<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo, the gadget guide. So much in love with shiny new toys, it's unnatural.]]></description>
				        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ All You Need Is Love Sung Simultaneously in 156 Countries [Music] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/156-countries.jpg"></a>Remember the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5437856/top-10-most-popular-articles-of-2009">extremely popular</a> and heart-touching <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5231112/best-video-ive-seen-today-will-make-you-smile">Stand By Me video</a>? That was recorded in a virtual studio around the world during different days. Here's the not-less-heart-touching All You Need in Love, recorded in 156 countries <i>at exactly the same time</i>:</p> <p><script type="text/javascript"> newVideoPlayer("/156-countries_gizmodo.flv", 500, 375,""); </script><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/156-countries_gizmodo.flv.jpg"></a></p> <p>The video was recorded on December 7, 2009 at 1:30pm Greenwich Meridian Time. All the different musicians in 156 locations started to sing the song at that time, with the same tempo. They obviously were good, because when the results were assembled in a single track, everything matched.</p> <p>The event was organized by Starbucks to help <a href="http://StarbucksLoveProject.com/">raise awareness of AIDS in Africa</a> for the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #redfoundation" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/redfoundation/">(RED) foundation</a>. Like the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5231112/best-video-ive-seen-today-will-make-you-smile">Stand By Me video</a>, the result will touch even the more-coldester-hearted bastards among you. And if it doesn't, you need a punch on the bracket.*</p> <p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5438506/an-image-to-start-2010-with-a-big-smile">Another happy way</a> to start 2010. Pass the link along. [<a href="http://StarbucksLoveProject.com/">Starbucks Love Project</a>]</p> <p>* What's a punch on the bracket?</p> <p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/KJ2yRTRlMFU&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22&start=53"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/KJ2yRTRlMFU&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22&start=53" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object></p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5438484/all-you-need-is-love-sung-simultaneously-in-156-countries]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5438484]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Music ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[(red)]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[(Red) foundation]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[All you need is love]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Beatles]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Clips]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Starbucks]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 01 Jan 2010 21:30:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5438484&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Raise Your Hand If You Spent New Years Eve on Top of the Tallest Structure in the World [Architecture] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/VrGsS2IQqAg&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/VrGsS2IQqAg&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object> Yes, me neither. But these guys almost did, filming this crystal clear video&mdash;much better and vertigo-inducing than <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5404350/this-video-from-the-tip-top-of-the-burj-dubai-makes-me-sick-to-my-stomach">the previous one</a>, thanks to a better camera and wider lens angle&mdash;on December 31, from the tip of the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #burjdubai" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/burjdubai/">Burj Dubai</a>.</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5438561/raise-your-hand-if-you-spent-new-years-eve-on-top-of-the-tallest-structure-in-the-world]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5438561]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Architecture ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Burj Dubai]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Clips]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 01 Jan 2010 20:52:23 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5438561&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Man Blowing a Bubble: An ASCII Short Film [Retromodo] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_blowing-bubble.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Before the internet, there were movies. And before movies, there were typewriters. And before typewriters, there was chewing gum. And before chewing gum, there were only <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chewing_gum#History">cavemen</a>. Is this dude a caveman chewing gum in a typewriter movie? Maaaybe. [<a href="http://obsoletethebook.com/post/311928467/ive-given-up-emoticons-new-years-resolution">Obsolete</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5438533/man-blowing-a-bubble-an-ascii-short-film]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5438533]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Retromodo ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ASCII]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Emoticons]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Man blowing bubble]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 01 Jan 2010 19:44:10 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5438533&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ An Image to Start 2010 With a Big Smile [Image Cache] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/6s663.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_6s663.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Dear 2010, you'll bring the iSlate, Android 3, Natal, iPhone 4, and whatever other cool things we can't foresee now. But now you're too young, geeky, and cute. Don't worry, you'll get there. <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #happynewyear" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/happynewyear/">Happy New Year</a>, everyone. [Thanks David Keyes]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5438506/an-image-to-start-2010-with-a-big-smile]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5438506]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Image cache ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Happy New Year]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Macintosh]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 01 Jan 2010 18:34:36 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5438506&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Finally, a Way to Hold Coffee, Cellphone and Wallet at the Same Time [DIY] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_500x_coffee-cup.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />This is a solution to a problem I definitely have&mdash;I often find myself wrestling with coffee and a few gadgets, without enough hands to hold it all. This DIY sleeve takes at least the coffee off your hands.</p> <p>It's basically one of those coffee sleeves you get to keep from burning your hands, but with a few strong magnets embedded inside. So if you need an extra hand to tie your shoes, fiddle with a smartphone or PMP, you can just stick your coffee to the nearest streetlamp. And it looks like it might be even more protective for our delicate nerd hands than those wimpy cardboard ones. [<a href="http://lifehacker.com/5437325/diy-magnetized-coffee-sleeve-doubles-as-third-hand">Lifehacker</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5438158/finally-a-way-to-hold-coffee-cellphone-and-wallet-at-the-same-time]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5438158]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ DIY ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Coffee]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Coffee sleeve]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Hacks]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Magnet coffee sleeve]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Magnets]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Sleve]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 01 Jan 2010 18:30:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5438158&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ I Bet This Catamaran Can Also Jump Into Hyperspace [Concept] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/246503_kfjpyvqm8l_j3l716n5ilnzgp_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2010/01/500x_246503_kfjpyvqm8l_j3l716n5ilnzgp_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>I have seen really amazing ship designs, like the impressive <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5430355/ghost-supership-can-probably-break-other-ships-in-two">kind-of-Nautlish Ghost ramming yacht</a>, the weird <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5427880/ikkar-transforming-yacht-requires-supervillain-spandex-suit">transforming Ikkar</a>, the luxurious <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5372892/this-is-my-dream-house-except-its-not-a-house">perfect dream-aparment-that-is-really-a-boat</a>, and the classic <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5412408/gifts-for-design-lovers-and-jon-ive-wannabees/gallery/7">schooner America</a>. The Enso, however, is the first that looks from another planet:</p> <p><script type="text/javascript"> gawkerGallery(5438487,10,''); </script></p> <p>I someone told me that the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #ensocatamaran" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ensocatamaran/">Enso Catamaran</a> is really a secret version of <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5420877/first-video-of-virgin-galactics-spaceshiptwo">Burt Rutan's Spaceshiptwo</a> I wouldn't be suprised. The 140-foot Wingsailed Enso Catamaran, whoever, was designed by <a href="http://www.coroflot.com/public/individual_work.asp?individual_id=246503&">student Zack Stephanchick</a>. Zack's real name is Grørrrkzyngy Aarkaantar, from the Vega 4 system. You are not tricking me Zack. I mean Grørrrkzyngy, you weird tentacle-nosed alien you. [<a href="http://www.coroflot.com/public/individual_file.asp?individual_id=246503&portfolio_id=3087308&">Coroflot</a> <a href="http://www.bornrich.org/entry/the-enso-catamaran-brings-the-green-and-gorgeous-on-the-blue/">Born Rich</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5438473/i-bet-this-catamaran-can-also-jump-into-hyperspace]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5438473]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Concept ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Boat]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Enso Catamaran]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ship]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[yacht]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 01 Jan 2010 17:50:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5438473&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Speaker Bot:  The Iron Giant  Reimagined as an Artsy iPod Dock [Art] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/il_430xn.112638579.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />This <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #speakerbot" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/speakerbot/">Speaker Bot</a> is a handmade, Etsy-fied robot seemingly designed around one of those little pocket guitar amps. It's maybe not the most technologically advanced iPod dock around, but it's about as cute as robots ever get.</p> <p>It's a fair-sized sculpture, the only one of its kind, about a foot and a half tall. It seems to be constructed from recycled materials, which gives it a nice weathered look. It also costs $500, which is okay for a unique sculpture but as much as a pretty decent full-sized stereo, so it's probably more for the art crowd than the omg cool robot! crowd. [<a href="http://www.etsy.com/view_listing.php?listing_id=37523266">Etsy</a> via <a href="http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20091231/speaker-bot-plays-mp3-player/">Coolest Gadgets</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5438113/speaker-bot-the-iron-giant-reimagined-as-an-artsy-ipod-dock]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5438113]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Art ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Etsy]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Robots]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Sculpture]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Speaker]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Speaker bot]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 01 Jan 2010 17:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5438113&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ The Digital Cameras of 2000 Look Awfully Good For Their Age [Decades] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/g1_front_angle.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />This <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #canonpowershotg1" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/canonpowershotg1/">Canon PowerShot G1</a>, released in 2000 and <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20010625223041/www.bestbuy.com/detail.asp?e=11044942&m=82&cat=83&scat=84">listed at Best Buy</a> for $800 in 2001, has held up well. Sure, 3.34 megapixels isn't much, but spec for spec, this codger can almost hang with the kids.</p> <p>Seriously, you could just post this spec sheet next to a Canon in a retail store now, and most people wouldn't bat an eye. They sure as hell wouldn't buy it, but they probably wouldn't say anything, either: <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_screencap_2009-12-31_at_3.43.43_pm_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />In ten years, what have we gained? More megapixels, higher-quality video, some more ports, better low-light performance, smaller memory cards, better battery life, and a little compactness. Canon's cheapest P&S, the 10-megapixel <a href="http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelInfoAct&fcategoryid=183&modelid=18155#ModelFeaturesAct">Powershot A480</a>, handily outspecs the $800 G1 for just $110 (though it doesn't have video). Today, if you hand Canon $800, they'll hand you back <a href="http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelInfoAct&fcategoryid=139&modelid=18385">a DSLR that shoots HD video</a>:<br> <a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/t1i_586x225.