<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: iPhone]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphone</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'iphone']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[A Romance Flowchart: When Is It Inappropriate to Use Your iPhone?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_iphone_sig_mouth.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /> Does your significant other always yell at you for busting out your smartphone too much when you're together? Follow this flowchart to determine if now really is a good time to fire that brick up:</p>

<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/iphone_sig_final_800.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_iphone_sig_final_800.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a> <i>Click the image to view a larger version.</i></p>
<p><i>Based in New York City, <a href="http://shanesnow.com/">Shane Snow</a> is a graduate student in Digital Media at Columbia University and founder of Scordit.com. He's fascinated with all things geeky, particularly social media and shiny gadgets he'll never afford.</i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5419435/a-romance-flowchart-when-is-it-inappropriate-to-use-your-iphone]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5419435]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[inappropriate iphone use]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[infographics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shane Snow]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5419435&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Week's Best iPhone Apps]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/ipat.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_ipat.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>In this week's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5416950/steve-jobs-approves-knocking-live-video-app-personally">Steve-approved</a> app roundup: Your music library, converted into baddies! Twitter, visualized in 3D! Byplanes, flown! Xbox Live accounts, accessed! Cars, salvaged! Overprotective parents, abetted! Live video calls, called! And more...</p>

<h2>The Apps</h2>
<p><em>To view the gallery as a single page, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5419421/the-weeks-best-iphone-apps/">click here</a></em></p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5419421,9,'');
</script></p>
<h2>This Week's iPhone News On Giz</h2>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_500x_phone-o-scope_1-thumb-600x399-39383.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5419022/an-exploded-iphone-is-a-major-frat-party-buzzkillor-is-it">An Exploded iPhone Is a Major Frat Party Buzzkill...Or Is It?</a></p>
<p>• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5419047/apple-sued-for-iphone-patent-infringement-again">Apple Sued For iPhone Patent Infringement, Again</a></p>
<p>• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5419004/the-new-mobile-twitter-site-is-actually-um-nice">The New Mobile Twitter Site Is Actually, Um, Nice</a></p>
<p>• <a href="Droid%20Commercial%20Paints%20iPhone%20as" digitally="" clueless="" beauty="" pageant="">Droid Commercial Paints iPhone as "Digitally Clueless Beauty Pageant Queen"</a></p>
<p>• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5418419/wolfram-alpha-is-tired-of-people-not-paying-50-dollars-for-their-iphone-app">Wolfram Alpha Is Tired Of People Not Paying $50 Dollars For Their iPhone App</a></p>
<p>• <a href="http://jalopnik.com/5418139/new-mercedes-iphone-app-hands-on/gallery/">New Mercedes iPhone App: Hands On</a></p>
<p>• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5418024/iphone-orchestra-hacks-touchscreen-gps-and-accelerometer-to-create-music">iPhone Orchestra Hacks Touchscreen, GPS and Accelerometer to Create "Music"</a></p>
<p>• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5417067/just-a-cheap-iphoneipod-adapter-usb-hub">Just a Cheap iPhone/iPod Adapter USB Hub</a></p>
<p>• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5417120/mirrors-edge-coming-to-the-iphone-in-january">Mirror's Edge Coming to the iPhone In January</a></p>
<p>• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5417033/iphone-fitted-with-slr-lens-it-was-bound-to-happen">iPhone Fitted With SLR Lens (It Was Bound to Happen)</a></p>
<p>• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5416765/top-5-assclowns-laughing-at-the-iphone-back-in-2007">Top 5 Assclowns Laughing at the iPhone Back in 2007</a></p>
<p>• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5416956/redeye-makes-your-iphone-a-universal-remote-control">RedEye Makes Your iPhone a Universal Remote Control</a></p>
<p>• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5416920/stolen-belgian-iphones-traced-to-russian-black-market">Stolen Belgian iPhones Traced to Russian Black Market</a></p>
<p>• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5416494/where-is-my-iphone-videochat-apple">Where Is My iPhone Videochat, Apple?</a></p>
<p><em>This list is in no way definitive. If you've spotted a great app that hit the store this week, give us a heads up or, better yet, your firsthand impressions in the comments. And for even more apps: see our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/the-week-in-iPhone-apps/">previous weekly roundups here</a>, and check out our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphone-apps-directory">Favorite iPhone Apps Directory</a>. Have a great weekend, everybody!</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5419423/the-weeks-best-iphone-apps]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5419423]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the week in iPhone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5419423&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[An Exploded iPhone Is a Major Frat Party Buzzkill...Or Is It?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/flaming_party_iphone.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_flaming_party_iphone.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a> The latest tale of a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5327124/flaming-iphone-3g-melts-a-crater-in-this-car-seat">flaming iPhone</a> encounter comes to us courtesy of Bobby Hodges, who describes how such an incident almost ruined a fraternity house party.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>I was at a fraternity house hanging out one night. One of my friends had his iPhone plugged into the speakers so we could have music. We had the usual speaker system, a receiver and some speakers. I was standing near the receiver when All the sudden the iphone cut off and started to smoke. The room filled up with what must have been hazardous smoke. After picking up the iPhone that was still extremely hot, the entire battery had been ejected from the phone and was sitting on the floor. The house smelled like burning electronics for the rest of the night and the iPhone left a square-ish burn mark on the table it was sitting on.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Fortunately, it sounds like the cloud of acrid, poisonous fumes proved to be only a minor inconvenience for the partygoers. Who knows? It might have even enhanced some of their experiences. [<em>Thanks Bobby!</em>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5419022/an-exploded-iphone-is-a-major-frat-party-buzzkillor-is-it]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5419022]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[exploded iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[party]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 04 Dec 2009 17:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5419022&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Sued For iPhone Patent Infringement, Again]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/iphonecam.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_iphonecam.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>These <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/patents">patent lawsuit stories</a> are basically madlibs anyway, so <a href="http://www.loopinsight.com/2009/12/04/apple-sued-for-infringing-digital-camera-patent-with-iphone/">what the hell</a>: <u>ST CLAIR <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #intellectualproperty" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/intellectualproperty/">INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY</a> CONSULTANTS</u> has sued <u>APPLE COMPUTER</u> over <u>CAMERA TECHNOLOGY</u> in the <u>IPHONE</u>. They have a history of <u>WINNING LAWSUITS</u>, and <u>BUTT FARTS</u>.</p>

<p>The suit bears a lot of the stamps of hollow patent trollery, from the outside-the-industry plaintiff company to the oddly late filing. (The iPhone has been out for a couple years now, and it's had a camera the whole time.) But these guys aren't bullshitting: they have a history of winning similar suits against major camera maufacturers, including Sony, which paid them $25m in 2001, and Canon, which paid them $34m in damages in 2003. They've entered into licensing agreements with "many" of the companies they've sued, which include the likes of Samsung, Nokia and Nikon. So, what's their secret? Patents like this: <a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/screencap_2009-12-04_at_12.14.41_pm.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_screencap_2009-12-04_at_12.14.41_pm.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
Digital cameras, <em>have you ever heard of them?</em></p>
<p>To have a patent as fundamental as this&mdash;among others, including a patent on digital shutter buttons, and one for storage and display methods for digital images&mdash;awarded in the early 90s and <em>upheld</em> by the courts is nothing to scoff at. When this thing finally kicks off&mdash;the scheduling conference isn't until January, so it'll probably be a few months before we see fireworks&mdash;it'll be one to watch, since companies who land in court with Apple have a tendency to&mdash;one sec&mdash;<u>DIE HORRIBLY</u>. There. [<a href="http://www.loopinsight.com/2009/12/04/apple-sued-for-infringing-digital-camera-patent-with-iphone/">LoopinSight</a>, specific patent list <a href="http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-dedce/case_no-1:2009cv00804/case_id-43103/">here</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5419047/apple-sued-for-iphone-patent-infringement-again]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5419047]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple iphone camera patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[madlibs]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:29:04 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5419047&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The New Mobile Twitter Site Is Actually, Um, Nice]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/mobiletweetmain.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_mobiletweetmain.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The mobile Twitter site had been a vastly more miserable experience compared to even the worstest apps, <a href="http://mobile.twitter.com">but now</a>, it's a strikingly good web app, with full Twitter powers, all while actually looking clean and respectable.</p>
<p>It's currently most optimized for WebKit browsers&mdash;iPhone, Android, webOS and Symbian&mdash;but BlackBerrys work too. It's built entirely using Twitter's own APIs, hence the announcement post's title, "<a href="http://blog.twitter.com/2009/12/takeout-dogfood.html">Takeout Dogfood</a>." (Why not <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5416404/dog-food--ice-cream&mdash;msn-search&mdash;bing">ice cream</a>?) For now, you'll have to go to mobile.twitter.com to use it, but they'll eventually be transitioning m.twitter.com over to the new site as they work out all the kinks. And so far, it's pretty impressive, even if it does feel a tad slower than I'd like at the moment.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5418988,4,'');
</script> [<a href="http://mobile.twitter.com">Twitter</a>, <a href="http://blog.twitter.com/2009/12/takeout-dogfood.html">Twitter</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5419004/the-new-mobile-twitter-site-is-actually-um-nice]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5419004]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[symbian]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[webos]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 04 Dec 2009 11:39:50 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5419004&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Droid Commercial Paints iPhone as "Digitally Clueless Beauty Pageant Queen"]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/sLDxv9ohH2s&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/sLDxv9ohH2s&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object>Ohhh shit, y'all. This is getting dirty. Motorola/Verizon's newest Droid ad not only depicts the iPhone as a tiara-wearing, Sandra-Bullock-worshipping Barbie doll, it actually <em>shows a clearly identifiable iPhone</em>. It's both inflammatory and in your face. Right up in it!</p>
