<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: Feature]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/feature</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'feature']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Holiday Flowchart: Inappropriate Times To Use Your Smartphone (Around Family)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_smartphone_inappropriate_holidays.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />By now you're probably wise enough to know <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5419435/a-romance-flowchart-when-is-it-inappropriate-to-use-your-iphone">when not to whip out your smartphone around your significant other</a>, but what about when you're bored at home for the holidays? Follow this flowchart to determine when you've crossed the line:</p>

<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/iphone_holiday_final.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_iphone_holiday_final.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><i>Click the image to view a larger version.</i></p>
<p><i>Based in New York City, <a href="http://shanesnow.com/">Shane Snow</a> is a graduate student in Digital Media at Columbia University and founder of Scordit.com. He's fascinated with all things geeky, particularly social media and shiny gadgets he'll never afford.</i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5434170/holiday-flowchart-inappropriate-times-to-use-your-smartphone-around-family]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5434170]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[inappropriate iphone use]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[infographics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 26 Dec 2009 13:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shane Snow]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5434170&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Exhaustive Guide to Apple Tablet Rumors]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_500x_500x_apple-tablet-contest.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />The Apple tablet is almost here. We hear. Actually, we're hearing <em>a whole lot</em> lately. With this exhaustive guide to every tablet rumor, we've got the clearest picture of the Apple tablet yet.</p>

<h2>Uh, What's It Called?</h2>
<p>The iPhone was called the iPhone years before Steve Jobs ever took the stage to announce it. We don't have the luxury of such clarity here. I would think the name has no more than two syllables, personally.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_islaterecoooord.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Overwhelmingly what "evidence" there is points to some form of Slate. Not only did <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5434085/apple-owns-islatecom-domain-the-mystery-deepens">Apple register the domain iSlate.com</a> through an intermediary to keep it a secret, they've <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5434397/the-apple-tablets-name-islate-at-least-it-sure-looks-that-way">trademarked it through a shell company called Slate Computing</a> (signed for by Apple's Senior Trademark Specialist) and registered domains and trademarks in Europe through their usual IP law firm, utilizing their standard secret trademark practices, last used with the iPhone. They've also registered "Magic Slate" through the same company. And, while we initially <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5390120/on-that-nytimes-editors-mention-of-the-apple-tablet">blew off</a> NYT editor Bill Keller referencing an "Apple Slate" in a speech as meaningless, it's a <em>whole lot curiouser</em> now.</p>
<p>Borders <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5338122/borders-bookstores-includes-mysterious-apple-ipad-in-survey">referenced an "Apple iPAD"</a> in a survey, but it sounds the sad invention of a survey copywriter who hit caps lock instead of shift, not to mention a digital feminine hygiene product. Apple also <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5416199/apple-registers-tabletmac-trademark-after-dueling-axiotron-macbook-modders">registered a trademark for TabletMac</a>, but most likely to protect the Mac brand name from modders (it sounds unwieldy and gross).</p>
<p>Apple's put a <em>lot</em> of effort into iSlate. Is that the name of the Apple Tablet?</p>
<h2>When's It Coming?</h2>
<p>Well, obviously <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5323446/ft-claims-apple-tablet-possible-september-launch">everybody</a> who picked a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5324544/foxconn-building-apple-tablet-for-september-or-october-launch">day before today</a> is wrong. Which leaves everyday after today! The overall consensus is that's being announced in late January&mdash;note, though, that a lot of the people part of the <em>new</em> January cabal were the same people convinced it was coming in the fall.</p>
<p>iLounge <a href="http://www.ilounge.com/index.php/backstage/comments/ten-new-details-on-the-apple-tablet/">predicted awfully specifically</a> back in September that "Apple is currently planning to announce it on or before January 19, 2010." The Financial Times <a href="http://blogs.ft.com/techblog/2009/12/exclusive-apple-to-host-event-in-january/"><br>
said two days ago</a> that Apple is expected "make a major product announcement on Tuesday, January 26th" at the Yerba Buena Center for the Arts in San Francisco, where Apple's rented a stage for "several days." Silicon Alley Insider says that Apple is <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/apple-to-demo-tablet-in-january-asks-developers-to-get-apps-ready-2009-12">going to demo a tablet</a> in January.</p>
<p>But when can you actually hold one? From most to least specific: The Wall Street Journal says the tablet is <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5431708/wsj-apples-plan-to-kill-cable-with-itunes-and-the-tablets-coming-in-march">actually going to ship in March</a>, and an analyst said <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5422457/apple-tablet-launching-march-or-april-analyst-says">it's coming in March or April</a>. iLounge says it'll hit stores <a href="http://www.ilounge.com/index.php/backstage/comments/ten-new-details-on-the-apple-tablet/">in May or June</a>, like the iPhone. Digitimes reported Foxconn is supposed to have almost half a million of 'em <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5376106/rumor-apple-tablet-to-be-made-by-foxconn">shipped by April</a>. Little emperor of Apple analysts Gene Munster <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5264517/analyst-says-apple-tablet-in-first-half-of-2010">says the first half of 2010</a>. A bunch of connected Mac people <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5337430/no-apple-tablet-till-2010-say-sources">just say 2010</a>.</p>
<p>Everybody from the WSJ to Apple fan sites are convinced the tablet is being announced sometime late next month, shipping 2-6 months afterward, so hype and development can be bloom, like the iPhone. (Though most of 'em were wrong three months ago.)</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/tablet-top.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_tablet-top.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<h2>How Much Is It Gonna Cost?</h2>
<p>The iPhone was $600. Then sales stopped be a-mazing and it dropped to $400. When the iPhone 3G came out, it to went to $200 and everybody bought one. So, uh, how much is the tablet gonna be?</p>
<p>Everybody says roughly the same thing: <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/07/24/apples_much_anticipated_tablet_device_coming_early_next_year.html">AppleInsider has said</a> it's "expected to retail for somewhere between the cost of a high-end iPhone and Apple's most affordable Mac notebook." Our insider <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5335942/an-insider-on-the-apple-tablet">told us</a> it would "cost $700 to $900," or "more than twice as much as a netbook." Taiwan Economic Times says it's between <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5359500/apple-tablet-with-96+inch-touchscreen-hsdpa-in-february">$800 and $1000</a>. China Times, while they got the date pegged to the price horribly wrong, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5313266/re+rumor-apple-tablet-coming-in-october-priced-at-800">said 800 bucks</a>. And then <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5408179/digitimes-claims-apple-tablet-delayed-for-oled-upgrade">there's DigiTimes, who says</a> the whole reason the tablet was "delayed" was because it was getting an OLED upgrade, so it'd be a whopping $1500 to $1700. The final word comes from Steve Jobs <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5067405/macbook-nano-or-iphone-slate-caught-online-says-nyt">who said</a> "we don't know how to build a sub-$500 computer that is not a piece of junk."</p>
<p>Survey&mdash;and logic&mdash;says it'll be pricier than an iPhone and more expensive than a MacBook. Which doesn't say a lot. If you had to pick a number $800ish seems like the safest bet.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/patent080828-3.gif"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_patent080828-3.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<h2>How Big Is It?</h2>
<p>The most important spec&mdash;and maybe the biggest mystery&mdash;is well, how big the tablet is. Three sizes dominate rumors, tied to the size of panels produced by Taiwanese manufacturers: 7 inches, 9.6 (or 9.7) inches, and 10.6 inches.</p>
<p>Let's go from least to most specific. Apple <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5390826/apples-tablet-pitch-to-media-its-small-enough-for-a-handbag-too-big-for-a-pocket">reportedly told publishers</a> it's "small enough to carry in a handbag but too big to fit in a pocket." A <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5067405/macbook-nano-or-iphone-slate-caught-online-says-nyt">company discovered</a> in its traffic logs an "unannounced Apple product with a display somewhere between an iPhone and a MacBook," reported the NYT. The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5207788/wsj-steve-jobs-still-pulling-apples-strings-working-on-new-portable">WSJ reported</a> it's "smaller than its current laptop computers but bigger than the iPhone or iPod Touch."</p>
<p>Apple analyst king of the dweebs Gene Munster, after speaking to "component contacts" in Asia, says it's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5264517/analyst-says-apple-tablet-in-first-half-of-2010">between 7 and 10 inches</a>. TechCrunch says <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/30/large-form-ipod-touch-to-launch-in-fall-09/">it's 7 or 9 inches</a>. Digitimes <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5408179/digitimes-claims-apple-tablet-delayed-for-oled-upgrade">says there's two tablets</a>, one that's 9.6 inches (with OLED) and another that's 10.6 inches. Taiwan Economic News <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5359500/apple-tablet-with-96+inch-touchscreen-hsdpa-in-february">says 9.6 inches</a> too. Actually respectable news organization Dow Jones says Apple ordered displays from Wintek that are "<a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5167235/dow-jones-newswire-chimes-in-on-apple-netbook-rumors-claims-10-screen">between 9.7 and 10 inches</a>." Oh, and there <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5347191/rumor-apple-may-be-working-on-xl-tablets-running-full-mac-os-x">might be ginormous tablets</a> somewhere out there.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5323446/ft-claims-apple-tablet-possible-september-launch">Financial Times</a> and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5167934/reuters-source-confirms-apple-10+inch-touchscreen-order-for-third-quarter">Reuters</a> both say it's 10 inches. So <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5335942/an-insider-on-the-apple-tablet">does our insider</a>.</p>
<p>iLounge <a href="http://www.ilounge.com/index.php/backstage/comments/ten-new-details-on-the-apple-tablet/">presents a unified theory</a> of the tablet universe that would explain the multiplicity of sizes: There have been three prototypes, and the initial had a 7-inch screen, which was too small, so the latest version is 10.7 inches. Whatever the exact size, they say, it has "7x the touchable surface area."</p>
<p>Let's just stick with bigger than an iPhone, but smaller MacBook.</p>
<h2>What's Inside</h2>
<p>There's been surprisingly little discussion of the actual specs beyond the size of the screen&mdash;storage, memory, processor, etc. Most of the little talk has been about the networking capabilities, actually.</p>
<p>There could be versions <a href="http://www.ilounge.com/index.php/backstage/comments/ten-new-details-on-the-apple-tablet/">with 3G and one without</a>. Specifically, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5359500/apple-tablet-with-96+inch-touchscreen-hsdpa-in-february">HSDPA</a> maybe (meaning it would only work on AT&T or T-Mobile in the US). Oh look, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5389869/rumor-is-this-the-apple-tablets-sim-card-tray">a SIM card tray</a>, maybe! But maybe it'll be on Verizon <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5230376/businessweek-apple-rumored-to-bring-tablet-and-iphone-lite-to-verizon-soon">said BusinessWeek</a>. Hey, maybe even <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5322475/rumor-says-verizon-working-double-time-on-lte-4g-for-apple-device">Verizon LTE 4G wireless</a>!</p>
<p>As for the processor, Intel Germany CEO passed gas about a bigger "version of the iPhone" <a href="http://gizmodo.com/390614/intel-germany-ceo-spills-on-atom+based-mini+tablet-iphone">powered by Atom</a>. Dean Takahashi <a href="http://deals.venturebeat.com/2009/07/13/look-for-pa-semis-chip-designs-in-upcoming-apple-tablet/">says</a> that the tablet will be the first device using chips that Apple's designed in-house by PA Semi, the chip company Apple <a href="http://gizmodo.com/382929/apple-buys-itself-a-little-chip-company-known-for-super-efficient-processors">bought a while ago</a>, and that they're possibly ARM-based.</p>
<p>Aaaaaannnd it <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5408179/digitimes-claims-apple-tablet-delayed-for-oled-upgrade">coooooooould have an OLED screen</a>, if it cost 1500 bucks.</p>
<p>A 3G option seems very possible, as does a secret-sauce processor, but who knows?</p>
<h2>Who's Involved?</h2>
<p>Um, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5207788/wsj-steve-jobs-still-pulling-apples-strings-working-on-new-portable">Steve Jobs</a>, duh. A whole bunch <a href="http://gizmodo.com/336009/apple-hiring-a-whole-team-of-multi+touch-engineers-not-just-one">of new multitouch engineers</a>. Oh, and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5369712/apple-hires-back-old-newton-pda-developer">the Newton guy</a> is back.</p>
<p>Quanta <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5167235/dow-jones-newswire-chimes-in-on-apple-netbook-rumors-claims-10-screen">might be</a> making it. Or <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5376106/rumor-apple-tablet-to-be-made-by-foxconn">Foxconn</a> (who makes the iPhone and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphoneleaksuicide/">got a guy killed over a leaked prototype</a>). With a display <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5408179/digitimes-claims-apple-tablet-delayed-for-oled-upgrade">made by LG</a> (who makes the gorgeous, if flaky, panel inside the 27-inch iMac.) Or maybe <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5167934/reuters-source-confirms-apple-10+inch-touchscreen-order-for-third-quarter">the display's from Wintek</a>, according to Reuters <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5324544/foxconn-building-apple-tablet-for-september-or-october-launch">and Dow Jones</a>. The battery might be <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5324544/foxconn-building-apple-tablet-for-september-or-october-launch">made by Dynapack</a>.</p>
<p>Besides Apple, again, who knows?</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_appletablet2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<h2>Patent Soup</h2>
<p>The thing about patents is that, besides the fact they're patenting something, they don't say a whole lot, at least not about actual products. But here's a few interesting ones pertaining to a tablet.</p>
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5145104/apple-tablet-likely-described-in-patent">This patent</a> for a "display housing for computing device" sure sounds like a tablet, which might fit into the tablet docking station in <a href="http://gizmodo.com/236906/iphone-docking-station-patent-application-shows-multi+orientation-design-possible-table-pc-compatibility">this patent</a>, and you might use two hands, as shown <a href="%20http://gizmodo.com/5372507/apple-tablet-may-have-two+handed-multitouch-input">in this patent</a> to interact a multitouchable OS X, generously illustrated <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5043024/leaked-apple-patent-filing-is-full-of-new-multitouch-tech-for-a-mac-tablet">in this patent</a>, unless <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5402971/apples-new-patent-application-for-pen+based-tablet-input">you use a pen</a> (ha ha ha). And it <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5433988/apple-patent-application-reveals-a-bumpy-tablet">might be bumpy</a>, in a cool way.</p>
<p>Patents don't mean a whole lot, so don't expect any of them to actually make it into a tablet. They could, though.</p>
<h2>The Backstory</h2>
<p>It's fairly well known the iPhone was <a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgets/wireless/magazine/16-02/ff_iphone?currentPage=2">born from efforts to develop a touchscreen tablet computer</a> that was simply miniaturized, using tech <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FingerWorks">from FingerWorks</a>, a touch interface company Apple bought. The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5374299/apple-working-on-a-tablet-since-at-least-2003">NYT reported</a> Apple's been working on it since 2003, when they built several prototypes using a battery-slaying PowerPC processor. Our insider said that Apple's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5335942/an-insider-on-the-apple-tablet">been working on it for 4-6 years</a>, and that the first prototype of the current version was developed in 2008. Steve Jobs killed the PowerPC tablet, according to the NYT, because Jobs asked what tablets were good for besides web surfing while browsing the web. The WSJ reported <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5344725/wsj-steve-jobs-killed-apple-tablet-twice-already">he's killed it twice already</a>.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/apple-tablet-natgeo.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_apple-tablet-natgeo.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<h2>What's It Going to Do?</h2>
<p>Perhaps the most important question of all: What's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5160598/im-afraid-an-apple-tablet-would-be-stupid">it actually like</a>?</p>
<p>Well, it depends on the OS. iPhone OS 3.1 <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5330122/new-iphone-os-31-has-clear-traces-of-new-apple-iproducts">had clear traces</a> of new Apple iProducts, and some people say it's a <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5121277/rumor-apple-launching-giant-ipod-touch-next-fall">bigass iPod touch</a>, or at <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5323446/ft-claims-apple-tablet-possible-september-launch">least running iPhone OS</a>, which sorta fits with iPhone app developers <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5433075/apple-tablet-demo-coming-in-january-devs-already-building-apps">supposedly being asked</a> to make higher res versions of their apps for demonstration. It apparently <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5432514/more-information-on-apples-plan-to-kill-cable-launch-tablet">fits in</a> with the iTunes remodeling Apple's got going on.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/23/2010-the-year-of-the-tablet/">NYT reported</a> "You will be very surprised how you interact with the new tablet," whatever that will come to mean. As much as Steve Jobs saying <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5066800/steve-jobs-on-netbooks-weve-got-some-interesting-ideas">they've got some "interesting ideas"</a> about small computers. Martha Stewart <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5425458/what-is-martha-stewart-up-to-with-all-this-tablet-talk">is hyped about it</a>, maybe 'cause it has something <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5335804/apple-films-ad-for-secret-product-on-location-in-california">to do with diners</a>.</p>
<p>Most of the excitement lately is that it's going to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5370252/apple-tablet-to-redefine-newspapers-textbooks-and-magazines">redefine newspapers, books and magazines</a>, which we heard from some publishers, and maybe textbooks, which <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5335942/an-insider-on-the-apple-tablet">an insider told us</a>. We're not the only ones who've heard it's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5370084/the-most-detailed-apple-tablet-rumors-yet-coming-january-19">got an ebook bent</a>.</p>
<p>Everybody pre-conceived the iPhone based on the iPod and, to a lesser extent, the Newton. Everybody was wrong. Today, most everybody is pre-conceiving the tablet based on the iPhone. Maybe we're all wrong again, or maybe the leaks are better this time.</p>
<h2>Your Turn</h2>
<p>You know our mantra about rumors: Never trust them. But putting all of them together, we've definitely got some ideas now.</p>
<p>If there's any rumor we missed&mdash;or you <a href="mailto:tips@gizmodo.com">have a tip</a> (we're good at keeping secret identities)&mdash;let us know.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5434566/the-exhaustive-guide-to-apple-tablet-rumors]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5434566]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple islate]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[islate]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[magic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[slate]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 26 Dec 2009 12:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5434566&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[How To Guides: The Best of 2009]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/504x_hackintosh_mini9_topcomp__1_.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_504x_hackintosh_mini9_topcomp__1_.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>As any diligent <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/how-to">weekend reader</a> knows, we don't just find and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5432485/giz-explains-everything-you-needed-to-know-in-2009">explain</a> the news around here, we like to <em>do</em> stuff; hack things; make gadgets <em>better</em>. Here's the cream of this year's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #howto" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/howto/">how to</a> guide crop:</p>

<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/win7mac.jpg" width="160" height="55"><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5430678/how-to-make-your-pc-and-mac-share-stuff-like-best-friends">Make Your PC and Mac Share Stuff Like Best Friends</a>: Getting PCs and Macs to play nice over a home network seems like something that should be trivially easy by now; incompatibilities like that feel like a relic from the 90s. Yet somehow, after all these years, it's still a pain in the ass. Unless, of course, you read this guide.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/googvoice.jpg" width="160" height="83"><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5425039/how-to-totally-overhaul-your-phones-with-google-voice">Totally Overhaul Your Phones With Google Voice</a> : You've probably heard about Google Voice in abstract terms, and with a unified, multi-phone phone number, a web-based voicemail dashboard, free text messaging and cheap international calls, it probably sounds great. Also: confusing. Here's how to get totally and painlessly set up with Google Voice.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/cleanz.jpg" width="160" height="96"><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5419737/how-to-clean-your-filthy-gadgets">Clean Your Filthy Gadgets</a>: Look down at your keyboard. Your smartphone. Your PMP. Your DSLR. Your HDTV. Notice how some of the most expensive things you own are <em>completely disgusting?</em> Here's how to clean them up on the cheap.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/bucell.jpg" width="160" height="109"><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5410369/how-to-back-up-any-smartphone">Back Up Any Smartphone</a>: Smartphones do just about everything your PC used to, so why don't we care about backing them up? We should, and in this post, we do. iPhone, Pre, WinMo, BlackBerry, Android&mdash;instructions are all there, ready to indulge your sexxxilyy cautious urges.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/500x_win7gadg-w160-h200_01.jpg" width="160" height="59"><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5404743/how-to-make-windows-7-play-nice-with-all-your-gadgets">Make Windows 7 Play Nice With All Your Gadgets</a>: Windows 7 is the first version of Windows that really respects the gadget hound&mdash;it knows us, it understands us, and it gives us <em>tools</em>. Getting your media players, phones, network devices, displays and cameras to work with Windows is easier than it's ever been, but it's also fairly different than it used to be. If you sense tension between your gear and your new Windows 7 PC, look no further.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/500x_opthack__2_-w160-h200_01.jpg" width="160" height="104"><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5389166/how-to-hackintosh-a-dell-mini-10v-into-the-ultimate-snow-leopard-netbook">Hackintosh a Dell Mini 10v Into the Ultimate Snow Leopard Netbook</a>: From dumpy Dell to full-on Mac netbook in one lazy afternoon. I use mine everyday (for pooping!) and you will to.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/500x_win7top__1_-w160-h200_01.jpg" width="160" height="113"><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5387353/how-to-survive-boot-camp-and-run-win-7-on-a-mac">Survive Boot Camp (and Run Win 7 on a Mac)</a>: Boot Camp, the Mac app that lets you dual boot Windows with OS X, works pretty well, except when it doesn't. Matt runs us through the simplest ways to make sure your Windows 7 install goes smoothly, and how to salvage it when it doesn't.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/500x_virtu-w160-h200_01.jpg" width="160" height="113"><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5383982/how-to-virtualize-any-os-for-free">How To: Virtualize Any OS For Free</a>: A great man once said, "Any sufficiently advanced virtualization software is indistinguishable from magic." Something like that, yes! Who cares. Point is, Virtualbox is free, and it lets you install pretty much any OS within any other OS, so you can introduce your Zune to your Mac, your Word to your Linux, your Ubuntu to your Snow Pussy. Again, magic! And again, free!<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/500x_prehowto-w160-h200_01.jpg" width="160" height="86"><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5373972/how-to-install-homebrew-on-palm-pre-121">Install Homebrew On Palm Pre 1.2.1</a>There's really no reason not to crack your Pre open for homebrew, which offers new apps, new functionality, themes, etc. Plus, software updates don't usually break your patches, like iPhone updates do jailbreaks. The version numbers in this guide are old and the software tools a bit different, but hey, the equivalent tools still work.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/500x_cdrip_01-w160-h200_01.jpg" width="160" height="59"><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5363273/how-to-rip-your-music-like-a-pro">Rip Your Music Like a Pro</a>: Please, please don't just leave your music ripping up to iTunes. Do right by your music, by ripping it as cleanly and purely as possible. It's actually pretty easy, once you've got the right tools. Your ears will thank you.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/160x120_topssss_copy-w160-h200_01.jpg" width="160" height="120"><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5357993/how-to-back-up-all-your-stuff-for-free-no-hard-drive-needed">Back Up All Your Stuff For Free, No Hard Drive Needed</a>: Excuse the grotty MacBook, it's been replaced. Which was pretty painless, because I backed up all my important stuff for free! Peace of mind, people.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/500x_usenettop__1_-w160-h200_01.jpg" width="160" height="102"><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5343260/how-to-kick-your-torrent-addiction-with-usenet">Kick Your Torrent Addiction With Usenet</a>: Usenet trolls sent me <em>actual death threats</em> over posting this article, which apparently threatened to ruin their top-secret file haven (did you jerks know I went on the <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/spark/2009/09/episode-86-september-27-29-2009/">radio</a> with this thing? <em>Ha!</em>) So it with it with the utmost glee that I backlink here. Usenet is awesome&mdash;faster than just about anything else, and full of sweet, sweet file<strike>z</strike>s. Here's how you, person who doesn't really know what Usenet is, can be saturdating your internet connection within an hour.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/500x_chromeos-w160-h200_01.jpg" width="160" height="121"><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5338089/how-to-bake-your-own-chrome-os-right-now">Bake Your Own Chrome OS, Right Now</a>: You can actually download <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/chrome-os">the real Chrome n</a>ow, so it wouldn't really make much sense to follow this guide today. But it's worth a read, if just to see how close Chrome matched our sad, modest expectations. To the people who said they hope Chrome is nothing like the imagined version in this post: oh well!<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/504x_6point5top-w160-h200_01.jpg" width="160" height="75"><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5281397/how-to-install-windows-mobile-65-right-now">Install Windows Mobile 6.5 Right Now</a>: A lot of newer Windows Mobile phones have official updaters, so you can bring your handset up to speed without resorting to hacks. Older ones, though, don't. The ROMs will be different that listed in this guide&mdash;better, now&mdash;but the process still works.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/504x_ttsetup-3-top__1_-w160-h200_01.jpg" width="160" height="107"><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5216965/how-to-calibrate-your-turntable-for-the-best-possible-sound">Calibrate Your Turntable For the Best Possible Sound</a>: Because having a poorly calibrated turntable is more damaging to your audiophile cred than not having one at all.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/504x_lossless__1_-w160-h200_01.jpg" width="160" height="71"><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5207476/how-to-manage-an-all+lossless-music-library-with-itunes">Manage An All-Lossless Music Library With iTunes</a>: From a music listener's standpoint, lossless music is the way to go. From a person-who-has-to-use-iTunes-because-that's-just-how-things-are-nowadays' standpoint, it doesn't. Luckily, it <em>is</em> possible to make iTunes and a lossless library play nice.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/504x_remotecontrol-w160-h200_01.jpg" width="160" height="102"><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5197759/how-to-remote-control-your-home-computer-from-anywhere-with-vnc">Remote Control Your Home Computer From Anywhere With VNC</a>: VNC, light of my life, fire of my loins. My sin, my soul. Vee-Enn-See: the tip of the tongue taking a trip of three steps down the palate to tap, at three, on the teeth. Vee. Enn. See.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/torretz.jpg" width="160" height="105"><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5187630/how-to-use-bittorrent-like-a-pro">Use BitTorrent Like a Pro</a>: It's embarrassing to admit that you don't know how to use torrents properly in this day in age, but let's face it&mdash;most people don't. Give them this guide! Or use it yourself, discreetly.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/504x_cairosky_804-w160-h200_01.jpg" width="160" height="107"><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5168454/how-to-create-stunningly-realistic-high-dynamic-range-photographs">Create Stunningly Realistic High Dynamic Range Photographs</a>: Love them or hate them, high dynamic range (HDR) photos are something any good photographer should know how to take. Ex Gizzer Johnathan Mahoogles lays down the steps to snapping hyperreal photos, one by one.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/bluray.jpg" width="160" height="107"><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5161848/how-to-rip-blu+ray-discs">Rip Blu-ray Discs</a>: Optical media is dead! Well, it should be. Here's how to help kill it, by ripping your entire Blu-ray collection to your PC where it belongs.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/504x_hackintosh_mini9_topcomp-w160-h200_01.jpg" width="160" height="57"><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5156903/how-to-hackintosh-a-dell-mini-9-into-the-ultimate-os-x-netbook">Hackintosh a Dell Mini 9 Into the Ultimate OS X Netbook</a>: Remember that Dell 10v hackintosh guide up above? This is that, except for the older, more popular Dell Mini 9.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/504x_ps3_ubuntu_3__1_-w160-h200_01.jpg" width="160" height="107"><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5143547/how+to-install-ubuntu-on-your-ps3-for-vintage-gaming-emulation">Install Ubuntu On Your PS3 For Vintage Gaming Emulation</a>: So your PS3 can run Linux, BFD. But what the really means is that your PS3 can play pretty much any vintage game, ever, through emulators. It's all about phrasing!<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/504x_buff_xbox-w160-h200.jpg" width="160" height="107"><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5133447/how-to-add-wi+fi-to-your-xbox-360-smartly-and-cheaply">Add Wi-Fi To Your Xbox 360 Smartly and Cheaply</a>: I was really hoping this guide would be obsolete by now, but man, Xbox wireless adapters are still way, way too expensive. Buying and bridging an entire router, as described here, is still a better deal.</p>
<p><em>So that's about it (for this year)! Let us know in the comments if there's anything you'd like to see in 2010. Happy holidays, folks.</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5433281/how-to-guides-the-best-of-2009]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5433281]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[how to]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[list]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[meta]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top how to guides]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 26 Dec 2009 06:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5433281&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Complete Guide to Setting Up Your New Xmas Smartphone]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_500x_smartphoooones__1_.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />The moment you unpackage a new smartphone is a magical one. Don't let the moment right after that, when you realize that it's practically useless out of the box, cancel that out. Here's everything you need to know:</p>

