<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: Ibm]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/ibm</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'ibm']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Microsoft Is the New IBM]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_microsoft1985.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Don Dodge was Microsoft's <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/04/microsoft-loses-don-dodge-this-is-a-huge-mistake/">champion in the startup community</a>, their connection to the crazy world that gave us Facebook and Twitter. They laid him off a month ago. Now we know what he really thinks about Microsoft. It's bad.</p>

<p>What's interesting isn't Dodge lobbing the bomb that Microsoft is the new Big Blue because "after 20 years they are losing the innovation edge," but he insinuates that if Bill was still running the show it'd be different: "The transition was smooth, but not having Bill there every day has far-reaching implications."</p>
<p>Bill was a geek. Ballmer's a suit. I suppose we shouldn't expect anything different. [<a href="http://blog.seattlepi.com/microsoft/archives/188966.asp">Seattle PI</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5432942/microsoft-is-the-new-ibm]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5432942]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blockquote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[1984]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 23 Dec 2009 11:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5432942&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Department of Defense Buys 2,200 PS3s to Upgrade Supercomputer]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/dodps3.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_dodps3.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Apparently the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #departmentofdefense" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/departmentofdefense/">Department of Defense</a> believes that PS3s are a better value when it comes to supercomputers than IBM products specifically designed for the purpose. Granted recent price drops probably didn't hurt in justifying a 2,200 console order either.</p>
<p>This isn't the first time that the DoD is using PS3 consoles for supercomputing. In fact, these 2,200 units are going to be added to an existing Linux cluster of <a href="http://gizmodo.com/363985/air-force-buys-300-playstation-3-for-research">336 PS3s used by the United States Air Force</a>. According to Justification Review Documents, the purchase is all about getting the best value out the DoD's budget:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>With respect to cell processors, a single 1U server configured with two 3.2GHz cell processors can cost up to $8K while two Sony PS3s cost approximately $600. Though a single 3.2 GHz cell processor can deliver over 200 GFLOPS, whereas the Sony PS3 configuration delivers approximately 150 GFLOPS, the approximately tenfold cost difference per GFLOP makes the Sony PS3 the only viable technology for HPC applications.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I'm all for balancing cost and features, but isn't it just a bit curious that someone thought to save on upgrading the supercomputer just after <i>Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2</i> was released? [<a href="http://arstechnica.com/security/news/2009/11/sony-still-subsidizing-us-supercomputer-efforts.ars">Ars Technica</a> via <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/11/29/department-of-defens-1.html">Boing Boing</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5414938/department-of-defense-buys-2200-ps3s-to-upgrade-supercomputer]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5414938]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[air force]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[department of defense]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[playstation 3]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ps3]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[supercomputers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[supercomputing]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:18:30 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5414938&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Rat Brain Simulator Calls IBM's Cat Brain Simulation Bogus]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/ratcat.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_ratcat.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5407562/it-takes-147456-powerpc-processors-to-out+think-a-single-stupid-cat-brain">cat brain simulation</a> IBM supposedly pulled off has just been called out as a "PR stunt" by the leader of the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #bluebrain" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/bluebrain/">Blue Brain</a> project, who says that it's all a "mass deception of the public."</p>
<p>Henry Markram, the Blue Brain guy, says in an email to IBM's CTO, that the project is not even close to an ants brain and that the kind of simulations pulled off by IBM are trivial. He also calls the whole thing "stupid", and "extremely harmful to the field." [<a href="http://spectrum.ieee.org/blog/semiconductors/devices/tech-talk/blue-brain-project-leader-angry-about-cat-brain">IEEE</a> via <a href="http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2009-11/blue-brain-scientist-denounces-ibms-claim-cat-brain-simulation-shameful-and-unethical">Popsci</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5411328/rat-brain-simulator-calls-ibms-cat-brain-simulation-bogus]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5411328]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ai]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blue brain]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[brain]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[brain simulator]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[brains]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rat brain simulator]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:35:12 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5411328&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Cell Processor Is Going Extinct (Updated)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/celllll.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_celllll.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>IBM's shitcanning the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #cellprocessor" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/cellprocessor/">Cell processor</a> line&mdash;you know, the chip that's in the PS3 and uh, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5025238/toshiba-qosmio-g55-is-first-laptop-with-cell-processor-aboard">Toshiba laptops</a> and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5381330/the-cell-regza-ps3-tv-sorts-shows-by-similarity">TVs</a>&mdash;<a href="http://www.fudzilla.com/content/view/16530/38/">according to their VP of Deep Computing</a>, making the current PowerXCell 8i the last of its ilk. <strong>Updated</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>Update</strong>: For now, IBM's <a href="http://www.driverheaven.net/news.php?newsid=344#ixzz0Xhq6YCSF">just saying</a> that the successor to the current PowerXCell 8i is canned, not all Cell development. [<a href="http://www.fudzilla.com/content/view/16530/38/">Fudzilla</a> via <a href="http://www.maxconsole.net/?mode=news&newsid=37958">MaxConsole</a>, <a href="http://www.driverheaven.net/news.php?newsid=344#ixzz0Xhq6YCSF">Driver Heaven</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5410833/the-cell-processor-is-going-extinct-updated]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5410833]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cell processor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cpus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[playstation 3]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ps3]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:34:19 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5410833&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[It Takes 147,456 PowerPC Processors To Out-Think a Single Stupid Cat Brain]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/catputer.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Also on IBM's <a href="http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/industry/4337190.html?page=1">cat-sized-brain-simulation</a> materials list: 143 terabytes of RAM, miles and miles of cabling, a <em>million</em> watts of electricity, 6675 tons of air conditioning equipment, and an acre of floor space.</p>

<p>Cats: they're kinda dumb. They only <em>seem</em> smarter than dogs because they're not so friendly, and our society judges kindness harshly. It's <strike>true!</strike> an interesting theory! Which is why, after mice, simulating a feline-sized brain on a BlueGene/P supercomputer was next on IBM's to-do list. But for all the kitty talk here, this project wasn't specifically about creating a computerized house pet; it's part of a larger, ongoing project to eventually simulate a full human brain. The cat equivalency, derived from the number of virtual neurons and synapses the simulation can manage, at 1.6 billion and 9 trillion, respectively, just gives a sense of how far along the project is: today, despite being the biggest simulated brain ever, it's only capable of simulating the human visual cortex, or as PopMech so delicately puts it, "the wrinkly outer layer" of the human brain.</p>
<p>So how long before a supercomputer can simulate (roughly&mdash;since these computer simulations don't have the same neural patterning and learning capabilities of a real brain, among other things) an entire human cortex? Weirdly soon, <a href="http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/industry/4337190.html?page=1">says the project's lead scientist</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>To [simulate a human cortex], he'll need to find 1000 times more computing power. At the rate that supercomputers have expanded over the last 20 years, that super-super computer could exist by 2019. "This is not just possible, it's inevitable," Modha says. "This will happen."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>People need to stop getting worked up about the future, honestly: Before we have to worry self-aware robot uprisings, we're going to have to deal with decades of extremely dumb, extremely expensive fake pets. Enforced caution, I believe this is called. [<a href="http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/industry/4337190.html?page=1">Popular Mechanics</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5407562/it-takes-147456-powerpc-processors-to-out+think-a-single-stupid-cat-brain]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5407562]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[at]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bluegene]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[brain simulation]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[brain simulations]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[supercomputers]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:01:28 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5407562&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[World's Fastest Supercomputer Is World's Largest, Tackiest Case Mod Too]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_jaguar500.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />This is <i>Jaguar</i>, the new King of the Petaputer Hill, running at 1.75 petaflops-per-second. The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #crayxt5" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/crayxt5/">Cray XT5</a> supercomputer was behind IBM's Roadrunnner for more than a year, until some clever scientist decided to paint a running Jaguar all over it.</p>
<p>Then it surpassed IBM's 1.04 petaflop/s supercomputer, achieving its 1.74 quadrillion floating points operation according to the Top500 Linpack benchmark. I mean, it was probably some extra CPUs coming online, but I'm pretty sure the main reason for the boost was that drawing.</p>
