<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: Laptops]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/laptops</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'laptops']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Plywood and Cork Laptop Case Slides To Stow]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_plywoodcase_02.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />With their innovative furniture design, Charles and Ray Eames showed the world that plywood could be both beautiful and functional. Brian Kelly's plywood laptop case is at least one of those two things.</p>
<p>While I'm not quite sold on the idea of pulling apart my entire case every time I need to schlep my machine somewhere, designer and woodworker Brian Kelly's two-piece take on portable protection is certainly easy on the eyes.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5436518,2,'');
</script></p>
<p>In addition to its slidable plywood shell, the case has a cork lining for heat resistance and padding. The designer says the case is only "an exploration into the process of bending plywood," though, so you won't have to decide between form and function just yet. [<a href="http://www.behance.net/Gallery/Ply-Laptop-Case/135339">Behance Network</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5436497/plywood-and-cork-laptop-case-slides-to-stow]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5436497]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cases]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[concepts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptop cases]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[plywood]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[portables]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[woodworking]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 29 Dec 2009 18:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kyle VanHemert]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5436497&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Biggie-Sized HP Envy 17 On Its Way]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>According to a legit-looking leak, HP is releasing 14 and 17-inch versions of their Envy laptops. And from what we can tell, even the 17-inch Envy will exclude an integrated optical drive. And if that's the case, I have no issue, since it'd be better to use that space to squeeze in a larger battery anyway. The 15's stock battery life <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5413076/hp-envy-15+inch-review">was horrid</a>. [<a href="http://hpfansite.com/hp-envy/alert-hp-envy-17-envy-14-elitebook-2540p-2740p-pipeline/">HP Fansite</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/28/hp-envy-14-envy-17-and-new-elitebooks-leak-onto-the-scene/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5435488/biggie+sized-hp-envy-17-on-its-way]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5435488]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[envy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hp envy 17]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 28 Dec 2009 11:46:09 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5435488&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[OLPC XO-3: An Impossible $75 Fantasy Tablet I Want to Believe In]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/olpcxo3main.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_olpcxo3main.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/392060/olpc-xo-laptop-20-has-dual-touchscreens-looks-amazing-and-future+y">dual-touchscreen XO-2</a> was a fantastical concept. But it's nothing on OLPC's XO-3, a hot, messy wet dream of a tablet: All semi-flexible plastic, multitouch, backlit and reflective ereading modes, thinner than an iPhone and $75.</p>

<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5432335,4,'');
</script></p>
<p>In other words, it's everything people have been fantasizing about in a tablet&mdash;durable, thin, multitouch, multiple screen modes for computing and reading&mdash;but for just <em>75 dollars</em>. And Nicholas Negroponte, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5041765/secret-origin-of-the-olpc-genius-hubris-and-the-birth-of-the-netbook">large head of the OLPC</a>, wants it by 2012.</p>
<p>Remember, this is the organization that didn't just scrap the XO-2, but couldn't even tack a touchscreen onto the current XO-1 laptop, which isn't anywhere near a hundred bucks. (Hey, at least they gave up on the dual-touchscreen idea.) I think this sadly says everything about the likelihood of it happening, as much as I'd love to see and play with this thing: "We don't necessarily need to build it," Negroponte told Forbes. "We just need to threaten to build it."</p>
<p>Well, I can't wait to see the XO-4! [<a href="http://www.fuseproject.com/#blogEntry79">Fuse Project</a>, <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2009/12/22/tablet-computer-negroponte-technology-cio-network-olpc.html">Forbes</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5432351/olpc-xo+3-an-impossible-75-fantasy-tablet-i-want-to-believe-in]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5432351]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[olpc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[olpc xo-3]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xo-3]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xo3]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:01:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5432351&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[MSI Wind U130 and U135 Netbooks Boast Pine Trail Chips]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_msi-wind-u130-u135.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />A couple of new netbooks have hit the "just announced" pool, and while MSI's Wind models don't usually grab me, the U130 and U135 do, thanks to the inclusion of Atom's new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #pinetrail" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/pinetrail/">Pine Trail</a> processors.</p>