<h2>What You Need to Buy</h2>
<p>There are plenty of smartphone accessories that are worth considering, and a few that you actually <em>need</em>. Proceed with caution, but don't be afraid to treat your new smartphone, and yourself, to a few goodies.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/case.jpg" width="160" height="160"><strong>A Case</strong>: They look goofy, Jason hates them, and they screw with your device's carefully designed curves. But here's the thing: smartphones are fragile. They aren't like dumbphones, and a single fall&mdash;especially with devices with a glass screen&mdash;can poop all over your new smartphone party. Until you're trained, play it safe. Wrap your unit. Case brand isn't important, so just take your pick from your local Best Buy or wherever. Just make sure your device's corners are covered, because it's edge impacts that break the most glass. Just remember, you're stuck in a multi-thousand dollar contract with this device, which itself would costs hundreds of dollars to replace. It's actually kind of terrifying! Pretend it's a baby, if that helps.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/headphones.jpg" width="160" height="163"><strong>Headphones</strong>: Your smartphone is now your primary media player, too, so you're going to need to ditch the headphones or headset it came with. Yes, they all suck; no, your phone's aren't the one exception. If you don't care about a microphone, treat yourself to a decent pair of <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5033455/ultimate-cut+the+crap-in+ear-headphone-battlemodo">in-ear headphones</a>. If you do, get a midrange <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5039819/cut+the+crap-iphone-headset-battlemodo">wired headset</a>.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/storage_01.jpg" width="160" height="175"><strong>Storage</strong>: Phones either come with internal storage, like the Pre or the iPhone, or taunt you with "expandable" storage, which pretty much means they've got an empty microSD slot. If your phone comes with less than 2GB of space and has said slot, you <em>need</em> to fill it. Buying a microSD card is a little different than buying a regular SD card, because speed doesn't really matter, and nothing you're using your phone demands particularly high transfer speeds. This is a place to store your music, photos and videos&mdash;that's it. Buy these <a href="http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=pd_lpo_k2_dp_sr_k2k_1?ie=UTF8&keywords=micro%20sd%20cards&index=blended&pf_rd_p=486539851&pf_rd_s=lpo-top-stripe-1&pf_rd_t=201&pf_rd_i=B000EEZCEG&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_r=04DNNSV2MJ56AXJX5TT7">online</a>, where branded 8GB cards regularly dip below $20&mdash;in stores, you'll pay much, much more. Also, don't worry too much about getting a full-sized SD adapters, as pictured above. Most phones will allow you to mount your smartphone's microSD card as mass storage when they're plugged into a computer, so removal is rarely necessary.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/cables.jpg" width="160" height="160"><strong>Cables</strong>: Pick up a spare charging cable for your phone. For most smartphones this is a simple mini/microUSB cable, while for iPhones it's an iPod dock connector. Why worry about the spare? Think of it this way: if you lose your only iPod cable, you can't listen to music until you buy another one. If you lose your only <em>iPhone</em> cable, you're out of touch with the rest of the world in a matter of hours.<br clear="all"></p>
<h2>What You Don't</h2>
<p>Of course, the temptation of new accessories is great, and there are legions of companies waiting to seize on your post-transactional bliss. When buying smartphone accessories, proceed with caution.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/docks.jpg" width="160" height="111"><strong>A dock</strong>: Again, people have a tendency to confuse their PMPs with their phones, which may look and act similar, but are used in a completely different way. Unless you want to dock your smartphone near your bed to use as an alarm, it's going to be charging&mdash;and syncing&mdash;with your computer whenever it's not in your pocket. An impulse-purchased dock will, in all likelihood, live a lonely life. Don't let this sad thing happen!<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/gps.jpg" width="160" height="156"><strong>A branded navigation mount</strong>: These are almost always overpriced, and all they really do is hold your phone in your line of sight. Just buy a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5431447/dont-get-screwed-a-guide-to-deals-on-cables-and-extras-for-your-gadget-gifts">dirt-cheap windshield or dash mount</a>, buy a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5431447/dont-get-screwed-a-guide-to-deals-on-cables-and-extras-for-your-gadget-gifts">12v DC converter</a> to plug your USB charging cable into, and you've got all the functionality you need for about $20.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><strong>Cleaning Kits</strong>: Cleaning your smartphone isn't hard, and it shouldn't cost you much at all. Just follow <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5419737/how-to-clean-your-filthy-gadgets">our instructions</a>, and avoid any smartphone-specific cleaning kits. They're a guaranteed waste.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/bluetooth.jpg" width="160" height="161"><strong>Bluetooth anything</strong>: Bluetooth headsets can make anyone look like a dweebish soccer dad, and while they might make chatting on the phone while driving more <em>legal</em>, they don't really make it much safer. Just hold your phone like a normal human, put it on speakerphone, or take the call later. You should avoid <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5369490/bluetooth-headphone-battlemodo-the-best-isnt-the-best">Bluetooth headphones</a> too, but for a different reason: they suck. They sound terrible, they'll drain your phone's battery and they're overpriced. If you have to buy a pair, spend <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5369490/bluetooth-headphone-battlemodo-the-best-isnt-the-best">as little as possible</a>.<br clear="all"></p>
<h2>Getting Started</h2>
<p>If your smartphone is a newborn, this is where we teach it to walk.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/contacts.jpg" width="160" height="226"><strong>Contacts</strong>: Somehow, in over two decades of cellphone development, we haven't settled on a simple way to transfer contacts from one phone to another. Here's how you should proceed through this somehow-still-painful process:<br>
• Get your carrier to do it. If you're upgrading handsets on one carrier, they should be able to transfer your contacts, and probably for free. If you're switching carriers, there may be a small fee. Don't spend more than five bucks.<br>
• Use your SIM. Are you on AT&T or T-Mobile? Is your smartphone on the same carrier as your old dumbphone? Most phones will have an option to write all contacts to a SIM card, which is the little chip that your phone uses to identify itself on a cell network. Do this, pop your old card out, pop it into your new smartphone, and transfer all your contacts from the old SIM onto your new phone's memory. Sadly, this won't work with Verizon or Sprint phones, which are CDMA-based, and therefore don't have SIM cards at all.<br>
• Google Sync. Through a protocol called SyncML, <a href="http://googlemobile.blogspot.com/2009/02/google-sync-beta-for-iphone-winmo-and.html">Google Sync</a> supports quite a few features phones, and can pull all your contacts into your Google account. Your new smartphone can then yank them back down from the cloud. Bonus: they're now backed up to Google server's, too.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/email.jpg" width="160" height="242"><strong>Email</strong>: Email, you'll find, is one of the best things about owning a smartphone. Setting up your email varies from smartphone to smartphone (<a href="http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1385">iPhone</a>, <a href="http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=114408">Android</a>, <a href="http://kb.palm.com/wps/portal/kb/na/pre/p100eww/sprint/solutions/article/20098_en.html">Palm Pre</a>, <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsmobile/en-us/help/v6-0/Send-Receive-Email-touch.aspx">Windows Mobile</a>) and service to service (Exchange and Gmail setups will be completely different, obvious) but there are few rules of thumb to keep in mind during account setup. For example, use IMAP (versus POP) whenever you can&mdash;this will keep your messages and their read/unread statuses in sync with your desktop clients. And since most of your email downloading will be happening over 3G, set the individual message size limit at or below about 10kb. This will ensure your messages come in quickly, but also that you have something to read once they arrive.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/cal.jpg" width="160" height="240"><strong>Calendars</strong>: If you keep a Google Calendar, having it sync with your smartphone is a revelation. Android phones will automatically sync with your default Google account's calendars, as will the Pre, while the iPhone will need to be configured with <a href="http://www.google.com/support/calendar/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=99358">CalDav</a>. If you don't keep a calendar, your new smartphone is a good excuse to start.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/sync.jpg" width="160" height="155"><strong>Media and Syncing</strong>: Most smartphones rely on some kind of desktop software to transfer personal info, music, video and photos to and from the handset. For the iPhone, this basically means downloading iTunes&mdash;which you have to do anyway. For BlackBerry, this means downloading <a href="http://na.blackberry.com/eng/services/desktop/">BlackBerry Desktop Manager</a>. Windows Mobile phones are best served by <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsmobile/en-us/downloads/microsoft/device-center-download.mspx)">Windows Device Center</a>, while Android and Palm phones&mdash;and optionally Windows Phones, iPhones and BlackBerrys&mdash;play nice with <a href="http://www.doubletwist.com/dt/Home/Index.dt">doubleTwist</a>, a cross-platform music player/media syncing app.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/convert.jpg" width="160" height="127"><strong>Converting Video</strong>: You can't just copy your torrented videos or home movies over to your smartphone; you need to downsample those videos, <em>stat</em>. Just download <a href="http://handbrake.fr/downloads.php">Handbrake</a> for this&mdash;it's basically magic, and it works on Windows, OS X and Linux. <a href="http://www.ilounge.com/index.php/articles/comments/the-complete-guide-to-ipod-video-conversion-win/">These instructions</a> are iPhone-centric, but videos converted to 320x240 h.264 will be suitable for most new smartphones.<br clear="all"></p>
<h2>Apps! Apps! Apps! Apps!</h2>
<p>Without apps, smartphones are nothing. With apps, they're practically <em>anything</em>. Every smartphone platform has an app storefront now, from Apple's pioneering App Store to BlackBerry's App World to the Android Market, and they're all, to different extents, treasure troves.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/iphoneapps.jpg" width="160" height="241"><strong>iPhone</strong>: First stop, Gizmodo's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphone-apps-directory/">Essential iPhone Apps Directory</a>. These are the best of the best, and everything you need to make your iPhone into a mobile powerhouse. If you're averse to spending money on your new iPhone&mdash;this thing wasn't cheap, after all&mdash;check out our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5423652/the-free-iphone-apps-you-need-to-download-right-now">Essential <em>Free</em> Apps</a>. We do <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphone-apps">regular posts</a> and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/the-week-in-iphone-apps">weekly roundups</a> around here too, so just keep an eye out.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/androidapps.jpg" width="160" height="240"><strong>Android</strong>: It's got the second best app selection, which is to say there's some really great stuff out there. Our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5423053/the-30-essential-android-apps">Essential Android Apps roundup</a> cuts through the noise of the App Market, while our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5414313/the-months-best-android-apps">monthly roundups</a> keep you up to date with the latest additions to the store.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/bbapps.jpg" width="160" height="120"><strong>BlackBerry</strong>: We cover the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/blackberry-apps">biggest new additions</a> to App World, but it's best to defer to a specialist site like <a href="http://CrackBerry.com">CrackBerry</a> for this one&mdash;they have their own app store too, which isn't really much better or worse than BlackBerry's janky official shop.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/appcatalog.jpg" width="160" height="240"><strong>Palm</strong>: We've just pulled one of our patented "Essential" roundups fresh out of the oven, so <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5433408/the-20-essential-palm-pre-apps/gallery/">consult that first</a>. Beyond that, PreCentral's <a href="http://www.precentral.net/pre-apps-reviews">official app reviews</a> are fairly fantastic. Also worth checking out is their extensive <a href="http://www.precentral.net/homebrew-apps">homebrew app gallery</a>, which has about as many decent apps in it as the official Catalog.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/winmoapps.jpg" width="160" height="267"><strong>Windows Mobile</strong>: App development for WinMo isn't exactly picking up nowadays but there's a tremendous backlog of useful reviews and materials at <a href="http://wmpoweruser.com/">WMPowerUser</a>, <a href="http://www.wmexperts.com/">WMExperts</a>, <a href="http://www.xda-developers.com/">XDA</a> and <a href="http://www.modaco.com/">MoDaCo</a>. And yeah, we occasionally still do <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows-mobile-apps">Windows Mobile app roundups</a>, though until things get <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows-mobile-7">exciting again</a>, expect less, not more.<br clear="all"></p>
<h2>Living Happily Ever After</h2>
<p>Lastly, a few odds and ends to make sure your metal'n'plastic darling lives a happy life, at least before the end of its two-year contract.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/backup.jpg" width="160" height="116"><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #howto" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/howto/">How to</a> back up your smartphone</strong>: Your smartphone probably contains as much personal data as your computer, and it's subjected to way more physical risk. Preempt the pain. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5410369/how-to-back-up-any-smartphone">Back it up</a>.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/ditryyyy.jpg" width="160" height="128"><strong>How to keep you smartphone clean</strong>: These little machines are fantastic at collecting fingerprints, dust and grime. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5419737/how-to-clean-your-filthy-gadgets">Wipe them off</a> every once in a while.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><em>Any other tips for new smartphone owners? Chuck them down in the comments. Happy Holidays!</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5433456/the-complete-guide-to-setting-up-your-new-xmas-smartphone]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5433456]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[how to]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA['windows mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[droid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm pixi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm pre]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[setting up your smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone guide]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 25 Dec 2009 12:30:48 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5433456&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[10 Things You Must Do With Your New Mac]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_500x_500x_imacok.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />You got a new Mac for Christmas? Awesome. But don't let Justin Long's smarmy face fool you, it doesn't just give you a warm hug and set itself up. Here are 10 things you need to do pronto:</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/Screen_shot_2009-08-25_at_2.06.58_AM.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_Screen_shot_2009-08-25_at_2.06.58_AM.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>1. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5345506/snow-leopard-visual-guide/gallery/16">Check Out Snow Leopard's Interface Tweaks</a>: They're not life-altering, but Apple's spiffed up the OS X interface in a couple of ways in <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #snowleopard" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/snowleopard/">Snow Leopard</a>. Notably, there's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5345506/snow-leopard-visual-guide//16">Dock Expose</a> (which works like Windows 7's Aero Peek) to show you all the windows of open app by clicking and holding on its icon in the dock. Also, giant, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5345506/snow-leopard-visual-guide//24">scalable thumbnail previews</a>.</p>
<p>2. <a href="http://lifehacker.com/software/mac/hack-attack-a-guide-for-switching-to-a-mac-224674.php">Move All Your Stuff</a>: The funny thing about switching OSes or moving to a new one is that <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5202748/i-switched-to-mac-after-a-lifetime-of-windows-and-it-doesnt-matter">it's really not hard anymore</a>, since so much of the stuff we <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5357993/how-to-back-up-all-your-stuff-for-free-no-hard-drive-needed">do is online</a>. The most complicated gambit for most people, I'd wager, is moving your iTunes library to a new machine&mdash;especially going from Windows to Mac&mdash;since organizing that stuff (if you're anal about it like me) takes forever. Luckily, there's a <a href="http://lifehacker.com/242468/geek-to-live--how-to-move-an-itunes-library-from-a-pc-to-mac-and-back">hack for that</a>. And if you're going from old Mac to new Mac, well it's pretty easy to move all your crap with the <a href="http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3322">built-in Migration Assistant</a>.</p>
<p>3. <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_500x_Grand_Central_Terminal_Instructions.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5346616/giz-explains-snow-leopards-grand-central-dispatch">Learn What's Actually Under the Hood of Snow Leopard</a>: Apple says a lot of the magic of Snow Leopard is actually under the hood, so you can't see it, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5346616/giz-explains-snow-leopards-grand-central-dispatch">like Grand Central Dispatch</a>, which promises <em>in the future</em> to make applications use all of those cores in your machine that much better to become superfaster. Or OpenCL, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5252545/giz-explains-gpgpu-computing-and-why-itll-melt-your-face-off">which uses your graphics card</a> for non-graphics applications to go more fasterer. And there's a whole <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5350976/giz-explains-why-tech-standards-are-vital-for-apple-and-you">bunch of other standards</a> Apple's real big on too.</p>
<p>4. <a href="hhttp://gizmodo.com/5345506//gallery/gallery/8">Don't Buy MobileMe, Sync Your Stuff With Yahoo or Google</a>: Don't buy MobileMe. Instead, sync your contacts with Google, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5224855/why-apples-mobileme-doesnt-work-as-a-100-service">straight from Address Book</a>, and use <a href="http://www.google.com/sync/index.html">Google Sync</a> to deliver 'em to your phone. Same deal with calendars&mdash;use the open standard CalDAV to sync iCal <a href="http://www.google.com/support/calendar/bin/answer.py?answer=99358">with Google</a> or Yahoo, which is as simple as putting in your account info now. And you can upload photos to Flickr directly from iPhoto. Online storage? That's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5357993/how-to-back-up-all-your-stuff-for-free-no-hard-drive-needed">free too</a>.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/win7top.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_win7top.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>5. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5387353/how-to-survive-boot-camp-and-run-win-7-on-a-mac">Install Windows</a>: Whether you do it through Boot Camp so you can play PC games ('cause gaming on a Mac sucks, at best) or use Parallels or Fusions to virtualize it and run alongside your Mac apps, with Windows 7 being <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5361767/college-students-get-windows-7-for-30">$30 with a valid .edu address</a>, there's no reason not to. It's even easier to move your <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5344879/parallels-switch-to-mac-edition-transfers-windows-programs-for-you">Windows apps and files over</a> that you wanna keep if you're making the slow transition, with Parallels Switch edition, which has a handy USB transfer tool.</p>
<p>6. <a href="http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=20080420211034137">Back Up to Any NAS With Time Machine</a>: Time Machine, OS X's built-in backup, is indispensable. Unfortunately, if you wanna do it over the network, it's kinda limited, unless you know what you're doing. After you figure out your <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5067201/how-to-choose-the-best-network-storage-for-a-macpc-home">network storage of choice</a> (HP's Windows <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5387088/hp-mediasmart-ex495-windows-home-server-review-better-time-machine-support">Home Server with Time Machine compatibility</a> is a damn good option; and for those on a budget, there's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5388904/iomega-ix2+200-nas-review-it-does-all-this">Iomega's ix2 200</a>), it takes just a few minutes a couple of lines of code in Terminal to get your Time Machine backup <a href="http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=20080420211034137">going on any NAS you please</a>.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/snowwin2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_snowwin2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>7. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5430678/how-to-make-your-pc-and-mac-share-stuff-like-best-friends">Make It Play Nice With PCs On Your Network</a>: If you get a NAS, you obviously don't have to worry about moving crap back and forth directly between your Macs and PCs, but if you want a method that will work every single time, this is <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5430678/how-to-make-your-pc-and-mac-share-stuff-like-best-friends">how to do it</a>. It's progressively easier with newer versions of Windows&mdash;stuff seems to just work more often.</p>
<p>8. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/382848/stream-music-and-video-to-your-xbox-360-from-your-mac-slightly-better-with-rivet">Forget Apple TV, Stream to Your Xbox or PS3</a>: If you've already got an Xbox 360 or PS3 (who doesn't?) there's no reason to bother with another media streamer, even if you're ditching Windows. The programs <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/home-entertainment/connect360-updated-let-your-mac-play-with-your-xbox-360again-260066.php">Connect 360</a> and Rivet will stream music, movies and photos from your Mac to your Xbox for $20. For the PS3, <a href="http://www.nullriver.com/products/medialink">there's MediaLink</a>, from the guys who make Connect 360, which does pretty much the same deal, but with slightly better integration with iTunes and iPhoto. The <a href="http://www.vuze.com/devices/">P2P app Vuze</a>&mdash;which is free&mdash;also streams videos to Xbox 360 and PS3 from any OS it runs on, but obviously it's a little less feature-rich.</p>
<p>9. <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5291841/lifehacker-pack-2009-our-list-of-essential-free-mac-downloads&quot;">Download the Best Free Software</a>: At first, there seems to be less freeware on a Mac, but you just need to know where to look. Lifehacker's essential free apps has you covered on everything from the best IM app (Adium) to better disc burning (Burn) to video playback (VLC, of course).</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/vncremooooote_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_vncremooooote_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>10. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5197759/how-to-remote-control-your-home-computer-from-anywhere-with-vnc">Remote Control It</a>: Sure, you could shell out for MobileMe to use Back to My Mac&mdash;except, you shouldn't&mdash;but why bother when you do the same thing and remote control your computer from anywhere with VNC? <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5197759/how-to-remote-control-your-home-computer-from-anywhere-with-vnc">An afternoon</a> and you're done.</p>
<p>That's it from us. Share your own tips and tricks in the comments, and Merry Christmas!</p>
<p><iframe src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http://digg.com/apple/10_Things_You_Must_Do_With_Your_New_Xmas_Mac" align="right" frameborder="0" height="82" scrolling="no" width="55"></iframe></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5433884/10-things-you-must-do-with-your-new-mac]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5433884]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 25 Dec 2009 09:40:48 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5433884&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[10 Things You Must Do With Your New Windows 7 PC]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/peeping.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_peeping.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>If you got a new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windows7" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows7/">Windows 7</a> laptop for Christmas, you are <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5330609/windows-7-review-you-can-quit-complaining-now">truly in luck</a>. But here are 10 things you need to get the most out of it.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/aeroneapk_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_aeroneapk_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>1. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5147665/">Take a Spin Around the New Interface</a>: Still glassy, glossy and damn near glittery, the Windows 7 interface is actually a major progression for Microsoft: It's not just easy to use, it's a whole new paradigm with the revamped taskbar and Aero Peek making multitasking with multiple windows more natural than ever.</p>
<p>2. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5165495/you-can-turn-off-every-major-windows-feature-in-windows-7">Turn Off Everything You Don't Need</a>: While Windows 7 is missing some odd things, like a mail application, the flip side is that you can turn off pretty much every major feature you don't want. Internet Exploder 8? Gone. Windows Media Player? Poof. And if you're used to tweaking the crap out of Windows, you still can&mdash;a <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5384603/the-best-windows-tweaks-that-still-work-in-windows-7">lot of the old tricks</a>, like for manipulating context menus, still work.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/reasytrasnfwercable.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_reasytrasnfwercable.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>3. <a href="http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/3179/migrate-xp-to-windows-7-with-easy-transfer-and-a-usb-drive/">Move All Your Crap from Your Old Machine</a>: Windows 7 actually has <a href="http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/products/features/windows-easy-transfer">pretty decent built-in powers</a> for moving all your crap from your old and busted PC to your new pride and joy, though you need to download Windows Easy Transfer separately onto XP if you're pulling stuff from that.</p>
<p>4. <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5390086/the-master-list-of-new-windows-7-shortcuts">Master All of the New Keyboard Shortcuts</a>: Why deal with flipping around a mouse or scribbling on a trackpad when you do the same thing in a tenth of a second with a keyboard combo? The Start key (oh sorry, <em>Windows</em> key), which I've always neglected as a useless monotasker, is supremely useful in Windows 7, as the underpinning for a metric ton of keyboard shortcuts.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_500x_d90.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />5. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5404743/how-to-make-windows-7-play-nice-with-all-your-gadgets">Get It to Play Nice With All of Your Gadgets</a>: The good news about Windows 7 is that, unlike Vista, most of your gear that worked with your computer a couple years ago with Windows should still work. And newer gear interacts with Windows in a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5150286/">fancy new way</a> with a big ol' splash graphic and easy access to all the stuff you'd wanna do with it. While even simple things, like adding a second monitor, are more straightforward now, here's a device-by-device breakdown on getting everything to touch Windows 7 appropriately.</p>
<p>6. <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5144999/win-7-tip-microsoft-attempts-to-fix-networking-with-homegroups">Share Stuff With Your Other Computers, 'Cause It's Easier Now</a>: The networking UI hasn't just gotten a facelift to make it more accessible, it's actually easier to use with HomeGroups&mdash;join a HomeGroup, and all of the stuff you want to share with other computers spreads like herpes to the rest of the HomeGroup, no arduous networking required. Also, network in general&mdash;<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5430678/how-to-make-your-pc-and-mac-share-stuff-like-best-friends">like with Macs</a>&mdash;seems to just work better with Windows 7.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/win_7_med_ctr_8.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_win_7_med_ctr_8.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a> 7. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5147395/">Stream Your Music and Videos Everywhere</a>: Connecting your PC to a TV sounds so 1999. Well, you might not know this, but your Windows 7 PC is a badass music and video streamer, DVR, photo viewer, video aggregator and everything else you'd want out of a multimedia box, all thanks to Windows Media Center. The living room PC is legit now. Not to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5146859/windows-7-windows-media-player-12-play-to-and-media-compatibility">mention Play To</a>, which beams music (and video and photos) to any compatible device on your network, no setup required (really!). All it takes it a right-click, and those Sonos speakers on the other side of your house will magically start yelling the Yeah Yeah Yeahs.</p>
<p>8. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5257386/how-to-install-windows-7-on-almost-any-netbook">Upgrade Your Netbook to Windows 7 Home Premium</a>: If you got a Windows 7 netbook, there's a good chance you got stuck with the artificially gimped out Starter edition, which sucks. The cheapest way to fix this is to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5361767/college-students-get-windows-7-for-30">buy Windows 7 for $30</a> using a valid .edu email address, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5257386/how-to-install-windows-7-on-almost-any-netbook">then follow our guide</a> to installing Windows 7 on any netbook.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_500x_homeserver1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />9. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5067201/how-to-choose-the-best-network-storage-for-a-macpc-home">Set Up Some Network Storage</a>: A fresh computer is a fresh start&mdash;meaning it's a perfect time to start a new life with fully networked storage for backup, especially if you're using your machine as a DVR with Windows Media Center. (But <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5399370/building-a-nas-skip-the-performance-drives">skip on faster drives</a>.) One awesome option? A <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5387088/hp-mediasmart-ex495-windows-home-server-review-better-time-machine-support">Windows Home Server machine</a>, which can do backups and stream out media to all of your computers.</p>
<p>10. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5197759/how-to-remote-control-your-home-computer-from-anywhere-with-vnc">Remote Control It From Anywhere with VNC</a>: While diving deep into the system and futzing with your network at the same time, you might as well set up a VNC server so you can control your computer from anywhere, whether it's to pull files or schedule downloads.</p>
<p>That's it from us. Share your own tips and tricks in the comments, and Merry Christmas!</p>
<p><iframe src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http://digg.com/gadgets/10_Things_You_Must_Do_With_Your_New_Xmas_Windows_7_PC" align="right" frameborder="0" height="82" scrolling="no" width="55"></iframe></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5433340/10-things-you-must-do-with-your-new-windows-7-pc]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5433340]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[roundups]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 25 Dec 2009 09:40:37 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5433340&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The 20 Essential Palm Pre Apps]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/topimage.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_topimage.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>WebOS's App Catalog may be way behind iPhone and Android in total number of apps, but that doesn't mean there aren't some great ones. Here are our picks for 20 of the best.</p>
<p>All you gallery-haters, click <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5433408/the-20-best-palm-pre-apps">here</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/thumb160x_ulocatewhere.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><br>
<strong><a href="http://www.where.com/">WHERE:</a></strong> WHERE integrates several widgets designed to answer any question that starts with its name. Where's the nearest coffee shop? Where's the nearest gas station? But it's more flexible than that, able to answer some questions that start with "what," as in "what's the traffic on I-95 like?" Hell, it can even do some "whens," like "when is <em>Fantastic Mr. Fox</em> playing?" It's got Yelp, YellowPages, Starbucks and more. <strong>Free</strong><br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/thumb160x_evernote_2009-11-06_165745.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><br>
<strong><a href="http://www.evernote.com/">Evernote</a>:</strong> Evernote is arguably the best note-taking app on every platform on which it appears (iPhone, Android) and on Pre it's nearly as good. For some reason the Pre version lacks voice notes, but it's still what I use for grocery lists. <strong>Free</strong><br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/thumb160x_pandora-320-100.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><br>
<strong><a href="http://www.pandora.com/palm">Pandora</a>:</strong> It's Pandora. It's great. Especially essential on the Pre, which has a mere 8GB of non-expandable memory. <strong>Free</strong><br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/thumb160x_fandango-palm-pre.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><br>
<strong><a href="http://www.fandango.com/palmpreapp">Fandango</a>:</strong> Another one that you probably already know, Fandango's the best movie-finding app on WebOS. It saves nearby or favorite theaters, uses GPS to find those closest, lets you watch trailers&mdash;it's everything you'd want in a movie app. <strong>Free</strong><br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/thumb160x_tweefreedan.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><br>
<strong><a href="http://www.precentral.net/twee-new-beta-twitter-app-palm-pre">Twee</a>:</strong> I had a hard time deciding between Twee and Tweed for the title of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #palmpre" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/palmpre/">Palm Pre</a> Twitter Champ, but decided on Twee for two reasons. First, I like its story&mdash;it was a jailbreak app first, and muscled its way into the App Catalog on sheer moxie and pluck. Second, it offers a free version, which is the one I actually use. Tweed has a more conventional (read: prettier) interface, but I'm not sure that's worth three bucks when TweeFree is totally competent. <strong>Free</strong><br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/thumb160x_reader_20092308_224347.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><br>
<strong><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/membercenter/faq/palmpre.html">NYTimes</a>:</strong> An essential for any smartphone platform, the Pre's NYTimes app falls in between the iPhone's and Android's in quality. It's less buggy and better-looking than Android's, but its smaller screen and slightly slower performance gives iPhone the edge. Regardless, it's a great app for the greatest news outlet in the country, and lets you feel informed even though you're just skimming headlines while sitting on the toilet. <strong>Free</strong><br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/thumb160x_findapps_2009-23-12_191956.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><br>
<strong><a href="http://www.precentral.net/new-app-catalog-15-december-2009">TasteSpotting Today</a>:</strong> TasteSpotting is my favorite food website, but the things that make it great (huge and constantly updated selection, links to external websites, great photography) also make it a headache to read on a mobile device. But TasteSpotting Today puts the massive amounts of info in an easy-to-read format. Great for anyone who likes food. <strong>$1</strong><br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/thumb160x_teatimer_2009-02-10_193845.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><br>
<strong><a href="http://www.tucows.com/preview/410043">Tea Timer</a>:</strong> Honestly, I don't really like tea. I can never get it to taste like much besides tea-flavored hot water, and, you know, I always feel like could be drinking coffee instead. But I have to say, Tea Timer, which provides exact steeping times for a huge variety of tea types (as well as a countdown timer), did result in the best cup of loose-leaf Rooibos I've ever had. Still tasted like tea-flavored water, but it was the best tea-flavored water I've ever made. Way to go, Tea Timer. <strong>$1</strong><br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/thumb160x_toppleball_2009-15-10_233302.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><br>
<strong><a href="http://www.brighthub.com/mobile/palm/reviews/49408.aspx">Topple Ball</a>:</strong> The Pre's definitely lacking in games compared to the iPhone, but Topple Ball is the perfect waiting-for-a-bus game. It's kind of like that tilting maze game Labyrinth, but with obstacles like bumpers, launchers and teleporters to provide extra challenge. Surprisingly tough, but my go-to timewaster. <strong>$2, free version available</strong><br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/thumb160x_player_2009-23-12_192259.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><br>
<strong><a href="http://blog.stitcher.com/?p=229">Stitcher</a>:</strong> As with Pandora, it's important to have a source of streaming media to make up for the Pre's anemic storage, and Stitcher is my favorite podcast app on the platform. It's sleek, fairly full-featured, streams quickly, and has an easy-to-use interface. <strong>Free</strong><br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/thumb160x_download.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><br>
<strong><a href="http://palmprescoop.wordpress.com/">Scoop</a>:</strong> Scoop is my pick for best RSS reader on the Pre, due to its solid integration with Google Reader. Feeds is the other frontrunner, but it's five times more expensive and you definitely aren't getting more for your money. <strong>$1</strong><br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/thumb160x_palm-opentable-app.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><br>
<strong><a href="http://blog.opentable.com/2009/it%E2%80%99s-here-opentable-mobile-app-for-the-palm-pre/">Open Table</a>:</strong> Open Table is a great (albeit sometimes limited) way to reserve tables at restaurants without having to, like, talk to a human being. It's really effective in major urban areas like NYC and SF, although in my suburban Pennsylvania hometown I was better off using Yelp and calling the restaurants. <strong>Free</strong><br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/thumb160x_accuweather.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><br>
<strong><a href="http://www.brighthub.com/mobile/palm/reviews/41734.aspx">Accuweather</a>:</strong> Tells you the weather. <strong>Free</strong><br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/thumb160x_dealrt-list.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><br>
<strong><a href="http://www.everythingpre.com/forum/webos-app-catalog/check-out-my-app-in-the-app-catalog-dealert-24524.html">Dealert</a>:</strong> Tracks deals from a variety of online deal purveyors, like SlickDeals, DealNews and FatWallet. That's provided you need some other source of deals beyond our own <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/dealzmodo/">Gadget Deals of the Day</a>, shocking though that may be. <strong>$2</strong><br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/thumb160x_yelp_palmpre_listing_270x406.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><br>
<strong><a href="http://officialblog.yelp.com/2009/08/mobile-mania-part-tres-yelp-now-with-100-more-pre.html">Yelp</a>:</strong> The premiere source for sometimes-corrupt listings of restaurants and local businesses. Need pan-Asian-Ethiopian fusion food right now, in the middle of Little Italy? Yelp's got your back. <strong>Free</strong><br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/thumb160x_jogstats_2009-20-08_071634.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><br>
<strong><a href="http://palm.preapplications.net/jogstats">JogStats</a>:</strong> If you're one of those weirdos who likes jogging even when there's a perfectly nice couch you could be sitting on, JogStats is the best running assistant on WebOS. It tracks your distance, speed, calories, altitude, all that stuff that makes me exhausted just typing it. <strong>$5</strong><br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/thumb160x_classic_20091008_170604.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><br>
<strong><a href="http://www.motionapps.com/classic/">Classic</a>:</strong> For the guy who just can't let go to the past, this oddly third-party app recreates the classic Palm OS on your Pre or Pixi, complete with virtual buttons, and will run any Palm OS app. <strong>Free</strong><br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/thumb160x_gdial-pro_1_01.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><br>
<strong><a href="http://www.precentral.net/homebrew-apps/gdial-pro-google-voice-app">GDial</a>:</strong> The Palm Pre's Google Voice app is damn good&mdash;in John Herrman's words, "The Pre handles Google Voice nearly as well as Android, and obviously way better than the iPhone." <strong>Free</strong><br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/thumb160x_crosswords-webos.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><br>
<strong><a href="http://www.precentral.net/crosswords-hits-webos">Crosswords</a>:</strong> It ain't from Will Shortz, but the Pre's Crosswords app is surprisingly excellent. Clever puzzles, huge selection, with a range of challenge from Monday to Saturday (there's a little crossword humor for you). Seems expensive, but if you're into crossword puzzles, this could mean dozens of hours of entertainment. Or, if you're like me, hundreds of hours. <strong>$10</strong><br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/thumb160x_media-remote-wmp-winamp-itunes-v0-5-0-beta-mediaremote_2009-01-08_125108.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><br>
<strong><a href="http://www.precentral.net/homebrew-apps/media-remote-wmp-itunes-winamp-ect">Media Remote</a>:</strong> A version of Apple's very first iPhone app, Remote, Media Remote takes the idea to the next level by letting you control several different programs on a Windows PC&mdash;WMP, iTunes, MediaMonkey, VLC and XBMC. Pre only (since the Pixi has no Wi-Fi) and yeah, Windows only is lame, but I use this app all the time to control my XBMC-running media center and it works great. <strong>Free</strong><br clear="all"></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5433408/the-20-essential-palm-pre-apps/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5433408]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[palm pre]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[best palm pre apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Palm Pre Apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pre]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[webos]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 25 Dec 2009 06:40:17 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5433408&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[This is God's Thundering Subwoofer]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_godwoofer2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />My brother worships two things: God and Subwoofers.</p>

<p>We were raised to be quiet, well-mannered Lutherans. But for Erik, there was nothing quiet about the gospel. In church, he sang as loud as he could. He didn't care what anyone else thought – he was reaching out to the Lord and it was our problem if it made our ears ring.</p>
<p>One Sunday, the rumbling bass and baritone voices in the choir sang, "What a Friend We Have in Jesus," and Erik felt God's presence. That rattle and boom was God's voice literally vibrating his heart. We were still young but it decided everything: he would do the Lord's work and it would be loud.</p>
<p>He enrolled in seminary as soon as he could, spent some time in the Holy Land and discovered that a low-end 25 watt sub could not adequately convey the genius of either John Paul Jones bass work on Led Zeppelin IV or the sermons of that other John Paul. Both required an upgrade to a 125 watt Miller & Kreisel MK II sub.</p>
<p>God understood.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_me_last_easter.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<p>My brother must not have mentioned his acoustic theory of divinity when he was ordained because the Bishop assigned him to an elderly congregation in rural Washington State. The greeting committee could hear Pastor Erik coming from miles away – the sound of a booming bass floated across the raspberry fields and through the apple orchards. Things didn't quiet down after he parked his car in the church's gravel parking lot. Erik rejects silences with a roaringly good-natured laugh and a voice that would feel at home in the Super Dome. The senior citizens responded by permanently notching down their hearing aids.</p>
<p>Pastor Erik didn't mind - he just spoke louder and pointed out some immediate problems with the pretty, white steepled church. First, the 20 year old sound system was not up to the task of conveying God's word.</p>
<p>"This is the Word of God we're talking about," he said. "It needs dignity and a high power 12-inch subwoofer with a neodymium magnet and a vented enclosure."</p>
<p>The Church Elders blinked. Pastor Erik was not like their other ministers.</p>
<p>This young whippersnapper wanted to take this flock in a new direction. It didn't matter if they needed walkers, dialysis or a hip replacement to get there– they were going to hear and feel God's word.</p>
<p>He met any resistance with an out-pouring of Lutheran wisdom. Why spend thousands of dollars upgrading the sound system for a congregation of only 80 people? Because in 1541, Martin Luther himself said, "Next to the Word of God, the noble art of music is the greatest treasure in the world." Pastor Erik watched his congregants closely and asked if they were willing to run the world's greatest treasure through a dusty old sound board that muddled the low range? Would Martin Luther want that?</p>
<p>The Elders decided to approve a budget of $9000 and Pastor Erik set to work.</p>
<p>His first move: bring in Jim Hall, an acoustician who has spent 42 years installing commercial audio systems in the Northwest. Hall and the Pastor huddled near the altar and laid out a battle plan. Hall wanted to deploy a four speaker TOA HX-5 variable dispersion system above the altar to ensure speech clarity. It's what he typically recommended for small churches.</p>
<p>"But it won't rock, will it?" the Pastor asked.</p>
<p>Hall was a little surprised – most churches were content with the HX-5 system. But this minister was sharp. He knew the HX-5 couldn't deliver the low end. The Pastor was asking Hall to push himself, to dig deep and that could mean only one thing: the FB-120B.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_fb120_pxle.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<p>The 120B is a crunk-ready 600 watt sub guaranteed to strip the paint off the steeple of any church silly enough to order it. It's exactly what Pastor Erik was looking for.</p>
<p>The system took eight hours to install. They added a 16 channel Mackie 1604 VLZ3 mixing board, an EAW CAZ 1400 dual-amp for the HX-5 and an additional CAZ 800 amp interlaced with an Ashly cross-over for the sub. The final touch: two 1 inch tweeters over the choir.</p>
<p>"It's got to be the best system for a church its size in the Northwest ," Jim Hall says.</p>
<p>To test it, Pastor Erik grabbed the nearest CD he could find: a copy of Veggie Tales left behind by a pre-schooler. He pressed play and the voice of Larry the Cucumber boomed across rural Washington as if Abraham himself had just come down from the mountain to tell the world that he had a new hat and it was made of lettuce.</p>
<p>Pastor Erik heard the music and it was good. It didn't matter what the Cucumber was babbling about. The tune sent its shock waves through his bones and brushed across his soul like a divine wind.</p>
<p>Now and truly, God was in da house.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="416" height="312" id="mbox_player_0097d0b01d15efc48f"><param name="movie" value="http://player.motionbox.com/VideoPlayer.swf?">
<param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always">
<param name="allowFullscreen" value="true">
<param value="video_uid=0097d0b01d15efc48f&security_token=prod3.78d729326c3d89c4&type=sd" name="flashvars">
<embed src="http://player.motionbox.com/VideoPlayer.swf?" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" width="416" height="312" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" name="mbox_player_0097d0b01d15efc48f" flashvars="video_uid=0097d0b01d15efc48f&security_token=prod3.78d729326c3d89c4&type=sd"></embed></object></p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.joshuadavis.net/">Joshua Davis</a> is a Contributing Editor for Wired Magazine who wrote about <a href="http://gizmodo.com/361048/wired-feature-on-deep-sea-cowboys-saving-giant-ships">deep sea cowboys</a> and the <a href="http://www.wired.com/politics/law/magazine/17-04/ff_diamonds?currentPage=2">world's largest diamond heist</a>. (Both of which are being adapted for film.) He's also the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Underdog-Survived-Worlds-Outlandish-Competitions/dp/0345476581">lightest man to ever compete in the US Sumo Open</a>.</em></p>
<p><iframe src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http://digg.com/arts_culture/This_is_God_s_Thundering_Subwoofer_Bass_Gizmodo" align="right" frameborder="0" height="82" scrolling="no" width="55"></iframe></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5433695/this-is-gods-thundering-subwoofer]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5433695]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[audio]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bass]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[church]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[god]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[subwoofer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[subwoofers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xmas]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 24 Dec 2009 14:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh Davis]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5433695&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Secret Lives of Amazon's Elves]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_rv_plus_santa.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />If Amazon is Santa, 400 folks living in RVs outside the Coffeyville, Kansas fulfillment center this winter are the elves.</p><p>A few years back <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #chrisdunphy" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/chrisdunphy/">Chris Dunphy</a> and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #cherieveard" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/cherieveard/">Cherie Ve Ard</a> flipped the bird to their desk jobs, packed their belongings in a custom 17-foot solar-powered fiberglass camper, and <a href="http://www.technomadia.com/">hit the road</a> to live "at the intersection of Epic and Awesome." A couple months ago, while staying with friends, they noticed that Amazon was luring RVers to Coffeyville, Kansas, the site of the retail giant's original and largest fulfillment center.</p>
<p>"We were located in San Diego at the time," explained Cherie. "We're part of a community of younger full-time RVers on <a href="http://www.nurvers.com/">Nurvers.com</a>, a group of non-retired-age folks who are living the mobile lifestyle and kind of going outside the norms of 'Wait for retirement to travel.'" They noticed other RVers were flocking to Kansas to work for Amazon. The pay wasn't great&mdash;just above $10-an-hour, typically&mdash;but Chris and Cherie were planning on being in St. Louis for the holidays. Why not kill a month in Kansas working for Amazon?</p>
<p>Fast forward a couple of weeks, and the self-styled "technomads" were putting down stakes at a state park about 20 miles from the four enormous but dull warehouses that comprise the Coffeyville hub.</p>
<p>Their first day inside, Chris was awed. "Walking inside reminded me of the scene from <em>Indiana Jones</em> when they abandon the Ark in that giant warehouse. It's three stories high. It feels like an industrial library. Shelves going up and up and up." Hundreds of employees scurried, some "orange-badges" or "green-badges" hired by two temporary employment services mixed with the sought-after blue-badges of full-time Amazon employees, guided to their next destination by computers that flashed lights when bins were full or guided workers through the maze with handheld computers. "Pickers are basically playing a human Pac-Man game. They've got a computer scanner that they carry around that tells them where to go. They find their little shelf. One slot might be a book. The next shelf over might be a toaster. Or an iPod. The next slot after that might be a pair of jeans."</p>
<h2>Fiberglass City</h2>
<p>Amazon didn't always lure in "workcampers" from the RV community.</p>
<p>"From what the agency people had told us, Amazon had a bad experience busing in people from Tulsa," says Chris. "There was a lot of theft and a lot of people who weren't really serious about the job."</p>
<p>Workers from Tulsa were adding a 4-hour round-trip commute to an already grueling 10-to-12 hour shift, Cherie is quick to add. "They'd get there exhausted."</p>
<p>Enter the workcampers, people making a go at living in their RVs full time&mdash;many of whom might be otherwise overqualified. "I think Amazon was skeptical at first," says Cherie. "But after the first trial year they were very, very impressed. Workcampers came in enthusiastic about working, since most are professionals. We've owned businesses or been managers." White collar workers, trying their hand at the gypsy life. Even better, the workcampers were able to stay locally.</p>
<p>Not all of the camps provided for the workcampers were exactly inviting.</p>
<p>Chris and Cherie pulled into the one just before Thanksgiving, but could tell it wouldn't make for a pleasant stay. "The closest one was a city park called Walter Johnson. RVs were very close together. Half the campsites had full hookups, which meant they had water, electricity, and sewer dump on-site. Half the sites just had electricity and water and they had what they call a 'Honey Wagon' that comes around and pumps your sewage out a few times a week." Some RVers had been in Coffeyville since August.</p>
<p>Worse, it was cramped and muddy. "Coffeyville also had a flood three years ago, so it was very, very wet and muddy because the area had been washed out, then rained on recently." They eventually moved on to a state park, which was lovely, but also four times farther away. They rarely had time to enjoy the scenery.</p>
<p>"We were on the night shift," says Chris, "Our day would start when we would wake up at three in the afternoon. Work started at five."</p>
<p>"Every shift starts with what they call a 'Stand Up.' You gather in one area with your usual department&mdash;ours was called 'Sortable Singles,' which sounds like it should be the name of a dating site&mdash;and they'd count off how many people they needed in each department. Run through a few announcements. Give you a few safety tips. And then they lead you through five minutes of group stretches."</p>
<p>Cherie was mainly a packer, putting items in the box and scanning them. Chris, on the other hand, was a "water spider." He explains, "A water spider is responsible for keeping all the packers supplied, so ideally they'd never need to stand up and leave their station to get any other supplies like all the different sizes of boxes, plus making sure their tape machines and paper-spitter machines are operating."</p>
<p>"I never quite exactly figured out why they call it a water spider. My guess is back in the history of assembly line jobs, the water spider would be the person who would bring people on the line water to drink. Nobody seemed to know!"</p>
<h2>The Mocha Factory</h2>
<p>Work was monotonous and&mdash;for a couple who had been living a relative life of leisure&mdash;full of endless hours of standing on one's feet.</p>
<p>"24-Hour Fitness, Amazon-style," laughs Chris. Cherie liked to think of it as having "a personal trainer for 60 hours a week."</p>
<p>Inside the warehouses, machines and man alike were controlled by Amazon's computerized assembly line.</p>
<p>In one part of the factory, Chris watched two giant elliptical carousels, each one the size of a <em>football field</em>, carry wooden trays around at 15mph. "All the items are coming in the totes on one side of this giant machine. There are people who take each individual item, scan them and put them on the trays as they go by. The trays get to a chute where their order is being assembled, tilt, and the product flies down into that space. When all the items for a particular order are assembled in one place an orange light comes on and somebody comes by." Above, another carousel brought an endless procession of empty boxes to be filled with the orders.</p>
<p>It wasn't exactly what Cherie had envisioned. "When we told people were going to do this, someone said 'Whenever I click the order button on Amazon, I always imagine a chorus of happy, singing Oompa-Loompas riding around on Segways and shipping my stuff.' Well...no. It's not <em>exactly</em> like that."</p>
<p>"The computer has to prioritize how it's going to send out all the pickers in this giant facility. So someone could order a book and a sweater and an iPod, and those could be in completely different corners of the whole facility. But somehow they all arrive within about 30 minutes of each other." It's efficiency even Willy Wonka could love.</p>
<p>Chris and Cherie wouldn't work another season at Coffeyville, but not because they were miserable. "Everybody treated each other really nicely!" says Chris. It's just that the two are "experience junkies, craving the new," even if working for Amazon certainly gave them a fresh perspective on American culture.</p>
<p>"You'd have a tote come down the line, and you'd have adult toys right next to kid toys in the same bin," laughs Cherie. "The <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001PKU2OI?ie=UTF8&tag=dethroner-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B001PKU2OI">Obama Chia Pet</a> was an oddity. And the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001D6L8TC?ie=UTF8&tag=dethroner-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B001D6L8TC">Bill Clinton corkscrew</a>. And I did have a tote one afternoon that was full of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001DTPAAC?ie=UTF8&tag=dethroner-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B001DTPAAC">mooning gnomes</a>."</p>
<p>Chris geeked on it pretty hard. (Before he became an migrant worker, Chris was a founding editor for <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maximum_PC">boot magazine</a>&mdash;later known as <a href="http://www.maximumpc.com/">Maximum PC</a>. He also worked for Palm.) "Just getting to experience that type of work, to literally see consumer culture flow beneath your fingertips, was absolutely fascinating. You feel the pulse of the market."</p>
<p>Besides their paychecks, all they're left with are memories&mdash;cameras weren't allowed inside.</p>
<p>"One of the rules at Amazon is that you're not allowed to bring anything into the facility that they sell." Chris went through a bit of withdrawal. "One of the hardest things about the job was going without my iPhone for a month. It was a great way to break the addiction of wanting to Twitter about things. You'd be like, 'Oh my God, I just saw this Bill Clinton corkscrew and you won't believe where the corkscrew comes out.' But oh crap, I can't tweet."</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5433487/the-secret-lives-of-amazons-elves]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5433487]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[holiday shopping]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cherie ve ard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chris dunphy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[christmas]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[elves]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rvs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[santa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[technomadia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 24 Dec 2009 10:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joel Johnson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5433487&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Tales of Holiday Techno-Failure]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_xmas-horror_top.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Is it any surprise that when I asked a bunch of Gizmodo readers to share their <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5424804/earn-pizza-and-fame-by-sharing-your-holiday-horror-stories">holiday horror stories</a>, you guys sent in tales of frozen cameras, techno-challenged dads and&mdash;yes&mdash;porn-filled PS3s?</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_frostythenikon4.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<h2>Frosty the Frozen Nikon</h2>
<p>A fellow who goes by Skunkabilly sent <a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/strobist/discuss/72157612505529367/">his pictorial tale on Flickr</a>, which documents a camping trip to Monument Valley and the miserable story of a D90 which froze up&mdash;literally. Apparently the poor camera was set up outside the tent in an attempt to capture one of those gorgeous swirling-star slow exposures of the sky.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>I've lived in Southern California my whole life, so I don't really understand how this whole cold and frost thing works.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>When he woke up, his precious DSLR was covered with frost. "What the crap is this?" he asked himself. "Ahhh, yes. All hail Frosty the Nikon!" He tried to thaw his camera on the engine block of his Subaru, but ultimately decided to take it inside the car. Sure, it fogged up <i>on the inside</i> for a bit, but it was fine eventually, and the rest of the trip was smooth.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5425573,6,'');
</script></p>
<p>The part that caught our attention though? Skunkabilly ended the tale by saying, "Hopefully I won't rappel into a pool and drown it to death like I did with my D200." Yikes! Sounds like there's a history of gadget abuse here.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_trainsetstory.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<h2>How the Phone Guy Saved Christmas</h2>
<p>Marte, better known as <a href="http://gizmodo.com/people/infmom">infmom</a>, sent in this photo from 1961. It's Christmas morning, and she and her brother are admiring the elaborate electric train set their father had bought and built for them. Only that fact in itself was mysterious, as their father "could barely change a lightbulb."</p>
<p>Marte explains that, to his dying day, her father referred to record players as "Victrolas" and refrigerators as "iceboxes." Not so much Luddite as someone who didn't usually get involved with the technical processes of the household, he decided that year to break the trend, and get constructive.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>A few days before Christmas, Dad brought home the train set and the plastic scenery and the controllers and a bunch of wood and nails and smuggled all the stuff into the basement through the outside door and told us to stay out of it. He borrowed a hand saw and a hammer from the neighbors and set to work trying to build a table to put the train set on. Including sawing a sheet of plywood to size. With a hand saw. Laid across our basement coffee table, which was a hollow core door on legs. When my mom heard the language coming from the basement she told us to stay <i>way</i> away from it.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Though his effort to this point was valiant, the electrical engineering&mdash;and a certain amount of required drilling, for which he lacked a drill&mdash;did him in. Still, on Christmas morning, the train set was up and running. How?</p>
<blockquote>
<p>We were thinking some kind of miracle had occurred, until our mother told us that later that day we were to go over and thank our neighbor, who worked for the phone company, for responding to Dad's late-night cry for help.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Marte thinks that's the point where she vowed to grow up learning how to fix things herself. And considering that she's lurking around Lifehacker and Gizmodo, odds are that she did. I feel bad for her father though. While Marte and her brother got to enjoy their gift, to him this must've been a genuine holiday horror.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_presentstree.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<h2>Floppy Disks Sold Separately</h2>
<p>We've heard of coal in the stocking, but <a href="http://gizmodo.com/people/jeffreyesjavier/">Jeff's</a> story sounds worse. One Christmas, he hit the jackpot, scoring not just a cool RC car, but a set of Crazy Bones figurines too. So the next Christmas, he was reasonably quite excited:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>I used to love sleeping by the fireplace at night, right next to the Christmas tree. Every season, I would do this with my little brother, and fall asleep to the warm glow of the fire, and wake up in the morning with presents all around us. I went to sleep too giddy to even imagine what I was going to receive the next morning.</p>
<p>I awoke to the sound of wrapping paper crumpling around me, as I stared at two of the biggest packages I had ever seen. I immediately started shredding the paper [the first one] was wrapped in, like a hungry wolf digging into its prey. What did I uncover? Two brand spankin' new... comforter and blanket sets. [And in] the smaller package next to it? A 100-capacity floppy disk lock box.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Sadly, he did not even receive any floppies to put inside it.</p>
<p><i>Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/luminarie/2179728755/">alliet</a></i></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_rctruck.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<h2>Son, You Can Play With Your Toys When I Sell You the Batteries</h2>
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/people/luckybob343">Luckybob343</a> grew up in the '80s, a time when "Christmas wasn't Christmas without a remote-controlled, battery-operated something."</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The trouble was, Santa brought all the cool electronic toys but he never brought any batteries. Those we had to buy ourselves, but in our house we could only buy batteries from my dad's independent electronics store.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Sure, sounds nice to keep it in the family, but there were two catches: First, his dad bought <i>his</i>batteries in bulk from Walmart, and jacked up the price by $2 per pack. And second, Luckybob's dad's store was closed from Christmas Eve until January 2nd.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Come the new year, we'd fork over three weeks of allowances over to my dad to get to play with our toys one week after we got them.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Luckybob finally got some revenge though. This year, he got a multi-instrument weather station that he knew his dad had been eying, and he took out all the instructions except the ones written in French.</p>
<p><i>Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/luna_space/2044078247/">cosmic tito</a></i></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_porntv.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<h2>Porn in the PS3</h2>
<p>Jose was happy to return home after finishing Navy boot camp last Christmas. Most of his family members, from age one to age 65, were gathered at his house. There his step-father had recently installed a 50-inch plasma TV and all the gaming console goodies that should go with it, including a PS3.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>One of my little cousins wanted to play the PS3 so he turned it on and a porno came on. Everyone's mouth just dropped to the ground. My sister quickly turned it off but it was too late.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Jose told us that about 25 dear family members heard and saw what was likely a film by the Bang Bros. Everyone stared down his step-father, giving him "the look of shame." Some family members left because of it, and are pretending Jose's step-father doesn't exist. Needless to say, his mom had to throw out some DVDs. There is a silver lining, though: "We are having the Christmas eve party at my aunt's now!" Yikes.</p>
<p><i>Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/me_vs_gutenberg/16005868/">me vs gutenberg</a></i></p>
<h2>You Name the Winner</h2>
<p>So, who wins the pizza? Each story has its own particular charm (and nastiness), so we thought we'd put it to a vote. Have at it, and by the end of Christmas Day, whoever has the most votes on this baby wins.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8" src="http://static.polldaddy.com/p/2425117.js">
</script><noscript><br>
<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/2425117/">Which of these stories deserves a pizza?</a><span style="font-size:9px;">(<a href="http://www.polldaddy.com">survey</a>)</span><br></noscript></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5433328/tales-of-holiday-techno+failure]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5433328]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[holiday horrors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[contest]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[disasters]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[holiday]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[holiday horror stories]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[holiday tech disasters]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[holidays]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 24 Dec 2009 01:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5433328&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Most Popular Firefox Extensions and Themes of 2009]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_firefox_extension_splash2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />This year's <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5304572/firefox-35-officially-available-for-download">release</a> of Firefox 3.5 gave us <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5295655/top-10-firefox-35-features">a lot of reasons to like it</a>, but its extensibility remains everyone's favorite feature. These add-ons and theme tools were the most popular in the year gone by.</p><p>This list is culled from a straight listing of the most popular posts that offered a Firefox extension for download in 2009. We're not including posts about configuring Firefox, or even our <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5291501/lifehackers-firefox-add+on-packs">own hand-rolled Firefox add-on packs</a>&mdash;even if they were pretty popular, too. Let's get to the good stuff.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5322073/firefox-37-theme-makes-your-browser-look-awesome">Firefox 3.7 Theme Makes Your Browser Look Awesome</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/firefox_37.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_firefox_37.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>One of the greatest things about Firefox is that its development happens way out wide in the open. When the design workers start coming up with <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5319301/mozilla-releases-initial-design-mockups-for-firefox-37">preliminary sketches of a new release</a>, anyone can peek at them and even <a href="http://boneyardbrew.deviantart.com/art/Firefox-3-7-Mockup-Redux-2-0-130502568">compile them into a theme</a>, which does just what the headline suggests.<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5270199/all+glass-firefox-enables-slick-transparency-effects">All-Glass Firefox Enables Slick Transparency Effects</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/allglass_firefox.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_allglass_firefox.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Windows Vista and 7 feature some fairly nice looking transparency effects, but if your primary browser doesn't use them, it can feel a bit disconnected. <a href="http://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=746714">All-Glass Firefox v2</a> tweaks your browser to look just, well, <em>proper</em> in its fancy-pants surroundings.<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5347125/vacuum-places-improved-speeds-up-firefox-with-a-click-of-your-mouse">"Vacuum Places Improved" Speeds Up Firefox with a Click of Your Mouse</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/12/vacuum_places_improved_.png" class="left image340" width="340" />You can speed up Firefox by <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5344418/make-firefox-faster-by-vacuuming-your-database">cleaning up its fragmented database</a>, and the <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/13878">Vacuum Places Improved 0.3</a> extension automates that admittedly pain-in-the-butt process.<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5231383/gmail-redesigned-30-focuses-on-speed-and-message-space">Gmail Redesigned 3.0 Focuses on Speed and Message Space</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/gmail_redesigned.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_gmail_redesigned.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><a href="http://www.globexdesigns.com/products/gr/">Google Redesigned</a>, a multi-site suite that trades Google's blue/white/minimal look for a darker, sleeker feel, kept improving its transformative powers this year, adding a host of improvements in its 3.0 release, and later releasing <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5147831/google-redesigned-updates-adds-greader-redesigned">a new version with GReader Redesigned</a> for the RSS hounds.<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5397444/dislike-02-adds-a-disapproving-dislike-button-to-facebook">Dislike 0.2 Adds a Disapproving Dislike Button to Facebook</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_dislike.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />"I'm having SUCH a bad day&mdash;the cleaning lady TOTALLY left her Pine Sol smell all over my bed linens!" That, my friends, is why clever JavaScript tweakers created the <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/47023">Dislike</a> extension.<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5372011/tineye-adds-reverse-image-lookup-to-firefox">TinEye Adds Reverse Image Lookup to Firefox</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/12/tineye.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Many of the pictures and illustrations you find across the web aren't in their original form&mdash;and many can be had at better, perhaps more wallpaper-worthy sizes. <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/8922">The TinEye extension</a> makes it a simple right-click maneuver to search out similar copies of any image you come across.<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5195313/skipscreen-lets-you-pass-go-and-collect-your-download">SkipScreen Lets You Pass Go and Collect Your Download</a></h3>
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="409" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://blip.tv/play/AfW%2BNgI">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://blip.tv/play/AfW%2BNgI" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="409" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object><br clear="all">
Sometimes, great stuff has to be hosted on public download services, because the file&mdash;or the attention it's getting&mdash;is just too much for our meek little personal sites. And the download sites often make it as painful as possible to grab those files. <a href="http://skipscreen.com/">SkipScreen</a> acts as an automated intermediary, jumping through the necessary hoops and entering the key presses required.<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5415450/firefound-tracks-your-stolen-computer-nukes-your-personal-data">FireFound Tracks Your Stolen Computer, Nukes Your Personal Data</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/12/firefound_01.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />This neat little extension, <a href="http://blog.mozilla.com/extendfirefox/2009/11/30/extend-firefox-3-5-winners/">winner of the Extend Firefox 3.5 contest</a>, utilizes lots of Firefox's built-in features, like geo-location and the extension framework, to offer wary laptop users a way to nuke their personal data, passwords, and history if necessary, track where their machine is logging on after a theft, and cull all kinds of data from the thief. <a href="http://www.firefound.com/">FireFound</a> is, in other words, a smart thing to install if your laptop ever leaves the home.<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5137655/guiconfig-gives-easy-access-to-hidden-firefox-settings/">Gui:config Gives Easy Access to Hidden Firefox Settings</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/12/guiconfig.png" class="left image340" width="340" />A lot of helpful stuff is tucked away in Firefox's <code>about:config</code> menus. <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/5523">Gui:config</a> brings them into focus and offers a graphical way to manage them. As the How-To Geek puts it, it's amazing that this isn't something being considered for mainstream distribution in the browser.<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5426767/memory-fox-manages-firefoxs-memory-use-aims-to-keep-it-low">Memory Fox Manages Firefox's Memory Use, Aims to Keep It Low</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/12/memory_fox.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />(Windows only): Firefox is <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5395555/browser-speed-tests-the-windows-7-results">decently light with memory on startup</a>, but extensions and plug-ins drag it down as you actually use it. <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/53880">Memory Fox</a> monitors Firefox's memory use and, once it reaches your pre-set limit, whips it back into shape.<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5296879/daum-blue-firefox-theme-is-clean-simple-and-elegant">Daum Blue Firefox Theme is Clean, Simple, and Elegant</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/daum_blue.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_daum_blue.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>(Windows only): Well, the headline and picture kind of say it all about <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/10288">Daum Blue</a>, but it's worth noting that beyond looks, it's also fairly customizable, and looks even better on Vista and Windows 7 systems.<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5421669/decreased-productivity-helps-you-browse-at-work-without-getting-busted">Decreased Productivity Helps You Browse at Work Without Getting Busted</a></h3>
<p>Sure, kind of anathema for this site's stated mission, but giving your mind a break at work has <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5196818/internet-leisure-browsing-is-a-helpful-distraction-study-says">real mental benefits</a>, even if your boss doesn't think so.<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5137236/urlbarext-adds-super-powers-to-the-awesome-bar/gallery/">UrlbarExt Adds Super Powers to the Awesome Bar</a></h3>
<p>If you're likely to do more at a web site than just simply bookmark it, <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/8758">UrlbarExt</a> is like a Leatherman for your AwesomeBar. Head to a site's root, search the site on Google, and do much more from a small array of address bar buttons.<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5162599/foxmarks-becomes-xmarks-adds-search-and-suggestion-features/gallery/">Foxmarks Becomes Xmarks, Adds Search and Suggestion Features</a></h3>
<p>Another headline that pretty much says it all. We weren't a big fan of <a href="http://xmarks.com">Xmarks</a>' new "discovery" features, but its growing reach <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5339465/xmarks-comes-to-chrome-syncs-bookmarks-with-all-your-browsers">into Chrome</a> and other browsers make the former Foxmarks' expansion a good thing.<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5401707/magnetiser-downloads-torrents-when-no-torrent-file-is-available">Magnetiser Downloads Torrents When No Torrent File Is Available</a></h3>
<p>Given the recent legal crackdown on BitTorrent-centered sites, magnet links (<a href="http://lifehacker.com/5411311/bittorrents-future-dht-pex-and-magnet-links-explained">explained here</a>) are increasingly popular. <a href="http://www.rohitab.com/discuss/index.php?showtopic=35291">Magnetiser</a> makes it easy to track down a working torrent link to grab the file you're looking for.<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5382531/integrated-gmail-updates-with-improved-looks-and-handy-features">Integrated Gmail Updates with Improved Looks and Handy Features</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_integrated_gmail.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />It must be mentioned that, beyond smooshing together Gmail, Google Calendar, and Google Reader into one neatly-arranged Gmail page, <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/9457">Integrated Gmail</a> also customizes every niggling detail of those combined apps, making it worth the try-out, even if you think you like your Google spaces separated into different tabs.<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5381671/omnibar-extension-collapses-firefoxs-address-and-search-boxes-into-one">Omnibar Extension Collapses Firefox's Address and Search Boxes into One</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/12/integrated_search.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/8823">Omnibar</a> is one of the clever ways Firefox can <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5059213/turn-firefox-into-a-google-chrome-clone">make itself into a Google Chrome clone</a>, and we love that kind of openness 'round here.<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5334708/invisible-hand-subtly-shows-best-web-prices">Invisible Hand Subtly Shows Best Web Prices</a></h3>
<p>If you're always looking at online purchases and wondering if you could save more before pulling the trigger, <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/11377">Invisible Hand</a> affirms your hunches for you, dropping down and showing lower prices wherever it can find them.<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5131562/ubiquity-sees-major-update-new-look-better-performance">Ubiquity Sees Major Update, New Look, Better Performance</a></h3>
<p>Mozilla's future-facing automation and shortcut engine, <a href="https://mozillalabs.com/ubiquity/">Ubiquity</a>, continued to get awesome-r in 2009.<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5401563/app-tabs-creates-permanent-icon+only-tabs-firefox-40+style">App Tabs Creates Permanent, Icon-Only Tabs, Firefox 4.0-Style</a></h3>
<p>We dug the idea of permanent, favicon-only tabs when <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5342149/set-up-space+saving-permanent-gmail-and-reader-tabs-in-firefox">a helpful reader explained it to us</a>, but the <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/47734">App Tabs</a> extension took a multi-step process and made it far more simple.<br clear="all"></p>
<hr>
Not seeing your favorite add-on released in 2009 here, or covered anywhere at Lifehacker? Can't believe your favorite app doesn't get more attention? Let's hear all about it in the comments.]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://lifehacker.com/5433177/most-popular-firefox-extensions-and-themes-of-2009]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5433177]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[best of 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[best of]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[extension]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[extensions]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[firefox extension]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[firefox extensions]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[web browsers]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 23 Dec 2009 20:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Purdy]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5433177&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The 50 Worst Gadgets of the Decade]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_50worst.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /> We're almost clear of the aughts. Just one more week, and we get to leave this decade behind for good. But before we do, it's worth taking stock of the absolute worst gadgets these last ten years have given us.</p>
<p>We haven't ranked our picks, but we have put them in a rough chronological order. Think of it as a guided tour through the various circles of gadget hell&mdash;and feel free to have a little guilt when you spot the ones you've owned (or still do). Anything we've missed? Share it in the comments. There have been thousands of gadgets released since 2000, and we're sure there are at least fifty more out there that should never have seen the light of day.</p>
<p><b>Update:</b> OK, <em>now</em> all you gallery haters can view the embedded all in one long skinny post, if you prefer. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5431759/worst-gadgets-gallery/">Here you go.</a> You're welcome.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5431759,50,'');
</script></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5432480/the-50-worst-gadgets-of-the-decade]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5432480]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[y2k10]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[retromodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[worstmodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Barrett]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5432480&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Best Alternatives to Every Apple Product]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p>Apple makes some of the most specialized mainstream devices around, but the gear is never very cheap and, let's face it, it stinks for any one company to own your wallet. So here are the best alternatives for each iProduct:</p>