<p>Roadrunner took a dip from June's 2009 test, which gave it 1.105 petaflops. That's probably Wile E. Coyote's fault. My recommendation to IBM: Paint flames on it to win the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/1/" class="posthashtag">#1</a> spot back.</p>
<p>This is the current top ten:</p>
<p>1. Jaguar, Cray, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, USA (1.75 petaflop/s)<br>
2. Roadrunner, IBM, Los Alamos National Laboratory, USA (1.04 petaflop/s)<br>
3. Kraken XT5, Cray, National Institute for Computational Sciences, USA (832 teraflop/s)<br>
4. JUGENE, IBM, Forschungszentrum Juelich, Germany (825.5 teraflop/s)<br>
5. Tianhe-1, NUDT, National SuperComputer Center, Tianjin, China (563.1 teraflop/s)<br>
6. Pleiades, SGI, NASA Ames Research Center, USA (544.3 teraflop/s)<br>
7. BlueGeneL, IBM, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, USA (478.2 teraflop/s)<br>
8. BlueGene/P, IBM, Argonne National Laboratory, USA (458.61 teraflop/s)<br>
9. Ranger, Sun, Texas Advanced Computing Center, USA (433.20 teraflop/s)<br>
10. Red Sky, Sun, Sandia National Laboratories, USA (423.9 teraflop/s)</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.top500.org/list/2009/11/100">Top500 Supercomputers</a> via <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-10397627-92.html">Cnet</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5405773/worlds-fastest-supercomputer-is-worlds-largest-tackiest-case-mod-too]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5405773]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[supercomputers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cray]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Cray XT5]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jaguar]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[roadrunner]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5405773&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[IBM and Intel Executives Arrested for Insider Trading]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Six people total were arrested today for making too much money too easily, among them executives from IBM and Intel. These guys made <i>$20 million</i> in profits between January and July 2007 by passing insider info regarding Google, Hilton Hotels and Polycom onto a trader. Now they're all facing multiple counts of conspiracy and securities fraud. </p>
<p>Considering the hedge fund manager behind the trades was ranked number 559 on Forbes' World Billionaire list, something tell me these guys could have done without the hassle and made a little less by trading the old-fashioned way: guessing. [<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/10/16/ibm_intel_insider_trading/">The Register</a> and <a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/10/16/the-rise-fall-of-a-billionaire-technology-hedge-fund-guru/">GigaOM</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5383645/ibm-and-intel-executives-arrested-for-insider-trading]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5383645]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[conspiracy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[insider trading]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:55:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5383645&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ThinkPad's $100 a Year Warranty Service is Actually Pretty Good]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/lenovo.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Boing Boing Cory relates <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/10/08/in-praise-of-ibm-thi.html">this tale</a> using his $100/year global support service for his Lenovo laptop and actually <i>liking</i> what eventually happened. Wha??</p>
<p>The Benjamin-a-year plan entitles the user to a service rep to come out next-day, no matter where on the planet you are&mdash;provided it's somewhere reasonable, we'd assume. The tech guy came by his office and fixed exactly what was wrong, basically doing an in-house call that Apple stores, even with their notoriously decent service, couldn't match. I mean, <i>in-house</i>? And they even ignored the fact that he put Linux on there instead of his original Vista?</p>
<p>He does some caveats on his experience with IBM/Lenovo as a whole, and you can check that out over at BB. [<a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/10/08/in-praise-of-ibm-thi.html">BoingBoing</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5377551/thinkpads-100-a-year-warranty-service-is-actually-pretty-good]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5377551]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[warranty]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[broken]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lenovo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lenovo warranty]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[service]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[warranties]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[warranty service]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 08 Oct 2009 21:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5377551&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Battery 500 Project Wants to Make a 500 Mile Range Electric Car Battery]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/lithium-air-battery-image-01.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />IBM, UC Berkeley and five US National Labs are collaborating in a consortium to make an electric vehicle battery that goes all the way up to 500 miles per charge.</p>
<p>The project wants to make this happen by using a lithium-air battery, which...</p>
<blockquote>
<p>couple to atmospheric oxygen-essentially harnessing the oxygen in the air as the cathode of the battery. Since oxygen enters the battery on-demand, it offers an essentially unlimited amount of reactant, metered only by the surface area of its electrodes. IBM believes its nanoscale semiconductor fabrication techniques can increase the surface area of the lithium-air battery's electrodes by at least 100 times, enabling them to meet the goals of the project.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>If you think the consortium will deliver a fantastic car by the time you need to trade in your current vehicle, you should hold off on getting so excited. IBM says it's going to be another two years to even see if the lithium-air batteries can be used to make the goal happen. [<a href="http://www.smartertechnology.com/c/a/Technology-For-Change/Battery-500-Project-Charged-Up-over-AllElectric-Cars/">Smarter Technology</a> via <a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/09/10/01/0122257/Electric-Car-Nano-Batteries-Aim-For-500-Mile-Range?from=rss">Slashdot</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5372991/battery-500-project-wants-to-make-a-500-mile-range-electric-car-battery]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5372991]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[batteries]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[battery]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[battery 500]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[battery 500 project]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lithium air]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lithium-air]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 02 Oct 2009 14:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5372991&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Videophone as Imagined In 1910 Still Had Dancing Webcam Girls]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/Video_telephony_as_imagined_in_1910.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_Video_telephony_as_imagined_in_1910.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>I'm ashamed to admit I was surprised someone had the videophone figured out as early as 1910. I also need to apologize to that old crazy guy in the park&mdash;your Prohibition-era webcam stories may have been true after all!</p>

<p>OK, it's a sketch of a concept for what the French thought videotelephony would look like in 2000, not a working videophone, but still it shows people were thinking big at the time.</p>
<p>In fact, even earlier in 1878 a wily inventor named George du Maurier actually published a conceptual upgrade to the era's "speaking tubes" using this drawing below, which depicts a "viewing display" to go along with that generation's literal series of tubes.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/800px-Telephonoscope.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_800px-Telephonoscope.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Only in 1927, with the help of IBM, would the traditionally accepted view of a "videophone" come to pass. The screen displayed at brisk 18fps and was run using one those room-sized computers (Ed. Note: as correctly stated in the comments, this was not necessarily a "computer" but a half-room full of necessary equipment for the broadcast). The video was one-way, but the audio allowed then Commerce Secretary Herbert Hoover, seated in D.C., to speak with an audience in New York City. [<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Videophone">Wikipedia</a> - Thanks, Blam!]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5363623/the-videophone-as-imagined-in-1910-still-had-dancing-webcam-girls]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5363623]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[retromodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[retro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[telephony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video telephony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[videophone]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 20 Sep 2009 16:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Loftus]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5363623&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Lenovo Goes All Multitouch On Us With the X200 Tablet, T400s]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/lenovotop.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_lenovotop.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The most important thing to remember about the multitouch Apple tablet is that it doesn't exist. So how about two multitouch laptops that <em>do</em>, from another hardware manufacturer that people actually like? Enter Lenovo's ThinkPad X200 tablet and T400s.</p>

<p>The big news of these two is the 14.1-inch T400s business portable which Lenovo has turned into their own multitouch experiment. They kept much of the hardware the same from when it was <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5300183/lenovos-t400s-aims-for-the-line-between-portability-and-performance">released</a> back in June, but added a capacitive screen capable of recognizing <strong>four</strong> fingers on the screen. Don't believe it?! Good thing we <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5359096/lenovo-thinkpad-t400s-with-multitouch-review-four-finger-flicking-fun">have a full review</a>.</p>
<p>If four finger fun wasn't enough, they've updated the X200T, which again looks exactly the same as <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5051875/lenovo-thinkpad-x200-tablet-12-inches-of-touchtasticness">its predecessor</a>, except for its capacitive touchscreen which can recognize two-finger input. It has also earned a healthy spec bump across the board: The Core 2 Duo processor is now available at up to 2.13GHz speeds and HDDs now reach up to 500GB while optional SSDs go all the way to 256GB. Besides configuring it with a multitouch screen you can also get it with an ultrabright outdoor-friendly panel.</p>
<p>Lenovo's made sure to give the X200 and T400s something a little extra in the software department, hoping to set them apart from your (soon to be) average <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged WINDOWS 7" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows-7/">Windows 7</a> multitouch wares. It's called SimpleTap, and it invokes a pretty little pop-up grid of common functions like Wi-Fi switching, adjusting brightness, changing volume and the like whenever you double-tab the screen.</p>