<p>Pine Trail was <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5430908/next+generation-intel-atom-processors-smaller-more-efficient-not-much-more-powerful">officially let out of the bag today</a>, and comes in four flavors: the N450, D410, D510, and NM10 Express chipset. The two new Wind netbooks use the N450 chip, which is designed specifically for those smaller-sized laptops, giving 15 per cent extra battery life.</p>
<p>Both the U130 and U135 have 10-inch LED backlit screens with 1,024 x 600 pixels. The first model has a 160GB HDD, the latter 250GB. 802.11b/g/n Wi-Fi, Bluetooth and 3.5G WiMax are listed, along with stereo speakers and a 1.3-megapixel webcam.</p>
<p>On sale in January, the price for the UK market is £229 and £279 for the two models (approximately $368 and $448), with the U130 coming in "snow white" and "brilliant black," the U135 in "sterling silver," "brilliant black," "midnight blue," and "cherry red." [<a href="http://www.msi.com">MSI</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5431247/msi-wind-u130-and-u135-netbooks-boast-pine-trail-chips]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5431247]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[netbooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[atom pine trail]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[msi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[msi wind]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[msi wind u130]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[msi wind u135]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[netbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pine trail]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[u130]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[u135]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wind]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:05:51 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kat Hannaford]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5431247&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Intel's New Superefficient-But-Fast Laptop Core i5 Chips on Jan. 7]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_intelshot.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Intel's dropping <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-10417450-64.html">a big bowl o' chips</a> January 7th&mdash;17 of 'em&mdash;like the first lower-end <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #corei3" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/corei3/">Core i3</a> chips, but we're most excited about the Arrandale <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5403468/intels-32nm-arrandale-core-i5-and-i7-chips-for-anorexic-notebooks">Core i5 for laptops</a>: still fast but more efficient 'cause they're shrunk to 32nm.</p>
<p>Remember all the excitement about Penryn a couple years ago, which took the Core 2 and made it more efficient with a new manufacturing process? It's the same deal here, as the tick of Intel's tick-tock cycle. "Tock" is a whole new microarchitecture, while "tick" is a die shrink of that, which makes it more power efficient. Nehalem is the tock&mdash;it was 45 nanometers&mdash;and Westmere is the tick, shrunk to 32nm.</p>
<p>Arrandale is what this set of mobile <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #corei5" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/corei5/">Core i5</a> chips, based on Westmere, is called. (Here's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5381760/giz-explains-intels-entire-confusing-armada-of-chips">our primer on Intel codenames</a>.) One thing in particular about Arrandale is that it has a graphics core built right onto the main chip package, which Intel says is good to go for Blu-ray.</p>
<p>Anyways, what all this means is that there's about to be a whole bunch of new laptops with faster, better Intel chips inside that won't munch your battery as hard. [<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-10417450-64.html">Cnet</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5429145/intels-new-superefficient+but+fast-laptop-core-i5-chips-on-jan-7]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5429145]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[arrandale]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core i3]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core i5]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cpus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gpus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:20:33 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5429145&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[DIY Laptop Tray Keeps Your Computer Cool, Legs Burn-Free]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_img_4708.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Many of us prop laptops on blankets or pillows to avoid the heat, but these inevitably obstruct air circulation and cause overheating. This DIY stand made from a bistro tray and a bit of wood helps keep your computer&mdash;and legs&mdash;cool.</p>