<p>I have a Droid, and like it a lot, but I'm a little concerned that these ads are alienating buyers by making the phone seem a lot more complex and threatening than it really is. To a first-time buyer, smartphones are a pretty intimidating purchase, and while I understand the impulse to differentiate the Droid from the cute-as-a-button, simple-as-can-be iPhone commercials, the Droid commercials may be going too far in the opposite direction with the whole DROID SMASH aesthetic. But that's just me, and, well, I bought one anyway&mdash;what do you guys think? [<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLDxv9ohH2s&feature=player_embedded">YouTube</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5418653/droid-commercial-paints-iphone-as-digitally-clueless-beauty-pageant-queen]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5418653]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[commercial]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[droid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[droid commercial]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 04 Dec 2009 01:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5418653&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Wolfram Alpha Is Tired Of People Not Paying $50 Dollars For Their iPhone App]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/photo-1.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />The first problem with the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5384451/wolframalpha-iphone-app-is-a-50-super-calculator">Wolfram Alpha iPhone app</a> was that it cost $50. The <em>second</em> problem was that the site's iPhone web interface was nearly as good as the app, and it was free. Guess which issue Wolfram "fixed!"<br clear="all"></p>

<p><a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2009/12/03/wolframalpha-iphone-formatted-web-page-no-longer-available/">TUAW</a> noticed a not-so-subtle change to the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #wolframalpha" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/wolframalpha/">Wolfram Alpha</a>'s mobile site, which now prompts stingy iPhone jerks to just <em>download the app already</em>. Luckily you <em>can</em> kill the prompt, but then you're left with an unoptimized version of the search engine, which is a chore to use on a mobile device.</p>
<p>So, Wolfram isn't moving as many copies of their app as they expected (Dozens! You'll see!) and it's totally within their rights to, you know, <em>make money</em>. But instead of taking away the free, slightly-less-capable alternative, why not just make the paid, slightly-<em>more</em>-capable app remotely affordable? What's the problem with that?<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/screencap_2009-12-03_at_5.05.12_pm.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_screencap_2009-12-03_at_5.05.12_pm.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
Oh. [<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2009/12/03/wolframalpha-iphone-formatted-web-page-no-longer-available/">TUAW</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5418419/wolfram-alpha-is-tired-of-people-not-paying-50-dollars-for-their-iphone-app]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5418419]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mathematica]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[oops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wolfram]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wolfram alpha]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wolframalpha]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:14:01 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5418419&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Withings Wi-Fi Scale Review (A Scale For the Year 2010)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/withings1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_withings1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The Withings Wi-Fi would have been alien technology in the 1950s. "What do you mean, this scale posts your weight on the 'internet', and then graphs it on your 'iPhone'"? And yet, folks, this is our world today.</p>
<h1>The Price:</h1>
<p>$160</p>
<h1>The Verdict:</h1>
<p>Expensive, but worth it.</p>
<p>How do we justify a $160 scale when normal scales are $20 at Target? Think about when the last time your parents replaced their bathroom scale. Was it before you were born? Was it <strong>never</strong>? $160 isn't too much when you spread it out over a lifetime.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5418298,3,'');
</script></p>
<p>But even if you you just look at the features, the Withings scale is worth it. On the "weighing you" side, it reports your weight in pounds, kilos or the weird British stone, plus calculates out your fat mass and BMI.</p>
<p>The top of the scale is made out of, in their words, "tempered glass slab, covered with a layer of metal", which looks and feels classy. The whole thing feels modern&mdash;again, the complete opposite of a normal filthy bathroom scale.</p>
<p>After the Withings weighs you, it'll send all three data points online, to their free website, where it charts and graphs it for you. You can even have different users in your family, each with their own separate data graphs. And (this is probably something you won't use) it'll post your weight updates to Twitter, if you want. It's not mandatory.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_weight.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />And here, for example, is a kid being tracked as she gets older&mdash;not a person devolving into a serious eating disorder.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/suiviimagetop.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_suiviimagetop.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>And if you have an iPhone/iTouch, you can access your chart via the free app as well, in case you want to show off to your friends how much weight you're losing.</p>
<p>In essence, the Withings makes for the perfect holiday gift. It's pricey enough to not make you look cheap, yet it still conveys the "I think you're fat" message that's inherent in giving someone a scale. [<a href="http://www.withings.com/">Withings</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/gizplus2.jpg" width="40" height="20">Internet connectivity and functionality is impressive for a scale<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/gizplus.jpg" width="20" height="20">Works great as a scale<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/giznormal_01.jpg" width="20" height="20">Slightly expensive</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5418300/withings-wi+fi-scale-review-a-scale-for-the-year-2010]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5418300]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[scale]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wi-fi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[withings]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[withings review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[withings wi-fi scale review]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 Dec 2009 16:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5418300&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[My Plea to Steve Jobs That Every iPhone Should Come With a Tank]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_6279165.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Mr. Jobs, my apologies, I didn't mean to interrupt you at home. I mean, obviously I did because I knocked at your door, but, you know&mdash;wait, were you watching <em>So You Think You Can Dance</em>?</p>

<p>THAT'S MY FAVORITE SHOW TOO!! WHY ISN'T IT ON ITUNES??</p>
<p>Sorry for shouting. I won't do that again. I'll try not to spit, either, but I can make no promises there. I mean, I'll most certainly make earnest attempts, but I really don't want to mislead you. My saliva is not something that I can wield with 100% proficiency, and I want this meeting to be built on trust. Mutual trust.</p>
<p>Anyway, my reason for showing at your door. Frankly, I wanted to know what your house smelled like. No, that's not my <em>primary</em> reason for being here. I view it as a sort of side quest that justified a face-to-face meeting rather than a more conventional email. And no, it's not nearly as creepy as your face is implying. My inquiry was a point of academic interest. Everyone's house smells different, an amalgamation of personal scent, furniture, general upkeep, pets and preference for food. And let me just say, I thought it'd smell like this. You know, kind of blue. Yes, I know blue is a color. I guess I mean, fresh, clean, but maybe even a bit sterile. Not in a bad way, mind you. And the hint of tempeh in the air is really quite welcoming.</p>
<p>OK, OK, I realize that I've gone on for a while here, and at any second, Nigel Lythgoe is going to unpause on your DVR and it's going to sound really loud because both our ears have adjusted to the room's noise without a television blaring&mdash;no Apple TV, btw? But that's neither here nor there. My pitch is this:</p>
<p>Sell every iPhone with an accompanying Arduino tank. Like <a href="http://www.projectallusion.com/1/post/2009/11/iphone-controlled-solar-powered-arduino-tank.html">this one</a>. Boom.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5418069/my-plea-to-steve-jobs-that-every-iphone-should-come-with-a-tank]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5418069]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[arduino]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone tank]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5418069&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New Mercedes iPhone App: Hands On]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Mercedes knows its drivers may lose their keys or even their cars but never their iPhones. Lose your giant luxury SUV at the mall? There's an app for that. Click through to see how it works.</p><p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/12/2009/12/thumb160x_photo_main_screen.jpg" class="left image158" width="158">The main screen for the <a class="tagautolink autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #iphone" href="http://jalopnik.comhttp://stage.jalopnik.com/tag/iphone/">iPhone</a> version of the app (the Blackberry version is boring) looks just like a Mercedes key fob and, essentially, works the same way. Unlock/lock the car or even locate it.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/12/2009/12/thumb160x_screen_vehicle_finder.jpg" class="left image158" width="158">The locate feature use's the car's GPS and the phone's GPS to provide instructions for how to get back to your car. And in case you're worried the wife is going to find you riding dirty, the system overrides if you're more than a mile away from the car. Philander in peace, Tiger.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/12/2009/12/thumb160x_photo_lock_successful.jpg" class="left image158" width="158">Don't want the kids getting their grubby hands on your M-Class? Lock the ungrateful rats out.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/12/2009/12/thumb160x_photo_assistance.jpg" class="left image158" width="158">The "mbrace" system isn't OnStar, Mercedes will tell you, but it's OnStar. Access all those features without having to crash your car from your phone.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/12/2009/12/thumb160x_photo_dealer.jpg" class="left image158" width="158">Screw up your CLK because you were too busy playing on your <a class="tagautolink autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #iphone" href="http://jalopnik.comhttp://jalopnik.com/tag/iphone/">iPhone</a> and left the parking brake on? The system will locate the nearest dealer to help fix your car and take a million dollars off your hands.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/12/2009/12/thumb160x_photo_dealer.jpg" class="left image158" width="158">Forget the Mercedes dealership with a staff you actually like? You can find your selling, local or preferred dealer.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/12/2009/12/thumb160x_photo_dealer_search.jpg" class="left image158" width="158">You must be moderately wealthy to live by all these Mercedes dealerships.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/12/2009/12/mbraceiphone.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/12/2009/12/500x_mbraceiphone.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></a>Developed by Hughes Telematics, this is rolling out on all new models and requires a monthly subscription.</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jalopnik.com/5418139/new-mercedes-iphone-app-hands-on/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5418139]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[la auto show]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[2009 LA Auto Show]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mbrace]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mercedes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[syndicate=gizmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Hardigree]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5418139&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Song Summoner Comes From iPod to iPhone, Uses Your Own Music]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/ss3.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #songsummoner" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/songsummoner/">Song Summoner</a> was one of the few games released for the iPod&mdash;not the touch, but original clickwheel type. It was special, as a game, because it used your own music to procedurally generate enemies. Now, it's on the iPhone.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5418157,4,'');