<p>The refreshed X200 and T400s will be available starting today with Windows Vista, with the multitouch versions coming in at $1,654 and $1,999, respectively. Lenovo will send you your Win 7 upgrade disc on October 22. Weirdly, SimpleTap won't be available as a download until October 22 either, but you can <em>probably</em> find a way to enjoy your <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MULTITOUCH TABLET" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/multitouch-tablet/">multitouch tablet</a> without it. [<a href="http://Lenovo.com">Lenovo</a>]</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Lenovo Adds Touch of Simplicity to New MultiTouch Screen ThinkPad PCs</p>
<p>RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC – September 15, 2009: Lenovo today is bringing business users a new way to work with multitouch screen technology1 on the versatile and portable ThinkPad X200 Tablet PC and slim and powerful ThinkPad T400s laptop. Lenovo is also introducing SimpleTap, an application that brings simplicity to the multitouch screen experience.</p>
<p>"We see now as the right time for multitouch screens on PCs," said Sam Dusi, vice president, worldwide ThinkPad product marketing, Lenovo. "With touch screens increasingly becoming part of more devices we use routinely and continued improvement of the technology including the integration of touch in the upcoming Windows 7 operating system, the environment for making touch part of our Tablet PC and ThinkPad T400s laptop experience couldn't be better. We've also extended the touch experience with SimpleTap to make frequent hardware-based functions touch-enabled and simple."</p>
<p>Lenovo also today announced a new defense against the sun for outdoor workers with a new super bright optional screen on the ThinkPad X200 Tablet.</p>
<p>Personalizing Productivity on the PC with Touch</p>
<p>Users can now interact with their ThinkPad PC in a more personal way with multitouch screen technology. Designed for highly mobile users, the optional multitouch screen ThinkPad X200 Tablet caters to individuals in fields such as sales, health care and education. Already supporting one finger touch, these users can now use two-finger touch to perform a variety of gestures, including pinching, zooming, tapping and flicking through documents, web pages and photos instead of using a mouse.</p>
<p>The high performance ThinkPad T400s laptop serves professionals in engineering and design. Now these users can manipulate four fingers on the ThinkPad T400s laptop's optional multitouch screen to not only replace the mouse but transform the way they work. They can now use four fingers to manipulate objects, move images with two hands and even have another person touch the screen to collaborate simultaneously. As new multitouch applications are introduced, there will be new possibilities for using multitouch screen laptops.</p>
<p>Using advanced capacitive touch, the screens are sensitive and responsive to even the slightest touch of the finger. Lenovo also optimized the firmware to help compensate for slightly imprecise taps on the screen, such as when closing a window or navigating the Start menu, helping make navigation easier for Tablet users. To combat fingerprints, an anti-fingerprint coating helps keep smudges at bay and the screen clean. The multi-touch screens also allow users to enjoy ultra long battery life with up to nine hours on the ThinkPad X200 Tablet.2</p>
<p>With upcoming ThinkPad X200 Tablet models supporting the Microsoft Windows 7 operating system, these mobile users can also take advantage of improved predictive text over previous operating systems, improved handwriting recognition in more languages and formula input features for math and scientific equations.</p>
<p>More details on the ThinkPad T400s and X200 Tablet are available at www.lenovo.com.</p>
<p>Adding a "Touch" of Simplicity to Touch Screens</p>
<p>Touch screens are designed to make interaction with a PC natural and intuitive, however, often users must switch between touch screen gestures and pressing hardware buttons. Lenovo designed SimpleTap, a ThinkVantage Technology, to enable uninterrupted use of people's touch screens by giving them access to hardware-based functions that may be more easily accessed via touch input. For Tablet users, that means staying in tablet mode longer while on-the-go, saving time and being more productive.</p>
<p>To use SimpleTap, simply double tap anywhere on the screen to launch the application. A clean and efficient grid of colorful and transparent square tiles, inspired by the classic 15 Puzzle, opens on top of the work beneath and allows users to choose several hardware-based functions including: turning on or off the wireless radio, ThinkLight and microphone, previewing the camera, enabling mute, adjusting the volume or screen brightness, locking the screen or putting the PC to sleep. To exit SimpleTap, just tap once anywhere on the screen to close the grid and continue working. As a quick access interface, SimpleTap allows users to get in, perform a function and get out quickly.</p>
<p>Designed to be highly customizable, individuals can create their own tiles to enhance their personal productivity. For example, a sales professional could create a tile that launches a sales presentation with just the tap of a finger. A health professional could similarly create a tile that pulls up a patient's medical information instantaneously. Or a consumer could quickly access his or her favorite website. Users can arrange the tiles however they choose by dragging and grouping them together, and designed to be fun to use, the tiles can even be flicked around the screen.</p>
<p>Click here to see a video demonstration of SimpleTap and here to read more about the design and inspiration behind the application.</p>
<p>Brightening Tablet PC for Outdoor Light</p>
<p>To further extend tablet computing outdoors, users can now choose a super bright outdoor screen that displays images even in direct sunlight. For field engineers, sales professionals, students and others who work outside, outdoor viewability is critical. The new optional outdoor screen on the ThinkPad X200 Tablet offers excellent viewability with a bright 400 nit screen, low 1.2 percent reflectivity and wide viewing angle. Coated with a thin anti-reflective layer, the screen provides crisp and bright images that can easily be seen indoors or outdoors. Mobile workers can also stay productive with the Tablet's all day battery life.</p>
<p>A photo of the ThinkPad X200 outdoor screen compared with a standard screen can be viewed here.</p>
<p>Pricing and Availability3</p>
<p>The ThinkPad T400s with the multitouch screen and the ThinkPad X200 Tablet with the multitouch screen and the outdoor screen will be available starting immediately through business partners and www.lenovo.com. Pricing starts at approximately $1,999 for the ThinkPad T400s with the multitouch screen and $1,654 and $1,704, respectively, for the ThinkPad X200 Tablet with the multitouch screen and outdoor screen. SimpleTap will be available for download after October 22.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5359325/lenovo-goes-all-multitouch-on-us-with-the-x200-tablet-t400s]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5359325]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[lenovo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Lenovo T400s]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lenovo x200]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[multitouch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[multitouch tablet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[simpletap]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t400s]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tablets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[x200]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:01:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5359325&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Gadgets of Our Future Will Continue To Get Smaller and Faster Thanks To Nanowires]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/Transistors.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_Transistors.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Computers have been getting smaller for years, yet they cram the same amount of power if not more. Essentially that is <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/moore.s-law|-the-motion-picture/gizmodos-video-salute-to-moores-law-332051.php">Moore's Law</a>, or the theory that every year the number of transistors per square inch on integrated circuits doubles.</p>

<p>Now that is (or was) expected to halt at some point, meaning our computers and gadgets would start remaining the same size. Yep, no more "Honey, I Shrunk the Processors." But work by IBM could keep the sequels coming.</p>
<p>If you didn't know Intel's processors and transistors are about to hit <a href="http://gizmodo.com/301548/intel-plans-move-from-45nm-to-32nm-chips">32 nanometers in size</a> (fun fact: a single hair strand is roughly 80,000 nanometers in width). Now that is pretty darn small, but if we want things to get even smaller, like Zoolander phone small, it is said that the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5029045/moores-law-revitalized-by-12+nanometer-chip+fabbing-invention">physical constraints in the silicon</a> in these transistors can only go so tiny. Apparently, they have even been playing tricks with the silicon even since 90 nanometers.</p>
<p>The New York Times reports some seriously advanced solutions which are being worked on by Dr. Ross of IBM (not George Clooney's ER character who had the same name). FinFETs are one type of transistor and are the basis of 22-nanometer technology which we may see by 2012. These transistors are vertically tipped, offer greater density and better insulating properties. She is also concentrating on constructing FinFET and silicon nanowire switches in a whole new process.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>It is a kind of nanofarming. Dr. Ross sprinkles gold particles as small as 10 nanometers in diameter on a substrate and then suffuses them in a silicon gas at a temperature of about 1,100 degrees Fahrenheit. This causes the particles to become "supersaturated" with silicon from the gas, which will then precipitate into a solid, forming a wire that grows vertically.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Complicated and extremely intricate stuff which is all apparently riddled with significant challenges, but Dr. Ross and her IBM team have got to keep at it. It means the continuation of us getting thinner and smaller electronics in our hands (and lost in my bag). [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/01/science/01trans.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1">The New York Times</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5350443/gadgets-of-our-future-will-continue-to-get-smaller-and-faster-thanks-to-nanowires]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5350443]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[microprocessors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cpus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[FinFET Transistors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[moore's law]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nanowires]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[transistors]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joanna Stern]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5350443&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[IBM Files Patent For Tweeting TV Remote]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/ibm_twitter_remote.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_ibm_twitter_remote.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Good lord, this is all we need. A TV remote that allows users to easily ramble on about the shows they watch via their blog or twitter account. For better or worse, IBM appears to be working on this technology.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/ibm_twitter_remote_2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_ibm_twitter_remote_2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<blockquote>
<p>A viewer selects a media program to view by use of a remote controller with networking capability.</p>
