<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: Canon]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/canon</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'canon']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Researchers Accidentally Demolish Building With Cannon-Like Gun]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/guncannon.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_guncannon.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Researchers at the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #losalamosnationallaboratory" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/losalamosnationallaboratory/">Los Alamos National Laboratory</a> have managed to accidentally cause $3 million of damage as they blew up one of their own buildings using a large-bore powder gun, a weapon which acts like a Civil War cannon. <b>Updated.</b></p>
<p>According to Project on Government Oversight's Senior Investigator, Peter Stockton, this incident "is a new twist in the long history of screw-ups by Los Alamos." I can't really blame him for saying that when testing a gun results in several million dollars of structural damage, propels doors away from the building, and leaves pieces of the weapon spread out on the ground outside. Geez.</p>
<p>Let's look at the positive side of this though. The gun was a mess, but they discovered a heck of a bomb here, no? [<a href="http://www.pogo.org/pogo-files/alerts/nuclear-security-safety/nss-lanl-20091223.html">Pogo</a> via <a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/12/blast-los-alamos-researchers-accidentially-demolish-building-with-a-cannon/">Wired</a>]</p>
<p><b>Update:</b> Wired reports that they've received an email from National Nuclear Security Administration spokesman Damien LaVera which implies that what we've first heard might not be the exact story:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Here are the facts: On December 16, Los Alamos conducted a standard proof test on a new design for a catch tank in the target chamber for one of our large bore powder guns (LBPG). These types of experiments are routine and responsible. The LBPG is used to conduct measurements of material properties at pressures needed for understanding nuclear weapons performance. During this particular test, unexpected explosive damage occurred and, because that damage could result in $1 million in damages, an investigation was automatically triggered. That investigation will seek to identify the cause of the incident and any changes in procedures that might be required. NNSA, Los Alamos, and all of our facilities take their commitment to safety very seriously. It is important to note that no personnel were injured from this event, no hazardous or radioactive materials were involved, and that lab's incident response mechanisms appear to have performed as intended.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5433437/researchers-accidentally-demolish-building-with-cannon+like-gun]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5433437]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blockquote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[accident]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[civil war canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[demolition]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gun]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[los alamos national laboratory]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 23 Dec 2009 21:53:24 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5433437&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Finally, Digital Camera RAW Compatibility Update 2.7 for Mac]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I've been waiting for this damn update for months: Apple's dropped the latest RAW compatibility update&mdash;2.7 to be precise&mdash;for Mac, which adds compatibility for these fine cameras:</p>
<p>&bull; Canon EOS-1D Mark IV<br />
&bull; Canon EOS 7D<br />
&bull; Canon PowerShot G11<br />
&bull; Nikon D3S<br />
&bull; Nikon D3000S<br />
&bull; Nikon D3000</p>
<p>Snag it on Software Update, of course. [<a href="http://apple.com">Apple</a></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5429678/finally-digital-camera-raw-compatibility-update-27-for-mac]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5429678]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dslrs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nikon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:03:24 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5429678&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Video: Surfing Huge Waves at Jaws In Canon 5d Mark II Slow Motion]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=8050122&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=8050122&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/8050122.jpg"></a><br>
Last week we saw some big wave activity in the Pacific. Some said the storms would develop some of the biggest waves in decades.* Here's some footage of nut jobs surfing said waves on Jaws, in Maui.</p>
<p>This is from the 7th of the month, when our guest blogger and surf gear experimenter Laird Hamilton was out. From his blog, he said a few newcomers were getting thrown up on to the rocks with their jetskis and boards. The waves were 25 foot, as rated in Hawaiian terms, which means 50 feet tall on the face.</p>
<p>These videos were shot using a Canon 5D Mark II, a 70-300mm USM lens and a Zoom H4n & Redhead windscreen. Slow motion was done in Premier CS4, but I can imagine how much better this'll would have looked if the 5D's 60FPS firmware was used. [<a href="http://vimeo.com/8050122">vimeo</a> via <a href="http://twitter.com/nickbilton">nick bilton</a>]</p>

<p>*They turned out to be overhyped a bit, but the waves were big enough to hold the Eddie Aikau contest in Waimea Bay, which has only been held 7 times in 25 years.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5428992/video-surfing-huge-waves-at-jaws-in-canon-5d-mark-ii-slow-motion]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5428992]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[insane]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jaws]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[surf]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[surfing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waves]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:59:12 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5428992&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Canon DSLR Suffers 3,000-Foot Fall, Camera and Lens Still Work]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/canon.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_canon.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>A photographer strapped a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #canonrebelxt" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/canonrebelxt/">Canon Rebel XT</a> to his helmet while skydiving, but instead of capturing some great airborne shots, it fell off his helmet and plummeted 3,000 feet to the ground. Unbelievably, it survived.</p>
<p>According to a friend of the photographer:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Amazingly, the Rebel survived the fall and my friend is still using it to this very day. It has a crack in the plastic body and the kit lens is a little jerky when zooming, but functional. I'd like to know if there is a similar story or something close to this but I doubt. It might be a world record indeed (for the height of a camera drop which survived).</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Photos show that the camera is remarkably intact&mdash;the viewfinder is still functional, both the camera body and lens are pretty much fine. Not that we recommend you heave your DSLR out of a low-flying plane, but it's nice to know that if you do, there's a chance it'll be just fine. [<a href="http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/845602">FredMiranda</a> via <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/12/who-says-rebels-arent-built-tough/">Canon Rumors</a> via <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/12/15/canon-rebel-xt-survives-3000-foot-drop/">Crunchgear</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5427517/canon-dslr-suffers-3000+foot-fall-camera-and-lens-still-work]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5427517]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon 3000 foot fall]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon rebel xt]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 16 Dec 2009 00:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5427517&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Best Point and Shoot Cameras for Every Purpose]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_bestcams.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><em>Mark Goldstein is the Editor of <a href="www.photographyblog.com">Photography Blog</a>. And he's been so kind as provide us with his favorite point and shoot picks in every key category.</em></p>

<h1>Best for lowlight</h1>
<p><em>Canon <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #powershots90" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/powershots90/">PowerShot S90</a> ($400)</em><br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/canon-powershot-s90.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_canon-powershot-s90.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
The camera of the moment, the popular PowerShot S90 is a small but perfectly formed compact for the keen photographer. Concentrating on image quality rather than simply joining in the megapixel race (just like Sony's TX1 / WX1 models), the S90 offers DSLR-like results in a pocketable device, making it the perfect second camera for any self-respecting DSLR owner. A sensible resolution of 10 megapixels and fast zoom lens make the S90 an excellent choice when the lighting drops. This is one camera that you carry everywhere and still achieve breath-taking photos that will look great on your wall. [<a href="http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews/canon_powershot_s90_review/">Review</a>]</p>
<h1>Best bang for your buck</h1>
<p><em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #samsunghz15w" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/samsunghz15w/">Samsung HZ15W</a> ($250)</em><br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/samsung-hz15w_1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_samsung-hz15w_1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
Samsung can always be relied upon to deliver more for less, and the HZ15W is certainly no different. The HZ15W can't quite match every feature that its main rivals offer, but it does cost a lot less than them. With an amazingly versatile 10x zoom lens, high-definition video and a wealth of beginner-friendly modes, this well-designed camera is simple to use yet offers enough features and quality to satisfy more experienced photographers. The HZ15W could well be the only camera that you ever need. [<a href="http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews/samsung_wb550_review/">Review</a>]</p>
<h1>Best video/still crossover</h1>
<p><em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #panasoniclumixdmctz7" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/panasoniclumixdmctz7/">Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ7</a> ($400)</em><br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/panasonic_lumix_dmc_tz6-504x367.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_panasonic_lumix_dmc_tz6-504x367.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
The Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ7 is not only one of the best video compacts on the market, it's also one of the best cameras full stop. Support for the AVCHD Lite format almost doubles the recording time, albeit at the expense of editing ease. The dedicated Record button, stereo microphone, wind cut function and audio sampling at 48kHz combine to make the TZ7 a star performer for moving images. It's also a fantastic stills camera too, with an incredibly versatile 12x zoom and top-notch image quality - a great do-it-all, carry-everywhere device. [<a href="http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews/panasonic_lumix_dmc_tz7_review/">Review</a>]</p>
<h1>Best super slim model</h1>
<p><em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #sonytx1" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/sonytx1/">Sony TX1</a> ($300)</em><br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/sony_dsc-tx1_4-540x400.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_sony_dsc-tx1_4-540x400.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
Sony has long ruled the roost in the "it's so slim you can barely see it" category, and the desirable TX1 continues that tradition. Combining a sturdy yet stylish metal body, clever sliding front plate and impressive folded lens optics in a frame that's just 14.1mm thick, the TX1 still manages to pack in a 4x zoom lens and 3-inch touch-sensitive rear screen. You also get the added bonus of Sony's impressive "Exmor R" back-illuminated CMOS image sensor, which greatly improves low-light performance. Available in a variety of attractive colors to match your personality, the TX1 is guaranteed to look as good as you. [<a href="http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews/sony_cybershot_dsc_tx1_review/">Review</a>]</p>
<h1>Best wet and rugged</h1>
<p><em>Pentax Optio W80 ($210)</em><br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/pentax_optio_w80-550x354.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_pentax_optio_w80-550x354.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
<em>Ed note: Brian Lam reviewed most every rugged camera under the sun last summer, and his favorite all around performer went to the Pentax W80, a Jack-of-all-trades rugged cam featuring a 5x internal zoom lens. Its picture quality doesn't compete with the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #bestpointandshoots" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/bestpointandshoots/">best point and shoots</a>, and the W80 can only be dropped from around 3 feet, but it can go underwater up to 16 feet and function in temperatures down to 14 degrees.</em> [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5336015/pentax-w80-camera-review-waterproof-and-now-slightly-ruggedized">Review</a>]</p>
<p>There are obviously a lot of other great cameras this year for every budget and level of experience. See all of Photography Blog's camera reviews here (http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews/).</p>
<p><em>Mark Goldstein is the Editor of <a href="http://www.photographyblog.com">Photography Blog</a>. Photography Blog has been independently reviewing cameras and reporting photography news since 2003.</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5423623/the-best-point-and-shoot-cameras-for-every-purpose]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5423623]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[best point and shoots]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bestmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dmc-tz7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[giftguide2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hz15w]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lumix]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[panasonic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[panasonic lumix dmc-tz7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[point and shoots]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Powershot s90]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung hz15w]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony tx1]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[txi]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Goldstein]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5423623&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Best Camcorders You Can Buy on Every Budget]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_best-camcorders.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><em>Kaitlyn Chantry is the editor-in-chief of <a href="http://www.camcorderinfo.com">CamcorderInfo.com</a>. And she's been so kind as provide us with her favorite camcorders picks in every key price range.</em></p>

<h2>Flip MinoHD</h2>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_flip-minohd.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Don't be confused by imposters: the ultracompact Flip camcorder is still the hot girl that everyone either wants to have or wants to be. At $230, the second-generation MinoHD is more expensive than all those Flip clones, but you get what you pay for. It's sleek and stylish&mdash;especially when you can design your own&mdash;and has decent video quality (for a tiny, trendy camcorder). Most importantly, it's so easy to use that your granny could make herself the next YouTube star. [<a href="%20http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content/Pure-Digital-Flip-MinoHD-Camcorder-Review-35690.htm">Review</a>]</p>
<p><em>Note: Gizmodo actually preferred Flip's Ultra HD, but only because it's substantially cheaper than the MinoHD. More on that in our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5401862/ultimate-pocket-camcorder-comparison">mini cam Battlemodo</a>.</em></p>
<h2>JVC Everio GZ-HM200</h2>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/jvc_gz_hm200.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_jvc_gz_hm200.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The JVC Everio GZ-HM200 doesn't exactly roll off the tip of your tongue, but for just $580, it might roll its way into your heart. It can't quite compete with the big dogs in our testing labs, but its digital image stabilization is surprisingly effective and the color accuracy left us slack-jawed. The HM200 is also small, easy to use, and has decent options if you want a little control over your video. And we just love having two SDHC memory card slots. [<a href="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content/JVC-Everio-GZ-HM200-Camcorder-Review-37237.htm">Review</a>]</p>
<h1>Canon Vixia HF20</h1>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_-2_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />The Canon Vixia HF20 is all about getting the complete package. It lacks the huge lens and high resolution of its big brothers, but it does have the sexy interface and powerful performance we've come to expect from a Canon camcorder. At $800, you're definitely paying for that clear, sharp video and fantastic design. The HF20 is for people that want to save a little cash, but still want to own the cool toys. [<a href="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content/Canon-Vixia-HF20-Camcorder-Review-36314.htm">Review</a>]</p>
<h1>Panasonic HDC-TM300</h1>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_latest-camcorder.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />If you're spending over a grand on a consumer camcorder, it's pretty hard to go wrong. But this year's Panasonics are the crème de la crème. They've got great auto features, are stuffed full of manual controls, and are smoking hot performers in low light. The TM300 (Panasonic's 32GB flash memory model) feels like it was personally sculpted for your hand&mdash;and at $1300, it won't break the bank. [<a href="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content/Panasonic-HDC-TM300-Camcorder-Review-37105.htm#">Review</a>]</p>
<p>There are obviously a lot of other great camcorders this year&mdash;for every budget and level of experience. Read all of CamcorderInfo's picks for the 2009 Select Awards <a href="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content/Camcorderinfo-com-Select-Awards-2009-37268.htm">here</a>.</p>
<p><em>Kaitlyn Chantry is the editor-in-chief of <a href="http://www.camcorderinfo.com">CamcorderInfo.com</a>. She has reported on and reviewed everything from video games to coffee cups. CamcorderInfo has been using scientific lab testing and comparative analysis to provide consumers with comprehensive, unbiased <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #camcorderreviews" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/camcorderreviews/">camcorder reviews</a> since 1997.</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5421645/the-best-camcorders-you-can-buy-on-every-budget]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5421645]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[camcorders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bestmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camcorder reviews]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[giftguide2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[panasonic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 08 Dec 2009 15:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kaitlyn Chantry]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5421645&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New Canon EOS 5D Mark II Firmware to Pack 60fps HD]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Canon has already revealed that their EOS 5D <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #markii" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #markii" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/markii/">Mark II</a> would be getting 24fps 1080P, which is handy for transfers to film. But a new industry-focused meeting revealed the company would also add 60fps 720P support to the camera, which would be great for fast motion clips or half-speed slow motion. [<a href="http://blog.planet5d.com/2009/12/a-taste-of-the-canon-eos-5d-mark-ii-firmware-coming-up/">Planet5D</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5420472/new-canon-eos-5d-mark-ii-firmware-to-pack-60fps-hd]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5420472]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[firmware]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[5d]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Canon EOS 5D Mark II]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mark ii]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sdlrs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 07 Dec 2009 08:24:13 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5420472&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Touchscreen DSLR Is Finally Upon Us]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/730580762_wzbms-o.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_730580762_wzbms-o.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>So, this finally happened: Canon, or possibly a four-year-old with a mild passion for drawing, has <a href="http://www.photographybay.com/2009/12/03/canon-touchscreen-dslr/">filed for a patent</a> on a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #touchscreendslr" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/touchscreendslr/">touchscreen DSLR</a>, which transfers common controls to the camera's LCD screen. The button genocide is <em>real</em>, people.</p>

