• more about #digitalcameras
    PurpleMonkeyDishwasher:: I can't get enough of these types of typos haha. I recommend www.engrishfunny.com or of course failblog.org for anyone who for some reason has never v... more »
    dfp3050: That's some cool and creative stuff. I could watch a whole movie of that kind of animation set to a Radiohead album. more »
    Zanzan42: So which ex-Giz editor is responsible for this? more »
    P3nnst8r: Sure, u can bring the technology. But can you bring the ROCK? more »
    njdevil: Man, I love Radiohead, but I can't bring myself to listen to more than one of their songs a day. (Thank you for helping me fill my qouta) more »
    david.wilhelmsson001: I see the typo - it's "Faeces detection", not "Face detection". more »
    Prostate of Grace: If the batteries cure constipation, I am a little baffled on how to use them properly. I hope they are 'AAA.' D-cells frighten me. more »
    Alfisted: They must be Energizers. more »
    dragonfire312: Man, they stole my idea! Oh wait, mine electrocutes people until they give in to the pain and take a shit. Oh well, same result. more »
    NewbiusMaximus: If Samsung collaborated with Pentax and used Pentax "K" mount lenses, then there wouldn't be (as much of) a problem. In fact, Pentax is probably the ... more »
    Sandeep Murali: DSLRs like the Nikon D3000 and the Canon 1000D are already pint sized. And they work with dozens of lenses from the respective manufacturers' catalog... more »
    lpranal: I do not understand you, Sam-I-Am. I realize you have a vested interest in getting people to buy lenses from you. fine. So make some lenses that ar... more »
    J2M3: ah jeeze... sigma just cried a little. more »
    RainyDayInterns: DOA more »
    Deckard: It looks like a pre-production prototype. more »
    Jrsy Devil's Advocate®: $1,110 dollars?? No offense but it looks like it was made for about 3 bucks out of an old disposable camera housing. And the blue accents don't just... more »
    Thee Sea: $1,100 gets me 648x480 video and digital zoom? Excuse me if I don't claw at my pants in a desperate bid to get my wallet out. Why is digital zoom eve... more »
    Noobs-R-Us: No Panasonic. That's why I use Lightroom! more »
    Kaiser-Machead: Sort of puts another dent in the whole Macs-for-media thing. The fact that compatibility wasn't there in the first place is sad. more »
    bornonbord: Well paint me silly: Was the entire Mac platform completely unable to deal with RAW from these cameras until now, or just Mac OS? In other words, wer... more »
  • We can't find any posts with those tags. Or check your spelling and try again.