<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: Core 2 Duo]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/core 2 duo</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'core 2 duo']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New iMacs Get Core i7 Chips, But What Does That Mean?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>We were pretty excited to see Intel's new monster quad-core chips inside <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5385841/apple-imac-hands-on">the iMacs Apple unveiled today</a>, but you may be a little confused by the options: <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #core2duo" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #core2duo" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/core2duo/">Core 2 Duo</a> or <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #corei7" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #corei7" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/corei7/">Core i7</a> or <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #corei5" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #corei5" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/corei5/">Core i5</a>??? Can someone please explain? Why yes, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5381760/giz-explains-intels-entire-confusing-armada-of-chips">Giz can</a>.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5385872/new-imacs-get-core-i7-chips-but-what-does-that-mean]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5385872]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core i5]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Core i7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[new imacs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:41:54 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5385872&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Giz Explains: Intel's Entire Confusing Armada of Chips]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/intelshot.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_intelshot.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Intel makes a lot of processors. Too many, maybe. Don't know what the difference a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #corei7" href="http://gizmodo.comhttp://gizmodo.com/tag/corei7/">Core i7</a> and a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #core2duo" href="http://gizmodo.comhttp://gizmodo.com/tag/core2duo/">Core 2 Duo</a>? A Bloomfield from a Wolfdale? A Sasquatch from a Yeti? You're not alone.</p>
<h2>Chips, Chipsets and Damned Chipsets</h2>
<p>Okay, so the first thing to understand is that an Intel brand, like <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #core2" href="http://gizmodo.comhttp://gizmodo.com/tag/core2/">Core 2</a> or Core i7, actually refers to a whole bunch of different processors. Although they generally have the same basic microarchitecture (in other words, <a href="http://www.intel.com/technology/architecture-silicon/microarchitecture.htm?iid=tech_as+micro_head">chip design</a>), the brand envelopes both desktop and mobile chips, chips with radically different clock speeds, that use different motherboard sockets, etc.</p>
<p>Because of these differences, each particular chip is given a codename, chosen for obscure geographical locations (seriously, plug just about any codename into Google Maps). For instance, the original mobile Core 2 Duo processor was Merom, and it was replaced after about two years by Penryn, which was manufactured using a new 45-nanometer process to be more efficient. Quite different, these two, but Intel pimped both as Core 2 Duos nonetheless.</p>
<p><iframe width="500" height="250" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" src="http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?ie=UTF8&amp;hl=en&amp;msa=0&amp;msid=104176566474738326459.000475f155d6a690a8ce6&amp;ll=37.996163,-94.570312&amp;spn=34.413051,87.890625&amp;z=3&amp;output=embed"></iframe><br>
<small>View <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?ie=UTF8&amp;hl=en&amp;msa=0&amp;msid=104176566474738326459.000475f155d6a690a8ce6&amp;ll=37.996163,-94.570312&amp;spn=34.413051,87.890625&amp;z=3&amp;source=embed" style="color:#0000FF;text-align:left">Intel</a> in a larger map</small><br>
Although Intel doesn't market chips according to their codenames, the individual chip <a href="http://www.intel.com/products/processor_number/index.htm">gets a model number</a> that gives you an idea of how it compares, spec-wise (clock speed, cache size, etc.), to other chips in the same group. So, a Core i7-950 is gonna be faster than a Core i7-920, and a Core 2 Duo P8600 isn't going to quite stack up to a Core 2 Duo P9600. The difference between a P8400 and P8600 is obviously less than the difference between a P8600 and a P9600. To match a particular chip codename to a particular model number, though, you probably have to do some Googlin' (or Bingin').</p>
<p>In some cases, Intel pushes chips with a ULV designator for "ultra-low voltage," which doesn't mean anything <em>in particular</em> in terms of chip design, since it includes <a href="http://www.intel.com/consumer/learn/ultra-thin.htm">several brands of chips</a>, from Core 2 to Celeron. The point is that these chips power notebooks that are almost as portable at netbooks, but are more expensive, so computer makers (and Intel) make more money.</p>
<p>While we're at it, I might as well explain what the hell Centrino is. It's not a single chip, it's a platform. That is, it's a combo meal for notebooks with a mobile processor, a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chipset">chipset</a> (essentially the silicon that lets the processor talk to the rest of the computer) and a wireless networking adapter. Typically, Intel releases a new combo meal every year, though they're all been called Centrino, with the most recent making the leap to being called Centrino 2.</p>
<p>The reason we decided to tell you all this stuff now is that Intel is gradually phasing out the Core 2 family, like Pentiums before that, and is moving Core i7, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #corei5" href="http://gizmodo.comhttp://gizmodo.com/tag/corei5/">Core i5</a> and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #corei3" href="http://gizmodo.comhttp://gizmodo.com/tag/corei3/">Core i3</a> up to take its place. This is how all the families relate to each other...</p>
<h2>Nehalem Rising: Core i7, Core i5 and Core i3</h2>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/corei7shot.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_corei7shot.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Core i7 systems use a totally new microarchitecture called Nehalem, and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5099060/giz-explains-why-intels-core-i7-processor-is-a-beautiful-monster">it's badass</a>.</p>
<p>The first set of Core i7 chips, codenamed Bloomfield, launched in November 2008 for high-end desktops. They're the most outrageously fast Core i7 chips, with triple-channel memory (meaning they're able to use memory sticks in triplets rather than pairs) and other blazing accoutrements.</p>
<p>The <em>new</em> Core i7 chips, launched last month, are for desktop and mobile. The desktop variant is codenamed Lynnfield, and it more closely resembles its mobile equivalent, codenamed Clarksfield, than it does the Bloomfield monster&mdash;dual-channel memory, not triple, for instance.</p>
<p>You'll be seeing a lot more Clarksfield in the next couple weeks, like in the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5359331/hp-envy-hands-on-macbook-pro-clone-better-than-the-real-thing">HP Envy 15</a>, since most computer makers were holding off for Windows 7 to drop their new laptops. All of the Core i7 processors are quad-core, even the mobile Clarksfield, so you're not gonna see it in anything like Dell's skinny Adamo.</p>
<p>Core i5 is going to be Intel's more mainstream Nehalem-microarchitecture chip brand, and as a broader brand, the chip differentiation gets a little more confusing. Core i5 actually includes <em>some</em>, but not all, of the desktop Lynnfield processors. For now, the only Core i5 chip is quad-core, but you're going to start seeing dual-core Core i5 chips, and soon enough they will make up the bulk of Intel's mainstream processors. In English: Unless you're looking for a crazyfast new computer, your next machine will probably run an Intel Core i5 CPU.</p>
<p>Eventually, dual-core Core i3 chips will come out, and as you can guess by the number, they won't be quite as fast&mdash;or expensive&mdash;as the Core i5 or i7 chips.</p>
<h2>Netbook's Best Friend: Atom N and Z</h2>
<p>Atom is probably the Intel chip you hear about second only to Core 2 Duo: It's essentially the CPU that goes inside of netbooks. There are a couple of different variations out now, the N series (codename Diamondville) and the Z series (codename Silverthorne). The Diamondville chips are for nettops and netbooks (though as pointed out, nettop don't use the N prefix, just the chip number), and can handle full versions of Windows Vista and 7. Silverthrone is used in netbooks but was designed for smaller connected devices like UMPCs and MIDs. (This is why Sony shoving an underpowered Atom Z in <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5131637/sony-vaio-p-review">the Vaio P</a>, and trying to run Windows Vista on top of it, was retarded.)</p>
<p>The <a href="http://arstechnica.com/hardware/news/2009/05/intel-announces-next-gen-atom-with-on-die-gpu.ars">next generation of Atom</a> is more interesting, and more confusing, in a way. The CPU is codenamed Pineview, and it's actually got the graphics processor integrated right onto the same chip, precluding the need for a separate GPU tucked into the netbook's overall chipset. The benefit is longer battery life, since it'll take less energy to crunch the same visuals. We'll start seeing Pineview netbooks sometime early next year, most likely.</p>
<h2>Oldies But Goodies: Core 2 Duo, Quad and Extreme</h2>
<p>Intel's Core 2 chips have been out three years now, an eternity in computer years. Because of this, and because they're the main ones used in most personal desktop and laptop systems, there is a metric shitton of different Core 2 chips.</p>
<p>It's also more confusing because there are way more codenames to wade through. Let's start from the top: Core 2 Solo has one core, Core 2 Duo two, and Quad has four (as does Extreme). From there, you have two distinct generations of chips within the Core 2 family.</p>
<p>In the first generation of Core 2 Duos, the main desktop chip was Conroe (with a cheaper variant called Allendale), while the main mobile one was called Merom. There was also a branch of Core 2 Quads called Kentsfield.</p>
<p>The next generation (that is, the current generation, unless you're already on the Core i7 bandwagon) arrived <a href="http://gizmodo.com/335090/giz-explains-whats-the-f-is-a-penryn">with a new process</a> for making chips with even smaller transistors. Among other more technical differences, they were more energy efficient than their predecessors. With this generation of Core 2s, the mainstream desktop chips are Wolfdale, the desktop quad-cores are called Yorkfield, and the mobile chips are Penryn&mdash;if you've bought a decent notebook in the last two years, it's probably got a Penryn Core 2 inside of it.</p>
<h2>Ancient History: Pentium and Celeron</h2>
<p>Pentium is dead, except it's not, living on as a zombie brand for chips that aren't as good as Core chips, but aren't as crappy as Intel's low-end Celeron processors. If you see a machine with a sticker for Pentium or Celeron, <em>run</em>.</p>
<p>Okay, I hope that helps, at least a little&mdash;you should probably thank me for staying away from clock speeds and other small variations, like individual permutations of Core i7 Bloomfield processors, to hopefully give you a broader overview of what all's going on. Intel told me it'll all make more sense once their entire road map for the year is out on the market, but I have a feeling it's not gonna help my mom understand this crap one bit better.</p>
<p><em>Top image via <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/36984152@N08/3471662920/">soleiletoile</a>/Flickr</em></p>
<p><em>Thanks to Intel for helping us sort all this out!</em></p>
<p><em>Still something you wanna know? Send questions about sweet potato chips, pumpkin pie or turduckens to tips@gizmodo.com, with "<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #gizexplains" href="http://gizmodo.comhttp://gizmodo.com/tag/gizexplains/">Giz Explains</a>" in the subject line.</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5381760/giz-explains-intels-entire-confusing-armada-of-chips]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5381760]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[giz explains]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[centrino]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core i3]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core i5]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Core i7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cpu]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cpus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5381760&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[IDF's Array of Affordable Thin-and-Lights Are Decidedly Not Netbooks]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/100_0661_01.JPG"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_100_0661_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Want the tiny size of a netbook, but the power of a full-size? Intel showed off a crop of ultraportable laptops, all aimed at around an $800 MSRP, using <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged CORE 2 DUO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/core-2-duo/">Core 2 Duo</a> processors, not Atom. Check out our gallery below.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5366232,8,'');
</script></p>
<p>Aside from a few from MSI, all of these ultraportables are from ODMs, meaning they're waiting for a larger company to snap them up and rebrand them (they're ready to go to market now, so you could start seeing them very soon). But they're all working prototypes and all very svelte and usable, with a focus on affordability. Sure, my 2009 MacBook Pro is very nearly as thin as a lot of these laptops, but it also cost twice as much. My favorite has to be the little white 10-incher with the blue flower design.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5366236/idfs-array-of-affordable-thin+and+lights-are-decidedly-not-netbooks]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5366236]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ultraportables]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gallery]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[idf]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[idf ultraportables]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[msi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[odm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[thin and light]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:33:58 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5366236&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Intel's New Easy-for-Your-Mom-to-Understand Processor Badges]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/04/intelbadges.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/intelbadges.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a> They're designed to be simple to understand for regular people, so you don't need these <a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2344791,00.asp">explained</a>, right?</p>
<p>It's easy, really: Black is for high-end (except, uh, the weak Atom also uses a black background, oops); blue is for mainstream, white is for cheaper chips like Celeron and Pentium (expect when it's Centrino and Centrino 2). Okay, not so great on the colors. Let's move on!</p>
<p>Just like your favorite restaurant, now they have star ratings. Five stars is for high end like <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged CORE I7" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/core-i7/">Core i7</a>, one star is for not-so-great like Celeron. The issue for regular people is that the star rating appears on a computer's sales card (not the chip logo itself) and only describes the chip, not the whole computer. "Hey this computer's got four stars? That's pretty good!" Anyone else feel a Microsoft ad coming on? [<a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2344791,00.asp">PC Mag</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5206710/intels-new-easy+for+your+mom+to+understand-processor-badges]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5206710]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Core i7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cpu]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cpus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 10 Apr 2009 09:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5206710&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Intel Refreshing Montevina Chips, Adding More Power in Spring]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/10/340x_intelmontevinarefresh.gif" class="left image340" width="340" /> If you're looking into getting a new laptop, you should probably hold off until after the holidays for an extra boost in processing power. According to sources at AppleInsider, Intel's planning a refresh of its Montevina <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #core2duo" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/core2duo/">Core 2 Duo</a> processors for Spring 2009. The update will give notebooks two new variants of chips, a P88000 running at 2.66GHz and a T9900 with 3.06GHz. These next Montevina chips will be the last ones Intel produces before it turns to its Core i7 architecture – but <i>that</i> switch-up is at least a year down the line, and who's going to put off laptop buying for <i>that</i> long? [<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/10/23/future_macbook_pro_bound_intel_chips_due_next_spring.html">Apple Insider</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5068098/intel-refreshing-montevina-chips-adding-more-power-in-spring]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5068098]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Intel Montevina]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel processor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[montevina]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 23 Oct 2008 23:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elaine Chow]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5068098&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sony Explains Intel Core 2 Duo with Weird French Elves]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/09/340x_ScreenHunter_07_Sep._27_14.33.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Sony's site has an absolutely hilarious page explaining how Intel's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #core2duo" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/core2duo/">Core 2 Duo</a> chip helps you multitask with cartoons featuring two odd, party-hat-wearing elfin caricatures. Read on for my analysis, with the caveat that I speak not a word of Japanese.</p>