<p>Upon the viewer wishing to send a blog posting to a blog, the viewer determines whether a tag to be included in the blog posting is to be a pre-existing tag or a custom tag, wherein the blog posting comprises program information about the media program useful to identify the media program. If the tag is to be a pre-existing tag, the viewer selects the pre-existing tag from a plurality of pre-existing tags using the remote controller and if the tag is to be a custom tag, the viewer generates the custom tag using the remote controller.</p>
<p>If a protocol provided by the remote controller to send the blog posting to the blog allows a snapshot of the media program to be included in the blog posting, the remote controller takes the snapshot of the media program and includes it in the blog posting.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>So, the device would let you blog or tweet and communicate with your followers about what you are watching via a networked remote control. Again, it's only a patent at this point, but is this remote something you could see yourself using? [<a href="http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=5&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=Facebook&OS=Facebook&RS=Facebook">Patent</a> via <a href="http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/news/technology/2009/08/ibm_building_a_tv_remote_that.html">BaltTech</a> via <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/08/28/ibm-files-patent-for-geek-couch-potato-dream-a-tv-remote-that-tweets/">TechCrunch</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5347971/ibm-files-patent-for-tweeting-tv-remote]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5347971]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[concept]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[twitter remote]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5347971&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[IBM Takes First 3D Image of Atomic Bonds]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/500_Pentacene_anatomy.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_500_Pentacene_anatomy.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>From what I remember of chemistry, molecules were presented on computer screens, or at the very least with dowels and balls. Thanks to this incredible discovery, however, I'm jealous of how tomorrow's engineers will view&mdash;and control&mdash;nature's building blocks.</p>

<p>Now, the picture above is pretty unremarkable, right? Black and white (trivia: molecules have no color), grainy, shot in the kind of out-of-focus manner you expect from a guy like me, who can't seem to venture out beyond the Auto setting on his entry-level Nikon D40 DSLR. But wait a second. Doesn't the image kind of seem, well, familiar? Like high school chem class familiar? Balls and sticks familiar?</p>
<p>Here's another image; a computer generated image that's much more at home for anyone who studied <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecular_graphics">atoms and molecules</a> in the dead and gone days of 1997:</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/500_Pentacene_model.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_500_Pentacene_model.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Make sense now? That B&W structure is an actual image of a molecule and its atomic bonds. The first of its kind, in fact, and a breakthrough for the crazy IBM scientists in Zurich who spent 20 straight hours staring at the "specimen"&mdash;which in this case was a 1.4 nanometer-long pentacene molecule comprised of 22 carbon atoms and 14 hydrogen atoms.</p>
<p>You can actually make out each of those atoms and their bonds, and it's thanks to this: An <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_force_microscope">atomic force microscope.</a></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/thumb160x_300_Pentacene_3D.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Like the venerable electron microscope, but more powerful and with an eye for the third dimension, the AFM is able to make the nano world something we humans can appreciate visually. Using a silicon microscale cantilever coated in carbon dioxide (tiny, tiny needle), lasers, an "ultrahigh vacuum" and temperatures that hovered around 5 Kelvin, the AFM imaged the pentacene in nanometers. It did this while sitting a mere <em>0.5 nanometers</em> above the surface and its previously invisible bonds for 20 long, unmoving hours. The length of time is noteworthy, said IBM scientist Leo Goss in statement from IBM, because any movement whatsoever would have disrupted the delicate atomic bonds and ruined the image.</p>
<p>And that's the real beauty of this image. For the first time ever we can see where each of those carbon and hydrogen atoms line up, and the overall symmetrical shape they create. In 3D.</p>
<h2>Quirky, Quarky, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged QUANTUM COMPUTING" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/quantum-computing/">Quantum Computing</a></h2>
<p>That IBM, a hardware company, was the entity to accomplish this feat should be fairly obvious, given what we know (and don't yet know) about quantum computing. Said an IBM representative in an email to me this morning, "This pioneering achievement and the new insights gained from the experiments extend the ability of scientists to study matter with atomic resolution and open up exciting new possibilities for exploring electronic building blocks and devices at the ultimate atomic and molecular scale-devices that might be vastly smaller, faster and more energy-efficient than today's processors and memory devices."</p>
<p>In a quarkshell, that means this discovery might help future engineers manipulate atoms and their bonds, as well as create powerful, energy-sipping quantum computers for their cryptography needs, space travel or maybe even large black and yellow rooms that make our fantasies come true (or at the very least allow androids to play Sherlock Holmes).</p>
<p>But not so fast, Einstein. I see that tabletop subspace communicator you've imagined on your desktop. It's a great idea, and while I understand your enthusiasm for such things, as Matt <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5335901/giz-explains-why-quantum-computing-is-the-future-but-a-distant-one">explained earlier this month</a> quantum computing, entangled desktops and <em>Star Trek</em> holodecks are all decades away, if not more.</p>
<p>What this discovery does do however is advance our primitive understanding of the Way Things Are. It's a small, nanometer-sized piece in a puzzle that doesn't even have all the pieces on the table yet. Hell, we don't even know where all the pieces are yet. From the looks of these images though, we will someday soon. [Images: IBM]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5346964/ibm-takes-first-3d-image-of-atomic-bonds]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5346964]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[quantum computing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[atoms]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microscopes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotechnology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 27 Aug 2009 14:14:30 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Loftus]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5346964&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[PS3 Slim Contains the 45nm Cell Processor]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Everyone assumed it because of the Slim's power savings, but it's been confirmed that the Cell has been shrunk to 45nm (down from 65nm). <a href="http://tech.yahoo.com/news/pcworld/20090820/tc_pcworld/sonysps3slimcarriesupdatedcellchip">[Yahoo Tech</a> via <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/08/20/45nm-cell-microprocessor-confirmed-in-ps3-slim/">CrunchGear</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5341699/ps3-slim-contains-the-45nm-cell-processor]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5341699]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ps3]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[45nm cell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[playstation 3]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[toshiba]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:41:38 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5341699&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[IBM Examining Microchips Built On DNA "Origami" Nanostructures]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/DLC-500-highres_copy.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_DLC-500-highres_copy.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>From the "at least 10 years out" category of microchip fabrication comes word that IBM is working to reduce future costs and microchip sizes by using DNA.</p>

<p>Yes, that's correct: The building blocks of life could one day contribute to your virtual reality headshot in <em>Halo 28: Master Chief Comes Back From the Dead for the 12th Time.</em></p>
<p>IBM's early stage research combines the DNA double helix and, unsurprisingly, nanotechnology to build frameworks for theoretically smaller and less expensive microchips.</p>
<p>"This is the first demonstration of using biological molecules to help with processing in the semiconductor industry," said IBM research manager Spike Narayan. "Basically, this is telling us that biological structures like DNA actually offer some very reproducible, repetitive kinds of patterns that we can actually leverage in semiconductor processes," he said.</p>
<p>But like I said, ten years out of more before the same genetic building blocks found in all of us are also powering the supercomputers of the future. [<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSTRE57F1K720090816?feedType=RSS&feedName=technologyNews">Reuters</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5338497/ibm-examining-microchips-built-on-dna-origami-nanostructures]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5338497]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[dna]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[concept]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[genetics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microchips]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 16 Aug 2009 17:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Loftus]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5338497&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Lenovo IdeaCentre C100 All-in-One Nettop Will Have a Touchscreen, Eventually]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/100_0357_01.JPG"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/504x_100_0357_01.JPG" class="left image500" width="500"></a>Here at the <a href="http://gdgt.com">gdgt</a> party, Lenovo introduced an all-in-one nettop we haven't seen before: The IdeaCentre C100 is an Atom-based, 20-inch nettop that will eventually pack Windows 7 and a touchscreen, but it'll have touchless Vista first.</p>
<p>The IdeaCentre C100 is a 20-inch all-in-one that'll launch at a price point of, as the Lenovo people told me, "around $400." It'll have a 1.6GHz Atom, 1 or 2GB of RAM, a DVD burner and an 80GB-160GB HDD. Interestingly, the webcam and WiFi are both optional, which we suppose is one way to keep the price down.</p>
<p>The demo unit I saw was running Windows 7, but I was informed that they'll be releasing it this month with Windows Vista and without a touchscreen, even though the unit is dying for one. They'll be releasing a touch-optimized Windows 7 version come the OS's release in October, but the price will go up to accommodate the change. We'll update this post with more exact info when we get it, especially a specific price and release date. [<a href="http://shop.lenovo.com/us/landing_pages/promos/laptops-for-home-and-work?cid=us|semd|ggl|us_ppb_lenovo_ex_en|t15386|s&&s_kwcid=TC|5930|lenovo||S|e|3000694681">Lenovo</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5330246/lenovo-ideacentre-c100-all+in+one-nettop-will-have-a-touchscreen-eventually]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5330246]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nettops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[all-in-one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[atom]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[desktops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lenovo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lenovo ideacentre c100]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 05 Aug 2009 00:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5330246&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[IBM SNAzzy Knows Your Circle of Friends Better Than You Do]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/IBM.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />That heavy breathing you hear on the phone sometimes? It's IBM.</p>