<p>(If you'd like to see this post in non-gallery form, just <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5431521/the-closest-alternatives-to-every-apple-product/">click here</a>.)</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_iphonedroid.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>Apple iPhone 3GS ($199) -&gt; Motorola Droid ($199)</strong><br>
When the iPhone was released, it was a generation, at least, beyond the entire smartphone market. Now, many manufacturers have worked hard to catch up. And while the iPhone is still my personal favorite, I understand wanting a phone on the Verizon network rather than AT&T. Besides, the Droid hardware is fantastic, and its software, Android 2.0, feels far more like a full-featured OS than the original. Just as we said in our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5396168/motorola-droid-review">full review</a>, "It's this simple: If you don't buy an iPhone, buy a Droid."</p>
<p><em>What you gain:</em><br>
&bull; Physical keyboard<br>
&bull; Fewer dropped calls<br>
&bull; Memory slot expansion</p>
<p><em>What you lose:</em><br>
&bull; iTunes integration<br>
&bull; Decent built-in media player</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_ipodvszunenew.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #ipodtouch" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ipodtouch/">iPod Touch</a> ($199, 8GB) -&gt; <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #zunehd" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/zunehd/">Zune HD</a> ($219, 16GB)</strong><br>
I know, I know. Why buy a <em>Zune</em>? If you're heavily invested in iTunes albums, the answer is, no reason. But for those who are willing to break from the Apple music infrastructure, the Zune HD is actually an awesome PMP. The aluminum case is very sharp, with an OLED screen that's richer than any iPod (though slightly worse in the sun). The Zune software, coupled with optional unlimited download subscription packages, is every bit as hip and convenient as Cover Flow and iTunes, provided you run Windows. Oh, also, you don't need to drop $300 to get a decent amount of storage <em>and</em> you get HD TV-Out and a not-so-bad TV interface to boot. So when you're sick of the little screen, you can go as big as you'd like.</p>
<p><em>What you gain:</em><br>
&bull; 8GB more storage (base model)<br>
&bull; HD Radio<br>
&bull; Unlimited music subscription with free MP3s<br>
&bull; HD TV-Out and an on-screen TV interface</p>
<p><em>What you lose:</em><br>
&bull; iTunes integration<br>
&bull; About a billion apps</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_ipodflip.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>iPod Nano ($180, 16GB) -&gt; <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #flipultrahd" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/flipultrahd/">Flip Ultra HD</a> ($150)</strong><br>
The obvious contender to the iPod Nano used to be the Zune 16. But now? You can't even get that model of Zune. And with a built-in camcorder, be it a bit on the crappy side, the Nano truly is a unique contender in its space. However, I ask you this: Don't you already have an MP3 player? Seriously, it's not possible that you don't. OK then, just buy the Flip Ultra HD, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5401862/ultimate-pocket-camcorder-comparison">best bang for your buck pocket camcorder</a> on the market. And use your old iPod because it probably still works fine.</p>
<p><em>What you gain:</em><br>
&bull; HD video</p>
<p><em>What you lose:</em><br>
&bull; I mean, it's not an iPod, or any kind of media player, obviously</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_clipvsnano.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #ipodshuffle" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ipodshuffle/">iPod Shuffle</a> ($80, 4GB) -&gt; <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #sansaclip" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/sansaclip/">Sansa Clip+</a> ($70, 8GB)</strong><br>
The new Shuffle is basically nonexistent, a device that, while remarkable in terms of minimalist design, may be a tad difficult to wield when you just want to play that one song you want to hear. Enter the Sansa Clip+, an chunky but still tiny MP3 player lauded by audiophiles (if such a thing is possible) that supports up to 16GB of MicroSD expansion. Save even more money by buying the 2GB version (just $40) and sticking in a spare MicroSD. And as we said in <a href="It's%20the%20best%20low-end%20mp3%20player%20on%20the%20market,%20without%20question.">our review</a>, the Clip+ is "the best low-end mp3 player on the market, without question."</p>
<p><em>What you gain:</em><br>
&bull; Sound quality<br>
&bull; MicroSD expansion<br>
&bull; An actual screen<br>
&bull; Voice recorder<br>
&bull; The freedom to choose any headphones</p>
<p><em>What you lose:</em><br>
&bull; iTunes<br>
&bull; <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5182659/we-discover-the-dark-side-of-the-new-ipod-shuffle">Trash-talking Voice Over function</a></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_tvvsasus.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>Apple TV ($229, 160GB) -&gt; <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #asusoplay" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/asusoplay/">Asus O!Play</a> ($99)</strong><br>
No matter what direction you go, you're pretty much always better off <em>not</em> buying an Apple TV. It's basically a closed box that hates supporting not only external codecs but external drives, too, and you can forget about navigating to files on your own network&mdash;even ones stored on your precious <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #timecapsule" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/timecapsule/">Time Capsule</a>. The $99 <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5415699/asus-oplay-review-best+priced-hd-video-player-is-the-new-champ">Asus O!Play</a> is our favorite budget way to play media in any codec under the sun, from files on a Mac or PC formatted drive or streamed from pretty much any NAS drive. As for watching movies on demand, chances are, your cable box already does that. Need more options? The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5255151/lg-bd390-wi+fi-blu+ray-player-review-so-packed-youll-forget-about-blu">LG BD390</a> is an excellent Wi-Fi-equipped Blu-ray player with Netflix and Vudu video, and DivX support. And heck, I'd even recommend the $199 Xbox 360 as a Netflix/DivX machine with Windows Media Center Extender capabilities. Basically, you can't go wrong here. Everything is better than Apple TV, unless you have a library full of purchased iTunes music and movies, and if you do, you probably have Apple TV already, so go enjoy it.</p>
<p><em>What you gain:</em><br>
&bull; Mega codec support<br>
&bull; Ability to stream your video files from computers and NAS drives<br>
&bull; Cash in your pocket</p>
<p><em>What you lose:</em><br>
&bull; The iTunes video ball and chain</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_macbookvs14z.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>MacBook ($999) -&gt; Dell Studio 14z ($750)</strong><br>
As Mark Spoonauer said in our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5421823/the-best-windows-laptops-from-400-to-1500">best Windows laptop roundup</a>, "Think of it as the poor man's MacBook-with better specs." No, the Dell Studio 14z doesn't run OS X, but the Core 2 Duo laptop weighs .3lbs lighter than a MacBook while offering 1GB more RAM (base), 70GB more storage, a backlit keyboard and nicer built-in speakers.</p>
<p><em>What you gain:</em><br>
&bull; More storage<br>
&bull; More RAM<br>
&bull; Backlit keyboard<br>
&bull; Less weight</p>
<p><em>What you lose:</em><br>
&bull; OS X<br>
&bull; Optical drive<br>
&bull; Flash card reader</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_mbvsenvy.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #macbookpro" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbookpro/">MacBook Pro</a> ($1200) -&gt; <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #hpenvy" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/hpenvy/">HP Envy</a> ($1700)</strong><br>
I'm not sure anyone should actually choose the 13-inch Envy (<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5370592/hp-envy-13-review-the-macbook-imitated-not-duplicated">full review</a>) over the 13-inch MacBook Pro (<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5287179/macbook-pro-2009-review">full review</a>), but the Envy is the closest knock-off on the market. For the $500 Envy premium, you do shed .8lbs off the MacBook Pro, coming in at just 3.7lbs (which is crazy-light for a laptop of this size). And you'll score an extra GB of RAM along with a more powerful, discrete Radeon HD 4330 graphics. But we're still talking about $500 extra for a computer that, ultimately, doesn't feel as solid as a unibody Mac. Plus, if you really want to run Win 7, that plays just fine on the MBP, too. As for the MBP 15, there's really no ideal alternative. And if you were considering the 15-inch Envy, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5413076/hp-envy-15+inch-review">think again</a>.</p>
<p><em>What you gain:</em><br>
&bull; More overall power<br>
&bull; Less weight<br>
&bull; Prettier screen</p>
<p><em>What you lose:</em><br>
&bull; OS X<br>
&bull; Optical drive<br>
&bull; Frame rigidity</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_imacvstouchsmart.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>iMac ($1200, 21.5-inch) -&gt; <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #hptouchsmart600" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/hptouchsmart600/">HP TouchSmart 600</a> ($1,050, 23-inch)</strong><br>
The latest iMac (<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5388567/apple-imac-review-27-inches-and-less-chin">full review</a>) is a beautiful machine, no doubt. But there are alternatives to this famed all-in-one. Our favorite is the HP TouchSmart 600 (<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5380088/hp-touchsmart-600-review-multitouch-multimedia-mogul">full review</a>), which is sort of the souped-up Civic to Apple's classic Porsche. Both will do a quarter mile in the same time&mdash;with Core 2 Duo processors&mdash;but the TouchSmart has the shiny detailing and LED underlighting of a street racer, while sprucing up the package with a decent touch display coupled with special Twitter, Facebook and even recipe box apps designed for the system. Especially as a kitchen computer, the HP TouchSmart is a valid alternative to the iMac.</p>
<p><em>What you gain:</em><br>
&bull; Larger, touchscreen<br>
&bull; Glitzy accents with customizable LED underlighting<br>
&bull; Clever apps<br>
&bull; HDMI input for home theater fun</p>
<p><em>What you lose:</em><br>
&bull; OS X<br>
&bull; Understated design</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_mbtoadamo.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #macbookair" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbookair/">MacBook Air</a> ($1500) -&gt; Dell Adamo XPS ($2000)</strong><br>
There's only one laptop on the market that can confidently purge alongside the MacBook Air, and that's the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5397393/dell-adamo-xps-hands-on-insanely-thin-and-just-insane">Dell Adamo XPS</a>. While the price premium seems absurd at first, keep in mind that the Adamo XPS, at about <em>half</em> the thickness of the Air, is loaded with a 128GB flash drive and 4GB of RAM stock (while the MacBook Air will run $1800 in a similar SSD configuration and maxed at 2GB of RAM). If you're considering an Air, you want a computer that says "I'm good at spending money." And the Adamo XPS will most certainly fulfill that need.</p>
<p><em>What you gain:</em><br>
&bull; 1 USB port<br>
&bull; Ethernet jack<br>
&bull; 2GB of RAM<br>
&bull; A clasp that opens from the heat of your finger</p>
<p><em>What you lose:</em><br>
&bull; OS X<br>
&bull; About $500</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_minirevo.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>Mac Mini ($600) -&gt; Acer AspireRevo R3610 ($330)</strong><br>
If I had the choice between a Mac Mini (<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5164718/mac-mini-2009-review">full review</a>) and the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5383094/acer-aspirerevo-upgraded-windows-7-ion-graphics-dual+core-atom-cpu">AspireRevo R3610</a>&mdash;spending someone else's money&mdash;I would still choose the Revo for its <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5420853/why-its-finally-time-to-get-a-home-theater-pc">HTPC prowess</a>. The Mac Mini has always been a promising system falling just short of its potential in terms of both price and performance. Meanwhile, the absurdly cheap Revo, equipped with Ion tech that's more than happy to handle 1080p video outputted to your TV through HDMI (as opposed to Apple's need for funky wiring and/or hard-to-find specialized adapters), is kind enough to include 2GB RAM, 160GB HDD, HDMI, eSATA, VGA, 6 USB ports, card reader, wireless-N <em>and</em> a wireless keyboard and mouse for roughly half the price of a Mini. The only thing the Revo isn't optimal for is browsing Flash pages, that is, until we finally see an update that makes Ions and Flash play well together.</p>
<p><em>What you gain:</em><br>
&bull; HDMI out<br>
&bull; 1 USB port<br>
&bull; eSATA port<br>
&bull; Wireless keyboard and mouse<br>
&bull; Like $300</p>
<p><em>What you lose:</em><br>
&bull; OS X<br>
&bull; FireWire</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_timevslink.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>Time Capsule (1TB, $299) -&gt; <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #dlinkdir685" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/dlinkdir685/">D-Link DIR-685</a> (Expandable, $215)</strong><br>
The convenience of a Time Capsule, a combination wireless router and NAS, is tough to beat because it's so unique. But I wouldn't call the task <em>impossible</em>. The D-Link DIR-685 (<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5344355/d+link-dir+685-wireless-storage-photo-frame-router-review">full review</a>) is a wireless-N router with a range that's competitive with Apple's own AirPort Extreme. You choose your storage capacity by sticking in your own 2.5-inch drive. Oh, <em>plus</em> it's a photo frame, BitTorrent downloader, iTunes server, FTP server, network file sharing with user management and even a UPnP streamer to video players. The only thing it isn't? Time Machine compliant. I know, I know. If you're willing to part with the built-in router, however, then another excellent choice is the Iomega Ix2-200 NAS (<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5388904/iomega-ix2+200-nas-review-it-does-all-this">full review</a>)&mdash;and that <i>is</i> Time Machine capable.</p>
<p><em>What you gain:</em><br>
&bull; Swappable storage<br>
&bull; Tons of advanced networking features<br>
&bull; BitTorrent downloading<br>
&bull; Media flexibility<br>
&bull; Digital photo frame</p>
<p><em>What you lose:</em><br>
&bull; Time Machine support (if this is a problem, check out Iomega's alternative)</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_macprohack.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #macpro" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macpro/">Mac Pro</a> ($2,500) -&gt; Hackintosh (far less $$$)</strong><br>
There is one reason you want to buy a Mac Pro, and that's for OS X. So I'm not going to waste time by pretending there's any suitable alternative by someone like Dell or HP. Your best bet is to build a Hackintosh, a custom PC with a bootlegged OS X. Just keep in mind, you won't be able to build this system like any old Windows PC&mdash;you'll need to follow a guide with pretested hardware to construct something you can be sure will work. Luckily, such a guide is available, built by our friends from Lifehacker (<a href="http://lifehacker.com/5360150/install-snow-leopard-on-your-hackintosh-pc-no-hacking-required">see it here</a>).</p>
<p><em>What you gain:</em><br>
&bull; Literally, thousands of dollars<br>
&bull; Gaudy case mods</p>
<p><em>What you lose:</em><br>
&bull; Peace of mind (there's always the slight chance of Hackintosh deactivation)<br>
&bull; Easy component upgrades</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5431521/the-best-alternatives-to-every-apple-product/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5431521]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple alternatives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[asus o!play]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[D-Link DIR-685]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dell 14z]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flip ultra hd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[HP Envy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[HP TouchSmart 600]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod touch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook air]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sansa clip+]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[time capsule]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[zune hd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 23 Dec 2009 11:06:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5431521&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Google Nexus One Hands On]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_droidside.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Thanks to a clandestine meeting with a source, I got a chance to play with and try out the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/nexusone/">Nexus One</a>. It's basically, from my time with it, Google's Droid killer. It's thin, it's fast, it's better in every way.</p>
<p>My source was very firm about no photography, and I didn't want to jeopardize anything on my source's end, so there are no photos, hence these photos are ones we've already shown you. But, based on all the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5431698/what-is-this">leaked shots this week</a>, plus the very pretty and very clear one <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5426316/more-photos-of-the-google-nexus-one">last week from Boy Genius</a>, everyone knows what the phone looks like already. Hell, there's even a complete UI walkthrough <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5432482/google-nexus-one-gets-extensive-interface-walkthrough">today</a> that's on YouTube. So I'm going to focus on the <b>experience</b>, and how it compares to the Droid and the iPhone 3GS.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_500x_imag0027-_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<h1>How it feels</h1>
<p>The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #nexusone" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/nexusone/">Nexus One</a> is <i>slightly</i> thinner than the iPhone 3GS, and <i>slightly</i> lighter. No hard specs were thrown around, unfortunately, since Google didn't even let people who they gave the phone to know that. The back is definitely not cheap and plasticky, like the iPhone's backing, and feels like some sort of rubbery material. So, not smooth like the iPhone, but not as rubbery as the Droid. It's halfway in-between.</p>
<p>You can call the design the antithesis of the Droid: smooth, curved, and light, instead of hard, square and pointy. It feels long and silky and natural in your hand&mdash;even more so than the iPhone 3GS. There are also three gold contacts on the bottom designed for future docking (possibly charging?) use, but there aren't any accessories available for the phone now. It plugs in via microUSB at the moment.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/bgrgn-2.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h1>That screen is damn good</h1>
<p>Even though the screen is the same size and same resolution as the Droid, it's noticeably better. The colors are much more vibrant and the blacks are blacker, as evidenced by putting both side by side and hitting up various websites and loading various games. The pinks on Perez Hilton and the blues on Gizmodo just <b>popped</b> a lot more on the N1, and made the Droid (which was actually considered to have a great screen) seem washed out. The same feeling carries over when you compare the Nexus with the iPhone 3GS. And it's pretty damn bright, compared to the other two phones.</p>
<p>This is probably the best screen we've seen on a smartphone so far. Probably.</p>
<h1>Why is it so fast?</h1>
<p>Google just gave Motorola (and Verizon) a swift shot to the TSTS, because the Nexus One is astonishingly faster than the Droid. The speed dominance was most evident when we compared the loading of webpages, but even when you're just scrolling around, launching apps and moving about the OS, you could tell that there's a beefier brain inside the N1. I don't know the specs for sure, but there's talk of a 1GHz processor being inside, which would push it quite a ways above the 550MHz Arm A8 in Motorola's newest toy.</p>
<p>When comparing the three phones in loading a webpage over Wi-Fi, the Nexus One loaded first, the iPhone 3GS came in a few seconds later, and the Droid came in a little while after that. This was constant throughout many webpage loads, so it's indicative of <i>something</i> going on inside with the hardware.</p>
<p>I ran all three through a Javascript benchmark engine for some quantifiable numbers, and while the results were similar between the Nexus One and the iPhone 3GS, the Droid still came up at about 60% of the other two. Surprisingly enough, Mobile Safari on the iPhone scored better on the Javscript benches than the Nexus did, even though the Nexus was able to pull down and render actual web pages faster. Note that I didn't list actual numbers here, for privacy reasons.</p>
<h1>That crazy video background</h1>
<p>You've no doubt heard about the animated video backgrounds, but they're actually more than just animations: you can interact with them.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_500x_nexone.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<p>The default background is the square/8-bit like one shown above, where lines of colored squares come in from different sides of the screen. What's neat (even if it is superfluous and battery draining) is that you can tap anywhere on the desktop in a blank space and trigger dots to spread out from your tap. Basically, press anywhere to cause blocks to fly outwards. The same thing happens in the "water" background, except instead of blocks, you cause ripples in the water.</p>
<p>What's also neat are the two virtual sound meters, which act as a visualizer for whatever music you're currently playing on your phone. There's one analog one that looks like one of the old ones with a red needle, and a "digital" one that looks similar to ones you see elsewhere. Sorta neat in itself, but it shows that the interactive backgrounds can actually interact with apps, as long as one knows the other's APIs.</p>
<h1>Other bits</h1>
<p>The 5-megapixel camera is nice, and the flash works well enough for a flash on a phone, but it's not spectacular, as seen by early photos taken and uploaded online by Googlers. There is autofocus, and you activate it with the trackball on the face of the phone. There is no tap-to-focus as see on the iPhone 3GS.</p>
<p>There's no multitouch in the browser or in the map, but I think at this point that's more of a legal consideration than a technical one, since many phones that run Android have the capability of supporting multitouch on a hardware level.</p>
<p>Playing back music over the speakers sounded decent, but not great. It's definitely in need of a dock&mdash;like all smartphones&mdash;if you want to listen to music for a sustained period.</p>
<p>I didn't get a chance to call on it, because I wanted to keep this as anonymous as possible, and didn't want any sort of way to trace when I used the phone. From what other people say in their time with it, it functions fine as a phone, and should work as normally as other Android phones in the SMS/MMS department.</p>
<h1>So what's this all mean?</h1>
<p>If Google's planning on releasing <i>this</i> phone as their official <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #googlephone" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/googlephone/">Google phone</a>, it'll certify them as the premium Android phone brand out there right now. Even though it doesn't have a hardware keyboard, it basically beats the hell out of the Droid in every single task that we threw at it. And face it, some people didn't like the Droid's keyboard because it was too flush and the keys were too unseparated with each other. N1's onscreen keyboard felt fine, and the speedy processor made sure that each key was interpreted well.</p>
<p>But in the end, it's still an Android phone. If you want Android phones, this is the one to get, provided Google goes ahead with the rumored plans of either selling it themselves or partnering with T-Mobile in a more traditional role. Droid, shmoid; Nexus is the one you're looking for.</p>
<p><i>Image courtesy anonymous tipster</i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5432678/google-nexus-one-hands-on]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5432678]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nexus one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[droid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google phone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nexus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 23 Dec 2009 02:43:37 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5432678&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Most Popular Free iPhone Apps (and Posts) of 2009]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_iphone-apps-hed.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />The iPhone is the <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/top-mobile-phones-sites-and-brands-for-2009/">most popular cellphone in the country</a>, and with good reason. Despite occasionally <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5324724/bad-apple-an-argument-against-buying-an-iphone">awful choices by Apple</a>, it still has the most&mdash;and best&mdash;applications around. Here are the most popular free iPhone apps (and posts) of 2009.</p>