<p>The technology has been available for years, and the DSLR market has been veering toward the general public ever since that cursed D was appended to it, so it's almost surprising that it's taking this long for touchscreens to infiltrate. But not <em>really</em>: DSLRs are proudly retro, built around mirror box and lens designs that date back decades, and covered in buttons to the point that, to an amateur, they are totally unapproachable. That said, the standard Canon and Nikon button layouts <em>do</em> work pretty well, and there are a lot of parameters you've got to deal with, so, well, here we are, staring down a Canon patent application for a basic touchscreen interface, in 2009:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/730596306_823hx-m.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_730596306_823hx-m.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
Here's <a href="http://www.photographybay.com/2009/12/03/canon-touchscreen-dslr/">how it works</a>, as interpreted by the Photography Bay:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>1. Sliding your finger across the panel in a vertical direction changes aperture values.</p>
<p>2. Sliding your finger across the panel in a horizontal direction changes shutter speed.</p>
<p>Other features contemplated by the patent that may be enabled by touch entry through the LCD include the following settings:</p>
<p>Focus detection area<br>
Exposure correction value<br>
Flash adjustment correction value<br>
Photometry mode (i.e., metering mode)<br>
Drive mode<br>
ISO value<br>
Auto focus mode<br>
White balance mode<br>
Exposure correction value</p>
</blockquote>
<p>In other words, the touchscreen would do everything your current 1970s aviation panel of a DSLR backside would, without the buttons.</p>
<p>In practice, I think a DSLR touchscreen would need to be supplementary. Given that a lot of DSLR adjustment is done with the photographer's eye in the viewfinder, the tactile feedback provided by buttons will be hard to replace; while it might make settings menus a bit easier to navigate, having a touchscreen won't do much good when you're trying to adjust aperture on the fly, or pull down your exposure time after a light flickers on. However wonderfully or horrifically it's executed, though, a touchscreen DSLR from a major manufacturer <em>will</em> happen, and probably soon. [<a href="http://www.photographybay.com/2009/12/03/canon-touchscreen-dslr/">Photography Bay</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5418007/the-touchscreen-dslr-is-finally-upon-us]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5418007]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dslrs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[interfaces]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[touchscreen dslr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[touchscreen dslrs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[touchscreens]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:25:40 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5418007&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[With an Eye to the Future, Try Raw Photos Today]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/bayer_pattern_creddxolabs1.png" class="left image340" width="340" />If you enjoy photography, don't make the mistake I did.</p>

<p>Using my then-new SLR in 2005 and 2006, I photographed everything from my new son to otherworldly canyons we visited in Utah. The only problem: the photos were taken only in JPEG format.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.cnet.com/"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/cnet_logo.jpg" width="129" height="65"></a>JPEG is fine as far as it goes, and indeed for most folks it will suffice. But having rediscovered my enjoyment of photography in the digital era, I wish I'd used the raw image format that comes with SLRs and higher-end compact cameras.</p>
<p>My initial regret was from the realization that raw photos, although taking up about three times the storage space as a JPEG and requiring manual processing, offer higher quality and more flexibility. But what I've come to understand since then is a second advantage of raw: because processing software improves over time, raw photos in effect can get better with age.</p>
<p>For that reason, I've begun recommending friends who show some enthusiasm for photography that they should think about shooting important events in raw format alongside JPEG. You don't have to mess with the raw files today, but if it's an important event like a wedding, you might want them for later.</p>
<p>I've included below some samples of a noisy image shot in near-darkness at ISO 25,600 from my SLR. They may not convince you that shooting raw is a miracle cure for photo quality, but they do illustrate some differences with the camera's JPEG and that the raw-processing software isn't standing still.</p>
<p><b>Raw? What's that mean anyway?</b><br>
But first, a little background. What exactly are raw images?</p>
<p>A digital camera's image sensor is a grid of pixels that captures light from a scene. Cameras can interpret this image, processing it in various ways to produce a JPEG. A raw file, though, is the unprocessed data from the image sensor. However, there's no raw standard; each digital camera has its own, usually proprietary, raw format, though they're sometimes related.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/rawsyndcap5.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Although cameras can produce JPEGs, a subset of the image-editing industry serves those who shoot raw. Options include Adobe Systems' Photoshop and Photoshop Lightroom, Apple's Aperture, DxO Labs' Optics Pro, Phase One's Capture One, and a handful of others.</p>
<p>The variety of proprietary formats means these applications must be constantly updated for the newest cameras. All SLRs can produce raw images, as can a variety of higher-end compact cameras such as Panasonic's LX3 and GF1, Canon's S90 and G11, and Olympus' E-P1 and E-P2.</p>
<p>Raw files vary from JPEG in several ways. Here are some of the nitty-gritty details.</p>
<p>Let's start at the individual pixel. Each one you see on a computer screen has a mixture of three colors of light: red, green, and blue. But with most cameras' image sensors, each pixel captures only one of those colors. A process called demosaicing converts this checkerboard-like arrangement of colors, called a Bayer pattern, so each pixel in the final image gets all three colors instead of just one.</p>
<p>Another difference is in white balance. Unlike film cameras of yore, digital cameras can make a snap judgment whether a shot is being taken under yellowish incandescent light, under white sunlight, or in bluish shade, then try to correct the image so white looks white. This processing change is baked into a JPEG image, but it's just a recommendation in a raw shot.</p>
<p>Finally, each color in a JPEG pixel is stored with an 8-bit value, providing 256 steps between, the darkest and lightest green, red, or blue. With raw, most cameras today record 12 or 14 bits per color, providing 8,192 or 16,384 levels, respectively.</p>
<p><b>What does raw get you?</b><br>
The big drawbacks of raw images are that the files are larger and that you can't share them easily until you've edited them with some kind of software. But here are some of the first advantages I found shooting raw.</p>
<p>Some professionals with lots of experience and time to set up shots get everything right. For the rest of us, shots often are overexposed or underexposed. One of the main advantages of shooting raw is better flexibility to correct such problems&mdash;in part because of that better color depth than JPEG affords.</p>
<p>"Shooting in raw is usually more forgiving than just shooting jpeg files, so should you make a mistake when capturing an image you have a better opportunity with a RAW file to go back and correct any mistakes," said Richard Pelkowski, product manager of digital SLRs for Olympus Imaging America. "We typically encourage our Olympus consumers to shoot in both raw plus JPEG mode so they immediately have both a JPEG file you can easily share and use instantly and a more forgiving raw file that you can go back to later for post processing."</p>
<p>Take the example of <a href="http://www.haikutimes.com/">Jonathan Machen</a>, an artist I know in Boulder, Colo., who embraced raw as he moved from point-and-shoot cameras to an SLR.</p>
<p>"While I strive to understand my camera completely and hope to take images that approximate the balance of light that my eye sees, it's not always possible, especially in fast-moving family situations. I love to take pictures of the kids in unusual lighting and compositional situations, but it can be a distracting combination trying to watch them and trying to take a good picture," he said. Case in point: at dinner in a restaurant recently, a kid-friendly lap dog appeared, but Machen's camera was set wrong.</p>
<p>"I got the shot, but the image was almost black," he said. "Later, editing the raw file, I brought it back to a place that brought a smile to my face as well as that of my wife."</p>
<p>Even if you don't make mistakes, raw images offer more flexibility in editing to bring out details otherwise lost in murky shadows or bright highlights. This is the particular ability I wish I had for shots of my newborn son held under bright heat lamps and of a twisty narrow canyon in both sun and shade.</p>
<p>Adjustable white balance is another nicety. On many occasions I've fixed the colors of conference speakers whose faces were turned to yellow putty by stage lights or of a friend's darling daughter whose position in the shade made her look like an ice queen in the making.</p>
<p>Computers also get more power to compensate for lens shortcomings or reduce the sensor noise that speckles images, said Cyrille de la Chesnais, director of sales and marketing for photography at the Paris-based DxO Labs. "Optical corrections and noise removal are much more precise and effective on raw files than on JPEG files," he said.</p>
<p>Many cameras let you adjust noise reduction levels when you take the photo&mdash;but again, with a JPEG, your choice is baked permanently into the image.</p>
<p><b>Moore's Law and the subtler promise of raw</b><br>
Here's where I hadn't appreciated raw's advantages: computers get faster.</p>
<p>Demosaicing is a complicated process that benefits from more computing horsepower, and unlike many computing tasks, it happens to be one that can easily benefit from multicore processors.</p>
<p>When you take a photo with your camera, it uses a relatively feeble image-processing chip to produce the JPEG. It's remarkable to me how well those chips can perform the task, but even with the best quality on the market today, your camera will only have one chance to make that JPEG.</p>
<p>But if you're converting a raw image with software, you not only get more computing horsepower than a camera offers, you get algorithms that are updated.</p>
<p>"You can revisit this digital negative and reprocess it as technology improves," said Tom Hogarty, Adobe's product manager for Lightroom.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/rawsyndcap1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_rawsyndcap1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/rawsyndcap2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_rawsyndcap2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>Hogarty likens the situation to what he saw looking at prints in a museum by the famed landscape photographer Ansel Adams. "You could tell the earlier prints didn't stand out. They didn't have same kind of depth that the later prints did. The printing technology and chemicals were getting better," Hogarty said. "Imagine if all you had was original print and you couldn't improve it going forward."</p>
<p><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-30685_3-10389409-264.html">DxO Optics Pro 6</a>, released in November, and the <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-30685_3-10380947-264.html">beta version of Lightroom 3</a>, introduced in October, both are designed to extract a better image from the raw data. De la Chesnais said DxO Optics Pro improves noise reduction so that one F-stop's worth of noise can be fixed. That means that if you previously were happy shooting photos at ISO 800, you could push your camera to ISO 1600 for better low-light performance, for example.</p>
<p>Noise reduction is a complicated problem. In addition to getting rid of the color and brightness variations from pixel to pixel, lower-frequency noise patterns often lead to blotches of red or blue that span many pixels. Good noise reduction preserves original colors and fine details and doesn't give the image a smeary watercolor-painting look up close.</p>
<p>Another software matter: software can take its best guess what sort of editing settings to apply. In my experience, that's a good starting point if not always a good final result, but I expect improvements here, too, just as cameras are generally getting better at automatically gauging the right exposure, focus, and other settings.</p>
<p><b>Is raw for everyone?</b><br>
No, but I think it's for more people than use it today.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/thumb160x_rawsyndcap3.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />If you're just uploading photos of your smiling friends to Facebook, chances are the core value of the image easily transcends a little pesky noise or skewed colors. Robert Balousek, from the San Francisco Bay Area, shoots raw&mdash;but mostly because Adobe Lightroom corrects some defective pixels in his SLR image sensor.</p>
<p>"Auto-fix is a gamble," he said. "I don't apply it to all photos, just ones that I would like to use but are a little off. Sometimes it does what I want, but more often than not I tweak a few knobs until it looks how I expect. I don't claim to be an expert, I just know what seems right to me."</p>
<p>If you're a bit more serious, though raw could be worth sampling. Give it a serious thought if you're an experimental students, a tourist who wants to compile memories in a photo book, a photo enthusiast sharing shots on Flickr, or a parent printing poster-size prints of your children.</p>
<p>I believe software will ease today's manual pains of handling raw photos. Aperture and Lightroom have made it easier to process large numbers of shots, though there's plenty of work to be done. Automatic adjustments will steadily improve, and perhaps Windows will get the better built-in support <a href="http://www.cnet.com/apple-mac.html">Mac</a> OS X has so people looking at a folder full of raw files see thumbnail images rather than a list of filenames with generic icons.</p>
<p>It's true raw shots take up more space on your flash card, hard drive, and backups. But storage is cheap these days with 1.5 terabyte hard drives costing less than $100 and 8GB SD memory cards costing about $20. Today's large image files will look gradually more ordinary as storage technology gets roomier.</p>
<p><b>Standardization could help</b><br>
One big change that could help raw catch on is standardization of the file formats. Today's profusion of formats ensures that operating systems or editing software have a hard time keeping up. The most promising avenue here is Adobe's Digital Negative format, which the company controlled for years but more has submitted to the <a href="http://www.iso.org/">International Organization for Standardization (ISO)</a> as a proposed standard.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/rawsyndcap4.jpg" width="146" height="129">DNG has been improved to address a number of earlier shortcomings, for example by adding profiles that can mirror camera tonal settings such as neutral, landscape, or portrait. Another more recent example are "opcodes" that can register lens settings used to so software can automatically correct optical problems such as vignetting or barrel distortion. DNG already could gracefully accommodate metadata such as copyright notices or editing instructions, and it for those worried about how well a specific raw format is converted into a generic format, the DNG can house the original raw file, too.</p>
<p>Pentax is the most prominent company to build DNG support into its cameras, but SLR leaders Nikon and Canon still don't. Hogarty hopes the standardization process will improve its prospects.</p>
<p>"I believe the gating factor in camera manufacturer adoption is the fact it is a format controlled by Adobe," Hogarty said. "Clearly it's not available in the majority of cameras shipped in the world today. That's why we're pursuing the ISO standard, so other companies can feel comfortable with the standard format."</p>
<p>Ultimately, Hogarty believes raw usage will spread more widely</p>
<p>"If you look at images shot by the mainstream market, they need the most latitude in editing and correction capabilities. They're not as passionate about getting the perfect image," Hogarty said. "I think they'd be able to take that raw product to a finished product that would make them happier."</p>
<p>I suspect it'll be a long time before raw processing is simple enough that mainstream snapshooters will embrace raw. But the trajectory is clear: the technology is improving.</p>
<p>So if you care about your shots and have a camera that'll do it, set it to shoot raw+JPEG next time you're photographing something important. You may not want to mess with the raw shots today, but why curtail your options if you don't have to?</p>
<p><i>This story originally appeared on <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-30685_3-10407309-264.html">CNET</a></i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5417220/with-an-eye-to-the-future-try-raw-photos-today]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5417220]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[adobe]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[adobe light room 3 beta]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon s90]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[DxO Optics Pro 6]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jpeg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[light room 3]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[raw]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Raw vs. jpeg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[S90]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:36:34 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[CNET]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5417220&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Canon Boy Meets Nikon Girl, a Rap Is Born]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/H_H8TOKcfjg&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/H_H8TOKcfjg&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object>The Windows/Apple divide has torn lovers apart for decades, and now this video explains why a Canon/Nikon relationship can never be. I'll leave the "incompatible lens mount" jokes to you guys and gals in the comments. [<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_H8TOKcfjg">Youtube</a>, Thanks Jon.]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5414343/canon-boy-meets-nikon-girl-a-rap-is-born]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5414343]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fanboy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nikon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5414343&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Four DSLR Cameras for Every Budget]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/D5000_vs_T1i_battlemodo_top.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_D5000_vs_T1i_battlemodo_top.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>We're in kind of a golden age of DSLR cameras. They're cheaper than ever, so they're affordable, and they <em>do more stuff</em> than ever, so the time's right to jump in. Here's our DSLR picks for every (non-pro) budget.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/nikond3000.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_nikond3000.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<h1>Baby's First DSLR: Nikon D3000</h1>
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5326026/nikon-d3000-beginners-10mp-dslr-with-educational-menus-for-600/gallery/">The D3000</a> is <em>cheap</em>. We're talking a full kit (i.e., it comes with a lens) for <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-D3000-Digital-18-55mm-3-5-5-6G/dp/B002JCSV5I/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1259179181&sr=8-1">just $460</a>, making it the cheapest DSLR kit around. But what really makes it stand out for beginners is a built-in tutorial system that explains how to get certain kinds of shots&mdash;like shallow depth of field&mdash;in plain English.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/03/custom_1237932889318_t1i_handson_12.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_custom_1237932889318_t1i_handson_12.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<h1>Amateur Hour: Canon T1i</h1>
<p>The next step up <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5234607/canon-rebel-t1i-vs-nikon-d5000-entry+level-dslr-battlemodo">is Canon's T1i</a>. What we like is that it packs a bigger boy's image sensor&mdash;it's got the same 15-megapixel sensor as the pricier mid-range 50D&mdash;and 1080p video into a camera <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B001XURPQS/ref=pd_luc_mri?_encoding=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&v=glance">that's $720 with kit lens</a>. Also, for the money, it edges out Nikon's D5000 on a few points, namely superior video handling and Live View.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/08/nikond90.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_nikond90.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<h1>Bigger Britches: Nikon D90</h1>
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5042209/nikon-d90-official-first-dslr-ever-with-hd-video-recording">Nikon's D90</a> was the first ever DSLR to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5055525/nikon-d90-video-tests-the-good-the-bad-and-the-shaky">shoot 720p video with manual controls</a>, but that's only part of the reason we like it. It's got the awesome image sensor from <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5049522/nikon-d300-dslr-lightning-review">the semi-pro D300</a>, in a package that's <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-D90-Digital-18-105mm-3-5-5-6G/dp/B001ENOZY4/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1259180119&sr=1-1">just over $1000</a>. And at that price, it's $100 cheaper than Canon's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5041734/canon-eos-50d-official-15+megapixel-prosumer-dslr-is-first-with-digic-4-processor">competing 50D</a>, which has the same image sensor as the cheaper T1i above, but none of the video benefits of either camera.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/7dbody__087.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_7dbody__087.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<h1>The Budding Auteur: Canon 7D</h1>
<p>The only camera on this list that's more expensive than its competition&mdash;the D300s&mdash;the 7D overwhelms with DSLR video that's superior to every camera but Canon's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5385446/canon-1d-mark-iv-the-5000-new-king-of-cameras">very pro 1D Mark IV</a> (which costs $5000). It shoots in 1080p, with full manual controls, and it's amazing what it can do in low light. Besides that, Canon's somehow cheated physics with an 18-megapixel sensor that doesn't explode with noise at high ISO settings, all while cramming a whole bunch of new features, and an actually good autofocus system. It's <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Canon-EOS-7D-28-135mm-Standard/dp/B002NEGTU6/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1259180617&sr=1-2">$1900</a> with a kit lens.</p>
<p>Beyond here, honestly, you should already have a pretty idea of <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5160540/canon-5d-mark-ii-vs-nikon-d700-review-shoot+out">what you're gonna buy</a> without our help. And if you've got your own opinions about what's best in every price range, let's hear 'em in the comments.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5412991/the-four-dslr-cameras-for-every-budget]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5412991]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[7d]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[d3000]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[d90]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dslrs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gift guide]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gift Guide 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nikon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[T1i]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5412991&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Gifts for Aspiring Artsy Photographers]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p>Every photographer wants to be artsy, because if their Flickr stream isn't fancy enough to pull in lots of "Oh, you're so <em>talented</em>" comments, what's the point? Here's some gift ideas for aspiring artsy photographers.</p>
<p>BTW, if you hate the gallery format as much as the Grinch hated Christmas, click <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5411074/gifts-for-aspiring-artsy-photographers">here</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_neckstrap.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>Crumpler Industry Disgrace neckstrap</strong> Fancy cameras, especially German ones, are <em>heavy</em>. Fancy lenses bolted to fancy cameras? It's like lugging around a (fancy) dump truck. Normal camera straps are thin and cut into your neck. Crumpler's Industry Disgrace neckstrap is fat, super padded and breathable. And, they come in patterns. <strong>$30-$40</strong>. [<a href="https://www.crumplerbags.com/flash/flash.aspx#/english/product-details/industry-disgrace-id02a.html">Link</a>]</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/lensbabywide.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_lensbabywide.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><strong>Lensbaby optics</strong> Crazy lenses for DSLRs, like tilt-shifts and fisheyes, can be ridiculously expensive, way too expensive for a starving artiste who must save their pennies for vintage boots. Enter <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #lensbaby" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/lensbaby/">Lens Baby</a>, which produces cheap, quick and dirty single-effect lenses and adapters for DSLRs. While their quality isn't exactly bulletproof, they do deliver the special effect shots Flickr whores crave. The core lenses do variations on the whole small area of focus, lots of blurriness surrounding it, while the optics system lets you swap out inserts for different effects, like fisheye or pinhole. <strong>$95-$300</strong>. [<a href="http://www.lensbaby.com/">Link</a>]</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/nikon50.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_nikon50.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><strong>A 50mm prime lens</strong> Back in the day, a 50mm prime lens is what photogs cut their teeth on. No zoom, no wide-angle, no image stabilization to fiddle with. Just sharp focus. Meaning it's pure composition on the photographer's part. If you're buying for a DSLR that's not full-frame&mdash;basically anything other than Canon 5D Mark II or D700&mdash;you're gonna wanna grab a 35mm lens (with the crop factor, it becomes about 50mm, give or take). They get pricier as they get faster, but you can score a cheap 50mm for about a hundred bucks, and a cheap(ish) 35mm for between $200 and $300. <strong>$90-</strong>$320 [<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-50mm-Nikkor-Digital-Cameras/dp/B00005LEN4/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1258760159&sr=8-2">Nikon 50mm</a>, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Canon-50mm-1-8-Camera-Lens/dp/B00007E7JU/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1258760159&sr=8-1">Canon 50mm</a>, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-35mm-AF-S-Digital-Cameras/dp/B001S2PPT0/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1258760179&sr=8-1">Nikon 35mm</a>, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Canon-35mm-Wide-Angle-Cameras/dp/B00009XVCU/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1258760179&sr=8-2">Canon 35mm</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_gorillapod.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>Joby GorillaPod</strong> A cheap tripod that'll fit in a hipster messenger bag, for <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5407851/shooting-challenge-slow-shutter-photography">long exposure shots</a>. <strong>$30-$50</strong> [<a href="http://joby.com/gorillapod/slrzoom/">Link</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_crumplerbag.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>Crumpler camera bags</strong> Most camera bags aren't very befitting of actually cool photographers. They're boring. Corporate. Ugly. Crumpler's 5 Million Home holds a DSLR, an extra lens and flash and is sunny sky blue. Stepping up a model, the 8 Million Dollar Home has more space for more stuff, if needed. <strong>$80-$170</strong>. [<a href="http://www.crumplerbags.com/Lite/English/Products/5-Million-Dollar-Home-MD0508A.html">Link</a>, <a href="http://www.crumplerbags.com/Lite/English/Products/8-Million-Dollar-Home-MD0810A.html">Link</a>]</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/cmykwiiiide.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_cmykwiiiide.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><strong>Diana F+ CMYK lomo camera</strong> Real artsy photographers shoot with cheap lomo film cameras to produce vintage-y lo-fi photos, with crazy saturation, exposures and optical effects, perfect for Vice Magazine. Don't think, just shoot. And the super bright CMYK paint job? You know what it is. <strong>$105</strong> [<a href="http://usa.shop.lomography.com/cameras/diana-f-cmyk">Link</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_leiiicam9.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>Leica M9</strong>: The ultimate photographer gift. Picking up a Leica camera instantly turns <a href="http://kenrockwell.com/leica/leica-man.htm">anybody</a> into a Photographer. While holding a Leica, it is impossible not to shoot perfect, artsy photos. Even if you try. The M9 is the latest, most exquisite piece of German photographic craftsmanship yet, with an 18-megapixel, full-frame sensor that delivers the <a href="http://www.kenrockwell.com/leica/m9.htm">most amazing photos</a> <em>of all time</em>. <strong>$7000 and worth every penny</strong>. [<a href="http://en.leica-camera.com/photography/m_system/m9/">Link</a>]</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/superzoomers.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_superzoomers.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><strong>Superzoom Cameras</strong>: They're not DSLRs, they're not pocketable point-and-shoots, and they're <em>definitely</em> not artsy. They're for tourists, and for the money, you could easily get a way better cheap DSLR or vintage film camera.</p>
<p><i><a href="http://gizmodo.com/t/giftguide2009">All Giz Wants</a> is our annual round-up of favorite gift ideas, including amazing attainable objects and a few far-out fantasies. We'll be popping guides catered to different interests several times per day for the next week, so keep checking back.</i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5411074/gifts-for-aspiring-artsy-photographers/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5411074]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gift guide]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[all giz wants]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bags]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[crumpler]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gift Guide 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gorillapod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lens baby]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lenses]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lomo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lomography]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nikon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:59:15 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5411074&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Shoot 3D Photos Using Two Hacked Canon Cameras]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_canon3d.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Sure, basic stereoscopic images can be created using software to merge two slightly offset photos, but that only works for stationary subjects. For moving targets, there's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5326643/fuji-finepix-real-3d-w1-tested-declared-coolest-camera-of-the-year">Fuji's Finepix Real 3D W1</a>, or this $20 hack using two Canon PowerShot cameras.</p>
<p><em>Maximum PC's</em> how-to uses 3D picture synchronization software called StereoData Maker, a nonvolatile firmware update based on the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5070958/dealzmodo-hack-juice-up-your-canon-digital-camera-with-chdk">Canon Hack Development Kit</a> (CHDK).</p>
<p>You'll then need to build a mounting rig, and use a small enclosure (such as an Altoids tin) to make a simple USB switch remote. Free software called StereoPhoto Maker is used for post-processing. And yeah, you'll still need a pair of red/cyan glasses. Still, it looks like fun. Full instructions at: [<a href="http://www.maximumpc.com/article/howtos/how_build_your_own_3d_camera_rig">Maximum PC</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5408283/shoot-3d-photos-using-two-hacked-canon-cameras]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5408283]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[diy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3d photography]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3D photography StereoData Maker CHDK]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chdk]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mods]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[powershot]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5408283&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The First Movie Shot on a Canon 7D? It's About Zombies, Of Course!]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7570768&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7570768&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/7570768.jpg"></a>Boy have zombies made a comeback lately, right along with teenage vampires. Regardless, indie zombie flick <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #deadseason" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/deadseason/">Dead Season</a></em> is the self-proclaimed first film shooting on the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5400595/canon-7d-review">$1700 Canon 7D</a>. (Warning, gore ahead.)</p>

