<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: Home Entertainment, googletv]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/home entertainment/googletv</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'home entertainment, googletv']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Google TV Might Watch You, According to Patent]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="TV_Watching.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/07/TV_Watching.jpg" width="150" height="172" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"/><iframe src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http://digg.com/tech_news/Google_TV_Might_Watch_You_According_to_Patent" align="right" frameborder="0" height="82" scrolling="no" width="55"></iframe>A patent recently filed by Google for an interactive TV service is chock full of new details, but the most interesting is this one: "an image capture device (e.g., digital camera, video recorder, etc.) can be used to measure how many viewers are watching or listening to a broadcast."</p>

<p>According to the patent, the main point of the system is to identify audio within a TV broadcast and compare it to the appropriate reference material for identification. After that, it aggregates "personalized information related to the media broadcast." </p>

<p>What sort of personalized info? On one hand, Google wants to layer in complementary websites and other data&mdash;I hope this means the IMDB tab I've been waiting for, but it also refers to the old "buy what the hot actress on Letterman is wearing" function. On the other hand, Google is really trying to turn your TV watching into a social experience that would be a lot smoother than logging into a computer. The goal is to share a viewing and chatting experience simultaneously, but this doesn't seem to account for the fact that DVRs have made realtime TV watching an antiquated concept.</p>

<p>More importantly to us, but way down in the filing, another form of analysis besides audio evaluation is discussed, that of using a still or video camera for "pattern matching":<br />
<blockquote>Various known pattern-matching algorithms can be applied to an image or a sequence of images to determine the number of viewers present in a broadcast environment during a particular broadcast. The images and or data derived from the images can be used in combination with audio descriptors to gather personalized information for a user, compute popularity ratings, or for any other purpose. </blockquote><br />
For any other purpose? OK, Google&mdash;thanks for making me feel reeeeeeaaaal comfortable about your plans. [<a href="http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=%2220070130580%22.PGNR.&OS=DN/20070130580&RS=DN/20070130580">US Patent Office</a> via <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/blog/invention/2007/07/google-tv.html">New Scientist</a>]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/277162/google-tv-might-watch-you-according-to-patent]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-277162]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google tv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[home entertainment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[original]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:56:31 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=277162&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[GoogleTV Beta: A Total Hoax, but an Impressive Hoax]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><object width="500" height="411"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/7MulSMSJV-U"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7MulSMSJV-U" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="500" height="411"></embed></object><br />
So that <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #googletvbeta" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #googletvbeta" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/googletvbeta/">GoogleTV Beta</a> video that we posted last Friday is, unsurprisingly, totally BS. It's a hoax, a joke, a trick, all perpetrated on us by <a href="http://www.fatalfarm.com">Fatal Farm</a>. They usually make twisted remakes of 80s sitcom openings (which are actually pretty funny), but I guess they got tired of making Alf look like he was showing the Tanners hidden bathroom cam footage and decided to mess with Internet geeks instead.</p>

<p>Now, normally we wouldn't give them any extra attention, but after their first video got so many people riled up they decided to make a follow-up. In the above video, "Mark. E. Erickson" gives a demo of the "GoogleTV Beta" in a single shot, trying to prove that logging in and out of Gmail 700 times will actually gain you access.</p><p>It's obviously still fake, but what's impressive is how cool the mockup they made just for this prank is. It looks like they made a fake GoogleTV just to run for these videos, and it looks surprisingly like something Google would create. I'd personally rather have a video of them showing what they did to perpetrate this hoax rather than another one trying to convince us that it's real, but that might be wishful thinking. In any case, let's just think of it as a cool product concept created by prankster jackasses rather than Photoshop wizards. Yeah, that'll make you feel better about wasting four hours of your life logging in and out of your email account. <span class="byline">&ndash;Adam Frucci</span></p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/232138/googletv-beta-a-total-hoax-but-an-impressive-hoax]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-232138]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[home entertainment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fatal farm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[googletv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[googletv beta]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 29 Jan 2007 09:41:06 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=232138&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[GoogleTV Beta: Annoying Easter Egg or Shenanigans?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><object width="500" height="411"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/J9SK_M_nVWA"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/J9SK_M_nVWA" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="500" height="411"></embed></object><br />
Now this, my friends, is fishy. Some vidcast on YouTube called "Infinite Solutions," a show that just so happens to have posted all 4 of its episodes about 12 hours ago, claims to show us how to sign up for a super-secret beta of <A href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/home-entertainment/youtubes-stab-at-profitability-premium-content-google-video-search-231537.php">GoogleTV</a>. You need to jump through a bunch of hoops, including having to log in and out of Gmail until a "random number generator" gives you an invite based on the number of times you've logged in. Right.</p>

<p>We here at the Giz are very skeptical but have been trying despite our better judgment to no avail. There are plenty of reasons to think this is BS, including the insanely cheesy intro to this video (oh, that music!), but just the idea of being able to play around with GoogleTV gets our tents popped all over the place.</p>

<p>Anyone with more patience than us want to see if they can prove/disprove this? And someone find out who this Mark Erickson character is, will ya? Internet detectives, do your thing. <span class="byline">&ndash;Adam Frucci</span><br />
</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/231908/googletv-beta-annoying-easter-egg-or-shenanigans]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-231908]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[home entertainment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[googletv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[googletv beta]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:46:30 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=231908&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