<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/core02_img.gif" width="419" height="331" class="center">1. Trying to saw a two-by-four alone looks awfully stressful: our moustachioed French hero has grown three heads in his panic. But recruiting a team of builders gets that barn made like they were Amish (though we all know the lazy French are incapable of such efficiency).<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/ScreenHunter_02_Sep._27_14.27.jpg" width="425" height="197" class="center">2. If you link arms, you can make kick-ass birdhouses. But watch out for the ghostly silhouettes inching ever closer.<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/ScreenHunter_03_Sep._27_14.27.jpg" width="428" height="243" class="center">3. Tools required to make birdhouses/barns/Core 2 Duo processors include: a chainsaw, a syringe, multiple dustpans, and a pastel scarf rakishly knotted around the neck. Optional but strongly recommended: party hats.<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/ScreenHunter_04_Sep._27_14.28.jpg" width="426" height="248" class="center">4. Doing basic arithmetic makes French barnbuilders very content.<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/ScreenHunter_05_Sep._27_14.28.jpg" width="429" height="222" class="center">5. OH GOD they've grown multiple heads again! At least people seem to be buying their barns, which apparently have shrunk into shoebox-sized models somewhere between here and the first panel.<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/ScreenHunter_06_Sep._27_14.28.jpg" width="434" height="236" class="center">6. Something awful has happened. Our heroic Frenchmen are now plugged directly into electrical outlets, with internal temperature monitoring. Is this some kind of Shyamalanianian twist and they were robots the entire time? This narrative ends on such a disturbing note. [<a href="http://www.jp.sonystyle.com/Style-a/Special/Intel/Core2duo_2/index.html">Sony</a>, thanks Christopher!]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5055889/sony-explains-intel-core-2-duo-with-weird-french-elves]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5055889]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[wtf]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[amish]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[barn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[birdhouse]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[caricature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[french]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[funny]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[japan]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[japanese]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[weird]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:45:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5055889&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Intel Opens Door for Army of MacBook Air Clones]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/08/340x_macbookairstack.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Muffled by the cacophony of like <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5040161/hands-on-with-intel-classmate-tablet-so-far-just-a-touchy-double+jointed-netbook">a million</a> netbooks and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5039871/intel-says-theyve-taken-a-huge-leap-in-wireless-power-tech">the wireless power</a> that'll power <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5040414/intel-explains-in-what-year-well-be-cyborgs-but-terminators-will-kill-us-anyway">our cyborg brains</a> at the Intel Developer Forum was <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080822-intel-shares-macbook-air-love-with-new-ulp-mobile-cpus.html">the low-key introduction of Intel's next-gen 45nm dual core chips</a> for ultra-thin notebooks—i.e., the dwarven chips that made the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #macbookair" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbookair/">MacBook Air</a> possible. Now that everybody can snag them, expect a surge of <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5015061/thinnest-notebook-showdown-voodoo-envy-133-vs-macbook-air">similarly limber notebooks</a> that can suck in their gut to fit into <a href="http://gizmodo.com/385262/lenovo-parodies-macbook-air-ad-for-x300">narrow pockets of ugly paper</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5037763/lenovo-unveils-thinkpad-x301-with-centrino-2-and-128-gb-ssd">Lenovo's X301</a> and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5038117/hp-elitebook-2530p-12-inches-of-mil+spec-business-badassery">HP's 2530p</a> already use the new chips. The SL9400 and SL9300 running at 1.8Ghz and 1.6GHz, respectively, both have a 1066MHz FSB and appear to be the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #core2duo" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/core2duo/">Core 2 Duo</a> Low Voltage (LV) chips with a TDP of 17W, while the SU9400 and SU9300 are the ULV variants, clocked at 1.4GHz and 1.2GHz with a 10W TDP.</p>
<p>While the clock speeds of the LV chips are the same as the MBA's, the switch to the 45nm process and faster front-side bus should yield both performance gains and power savings. More importantly, their ready availability for all-comers could make the ultra-thin market a lot more interesting, though we're kind of afraid at this point of what Asus will do with them. [<a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080822-intel-shares-macbook-air-love-with-new-ulp-mobile-cpus.html">Ars Technica</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5040558/intel-opens-door-for-army-of-macbook-air-clones]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5040558]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[2530p]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cpus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[envy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hp]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lenovo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook air]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voodoo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[x300]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[x301]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 22 Aug 2008 13:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5040558&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 Wolfdale Processor Tested (Verdict: "Recommended")]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/03/Intel%20Core%202%20Duo%20Wolfdale%20GI.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />The chaps over at <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged HOT HARDWARE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/hot-hardware/">Hot Hardware</a> have put the Intel <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged CORE 2 DUO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/core-2-duo/">Core 2 Duo</a> E8500 processor, which belongs to the (45nm) Wolfdale line, through its paces, and they sure were impressed. From their extensive testing, the processor, intended for desktop machines and ideal for gaming especially, did not seem to make any massive changes on an architectural level, however, small adjustments had a great overall effect on performance. The 6MB of L2 cache brought an impressive speed boost, while the power consumption and heat production levels both fell.</p>