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_t1i_586x225.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br> What's amazing, though, is that if you did spend $800 on this camera back in 2000, you could still use it today. It'd be beaten to hell, the zoom motor would sound like it had gained sentience and learned to experience real, mammalian pain, and the 16MB CF card would have been replaced with something a little roomier, but damnit, it would <em>work</em>&mdash;and your Facebook friends wouldn't know the difference. You can't say that about many gadgets from 10 years ago, so here's to you, Powershot: You were great, or your category moves slow. Whichever makes you feel better.</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5438069/the-digital-cameras-of-2000-look-awfully-good-for-their-age]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5438069]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ decades ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Canon]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Canon powershot g1]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Digital Cameras]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[point and shoots]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Y2k10]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 01 Jan 2010 15:30:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5438069&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ 7 Gadgets That Will Ruin 2010 [Tgif] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>Do you make new year's resolutions? If so, you should avoid the following products. Your chance for success in 2010 would be over before it began.</p> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/sausage_briefcase.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_sausage_briefcase.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><strong>Losing Weight</strong>: Sorry, but your diet is blown sky high when you carry around a briefcase full of sausage&mdash;as is your resolution about not having heart attacks in 2010. [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5424456/sausage-briefcase-for-the-well+prepared-traveller">Link</a>]<br> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_50_worst.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>Get More Enjoyment Out of Life:</strong> Unfortunately, if you purchase any one of the gadgets on our list of the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5437178/the-worst-gadgets-of-the-decade-10-bonus-dishonorable-mentions">50 (+10) worst gadgets of the decade</a>, the chances of leading a more joyful life are significantly reduced.<br> <a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/delorean.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_delorean.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><strong>Get On a Budget and Save Money:</strong> If you want to save more money in the upcoming year, you should probably steer clear of impulse Back to the Future Delorean replica purchases on eBay&mdash;no matter how insanely detailed they might be. [<a href="http://jalopnik.com/5435552/most-realistic-back-to-the-future-delorean-ever-hits-ebay">Jalopnik</a>]<br> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_office_score_cards.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>Get a Promotion:</strong> Forget a promotion, you will be completely unemployable if you decide to bust out the office babe score cards. [<a href="http://smuttygifts.com/office-babe-scorecards/prod_1259.html">Smutty Gifts</a>]<br> <a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/shotgun.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_shotgun.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><strong>Stop Drinking So Much:</strong> After New Year's Eve, I'm going to cut down on the alcohol&mdash;and this time, I mean it. Unfortunately, that goal is going to be a lot harder to achieve with a booze-loading shotgun lying around. [<a href="http://www.giftlab.co.uk/product_details_128_18_shot-gun---novelty-drink-dispenser.html">Giftlab</a>]</p> <p>And if you plan on going out tonight and getting completely hammered, make sure to check out our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5424266/8-examples-why-alcohol-and-gadgets-dont-mix/gallery/">PSA on the dangers of mixing alcohol and gadgets</a>. You've been warned.</p> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/shredder_hoodie.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_shredder_hoodie.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><strong>Meet a Nice Woman:</strong> If you go around wearing a shredder hoodie everywhere, 2010 probably isn't going to be the year you get lucky in love. [<a href="http://www.80stees.com/products/Shredder-TMNT-Hoodie.asp">'80s Tees</a> via <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5430939/turtles-and-rats-will-run-away-when-i-wear-this-hoodie">Link</a>]<br> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/volcano_vaporizer.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><strong>Stop Smoking So Much:</strong> Cigarette smoking is one thing, but using the Volcano Vaporizer for the purpose in which it was intended is quite another. Instead of smoke, you inhale vapor, which eliminates many of the toxins but retains all of the flavors and mind numbing effects. Sounds great, but this little guy simultaneously puts four new year's resolutions in jeopardy: get organized, learn something new, get promoted or find a new job, and establish a budget (it costs $500). [<a href="https://www.thevolcanovaporizer.com/">Volcano Vaporizer</a> via <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5219983/taking-the-670-volcano-vaporizer-for-a-test-drive">Link</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5437816/7-gadgets-that-will-ruin-2010/gallery/]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5437816]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ tgif ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Feature]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[New Years]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[thank giz it's friday]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 01 Jan 2010 14:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5437816&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Cube-Based Chess Set Adds Modern Confusion To Timeless Difficulty [Chess] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/cruzchess1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_cruzchess1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>My chess strategy doesn't extend too far beyond pulling my knights out first, because that's what the computer games always do against me. But with this cube-based set, I'd probably need a strategy just to remember which piece is which.</p> <p>Chess has been <a href="http://gizmodo.com/t/chess/">reimagined</a> more times than anyone cares to count. But <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #scottcruz" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/scottcruz/">Scott Cruz</a>'s chess set, designed around a cubic pawn, makes the game even <i>more</i> difficult to master, rendering all the pieces as rectangular towers of different heights.</p> <p><script type="text/javascript"> gawkerGallery(5437349,3,''); </script></p> <p>Thankfully, Cruz has included a built-in cheat sheet for the easily confused; each piece is indented with tiny squares showing its possible moves.</p> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/cruzchess2_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_cruzchess2_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p> <p>Still, my go-to set-up mnemonic&mdash;"the Queen always starts on her own color"&mdash;won't work too well on the gray scale board. [<a href="http://www.thedesignblog.org/entry/scott-cruz-s-chess-set-adds-wider-dimension-to-the-mind-game/">The Design Blog</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5437367/cube+based-chess-set-adds-modern-confusion-to-timeless-difficulty]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5437367]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Chess ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[activities]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Board Games]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Concepts]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Scott Cruz]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 01 Jan 2010 12:30:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Kyle VanHemert]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5437367&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Bathrobe Jumpsuit is the Final Word in Snuggie Technology [Snuggie] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/thumb160x_snugglesuit.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />You can keep your <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5426336/necky-the-snuggie-for-your-neck">neck snuggie</a> and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5191510/peekaru-is-a-baby-snuggie">baby snuggie</a> and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5251186/the-space-snuggie-could-protect-astronauts-from-radiation">space snuggie</a>. Real ballers know that the Snuggle Suit is the be all and end all.</p> <p>Not only is this actual product currently for sale, it's also <em>66% off</em> at <a href="http://www3.jcpenney.com/jcp/X6.aspx?ItemTyp=G&itemID=16f7511&GrpTyp=PRD&ShowMenu=T&ShopBy=0&SearchString=snuggle+suit&RefPage=SearchDepartment.aspx&s4PageSize=15&CmCatId=searchresults&Search1Prod=True">JC Penny</a>. If you don't wish you had one of these to lounge away your New Year's hangover in right now, you're doing something wrong. Available in four colors and infinity style points. [<a href="http://consumerist.com/2009/12/another-snuggie-hybrid-the-bathrobe-jumpsuit-blanket-thing.html">Consumerist</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5437990/bathrobe-jumpsuit-is-the-final-word-in-snuggie-technology]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5437990]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ snuggie ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[jumpsuit]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[snuggle]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Snugglesuit]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 01 Jan 2010 11:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Barrett]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5437990&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Microsoft's Lost Decade in Mobile [Decades] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/hp_02.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />10 years ago, you could buy the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Hewlett-Packard-Jornada-Color-Pocket/dp/B00004TDL2">HP Jornada 548</a> with a color screen, which let you listen to MP3s, surf the web, check your email, and keep a calendar. It had a touchscreen. It ran Windows. It was awesome.</p> <p>Today, you can buy a smartphone with a color screen, which lets you listen to MP3s, surf the web, check your email and keep a calendar. It has a touchscreen. It runs Windows. It does everything&mdash;everything&mdash;better than its ancestor did, in a much sexier hardware package. Plus it makes calls! It will cost you less than the $450 Jornada 548, though you'll probably have to sign a two-year cellphone contract. Amazingly, though, its software <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5374876/windows-mobile-65-review-theres-no-excuse-for-this">looks and feels</a> <em>almost exactly the same</em> as its ten-year-old brother.<br> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_500x_sshot024.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br> I don't just want to beat up on Microsoft here, because disregarding aesthetics and UX, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windowsmobile" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windowsmobile/">Windows Mobile</a> has evolved a lot since it was just a twinkle in Windows CE's eye. But not as much as the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphone">competitors</a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/android">around</a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/webos">it</a>, and not fast enough to stay relevant. So instead of looking back, let's look forward: Microsoft, Windows Mobile 7, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows-mobile-7">whatever it is</a>, is your chance to win us back. The mobile space moves faster than it did back at the turn of the millenium, back when you had some of the best mobile software on the market, but it also has a shorter memory. Show us what you've got; we're eager to see it.</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5438096/microsofts-lost-decade-in-mobile]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5438096]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ decades ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Cellphones]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[HP Jornada 548]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[PDAs]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Windows Mobile]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Y2k10]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 01 Jan 2010 09:30:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5438096&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Shine On, You Crazy Gadgets [Gadgets] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/shineon2010.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_shineon2010.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>I spent this decade hunting for the perfect gadget. I never thought I would end up with tech as good as this. But it's not the tech that interests me the most anymore.</p> <p>In 2000, I was just another kid out of college in Boston escaping to the Golden State's climate and opportunity. The perfect job didn't present itself for six long months; four months later, it burst with the bubble.</p> <p>It's not important what the job was. I was fired not just because the company was eating shit but also because I spent extraordinary amounts of company time online, obsessively reading about games and gadgets. That was fate, it seems.</p> <p>My toys were nothing fancy; a leftover Dell Inspiron laptop with a 266 MHz processor, maybe 256MB of RAM, and no 3D graphics; a Motorola Startac variant on T-Mobile (300 minutes, no data plan&mdash;can you imagine!&mdash;or even text messages).</p> <p>I don't think I even had a portable media player, playing Napster MP3s only at home on Winamp. For video games I had a first generation PlayStation, games rented from Kosmo and copied with a CD burner, played on an Aiwa 24-inch TV that was built around a Sony Trinitron CRT tube. At the time, these were important brands.</p> <p>Since then the companies that made the gadgets I loved started looking old-fashioned, following that simple-minded formula of chasing more MHz, more pixels.