<p>Specifically, it's the IBM Social Network Analysis for Telecom Business Intelligence data mining tool, or SNAzzy for short, and it knows all about who called who and for how long on the network of "one of the largest mobile operators in the world."</p>
<p>The purpose of this snazzy snooping, as explained by <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged BIG BLUE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/big-blue/">Big Blue</a> researchers, is to spot "churners" on a cell network who might influence their circle of friends with "profit-threatening behavior." The reasoning goes that when one person ditches a cell network for greener pastures, they can inspire their friends to do the same. Enter SNAzzy, which can apparently recognize this behavior, alert the carrier, and allow them to swoop in with retention materials and keep their remaining customers happy. It does this by mapping out call behavior, time, and a bunch of other heavy metrics that seem to be copy/pasted right out of the NSA.</p>
<p>Better still (I say sarcastically), IBM is already eying larger deployments beyond telecoms into areas like <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SOCIAL NETWORKS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/social-networks/">social networks</a>. Personally, I can't wait to see what my Facebook picture stalking looks like when presented to me in graph form. [<a href="http://domino.research.ibm.com/comm/research_projects.nsf/pages/snazzy.index.html">IBM</a> va <a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/story/09/08/01/1946208/IBM-Uses-Call-Detail-Records-To-Identify-Friends">Slashdot</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5328265/ibm-snazzy-knows-your-circle-of-friends-better-than-you-do]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5328265]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Big Blue]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[IBM Snazzy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nsa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[spying]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 02 Aug 2009 13:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Loftus]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5328265&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Intel 8088: The Chip That Gave Birth to the Borg]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_intel8088.jpg" class="left image500" width="500">This is the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged INTEL 8088" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/intel-8088/">Intel 8088</a>. A beast with 29,000 transistors that could be clocked up 8MHz in its 1979 heyday, it was the second chip to use the x86 architecture, and the brains inside the original <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged IBM PC" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ibm-pc/">IBM PC</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_intelhistory.jpg" class="left image500" width="500">Following the original 8086, it cost $100 when it was released in June 1979, which is about $300, adjusted for inflation. Today, $300 will buy you a Core i7 processor with 731 million transistors. How much more powerful is that than the 8088?</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/8088.jpg" class="left image160" width="160" />Immeasurably. Even Intel couldn't tell us. Meaning if you took a Core i7 back in time to 1979, and Miles Bennett Dyson was an Intel employee, he would fuck the human race in ways you can't even imagine. Or, you know, we just would've had Xbox in 1983.</p>
<p>With the ascendance of Windows, the x86-based PC would eventually take over the world in its own way.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.intel.com/museum/archives/pcturns25.htm">Intel</a>, <em>Top image: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_8088">Wikipedia</a>, Thanks to Intel for their help!</em>]</p>
<p><i><a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/gizmodo-79/">Gizmodo '79</a> is a week-long celebration of gadgets and geekdom 30 years ago, as the analog age gave way to the digital, and most of our favorite toys were just being born.</i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5317263/intel-8088-the-chip-that-gave-birth-to-the-borg]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5317263]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[pc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cpu]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cpus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gizmodo 79]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm pc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel 8086]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel 8088]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[retromodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[x86]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 17 Jul 2009 19:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5317263&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Then and Now: IBM Personal Computers]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/ibm_03.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_ibm_03.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></a><i><a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/gizmodo-79/">Gizmodo '79</a> is a week-long celebration of gadgets and geekdom 30 years ago, as the analog age gave way to the digital, and most of our favorite toys were just being born.</i></p>
<p><em><a href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/ibm.jpg">Click</a> for full size</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5316064/then-and-now-ibm-personal-computers]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5316064]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gizmodo 79]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[1979]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[giz 79]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lenovo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[retromodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5316064&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[IBM Seer Augmented Reality App Ensures No Confused Android Users At Wimbledon]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/7VZoDmqcZ34&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7VZoDmqcZ34&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5299581/ibm-seer-augmented-reality-app-ensures-no-confused-android-users-at-wimbledon">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a>Android is quickly becoming the go-to mobile OS for augmented reality apps: just days after Layar gave us a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5292748/layar-first-mobile-augmented-reality-browser-is-your-real-life-hud">realtor's tour of Amsterdam</a>, IBM has <a href="http://www.wimbledon.org/en_GB/fanzone/mobile/index.html?promo=MobileonHm">released</a> a similar&mdash;and more comprehensive&mdash;app for attendees of the Wimbledon tennis tournament.</p>

<p>The "Seer" app serves the same purpose as any other decent event app (see: <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5207011/the-week-in-iphone-apps-rocks">Coachella</a>), working as a digital handbook that lists specific locations, facilities and amenities in an easy to navigate interface. What makes this one cool, though, is that it uses your device's GPS and compass to present information as an overlay on your Android phone's camera instead of in a static map. Basically, if you point your phone's camera at a court, restaurant, bathroom or parking lot, Seer should tell you whatever you could want to know about it.</p>
<p>As you can see in the above video, the effect is mostly seamless, though I can imagine the novelty of attending a tennis tournament through the lens of your cellphone's camera getting old fairly quickly. The real promise of apps like this is that they become standardized and universal, so that getting a guide like this is as simple as downloading a new overlay. This isn't a bad start.</p>
<p>Wimbledon starts today, and this particular mobile app&mdash;one of many for the tourny&mdash;will be available "soon." [<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSTRE55L1S220090622">Reuters</a>&mdash;<a href="http://www.pocket-lint.com/news/news.phtml/24819/ibm-seer-android-app-wimbledon.phtml">video from Pocket-lint</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5299581/ibm-seer-augmented-reality-app-ensures-no-confused-android-users-at-wimbledon]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5299581]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android augmented reality app]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android ibm seer app]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm seer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[seer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wimbledon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wimbledon seer app]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:10:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5299581&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Computing Classic: The 1954 SAGE Protected the US From Invasions That Never Came]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5297556/computing-classic-the-1954-sage-protected-the-us-from-invasions-that-never-came">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a>Dag Spicer from the Computer History Museum leaned over and unscrewed a bolt. Underneath, it read, "I can't stand it". The operator's job was to look for cold war bombers that never came. I would go mad, too. Look:</p>

<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_IMG_8839.JPG" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></p>
<p>The IBM SAGE spoke to me. It was old, but unlike other machines from the era, with crude punch interfaces, it had a GUI, a light gun, and hell, an ashtray. And a big yellow screen. The ashtray was so operators didn't have to leave their posts for cigarette breaks. Spotting incoming planes from the Soviet Union was precise work that needed constant attention.</p>
<p>You see, after World War II, it was believed that bombers were invincible; That their high altitude, distanced attacks from above and multiple engines would allow them to drop their deadly payloads and fly away without any resistance. It was believed that the only way to intercept these attacks was by having planes in the air at all times, to detect them and immediately respond with force.</p>
<p>SAGE stood for Semi-Automatic Ground Environment and its sole purpose was to analyze radar data in real time and relay targeting information to fighter planes' autopilots. It was built by IBM in 1954 based off of MIT technology and was a fore bearer of additional *amazing futuristic ideas* like magnetic core memory, networking, and modems to facilitate communication between the 27 bases. Each of those bases had a SAGE. And a backup that could be hot swapped. The entire system had a then impressive 99.6% uptime in an age when most computers would blow a vac tube at every day or so. The computer's console referred to a much larger back end that was 300 tons and took up an entire floor of a usually faceless concrete building. The software was written by the Rand corporation because IBM didn't know what they'd do with 2000 in house programmers after the project was done, something they admitted was a part of their historically out of touch vision of just how important programmers would eventually become to big blue. The code itself was 250,000 lines long. Nothing compared to a modern operating system on even your phone, but it was the most complex of its time, employing 20% of the world's programming force at the time.</p>
<p>What's sad is that these glorious machines, even at their best and earliest warnings of incoming missiles, would only be informing the United States of the inevitable: there wouldn't have been enough time to intercept a real threat, says the Computer History Museum. Thank god for the great vastness of the Pacific, the Atlantic, Canada and Mexico.</p>