<p>Indeed, the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #core2duo" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/core2duo/">Core 2 Duo</a> E8500 was comparable in performance to lower clocked quad-core chips, proving the viability of the Wolfdale architecture. The chip is likely to retail at the +$300 mark and that seems to be the only drawback&mdash;it is a little on the steep side. Regardless, the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #hothardware" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/hothardware/">Hot Hardware</a> fellows were still willing to give the Core 2 Duo E8500 the highly coveted "Recommended" badge, and if their test results ring true, we would not disagree. Hit the link to check out the extensive testing [<a href="http://www.hothardware.com/articles/Wolfdale/">Hot Hardware</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/362727/intel-core-2-duo-e8500-wolfdale-processor-tested-verdict-recommended]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-362727]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[45nm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[e8500]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hot hardware]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel core 2 duo e8500]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wolfdale]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 01 Mar 2008 21:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haroon Malik]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=362727&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sony Vaio Type T Gets Refreshed CPU and Casing]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/01/VAIO_Type_T_Mont%20GI.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />The fantastic <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/shiny-laptop/sony-vaio-t-10th-anniversary-with-led-backlighting-and-solid-state-drive-261186.php">Vaio Type T</a> may have lost its thin crown to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/348753/macbook-air-review">another laptop</a>, but Sony has rejigged its slimline notebook, giving it a faster CPU, an ultra-low-voltage <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #core2duo" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/core2duo/">Core 2 Duo</a> U7600 running at 1.2GHz and a fancy-pants artsy finish. No word on pricing or availability yet. [<a href="http://www.akihabaranews.com/en/news-15429-CPU+Upgrade+and+New+skin+available+for+the+Vaio+T.html">Akihabara News</a>]<br>
<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('vaiotgi', 3, '');
</script></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/349991/sony-vaio-type-t-gets-refreshed-cpu-and-casing]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-349991]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[air pressure]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[refresh]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony vaio t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony vaio type t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[type t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[update]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vaio]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vaio t]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 29 Jan 2008 04:55:02 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haroon Malik]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=349991&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The MacBook Air  Mini-Processor Explained]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/01/macbook_air_CPU.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;float:none;"/>If you were curious about how the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/345115/macbook-air-hands+on">MacBook Air's</a> ultra-compact <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged CORE 2 DUO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/core-2-duo/">Core 2 Duo</a> processor came to be, an in-depth AnandTech study has revealed that the processor is a mixture of Intel's 65 nanometer (65nm) Merom architecture with an 800MHz bus and a new, smaller chip package originally slated to be released later this year. Hit the link for all the details. [<a href="http://www.anandtech.com/mac/showdoc.aspx?i=3203">AnandTech</a> via <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/01/17/macbook_airs_processor_riddle_solved.html">AppleInsider</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/346734/the-macbook-air--mini+processor-explained]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-346734]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cpu]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook air]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[merom]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:10:42 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=346734&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
					
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Ars Benches the New iMac, Predictably Decent Performance]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/08/imactredmillb.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;float:none;"/>While <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/apple/new-imac-impressions-and-full-hands+on-287508.php">we poked and prodded our new iMac</a> trying to answer all of your questions, <a href="http://arstechnica.com/reviews/hardware/aluminum-and-glass-a-review-of-the-new-imac.ars/5">Ars Technicha</a> went their traditional route and benchmarked the hell out of the poor iMac. The 20-inch, 2.4GHz machine with 2GB or RAM " outdid a MacBook Pro with an identical CPU and FSB in my testing, and it was more than competitive with a Mac Pro in formal tests." That said, these aren't huge increases over modern hardware. And the Mac Pro destroyed the iMac in heavily multi-threaded tests. Such is the predictability of performance in all x86 era. [<a href="http://arstechnica.com/reviews/hardware/aluminum-and-glass-a-review-of-the-new-imac.ars/5">Ars</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/288446/ars-benches-the-new-imac-predictably-decent-performance]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-288446]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ars]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tests]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[treadmill]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 10 Aug 2007 20:00:49 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[blongo3]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=288446&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Informed Speculation: Apple Macbook With Santa Rosa Coming Very Soon?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/05/speculation3.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />With <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/laptops/lenovo-t61-and-r61-now-with-hot-santa-rosa-action-255066.php">Lenovo</a> and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/santa-rosa-ahoy%21/vicious-new-santa-rosas-lg-x+note-laptops-throw-exclusive-party-with-korean-nymphs-258611.php">LG</a>'s <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #santarosa" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/santarosa/">Santa Rosa</a> laptop offerings (not to mention various other PC vendors as well) almost upon us, we're left wondering what Apple is going to do. If you remember, Core 2 Duos hit PC laptops around July/August, but Apple's MacBook Pros only got them late October. Will we have to wait nearly three months for Centrino Pro? Maybe not.</p>
<p>A chain partner revealed to us that a new model of MacBook is coming out as soon as next week, which is pretty ridiculous if we do say so ourselves. However, since PC makers are making the transition to Santa Rosa very soon, it's not out of the question that Apple will as well&mdash;maybe as soon as WWDC. After all, it's been more than a year since the switch to Intel, and they should be pretty good with this stuff by now. What do you think? <span class="byline">&ndash; Jason Chen</span></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/258775/informed-speculation-apple-macbook-with-santa-rosa-coming-very-soon]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-258775]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cpus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[santa rosa]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 08 May 2007 19:00:42 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=258775&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Dealzmodo: Refurbished Core 2 Duo MacBooks at Apple]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="core2duo_macbook.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/05/core2duo_macbook.jpg" width="150" height="90" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="2"/>Apple is offering savings up to $200 on <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #core2duo" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #core2duo" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/core2duo/">Core 2 Duo</a> MacBooks from their "Special Deals" store. Check out the goods:</p>

<p>&bull; MacBook 1.83GHz Intel Core 2 Duo - White for $1099 - $150 instant savings = $949 shipped. 13.3-inch Widescreen Glossy LCD, 512MB RAM, 60GB hard drive, Combo Drive, iSight Camera, iLife software.<br />
&bull; MacBook 2.0GHz Intel Core 2 Duo - White for $1299 - $200 instant savings = $1099 shipped. 13.3-inch Widescreen Glossy LCD, 1GB RAM, 80GB hard drive, Super Drive, iSight Camera, iLife software.<br />
&bull; MacBook 2.0GHz Intel Core 2 Duo - Black for $1499 - $200 instant savings = $1299 shipped. 13.3-inch Widescreen Glossy LCD, 1GB RAM, 120GB hard drive, Super Drive, iSight Camera, iLife software.</p>

<p>As always, the Apple Special Deals store has Dual Core systems of all types, but we need SPEED baby! The discounts are available while supplies last. <span class="byline">&ndash;Travis Hudson</span></p>

<p><a href="http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/AppleStore?family=CertifiedMac&cid=AOSA10000025758&siteID=6ckR%2AcoHy2A-D2vlSGyJFbElMM9Z5qE8Rg">Product Page</a> [Via <a href="http://www.dealhack.com/archives/2007/05/refurb_apple_macbooks_from_jus.html">Dealhack</a>]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/257139/dealzmodo-refurbished-core-2-duo-macbooks-at-apple]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-257139]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[refurbished laptops need love too]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[deals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dealzmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[refurbished]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 02 May 2007 16:00:09 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Travis Hudson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=257139&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sony Announces Upgraded VAIO C in New Colors, Sends Them to a Pyjama Party]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2007/04/vaiotypec.jpg"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/04/vaiotypec.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>Yes, it's a new-but-not-really Sony notebook, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/laptops/sony-vaio-c-series-core-2-duo-notebooks-are-colorful-and-light-204348.php">upgraded VAIO C series</a> with chic and totally superfluous <i>new</i> colors like "espresso black, shell white, coral pink, summer sky blue, urban grey and fresh green," probably chosen by Hello Kitty and the Teen Girl Squad while on tour in Japan, where they will be available in April.</p>
<p>Thankfully, there's more than colors in the air and they have refreshed processors too, starting with the Celeron M 430 at 1.73 GHz and reaching up to the 2.16 GHz <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #core2duo" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/core2duo/">Core 2 Duo</a> T7400. Sadly, the new versions have the same 1.280 x 800 pixels 13.3-inch display, although this time the top of the line is powered by the NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400 card instead of the previous (and lame) Intel GMA 950 chipset. And of course, they all come with yet another license of Windows Vista Home Premium, so <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/software/pc-makers-to-microsoft-vista-is-not-a-seller-you-suck-248336.php">Steve can get his cake and eat it too</a>. <span class="byline">&ndash; Jesus Diaz</span></p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('VAIOTYPEC', 8, 'VAIOTYPEC');
</script></p>
<p><a href="http://www.vaio.sony.co.jp/Products/C2/spec_retail.html">Press release (Japanese)</a> [Sony via <a href="http://akihabaranews.com/en/news-13604-It%27s+the+SONY+VAIO+day+%21%3F%21.html">Akihabara News</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/251016/sony-announces-upgraded-vaio-c-in-new-colors-sends-them-to-a-pyjama-party]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-251016]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vaio]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vaio type c]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 10 Apr 2007 10:15:16 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[www.gizmodo.com]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=251016&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Intel Holds $1M Design Contest for Coolest Living Room PC]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img alt="Team%20BICOM.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/03/Team%20BICOM.jpg" width="445" height="237" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"> When it comes to living room PCs, you can't top the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #macmini" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macmini/">Mac Mini</a>. At least that's what Intel thinks, which is why they're dishing out $1m to the person who can design a living room-worthy Viiv <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #core2duo" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/core2duo/">Core 2 Duo</a>-based PC that tops Apple's angel. Seven of the semifinalists have been chosen and can be seen/voted on before a winner is announced next month.</p>
<p>I chose my favorite up top made by team <a href="http://www.bicom-inc.com/bicomhms">BICOM</a>. It has a laser-cut touch-sensitive front panel that provides force-feedback when your fingers come close to the buttons (hit the jump for a vid on how it was made). The others, to me, are looking a little fugly. What do you guys think?</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('IntelPCDesignContest', 7, 'IntelPCDesignContest');
</script></p>