</p> <p>Then: iPod.</p> <p>And I ignored it. It was pretty but I couldn't afford one. It almost seemed stupid, since lots of other MP3 players advertised more features for less cash. I didn't own a Mac, nor did I plan to. It was white&mdash;and who wanted a white gadget? Silver was my kind of cool. Fake plastic silver, even. Anything with a metallic flake in its finish. I didn't get it, conceptually or literally.</p> <p>Remember Creative? They made better stuff than Apple for less money, and I wanted one of their players. Today, I don't know if Creative even makes MP3 players. I use iTunes and Amazon.com for music buying. I bet you do, too. It took more than a few failed experiments, but a lot of us are actually buying music again.</p> <p>Digital changed cameras, too.</p> <p>My first digital camera was a Kodak, because Kodak was the brand for imaging even through the late '90s, before the Canon and Nikon train barreled past Rochester, leaving Kodak a ghost town. Kodak was invested in the past.</p> <p>This was the decade I got into PC gaming hardware&mdash;then got out. I wasn't even that into the games, but loved slapping cheap components into tall steel Taiwanese cases, looping wires through sharp-edged bays for fans, lights, optical and hard drives.</p> <p>A year into this habit, I realized I was in an pointless upgrade loop. I'd get a few more frames per second out of a new video card, but the games weren't more fun at higher frames-rates or resolutions, especially when everyone got stuck playing <em>Counterstrike</em> for two years straight. (I was still playing consoles, but my fervor was waning; I waited in line for a PS2 and only to collapse onto my bed with the box, too tired to open it.)</p> <p>One sweltering day my PC suffered a fatal crash and lost a lot of data. That was that. I gave in to Mactardedness&mdash;and not because I loved Apple, but because I hated inconvenience. Maybe using a Mac would provoke less cursing. I even got an iPod. Slowly, my brain released its desire to tinker, and I used my rebuilt PC less and less.</p> <p>I noticed Friendster. Joined. It got slow.</p> <p>Joined MySpace. It got filled with junk.</p> <p>Joined that Facebook thing because Nick Denton made me. Man is it ugly. I didn't log back in for a few years.</p> <p>Signed up for Twitter. No one I know in real life uses this thing. Didn't sign in for a few years. I didn't get the social web, at first. Google&mdash;not other people&mdash;was my door to the internet.</p> <p>Got a PS3. Turned it on for <em>Metal Gear</em>. Squinted at menus. It asked me to log in for its store, but there was nothing in there. Beat <em>Metal Gear</em> twice, turned it off. Dust looks like a matte finish on a PS3.</p> <p>Got an Xbox 360. Added my friends. Liked knowing where my friends were and what they were doing. Liked killing my friends on Xbox, even though PS3 has faster, quieter, nicer hardware. I guess I am not as anti-social as I thought&mdash;as long as being social involves assassination. (Twitter would be better if you could use it to murder your friends.)</p> <p>Bought HD-DVD. Blu-ray won the battle the last physical media format ever. Now I just subscribe to 15 different movie services. (Wait, is that better?)</p> <p>Ten years ago, Dell was shaking things up because it sold through the internet for cheap. Now they're shrinking. You can't tell the difference between an Inspiron or Latitude or XPS with a 15-inch screen. People who shop for computers now often look to Apple simply because it's easier to pick a size&mdash;small, medium, or large&mdash;and then pick the expensive or the cheaper version. (Do you want fries with that?) Dell's branding and model line up is an American heartland clusterfuck.</p> <p>Sony stopped cooking up so many proprietary&mdash;often imaginary&mdash;formats, but only because they'd lost. The company that made the Walkman now makes iPod docks. Sony's hardware continues to be fantastic, but does it matter? They're the only gadget company with a music label and movie studio. Can anyone name the Sony iTunes alternative? Does anyone talk to their friends about their love for the TX-1234xZR? Or its cousin without Bluetooth, the TX-1234xZRnbt? Or the TX-1234xZRnbt2xz with an extra 2X zoom? Sony's branding and model line up is a Japanese megacorp clusterfuck.</p> <p>For an all-too-brief moment, T-mobile was hip because they were cheap, had a phone called the Hiptop, and Catherine Zeta Jones was hotter than Ma Bell. You could get your problems taken care of in one call. Also: pink logo. Then we all got phones capable of doing real things that needed real pipes. AT&T was convinced by Apple to do some cheap flat rate thing on that iPhone. Sorry TMO.</p> <p>Apple came back. It was Steve, a man who lost the first round 20 years ago and came back to fight the mobile war with all the old lessons from the PC war in pocket. Design, manufacturing, sourcing of components, marketing and maybe most importantly, software. He had almost everything under control. They went Intel, declaring that hardware wasn't the thing that defined a better computer.</p> <p>And, this little thing called iPhone. We had an email debate at <em>Gizmodo</em> about calling this decade the "iDecade". Naming a decade after a gadget, no matter how great it is, makes me want to vomit. So does calling the iPhone the gadget of the year. It just seems too easy, too cliche.</p> <p>But it was the one. It has been the culmination of decades of development across countless industries, all coming together into a single little slab of near-perfection. After a decade filled with so many aborted, ill-conceived clones and ideas tuned more for profit than progress, the iPhone was a rare gem. Just because it's obvious doesn't make it less true.</p> <p>For years, the received wisdom was that specialized devices would always continue to progress at a rate that made all-in-one devices poor solutions.</p> <p>Here are the things replaced by my iPhone: Mapping and GPS; point-and-shoot camera; Flip camcorder; Game Boy; calculator (okay, I didn't carry this around ever); calendar; organizer; any book-of-the-moment; <em>phone</em>; <em>Playboy</em>; newspaper; notebook; voice recorder; iPod; video player (can you believe this was a whole gadget category just three years ago?); weatherman; TV; wrist watch; radio; alarm clock; compass; pedometer; musical instrument; Bible, medical journals, dictionary, any reference book. Sometimes, even my laptop. Put together enough "good enough" solutions, it turns out, and they begin to outweigh even the specialized devices.</p> <p>Thank goodness it's looking like it's not going to just be the iPhone. (Although credit where it's due; Apple pushed the whole industry forward by five years, easily, if judged by the rate the rest of the industry was moving.) Whether Android, Palm, maybe even Windows Mobile if Microsoft really buckles down, little portable internet computers with an ever-expanding array of senses we have (save taste/smell, but just wait) and little applications that make them more and more useful, are finally pushing gadgetry forward in ways we never fully expected.</p> <p>None of this happened randomly. Those who ended up on top had luck and timing and resources. But <em>why</em> they came out ahead was predicated by several things, naturally highlighted in hindsight.</p> <p>The four rings of gadgetdom in the 2000s were design, the social internet, powerful but inexpensive hardware, and a real software ecosystem.</p> <p>Only five companies have a shot at nailing the home, mobile and work hat trick, from software and hardware to internet: Apple, Microsoft, Google, Sony and Samsung. They're all failing in some way. Apple's cloud services are a joke. Sony can still make great hardware but have no idea how people want to use it. Samsung can't write code. With Android, Google can't figure out if they want to be Microsoft or Apple. Counterintuitive as it may seem, I think Microsoft has a real shot at winning the next decade, if they listen to their entertainment group who have figured out how to do a platform right.</p> <p>Little companies don't really have a shot at this level of unified, do-all gadget greatness. The age of the garage hardware start-up belongs to the web generation, not the next generation of gadget makers. Smartphones have become analogous to PCs of the '90s. There's little room for a new PC platform to come online, but a vast potential space for start-ups to use the big platforms as a springboard with new accessories and software.</p> <p><em>Gizmodo</em> has undergone fundamental changes in the last few years. It's really hard to get excited about copy cat hardware made from the same underlying chips and parts, often in the same factory. Any blog that covers press release after press release indiscriminately is doing readers a serious disservice instead of focusing on what makes a real difference to gadgetry: content, social context and applications. What gets us excited are evolving operating systems that pump the hardware full of new life and devices that continuously inhale new movies, music, and messages from friends through the internet.</p> <p>Right now, I'm in Japan. It's already 2010. When I look ahead at this year, it's easy to see why the anticipation for tablets is boiling over, even though the idea of tablets, like smartphones five years ago, is perhaps old hat. Now that we've seen what happens when companies really nail a unified smartphone, we're projecting our hopes on the generation of tablets to come.</p> <p>The best tech, as it approaches a zenith of purpose and polish, becomes invisible. It gets out of the way of the user, becomes just a portal to...stuff. One does not give much thought to a faucet as long as it provides water. Finally, at the end of this decade, we've had a taste of what it's like when network capability, slick software, sensors and&mdash;most importantly&mdash;content and communication come together in such tiny, shrinking hardware.</p> <p>It's not shiny things that captivate me anymore; it's what they shine.</p> <p><iframe src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http://digg.com/gadgets/Shine_On_You_Crazy_Gadgets_Feature_Gizmodo" align="right" frameborder="0" height="82" scrolling="no" width="55"></iframe></p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5437977/shine-on-you-crazy-gadgets]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5437977]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Gadgets ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Feature]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Y2k10]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5437977&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ How Many Times Have You Broken Your Phone During Your Two-Year Contract? [Qotd] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/crackedphone.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_crackedphone.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>When thinking about the cost of a cellphone, we consider the phone itself and any service plans, but what about the price of misuse? How often are we finding ourselves paying an unsubsidized price to replace phones under contract?</p> <p>It's just so easy to damage a phone. It slips out of your hand and crashes to the ground, gets knocked into a sink, thrown into the wash, and abused in who-knows-what other ways. The lousy part is that when you need to replace your precious gadget in the midst of a one-two-three year agreement, you're very likely to find yourself paying full retail price.</p> <p>It's miserable, but it happens <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5219765/i-dropped-my-stupid-iphone-and-broke-the-stupid-screen">to even the best of us</a>.</p> <p>What we want though, is for you to 'fess up. Tell us how often you've been in this costly situation during your last two-year agreement and whether it's affected any of your buying decisions. [<i>Thanks to Shooter for this QOTD idea!</i>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5438173/how-many-times-have-you-broken-your-phone-during-your-two+year-contract]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5438173]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ qotd ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Broken]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[broken phone]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[contract]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Phone]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 31 Dec 2009 23:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5438173&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Mysterious Lunar Base Hole Explained [Space] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/tc_039.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_tc_039.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>"We discovered a vertical hole on the moon," says JAXA's Junichi Haruyama. A mysterious tube so large and deep that it can shelter a future <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #moonbase" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/moonbase/">moon base</a>. Until the creatures inside kill everyone, which is what happens in these cases.</p> <p>Before, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5388932/newly-discovered-hole-on-moon-leads-to-network-of-tubes">they didn't know</a> what the hole's origin was. Now they have a theory: According to a study published in Geophysical Research Letters, the vertical cave&mdash;"213 feet (65 meters) across and some 262 to 289 feet deep (80-88 meters)"&mdash;may be a collapsed lava tube, which could provide a perfect shelter for a future moon base:</p> <blockquote> <p>Lava tubes, underground cave-like channels through which lava once flowed, are commonly found on Earth. Because lava tubes are sheltered from the harsh environment on the moon's surface, such tubes could one day be useful for lunar bases.</p> </blockquote> <p>Their theory is that the flowing lava left the tunnel a long time ago, with a lava roof that later collapsed.</p> <p>I'm reading their report and only two things come to my mind. One, the awesome lunar base in Stanley Kubrick's 2001. Two, a sci-fi horror movie flick directed by Roger Corman, in which the moon base is invaded by slimy aliens, pissed off because the humans built their base on top of the entrance of their hidden colony. Based on real events, of course.</p> <p>OK, maybe I have three things in mind, because now I can see Sybil Danning there too, as the queen in "Amazon Women on the Moon." No hole connection there, though. Or maybe there is. I don't know. Whatever. Leave me alone. I'm drunk.