<p>The SAGE was retired in 1983 when ICBMs rendered them even more obsolete. But before then, adding shame to uselessness was the fact that in the end, the only place to get SAGE replacement tubes was from the Soviet Union itself. The industrial war machine is a complex and nonsensical thing. Sometimes that complex nonsensicality costs several billion taxpayer dollars.</p>
<p>Update: "This also fails to mention that operators could order the launch of either nuclear armed BOMARC or Nike Hercules Surface-to-Air missiles." From CPUZapper in the comments, which happen to be stellar in this post.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.computerhistory.org/VirtualVisibleStorage/artifact_main.php?tax_id=02.02.02.00">Computer History Museum</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semi_Automatic_Ground_Environment">Wikipedia</a>]<br>
<em>The <a href="http://www.computerhistory.org/">Computer History Museum</a> is a wonderful place. If you're in northern CA, I recommend you find a way to stop by. We'll be running pieces from their collection as an ongoing series. Special thanks to Fiona Tang, John Hollar and the amazing Dag Spicer for showing me around.</em></p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('IBMSAGEretromodo', 3, '');
</script></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5297556/computing-classic-the-1954-sage-protected-the-us-from-invasions-that-never-came]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5297556]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Computing Classic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[classic computing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gallery]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[retrobyte]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[retromodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[usaf]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:34:04 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5297556&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[IBM Prepping 'Watson' Computer to Compete on Jeopardy!]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><br clear="all" /><object width="506" height="311" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/3e22ufcqfTs&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/3e22ufcqfTs&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="506" height="311" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object>IBM, not content to merely crush the spirits of chess masters like Garry Kasparov, have started working with <em>Jeopardy!</em> to create a supercomputer that will undoubtedly answer questions more accurately than Sean Connery.</p>
<p>The supercomputer, dubbed simply as a "Question Answering" system, is named Watson. Designers believe it will have the speed and "understanding" necessary to research, buzz in, and then answer questions fast enough to compete on the popular game show. But it's <em>not</em> Google, engineers say. Don't you <em>dare</em> call it Google.</p>
<p>And as you can see in the video, Alex Trebek is totally for it, going so far as to appear as though all his lines were prepared by IBM PR. Anything to avoid having to face off against your mortal enemy Sean Connery, eh Trebek? [<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3e22ufcqfTs">YouTube</a> - Thanks, blam!]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5228887/ibm-prepping-watson-computer-to-compete-on-jeopardy]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5228887]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[jeopardy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[alex trebeck]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[supercomputers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[watson]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Loftus]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5228887&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[IBM Withdraws $7 Billion Bid For Sun Microsystems]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5197473/nearly-official-7-billion-sun-swallowed-by-ibm">$7 billion deal between IBM and Sun Microsystems</a> has all but failed, say sources at the <a href=" http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123896664697090681.html#mod=testMod">Wall Street Journal</a> and the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/06/technology/business-computing/06blue.html?_r=1&hp">New York Times.</a> Sources say Sun balked at IBM's latest offer and IBM eventually withdrew sometime today.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5199644/ibm-withdraws-7-billion-bid-for-sun-microsystems]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5199644]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[deals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsystems]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sun]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 05 Apr 2009 20:50:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Loftus]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5199644&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Nearly Official: $7 Billion Sun Swallowed By IBM]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>We <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5173667/ibm-wants-sun-for-7-billion">mentioned the rumor before</a>, but NYT is now reporting an all-but-done deal: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/03/technology/business-computing/03blue.html">IBM will buy Sun Microsystems</a>, and all its succulent intellectual property, for just under $7 billion. [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/03/technology/business-computing/03blue.html">NYT</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5197473/nearly-official-7-billion-sun-swallowed-by-ibm]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5197473]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sun]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sun microsystems]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:39:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5197473&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[IBM Prepping For Thousands Of Layoffs "Resource Actions"]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>IBM has begun notifying employees that layoffs or "resource actions" are coming. All in all, some 5000 employees, mostly from the Global Business Services division will be affected. [<a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090326/black-thursday-at-big-blue-2/">Digital Daily</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5185701/ibm-prepping-for-thousands-of-layoffs-resource-actions]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5185701]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Financiapocalypse]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Big Blue]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm layoffs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[layoffs]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5185701&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Falls to Third Place in Reliability Report, Loses to Asus and Lenovo/IBM]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/03/thumb160x_c8df393f3f06bde4cc8b28934755446b.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Apple, the previous champ in RESCUECOM's consumer reliability 2008 report, just got demolished by Asus in an almost 3 to 1 score for Q1 2009. It even loses to Lenovo.</p>
<p>Asus scored a 972, compared with Lenovo's 348 and Apple's 324. How did they get such a high score? Because their repair share was a miniscule 0.2% of service calls to RESCUECOM, whereas Apple's consisted of 2.1%. Even when you factor in that Asus only has a 1.6% marketshare in the US to Apple's 6.8%, it's still quite a low percentage of calls.</p>
<p>Toshiba, Acer and HP/Compaq round out the top 6. [<a href="http://news.prnewswire.com/DisplayReleaseContent.aspx?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/03-24-2009/0004993489&EDATE=">PR Newswire</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5182321/apple-falls-to-third-place-in-reliability-report-loses-to-asus-and-lenovoibm]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5182321]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[reliability]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[asus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[asus highest reliability]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lenovo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[reliability survey]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rescuecom]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:16:34 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5182321&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[IBM Wants Sun for $7 Billion]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/ibm-sun.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/>Sun&mdash;once a bright star in the technology universe, who even wanted to buy Apple&mdash;is about to get swallowed by IBM for $7 billion, say New York Times' sources. [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/19/technology/companies/19sun.html?_r=2&ref=technology">NYT</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5173667/ibm-wants-sun-for-7-billion]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5173667]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[buyout]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sun]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Mar 2009 11:44:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5173667&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[IBM Patents Bionic Armor That Gives Humans Ability To Dodge Bullets]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/02/imagesmatrix-dodge-this-small1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/imagesmatrix-dodge-this-small1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>Believe it or not, IBM has filed for a patent on tech that heightens our reflexes so that we could, theoretically, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged DODGE BULLETS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/dodge-bullets/">dodge bullets</a> like Neo in <em>The Matrix</em>.</p>
<p>This "<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged BIONIC BODY ARMOR" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/bionic-body-armor/">Bionic Body Armor</a>" would continuously scan the area for incoming projectiles. If one is detected, the system would deliver a shock to the muscles causing a swift, reflexive action away from the bullet.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The present invention relates generally to the protection of an individual against a projectile propelled from a firearm. More particularly, the present invention relates to a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged BODY ARMOR" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/body-armor/">body armor</a> system and its method of use that is capable of detecting a projectile propelled from a firearm, computing the trajectory of the projectile, and moving the individual out of the path of the projectile to avoid being hit.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Damn, that might actually work. I mean, think about how fast you move your hand away from a hot stove. Would that kind of movement actually be fast enough to dodge a bullet? [<a href="http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=7,484,451.PN.&OS=PN/7,484,451&RS=PN/7,484,451">Patent</a> via <a href="http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2009/02/12/ibm-files-matrix-style-bullet-dodging-patent/">The Firearm Blog</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5152676/ibm-patents-bionic-armor-that-gives-humans-ability-to-dodge-bullets]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5152676]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[bionic body armor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[body armor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dodge bullets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 12 Feb 2009 20:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5152676&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Computers: Happy 200th Birthday, Charles Darwin]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/02/darwinbday_computers.