<p>This step-by-step guide from DIY web site Instructables is far from difficult&mdash;all it requires is a few household tools, along with some thin pieces of wood and, of course, a stylish bistro tray. Plus, not only can you use the extra space to store flash drives, power cords, or other miscellaneous computer items below the laptop, but you can also still use the tray to carry drinks and such when it's not holding your laptop&mdash;and where once the tray was stylish but prone to spillage, it is now a spill-free multitasker.</p>
<p>We had a tough time finding the exact tray used in the post, but it looks to be <a href="http://www.cb2.com/family.aspx?c=230&f=4360">this one</a> from CB2. IKEA has <a href="http://www.ikea.com/us/en/catalog/products/06410406">similar trays</a> that could work, though, if you're looking for something a bit different. If you find one that you like, feel free to share in the comments.</p>
<div class="related"><a href="http://www.instructables.com/id/Everybody-Else-Is-Making-A-Laptop-Stand-So-Why-Ca/">Everybody Else Is Making A Laptop Stand, So Why Can't I?</a> [Instructables]</div>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://lifehacker.com/5427081/diy-laptop-tray-keeps-your-computer-cool-legs-burn+free]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5427081]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[diy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptop stand]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptop stands]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Whitson Gordon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5427081&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Most Popular DIY Projects of 2009]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_untitled-6_02.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />We love DIY projects here at Lifehacker. Whether we're building computers, backyard projects, or turning office supplies into artillery, we're always tinkering. Today we're taking a peek at the most popular DIY projects of 2009.</p>

<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5315357/create-your-own-sun-jar-lifehacker-edition/gallery/">Create Your Own Sun Jar: Lifehacker Edition</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_504x_dsc_0842.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
Inspired by a tutorial we posted last year, we decided to make our own DIY sun jars. The trendy summer time lighting accessory retails for $30+ but we were able to make ours for around $10 each. The sun jars proved to be our most popular non-computer DIY of the entire year and readers <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5316055/diy-sun-jar-in-a-jiffy">shared their own creations with us</a>.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5151369/the-first+timers-guide-to-building-a-computer-from-scratch">The First-Timer's Guide to Building a Computer from Scratch</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/first-timers-building-new-pc.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_first-timers-building-new-pc.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
Building your own computer is a great way to get exactly what you want, the way you want it, without being constrained by the limits and high-prices of mass produced computers. We showed you <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5151369/the-first+timers-guide-to-building-a-computer-from-scratch">how to build a computer from start to finish</a> and have fun doing it.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5161306/turn-a-sharpie-into-a-liquid-fueled-rocket">Turn a Sharpie into a Liquid Fueled Rocket</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/rocket.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_rocket.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
What's standing between you and some office mayhem? Certainly not a lack of Sharpie markers and keyboard dusting spray. Combine the two with this fun DIY project and you've got one of the most awesome pieces of office-machinery we've ever featured.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5153684/properly-erase-your-physical-media">Properly Erase Your Physical Media</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_2009-12-11_164954.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
You need to be properly erasing your physical media: all the time, every time. Our guide will show you how to get the job done and done right whether you use software to scrub your disks or you send them to the great data mine in the sky with a 21-gun salute.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5177762/turn-an-old-laptop-into-a-wall+mounted-computer">Turn an Old Laptop into a Wall-Mounted Computer</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_2009-12-11_165737_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Why settle for a digital picture frame when, in the same wall space, you could mount an entirely functional computer/slideshow player/TV tuner? One Lifehacker reader turned an old laptop into a super-charged digital frame.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5251244/8-diy-aluminum-laptop-stand/gallery/">$8 DIY Aluminum Laptop Stand</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/rearviewinuse.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_rearviewinuse.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>We've always been keen on <a href="http://lifehacker.com/tag/laptop-stand/">DIY laptop stands</a>, but reader Aaron Kravitz&mdash;inspired by an attractive $50 stand&mdash;went above and beyond, creating one of the most attractive DIY laptop stands we've featured to date.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5165624/build-an-ikea-nas-on-the-cheap">Build an IKEA NAS On the Cheap</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_fnujtjgfrtxg4cs.medium.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
