<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: J2me]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/j2me</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'j2me']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Java-based Bolt Joining the Mobile Browser Wars, Doesn't Look Horrible]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><object width="506" height="380" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=2847084&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=2847084&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="506" height="380" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object>Bitstream is working on a mobile browser called Bolt, based on WebKit and compatible with pretty much any J2ME-compatible handset (read: almost everything). <a href="http://crackberry.com/preview-bolt-browser-blackberry-beta-get-your-copy">CrackBerry</a> ran it through its paces, and it looks promising.</p>
<p>The version you see above is for BlackBerry, though functionality should be almost identical between platforms. Like Skyfire of Opera Mini, Bolt performs a good deal of page optimization server-side, meaning that it's fast. In fact, compared to the Bold's stock browser, it's <em>really</em> fast. Rendering accuracy looks about as good as any other WebKit-based mobile browser (Safari, Chrome, S60 default browser) but appears significantly snappier than its competition.</p>
<p>Bolt is in a private beta for now, but you can request an invite <a href="http://boltbrowser.com/download.html">here</a>. </p>
<p>J2ME is nearly ubiquitous, barring the obvious iPhone/G1 exceptions. That means Bolt will run fine on your BlackBerry, S60 and Windows Mobile phones, among many others. [<a href="http://crackberry.com/preview-bolt-browser-blackberry-beta-get-your-copy">CrackBerry</a>]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5132736/java+based-bolt-joining-the-mobile-browser-wars-doesnt-look-horrible]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5132736]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Mobile Browsers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry browsers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bolt]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bolt mobile browser]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[j2me]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[java]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[webkit]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows mobile browsers]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:39:16 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5132736&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Windows Live Search For Mobile vs. Google Maps Mobile]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/11/wlshome.png" class="right image158" width="158" />Microsoft's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windowslivesearch" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windowslivesearch/">Windows Live Search</a> for Mobiles just went live last night, and we took it for a spin, comparing it to <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #googlemaps" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/googlemaps/">Google Maps</a> for Mobile, which has traffic, maps local business searches and directions as well.</p>
<p>Windows Live Search runs on both J2ME (Java) phones and on <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/windows-mobile">Windows Mobile phones</a>, whereas Google Maps only works on J2ME phones.</p>
<p>So which is better? Without a doubt, Microsoft's was the winner.</p>

<p>This matchup could have been a bit uneven. We were running WLS on a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windowsmobile" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windowsmobile/">Windows Mobile</a> phone, seeing as the Windows Live Search had a "native-app" feel, because it <i>was</i> a native app. Google Maps on Java ran like Java always does. Painfully.</p>
<p><img alt="googlemaps.png" src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/11/googlemaps.png" width="480" height="320" class="center"><br>
In terms of maps, both apps gave you streets as well as "aerial" view, which is a satellite combined with street names. However, WLS's looked smoother, scrolled faster, and zoomed in and out much better. Google's (above) was, well, sluggish.</p>
<p><img alt="wlstraffic.png" src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/11/wlstraffic.png" width="480" height="320" class="center">Traffic was nicely painted green, red, or yellow, and looked clear even on aerial view. You're going to want to use regular map view unless you really like trying to find your own house.</p>
<p><img alt="wlsdirections.png" src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/11/wlsdirections.png" width="480" height="320" class="center">A nice touch with WLS was the turn by turn driving directions, which are usable if you're a passenger, but probably tricky to finagle if you're the driver. Google Maps also has driving directions, but on the whole, the buggy Java implementation renders it too iffy to use while driving.</p>
<p><img alt="wlsbusiness.png" src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/11/wlsbusiness.png" width="480" height="320" class="center"><br>
Local Business Search in WLS also provided interesting results, with two hits when we searched for ballroom dancing in SF. Google does have a Find Business option, but would just hang the app half the time. When it did come with a ballroom dancing result, the results were presented one at a time instead of on a list, which then in turn would sometimes hang the app. Every time it hangs, a full reboot is in order. We blame Java.</p>
<p>If you're using a Windows Mobile phone, we'd definitely recommend you try out Windows Live Search. The Java-based Google Maps is just too buggy and slow, not to mention clunky, to be useful to us. <span class="byline">&ndash; Jason Chen</span></p>
<p><br>
Update: Google Maps does have local business and directions. We updated the comparison to reflect that. Thanks to rg and insomnic for pointing out our oversight.</p>
<p><a href="http://wls.live.com/">Product Page</a> [Windows Live Search (Visit on your phone)]</p>
<p><a href="http://google.com/gmm/index.html">Google Maps Mobile</a> [Google]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/218467/windows-live-search-for-mobile-vs-google-maps-mobile]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-218467]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[directions]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google maps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[j2me]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[java]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[maps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[searching]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows live search]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows mobile]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 30 Nov 2006 18:35:56 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=218467&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Opera Releases Mini 2.0]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/images/2006/05/operamini.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Owners of non-smartphones were out of luck in the browser department until Opera released their Mini. Regular Opera functionality, compatible with J2ME phones, allows lower end phones to browse standard websites in condensed form. Now with <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #operamini" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/operamini/">Opera Mini</a> 2.0, users can download mp3s, pictures and videos directly onto their phones. This feature, along with buying content via sms automatically were missing from 1.0.</p>
<p>The download is free and works on any Java enabled phone.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.opera.com/products/mobile/operamini/">Opera Mini</a> [via <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/resource/article/0,aid,125621,pg,1,RSS,RSS,00.asp">PC world</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/171748/opera-releases-mini-20]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-171748]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[j2me]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[java]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mini]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[opera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[opera mini]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 05 May 2006 07:23:35 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=171748&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
