even <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/thanko">Thanko</a>, proprietor of all gadgets <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5130172/thankos-usb-bust-beauty-pad-fights-boob+chill-epidemic-valiantly">weird</a> and crappy, has <a href="http://www.akihabaranews.com/en/news-18250-X.html">pooped one out</a>. Akihabara News has <a href="http://88.191.20.67/video/akiba/thankoHDCam.MOV.zip">some not terribly telling sample video</a>, but says <a href="http://www.geekstuff4u.com/thanko-pocket-hdcam.html">for the price</a> ($175), it's "decent." [<a href="http://www.akihabaranews.com/en/news-18426-Thanko%27s+New+Pocket+HDCam%2C+Hands-on+Update.html">AkihabaraNews</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5308611/even-thanko-makes-sorta-decent-cheapo-hd-camcorders-now]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5308611]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[camcorders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[japan]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pocketcam]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[thanko]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[thanko hd pocketcam]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5308611&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Vue Wireless Home Video Monitoring Lightning Review]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_vue.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"><strong>The Gadget</strong>: A wireless monitoring system called Vue that consists of one central gateway and two tiny battery-powered wall-mountable <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged WIRELESS CAMERAS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/wireless-cameras/">wireless cameras</a>. They're meant to let you monitor your house from anywhere, as long as you have a network connection.</p>
<p><strong>The Price</strong>: $300 for two cameras and four magnetic wall mounts</p>
<p><strong>The Verdict</strong>: It works and it's easy. The three pieces are self-configuring, and all you need to set it up is to plug the main gateway into an Ethernet jack and the wireless cameras will all hook up seamlessly. Here's the video quality:</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("/vid0706113717.flv", 506, 423,"");
</script>It's not bad, especially for a wireless video recording from such a small camera. It's on par with a mediocre webcam, and is definitely good enough for a "security" cam. It's nothing you want to use for actual webcamming, but it's great for seeing whether or not your kids are doing their homework.</p>
<p>There are a few other interesting features, like video sharing and video recording. Recording is obvious, but sharing works by inviting your friends to view either live streams or recorded clips. You and your friends interact with the system via the Vue website, which is accessible inside or outside your network. The batteries are supposed to last a year (they're not rechargeable), but you can buy replacement CR123 batteries. You turn on recording from the interface and there is scheduling.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_vue2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;">So is this worth $300? Probably, depending on how much you need something like this. There are cheaper solutions like hooking up a webcam yourself to a computer and somehow routing that online so you can access it anywhere. This involves port forwarding and all kinds of more technical workarounds. So for ease of use, performance and convenience (it's wireless and reaches 300 feet), it's hard to beat the Vue. We only wish that, for $300, this would come with four wireless cameras instead of just two. Available later this summer. [<a href="http://vuezone.com/products">VueZone</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5308594/vue-wireless-home-video-monitoring-lightning-review]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5308594]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[avaak]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[monitoring]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[security cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vue]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vue review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vuenow]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vuezone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wireless cameras]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5308594&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Energizer Energi To Go DSLR Charger Gives Paparazzi More Portability]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_usbclip.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;">Need to hide in the bushes for eleven hours outside Megan Fox's house while taking the occasional super-zoom shot? Need to recharge your batteries but have no outlet? Energizer's portable charger clip is there.</p>
<p>This DSLR battery clip charges via a special USB source (like Energizer's own portable battery pack, which has a higher voltage than standard USB) and clamps on to "any" digital camera or camcorder battery. The compatibility list is probably high, but we're unsure if any actually means any, so check out the site before buying. The entire <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged ENERGI TO GO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/energi-to-go/">Energi To Go</a> line will be available next month. [<a href="http://www.gearlog.com/2009/06/energizer_unveils_energi_to_go.php">Gearlog</a> via <a href="http://www.ohgizmo.com/2009/07/01/energizer-usb-clip-charges-dslr-batteries/">Oh Gizmo</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5305550/energizer-energi-to-go-dslr-charger-gives-paparazzi-more-portability]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5305550]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[batteries]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[battery]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[battery charger]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camcorder]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camcorder charger]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[charger]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chargers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[energi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[energi to go]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[energizer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[energizer energi to go]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5305550&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[World's Fastest and Most Sensitive Astronomical Camera Shoots 1500 Images Per Second]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/ccd200.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_ccd200.