If the <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5162026/best-home-server-software">Hive Five on best home server software</a> got you excited about setting up a home server but you're not keen on another unsightly PC in your home, check out this DIY IKEA NAS.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5308833/build-a-diy-portable-air-conditioner">Build a DIY Portable Air Conditioner</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_504x_portac.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
We've shown you <a href="http://lifehacker.com/181510/make-your-own-air-conditioner">how to make an air conditioner</a> (even for <a href="http://lifehacker.com/107753/how-to-build-a-30-air-conditioner">as low as $30</a>), but what if you wanted something you can put in your car and take with you? While it's no substitute for a fully-charged and factory-fresh AC system, it'll keep you cool.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5307420/turn-a-bookshelf-into-a-secret-passage">Turn a Bookshelf into a Secret Passage</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_3655675969_e0185b0001.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
Who hasn't dreamed of having a mystery-story-style secret passageway? While a trick bookshelf is pretty awesome in itself, this secret passage hides a home office with clever style. One industrious Lifehacker reader and his girlfriend had grown tired of seeing their office from their living space, so they hid it behind a wall of books.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5398668/wire-your-house-with-ethernet-cable">Wire Your House with Ethernet Cable</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_fcu8vqvfpkfcykk.medium.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />You've ripped a movie on your laptop, and now want it on that fancy new home theater PC next to your TV. If you've got the time, wiring your house with Cat-5e cable could make transfer times a distant memory.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5299994/rain-gutters-as-cable-management-tools">Rain Gutters as Cable Management Tools</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/rain-gutter.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_rain-gutter.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
We're all about <a href="http://lifehacker.com/tag/cable-management/">creative cable management</a> here at Lifehacker, so we were instantly drawn to reader <a href="http://lifehacker.com/commenter/Seandavid010/">Seandavid010</a>'s rain-gutter <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged CABLE MANAGEMENT" href="http://lifehacker.com/tag/cable-management/">cable management</a> setup. He was awesome enough to send detailed photos and step by step instructions to help other readers recreate his setup.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5138746/build-your-own-dtv-antenna">Build Your Own DTV Antenna</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_2009-12-11_171805.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />The lights went out on analog television this year and we were there with a guide to help you build a great DIY antenna for boosting your reception and getting that crisp digital picture you crave.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5161054/diy-laptop-rack-hack-turns-your-monitor-into-an-imac">DIY Laptop Rack Hack Turns Your Monitor into an iMac</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_2009-12-11_172326.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
Lifehacker reader Matt Lumpkin saw our <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5159703/diy-tv-or-monitor-stand-from-door-stoppers">monitor stand from door stoppers</a> post and thought we might like his laptop rack hack as another space-saving desktop solution for laptop-lovers. He was right.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5296731/build-your-own-pizza-oven">Build Your Own Pizza Oven</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_2009-12-11_172810.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
Suppose you were inspired by the <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5274264/build-the-ultimate-homemade-pizza-oven-on-the-cheap">cheap DIY home pizza oven</a>&mdash;but weren't so sure your home insurance would cover oven modifications. It's time to build a safer, more eye-pleasing oven, and we've got a thorough guide.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5376442/crack-a-master-combination-padlock-redux">Crack a Master Combination Padlock Redux</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_500x_lock-crack.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
Two years ago we highlighted <a href="http://lifehacker.com/301018/crack-a-master-combination-padlock">how to crack a Master combination padlock</a> for those of you who may have lost the combination to your bulletproof lock; now designer Mark Campos has turned the tried-and-true instructions into an easier-to-follow visual guide.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5245964/diy-invisible-floating-bookshelves">DIY Invisible Floating Bookshelves</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_2009-12-11_173036.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