<p><object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/cC9h1--Es4M">
<param name="wmode" value="transparent">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/cC9h1--Es4M" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object></p>
<p><span class="byline">&ndash; Louis Ramirez</span><br>
<a href="http://www.intelchallenge.com/">Voting Page</a> [via <a href="http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2007/03/22/intel_challenge_goes_public/">Reg Hardware</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/246206/intel-holds-1m-design-contest-for-coolest-living-room-pc]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-246206]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple mac mini]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[home entertainment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel contest]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel design contest]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac mini]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[viiv]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 22 Mar 2007 10:50:13 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Louis Ramirez]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=246206&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Core 2 Duo Dancing Dork]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Sm2dv-eSdgw"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Sm2dv-eSdgw" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object><br />
Down at the Intel booth they set up a green screen that lets you star in their <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #core2duo" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #core2duo" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/core2duo/">Core 2 Duo</a> Commercials. You know the one where it's a bunch of copies of one person dancing around on the screen. </p>

<p>It's actually pretty cool, that is unless you're this guy. Just kidding we're not particularly good dancers here at Gizmodo, that's why you didn't see us dancing.<span class="byline">&ndash; Ben Longo and video by <a href="http://www.college2point0.com">Richard Blakeley</a></span></p>

<p>P.S. Any green screeners out there want to take a crack at this? Let us know <a href="mailto:Ben@gizmodo.com">Ben@gizmodo.com</a></p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/227154/core-2-duo-dancing-dork]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-227154]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[home entertainment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ces2007]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dance]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dancing moron]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:06:09 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[blongo3]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=227154&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Panasonic's Toughest Toughbooks, Now Faster and Brighter]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2006/12/panny_tough30.jpg"><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/12/panny_tough30.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The most hardened versions of the Panasonic Toughbooks have been updated with the latest Intel <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #core2duo" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/core2duo/">Core 2 Duo</a> processors and brighter touchscreens. Since most of these laptops will be used in broad daylight, that extra screen brightness will certainly be welcome.</p>
<p>All this durability comes at a price, though: depending on configuration, you'll spend around $4000 for the 10.4" screen Toughbook-19, and around $4500 for a fully-equipped Toughbook-30 (pictured above) with its 13.3" screen. Still, it's probably worth it if you're taking your laptop along when you go bungee jumping. <span class="byline">&ndash; Charlie White</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.akihabaranews.com/en/news-13011-More+luminous+TOUGHBOOKs%21.html">More luminous TOUGHBOOKs!</a> [Akihabara News]<br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/223490/panasonics-toughest-toughbooks-now-faster-and-brighter]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-223490]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[panasonic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[panasonic toughbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[toughbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[toughbook-19]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[toughbook-30]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:54:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie White]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=223490&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[AMD Rolls Out New Brisbane Processors]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/12/AMD%20Brisbane.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /> AMD's first 65-nanometer Athlon 64 processors have arrived. Codenamed Brisbane, the dual-core chips mark the company's transition from 90nm CPUs to 65nm. Essentially this means AMD's chips will be more energy efficient and better suited for small form factor PCs. The four processors launching today range from the 2.1GHz 4000+ ($169) to the 2.6GHz 5000+ ($301). Despite the range in performance, all of the processors will have a 65W TDP and they'll each have a 2x512KB L2 cache. AMD is still playing catch up, however, as Intel continues to enjoy the lead with their Core 2 Duos. <span class="byline">&ndash; Louis Ramirez</span><a href=""></a></p>
<p>AMD [<a href="http://www.amd.com/us-en/Corporate/VirtualPressRoom/0,,51_104_543%7E114609,00.html">Press Release</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/219277/amd-rolls-out-new-brisbane-processors]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-219277]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[amd brisbane]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[brisbane]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cpu]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 05 Dec 2006 07:30:55 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Louis Ramirez]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=219277&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Systemax Pursuit: Core 2 Duo Under a Grand]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/11/systemaxcore2duo.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Envious of all your workmates rubbing their fancy new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #core2duo" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/core2duo/">Core 2 Duo</a> notebooks in your face? Fret not, as Systemax has a Pursuit line of notebooks that even your thrifty wife will accept.</p>
<p>The Pursuit goes for $999, and has a 15.4-inch screen, 80GB hard disk, 1GB of RAM, DVDRW, Intel Extreme Graphics 2, a 1.3-megapixel webcam, and a 1.66GHz Core 2 Duo T5500. Good for your home office or for your kids as Christmas presents, seeing as they're tired of bumming laptops off their dorm-mates because you were too cheap to buy one for back-to-school. <span class="byline">&ndash; Jason Chen</span></p>
<p>Update: Not the first Core 2 Duo under a grand. Thanks Xavier.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.systemaxpc.com/">Product Site</a> [Systemax via <a href="http://www.mobilemag.com/content/100/334/C10542/">Mobile Mag</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/215736/systemax-pursuit-core-2-duo-under-a-grand]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-215736]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pursuit]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[systemax]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 17 Nov 2006 17:37:45 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=215736&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Dealzmodo: MacBook Core Duos Are Cheaper Now]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/11/macbooksohyes.jpg" class="right image158" width="158" />Just like when the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/deals/dealzmodo-core-2-duo-macbook-pros-mean-cheap-old-ones-209845.php">MacBook Pros went Core 2 Duo</a>, the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/laptops/apple-macbooks-get-core-2-duo-chips-i-yawn-213258.php">upgrade of Apple's MacBook line</a> means the old leftover laptops get a bit of a discount. For example, the 1.83 GHz model that used to be $1099 is now $899, and the 2.0 GHz black model that used to be $1499 is now $1099. Quite a steep drop thanks to their newborn brothers pushing them out from under their mother's teat.</p>
<p>If you're in the mood for a 12-inch PowerBook, they still have refurbished models of those going for $1199 down from their old original price of $1699. <span class="byline">&ndash; Jason Chen</span></p>
<p><a href="http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/AppleStore.woa/wa/RSLID?mco=2ACE5063&nclm=Certified">Refurb Store</a> [Apple]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/213427/dealzmodo-macbook-core-duos-are-cheaper-now]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-213427]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[deals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dealzmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 08 Nov 2006 17:33:18 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=213427&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Macbooks Get Core 2 Duo Chips, I Yawn]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2006/11/applekinda-thumb.png"><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/11/applekinda-thumb.png" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Before the first cup o joe, Apple dropped the word on fresh Macbooks. The major improvement come in the form of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #core2duo" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/core2duo/">Core 2 Duo</a> chips clocked at the same 1.87 and 2.0 GHz speeds as the old Core Duo CPUs. They claim they're 25% faster than the old Macbook's chips, but lets see...When the Macbook Pros were <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/announcements/new-macbook-pro-39-faster-209786.php">said to be 39% faster</a> after the upgrade from Core Duo to Core 2 Duo, they turned out to only be <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/laptops/macbook-pro-core-2-duo-benchmarks-are-in-how-much-faster-are-they-212823.php">10% faster.</a> So, I am expecting these chips to be little more than the typical speedbump-like refreshes that PC laptops go through. My guestimate? In overall performance, we see less than 5% in speed jump.</p>
<p>The other upgrades: Larger allotments of RAM in the standard configs, up to 200 GB of HD, and a dual layer DVD-burning Superdrive. That's it.</p>
<p>I will declare it: The golden age of mind blowing Apple computer hardware announcements are dead...until the next keynote. <span class="byline">&ndash;Brian Lam</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.apple.com/macbook/specs.html%3Cbr%20/%3E">Macbooks get Core 2 Duo</a> [Apple]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/213258/apple-macbooks-get-core-2-duo-chips-i-yawn]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-213258]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 08 Nov 2006 09:24:40 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=213258&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[MacBook Pro Core 2 Duo Benchmarks Are In: How Much Faster Are They?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2006/11/mbpbench.png"><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/11/mbpbench.png" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Are the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/apple/macbook-pro-core-2-duo-is-here-209686.php">updated Core 2 Duo MacBook Pros</a> really <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/announcements/new-macbook-pro-39-faster-209786.php">39% faster</a> than their Core Duo predecessors? MacWorld takes a look to see how much the speed boost and additional L2 cache really helped.</p>
<p>Scoring times in photoshop a full 24 seconds faster in Photoshop, and 45 seconds faster in Compressor, the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #core2duo" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/core2duo/">Core 2 Duo</a> models quite speedy, but not 39% faster. In fact, in some tests they were only marginally faster (a time of 1:06 down to 1:01, time of 0:58 to 0:54, and frame rate of 59 to 63.9). In tasks that were more processor oriented, the Core 2 Duo's speed improvements were "substantial". In disk or graphics intensive tasks, were quite a bit smaller. Just be aware <i>what kind</i> of performance gains you're getting when you upgrade to a Core 2 Duo <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #macbookpro" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbookpro/">MacBook Pro</a>. <span class="byline">&ndash; Jason Chen</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.macworld.com/2006/11/firstlooks/mbpbench/index.php">Benchmarks: MacBook Pro gets its Core 2 Duo boost</a> [MacWorld]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/212823/macbook-pro-core-2-duo-benchmarks-are-in-how-much-faster-are-they]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-212823]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 06 Nov 2006 18:56:07 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=212823&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Dealzmodo: Core 2 Duo MacBook Pros Mean Cheap Old Ones]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2006/10/mbpdeals.png"><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/10/mbpdeals.png" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Looking to get a deal on a MacBook Pro? Hop on over to Apple's refurb shop where they have yesterday's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #coreduo" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/coreduo/">Core Duo</a> MacBook Pros for 22-37% off their old retail price. Just like what happened when my second child was born and we gave the first less attention, the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/apple/macbook-pro-core-2-duo-is-here-209686.php">new Core 2 Duo MacBook Pros</a> are making the older models look like dog doo.</p>
<p>The refurbs offer the same warranty as new models, so you get the same protection if this ever dies. If you're not impressed with the marginal speed increases of Core 2 Duos, or if you're looking to save a few bucks, go with these. <span class="byline">&ndash; Jason Chen</span></p>
<p><a href="http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/AppleStore.woa/6144000/wo/UF1JHg7rxOCV3O1GRrR1AePLBCN/0.0.0.21.1.0.8.7.1.0.1.1">Apple Store</a> [via <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2006/10/24/macbook-pro-core-2-duo-means-great-deals-on-yesterdays-macbook/">TUAW</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/209845/dealzmodo-core-2-duo-macbook-pros-mean-cheap-old-ones]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-209845]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[deals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA["macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA["macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA["macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dealzmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pro"]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Oct 2006 20:00:38 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=209845&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Trigem Little Lluon+: Big Things in Small Packages]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/10/lluon_main.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />In case you didn't notice, those fabulous babes are holding some exceptionally slim PCs from Trigem, and they're calling them <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #littlelluon" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/littlelluon/">Little Lluon+</a>. They offer a choice of either a 1.7GHz or 2GHz <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #core2duo" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/core2duo/">Core 2 Duo</a> processors, up to a 320GB SATA hard disk and 512MB of RAM.</p>
<p>The diminutive PCs are aimed at <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #hometheater" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/hometheater/">home theater</a> users, and if they can just keep that fan noise down, these might be the worthy addition to that shelf of components. However, topping off at a hard disk capacity of 320GB, apparently these home theater PCs (HTPC) aren't aimed at HDTV users.</p>
<p>Although Trigem's a Korean company, we're hoping US designers will follow the lead of Trigem and take notice of this pleasing form factor. Some already have. Case in point: WinBook, whose $1200 <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/pcs/winbook-jiv-mini-htpc-reviewed-verdict-small-but-loaded-191049.php">Jiv Mini HTPC</a> is undoubtedly on the right track. Gentlemen, start your copiers, and while you're at it, keep them quiet, and make them HDTV CableCard-ready DVRs. <span class="byline">&ndash; Charlie White</span></p>
<p>More pics of the lovely ladies and close-ups of the PCs, after the jump.<br></p>

