• more about #homeentertainment
    superberg: And if the 11-inch Sony OLED is any indication, it will only cost $10,000... a year or two after release. more »
    CommentingpointlesslyisMeh: Wow more »
    Zanzan42: I've gotta hand it to them. The Korean's really do have the best booth bait. more »
    Bokusatsu_Tenshi: 4Kg? Holy crap! My weenie dog used to weight 3 times that... What's next? A .5mm 60" OLED screen lighter than air? They'll soon have to make some lea... more »
    kernow: No wall mount brackets will be included as the depth of the screw would be grater than that of the screen instead LG will be including a roll of doubl... more »
    Monty: This is an amazing step forward in display screen technology: Instead of TV's falling on kids to kill them, they will be razor thin and chop them in ... more »
    Elec.pookaloo: There will be an action movie where this TV will KILL someone. more »
    Die Fledermaus: Look its still to thick when you get to three microns then I will be interested. more »
    ReynaldoRiv: One question: When I want to move this poster into a different room will the sticky tack rip through it during the dismount? more »
    deniz.sica: how the hell would you mount that to a wall? more »
    OCEntertainment: Just remember. Until 3D glasses are either gone, or somehow manage to be cool, you will always look stupider than this guy while watching. more »
    KhaiJB: they come in prescription? if not, useless to me.... more »
    Lizard_King: meh.... Have't seen a 3D presentation that doesn't give me migranes. Fad. more »
    Kaiser-Machead: Is it too much to ask to have a set that looks like Nite Owl's? more »
    Yerzriknot: I can't say I like the idea of having to put glasses on every time just to watch a movie. more »
    wutlulzky: People say i look like an idiot even when i dont wear glasses, ... putting those one, will definitely make no difference more »
    Wraithen: surely the whole point of using shutter glasses, instead of the cheaper polarised ones you get in the cinema, is that you wouldn't need a 3D television? more »
    yuriythebest3: that's why I went passive polarized! using that tech glasses cost <10$ a pair and there is less eyestrain more »
    white_trash66: The thing that i don't like is this... the PS3 will still work as a bluray player and will have 3d, but i would need to get a new 3d enabled TV, as w... more »
    yantelope: I personally think that this will be good eventually. Many people already have 120Hz TVs and more and more people are buying blu-ray players. Where ... more »
  • We can't find any posts with those tags. Or check your spelling and try again.