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/darwinbday_computers.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5152647/computers-happy-200th-birthday-charles-darwin]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5152647]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[charles darwin]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[eniac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macintosh]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[packard bell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 12 Feb 2009 20:10:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Mahoney]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5152647&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Microsoft Crosses 10,000 Patent Mark]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft recently rolled past the 10,000 patent mark, reports Ina Fried at CNet, saying that the lucky #10K covered natural interfaces, linking "a real-world object with a set of data or images." Is 10,000 patents&mdash;well, 10,541 at last count&mdash;<i>that</i> good? Well, according to our snappy research, it's way better than Apple, with 2,541 to date, but it's a far cry from IBM, with 53,413. Fried reports that the US Patent Office issued IBM 4,000 of those little licenses to print money just last year. Go Big Blue! [<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-10157884-56.html">CNet</a>, <a href="http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=0&f=S&l=50&TERM1=international+business+machines&FIELD1=ASNM&co1=AND&TERM2=&FIELD2=&d=PTXT">IBM Patents at USPTO</a>, <a href="http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=0&f=S&l=50&TERM1=apple&FIELD1=ASNM&co1=AND&TERM2=&FIELD2=&d=PTXT">Apple Patents at USPTO</a>, <a href="http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=0&f=S&l=50&TERM1=microsoft&FIELD1=ASNM&co1=AND&TERM2=&FIELD2=&d=PTXT">Microsoft Patents at USPTO</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5150866/microsoft-crosses-10000-patent-mark]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5150866]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:19:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5150866&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Your Keyboards May Have Been Made In Appalling Conditions]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/02/keyboardworkers.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/keyboardworkers.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>I don't mean to get super human-rights on everyone, but if you're using a keyboard from Microsoft, IBM, Dell, Lenovo or HP, there's a chance it was made under some horrific working conditions.</p>
<p>A study by The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Labor_Committee">National Labor Committee</a>, which is a worker's rights group that actually is not associate with the government, found very crazy (and very cruel) working conditions in a Meitai factory in Dongguan City. Here's a very small subsection of cruelties employees were subjected to:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&bull; Workers are prohibited from talking, listening to music, raising their heads, putting their hands in their pockets. Workers are fined for being one minute late, for not trimming their fingernails-which could impede the work, and for stepping on the grass. Workers are searched on the way in and out of the factory. Workers who hand out flyers or discuss factory conditions with outsiders are fired.<br>
&bull; The assembly line never stops, and workers needing to use the bathroom must learn to hold it until there is a break.<br>
&bull; All overtime is mandatory, with 12-hour shifts seven days a week and an average of two days off a month. A worker daring to take a Sunday off-which is supposedly their weekly holiday-will be docked 2 ½ days' wages. Including unpaid overtime, workers are at the factory up to 87 hours a week. On average, they are at the factory 81 hours a week, while toiling 74 hours, including 34 hours of overtime, which exceeds China's legal limit by 318 percent!<br>
&bull; The workers are paid a base wage of 64 cents an hour, which does not even come close to meeting subsistence level needs. After deductions for primitive room and board, the workers' take-home wage drops to just 41 cents an hour. A worker toiling 75 hours a week will earn a take-home wage of $57.19, or 76 cents an hour including overtime and bonuses. The workers are routinely cheated of 14 to 19 percent of the wages legally due them.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Workers are also routinely penalized for random things, including these, which BoingBoing highlighted:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>* "Infractions" punished with the loss of over two hours' wages (fine of 10 RMB&mdash;$1.44), including for-<br>
&mdash;"Being 1 to 5 minutes late to start a shift…"<br>
&mdash;"Not periodically trimming fingernails, which will affect product quality."<br>
&mdash;"Not lining up correctly while punching time cards or at the cafeteria."<br>
&mdash;"Wearing work shoes outside the work room after work."<br>
&mdash;"Putting hands in pant pockets while inside the factory or workroom."</p>
<p>* "Infractions" punished with the loss of 4 ½ hours wages (20 RMB fine, $2.88)<br>
&mdash;"…answering a personal telephone call in the workroom."<br>
&mdash;"Not diligently working or raising ones head to look around when guests or cadres come to visit."<br>
&mdash;"Putting personal objects on the work desk."<br>
&mdash;"…listening to the radio while on the job."<br>
&mdash;"Not parking bicycles according to company regulations; riding bicycles in and out of the company in a way not in accordance with company regulations."<br>
&mdash;"Returning to the dorm after regulated hours [curfew]."</p>
<p>* "Infractions" punished with the loss of nearly seven hours' wages (30 RMB fine&mdash;$4.32)<br>
&mdash;"Switching beds without authorization." (Dorm beds are assigned by management.)</p>
<p>* "Infractions" punished with the loss of nearly 1 ½ days' wages (50 RMB fine&mdash;$7.20)<br>
&mdash;"Workers who arrive over one hour late…"<br>
&mdash;"Riding the elevator without permission."<br>
&mdash;"Plugging in electronics [using electricity] in the dorm room for personal use."<br>
&mdash;"Using the company phone to make personal calls."<br>
&mdash;"Producing products of low quality…"<br>
&mdash;"Workers who…go to visit other workers during working hours."<br>
&mdash;"Chatting at the workstation during work hours…"<br>
&mdash;"Entering or leaving the factory area without allowing door personnel [security guards] to inspect [search workers]."<br>
&mdash;"Treating supervisors with an arrogant attitude…"</p>
<p>* "Infractions" punished with the loss of nearly three days' wages (100 RMB fine&mdash;$14.40):<br>
&mdash;"Leaving one's workstation without permission…"<br>
&mdash;"Putting up personal notices…or handing out flyers."<br>
&mdash;"Revealing confidential company or production-related information."</p>
<p>* "Infractions" punished with firing:<br>
&mdash;"Violating labor discipline…and not obeying the company's work arrangements."<br>
&mdash;"…Taking part in illegal organizations." [In China, this means independent unions; human, women's and children's rights organizations and non-state-sanctioned religious organizations.]<br>
&mdash;"Not following the procedures spelled out by government regulations on stopping work, slowing work down, encouraging others to stop or slow down work."<br>
&mdash;"Missing three days of work."<br>
&mdash;"Disobeying China's one-child policy."<br>
&mdash;"Not obeying company arrangements or directions or…collectively causing trouble as a group…"<br>
&mdash;"Any behavior similar to that listed above or helping or colluding in such behavior."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>If you think these conditions are obscene&mdash;and I think most of us should&mdash;contact details for the companies that contract Meitai for manufacturing are located at the bottom of the link. [<a href="http://www.nlcnet.org/article.php?id=613">NLCNet</a> via <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/02/09/ghastly-working-cond.html">Boingboing</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5150655/your-keyboards-may-have-been-made-in-appalling-conditions]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5150655]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[man vs machine]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hp]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[keyboard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[keyboard sweatshop]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[keyboards]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lenovo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sweatshop]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5150655&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sony: PS3 to Get 45-Nanometer Chips Around June]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/02/fromtops3.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/fromtops3.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>According to <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged DAVID REEVES" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/david-reeves/">David Reeves</a>, president of Sony Computer Entertaintment Europe, the PS3 could get a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/353687/the-ps3-processor-has-been-successfully-shrunk">45-nanometer Cell chip</a> in a few months. From an interview with <em>The Guardian</em>:</p>

<blockquote>
<p>We're always looking at ways to reduce costs [in the PS3], replacing the current 65 nanometre Cell chip with a 45 nanometre one probably in middle of year.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>So why should you care? Well, the chips should run cooler and at a lower wattage. But more importantly, shrinking the processor to something cheaper to build is absolutely essential if we're ever to see a cheaper PS3.</p>
<p>What we're a little confused about is why it's taking Sony so long to make this switch. Because, according to reports, IBM has <a href="http://gizmodo.com/353687/the-ps3-processor-has-been-successfully-shrunk">long figured out</a> how to make a 45nm Cell. So is Sony sitting on a pile of 65nm chips that haven't sold since last year? [<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/feb/05/david-reeves-sony-europe-losses">The Guardian</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/david-reeves-drops-hint-of-sonys-shift-to-45nm-ps3s/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5147261/sony-ps3-to-get-45+nanometer-chips-around-june]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5147261]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[david reeves]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[45]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[45-nanometer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[45nm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[45nm ps3]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[65-nanometer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[65nm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[playstation 3]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ps3]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[toshiba]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5147261&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[IBM Sequoia: Faster Than the Fastest 500 Supercomputers, Combined]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/02/blue-gene-skynet-terminators.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/blue-gene-skynet-terminators.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>20 petaflops. That's the speed rating of IBM's slated Sequoia supercomputer, the future world's fastest supercomputer that promises to be faster than every system on the Top500 supercomputer list, combined.</p>

<p>So what's all that actually mean? IBM offered us some more tangible ways to wrap your mind around 20 quadrillion mathematical processes per second.<br></p>
<blockquote>&bull; If each of the 6.7 billion people on earth had a hand calculator and worked together on a calculation 24 hours per day, 365 days a year, it would take 320 years to do what Sequoia will do in one hour.