We've covered the invisible floating bookshelf <a href="http://lifehacker.com/368814/diy-invisible-floating-bookshelf">once</a> or <a href="http://lifehacker.com/software/books/diy-invisible-bookshelf-232262.php">twice</a> before, but if you liked the idea but weren't keen on ruining a book in the process, weblog May December Home's got you covered.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5302134/diy-inverted-bookshelf">DIY Inverted Bookshelf</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_f4n1nq2flqal6cn.medium.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
Instead of storing your books upright on top of the shelf, the inverted bookshelf holds all of your books in place using elastic webbing so you can hang them below the shelf&mdash;all the while allowing you to still take them out and put them back on as needed.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5196069/build-an-under+the+cabinet-kitchen-pc-from-an-old-laptop">Build an Under-the-Cabinet Kitchen PC from an Old Laptop</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/undercounter-pc.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_undercounter-pc.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
Inspired by our guide to <a href="http://lifehacker.com/359389/give-an-old-laptop-new-life-with-cheap-or-free-projects">giving an old laptop new life with cheap or free projects</a>, Lifehacker reader Brian turned his aging Dell laptop into an incredible under-the-cabinet kitchen PC.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5190496/turn-storage-containers-into-self-watering-tomato-planters">Turn Storage Containers into Self Watering Tomato Planters</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_untitled-4.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
If you'd like to have delicious home-grown tomatoes but lack a garden to grow them in, you'll definitely want to check out this ingenious and inexpensive self-watering system.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5259519/deter-thieves-by-uglifying-your-camera">Deter Thieves by Uglifying Your Camera</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_ugly-cam.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
A few years ago, blogger Jimmie Rodgers's camera was stolen while volunteering in an impoverished Brazilian community, so he did what any sane person would do: He bought a new camera and made it ugly. With his uglified camera, Rodgers was able to snap pictures freely during the rest of his trip without worrying too much that his ostensibly crappy camera would end up stolen.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5159703/diy-tv-or-monitor-stand-from-door-stoppers">DIY TV or Monitor Stand from Door Stoppers</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_untitled-467859.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
Nothing adds space to a desk or home theater setup like a simple monitor or TV stand, and weblog IKEA Hacker details how to build your own stand on-the-cheap with a few inexpensive items from IKEA.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5296767/repurpose-your-analog-television">Repurpose Your Analog Television</a></h3>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/yboxfortv.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_yboxfortv.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
You don't need to run out and buy a new TV because of <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5287456/say-goodbye-to-analog-broadcasts-your-last-minute-guide">the DTV switchover</a>. If you did anyways, Make Magazine has put together quite a guide to giving old TVs new life.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5373479/use-ping+pong-balls-to-create-diffused-party-lights">Use Ping-Pong Balls to Create Diffused Party Lights</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_500x_2009-10-09_232655.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
If you need some cheap and novel ambient lighting for your next party, you're only a box of ping-pong balls and a string of lights away from solving your lighting worries.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5153007/build-a-custom+made-boxeebox">Build a Custom-Made BoxeeBox</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_untitled-23544.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
DeviceGuru blogger Rick Lehrbaum, inspired by the cheaper set-top boxes, made his own higher-powered "BoxeeBox" for the <a href="http://boxee.tv">free, open-source media center</a>. He posted all the parts, the how-to details, and lots of pictures.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5246528/build-a-sturdy-cardboard-laptop-stand">Build a Sturdy Cardboard Laptop Stand</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_2009-12-11_180015.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
You already shelled out your hard earned cash for a swanky laptop, why drop more cash on an overpriced <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged LAPTOP STAND" href="http://lifehacker.com/tag/laptop-stand/">laptop stand</a>? Cardboard alone can do the trick, as detailed in this step-by-step tutorial.</p>
<h3 style="font-size: 120%; margin-top: 20px;"><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5360150/install-snow-leopard-on-your-hackintosh-pc-no-hacking-required">Install Snow Leopard on Your Hackintosh PC, No Hacking Required</a></h3>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/17/2009/12/500x_500x_snowhackintosh1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