<p><img alt="LLUON_1_jpg.jpg" src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/10/LLUON_1_jpg.jpg" width="499" height="412" class="center"></p>
<p><img alt="LLUON_3_jpg.jpg" src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/10/LLUON_3_jpg.jpg" width="399" height="341" class="center"></p>
<p><img alt="LLUON_4_jpg.jpg" src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/10/LLUON_4_jpg.jpg" width="369" height="353" class="center"></p>
<p><img alt="LLUON_8_jpg.jpg" src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/10/LLUON_8_jpg.jpg" width="392" height="361" class="center"></p>
<p><img alt="LLUON_9_jpg.jpg" src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/10/LLUON_9_jpg.jpg" width="386" height="354" class="center"></p>
<p><a href="http://www.akihabaranews.com/en/en/news-12661-The+new+Little+Lluon++with+a+Core+2+Duo!.html">The new Little Lluon+ with a Core 2 Duo!</a> [Akhihabara News]<br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/209748/trigem-little-lluon%252B-big-things-in-small-packages]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-209748]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[home entertainment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[home theater]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htpc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[little lluon+]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[trigem]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[trigem little lluon+]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Oct 2006 15:30:11 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie White]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=209748&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple: What Took You So God Damn Long?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/10/apple_retarded_ejac.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />While all the other Mac worshipers dance in the streets and shout their hosannas at Apple's leisurly introduction of its <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #core2duo" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/core2duo/">Core 2 Duo</a>-packing MacBook Pros, the rest of us surly chip watchers sit in the dark and dank back rooms wondering wtf Apple has been doing, taking two months just to swap out a processor. Check out the graph above for some context. Keep in mind, there are not any MacBooks with Core 2 Duo processors available yet, either.</p>
<p>In fact, we asked Apple why there was such a lengthy delay, and their response: "Our last updates were less than six months ago." Six months? Apple, thinking different [sic], is the cow's tail. <span class="byline">&ndash; Charlie White</span></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/209717/apple-what-took-you-so-god-damn-long]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-209717]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[merom]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Oct 2006 10:51:50 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie White]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=209717&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[MacBook Pro Core 2 Duo Is Here]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/10/macbookprocore2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />
<div class="FloatHack"></div>
<p>Just like that, and without fanfare, Apple dropped MacBook Pros with <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #core2duo" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/core2duo/">Core 2 Duo</a> processors today. A lot of people have been waiting for these lovelies to come out, and they don't disappoint, offering a 39 percent speed boost double memory and a FireWire 800 port in the same one-inch shell.</p>
<p>There are two 15-inch models that are available today weighing-in at 5.6 lbs. One is a 2.16 GHz and sells for $1,999, then there is a 2.33 GHz for $2,499. The 17-inch MacBook Pro (6.8 lbs) is available starting next week for $2,799.</p>
<p>The highlights:<br>
* Clock Speed up to 2.33 GHz<br>
* 7x faster than the PowerMac G4 notebooks released one year ago<br>
* Hard drive starts at 120GB &mdash; this is where the current MacBooks top out &mdash; and is configurable for up to 200GB</p>
<p>Battery life is the same on the 17-inch model, but the 15-incher takes a slight hit (shaving 30 minutes off of your wireless productivity versus the current models).</p>
<p>What took them so long? Just interviewed the VP of Product Marketing who responded: "Our last updates were less than six months ago." Dude, that's centuries in laptop time.</p>
<p>Complete specs after the jump: <span class="byline">&ndash; Noah Robischon</span></p>