</script></p>
<p>It's $10, but it's an RPG, which supposedly implies more gameplay hours than non-RPGs. Even when you're not actually playing the game, you can level up your guys by listening to the music that's bound to each character, giving you an added bonus to use your iPhone/iTouch more. [<a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/artist/square-enix-co-ltd/id300186801?mt=8">iTunes (Full Version)</a> and <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/song-summoner-the-unsung-heroes/id340358512?mt=8">iTUnes (Lite)</a> via <a href="http://kotaku.com/5418001/square-enix-remakes-song-summoner-for-the-iphone?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+kotaku%2Ffull+%28Kotaku%29">Kotaku</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5418160/song-summoner-comes-from-ipod-to-iphone-uses-your-own-music]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5418160]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone games]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[song summoner]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[square enix]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 Dec 2009 12:51:05 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5418160&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[iPhone Orchestra Hacks Touchscreen, GPS and Accelerometer to Create "Music"]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_iphone-orchestra-2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Dressed in the required blue jeans and black turtleneck, the world's first <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #iphoneorchestra" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphoneorchestra/">iPhone orchestra</a> is staging a public performance next week as part of the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #universityofmichigan" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/universityofmichigan/">University of Michigan</a>'s "Building a Mobile Phone Ensemble" course.</p>
<p>Each iPhone has been programmed to deliver a different sound when each function is used. The touchscreen, microphone, GPS, compass, wireless sensor and accelerometer have all been tinkered with, so Georg Essl, the lecturer/computer scientist/musician can turn the cacophony into something resembling music. We say "something" very loosely, as you can see from <a href="http://www.ns.umich.edu/podcast/video2.php?id=1181">the video here</a>. [<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Michigan-Mobile-Phone-Ensemble/177225121724?v=wall">Facebook</a> via <a href="http://www.9to5mac.com/iphone_orchestra_december_9_30144?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+9To5Mac-MacAllDay+%289+to+5+Mac+-+Apple+Intelligence%29">9to5Mac</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5418024/iphone-orchestra-hacks-touchscreen-gps-and-accelerometer-to-create-music]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5418024]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone orchestra]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[university of michigan]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:52:09 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kat Hannaford]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5418024&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Super Mario Bros iPhone App Makes Your Life a Mario Level]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/thumb160x_844023.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/irwego/id340844023?mt=8">iRwego</a>, a sort-of-cleverly named iPhone app, may not have a very long lifespan, since it's not approved by Nintendo. But I hope it stays&mdash;it soundtracks your life as if it were a Mario game.</p>
<p>The idea is to put it in your pocket, and the accelerometer will detect your movements and play the appropriate Mario sound effect. Jump, and it'll make the distinctive Mario jump sound; crouch, and it'll make the "worp worp worp" sound as if you're entering a green pipe. Also included are brick hits and Goomba-stomping, among other noises, tunes and a few choice Mario catchphrases. It's available now (hopefully) for a buck. [<a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/irwego/id340844023?mt=8">iRwego</a> via <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-27076_3-10408099-248.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-20">CNET</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5417670/super-mario-bros-iphone-app-makes-your-life-a-mario-level]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5417670]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[irwego]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mario]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nintendo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[super mario bros]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 Dec 2009 00:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5417670&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Remainders - Good and Bad Stuff We Didn't Post (And Why)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><i>Shockingly</i> cheap Apple tablets, Twitter books, Google power plants, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #samuraimario" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/samuraimario/">Samurai Mario</a> and a bunch of things that didn't make the cut today. Some of it we didn't like, and some are fun gems from our (riveting!) staff chat room.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/googlesolar.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_googlesolar.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<h2>Google Might Build Super-Green Power Plants</h2>
<p>Google's been investing in solar, wind and geothermal companies for a while, so it's not particularly surprising that the company is thinking about going a step further and directly financing some green power plants. This could be a move that could push other companies to delve deeper into greener energy tech, so all the more power to Google. Good God, did I just make a pun out of that? [<a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/12/google-greentech-power-plants/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+wired%2Fscience+(Wired%3A+Science)">Wired</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_tablet.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<h2>Apple Tablet to Be "Shockingly" Cheap</h2>
<p>On the latest episode of <i>Diggnation</i>, Internet and television personality Alex Albrecht remarked that he was shocked about 'how cheap the price point" of the Apple tablet would be. No word on how exactly he got his information or just how cheap it needs to be to shock him. [<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/12/02/apple_tablet_rumored_to_be_shockingly_inexpensive.html">Apple Insider</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_hospital.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<h2>Computers Don't Really Save Hospitals Any Money</h2>
<p>Harvard did a study to see if using computers saves hospitals money or increases administrative efficiency. The answer to both questions was a resounding "no," but I don't think that should be a surprise. Using computers in an environment like that requires maintenance and training, which naturally cost both money and time. What surprised me about the study is that it didn't look at what effect the use of computers had on actual patient services. Does it make a difference there? [<a href="http://voices.allthingsd.com/20091202/harvard-study-computers-dont-save-hospitals-money/?mod=ATD_rss">All Things D</a>]</p>
<p><i>Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tahitianlime/912907071/">tahitianlime</a></i></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/ughbookz_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_ughbookz_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<h2>TweetBookz Made My Inner Bookworm Crawl Into a Hole</h2>
<p>Alright, I confess: <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5404804/gifts-for-bookworms-who-live-for-lazy-weekend-reads/gallery">I like books</a> and I'm a bit of a dorky geek which means that nearly any new combination of geek and lit tends to appeal to me. Except when it goes oh-so-very-wrong like these <i>TweetBookz</i>.</p>
<p>The idea behind <i>TweetBookz</i> is that you pay about $30 to have a bunch of your tweets made into a nicely bound book. Initially I thought that this could be neat, but then I looked at my own tweets. I somehow don't think I or anyone else would want a book full of <a href="http://twitter.com/rosagolijan/status/5928455509">messages to creepy people</a> or <a href="http://twitter.com/rosagolijan/status/5920430215">days of the week</a>.</p>
<p>But maybe I'm just a bit of a lazy, boring Twitter user. [<a href="http://www.tweetbookz.com/index.php">TweetBookz</a> via <a href="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/12/the-ultimate-vanity-press-your-tweets-in-hardcover/">Wired</a>]</p>
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/081dHOYY6IE&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/081dHOYY6IE&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object></p>
<h2>Guy Wins <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #beardcontest" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/beardcontest/">Beard Contest</a> With a Hairy Bird Cage</h2>
<p>Jason was particularly excited about this old clip of a beard contest of some sort. I was just plain terrified.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_bigsammario.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<h2>Samurai Mario Battles Bowser and a Dinosaur</h2>
<p>I'm not entirely certain what possessed someone to make this illustration of Mario attempting to battle a dinosaur and Bowser while dressed as an ancient samurai, but I like it. [<a href="http://www.geekologie.com/2009/12/samurai_mario_battling_bowser.php">Geekologie</a>]</p>
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_1"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/rzYxtc5F1s4&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/rzYxtc5F1s4&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object></p>
<h2>Ikea Makes an iPhone App</h2>
<p>Good news for those who want to deck out their rooms with Ikea items, but <i>need</i> to see the entire catalog on their iPhone before shopping: There's an app for that. [<a href="http://freshome.com/2009/12/02/ikea-launches-catalogue-as-iphone-app/">Fresh Home</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_audietron_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<h2>I'll Tell You About The Audi E-Tron as Soon as I Stop Drooling</h2>