Earlier this year we put together a wildly popular <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5351485/how-to-build-a-hackintosh-with-snow-leopard-start-to-finish">guide to building a Hackintosh with Snow Leopard, start to finish</a>, and then followed it up with an even easier guide to <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5360150/install-snow-leopard-on-your-hackintosh-pc-no-hacking-required">install Snow Leopard on your Hackintosh PC, no hacking required</a>. Computers + DIY is all sorts of geeky fun waiting to happen.</p>
<hr>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8" src="http://static.polldaddy.com/p/2374373.js">
</script><noscript><br>
<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/2374373/">Which Is Your Favorite Lifehacker DIY Project of 2009?</a><span style="font-size:9px;">(<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com">polls</a>)</span><br></noscript></p>
<p>Have a favorite DIY from 2009 that wasn't highlighted here? Sound off in the comments with a link to your favorite project. Want to see more popular DIY guides courtesy of the ghost of Lifehacker past? Check out <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5113372/most-popular-diy-projects-of-2008-and-all-time">our huge DIY guide roundup</a> from 2008.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://lifehacker.com/5424553/most-popular-diy-projects-of-2009]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5424553]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[best of 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cooking]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[diy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[diy creations]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gardening]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hackintosh]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[home]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[household]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptop stands]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lighting]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac os x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[media center]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[monitors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[outdoors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[theft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Fitzpatrick]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5424553&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Onkyo DX Laptop Gives You Two Screens for Under $1000]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/onkyos-dx-dual-screen-laptop.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_onkyos-dx-dual-screen-laptop.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #dualscreenlaptops" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/dualscreenlaptops/">Dual screen laptops</a> are nothing more than a novelty. But I mean, what a novelty!</p>

<p>Onkyo's DX laptop features two, 10.1-inch screens, both of which run at a respectable 1,366×768 resolution. They're complemented by a 1.6GHz Athlon processor, 2GB of RAM, ATI Radeon HD 3200 graphics, 320GB hard drive and Bluetooth/Wi-Fi n. It's preloaded with Windows 7.</p>
<p>(Yes, the astute among you will notice that this laptop <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5375159/kohjinsha-netbook-concept-has-dual-101+inch-screens">looks quite familiar</a>, but under the Onkyo brand, we've seen the best price to performance ratio yet.)</p>
<p>Of course, you'll need to import the DX to own one, but for $960, you can almost justify the tacky extravagance. <script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5423413,4,'');
</script>[<a href="http://onkyodirect.jp/pc/dx/">Onkyo</a> and <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&ie=UTF8&langpair=ja|en&sl=ru&tl=en&u=http://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/news/20091210_334159.html">PCWatch</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/10/onkyos-dx-dual-screen-laptop-is-a-far-better-deal-than-kohjinsh/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5423424/onkyo-dx-laptop-gives-you-two-screens-for-under-1000]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5423424]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Dual Screen Laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[onkyo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[onkyo dx]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:16:47 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5423424&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Best Windows Laptops, From $400 to $1500]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_notebookbest.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><em>To find out the best Windows laptops of 2009, we checked in with Mark Spoonauer who, as editor-in-chief of Laptop Magazine and Laptopmag.com, oversaw 130+ notebook and netbook reviews this year. If you're buying, buy one of these.</em></p>

<h1>Under $400</h1>
<p><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #aceraspire1410" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/aceraspire1410/">Acer Aspire 1410</a></strong><br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_aspire1410.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
<em>Starting Price: $399</em><br>