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></a>Developed by British scientists for the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very_Large_Telescope">VLT (very large telescope)</a>, the CCD200 detector is the world's fastest and most sensitive <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged ASTRONOMICAL CAMERA" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/astronomical-camera/">astronomical camera</a>&mdash;capable of shooting an astonishing 1500 images per second.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"This breakthrough camera is without an equivalent anywhere in the world," says Norbert Hubin, head of the Adaptive Optics for ESO space agency. "The camera will enable great leaps forward in many areas of the study of the universe."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Ok, so the images are only 240 x 240, but it does produces around 10x digital noise than current VLT cameras. A mixture of speed and sensitivity like that is no small achievement. Images from the ground could be as crisp as those taken from space. [<a href="http://www.techradar.com/news/world-of-tech/shooting-stars-the-world-s-most-sensitive-camera-609378?src=rss&attr=all">TechRadar</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5295819/worlds-fastest-and-most-sensitive-astronomical-camera-shoots-1500-images-per-second]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5295819]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[telescopes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[astronomical camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ccd200]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[very large telescope]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vlt]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5295819&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Olympus E-P1 Is the Micro Four Thirds Camera We've Been Waiting For]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/e-p1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_e-p1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></a>The Micro Four Thirds lens standard has <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/micro-four-thirds">birthed</a> some decent mini-DSLR-style cameras, but its true, unfulfilled potential lies with compact, Rangefinder-esque hardware. The E-P1, Olympus's modern take on its classic Pen SLR, is <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5196926/olympus-please-turn-the-vintage-pen-f-into-the-micro-four-thirds-camera-weve-been-dreaming-of">exactly what we had in mind</a>.</p>

<p>All we've really got here are a few leaked photos&mdash;no specs, no price, no possible date of delivery&mdash;but what we can see, we really like. There's no front photo yet, but all signs point to a modern reimagining of the Pen F, which we outright demanded get the Micro Four Thirds treatment a few months ago. It's outfitted with a 17mm f2.8 prime lens, and looks to be about the size of a mid-to-large-sized point-and-shoot. Oh, and remember Olympus's <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5255583/retro-olympus-micro-four-thirds-camera-landing-in-early-july">expected June 15th announcement</a> of a retro Micro Four Thirds camera, due for release in July? I've got a <em>little tiny hunch</em> that this might have something to do with it.</p>
<p>Photography blogs are buzzing with speculation about all facets of this (presumably) upcoming camera, but it's the concept, not the specific execution, that's exciting: we know Micro Four Thirds sensors can nearly match their APS-C counterparts in quality, and the the ever-expanding catalog of compatible glass ensures DSLR-like versatility for the emerging standard. Now, the format may well be getting its first body that people might actually want to buy. [<a href="http://www.1001noisycameras.com/2009/06/picture-of-olympus-ep1-micro-four-thirds-camera-leaked.html">1001NoisyCameras</a>, <a href="http://43rumors.com/e-p1/">43Rumors</a> via <a href="http://www.pocket-lint.com/news/news.phtml/24622/new-micro-four-thirds-olympus-camera-leaked.phtml">PocketLint</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5282802/olympus-e+p1-is-the-micro-four-thirds-camera-weve-been-waiting-for]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5282802]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[olympus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[olympus e-p1]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[olympus micro four thirds]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 08 Jun 2009 06:29:20 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5282802&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Fake: More Possible iPhone 3G 2009 Shots Reveal Video Chat]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_33omez6-500x350.png" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;">From the same source as <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5281731/another-possible-iphone-3g-2009-shot">this possible leak</a> comes a few shots of what could be <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged VIDEO CHAT" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/video-chat/">video chat</a> on the iPhone. Who knows. <b>UPDATE: <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5282180/rumor-smash-videoconference-shots-are-fake">This image is fake</a></b>.</p>
<p>But, supposing it's real, it's interesting to note that it appears to be on Wi-Fi. It's possible that it's like Skype and SlingPlayer and only work over Wi-Fi. On the other hand, we can't make that conclusion yet, but since video chat is a "data" service, it makes sense that it goes over whatever "data" service you're currently on (Wi-Fi or 3G). And it may be a simple photoshop anyway&mdash;just load and image, then add the green light in Photoshop (as <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5282180/rumor-smash-videoconference-shots-are-fake">shown here</a>). In any case, remember to <a href="http://live.gizmodo.com/">check out our liveblog on Monday</a> to see the real iPhone reveal. [<a href="http://www.nowhereelse.fr/nouveau-iphone-video-2009-nouvelles-photos-20649/">Nowhereelse</a>&mdash;<em>thanks Brendan</em>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5281732/fake-more-possible-iphone-3g-2009-shots-reveal-video-chat]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5281732]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iPhone 3G 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video chat]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 06 Jun 2009 22:01:13 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5281732&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Atom Pinhole Camera Is The First Step Towards a Real Star Trek Replicator]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5277744/the-atom-pinhole-camera-is-the-first-step-towards-a-real-star-trek-replicator">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a>Researchers at the Russian Academy of Sciences are developing a technology that could lead to a real-life <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged STAR TREK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/star-trek/">Star Trek</a> replicator. They have demonstrated that it is possible to manufacture an array of identical atomic nanostructures in controlled shapes and sizes.</p>