<p>Ok, I don't think I can stop drooling long enough to type, so I'll keep it brief: Wowza. This is the Audi E-Tron which was shown off as a concept at prior car show. She's still got the 3,320 lb-ft of torque we were teased about, but now she's been photographed some more and she looks oh-so-very-nice. Check out the bright-pumpkin-orange car-shaped eyecandy over at Jalopnik. [<a href="http://jalopnik.com/5417502/audi-e+tron-sexiest-electric-car-concept-ever">Jalopnik</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5417622/remainders-+-good-and-bad-stuff-we-didnt-post-and-why/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5417622]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[beard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[beard contest]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[beards]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gizmodo remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google powerplants]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hospitals hospital apple tablet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ikea]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ikea iphone app]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mario]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[powerplants]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samurai mario]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tweetbookz]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 02 Dec 2009 23:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5417622&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[It Took This Long To Make iPhone Icon Pillows?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/iphone_icon_pillows.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_iphone_icon_pillows.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>I thought we saw every kind of <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/pst/pillows/">nerdy pillow</a> imaginable but, for some reason, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #iphoneicons" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphoneicons/">iPhone icons</a> slipped under the radar despite being well represented as <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5056186/iphone-coasters-convert-any-table-into-a-jobsonian-device">coasters</a> and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5318643/iphone-icon-paperclips-appify-your-office-supplies">paperclips</a>. Finally, someone has delivered.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5417139,4,'iPhone Icon Pillows');
</script></p>
<p>And that someone just happens to be Etsy user iconpillow. Actually, he has quite a few pillow designs outside of iPhone icons that might make a great gift for someone who enjoys both gadgets and naps&mdash;including Facebook and Firefox. [<a href="http://www.etsy.com/shop/iconpillows?page=1">Etsy</a> via <a href="http://www.geeky-gadgets.com/iphone-icon-pillows-02-12-2009/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+geeky-gadgets+%28Geeky+Gadgets%29">Geeky Gadgets</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5417128/it-took-this-long-to-make-iphone-icon-pillows]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5417128]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[pillows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone icon pillows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone icons]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5417128&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Just a Cheap iPhone/iPod Adapter USB Hub]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_usbipod.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />If the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5068952/lightning-review-griffin-simplifi-ipod+iphone-dockcard-readerusb-hub">Griffin Simplifi</a> is too expensive for you, this $15 generic iPhone/iPod 3-port <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #usbhub" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/usbhub/">USB hub</a> will allow you to sync an Apple product while accommodating up to three other devices that resent your favoritism. [<a href="http://www.usbfever.com/index_eproduct_view.php?products_id=1621">USBFever</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5417067/just-a-cheap-iphoneipod-adapter-usb-hub]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5417067]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[peripherals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone usb hub]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[usb hub]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5417067&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Mirror's Edge Coming to the iPhone In January]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_500x_mephone2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Love it, hate it, or occasionally <a href="http://kotaku.com/5026052/mirrors-edge-motion-sickness">vomit because of it</a>, you have to admit that <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #mirrorsedge" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/mirrorsedge/">Mirror's Edge</a></em> was one of the more interesting games of the last few years. And now it's <a href="http://kotaku.com/5416905/mirrors-edge-running-straight-to-the-iphone">coming to the iPhone</a>.</p>

<p>If you don't have any idea what I'm talking about, here's Mirror's Edge in a nutshell: Parkour, with bullets. Which is an unusually hearty mix! The few early screens show what looks like a 3D sidescroller/platformer, which means that the iPhone version is a sort of hybrid game, somewhere between the original and the fantastic <a href="http://mirrorsedge2d.com/">2D Flash version</a> that EA posted for free. Either way: awesome.<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_500x_mephone.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
Especially since this is one of the few types of games that could actually <em>benefit</em> from the iPhone's tilt-based controls, as opposed to most franchise translations, which see every last ounce of joy sucks from their essence by that cursed accelerometer, and that god-forsken panel of <em>glass</em>. [<a href="http://kotaku.com/5416905/mirrors-edge-running-straight-to-the-iphone">Kotaku</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5417120/mirrors-edge-coming-to-the-iphone-in-january]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5417120]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mirror's edge]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:11:12 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5417120&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[iPhone Fitted With SLR Lens (It Was Bound to Happen)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_phone-o-scope_1-thumb-600x399-39383.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />We've seen plenty of those tiny lens add-on kits for cellphones, but never before have we seen the equal of the Phone-O-Scope: 18-55mm glass attached to the iPhone. And it's no wonder, because the process was anything but simple.</p>

<p>ILM Research Engineer Bhautik Joshi disassembled his iPhone only to stuff in part of his DVD player, the laser pickup, which houses three miniature magnifying lenses. These lenses are what made it possible for the iPhone to accept the light/images beaming through the 18-55mm lens, which was carefully positioned through PVC pipe, duct tape and cursing.</p>
<p>The results?<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_iphoneslr.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
(<em>iPhone left, modded version right</em>)</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The Phone-O-Scope doesn't take especially superb images, and it's a bit clumsy to handle. On the other hand, it's fun to shoot with and produces very analog (almost Holga-like) results.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>We're just glad someone did it, finally, so we didn't need to duct tape our iPhone to our dSLR <em>Flight of the Conchords</em> style. [<a href="http://cow.mooh.org/2009/12/phone-o-scope-attaching-slr-lenses-to.html">captin nod</a> via <a href="http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2009/12/attach_a_slr_lens_to_an_iphone_with.html">MAKE</a> via <a href="http://www.ohgizmo.com/2009/12/02/phone-o-scope-slr-lens-mount-for-the-iphone/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Ohgizmo+%28OhGizmo!%29">OhGizmo!</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5417033/iphone-fitted-with-slr-lens-it-was-bound-to-happen]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5417033]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mods]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phone-o-scope]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:53:01 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5417033&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Top 5 Assclowns Laughing at the iPhone Back in 2007]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/C5oGaZIKYvo&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/C5oGaZIKYvo&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object> I wonder how many times <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #steveballmer" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/steveballmer/">Steve Ballmer</a> laughed about the iPhone after pooping all over it in this 2007 interview. My guess: Not many. Don't worry Steve, here's the rest of the top 5 assclowns who dug their own grave:</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5416781,6,'Top 5 iPhone Assclowns');
</script></p>
<p><iframe src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http://digg.com/apple/Top_5_Assclowns_Laughing_at_the_iPhone_Back_in_2007" align="right" frameborder="0" height="82" scrolling="no" width="55"></iframe></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5416765/top-5-assclowns-laughing-at-the-iphone-back-in-2007]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5416765]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[retromodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[anssi vanjoki]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blockquote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ed colligan]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ed zander]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fail]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[john c. dvorak]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jon rubenstein]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[steve ballmer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5416765&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[RedEye Makes Your iPhone a Universal Remote Control]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_redyeye1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />After months of private beta testing, ThinkFlood's RedEye goes on sale today. You control the dock using an <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=315598320&mt=8">iPhone app</a> via Wi-Fi, and it sends out infrared signals to control your AV gear. At $188, it's not crazy expensive, either.</p>
<p>I mean, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5334917/logitech-harmony-900-universal-remote-review">Logitech Harmony 900</a> costs $400, and even the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5351388/logitech-harmony-700-universal-remote-gives-you-more-physical-buttons">Harmony 700</a> is $150.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_redeye2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<p>Being touchscreen-based, you can tailor buttons to your lounge room kit, and group multiple devices into single macro "actions". There's also basic use of multi-touch (two finger swipes for volume, for instance), and you can control additional RedEye units that may be setup in different rooms.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_redyeye3.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<p>The kit works with any iPhone or iPod touch, but doesn't yet support Bluetooth or Bang and Olufsen devices.</p>
<p>I gotta admit, the RedEye actually seems pretty cool. If the price comes down just a teeny bit, it may become a must-have iPhone accessory. [<a href="https://thinkflood.com/products/redeye/what-is-redeye/">RedEye</a>]</p>
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/s-TC5uh4j7M&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/s-TC5uh4j7M&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5416956/redeye-makes-your-iphone-a-universal-remote-control]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5416956]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone universal remote redeye]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[redeye]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[thinkflood]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[thinkflood redeye]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[universal remote]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 02 Dec 2009 08:22:28 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5416956&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Steve Jobs Approves Knocking Live Video App Personally]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/knocking-live-video-dual.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Normally whingeing gets you nowhere, but in a heartening turn of events, a developer's late-night email shot off to <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #stevejobs" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/stevejobs/">Steve Jobs</a> yielded some surprising results.</p>