<blockquote><br>
The 2.16 GHz, 15-inch MacBook Pro, for a suggested retail price of $1,999 (US), includes:<br>
<br>
&mdash; 15.4-inch widescreen 1440 x 900 LCD display with 300 cd/m2 brightness;<br>
&mdash; 2.16 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor;<br>
&mdash; 1GB of 667 MHz DDR2 SDRAM, expandable to 3GB;<br>
&mdash; 120GB Serial ATA hard drive running at 5400 rpm, with Sudden Motion<br>
Sensor;<br>
&mdash; a slot-load 6x SuperDrive(TM) with double-layer support (DVD+R<br>
DL/DVD+/-RW/CD-RW) optical drive;<br>
&mdash; PCI Express-based ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 with 128MB GDDR3 memory;<br>
&mdash; DVI-out port for external display (VGA-out adapter included,<br>
Composite/S-Video out adapter sold separately);<br>
&mdash; built-in Dual Link support for driving Apple 30-inch Cinema HD Display;<br>
&mdash; built-in iSight video camera;<br>
&mdash; Gigabit Ethernet port;<br>
&mdash; built-in AirPort Extreme wireless networking and Bluetooth 2.0+EDR;<br>
&mdash; ExpressCard/34 expansion card slot;<br>
&mdash; two USB 2.0 ports, one FireWire 800 port, and one FireWire 400 port;<br>
&mdash; one audio line in and one headphone out port, each supporting optical<br>
digital audio;<br>
&mdash; Scrolling TrackPad and illuminated keyboard;<br>
&mdash; the infrared Apple Remote; and<br>
&mdash; 85 Watt Apple MagSafe Power Adapter.<br>
<br>
The 2.33 GHz, 15-inch MacBook Pro, for a suggested retail price of $2,499 (US), includes:<br>
<br>
&mdash; 15.4-inch widescreen 1440 x 900 LCD display with 300 cd/m2 brightness;<br>
&mdash; 2.33 GHz Intel Core 2Duo processor;<br>
&mdash; 2GB of 667MHz DDR2 SDRAM, expandable to 3GB;<br>
&mdash; 120GB Serial ATA hard drive running at 5400 rpm, with Sudden Motion<br>
Sensor;<br>
&mdash; a slot-load 6x SuperDrive with double-layer support (DVD+R DL/DVD+/-RW/<br>
CD-RW) optical drive;<br>
&mdash; PCI Express-based ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 with 256MB GDDR3 memory;<br>
&mdash; DVI-out port for external display (VGA-out adapter included,<br>
Composite/S-Video out adapter sold separately);<br>
&mdash; built-in Dual Link support for driving Apple 30-inch Cinema HD Display;<br>
&mdash; built-in iSight video camera;<br>
&mdash; Gigabit Ethernet port;<br>
&mdash; built-in Airport Extreme wireless networking and Bluetooth 2.0+EDR;<br>
&mdash; ExpressCard/34 expansion card slot;<br>
&mdash; two USB 2.0 ports, one FireWire 800 port, and one FireWire 400 port;<br>
&mdash; one audio line in and one headphone out port, each supporting optical<br>
digital audio;<br>
&mdash; Scrolling TrackPad and illuminated keyboard;<br>
&mdash; the infrared Apple Remote; and<br>
&mdash; 85 Watt Apple MagSafe Power Adapter.<br>
<br>
The 2.33 GHz, 17-inch MacBook Pro, for a suggested retail price of $2,799 (US), includes:<br>
&mdash; 17-inch widescreen 1680 x 1050 LCD display with 300 cd/m2 brightness;<br>
&mdash; 2.33 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor;<br>
&mdash; 2GB of 667 MHz DDR2 SDRAM, expandable to 3GB;<br>
&mdash; 160GB Serial ATA hard drive running at 5400 rpm, with Sudden Motion<br>
Sensor;<br>
&mdash; a slot-load 8x SuperDrive with double-layer support (DVD+R DL/DVD+/-RW/<br>
CD-RW) optical drive;<br>
&mdash; PCI Express-based ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 with 256MB GDDR3 memory;<br>
&mdash; DVI-out port for external display (VGA-out adapter included,<br>
Composite/S-Video out adapter sold separately);<br>
&mdash; built-in Dual Link support for driving Apple 30-inch Cinema HD Display;<br>
&mdash; built-in iSight video camera;<br>
&mdash; Gigabit Ethernet port;<br>
&mdash; built-in AirPort Extreme wireless networking and Bluetooth 2.0+EDR;<br>
&mdash; ExpressCard/34 expansion card slot;<br>
&mdash; three USB 2.0 ports, one FireWire 800 port, and one FireWire 400 port;<br>
&mdash; one audio line in and one headphone out port, each supporting optical<br>
digital audio;<br>
&mdash; Scrolling TrackPad and illuminated keyboard with ambient light sensor;<br>
&mdash; the infrared Apple Remote; and<br>
&mdash; 85 Watt Apple MagSafe Power Adapter.<br></blockquote>
<br>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/209686/macbook-pro-core-2-duo-is-here]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-209686]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Oct 2006 10:37:53 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Noah Robischon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=209686&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Rumor: Core 2 Duo MacBook, MacBook Pros coming in November]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/10/sm-pcmag-mbp-17inch.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Our blogging cohorts, Engadget, got some word about the release date of the highly anticipated <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #core2duo" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/core2duo/">Core 2 Duo</a> Apple laptops. An IT guy at a Swiss University got the scoop on the Core 2 Duo MacBooks from some sales reps and word is that the laptops will be released in November. Not much other information is known about this Swiss IT guy, but it is still awesome that the Core 2 Duo-ness will be here sooner than expected, possibly.</p>
<p>This makes me all happy in my underoos&mdash;I've been waiting for the Core 2 Duo MacBooks to be released so I can upgrade my ancient Dell laptop that is just waiting to explode on me. <span class="byline">&ndash; Travis Hudson</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/17/core-2-duo-macbook-and-macbook-pro-due-this-november/">Core 2 Duo MacBook and MacBook Pro due this November?</a> [Engadget]<br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/208519/rumor-core-2-duo-macbook-macbook-pros-coming-in-november]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-208519]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:32:18 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Travis Hudson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=208519&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Fujitsu Rolls Out Three LifeBooks, All Dual-Core Intel or AMD]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2006/10/lifebook_main.jpg"><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/10/lifebook_main.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Fujitsu announced three attractive lappies as part of its LifeBook line, the N6420 (pictured above) with its big 17-inch screen, the clean, white A3110 with its 15.4-inch display and the A6010, also a 15.4-incher. The 10-pound A6420 (starting at $1499) is a desktop replacement with an optional HD DVD player (for $460 extra), Intel <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #core2duo" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/core2duo/">Core 2 Duo</a> processor and a remote, but no HDMI port.</p>
<p>The A3110 ($1,399) has an <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #amdturion64x2" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/amdturion64x2/">AMD Turion 64 x2</a> dual core processor, and is a bit lighter at 6 pounds. The A6010 is quite similar to the A3110 but with your choice of an Intel Core Duo or Core 2 Duo processor. It's $1149. They're all pretty, and all are available now.</p>
<p>These notebooks look a lot like Dell's offerings inside and out (well, except for that AMD one), with similar pricing, too. Pretty soon you'll be shopping price on notebooks just like you do any other commodity. See more appealing pics of all these luscious laptops, after the jump. <span class="byline">&ndash; Charlie White</span></p>
<p><a href="http://store.shopfujitsu.com/fpc/Ecommerce/productoverview.do?type=NB&pgid=Notebooks">Product Page</a> [Fujitsu]</p>