<p>The camera quality is sort of a mixed bag for the bloody independent film. High resolution coupled with gorgeous depth of field tricks emulate Hollywood (or at least, TV-level) production. But, while you can call me old fashioned, blood and guts only look better in low-fi. Best of luck to the group finishing the film. These dailies from week one have some nice moments. [<em>Thanks Super Greene!</em>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5403097/the-first-movie-shot-on-a-canon-7d-its-about-zombies-of-course]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5403097]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[7d]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon 7d]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dead season]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5403097&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Canon's First Hybrid Stabilized Lens Reviewed: It Works, Mostly]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/f28100mm.jpeg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_f28100mm.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Canon's F2.8 100mm Macro L lens is the first to use a new hybrid <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #imagestabilization" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/imagestabilization/">image stabilization</a> system that corrects for two kinds of camera shake. <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/canon_100_2p8_is_usm_c16/">DPReview says it</a> works as advertised, most of the time.</p>
<p>The hybrid IS system works best at long ranges, delivering all four stops of stabilization Canon claims, though it ironically&mdash;given we're talking about a macro lens here&mdash;falls short at close-ups. But more than that, "this is one of the very finest lenses we've seen - optically it's superb, and operationally it works very well too, with fast and positive autofocus, and one of the most effective image stabilization systems currently available." In other words, it kills the current non-L F2.8 100mm Macro.</p>
<p>It'll be interesting to see this new system migrate over to other, non-macro lenses. Check the full review there: [<a href="http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/canon_100_2p8_is_usm_c16/page6.asp">DP Review</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5402606/canons-first-hybrid-stabilized-lens-reviewed-it-works-mostly]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5402606]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[image stabilization]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lenses]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:58:50 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5402606&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Canon 7D Review]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/7dbody__087.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_7dbody__087.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>For a long time with Canon, if you weren't dropping nearly three grand <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5160540/canon-5d-mark-ii-vs-nikon-d700-review-shoot+out">on a 5D</a>, you were stuck with a vastly lesser DSLR. The $1700 7D is Canon's first semi-pro DSLR, and actually it's my favorite yet.</p>

<h1>What's New and Dandy</h1>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/7dbody__092.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_7dbody__092.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>What makes it my favorite Canon so far is actually everything that's completely new to Canon&mdash;DP Review <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos7d/page3.asp">has a nice summary</a> here, in pictures. But in short, while this might sound weird, it shoots more like a Nikon than any Canon DSLR I've used. This is primarily because of the new 19-point autofocus system and the color metering system that goes with it. You're able to select AF zones&mdash;clusters of AF points&mdash;while in the past with Canon you've been limited to a full AF blast or picking out a single point. The system is also more customizable, so it can be locked with different default focus points depending on whether you're holding the camera horizontally and vertically orientations. Against <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5370768/nikon-d300s-dslr-review-great-but-not-much-of-an-upgrade">Nikon's D300s</a>, Canon's new AF system mostly kept up, and definitely performs better than autofocus on the 5D Mark II.</p>
<p>The new viewfinder now provides 100 percent coverage, unlike previous Canons in this range, and it uses a new polymer LCD network for the graphical overlay to display AF points, grids and other displays, so it's more flexible and feels more fluid. (It also just looks swankier, and again, more Nikon-like.) Your <em>other</em> viewfinder (when you're shooting video, anyway), the LCD screen, is a 3-inch, 920k dot display like the 5D Mark II and it's still excellent, with a wide viewing angle, nice color and the right amount of crispness.</p>
<h1>Sensor and Image Quality</h1>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/7dsamples__127.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_7dsamples__127.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Truthfully, I've been mildly surprised at the quality of photos that've come out of the 7D, which uses an absolutely stuffed 18-megapixel, APS-C sized sensor. (So, there is a 1.6x crop factor.) For comparison, the D300s has a 12MP sensor that's the same physical size (<strong>Update</strong>: For nitpickers, yes, Nikon's DX format is marginally larger than Canon's APS-C sensor, with the D300s's sensor coming in at 23.6 x 15.8 mm to the 7D's 22.3 x 14.9 mm.) The the D3 only goes for 12 megapixels on its bigger full-frame (35mm-equivalent) sensor. The 5D Mark II has a 21MP full-frame sensor. And typically, the more pixels you try to cram on a sensor of a given size, the more the image quality degrades, especially when it comes to low light, high ISO shots.</p>
<p>I was expecting a noisefest, or at best, seriously noticeable noise reduction employed by the camera's software. It is clear that Canon's using incredibly sophisticated noise reduction algorithms with the dual Digic IV processors onboard, though the effects are less drastic than I expected. It's most apparent, actually, when you directly compare photos taken with the D300s. Looking at photos taken with the 7D and D300s at 100 percent crops, the D300s's images are noisier, but they also preserve more detail. For web-sized images, the 7D's images look better, with less noise and more smoothness.</p>
<p>I've got two sample galleries&mdash;an array of sample shots, and then another directly comparing the 7D with the D300s in low light situations, using identical settings for photos. 100 percent zooms follow photos in both galleries. Or you can download full size photos from Flickr <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattbuchanan/sets/72157622645225621/">here</a> and <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattbuchanan/sets/72157622644763643/">here</a>.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5400459,12,'7D Samples');
</script><br>
<script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5400531,12,'7D vs. D300s');
</script></p>
<h1>Video</h1>
<p><object width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7521943&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7521943&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/7521943.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_7521943.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display: none;"/></a><br>
You can get sense of Canon and Nikon's philosophical differences with the difference in their buttons for video: Canon makes a distinction between Live View and video mode, while Nikon is ready to start shooting video as soon you tap the live view button on the D300s. Creating video is a separate, dedicated event for Canon, in other words, and there is a semi-serious video camera that happens to be built into a DSLR. Nikon's D300s, on the other hand, is a DSLR that happens to shoot video.</p>
<p>With video, the 7D simply has the upper hand&mdash;video is very much a legitimized use of this camera, not a secondary one like the D300s. (As expected from a company with an entire wing dedicated to camcorders for pros and consumers.) Not only does it have full manual controls, I find that it's slightly easier to use that the D300s while shooting video&mdash;not to mention the whole shooting in a real video codec at 1080p, yadda yadda. Three clips here: A melange of video above, and then by two videos, one from the 7D, one of the D300s, that mirror each other. Both were shot at ISO 6400, and you should be able to catch them at full res if you click over to Vimeo.</p>
<p><object width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_1"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7521035&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7521035&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/7521035.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_7521035.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display: none;"/></a></p>
<p><object width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_2"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7520851&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7520851&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/7520851.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_7520851.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display: none;"/></a></p>
<h1>Build and Controls</h1>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/7dbody__095.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_7dbody__095.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The 7D is heavy, heavier than the 5D, but it's also slightly sturdier, with a build quality and weatherproofing that that's slightly in between the 5D and Canon's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5385446/canon-1d-mark-iv-the-5000-new-king-of-cameras">definitely pro 1D</a>. It feels about the same in your hand, though. And it's roughly comparable to the D300s.</p>
<p>Controls aren't radically different from other Canon DSLRs of this caliber&mdash;that is, it's what you'd mostly expect from a DSLR that sits in between <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5041734/canon-eos-50d-official-15+megapixel-prosumer-dslr-is-first-with-digic-4-processor">the lower end 50D</a> and the higher end 5DMkII, though it's a bit closer to the latter. While the menu system feels completely unchanged&mdash;leaving more advanced features, like the orientation autofocus a bit inscrutable&mdash;a few things are new on the outside: The power switch is up on the top left, under the mode dial; there's a dedicated button for switching to RAW/JPEG; a quick action button; and a new toggle switch for Live View and video, which you engage by pressing a start button in the center.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5397354,12,'7D Body Gallery');
</script></p>
<h1>You Already Know If You're Going to Buy This</h1>
<p>The real question for Canon users who want something more than the lower end 50D is whether they go for the 7D, at $1700, or full bore to full-frame with the $2700 5D Mark II. The 7D has a 1.6x crop factor which is useful for sports, a better autofocusing system, shoots faster, is slightly more rugged, and is $1000 cheaper. The 5D is full frame&mdash;which I suspect is the real consideration for folks&mdash;and takes slightly better photos at higher resolutions.</p>
<p>Obviously, if you're locked into Nikon, with thousands of dollars in lenses, you're not going to jump to Canon, or vice versa. But Canon's dedication to DSLR video is proving formidable in carving out a new kind of market that Nikon might have some trouble competing in, since they're a dedicated still camera company, not a video company, too, like Canon. Really, both the D300s and 7D deliver for the money, though I think the 7D delivers more, since it's packed full of newer technology and for the people who want it, the video component is truly killer. Either way, it's proof that competition is good&mdash;it clearly wouldn't exist without the D300, and the D400 will be that much better because of it.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3_02.jpg" width="20" height="20">New 19-point autofocus and metering systems plus the new viewfinder rock<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3_02.jpg" width="20" height="20">Excellent 1080p video with full manual controls<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/giznormal_02.jpg" width="20" height="20">Not full-frame, which might put off some people<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/giznormal_02.jpg" width="20" height="20">I'd like a secondary SD card slot, like the D300s<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizminus_02.jpg" width="20" height="20">Noise reduction can get pretty aggressive at higher ISO speeds, obscuring detail</p>
<p>BTW, here are some Giz posts shot w/ the 7D:<br>
&bull; <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5391825/motorola-droid-first-hands-on-its-a-terminator">Motorola Droid Impressions</a><br>
&bull; <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5396168/motorola-droid-review">Motorola Droid Review</a><br>
&bull; <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5392904/blood-energy-potion-review-mmm-true-blood">Blood Energy Potion Review</a><br>
&bull; <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5393132/blackberry-storm-2-review-improving-but-still-mostly-cloudy">BlackBerry Storm 2 Review</a><br>
&bull; <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5393112/canon-s90-review-itll-never-leave-my-pocket-except-when-im-taking-pictures">S90 Review</a></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5400595/canon-7d-review]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5400595]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[7d]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bestmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Canon EOS 7D]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dslrs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5400595&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[20 Terrifyingly Toxic Fast Food Photos]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/TharakaPathirage.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_TharakaPathirage.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>You may be <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/shooting-challenge">excellent photographers</a>, but some of you have atrocious (OK, delicious) taste in food. Here are winners of this week's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5395262/shooting-challenge-fast-food">Shooting Challenge: Fast Food</a>.</p>