</p> <p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/LhrUOeX6Ees&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/LhrUOeX6Ees&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object></p> <p>[<a href="http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/091231-moon-hole-lava-tube.html">Space</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5438188/mysterious-lunar-base-hole-explained]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5438188]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Space ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Moon]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[moon base]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Moon Hole]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Selene]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 31 Dec 2009 22:14:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5438188&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ DIY Wolverine Claws Seized During Postal Crackdown [Xmen] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_scritchyscratchy.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />A wannabe Wolverine is crying somewhere in the UK, because these homemade claws of his were seized by border agents as part of a crackdown on illegal goods shipping into the country. Guess he'll just hope for a mutation now.</p> <p>Look at how sharp these seem. A pair of them and some of those <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5377668/your-great-great-great-grandkids-might-heal-like-wolverine">nanopaticles that aid healing</a> and I could be the next Logan. [<a href="http://www.tmz.com/2009/12/30/makeshift-wolverine-claws-england-photo-picture/">TMZ</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5438152/diy-wolverine-claws-seized-during-postal-crackdown]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5438152]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Xmen ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[DIY]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Weapons]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[wolverine]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Wolverine claws]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 31 Dec 2009 22:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5438152&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ How To Build The World's Most Useless Machine [DIY] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Z86V_ICUCD4&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Z86V_ICUCD4&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object>No, this isn't an instructional guide on how to build a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/twitterpeek/">TwitterPeek</a>. This device is even <em>more</em> useless. Impossible? Hardly. Check out the video. Then hit the following link for the complete set of build instructions. [<a href="http://www.instructables.com/id/The-Most-Useless-Machine/?&sort=NEWEST&limit=50&offset=50">Instructables</a> via <a href="http://www.neatorama.com/2009/12/30/the-most-useless-machine-ever/">Neatorama</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5437930/how-to-build-the-worlds-most-useless-machine]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5437930]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ DIY ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Clips]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Machines]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Useless machines]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 31 Dec 2009 21:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5437930&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ LED Shower Bathes You In Cascading Light (and Lots of Water) [Home] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_visshower.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Visentin's LED shower heads are pretty stunning, that is, until you realize that, not only are you completely naked in front of your guests, but you're also splashing water all over the living room. [<a href="http://www.visentin.it/">Visentin</a> via <a href="http://www.trendir.com/archives/cat_shower_fixtures.html">Trendir</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5437956/led-shower-bathes-you-in-cascading-light-and-lots-of-water]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5437956]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Home ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Shower]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Visentin]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 31 Dec 2009 20:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5437956&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Apple Refuses To Send Stolen iPhone Back To Rightful Owner After Repair [Crime] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_mission-impossible-iphone.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />When your stuff gets stolen, FILL OUT A <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #policereport" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/policereport/">POLICE REPORT</a>. <a href="http://consumerist.com/2009/12/customer-knows-her-stolen-iphone-is-being-sent-to-apple-but-apple-says-they-cant-return-it.html">Consumerist</a> reader Alisa is figuring this out the hard way after Apple received her stolen phone for repair. Even though it's clearly hers, they refuse to return it.</p> <blockquote> <p>I got robbed on the subway in Brooklyn about 2 weeks ago, my iPhone (and some other crap)was taken. I called the police who were very helpful , they searched the area for a little bit, follow protocol and all that fun stuff.</p> <p>Anyways, fast forward to yesterday when I get a email from Apple that someone had filed a request for a replacement phone due to a software malfunction from Apple CareService. I suspected that since I made an appointment with an Apple genius before, the Serial number on the phone was associated with my email. I called Apple to confirm this, after Apple and AT&T transferred me back and forth a few times I had the confirmation from the two companies the phone was mine , I had the address the service request was coming from (in the email) and a phone number (from an Apple rep).</p> <p>I'm so excited that I can get my phone back! Until the cops arrive at my house, they tell me that since I didn't file a police report they can't do anything. I didn't file it because in order to file one, I would have had to go to a precinct downtown (like an hour away) look through books of pictures to try to ID the thief, whose face I only saw from the side for a millisecond. And really, what would a police report do for an iPhone that was stolen on a NYC subway a week before Christmas?(plus i had a final that night) The two officers also told me that even if I had a police report it would still be up to Apple and AT&T to decide how to proceed with the situation.</p> <p>So I call AT&T... and over the course of 12 hours I speak to a bunch of people who are all very sorry that this is the situation I'm in, but their hands are tied &mdash; they have to honor the warranty and it does not matter that it's clear the phone is mine. They would need the authorities to tell them to do otherwise.</p> <p>So I head to the police precinct where an officer calls the rep I spoke to last (aka the authorities speaking to Apple). The officer spends about an hour on the phone with Apple telling them that once the current holder of the phone ships the phone back to Apple, they should ship me the replacement. He gets the same answer I got&mdash;they will not do anything, they do not care that the person who has the phone currently is using a stolen phone and is not using it with AT&T (AT&T confirmed the phone # I got from the Apple rep is NOT an AT&T number).</p> <p>It's not even about the phone anymore (I bought a blackberry&mdash;$600 is a TAD ridiculous for a new iPhone) its the principle of the situation, basically Apple is siding with someone who will most likely jailbreak the phone as opposed to helping a loyal customer (I've been using Apple products forever&mdash;iPods, Macs and iPhones (since the first gen)) who legally bought the phone from Apple and is using it with AT&T.</p> <p>The whole situation is just illogical to me.</p> </blockquote> <p>Yeah, illogical is a good word. Absurd is another. Does anyone out there know if this is purely about not filing a police report, or is there some other reason why Apple is being such a dick about this? [<a href="http://consumerist.com/2009/12/customer-knows-her-stolen-iphone-is-being-sent-to-apple-but-apple-says-they-cant-return-it.html">Consumerist</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5437979/apple-refuses-to-send-stolen-iphone-back-to-rightful-owner-after-repair]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5437979]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Crime ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Cellphones]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[police report]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Repair]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Stolen]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Theft]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 31 Dec 2009 19:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5437979&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Wireless N Support in Next Gen iPhone Implied by Apple Job Posting [Unconfirmed] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>After the iPhone 3.0 firmware update, we wondered whether the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5199267/unconfirmed-next+gen-iphone-includes-support-for-80211n-networks">the next gen iPhone</a> would bring a new chip with support for 802.11n. Now a job posting on Apple's website is feeding that theory.</p> <p>We've already seen that the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5357667/new-ipod-touch-teardown-reveals-80211n-fm-transmission-hardware-plus-room-for-nano-camera">newest iPod Touch</a> has a Broadcom BCM4329 chip with support for 802.11n and FM transmission&mdash;something missing in our most recent iPhone generation&mdash;but we've also learned that the hardware is dormant, perhaps to be brought to life by later additions in software support.</p> <p>A recent Apple job posting teases that such software support might come soon along with some kind of upgrade allowing for 802.11n capabilities in the next gen iPhone, because it's asking for a Wi-Fi software engineer to join the iPhone team and bring experience in:</p> <blockquote><p> &bull; Implementation of 802.11 a/b/g/n & related specifications.<br /> &bull; 802.11i/802.1x Security protocols<br /> &bull; Good understanding of wireless RF technologies & co-existence issues of 802.11 PHYs with other Wireless interfaces like Bluetooth. </p></blockquote> <p>Ooh la la. Yes, it's just a job posting and pure speculation regarding what we'll see in the next generation of iPhones, but addition of Wireless N capabilities and support are a logical addition and seem rather likely.[<a href="http://jobs.apple.com/index.ajs?BID=1&method=mExternal.showJob&RID=27315&CurrentPage=1">Apple</a>&mdash;<i>Thanks, A!</i>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5438139/wireless-n-support-in-next-gen-iphone-implied-by-apple-job-posting]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5438139]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ unconfirmed ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[fourth generation iphone]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Rumor]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 31 Dec 2009 18:36:15 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5438139&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Single Photo Tutorial: How to Make a Mask With Photoshop [Photoshop] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_tumblr_kvh6fjubqi1qzn9x6o1_500.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Get it? Get it?? Yeah, I bet you got it. [<a href="http://nickmcglynn.tumblr.com/post/308160460">tumblr</a> via <a href="http://peterfeld.tumblr.com/post/308177685/via-nickmcglynn">tumblr</a> via <a href="http://superpunch.blogspot.com/2009/12/how-to-make-mask-with-photoshop-link.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+SuperPunch+%28Super+Punch%29&utm_content=Google+Reader">Super Punch</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5437925/single-photo-tutorial-how-to-make-a-mask-with-photoshop]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5437925]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Photoshop ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Photoshop mask]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 31 Dec 2009 18:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5437925&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Top 10 Most Popular Articles of 2009 [Zeitgeist] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/2009top.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_2009top.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Dear 2009, thank you for all the stories, the good and the bad ones. Here are the top 10 most popular articles. Now we have to say good bye forever, because 2010 and the new <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/y2k10">decade</a> are here. So long!</p> <p><script type="text/javascript"> gawkerGallery(5437870,10,'Click the pictures or the top most popular articles of 2009'); </script></p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5437856/top-10-most-popular-articles-of-2009]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5437856]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Zeitgeist ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Bestofgizmodo]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Mostpopularstoriesof2009]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 31 Dec 2009 17:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5437856&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Laptops in the Year 2000 Were the Smartphones of Today [Decades] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_vaionew.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Now I want you to close your eyes and squint really hard. Because I'm going to tell you about a time that feels ancient, a time when Sony made some of the baddest laptops around.</p> <p>Way before the internet made the idea plausible, Sony was ripping optical drives out of laptops to make them as portable as possible. One such computer, the $1,500 <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #sonyvaiopcgsrx99" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/sonyvaiopcgsrx99/">Sony VAIO PCG-SRX99</a> (circa 2001), weighed just 2.76lbs and made do with a 10-inch screen.</p> <p>Inside, it had plenty of power, an 850MHz Pentium III-M, 256MB of RAM, and 802.11b for wireless networking (if you could find a wireless network, that is). Plus it had 20GB of storage, FireWire and even one USB port.</p> <p>(I'd mention that it ran XP, but that part is a bit too familiar for nostalgic comfort.)</p> <p>Today, the closest analog to the PCG-SRX99 is a netbook. For about $300 and a weight just shy of 3lbs, you can score a system that, from the outside, is remarkably similar. And on the inside, its clock speed has about doubled, plus there's anywhere between 4x and 8x the amount of RAM and storage.