<p>As with our most popular <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5426007/most-popular-free-windows-downloads-of-2009">Windows downloads</a> and <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5427165/most-popular-free-mac-downloads-of-2009">Mac downloads</a> of 2009, this collection of applications is based solely on the popularity of the associated post here on Lifehacker. We always prefer free applications that offer a little productivity boosting, so this is by no means a complete look at the most popular apps of the 80 billion in the App Store.</p>
<p>First, <strong>the downloads</strong>...</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5227441/gv-mobile-makes-google-voice-the-default-for-your-iphone">GV Mobile Makes Google Voice the Default for Your iPhone</a></h3>
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/9IlvfEBJGx4&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/9IlvfEBJGx4&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/12/9ilvfebjgx4.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display: none;"/>In April, an industrious iPhone developer released <a href="http://www.seankovacs.com/index.php/gv-mobile/"><strong>GV Mobile</strong></a> to the iTunes App Store. It was followed by other Google Voice apps, and then Apple went brain dead and <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5324724/bad-apple-an-argument-against-buying-an-iphone">removed every Google Voice application from the App Store</a> (along with rejecting Google's official Voice app). Annoying, to be sure, but users still willing to jailbreak can still get <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5324596/">GV Mobile for free on Cydia</a>.<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5122563/stanza-turns-your-iphone-into-a-kindle">Stanza Turns Your iPhone into a Kindle</a>, <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5164140/kindle-for-iphones-puts-amazons-catalog-on-smaller-screens/">Kindle App Counters</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_stanza.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />At the beginning of the year, the beautiful <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/stanza/id284956128?mt=8"><strong>Stanza</strong></a> (iTunes link) iPhone app came along and wowed us with how good ebook reading on the iPhone could be. Then, when <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=302584613&mt=8"><strong>Kindle for iPhone</strong></a> (iTunes link) <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5164140/kindle-for-iphones-puts-amazons-catalog-on-smaller-screens/">was released a few months later</a>, it gave iPhone users a pretty good reason not to buy a Kindle. In the end, Amazon liked Stanza so much they ended up <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/27/amazon-acquires-stanza-an-e-book-application-for-the-iphone/">buying it</a>, so that's probably the app we'd choose.<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5165275/runkeeper-is-like-nike%252B-for-your-iphoneonly-better/gallery/">RunKeeper is Like Nike+ for Your iPhone&mdash;Only Better</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_runkeeper.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>RunKeeper</strong> (available in <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/runkeeper-free/id300226023?mt=8">free</a> and <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/runkeeper-pro/id300235330?mt=8">pro</a> versions) uses your iPhone's GPS to do some seriously cool tracking for your running, walking, or biking routine. Apple was extremely slow in bringing Nike+ to the iPhone (once they did, it only supported 3GS), and even then it doesn't take advantage of the fact that the iPhone has a built in GPS and excellent mapping capabilities. RunKeeper is an excellent alternative to people who don't want to pay for the Nike+ dongle, want advanced GPS and mapping capabilities, or don't have an iPhone 3GS. Still, if we could marry these two apps, we happily would.<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5256519/email-n-walk-lets-you-multitask-without-getting-hit-by-a-car">Email 'n Walk Lets You Multitask Without Getting Hit By a Car</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/12/email_nwalk.png" class="left image340" width="340" />We get it. You are <em>seriously</em> busy, and you don't have time to make sure you don't walk into traffic while you're composing that email. <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/email-n-walk-as-seen-on-the-bbc/id313095174?mt=8"><strong>Email n' Walk</strong></a> overlays an email composition window on top of the view from your iPhone's camera, so you can type out an email and watch where you're going. It was free when we first covered it; now it'll set you back a buck.<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5370537/dropbox-comes-to-the-iphone-and-ipod-touch">Dropbox Comes to the iPhone and iPod touch</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_500x_dropbox1_copy.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><a href="https://www.dropbox.com/">Dropbox</a> is far and away <a href="http://lifehacker.com/398696/five-best-file-syncing-tools">our favorite file syncing tool</a>, so we were thrilled this September when <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=327630330&mt=8"><strong>Dropbox for iPhone</strong></a> (iTunes link) finally made its way to the iPhone. Users can access any of their synced files, view files supported by the iPhone (including documents, photos, music, and video), upload photos and video to Dropbox, and save files for offline viewing. Handy.<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5278532/cardstar-creates-scanner+friendly-bonus-cards-on-iphones">CardStar Creates Scanner-Friendly Bonus Cards on iPhones</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_cardstar.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Lifehacker readers hate a bulging wallet, which is presumably why <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/cardstar/id301460311?mt=8"><strong>CardStar</strong></a> (iTunes link) resonated. The free app replaces keychain tags and wallet-cluttering bonus/discount/rewards/"shopper's club" cards with scanner-friendly barcodes that live on your iPhone. Users report mixed results in the App Store, but if it does the trick in place of your rewards card, it could be worth the download.<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5191834/skype-for-iphone-brings-reliable-voip-to-your-pocket/gallery/">Skype for iPhone Brings Reliable VoIP to Your Pocket</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_skype.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><a href="http://www.skype.com/">Skype</a> is far and away the most popular VoIP service, so it's understandable that people were pretty excited when it finally made its official plunge onto the iPhone with <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/skype/id304878510?mt=8"><strong>Skype for iPhone</strong></a> (iTunes link).<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5422606/dragon-dictation-does-voice+to+text-transcription-on-your-iphone">Dragon Dictation Does Voice-to-Text Transcription on Your iPhone</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_500x_dragon.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />You spend plenty of time typing at the computer all day, so we forgive you if you're not eager to continue pecking away at the software keyboard on your iPhone. <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/dragon-dictation/id341446764?mt=8"><strong>Dragon Dictation</strong></a> (iTunes link) does voice-to-text transcription you can copy to your clipboard and use anywhere.<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5244402/epicurious-app-puts-an-entire-cookbook-in-the-palm-of-your-hand">Epicurious App Puts an Entire Cookbook in the Palm of Your Hand</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_epic.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/epicurious-recipes-shopping-list/id312101965?mt=8"><strong>Epicurious for iPhone</strong></a> (iTunes link) puts access to over 25,000 recipes from the likes of Gourmet and Bon Appetit at your fingertips. When you find something you like (I seriously love this app and would strongly recommend the simple-yet-delicious Mario Batali Basic Tomato Sauce), you can add it to your favorites, generate a shopping list, and get cooking. The entirety of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/061880692X/ref=nosim/gizmodo-20">The Gourmet Cookbook</a> is inside this killer kitchen supplement.<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5166625/put-google-calendar-and-notes-on-your-iphone-wallpaper/gallery/">Put Google Calendar and Notes on Your iPhone Wallpaper</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/iphone_screens.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_iphone_screens.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>By default, the iPhone lock screen shows you the time, date, and possibly a pretty picture. With <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=307058227&mt=8"><strong>gCalWall Lite</strong></a>, your home screen also displays your upcoming Google calendar appointments. Handy.<br clear="all"></p>
<hr>
<p>And now, the popular <strong>iPhone-specific posts/how-tos</strong>:</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5309573/set-up-push-gmail-on-your-iphone">Set Up "Push" Alerts for Anything from Your Computer to Your Phone</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/07/push-notifications-growl-head.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />When push notifications finally rolled out to iPhone 3.0 this year, lots of applications started using them&mdash;but not everything we wanted. In this guide, we demonstrate how to use Growl (for Mac and Windows) in conjunction with <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/prowl-growl-client/id320876271?mt=8"><strong>Prowl</strong></a> (iTunes link), a $3 iPhone app, to set up push notifications for virtually <em>anything</em>. Our guide focused on Gmail push (which wasn't available at the time, and still isn't available with message previews), but anything that sends an alert with Growl can also work with Prowl, so your options are only limited by your creativity.<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5397023/enable-tethering-on-your-iphone-3g-or-3gs-running-312">Enable Tethering on Your iPhone 3G or 3GS Running 3.1.2</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/12/tether.png" class="left image340" width="340" />It's been a feature of the iPhone forever now, but AT&T is <em>still</em> dragging its feet on iPhone tethering&mdash;that is, allowing users to enjoy their iPhone's data connection on their laptops. We've shown you <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5397023/enable-tethering-on-your-iphone-3g-or-3gs-running-312">how to enable tethering on your iPhone 3G or 3GS running 3.1.2</a> (the latest iPhone OS), and before that we helped you pull it off with the <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5295452/">3.0 OS</a>. You may not want to tempt the AT&T billing gods with flagrant use of this one (wild fees may apply if AT&T decides they do), but it's a godsend in a pinch.<br clear="all"></p>
<hr>
Got a favorite iPhone app we covered (or didn't) in 2009 that you love? Let's hear more about it in the comments.]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://lifehacker.com/5432314/most-popular-free-iphone-apps-and-posts-of-2009]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5432314]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[best of 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[downloads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod touch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 22 Dec 2009 20:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Pash]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5432314&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Don't Get Screwed: A Guide to Deals on Cables and Extras For Your Gadget Gifts]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_best_buy_open_item.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Unwrapping a nice lustworthy gadget only to learn that some crucial part is sold separately can be a major drag. But exercise patience: It's dumb to run to the first open store for <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #hdmicables" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/hdmicables/">HDMI cables</a> and extra game controllers.</p>
<h2>Beware of the Upsell</h2>
<p>It's something worth repeating every holiday season: When retailers take a hit on TVs, they often make up the difference on ridiculously overpriced extras. You may find a genuine deal or two on a big ticket item at a giant tech retailer like Best Buy, but, as far as I am concerned, you would have to be a damned fool to buy any of their extras and accessories. You know about HDMI cables, but there's a lot more profit-driven accessorizing where that came from.</p>
<p>Even if you already did buy the accessories needed for your gadget gifts, go online and do some calculations before you toss out those receipts. You may want to return them when you see how much you could have saved. As for late shoppers&mdash;listen up. Getting batteries, cables, controllers, mounts and other necessities can really nickel-and-dime your holiday budget. Time may be running out to shop, but that doesn't mean you should allow retailers to take advantage of you.</p>
<p>Let's go over this again. Retailers like Best Buy are not above bending you over with <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5326361/news-flash-best-buys-extended-warranties-are-rip-offs">sucker warranties</a> and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5363970/bend-over-best-buy-will-set-up-your-playstation-3-for-130">massively overpriced</a> or <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5119861/best-buy-turns-to-component-cable-deception-to-sell-hdtv-calibration-service">deceptive</a> services.</p>
<p>And how about those high-margin extras? For example, I selected a random low-profile wall mount from Sanus designed for HDTVs measuring 30 to 60 inches diagonal. It's the kind of wall mount the average Joe would probably select for their new TV&mdash;a TV they may well have got a reasonable deal on. Best Buy <a href="http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Sanus+Systems+-+Sanus+Low+Profile+TV+Wall+Mount+for+Flat-Panel+TVs+30">is selling it for $169</a>. Buy.com is <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Sanus-Large-Profile-Mount-Displays/dp/B001DLCHNS/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1261430972&sr=8-1">selling it via Amazon for $94 with free shipping</a>. Guess what, Best Buy&mdash;bite me. I can wait for the UPS guy if it means saving $75 or more.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/hdmi_cables.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_hdmi_cables.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<h2>The Rewards of Patience</h2>
<p>So, I have to ask: Is the convenience worth spending $50 or more on that "high quality" 6-foot HDMI cable upsell in a store when <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/pst/hdmicablebattlemodo/">you can get basically the same performance</a> from a <a href="http://www.amazon.com/HDMI-meter-foot-cable-1080P/dp/B0002L5R78/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1261428577&sr=8-1">$3 version (shipped) from Amazon</a>? Best Buy's <a href="http://www.bestbuy.com/site/6'+HDMI+Cable+-+6'+HDMI+Cable/9343061.p?id=1218088202342&skuId=9343061&st=hdmi%20cable">cheapest 6-foot HDMI cables will still run you $13</a>. Even discount giant Walmart <a href="http://www.walmart.com/search/search-ng.do?search_query=hdmi+cable&search_constraint=0&tab_value=164_All&ic=48_0&ref=&search_sort=4&selected_items=+">can't get anywhere near</a> the prices you can find online at places like Amazon and <a href="http://www.monoprice.com/home/index.asp">Monoprice</a>. When you consider all of the various cables you might need to buy for your gadgets this holiday, the costs can really add up. My advice with cables is to suck it up, shop online and and wait if necessary.</p>
<p>For other products, you may not need to wait for an online shipment because the best price is just up the road. I don't know why anyone would spend $50 on <a href="http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Microsoft+-+Xbox+360+Wireless+Controller/7457575.p?id=1126591945583&skuId=7457575&st=xbox%20360%20wireless">a wireless Xbox 360 controller</a> and $100 on a <a href="http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Microsoft+-+Wireless+N+Network+Adapter+for+Xbox+360/9590917.p?id=1218128732973&skuId=9590917&st=xbox%20360%20wireless%20n&cp=1&lp=1">wireless-N adapter</a> at Best Buy when they can hop in the car and head to Walmart and get them for <a href="http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=4196266">$38</a> and <a href="http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=12510643">$83</a> respectively. I know shopping can be hectic, and I understand why you would just want to get it over with, but saving money is going to be worth the inconvenience. As always, it is best to do your price comparisons before heading out. And if your local store is sold out, you can always order them.</p>
<h2>Other Extras You Might Need</h2>
<p>Now that you're good and aware of the nature of this problem, let's go over all of the things you might still need, even <i>after</i> Santa has left the building.</p>
<p><strong>Batteries</strong>: I don't expect you to order batteries online last minute, but the good news is that you can probably find great prices in your area. We recommend <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5152116/battlemodo-energizer-vs-duracell-rechargeable-batteries">Duracell rechargeables</a>, but if you try and pick up a basic 6-hour charger with 4 AA batteries from Best Buy, it is <a href="http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Duracell+-+NiMH+AA/AAA+Battery+Charger+with+4+Rechargeable+AA+Batteries/7293886.p?id=1118841173566&skuId=7293886">going to run you $28</a> compared <a href="http://www.target.com/Duracell-Battery-Charger/dp/B000E9ZHUA/ref=sr_1_23?ie=UTF8w=grid5e=0&node=1038576=duracell&field_browse=1038576&searchSize=150&id=Duracell%20Battery%20Charger&field_availability=-2&refinementHistory=subjectbin,target_com_age,target_com_gender-bin,target_com_character-bin,price,target_com_primary_color-bin,target_com_size-bin,target_com_brand-bin&searchNodeID=1038576&field_launch-date=-1y&searchRank=target104545&searchPage=1&field_keywords=duracell">to $20 at Target</a>. Futhermore&mdash;if you already have the charger or are buying it separately&mdash;a 4-pack of extra pre-charged NiMH AAs <a href="http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Duracell+-+Precharge+Rechargeable+AA+NiMH+Batteries+(4-Pack)/8511498.p?id=1186005932804&skuId=8511498">runs you $18 at Best Buy</a> and <a href="http://www.target.com/Duracell-Pre-Charged-AA-Batteries-4-pk/dp/B00126EM3M/ref=sr_1_22?ie=UTF8&searchView=grid5&frombrowse=0&node=1038576&keywords=duracell&field_browse=1038576&searchSize=150&id=Duracell%20Pre-Charged%20AA%20Batteries%204-pk&field_availability=-2&refinementHistory=subjectbin,target_com_age,target_com_gender-bin,target_com_character-bin,price,target_com_primary_color-bin,target_com_size-bin,target_com_brand-bin&searchNodeID=1038576&field_launch-date=-1y&searchRank=target104545&searchPage=1&field_keywords=duracell">only $13 at Target</a>.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/seagate_freeagent.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_seagate_freeagent.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><strong>Storage</strong>: Everyone who buys a new computer or even upgrades their OS suddenly finds themselves in need of a backup hard drive. Generally speaking, a big ole USB desktop unit is the best value. The going rate for a 1TB brand-name USB 2.0 drive is around $100, and while Amazon, NewEgg and Walmart all beat Best Buy on price in some ways, only Walmart, strangely enough, offers either the <a href="http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=10575415">1TB Seagate FreeAgent</a> desktop drive or the <a href="http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=12517495">1TB WD My Book desktop drive</a> for $99.</p>
<p>If you have several computers (especially with different OS platforms), you're going to want to check out setting up a network drive or array. We really liked the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5388904/iomega-ix2+200-nas-review-it-does-all-this">Iomega's Ix2-200</a> as a cheap but full-featured NAS solution. I actually ended up picking one of these up myself <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Iomega-StorCenter-ix2-200-Attached-34749/dp/B002VRFHF8/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1261170536&sr=8-1">for about $40 off list at Amazon</a>, but you can find a slightly (and I do mean slightly) better deal on <a href="http://www.nextwarehouse.com/item/?873343">Next Warehouse</a> right now. NewEgg also has a great reputation for good prices on storage devices. In this case however, <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822186211&cm_re=Ix2-200-_-22-186-211-_-Product">they come in third because of shipping charges</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_linksys_plk_300.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<p><strong>Powerline Networking Kit</strong>: If you're getting a connected Blu-ray player, TV, Roku Box, game console, HD media player or other assorted networked thingamajigs, you may want to think about a powerline adapter, like Linksys' PLK300. It's a simpler and usually more broadband friendly alternative to Wi-Fi. But the PLK300 sells for $155 on Best Buy and a shocking $169 at Walmart. Amazon will hook you up <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Linksys-PLK300-PowerLine-Ethernet-Adapter/dp/B001J2ZSL4/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1261467840&sr=1-1">for $122</a>, but if you don't mind a little risk, NewEgg has an <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833124306R&cm_re=plk300-_-33-124-306R-_-Product">"open box" offer for $93</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Bags and Camera Packs</strong>: There are countless options when it comes to cases and bags for your gadgets, but one of our faves is the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5320259/timbuk2-hal-backpack-review-pockets-for-laptops-and-contraband">Timbuk2 HAL backpack</a>. It has all of the storage you would need, and you can score it for as little as <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Timbuk2-289-H-A-L-Laptop-Backpack/dp/B001UHNS24">$96 on Amazon shipped</a>. In other stores, it might cost as much as $120. eBags also has the <a href="http://www.ebags.com/timbuk2/h_a_l_laptop_backpack/product_detail/index.cfm?modelid=141302">Timbuk2 for $96 with a free 2-day air upgrade</a>. Some cool bags aren't as easy to find on sale&mdash;Matt loved the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5411074/gifts-for-aspiring-artsy-photographers/gallery/5">Crumpler 5 Million Dollar Home camera bag</a>, and we can't really find it anywhere (respectable) for under $80.</p>
<p><strong>Gadget Cases</strong>: When it comes to cases for iPhones and iPods, profit is the name of the game, so be careful about any potential screwings. Our best advice is to try doing generic searches&mdash;instead of a brand name, type in "silicone iphone case" or "rugged iphone case" and weigh your options. For the former, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss?url=search-alias%3Delectronics&field-keywords=iphone+case+silicone&x=0&y=0">Amazon</a> and <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&DEPA=0&Order=BESTMATCH&Description=silicone+iphone+case&x=0&y=0">NewEgg</a> yield a huge selection of cases in the $15, while Walmart only shows just two $20 cases, and Best Buy has a similar two, for $25 a piece. A combination of thinking&mdash;and thinking ahead&mdash;is what works here.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/iphone_dock.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_iphone_dock.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><strong>iPhone and Smartphone Car Mounts</strong>: With many of us relying on our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5367026/iphone-navigation-app-battlemodo-part-ii-the-best-cheap-gps-app">cellphones for GPS guidance</a> these days, a good car mount is becoming essential. Unfortunately, those fancy iPhone docks with a GPS-boosting receiver like the <a href="http://store.apple.com/us/product/TX672LL/A">TomTom</a> and the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5431448/magellans-premium-iphone-car-kit">Magellan</a> are pretty overpriced (especially when you have GPS already built into the phone), and besides, they're in pretty short supply, as is the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5392760/droid-fancy-dock-and-car-mount-are-each-30">official car mount for Droid phones</a>. So where does that leave you? Well, it leaves you with a lot of basic, no-frills options that do the job just fine. For the iPhone, you could get something as dirt-ass cheap as this <a href="http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.11689">$6 windshield mount from DealExtreme</a>. Here's a secret, the Droid fits in many iPhone docks, especially ones that hold at just one end. But if you're gonna fudge it, go cheap, or else hold out for the official dock.</p>
<p><strong>In-Car Phone Chargers</strong>: Don't ever ever ever spend money on specialized, phone-specific chargers if your phone happens to charge with USB. That's just a con. Just take the <em>same cord</em> you plug your phone into your computer with&mdash;regardless of whether you have an iPhone, a Droid, a Pre, really anything "smart"&mdash;and plug it into one of these super-cheap <a href="http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss?url=search-alias%3Delectronics&field-keywords=12v+usb&x=0&y=0">12V USB adapters</a>. Griffin's dual-USB one <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Powerjolt-Dual-Universal-USB-Charger/dp/B001Q2FM5E/ref=sr_1_10?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1261467500&sr=1-10">sells on Amazon for $7.50</a>. With all the money you can finally save not buying proprietary car chargers, you may just want to buy a few of those, and while you're at it, stock up on extra USB cables.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_harmony_900.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<p><strong>Universal Remotes</strong>: You can get cheap universal remotes anywhere, but if you want something more high end, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5334917/logitech-harmony-900-universal-remote-review">Logitech Harmony 900</a> should fit the bill. On Amazon <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Logitech-Harmony-Remote-Control-Black/dp/B002IC0YL8/ref=sr_1_15?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1261436344&sr=1-15">it's $280 shipped</a>. How about Best Buy? <a href="http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Logitech+-+Harmony+900+Universal+Remote+with+Color+Touch+Screen/9365395.p?skuId=9365395&id=1218091959397">Oooh, $380</a>. See a pattern developing here?</p>
<p>As I mentioned in my <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5420853/why-its-finally-time-to-get-a-home-theater-pc">recent article championing the HTPC</a>, you can get something as simple as the HA-IR01SV from Mediagate to control Windows Media Center for only <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Company-MediaGate-HA-IR01SV-Windows-Ultimate/dp/B00123UGWQ/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1261437458&sr=1-3">$25.41 shipped from Amazon</a>. If you absolutely need it now you will have to pay a <a href="http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=12961386">few extra bucks at Walmart</a>.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>When it comes to buying all of those extras for your holiday gadgets this year, my advice is simple: Use common sense and don't settle. Stores like Best Buy, Staples, Office Max and Gamestop are probably not the places you want to go to score your accessories. Look at the local discount stores like Walmart and Target first&mdash;and if you can't find a good enough price without ordering online, you're just gonna have to wait it out. As tough as that might be with a new gadget to play with, the savings will be worth it.</p>
<p>And if any of you have come across any good deals of your own on stuff to make your gadgets run at 100%, just throw them into comments&mdash;with pricing and a photo, if possible.</p>
<p><i>Image via <a href="http://gizmodo.com/338756/best-buy-in-san-francisco-charges-more-for-opened-merchandise">Link</a></i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5431447/dont-get-screwed-a-guide-to-deals-on-cables-and-extras-for-your-gadget-gifts]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5431447]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[prof.]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[accessories]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[batteries]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cables]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dealzmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[extras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadget extras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdmi cables]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[professor dealzmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ripoff]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5431447&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[14 Christmas Wishes Left Unspoken for Obvious Reasons]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_xmaswishestop.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />There's a reason that people ask for realistic stuff like the <i>Star Trek</i> Blu-ray for Christmas instead of what they <i>really</i> want in their heart of hearts. Because their heart of hearts are fucking crazy.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5432191,14,'');
</script></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5432202/14-christmas-wishes-left-unspoken-for-obvious-reasons]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5432202]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[photoshop contest]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[christmas]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[contests]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gifts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[holidays]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[photoshop]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[photoshopcontest]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5432202&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Ray Guns of War: I Fought In a Laser Tag Nerd Platoon]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_lasertag1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Crouched behind a thin eucalyptus tree on a crisp Saturday morning, I peer through my gun sight. I spot someone running through the woods. I aim for his head. And fire. The robotic voice in my gun says "CASUALTY".</p>

<p>My quarry stops and looks around confused, but makes no effort to take cover. So I resume firing until my gun yells "Arrrrrrgh!", signifying a kill shot. The LED lights on my opponent's head flash red and he raises his gun into the air. This little tree is proving to be the perfect spot for ambushing attackers. I maybe kind of like pretending to kill people.</p>
<p>&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;</p>
<p>Today is BattleSFO, a day-long <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #lasertag" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/lasertag/">laser tag</a> capture-the-flag tournament. The field of conflict is a hilly eucalyptus grove in San Bruno, CA, 45 minutes south of San Francisco, in Juniperro State Park. There are about 30 people here broken up into platoons of 5 to 7. Each player is dressed to the nines in varieties of camouflage, some with black war paint under their eyes. They're not quite as geeky as I had expected them to be. Then again, this isn't exactly the kind of laser tag everyone played as kids. The gear is bigger and badder, even if the players are not.</p>
<p>Almost the entire crowd of mostly men has never played laser tag outdoors before. For the most part they're very friendly, though a little shy when I ask them about themselves. One team is made up of four guys who went to college together &mdash; an electrical engineer, a carpenter, and an options trader. Another team makes up a local rock band (they seem more interested in drinking beer and running around the woods in battle gear then actually playing to win.) Then there's a group of three middle-aged Asian gentlemen and one of their sons who get together regularly and compete. They found the game on Meetup.com. Raymond Wan, who convinced the others to join him in the woods, explains that normally they play paintball. "The weapons and radio communication make a big difference," he says. "I'm a strategy person. This is more fun."</p>
<p>But among the beginners are some veterans of ray gun war.<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_lasertag2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<p>The general of these mini-gorilla-armies today is Ziggy Tomcich. Earlier in the morning Tomcich performed his duties as the event's organizer, scurrying around the picnic table area, AKA central command. He's sort of a goofy guy, but his excitement was palpable and I couldn't help but giggle a little bit in anticipation of getting my hands on these fake guns and peering down the sight at some unknowing adversary. As I watched Tomcich untangle headsets, distribute color-coded headbands, and make sure everyone was checking in correctly it was clear that, though his day job is as an audio engineer for the San Francisco Opera, playing laser tag is his true passion in life.</p>
<p>Tomcich has been playing the game since he was a teenager. Running around the Photon indoor arena in Baltimore at 15, Tomcich got hooked. After graduating college he took a job as a designer, marketer, and consultant for several arenas around the country. Then, in 2006, Tomcich took laser tag to the next level. Playing in Armageddon games in the UK and Sweden, where players compete in 3-4 day tournaments, Tomcich played outdoor laser tag for the first time. When he returned to San Francisco, Tomcich realized that the city lacked the kind of gaming he really loved. Being outdoors and playing laser tag was something, he felt, everyone should do.</p>
<p>"To me, laser tag is an extreme sport," he says. For him, part of the fun and the reason why he started his event website SFLastag.org, is the idea that the game is simple to play and creates a highly social environment. "Unlike most other sports, first-time players in outdoor laser tag can do quite well against seasoned players. It's more about strategy and tactics."</p>
<p>Before the first battle "Cypher," aka Todd Robinson, who co-owns SpecOps Live Play, a central California company that provided the artillery, gave everyone a rundown of their equipment. SpecOps imports their guns from an Australian company called Battlefield Sports, essentially an arms dealer that deals in toys. The company custom builds 10 different models of gaming weapons from sniper rifles to sub machine guns – all equipped with real-world laser sights, speakers for feedback, and sensors to keep track of game stats. Guns can emulate any of 69 models down to recoil, and fire and reload rates and muzzle flashes (LEDs, essentially). SpecOps has brought M4 assault rifles, sub machine guns, carbine rifles, and sniper rifles.</p>
<p>During Robinson's speech, Tomcich chimed in: "Do not aim your gun at non-laser tag players. These guns don't exactly look like Hasbro." For this game every weapon has 99 clips of 50 rounds. Those with smaller guns reload in about 5 seconds, the bigger ones about 7-10 seconds, so Robinson recommended taking cover while reloading. "The ‘bullets' will bounce off of pavement," he says. For this game they've disabled friendly fire. But when they hit the laser targets velcro'd to heads that belong to enemies, the guns vocalize the action like weapons with built in sports announcers synthesizing current status of prey as "casualty", "killed" or "already dead".</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_laser_tag_3.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<p>As he went through the briefing, the look on Robinson's face was more serious then anyone in the eucalyptus grove. Listening to him describe each weapon and how they worked made it clear to me that, though some people are here to play a game, for others laser tag is a way of life. In other words, I better take good care of his guns.</p>
<p>Honestly, the weapons are a little intimidating. First off, they're huge and I'm, well, I'm little. The guns are so heavy, in fact, that I opted for the smallest one I could find. I was also one of two girls on the field. Cypher's father, who co-owns SpecOps, told me that women actually tend to fair better at this type of laser tag then men. Women, he said, will hang back and think tactically about the game. Guys sometimes have a tendency to run out out commando-style and shoot at everything they see. My tactics were set: I'd wait for my enemies to come to me.</p>
<p>The game starts and I take up position. When I shoot people that happen upon my trap, they stood still, look around, and fired recklessly without making much effort to take cover. Those I shoot over 20 times are killed, sent back to the respawn area (AKA Command Center, AKA picnic tables) where Robinson will reset them, reactivate their ordinance and send them back into the fray.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_laser_tag_4.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<p>The battle heats up. Despite my overall aversion in life to things that require running and exercise, the real-world feel of this whole day is bringing up the competitor in me that normally only emerges when I'm shit-talking people during video games. It is unclear who is winning at the moment; the command center tracks the flag movement via new GPS-tracking system and the PC that also handles all the on field comms.</p>
<p>But no one is listening back at HQ. The General Tomcich isn't attending to the computer anymore. Instead, Tomcich's standing across from me in the grove defending our Purple flag from capture. "We're encountering heavy resistance," we can hear over the radio. "Wear them down," a player shouts. Minutes later our fellow Purple team members come running through the brush holding a flag. Our opponents are not far behind. But they're too late. This round is ours.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5431474,20,'');
</script></p>
<p><em>Erin Biba is a San Francisco-based Correspondent for WIRED Magazine who writes about science, popular culture and beer made from <a href="http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/magazine/17-08/ff_primordial_yeast">primordial yeast</a>. Follow her on <a href="http://twitter.com/erinbiba">Twitter</a>.</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5431491/the-ray-guns-of-war-i-fought-in-a-laser-tag-nerd-platoon]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5431491]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[laser tag]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[features]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[geek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laser]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nerds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shooting]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[weapons]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:20:11 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erin Biba]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5431491&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Most Popular Repurposing Tricks of 2009]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_500x300-12-pic-grid_02.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />We're huge fans of repurposing here at Lifehacker&mdash;squeezing extra and usually clever uses out of every day objects. Here's a look back at out some of the most popular repurposing posts from 2009.</p>