<p><strong>First Place</strong><br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_ZachSlootsky.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />8 Bigmacs. Two SB-800 speedlights and on-camera flash (nikon CLS kicks ass) Nikon D80 I think at 1/125 f/5.6. Fast enough to shoot hand-held before it would tip over. The macs are skewered with two wooden kebab skewers to a piece of plasticine (unfortunately visible). Some photoshop curves and black and white mixing. -Zach Slootsky</p>
<p><strong>Second Place</strong><br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/TraskBedortha.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_TraskBedortha.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The Coburg Cafe's monster burger. Regular sized burger on top for size reference; 1 lb. hamburger, ham, bacon, swiss &amp; american, on an 8" bun w/all the fixins' -Trask Blueribbon [<em>Ed note: remember to tell us your camera/settings!</em>]</p>
<p><strong>Third Place</strong><br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/RobbieAmburgey.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_RobbieAmburgey.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>This photo was taken at my son's school cafeteria. We had lunch together. It was abysmal. Jello was good though. I snapped this photo with my Verizon HTC Touch. Basic settings. My technique was to hold back the vomit before I barfed on my phone. -Robbie Amburgey</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5398761,20,'');
</script></p>
<p>Thanks for the entries, and look for a more classic <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #shootingchallenge" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/shootingchallenge/">Shooting Challenge</a> topic next Monday&mdash;something more along the lines of photography for photography's sake. (Not that I don't love watching you poison yourselves in the name of art.)</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5398769/20-terrifyingly-toxic-fast-food-photos]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5398769]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[shooting challenge]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dslrs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fast food]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nikon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[slrs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398769&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Canon S90 Review: It'll Never Leave My Pocket (Except When I'm Taking Pictures)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/s90body__025.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_s90body__025.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>My first real camera was <a href="http://gdgt.com/canon/powershot/s50">a Canon S50</a>. I loved it. Canon let the pro compact S line die a few years later. It's back with <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5340815/canon-powershot-s90--pro-point+and+shoot-yes-pleeeeease">the S90</a>, though the only thing that's the same is that it's still awesome.</p>

<h1>Sex and Brains</h1>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/s90body__035.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_s90body__035.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>It's got the same <a href="http://gizmodo.com/383170/giz-explains-digital-camera-image-sensors">spacious image sensor</a> as <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5389028/canon-g11-review-makes-you-feel-like-a-real-photographer-almost">the G11</a>&mdash;1/1.7" as opposed to 1/2.5" like most point-and-shoots. But instead of being built into a Panzer tank, it's in the body of a hot German model. It's an actual point-and-shoot: It fits in the pocket of your skinny jeans, but delivers, for the most part, the same wow image quality.</p>
<p>I wish it was slightly more square with sharper angles for an even more classic aesthetic, but it's still pretty classy looking. The texture, which makes for half of the appeal, makes it a little slippery. The control ring around the lens is like the perfect scarf that ties it altogether. And despite being a bantam-weight shooter, it feels more solid than most cameras its size.</p>
<h1>Lord of the Ring</h1>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/s90body__038.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_s90body__038.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>What makes the camera really work is that control ring wrapped around the lens. By default, when you turn it, it adjusts the main setting for each mode&mdash;aperture in aperture priority, shutter speed in shutter priority, you get the idea. Using the ring function button on top of the camera, you can set the ring to adjust almost whatever parameter you want though, like white balance, ISO, exposure, even specific zoom intervals.</p>
<p>Truthfully, using the dial never feels <em>completely</em> seamless, because of way you're forced to hold the camera. As a result of its pint size, there's no completely natural hand or finger posture for spinning the ring. But, the control it manages to put at your fingertips is remarkable: In manual mode, I had aperture mapped to the main ring, exposure set to the control ring on the back (which, like the G11, is a little too small to have a settings dpad stuffed in the center of it) and ISO speed mapped to the shortcut button. The only real issue with that setup is that the ISO setting interface lags behind your input occasionally, so you sometimes overshoot the ISO speed you wanted.</p>
<h1>Just a Little More Hardware Talk</h1>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/s90body__036.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_s90body__036.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>There's no viewfinder, so you're stuck using the screen exclusively. The LCD is a little bigger than the G11's, at 3 inches, though it uses the same number of pixels and obviously doesn't swivel out. It too is easily viewable in sunlight, though I found a more of a difference, exposure-wise, between what I thought I shot according to the display and what I later saw on my computer, than I noticed with the G11. Also, there's no flash hot shoe, like you get with the G11.</p>
<p>The battery's small, obviously, so your picture taking is capped at a little over 200 shots, <a href="http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelInfoAct&fcategoryid=144&modelid=19210#ModelTechSpecsAct">according to Canon</a>. My days of shooting didn't contradict that, for better or for worse&mdash;I'd get to half battery after around 100 shots and a couple video clips.</p>
<h1>Finally, the Photos (and Video)</h1>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/s90shots__041.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_s90shots__041.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>Since it's the same 10-megapixel image sensor <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5389028/canon-g11-review-makes-you-feel-like-a-real-photographer-almost">as the G11</a>, yes, you do get just about the same fantastic image quality, solid low-light performance (noise doesn't start really kicking in til ISO 800, and even that's totally usable for most stuff) and ability to shoot in RAW. The main difference is in the lens. The S90 has a faster lens that'll shoot at F/2 wide open, meaning you rely less on that high ISO&mdash;up to 3200&mdash;to compensate for the lack of light. The oh-so-small price for this incredibly fast lens is that you lose a bit of zoom, since it goes out to 105mm, vs. the G11's 140mm, but who cares? I can't reiterate how big of a deal a lens like this is on this kind of point-and-shoot. That said, I seemed to get photos that were a <em>touch</em> less sharp than what I got on the G11.</p>
<p>Here's a gallery of some stuff I shot, which you can compare to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5388903/g11-sample-photos/gallery/">G11 sample photos</a> and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5388885/g11-iso-test-shots/gallery/">ISO tests</a> (spoiler, they look great):</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5393130,12,'Canon S90 photos');
</script></p>
<p>The video's still 640x480, and still quite good too:</p>
<p><object width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7342902&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7342902&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/7342902.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_7342902.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display: none;"/></a><br>
<script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5393109,8,'Canon S90');
</script></p>
<h1>Buy If You Need a Tiny-But-Great Camera</h1>
<p>I know, it's $430, way more than most point-and-shoots cost in this day and age. But the amount of picture power this literally slips into your pocket is almost unbelievable: Outstanding low-light performance for a camera this size; a speedy lens; full control rings, plural; and yep, RAW. It's the soul of what makes the $500 behemoth G11 great, packaged in a true point-and-shoot. You lose some power and some pro tools, like the swivel screen, a (shitty) viewfinder, faster burst shooting, hot shoe, some zoom and a custom mode or two, but you're also shedding a ton of bulk, meaning you'll actually take it everywhere. And the best camera's always the one you have with you&mdash;for me, that's this camera, which just happens to be an excellent one all by itself.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizplus3_05.jpg" width="20" height="20">G11's awesome image sensor plus a fastfastfast lens means awesome photos<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizplus3_05.jpg" width="20" height="20">Looks like a serious little camera (it is)<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizplus3_05.jpg" width="20" height="20">Did I mention I love this camera?<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/giznormal_12.jpg" width="20" height="20">Control ring can feel awkward<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizminus_12.jpg" width="20" height="20">More battery life and 720p video would be nice</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelInfoAct&fcategoryid=144&modelid=19210#ModelTechSpecsAct">Canon</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5393112/canon-s90-review-itll-never-leave-my-pocket-except-when-im-taking-pictures]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5393112]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bestmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon s90]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[point and shoot]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[S90]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5393112&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Terminator: Salvation's Director of Photography Asks: Can You Tell the Difference Between Film and Digital?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/Screen_shot_2009-10-27_at_10.33.20_PM.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_Screen_shot_2009-10-27_at_10.33.20_PM.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0403397/">Shane Hurlbut</a>, who's been DP on, ahem, illustrious projects like <em>Terminator: Salvation</em>, is a huge proponent of consumer DSLRs, especially the Canon <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #5dmkii" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/5dmkii/">5D MKII</a>. Now, he's challenging viewers to separate digital from film shots in his new movie. Can you?</p>
<p>Hurlbut is shooting a project based on Navy SEALs, and the trailer (of sorts; it's mostly an awful lot of bikini'd ladies) is shot with a mix of digital and film photography, using the digital Canon 5D MKII and Sony 950 as well as the Arri 235 film camera. He created kind of a contest to see who could pick out the digital shots from the film in the trailer (most is digital, shot with the 5D MKII)&mdash;it's way harder than you'd think, not least because the dude is clearly an expert. His wide-angle shots of a yacht and closeups of bikini-clad ladies may look like the intro to a Puff Daddy music video (<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHgXTaHLQYQ">sing it with me</a>: BEEN AROUND THE WORLD AND AYAYAY) but it is shockingly gorgeous and I'm hard-pressed to be able to tell the difference between digital and film. Check out the video <a href="http://www.hurlbutvisuals.com/">here</a>, and enter his contest <a href="http://hurlbutvisuals.com/blog/2009/10/25/wheres-the-5d/">here</a>. [<a href="http://hurlbutvisuals.com/blog/2009/10/25/wheres-the-5d/">Shane Hurlbut</a> via <a href="http://blog.vincentlaforet.com/2009/10/27/just-so-you-know-that-im-not-alone/">Vincent LaForet</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5391504/terminator-salvations-director-of-photography-asks-can-you-tell-the-difference-between-film-and-digital]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5391504]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[5d mkii]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon eos 5d mkii]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dslrs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shane hurlbut]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shane hurlbut contest]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 28 Oct 2009 03:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5391504&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Canon 7D's Continuous Mode May Retain Ghost Images From Previous Shot]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #continuousmode" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #continuousmode" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/continuousmode/">continuous mode</a>, Canon's 7D DSLR sometimes carries over ghost images from the previous shot, which sounds kinda cool but probably isn't cool at all to serious photogs. Canon should offer a fix via firmware upgrade soon. [<a href="http://www.cameratown.com/news/news.cfm?id=8356">Cameratown</a> via <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/10/27/canon-7d-shots-can-carry-over-ghost-image-to-next-shot-fix-imminent/">Crunchgear</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5391338/canon-7ds-continuous-mode-may-retain-ghost-images-from-previous-shot]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5391338]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[dslrs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon 7d]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon 7d ghost]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Canon EOS 7D]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[continuous mode]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[eos 7d]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[firmware]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ghosting]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:39:21 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5391338&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Canon G11 Review: Makes You Feel Like a Real Photographer (Almost)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/DSC_0075.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_DSC_0075.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>It's fat. It's $500. It takes fantastic photographs.</p>

