• more about #columns
    tharden33: Does this account for the fact that a lot of articles have probably already gone through their motions? I mean doesn't it make sense that after it wa... more »
    Coolmodo: Funny, they implement more regulation of contributions and people don't want to write for Wikipedia anymore. Shows you they all wanted to spam, lie a... more »
    Platypus Man: Once you get used to the rules used on Wikipedia, editing on it isn't bad. I don't edit nearly as much as I do, and it does get frustrating sometimes,... more »
    comics0026: I attribute this to two things: 1) Jacka$$es who try to delete stub articles before they've had a chance to grow (although people who try to delete an... more »
    neoliminal: Maybe we've written enough? Really. After years of entering everything from chicken soup to super bowl winners there's not much more NEW stuff to pu... more »
    SeanGone: Every edit i've ever made on Wikipedia no matter how mundane was immediatly changed back for little or no reason. it was to frustrating to continue. more »
    oldtaku: I gave up on trying to help after three separate article updates in which my changes were reverted because the 'editors' thought that topic wasn't imp... more »
    blash: I do note the "English" wikipedia part - since there are a good deal of articles that still need to be translated. more »
    Hello Mister Walrus: This might be against the "non-profit" spirit of Wikipedia, but maybe it's time to, you know, pay more people to edit articles? If you open up a Wikip... more »
    Brazell: I'll still donate to Wikipedia so that others can enjoy the site as I have, but I gave up contributing a year ago because the mission of Wikipedia is ... more »
    fleebailey33: and google has been counting on this for the same reason knol still exists more »
    RedEyeNinja: Wiki always gave me a sense of communism and society: looks good on paper but impossible to implement in its truest form due to human nature and its i... more »
    HurtsSoGood: 1. Wikipedia is a mature site, and most of the articles have already been written. Thus, the powers that be (TM) can focus more on quality over quan... more »
    Michai: Obviously it will decline. As the number of validated entries grows, the number of entries needing editing decline. There is only so much informatio... more »
    Les Mikesell: So how often do facts change? Once they are typed in correctly, how many editors do you need? more »
    sega8800: I guess in the end, knowledge is what a small group of people believe in. Since they reject anything that in their view as wrong or irrelevant. more »
    met2art: Well, I looked up "Fading Enthusiasm for Wikipedia" on Wikipedia, and it said "Tom is a dick. No Dave is. No, Tom, you're a dick and I Googled your mo... more »
    Kaiser-Machead: I imagine some are also disheartened somewhat to see their input re-edited and cut up because it's felt that they were not being "relevant" to the sub... more »
    rabies99: The infighting in Wikipedia is outrageous. My ip was banned because I had the audacity to fix the punctuation and grammar of a single sentence. I didn... more »
    strider_mt2k: Sidestepping out principles is what we built the last eight years on here in the good old USA! WELCOME! more »
  • We can't find any posts with those tags. Or check your spelling and try again.