<p><br>
&bull; 20 petaflops could offer a 50x improvement in our capability to predict earthquakes, allowing scientists to predict an earthquake's effects on a building-by-building basis across an area as large as Los Angeles County.</p>
<p>&bull; 20 petaflops could also provide a 40x improvement in our capability to monitor and forecast weather. This would allow forecasters to predict local weather events that affect areas 100 meters to one kilometer in size, down from their current ten-kilometer ability.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The Sequoia will be powered by 1.6 million cores (specific 45-nanometer chips in development) and 1.6 petabytes of memory. It will be housed in 96 refrigerators spanning roughly 3,000 square feet.</p>
<p>It's for the U.S. Government who will use the system for "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty_quantification">uncertainty quantification (UQ) studies</a>" and weapon science calculations. [<a href="http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/deepcomputing/top500.html">IBM Supercomputing</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5145315/ibm-sequoia-faster-than-the-fastest-500-supercomputers-combined]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5145315]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[supercomputers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm sequoia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5145315&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple's New Head of iPhone and iPod Hardware Engineering Starts Soon]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Apple has cleared the way for Mark Papermaster to start working as head of iPod and iPhone development, starting April 24th. The previous roadblock was a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5080517/judge-orders-apples-new-ipod-and-iphone-chief-to-stop-work-immediately">non-compete</a> clause from his time at IBM.</p><blockquote><p>Mark Papermaster to Begin at Apple as Senior Vice President of Devices<br />
Hardware Engineering on April 24</p>
<p>    CUPERTINO, Calif., Jan. 27 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ &mdash; Apple(R) today<br />
announced that Mark Papermaster will be coming to Apple as senior vice<br />
president of Devices Hardware Engineering, reporting to Apple CEO Steve Jobs, on April 24. Papermaster, who comes to Apple from IBM, will lead Apple's iPod(R) and iPhone(TM) hardware engineering teams. The litigation between IBM and Mark Papermaster has been resolved.<br />
    Papermaster has 25 years of product and technology experience, and was previously a vice president at IBM. He has a Bachelor of Science degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Texas, and a Master of Science in Electrical Engineering from the University of Vermont in 1988. Papermaster is active with the University of Texas where he is a member of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Advisory Council.<br />
    Apple ignited the personal computer revolution in the 1970s with the Apple II and reinvented the personal computer in the 1980s with the Macintosh.<br />
Today, Apple continues to lead the industry in innovation with its<br />
award-winning computers, OS X operating system and iLife and professional<br />
applications. Apple is also spearheading the digital media revolution with its iPod portable music and video players and iTunes online store, and has entered the mobile phone market with its revolutionary iPhone.
 </p></blockquote>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5140418/apples-new-head-of-iphone-and-ipod-hardware-engineering-starts-soon]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5140418]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mark Papermaster]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[papermaster]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:14:32 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5140418&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[IBM First Company to Win 4,000 Patents in a Year, More Than Microsoft and Intel Combined]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/01/edison_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/edison_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>IBM has always hoarded patents like a dwarf and his gold. But this year, they're the first company to ever win more than 4,000 in a single year, more than Microsoft and Intel combined.</p>
<p>IBM picked up 4,186 U.S patents in 2008, while Microsoft won 2,030 and Intel earned a patriotic 1,776. The silver medal surprisingly went to Samsung, who earned 3,515. We would tell you to just give up if you're planning on inventing anything, since it's already been patented, and <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/317953/wi+lan-sues-everyone-and-their-mom-really-over-dubious-wi+fi-patents">knowing the USPTO</a>, they've awarded patents for broad, overly general and totally obvious ideas.</p>
<p>But there's hope&mdash;IBM says they're going to increase the number of inventions it takes to publishing annually instead of grabbing a patent for to try to spur broader, more open innovation. But likely that just means <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent_troll">some asshole in Minnesota</a> will try to patent the world's first supercomputer sex machine and deprive everyone of it instead of IBM. [<a href="http://tech.yahoo.com/news/nm/20090114/tc_nm/us_ibm_patents">Reuters</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5131075/ibm-first-company-to-win-4000-patents-in-a-year-more-than-microsoft-and-intel-combined]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5131075]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[innovations]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[inventions]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[uspto]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5131075&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sony Basically Designed the Xbox 360 Processor For Microsoft, Says New Book]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/12/thumb160x_sonybook.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />The new book <i>The Race For a New Game Machine</i>, by two IBM engineers, details how ridiculous the design process was when IBM was making Sony's PS3 cell chip. Microsoft basically got a free ride.</p>
<p>The WSJ pulls out facts like IBM employees trying to hide their work from people from companies in cubicles next to them, helping one team out (the Microsoft team) with their design process based on knowledge they had already gained from the Sony side, and most importantly, that Microsoft received the chip from manufacturing BEFORE Sony did because they ordered "backup manufacturing capacity from a third party." [<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123069467545545011.html">WSJ</a> via <a href="http://www.ps3fanboy.com/2008/12/31/new-book-explains-how-sony-inadvertently-helped-make-xbox-360/">PS3 Fanboy</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5121603/sony-basically-designed-the-xbox-360-processor-for-microsoft-says-new-book]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5121603]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cpu]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[playstation]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[playstation 3]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ps3]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the face for a new game machine]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xbox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xbox 360]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 31 Dec 2008 16:45:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5121603&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[IBM Embarrasses Itself with Five Idiotic Predictions for the Future]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><object width="494" height="399"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/86RpIwNTGvI&rel=0&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/86RpIwNTGvI&rel=0&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="494" height="399"></embed></object>IBM has just released a list of five innovations it thinks we'll see in the next five years, and they're ridiculous. It's the kind of crap we laugh at when we see <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5101336/the-kitchen-of-tomorrow-in-1943">old Life magazine from the 40's predicting airship kitchens</a> by the year 2000.</p>
<p>Here's the list:</p>
<p>-Energy saving solar technology printed and stuck onto asphalt, paint and windows<br />
-A crystal ball to help you monitor health<br />
-We will talk to the Web, and the Web will talk back<br />
-We will have our own digital shopping assistants<br />
-Forgetting will become a distant memory via smart appliances in every area of the home and office</p>
<p>Seriously, your big prediction for the next five years of technological innovation is <i>talking internet</i>? Are you fucking serious? Every single one of these predictions is laughable and idiotic. Seriously, a touchscreen in a dressing room to help you call someone to get you a different size is not an innovation, nor is it something that we will need to wait five years for. If that was a good idea, we'd have it now, but it's not, so we don't.</p>
<p>You would think that a company that exists in the tech sphere would have a clue about the types of short-term advances we can expect. Oh well, better go make some more unfunny ads to run incessantly during football games! [<a href="http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/presskit/26121.wss">IBM</a> via <A href="http://www.psfk.com/2008/12/when-innovation-dies-ibm.html">PSFK</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5101380/ibm-embarrasses-itself-with-five-idiotic-predictions-for-the-future]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5101380]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[predictions]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 03 Dec 2008 11:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5101380&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[IBM Roadrunner Tops Cray as the Official World's Fastest Supercomputer]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/11/roadrunner_supercomputer.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/roadrunner_supercomputer.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>It's like a geek soap opera. Just last week, Cray bragged that their updated <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5084224/cray-xt-jaguar-the-new-worlds-fastest-supercomputer">Jaguar XT</a> supercomputer was the world's fastest. Now this week, IBM responds to the trash talk with a number one ranking of their Roadrunner system on the newly published Top500 supercomputing list.</p>

<p>Both the IBM and Cray systems break the petaflop processing barrier according to Top500 measurements (1.45 petaflops vs 1.38 petaflops, respectively). Heck, even IBM admitted to us that the two computers "run neck and neck." But there's a huge difference between them.</p>
<p>The Roadrunner uses roughly half the power of the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #jaguarxt" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/jaguarxt/">Jaguar XT</a>.</p>
<p>It assembles 12,960 IBM PowerXCell 8i Cell Broadband Engine processors and an additional 6,948 AMD Opteron Dual-Core processors. The AMD equipment handles "basic" functions while the IBM chips handle the intense number crunching. (Read all about the Roadrunner <a href="http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/24405.wss">here</a>.)</p>
<p>Seeing as the Cray XT5 uses 45,000 quad-core AMD Opteron processors to get the same job done, you've gotta be at least a little impressed. [<a href="http://www.top500.org/">Top500</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5090737/ibm-roadrunner-tops-cray-as-the-official-worlds-fastest-supercomputer]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5090737]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[supercomputers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ jaguar]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cray]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cray]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm roadrunner]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jaguar]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Jaguar xt]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xt"]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 17 Nov 2008 11:45:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5090737&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[IBM Played the Sappy Family Guilt Card In Bid to Keep Papermaster]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/11/340x_494x_nanoraiiiinbow_01.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />The legal snafu regarding former IBM employee Mark Papermaster's departure for Apple took a hard right toward <em>Lifetime</em> TV town this week after some new information shed light on just how far IBM went to keep him on the payroll. Imploring Papermaster to remain in the Big Blue camp, an unnamed exec asked the new iPod head at Apple to "consider the effect of his decision on his family." When Papermaster declined the offer, thereby choosing free iPods over discount <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #bladeservers" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/bladeservers/">blade servers</a>, IBM sued him for violation of a non-compete contract. Per a judge's emergency order, Papermaster is currently <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5080517/judge-orders-apples-new-ipod-and-iphone-chief-to-stop-work-immediately">not working for Apple</a> until this is cleared up. If nothing else comes of this, at the very least Papermaster has some interesting additions for his updated resume. [<a href="http://www.crn.com/hardware/212100058">CRN</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5089486/ibm-played-the-sappy-family-guilt-card-in-bid-to-keep-papermaster]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5089486]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Guilt Card]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Blade servers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[papermaster]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 16 Nov 2008 12:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Loftus]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5089486&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