<p>The G11 is Canon's top-of-the-line point-and-shoot. It occupies a sorta strange spot, towering over the average point-and-shoot in basically every metric&mdash;image quality, size, weight and price&mdash;but sits just below entry-level DSLRs and more recently, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5382689/panasonic-gf1-review-i-">micro four thirds cameras</a>.</p>
<p>So, there are two ways to look at the G11: It's an amazing street camera. More discreet than a DSLR, but more powerful than a run-of-the-mill point-and-shoot. You can't stuff it in your jeans pocket, but that's fine, because you want to sling it over your shoulder anyways. The other way is that you can buy a more versatile entry-level DSLR that's not much larger for around the same price, especially if you step back a generation or so.</p>
<p>It's all about your priorities.</p>
<h1>H-h-h-h-hardware</h1>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/DSC_0339.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_DSC_0339.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Everything about this camera is just&mdash;solid. The full-metal jacket makes it feel indestructible, while the shape evokes the classic cameras you feel like you're supposed to be taking photos with. It's thick, remarkably so, in part because of the flip-out swivel LCD screen. And it's definitely more along the lines of a rangefinder-style camera than a typical point-and-shoot.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/DSC_0382.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_DSC_0382.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The real magic of this camera lies in the dedicated control dials. You'll fine <em>three</em> on top&mdash;exposure compensation, ISO speed, and shooting mode. They feel cramped and tiny, at first, but the snap they make as as you rotate them is surprisingly deep and satisfying. Having these settings at your fingers at all times is so much of why the G11 feels like a camera that's a step above point-and-shoots, a tool for creating photographs.</p>
<p>The back dial is the most frustrating part of controlling the camera&mdash;a ring surrounds a four-way d-pad with a button in the center. Ultimately, you wind up pressing buttons on the d-pad when you're trying to rotate the dial to adjust shutter speed or aperture, or simply pressing the wrong button because it's so small. The menu system, otherwise, is a pretty standard Canon setup, which looks a lot like the G10's&mdash;it's not dead simple, but it's not overly complicated either, and a couple minutes of fiddling will reveal all of its secrets.</p>
<p>The viewfinder is utterly depressing. I want to use it, badly. It just feels intrinsically wrong to hold a camera of this caliber out in front of me to shoot, not up to my eyeball. Meanwhile, the G11's viewfinder is so small, and the coverage is so bad (you can see the lens through it!), that it's nigh useless, like trying to compose through a pinhole.</p>
<p>One of the shooting modes, quickshot, sounds like a good idea on paper, but is ruined by this viewfinder. The camera constantly adjusts parameters while waiting for you to take the photo, so you can fire off instantly without worrying about missing the shot. Unfortunately, you <em>have</em> to use the minuscule viewfinder in quickshot, and I wound up botching far more photos than I did nailing them.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/DSC_0371.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_DSC_0371.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>So, you're pretty trapped to using the decent flip-out swivel LCD display. Honestly, I probably would've preferred the static-but-larger 3-inch version on the G10, to the 2.8-inch, 461,000-dot display on the G11.</p>
<p>The LCD is really bright, though, and perfectly usable in direct sunlight, with a wide viewing angle to boot. But the video feed is not quite crisp enough on it to use it for manual focusing&mdash;in this mode, a zoomed in box appears in the center of the display as you spin the back dial to bring it into focus. The experience of focusing becomes a bad iPhone game.</p>
<h1>Can we talk about the photos please?</h1>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/IMG_0146.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_IMG_0146.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>With the G11, Canon pulled the bold maneuver of cutting megapixels&mdash;to 10, from 14 on the G10&mdash;in order to get better quality and low-light performance. It was the right move. Low-light images are definitely improved, and more detail is preserved up through ISO 800. Shots at ISO 1600 are definitely usable at web resolutions, which is pretty impressive for a compact camera. You should stay away from the special "low light" shooting mode, though, which cuts the size of pictures in half to try to extract every ounce of light possible&mdash;it produced uniformly bad pictures.</p>
<p>The G11 has a wide-angle zoom lens with the same basic specs as the G10, starting at 28mm and going up to 140mm, which is versatile enough to shoot just about anything you'd want. I'm not sure, however, if it corrects <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/CanonG10/page7.asp">some of the problems</a> at the wide-end with the macro mode, though, since I didn't have a G10 to compare it with.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5388885,8,'ISO Range tests');
</script><br>
The runthrough of the ISO range goes a couple ways&mdash;on programmed auto, letting the camera figure out what to make of the ISO setting I picked, and then another set where I dictated shutter speed, so you can see how much you gain (or lose, depending on your point of view) as you ratchet up the ISO setting.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5388903,8,'Sample Photos');
</script>Like past G series cameras, you can shoot in RAW, but if you do, you're stuck with using Canon's software to process it for the time being. In the full sample gallery above, I've marked the handful shot in RAW.</p>
<p><object width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7208864&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7208864&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/7208864.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_7208864.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display: none;"/></a><br>
In a world where phones and gadgets the size of a jumbo pack of Juicy Fruit shoot 720p, the fact that video's limited to 640x480 resolution on such a stacked camera gets a big frowny face. But, the video the G11 produces at that resolution is generally excellent (just compare to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5356015/ipod-nano-review">the video-shootin' iPod nano</a>). That's because it's packed with data&mdash;the bitrate averages around 10Mbps, which is more than <a href="http://store.theflip.com/MinoHD.aspx">the Flip Mino HD</a>, at 9Mbps for 720p video. That's why it looks so vibrant compared to a lot of the 720p video out there. Sure, 720p out of this would be nice, but I'd take VGA video that looks great over HD video that looks like crap.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5388786,8,'G11');
</script></p>
<h1>Okay, but do I buy it?</h1>
<p>I like this camera a lot. It's what I'd reach for whenever I wouldn't feel like tugging along a honkin' DSLR, and I'd feel like I wasn't sacrificing too much. The real question, I think, it how it stacks up against Panasonic's Lumix LX3, which is in the same demographic&mdash;a lauded $500 point-and-shoot&mdash;and <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/CanonG10/page9.asp">outgunned the G10</a> in many respects (though the G10 tried to cram 14 megapixels onto the same-sized sensor the G11 only squeezes 10 megapixels onto). The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5340815/canon-powershot-s90--pro-point+and+shoot-yes-pleeeeease">slightly cheaper S90</a> offers the same sensor as the G11 as well, and inside of a pocketable body&mdash;though you lose perks like the dedicated control dials and a viewfinder, as far as that's a perk on the G11.</p>
<p>If you do buy the G11, you won't regret it&mdash;you'll be too busy taking pictures.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizplus3_03.jpg" width="20" height="20">Photographs are top-notch for a compact camera<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizplus3_03.jpg" width="20" height="20">Solid low-light performance<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizplus3_03.jpg" width="20" height="20">Built to smash into people's spaces and live to smash again<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/giznormal_10.jpg" width="20" height="20">It's huge<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizminus_10.jpg" width="20" height="20">The viewfinder is basically useless</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelInfoAct&fcategoryid=144&modelid=19209">Canon</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5389028/canon-g11-review-makes-you-feel-like-a-real-photographer-almost]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5389028]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon g11 review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[g11]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[point and shoot]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5389028&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Camera Tattood in Time Lapse (by Another Camera)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/camtat.jpg"></a><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="500" height="281" data="http://www.flickr.com/apps/video/stewart.swf?v=71377" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000"><param name="flashvars" value="intl_lang=en-us&photo_secret=c1f0947a7f&photo_id=4027491253&hd_default=false">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.flickr.com/apps/video/stewart.swf?v=71377">
<param name="bgcolor" value="#000000">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.flickr.com/apps/video/stewart.swf?v=71377" bgcolor="#000000" allowfullscreen="true" flashvars="intl_lang=en-us&photo_secret=c1f0947a7f&photo_id=4027491253&hd_default=false" height="281" width="500"></object>Dabe Alan is got a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5378721/obsolete-gadget-tattoos-are-seven-shades-of-wrong">vintage gadget tattoo</a> of his own, but he shot the process in time lapse with a very modern Canon <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #5dmarkii" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/5dmarkii/">5d Mark ii</a> before editing this video in Final Cut Pro. Ouchies. [<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bearandyeti/4027491253/">Flickr</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5386603/camera-tattood-in-time-lapse-by-another-camera]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5386603]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[image cache]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[5d mark ii]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera tattoo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tattoo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tattoos]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5386603&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Canon 1D Mark IV: The $5000 New King of Cameras]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/1dsmarkiv.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_1dsmarkiv.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5385443/canon-1d-mark-iv-1080p-night-vision-videos-are-simply-incredible">videos are out</a>, and now so's the camera: $5000 buys you a 16MP DSLR that shoots at a whopping 102,400ISO with a new 45-point autofocus system, 10fps bursts, and oh yeah&mdash;<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5381043/nikon-d3s-dslr-has-night-vision-with-102400-iso-yes-you-read-that-right">suck it D3s</a>, incredible 1080p video.</p>

<p>The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #1dmarkiv" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/1dmarkiv/">1D Mark IV</a> uses an APS-H-sized 16-megapixel sensor that's "similar in size to a Super 35mm motion picture film frame" with a 1.3x crop factor (so not full-frame, booo) , and a normal ISO range of 100 to 12,800, with expanded going up to 102,400 ISO (like <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5381043/nikon-d3s-dslr-has-night-vision-with-102400-iso-yes-you-read-that-right">Nikon's fresh D3s</a>). The new 45-point autofocus system has 39 cross-type points and uses a new AI Servo II AF predictive focusing algorithm that's supposed to be faster, which is handy, since it shoots in 10fps bursts.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="500" height="281" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<param name="flashVars" value="s=ZT0xJmk9Njg2MzQ1ODIwJms9RWVEQ2EmYT0xMDAyNDEyMl9zcWh3RSZ1PXZpbmNlbnRsYWZvcmV0">
<param name="src" value="http://cdn.smugmug.com/ria/ShizVidz-2009090604.swf">
<embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="500" height="281" src="http://cdn.smugmug.com/ria/ShizVidz-2009090604.swf" flashvars="s=ZT0xJmk9Njg2MzQ1ODIwJms9RWVEQ2EmYT0xMDAyNDEyMl9zcWh3RSZ1PXZpbmNlbnRsYWZvcmV0" allowfullscreen="true"></object>But, let's talk about video, which Canon isn't too shy of making the star of this camera: You get full manual exposure control, stereo mic input, and 1080p video at 24, 25 or 30fps; 720p and standard def at 50 or 60fps; and the samples, while obviously Canon-vetted, so far <a href="http://vincentlaforet.smugmug.com/Laforet-Videos/Nocturne-Canon-1DMKIV-Video">look seriously amazing</a> (that's a link to a full-res1080p stream of the video above, by Vincent Laforet).</p>
<p>There's a new auto-lighting optimizer that automatically adjusts contrast and brightness in-camera that sounds sorta like Nikon's Active D-Lighting. And hurray, a new white balance algorithm that's better at low color temperatures, something that Nikon's typically been better with in the past.</p>
<p>It's coming out in December for $5000. Man, pro DSLRs just got way more interesting again. Six-digit ISO speeds, extreme low-light performance , high-def video: It's a war.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5385465,3,'');
</script></p>
<blockquote>
<p>INTRODUCING THE ULTIMATE MULTIMEDIA IMAGING SOLUTION:<br>
THE NEW CANON EOS-1D MARK IV DIGITAL SLR CAMERA</p>
<p>The EOS-1D Mark IV Features a Completely Redesigned 45-Point Autofocus System, Fast 10 fps Continuous Shooting, 16-Megapixel Resolution, Outstanding ISO Sensitivity, and Full HD Video Recording at Selectable Frame Rates</p>
<p>LAKE SUCCESS, N.Y., October 20, 2009 – Canon U.S.A., Inc., a leader in digital imaging, is proud to introduce the next evolution in the EOS 1D series of cameras: the Canon EOS-1D Mark IV Digital SLR camera. The EOS-1D Mark IV is a high-speed multimedia performance monster with a 16-megapixel Canon CMOS sensor, Dual DIGIC 4 Imaging Processors, and 14-bit A/D data conversion, all at 10 frames-per-second (fps), with the widest ISO range Canon has produced to date. This new camera also features 1080p Full High-Definition video capture at selectable frame rates packaged in Canon's most rugged and durable professional camera body.</p>
<p>The crowning achievement of Canon's 1D Mark IV Digital SLR is its new autofocus system that starts with 45 AF points including 39 high-precision cross-type focusing points capable of tracking fast moving athletes or wildlife accurately at speeds up to 10 frames per second. With greater subject detection capability than ever before plus a newly redesigned AI Servo II AF predictive focusing algorithm, the Canon EOS-1D Mark IV camera sets new standards for autofocus performance among professional digital SLRs. Whether shooting for the six o'clock news or the front page, the EOS-1D Mark IV Digital SLR is the quintessential camera to freeze fast-moving action with high-speed stills or capture stunning HD video with dynamic color and image quality. To accompany the new EOS-1D Mark IV Digital SLR camera, Canon is also announcing a new accessory, the WFT-E2 II A wireless file transmitter providing photographers with a wide range of professional digital connectivity options.</p>
<p>"Canon works hard to be the imaging leader in all our business endeavors. This goal has fueled our innovation and R&D efforts to engineer the most advanced autofocus system Canon has ever produced. We are proud to announce the camera that will deliver the ultimate in imaging quality to professionals working in all areas of multimedia imaging, whether it's action photography, photojournalism or HD video and cinematography," stated Yuichi Ishizuka, senior vice president and general manager, Consumer Imaging Group, Canon U.S.A.</p>
<p>The Canon EOS-1D Mark IV camera will intrigue professional photographers in virtually every category from photojournalism and sports through nature, wedding, portrait and fashion to commercial, industrial and law enforcement. What makes the EOS-1D Mark IV camera different from its predecessors, in addition to numerous focusing system and image quality improvements, is its exceptional Full HD video capture capability. With this new level of functionality, the 1D Mark IV Digital SLR is destined to appeal not only to professional still photographers but also to a diverse market of professional videographers and filmmakers who are looking for exceptional Full HD video quality, amazing low-light performance, outstanding portability and a level of durability unheard of in most HD video cameras in this price range.</p>
<p>New 45-Point Autofocus System<br>
The new EOS-1D Mark IV Digital SLR camera features Canon's most advanced Autofocus system to date. It is equipped with a newly developed 45-point AF sensor featuring 39 high-precision cross-type AF points, and an all new AI Servo II AF mode that gives still photographers the power and performance to track and focus a fast-moving subject at speeds up to 10 frames per second. With more than twice as many cross-type focusing points as the EOS-1D Mark III and a new AF sensor construction that improves performance in low light and with low contrast subjects, the EOS-1D Mark IV has greater subject detection capabilities than any previous EOS model. To complete the range of AF improvements, Canon has developed a new AI Servo II AF predictive focusing algorithm that significantly improves responsiveness and stability by making better decisions on focus tracking in a variety of shooting conditions.</p>
<p>Amazing High ISO Performance<br>
Wedding and event photographers shooting in low light without the benefit of a flash can take advantage of Canon's widest ISO range and highest performance ever. The EOS-1D Mark IV camera's ISO speed settings range from 100 up to 12,800 in 1/3 or 1/2 stop increments with ISO Expansion settings of L: 50 for bright light or H1: 25,600, H2: 51,200, and H3: 102,400 for even the most dimly lit situations. Photographers and documentary filmmakers working in available light will be impressed by the low-noise image quality of the 1D Mark IV, capturing amazing still images and video footage even at speed settings as high as ISO 12,800. High ISO, low light still images are further enhanced by Canon's adjustable High ISO Noise Reduction feature, now a default setting in the camera.</p>
<p>The EOS-1D Mark IV, EOS HD Video Powerhouse<br>
Over the past year, Canon's EOS HD Video technology has changed the way users capture 1080p HD video and opened new doors for multimedia journalists and Hollywood cinematographers alike with full manual exposure control, selectable frame rates, and interchangeable lenses on some of the largest and most sensitive image sensors on the market. Canon continues this innovation trend with the new EOS-1D Mark IV Digital SLR with Full HD capture and full manual exposure control, plus selectable frame rates on an all-new APS-H-sized image sensor that's similar in size to a Super 35mm motion picture film frame. The large sensor allows filmmakers to achieve shallow depth-of-field just as cinematographers have traditionally done using much higher-cost motion picture equipment.</p>
<p>The more than 50 Canon EF lenses compatible with the EOS-1D Mark IV give videographers incredible creative options, including an impressive selection of large-aperture professional L-series primes as well as zoom lenses, macro, Tilt-Shift and Fisheye optics. The Canon EOS-1D Mark IV allows for three video recording resolutions – 1080p Full HD and 720p HD in a 16:9 aspect ratio and Standard Definition (SD) in a 4:3 aspect ratio. The camera will record Full HD at 1920 x 1080 in selectable frame rates of 24p (23.976), 25p, or 30p (29.97); and 720p HD or SD video recording at either 50p or 60p (59.94). SD video can be recorded in either NTSC or PAL standards. Sound is recorded either through the internal monaural microphone or via optional external microphones connected to the stereo microphone input. The camera also provides an in-camera video editing function allowing users to remove the start or ending of a video clip directly in the camera to eliminate unwanted footage and speed up post-production.</p>
<p>Image Quality and Performance<br>
The heart of the EOS-1D Mark IV camera's outstanding image quality is a newly developed 16.1-Megapixel CMOS sensor featuring Canon's latest and most advanced proprietary technologies. These technologies include improved photodiode construction to enhance dynamic range and gapless microlenses that are positioned closer to the photodiodes for improved light gathering efficiency. The transmissive quality of the color filter array has been enhanced to improve sensitivity. Canon has also upgraded the sensor circuitry to improve noise reduction before the image data is exported from the CMOS sensor to the rest of the image processing chain.</p>
<p>With 60 percent more pixels than the EOS-1D Mark III, the EOS-1D Mark IV Digital SLR employs Dual DIGIC 4 Image Processors with approximately six times the processing power of DIGIC III for full 14-bit A/D conversion at 10 fps. High-speed continuous shooting up to 121 Large JPEGs is possible using a UDMA CF card. This camera also features three RAW shooting modes for versatility with Full RAW (approx. 16 million pixels), M-RAW (approx. nine million pixels), and S-RAW (approx. four million pixels). Three additional JPEG recording formats (M1, M2 and Small) are also available.</p>
<p>The 14-bit per channel conversion facilitated by the dual DIGIC 4 Processors provides smoother tonalities in final images capturing all 16,384 distinct tones in each channel (red, green and blue) at the full 10 fps frame rate. RAW images shot on the new Canon EOS-1D Mark IV use the entire 14-bit space when converted to 16-bit TIFF files in Canon Digital Photo Professional (DPP) software, which is supplied with the camera at no extra charge. The 14-bit A/D conversion is also the foundation for Canon's Highlight Tone Priority feature that takes maximum advantage of the camera's extensive dynamic range to preserve detail in highlight areas of the image. Canon's new EOS-1D Mark IV Digital SLR also features an improved white balance algorithm making colors more accurate when shooting under low color temperature light sources such as household tungsten lamps.</p>
<p>The EOS-1D Mark IV Digital SLR features Canon's Peripheral Illumination Correction function which corrects darkening that can occur in the corners of images with most lenses when used at their largest apertures. When activated, it is automatically applied to JPEG images and video clips as they are shot. For RAW images, it can be applied in DPP software.</p>
<p>Other new features include a large three-inch solid structure Clear View II LCD screen with 920,000 dot/VGA resolution and a wide 160-degree viewing angle for enhanced clarity and more precise color when reviewing images and shooting video. The new in-camera copyright information feature helps professionals secure control over images by setting copyright data directly into the camera and appending that information to each image file in the Exif metadata. Additional features include a fluorine coating on the Low Pass Filter to further repel dust and enhance the EOS Integrated Cleaning System.</p>
<p>Minimize Post-Production with Enhanced Canon Auto Lighting Optimizer<br>
Action photography truly is all about speed, capturing a fast subject with fast focusing and fast frame rates. However, all this speed might be wasted if it is slowed down by lengthy post-production procedures to adjust image quality. The EOS-1D Mark IV Digital SLR helps reduce post-production work with a powerful new Auto Lighting Optimizer (ALO) system. When enabled, Canon's ALO automatically adjusts the image for optimal brightness and contrast on the fly during in-camera image processing, reducing clipped highlights while keeping shadowed areas as clear and detailed as they actually appear. By optimizing brightness and contrast in-camera, Canon's ALO system significantly reduces the need for post-production image optimization, and gives photographers image quality they can take directly to press. Demanding professional photographers who tested ALO clearly stated that this one feature will reduce their post-production image optimization process by more than 75 percent. Canon's ALO works with both RAW[i] and JPEG images as well as video recording.</p>
<p>Rugged Reliability<br>
Canon has taken every measure to ensure that the EOS-1D Mark IV Digital SLR camera has the highest degree of weather resistance in the EOS line. The 1D Mark IV camera incorporates a wide range of design features that enhance its durability and reliability for professional assignments. For example, the 1D Mark IV's body, chassis and lens mount are completely weather-resistant and 76 gaskets and seals surround all buttons and seams. The body covers and internal chassis, including the mirror box, are constructed with magnesium-alloy, one of the strongest and rigid metals available for its weight. For added strength, the lens mount is constructed with stainless steel. In fact, when used with Canon's Speedlite 580EX II and/or most current L-series lenses, the entire camera system remains fully weather resistant, so professionals can concentrate on getting the shot instead of worrying about protecting their gear.</p>
<p>New Wireless Connectivity<br>
Canon is announcing the availability of the new WFT-E2 II A* wireless file transmitter exclusively for the EOS-1D Mark IV Digital SLR camera. The WFT-E2 II A wireless transmitter is an extremely small and versatile device that offers professional photographers a wide range of digital connectivity options including IEEE802.11a/b/g and Ethernet, ideal for commercial and studio work. In addition to adding the ability to connect to wireless networks over 802.11a, the new WFT-E2 II A adds a wealth of new professional features to the photographer's tool kit. The new Camera Linking feature allows a single photographer to simultaneously fire up to 10 cameras remotely; and the updated WFT Server mode lets you remotely use Live View, control settings, and fire the EOS-1D Mark IV over the internet from anywhere in the world using a standard Web browser or many Web-enabled smart phones. Additionally, geotagging is now possible via Bluetooth, using compatible GPS devices to append coordinate data to the images.</p>
<p>Pricing and Availability<br>
The Canon EOS-1D Mark IV Digital SLR camera is scheduled to be delivered to U.S. dealers in late December, and will be sold in a body-only configuration at an estimated retail price of $4,999.00[ii]. Final pricing and availability for the Canon WFT-E2 II A wireless file transmitter will be available later this year.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>[<a href="http://usa.canon.com">Canon</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5385446/canon-1d-mark-iv-the-5000-new-king-of-cameras]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5385446]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[1d mark iv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon 1D Mark IV]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dslrs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:03:26 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5385446&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Canon 1D Mark IV 1080p Night Vision Videos Are Simply Incredible]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/1dmarkiv.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_1dmarkiv.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Canon's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #1dmarkiv" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/1dmarkiv/">1D Mark IV</a> is real: Vincent Laforet, who shot the first videos <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5052767/a-taste-of-the-canon-5d-mark-iis-mindblowing-full-hd-video">using the 5D Mark II</a> was the first to take out the 1D Mark IV, and <a href="http://blog.vincentlaforet.com/2009/10/19/lights-out-camera-action/">the result</a>, using entirely ambient light, is just astounding.</p>