<p>Apple didn't approve of the use of a private API in Pointy Heads Software's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #knockinglivevideo" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/knockinglivevideo/">Knocking Live Video</a> app, which allows iPhone users to stream live video to each other over 3G and Wi-Fi. After pleading to Steve Jobs to reconsider their verdict, Apple got back to developer Brian Meehan the next morning, promising that his request was being taken seriously.</p>
<p>Three hours later, with the order reportedly coming "directly from the top," the Knocking Live Video was available on the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #appstore" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/appstore/">App Store</a>, where you can download it for free now. Until Apple sticks a forward-facing camera on the iPhone, it's not ideal for video chat, but as Jesus <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5416494/where-is-my-iphone-videochat-apple">pointed out in his rant yesterday</a>, Apple's likely biding its time until it can smell the video chat competition.</p>
<p>Meehan's gone public with his story, telling Ars Technica that "Apple told me they are listening, and truly care about their developers and getting it right," giving hope to developers railing against them on the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5414319/apple-rejected-me-a-site-for-scorned-app-developers">Apple Rejected Me</a> hate-site, and hope for anyone wishing to use a private API in an app. With Apple loosening its grip in this instance, we could be seeing a lot more interesting apps launching soon. [<a href="http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2009/12/steve-jobs-intervenes-approves-knocking-streaming-video-app.ars">Ars Technica</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5416950/steve-jobs-approves-knocking-live-video-app-personally]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5416950]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[stevejobs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[app store]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[developer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[developers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[knocking live video]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[steve jobs]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 02 Dec 2009 08:13:59 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kat Hannaford]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5416950&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Stolen Belgian iPhones Traced to Russian Black Market]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_mission-impossible-iphone.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Remember that <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5406577/3-million-of-iphones-stolen-in-belgium-heist">$3M iPhone 3GS heist</a> in Belgium last month? Burglars nabbed 3,000-4,000 handsets. Now, according to blogs uncovered by <em>Cult of Mac</em>, they're being offloaded in Russia (where the 3GS isn't available) in batches of 100&mdash;cash only.</p>
<p>Problem is, Interpol has a list of the phone's International Mobile Equipment Identifier (IMEI), which carriers can use to block the devices. We had already warned against grabbing an iPhone in a Belgian back alley…you can add Russia to that list. (I much prefer back alleys in the Netherlands, anyway). [<a href="http://www.cultofmac.com/stolen-belgian-iphones-starting-to-appear-on-russian-black-market/22227">Cult of Mac</a> via <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/183352/report_stolen_belgian_iphones_surfacing_in_russia.html">PC World</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5416920/stolen-belgian-iphones-traced-to-russian-black-market]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5416920]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[belgium]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[interpol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone heist RUSSIA]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mobsistar]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[russia]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 02 Dec 2009 07:01:11 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5416920&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Where Is My iPhone Videochat, Apple?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_iphone-third-eye.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Dear Apple and AT&T: I have had enough of this. Tell me, why don't we have videochat on the iPhone, you assclowns? Whatever excuse you may have, I'm here to destroy it.</p>
<p>This morning, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5416214/video-calls-now-available-on-the-iphone">latest Fring update brought videochat</a> to the iPhone. It only works in one direction, from a computer to your iPhone. It uses Wi-Fi instead of the 3G connection, even while 3G is capable of supporting videoconferencing (in fact, it was one of its major selling points, back in the day of its introduction). The only reason for not having bi-directional chat is simple: The iPhone doesn't have a front camera.</p>
<p>The main thing is that it works. A third-party has created a videoconferencing app for the iPhone that communicates with desktop computers, just using Apple's standard iPhone programming toolbox. The question now is: If it's that easy, why don't we have a camera and iChat AV on the iPhone?</p>
<p>Could it be because AT&T is fearing that videoconferencing on the iPhone would bring their already overloaded 3G network to a total collapse? That's a valid reason. But if that's the case, just enable the videoconferencing under Wi-Fi, and be done with it.</p>
<p>Maybe the iPhone doesn't have enough processing power to do bidirectional videochat? Nonsense. The processor in the iPhone is plenty fast to handle simultaneous H.264 encoding and decoding for videoconferencing applications. In fact, the iPhone 3GS' PowerVR SGX processor has dedicated pipes to encode and decode H.264 in real time. And even <a href="http://www.apple.com/quicktime/technologies/h264/">Apple highlights the use of H.264</a> for videoconferencing applications in other 3G mobile devices, most of them a lot less capable than the iPhone.</p>
<p>Perhaps the VGA camera required to capture the video is too expensive or too big? That doesn't make any sense either. Not only do other phones have these cameras, but the latest generation is so tiny and inexpensive that I wouldn't be surprised if they gave one away integrated in every Corn Flakes box soon.</p>
<p>If there's no technical reason for not having videoconference in the iPhone, then why oh why Apple doesn't give us an iChat AV client and an iPhone that doesn't require an <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5015395/apple-introduces-iphone-3g-videoconferencing-kit-zomg">stupid contraption</a> to use it? After all, they were the first company to push videoconferencing across their whole product line, and they keep working on it actively. The latest generation of iChat AV&mdash;rolled out with Snow Leopard&mdash;has more efficient codecs than the previous version.</p>
<p>My only guess: They just want to milk the hell out of their user base. They know their game, these Cupertino boys and girls. They know they have the market by the balls. They know they can keep churning out marginal upgrades because, like <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5385263/apple-people-are-still-just-trying-to-catch-up-with-the-first-iphone">Tim Cook said</a>: "frankly, I think people are still just trying to catch up with the first iPhone 2 years ago." And people will keep sinking dollars in the marginal upgrades like there's no tomorrow, as shown by the iPhone 3GS.</p>
<p>Why release an iPhone with AV conferencing now when they can hold it for a little longer, as they wait for the rest of the market to catch up? Exactly: There's no need. And that's why we will have to wait. Wait until they smell that Google is about to release a phone that supports Gtalk with videoconferencing. Or until whenever they have it planned in their roadmap. Yes, that private roadmap that already has three or four generations of this thing ready to launch.</p>
<p>In other words: Prepare to wait, and keep sucking hard on the Apple Kool-aid, because this is not happening until they feel a real threat from someone else.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5416494/where-is-my-iphone-videochat-apple]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5416494]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rant]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3gs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video conference]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:20:01 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5416494&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Augmented Reality Twitter App Shows You Exactly Where Your Friends Are Tweeting]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_screencap_2009-12-01_at_3.17.49_pm.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Augmented reality Twitter isn't new to the App Store, but their official geolocation service is just a few weeks old. How? <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5381846/androids-best-augmented-reality-app-hits-the-iphone">Hacks</a>! <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #twitter360" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/twitter360/">Twitter 360</a> is the first augmented reality Twitter app to support the official API, and it looks fantastic.</p>
<p>Previously, the only way to grab location data from Twitter was to scrape through user profiles or to rely on some kind of third-party geodata service, with which Twitter users could upload their current locations as individual Tweets. It worked, sort of, but it was janky and awkward. Now that Twitter lets you embed your location in each tweet without taking up any characters, things are different.<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_screencap_2009-12-01_at_3.18.01_pm.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
Most new iPhone Twitter clients support the GPS tagging feature, so there's no shortage of location data to play with, and Twitter 360 is one of the first apps to really take advantage of it. You can basically watch your Twitter friends leave a trail of narcissistic word nuggets all over town <em>in real time</em>, rendered on a map or through your iPhone's camera. It's fascinating, if, you know, you're into loose acquaintances' latitudes and longitudes. (Which is an acceptable thing, in this 2009.)</p>
<p>Twitter 360 is $3 and only available for the iPhone 3GS, since a compass is necessary to properly orient the tweets on screen. And the app itself is executed well enough, though its function are fairly narrow&mdash;if you can stand to wait, I'm sure free multipurpose AR apps like <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/layar">Layar</a> will get support for Twitter geolocation soon enough. [<a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/twitter-360/id330158239?mt=8">iTunes</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5416427/augmented-reality-twitter-app-shows-you-exactly-where-your-friends-are-tweeting]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5416427]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[geolocation]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[twitter 360]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:19:30 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5416427&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[AT&T Comes in Last in Consumer Reports Study That Surprises No One]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/cellsurvey1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_cellsurvey1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Here's some news anyone with an iPhone could have told you: AT&T delivers crappy service that its customers hate. But this news comes from a reputable source, <i>Consumer Reports</i>, instead of the usual whiny friends.</p>