<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5299994/rain-gutters-as-cable-management-tools">Rain Gutters as Cable Management Tools</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/rain-gutter_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_rain-gutter_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
We're all about <a href="http://lifehacker.com/tag/cable-management/">creative cable management</a> here at Lifehacker, so we were instantly drawn to reader <a href="http://lifehacker.com/commenter/Seandavid010/">Seandavid010</a>'s rain-gutter <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged CABLE MANAGEMENT" href="http://lifehacker.com/tag/cable-management/">cable management</a> setup. Granted, you can find other cord-wrangling solutions, like the one Adam used when he <a href="http://lifehacker.com/179911/hack-attack-the-cordless-workspace-sort-of">made his cordless workspace</a>, but the rain gutter approach yields impressive results. Sean was nice enough to send in his entire step-by-step, check out the <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5299994/rain-gutters-as-cable-management-tools">full post</a> to see it.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5350348/5-ikea-coat-hanger-offers-solid-cable-management">$5 IKEA Coat Hanger Offers Solid Cable Management</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_cords.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
Weblog BitsOfMyMind shares a very simple idea that turns an inexpensive coat-hanger rack into a simple and streamlined cord management solution.</p>
<p>Back when Adam detailed how to <a href="http://lifehacker.com/179911/hack-attack-the-cordless-workspace-sort-of">go cordless in your workspace</a>, he championed a <a href="http://www.ikea.com/us/en/catalog/products/50035115">$10 cable management add-on</a> from IKEA. Many readers wrote in and said they couldn't find the IKEA wire-manager he used, so this clever hack is a welcome addition to our cable-wrangling bag of tricks.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5396212/open-a-bottle-of-wine-with-your-shoe">Open a Bottle of Wine with Your Shoe</a></h3>
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/9s89FqNpXO4&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/9s89FqNpXO4&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/12/9s89fqnpxo4.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display: none;"/><br>
Got a bottle of wine on hand but no corkscrew to get it open? You can argue all you want about whether or not the guy in this video really needs more wine, but you can't argue with the results.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5398863/make-cookies-in-90-seconds-with-your-waffle-iron">Make Cookies in 90 Seconds with Your Waffle Iron</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_500x_110609-wafflecookies.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
Baking cookies in your oven is fine and all, but if you want to turn out some tasty cookies in a very short time, consider turning to your trusty waffle iron. Turns out you're only 90 seconds away from crispy, chewy, cookie-goodness.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5188992/create-a-cat-haven-from-ikea-shelves">Create a Cat Haven from Ikea Shelves</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_ikeahack.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
The climbing trees at pet stores are ridiculously expensive and take up tons of floor space. Help your kitty jump to a royal view, Super-Mario-style, without cluttering your floor or wasting money.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5354827/remove-splinters-using-a-banana-peel">Remove Splinters Using a Banana Peel</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_15288615_8a5421cd9f.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
Bananas are a good source of potassium, but turns out the peels can do more than just store the fruit. Apartment Therapy outlines seven ways to put used peels to work, including removal of those inconvenient splinters. <em>Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/keepon/15288615/">keepon</a>.</em></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5217283/get-more-from-cheap-vodka-than-a-hangover">Get More From Cheap Vodka Than a Hangover</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_2870823176_f6eb91d6a5.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
Sooth headaches? Clean razors? Kill bees? Vodka is handy for all sorts of uses besides the traditional one. The clear and high-proof alcohol can be used for all manner of tricks. <em>Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/lorentzen/2870823176/">Carsten Lorentzen</a>.</em></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5123804/coke-can-clean-your-toilet-in-a-pinch">Coke Can Clean Your Toilet in a Pinch</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_untitled-2_02.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
When your toilet's got rings and lime scale stains and you've got no cleaning gear on hand, grab a can of Coke out of the fridge.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5393470/turn-ikea-cabinets-into-a-cordless-desktop-stand">Turn IKEA Cabinets Into a Cordless Desktop Stand</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_2009-12-21_175613.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
The new iMacs, and similar all-in-one LCD desktop systems, make for a mostly cordless computing experience. Using two pieces of IKEA furniture meant for laptops and modems, you can hide the remaining wires and up the elegance.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5155870/disposable-muggers-wallet-gets-you-off-scott-free-or-gets-you-beat-up">Disposable Mugger's Wallet Gets You Off Scott Free or Gets You Beat Up</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_36611020_f2b1a4398a.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
A mugger's wallet is a disposable second wallet that you're more than happy to give away to a mugger. It contains a few bucks, a non-essential ID, but not much else that would endanger your identity.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5184274/diy-car-dash-camera-mount">DIY Car Dash Camera Mount</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_fks4r7gfsh7ew2d.medium.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
Ever wished you had some high-speed chase footage after you finished tearing down the freeway after crooks? Of course you have! You need a quick, cheap DIY camera mount.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5223421/remove-stubborn-batteries-and-other-cool-magnet-tricks">Remove Stubborn Batteries and Other Cool Magnet Tricks</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/504x_magnet-tricks.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_504x_magnet-tricks.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
As if the sheer magnetism aspect of magnets wasn't magical enough, weblog Evil Mad Scientist Laboratories points out 17 very cool tricks that put your magnets to great use. For starters, a strong magnet can be the perfect tool to remove batteries from the grips of a stubborn spring.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5392793/use-vicks-vaporub-to-cure-toenail-fungus">Use Vicks VapoRub To Cure Toenail Fungus</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/303080-main_full.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_303080-main_full.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
We've heard that Vicks VapoRub can cure toenail fungus before (it's also helpful when you've got a cold!), but the New York Times recently put it to the test. The results: The thyme in VapoRub can in fact do the job.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5414106/repair-a-broken-ethernet-plug-with-zip-ties">Repair a Broken Ethernet Plug with Zip Ties</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_500x_fxzehbkfzhlaeha.medium.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
We've all been there at some point: You've got a perfectly functional Ethernet cord that somewhere along the line had its tab broken off. Don't buy a new one or re-terminate the cord. Fix it with zip ties.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5296623/open-beer-bottles-with-bic-lighters">Open Beer Bottles with Bic Lighters</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/beerlighter.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_beerlighter.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
If you lack for a <a href="http://lifehacker.com/software/beverages/video-demonstration--open-a-beer-bottle-with-a-piece-of-paper-243642.php">piece of paper</a>, a <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5082121/open-a-beer-bottle-with-a-ring">ring</a>, or just don't want to risk <a href="http://lifehacker.com/184067/open-a-beer-bottle-with-another-bottle">bursting another bottle</a>, Wired explains the time-honored tradition of popping the top with a Bic-type lighter.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5185176/outlet+hanging-charge-station-for-your-small-gadgets">Outlet-Hanging Charge Station For Your Small Gadgets</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_untitled-sdfg2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
If a full-sized charging station is overkill for your single cellphone or iPod, try this smaller gadget cradle that mounts neatly on a wall outlet. Craft blog Zakka Life put together a simple tutorial for making a cradle that's perfect for single, regularly-charged items&mdash;the kinds of things you dump out of your pockets upon returning home.</p>
<hr>
<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8" src="http://static.polldaddy.com/p/2416395.js">
</script><noscript><br>
<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/2416395/">Best Repurposing Trick of 2009?</a><span style="font-size:9px;">(<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com">answers</a>)</span><br></noscript>
<p>Have a favorite post from 2009 that highlights a clever use or novel way to repurpose an everyday object? Let's hear about it in the comments.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://lifehacker.com/5430909/most-popular-repurposing-tricks-of-2009]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5430909]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[best of 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clever uses]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[diy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[diy creations]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macgyver]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macgyver tip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[reader poll]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[recycle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[reuse]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Fitzpatrick]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5430909&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Our 2009 12-City 3G Data Mega Test: AT&T Won]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/3g_test_map_2009-w-sd.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_3g_test_map_2009-w-sd.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Given carrier reputation and our own iPhone call drops, we were pretty surprised to discover, through careful testing in 12 markets, that AT&T's has pretty consistently the fastest 3G network nationwide, followed closely&mdash;in downloads at least&mdash;by <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #verizonwireless" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/verizonwireless/">Verizon Wireless</a>.</p>
<p>Let's get this straight right away: We didn't test dropped voice calls, we didn't test customer service, and we didn't test map coverage by wandering around in the boonies. We tested the ability of the networks to deliver 3G data in and around cities, including both concrete canyons and picket-fenced 'burbs. And while every 3G network gave us troubles on occasion, AT&T's wasn't measurably more or less reliable than Verizon's.</p>
<p>It was measurably faster, however, download-wise, in 6 of the 12 markets where we tested, and held a significantly higher national average than the other carriers. Only Verizon came close, winning 4 of the 12 markets. For downloads, AT&T and Verizon came in first or second in nine markets, and in whatever location we tested, both AT&T and Verizon 3G were consistently present. If you're wondering about upload speeds, AT&T swept the contest, winning 12 for 12.</p>
<h2>The Cities</h2>
<p>Last year, we did an <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5111989/the-definitive-coast+to+coast-3g-data-test">8-city coast-to-coast test</a>, and called Sprint the big winner. This year, we have results from 11 cities coast-to-coast, and even got to test (during what was otherwise vacation time) on the Hawaiian island of Maui. Also, unlike last year, we were able to test T-Mobile's new 3G network, active in all the markets we visited (except, at the time, Maui). For being such a latecomer, T-Mo did well, and the numbers show even more promise from them.</p>
<p>We tried to spread the love around this year, geographically, hitting cities we didn't get to last year (at the cost of losing a few from '08). Besides Maui, we hit Atlanta, Chicago, Denver, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #lasvegas" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/lasvegas/">Las Vegas</a>, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #losangeles" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/losangeles/">Los Angeles</a>, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #newyork" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/newyork/">New York</a>, Phoenix, Portland, Seattle, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #sanfrancisco" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/sanfrancisco/">San Francisco</a>/<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #bayarea" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/bayarea/">Bay Area</a> and Tampa.</p>
<h2>The Methodology</h2>
<p>Our testing regimen was based on the same scheme as last year: We picked five locations in each city, including at least one "downtown" location that was considered a suburb. The selections were arbitrary, or fixed but logical&mdash;landmarks, residences, etc. (Note: Due to timing constraints, Chicago and Maui only had three test locations.)</p>
<p>Our hardware consisted of two identical stripped-down Acer Timeline laptops running Windows Vista, and four 3G wireless modems requested from the carriers. We allowed them to make the choice of hardware, simply asking for their "best performing" model. Once up and running, here are the tests we ran:</p>
<p>&bull; Bandwidth & Latency: <a href="http://speedtest.net/">Speedtest.net</a> - Reports upload and download bandwidth in megabits per second, as well as ping latency in milliseconds. We performed this test five times at each location on each modem.</p>
<p>&bull; Pageload: <a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Hubble_images">Hubble images</a> at Wikimedia - A 4.42MB web page with 200 4KB thumbnails, it was fully reloaded three times, and timed using the Firefox plug-in YSlow. The three time readings were averaged.</p>
<p>&bull; Download: Wikimedia's <a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/62/Abell_2667HSTFull.jpg">Abell 2667 galaxy cluster photo</a> - This single 7.48MB JPEG is a clear test of how fast you can download stuff from the cloud, and again, we hard refreshed this file three times, and measured time using YSlow for an accurate human-error-free reading.</p>
<p>This was a test of 3G performance. Even though Sprint and its tech partner Clearwire have intrepidly released 4G networks in half of the tested markets&mdash;Atlanta, Chicago, Las Vegas, Maui, Portland and Seattle&mdash;we only tested Sprint's 3G network. The reason should be obvious: While we performed the test with laptop cards on PCs, it's supposed to serve as a test of the network's ability to deliver service to all devices, including smartphones, dumbphones and laptops. Show us a Palm Pre WiMax edition&mdash;better yet, sell 100,000 of them&mdash;and then we'll switch it up. And while you may argue that this <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #3gtest" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/3gtest/">3G test</a> still doesn't adequately reflect your experience with your iPhone, at least it's the same network, and may serve to rule out AT&T's data pipe as the independent cause for all those infamous dropped calls.</p>
<p>(On a side note, when multiple carriers release 4G networks, we'll definitely conduct a comparative test of them all, using new parameters, and focused around laptop use.)</p>
<h2>The Results</h2>
<p>Now that you know how we ran the test, here are the top finishers in each market, plus some pretty bar graphs showing you how bandwidth compares.</p>
<p>Though we tested for uploads and downloads, we focused our additional tests on the downstream, as it's the more important direction, in the minds of most consumers and most carriers. The anomaly there is AT&T, which has dramatically good upload bandwidth, even when its download bandwidth doesn't keep up. Fast uploads are a priority for AT&T, and will soon be for T-Mobile, which recently turned on faster uploading in NYC, which you can see in our test results. Meanwhile, although Verizon technically came in second in uploads as well as downloads, it doesn't seem to treat this as a major priority.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/2009_3g_average_upload_graphs.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_2009_3g_average_upload_graphs.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>When it came to downloads, though, the competition was markedly stiffer:</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/2009_3g_average_download_graphs.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_2009_3g_average_download_graphs.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>Atlanta - AT&T, followed by Verizon<br>
Bay Area/San Francisco - AT&T, followed by Verizon<br>
Chicago - AT&T, followed by Verizon then Sprint<br>
Denver - AT&T, followed by Verizon<br>
Las Vegas - Verizon, followed by AT&T<br>
Los Angeles - AT&T, followed by Sprint<br>
Maui - Verizon, followed by AT&T<br>
New York - AT&T, followed by T-Mobile<br>
Phoenix - Verizon, followed by T-Mobile<br>
Portland - T-Mobile, followed by Verizon<br>
Seattle - Verizon, followed by T-Mobile<br>
Tampa - Sprint, followed by AT&T</p>
<h2>Is That The End?</h2>
<p>No. We've compiled the following gallery with all the data from each test location in the 12 markets, so you can see on a neighborhood-by-neighborhood level who won what. This also includes latency, pageload and download numbers, so you can track the performance in several ways. (The data above is bandwidth, though as you'll see, that was generally representative of the overall performance. If a carrier was tops in bandwidth, it was usually tops in download time.) These tests are all just "snapshots in time," as the carriers like to say, so feel free to bitch about where your experience <i>doesn't</i> reflect our results. We stand by them, but acknowledge that network performance is changing all the time, and experiences very regular hiccups.</p>
<p>Regarding latency, you'll notice it didn't appear to affect actual user experience&mdash;3G isn't really up for Modern Warfare 2, if that's what you're thinking&mdash;we will gladly show you latency averages, as well as pageload and file download averages, broken out for every market on the test.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5431459,12,'');
</script></p>
<p><i>Special thanks to all of the excellent testers we enlisted, Mark Wilson, Chris Mascari, John Herrman, Kyle VanHemert, Dan Nosowitz, Matt Buchanan and Rosa Golijan from our own team, along with Tamara Chadima and the indefatigable Dennis Tarwood. You guys were troopers, and I'm pretty sure FedEx either loves you or hates you. Thanks to John Mahoney for helping develop the initial tests that we've continually refined, to Chris Jacob for mapping all the locations, and to Don Nguyen for the mad number crunching&mdash;you truly are a spreadsheet pimp.</i></p>
<p><i>Note: Some of you may have noticed that San Diego is among the cities highlighted on the top illustration&mdash;and that Maui is not. The reason is that while we did testing in three great San Diego locations, one of the locations didn't get any Sprint or T-Mobile service, and the already fairly thin dataset was rendered too compromised for any kind of usable report. As for Maui's absence, Maui's just too far out in the Pacific to make for a pretty map shot.</i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5428343/our-2009-12+city-3g-data-mega-test-att-won]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5428343]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[3g test 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3G networks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3g test]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[atlanta]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bay area]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[best 3g network]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chicago]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[denver]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hawaii]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[las vegas]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[los angeles]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[maui]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[new york]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[portland]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[san francisco]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[seattle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sprint]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tampa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tmobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon wireless]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5428343&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Gizmodo Reading Room: Books We Love]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/giz_reading_room_top.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_giz_reading_room_top.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>A synonym for "nerd" used to be "bookworm," but it's lost in today's broadband ADHD society. <em>We</em> still read, though. Voraciously. Here we present a collection of books, new and old, that we've enjoyed over the course of this year.</p>
<h2>The Dark Pasts of Our Geekiest Treasures</h2>
<p>There's that old expression about those who forget their history being doomed to repeat it. So it's good that there are so many chroniclers of the great achievements in tech, and in geek culture. [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5424726/gizmodo-reading-room-history">History Books</a>]</p>
<h2>Back to the Drawing Board</h2>
<p>Why are we so enamored with certain images or objects? Though an explanation on the inner workings of the soul is always just out of reach, there are books that help us understand our art and design fetishes, what informs our gear lust as well as our definition of beauty. [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5424725/gizmodo-reading-room-design">Art & Design Books</a>]</p>
<h2>Tales of Science and Technology, Told With Feeling</h2>
<p>Science is about a passionate, single-minded pursuit of an uncertain goal, but you wouldn't know it from reading most news coverage of great discoveries. Each year, though, a few brilliant writers dip into the details, and string together a story that is as beautiful as it is mind-blowing. [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5424730/gizmodo-reading-room-scitech-lit">Science & Tech Lit Books</a>]</p>
<h2>What's Cookin', Good Lookin'?</h2>
<p>We certainly try to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/tastetest/">hone our culinary skills on occasion</a>, so it's a given that we've been reading up on tasty treats and crazy concoctions. Naturally we've got some cookbooks that we can't stop raving about, but since we're dedicated nerds about food, there's a lot more going on here, too. [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5424723/gizmodo-reading-room-cooking">Food & Cooking Books</a>]</p>
<h2>Doing It For Ourselves</h2>
<p>Maybe we're not quite as prone to making nearly everything ourselves like our counterparts at <a href="http://lifehacker.com/">Lifehacker</a>, but we certainly love to tinker and enjoy <a href="http://gizmodo.com/t/diy">DIY projects</a>. Albeit it's the ones that could cause <a href="http://gizmodo.com/t/diy/gun">major damage</a> which we seem to go particularly crazy for, but I promise that there are innocent projects lurking in these books, too. [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5424722/gizmodo-reading-room-diy">DIY Books</a>]</p>
<h2>The Art of Escape: Our Favorite Fiction</h2>
<p>Even the craziest DIYer, chef, historian, gadget lover or designer needs a break at some point. Here are the departures from reality that kept us sane, especially after long, busy weeks of telling the truth. [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5424728/gizmodo-reading-room-fiction">Novels and Other Fiction</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5419530/the-gizmodo-reading-room-books-we-love]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5419530]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gizmodo reading room]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 20 Dec 2009 18:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5419530&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[How To: Make Your PC and Mac Share Stuff Like Best Friends]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/snowwin2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_snowwin2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Networking is stupid. You'd think it'd be real darn easy to share stuff between PCs and Macs, but it's not as <em>nearly</em> simple as it should be. So, here's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #howto" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/howto/">how to</a> make 'em talk and share stuff like best friends.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/wrt610.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_wrt610.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<h2>What You Need</h2>
<p>&bull; A Windows PC (Linux dudes, you already know how to do this, right?)<br>
&bull; A Mac<br>
&bull; A router to connect them</p>
<p>Before we get into sharing between computers directly, are you sure you <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5067201/how-to-choose-the-best-network-storage-for-a-macpc-home">don't just want a NAS</a>?</p>
<h2>Talk to Me, Girl</h2>
<p>So, assuming that your PC and Mac are both sitting comfortably on your network, wirelessly or otherwise (if you haven't gotten that far, you need more help than I'll be providing right here), there are a couple of different ways for the various machines on your network to talk to each other and share files. Think of 'em sorta like languages.</p>
<p>&bull; <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa365233(VS.85).aspx">SMB (Server Message Block)</a> aka CIFS (Common Internet File System) is Windows' preferred network <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #filesharing" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/filesharing/">file sharing</a> protocol, and luckily, Macs speak it, so this how your computers will most likely be talking and sharing stuff. Vista and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windows7" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows7/">Windows 7</a> <a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/WINDOWS-SERVER-2008-REVIEWED,1710-8.html">use SMB 2.0</a>, which is mo' faster for file transfers.</p>
<p>&bull; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_Transfer_Protocol">FTP (File Transfer Protocol)</a> is one you know and love, if you've ever spent any time on the internet. It's one option for sharing stuff between your Mac and PC.</p>
<p>&bull; <a href="http://nfs.sourceforge.net/">NFS (Network File System)</a> is the protocol Unix-based systems like to use for sharing files, which both Windows and Macs can understand. A lot of NASes use it.</p>
<p>&bull; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Filing_Protocol">AFP (Apple Filing Protocol)</a> is like a secret language for Macs, 'cause Windows sure as crap don't speak it. But from Mac-to-Mac, it's what makes sharing just work (when it does).</p>
<h2>Things That Will Help</h2>
<p>My goal here is to show you how to share files between your PC and Mac easily, and for the most part, without worrying about things like IP addresses or diddling with your router's settings. But! If you want to make troubleshooting easier&mdash;this kind of networking is more voodoo than science&mdash;there are a few things you could stand to know and do beforehand.</p>
<p>1. <strong>Know your router</strong>. Or really, know how to get into it. For most routers, punching the number soup 192.168.1.1 (Linksys, for instance) or 192.168.0.1 (D-Link, for example) into your web browser will take you to the router's settings, where you can fiddle with things (which you hopefully already did to protect your network).</p>
<p>2. <strong>Make everything static</strong>. If you take your computer on and off the network a lot, odds are, your router isn't going give it the same IP address every the computer jumps back on, because it hands those addresses out dynamically (you might recognize this as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_Host_Configuration_Protocol">DHCP</a> in action, if you're wondering what that acronym refers to). For consistency's sake, it's not a bad idea to assign your computers static IP addresses on the network, so they'll always have the same address&mdash;I at least give my desktop PC and Xbox static IP addresses&mdash;just in case something else is broken.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/dhcpreservation.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_dhcpreservation.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Look in the router settings for a reference to DHCP reservations or static DHCP, which is most likely under the general settings tab. Hit that up, like so, and you should see a list of computers on your network, along with their MAC addresses (an ID tied to the actual networking card in your computer) and currently assigned IP address (something like 192.168.1.102). If your computer's already connected to the network and listed here, it's real easy to give it an unwavering address on your network, a matter of a couple checkboxes.</p>
<p>If, for some reason, your computer's not on the network and you wanna give it a static address, like 192.168.0.104, you're gonna need to know its MAC address. On a Mac, just open the Network Utility app and select AirPort&mdash;it's the "hardware address." In Windows Vista and 7, go to Network & Sharing Center, and tap view status link next to your connection. Hit "details" in the pop up box and note the "physical address." On XP, bring your network connections, double click the one you want, flip to the "support" tab, and hit details. It's the physical address. Now that you have the MAC address for your computers, you can assign a set IP address to each one, that it'll have every single time it's on the network, which is a handy list to have.</p>
<h2>Getting Ready</h2>
<p>Okay, let's get our machines ready. We'll start with the Mac, 'cause it's a little easier.</p>
<p><strong>Mac</strong><br>
1. Setup a user account for sharing, either under Accounts or Sharing -&gt; File Sharing in System Preferences. (Unless you just wanna log in from Windows using your regular Mac login, then you can skip creating a sharing account.) Click the little plus sign under users, and then you pull can a name out of your address book to use for the account, or setup a whole new one.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/enablesmbmac.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_enablesmbmac.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>2. Open system preferences, go to sharing if you haven't already, and check the box for file sharing. Click options, and enable AFP (if you've got other Macs you wanna share with) and SMB. Crucially, make sure the account you're gonna be logging in from Windows with has SMB enabled.</p>
<p>3. To pick the folders you wanna share with other users, click the little plus sign and browse to the folder you wanna give access to. Maybe it's your pictures, maybe it's your whole Home folder. You'll need to add each folder individually, especially if you wanna give different people access to different folders. (If you're logging in from Windows with your standard Mac account, you'll have access to your whole hard drive anyway.)</p>
<p>After you've picked the folder you wanna share, then you just pick the user you want to share with, and how much access you want them to have. Read-only, write-only or read and write.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_windowsharing_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />4. Note your computer's name on the local network. It's sitting on top of the main file sharing setting page. And, if you've got AFP turned off, you'll get this dialog, noting the IP address Windows users can access your stuff.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/workgroupmac.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_workgroupmac.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>5. Go back to the main system preferences page, then click on Network. Go to the main connection you'll be using, like AirPort, and click advanced. Go to WINS, and set your Workgroup to the same one as your Windows PCs (probably either WORKGROUP, on newer Windows machines or MSHOME on XP).</p>
<p><strong>Windows 7 and Windows Vista</strong><br>
In Windows 7 and Vista, the Network and Sharing Center is where we'll be spending our time. (Here's <a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb727037.aspx">Microsoft's own guide</a>, if you wanna check it out.)</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/n_s.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_n_s.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>1. First, make sure in your little path to the internet up top, you've got a picture of a house sitting between your computer the internet globe at the top. That means you've got it set to private network, so stuff's a little more exposed to other computers on the network. If not, click customize to the right of the network name, and set it to private network.</p>
<p>2. In Vista, you'll notice the big ol' Sharing and Discovery section up front and center. In Windows 7, it's under advanced sharing settings. Go in there, and you'll want to enable network discovery, and make note of your Workgroup (so you can make sure your Mac is on the same one) which is listed here. Also, you have the option to turn off password-protected sharing, so that you don't need an account on the machine set up for sharing. Obviously, it's less secure, but if you prefer convenience, that's up to you.</p>
<p>3. Now for some voodoo that's not required, but it'll make life easier and might be something you need to come back to if stuff isn't working, because <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #osx" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/osx/">OS X</a> and Windows shake hands like goons (really it's about tweaking the <a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc738867(WS.10).aspx">LAN Manager Authentication Level</a>, so OS X has an easier time connecting to Windows). If you have Windows 7 or Vista Ultimate, go to the Control Panel, then Administration Tools, then local security policy. Hit local policies, then security options, and look for Network Security LAN Manager Authentication Level. There, you want to switch it to "send LM & NTLM, use NTLMv2 session if negotiated."</p>
<p>If you're in Windows 7 or Vista Home Premium, you don't have access to that, so you'll need to registry hack it up. Open up regedit, and look for this:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\LSA\</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Double click on LmCompatibilityLevel, and set the value to 1.</p>
<p>For more on this, just Google "vista mac NTVLM2." (Sans period.)</p>
<p>4. Now, we'll need to set up an account to share with. (Again, you can skip this if you're just going to use your regular Windows login from your Mac, though you'll need to have a password on the account for it to work best in Vista.) Go to User Accounts in Control Panel, then to Manage Accounts. Create a new account.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/share.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_share.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>5. If you're going to be logging in with your main administrator account, you can skip this step, since you'll have access to everything anyway. For all other accounts, go to the folder you want to share, right-click on it and hit properties. Click the sharing tab, hit "share," and then you can add users to the share list, along with their permissions. Windows will share it, and give you the network path where you can access it. Alternatively, go to Computer, right-click, and check out the system properties and note your computer's name on the network and its Workgroup (make sure the Workgroup is the same as your other computers, it makes life easier).</p>
<p><strong>Windows XP</strong><br>
XP's interface feels pretty damn ancient when it comes to Networking. Anyways, it's mostly the same stuff, just with a slightly uglier interface. I found <a href="http://www.myfirstmac.com/index.php/mac/articles/how-do-i-share-files-between-my-mac-and-pc">this guide</a> helpful when I was trying to remember where everything was.</p>
<p>1. Like before, you'll need a user account and password setup. Go to control panel, user accounts and create a new one, if you need to.</p>
<p>2. Make sure you're on the same workgroup as everything else&mdash;XP Home defaults to MSHOME, so if you need to change it, right-click on My Computer, hit properties, then go to Computer Name, and go to "Change" if you need to switch up the Workgroup.</p>
<p>3. Go to the folder you wanna share, right-click, hit properties, and switch over to sharing. Allow it to be shared over the network, and allow users to change files.</p>
<h2>Sharing Stuff</h2>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/finderbar.jpg" height="314" width="160">Okay, if you've done everything correctly, and the gods are pleased, what you should see on your Mac in your Finder Sidebar under the Shared tab is your Windows computer. (Make sure Shared is enabled in your Finder sidebar preferences, or you won't see it.) Then, you should be able to just click on it, enter your user account and password, and voila, you can get right at everything just like you hoped.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/netwooork.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_netwooork.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>On your Windows 7 or Vista machine, you should be able to click Network, and see all of your connected computers, including your Macs. To login, <a href="http://www.simplehelp.net/2008/07/17/how-access-the-files-on-your-mac-from-vista/">as Ross McKillop points out</a>, your username is the name of the Mac followed by the OS X username, like this, minus the quotes and period: "MATTBOOK-PRO/matt." In XP, you'll go to My Network Places or Workgroup, and it should be the same deal, though you can just stick to the actual Mac username and password. Life's good.</p>
<p><strong>Update</strong>: BTW, if you have Apple's Bonjour&mdash;Apple's zero configuration networking dealio, which powers music sharing in iTunes&mdash;installed on your Windows machines (it comes with iTunes), the discovery part of the guide above&mdash;the parts pertaining to locating the other machines on your network, should just work. That is, your Windows machines should just show up in your Finder sidebar and your Mac in your PC's Networking page, though you still need the accounts setup properly to actually share stuff.</p>
<p>Sometimes, things don't work like that. PCs don't show up in the Finder automagically, you can't login easily from your PC. Network discovery just isn't always that reliable. In that case we go all manual mode. Remember earlier, when I had you note your computer's name on the network and setup a static IP? That's where this comes in handy. So, know either your computers names, or their IP addresses on your network.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_connectservermanual_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />On a Mac, it's pretty simple. Go to Finder, tap command+k and punch in:<br clear="all"></p>
<blockquote>
<p>smb://computername or smb://192.168.X.XXX</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The latter is the PC's IP address, which should be something like 192.168.0.105&mdash;unless you have a weird setup&mdash;though the last two numbers of it will obviously vary. The computer name is easier and usually better, especially if you don't have a static IP address set up.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/mountvolume.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />It'll ask you what volume to mount (what folder you want stuck on your Finder Sidebar under shared, essentially), and a login, and then you're good to go. If prefer the cmd+k approach, you can add computers you tap a lot as a favorite, so you don't have to type it in every time.</p>
<p>It's pretty simple in Windows too, actually. Either in the Windows Explorer address bar, or the Run command type:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>\\MACNAME\Folder or \\192.168.X.XXX\Folder</p>
</blockquote>
<p>And it should give you the option to login there, giving you access to all of your stuff. Using the full address of the folder you're trying to get to will help with making sure the authentication pop-up appears&mdash;otherwise you might just see automatically what's publicly shared and not the stuff you're trying to log into.</p>
<h2>Shortcuts</h2>
<p>Logging in every single time would be a pain in the dick, but luckily you can make shortcuts to this stuff. On a Mac, as <a href="http://lifehacker.com/247148/how-to-mount-a-windows-shared-folder-on-your-mac">Gina points out here</a>, under Accounts, you can add a network share to login items, so it'll connect every time you start up your computer. In Windows, you can either create a shortcut by right-clicking on the share, or you can add your Mac's shared folder as a mapped network drive, so it'll connect to the folder every time you fire up your computer.</p>
<h2>Your Tips and Tricks</h2>
<p>There is more than one way to tackle this particular angry bear, so if you've got your own tips and tools to share, please drop some links in the comments-your feedback is hugely important to our weekend How To guides.</p>
<p>And if you have any topics you'd like to see covered here, please let us know. Happy sharing!</p>
<p>Other Helpful Networking How Tos:<br>
&bull; <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5197759/how-to-remote-control-your-home-computer-from-anywhere-with-vnc">How to Remote Control Your Computer From Anywhere With VNC</a><br>
&bull; <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5357993/how-to-back-up-all-your-stuff-for-free-no-hard-drive-needed">How to Back Up All Your Stuff for Free, No Hard Drive Needed</a><br>
&bull; <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5343260/how-to-kick-your-torrent-addiction-with-usenet">How to Kick Your BitTorrent Addiction with Usenet</a></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5430678/how-to-make-your-pc-and-mac-share-stuff-like-best-friends]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5430678]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[how to]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[file sharing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[guide]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac pc filesharing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[networking]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 20 Dec 2009 14:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5430678&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Top 10 Essential Tools for Your Wallet, Keychain, or Pocket]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_ultimate_keychain.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />You want to be organized and prepared when you're walking around, but you don't want to lug around 10 pounds of gear and ruin your back with a mega-wallet. These essential carry-around tools are discrete, super-handy, and oh so brag-worthy.</p><p><em>Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/joelogon/237409211/">joelogon</a>.</em></p>
<p>We've previously covered the gear our editors and readers find handy to carry in their <a href="http://lifehacker.com/309331/go-bag-show-and-tell-roundup">"Go bags"</a> and <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5266491/the-gear-and-tactics-from-lifehackers-laptop-bags">laptop bags</a>, and some of those tools (like a certain USB key) cross into the pocket-worthy realm. Otherwise, we tried to stick to very small tools and printables that do a really good job for this roundup.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;">10. Foldable Organizer</h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/thumb160x_pocketmod.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />The <a href="http://www.pocketmod.com/">PocketMod webapp</a> is more than a simple printout maker. It's an expandable, customizable system for creating an 8-page, super-slim booklet with anything you want on any side. You can <a href="http://lifehacker.com/369766/track-travel-and-workouts-with-a-pocketmod">track your business mileage</a> on one side while keeping your calendar and important contacts on another, or print out an entirely new pocket <a href="http://lifehacker.com/399090/mapufacture-creates-small-pocketmod+compatible-maps">stuffed with travel maps and local attractions</a>. Cool stuff, and definitely worth the wallet space. (<a href="http://lifehacker.com/software/personal-organizers/pocketmod-a-customizable-mininotebook-124437.php">Original post</a>).<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;">9. Compact keychain</h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/thumb160x_leatherman-multikey.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />If you've only got a few keys, and an eye for something different, you don't have to go with the typical ring-shaped chain. You really only need <a href="http://carlitoscontraptions.blogspot.com/2007/03/compact-keychain.html">washers and a rivet</a> to create a minimalist, quiet keychain. You can take it further by shaping those keys into a <a href="http://www.instructables.com/id/Swiss-Army-Keys-Key-and-Leatherman-Mod/?ALLSTEPS">mini-Leatherman with a few tools kept in</a>, attaching the rivets <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5045986/diy-keychain-money-clip-lightens-your-pockets">onto a money clip</a>, or <a href="http://lifehacker.com/383672/diy-leatherman-compact-keychain">crafting your own compact key device</a>. (Original posts: <a href="http://lifehacker.com/349647/diy-compact-keychain">compact keychain</a>, <a href="http://lifehacker.com/399031/diy-leatherman-key-mod">mini-Leatherman</a>)<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;">8. Universal club card</h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/12/keyringthing.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Some stores require them, some stores provide discounts with them, and others offer passive rewards and points for using club/membership cards and bar codes. Combine all of your codes onto a single card with <a href="http://www.justoneclubcard.com/">Just One Club Card</a>, or choose between a card and keyring tab at <a href="https://www.keyringthing.com/">KeyRingThing</a>. Actually, the two sites seem to have gotten together, and now offer combination cards with a nice laminate finish and firm back, so you won't have to worry about wear, tear, and faint barcodes. We love it when great webapps find each other. (Original post: <a href="http://lifehacker.com/240816/slim-down-your-wallet-with-just-one-club-card">Just One Club Card</a>, <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5260900/keyringthing-creates-one-bonus-card-to-rule-them-all">KeyRingThing</a>)<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;">7. Indestructible, keychain-friendly USB drive</h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/12/imakey.png" width="158" height="120" class="left" align="left">Maybe you don't need this exact model, but having a nearly-indestructible USB drive that fits on your keychain is convenient in ways you can't quite fathom until you've added it. You're almost never without a bit of storage for transferring or grabbing files. If you're the <a href="http://portableapps.com">PortableApps</a> type, you've always got a working Firefox/Pidgin/Thunderbird setup handy for being productive on someone else's system. At the moment, the 4 GB IamaKey <a href="http://www.lacie.com/us/products/product.htm?pid=11225">sells for $22 directly</a>, so it&mdash;or something like it&mdash;might make a great recommendation as a last-minute stocking stuffer. (<a href="http://lifehacker.com/5210255/lacie-iamakey-is-a-sturdy-thumb-drive-for-your-keychain">Original post</a>)<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;">6. Compact calendar</h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/12/small_calendar_thumb_01.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Designer David Seah has been making "candy bar calendars" for some time now, and his <a href="http://davidseah.com/blog/compact-calendar/">2010 compact calendar</a> is just as beautifully efficient as ever. His are monthly calendars you line up and customize in Excel. If you're looking for more of an all-in-one solution, try <a href="http://www.grafishdesign.it/blog/the-small-calendar-eng">The Small Calendar 2010</a> from Grafish Designs, or the <a href="http://adam.sporka.eu/wiki/doku.php?id=web:thumb_calendar">Thumb Calendar 2010 design</a>, both of which offer clever ways of peeking at today, tomorrow, and the future from a wallet-sized slip of paper. (Original posts: <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5428639/the-small-calendar-puts-a-whole-year-on-a-business-card">The Small Calendar</a>, <a href="http://lifehacker.com/333907/tiny-business-card-calendar">Thumb Calendar</a>).<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;">5. A baby (or really cute pet) photo</h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/baby_cookie.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_baby_cookie.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Wallets get lost, left behind, and lifted more often than you'd like to think. If your wallet is more misplaced than stolen, having a very cute baby photo in your wallet, even if it's not necessarily yours, seems to seriously <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article6681923.ece">boost your chances of getting it back.</a> A not-too-close backup is having a cute pet picture. As they say in journalism school, every story (and wallet, maybe) needs a dog&mdash;or at least a really interesting human. <em>Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/sunseeker73/523300435/">°Eli</a>.</em> (<a href="http://lifehacker.com/5313032/baby-photos-might-get-your-lost-wallet-returned">Original post</a>).<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;">4. Earbud de-tangler</h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/12/earbud_owl.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Ever pull out your tangled, knotted headphones and wonder if they're secretly holding gymnastics practice when they're tucked away? Keep your earbuds, cords, and plugs in place with a de-tangling tool. Our inner stylist loves this <a href="http://www.understandingmaya.com/blog/?p=162">laser-cut earbud owl</a> and its old-time-y wooden look, but you can also cut something similar from plastic. In fact, you can fashion an earbud holder <a href="http://www.instructables.com/id/EGXN0RMF4WY1L6I/?ALLSTEPS">out of a junk or expired credit card</a>. If you've got no room for a single-purpose flat piece, at least train yourself in manual de-tangling methods like the <a href="http://lifehacker.com/software/life-hacks/keep-headphone-wires-from-getting-tangled-152499.php">devil horn wrap</a>, the <a href="http://www.instructables.com/id/ED5SHYK5A9EXCFGD1X?ALLSTEPS">around-the-player wrap</a>, or get fancy with a <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5411305/daisy-chain-knots-resize-or-store-spare-cords-without-clutter">daisy chain</a> or <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5304798/use-a-chain-sinnet-to-tidy-cables">chain sinnet</a> style. (<a href="http://lifehacker.com/5234623/laser+cut-earbud-owl-keeps-your-cords-tangle+free">Original earbud owl post</a>)<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;">3. A darned good pen</h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/12/beta-pen.png" class="left image340" width="340" />Yeah, you still need to write now and again. Whether it's a credit card receipt scrawl or a note you really want to be able to read later, having a pen that actually makes you want to write is always worth the price. We <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5364592/whats-your-favorite-writing-utensil">asked our script-friendly readers</a> what pens they liked, and they came back with <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5369470/lifehacker-readers-favorite-pens">impressive results</a>. In describing his trusted <a href="http://www.penagain.com/">PenAgain</a>, for example, <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5364592/whats-your-favorite-writing-utensil#c15562893">Cowboy Bill wrote:</a> "Helps my horrible handwriting. Busted knuckles from nuns' rulers." That's an endorsement from the heart, or at least the memory of hands.<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;">2. Multi-tool, credit-card or standard</h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/12/leatherman_micra.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />We agree with <a href="http://www.kk.org/cooltools/archives/001576.php">Steve Sussex's assessment</a> of the <a href="http://www.leatherman.com/products/product.asp?id=24&f=8&c=1">Leatherman Micra</a>&mdash;it's just as useful to computer geeks as to outdoor types. If carrying an actual knife on your keychain won't fly with security at work, or you don't want to clutter it, consider the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/B000Q06LI4/ref=nosim/gizmodo-20">11-function, credit-card-sized survival tool</a>, also <a href="http://www.kk.org/cooltools/archives/001782.php">recommended by Cool Tools</a>. You get a ruler, a knife and screwdriver plane that can work in a pinch, and, perhaps most helpfully, a bottle opener you never forget at home. Even if you forget to pull it from your wallet before a flight, it's only around $5, and a fairly clever conversation starter. (Original posts: <a href="http://lifehacker.com/235267/stuff-we-like--leatherman-micra">Leatherman Micra</a>, <a href="http://lifehacker.com/284304/the-credit-card-survival-multi+tool">credit card tool</a>).<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;">1. A backup system</h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/thumb160x_organizedwallet.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />The wallet is where you <em>should</em> keep all your essential IDs and cards, but it's good to have a fallback plan for when you leave it at home, or in the cab. Inspired by a Real Simple article (now dead-linked) on using clear pockets and cords to separate ID badges, Gina <a href="http://lifehacker.com/382863/slim-down-back-up-and-organize-your-wallet">wrote up a diet plan and backup system for your wallet</a>, based on her own use of a <a href="http://www.koyono.com/Slimmy-Slim-Wallet-Alternative-p/m17546.htm">Slimmy</a> minimalist wallet and just the bare essentials. If you find yourself holding up the line to dig through a virtual filing cabinet of receipts and cards, consider putting your own money holder through boot camp.<br clear="all"></p>
<hr>
What's the most essential item on your own keychain, in your wallet, or loose in your jacket pocket these days? Share your stuff in the comments.]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://lifehacker.com/5429809/top-10-essential-tools-for-your-wallet-keychain-or-pocket]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5429809]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[lifehacker top 10]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[keychain]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[stuff we like]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[travel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wallet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wallets]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 19 Dec 2009 12:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Purdy]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5429809&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Orson Welles and His Brief Passionate Betacam Love Affair]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_orson_welles_eyes.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />In January 1985, the phone rang. The caller announced that he was <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #orsonwelles" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/orsonwelles/">Orson Welles</a> and that he wanted to have lunch with me. Thus began one of the most extraordinary and bittersweet adventures of my life.</p>
<p>Sometimes the journeys we take through this life begin and end in the most unexpected ways. My encounter with Welles in the last days of his life centered on a common interest: Sony's new one-piece camcorder, the Betacam. It had just come to market and Welles, always the genius filmmaker, had big ideas for what he could do with one. With Welles there were no limits. "You can't do that" wasn't in his vocabulary. This was a short, but very passionate story.</p>
<p>At the time I was running Television Matrix, a small video production facility in the Sunset-Gower Studios in Hollywood. I had been in California only a short time, having moved from Miami the previous summer. I had started in video production in 1975 and had been shooting mostly news for the networks throughout Latin America. Business was good because the networks were switching from film to tape in this period and they were short of video crews. In late 1982, I purchased something totally new&mdash;one of the first Sony Betacams delivered in the United States.</p>
<h2>Beta Goes To Hollywood</h2>
<p>One of our clients in Miami had been <em>Entertainment Tonight</em>. During a lull in a location shoot with Robin Leach, then an ET correspondent, I'd shown him the new Betacam. Leach had been offered a chance to do his own television show, but could find no one in the mid-1980s who could bring in a one-hour episode for his very low budget of $100,000. The Betacam, Leach thought, might be the answer.</p>
<p>"Could this work?" he asked me at the time. "Maybe," I responded. Only the Sony Betacam camcorder&mdash;the first one-piece camera and recorder ever made&mdash;and a standalone player existed. To edit, one would need to connect the player to another format to finish the work. That would mean integration with a one-inch Type C format system.</p>
<p>Leach made me an offer. If I could figure out how to make all the technology work, he would move me and my crews to LA to do the production on his new reality show. That motivated me to call Charles Felder, then the president of the tiny Sony Broadcast office in New York. My timing couldn't have been better. It turns out that Sony had the same thoughts about how to extend the Betacam and I had brought them the right project at the right moment. In a flash, we made a deal. In exchange for a small financial investment on my part, Sony would build an experimental facility in LA. They would make it a "first" that they'd advertise and show to others in Hollywood.</p>
<h2>The Hottest Video Editing Suite in Town</h2>
<p>The prospects were exciting for everyone. An elated Robin Leach began to plan for the new show, and I, along with several freelance crew members that I had worked with, moved to Los Angeles in the summer of 1984. One of the reasons we picked the Sunset-Gower lot (the old Columbia Pictures Studios) was it housed the broadcast center for the 1984 Olympics in LA that summer. When the Olympics ended, the networks would have a huge fire sale of their used broadcast equipment on the same lot. I had targeted the pieces we needed in advance, bought the gear, and moved it to our new edit bay days after the games ended.</p>
<p>We were lucky enough to hire Jim Fancher, now chief science officer at Technicolor in Hollywood, to build the facility. He was far more than a brilliant engineer. As a hands-on "can do" guy, he was also a natural-born negotiator who could coordinate the different technical approaches of companies whose gear would not work together. I will always picture Jim lying on his back under a rack of gear talking with tech support at some company about why their product wouldn't work.</p>
<p>Somehow, thanks to Jim, it all came together on time and on budget. By fall, we were ready. The show, now called <em>Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous</em>, went on the air. To be honest, I thought it was dumb idea that would last for one season if we were lucky. All I really cared about was that we had moved to Los Angeles and that Leach had paid for everything. I was ready for whatever came next. I can honestly say it was one of the great shocks of my life when the show became a major hit. I was totally unready for it.</p>
<p>We had built the first interformat edit bay in the nation (Betacam to one-inch), and <em>Lifestyles</em> was the first major magazine show to be shot using the new format. We had made history. The cost of television production had come down&mdash;way down. At least by half. Word spread fast and we were running facility tours in no time. Sony even hired Milton Berle to do a two-page ad for the facility and the technology concept behind it.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_orson_with_camera.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<h2>Enter Orson</h2>
<p>A freelance editor for our show, Paul Hunt, also did some sound work for the legendary actor/director/producer/genius Orson Welles. He told Welles about our Betacam facility, now running almost around the clock, and from that moment on the great man's insatiable curiosity about every new sound and imaging technology took over. Welles wanted to meet me, and thus came a lunch invitation many film buffs would have died for.</p>
<p>To be honest, I knew very little about Welles. I had majored in television and radio at the University of South Carolina in the 1960s and it was hard to escape the many contributions Welles made to the broadcast and film industries. From audio special effects to remarkable moving dolly shots, Welles was a genius of the first order. But outside of having seen <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #citizenkane" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/citizenkane/">Citizen Kane</a></em>, I didn't know the details of his career nor did I pretend to.</p>
<p>Our first lunch at Welles' favorite haunt, Ma Maison, was a roaring success. For reasons I still don't fully understand, we hit it off. Welles was curious about all things video, especially the Betacam, a device he envisioned to be an Arriflex camera that didn't need film. As our first meeting continued, Welles' small dog, who was seated at the table next to me, kept nipping at my leg. It was annoying, but I didn't dare take a swat at Orson Welles' beloved dog!</p>
<p>That lunch led to many others throughout 1985. In the earlier days of our relationship, he tested me in strange ways. One night, after midnight, Orson (he insisted that everyone call him Orson) called to ask for help in solving a sound problem he claimed to be having. He was recording and editing some narration on his Nagra tape recorder in his bedroom in the hills above Hollywood Blvd.</p>
<p>"Frank, after I do a splice with a razor blade, I get a bump in the sound when I play back the tape. What should I do?" he asked. This was a very strange question from the man who had practically invented modern sound recording. He had scared the nation with <em>War of the Worlds</em> and was asking me such a basic question about audio editing. Though half asleep, I knew he had to know the answer and instantly recognized it as some sort of test.</p>
<p>"Orson, your razor blade is magnetized. Get another one," I answered. "Oh, OK," he responded, apologizing for waking me and then promptly said goodbye. I went back to sleep and never heard of the issue again.</p>
<h2>"Call Sony. Make It Work!"</h2>
<p>As he learned more about video camcorders and nonlinear editing, Orson became determined to do a video project of his own. We visited New England Digital for a demo of nonlinear sound editing on the Synclavier. As for video, Orson wasn't content with just renting a Montage, one of the first non-linear video editors. He wanted his own, and he wanted it to sit next to his flatbed film editor at home.</p>
<p>As the talk turned to money (it always did in Orson's case), I offered to contribute video facilities and help him raise money for a one-man show to be called Orson Welles Solo. The production would be a retrospective of Orson's favorite theatrical material along with a big dose of magic&mdash;both new tricks and archival footage from Orson's glory days as a working magician. Our facility was already booked around the clock, but it didn't stop me from promising Orson anything he wanted.</p>
<p>Through a long and convoluted series of events (and with the help of the late Paul Rothchild, producer of The Doors, the Paul Butterfield Blues Band and Janis Joplin), the money was raised and the production was set to begin. Now Orson focused on how he'd use the two Betacams we'd secured to shoot the show.</p>
<p>Just as he had accepted no conventional technical limitations when he made <em>Citizen Kane</em> in 1940, Orson approached video in the same unrelenting way. In 1985, Betacams had Saticon tubes&mdash;not CCD sensors&mdash;and their ability to sync to one another via time code was, to put it mildly, a bit crude. Orson didn't care. He demanded that the handheld Betacams float around the set wirelessly and always be in perfect sync. He also directed that we shoot directly into bright lights and he didn't want to hear about any problems with lag.</p>
<p>"Call Sony and tell them to make it work," Orson demanded, slamming his fist on a table at one point. "Don't ever tell me 'No.'" I called Sony, and Sony responded by sending two expert engineers to help Orson push the video envelope on the project.</p>
<p>The day before the shoot was to begin in November, 1985, the Betacams were tweaked to the max. The jury-rigs&mdash;and there were a lot of them&mdash;were tested and re-tested. Every engineer and crew member that was to be in Orson's field of view was told that the words "you can't do that" were to be stricken from their vocabulary. With this project, I demanded, we will find a way to do any and everything Orson wants to do. All the old excuses about the limits of video will be left at the front door.</p>
<h2>On the Evening Before the Big Shoot</h2>
<p>As technical preparations for the shoot continued, Orson taped an appearance in the late afternoon on Merv Griffin's syndicated talk show. Normally, Orson disdained conversations about his past. He'd always say he wanted to talk about the future, not "go down memory lane." But, uncharacteristically, he did go down memory lane that afternoon with his old friend, Merv. Orson charmed the audience, both with stories and card tricks.</p>
<p>After the show, Orson had dinner at Ma Maison and then headed home to finish writing the script for our first taping, now only hours away. Our first day of shooting was to be in auditorium on the UCLA campus. Orson would call when he was ready for us to go to the location.</p>
<p>The next morning, as I awaited those instructions from Orson in my office, the phone rang. It was Paul Rothchild.</p>
<p>"Did you hear the news," he asked gently.</p>
<p>"What news?" I replied.</p>
<p>"Orson Welles is dead."</p>
<p>Orson had died of a heart attack during the night. He was found slumped over his typewriter, working on our script. Minutes later, a Welles assistant called and said bluntly: "Frank, the project has been canceled."</p>
<h2>Welles' Legacy and Love of New Technology</h2>
<p>I drove home&mdash;numb and unable to function. After the initial days of despair, my incredible year working with Orson Welles took on a new dimension. A new journey would begin. Those same Betacams were used to record Orson's memorial service a few weeks later and that event, in turn, introduced me to the remarkable men and women who had been associated with Welles from his days with the Mercury Theater. The film critic Leonard Maltin and I did a documentary with these fascinating people, and I later produced, with Mercury Theater actor Richard Wilson, a retrospective of Orson's best radio work from his personal tape collection.</p>
<p>A couple of weeks after Orson's death, his cinematographer, the late Gary Graver, came by my office for a visit. Gary said something I will never forget.</p>
<p>"I've been driving around for two weeks with Orson's ashes in the truck of my car," he said, matter of factly.</p>
<p>"What?" I responded, quickly envisioning a fender bender with the Hollywood legend's ashes being scattered across an LA freeway.</p>
<p>"I'm not going to take them into my house," Graver said, almost fearing the prospect. "What should I do?"</p>
<p>I thought for a minute, looked a Graver, and said, "I don't know." Some months later, Welles' ashes were buried in Ronda, Spain, on the property of a longtime friend, retired bullfighter Antonio Ordóñez.</p>
<p>The demise of our video project left me yearning to do some kind of major Welles project to fill the void. As I reviewed our time together, I recalled an extraordinary story that Welles had taken nearly two hours to tell me on a leisurely Saturday afternoon a few months earlier. It was about the events surrounding his production of Marc Blitzstein's musical, <em>The Cradle Will Rock</em>, in 1937. It was, Welles told me, the only time in U.S. history that the military was sent out to shut down a Broadway play. He wanted to make a movie about it, but had failed to raise the money.</p>
<p>That was it. I would try to get the film made. It took the support of many of Welles' original Mercury colleagues&mdash;including the late actor/producer John Houseman&mdash;and a lot of crazy investors to keep the project alive over the years. Most importantly, it took Tim Robbins, who recognized the power of the story early on and spent most of 1990s writing and directing the film that eventually came to the screen.</p>
<p>Houseman once said that it's rare in this life to be touched by real genius. Welles, said Houseman, was the real thing&mdash;perhaps the only real genius he'd ever known. Now, I understand what he meant. Welles, long before most filmmakers, saw the powerful potential of small format video. Yet, he was perhaps 20 years too early to enjoy the real fruits of the video revolution in his own work.</p>
<p>Whenever I see a tiny new camcorder introduced, or see Apple upgrade a revolutionary application like iMovie, I think of Orson. Oh, how excited he'd be. The pure magic of it all! If he were alive today, he'd be making his movies without regard to raising huge amounts of money. That, for both Orson and his audience, would be an achievement that we'll never be able to enjoy.</p>
<p><em>Frank Beacham is a New York City-based independent writer at <a href="http://www.beachamjournal.com/">www.beachamjournal.com</a>. Beacham was executive producer of the 1999 Touchstone Films release of Tim Robbins film,</em> Cradle Will Rock<em>. He and George Demas have written</em> Maverick<em>, a new play based on the events described in this story.</em></p>
<p><i>Top CC image from <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/scarycow/2283568428/">Scary Cow/Flickr</a>; shot of Orson with camera from <a href="http://www.moviemail-online.co.uk/film/dvd/F-For-Fake-Masters-Of-Cinema/">MovieMail</a>, which sells the brilliant latter-day Welles documentary</i> F for Fake.</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5429390/orson-welles-and-his-brief-passionate-betacam-love-affair]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5429390]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[filmmaking]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[betacam]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[betamax]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[citizen kane]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[orson welles]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[retromodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank Beacham]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5429390&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Most Popular Featured Workspaces of 2009]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_500x300-12-pic-grid_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Every week we bring you fresh workspaces from the <a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/lifehacker-workspace-showandtell/pool/">Lifehacker Workspace Show and Tell pool</a>, all supplied by you&mdash;the awesome Lifehacker readership. Today we're highlighting the 25 most popular workspaces of 2009.</p>