<p>In their <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged ATOM PINHOLE CAMERA" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/atom-pinhole-camera/">atom pinhole camera</a>, the atoms act like photons in an optical pinhole camera, but instead of light traveling through a lens, it travels through a pinhole on a mask and creates a high-res inverted image on a silicon substrate. This camera is capable of resizing nanostructures down to 30 nm&mdash;10,000 times smaller than the original. So, a camera with say 10 million pinholes could produce large numbers of identical (or diverse) nanostructures simultaneously.</p>
<p>It all sounds very promising, but the real question is will I be getting instant food, clothing and gadgets in my lifetime? Maybe&mdash;but chances are the "gadgets" will be a <a href="http://www.rascalscooters.com/">Rascal</a> and the "clothing" will be Depends. [<a href="http://www.physorg.com/news163074546.html">Physorg</a> via <a href="http://www.kurzweilai.net/news/frame.html?main=/news/news_single.html?id%3D10678">KurzweilAI</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5277744/the-atom-pinhole-camera-is-the-first-step-towards-a-real-star-trek-replicator]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5277744]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotechnology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[atom pinhole camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[atoms]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nanostructures]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[replicator]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek replicator]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5277744&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sony Ericsson W995a: Walkman Cellphone with Geo-Tagging 8.1MP Camera]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/W995a_Box_Progressive_med.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_W995a_Box_Progressive_med.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></a>This is the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SONY ERICSSON W995A" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/sony-ericsson-w995a/">Sony Ericsson W995a</a>, a $600 unlocked Wi-Fi and A2DP-enabled 3G cellphone that puts together a 8.1-megapixel camera&mdash;with geo-tagging capabilities, face detection, flash, autofocus, and dedicated buttons&mdash;and a Walkman. It even has Media Go support, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5275966/everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-psp-go">like the PSP</a>.</p>

<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/W995a_Box_Horizontal_med.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_W995a_Box_Horizontal_med.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></a></p>
<p>The Sony Ericsson W995a comes with Google Maps built-in to show to you where you are&mdash;using 3G triangulation, not GPS&mdash;and automatically adds your location to your photos.</p>
<p>As a Walkman player it uses dedicated physical playback buttons, supporting all the standard audio formats and including a built-in FM radio with presets. It also has Clear Stereo and Clear Bass technology, which Sony says enhances the audio quality, avoiding "channel leakage" and "bass distortion".</p>
<p>The Sony Ericsson W995a also comes with Media Go software, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5275966/everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-psp-go">newly announced media software</a> that will allow you to access show and movies, as well as transcode video and music files optimized for the W995a hardware features.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5276633/sony-ericsson-w995a-walkman-cellphone-with-geo+tagging-81mp-camera]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5276633]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[8.1MP]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[geo-tagging]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sony Ericsson W995a]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[walkman]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 03 Jun 2009 03:01:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5276633&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[I Could Spend All Day at the Canon Camera Museum]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/05/504x_cameramuseum.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;">I wish every company who made gadgets did this: The Canon Camera Museum is a comprehensive virtual tour of Canon's camera history. Every DSLR, film camera and point-and-shoot, the history of Canon design and technology, random trivia, it's all there. [<a href="http://www.canon.com/camera-museum/">Canon</a> via <a href="http://www.retrothing.com/2005/10/canon_camera_mu.html">Retro Thing</a> via <a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/05/visit-the-canon-camera-museum-today/">Wired</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5272617/i-could-spend-all-day-at-the-canon-camera-museum]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5272617]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dslrs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lens]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lenses]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 29 May 2009 14:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5272617&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[First Photographs Taken With a Palm Pre]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/palmpre_02.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/05/504x_palmpre_02.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></a>Here is one of the first photos ever taken by a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged PALM PRE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/palm-pre/">Palm Pre</a>: a blonde coed riding a stallion. A coin-operated one. Zooming in, I'm not impressed. And the photo quality is not that good either. But there is a lot more.</p>
<p>The 1520 x 2032 pixel image looks very videoish, just like the iPhone. I was hoping for a better camera, but I guess that everyone is cutting corners when it comes to smartphones&mdash;and there's not enough space to make things a whole lot better.</p>
<p>But since one photo alone is not good enough to judge the quality of the camera, here is a gallery taken by Rik Sagar&mdash;Multimedia Software Engineer at Palm&mdash;with a Pre.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/05/504x_Picture_2_03.png" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></p>
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5271677/first-photographs-taken-with-a-palm-pre"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/05/smallish_3549945363_24a4458e6b.jpg" alt="
" title="