<p>Yes, in 19 of the 26 cities surveyed, AT&T was ranked dead last in every category. Verizon was ranked the best, followed by T-Mobile, then Sprint and then, of course, bringing up the rear is our friend AT&T. You can compare their results to the results of <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5111989/the-definitive-coast+to+coast-3g-data-test">our own nationwide 3G test here</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/cellsurvey2.jpg" width="700" height="525">You've got to wonder if Apple can afford to stick this exclusivity contract out another year, what with decent competitors such as the Droid and the Pre now available. AT&T is as big a black mark on Apple's customer service reputation as they've ever had. And hell, for AT&T's sake it'd be nice to see some other carriers share the burden of iPhone data hogs. [<a href="http://www.9to5mac.com/AT-T-consumer-reports-carriers-642754">9 to 5 Mac</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5416389/att-comes-in-last-in-consumer-reports-study-that-surprises-no-one]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5416389]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[schadenfreude]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sprint]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:45:04 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5416389&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Twitter Co-Founder Begins Trial On SquareUp iPhone Credit Card Payment Service]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/squareup.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_squareup.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Basic details about Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey's plans for an iPhone credit card payment service have been floating around for some time, but it appears that his <a href="http://squareup.com/">SquareUp</a> startup has finally gone live for trial users&mdash;and it looks promising.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/squareup_2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_squareup_2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>There are several apps on the iPhone designed to accept credit card payments but, as far as I can tell, SquareUp has the best set of features. It doesn't require any contracts or monthly fees, and card payments can be accepted through a small device that plugs into the audio jack. Receipts can be sent via email or viewed online and text messages can be used to verify payments in real time.</p>
<p>There are even benefits to using the service for cardholders, much like the points you might accrue for making purchases. SquareUp lets business owners know that you are a repeat customer that may be entitled to a freebie&mdash;kind of like punch cards do now. They also donate one cent of each transaction to the charity of your choice.</p>
<p>SquareUP claims the service will roll out to everyone in 2010, which is good news for small businesses. No word yet on how much the swiping plug-in will cost, but you can bet that it will be a hell of a lot cheaper than the machines you currently have to contend with. [<a href="http://squareup.com/">SquareUp</a> via <a href="http://venturebeat.com/2009/12/01/twitter-co-founder-jack-dorsey-shows-off-his-new-mobile-payments-startup/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+Venturebeat+(VentureBeat)">VentureBeat</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5416344/twitter-co+founder-begins-trial-on-squareup-iphone-credit-card-payment-service]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5416344]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[card]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cards]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[credit]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[payments]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[small]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:17:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5416344&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Video Calls Now Available On the iPhone]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/fring-videocalls.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_fring-videocalls.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Be happy, because video calls are now <i>legally</i> available on the iPhone. Be sad, because it's one way only, so you won't be able to flash your naughty bits.</p>
<p>Fring&mdash;a free chat client for the iPhone that supports most standards&mdash;has been updated to support video conferencing on the iPhone, using Wi-Fi. It works on Fring to Fring, and Skype to Fring. Unfortunately, it's not bi-directional. You would be able to see whoever is calling you from a desktop, but you won't be able to transmit your image, even if you have the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5015395/apple-introduces-iphone-3g-videoconferencing-kit-zomg">3G videoconferencing kit</a>. The reason is a physical one, according to the developer: The iPhone doesn't have a front camera, so you can't do face to face.</p>
<p>Which begs the question once again: When in the name of all that is good and chromed is Apple going to update the iPhone with a front camera and iChat AV? Given their push for videoconferencing on the desktop, the power in the current iPhone, and the efficiency of their iChat AV video codecs, it can't be far away. I hope. [<a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/fring/id290948830?mt=8">iTunes App Store</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5416214/video-calls-now-available-on-the-iphone]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5416214]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[app]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fring]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video conference]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 01 Dec 2009 12:40:52 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5416214&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Best Reading Device Ever]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/fVMnmTFxAjA&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/fVMnmTFxAjA&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object> There's just so much right about this. [<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVMnmTFxAjA&feature=player_embedded">YouTube</a> via <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/11/30/cute-apple-parody-fr.html">BoingBoing</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5415586/the-best-reading-device-ever]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5415586]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[newspaper]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the sun]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5415586&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo's Essential iPhone Apps: November '09 Edition]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_bestappsnov.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Each month, the best new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #iphoneapps" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphoneapps/">iPhone apps</a>&mdash;and some older ones&mdash;are considered for admission into Gizmodo's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphone-apps-directory/">Essential iPhone Apps Directory</a>. Who will join? Who will live? <em>Who will die?</em></p>

<p><em>For the full directory of Gizmodo's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #essentialiphoneapps" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/essentialiphoneapps/">Essential iPhone Apps</a>, click <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphone-apps-directory/">here</a>.<br></em></p>
<h1>The Month's Best</h1>
<p>As gathered from our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/the-week-in-iphone-apps">weekly roundups</a>.</p>
<p>If you hate hate <em>hate</em> galleries, click <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5415665/the-months-best-iphone-apps/">here</a> for a single post.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5415665,7,'');
</script></p>
<h1><a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphone-apps-directory/">Essential App Directory</a> Inductees</h1>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/inductees.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_inductees.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>This month was BOUNTIFUL, as we welcome seven (7!) new apps to the fold. Here are your new inductees:</p>
<p>• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5415640/i-am-t+pain">I Am T-Pain</a>: This app was fun when it first came out, but now that you can sing over your iPod library, it's priceless.</p>
<p>• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5415619/waze">Waze</a>: Because it's getting to be good enough to depend on (in a few areas), because it's free, and because their video-gamey plan to make the app better is totally charming.</p>
<p>• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5415626/voices">Voices</a>: Because when your iPhone isn't acting as a tool, it's a toy. And <em>everyone</em> loves some good voice modulation.</p>
<p>• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5415596/snapture">Snapture</a>: Because full 3GS support, which Snapture recently added, was the only thing holding this app back from replacing the iPhone's camera completely.</p>
<p>• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5415615/shopsavvy">ShopSavvy</a>: Because any iPhone decent a good, <em>free</em> barcode scanning app.</p>
<p>• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5415628/chorus">Chorus</a>: Because finding new apps is <em>hard</em>, y'all.</p>
<p>• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5415644/kirikae">Jailbreak</a>: Kirikae: Because without a solid task switcher like Kirikae, fantastic jailbreak app Backgrounder is kind of useless. <em>With</em> it, your iPhone is a full-fledged multitasking smartphone, finally. (Don't get defensive!)</p>
<h2>And Farewell To...</h2>
<p>Our current directory members are all safe this time around. But next month, expect <em>hell</em>. (Maybe!)</p>
<p><em>What counts as an <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphone-apps-directory/">essential iPhone app</a> changes all the time, and so should our guide: If we've missed anything huge, or you've got a much better suggestion for a particular type of app, let us know, or say so in the comments. We'll be updating this thing pretty frequently, and a million Gizmodo readers can do a better job at sorting through the app mess than a single Gizmodo editor. Enjoy!<br></em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5415675/gizmodos-essential-iphone-apps-november-09-edition]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5415675]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[essential iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:00:12 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5415675&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[More Evidence Apple's Looking Beyond Google for iPhone Maps?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/iphonemaps.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_iphonemaps.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>A few months ago, Apple bought <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5371694/apple-buys-their-very-own-maps-company-see-ya-google-maps">their own mapmaker</a>, Placebase, which seemingly opened the possibility of non-Google-y maps. Now, <a href="http://jobs.apple.com/index.ajs?BID=1&method=mExternal.showJob&RID=44070&CurrentPage=3">they're looking</a> for an <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #iphonemaps" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphonemaps/">iPhone maps</a> engineer to "rethink how users use Maps and change the way people find things."</p>
<p>That job description actually fits kind of perfectly with what Placebase did well in its former life&mdash;customization and tons of ways to layer multiple kinds of data sets onto maps, with an API that makes it easy to layer on said data sets. Here's more of the listing:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The iPhone has revolutionized the mobile industry and has changed people's lives and we want to continue to do so. We want to take Maps to the next level, rethink how users use Maps and change the way people find things. We want to do this in a seamless, highly interactive and enjoyable way. We've only just started.</p>