<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="500" height="281" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<param name="flashVars" value="s=ZT0xJmk9Njg2MzQ1ODIwJms9RWVEQ2EmYT0xMDAyNDEyMl9zcWh3RSZ1PXZpbmNlbnRsYWZvcmV0">
<param name="src" value="http://cdn.smugmug.com/ria/ShizVidz-2009090604.swf">
<embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="500" height="281" src="http://cdn.smugmug.com/ria/ShizVidz-2009090604.swf" flashvars="s=ZT0xJmk9Njg2MzQ1ODIwJms9RWVEQ2EmYT0xMDAyNDEyMl9zcWh3RSZ1PXZpbmNlbnRsYWZvcmV0" allowfullscreen="true"></object>The basic specs of the camera are what was rumored: 1D body, 1.3x crop, 10fps bursts, a new autofocus system, and 60fps shooting at 720p with 24 and 30fps at 1080p. Canon's official release isn't out yet, so we'll make do with Vincent's videos for now. The main thing to understand, he says, is that "the short film you are about to watch was shot in pretty much the very worst light that I could possibly find in an evening urban landscape." You'll have <a href="http://vincentlaforet.smugmug.com/Laforet-Videos/Nocturne-Canon-1DMKIV-Video">to watch it here</a> for now, but it's worth making the jump.</p>
<p>It may target a different audience than <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5381043/nikon-d3s-dslr-has-night-vision-with-102400-iso-yes-you-read-that-right">Nikon's D3s</a>, but begun, the light wars have. [<a href="http://blog.vincentlaforet.com/2009/10/19/lights-out-camera-action/">Vincent Laforet</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5385443/canon-1d-mark-iv-1080p-night-vision-videos-are-simply-incredible]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5385443]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[1d mark iv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon 1D Mark IV]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dslrs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 19 Oct 2009 23:41:43 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5385443&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Canon 1D Mark IV Pro DSLR Revealed Tomorrow?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/canoon.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_canoon.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Canon's pro DSLRs are <em>Holy Grail</em> ancient at this point, so something's gotta be coming soon: It might the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #1dmarkiv" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/1dmarkiv/">1D Mark IV</a>, as early as tomorrow. <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/10/canon-eos-1d-mark-v-cr1/">People</a>, inventory systems and <a href="http://www.photographybay.com/2009/10/19/canon-1d-mark-iv-coming-tuesday-oct-20/">invitations</a> are talking.</p>
<p>The rumored specs are for a 16MPish APS-H sensor (1.3x crop factor) with bursts of 10-12fps, 19-point autofocus system, and the same kind of <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5349829/canon-7d-dslr-first-hands-on-18-megapixels-24fps-full-hd-video-for-1900">1080p video powers as the 7D</a>. Price? $5000.</p>
<p>Even if it's not tomorrow, it can't be too much longer before we see some 1D and 1Ds Mark IV action, since Canon can't let <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5381043/nikon-d3s-dslr-has-night-vision-with-102400-iso-yes-you-read-that-right">Nikon have all the pro fun</a>, after all. [<a href="http://www.photographybay.com/2009/10/19/canon-1d-mark-iv-coming-tuesday-oct-20/">Photography Bay</a>, <a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/10/canon-eos-1d-mark-v-cr1/">Canon Rumors</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5384805/canon-1d-mark-iv-pro-dslr-revealed-tomorrow]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5384805]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[1d]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[1d mark iv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon 1D Mark IV]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dslrs]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:27:38 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5384805&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New Canon iPhone App Prints Wirelessly to Your PIXMA]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/CanoniPhoneApp.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_CanoniPhoneApp.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>If you've used a Canon printer, you're probably familiar with the bundled Easy-PhotoPrint software. They've now streamlined it for the iPhone interface, and the free app works with Canon's newest wireless multifunction PIXMA printers.</p>
<p>HP has had its own simple but effective <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=299531647&mt=8">iPrint app</a> (iTunes Link) for a while now, and from first glance, Canon's app looks to at least be as good, if not a touch more mature.</p>
<p>The polished interface lets you select paper sizes, find wireless printers, print borderless photos, and select photos from multiple albums stored on your iPhone or iPod touch.</p>
<p>The main drawback: support is currently limited to Canon's MP990, MP640, and MP560 MFPs. It would be nice if any Canon printer hooked up to a Wi-Fi network also worked, but we'll have to wait and see. [<a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=331269951&mt=8&uo=6">iTunes Store</a> | <a href="http://www.usa.canon.com/templatedata/pressrelease/20091014_iphone_print_app.html">Canon</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5383108/new-canon-iphone-app-prints-wirelessly-to-your-pixma]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5383108]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[app]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[app store]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[printer]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 16 Oct 2009 08:56:25 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5383108&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[HP Photosmart Premium Web Printer Review: Your Mom Will Love It]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/HP_Photosmart_Premium_top_do-over.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_HP_Photosmart_Premium_top_do-over.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>HP puffed its chest when <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5299801/hp-photosmart-premium-with-touchsmart-web-is-the-worlds-first-web+connected-printer">announcing the Photosmart Premium</a> web-connected touch-enabled printer, and I understand why. You can print coloring books, movie tickets and news reports without even <em>owning</em> a computer. It works, and works well.</p>
<h2>The Gadget</h2>
<p>What the hell is it? It's a $400 Wi-Fi printer all-in-one (yes, this includes fax). It has a touchscreen that includes a string of different branded widgets. The widgets do many things you can do on your cellphone or a computer, but they all center around printing. So you don't just order movie tickets, you print them out, along with weather reports, blank to-do lists, Google calendars, coloring book pages from Nickelodeon and Disney, news synopses from USA Today and coupons for everything from Hasbro toys to Yoplait yogurt.</p>
<h2>The Price</h2>
<p>$400. Count 'em. That's more than twice what most similarly classed all-in-ones cost.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5373237,4,'');
</script></p>
<h2>The Widgets&mdash;and What's Missing</h2>
<p>In case you're not picking up on this, regular Giz readers may not be the target audience. It's as much an arts-and-crafts hub as it is a don't-want-to-mess-with-a-computer resource, full of easy-access widgets that scream out "overworked mother of five," with barely anything for "twentysomething nerd." (Honestly, I can picture Kristin Wiig using this and making one of those weird smiles of surprised satisfaction.) Still, I was impressed by the diversity and wealth of resources this thing has&mdash;at launch.</p>
<p>Here's what it still needs though, and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5354239/theres-a-printer-app-for-that-hp-launches-app-studio-for-its-photosmart-premium-with-touchsmart-web">has the SDK to provide</a>, so listen up, developers:</p>
<p>&bull; Driving directions - Google Maps is included, but for now you can just print the actual maps. A note says that driving directions are coming soon, and that just isn't soon enough. Hurry!</p>
<p>&bull; Boarding passes - Airlines widgets would be glorious: With all the emphasis on printing out boarding passes at home, how about a way to log into Delta or United and pull up your latest boarding passes?</p>
<p>&bull; Email - I swear HP had some device that printed emails out for old people who didn't like computers but liked hearing from their grandkids. Why isn't that app on here?</p>
<p>&bull; Epicurious - There's already a recipe widget, and you can already sift through nearly 600 dishes, but that's not satisfactory. Let's have proven content from the culinary maestros.</p>
<p>&bull; Sesame Street - As a dad, I am impressed with all the coloring and crafts that you can do with this thing, but if there's no Elmo, someone's gonna cry.</p>
<h2>The Performance</h2>
<p>I realize I've used up most of your attention talking about the services, and that's because the printer itself works fine. I have criticized HP's color palette in the past, but ever since <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5161352/why-i-now-hate-epson-printers">my Epson blowout</a>, I have given up on trying to find "the best printer" in all aspects. Epson may still have the absolute best color representation, but here I found a printer that jumped onto my Wi-Fi network faster than anything I've seen from Epson or Canon, and soon started spitting out out perfectly usable snapshots&mdash;not just from my computer but from my iPhone, using HP's simple but effective <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=299531647&mt=8">iPrint Photo app</a>. It's a quick printer, if you don't count the painfully long "one-time" ink initialization period or inkjet head calibration.</p>
<p>An odd, random note: In the gallery you may notice that it comes inside of an eco-friendly reusable bag. I was like, oh, I see, HP gets it, but then I noticed that <i>inside</i> that bag was another, plastic, eco-not-so-friendly bag. One or the other, HP. Pretty sure wrapping old-fashioned plastic inside newfangled recycled bags is like worse, not better.</p>
<h2>The Verdict</h2>
<p>Do I think you should spend $400 on this printer? Not for your bachelor pad, dorm room or group home, that's for sure. But do I think you and the rest of the fam chip in to get this thing for mom for Christmas? To quote one of the more famous moms of our time, "You betcha."</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/gizplus3.jpg"> Possibly the easiest Wi-Fi setup experience I've had to date</p>
<p><br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/gizplus3.jpg"> Fast, decent print quality using HP premium print paper</p>
<p><br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/gizplus3.jpg"> Amazing diversity of widgets for printing coupons, coloring books, movie tickets and more</p>
<p><br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/giznormal_01.jpg"> Designed for a full house, with kids in need of boredom relief, and parents in need of quick data and services&mdash;it's not for everyone</p>
<p><br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/gizminus_01.jpg"> The $400 price is twice what other all-in-one printers in this class cost, so basically the widgets cost you $200</p>
<p><br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/gizminus_01.jpg"> Launch was great, but there's a lot of fluff in the content lineup, and it's missing key applications that would make it a must-have appliance</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5373241/hp-photosmart-premium-web-printer-review-your-mom-will-love-it]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5373241]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[epson]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hp]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hp photosmart premium]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Photosmart premium]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[printers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[touchsmart]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[touchsmart with web connect]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5373241&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New High-Def Home Video From The Edge of Space]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/HDSpace.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_HDSpace.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>This amazing video was shot by a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5340725/canon-vixia-hf-s11-camcorder-can-film-an-entire-day-of-your-life">Canon Vixio-HF camcorder</a> attached to a hydrogen balloon launched by a small group of Edmonton radio enthusiasts on August 24. It's believed to be the first amateur video taken at 107,145 feet.</p>
<p>The mission was dubbed BEAR-4 (Balloon Experiments with Amateur Radio), and used an 1800g balloon for a total weight of about 3.84lbs.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/BEARcamera.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_BEARcamera.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>The camera was kept in place by foam blocks, and hooked up to five AAA Lithium L91 battery cells. With the extra legs, it captured almost four and half hours of footage. Mercifully, they've edited that down for the results you see below. [<a href="http://bear.sbszoo.com/bear3-4/bear4.htm">BEAR</a>]</p>
<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Lie0diOhfdg&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Lie0diOhfdg&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object></p>
<p><strong>Bonus:</strong> remember those kids who <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5358667/mit-students-explain-how-to-photograph-space-for-150">photographed space for $150</a>? They've now put together a time lapse video of all the photos their rig took during its flight. Not quite as cool (or expensive) as the video above, though. [<a href="http://space.1337arts.com/hardware">L337arts</a>]</p>
<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_1"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/MCBBRRp9DOQ&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/MCBBRRp9DOQ&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5366687/new-high+def-home-video-from-the-edge-of-space]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5366687]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[balloons]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Canon Vixio HF]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[diy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[earth's curvature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[edge of space]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[experiment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[High Definition Video space]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[space photo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[stratosphere]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 24 Sep 2009 07:35:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5366687&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Concept Windows 7 Ads Shot With 5D Mark II Set The Bar High]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/O4FbtCHUIss&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/O4FbtCHUIss&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object>Microsoft is set to bombard us all with <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged WINDOWS 7" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows-7/">Windows 7</a> ads around the October 22nd launch&mdash;and director Marty Martin's concept spots are setting the bar high.</p>
<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_1"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/g1p1_JNCEds&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/g1p1_JNCEds&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object></p>
<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_2"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-aoAGRt3ln0&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/-aoAGRt3ln0&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object>The spots are all the more impressive when you find out that they were shot with the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/canon-5d-mark-ii/">Canon 5D Mark II</a> for Microsoft on a tight 3-day deadline. Hopefully, Martin's work is a good indicator of where Microsoft plans to take the campaign. [<a href="http://www.istartedsomething.com/20090907/a-taste-windows-7-advertising-to-come/">istartedsomething</a> via <a href="http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2009/09/concept-windows-7-ads-show-off-the-product-well.ars?utm_source=microblogging&utm_medium=arstch&utm_term=Main%20Account&utm_campaign=microblogging">ars technica</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5355644/concept-windows-7-ads-shot-with-5d-mark-ii-set-the-bar-high]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5355644]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[5d mark ii]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon 5d mark ii]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:50:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5355644&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Canon 7D DSLR First Hands On: 18 Megapixels, 24FPS Full HD Video for $1900]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/IMG_5974_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_IMG_5974_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Yep, <a rhef="http://gizmodo.com/5340910/canon-eos-7d-glimpse-details-leaked">it's real</a>. The Canon 7D is an 18-megapixel semi-pro DSLR that shoots 1080p video in 24&mdash;or 30&mdash;glorious frames per second for $1899, kicking <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5326020/nikon-d300s-dslr-adds-720p-hd-video-with-stereo-input-sd-slot-to-d300">Nikon's previously unchallenged D300s</a> where it hurts. But it's also an odd little beast.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5349815,8,'Canon 7D');
</script>The 7D feels like Canon took the results of a survey they handed out to people about what they wanted in a camera and crammed 'em all into one product targeted at semi-pros. Full HD video with manual exposure in 24, 25 or 30 frames per second, check. More rugged, weatherproof body than 5D, check. Customizable buttons, including a new multifunction button, check. A dedicated button for switching to RAW+JPEG mode. Um, check. Electronic axis level? Also check. It has dual DIGIC IV image processors, the first model outside of the pro 1Ds line with dual image processors for fast burst shooting: 8FPS with 94-shot JPEG bursts (124 with UDMA card) or 15 RAW shots, all at full resolution with 14-bit A/D conversion.</p>
<p>But, it's not full-frame: They've crammed 18 megapixels into an APS-C-sized sensor (like in the Rebel series or 50D, versus full-frame in the 5D) with an ISO range from 100-6400, and a Hi setting of 12,800. Canon says they've shortened the distance between the photodiodes in the sensor, which decreases light falloff, supposedly translating into better high ISO performance.</p>
<p>We got to shoot with a beta pre-production model for a little while in midtown using a couple of Canon's new EF-S lenses&mdash;a 15-85mm ($800, coming in Oct.) that's replacing the old 17-85mm, and a 100mm macro lens ($1050, out in Sept.)&mdash;so you can see some of the low-light results, along with other samples, below. (Again, Canon would like us to reiterate that the pictures are from a pre-production sample, i.e., not final product.)</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5349830,8,'7D Samples Images');
</script></p>
<p>Here's a close-up on those guitars comparing the different ISO levels. At ISO1600, it's not <em>so</em> bad, even if it's not 5D level, but it starts getting kinda gruesome at ISO3200 (click to make bigger): <a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/ISOcompare.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_ISOcompare.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Video</strong><br>
It <em>might</em> just be the best video on a DSLR yet: Manual exposure from the get-go, and oh yeah, the ability to shoot 1080p video at 30, 24 or 25 frames per second. If you cut it to 720p, you can shoot up to 60FPS. Also, video is encoded using H.264 now. There's a dedicated switch to flip from shooting stills to video that encircles a start/stop button for recording, so it's much easier to get right to shooting video than the 5D. You can see some sample videos below:</p>
<p><object width="502" height="377" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=6370832&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=6370832&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="377" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/6370832.jpg"></a></p>
<p><object width="502" height="377" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_1"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=6370469&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=6370469&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="377" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/6370469.jpg"></a></p>
<p><strong>Everything Else</strong><br>
Okay, so what else? Focusing system has 19 cross-type points, with a new way to focus in addition to the usual full-blast autofocus vs. single-point&mdash;zones, which are clusters of points. You can also lock different default focus points for horizontal and vertical orientations, so you can turn the camera back and worth without having to repick your focus point. (Setting it up is a little confusing&mdash;even the Canon rep took a minute to make it happen.) AI servo focus is supposedly smarter, so it tracks moving objects better, and it works with a new light-source detection system that adjusts for flickering light. (We didn't get a chance to check that out.)</p>
<p>The viewfinder provides 100 percent coverage, like the 1Ds, and it uses a new polymer LCD network with a different graphics overlay than the 5D&mdash;that's a lot like what Nikon's got in the D300, actually&mdash;so it can do things like display the neat new 3D-axis electronic level in the viewfinder (which feels like an iPhone tilt game from hell if you're holding the camera by hand trying to level it on both axes). In a first for Canon, the built-in, wide-coverage flash can command other wireless flash modules.</p>
<p>Oh, did I mention a ton of new buttons? Seriously: A dedicated RAW+JPEG button that'll shoot your next shot in RAW+JPEG if you're only shooting one at the moment. A new start/stop live view button with a control ring to quickly switch from live view to video mode. There's also a new multi-function button on the top right. Aaand another for the custom controls menu, where you can assign different features to different buttons if you want.</p>
<p>Honestly, a lot of the deep customization and new interface commands were confusing, at least in the short time I spent with the camera&mdash;like setting different autofocus points for whether you're holding the camera vertically or horizontally. There was some other shortcut that required pressing and holding two buttons at once on the camera. And I never <em>quite</em> understood how to use the multifunction button or pick what graphical display showed up in my viewfinder. I think you would learn a lot of that stuff in time, though. In terms of overall handfeel, I slightly the ergonomics and weight of the D300, FWIW.</p>
<p>The WFT-E5A wireless transmitter for the 7D sounds pretty excellent too: Wireless a/b/g allows you to connect up to 10 cameras ad hoc and remotely control them via smartphone. Also you can transfer photos to any DLNA device. And, finally, you can geotag via Bluetooth. Sadly, it's not coming 'til November and it's 700 bucks.</p>
<p><strong>Final Thoughts</strong><br>
While we can't give any final judgments on this in some ways odd camera until we get a review unit, one thing seems certain: The value proposition for <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5326020/nikon-d300s-dslr-adds-720p-hd-video-with-stereo-input-sd-slot-to-d300">Nikon's $1800 D300s</a>&mdash;which might've already seemed dicey, given that it's the guts of a 2-year-old camera with a dash of limited 720p video&mdash;just got a lot less enticing, simply on account of the 7D's fairly wide video powers. That's before you even take anything else into consideration, like more pixels for more crop potential (if the pixels are good ones, that is). Obviously, we'll be head-to-heading these two as soon as we can. Which should be shortly, since the 7D is due by the end of next month, at $1900 for the kit with an 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 lens, or $1700 body only.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>CANON U.S.A. REDEFINES MID-RANGE DSLR CATEGORY WITH<br>
THE NEW <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged EOS 7D" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/eos-7d/">EOS 7D</a> DIGITAL SLR CAMERA</p>
<p>The EOS 7D Features Fast Eight fps Continuous Shooting, Class-Leading 18-Megapixel Resolution<br>
and Full HD Video Recording with Variable Frame Rates and Manual Exposure Control</p>
<p>LAKE SUCCESS, N.Y., September 1, 2009 – Canon U.S.A., Inc., a leader in digital imaging, today introduced a revolutionary camera that redefines the highly competitive mid-range DSLR product category: the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged CANON EOS 7D" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/canon-eos-7d/">Canon EOS 7D</a> Digital SLR camera. Professional photographers and advanced amateurs have been demanding higher performance and more diverse functions in their cameras, and Canon has answered – with the new EOS 7D. Far more than a slight improvement from a previous model, the EOS 7D DSLR is a brand new product that stands on its own with new features never before seen in any Canon camera. Whether it's shooting at eight frames per second (fps), focusing with the new Zone AF mode or recording 24p Full HD video, the EOS 7D DSLR camera satisfies the most rigorous professional requirements with durability, flexibility, high-resolution images and customizable controls. With its unprecedented out-of-the-box performance and high-end feature set, the EOS 7D is poised as the ultimate step-up camera for serious photographers or a second camera for professionals in the field.</p>
<p>The EOS 7D boasts significant EOS advancements including a completely new 19-point Autofocus system, a new Canon iFCL Metering System (Intelligent Focus, Color, Luminance) and a new Intelligent Viewfinder. An 18-megapixel Canon CMOS sensor and Dual DIGIC 4 Imaging Processors fuel the EOS 7D's 14-bit A/D data conversion and its ability to freeze fast motion in high-resolution with eight fps continuous shooting up to 126 Large JPEGS using a UDMA CF card, positioning this camera for the studio as well as the sideline. The EOS 7D captures beautiful low-light images with or without a flash, at occasions such as a dance recital or wedding reception, thanks to a wide range of ISO speed settings from 100-6400 (expandable to 12,800). In addition to its new still capture capabilities, the EOS 7D features Full HD video capture at 1920 x 1080 resolution with selectable frame rates of 24p, 25p or 30p. Native 24p recording helps videographers achieve a more cinema-style look for their footage without the need for post-processing.</p>
<p>"The EOS 7D represents a completely new chapter in digital photography and Canon product development. This camera stands alone as the most functional and innovative DSLR Canon has released to-date, bringing together all of the best professional features offered, along with numerous user requests at a price-point everyone can appreciate," stated Yuichi Ishizuka, senior vice president and general manager, Consumer Imaging Group, Canon U.S.A.</p>
<p>The Evolution of Vision, the EOS 7D's New Autofocus System<br>
The Canon EOS 7D boasts the most advanced AF system ever seen in an EOS SLR. The completely re-designed system includes a new multi-axis cross-type 19-point AF grid, where the focusing points are evenly spread out across the image plane and clearly displayed through Canon's new Intelligent Viewfinder. All 19 points are f/5.6-sensitive for both horizontal and vertical cross-type focusing, while the center AF point adds high-precision diagonal cross-type sensitivity for f/2.8 and larger aperture lenses. The Canon EOS 7D Digital SLR camera is the first EOS SLR to feature 19 cross-type focusing points that remain fully functional with maximum apertures as small as f/5.6, which brings the performance of the AF system to unprecedented levels for assignments as varied as fast-moving sports action or low-light wedding ceremonies.</p>
<p>The Canon EOS 7D's AF system allows numerous AF area selection modes never seen before in an EOS SLR camera. New modes include:</p>
<p>· Spot AF mode reduces the size of a single AF point to focus on small subjects like an animal in a cage.<br>
· AF Point Expansion mode uses a cluster of AF points adjacent to the selected AF point to automatically assist focusing on moving subjects, such as an athlete on the run.<br>
· Zone AF divides the 19 AF points into five selectable focusing zones and makes it easier to achieve focus with subjects that are difficult to track with Single Point AF or AF point expansion, such as birds in flight.</p>
<p>Additional AF improvements include a revised Automatic AF point selection sequence that allows a user to pick any one of the 19 AF points as a starting point for tracking moving subjects in AI Servo mode. (Previous EOS models required the subject to first be acquired by the center focusing point.) If the subject moves away, the camera will continue to track the movement with the remaining points and display the active focusing point in the viewfinder. Also, a time-saving feature is AF Point Switching, which allows photographers to select and register one AF point for horizontal compositions and a second AF point for vertical shooting, ideal for studio and portrait photographers.</p>
<p>To complement the new AF system, the exposure metering system for the EOS 7D has been completely re-designed to take color information into account, another first for an EOS system. Canon's iFCL metering includes a 63-zone dual-layer metering sensor that reads both illumination and color for consistent results in all lighting conditions, keeping exposure levels stable from shot to shot, even as the light source changes.</p>
<p>Canon's new Intelligent Viewfinder uses a liquid crystal overlay to provide clear and precise displays of focusing points and zones, on-demand grid lines and a spot metering circle. The LCD overlay can also be illuminated in extreme low-light situations or turned off completely. The EOS 7D camera's viewfinder includes a large all-glass pentaprism with an antireflective coating to maximize clarity and provide a brighter display. The EOS 7D's Intelligent Viewfinder features 1.0x magnification with 100 percent coverage for accurate composition and checking of detail.</p>
<p>EOS HD Movie: Empowering the World of Videography<br>
Canon has blazed new trails in HD video capture with the 5D Mark II. Now, the EOS 7D takes DSLR video to new heights with Full HD capture featuring fully manual exposure control, and selectable cinematic frame rates for both NTSC (National Television System Committee) and PAL (Phase Altering Line) standards. Compatible with more than 60 Canon EF and EF-S lenses, the EOS 7D lets videographers take full advantage of the camera's large CMOS sensor to achieve the dramatic frame composition they desire. At the heart of the EOS 7D are two key proprietary Canon technologies, Dual DIGIC 4 Imaging Processors and a large APS-C–sized CMOS sensor, helping to render stunning color reproduction, amazing depth of field and fine detail, even in low-light conditions. The Canon EOS 7D allows for three video recording modes – Full HD and HD in a 16:9 aspect ratio and Standard Definition (SD) in a 4:3 aspect ratio, all at selectable frame rates. The EOS 7D Digital SLR camera will record Full HD at 1920 x 1080 pixels in selectable frame rates of 24p (23.976), 25p, or 30p (29.97); 720p HD recording at 50p or 60p (59.94) and SD video at frame rates of 50p or 60p (59.94). The EOS 7D features a new dedicated button to initiate live view for both video and still shooting. Once engaged, the same dedicated button will start and stop video recording. Like the EOS 5D Mark II, the Canon EOS 7D Digital SLR camera provides users with the capability to use an external stereo microphone for professional audio effects or a built-in monaural microphone for convenience.</p>
<p>The Features You Asked For<br>
A helpful new tool for architectural and landscape photography where angles and perspective are critical is Canon's new built-in Dual Axis Electronic Level, featuring an artificial horizon over the image on the rear LCD screen in Live View or in the viewfinder using illuminated AF points for easy leveling while shooting. The dual axis electronic level shows both horizontal roll and vertical pitch, making it easy to identify when the camera is in a fixed level shooting position and ready to take the shot.</p>
<p>The EOS 7D's pop-up flash features a built-in Integrated Speedlite Transmitter for control of multiple off-camera EOS Speedlites without the need for an external transmitter. This built-in wireless option is a compact and economical solution for studio and wedding photography with multiple flash set-ups.</p>
<p>A new Intelligent Macro Tracking function helps reduce blur during macro shooting by recognizing when a macro lens is attached and automatically adjusting the AI Servo sampling frequency. This AI Servo adjustment accounts for camera movement forward and back, a typical occurrence when moving in close for a macro shot as photographers rock back and forth, or a flower blows in the wind.</p>
<p>Once in your hands, you can immediately feel the ergonomic improvements of the Canon EOS 7D camera, starting with a new super-fluid body design with continuous curves outlining the top of the camera and a revised grip that fits better in a user's hand. The camera has a new Quick Control Button, which opens an easy-to-navigate menu on the camera's LCD screen. From this menu, users can adjust all camera settings including AF modes as well as set custom button functions, an insightful new feature that can easily customize each button's function to the photographer's preference. Another new feature is the RAW/JPEG toggle button providing quick dual-format shooting, allowing photographers to quickly add large JPEG or RAW file formats to their already selected shooting mode at the touch of a button.</p>
<p>The Canon EOS 7D camera also features a new large, clear 3.0-inch solid structure Clear View II LCD screen with 920,000 dot/VGA resolution for enhanced clarity and color when viewing images. The camera's nine internal seals enhance weather resistance, and its 150,000-cycle shutter durability positions the EOS 7D as a "workhorse" for professionals in any photography discipline.</p>
<p>New Wireless Connectivity<br>
Canon is announcing the availability of the new WFT-E5A wireless file transmitter (WFT) exclusively for the EOS 7D Digital SLR camera. The WFT-E5A wireless transmitter offers professional photographers a wide range of digital connectivity options including IEEE802.11a/b/g and Ethernet, ideal for commercial and studio work. The WFT-E5A wireless file transmitter opens the door to new possibilities in remote and Geotagged shooting applications. Photographers can fire up to 10 cameras simultaneously from across the room or across the country while maintaining control over camera settings and remote live view on a laptop or smart phone.[i] The WFT-E5A wireless transmitter can also transfer and display images on DLNA (Digital Living Network Alliance) compatible televisions and photo frames. Geotagging is now possible via Bluetooth, using compatible GPS devices to append coordinate data to the images.</p>
<p>Pricing and Availability<br>
The Canon EOS 7D Digital SLR camera is scheduled to be delivered to U.S. dealers at the end of September, and will be sold in a body-only configuration at an estimated retail price of $1,699.00[ii]. It will also be offered in a kit version with Canon's EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM zoom lens at an estimated retail price of $1,899.00[iii]. The Canon WFT-E5A wireless file transmitter is scheduled to be available in early November and sell at an estimated retail price of $699.99[iv].</p>
<p>CANON U.S.A. INTRODUCES THREE NEW EF AND EF-S LENSES, INCLUDING THE FIRST CAMERA LENS FEATURING HYBRID IMAGE STABILIZATION</p>
<p>Introducing the EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM,<br>
EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM, and EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Lenses</p>
<p>LAKE SUCCESS, N.Y., September 1, 2009 – Canon U.S.A., Inc., a leader in digital imaging, continues its advancement of EOS lens technology with the introduction of three new EF and EF-S lenses – EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM, EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM and the EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS, lenses. The new EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS lens is the world's first camera lens featuring Canon's new Hybrid Image Stabilization (Hybrid IS) technology*, compensating for both angle camera shake and shift camera shake, up to four shutter speed steps. The EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM lens is compatible with all EOS cameras, while the EF-S 15-85mm and EF-S 18-135mm zoom lenses are designed specifically for Canon <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged DIGITAL CAMERAS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/digital-cameras/">digital cameras</a> that are compatible with EF-S lenses.**</p>
<p>EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM lens<br>
The EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM lens could very well be the essential multipurpose lens for every camera bag due to its ability to capture sharp close-up images of small objects as well as beautiful portrait-length telephoto shots. The incorporation of Canon's new Hybrid IS in this L-series macro lens allows it to compensate more effectively for camera shake during close-up shooting and marks a significant improvement for professionals and advanced amateurs utilizing macro photography for portrait, nature or wedding shoots.</p>
<p>New Hybrid IS Technology: Designed Especially for Macro Photography<br>
The world's first* optical image stabilizer for SLR cameras was introduced in the EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM in 1995. Since then, Canon has made continual advancements in IS systems to enhance panning capability and improve compensation for camera shake. Now, in a move aimed at extending image stabilization to the macro realm, Canon introduces its Hybrid IS in the new EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM - another first for Canon and the world.</p>
<p>Conventional image stabilization technology is useful for reducing the effects of camera shake in non-macro shooting situations. When shooting handheld close-ups at 1x, however, camera shake makes it difficult to achieve acceptable results even with lenses incorporating conventional image stabilizers. Now, thanks to the Hybrid IS found in the EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM, Canon extends IS technology to the macro realm, making it easy to obtain clear handheld close-ups - a world first* and a definite advantage in environments where use of a tripod is not an option.</p>
<p>In order to combat the effects of camera shake in a macro lens, the IS system must be able to compensate for both angular camera shake and shift camera shake - problems that become more apparent as magnification increases. The effects of shift camera shake are rarely noticeable when shooting outside the macro realm, such as in landscape photography. But when shooting extreme close-ups, even the slightest amount of camera shake, either of the angular or shift variety, can adversely affect image quality.</p>
<p>In macro photography, shift camera shake and angular camera shake affect both the image formed on the sensor and the image shown in the viewfinder. This is especially relevant to handheld shooting at 1x, since the inability to properly compose and focus due to a shaky image in the viewfinder makes it extremely difficult to record sharp images.</p>
<p>Conventional image stabilizers of the type found in Canon IS lenses incorporate an angular velocity sensor (vibration gyro) to compensate for angular camera shake. Based on the amount of camera shake detected by the sensor, the IS system calculates the amount of blur on the image plane, after which lens elements in the IS are positioned to compensate for the shake. However, this type of image stabilizer can neither detect nor correct shift camera shake common to handheld macro photography.</p>
<p>The Hybrid IS includes an acceleration sensor in addition to the conventional angular velocity sensor (vibration gyro). Based on the amount of camera shake detected by the two sensors, a newly developed algorithm calculates the amount of blur on the image plane, after which lens elements in the IS are positioned to compensate for the two types of shake - a first in an interchangeable lens for SLR cameras and an excellent way to solve the problem of camera shake in macro photography.</p>
<p>EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM lens<br>
The versatile focal length, extreme wide angle and stunning image quality of Canon's new EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM lens makes this the ideal multipurpose wide-angle zoom lens for the photographer shooting a wedding or exotic vacation. Featuring three aspherical elements and one UD glass element for outstanding image quality, the zoom range of this lens is equivalent to 24-136mm on a full-frame camera. When coupled with Canon's new EOS 7D DSLR, this lens provides moviemakers and videographers with a phenomenal focal range for wide-angle scenic footage and zoomed in telephoto shots.</p>
<p>EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS lens<br>
Canon's new EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS lens is the perfect Image Stabilized lens for advanced photographers looking for a wide-angle zoom lens with telephoto capabilities. Featuring a compact IS unit with shake correction up to four shutter speed steps, the zoom range of this lens is equivalent to 29-216mm on a full-frame camera.</p>
<p>Pricing and Availability<br>
The Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM and EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS lenses are scheduled to be available at the end of September and sell at estimated retail prices of $1,049.00 and $499.99, respectively[i]. The Canon EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 USM is scheduled to be available in late October and sell at an estimated retail price of $799.99[ii]</p>
</blockquote>
<p>[<a href="http://www.canon.com">Canon</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5349829/canon-7d-dslr-first-hands-on-18-megapixels-24fps-full-hd-video-for-1900]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5349829]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[7d]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Canon EOS 7D]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dslrs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[eos 7d]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 01 Sep 2009 00:00:01 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5349829&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
						