</p> <p>But if you were willing to look a bit beyond skin deep, I'd argue that the contemporary smartphone is more similar to the PCG-SRX99 than the netbooks of today. Take the iPhone 3GS. In terms of sheer tech specs, it's pretty much a midrange smartphone...and it's about identical to our retro Vaio.</p> <p>The 3GS has a 600MHz processor and an identical amount of RAM to the PCG-SRX99&mdash;256MB. And it holds anywhere from 16 to 32GB in flash storage. Amenities like Wi-Fi (faster 802.11g). Turn to a company like <a href="http://www.htc.com/www/product/hd2/specification.html">HTC</a>, and you can double the RAM while including a processor as fast as 1GHz.</p> <p>Still, while Sony's Vaio PCG-SRX99 couldn't fit in our pocket, we've championed its form in an entire wave of cheap, portable computers today. Oh, and that whole ditching the optical drive idea? Sony spotted that trend a mile away. [<a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20021123202351/www.bestbuy.com/ComputersPeripherals/Notebooks/ViewSelection.asp?m=488&cat=494&scat=495">Product Page</a> and <a href="http://pcworld.about.com/news/Oct232002id106118.htm">Review</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5437844/laptops-in-the-year-2000-were-the-smartphones-of-today]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5437844]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ decades ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Laptops]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Pcg-srx99]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Sony VAIO PCG-SRX99]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Vaio]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Y2k10]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 31 Dec 2009 16:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5437844&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Thorium, the Next Uranium [Science] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_thorium.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Wired has a fairly epic look into a material that could make nuclear power both clean and safe called thorium&mdash;named after the Norse god of thunder. Of course, scientists recognized its promise back in the 1950s.</p> <p>Whereas uranium is extremely rare, requires purification and creates waste that will be with us for hundreds of thousands of years, thorium is extremely common, burns more efficiently in reactors and leaves less, less radioactive waste (that can't be turned into a nuke).</p> <p>In fact, if it weren't for the Soviet Union building uranium reactors in the 60s (and us responding in typical Cold War fashion), we'd probably be using thorium today.</p> <p>But as Wired explains, thorium may be poised for a comeback. [<a href="http://www.wired.com/magazine/2009/12/ff_new_nukes/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+wired%2Findex+%28Wired%3A+Index+3+%28Top+Stories+2%29%29">Wired</a> and <a href="http://students.hthcv.hightechhigh.org/~vcasas/10/C.M/myspaceTemplate.htm">Image</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5437788/thorium-the-next-uranium]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5437788]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Science ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Nuclear]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Throrium]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Uranium]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 31 Dec 2009 15:30:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5437788&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ How To: Execute the Ultimate Phone Prank With Skype [Pranks] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/screencap_2009-12-31_at_2.54.42_pm.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_screencap_2009-12-31_at_2.54.42_pm.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Here's an <a href="http://gizmodo.com/368913/how-to-make-all-of-the-phones-in-your-office-ring-simultaneously-and-get-away-with-it">old gem</a> of a trick for anyone feeling lonely, vindictive, or <em>very</em> drunk this New Year's Eve: with Skype, you can connect any phones in the world, and listen in on the results. Man, what a <em>decade</em>.</p> <p>Here's the game, as articulated by Reddit user <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/WTF/comments/aka80/dont_text_this_phone_no_more/c0i0g68">quicksilver 5</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>Here's a fun trick - download Skype and set up a conference call by calling two of your friends simultaneously. They'll both answer and be thoroughly convinced that the other has called them. While you sit there at your computer trying to hold back laughter (or with your microphone muted), you can listen to them try and figure out what the hell is going on. If they chalk it up to an accidental speed-dial and hang up, keep calling them and hilarity will ensue.</p> </blockquote> <p>Here's what you'll need to do:</p> <p><strong>1.) Get some SkypeOut credit:</strong> To call landlines or cellphones with Skype, it costs money. You need to sign up for SkypeOut and buy $10 of credit&mdash;the minimum amount available&mdash;which should supply you with hours of phone-to-phone pranking. I had some Skype credit sitting around already, because SkypeOut, in addition to offering local calls for a few cents a minute, offers international calls at extremely low rates.</p> <p><strong>2.) Choose your victims:</strong> Who, of all the people you know, would you like to call one another at an inopportune time? Because you can pick <em>whoever you want.</em> Asshole boss and his terrible ex-wife, at 11:59 on New Year's Eve? Why not! Two people who you know will be in the same room at the time? Even better. You can add more than two people to a call, but two is the funniest, since it's less obvious what's going on.</p> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/thumb160x_screencap_2009-12-31_at_3.14.23_pm.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><strong>3.) Organize the call:</strong> Under the "Call" menu in Skype, select "Start conference call." To add someone to the call they need to be in your contacts, so make sure you've added your victims to your main Skype list first.<br clear="all"></p> <p><strong>4.) Do it:</strong> It may take a couple tries to get them to both pick up, but nobody's to alarmed by a phantom call or two&mdash;they happen all the time. Their caller ID will read "Unknown" or "Private." After your first call, which your victims will probably write off as a pocket dial, do it again. And again. And again, until things start to feel dangerous. or your conscience kicks in. If you can't keep quiet, hit the mic mute button in the Skype call window; you'll still be able to hear the other callers, but they won't be able to hear you.</p> <p>And that's it, asshole. Happy new year. [<a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/WTF/comments/aka80/dont_text_this_phone_no_more/c0i0g68">Reddit</a>, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/368913/how-to-make-all-of-the-phones-in-your-office-ring-simultaneously-and-get-away-with-it">Previously</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5438051/how-to-execute-the-ultimate-phone-prank-with-skype]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5438051]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Pranks ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Skype]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Skype conference call prank]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Skype prank]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[VoIP]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 31 Dec 2009 15:22:47 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5438051&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Gadget Deals of the Day [Dealzmodo] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/dealz-december31t2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_dealz-december31t2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Cop these bargains before the calendar clicks into the next decade. Get an eMachines 22" monitor for $99, check out the Sony DSLR with extras for $700, and snag an Ani DiFranco MP3 to groove to this evening.</p> <p><br clear="all"> <br> <b>Top Deals:</b><br> • <a href="http://www.techdealdigger.com/pr/cheap-emachines-e211h-bmd-22-inch-widescreen-hd-lcd-monitor-deals/2723">22" eMachines E211H Monitor for $99.90 plus free shipping</a> (normally $138).<br> • <a href="http://www.cheapstingybargains.com/192517/sony-a380-142-mp-digital-slr-camera-w-dt-18-55mm-f35-56-standard-zoom-lens-50-newegg-gift-card/">Sony a380 14.2 MP DSLR with extras for $700 with free shipping</a> (normally $800).<br> • <a href="http://www.cheapcollegegamers.com/forum/showthread.php?t=4853">Red Letter Year by Ani Difranco (MP3) for $0</a> (download <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B001F1XIZW/ref=nosim/mmbevigaotst-20">here</a>).</p> <p><b>Computing and Peripherals:</b><br> • <a href="http://dealzon.com/deals/asus-k61ic-a2-16-inch-core-2-duo-led-laptop">16" ASUS K61IC-A2 Laptop for $899.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $958 - use coupon code <b>EBAAA375</b>).<br> • <a href="http://dealzon.com/deals/dell-studio-15-inch-core-i7-laptop">15.6" Dell Studio 15 Laptop for $999 plus free shipping</a> (normally $1,313).<br> • <a href="http://www.cheapstingybargains.com/163161/dell-inspiron-15z-laptop-with-core-2-duo-su7300-13ghz-and-156-high-definition-tl-wled/">15.6" Dell Inspiron Laptop for $649 + shipping</a> (normally $909).<br> • <a href="http://www.logicbuy.com/deals/lenovo-coupon-quickship-thinkpad-laptops/17774.aspx">15" Lenovo ThinkPad T500 2.8GHz Laptop for $1,099 with free shipping</a> (normally $1,849 - use coupon code <b>USPINSTOCK</b>)<br> • <a href="http://www.logicbuy.com/deals/toshiba-satellite-l515-s4960-notebook/18043.aspx">14" Toshiba Satellite L515-S4960 2.1Ghz Laptop for $449.99 with $9.99 shipping</a> (normally $529.99)<br> • <a href="http://dealzon.com/deals/asus-k40ij-d2-14-inch-core-2-duo-laptop">14" ASUS K40IJ-D2 Laptop for $529.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $678 - use coupon code <b>EBAAA375</b> and <a href="http://www.zipzoomfly.com/rebate/ASUS_120109_DS_04.pdf">this form</a>).<br> • <a href="http://dealzon.com/deals/lenovo-ideapad-u350-13-3-inch-1-3ghz-pentium-su2700-led-laptop-w-hdmi-out">13.3" Lenovo Ideapad U350 Laptop for $507.35 plus free shipping</a> (normally $549).<br> • <a href="http://dealzon.com/deals/lenovo-ideapad-s10-10-1-inch-intel-atom-netbook">10" Lenovo IdeaPad S10 Netbook for $254 plus free shipping</a> (normally $378).<br> • <a href="http://www.gamerhotline.com/10-msi-u100-869us-netbook/">10" MSI U100-869US Netbook for $249.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $291 - use coupon code <b>SHINE0530</b>).<br> • <a href="http://www.techdealdigger.com/pr/cheap-hannsg-hh-281hpb-28-widescreen-hd-lcd-monitor-deals/2764">28" Hanns-G HH-281HPB Monitor for $299.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $337).<br> • <a href="http://www.cheapstingybargains.com/192410/acer-h243hbmid-24-full-hd-lcd-monitor-2/">24" Acer H243Hbmid Monitor for $225 w/ Free Shipping</a> (normally $250).<br> • <a href="http://www.logicbuy.com/deals/dell-professional-p2310h-23-in-1080p-lcd-monitor/14525.aspx">23" Dell Professional P2310H 1080p LCD for $188 with free shipping</a> (normally $249 - use coupon code <b>BBF5XCD2PK$12Q</b>)<br> • <a href="http://www.logicbuy.com/deals/Dell-S2209W-22-inch-1080p-Full-HD-LCD-Monitor/9263.aspx">22" Dell S2209W 1080p LCD for $139 with free 3-day shipping</a> (normally $199).<br> • <a href="http://www.cheapstingybargains.com/192541/viewsonic-vx2240w-22-widescreen-lcd-monitor/">22" ViewSonic VX2240w LCD for $170 with free shipping</a> (normally $185).<br> • <a href="http://www.techdealdigger.com/pr/cheap-emachines-e211h-bmd-22-inch-widescreen-hd-lcd-monitor-deals/2723">22" eMachines E211H bmd LCD for $99.90 plus free shipping</a> (normally $138).<br> • <a href="http://dealzon.com/deals/toshiba-ph3200u-1exb-2tb-desktop-external-hard-drive">2TB Toshiba PH3200U-1EXB External HDD for $189.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $209).<br> • <a href="http://www.techdealdigger.com/pr/cheap-canon-pixma-mp560-wireless-inkjet-all-in-one-photo-printer-deals/2766">Canon PIXMA MP560 Photo Printer for $79.97 plus free shipping</a> (normally $99.99).<br> • <a href="http://www.logicbuy.com/deals/netgear-rangemax-wndr3700-dual-band-wireless-n-gigabit-router/14496.aspx">Netgear RangeMax WNDR3700 Wireless-N Router for $143.99 with free shipping</a> (normally $159.99 - use coupon code <b>BBF5XCD2PK$12Q</b>)<br> • <a href="http://www.gamerhotline.com/belkin-f5d9050/">BELKIN F5D9050 USB 2.0 MIMO Network Adapter for $12.28</a> (normally $35 - use coupon code <b>EMCMNNX78</b>).<br> • <a href="http://www.cheapstingybargains.com/192548/dell-bluetooth-wireless-headphone/">Dell Bluetooth Wireless Headphone for $19 with free shipping</a> (normally $60).<br> • <a href="http://www.cheapstingybargains.com/192409/dell-ax210-usb-stereo-multimedia-speakers/">Dell AX210 USB Speakers $9 w/ Free Shipping</a> (normally $30 - use coupon code <b>BBF5XCD2PK$12Q</b>).<br> <b>Gaming:</b><br> • <a href="http://www.techdealdigger.com/pr/cheap-playstation-3-slim-120-gb-deals/2120">PlayStation 3 Slim 120GB for $274.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $300 - use coupon code <b>TRADEPLY</b>).<br> • <a href="http://www.gamerhotline.com/xbox-360-elite-120gb-console-w-12-month-xbox-live-card-4-bonus-games-349/">Xbox 360 Elite + 12 months XBL & 4 Bonus Games for $349</a> (normally $410).<br> • <a href="http://dealzon.com/deals/xbox-360-hori-real-arcade-pro-fight-stick-ex-se-arcade-control-deck">Xbox 360 Hori EX-SE Real Arcade Pro Fight Stick for $79.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $125).<br> • <a href="http://www.cheapcollegegamers.com/forum/showthread.php?p=5604">Punch-Out!! Little Mac Boxing Glove (Wii) for $39.98 plus free shipping</a> (normally $69.99).<br> • <a href="http://www.cheapcollegegamers.com/forum/showthread.php?p=5605">Resident Evil 5 (360/PS3) for $24.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $36.99).<br> • <a href="http://www.cheapcollegegamers.com/forum/showthread.php?p=5606">Tekken 6 Limited Edition Wireless Fight Stick Bundle (360) for $68.72 plus free shipping</a> (normally $99.99).<br> • <a href="http://www.logicbuy.com/deals/Lost--Via-Domus-PS3-Video-Game/11984.aspx">Lost: Via Domus (PS3) for $5.99 with free shipping</a> (normally $15)<br> • <a href="http://www.gamerhotline.com/don-king-presents-prizefighter-360-7-99/">Don King Presents: Prizefighter (360) for $7.99</a> (normally $16).<br> • <a href="http://www.gamerhotline.com/transformers-revenge-of-the-fallen-360/">Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (360) for $19.99</a> (normally $30).