<p>As an engineer on the Maps team, your responsibilities will range from implementing low-level client/server code to implementing high-level user interfaces. You'll be responsible for implementing new and innovative features, fixing problems and enhancing the performance of Maps. You will work closely with the other engineers on the Maps team, other iPhone and iPod touch teams as well our partners in other companies.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Of course, it's also just as possible&mdash;if not more so&mdash;that Apple's sticking with <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5391966/google-and-the-deadly-power-of-data">Google for map data</a>, and simply looking to add new and unique powers to its Maps application, to differentiate it from <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #googlemaps" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/googlemaps/">Google Maps</a> on other phones (which in Android's case includes, exclusively, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5393935/google-navigator-for-android-review-good-for-free-but-far-from-perfect">awesome Google Navigation</a>). [<a href="http://jobs.apple.com/index.ajs?BID=1&method=mExternal.showJob&RID=44070&CurrentPage=3">Apple</a> via <a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2009/11/27/apple-to-take-iphones-maps-app-to-the-next-level/">MacRumors</a> via <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/30/apple_hiring_mapping_engineer/">The Reg</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5415565/more-evidence-apples-looking-beyond-google-for-iphone-maps]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5415565]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[speculation]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google maps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone maps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[maps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[navigation]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[placebase]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:46:27 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5415565&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Best Twitter Apps for iPhone and Android Just Got Better]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/twitterdates.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_twitterdates.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Some of the best of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #twitterapps" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/twitterapps/">Twitter apps</a> just got a lot better with fresh updates&mdash;<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5378336/tweetie-2-review-the-best-iphone-twitter-app-period">Tweetie</a> 2.1 and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5304733/birdfeed-twitter-app-review-lean-fast-and-pretty">Birdfeed</a> 1.2 on the iPhone, and Twidroid 3.0 on Android. Here's what new and awesomer:</p>
<p><strong>Birdfeed 1.2</strong><br>
The biggest change in Birdfeed 1.2 is geolocation using the official Twitter API, which embeds the location of a tweet as metadata, unlike previous Twitter app geolocation powers, which were workarounds. It's probably my favorite implementation since it's the dead simplest, with a tap adding location to any tweet. Also new and excellent is support for Flickr, designed in a fairly elegant way. Of course, there's a bunch of smaller tweaks too, and now it's only $3, down from $5. It's still my favorite looking/feeling Twitter app.</p>
<p><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #tweetie2" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/tweetie2/">Tweetie 2</a>.1</strong><br>
Tweetie 2.1 has a bunch of gut changes that add up to a better experience. The big things are that there's now native support for Twitter's new official retweets (love 'em or hate 'em) and Twitter lists. Also, in-app spam reporting (yay) and better geolocation using Twitter's official API. Free update, of course.</p>
<p><strong>Twidroid 3.0</strong><br>
Android's most powerful Twitter app is a lot more usable now. The main thing for me is that it <em>finally</em> supports threaded conversations, so you can see what the hell people were replying to. In-app link and photo previews, new keyboard shortcuts, and lots of other smaller UI tweaks. For the future, plug-ins could be huge. The first one is Google Maps, which is nice to have. Oh, and it doesn't look like ass on the Droid anymore.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://twidroid.com/">Twidroid</a>, <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/tweetie-2/id333903271?mt=8">Tweetie</a>, <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/birdfeed-a-very-nice-twitter-client/id320494156?mt=8">Birdfeed</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5415537/the-best-twitter-apps-for-iphone-and-android-just-got-better]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5415537]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[birdfeed]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tweetie]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tweetie 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[twidroid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[twitter apps]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:15:41 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5415537&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The iPhone Is an Affront to Language]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/iphonelanguage.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_iphonelanguage.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>I dislike capital letters. I dislike <em>exceptional</em> capital letters even more. The iPhone, and indeed most Apple products, suffer from "camel case," as the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/29/magazine/29FOB-onlanguage-t.html?_r=1">NYT's On Language calls it</a>. "Steep is the descent into orthographic antinomianism." He's right.</p>
<p>There's a historical reason in tech for products with camel case, like QuickTime or WordPerfect, as Crain, channeling New Scientist lays out: Often, spaces had to be dropped in programming languages, so capital letters were used in compound words to make them easier to read. That's fine, but in today's world, I agree very much with this sentiment:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>In my considered opinion, the juxtaposition of majuscule and minuscule in a personal name may be safely indulged as a prerogative of the human being, with all his individual strangeness, but to extend the same license to the fruits, literal and figurative, of human labor is another matter.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Now, we have brands and products like TiVo, NVIDIA*, iEverythingapplemakes, BlackBerry, eXpo, eBook, eMachines, <strike>iRiver</strike> (it's iriver, oops), PlayStation and way, way more that insist on being special through forcing you to stretch your pinky finger over to the shift key at odd intervals, following their rhythm, dancing to their tune. It's a form of control.</p>
<p>Historically, Crain says, word spacing didn't really become standard for the modern world until the 13th century, after disappearing for a millennium. So camel case, he says, "is regressive &mdash; in fact medieval. It harks back to an era when reading was effortful, public and loud - like a visit to a contemporary shopping mall." Yep, that's the point. [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/29/magazine/29FOB-onlanguage-t.html?_r=1">NYT</a>]</p>
<p>*I hate all caps, too, unless it's an acronym.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5415432/the-iphone-is-an-affront-to-language]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5415432]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[on language]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tivo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:04:12 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5415432&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[4iThumbs: iPhone Gets Another Physical Keyboard Idea]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/4ithumbs.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_4ithumbs.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Still wish the iPhone had physical letter keys like Blackberries or WinMo phones? First there was that butt-ugly <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5362350/itwinge-iphone-keyboard-video-makes-me-cringe-a-little-less">iTwinge keyboard holster</a>, now there's 4iThumbs: a clear plastic overlay with nubs located over the on screen keyboard.</p>
<p>On the upside, the covers only cost $15 (portrait), $17 (landscape), or $20 for both. Problem is, you're supposed to slap them on and off when you want to continue using the iPhone's touchscreen. That's not only a pain in the ass, <strike>but I'm sure the adhesive won't last too long, either.</strike> <strong>Update:</strong> The 4iThumbs team got in touch to clarify that the overlay doesn't actually adhere to iPhone screen&mdash;it slips and clicks into 2 black strips that remain on the top and bottom portions of the face. You can't see it in the shots because they integrate into the design of the phone and allow the screen to be inserted and removed as much as you want.</p>
<p>So maybe 4iThumbs might interest those who type novel-length emails and texts, or those who <em>really</em> suck at the touchscreen keyboard. What do you think? [<a href="http://web.me.com/ryouthsave/4ithumbs/Home.html">4iThumbs</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/25/4ithumbs-overlay-adds-a-tactile-keyboard-to-your-iphone-sorta/">Engadget</a>]</p>
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/aW6Iy-UE4Wo&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/aW6Iy-UE4Wo&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object></p>
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_1"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/glYvCCgFjVc&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/glYvCCgFjVc&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5415329/4ithumbs-iphone-gets-another-physical-keyboard-idea]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5415329]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[4ithumbs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone keyboard 4iThumbs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[itwinge]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:03:02 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5415329&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Rejects iDroid App (Thankfully)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_idroid.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Sure, a Motorola Droid-style glowing red eye sounds cool, but the iDroid app would not have actually replicated any Droid features. In fact, it would have been little more than an ad spewing marketing propaganda once you tapped on it.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5396168/motorola-droid-review">Motorola Droid</a> is a great handset&mdash;it doesn't need crapware advertising to sell itself. Apple has a shitty history when it comes to app rejections, but yeah, I'm with them on this one. iDroid's creators, Swavv Apps, should have just stuck to Beer Pong. [<a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/29/idroid-app-rejected-apple-iphone/">TechCrunch</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5415151/apple-rejects-idroid-app-thankfully]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5415151]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[app store]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[idroid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[idroid iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:43:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5415151&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[A Very Personal Message to the Buyer of the iPhone 3GS Supreme]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_iphone-3gs-supreme-worlds-most-expensive-mobile.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Dear anonymous buyer of the $3,164,000 <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #iphone3gssupreme" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphone3gssupreme/">iPhone 3GS Supreme</a>, the most expensive and tacky cellphone in the world: You are a tasteless assclown. Sincerely, Me.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_iphone-3gs-supreme-worlds-most-expensive-mobile_1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<p>P.S. I don't care that you are a rich Australian business man in the gold mining industry. I don't care that you are so rich that paying $3,164,000 for this ridiculous piece of gold and diamond tackiness probably doesn't even register in your bank account. And I don't care that this garish brick is made with 271 grams of 22k gold, 136 flawless color F diamonds for the bezel, 53 diamonds for the logo, and one 7.1 carat diamond as the navigation button. This ostentatious piece of shiny crap that should have never happened. I'm not even taking into consideration that we are in the middle of a worldwide economic crisis, with millions suffering around the world. It's just that it sucks golden donkey balls, no matter how you look at it.</p>