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Canon EOS 7D Specs Leak: More Megapixels!]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/eos-7d-leak-1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_eos-7d-leak-1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>We saw the poster and possible lenses for Canon's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged EOS 7D" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/eos-7d/">EOS 7D</a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5348130/supposed-canon-eos-7d-poster-and-lenses-turn-up-online">yesterday</a>, and now it looks like the floodgates are open. A photography forum has <a href="http://www.neutralday.com/pictures-and-specifications-of-the-canon-eos-7d/">most of the details you'll need</a>, except the exact price and release date.</p>
<p>It'll have a 18MP sensor, dual DIGIC 4 processors, ISO from 100 to 6400 (and some crazy 12800 mode), a 3-inch LCD in addition to the 100% coverage viewfinder and of course HD video capabilities like its siblings. It looks like it'll compete most directly with the king of prosumer DSLRs, the Nikon D300s. Past rumors have suggested it'll cost around $2700, but we'll wait and see: We wouldn't be surprised if it was actually a lot less. [<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/29/canon-eos-7d-pics-and-specs-leak-out/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5348618/canon-eos-7d-specs-leak-more-megapixels]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5348618]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[7d]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Canon EOS 7D]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dlsrs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[eos 7d]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[leaks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 29 Aug 2009 21:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5348618&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Supposed Canon EOS 7D Poster and Lenses Turn Up Online]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/7d01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_7d01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>CanonRumors has what they claim are pictures of posters and lenses for the yet-to-be-confirmed <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged CANON EOS 7D" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/canon-eos-7d/">Canon EOS 7D</a>. Not much new information can be gleaned from the poster, but at least the lenses look nice.</p>