<br> • <a href="http://www.gamerhotline.com/king-of-fighters-xii-xbox-360/">King of Fighters XII (360) for $21.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $57).<br> • <a href="http://www.gamerhotline.com/raven-squad-hidden-dagger/">Raven Squad: Hidden Dagger (PC download) for $20</a> (normally $28).<br> • <a href="http://www.gamerhotline.com/gun/">GUN (PC download) for $9.95</a> (normally $20).<br> • <a href="http://www.gamerhotline.com/manhunt-2/">Manhunt 2 (PC download) for $14.95</a> (normally $29).<br> • <a href="http://www.gamerhotline.com/champions-online-pc/">Champions Online (PC download) for $14.95</a> (normally $25).<br> • <a href="http://www.gamerhotline.com/star-wars-jedi-knight-ii-jedi-outcast-pc/">Star Wars Jedi Knight II : Jedi Outcast (PC download) for $4.95</a> (normally $10).<br> • <a href="http://www.gamerhotline.com/guitar-hero-iii-legends-of-rock-bundle/">Guitar Hero III Bundle w/ Wireless Guitar Controller (360) for $32.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $56).<br> • <a href="http://www.gamerhotline.com/alone-in-the-dark-xbox-360/">Alone in the Dark (360) for $9.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $19).<br> • <a href="http://www.logicbuy.com/deals/virtua-tennis-2009-xbox-360/18034.aspx">Virtua Tennis 2009 (360) for $10.99 with free shipping</a> (normally $23.48)<br> • <a href="http://www.logicbuy.com/deals/fear-files-xbox-360/17727.aspx">F.E.A.R. Files (360) for $9.99 with free shipping</a> (normally $19.82)<br> • <a href="http://www.logicbuy.com/deals/50-cent-blood-in-the-sand-ps3/17745.aspx">50 Cent: Blood in the Sand (PS3) for $14.99 with free shipping</a> (normally $34.46)<br> • <a href="http://www.logicbuy.com/deals/uncharted-drake-fortune-and-dualshock-3-bundle/17695.aspx">Uncharted: Drake's Fortune and DualShock 3 Bundle (PS3) for $53.99 with free shipping</a> (normally $59.99)<br> • <a href="http://www.gamerhotline.com/world-of-warcraft-pc/">World of Warcraft (PC) and World Of Warcraft Expansion: Burning Crusade (PC) for $17.99</a> (normally $34).<br> • <a href="http://www.gamerhotline.com/logitech-wireless-driving-force-wheel/">LOGITECH Wireless Driving Force Wheel (PS3/PS2) for $29.99</a> (normally $50).</p> <p><b>Home Entertainment:</b><br> • <a href="http://www.logicbuy.com/deals/samsung-ln65b650-65-inch-1080p-120-hz-lcd-hdtv/17459.aspx">65" Samsung LN65B650 1080p HDTV for $4,268 with free shipping</a> (normally $4430.49 - use coupon code: <b>LOGICBUY20</b>)<br> • <a href="http://www.logicbuy.com/deals/vizio-vt470m-47-inch-1080p-120hz-lcd-hdtv/18052.aspx">47" VIZIO VT470M 1080p HDTV for $899 with free shipping</a> (normally $999.99)<br> • <a href="http://www.cheapstingybargains.com/192488/samsung-un46b8000-46-led-1080p-lcd-hdtv/">46" Samsung UN46B8000 HDTV for $1,878 w/ Free Shipping</a> (normally $2178).<br> • <a href="http://www.techdealdigger.com/pr/cheap-toshiba-46rv525u-46-inch-1080p-lcd-tv-deals/2184">46" Toshiba 46RV525U 1080p TV for $799.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $900).<br> • <a href="http://www.logicbuy.com/deals/sceptre-x460bv-f12-46-inch-1080p-120hz-lcd-hdtv/17954.aspx">46" Screptre X460BV-F120 1080p LCD HDTV for $699.99 with $19.99 shipping</a> (normally $899.99)<br> • <a href="http://www.gamerhotline.com/32-jvc-lt-32d200/">32" JVC LT-32D200 720p HDTV w/ Built-in DVD Player for $464.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $530).<br> • <a href="http://www.logicbuy.com/deals/LG-32-inch-1080p-LCD-HDTV-32LH30/12798.aspx">32" LG 32LH30 1080p HDTV for $429 with free shipping</a> (normally $458)<br> • <a href="http://dealzon.com/deals/sharp-lc-32dv27ut-32-inch-720p-lcd-hdtv-with-built-in-dvd-player">32" Sharp LC-32DV27UT 720p HDTV w/ DVD Player for $378.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $498 - use coupon code <b>HH?6C5Z1QL0GCC</b>).<br> • <a href="http://dealzon.com/deals/viewsonic-vt2645-26-inch-1080p-lcd-hdtv">26" ViewSonic VT2645 1080p HDTV for $268.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $368 - use coupon code <b>G2F783PD5SGQV0</b>).<br> • <a href="http://dealzon.com/deals/samsung-ln19b360-19-inch-720p-lcd-hdtv">19" Samsung LN19B360 720p HDTV for $201 plus free shipping</a> (normally $230).<br> • <a href="http://dealzon.com/deals/sylvania-nb501sl9-1080p-blu-ray-disc-player">Sylvania NB501SL9 Blu-Ray Player for $119.89 plus $20.86 shipping</a> (normally $250).<br> • <a href="http://www.cheapstingybargains.com/192560/logitech-harmony-1100-advanced-universal-remote-control/">Logitech Harmony 1100 Advanced Universal Remote for $317 w/ Free Shipping</a> (normally $350).<br> • <a href="http://www.cheapstingybargains.com/192511/klipsch-cs-500-dvd-home-theater-system/">Klipsch CS-500 DVD Home Theater System for $400 with free shipping</a> (normally $450).<br> • <a href="http://www.techdealdigger.com/pr/cheap-yamaha-htr-6250-630-watt-7-channel-home-theater-receiver-deals/2762">Yamaha HTR-6250BL 7.1-Ch Receiver for $299.96 plus free shipping</a> (normally $369).<br> • <a href="http://dealzon.com/deals/patriot-box-office-pcmpbo25-1080p-hd-media-player-black">Patriot Box Office PCMPBO25 1080p HD Media Player for $99.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $140 - use <a href="http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/00/00/06/52/96/21/652962170._V207900703_.pdf">this form</a>).<br> • <a href="http://www.gamerhotline.com/the-sopranos-the-complete-series-dvd/">The Sopranos: The Complete Series DVD for $119.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $159).<br> • <a href="http://www.logicbuy.com/deals/True-Blood--The-Complete-First-Season&mdash;HBO-Series&mdash;-Blu-ray&mdash;/13122.aspx">True Blood: The Complete First Season HBO Series (Blu-ray) for $24.99</a> (normally $31.86)<br> • <a href="http://www.cheapcollegegamers.com/forum/showthread.php?p=5611">It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia - Seasons 1 & 2 (DVD) for $17.99</a> (normally $27.22).<br> • <a href="http://www.cheapstingybargains.com/192539/big-bang-theory-the-complete-second-season-on-dvd/">Big Bang Theory: The Complete Second Season for $15 w/ Free Shipping</a> (normally $45).<br> • <a href="http://www.gamerhotline.com/harry-potter-years-1-5/">Harry Potter Years 1-5 (Blu-ray) for $53.49 plus free shipping</a> (normally $84).<br> <b>Personal Portables and Peripherals:</b></p> <p>• <a href="http://www.cheapstingybargains.com/192517/sony-a380-142-mp-digital-slr-camera-w-dt-18-55mm-f35-56-standard-zoom-lens-50-newegg-gift-card/">Sony a380 14.2 MP DSLR with extras for $700 with free shipping</a> (normally $800).<br> • <a href="http://www.techdealdigger.com/pr/cheap-pentax-optio-p70-12mp-digital-camera-deals/2767">12MP Pentax Optio P70 Digitial Camera for $99.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $170).<br> • <a href="http://www.logicbuy.com/deals/Canon-PowerShot-SD960IS-12MP-Digital-Camera-Silver/11785.aspx">12.1-MP Canon PowerShot SD960IS Digital Camera w/4GB Memory Card for $239 with free shipping</a> (normally $249 - use coupon code <b>LOGICBUY10</b>)<br> • <a href="http://www.cheapcollegegamers.com/forum/showthread.php?p=5613">Flip Mino 60 Minute Digital Camcorder for $99.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $124.95).<br> • <a href="http://www.cheapcollegegamers.com/forum/showthread.php?p=5616">JBuds J3 Micro Atomic In-Ear Earphones with Travel Case for $24.01</a> (normally $79.95).<br> • <a href="http://www.gamerhotline.com/microsoft-zune-120gb-mp3-player/">Microsoft Zune 120GB MP3 Player for $199.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $230).<br> • <a href="http://www.logicbuy.com/deals/sony-ericsson-aino-u10-unlocked-touchscreen-cell-phone/17675.aspx">Sony Ericsson AiNo U10 3G Unlocked Phone for $422.99 with free shipping</a> (normally $529.95 - use coupon code <b>BBF5XCD2PK$12Q</b>)<br> • <a href="http://www.gamerhotline.com/garmin-nuvi-1200-gps/">GARMIN nüvi 1200 GPS for $109.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $143).<br> • <a href="http://www.logicbuy.com/deals/nokia-n86-unlocked-cell-phone-/14825.aspx">Nokia N86 3G Unlocked Phone for $341.99 with free shipping</a> (normally $425.99 - use coupon code <b>BBF5XCD2PK$12Q</b>)<br> • <a href="http://www.techdealdigger.com/pr/cheap-samsung-wep850-bluetooth-headset-deals/2768">Samsung WEP850 Bluetooth Headset for $9.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $30 - use <a href="http://images10.newegg.com/uploadfilesfornewegg/rebate/SH/SAMSUNG2MIRsSep2509Jan151009ll97.pdf">this form</a>).<br> • <a href="http://www.logicbuy.com/deals/skullcandy-inkd-earbuds--/18042.aspx">Skullcandy INK'D Earbuds for $7.97</a> (normally $12.99)<br> • <a href="http://www.cheapstingybargains.com/192546/microphone-recorder-for-ipod-and-iphone/">Microphone Recorder for iPod and iPhone for $2 with free shipping</a> (normally $7 - use coupon code <b>MLC401552123172T</b>).<br> • <a href="http://www.logicbuy.com/deals/garmin-nuvi-1350t-gps/16368.aspx">4.3" Garmin Nuvi 1350T GPS with FM Live Traffic for $179.99 with free shipping</a> (normally $200).</p> <p><b>Hobomodo:</b><br> • <a href="http://www.gamerhotline.com/free-coffee-at-white-castle-jan-1st/">Coffee at White Castle Jan 1st $0</a>.<br> • <a href="http://www.cheapcollegegamers.com/forum/showthread.php?p=5617">Draw 'n' GO! (iPhone) for $0</a> (normally $.99).<br> • <a href="http://www.cheapcollegegamers.com/forum/showthread.php?t=4853">Red Letter Year by Ani Difranco (MP3) for $0</a> (download <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B001F1XIZW/ref=nosim/mmbevigaotst-20">here</a>).<br> • <a href="http://dealzon.com/deals/amazon-prime-3-months-free-unlimited-free-2-day-shipping-1-day-shipping-only-3-99">Amazon Prime - 3 Months for $0</a> (use <a href="http://bit.ly/8l7vrV">this form</a>).<br> • <a href="http://www.logicbuy.com/deals/Blockbuster-Online-Total-Access/5751.aspx">Blockbuster Total Access 4 week Blu-ray & DVD movies rental for $0</a> (use coupon code <b>face1m</b>)</p> <p><i>If a deal looks too good to be true, investigate the store and see if it's a good, reputable place to buy. Safe shopping!</i></p> <p>[<i>Thanks <a href="http://www.techdealdigger.com/">TechDealDigger</a>, <a href="http://www.dealzon.com/">Dealzon</a>, <a href="http://www.logicbuy.com/">Logic Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.gamerhotline.com/">GamerHotline</a>, <a href="http://www.cheapcollegegamers.com/">Cheap College Gamers</a>, <a href="http://www.cheapstingybargains.com">CheapStingyBargains</a> and <a href="http://www.techbargains.com">TechBargains</a>.]</i></p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5437931/gadget-deals-of-the-day]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5437931]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Dealzmodo ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Deals]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Dealz]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Gadget dealz]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Gadget dealz of the day]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Hobomodo]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 31 Dec 2009 15:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[David Chaid]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5437931&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Time Warner Cable's Genius Solution to Possible Fox Outage: The Internet! [TimeWarner] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_screen_shot_2009-12-31_at_1.10.08_pm.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><em>PSSSSST</em>! Hey, Time Warner Cable! If you tell everyone <a href="http://rolloverorgettough.com/zipcode/10012">how to watch Fox shows from their PC</a>, they'll probably start doing it for <em>all your other programming</em>, too! Self-defeating bitterness really is the perfect way to say goodbye to 2009.</p> <p>The spat between Time Warner and News Corp has been escalating steadily this week, with the latter threatening to pull their content at midnight tonight unless the two sides reach an agreement on subscription fees. Thus far, Time Warner Cable's main response has been to produce <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5436599/time-warner-cable-takes-subscription-fee-fight-to-the-people">silly full-page ads</a>, but now they've pulled out the big guns: spilling the dirty little secret that'll some day put them out of the TV business.</p> <p>You could watch their how-to video below, but for a full explanation I'd recommend our own Giz guides to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5366161/life-without-cable-or-satellite-tv-is-easier-than-you-think">living without cable or satellite TV</a> and to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5420853/why-its-finally-time-to-get-a-home-theater-pc">home theater PCs</a>. In the meantime, let's all just sit back and enjoy watching two corporate monoliths greed themselves to death.</p> <p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/iujkZh5uIa8&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/iujkZh5uIa8&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object>[<a href="http://rolloverorgettough.com/zipcode/10012">Time Warner Cable</a> via <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20091231/time-warner-cable-shows-subscribers-how-to-cut-the-cord/">All Things D</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5437975/time-warner-cables-genius-solution-to-possible-fox-outage-the-internet]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5437975]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ TimeWarner ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Cable]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Fox]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Newscorp]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Subscription]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[TimeWarnerCable]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 31 Dec 2009 14:30:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Barrett]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5437975&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ The Decade in Tech Stocks: Hope You Had GOOG and AAPL [Y2k10] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/techstocksdecade.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_techstocksdecade.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Turns out it was a tough decade for tech companies. First the bubble they helped create burst and took the rest of the economy down with them; now the credit markets have sunk them in return&mdash;with two notable exceptions.</p> <p>I'll admit that this chart would be more readable if it had been a more competitive field. But isn't that kind of the point? While everyone else was mucking around trying to recover from the mistakes of the late nineties, two truly innovative companies&mdash;Apple and Google&mdash;distinguished themselves in spectacular fashion. Granted, Google didn't join the party until 2004 and benefits from a severely undervalued IPO, but even taking that into consideration, their current stock price of $622 is <em>20 times</em> that of Microsoft. No matter what kind of dividend Ballmer hands out, that's an enormous&mdash;and telling&mdash;gap.