" align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2"/></a><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5271677/first-photographs-taken-with-a-palm-pre"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/05/smallish_3532073128_4da1638ed8.jpg" alt="
" title="
" align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2"/></a><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5271677/first-photographs-taken-with-a-palm-pre"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/05/smallish_3546900581_21b6c10f50.jpg" alt="
" title="
" align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2"/></a><br clear="both" /><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5271677/first-photographs-taken-with-a-palm-pre"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/05/smallish_3547717380_c42d85e97f.jpg" alt="
" title="
" align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2"/></a></p>
<p>I wish he had some taken in darker environments, to see the speed, but it doesn't look much different from the iPhones or Blackberries of this world. I hope <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5266037/whats-cooking-for-apple-wwdc-09">someone releases one with a better camera built-in</a>, at least as good as the ones found in some cameraphones. [<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/riksagar/">Flickr</a>&mdash;thanks Stephan&mdash;and <a href="http://img39.imageshack.us/my.php?image=l1t.jpg&via=tfrog">yfrong</a> via <a href="https://twitter.com/palm/status/1940189342">Twitter</a>&mdash;Thanks Kat]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5271677/first-photographs-taken-with-a-palm-pre]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5271677]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[pre]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gallery]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[image]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm pre]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[photo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 27 May 2009 20:06:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5271677&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Camera Misses the Mark on Racial Sensitivity]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/05/Picture_1_05.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/Picture_1_05.png" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a>I know this <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged NIKON S630" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/nikon-s630/">Nikon S630</a> is just trying to be helpful, but a little tact wouldn't hurt. Some people's eyes just extra squinty when they smile, <i>OK, camera?</i> [<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jozjozjoz/3529106844/">Flickr</a> via <a href="http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2009/05/15/asian-camera-doesnt.html">BoingBoing</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5256650/camera-misses-the-mark-on-racial-sensitivity]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5256650]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blink detection]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[asian]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nikon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nikon s630]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 15 May 2009 19:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Odelia Lee]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5256650&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Retro Olympus Micro Four Thirds Camera Landing in Early July]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/05/340x_20936.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/>Olympus's rangefinder-esque, DSLR-sensored <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MICRO FOUR THIRDS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/micro-four-thirds/">Micro Four Thirds</a> camera still hasn't been spec'd or priced, but now we now know it's coming in "early July". A formal announcement, with numbers'n'stuff, is expected on June 15th. [<a href="http://us.aving.net/news/view.php?articleId=126414&mn_name=">AVING</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5255583/retro-olympus-micro-four-thirds-camera-landing-in-early-july]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5255583]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[micro four thirds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[olympus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[olympus camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[olympus micro four thirds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rangefinder]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[retro camera]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 15 May 2009 04:28:09 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5255583&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Cheap DIY Wi-Fi Tethering Dongle for Your DSLR]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/05/3516604580_f8d6cf6344_ojpg-660x438.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/3516604580_f8d6cf6344_ojpg-660x438.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a>For those who can't afford an $800 wireless transmitter for your camera but need one to quickly transmit photos from your DSLR to your computer, here's a DIY wireless tethering solution that costs under $40.</p>
<p>Using a wireless USB tether&mdash;specifically, a Cables Unlimited Wireless Adapter Kit&mdash;Peter Tsai, a professor in photography, created an easy and cheap tethering module that supposedly seamlessly worked with his Nikon DSLR. Apparently, it also could transfer photos over Wi-Fi from his camera to his computer even quicker than an official $800 WT-4a transmitter. Although it took slightly longer for the dongle to sync with his computer, once connected, it was reportedly able to transfer photos shot in RAW in eight seconds and JPEG photos in four. Tsai also said you could use Nikon's Camera Control 2 software on your computer to remotely control your camera.</p>