<p>Featured workspaces cover a wide range of designs, budgets, and occupations. We've featured entire offices, individual offices, home offices, workspaces, work benches, and every possible configuration of places therein. Wherever you get things done, we love to see and hear about it.</p>
<p>The following are the 25 most popular workspaces of 2009. Each featured workspace includes additional photos and sometimes video of the workspace, so click on the name of the workspace to check out additional photos and information about it.</p>
<p>If you want to give your workspace a shot at fame in 2010, make sure to check out our guide to <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5322389/photograph-your-workspace-for-fame-and-fortune">photographing your workspace for fame and fortune</a> and then then post it to the <a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/lifehacker-workspace-showandtell/pool/">Lifehacker Workspace Show and Tell pool</a>!</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5159194/before-and-after-barren-attic-to-programmers-paradise">Before and After: Barren Attic to Programmer's Paradise</a></h3>
<p><a href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/07/mitchofficehed.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/02/mitchofficehed.jpg" width="500"></a></p>
<p>One of the most popular workspaces we featured in 2009, Mitch's home office was a makeover to behold. He totally gutted his attic and rebuilt the entire thing as a programmer's paradise.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5373720/floating-monitors-and-hidden-peripherals">Floating Monitors and Hidden Peripherals</a></h3>
<p><a href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/10/3787509186_ed2e1892ab_b.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/10/500x_3787509186_ed2e1892ab_b.jpg" width="500"></a>Lifehacker reader acflynn put together a home office with a lot of functional style. The small shelf beneath his monitors actually houses his network gear.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5329865/office-on-the-forests-edge">Office on the Forest's Edge</a></h3>
<p><a href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/08/3747545471_1b022daa2c_b.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/08/504x_3747545471_1b022daa2c_b.jpg" width="500"></a></p>
<p>What can you say about reader Peter Frazier's office? It's awesome. It's built into a cliff with a scenic view. It's got grass growing on the roof!</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5349543/building-the-ultimate-dorm-desk">Building The Ultimate Dorm Desk</a></h3>
<p><a href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/09/3927741232_94a16ae943_b.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/09/500x_3927741232_94a16ae943_b.jpg" width="500"></a></p>
<p>When you're a DIYer with a desire to build an epic desk for your dorm room, it helps to have access to good tools and materials. One Lifehacker reader used great gear and forward-looking design to craft an ultimate dorm desk.</p>
<p><a href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/08/3170156475_5d02e8fd57_b.jpg"></a></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5332557/the-trap-door-desk">The Trap Door Desk</a></h3>
<p><a href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/08/3170156475_5d02e8fd57_b.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/08/504x_3170156475_5d02e8fd57_b.jpg" width="500"></a></p>
<p>How do you maintain a completely uncluttered workspace, but also keep access to basic tools and peripherals? You build, as Lifehacker reader Roitsch did, a desk with a large storage compartment in the middle.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5331491/the-computer-cabinet-office">The Computer Cabinet Office</a></h3>
<p><a href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/08/3794682122_4f4b345b42_b.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/08/504x_3794682122_4f4b345b42_b.jpg" width="500"></a></p>
<p>Lifehacker reader Steve Price had a two-fold problem. His previous desk was short on space for all his monitors and the noise and heat generated by having all his computers under the desk was unpleasant. By taking advantage of an alcove in his computer room he was able to cut down on the heat and noise substantially.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5328261/the-well+planned-dorm-room">The Well-Planned Dorm Room</a></h3>
<p><a href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/08/3763530792_eea99ca3a9.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/08/504x_3763530792_eea99ca3a9.jpg" width="500"></a><br>
Just because you're in college doesn't mean that your room has to be a cluttered mess of schoolwork, piled with unwashed clothes, and overseen by John Belushi posters. Check out today's featured workspace to see a well planned room.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5163142/custom-wire-management-for-multi+monitor-bliss">Custom Wire Management for Multi-Monitor Bliss</a></h3>
<p><a href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/07/2009-03-03_120111.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/03/2009-03-03_120111.png" width="500"></a></p>
<p>Brian Connolly was tired of cramped desks and messy wiring, so he built his own desk and wire management system to have the spacious and tidy spread he desired.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5198015/the-mac+tacular-lair">The Mac-tacular Lair</a></h3>
<p><a href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/07/2009-04-25_181639.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/04/2009-04-25_181639.png" width="500"></a></p>
<p>Lifehacker reader m2j2 has invested quite a bit of time, creativity, and cold, hard cash into his office setup. The result is an office that is not only visually appealing but packed with enough shiny tech toys to cover all sorts of work and play. His office is set up to handle just about anything he wants to throw at it, short of planning a zombie apocalypse resistance, although don't quote me on that&mdash;for all we know, the office is in an abandoned missile silo.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5165084/unidentified-floating-desk/gallery/">Unidentified Floating Desk</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_3321453570_d37aaf33f8.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<p>Brett wanted to get his monitor off his desk, but didn't want to waste money on an expensive mounting arm. With the addition of some lumber and LEDs, problem solved!</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5244220/the-innovative-office">The Innovative Office</a></h3>
<p><a href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/07/2009-05-07_144407.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/05/2009-05-07_144407.png" width="500"></a></p>
<p>Lifehacker reader and architect <a href="http://www.jeremylevine.com/">Jeremy Levine</a> has a spacious and well lit office that will likely be the envy of cubicle-dweller and telecommuter alike. Jeremy's office features a vaulted ceiling with exposed recycled wood beams and a combines clerestory and transom windows to bring in a huge amount of natural light and create an expansive work environment.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5313991/the-hidden-cable-workspace">The Hidden Cable Workspace</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_504x_2009-07-14_114417.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<p>Lifehacker reader Tomas Carrillo&mdash;responsible for sharing the handy <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5304798/use-a-chain-sinnet-to-tidy-cables">chain sinnet method of cable tidying</a> with us&mdash;has the kind of neat workspace you'd expect from a guy with that kind of cable wrangling knowledge.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5368107/the-triple+monitor-haven">The Triple-Monitor Haven</a></h3>
<p><a href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/09/3866662463_a61ba21174_o.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/09/500x_3866662463_a61ba21174_o.jpg" width="500"></a></p>
<p>Combine dark colors, ample desk space, and an arc of viewing pleasure, and you've got a workspace dear to many a geek's heart. Throw in a few toys like an Ambient Orb and a break now and then to play some video games on a nearly wraparound display and the deal is sealed.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5394600/handcrafted-and-free-floating-the-wraparound-workspace">Handcrafted and Free Floating: The Wraparound Workspace</a></h3>
<p><a href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/11/3747157374_838d9d6304_b.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/11/500x_3747157374_838d9d6304_b.jpg" width="500"></a></p>
<p>One of the best ways to cut down on cable clutter is to get all your equipment and cables right off the floor, so cables can never drape across the floor in the first place. Louis' workspace uses a system of shelves to keep everything in a position where the cords travel the shortest distance possible.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5287275/the-quad-monitor-alcove">The Quad Monitor Alcove</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_3601658694_fb5f16fa93.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<p>Lifehacker reader Mandrake has assembled quite a setup for himself. From the custom ergonomic chair to the tilting work surface of the ergonomic desk, the workspace is geared for long term comfort.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5275978/the-serene-workspace">The Serene Workspace</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_2009-06-02_141820.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<p>Lifehacker reader Schodts has been tweaking and tuning his workspace setup for some time. The current incarnation is a pleasing multi-monitor setup with plenty of space to work. Thanks to a wall mount for the TV and a repurposed glass table top turned monitor shelf the common desktop fixtures like monitor stands, phones, and pencil cups have been lifted off the desk freeing up more space.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5423243/before-and-after-the-wire-loom-workspace">Before and After: The Wire Loom Workspace</a></h3>
<p><a href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/4020313624_76695218d5_b.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_4020313624_76695218d5_b.jpg" width="500"></a></p>
<p>This featured workspace belongs to Lifehacker reader tehdik. He was pretty happy with this workspace, save for the enormous tangle of wires under his desk. Thanks to its sleek glass surface, he could see the mess not only across the room but every minute he was at his work station. Finally he'd had enough of the mess and ordered some supplies to make short work of it.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5337810/the-attic-playground">The Attic Playground</a></h3>
<p><a href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/08/3539868350_eea0e1ca3e_b.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/08/500x_3539868350_eea0e1ca3e_b.jpg" width="500"></a></p>
<p>If we had to guess how Lifehacker reader edgefactor627 came about the idea of having such a pile of goodies in his attic, we'd have to go with him having a strong desire to serve as a beacon of fun for the whole neighborhood, drawn to the signal of condensed awesomeness in the highest room in his house.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5343591/the-floating-shelves-and-hidden-cables-workspace">The Floating Shelves and Hidden Cables Workspace</a></h3>
<p><a href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/08/3846450901_03c2428cd3_b.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/08/500x_3846450901_03c2428cd3_b.jpg" width="500"></a></p>
<p>Lifehacker reader msweston took some basic building blocks from IKEA and assembled them into a sleek workspace with well manged cables and a tidy layout.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5408359/before-and-after-the-loft-workstation">Before and After: The Loft Workstation</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/img_3993.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_img_3993.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>Lifehacker reader aloftindenver lives, shockingly enough, in a a loft in Denver. They've been cataloging their adventures in furnishing the loft-largely by creating their own designs and furniture-at their blog <a href="http://aloftindenver.com/">A Loft In Denver</a>. While we'd highly recommend reading over the entire blog, especially if you're into loft living and modern design, what really caught our eye is the amazingly sleek workspace they built from scratch.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5414535/the-mac-lovers-bedroom">The Mac Lover's Bedroom</a></h3>
<p><a href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/11/3902402971_51693f2dc7_o.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/11/500x_3902402971_51693f2dc7_o.jpg" width="500"></a></p>
<p>This featured workspace pulls off the office-as-bedroom tact without introducing clutter or bulk into the bedroom. Tucked neatly in the corner and with dual monitors to boot, reader ryopang can get work done in style in his bedroom office</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5300475/before-and-after-the-benefits-of-basic-tidying-and-cable-management">Before and After: The Benefits of Basic Tidying and Cable Management</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_3649366304_30507eba12.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<p>It doesn't float, spin, flash, or appear to contain glowing alien spore, but today's featured workspace gets the job done in a very practical and tidy way. Lifehacker reader Dani Cela just needed to tame the mess of cables at his feet and tidy up.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5410344/white-space-and-leds">White Space and LEDs</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_500x_4036640292_3b4d7bf539.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<p>This featured workspace is an example of how you don't have to spend a fortune to have a fun and functional workspace with a solid dose of style. Obviously Apple products don't come cheap, so we'll discount the presence of a gorgeous and pricey Apple screen as part of the total cost of the space. The rest of the space is composed of simple and inexpensive items, like $89 IKEA Vika Gruvan desktop and a comically large clothespin for temporally stashing important papers.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5160893/land-of-the-colorful-cubes/gallery/">Land of the Colorful Cubes</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/3294080742_15362134c7_o.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_3294080742_15362134c7_o.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>Cubes are the antithesis of individuality. Tiny, colorless combs in the hive of industry, right? Not if you work at The Balcom Agency in Fort Worth, Texas.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5170035/the-media-mecca">The Media Mecca</a></h3>
<p><a href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/07/2009-03-14_130715.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/03/2009-03-14_130715.png" width="500"></a></p>
<p>What do you do when you and your roommate are media-loving computer geeks? Why, turn your mutual living room into a mecca of computing and media magic, of course!</p>
<hr>
<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8" src="http://static.polldaddy.com/p/2405117.js">
</script><noscript><br>
<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/2405117/">Best Featured Workspace of 2009?</a><span style="font-size:9px;">(<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com">answers</a>)</span><br></noscript>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://lifehacker.com/5428746/most-popular-featured-workspaces-of-2009]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5428746]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[best of 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[desk]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[desktop]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[featured workspace]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[workspace]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[workspace show and tell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[workspaces]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 18 Dec 2009 20:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Fitzpatrick]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5428746&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[10 Strange Gadget Situations Caught on Camera]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p>It's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/pst/tgif/">Friday</a>. You've got the weekend and, chances are, a short week coming up. Life is good. Let's celebrate by kicking back and enjoying some gadget hilarity.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/greatest_iphone.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_greatest_iphone.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>World's Greatest iPhone: The image of the iPhone above is obviously a shop, but YouTube, Weather and Safari still have me laughing months later. [<a href="http://i.imgur.com/OBKyC.jpg">igmur</a> via <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5302578/this-iphone-is-freakin-hilarious">Link</a>]<br>
<script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("bigdogbeta_gizmodo.flv", 520, 410,"");
</script><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/bigdogbeta_gizmodo.flv.jpg"></a>Beta Version of BigDog Quadrupled Robot: Needless to say, the beta version of Boston Dynamics' <a href="http://gizmodo.com/368651/new-video-of-bigdog-quadruped-robot-is-so-stunning-its-spooky">BigDog</a> was rather primitive. You have Peter Furia, David Fine and Beau Lewis of <a href="http://seedwell.com/">Seedwell Marketing</a> to thank for this hilarious spoof. [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/372272/video-of-bigdog-beta-quadruped-robot-is-so-stupid-its-hilarious">Link</a>]</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/zombiesahead.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_zombiesahead.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Road Sign Hacking: It's illegal to hack a road sign, but the control boxes are rarely protected. Unfortunately, that makes pranking easy, which will lead people to ignore warnings when there is an actual zombie outbreak. [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5136970/hacking-road-signs-is-frightningly-easy-and-funny-and-illegal">Link</a>]</p>
<p><object id="mbox_player_0096dabe111de2c88f" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="320" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_4"><param name="movie" value="http://bg-video.cp.motionbox.com/motionboxons/flash/VideoPlayer.swf?video_uid=0096dabe111de2c88f&type=sd&security_token=prod3.02a5c966e4f4516b">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always">
<embed name="mbox_player_0096dabe111de2c88f" src="http://bg-video.cp.motionbox.com/motionboxons/flash/VideoPlayer.swf?video_uid=0096dabe111de2c88f&type=sd&security_token=prod3.02a5c966e4f4516b" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="320" allowscriptaccess="always" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object><br>
What Happens When You Bring a 22-Year Old Mac to a Genius Bar? <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5406566/what-happens-when-you-bring-a-22+year+old-mac-to-the-genius-bar">Our own Adam Frucci finds out</a>.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/squirrel-portrait-banff-sw.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_squirrel-portrait-banff-sw.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Squirrel Photo Crasher: Surely you recall seeing this image when it hit big a few months back. Many thought it was a fake, but it turns out that all the couple needed to score their 15-minutes was a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/pst/gorillapod/">Gorillapod</a>, a camera and some luck. [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5340188/the-story-of-the-hilarious-photo-crasher-squirrel">Link</a>]</p>
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/a07W2t2wcRA&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/a07W2t2wcRA&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object>HSN Wiimote Mishap: There have been plenty of videos of Wiimote-related incidents over the years, but it's even funnier when it happens on live television. [<a href="http://kotaku.com/5384471/ok-this-wiimote-mishap-were-calling-not-fake">Kotaku</a>]</p>
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_1"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/jrBaV5MvX_4&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/jrBaV5MvX_4&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object>Fart Machine Grinds Government to a Halt: A kid brings down city council meeting with mechanical farts. Amusing, but I bet this could be a serious weapon in a fillibuster. [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5166765/kid-uses-fart-machine-in-city-council-meeting-government-grinds-to-a-hilarious-halt">Link</a>]</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/bsod_nest_main2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_bsod_nest_main2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Gold Medal BSOD: The dreaded <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/bsod/">Blue Screen of Death</a> can strike anywhere&mdash;even at the opening ceremonies of the Olympics. [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5035456/blue-screen-of-death-strikes-birds-nest-during-opening-ceremonies-torch-lighting">Link</a>]</p>
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_2"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/np5r-gYso5w&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/np5r-gYso5w&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object>Office Camouflage: I'm not sure what the hell they are saying, but the funny still gets across. [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5345013/hilarious-video-shows-perfect-office-camouflage-techniques">Link</a>]</p>
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_3"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hqC2URQstz4&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hqC2URQstz4&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object>Forklift Catastrophe: It's only funny now because no one got hurt, but damn. Destroying $250,000 worth of vodka with a little fender bender is a sign that you need to update the shelving system in the warehouse. [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5395292/why-you-should-always-be-careful-while-using-a-forklift">Link</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5429632/10-strange-gadget-situations-caught-on-camera/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5429632]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[tgif]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[videos]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5429632&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Avatar Review: Yes, It Changed Everything After All]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_avatar13.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Put simply, Avatar is the most visually fantastic film I've ever seen. It will be hailed as the groundbreaking 3D release of its time while setting a new standard by which all blockbusters are measured. Yes, it's that good.</p>

<p>I'm not going to talk about plot (or that I thought to myself, <em>Dances with Wolves</em> in space more than once). I'm not going to talk about dialog or pacing (or that the limited narration was totally unnecessary). There are other reviews, more reviewy type reviews, that have all that covered. I'm not going to spoil anything, either. Heck, I'm not even going to talk about <em>Avatar</em>...not just yet.<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_avatar12.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
I want to talk about <em>Jurassic Park</em>.</p>
<p><em>Jurassic Park</em> was the first movie I remember being excited to an unhealthily obsessive level. My dad, a huge Michael Crichton fan, did his best to tempt my young self into reading the full-out book. So he told me a sort of good parts version, filling my head with tales of dinosaur resurrection from amber dug up deep in the Earth, all while I would do my best to get more and more out of him without actually having to crack open a book.</p>
<p>So when I heard <em>Jurassic Park</em> was becoming a movie, not only did that dash any chance of me reading the story, but I literally could not fathom a world in which I'd be patient enough to wait to see it (not that I had any other option). I mean, dinosaurs, theme parks, and terror? <em>Jurassic Park</em> was biologically engineered for young boys.</p>
<p>All of this is nice background, but my point is simpler. When I saw those dinosaurs on screen, knowing that, in many cases, they'd been modeled purely by computers&mdash;<em>computers!</em>&mdash;I felt like anything was possible. Yes, it's a cliche feeling. That's actually why I'm sharing it. Because ultimately, we all have that movie&mdash;be it <em>Star Wars</em> or <em>Terminator</em> or whatever&mdash;that movie we actually felt a bit humbled, even challenged, watching because it was was an amuse-bouche of the future, even if a bit cheesy at heart.</p>
<p><em>Avatar</em> is that movie for the new generation.</p>
<p>I don't expect you to believe me if you haven't seen the film yet. I, myself, was a huge skeptic until a few hours ago. Blue people? Papyrus font?? What the fuck happened to dinosaurs and light sabers and killer robots from the future? Did we use all the cool stuff up?<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_avatar5.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
But about 30 minutes in to the film, you realize that the marketing has <em>undersold</em> the movie. In an era when every great moment of a film makes its way to a trailer, <em>Avatar</em> surprised me with an endless amount of unparalleled optical overload. Every single shot is just so full of detail that you literally open your eyes wider to take as much in as you can before each cut.<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_avatar11.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
Gizmodo readers will love the tech, especially as that about 50% of the film's budget apparently went to rendering badass 3D curved displays and absurdly awesome cockpits. But sequences from Pandora's woods at night...let's just say they're the first luminescent <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #visualeffects" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/visualeffects/">visual effects</a> I've seen that made 1982's Tron look like a 27-year-old movie.<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/avatar-still-2.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_avatar-still-2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
Also, while shots of the Na'vi (the blue dudes) clearly deviate from a 50/50 balance between real footage and CGI depending on the scene, their body animation, even for motion capture, is unparalleled. While their faces and eyes especially can appear a tad cartoony at times, the overall effect is not done justice by YouTube trailers or that shot pasted above. Call the effect hyperreal or even unreal, but it's certainly doesn't look "fake." I don't know that I've ever witnessed complete humanoid models move so realistically, especially given their exposure (in both screen time and skin).<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_avatar6.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
Of course, <em>Avatar</em>'s 3D is the basis of my obnoxious zeal for the aesthetics. I viewed the film in a full-sized IMAX theater. And while I knew that a fair share of missiles would fly off the screen (and ZOMG the mechs look <em>amazing</em>), I couldn't have expected the sheer tangibility that 3D&mdash;what I once supposed a gimmick&mdash;added to the experience. I mean, I saw <em>textures</em> in this film that I've never seen in a movie before, like wet, rubbery skin on the wildcats of Pandora that made people around me gasp more than once. There's a more understated moment, too, when Sam Worthington shaves and you realize, wow, stubble is pretty remarkable in 3D. The jagged hairs bring a level of humanity to his character, adding something unexpectedly corporeal to what's really a 30-foot-tall head in closeup.</p>
<p>So yes, 3D is more than a gimmick. The glasses are still a pain, but 3D is here to stay.</p>
<p><em>Avatar</em> doesn't handle this new technology perfectly, however, and I hope that other filmmakers learn from its mistakes. Especially early in the film during shots in close quarters, the direction allowed many objects to break frame (think of a person walking from one end of the screen to the other). For my untrained eyes, seeing a figure go from 2D to 3D to 2D was not only distracting, it was tiring. And the same can be said for a constantly shifting depth of field&mdash;based upon where the camera is focusing, you'll need to figure out whether to look deep into the screen or right in front of you.<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_avatar4.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
An out of focus shoulder breaking the corner of the frame is pretty much the worst implementation of 3D I could imagine. Luckily, the forest sequences that make up the majority of the film seemed to have been planned with a wider depth of field&mdash;more of the shot is in focus.</p>
<p>After 2 1/2 hours in the theater, I am exhausted far more than the same amount of time playing an FPS would make me, but <em>Avatar</em> was so remarkable that it was well-worth the work of watching it.</p>
<p>I still can't imagine popping on a pair of glasses to watch the evening news after a long day of work, and I sympathized for the guy sitting beside me as he started rubbing his eyes about halfway through. As someone with a slight uncorrected astigmatism, my left eye was ready to fall out of its socket by the final climactic sequence.<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_avatar7.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
But as viewers, we'll adapt to the new tech. And as technicians, Hollywood will learn the rules of 3D as it writes them.</p>
<p>So for now, I'm not quite ready to see every piece of the world's media in 3D. But <em>Avatar</em>? Yeah, I'll be seeing it again...and maybe again...just in hopes of absorbing a bit more of the visual splendor.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5429424/avatar-review-yes-it-changed-everything-after-all]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5429424]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3d]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[avatar]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[avatar review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[james cameron]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[special effects]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[visual effects]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 18 Dec 2009 11:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5429424&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
					
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Most Popular Featured Desktops of 2009]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_desktops-500x300-12-pic-grid.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Our readers have submitted thousands of screenshots of their best desktop configurations, and over the year we've featured some truly impressive and unique desktops with you. Here's a look back at some of the best this year had to offer.</p>

<p>Just like the <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5104423/most-popular-desktops-of-2008">most popular desktops in 2008</a>, this list is comprised by the popularity of the post in 2009. You can click through to the original post for details regarding how each user put together his/her killer desktop. So check out the top 13 featured desktops below, including Enigma, the one that started off the year with a bang.</p>
<h3>The Enigma 2.0 Desktop</h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/enigma26.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_enigma26.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
The updated Enigma Desktop set the tone for the entire year&mdash;it all started with the <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5158878/">first 2.0 version being released with an installer</a>, followed with <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5332071/rainmeter-10-brings-the-enigma-desktop-to-everyone">Rainmeter 1.0 bringing the Enigma desktop to everyone</a> as the default theme, and then the year came to a close with <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5398094/rainmeter-11-makes-the-enigma-desktop-even-easier-to-use">Rainmeter 1.1 making it even easier to use</a> with tools that let you modify your theme without mucking around in code. <em>Impressive work, Kaelri!</em></p>
<h3><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5288658/the-starlight-desktop">The Starlight Desktop</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/starlight.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_starlight.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The Reader rykennedyan's Starlight desktop was far and away the most popular single desktop of 2009, and with a beautiful wallpaper like that, it's not hard to understand what drew readers in&mdash;but the theme had much more going on, with an entire set of launchers and system information in a bar at the bottom of the screen.</p>
<h3><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5297193/the-halo-3-hud-desktop">The Halo 3 HUD Desktop</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/halo3.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_halo3.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
Barely a week went by after the amazing Starlight desktop before rykennedyan blew us all away again by transforming his desktop into an impressive recreation of the popular Halo 3 first-person shooter, complete with system stats and information blended into the screen.</p>
<h3><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5194159/the-spidermac-desktop">The SpiderMac Desktop</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/spidermac1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_spidermac1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
Reader zackshackleton's desktop took a comic book panel and blended the system stats right into the conversation bubbles, making one of the most fun desktops we've seen all year&mdash;and sparking a wave of desktops with stats integrated directly into unlikely background images.</p>
<h3><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5170413/the-windows-2019-desktop">The Windows 2019 Desktop</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/2019-1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_2019-1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
Reader <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/painkilla05/">Painkilla05's</a> stylish desktop was inspired from a <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5163177/remains-of-the-day-a-glimpse-at-2019">Microsoft research video</a> showing what computer interfaces might look like in the year 2019, with system stats and information wrapped around the sides of the screen&mdash;just like they might be on a futuristic tablet.</p>
<h3><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5161303/the-stars-memory-desktop">The Star's Memory Desktop</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/starsmemory1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_starsmemory1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Reader Chaebi69 took the Enigma desktop customization, transformed it with an artistic wallpaper, and blended the whole thing together into one of the first great looking desktops of the year&mdash;and it didn't hurt that he included the Hulk.</p>
<h3><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5216876/the-lcars-for-mac-desktop">The LCARS for Mac Desktop</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/lcars1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_lcars1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
What desktop nerd-fest would be complete without at least one LCARS desktop? Reader momoses answered the call for one of the most often-requested customizations and turned his Mac into a lookalike for the computer display in Star Trek: The Next Generation.</p>
<h3><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5169473/the-gothic-century-desktop">The Gothic Century Desktop</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/gothiccentury.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_gothiccentury.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Reader chaebi69 continued his artistic flair with this stunning display of useful information blended perfectly into a simple wallpaper. Between the vertical calendar, customized dock, and Century Gothic font, it was an amazing theme that fit together extremely well.</p>
<h3><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5271632/the-os-x-alpha-geek-desktop">The OS X Alpha Geek Desktop</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/osxalphageekdesktop1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_osxalphageekdesktop1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>If there was a prize for the nerdiest desktop, there's no question at all that reader Andreas would win, and while it's not the most beautiful desktop in the world, the incredible amount of information that he was able to pack into one screen is simply amazing.</p>
<h3><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5280484/the-minimalist-os-x-desktop">The Minimalist OS X Desktop</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/minimalistosx.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_minimalistosx.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
Reader нawk went an entirely different route&mdash;instead of overloading the screen with loads of information, he stuck with a simple wallpaper and just the important system stats, ending up with a clean, minimalistic look that sparked a wave of minimal desktops.</p>
<h3><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5402431/the-gaia-desktop">The Gaia Desktop</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/gaiadesktop2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_gaiadesktop2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The Gaia desktop suite transformed reader Sweetshop Union's Windows 7 desktop with widgets, wallpaper, Rainmeter, and a visual style to match, resulting in a polished, unique, and beautiful overall look.</p>
<h3><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5202999/the-retro-enigma-desktop">The Retro Enigma Desktop</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/retrodesktop1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_retrodesktop1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Reader Cody took the Enigma desktop customization and combined it with a retro vector wallpaper to make a slick, colorful, and completely awesome theme.</p>
<h3><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5197489/the-neon-rings-desktop">The Neon Rings Desktop</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/neonrings1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_neonrings1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
Reader TDuck's OS X desktop was all about the beautiful wallpaper image, but if you look closely you'll see that he blended circular system information graphs right into the slick overall theme.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8" src="http://static.polldaddy.com/p/2400692.js">
</script><noscript><br>
<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/2400692/">Which Is Your Favorite Featured Desktop of 2009?</a><span style="font-size:9px;">(<a href="http://www.polldaddy.com">survey software</a>)</span><br></noscript></p>
<p>Have a favorite featured desktop from 2009 that wasn't featured here? Let's hear about it in the comments.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://lifehacker.com/5429064/most-popular-featured-desktops-of-2009]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5429064]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[best of 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[customization]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[desktops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[featured desktop]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[icons]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[skins]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[themes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wallpaper]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 17 Dec 2009 20:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[The How-To Geek]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5429064&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[It's OK. I Love My Old Gear, Too]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_old_gadgets_polaroid_tiles.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />You'd think a guy who writes about tech all day would have the latest and greatest gear. Confession time: I don't. In fact, most of it's pretty old and I sort of like it that way.</p>
<p>The winter months are the hardest time to not want <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5413982/mind-your-wallet">new stuff</a>. We're inundated with sales, and in a few short weeks we'll be ogling next year's tech at CES. As the resident Gizmodo "no I won't upgrade my PowerBook" curmudgeon, I'm here for support. Take a look at the gear I use, and how despite its age, all (well, most of) it has plenty of life left.</p>
<h2>I Call Him FrankenPod</h2>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_ipod_miniold_gadgets2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />No, you're not seeing things. The image above is indeed a picture of my primary media player, and yes, it is an <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #ipodmini" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ipodmini/">iPod mini</a>.</p>
<p>Go ahead, get the Borat jokes out of your system.</p>
<p>Done? Okay, now hear me out. Don't judge a book by its cover. As far as I'm concerned, this little guy can blow away nearly any other MP3 player on the market.</p>
<p>Under the hood, I swapped the 6GB microdrive with a 16GB Compact Flash card. I can easily change it out for a 32 or a 64GB card once prices come down. It's also running what I consider to be the most feature-rich firmware around, <a href="http://www.rockbox.org/">Rockbox</a>. What looks like a beat-up iPod mini is actually a robust, nearly indestructible flash-based portable audio player, all built for a fraction of what a new one costs.</p>
<p>The mini isn't the only old iPod that's easily moddable. Considering about 118% of the United States' population has an old iPod lying around somewhere by now, chances are you've got what you need for a <a href="http://geektechnique.org/projectlab/753/how-to-turn-your-ipod-mini-into-a-flash-based-ipod">fun weekend project</a>. Even if your heart's set on the Zune HD's OLED display or the Touch's app catalog, some love and a little elbow grease can breathe old life into that old iPod, and give you a great secondary PMP.</p>
<h2>The Little Computer that Could</h2>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_powerbookg4oldgadgets.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />When I walked into Gizmodo HQ on my first day, I was nervous. Some of that anxiety was the new job jitters, but I was mostly afraid that my 12" PowerBook wouldn't cut it. Gizmodo moves fast, and my aging machine certainly doesn't. I was on the verge of upgrading, but decided to see how my old hardware fared before taking the plunge.</p>
<p>Long story short: It did the job. Barely. But through compromise, I made it work. I love Firefox and all of its extensions, but Safari runs at half the resource load. Photoshop Elements does what I need without the huge footprint of CS. With a little thought as to what applications I was running, which ones I didn't need, and where I was willing to compromise, my plucky PowerBook and I made it through the summer.</p>
<p>As much as I love the little guy, it's not like I haven't thought about replacing him. I almost pulled the trigger on a new MacBook last month. At the last minute I decided that instead of buying a computer that would last me 2-3 years, I wanted another that could feasibly last for 4+. Whenever that computer comes out, I'll probably bite, but until then I'm happy squeezing a little extra life out of my aging hardware.</p>
<p>Look at how you use your computer. If you're rendering all day, never leave Photoshop, or doing any other heavy computing and you <i>need</i> the speed, then upgrade. But the rest of us can probably hold off a little longer, even tech-obsessed gadget bloggers.</p>
<h2>Nice Peeling Chrome Paint, Dude</h2>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_chocolate3old.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />I'm fairly certain I'm the only writer at Gizmodo without a smartphone. Yes, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5279250/dumb-cellphones-must-die">dumbphones must die</a>, and someday I will upgrade this one. But for now, it makes calls, texts, and even has an almost acceptable music player built in that works in a pinch. Google services run surprisingly well in a WAP browser, too, so I can get email and read my RSS feeds when necessary.</p>
<p>Would I love to have a smartphone? Sure. (Hey Brian Lam and Jason Chen, skip down a few sentences) But it's also really nice to be disconnected sometimes. My Gizmodo email account receives a <i>very</i> steady stream of emails, to say the least. I like being able to walk away from the computer and cut myself off every once in a while, without my phone constantly reminding me that there's work to be done (Okay overlords, you can read on from here).</p>
<h2>Just Because it's Old Doesn't Mean it Sounds Worse</h2>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_stereo_old_gadgets2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />No, this stereo doesn't do DTS-HD Master Audio. It has zero HDMI ports. But it still does 2-channel audio pretty well, more than well enough for what I need it to do.</p>
<p>Repurposing old stereo equipment is one of the best ways to build a great system on the cheap. The turntable and receiver are my dad's old gear, coupled with a pair of speakers I yanked off of a CD player I've had since I was 14. The setup won't win me any audiophile cred, but it definitely does a much-better-than-OK job at playing music.</p>
<p>Not to mention that it's pretty cool to listen on the same equipment my dad once used. When I was 17, I found his old record collection in the basement and immediately started spinning it on his long-forgotten turntable. Call me corny, but I think it's pretty awesome to know that 30-some years ago he was listening to the same records on the same deck.</p>
<p>If you aren't lucky enough to have access to your parents' old stereo equipment, it's not uncommon to find some real gems at your local thrift shop on the cheap, tossed away by someone who thought McIntosh is a cheap Apple knock-off.</p>
<h2>Okay, so Maybe I Want to Upgrade Some of It</h2>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_tv_old_gadgets.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />I do have one thing that I desperately want, and will upgrade to soon: an HDTV. I've never owned anything besides tube TVs under 20 inches. The fact that flat-panel prices are finally reasonable, combined with the digital switchover makes it prime time for me to jump the CRT ship.</p>
<p>I want to say that it always makes sense to hold onto your old TV after you upgrade, but in this case it might not. Television sets were at their saturation point well before HDTVs came along. In 2009 there were <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/more-than-half-the-homes-in-us-have-three-or-more-tvs/">more TVs per household than people</a>. By now it's likely that you just don't have room for a fourth or twelfth tube anywhere.</p>
<p>If you find yourself needing to dispose of an aging TV, please do so properly. Donate it. Sell it on Craigslist. Or look into electronics recycling centers in your area. An old TV may not have a place in your house or apartment, but it might find a place in someone else's home. It certainly doesn't belong in a landfill.</p>
<h2>See? I'm Not a Total Luddite</h2>
<p>I might roll with old stuff, but I'm not some sort of quasi-neo-luddite. Plenty of other gadgets in my arsenal are much more recent than what you see here. I have a PS3, my music gets fed to my stereo through a Squeezebox, and I do have another receiver that handles multichannel audio, albeit a relatively cheap and older one (and in case you're wondering, I did take these pictures with a DSLR, but it's not mine).</p>
<p>So yes, even I don't always live by the "never upgrade" mentality. Planned obsolescence and the industry's fast pace make it impossible to live by that creed. But I also think that a lot of the time we feel "forced" to upgrade we're really being driven by gadget lust, that powerful desire which makes us overlook the benefits of using old stuff.</p>
<p>Here's what I always think about when that ol' familiar "gotta have it" feeling hits. The biggest and most obvious perk: buy new stuff less often, save money. I don't know about you, but if I walk away from a big purchase, I feel like I've won. It's like trapping money that was trying to escape from my bank account. And if you've got a bit of the tree-hugging hippy spirit in you, you'll feel good about cutting down on your e-waste output, even if only by a little bit.</p>
<p>Not to mention the freedom old gear provides. I imagine it's similar to the feeling of operating the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/t/rover">Mars rovers</a>. I know that my gadgets have gone far beyond their planned mission length, so I throw them around without caring if they get damaged. And once that old gear inevitably goes belly up, I'll feel no remorse upgrading something that lasted for so long.</p>
<p>But that doesn't mean I won't be sad to lose my gadgets. I've heard other tech junkies say that we should never fall in love with technology, because we'll just end up heartbroken when it's time to say goodbye. In my opinion, that emotional connection is exactly what we need nowadays. If we all try to love our gadgets, to start treating them more like companions than disposable tools, a lot more perfectly good gear could be saved from an untimely retirement.</p>
<p>I know more than a few of you out there are eyeing some new toys for the holidays. I am too. But before we let upgraditis get the best of us, let's consider what we already have. Maybe it's still good enough. Maybe there's a new part that could make our gadgets better and provide a fun modding project to boot. Take it from me: There's almost always some way to squeeze extra life out of old gear.</p>
<p>Now, if you'll excuse me, there's an old Dell tower around here somewhere that's begging to become a NAS.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5422023/its-ok-i-love-my-old-gear-too]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5422023]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[old gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[audio]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod mini]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lg chocolate]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[powerbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[powerbook g4]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[stereo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:40:03 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5422023&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Rainn Wilson on His Nikon DSLR Short Film, and Why Dwight Would Taste Banhammer]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/screen_shot_2009-12-16_at_1.24.45_pm.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_screen_shot_2009-12-16_at_1.24.45_pm.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #rainnwilson" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/rainnwilson/">Rainn Wilson</a>, best known for playing Dwight Schrute on</em> <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #theoffice" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/theoffice/">The Office</a><em>, shot a 140-second film using a Nikon D5000 as part of his participation in the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5401038/nikons-twitter+inspired-digital-film-festival-will-feature-ashton-kutcher-and-dwight-schrute">Nikon Film Festival</a>. He talked with us about directing, pancakes and solar-powered deer-meat grinders.</em></p>
<p><em>Rainn is one of three judges in the inaugural <a href="http://www.nikonfestival.com/">Twitter-themed Nikon Festival</a>, in which people submit 140-second videos in the hopes of winning a $100,000 prize. Here's Rainn's own video&mdash;not a contest entry, naturally&mdash;which he made using just an <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5234607/canon-rebel-t1i-vs-nikon-d5000-entry+level-dslr-battlemodo">entry-level DSLR</a>:</em></p>
<p><em><object width="500" height="280" data="http://www.nikonfestival.com/wp-content/plugins/VydioPlayer/vp_assets/player.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" bgcolor="#000000"><param name="flashvars" value="postID=964&amp;services=http://www.nikonfestival.com/blog/2009/11/10/rainn-wilson/&amp;autostart=false">
<param name="src" value="http://www.nikonfestival.com/wp-content/plugins/VydioPlayer/vp_assets/player.swf">
<param name="allowfullscreen" value="true">
<param name="wmode" value="transparent">
<embed src="http://www.nikonfestival.com/wp-content/plugins/VydioPlayer/vp_assets/player.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" bgcolor="#000000" flashvars="postID=964&amp;services=http://www.nikonfestival.com/blog/2009/11/10/rainn-wilson/&amp;autostart=false" wmode="transparent" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="280"></embed></object></em></p>
<p><em>In your 140-second film, you scatter pancakes on the ground in the shape of an eye, taunt a rocking horse, and play yourself in ping-pong. Were you worried about making a film that's such transparent Oscar-bait?</em></p>
<p>I was, I was a little bit. You know, there's kind of a formula for winning an Oscar and I pretty much followed it to a tee. The only things I left out were someone dying of a debilitating illness and a lot of, like, tracking shots at an airport.</p>
<p><em>You're an actor, writer and Twitterer, so it seems like this festival is a pretty good fit&mdash;but what about this particular festival most appealed to you?</em></p>
<p>One thing I'm all for, in all seriousness, is, in this age of minutia, where anyone can post their domes on their websites or on YouTube, where digital cameras take high-def video, is to democratize the filmmaking art. Instead of filmmaking being this realm of people who went to top film schools and knew the right people, now it's open to everyone. All you need is a camera that you can buy at your local Best Buy, a good idea and some visual talent for storytelling, and you can win a real prize.</p>
<p><em>Hypothetical question: What would you say is a reasonable amount of money to slip a judge in, say, a digital short film festival, to ensure a win? Purely hypothetical, remember.</em></p>
<p>I can guarantee anyone a win for $99,000. You could walk away with $1,000. American. Just slip me 99 grand and it's yours.</p>
<p><em>You've achieved pretty amazing success in the past few years, with a breakout role on a hit sitcom, the leading role in a movie, and a bunch of memorable cameos. Were you upset when MTV chose iJustine over you to be the official Twitter correspondent of the 2009 Video Music Awards?</em></p>
<p>Upset is the understatement of the century. I was devastated. My world was rocked. I have more Twitter followers, I'm better known, and I have a MUCH better body.</p>
<p><em>Your spirituality-discussion website is called SoulPancake, and pancakes are also featured in your 140-second film. What can you tell us about your relationship with pancakes?</em></p>
<p>You know, I'm trying to get over a primal wound. When I was a child, I was raped by a pancake.</p>
<p><em>My followup question was if you had any favorite pancake recipes you want to share, but now it seems like kind of a sore topic.</em></p>
<p>Yeah, very sore. But I'd have to go with the walnut-cranberry.</p>
<p><em>That's a good one.</em></p>
<p>Pumpkin. Lemon.</p>
<p><em>So…</em></p>
<p>Caramel... Pancakes.</p>
<p><em>Your 140-second film is really well shot and fun to look at&mdash;did you direct it yourself?</em></p>
<p>I directed it in collaboration with a friend of mine, Joshua Homnick. We've collaborated on a bunch of things; we're actually working on a new media project for Microsoft Zune and Xbox. [Joshua is] a great filmmaker, photographer, and editor; I couldn't have done it without him.</p>
<p><em>Are you interested in maybe directing an episode of</em> The Office<em>, like Steve Carell did?</em></p>
<p>Yeah. John Krasinski directs one in the spring and supposedly I'll be directing one pretty soon. So get ready for that. I'm gonna put Carell through his paces. I'm gonna be like, "Man, uh-uh, not good enough. Not funny enough. Try again, make me laugh. Cut! What are you thinking, Carell? Come on, magic man, show me what you got!"</p>
<p><em>Do you think Dwight would read Gizmodo? I ask because it sometimes seems like some of our commenters are channeling him.</em></p>
<p>Dwight would definitely be on Gizmodo, but he'd be the guy on the comment board who always writes "first." He'd always be in a race to write first. He'd be "The First Guy."</p>
<p><em>After seeing the joy that Dwight took in his Christmas present this year, a nutcracker he built himself, I'm curious: What would Dwight's favorite gadgets be? Are any of them from this century?</em></p>
<p>That's an excellent question. I think Dwight would enjoy updating industrial gadgets from the last century for the modern world. For instance, he might have, like, a deer sausage grinder, but solar powered.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5428149/rainn-wilson-on-his-nikon-dslr-short-film-and-why-dwight-would-taste-banhammer]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5428149]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[interview]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nikon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nikon festival]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rainn wilson]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rainn wilson interview]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the office]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5428149&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Physics of Space Battles]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_spacebattlebig_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><i>Joseph Shoer is a Ph.D. candidate in aerospace engineering, studying how modular spacecraft could be assembled, and hoping that they will be the telescopes and human exploration vehicles of the future, and not for crushing the dreams of Martian colonists.</i></p>
<p>I had a discussion recently with friends about the various depictions of space combat in science fiction movies, TV shows, and books. We have the fighter-plane engagements of Star Wars, the subdued, two-dimensional naval combat in Star Trek, the Newtonian planes of Battlestar Galactica, the staggeringly furious energy exchanges of the combat wasps in Peter Hamilton's books, and the use of antimatter rocket engines themselves as weapons in other sci-fi. But suppose we get out there, go terraform Mars, and the Martian colonists actually revolt. Or suppose we encounter hostile aliens. How would space combat actually go?</p>
<p>First, let me point out something that Ender's Game got right and something it got wrong. What it got right is the essentially three-dimensional nature of space combat, and how that would be fundamentally different from land, sea, and air combat. In principle, yes, your enemy could come at you from any direction at all. In practice, though, the Buggers are going to do no such thing. At least, not until someone invents an FTL drive, and we can actually pop our battle fleets into existence anywhere near our enemies. The marauding space fleets are going to be governed by orbit dynamics – not just of their own ships in orbit around planets and suns, but those planets' orbits. For the same reason that we have Space Shuttle launch delays, we'll be able to tell exactly what trajectories our enemies could take between planets: the launch window. At any given point in time, there are only so many routes from here to Mars that will leave our imperialist forces enough fuel and energy to put down the colonists' revolt. So, it would actually make sense to build space defense platforms in certain orbits, to point high-power radar-reflection surveillance satellites at certain empty reaches of space, or even to mine parts of the void. It also means that strategy is not as hopeless when we finally get to the Bugger homeworld: the enemy ships will be concentrated into certain orbits, leaving some avenues of attack guarded and some open. (Of course, once our ships maneuver towards those unguarded orbits, they will be easily observed – and potentially countered.)</p>
<h1>Now, Let's Talk Technology</h1>
<p>First, pending a major development in propulsion technology, combat spacecraft would likely get around the same way the Apollo spacecraft went to the Moon and back: with orbit changes effected by discrete main-engine burns. The only other major option is a propulsion system like ion engines or solar sails, which produce a very low amount of thrust over a very long time. However, the greater speed from burning a chemical, nuclear, or antimatter rocket in a single maneuver is likely a better tactical option. One implication of rocket propulsion is that there will be relatively long periods during which Newtonian physics govern the motions of dogfighting spacecraft, punctuated by relatively short periods of maneuvering. Another is that combat in orbit would be very different from combat in "deep space," which is what you probably think of as how space combat should be – where a spacecraft thrusts one way, and then keeps going that way forever. No, around a planet, the tactical advantage in a battle would be determined by orbit dynamics: which ship is in a lower (and faster) orbit than which; who has a circular orbit and who has gone for an ellipse; relative rendezvous trajectories that look like winding spirals rather than straight lines.</p>
<p>Second, there are only a few ways to maneuver the attitude of a spacecraft around – to point it in a new direction. The fast ways to do that are to fire an off-center thruster or to tilt a gyroscope around to generate a torque. Attitude maneuvers would be critical to point the main engine of a space fighter to set up for a burn, or to point the weapons systems at an enemy. Either way, concealing the attitude maneuvers of the space fighter would be important to gain a tactical advantage. So I think gyroscopes ("CMGs," in the spacecraft lingo) would be a better way to go – they could invisibly live entirely within the space fighter hull, and wouldn't need to be mounted on any long booms (which would increase the radar, visible, and physical cross-section of the fighter) to get the most torque on the craft. With some big CMGs, a spacecraft could flip end-for-end in a matter of seconds or less. If you come upon a starfighter with some big, spherical bulbs near the midsection, they are probably whopping big CMGs and the thing will be able to point its guns at you wherever you go. To mitigate some of the directionality of things like weapons fire and thruster burns, space fighters would probably have weapons and engines mounted at various points around their hull; but a culture interested in efficiently mass-producing space warships would probably be concerned about manufacturing so many precision parts for a relatively fragile vessel, and the craft would likely only have one main engine rather than, say, four equal tetrahedral engines.</p>
<h1>How About Weapons?</h1>
<p>We have to consider just how you might damage a spacecraft to put it out of action.</p>
<p>Explosions are basically a waste of energy in space. On the ground, these are devastating because of the shock wave that goes along with them. But in the vacuum of space, an explosion just creates some tenuous, expanding gases that would be easily dissipated by a hull. No, to damage spacecraft systems, you can't hit them with gas unless it's really, really concentrated and energetic. So unless you want to just wait till your enemy is close enough that you can point your engines at him, the best bets for ranged weapons are kinetic impactors and radiation.</p>
<p>A kinetic impactor is basically just a slug that goes really fast and hits the enemy fighter, tearing through the hull, damaging delicate systems with vibrations, throwing gyroscopes out of alignment so that they spin into their enclosures and explode into shards, puncturing tanks of fuel and other consumables, or directly killing the pilot and crew. You know…bullets. But it sounds much more technical and science-fictiony to say "mass driver" or "kinetic lance" or something of the sort. Of course, the simplest way to implement this sort of weapon in space is just as some kind of machine gun or cannon. Those will work in space (ask the Soviets, they tested a cannon on their first Salyut space station), and the shells will do plenty of damage if they hit anything. However, space is filled mostly with empty space, and hitting the enemy ships might be a challenge. Furthermore, if the impactors are too large, the enemy could counter them by firing their own point-defense slugs and knocking the shells out of line. Therefore, I contend that the most effective kinetic space weapons would be either flak shells or actively thrusting, guided missiles. The flak shells would explode into a hail of fragmented shards, able to tear through un-armored systems of many craft at once without the shell directly hitting its target, or able to strike a target even after it tries to evade with a last-minute engine burn. The missiles would be a bit different from the missiles we are used to on Earth, which must continuously thrust to sustain flight. In space, such a weapon would rapidly exhaust its fuel and simply become a dummy shell. No, a space missile would either be fired as an unguided projectile and power up its engine after drifting most of the way to its target, or it would fire its engine in sporadic, short bursts. A definite downside to kinetic weapons on a starfighter is that they would impart momentum to the fighter or change its mass properties. Very large cannons or missiles might therefore be impractical, unless the fighter can quickly compensate for what is essentially a large rocket firing. Even that compensation might give the enemy just the window he needs…</p>
<p>Radiation-based weapons that burn out the electronics of a spacecraft sound exotic, but are still potentially achievable. This would be the attraction of nuclear weapons in space: not the explosion, which would affect just about nothing, but the burst of energetic particles and the ensuing electromagnetic storm. Still, such a burst would have to be either pretty close to the target vessel to scramble its systems, or it would have to be made directional in some way, to focus the gamma-ray and zinging-proton blast. But while we're talking about focused energy weapons, lets just go with a tool that we already use to cut sheet metal on Earth: lasers. In space, laser light will travel almost forever without dissipating from diffraction. Given a large enough power supply, lasers could be used at range to slice up enemy warships. The key phrase there, though, is "given a large enough power supply." Power is hard to come by in the space business. So, expect space laser weapons to take one of three forms: small lasers designed not to destroy, but to blind and confuse enemy sensors; medium-sized lasers that would be fired infrequently and aimed to melt specific vulnerable points on enemy space fighters, like antennae, gimbals, and maneuvering thrusters; and large lasers pumped by the discharge from a large capacitor or similar energy storage device to cut a physical slice into the enemy craft wherever they hit. Such a large weapon would likely only be fired at the very beginning of a battle, because the commander of a ship with such a weapon would not want to keep his capacitor charged when it might unexpectedly blow its energy all at once once he's in the thick of things.</p>
<p>Deflector shields like those in fiction are not possible at present, but it would still make sense to armor combat spacecraft to a limited extent. The spaceframes of the fighters would likely be designed solely for the space environment; the actual ships would be launched within the payload fairings of a rocket or assembled in space. If launched from the ground, armor must be minimized to reduce the launch weight of the spacecraft. But if built and launched in space, it would make sense to plate over vital systems of the vehicle. Thick armor would prevent flak or small lasers from piercing delicate components, and might mitigate a direct strike from a kinetic impactor or heavy cutting laser. However, the more heavily armored and massive a space fighter is, the more thrust it will take to maneuver in orbit and the more energy it will take to spin in place. (Here's where computer games get space combat all wrong: the mass of a huge space cruiser would not place an upper limit on the speed of a vehicle, but it would reduce the acceleration a given engine could produce compared to the same engine on a less massive vehicle.)</p>
<p>I'm assuming that we'd have some intrepid members of the United Earth Space Force crewing these combat vessels. Or, at least, crewing some of them – robotic drone fighters would be a tremendous boon to space soldiers, but the communication lag between planets and vessels in orbit would make the split-second judgments of humans necessary at times. (Until we perfect AIs… but if we're giving them the space fighters from the beginning, we deserve the robot uprising we'll get.) The crews will hardly be sitting around nice conference-room command bridges with no seat belts; nor will they be standing upright in slate-gray console pits with glowing glass displays all over. It's not even a good idea for them to have windows, which would be vulnerable to flak and could give the crew an intense sense of disorientation as the spacecraft maneuvers, and could give them tremendous trouble adapting to rapid changes in light levels as the ship rotates near a planet or star. No, they should be strapped into secure couches and centrally located in the most protected part of the spacecraft. They should also be in full pressure suits, and the interior cabin of the spacecraft should already be evacuated – to prevent fires, or any secondary damage if all the atmosphere rushes out a hull breach. This also reduces the need for escape pods. Camera views from the exterior of the ship and graphical representations of the tactical situation would then be projected directly onto helmet faceplates.</p>
<p>Now, for the final word, let's say the United Earth Space Force defeats the Martian rebels in orbit. What do we do to hit them on the ground? Well, strategic weapons from space are easy: kinetic impactors again. You chuck big ol' spears, aerodynamically shaped so they stay on target and don't burn up in the atmosphere, onto ground targets and watch gravitational potential energy turn into kinetic energy and excavate you a brand-new crater. At some point, though, the imperialist Earthlings probably want to take over the existing infrastructure on Mars. Time to get out the Space Marines!</p>
<p>It's not terribly expensive or difficult, comparatively speaking, to get people from orbit down to a planet surface. You fall. This is the purpose of a space capsule. What's really, really, prohibitively difficult is getting them back up again. So, the victorious orbital forces would have to bring in a transport ship chock full of Space Marines and drop them all at once in little capsules (little because they can only be so big for the atmosphere to effectively brake them, and because you don't want all your Marines perishing in some unfortunate incident). Some orbital forces would remain in place to threaten the ground with bombardment and give the Marines a bit more muscle, but really, the ground-pounders are going to have to be pretty self-sufficient. If they ever want to come back up, they would have to build and/or fuel their own ascent vehicle. (This is the problem facing any NASA Mars efforts, too: getting back up through the Martian atmosphere is much harder than any of the lunar ascents were.)</p>
<h1>What Would Combat Spacecraft End Up Looking Like?</h1>
<p>There are good arguments to have both large and small spacecraft in the Earth forces. A big spacecraft could have a lot more armor to keep its systems and crew safe, more room for large fuel tanks and electrical power supplies, and larger mass to resist impulses from cannon recoil. However, a smaller craft would be less visible to radar, more maneuverable, and could achieve higher accelerations for constant engine thrust. As with just about any military force, the role of the craft would be tailored to the tactical operations required, so the Space Force would probably include several sizes of craft.</p>
<p>Enemies could come at your ship from any direction in space, which means that you would want to react, strike, and counterattack in any direction. So, you would either have to mount weaponry all around your starfighter, put the weapons on gimbals so that they could rapidly point in any direction, or make the fighter maneuverable enough that it could rapidly point in any direction. Gimbals would be a bad option, because they would introduce points of increased vulnerability, unless they could be very well-armored. I conclude that the big ships would have many weapons, pointed in many directions; the small ships would have a few weapons, with the main weapon systems pointed in one direction.</p>
<p>Maneuverability (angular acceleration) you could achieve with gyroscopes, or by mounting engines or thrusters away from your fighter's center of mass. For the highest levels of maneuverability, the spacecraft should be close to spherical and these engines should be as off-center as possible, which might mean putting thrusters on long booms or struts. The problem with this kind of Firefly-like engine layout is that it becomes very vulnerable. If a fighter can achieve high maneuverability with gyros, those are probably the best option.</p>
<p>So, I think the small fighter craft would be nearly spherical, with a single main engine and a few guns or missiles facing generally forward. They would have gyroscopes and fuel tanks in their shielded centers. It would make sense to build their outer hulls in a faceted manner, to reduce their radar cross-section. Basically, picture a bigger, armored version of the lunar module. The larger warships would also probably be nearly spherical, with a small cluster of main engines facing generally backward and a few smaller engines facing forward or sideways for maneuvering. Cannons, lasers, and missile ports would face outward in many directions. On a large enough space cruiser, it would even be a good idea to put docking ports for the small fighters, so that the fighters don't have to carry as many consumables on board.</p>
<p>I think it's time to sketch some pictures and write some stories!</p>
<h1>Space-Wide Peace</h1>
<p>I certainly hope we don't get into any space wars. Human nature being what it is, though, and given how scarce a lot of resources really are on the scale of a solar system or a galaxy, I don't think it's out of the question. I would like to think that when we start colonizing other worlds, we will be sufficiently enlightened to do so from on board the Ship of the Imagination, and not as futuristic conquistadores. Still, the part of me that loves science fiction has fun with these thought experiments.</p>
<p><i>Reprinted with permission from <a href="http://josephshoer.com/blog/?p=377">Joseph Shoer</a>. Photo by <a href="http://www.tgdaily.com/images/stories/article_images/interview/futuremark/3dmarkproxycon.jpg">TG Daily</a></i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5426453/the-physics-of-space-battles]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5426453]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[physics of space battle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[space battle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Shoer]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5426453&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Most Popular Linux Posts of 2009]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_lin-th.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />A new browser, two new Ubuntu releases, and more than one new netbook OS&mdash;2009 was a big year for open-source software. Here are the Linux-related posts that caught our readers' attention in 2009.</p>