<p><img alt="LifeBookA3110large.jpg" src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/10/LifeBookA3110large.jpg" width="442" height="356" class="center"> LifeBook A3110</p>
<p><img alt="LifeBookA6010large.jpg" src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/10/LifeBookA6010large.jpg" width="428" height="423" class="center"> LifeBook A6010</p>
<p><img alt="LieBookA6010front.jpg" src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/10/LieBookA6010front.jpg" width="449" height="336" class="center"> LifeBook A6010</p>
<p><img alt="LifeBookN6420high.jpg" src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/10/LifeBookN6420high.jpg" width="605" height="510" class="center"> LifeBook A6420<br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/208114/fujitsu-rolls-out-three-lifebooks-all-dual+core-intel-or-amd]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-208114]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lifebook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[a3110]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[a6010]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[amd turion 64 x2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fujitsu]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fujitsu a3110]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fujitsu a6010]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fujitsu n6420]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lifebook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lifebook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[n6420]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Oct 2006 11:06:50 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie White]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=208114&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Rumor: Apple Ramping Up Production of Core 2 Duo MacBook Pros]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/10/core2duo.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Now that we've seen how well <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/laptops/how-often-is-thinksecret-right-about-apple-predictions-205928.php">Think Secret</a> does with Apple rumors, here's one from AppleInsider. They've gotten reports that Apple is starting manufacturing of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #core2duo" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/core2duo/">Core 2 Duo</a> MacBook Pros for the holidays.</p>
<p>On Apple's online store, stock MacBook Pros are still shipping immediately, but distributors and reseller partners are getting wait times of 2 to 3 weeks for custom orders. That may just mean they're stocking up in time for the holidays, or it could mean they're ramping down the Core Duos in favor of the Core 2 Duos. We'll have to wait and see.</p>
<p>The new models are reported to be 2.33GHz Core 2 Duos, which should be out in time to make sure Apple has a "Core 2 Duo" notebook presence this holiday. Our recommendation is to wait a few weeks to see what they're up to, just to be on the safe side. <span class="byline">&ndash; Jason Chen</span></p>
<p><a href="http://appleinsider.com/article.php?id=2114">Apple prepares for Core 2 Duo MacBook Pro ramp</a> [Apple Insider]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/205952/rumor-apple-ramping-up-production-of-core-2-duo-macbook-pros]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-205952]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA["macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA["macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA["macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pro"]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Oct 2006 21:06:05 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=205952&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sony Vaio C Series Core 2 Duo Notebooks Are Colorful and Light]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2006/09/sony_colorful_notebooks.jpg"><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/09/sony_colorful_notebooks.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
How about a Sony <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #core2duo" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/core2duo/">Core 2 Duo</a> notebook in some fancy colors? That's what you can get with these Sony Vaio notebooks whose screens hit that sweet spot between a large 15-inch screen and a slightly-too-small 12-incher&mdash;13.3 inches&mdash;just right for using on a plane but not bumping up against the back of that seat in front of you.</p>
<p>Sony's built in 802.11a/b/g wireless connectivity and a DVD burner, and the laptop is nice and light, too: at five pounds, and available in five colors. That makes five reasons why you might want one. Or not. The black and urban grey models will be available next month for $1350, those purdy colors will wait until November to make their debut. <span class="byline">&ndash; Charlie White</span></p>
<p><a href="http://news.sel.sony.com/en/press_room/consumer/computer_peripheral/notebooks/release/25264.html">Press Release</a> [Sony Style]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/204348/sony-vaio-c-series-core-2-duo-notebooks-are-colorful-and-light]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-204348]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[c series]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony vaio c series]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vaio]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:36:08 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie White]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=204348&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple and Intel Working Together on Top Secret Technologies?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/09/appleintel.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Apple and Intel have joined forces to develop several new technologies together, it emerged this week. The partnership became apparent when an Intel executive gave an interview to <i>InformationWeek</i> and said, "... number of projects are under way with Apple on next-generation technologiess&mdash;but I can't detail those." Juicy industry gossip, how we love thee.</p>
<p>What isn't any clearer, of course, is exactly what kinds of technologies are being worked on. Is it MacBook-related, or is it something so different, so <i>secret</i>, that we can't even comprehend it? Hopefully, the blabbermouth Intel exec just wasn't referring to <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/laptops/intel-core-duo-whassup-faster-197105.php">Core 2 Duo</a>-based <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/laptops/apple-to-release-updated-macbooks-before-christmas-201567.php">MacBook Pro</a> that we expect to hit stores before the holiday rush. <span class="byline">&ndash; Nicholas Deleon</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/article.php?id=2095">Intel and Apple in cahoots on several new technologies</a> [AppleInsider]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/204264/apple-and-intel-working-together-on-top-secret-technologies]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-204264]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[merom]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[partnerships]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumors]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:06:38 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gizloco]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=204264&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple To Release Updated MacBooks Before Christmas?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/09/core2macbook.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Yes, it's not exactly a state secret that Apple will update its MacBook laptops sometime in the future, but the key here is the timing, that is, before Christmas. Moles inside Apple have indicated that the 13-inch MacBook and the 15- and 17-inch MacBookPro have all been given the go-ahead to use Intel's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #core2duo" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/core2duo/">Core 2 Duo</a> processor and that it's just a matter of time until Apple hits the "go" button, much like the one in Endless Mike's car in <i>The Adventures of Pete & Pete</i>. Latest hints point to a release sometime around Thanksgiving, giving Mommy and Daddy Consumer plenty of time to shop.</p>
<p>Nobody knows if the MacBook and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #macbookpro" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbookpro/">MacBook Pro</a> will be updated simultaneously, but guys who professionally guess things don't expect much of an update to either laptop save for the processor. Apparently, Intel shipped Apple a bunch of Core 2 Duos at the end of August, but Apple chose to use them for its <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/pcs/24inch-imacs-graphics-card-is-selfupgradeable-199477.php">iMac</a>. Let's give a round of applause to hearsay! <span class="byline">&ndash; Nicholas Deleon</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/article.php?id=2060">Apple to update MacBook lines in time for holidays</a> [AppleInsider]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/201567/apple-to-release-updated-macbooks-before-christmas]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-201567]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 19 Sep 2006 09:40:36 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gizloco]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=201567&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo Frankenreview: Dell XPS M1710 Core 2 Duo Laptop]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/09/dellcore2duofrank.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><br>
This past month, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/intel/intel-names-nextgen-chips-core-2-duo-172129.php">Core 2 Duo</a> laptop announcements flew by hard and fast. Intel's new Merom chips got jammed between the legs of every notebook out there, and the morning-after reviews are finally upon us.</p>
<p>The machine with the most acclaim? The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #dellxpsm1710" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/dellxpsm1710/">Dell XPS M1710</a> Core2Duo gaming laptop. This big boy gets a 2.33Ghz CPU, an Nvidia GeForce Go 7900GTX gaming card, Wireless-N. PC Magazine's all hot and bothered by it, digging deep to come up with the "Awesome" verdict. But our review, patched together from the undead limbs of other reviews, will be better. How does the Dell compare to an HP, and a slightly less endowed Dell Inspiron? See the chart, and jump for choice quotes on each machine.</p>
<p><img alt="core2.jpg" src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/09/core2.jpg" width="450" height="347" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"></p>

<p><strong>Frankenreview MEGA XTREME TIMES THREE</strong><br>
<strong><br>
<img alt="aDELL.jpg" src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/09/aDELL.jpg" width="376" height="223" class="center"><br>
Dell XPS M1710 (high end)</strong><br>
"Continues to shine as the best gaming laptop on the market."<br>
"When it comes to 3D games, though, the XPS M1710's new processor alone couldn't provide a performance bump"<br>
- Low gaming resolutions will see performance bump. Higher resolutions will not.<br>
"...quickly dispensed with processor-intensive tasks such as encoding MP3 files and multitasking"<br>
"The biggest improvement comes in my video encoding tests. Thanks to the Intel <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #core2duo" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/core2duo/">Core 2 Duo</a> mobile processor, video professionals should see more than a 20 percent differential."<br>
- Edit that furry documentary you've been hanging on to.<br>
-"The M1710's performance scores even surpassed those of the Area-51 m5550, made by Dell's recent acquisition, Alienware, even though both machines have the same processor."<br>
-Doom 3 scores benefited the most from the processor upgrade, leaping 28 percent. Splinter Cell scores also improved by 15 percent.<br>
-Battery life just over 2.5 hours.</p>
<p><strong>Dell XPS M1710 Core 2 Duo Laptop Stat Smather:<br></strong>Type: Gaming, Media<br>
Operating System: MS Windows XP Media Center<br>
Processor Name: Intel Core Duo T2600<br>
Processor Speed: 2.16-2.33 GHz<br>
RAM: 2048 MB<br>
Weight: 8.8 lb<br>
Screen Size: 17 inches<br>
Screen Size Type: widescreen<br>
Graphics Card: nVidia GeForce Go 7900GTX<br>
Storage Capacity: 100 GB<br>
Wireless: 802.11a/g<br>
Primary Optical Drive: DVD+R D</p>
<p><img alt="aHP.jpg" src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/09/aHP.jpg" width="400" height="369" class="center"></p>
<p><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #hppaviliondv6000t" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/hppaviliondv6000t/">HP Pavilion dv6000t</a> (Midrange)</strong><br>
"...we love HP's QuickPlay feature for launching and controlling multimedia files"<br>
"...deliver[ed] the best MobileMark 2005 score we've ever seen from a mainstream portable"<br>
"The biggest differences (over 20 percent) can be found on running tasks such as video and audio encoding."<br>
- We love our video.<br>
"Battery life is mediocre, if not disappointing, at a mere 2 hours 27 minutes."<br>
"Battery life was a respectable 3 hours and 39 minutes."<br>
- FIGHT!<br>
<strong><br>
HP Pavilion dv6000t Stat Smather</strong><br>
Type: General Purpose, Media<br>
Operating System: MS Windows XP Professional<br>
Processor Name: Intel Core 2 Duo T7400<br>
Processor Speed: 2.16 GHz<br>
RAM: 512 MB<br>
Weight: 6.1 lb<br>
Screen Size: 15.4 inches<br>
Screen Size Type: widescreen<br>
Graphics Card: nVidia GeForce Go 7400<br>
Storage Capacity: 120 GB<br>
Wireless: 802.11a/g<br>
Primary Optical Drive: DVD+R DL</p>
<p><img alt="aDELL2.jpg" src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/09/aDELL2.jpg" width="400" height="400" class="center"><br>
<strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #dellinspirone1405" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/dellinspirone1405/">Dell Inspiron E1405</a> (cheap)</strong><br>
"...the performance gains I had expected from the processor upgrade really didn't come to fruition"<br>
"It appears to be about 10% faster than the proceeding Core Duo"<br>
"...media related tasks will benefit more than office applications will from an upgrade to a system with the T5500 chip"<br>
- Considering the E1405's price, there might be another bottleneck going on here.<br>
"At the end of the day...who can argue with paying the same but getting more?"<br>
- Even if it's just a tiny bit more. <span class="byline">&ndash; Mark Wilson</span><br>
<br>
<strong>Stat Smather for the Dell Inspirion E1405<br></strong>Type: General Purpose, Value<br>
Operating System: MS Windows XP Media Center<br>
Processor Name: Intel Core 2 Duo T5500<br>
Processor Speed: 1.6 GHz<br>
RAM: 1024 MB<br>
Weight: 5.8 lb<br>
Screen Size: 14.1 inches<br>
Screen Size Type: widescreen<br>
Graphics Card: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 950<br>
Storage Capacity: 80 GB<br>
Wireless: 802.11a/g<br>
Primary Optical Drive: DVD+R DL</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,2008177,00.asp">PC Mag</a> [Dell XPS]<br>
<a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,2009719,00.asp">PC Mag</a> [HP Pav]<br>
<a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,2009309,00.asp">PC Mag</a> [Dell Insp]<br>
<a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/Dell_XPS_M1710_Core_2_Duo/4505-3121_7-32036695-2.html">CNET</a><br>
<a href="http://computershopper.com/reviews/dell_xps_m1710_core_2_duo">Computer Shopper</a><br>
<a href="http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=3137&review=Inspiron+e1505+Core+2+Duo">Notebook Review</a><br>
<a href="http://laptopmag.com/Review/HP-Pavilion-dv6000t.htm">Laptop Mag</a></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/198695/gizmodo-frankenreview-dell-xps-m1710-core-2-duo-laptop]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-198695]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core2duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dell inspiron e1405]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dell xps m1710]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[frankenreview]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hp pavilion dv6000t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[roundup]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 06 Sep 2006 15:06:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=198695&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Releases 24-inch iMac, Has Core 2 Duo]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/09/24inchimac.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Apple has quietly released a 24-inch widescreen iMac that features the Intel <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #core2duo" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/core2duo/">Core 2 Duo</a> processor and an nVidia 7300GT. While Apple's U.S. online store doesn't seem to have been updated quite yet, this new, giant iMac is all over many of the company's Euro stores.</p>
<p>Thanks to the increased screen real estate, the iMac's resolution has been upped to 1,920x1,200 and is powered by a 2.16GHz Core 2 Duo. The rest of the system's specs appear to be similar to the 20-inch version, that is, 1GB of RAM, an 8x DL DVD burner and 4MB of L2 cache.</p>
<p>Right now, it looks like it's taking Apple a little while to update all of its online stores to reflect the new addition to the iMac line, but, as the saying goes, the cat's out of the bag now. Converting from Euroland money, the 24-inch iMac will cost around $2,621. <span class="byline">&ndash; Nicholas Deleon</span></p>
<p><a href="http://store.apple.com/Apple/WebObjects/fistore.woa/6074042/wo/vMENAyWta6Gf3GpblW2D3uEad6j/0.PSLID?mco=BC302A9&nclm=iMac">Product Page</a> [Apple Finland]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/198748/apple-releases-24+inch-imac-has-core-2-duo]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-198748]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 06 Sep 2006 09:55:58 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gizloco]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=198748&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Acer 9520 for Fun'n'Games]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/09/inner_main_as9520.gif" class="right image158" width="158" />Unlike the other <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/laptops/acer-3290-laptop-gets-magnesiumd-198459.php">Acer laptop</a> today, this one isn't built as much for portability, but rather for power. This 17-inch beast is powered by the Intel <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #core2duo" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/core2duo/">Core 2 Duo</a> processor and the NVIDIA GeForge Go 7900 GS or 7600. This laptop has an integrated digital/analog TV-tuner, HDMI-out, DVI ports, HDCP support and S/PDIF. Hot diggity damn, it is pretty much a high-end <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #mediacenter" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/mediacenter/">media center</a>, especially with the included remote.</p>
<p>This laptop also comes with the essentials: Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, ExpressCard, SATA, Acer SignalUp and is all housed in a pretty case. No worries for those planning ahead, this laptop is very Vista-friendly. No word on pricing or availability, but we'll keep you posted. Our guess? Probably well over $2,000 and available in the next month or two. <span class="byline">&ndash; Travis Hudson</span></p>
<p><a href="http://global.acer.com/products/notebook/as9520.htm">Product Page</a> [Acer]<br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/198462/acer-9520-for-funngames]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-198462]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[9520]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[acer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[media center]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 05 Sep 2006 10:43:10 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Travis Hudson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=198462&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Mad Hatter's Quad Core 2 Duo Server Goes Sixteen Ways]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/08/6800.jpg"><img alt="6800.jpg" src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/08/6800-thumb.jpg" width="520" height="362" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"></a><br>
This one goes out to all my IT homies.</p>
<p>A Gizmodo reader just sent this screen shot in of task manager running on a server he built for work. It runs 4 processors, that have 2 cores each, with each of those cores hyperthreaded. So...That shows up in Windows as 16 procs. I'll stand back and let the man speak for himself:</p>
<blockquote>Dell PE6800, Quad Processor Dual Core w/Hyperthreading running Win2003-R2 Enterprise. Windows sees all that processor goodness as 16 separate processors. The onboard 26GB of RAM and 3TB of local storage round out this sweet server. Price ? $25k-ish. It's going to be a kickass SQL server machine.</blockquote>
<p>We asked him to send us a picture of it loaded. Since it was a preproduction server, he had to run some apps. Namely, "defrag, scandisk /f, virus scan on all fixed disks, and finally a five minute CPU stress/reliability test" Click to the jump to see how the monster fared.<br></p>