<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/7d02.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_7d02.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>This isn't the first time we've been <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5340910/canon-eos-7d-glimpse-details-leaked">teased with glimpses of the 7D</a>, but now we at least have details on the lenses which are a EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM lens and a longer EF-S 18-135m f/3.5-5.6 IS [<a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/7d-lens-pictures/">canonrumors</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/28/purported-canon-eos-7d-poster-lenses-turn-up-online/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5348130/supposed-canon-eos-7d-poster-and-lenses-turn-up-online]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5348130]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon 7d]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Canon EOS 7D]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[eos]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:21:39 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5348130&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
					
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Canon Powershot D10 Waterproof Camera Review: Dive, Dive, DIVE!]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/canon_powershot_d10.JPG"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_canon_powershot_d10.JPG" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged CANON POWERSHOT D10" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/canon-powershot-d10/">Canon Powershot D10</a> will never, ever fit into a pocket unless you are MC Hammer, circa 1990. That's because it houses a telescoping lens in a bulging case, making it look like a sub. Still, shots are pretty.</p>

<p><strong>The Price:</strong> $329</p>
<p><strong>The Waterproof-ness:</strong> Good down to 10 meters, making it suitable for light diving and heavy snorkel duty, as well as making it impervious to higher pressure of waves that may slap you and the camera around at lesser depths. The most waterproof camera without a housing, by far. And although they don't do a great job of advertising it, the camera is actually good to 14 degrees F and is shockproof to 1.22 meters, so its at least as rugged as the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5336015/pentax-w80-camera-review-waterproof-and-now-slightly-ruggedized">Pentax W80</a> I looked at last week.</p>
<p><strong>The Images:</strong> DPreview unequivocally gives this camera their top ranks on image quality, without acknowledging the <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/Q209waterproofgroup/page17.asp">issues of bulge</a> (later on that). We looked at it in <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5232843/toughcam-battle-canon-powershot-d10-vs-panasonic-lumix-dmc+ts1">a battle with the TS1 Lumix and</a> John found the casing (or something) to affect color in low light shots, and the camera had problems autofocusing underwater comparatively. I only noticed that the Canon's shots were some of the best of the bunch, reaching for a touch more exposure than the others at appropriate times in its 12mp shots. The lens is a 35mm to 105mm equivalent, which is a solid range, but not the longest in the group by any means. Unlike periscoping lenses in cameras like the waterproof Lumix, Fuji and others, there's no lens distortion on the outside of the focal range. It has face detection and a mode that allows you to set the camera on a tripod and it will wait for you (an additional face) to enter the frame before shooting. There is also optical shake reduction.</p>
<p><strong>The Chassis:</strong> The case design here is bulbous, and crazy and yet so appropriate under the sea (even if obscene outside of the water). That is what affords it a sort of no nonsense dive reach of 10 meters without the use of an external housing, as well as these four cornered locking joints that are mounting points for the accessory kit: essentially a bunch of tentacles and loops so you don't lose it. It's crazy, and yet, totally appropriate for mounting the camera to dive belts or around your wetsuit when in a kayak. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Canon-AKT-DC1-Accessory-Digital-Underwater/dp/B001TDL3W6">Check it out</a>. As you can see, those straps make it much more accessible than a camera stowed inside a jacket on a ski trip or in a bag on a canoe. But note that there's no accessory for flotation in this expensive $130 kit, as Olympus and Pentax offer as $10 accessories. No matter, you can easily fit those, or a keyring floatie from <a href="http://www.westmarine.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/HomePageView?storeId=10001&langId=-1&catalogId=10001">West Marine</a> to make the most ocean friendly point and shoot even more appropriate for life at sea.</p>
<p><strong>The Interface:</strong> It's neat that the buttons are all so well laid out and you can easily hit all the major controls while wearing dive gloves. Confession: The automatic scene detection knows when you're shooting people or underwater, but I never discovered how to switch it to manual.</p>
<p><strong>The Video:</strong> At best, it shoots 640 by 480. And everything I shot had a nasty blue tint to it.</p>
<p><strong>Verdict:</strong> Good if you're a inshore merman or mermaid, or other creature that spends the majority of its life out at shallow sea, but totally inappropriate for anything not considered an extreme or quasi extreme sport where bulge is an excusable thing when you're trying to take the sharpest shots possible of your wet exploits.</p>
<p><br>
<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/gizplus3.jpg">Big, simple buttons and LCD icons. Goes to 10 meters deep. Cool accessory straps available for extra cost.<br clear="all">
<br>
<br>
<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/gizminus.jpg">Only shoots video at 640x480. Expensive. Bulges so much it won't fit into pockets. Awkward looking out of the water.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5342209,15,'');
</script></p>
<p><em><a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/summermodo">Summermodo</a> is a chance for Giz to get outside and test our gear where it belongs.</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5342210/canon-powershot-d10-waterproof-camera-review-dive-dive-dive]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5342210]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon powershot d10]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[d10]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ocean]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[powershot]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sea]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[summermodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[underwater]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:30:38 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5342210&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Canon EOS 7D Glimpse, Details Leaked]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/1250680167dsc00049.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_1250680167dsc00049.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>What's $2700, has built-in flash, and comes with an EF 28-135mm lens for an extra $200? According to Best Buy inventory system and this image leaked in a forum, it's the new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged CANON EOS 7D" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/canon-eos-7d/">Canon EOS 7D</a>. [<a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/08/7d-g11-s90-sx-a-sx-b-show-up-at-best-buy/">Canon Rumors</a> and <a href="http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1032&message=32722570">DPReview</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5340910/canon-eos-7d-glimpse-details-leaked]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5340910]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[7d]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Canon EOS 7D]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[eos]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:20:43 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5340910&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Hands On Canon's Other New Digital Cameras: Man, the G11 Is Huge]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/IMG_0597.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_IMG_0597.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Here's the rest of Canon's new army of cameras&mdash;they don't do anything crazy, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5329619/in-the-nikon-s1000pj-future-there-is-no-escape-from-baby-pictures">like project baby photos</a> or have <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5336775/hands-on-with-samsungs-dual+display-cameras">an LCD up front take pictures</a> of yourself, but they're not too shabby. The G11 is ginormous, though.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5340822,6,'Canon Cameras');
</script>The G11's vari-angle screen seems plenty bright, but it makes an already huge camera even huger when it's all splayed out like a tumor growth. It's heavy too. And complicated. Look at all those dials!</p>
<p>The SD980's touchscreen is responsive enough, but the interface is confusing&mdash;sometimes it's touchable, sometimes it's not. And it uses strange drag gestures, like in playback mode, you hold down for a second, then slowly swipe down, which brings up options to the left or right&mdash;swipe left to delete or swipe right for another feature. Confusing and weird. If you're gonna go touch, go all the way.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5340842/hands-on-canons-other-new-digital-cameras-man-the-g11-is-huge]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5340842]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital elph]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital elph sd980]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[g11]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[powershot]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[powershot g11]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[SD980]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sx120]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sx20]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:22:59 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5340842&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
					
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Canon PowerShot S90  Pro Point-and-Shoot: Yes Pleeeeease]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/IMG_0553.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_IMG_0553.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>I thought Canon's new G11 pro point-and-shoot&mdash;decked out with everything but HD video, depressingly&mdash;would make me drool the most, but I was wrong: Canon's pocketable pro point-and-shoot, the S90 is <em>fapfreakintastic</em>.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5340813,3,'PowerShot S90 Hands On');
</script> The design is exactly what I want in a high end point-and-shoot&mdash;it's svelte, but not too puny, and the black metal finish feels sturdy, without the whole thing feeling like a little brick. (I hope you like black, since it comes in black and...black.) It really manages to achieve that zen balance level between feeling professional and consumer, though it makes me want to run around shooting only in black and white. What slew me, though, was the clicky control ring around the lens, which you can use to adjust almost any setting&mdash;it can change the ISO, focus or zoom. As you know, <em>real</em> gadget people love dials and gauges things that actually click and feel like they actually control things in this age of silent squeegee presses on glass screens, and it taps into that pretty hard.<br>
<br>
I almost don't know why you'd even go for the G11 with the S90 on the table&mdash;the S90 uses the same high sensitivity sensor, meaning you should get the same kind of image and low-light performance, which I can't wait to check out in depth, since Canon's using the same size sensor as the G10 used to use, but actually cut the megapixels down to get better light sensitivity. The S90 also has a fast F/2.0 lens, and it's not the size of a gorilla fist. Did I mention it was cheaper too? $430 to the G11's $500.<br>
<br>
The only real problem I see right now is that it doesn't shoot HD video, just standard VGA. But if it shoots truly gorgeous pictures&mdash;which we intend to find out shortly&mdash;I can let that go.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5340815/canon-powershot-s90--pro-point+and+shoot-yes-pleeeeease]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5340815]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Canon powershot s90]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[powershot]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Powershot s90]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[S90]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:11:23 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5340815&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