<p>Last year, we compiled the <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5111764/most-popular-linux-downloads-of-2008">most popular Linux downloads of 2008</a> and the <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5106355/the-most-popular-linux-posts-of-2008">most popular Linux posts</a>. The most popular Linux <em>downloads</em>, however, tend to also be released for Windows and Mac systems, and we'd rather not repeat ourselves.</p>
<p>So! This year, we ran through our archives and pulled out the posts most directly related to Linux: informational, how-to, Linux-focused downloads, and the like. For good measure, though, we'll list the most popular cross-platform downloads at the end, which will look very familiar to those posted in our <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5427165/most-popular-free-mac-downloads-of-2009">Most Popular Free Mac Downloads of 2009</a> and <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5426007/most-popular-free-windows-downloads-of-2009">Most Popular Free Windows Downloads of 2009</a> posts.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5195999/portable-ubuntu-runs-ubuntu-inside-windows">Portable Ubuntu Runs Ubuntu Inside Windows</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/portable_ubuntu_splash.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_portable_ubuntu_splash.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>And it really does, too, after a bit of command line tweaking. It's a close relative of the <strong><a href="http://andlinux.org/">andLinux</a></strong> system that lets you <a href="http://lifehacker.com/358208/seamlessly-run-linux-apps-on-your-windows-desktop">seamlessly run Linux apps on your Windows desktop</a>. This one doesn't require any installation, however, and you can even take it with you on a thumb drive. This holiday season, feel free to show Uncle Steve just how open and free Linux can be.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;">Linux Puts the Lie to WEP "Security"</h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_wepcrackbacktrack-head.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Using a <a href="http://www.remote-exploit.org/backtrack_download.html">BackTrack 3 Live CD</a> (which we <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5166530/backtrack-is-a-security+focused-live-cd-packed-with-system-tools">previously profiled</a>, Gina showed us how easy it was to <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5305094/how-to-crack-a-wi+fi-networks-wep-password-with-backtrack">crack a Wi-Fi network's WEP password</a>, offering a sound reason to upgrade your age-old router, and providing a kind of last-ditch solution for those in need of emergency connectivity. She also provided <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5309695/wep-cracking-redux-beyond-the-command-line">more WEP-cracking tools and tips</a>, including some sound reasoning on why anyone would still use a fallible encryption scheme (or use something much stronger).</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;">Looking Ahead to Ubuntu Releases</h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/ubuntu_splash.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_ubuntu_splash.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Every year, at least two versions of <strong><a href="http://ubuntu.com">Ubuntu</a></strong> are released in six-month lockstep. This year gave us Keir Thomas' peek at the <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5224586/first-look-at-ubuntu-904-jaunty-jackalope">9.04 "Jaunty Jackalope" release</a>, and our own <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5180833/">screenshot tour</a>. That release was more about subtle changes and improvements. Ubuntu 9.10, Karmic Koala, brought a <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5372301/first-look-at-ubuntu-910-karmic-koala-beta/gallery/">whole new look to the free OS</a>, along with some major decisions on default applications and immediate improvements like <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5362500/ubuntu-910-will-have-slicker-boot+up-software-store">faster, slicker boot-ups and a universal software store</a>. We are, as ever, eager to see what crops up in April.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;">VirtualBox Makes Linux Life Easier</h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/virtualbox_splash.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_virtualbox_splash.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Sun Microsystems' free <a href="http://virtualbox.org">VirtualBox</a> software is free, offers an open-source edition, and is generally <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5204434/the-beginners-guide-to-creating-virtual-machines-with-virtualbox">easy enough for beginners to get into</a>. Not coincidentally, it solves a big problem for Linux users who just <em>occasionally</em> need access to one or another Windows apps or features. It also keeps adding on new features, like <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5295334/virtualbox-30-beta-adds-gaming+level-graphics">support for Windows' gaming graphics</a>, and making life generally better for those running one system inside another.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;">Features We Wanted to See from Ubuntu (and a Response)</h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_500x_ubuntu_apps.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />"If every Ubuntu developer were assembled at one place, here are five things we'd ask them to accomplish." That's the grand daydream that launched our list of <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5355900/five-features-we-want-to-see-in-ubuntu">five features we want to see in Ubuntu</a>, including strong sticking points like a decent video editor and a design-centric look. Not all of that is under of the Ubuntu team's purview, but Community Manager Jono Bacon still took the time to <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5357229/ubuntu-community-manager-responds-to-our-wishlist">respond to our wishlist</a>, noting the progress on many of the fronts we wrote on. That was a very nice moment.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5403100/dual+boot-windows-7-and-ubuntu-in-perfect-harmony">Dual-Boot Windows 7 and Ubuntu in Perfect Harmony</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_500x_dual_boot_splash.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Simply installing Windows 7 and Ubuntu together isn't all that hard&mdash;just do Windows before Ubuntu, and leave a little room for the Linux. Fine-tuning it for convenience, access, and general usability, though&mdash;that's something we spent a lot of time thinking on. We wrote it all down, step by step, in this post.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5406563/build-a-cheap-but-powerful-boxee-media-center">Build a Cheap But Powerful Boxee Media Center</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_500x_boxee_splash.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Following up on Adam's guide to <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5391308/build-a-silent-standalone-xbmc-media-center-on-the-cheap">building a small, silent XBMC media center on the cheap</a>, Lifehacker's resident Linux nerd (Howdy!) wrote up an alternative guide to getting a more powerful, Linux-backed, Boxee-centered HTPC running. Seeing as how the <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5421149/boxee-beta-gets-an-entirely-new-look-and-feel">upcoming Boxee beta</a> and <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5403314/dedicated-boxee-box-to-come-preloaded-with-the-popular-media-center">pre-built Boxee Box</a> will include sped-up support for this very kind of NVIDIA-powered, Linux-based system, this Boxee setup will actually hit its real peak in 2010.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5309937/nine-must+have-features-we-want-to-see-in-a-google-os">Nine Must-Have Features We Want to See in a Google OS</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_chrome_os_splash.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Now that we've actually seen <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5408594/first-glimpse-at-google-chrome-os">what Chrome OS will look like</a>, and even <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5416968/the-humans-guide-to-running-google-chrome-os">taken it on an open-source test drive</a>, we can run through our initial wish list for the Linux-based netbook OS and do the tally: Three yays (speed, syncing, and blurred desktop/browser experience), two nays ("All kinds of hardware" and native Linux apps), and four shoulder shrugs (integrated Quicksilver-like app launcher, powerful keyboard shortcuts, user privacy, and enterprise-friendly setup). There's a lot more bound to come in 2010, though, including the first official release, so stay tuned.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;">GNOME Do and Docky Are Slick Linux Interfaces</h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/docky_splash.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_docky_splash.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>We dig <strong><a href="http://do.davebsd.com/">GNOME Do</a></strong> as a Quicksilver-like application launcher that knows your system better than you do. When it <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5145499/gnome-dos-smart-dock-takes-app-launching-to-another-level">rolled in a dock interface</a>, it got a bit more unstable, but even more helpful&mdash;and notably more smooth and eye-pleasing than the standard GNOME interface. The two projects have since <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5411278/docky-separates-from-gnome-do-still-a-clever-linux-app-dock">gone their separate ways</a>, but, installed side by side, they still make for a better Linux experience.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5175680/presto-loads-a-streamlined-desktop-in-15-seconds">Presto Loads a Streamlined Desktop in 15 Seconds</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/presto2.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_presto2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Well, we <em>thought</em> <strong><a href="http://www.prestomypc.com/">Presto</a></strong> looked like a pretty neat quick-boot alternative for Windows users, at least while it was free, and promising boot-ups in mere seconds. Then we tried it out and clocked it at a more human 15 seconds, found it to be kind of a simplified Xfce desktop, and, oh, right, this other operating system from some search company was announced. Not to say Presto is a dead option, but, at this point, it might need an overhaul (Chrome installed, maybe?) to grab much more than a glance.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5306169/install-firefox-35-on-ubuntu-with-one-command">Install Firefox 3.5 on Ubuntu with One Command</a></h3>
<p>Even released every six months, Ubuntu still manages to make its users wait on some newly-released apps getting official support&mdash;like Firefox, most importantly. This little Python script makes short work of bringing your built-in Firefox up to the bleeding edge.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5139752/ubuntu-pocket-guide-available-as-a-free-download">Ubuntu Pocket Guide Available as a Free Download</a></h3>
<p>Author <a href="http://ubuntukungfu.org/blog">Keir Thomas</a> did the freely-licensed thing with his pocket guide, and we were all very glad to have it.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5154130/elisa-is-a-simple-streamlined-media-center">Elisa is a Simple, Streamlined Media Center</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/12/elisa.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Looking for something that just plays your music, shows your videos and pictures, and doesn't get in your way or bog you down with flashy features? That's what Elisa is, and it looks pretty nice while doing so.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5290955/mac4lin-gives-linux-desktops-the-complete-mac-look">Mac4Lin Gives Linux Desktops the Complete Mac Look</a></h3>
<p>It really, really does. If you don't mind the obvious break in your your free-as-in-speech fidelity, it's a pretty nice setup.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5423574/jolicloud-netbook-os-is-a-bit-like-chrome-os-with-awesome-desktop-applications">Jolicloud Netbook OS Is a Bit Like Chrome OS with Awesome Desktop Applications</a></h3>
<p>Adam's headline pretty much says it all&mdash;you get most of the benefits of a fast-loading, small-screen-oriented OS, but with far more adaptability and a wide range of awesome Linux apps you can install.</p>
<hr>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;">Popular Cross-Platform Apps</h3>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;">Google Chrome, Alpha and Beta Releases</h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_chrome-beta-1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><a href="http://www.google.com/chrome"><strong>Google Chrome</strong></a>, which just <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5351067/happy-birthday-a-look-back-at-one-year-of-google-chrome">barely turned one</a>, has actually been up and running on many Linux systems since its earliest days, due to the hard work of Chromium open-source hackers. You could <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5271927/chromium-linux-builds-reach-alpha-stage">grab the alpha in May</a>, try out a <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5050317/crossover-chromium-ports-chrome-to-mac-and-linux">CrossOver-built release in September</a>, and grab the <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5421633/google-chrome-for-mac-and-linux-finally-hits-beta-very-fast-pretty-stable">official beta last week</a>. Been holding off on your Chromium and just now trying Chrome? Check out our <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5386582/the-power-users-guide-to-google-chrome-2009-edition">power user's guide to Google Chrome</a> to get acquainted.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5420931/namebench-helps-you-find-the-fastest-dns-server-for-your-computer">Namebench Helps You Find the Fastest DNS Server for Your Computer</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_500x_namebench.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Google came out with a <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5418211/google-public-dns-aims-to-speed-up-your-browsing">free DNS service</a>, but many folks are learning, with the help of <a href="http://code.google.com/p/namebench/"><strong>namebench</strong></a> or the also-excellent <a href="http://www.grc.com/dns/benchmark.htm">DNS Name Server Benchmark</a>, that what the big G does isn't always the best. Test out all the popular, public DNS systems to see what's your own network's best bet.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5144589/google-earth-50-beta-released-looks-incredible">Google Earth 5.0 Released, Looks Incredible</a></h3>
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GSuJq4UzkIA&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GSuJq4UzkIA&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/12/gsujq4uzkia_02.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display: none;"/><a href="http://earth.google.com/intl/en/index.html"><strong>Google Earth 5</strong></a> is one of those lucky Linux products that Google still intends to keep up to date, <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5367627/install-picasa-35-in-linux">unlike its sad cousin Picasa</a>. So being able to put historical imagery, ocean maps, and improved world touring on a Linux desktop is A-OK with many readers.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;">Firefox (Of Course)</h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_firefox_3.5_official.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/firefox.html"><strong>Firefox</strong></a> seemed to have met its first real challenge for the Best Alternative Browser this year, but it kept up with the modern web at its own pace. This year saw a <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5304572/firefox-35-officially-available-for-download">big Firefox 3.5 release</a> and a bunch of Firefox 3.6 betas (<a href="http://lifehacker.com/5394003/firefox-36-beta-1-officially-available-for-download">1</a>, <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5401686/firefox-36-beta-2-available-for-download">2</a>, <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5407474/firefox-36-beta-3-available-with-90%252B-bugs-squashed">3</a>, and <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5413505/firefox-36-beta-4-available-with-many-fixes">4</a>). It'll be interesting to see if Linux distributions consider Chrome as their default in 2010, but we expect Firefox to stick around for quite some time.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5421721/thunderbird-3-officially-released-with-new-features-improved-look">Thunderbird 3 Officially Released with New Features, Improved Look</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_500x_thunderbird-3.0.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />A lot has changed since <a href="http://www.mozillamessaging.com/en-US/thunderbird/"><strong>Thunderbird</strong></a> 2.0 release, but 3.0 brought enough savvy features&mdash;awesome search, smart syncing, and tabbed content&mdash;to make it an <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5426234/make-thunderbird-3-your-ultimate-onlineoffline-message-hub">ultimate online/offline message hub</a>.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5412874/handbrake-updates-to-094-with-over-1000-changes-64+bit-support">HandBrake Updates to 0.9.4 with Over 1,000 Changes, 64-Bit Support</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_handbrake-top.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Yeah, Mac and Windows users probably find <a href="http://handbrake.fr/"><strong>HandBrake</strong></a> really helpful. But Linux is where encoding to non-restricted formats can be <em>crucial</em>, so seeing regular development is a very nice thing. On any platform, Handbrake remains a <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5060149/hive-five-winner-for-best-media-converter-handbrake">favorite video encoder</a>&mdash;even after developers dropped AVI/XviD support.</p>
<hr>
Since you've made it this far, let's go ahead and put it up for vote:
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8" src="http://static.polldaddy.com/p/2396164.js">
</script><noscript><br>
<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/2396164/">What Was Your Favorite Linux Post or Download of 2009?</a><span style="font-size:9px;">(<a href="http://www.polldaddy.com">surveys</a>)</span><br></noscript></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://lifehacker.com/5428052/most-popular-linux-posts-of-2009]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5428052]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[best of 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[best of]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[reader poll]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ubuntu]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 16 Dec 2009 20:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Purdy]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5428052&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[This Year in Google: The 2009 Edition]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_google-2009-hed.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
When technologists of the future look back in time, they'll remember 2009 as the year Google got serious about an internet operating system, speeding up the web, and indexing EVERYTHING in sight. Take a look at the year 2009 in Google.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;">Google's Three Biggest Launches of 2009</h3>
<p>Two of the three most significant Google releases of 2009 are not yet available to the public in a final release build, but all three are open source. In no particular order:</p>
<p><b>Chromium OS:</b> In July, Google got Microsoft and Apple shaking in their boots when <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5309868/google-releasing-chrome-operating-system">they announced they were building an operating system</a>. The source code for Chrome OS (in its development phase it's called <i>Chromium OS</i>) <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5408594/first-glimpse-at-google-chrome-os">became available in November</a>; early adopters can <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5416968/the-humans-guide-to-running-google-chrome-os">run virtual machine images and bootable USB drive versions of the OS</a>.</p>
<p><b>Google Wave:</b> In May, Google <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5272048/google-wave-is-what-email-would-look-like-if-it-were-invented-today">demonstrated their new, real-time collaboration webapp</a>, <a href="http://wave.google.com">Google Wave</a>, to a crowd of incredulous developers who couldn't stop applauding. In September, they invited 100,000 users to try the Wave Preview. By now, over one million users have joined the Wave Preview. We <a href="http://completewaveguide.com">wrote a book about Wave</a>; and you can <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5426196/give-and-receive-google-wave-invites-any-time-in-our-dedicated-forum-page">give and get Wave invitations on our dedicated forum page</a>.</p>
<p><b>Android 2.0/Droid:</b> While Android-based handsets were already available when the year started, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motorola_Droid">Motorola Droid</a> debuted in November running Android 2.0 (with <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5391781/google-maps-navigation-brings-slick-turn+by+turn-gps-to-android">turn-by-turn GPS capabilities</a>) and <a href="http://phones.verizonwireless.com/motorola/droid/">took on the iPhone</a> in its "Droid Does" ad campaign. Google also released <a href="http://smarterware.org/3944/the-best-android-apps-are-made-by-google">a flurry of Android-only applications</a> and updates to existing ones in 2009 to boost their mobile platform, including the Google Voice app (which <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5324724/bad-apple-an-argument-against-buying-an-iphone">Apple rejected</a> on the iPhone), the amazing <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5420972/google-goggles-searches-by-sight">Google Goggles</a> app, Google Maps enhancements, and Google Listen.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;">Google's Most Updated Apps of 2009</h3>
<p>While a few Google products did get <a href="http://googlenotebookblog.blogspot.com/2009/01/stopping-development-on-google-notebook.html">shut down</a>, "<a href="http://lifehacker.com/5416331/google-says-adios-to-gears-hola-to-html5">sunsetted</a>," or just didn't change much, several marquee apps grew up a whole lot this year with serious feature additions and upgrades.</p>
<p><b>Search Engine Upgrades:</b> Remember when Google was just a search engine? Googlers do, because they're still busy bees improving search results and rolling out new ways to get to them. This year saw the rollout of <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5401305/googles-better-search-caffeine-going-primetime">Google web search's Caffeine update</a>, as well as <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5392219/google-music-search-officially-launched">music</a>, <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5390307/google-launches-social-search-experiment-to-search-what-your-friends-are-posting">social</a>, and <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5420872/googles-new-real+time-search-streams-breaking-news-and-live-twitter-updates">real-time</a> search, along with <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5141191/find-images-by-exact-dimensions-make-wallpaper-search-a-breeze">several</a> <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5220366/similar-images-feature-refines-google-image-search">new</a> Google Image <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5407010/refine-your-image-search-with-google-image-swirl">search options</a>, and updates to the <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5264635/google-suggest-introduces-more-time+saving-features">Google Suggest drop-down</a>.</p>
<p><b>Gmail:</b> Thanks to <a href="http://lifehacker.com/tag/pst/gmaillabs/">Gmail Labs</a>, our favorite web-based email client got a slew of new features for power users, from <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5261546/gmail-labs-automatically-translates-your-email">automatic translations</a> to <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5411931/gmail-now-lets-you-add-and-send-attachments-offline">offline attachments</a> to <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5205003/gmail-time-zone-notifiers-prevent-badly+timed-long+distance-calls">time zone notifiers</a> to <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5167829/ten-must+have-gmail-filters-available-for-download">exportable mail filters</a>. If you haven't recently, <a href="http://mail.google.com/mail/#settings/labs">cruise through your Gmail account's Labs area</a> to pick and choose from over 60 experimental features. <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5202359/new-and-improved-gmail-google-calendar-for-iphone-and-android">Gmail's mobile web application</a> for the iPhone and on Android also saw an overhaul and vast improvement this year.</p>
<p><b>Chrome web browser:</b> Google's own browser, Chrome, saw a whole lot of movement in 2009, especially late in the year with the release of <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5395897/google-chrome-beta-adds-bookmark-sync-speed-boost">bookmark sync</a>, <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5421633/google-chrome-for-mac-and-linux-finally-hits-beta-very-fast-pretty-stable">official beta builds for Mac and Linux</a> (finally!), and <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5421752/18-extensions-worth-downloading-from-google-chromes-gallery">Chrome extensions</a>.</p>
<p>Google News also saw a couple of interesting experiments like <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5359335/google-fast-flip-gives-a-print-look-and-feel-to-google-news">Fast Flip</a> and the <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5221180/google-news-timeline-is-a-slick-headline-skimmer">News Timeline</a>.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;">Google's Mission to Speed Up the Web</h3>
<p>If there's any one thing Google did this year, it was launch a concerted effort on all fronts <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/search/label/faster%20web">to make the web faster</a>. From <a href="http://code.google.com/speed/tools.html">developer tools</a> (like <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5422647/speed-tracer-diagnoses-where-your-web-sites-slowing-down">Speed Tracer</a> and the <a href="http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/">Google Web Toolkit</a>) to consumer products (like Chrome and <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5418211/google-public-dns-aims-to-speed-up-your-browsing">Google Public DNS</a>), it's kind of astounding the sheer amount of <i>stuff</i> Google put out there this year under the speed umbrella. They're even going so far as attempt to reinvent the two pillar protocols of email and the web with <a href="http://waveprotocol.org">Wave</a> and <a href="http://googleresearch.blogspot.com/2009/11/2x-faster-web.html">SPDY</a> (a faster replacement for HTTP).</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;">And the rest....</h3>
<p>2009 was also the year of a few legal skirmishes (like the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Book_Search_Settlement_Agreement">Google Books settlement</a>, the <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5369648/cyanogenmod-to-continue-offering-custom-android-builds">Cyanogen C&D</a>, the <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5342975/google-apple-and-att-all-make-their-statements-to-the-fcc-over-google-voice">Google Voice/FCC dust-up</a>), a few <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acquisitions_by_Google">acquisitions</a> (like reCAPTCHA, Gizmo5, and AppJet), and data control initiatives (the <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5397713/google-dashboard-provides-a-top+down-look-at-your-google-use">Google Dashboard</a> and <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5359205/googles-data-liberation-front-details-how-to-free-your-data-from-google">the Data Liberation Front</a>).</p>
<p>You could say it was a pretty busy year at the Googleplex.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;">Google's 2009 Product Release Calendar</h3>
<p>Take a chronological ride through the last four seasons at Google in this list of 2009 product releases and updates, listed month by month.</p>
<p><strong>January</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5140668/gmail-goes-offline-with-google-gears">Offline Gmail gets released with Google Gears</a></li>
<li><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5123996/picasa-for-mac-beta-released-first-look">Picasa for Mac released</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>February</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5146006/google-maps-finds-your-nearby-friends-with-latitude">Google Latitude</a> and <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5145630/google-mobile-search+by+voice-comes-to-android">search by voice for Android</a> launch</li>
<li><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5149741/google-sync-keeps-contacts-and-calendars-in-sync-on-your-mobile-phone">Google Sync for your mobile phone launches</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>March</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5164109/offline-google-calendar-goes-live-for-everyone">Google Calendar goes offline with Google Gears</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>April</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5221323/google-profiles-give-you-control-over-what-google-says-about-you">Google Profiles show up at the bottom of search results</a></li>
<li><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5202359/new-and-improved-gmail-google-calendar-for-iphone-and-android">Updated mobile Gmail and Google Calendar webapps for iPhone and Android launch</a></li>
<li><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5229560/google-maps-mashup-tracks-swine-flu">Google Maps mashup tracks swine flu</a></li>
<li><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5227441/gv-mobile-makes-google-voice-the-default-for-your-iphone">GV Mobile makes Google Voice the default for your iPhone</a> (later, <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5324724/bad-apple-an-argument-against-buying-an-iphone">Apple pulled this app from the iTunes Store</a> for reasons that are still unclear)</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>May</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5272048/google-wave-is-what-email-would-look-like-if-it-were-invented-today">Engineers demo Google Wave at the Google I/O conference, give developers access to the Wave "sandbox"</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>June</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5284904/google-apps-sync-syncs-outlook-with-gmail-google-contacts-and-calendars">Google Apps Sync syncs Microsoft Outlook with Gmail, Google Contacts, and Calendars</a> (updates with <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5365072/google-sync-updates-with-push-gmail-support">push Gmail in September</a>)</li>
<li><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5277696/google-squared-goes-live-formats-your-searches-into-a-spreadsheet">Google Squared puts your search results into a spreadsheet</a></li>
<li><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5309230/gmail-google-calendar-docs-and-talk-leave-beta">Gmail, Google Calendar, Docs, and Talk leave beta</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>July</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5326722/feeddemon-netnewswire-to-sync-exclusively-with-google-reader">FeedDemon, NetNewsWire sync exclusively with Google Reader</a></li>
<li><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5309868/google-releasing-chrome-operating-system">Google announces Chromium OS</a> (but doesn't release any code, <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5326377/possible+but+unlikely-chrome-os-screenshots-show-off-ultra+minimal-desktop">doctored screenshots</a> and <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5369361/try-out-a-fan+made-chrome-os-linux-build">fan-made versions</a> start popping up)</li>
<li><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5324724/bad-apple-an-argument-against-buying-an-iphone">Apple rejects all Google Voice applications from the iTunes Store</a></li>
<li><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5314872/gmail-tasks-keeps-it-too-simple">Gmail Tasks graduates from Google Labs</a> (where it first appeared in December of 2008)</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>August</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5341054/gmail-imports-mail-and-contacts-from-old-email-accounts">Gmail makes importing mail and contacts from old email accounts easy</a></li>
<li><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5331165/the-pushbutton-web-now-in-google-reader">PubSubHubbub gets baked into Google Reader</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>September</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5370738/google-wave-first-look">Google Wave Preview opens to 100,000 users</a></li>
<li><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5359860/grandcentral-closing-its-doors-tomorrow">GrandCentral closes its doors, transitions entirely to Google Voice</a></li>
<li><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5365996/google-sidewiki-is-a-universal-commenting-system-for-the-web">Google Sidewiki launches</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>October</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5390308/google-voice-offers-voicemail-without-changing-your-number">Google offers voicemail storage and transcriptions for your existing phone number</a> (part of Google Voice)</li>
<li><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5391781/google-maps-navigation-brings-slick-turn+by+turn-gps-to-android">Google Maps Navigation adds turn-by-turn GPS to Android</a></li>
<li><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5380799/google-voice-gives-users-invitations-to-hand-out-to-friends">Google Voice gives existing users invitations to send to their friends</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>November</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5408594/first-glimpse-at-google-chrome-os">Chrome OS announced, Chromium build demo'ed and source code released</a> (here's how you can <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5416968/the-humans-guide-to-running-google-chrome-os">try out a Chromium build yourself</a>)</li>
<li><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5395897/google-chrome-beta-adds-bookmark-sync-speed-boost">Google Chrome adds bookmark sync</a></li>
<li><a href="http://golang.org/">Google releases Go, a new programming language</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>December</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5421633/google-chrome-for-mac-and-linux-finally-hits-beta-very-fast-pretty-stable">Chrome browser hits Mac/Linux with extensions enabled</a> (<a href="http://lifehacker.com/5107637/google-chrome-officially-leaves-beta">Chrome for Windows left beta in December of 2008</a>)</li>
<li><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5420872/googles-new-real+time-search-streams-breaking-news-and-live-twitter-updates">Google's new real-Time search includes Twitter streams</a></li>
<li><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5418211/google-public-dns-aims-to-speed-up-your-browsing">Google Public DNS launches</a></li>
<li><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5416331/google-says-adios-to-gears-hola-to-html5">Google "lets the sun set" on Gears, moving to HTML5</a></li>
<li><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5420972/google-goggles-searches-by-sight">Google Goggles for Android searches the web by photo</a></li>
<li><a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/12/explore-whole-new-way-to-window-shop.html">Google Favorite Places puts a barcode on restaurants and shops you can scan with your mobile phone</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Now you tell us:</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8" src="http://static.polldaddy.com/p/2394567.js">
</script><noscript><br>
<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/2394567/">What's the best thing Google released or announced this year?</a><span style="font-size:9px;">(<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com">answers</a>)</span><br></noscript></p>
<hr>
What was the best Google launch of the year? The biggest flop? The product that made the biggest difference in your daily life? Let us know in the comments.<br clear="all">
<p><i><strong><a href="http://ginatrapani.org">Gina Trapani</a></strong>, Lifehacker's founding editor, looks forward to what the GOOG will come up with in 2010. Find her at <a href="http://smarterware.org">Smarterware</a> and on <a href="http://twitter.com/ginatrapani">Twitter</a>.</i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://lifehacker.com/5427816/this-year-in-google-the-2009-edition]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5427816]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Smarterware]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[timeline]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gina Trapani]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5427816&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Most Popular Free Mac Downloads of 2009]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_pop-mac-dls.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Nothing beats finding just the right application to fill a common need, fix a problem, or boost your productivity. Give yourself an early present this holiday season with 15 of the most popular Mac downloads of 2009.</p>