<p>However, Tsai pointed out that this particular hack only works with PCs, and that the particular wireless adapter kit needed a bulky AC power brick for it to work. Although he was able to solder a 4-AAA powerpack to the kit, he says he is still looking to fix the problem, and hopefully create an encasing for his homemade adapter to keep it contained and make it into a camera handgrip. [<a href="http://petetek.blogspot.com/">PeteTek</a> via <a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/05/cheap-home-made-wi-fi-tether/">Wired</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5252949/cheap-diy-wi+fi-tethering-dongle-for-your-dslr]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5252949]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[diy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[adapter]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[adapter"]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera tethering]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tether]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[USB camera tether]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[USB wireless tether]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wi-fi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wireless tether]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 13 May 2009 20:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andi Wang]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5252949&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Lumopro Hot Shoe Lets Any Flash Do It with Any Camera]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/05/custom_1241796487150_strobist-cube.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/05/custom_1241796487150_strobist-cube.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a>The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged LUMOPRO HOT SHOE UNIVERSAL TRANSLATOR" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/lumopro-hot-shoe-universal-translator/">LumoPro Hot Shoe Universal Translator</a> is an adapter that lets you link any flash with any camera&mdash;<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5245132/sony-product-timeline-is-a-glorious-gadget-history-lesson?skyline=true&s=i">except Sony's</a>. And anything that makes artificially-incompatible things mix and match is a winner for us.</p>
<p>The LumoPro <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged HOT SHOE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/hot-shoe/">Hot Shoe</a> <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged UNIVERSAL TRANSLATOR" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/universal-translator/">Universal Translator</a> comes with a male hotshoe that connects to the camera, and a female that connects to the flash. In the middle, the little cube has a PC socket&mdash;to trigger it&mdash;and a 3.5mm mini-jack socket to connect to additional flashes to blind your object with light. [<a href="http://www.mpex.com/browse.cfm/4,12111.html">Product Page</a> via <a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/05/universal-translator-marry-any-flash-to-any-camera/">Wired</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5245730/lumopro-hot-shoe-lets-any-flash-do-it-with-any-camera]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5245730]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[digital photography]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hot shoe]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hotshoe]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lumopro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[LumoPro Hot Shoe Universal Translator]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[universal translator]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 08 May 2009 13:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5245730&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[World's Fastest Camera Uses Lasers to Boost Images]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/04/steam_481.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/steam_481.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged KEISUKE GODA" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/keisuke-goda/">Keisuke Goda</a>'s team at UCLA have built the fastest camera ever, which takes an upwards of a whopping 6.1 million pictures per second, at a shutter speed of 440 trillionths of a second.</p>

<p>Possibly the most frustrating part of photography is the age-old trade off between light sensitivity and speed. Using a fast shutter speed means less light enters the camera, usually leading to underexposed, dingy images. However, by using new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SERIAL TIME-ENCODED AMPLIFIED MICROSCOPY" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/serial-time_encoded-amplified-microscopy/">Serial Time-Encoded Amplified Microscopy</a> (STEAM) technology, scientists have overcome these limitations.</p>
<p>The STEAM camera illuminates objects with an infrared laser that emits a different wavelength for each pixel captured. The camera's sensor then electronically amplifies the original, dim signal with a matching wavelength until it becomes visible.</p>
<p>Compared to the multi-million-pixel images produced by standard digital cameras, the current STEAM prototype only produces images composed of just 3,000 pixels. Yet there is a multi-megapixel camera in the works that the scientists hope will be competitive against consumer cameras. [<a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/04/fastestcamera/">Wired</a>&mdash;<i>Thanks Mark!</i>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5233259/worlds-fastest-camera-uses-lasers-to-boost-images]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5233259]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fast camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Keisuke Goda]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laser]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Serial Time-Encoded Amplified Microscopy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[steam]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ucla]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[world's fastest camera]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Odelia Lee]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5233259&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Kite Aerial Photography: The Camera Places Its Life In Your Hands]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/FGRYHQPFTNHEES9.MEDIUM.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/>Instructables user Mikeasaurus used household items&mdash; including thumbtacks and a Bic pen&mdash; to make a remotely-triggered rig for his kite, compatible with any camera. Well, any camera he felt comfortable dangling off a kite.</p>
<p>As much as we love complicated, Arduino-based wonders of homemade coding, sometimes it's nice to see a simple, MacGuyvered mechanical creation. We're not sure anyone would want to make exactly this example, but check out the <a href="http://www.instructables.com/id/Kite-Aerial-Photography-KAP/">guide</a>, it'll give you an idea how he made it. [<a href="http://www.instructables.com/id/Kite-Aerial-Photography-KAP/">Instructables</a> via <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5227038/take-aerial-photos-with-a-diy-kite-camera-timer">Lifehacker</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5227781/kite-aerial-photography-the-camera-places-its-life-in-your-hands]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5227781]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[summer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[diy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[instructables]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[kite]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[kite aerial photography]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 25 Apr 2009 18:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5227781&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