<p>And you are still a tasteless assclown. [<a href="http://stuarthughes.com/newdawn/product_info.php?products">Stuart Hughes</a> via <a href="http://www.likecool.com/iPhone_3GS_Supreme_Worlds_most_expensive_mobile--Apple&mdash;Gear.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Likecool+%28Likecool-gadget+and+design+magazine%29">Like Cool</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5414827/a-very-personal-message-to-the-buyer-of-the-iphone-3gs-supreme]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5414827]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[wrongmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3gs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone 3gs supreme]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5414827&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Unknown iPhone Model Number Being Field Tested in San Francisco]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_iphone_sanfrancisco.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Could be something, could be nothing, but an "iPhone3,1" mysteriously popped up in the usage records of a Bay Area App Store developer. If you'll remember, the "iPhone2,1" turned out to be the 3GS.</p>

<p>The 3,1 phone was spotted in an analytics report from November for the iPhone app iBART.</p>
<p>This isn't the first time something with that ID popped up on the rumor radar. In August, 3,1 was discovered hiding in iPhone firmware files. However, as MacRumors notes, this is the first time the marker's been "seen" gallivanting out in public.</p>
<p>Also noteworthy is the timing of the discovery: In October 2008, Apple starting testing the 3GS in and around the San Francisco area. [<a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2009/11/28/apple-starts-field-testing-next-generation-iphone-31/">MacRumors</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5414731/unknown-iphone-model-number-being-field-tested-in-san-francisco]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5414731]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[testing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[unconfirmed]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Loftus]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5414731&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Rejected Me, a Site for Scorned App Developers]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_apple_rejected_me.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Apple Rejected Me reads like FML, but features stories from rejected app developers instead of inappropriate innuendoes dropped by "that uncle" at Thanksgiving. Got a beef with Apple's approval process? Sound off. [<a href="http://applerejectedme.com/">ARM</a>, Thanks Matt.]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5414319/apple-rejected-me-a-site-for-scorned-app-developers]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5414319]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[app]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[applerejectedme]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[appstore]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphoneapps]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 28 Nov 2009 15:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5414319&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[This Week's Best iPhone Apps]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/appztopz.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_appztopz.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>In this week's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5413982/mind-your-wallet">tentatively</a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5411057/black-friday-anti+deals-what-not-to-buy">materialistic</a> app roundup: Deals, scrutinized! Barcodes, scanned! Movies, thriftily rented! Magazines, digitized! Pac-Man, terrifyingly adapted to the road! The iPhone's camera, made less terrible! Turn-by-turn, discounted! Home screens, organized! And more...</p>

<p><em>To view the following gallery as a single page, click <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5414060/this-weeks-best-iphone-apps/">here</a></em></p>
<h2>The Apps</h2>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5414060,10,'');
</script></p>
<h2>This Weeks' iPhone News on Giz</h2>
<p><object id="mbox_player_0096dbba1d1fe7c68f" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="320" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://bg-video.cp.motionbox.com/motionboxons/flash/VideoPlayer.swf?video_uid=0096dbba1d1fe7c68f&type=sd&security_token=prod3.a73dfdd73fb05ee0">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always">
<embed name="mbox_player_0096dbba1d1fe7c68f" src="http://bg-video.cp.motionbox.com/motionboxons/flash/VideoPlayer.swf?video_uid=0096dbba1d1fe7c68f&type=sd&security_token=prod3.a73dfdd73fb05ee0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="320" allowscriptaccess="always" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/0096dbba1d1fe7c68f_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_0096dbba1d1fe7c68f_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display: none;"/></a><br>
• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5413462/a-thanksgiving-message-from-the-iphone">A Thanksgiving Message From the iPhone</a></p>
<p>• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5412901/opening-up-a-sega-genesis-leads-to-a-genesis-iphone-dock-naturally">Opening Up a Sega Genesis Leads to a Genesis iPhone Dock, Naturally</a></p>
<p>• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5411304/this-is-how-multitasking-should-work-on-the-iphone">This Is How Multitasking Should Work On the iPhone</a></p>
<p>• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5411253/iphone-and-android-are-taking-over-the-mobile-internet">iPhone and Android Are Taking Over the (Mobile) Internet</a></p>
<p>• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5411077/new-apple-ads-get-in-on-the-att-vs-verizon-slapfest">New Apple Ads Get In on the AT&T vs. Verizon Slapfest</a></p>
<p>• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5410903/the-dumb-iphone-that-thinks-its-a-macbook">The Dumb iPhone That Thinks It's a MacBook</a></p>
<p>• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5410865/three+iphone-ocarina-much-more-expensive-than-no+iphone-ocarina">Three-iPhone Ocarina Much More Expensive Than No-iPhone Ocarina</a></p>
<p>• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5410732/new-jailbroken-iphone-worm-wants-your-bank-details">New Jailbroken iPhone Worm Wants Your Bank Details</a></p>
<p><em>This list is in no way definitive. If you've spotted a great app that hit the store this week, give us a heads up or, better yet, your firsthand impressions in the comments. And for even more apps: see our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/the-week-in-iPhone-apps/">previous weekly roundups here</a>, and check out our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphone-apps-directory">Favorite iPhone Apps Directory</a>. Have a great weekend, everybody!</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5414061/this-weeks-best-iphone-apps]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5414061]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[app butler]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[appbutler]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[copilot]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gq]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ilingual]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[photoshop]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[redbox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[snapture]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[stair dismount]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the week in iPhone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5414061&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Stair Dismount iPhone Game Hands On (Verdict: Sadistic Fun)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/stairtop.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_stairtop.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5411988/stair-dismount-gloriously-tumbles-onto-the-iphone-soon">Stair Dismount iPhone game</a> sent me back eight years to the time when I would waste hours sending the stickman tumbling down instead of working on my programming assignments. The iPhone game is that, with slightly better controls.</p>
<p>Its basic premise remains unchanged: select a part of a body, an angle, and then a level of power that you want to shove him down the stairs with. By varying the three, you get different types of tumbles, with the final goal being to hit as many parts of his person on the ground as hard as possible.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/stairs2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_stairs2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>If you're sadistic and enjoy seeing ragdolls get hurt, this is the game for you. The injury process is made all the more fun by the added Facebook Connect feature Secret Exit put in. You can only choose your friend's default profile photo, which eliminates a lot of your friends that don't just use their faces, but still gets you fun results, as seen in the screenshots above.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5412224,3,'');
</script></p>
<p>Basically, you already know if you're the kind of person who would enjoy the game. Either you laugh at people getting hurt, or you don't. And Secret Exit tells me that, depending on sales of this game, they'll consider releasing Truck Dismount (the followup to <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #stairdismount" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/stairdismount/">Stair Dismount</a>). That's undoubtedly just a ploy to get more sales, but this game is good enough as is to warrant a purchase.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5412226/stair-dismount-iphone-game-hands-on-verdict-sadistic-fun]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5412226]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hands on]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hands-on]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone games]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[stair dismount]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[stair dismount iphone]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 26 Nov 2009 18:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5412226&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[A Thanksgiving Message From the iPhone]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object id="mbox_player_0096dbba1d1fe7c68f" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="320" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://bg-video.cp.motionbox.com/motionboxons/flash/VideoPlayer.swf?video_uid=0096dbba1d1fe7c68f&type=sd&security_token=prod3.a73dfdd73fb05ee0">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always">
<embed name="mbox_player_0096dbba1d1fe7c68f" src="http://bg-video.cp.motionbox.com/motionboxons/flash/VideoPlayer.swf?video_uid=0096dbba1d1fe7c68f&type=sd&security_token=prod3.a73dfdd73fb05ee0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="320" allowscriptaccess="always" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/0096dbba1d1fe7c68f.jpg"></a><br>
Happy Thanksgiving, everybody! Here's a message about the holiday and Black Friday from our friend from Cupertino, the iPhone.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5413462/a-thanksgiving-message-from-the-iphone]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5413462]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphonepuppet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:17:14 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5413462&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