<p>Like <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5111727/most-popular-free-mac-downloads-of-2008">last year's most popular Mac downloads</a>, this list is based on the popularity of apps we've covered in 2009, regardless of the original release date of the app. Many were brand new this year, while others were solid updates to popular software. If you took a look at yesterday's <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5426007/most-popular-free-windows-downloads-of-2009">Most Popular Free Windows Downloads of 2009</a>, a few of the cross-platform favorites may look familiar. (I've rounded up the most popular cross-platform downloads at the bottom of the post.)</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;">Snow Leopard: The Feisty Kitty That Could (and No, It's Not Quite Free, Either)</h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_snow-leop.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />The release of Snow Leopard was nearly <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5277207/windows-7-versus-mac-os-x-leopard-the-feature+by+feature-showdown">as big a deal</a> for Mac users this year as Windows 7 for Windows folks, and while it was never strictly a download (unless you grabbed it from less reputable means), it's worth highlighting. Over the course of the year, we helped out by <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5345690/prep-your-mac-for-snow-leopard">prepping your Mac for Snow Leopard</a>, highlighted its <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5350650/snow-leopards-four-best-improvements-for-civilians">biggest improvements</a>, and held your hand while <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5348150/how-to-upgrade-from-leopard-to-snow-leopard">upgrading</a>. If you didn't want to pony up for Apple hardware, we even showed you <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5360150/install-snow-leopard-on-your-hackintosh-pc-no-hacking-required">how to install Snow Leopard on your Hackintosh PC, no hacking required</a>&mdash;and luckily for the frugal among us (no, this one's not free, but it was a big deal in the OS X world so we figured we'd include it), the $29 upgrade disc worked <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5347086/confirmed-29-snow-leopard-installs-whether-or-not-youve-got-leopard">whether or not you were upgrading from Leopard</a>.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;">2009 Was Still a Year of the Jailbreak</h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_500x_pwnage.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />The iPhone hardware may be getting better and better, but Apple still <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5324724/bad-apple-an-argument-against-buying-an-iphone">hasn't gotten any better at opening up the app store</a> to, oh, competition. As long as that's the case, jailbreaking apps like <a href="http://blog.iphone-dev.org/post/211802082/pwnage-pie"><strong>PwnageTool</strong></a> and <a href="http://blog.iphone-dev.org/post/74278878/close-the-stable-door"><strong>QuickPwn</strong></a> will still be extremely popular. <i><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5381563/pwnagetool-updates-jailbreaks-iphones-and-most-ipod-touches">Read more &gt;&gt;</a></i></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5187072/magnifique-customizes-your-os-x-theme">Magnifique Customizes Your OS X Theme</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/magnifique.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_magnifique.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The release of Snow Leopard didn't do all that much to change Leopard's spots, but <a href="http://magnifiqueapp.com/"><strong>Magnifique</strong></a> certainly does. This free skinning app is full of user-generated Leopard-customizing goodies. <em>Note: Magnifique does not support Snow Leopard, so you'll want to steer clear of it if you've upgraded. Unfortunately the Magnifique development seems to be at a standstill at the moment.</em></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5160323/doubletwist-may-be-the-coolest-universal-media-manager-ever">DoubleTwist May Be the Coolest Universal Media Manager Ever</a></h3>
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/JHQBg6o97-U&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/JHQBg6o97-U&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/12/jhqbg6o97-u.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display: none;"/>People fed up with iTunes' restrictive stance on non-Apple devices (see Apple and Palms' <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5322002/palm-pre-syncs-with-itunes-again-for-now">dance</a>, for example) were very interested in <a href="http://www.doubletwist.com/dt/Home/Index.dt"><strong>doubleTwist</strong></a>, a universal media manager that automatically converts files to the appropriate formats and seamlessly syncs them to your PSP, Android device, BlackBerry, and more.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5129873/google-quick-search-like-quicksilver-from-google">Google Quick Search Like Quicksilver from Google</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/07/340x_gqs-main.png" class="left image340" width="340" />A lot of people were disappointed to learn about <a href="http://lifehacker.com/330548/quicksilvers-creator-on-the-future-of-qs">Quicksilver's grim future</a> a while back, but many of you were heartened to learn that Quicksilver's creator had released a similar tool working with Google called <a href="http://code.google.com/p/qsb-mac/"><strong>Quick Search Box</strong></a>. Then again, it appears Quicksilver's not entirely dead just yet (see below).<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5372083/pollux-automatically-cleans-and-tags-your-itunes-library">Pollux Automatically Cleans and Tags Your iTunes Library</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_500x_Tagging_Tracks.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />For all the access to track metadata contained in the iTunes store, iTunes is a slouch at cleaning and tagging mislabeled or poorly labeled tunes. <a href="http://polluxapp.com/"><strong>Pollux</strong></a> was an absolutely killer iTunes supplement that grabbed song, artist, album, and other metadata names, along with lyrics and album art, quickly and accurately. The problem? Shortly after we highlighted it, Pollux was shut down because the APIs it accessed stopped letting it access them for free. We liked Pollux better, but if you're looking for something similar, check out <a href="http://www.tuneupmedia.com/">TuneUp</a> (free and pay versions available).</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5123996/picasa-for-mac-beta-released-first-look">Picasa for Mac Beta Released, First Look</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/image-editing.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_image-editing.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>After years of Windows-only support, Google released the first Mac version of <a href="http://picasa.google.com/mac/"><strong>Picasa</strong></a> at the beginning of the year, and it didn't take long before the majority of our Mac readers preferred it to iPhoto. You go, Google.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5417237/quicksilver-releases-update-improves-performance">Quicksilver Releases Update, Improves Performance</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_500x_qs57.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Just when we thought <a href="http://github.com/tiennou/blacktree-alchemy/downloads"><strong>Quicksilver</strong></a> was no more, it turns out that several contributors are continuing occasional development over at social coding web site <a href="http://github.com/tiennou/blacktree-alchemy">GitHub</a>. Their latest release brought on some solid performance improvements, and it worked well (for us at least) with Snow Leopard.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5127480/glims-turns-safari-into-a-browser-worth-using">Glims Turns Safari into a Browser Worth Using</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/07/340x_glims.png" class="left image340" width="340" />Free Safari plug-in <a href="http://www.machangout.com/"><strong>Glims</strong></a> adds a handful of new features to Safari, giving it the kind of features one might expect from a more, ahem, customizable browser&mdash;for those of you who still prefer Safari to its more feature-rich counterparts.<br clear="all"></p>
<hr>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;">Popular Cross-Platform Apps:</h3>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;">Google Chrome&mdash;Dev Releases and Beta At Last</h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_chrome-beta-1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><a href="http://www.google.com/chrome"><strong>Google Chrome</strong></a> is <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5351067/happy-birthday-a-look-back-at-one-year-of-google-chrome">just over a year old</a>, but it's actually much younger for Mac users. We got our first glimpse at Chrome on OS X <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5202014/try-out-a-rough-but-working-google-chrome-on-mac-os-x">back in April</a>, and it wasn't until <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5421633/google-chrome-for-mac-and-linux-finally-hits-beta-very-fast-pretty-stable">last week</a> that Google released the first beta for Macs. Be sure to check out our <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5386582/the-power-users-guide-to-google-chrome-2009-edition">power user's guide to Google Chrome</a> if you're just getting started.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5420931/namebench-helps-you-find-the-fastest-dns-server-for-your-computer">Namebench Helps You Find the Fastest DNS Server for Your Computer</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_500x_namebench.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Google very recently <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5418211/google-public-dns-aims-to-speed-up-your-browsing">announced a free DNS service</a> they boasted as fast, but rather than take their word for it, we pointed you toward <a href="http://code.google.com/p/namebench/"><strong>namebench</strong></a> (and several readers also pointed toward the excellent <a href="http://www.grc.com/dns/benchmark.htm">DNS Name Server Benchmark</a>). It tests various popular DNS servers to find what's really going to be the fastest choice for your system.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5144589/google-earth-50-beta-released-looks-incredible">Google Earth 5.0 Released, Looks Incredible</a></h3>
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_1"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GSuJq4UzkIA&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GSuJq4UzkIA&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/12/gsujq4uzkia_01.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display: none;"/>We're sort of junkies for maps and 3D, so when <a href="http://earth.google.com/intl/en/index.html"><strong>Google Earth 5</strong></a> was released, we were pleased as punch. The update featured historical imagery, ocean maps, and improved world touring capabilities. Maybe we just like saving ourselves some dough in these tough economic times with a little Google Earth sightseeing.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;">And Then There Was Firefox</h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_firefox_3.5_official.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />The notorious <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/firefox.html"><strong>Firefox</strong></a> memory slow-downs may have some of us down on the reliable old 'fox, but that doesn't mean we aren't all still eager to grab the latest and greatest releases and stick with it as our default browser&mdash;whether it's the <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5304572/firefox-35-officially-available-for-download">big Firefox 3.5 release</a> or the Firefox 3.6 beta (<a href="http://lifehacker.com/5394003/firefox-36-beta-1-officially-available-for-download">1</a>, <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5401686/firefox-36-beta-2-available-for-download">2</a>, <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5407474/firefox-36-beta-3-available-with-90%252B-bugs-squashed">3</a>, or <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5413505/firefox-36-beta-4-available-with-many-fixes">4</a>). We're looking forward to more great Firefox'ing in 2010.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5421721/thunderbird-3-officially-released-with-new-features-improved-look">Thunderbird 3 Officially Released with New Features, Improved Look</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_500x_thunderbird-3.0.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Sure it was two years since <a href="http://www.mozillamessaging.com/en-US/thunderbird/"><strong>Thunderbird</strong></a>'s 2.0 release, but at least they didn't disappoint. Thunderbird 3.0 comes with solid new search and filtering tools, better looks, and a great new tabbed interface.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5412874/handbrake-updates-to-094-with-over-1000-changes-64+bit-support">HandBrake Updates to 0.9.4 with Over 1,000 Changes, 64-Bit Support</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_handbrake-top.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Free, open-source DVD ripping and encoding tool <a href="http://handbrake.fr/"><strong>HandBrake</strong></a> released a pretty saucy update last month with a ton of fixes and improvements. It's no coincidence that it's always been our readers' <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5060149/hive-five-winner-for-best-media-converter-handbrake">favorite video encoder</a>, and this year's big-ish (but still not 1.0) update should only help keep it there&mdash;even though several users aren't thrilled that the HandBrake devs have dropped AVI/XviD.</p>
<hr>
<p>Now, because we like a good polling:</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8" src="http://static.polldaddy.com/p/2391787.js">
</script><noscript><br>
<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/2391787/">Which Is Your Favorite Mac Download of 2009?</a><span style="font-size:9px;">(<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com">opinion</a>)</span><br></noscript></p>
<p>Got a favorite Mac download from 2009 that you'd add to your list of favorites? Let's hear about it in the comments. If you're craving still more popular Mac downloads, you can also take a look back at the <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5111727/most-popular-free-mac-downloads-of-2008">most popular free Mac downloads of 2008</a>.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://lifehacker.com/5427165/most-popular-free-mac-downloads-of-2009]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5427165]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[best of 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[best of]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[downloads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac os x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[reader poll]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Pash]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5427165&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Gestapo: How Apple Hunts Down Leaks]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/apple-gestapo.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_apple-gestapo.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>They call themselves the Worldwide Loyalty Team. Among some employees, they are known as the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #applegestapo" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/applegestapo/">Apple Gestapo</a>, a group of moles always spying in headquarters and stores, reporting directly to Jobs and Oppenheimer. Here's how they hunt people down.</p>
<p>"You may want to know about their Worldwide Loyalty Team," Tom told me recently in an email. I read what he had to say. It felt like a description of the Gestapo, without the torture and killing part.</p>
<p>Tom never lived in Nazi Germany, back in the time when the Geheime Staatspolize had the power to get into any house or any office, at any time of the day or night, without any warrant or reason, to seize whatever or whoever they wanted in their never ending search to find enemies of the state. A place in which you had no right to privacy whatsoever. A place in which you were guilty until proven otherwise.</p>
<p>No, Tom never lived in Nazi Germany, nor in East Germany, nor in the Soviet Union, nor in Communist China. He lives in the United States. For sure, he has never been scared of losing his life nor the ones he loves, like thousands of millions in those countries. But he knows how it feels to be watched, to always be considered guilty of crimes against another kind of state. He knew how it felt to have no privacy whatsoever when he was working right here, in a little Californian town called Cupertino, in a legendary place located in One Infinite Loop.</p>
<p>Tom knew about all that pretty well, back when he was working at Apple Inc.</p>
<h1>Operation Lockdown</h1>
<p>Of course, if Tom had never sent any sensitive information to media outlets, he would have never had the fear of being caught, only to get fired and sued into oblivion by Apple Legal. But the lack of any privacy whatsoever is something that he shared with all his fellow employees.</p>
<p>"Apple has these moles working everywhere, especially in departments where leaks are suspected. Management is not aware of them," he told me, "once they suspect a leak, the <i>special forces</i>&mdash;as we call them&mdash;will walk in the office at any hour, especially in the mornings. They will contact whoever was the most senior manager in the building, and ask them to coordinate the operation."</p>
<p>The <i>operation</i>, as Tom calls it, is not anything special. It is not one of a kind event. It's just a normal practice, and the process is pretty simple: The manager will instruct all employees to stay at their desks, telling them what to do and what to expect at any given time. The Apple Gestapo never handles the communication. They are there, present, supervising the supervisors, making sure everything goes as planned.</p>
<p>All cellphones are then taken. Usually, they collect them all at the same time, which means that the process could take a long time. If you need to contact the exterior during the time your cellphone is under examination, you will have to ask for permission, and your call will be monitored.</p>
<p>They don't ask for cameras because there are no cameras at Apple: Employees are not allowed to get into the campus with them. If the cellphone is an iPhone, it gets backed up onto a laptop. "In fact, at the beginning they used to say that the iPhones were really their property, since Apple gave every employee a free iPhone," he points out. All the employees are asked to unlock and disable any locking features in their cellphones, and then the special forces will proceed to check them for recent activity.</p>
<p>They back up everything and go through all the other phones' text messages and pictures. If you have porn in your phone, they will see it. If you have text messages to your spouse, lover, or Tiger Woods, they will see them, too. Just like that. No privacy, no limits.</p>
<p>While all this is happening, the employees are ordered to activate the screensaver on their computers, so the special forces are sure there are no chats happening between employees or with the exterior. They are told not to speak, text or call one other when the lockdown is happening: "It is like a gag order, and if the employee does not want to participate, they are basically asked to leave and never come back."</p>
<h1>2009 Is Like "1984"</h1>
<p>Of course, all this is <i>voluntary</i>. Management recommends that you relinquish your phones. If you don't do it they will fire you, or they will investigate why you didn't want to give them your cellphone. Simultaneously, everyone is asked to sign NDA's during the investigations, even though they already signed Apple NDAs to work there.</p>
<p>"I was at several <i>events</i>. When they find what they are looking for&mdash;which they usually do&mdash;the person is asked to stay until the end of the business day. Then he is asked to leave the premises quietly, escorted by security," Tom says. While he's there, the <i>special forces</i> hang around, watching. "There is a lot that goes behind doors that I don't really know about. I do know, however, that they really interrogate people that are serious suspects, intimidating them by threatening to sue."</p>
<p>There is no way to know how often this happens, however, as everything is handled very quietly. The same Worldwide Loyalty Team does many other things to keep everyone in check, from searching out the email history of every employee&mdash;which is also a normal practice in other corporations and government agencies&mdash;to seeding fake images to catch potential leaks and diffuse the hype about some product introductions.</p>
<p>As Tom was describing all this, my mind was getting back to all I've read about Steve Jobs and Apple, back when he was El Capitán of the brave group of free pirates who created the Macintosh. The Mac was a secret project too, but there was no secret police making sure there were no leaks. After a hard day of work, all the Mac team sometimes played on the beaches of California, careless and happy, confident that this new revolutionary computer would change the world, one desktop at a time. All of them shared information, there were no seeeecrets, and that's why they came up with an "insanely great" computer, as Steve Jobs himself used to refer to it.</p>
<p>And while I understand that secrecy is paramount to success in today's extremely competitive market&mdash;hello, dear marketdrones&mdash;now I look at this story on the Worldwide Loyalty Team, and it makes me realize how much Apple has changed. From a happy hippie company, to a company that does KGB-style lockdowns and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5319275/report-iphone-leak-interrogations-drive-foxconn-employee-to-suicide">Gestapo interrogations that end in suicides</a>.</p>
<p>I wonder if the <i>special forces</i> have ever chased anyone through the Infinite Loop campus, dressed in their full regalia:</p>
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/OYecfV3ubP8&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/OYecfV3ubP8&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object><br>
<br clear="all"></p>
<p><iframe src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http://digg.com/apple/Apple_Gestapo_How_Apple_Hunts_Down_Leaks" align="right" frameborder="0" height="82" scrolling="no" width="55"></iframe>I wouldn't be surprised.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5427058/apple-gestapo-how-apple-hunts-down-leaks]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5427058]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Apple gestapo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Apple Worldwide Loyalty Team]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gestapo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[leaks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[moles]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:38:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5427058&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[A Century of Great Gadget Design: Phaidon's Design Classics]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_century_of_gadget_design_top.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Phaidon, publisher of the best-looking books on the planet, just released Pioneers, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #massproduction" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/massproduction/">Mass Production</a>, and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #newtechnologies" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/newtechnologies/">New Technologies</a>, three volumes each containing 333 of the most impressively designed objects of the last century. Here are 12 gadgets that made the cut.</p>
<p>The books move loosely through the 20th century&mdash;though they also contain some objects that were devised in the 19th century, and others that a certain Mr. Ive and Mr. Jobs cooked up since the year 2000. We skipped over all the Apple stuff, and much of the classic Braun and Bang & Olufsen objets de tech that you commonly encounter in gadget retrospectives. We looked deeper into the list, to find unexpectedly wondrous objects of great design. (We also skipped about a million different chairs&mdash;according to these books, designers spend more time thinking about where to park their keisters than any other dilemma in human history.)</p>
<p>Needless to say, the books are unbelievably gorgeous and informative, and the juxtaposition of so many varied products gives you new insight into what designers think about.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5427106,12,'');
</script></p>
<p>All three books are published this year by <a href="http://www.phaidon.com/store/">Phaidon</a> as a series. They list for $40 each, but thankfully Amazon is selling them for a lot less (see below). While it makes sense to maybe buy just one, it's tough to pick just one, and not just because the products are numbered from 1 to 999, with each volume covering one third. To simplify things perhaps too much, <em>Pioneers</em> covers archetypal designs we now take for granted, <em>Mass Production</em> includes all of the smartly conceived products we grew up with, and <em>New Technologies</em> brings design up to date with contributions from the consumer electronics and computer businesses. As much as the third volume best fits our readership, it's almost more exciting to see how the legacies of the earlier product design movements informed the new tech.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/phaidon_pioneers-mass-production-new-technologies-book-shots.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_phaidon_pioneers-mass-production-new-technologies-book-shots.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>&bull; <em>Pioneers</em> on <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Pioneers-Products-Phaidon-Design-Classics/dp/0714856657/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1260902009&sr=1-1">Amazon for $26.37</a></p>
<p>&bull; <em>Mass Production</em> on <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Production-Products-Phaidon-Design-Classics/dp/0714856665/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1260901908&sr=8-1">Amazon for $26.37</a></p>
<p>&bull; <em>New Technologies</em> on <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Technologies-Products-Phaidon-Design-Classics/dp/0714856673/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1260901952&sr=1-1">Amazon for $29.16</a></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5427105/a-century-of-great-gadget-design-phaidons-design-classics]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5427105]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[book excerpt]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[history of gadget design]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mass production]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[new technologies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phaidon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pioneers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5427105&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[40 Gadgets Changed Irrevocably By One Letter]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_oneletterofftop.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />It's amazing what one letter will do. The Segway becomes the Kegway, Nikon becomes Nixon and Gatorade becomes, uh, Gatorape. I know that last one isn't gadgety, but I let it slide.</p>
<p><b>First Place</b> &mdash; JPS<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/jps1369_2.jpg.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_jps1369_2.jpg.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
<b>Second Place</b> &mdash; Jeff Forde<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/jeffforde.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_jeffforde.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
<b>Third Place</b> &mdash; Harm Veenstra<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/harm.veenstra.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_harm.veenstra.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5426981,40,'');
</script></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5427007/40-gadgets-changed-irrevocably-by-one-letter]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5427007]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[photoshop contest]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[contests]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[photoshop]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[photoshopcontest]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5427007&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Make Thunderbird 3 Your Ultimate Online/Offline Message Hub]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_thunderbird3_splash.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />You may be a diehard Gmail user, prone to declaring desktop email clients dead. That's fine. We still think you'll find Thunderbird 3 to be a better offline email solution, and a really convenient aggregator for all your inboxes.</p><p>What follows is a guide for getting <a href="http://mozillamessaging.com/thunderbird">Thunderbird 3</a> set up as a dedicated offline email client, as well as a more convenient and powerful online inbox aggregator&mdash;allowing you to manage everything from your regular email accounts to Google Voice, Google Wave, and other non-email inboxes with a little setting up. If you're using a standard Gmail account, setting it up with Thunderbird 3 is really easy&mdash;just type in your username and password when you first start up. If you're a Google Apps user or have another IMAP-available email client, follow <a href="http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=75725">Google's IMAP instructions</a> to get started.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;">Set up content tabs for Google Wave, Voice, or any site</h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_500x_thunderbird_wave.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />We showed you last week how easy it is to <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5423317/run-google-wave-inside-thunderbird-3">create a persistent Google Wave tab in Thunderbird 3</a>, helping you keep tabs on the not-quite-there-but-really-interesting messaging and collaboration service. The short version? Head to the Tools menu, select Error Console, then enter this code (copy the whole thing) and hit Evaluate:</p>
<div class="code">Components.classes['@mozilla.org/appshell/window-mediator;1'].getService(Components.interfaces.nsIWindowMediator).getMostRecentWindow("mail:3pane").document.getElementById("tabmail").openTab("contentTab", {contentPage: "https://wave.google.com/wave/?nouacheck"});</div>
<p>If you're a Google Voice user, you can pull off a similar persistent Voice inbox tab, per <a href="http://lifehacker.com/comment/17480786">commenter steelpitt's advice</a>:</p>
<div class="code">Components.classes['@mozilla.org/appshell/window-mediator;1'].getService(Components.interfaces.nsIWindowMediator).getMostRecentWindow("mail:3pane").document.getElementById("tabmail").openTab("contentTab", {contentPage: "https://google.com/voice/?"});</div>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/12/gmail_tab.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />And, as <a href="http://lifehacker.com/comment/17564444">trstn points out</a>, you can easily enter most any web site as the address in the <code>contentPage</code> section. Heck, you can even keep your web-based Gmail open, if you feel like having a fallback if Thunderbird frustrates you.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;">Learn its search and filter powers (and let it index overnight)</h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_thunderbird_search.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Thunderbird's new search powers are, in a word, awesome. One of the most powerful arguments for sticking to Gmail's web interface is its <a href="http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=7190">uber-powerful search operators</a>. Thunderbird's search powers aren't quite as comprehensive, but they do help you quickly find a message using the same kind of filters and operators.</p>
<p>For my personal Gmail account, search results loaded about as fast they did on the web version. After a quick keyword search, you can filter by sender, prioritized by how many emails they've sent you, or by folder location, and add filters like "To Me," "From Me," starred items, and with attachments. Those are, of course, the basics of web-based Gmail, but when you're using Thunderbird offline, they can still search through every single message, not just the 3 months and change you've loaded into Google Gears.</p>
<p>A good bit of advice, though, from <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10411854-2.html">Seth Rosenblatt at CNET</a>: give Thunderbird time to run through your messages. Leaving it running overnight is about what's needed for accounts that have been active for a few years, and overnight plus a day in the background should work for most any account.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;">Set up permanent and one-shot offline sessions</h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_thunderbird_offline.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Gmail offers <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5140668/gmail-goes-offline-with-google-gears">offline inbox access and composition</a>, and even <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5411931/gmail-now-lets-you-add-and-send-attachments-offline">offline message attachments</a>, but it's limited in size, and even Google warns you that you'll see some serious slowdown if you stash more than the standard 3 months of messages in your Google Gears database. Thunderbird, on the other hand, is a tried and true road warrior, and lets you keep as much material as you want on your hard drive.</p>
<p>To edit which messages, and how many of them, are kept local for searching and retrieval, head to the Edit menu and then Account Settings. Under the Synchronization & Storage menu for a particular email account, hit Advanced to set which folders get the synchronization treatment. Don't select all of them out of security, though&mdash;you'll see that you can do one-shot folder syncs, just below. When you've got a good set checked off, set the maximum message size in back in the main storage settings.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_download_sync.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
When you're getting ready to head out on a trip, hit the File-&gt;Offline menu and select Download/Sync. You'll get the menu you see above, asking you to either go ahead and use your default settings, or choose certain folders to bring offline for this offline jaunt. Do the sync, and you're ready to read, write, and do your general email thing without a net connection.</p>
<p>You'll still want to "compact" your mail folders every now and again&mdash;made easier with one of the buttons in the <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/2377">Toolbar Buttons add-on</a>.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;">Install <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/5373">ThunderBrowse</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/12/thunderbrowse_options.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />At its core, ThunderBrowse is a tiny, fast browser that bakes itself into Thunderbird to allow reading web sites without switching over to your browser. More than that, though, ThunderBrowse's preferences let you fine-tune how JavaScript, images, and plug-ins like Flash are handled in HTML-formatted emails. Put simply, ThunderBrowse makes it more convenient to stick to text-only emails, clicking to open the HTML-formatted space hogs only if you choose.</p>
<p>"Yeah, that's nice, but I like my Chrome/Safari/Opera," you say? ThunderBrowse is still worth the very quick download.</p>
<p>To start with, ThunderBrowse lets you customize how your external browser is launched. You can open most links in ThunderBrowse, but save middle-clicked links for your high-powered browser. Customize how email links are launched in that browser? You sure can. ThunderBrowse is also fairly snappy and light, so even if you're using an ultra-speedy browser, it might be just as fast to launch a site you're glancing at inside Thunderbird, rather than wait for an external browser to pick up the URL and load it. Your mileage may vary, but I've found ThunderBrowse tremendously helpful in running through emails with speed.</p>
<hr>
How does Thunderbird fit into your own online/offline messaging life? What features or add-ons does it need to remain relevant? Tell us your take in the comments.]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://lifehacker.com/5426234/make-thunderbird-3-your-ultimate-onlineoffline-message-hub]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5426234]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[messaging]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[email filters]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gmail]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google voice]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Google Wave]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[inbox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[inboxes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[offline]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[offline access]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[search operators]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Thunderbird 3]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Purdy]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5426234&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Most Popular Free Windows Downloads of 2009]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_win-dl.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />We've featured hundreds of free Windows applications over the course of 2009 that we hoped might bolster your productivity, workflow, or your PC usefulness in one form or another. Here's a look back at the most popular Windows downloads of the year.</p>

<p>As with <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5110552/most-popular-free-windows-downloads-of-2008">2008's most popular free Windows downloads</a>, keep in mind that the apps featured here are chosen by the popularity of the associated post we published in 2009. Many were new, some were improvements to already loved apps, and others were simply new-to-us. Here's a quick look back at the 19 or so most popular Windows downloads of 2009:</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;">Windows 7&mdash;from Beta to Release Candidate and So On</h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_500x_2009-12-13_115755_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />2009 was a big year for Windows, and Windows 7 was the most important ingredient in Windows' solid year. (In fact, you'll notice that several of this year's most popular downloads are related to Windows 7 in one way or another.) Sure it's not exactly an application but rather a full-blown operating system, but it only makes sense that a new version of Windows would top the list of Windows downloads for the year. It started with the <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5127294/windows-7-beta-ready-for-official-download">Windows 7 beta download</a> in January, which had a ton of hiccups. It was released, <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5127558/windows-7-beta-available-pulled-no-eta-on-product-keys">then pulled</a>, then <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5128018/windows-7-beta-product-keys-now-available-for-real">released again</a>, then <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5128404/microsoft-extends-windows-7-beta-availability-until-january-24th">extended</a> because of the trouble Microsoft had handling the demand. (Actually, we just think they <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5127866/in-2009-microsoft-still-underestimates-the-web">underestimated the web</a>.) Later, in May, Microsoft <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5240198/windows-7-rc-available-for-download-now">released the Windows 7 release candidate</a>. You even jumped on the chance to try Windows 7's <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5131371/windows-7-betas-many-free-and-legit-themes">beautiful new themes</a>.</p>
<p>Folks who were still using Vista also <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5270137/windows-vista-sp2-available-for-download">flocked to Vista's Service Pack 2</a> (<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=a4dd31d5-f907-4406-9012-a5c3199ea2b3&DisplayLang=en">32-bit</a>; <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=656c9d4a-55ec-4972-a0d7-b1a6fedf51a7&DisplayLang=en">64-bit</a>) to keep their PCs secure and up to date.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5158878/enigma-desktop-20-released-adds-installer-widget-manager-and-templates">Enigma Desktop 2.0 Released, Adds Installer, Widget Manager, and Templates</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/504x_enigma-desktop.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_504x_enigma-desktop.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>One of our very own readers released his popular desktop configuration as a installable utility that brings a handful of great customization and productivity tools to your desktop. It's called <a href="http://kaelri.deviantart.com/art/Enigma-103823591"><strong>Enigma 2.0</strong></a>. Then <a href="http://rainmeter.net/RainCMS/">Rainmeter</a>, another very popular desktop customization tool, set <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5332071/rainmeter-10-brings-the-enigma-desktop-to-everyone">Enigma as its default desktop</a>. Fancy pants.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5195999/portable-ubuntu-runs-ubuntu-inside-windows">Portable Ubuntu Runs Ubuntu Inside Windows</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/portable_ubuntu_splash.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_portable_ubuntu_splash.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Ever wish you could enjoy some of the finer tools available to Linux but stay comfortably in your Windows desktop? Sure you could run a virtual machine, but <a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/portableubuntu/"><strong>Portable Ubuntu for Windows</strong></a> runs an entire Linux OS as a Windows application. Better yet, it's portable.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5156634/make-windows-xp-look-like-windows-7-no-hacking-required/">Seven Remix XP Makes Windows XP Look Like Windows 7</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/Win7XP1.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_Win7XP1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The release of Windows 7 left a lot of XP users wishing they could get in on some of that snazzy new eye candy. <a href="http://niwradsoft.blogspot.com/"><strong>Seven Remix XP</strong></a> is a free utility that does its best to bring Windows 7's comely looks to XP.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5388408/ninite-bulk+installs-great-free-windows-apps">Ninite Bulk-Installs Great Free Windows Apps</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_500x_ninite_splash_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Another result of the Windows 7 launch: A whole lot of us were rebuilding systems from the ground up, which often means a lot of tedious downloading and installing one app at a time. <a href="http://ninite.com/"><strong>Ninite</strong></a> makes it easy, streamlining the download and installation processes for tons of the most popular free Windows apps, including most of our <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5271828/lifehacker-pack-2009-our-list-of-essential-free-windows-downloads">2009 Lifehacker Pack</a>.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5133039/windows-7-shortcuts-enables-the-best-win7-shortcuts-in-xp-or-vista">Windows 7 Shortcuts Enables the Best Win7 Shortcuts in XP or Vista</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/peek-through.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_peek-through.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Apart from all the new eye candy, Windows 7 really tickled our fancy with <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5390086/the-master-list-of-new-windows-7-shortcuts">tons of incredible new keyboard shortcuts</a>. For folks still chilling out with XP or Vista, we released <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5133039/windows-7-shortcuts-enables-the-best-win7-shortcuts-in-xp-or-vista"><strong>Windows 7 Shortcuts</strong></a>, a lightweight utility written to bring some of the best new shortcuts of Windows 7 to previous versions of Windows.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5154441/computer-repair-kit-packs-dozens-of-tools-in-one-portable-package">Computer Repair Kit Packs Dozens of Tools in One Portable Package</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/ComputerRepairKit1.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_ComputerRepairKit1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>By virtue of reading Lifehacker, you're more likely than not the most schooled person among your friends and family when it comes to fixing a bum PC. It's a dubious honor, because it also means you generally are the person who gets called when something goes wrong. <a href="http://www.technibble.com/computer-repair-utility-kit/"><strong>Computer Repair Utility Kit</strong></a> puts a handful of useful PC repair utilities in one handy, portable suite. <em>Update: It appears the surge of readers looking to download this one brought down the server; luckily helpful reader Richard offers a mirror of the download on his own server <a href="http://techproutah.com/files/tool_kit_3.0.zip">here</a>.</em></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5147316/fences-is-a-seriously-awesome-desktop-icon-organizer">Fences is a Seriously Awesome Desktop Icon Organizer</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/Fences1.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_Fences1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Like to keep items you want to access frequently easily accessible on your desktop but don't want to deal with the added clutter? <a href="http://www.stardock.com/products/fences/"><strong>Fences</strong></a> arranges your cluttered desktop icons into containers so you can clean up the mess into useful groups of shortcuts&mdash;or optionally hide them altogether.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5383383/avg-9-free-now-available-for-download">AVG 9 Free Antivirus</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_500x_2009-11-12_122950.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />We're of the mind that <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5401453/stop-paying-for-windows-security-microsofts-security-tools-are-good-enough">Microsoft's security tools are good enough</a>&mdash;including the new and impressive <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/Security_Essentials/">Microsoft Security Essentials antivirus app</a>&mdash;but that doesn't mean many of you don't get excited when the <a href="http://free.avg.com/ww-en/download?prd=afg#tba2"><strong>AVG 9 Free</strong></a> update is available. It's still the <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5401255/best-antivirus-application-avg">favorite antivirus app of Lifehacker readers</a> (who doesn't love free), though we're sensing a slow but steady sea of change on this one.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;">Google Chrome&mdash;Stable, Beta, and Dev Releases</h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_500x_chromepug-hed.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><a href="http://www.google.com/chrome"><strong>Google Chrome</strong></a> is <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5351067/happy-birthday-a-look-back-at-one-year-of-google-chrome">just over a year old</a>, but it's made huge strides among early adopters. Chrome came out with its <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5265039/google-chrome-2-brings-new-features-and-serious-speed">stable 2.0 release</a> in May, then followed up with a Chrome 3.0 release <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5359986/google-chrome-3-brings-more-speed-and-features-to-the-stable-release">in September</a>. Early adopters willing to try their luck in the <a href="http://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/dev-channel">beta and dev channels</a> get more features, which we detailed in our <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5386582/the-power-users-guide-to-google-chrome-2009-edition">power user's guide to Google Chrome</a>. Whichever version of Chrome interests you most, it's clear that it was a pretty good year for Chrome.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5310467/hulu-video-downloader-saves-your-favorite-shows-for-offline-enjoyment">Hulu Video Downloader Saves Your Favorite Shows for Offline Enjoyment</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/hulu-video-downloader.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_hulu-video-downloader.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><a href="http://www.downloadtoolz.com/hulu/">Hulu Video Downloader</a> was a fun little app that lasted about as long as you could say Hu... that is, it doesn't work anymore. But when it did, it grabbed videos from the popular video service for your offline viewing pleasure, and you were eager to try it out.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5159907/a-hands-on-look-at-safari-4s-crashy-eye-candy">Safari 4 Tempts with Good Looks</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/safari4b-topsites.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_safari4b-topsites.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><a href="http://www.apple.com/safari/download/"><strong>Safari</strong></a>'s 4.0 beta release for Windows came with a lot of bugs and some serious eye candy, but despite the interest at release, we can't imagine many people still stick with Safari on Windows over, say, Firefox, Chrome, Opera, etc.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5420931/namebench-helps-you-find-the-fastest-dns-server-for-your-computer">Namebench Helps You Find the Fastest DNS Server for Your Computer</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_500x_namebench.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Google very recently <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5418211/google-public-dns-aims-to-speed-up-your-browsing">announced a free DNS service</a> they boasted as fast, but rather than take their word for it, we pointed you toward <a href="http://code.google.com/p/namebench/"><strong>namebench</strong></a> (and several readers also pointed toward the excellent <a href="http://www.grc.com/dns/benchmark.htm">DNS Name Server Benchmark</a>). It tests various popular DNS servers to find what's really going to be the fastest choice for your system.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5144589/google-earth-50-beta-released-looks-incredible">Google Earth 5.0 Beta Released, Looks Incredible</a></h3>
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GSuJq4UzkIA&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GSuJq4UzkIA&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/12/gsujq4uzkia.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display: none;"/>We're sort of junkies for maps and 3D, so when <a href="http://earth.google.com/intl/en/index.html"><strong>Google Earth 5</strong></a> was released, we were pleased as punch. The update featured historical imagery, ocean maps, and improved world touring capabilities. Maybe we just like saving ourselves some dough in these tough economic times with a little Google Earth sightseeing.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;">And Then There Was Firefox</h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_firefox_3.5_official.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />The notorious <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/firefox.html"><strong>Firefox</strong></a> memory slow-downs may have some of us down on the reliable old 'fox, but that doesn't mean we aren't all still eager to grab the latest and greatest releases and stick with it as our default browser&mdash;whether it's the <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5304572/firefox-35-officially-available-for-download">big Firefox 3.5 release</a> or the Firefox 3.6 beta (<a href="http://lifehacker.com/5394003/firefox-36-beta-1-officially-available-for-download">1</a>, <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5401686/firefox-36-beta-2-available-for-download">2</a>, <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5407474/firefox-36-beta-3-available-with-90%252B-bugs-squashed">3</a>, or <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5413505/firefox-36-beta-4-available-with-many-fixes">4</a>). We're looking forward to more great Firefox'ing in 2010.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5233052/motion-detection-is-an-effective-dead-simple-security-camera-app">Motion Detection Is an Effective, Dead Simple Security Camera App</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/07/340x_motion-detection-1.png" class="left image340" width="340" />If your webcam is sitting around collecting dust, try out <a href="http://www.hiren.info/downloads/freeware-tools/6"><strong>Motion Detection</strong></a>, a free, motion-detecting security camera application. It'll snap pics and video when it detects movement, can upload the results via FTP, and more fun at-home security stuffs.<br clear="all"></p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5421721/thunderbird-3-officially-released-with-new-features-improved-look">Thunderbird 3 Officially Released with New Features, Improved Look</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_500x_thunderbird-3.0.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Sure it was two years since <a href="http://www.mozillamessaging.com/en-US/thunderbird/"><strong>Thunderbird</strong></a>'s 2.0 release, but at least they didn't disappoint. Thunderbird 3.0 comes with solid new search and filtering tools, better looks, and a great new tabbed interface.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5412874/handbrake-updates-to-094-with-over-1000-changes-64+bit-support">HandBrake Updates to 0.9.4 with Over 1,000 Changes, 64-Bit Support</a></h3>
<p>Free, open-source DVD ripping and encoding tool <a href="http://handbrake.fr/"><strong>HandBrake</strong></a> released a pretty saucy update last month with a ton of fixes and improvements. It's no coincidence that it's always been our reader's <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5060149/hive-five-winner-for-best-media-converter-handbrake">favorite video encoder</a>, and this year's big-ish (but still not 1.0) update should only help keep it there.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5164680/deskhedron-adds-3d-virtual-desktop-eye+candy-to-windows">DeskHedron Adds 3D Virtual Desktop Eye-Candy to Windows</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/DeskHedron1.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_DeskHedron1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Linux users have a killer desktop management tool called <a href="http://www.compiz.org/">Compiz Fusion</a> that puts multiple desktop management on a 3D cube that we've always been jealous of on Windows. Open-source application <a href="http://tokyodownstairs.blogspot.com/2008/10/deskhedron.html"><strong>DeskHedron</strong></a> brings a similar three-dimensional desktop management tool to Windows users.</p>
<hr>
Now, for fun:
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8" src="http://static.polldaddy.com/p/2387388.js">
</script><noscript><br>
<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/2387388/">Which Is Your Favorite Windows Download of 2009?</a><span style="font-size:9px;">(<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com">opinion</a>)</span><br></noscript></p>
<p>Got a favorite Windows download from 2009 that you'd add to your list of favorites? Let's hear about it in the comments. If you're craving still more popular Windows downloads, you can also take a look back at <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5110552/most-popular-free-windows-downloads-of-2008">the most popular free Windows downloads of 2008</a>.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://lifehacker.com/5426007/most-popular-free-windows-downloads-of-2009]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5426007]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[best of 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[best of]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[downloads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[reader poll]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Pash]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5426007&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