<p><a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/08/stress_test.jpg"><img alt="stress_test.jpg" src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/08/stress_test-thumb.jpg" width="520" height="245"></a></p>
<p>Swimmingly, I'd say!<br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/198190/mad-hatters-quad-core-2-duo-server-goes-sixteen-ways]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-198190]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cpu]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hyperthreaded]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nerd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[quad]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[server]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 01 Sep 2006 14:00:27 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=198190&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Surprise! Mac mini Core Solo CPUs Quietly Getting Duo'd?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/08/MacMiniDuo.jpg" class="right image158" width="158" />Here's a report:mdash;a lone report, mind you, of a buyer's new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #macmini" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macmini/">Mac mini</a> shipped with upgraded specs. He couldn't have been happier if a stripper jumped from the box. From SuperG's words found on hardmac.com:<br></p>
<blockquote>I have ordered a Mac mini <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #coresolo" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/coresolo/">Core solo</a> with 1GB of RAM last Saturday to use it as a server, and what a surprise when I received the box!
<p>My Mac mini has been upgraded:<br>
- Core Duo 1.66GHz instead of Core Solo 1.5GHz<br>
- HD 100GB instead of 60GB<br>
- and a SuperDrive instead of a Combo!</p>
<p>Thanks Apple !</p>
<p>On the box, the specifications are those of a Mac mini Core Solo...</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Who knows if this is just a mistake, or the start of another beautiful revision. As of now, there aren't any changes to the Apple store. Anyone else have a similar experience?<span class="byline">&ndash;Brian Lam</span></p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.hardmac.com/news/2006-08-31/#5869">Hardmac</a> via <a href="http://www.macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/apple_upgrades_mac_mini/">Mac Daily News</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/198006/surprise-mac-mini-core-solo-cpus-quietly-getting-duod]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-198006]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core solo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac mini]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:33:34 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=198006&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Overclocking Core 2 Duo: Revving Up an Extra Giga-Hurt, Painlessly]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/08/core2duo.jpg" class="right image158" width="158" />Those who tinker with sophisticated cooling technology can often overclock processors to extraordinary speeds, but the guys at TechSpot took a more practical approach. Using a rock-bottom-priced ($180) E6300 <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #core2duo" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/core2duo/">Core 2 Duo</a> processor and a few simple parts, they raised its clock speed from 1.86GHz up to 3.03GHz without compromising stability. As a result, they got better clock-speed performance with this low-priced processor than they would have using a $1000 2.93GHz Core 2 Extreme 6800 chip.</p>
<p>Looky what they did with the more-expensive ($580) E6700 Core 2 Duo chip, cranking it up an extra 1GHz from 2.66GHz to a lofty 3.66GHz. Sure, some overclockers are able to exceed 4GHz with that same E6700 Core 2 Duo, but that's only possible when using exotic, expensive and impractical water cooling systems. Without using much more than a 120mm fan and an aftermarket heat sink to cool the over-revving chip, these guys were able to achieve a 33% speedup, calling its performance "astonishing." The tweakage involved is not for the faint of heart, though. See how they did it after the jump. <span class="byline">&ndash; Charlie White</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.techspot.com/article/13-intel-core2duo-e6300-e6700-overclocking/">Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 and E6700 Overclocking</a> [TechSpot]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/197886/overclocking-core-2-duo-revving-up-an-extra-giga+hurt-painlessly]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-197886]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[e6300]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[e6700]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[overclocking]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 31 Aug 2006 10:17:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie White]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=197886&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Core 2 Duo Coming To Apple MacBooks Sept. 16?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="apple-macbook-pro.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/08/apple-macbook-pro.jpg" width="230" height="187" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"/>File this under R for "Rumor", but another Mac site is speculating that Apple will release updates to their laptop line come Sept. 16. The annual Paris Expo could be just the time for Apple to stick the recently released <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #core2duo" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #core2duo" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/core2duo/">Core 2 Duo</a> processors in their MacBooks and MacBook Pros, joining <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/laptops/toshiba-launches-qosmio-g35-laptop-with-core-2-duo-and-hddvd-197337.php">Toshiba</a>, <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/laptops/core-2-duo-notebooks-launched-dell-rocks-xps-line-with-more-to-come-197063.php">Dell</a>, and <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/laptops/samsung-core-2-duos-the-q35-and-the-r55-notebooks-197128.php">Samsung</a> in the upgraded notebook party.</p>

<p>Keep in mind this is just a rumor, and nobody knows whether Apple will do this or not. But if you can wait on your laptop purchase until the 16th of September, it's probably a good idea to. <span class="byline">&ndash; Jason Chen</span></p>

<p><a href="http://www.macnewsworld.com/story/EVpq8qW8XWqfFV/Is-Next-Gen-Apple-Laptop-Coming-Soon.xhtml">Is Next-Gen Apple Laptop Coming Soon?</a> [Mac News World via <a href="http://crunchgear.com/2006/08/29/dont-buy-an-apple-macbook-or-macbook-pro-just-yet/">Crunchgear</a>]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/197440/core-2-duo-coming-to-apple-macbooks-sept-16]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-197440]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 29 Aug 2006 18:15:47 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=197440&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