</p> <p>That's the big picture. But I'm curious as to what you guys see in the details, too. A stock can <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5433864/how-the-apple-tablet-is-already-making-people-rich">pop on a rumor</a> and drop on a dime. What's behind some of the peaks and valleys we see here? [Chart via <a href="http://www.google.com/finance">Google</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5437783/the-decade-in-tech-stocks-hope-you-had-goog-and-aapl]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5437783]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Y2k10 ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Data]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Stocks]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 31 Dec 2009 14:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Barrett]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5437783&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ The Year In Image Cache: 50 Shots That Wowed Us In 2009 [Imagecache] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/imagecacheroundup.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_imagecacheroundup.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The Internet offers an endless stream of cool pictures, but here's a look at the best we've come across this year. Inside you'll find images that amaze <em>and</em> amuse.</p> <p>Though <a href="http://gizmodo.com/t/imagecache">#imagecache</a> has only been around since March, we've collected some incredible images in these last nine months. Click through to the original posts for hi-resolution images and more information.</p> <p><script type="text/javascript"> gawkerGallery(5437921,50,''); </script></p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5437946/the-year-in-image-cache-50-shots-that-wowed-us-in-2009]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5437946]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Imagecache ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Trains]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 31 Dec 2009 13:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Kyle VanHemert]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5437946&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Invetech Delivers World's First Production Human Tissue Printer [Medicine] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/tissue_printer.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_tissue_printer.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Or, as they call it, a "3D bio-printer." Essentially, it allows scientists to build tissue cell by cell. It's that cool sci-fi medical stuff we all dream about.</p> <blockquote> <p>"Scientists and engineers can use the 3D bio printers to enable placing cells of almost any type into a desired pattern in 3D," Murphy said. "Researchers can place liver cells on a preformed scaffold, support kidney cells with a co-printed scaffold, or form adjacent layers of epithelial and stromal soft tissue that grow into a mature tooth. Ultimately the idea would be for surgeons to have tissue on demand for various uses, and the best way to do that is get a number of bio-printers into the hands of researchers and give them the ability to make three dimensional tissues on demand."</p> </blockquote> <p>The system includes software that enables engineers to build a model of the tissue before layering cells with laser-calibrated print heads. So, it seems pretty similar to a standard 3D model printer. Hopefully, most of us will live to see the day when we can have new hearts and livers printed on demand. That would be handy. Teeth would be great in the short term too. That whole Polygrip lifestyle where corn cobs and apples could lead to disaster does not seem appealing. [<a href="http://www.livescience.com/technology/091229-3d-bioprinter.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+Livesciencecom+(LiveScience.com+Science+Headline+Feed)&utm_content=Google+Reader">Livescience</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5437954/invetech-delivers-worlds-first-production-human-tissue-printer]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5437954]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Medicine ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Invetech]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Organ printer]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Organovo]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Tissue printer]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 31 Dec 2009 12:47:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5437954&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ World's Most 'Perfect' Speaker Gets Even Better [Speakers] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/thumb160x_magneplanar_1.7_270x386.jpeg.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Every year product life cycles in the consumer marketplace grow ever shorter. On the audio side, the latest and greatest receivers become yesterday's news faster than you can say "<a href="http://www.hdmi.org/manufacturer/hdmi_1_4/hdmi_1_4_faq.aspx">HDMI 1.4</a>."</p> <p>Speaker companies show a little more restraint and "refresh" their lines every few years, but even then new models rarely demonstrate actual performance improvements over the previous generations' models. Speaker manufacturer Magnepan doesn't play by those rules; it invests years of development in each of its models before introducing a new speaker. It has to sound better&mdash;a lot better&mdash;than the outgoing model before it's released to the world.</p> <p>And not just in the opinion of the designers. New-model Magnepans undergo extensive "blind" listening tests with a wide range of audiophile and non-audiophile listeners (the listeners don't know whether they're hearing the old or new model). The new speaker must consistently score better than the old model before it goes into production.</p> <p>When I first heard the <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13645_3-10016462-47.html">Magneplanar 1.6 back in 2008</a> I said it was the best under-$2,000 speaker on the market. Incredibly enough it was 10 years old at the time! The Magneplanar 1.6 has stayed in production for 12 years, but now it's about to be replaced with the new Magneplanar 1.7.</p> <p>Magnepan, based in White Bear Lake, Minn., builds nothing but panel (boxless) speakers. Not only that, Magnepan designs forgo conventional dome tweeters and cone-type woofers. As I pointed out in my August 14, 2008, blog that's why the company's Magneplanar 1.6 speaker mostly avoids sounding like a speaker. The speaker earned the top position in my <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13645_3-10250539-47.html">Top 10 greatest audiophile speakers</a> blog earlier this year.</p> <p>The new Magneplanar 1.7 is also a flat-panel design, 64.5 inches tall and a mere 2 inches thick! The new speaker looks a little more contemporary, thanks to its aluminum, wrap-around edge molding. The old model was a two-way design, with a 48-inch-tall aluminum ribbon tweeter and a 442-square-inch mid/bass panel. The Magneplanar 1.7 is a three-way design, with a woofer, tweeter, and super-tweeter. The super-tweeter comes in around 10,000 hertz and is said to produce wider dispersion and better-resolved treble than the Magneplanar 1.6 did.</p> <p>The other big difference is the Magneplanar 1.7 is a "full-range" ribbon design. The ribbon terminology refers to the way the woofer, tweeter, and super-tweeter drivers incorporate thin-film aluminum foil mounted on a Mylar substrate, suspended in a magnetic field. Conventional tweeters and woofers are "driven" in the center or edge by a voice coil, so the surface of the tweeter or woofer is free to deform its shape as it makes sound. The Magneplanar 1.7's woofer, tweeter, and super-tweeter's entire surface area remains under full control by the signal it's reproducing, so it can't change shape. Translation: it sounds clearer and more lifelike than cone and dome driver designs.</p> <p>The Magneplanar 1.7 is the first full-range ribbon speaker from the company, and it may be the only such design currently on the market (<a href="http://www.apogeespeakers.com/company_history.htm">Apogee Acoustics</a> started making full-range ribbon speakers in the 1980s and went out of business in the 1990s).</p> <p>I'm using "perfect" in the sense that Magnepan speakers sound less like speakers than any box speaker you're likely to hear that sells for less than $10,000. Down sides? Magnepans need to be partnered with powerful amplifiers, they're picky about speaker placement, and they usually need to be placed a good 3 feet away from the rear wall. The new speaker probably will be just as demanding. I will be among the first to review the Magneplanar 1.7 in 2010, so I'll let you know if it's truly an advance over the Magneplanar 1.6.</p> <p>The Magnepan 1.7's suggested retail price starts at $1,995 a pair.</p> <p>Magnepan and Canadian electronics manufacturer Bryston have something special planned for CES 2010. The two brands will be demonstrating new products at <a href="http://theshowlasvegas.com/2010/show_information.php">T.H.E. Show at the Pink Flamingo Hotel in Las Vegas</a>, and consumers are welcome to drop by.</p> <p><a href="http://news.cnet.com/"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/cnet_logo.jpg" width="129" height="65"></a><i>This story originally appeared on <a href="http://news.cnet.com/">CNET</a></i></p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5437890/worlds-most-perfect-speaker-gets-even-better]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5437890]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Speakers ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Audiophiles]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Stereos]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 31 Dec 2009 12:30:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[CNET]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5437890&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Mophie iPhone Credit Card Scanner [IPhone] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_iphonecard.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />You'd think that smartphones would have made traditional credit cards obsolete by now, but since they haven't (in the US, at least), Mophie's iPhone <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #creditcard" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/creditcard/">credit card</a> reader may be the next best thing.</p> <p>Its full details will be shared with us next week at CES, but the system will consist of a hardware scanner and a corresponding app. So while the iPhone's API restrictions will prevent you from scanning your card directly into Safari for your next web purchase, there are surely some remote pay possibilities in the works similar to what we've seen from <a href="https://squareup.com/">Square</a>&mdash;not to mention, it'll pave the way for an entire generation of even lazier credit card theft. [<a href="http://www.pocket-lint.com/news/30435/iphone-gets-credit-card-reader">Pocket-Lint</a> via <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/mophie-set-to-unveil-credit-card-reader-3167364/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+slashgear+%28SlashGear%29">SlashGear</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5437784/mophie-iphone-credit-card-scanner]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5437784]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ iPhone ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[app store]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Credit Card]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[mophie]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 31 Dec 2009 12:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5437784&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ The Times Square New Year's Eve Ball Timeline [Timeline] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/timeball-timeline-2010new.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_timeball-timeline-2010new.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The 102-year history of the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #timessquare" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/timessquare/">Times Square</a> New Year's Even Ball is one filled with technology, death and, of course, pretty shiny lights. See it all unfold in our historical timeline.</p> <p>(Click the image for a large popout version.)</p> <p>Of course, for those who don't appreciate the festivity of the ball drop, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5437809/building-the-times-square-new-years-ball">despite all of the hard work behind the scenes</a>, feel free to ignore the ball's 32,256 glimmering Philips LEDs and turn your attention to your iPhone...because, yes, Waterford has made an <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5437570/waterford-clink+clink-app-is-a-must-for-new-years-eve">app for that</a>.</p> <p>Happy New Year everyone!</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5437770/the-times-square-new-years-eve-ball-timeline]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5437770]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Timeline ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[new year's eve]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Timeball]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Times Square]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Times Square New Year's Eve Ball]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 31 Dec 2009 11:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5437770&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Behind the Scenes of the 2010 Times Square New Year's Ball [Time Ball] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/j-fTK4ooUro&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/j-fTK4ooUro&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object> The 2010 <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #timessquare" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/timessquare/">Times Square</a> New Year's Ball is ready to go. They saved money and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5437770/the-times-square-new-years-eve-ball-timeline">didn't add any LEDs</a>, but they added new stunning <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5437570/waterford-clink+clink-app-is-a-must-for-new-years-eve">Waterford clink-clink glass panels</a>. Here's the insider look on how they did it, and why.