Now it's official, AMD has bumped its Athlon processors off the high horse and replaced them with Phenom X2 (dual core) and Phenom X4 (quad core) processors, and the company says these new chips will be part of its enthusiast platform it calls FASN8. The company's saying that when you lash these chips together with its DirectX 10 ATI Radion HD 2000 series graphics cards shipped today, you'll get, well, some serious graphics performance. We'll believe it when we see it, but the ability to have two of these quad-core processors on one motherboard will surely make for some serious eight-way action.
AMD added lots of bluster along with the announcement, too:
With this announcement, AMD also unleashes some world-class marketing guff, calling these Phenom X4 chips the first "true quad core" processors, accusing "other products" of "packaging two dual core chips to form their quad core processors." Accusations such as this volley directed at Intel signal a hot chip war on the way.
It's going to take a lot for AMD to catch up to Intel, though, but the enhanced performance per watt of these chips, along with their Dual Socket Direct Connect architecture, 128-bit FPUs and shared L3 cache might just put a bit of heat on Intel for a while. We can't wait to see the benchmarks on these chips, because until we see the performance numbers, this just sounds like a lot of mumbo-jumbo.
Press Release [AMD]













Comments
I can't wait for benchmarks - especially of an octo-core setup with dual 2900XTs vs an octo-core Xeon with dual Nvidias
Processor companies need to work on their product names. "Phenom", "FASN8" or even "Core 2 Duo" are some pretty ridiculous names.
That said, I do hope that AMD does well with regard to their benchmarks to drive competition with Intel's line of products. Consumers lose in industries controlled by a monopoly.
It would be great to see AMD back in the game. I love my Core 2 Duo, but I'd love to see the companies genuinely competing again. Drive things further. And I have no problem switching back to AMD if it's worth it. My loyalty's only as strong as the manufacturer's lead over its competition.
As for AMD's claims about quad-core, well yes, this is true. It seems like a repeat of when AMD went dual-core and Intel soldered two Pentium 4s together to make the Pentium D. Difference is this time Intel launched the soldered-together quad-core BEFORE AMD, and they still managed to bridge the two dual-cores together, removing the biggest flaw the Pentium D had. Still, assuming the overall processor architecture is at least comparable to the Core 2 Duos, AMD's approach might give their X4 the lead. Of course the depends on whether you're even doing anything that could benefit from four (or even eight) cores.
"Phenom"? Seriously? It rhymes with venom, which most sane people like to avoid (coffee excluded). Talk about a name with a negative vibe. Sheez! What'll we have have next?
Or maybe it's pronounced "fee-nom", as in "phenomenal"?
'Venom' gives the processor a dangerous edge, like it's so fast it might kill you. Anyway, I don't think anyone pronounces it 'vee-nom'.
Sheez! What'll we have have next?
people who know how to read and pronounce english properly? if there were any of those around, they might actually buy a product that has a good name!
phenom is more imaginative than core duo, at the very least
i'm sorry i know "phenom" is not in the proper English dictionary but, is it pronounced "fee-nom" or "fen-uhm"? because "fee-nom" and venom does not rhyme. and, i highly doubt AMD will name it something that sounds like chalky and bland vegetable.
Comment on this post
Reply by EmailLogin with your username and password below. Or comment on this post via email.
Forgot your username or password? New User?