</p> <p><a href="http://www.quintanomedia.com/index.php/2009/12/30/times-square-new-years-ball-in-new-york-city-behind-the-scenes/">Anthony Quintano</a> also sent us this video on the setup of the camera that will offer the closest view of the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #timeball" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/timeball/">time ball</a> tonight, broadcasting the event to the entire world.</p> <p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_1"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=8466201&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <embed name="" src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=8466201&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/8466201.jpg"></a></p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5437809/behind-the-scenes-of-the-2010-times-square-new-years-ball]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5437809]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Time Ball ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Clips]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[new year's eve]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Timeball]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Timeline]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Times Square]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Times Square New Year's Eve Ball]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 31 Dec 2009 11:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5437809&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Motorola's Rumored Superthin Android Phone Sounds Spectacular [Rumor] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/mobile-01-motorola-shadow-mirage.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_mobile-01-motorola-shadow-mirage.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>We had few complaints with the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5396168/motorola-droid-review">Droid</a>, and the Sholes tablet, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5418629/leaked-motorola-sholes-returns-with-a-disturbing-lump-in-its-side">Occiphobic as it may be</a>, is lustable, without a doubt. But Motorola's alleged next phone, the .35-inch-thick, 1080p-capable Shadow/Mirage, makes Motorola's current Android lineup look old-fashioned.</p> <p>All we've got for now is a crude rendering and a dubiously sourced Chinese leak, but given the recent spate of Snapdragon-powered Android phones, the specs are within the realm of plausibility: crammed into the slim body, there's a processor capable of decoding 1080p video, an 8-megapixel camera, and an HDMI port, masked by a 4.3-inch, 800 x 484 screen, as compared to the Droid's 3.7-inch display of the same resolution.</p> <p>If true, this means that there's an Android phone that's at least as powerful as, and <em>thinner</em> than, Google's überbuzzed <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/nexus-one">Nexus One</a> sitting <em>just</em> over the horizon, which strikes yet another blow to the mythos of the be-all, end-all Android device. [<a href="http://www.mobile01.com/topicdetail.php?f=423&t=1362866&last=16696674">Mobile1</a> via <a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/12/31/fresh-out-of-china-emerges-the-motorola-shadowmirage-yet-another-motorola-android-handset/">BGR</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5437874/motorolas-rumored-superthin-android-phone-sounds-spectacular]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5437874]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Rumor ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Cellphones]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[droid]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Mirage]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Motorola mirage]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Motorola shadow]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Shadow]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[sholes]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[snapdragon]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 31 Dec 2009 10:59:14 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5437874&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ AT&T Drops Tiger Woods Like an Important Call [At&t] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>"We are ending our sponsorship agreement with Tiger Woods and wish him well in the future." That's from AT&T spokesman Fletcher Cook in an email sent out earlier today. [<a href="http://money.cnn.com/2009/12/31/news/companies/tiger_woods_att/index.htm">CNN</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5437862/att-drops-tiger-woods-like-an-important-call]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5437862]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ At&t ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Tiger Woods]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[tiger woods AT&T]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 31 Dec 2009 10:55:01 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5437862&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ The Worst Gadgets of the Decade: 11 Bonus Dishonorable Mentions [Y2k10] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_50worsthonorablemention11.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />While we're confident that we nailed our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5432480/the-50-worst-gadgets-of-the-decade">50 worst gadgets of the decade</a>, you commenters reminded us of a few truly awful gems that didn't make the cut. So here are eleven more worst gadgets for your enjoyment and derision.</p> <p>And please, suggest any others that you feel strongly about. I'll be reading the comments all day, adding the most egregiously bad examples to the list. And if you'd rather view the embedded as one long post, we've got you covered <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5436982/worst-gadgets-of-the-decade-dishonorable-mentions-gallery">here</a>.</p> <p><script type="text/javascript"> gawkerGallery(5436982,11,''); </script></p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5437178/the-worst-gadgets-of-the-decade-11-bonus-dishonorable-mentions]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5437178]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Y2k10 ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Retromodo]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Worstgadgets]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[worstmodo]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 31 Dec 2009 10:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Barrett]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5437178&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Apple Free To Continue Destroying Our Ears In 2010 [Lawsuits] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/photo-3.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Everyone remembers <a href="http://gizmodo.com/152239/ipod-too-loud-sue-em">that story</a> about how a bunch of people were suing Apple for potential iPod-induced <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #hearingloss" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/hearingloss/">hearing loss</a>, even though they hadn't lost any hearing. It got shot down last year, appealed, and today, killed for good. CRANK IT.<br clear="all"></p> <p>The case was a bit odd from the start, in that it hinged on the potential for hearing loss, rather than actual, <em>inflicted</em> hearing loss. It was also odd beacuse iPods, which are evidently capable of pumping out about 125dB of sound through a pair of those crappy white earbuds, already have a volume-limiting function. This is in addition to normal volume controls, which apparently don't provide enough guidance to users to prevent them from techno-blasting their eardrums into mucousy, deaf meat-nuggets. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals <a href="http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2009/12/dismissal-of-ipod-hearing-loss-lawsuit-upheld-on-appeal.ars?utm_source=microblogging&utm_medium=arstch&utm_term=Main%20Account&utm_campaign=microblogging">upheld</a> a lower court's decision from last year that iPod could be, and generally are, used safely, and dismissed the lawsuit.</p> <p>But as my grandfather always used to say, at the center of every frivolous class action technology lawsuit, there lies a grain of truth: iPods and iPhones, if you turn them up too loud, can damage your hearing. So don't, k? [<a href="http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2009/12/dismissal-of-ipod-hearing-loss-lawsuit-upheld-on-appeal.ars?utm_source=microblogging&utm_medium=arstch&utm_term=Main%20Account&utm_campaign=microblogging">Ars Technica</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5437840/apple-free-to-continue-destroying-our-ears-in-2010]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5437840]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Lawsuits ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Hearing loss]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[iPods]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[volume limits]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 31 Dec 2009 09:54:03 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5437840&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ The Socially Acceptable Geek Subgenre Scale [Geeks] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/geeks.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_geeks.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Being a geek no longer holds the stigma it once did. In fact, it can be downright cool to be a geek these days. But not all geeks are created equal.</p> <p>The Socially Acceptable Geek Subgenre Scale is a handy showcase of just where various types of geeks fall in the social hierarchy. And if you're offended because you find yourself near the bottom of the scale, just remember: there's no shame in being passionate about something unpopular as long as no one knows about it. And if you really hate clicking through the gallery, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5437389/socially+acceptable-geek-subgenre-scale-gallery">click here</a> to see all of them on one long page. Although while doing so realize that people who whine about galleries are their own subgenre of geek, and it's not very high up on the scale.</p> <p><i>Illustrations by <a href="http://www.danmeth.com">Dan Meth</a>.</i></p> <p><script type="text/javascript"> gawkerGallery(5437389,14,''); </script></p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5437390/the-socially-acceptable-geek-subgenre-scale]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5437390]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Geeks ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Dan Meth]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Geek scale]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 31 Dec 2009 09:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5437390&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ John Mayer Wants You All To Go On a Week-Long "Digital Cleanse" [John Mayer] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/john-mayer-bb.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Hi guys, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/john-mayer">John Mayer here</a>. I know it's been a while since I've "touched base," but you know I've been pretty busy with my fourth album launch, y'know, the "heartbreak handbook"? About that <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5181120/breaking-john-mayer-news-jennifer-aniston-ends-relationship-because-he-twittered-too-much">anti-Twitter girl</a>?</p> <p>Anyway, Imma here to let you know that I think you should all take a one week <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #digitalcleanse" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/digitalcleanse/">digital cleanse</a>. Defragment your mind, man&mdash;I'm talking about your mental and psychological hard drive!</p> <p>Here's what I wrote on my <a href="http://jhnmyr.tumblr.com/post/308807536/the-one-week-digital-cleanse">Tumbly-blog-thang</a> about my super-cool idea:</p> <blockquote> <p>"The cleanse will begin at 9am on January 1. This gives everyone a chance to text and tweet their new year's well wishes, and theoretically begins upon waking up the morning of January 1. The cleanse will end at 9am on January 8.</p> <p>Guidelines:</p> <p>*email only from laptop or desktop computers</p> <p>*cell phones can only be used to make calls, and no text messages or e-mails are allowed - if you receive a text, you must reply in voice over the phone. E-mails must be returned from a laptop or desktop computer.</p> <p>*no use of Twitter or any other social networking site - this includes reading as well as posting.</p> <p>*no visiting of any entertainment or gossip sites. (No need to detail which ones - you know what they are.)"</p> </blockquote> <p>I probably shoulda thought of those people who don't wake up until after 9am on New Year's Day, clutching their vodka-soaked stomachs. But hey, I'm a <a href="http://perezhilton.com/2008-01-12-john-mayer-says-dont-drink-and-drive">clean-living soul</a>, remember?</p> <p>I'll leave you with the final words of encouragement from my blog. Put on Eye of the Tiger, or a super-positive song, maybe even my hit single Gravity if you're up for the power. Say these words with me, people, come on:</p> <blockquote> <p>"This can be done, people. Do it with me. When we pop back up on the grid on January 8, let's trade stories on what it felt like, how hard it was, and maybe how hard it actually wasn't."</p> </blockquote> <p>Peace, JM.</p> <p>&mdash;&mdash;&mdash;</p> <p>Wise words from our buddy <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #johnmayer" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/johnmayer/">John Mayer</a> there. Just so you know, we're taking his advice and are hanging up our internet connections tomorrow for a week. Sorry readers&mdash;we know you were looking forward to our CES coverage next week, but Mayer's right. Peace. We're off to do some serious defragmentation.</p> <p><em>Image Credit: <a href="http://www.newsgroper.com/john-mayer/2007/11/30/im-indie-rock-like-it-dont-stop">Newsgroper</a></em></p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5437754/john-mayer-wants-you-all-to-go-on-a-week+long-digital-cleanse]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5437754]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ John Mayer ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Digital cleanse]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[John mayer digital cleanse]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Musician]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 31 Dec 2009 08:40:12 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Kat Hannaford]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5437754&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
    
			</channel>
</rss>