This 3.2-pound ultraportable is such a sweet deal it makes us question whether netbooks are long for this world. Acer stuffed a dual-core Celeron processor (about double the performance of Atom), 2GB of RAM and Windows 7 Premium inside a 11.6-inch system with a full-size keyboard&mdash;all for just $399. Plus, you get 6.5 hours of battery life. Sure, the 160GB hard drive is a bit skimpy, but the 1410 is a real PC you can take anywhere. [<a href="http://www.laptopmag.com/review/laptops/acer-aspire-1410.aspx">Review</a>]</p>
<h1>Under $700</h1>
<p><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #gatewaynv" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/gatewaynv/">Gateway NV</a></strong><br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_laptops-nv2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
<em>Starting Price: $599.99</em><br>
The NV proves that you can get a good-looking budget laptop that performs. In addition to four color choices (blue, brown, read, and black), this 15.6-inch notebook sports a fashionable metal hinge and glowing LED controls. Under the hood the NV satisfies with the combination of an Intel Core 2 Duo CPU, 4GB of RAM, and a 320GB hard drive. Our only nitpick is the narrow touchpad button. [<a href="http://www.laptopmag.com/review/laptop/gateway-nv-series.aspx">Review</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Asus UL30A</strong><br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_laptops-ul30a.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
<em>Starting Price: $649.99</em><br>
If we had to pick a notebook of the year, the UL30A would be it. Why? Because this 13 incher is light enough to take anywhere yet offers enough pep to be your primary machine. This 4-pound ultraportable lasted nearly 10 hours on a charge in our tests (continuous surfing over Wi-Fi), and its ultra-low voltage Core 2 Duo processor can easily handle Windows 7. Bonus: 500GB of storage is nice for the $650 price. [<a href="http://www.laptopmag.com/review/laptops/asus-ul30a.aspx">Review</a>]</p>
<h1>Under $1000</h1>
<p><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #dellstudio14z" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/dellstudio14z/">Dell Studio 14z</a></strong><br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_laptops-14z.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
<em>Starting Price: $749.99</em><br>
Think of it as the poor man's MacBook&mdash;with better specs and sound. Dell's 14-inch thin and light notebook weighs in at just 4.4 pounds and features Nvidia 9400 graphics for extra multimedia punch. But unlike the entry level $999 Mac, the Dell offers 70GB more hard drive space, superior speakers, and a backlit keyboard for $160 less. The only trade-offs are the lack of a DVD drive and the need for an adapter for plugging in memory cards. [<a href="http://www.laptopmag.com/review/laptop/dell-studio-14z.aspx">Review</a>]</p>
<h1>Under $1500</h1>
<p><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #toshibaqosmiox505" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/toshibaqosmiox505/">Toshiba Qosmio X505</a></strong><br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_laptops-x505.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
<em>Starting Price : $1399</em><br>
Ideal for multimedia mavens and good enough for gamers, the 18.4-inch Qosmio X505 brings serious muscle in the $1,499 configuration, including a blazing Core i7 CPU and Nvidia GTS 250M graphics (with 1 GB of dedicated video memory). We also dig the classy glossy black design with metallic red accents, integrated Blu-ray drive, and booming Harman Kardon speakers. If you want to step up from the 1680 x 945 display to a full HD screen, splurge for the $1,899 model, which also sports 6GB of RAM and an SSD. [<a href="http://www.laptopmag.com/review/laptop/toshiba-qosmio-x505.aspx">Review</a>]</p>
<p><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #thinkpadt400s" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/thinkpadt400s/">ThinkPad T400s</a></strong><br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_laptops-t400s.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
<em>Starting Price: $1599 ($1359.15 after coupon)</em><br>
If BMWs are the ultimate driving machines, ThinkPads are the ultimate business machines, and this is the flagship vehicle. The T400s measures just 0.8 inches thick and weighs 3.9 pounds, and it's decked out in supersturdy magnesium (for the bottom and deck) and carbon fiber (for the lid). More important, this 14-incher blows away the competition in terms of ergonomic comfort and performance&mdash;when you spring for the 2.53-GHz processor and 128GB solid state drive. [<a href="http://www.laptopmag.com/review/laptops/lenovo-thinkpad-t400s.aspx">Review</a>]</p>
<p><em>To see all of Laptop's top picks of the year, <a href="http://www.laptopmag.com/review/laptops/best-notebooks-of-the-year-2009.aspx">click here</a>.</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5421823/the-best-windows-laptops-from-400-to-1500]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5421823]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[acer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[acer aspire 1410]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[asus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[asus ul304]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bestmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dell studio 14z]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gateway nv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[giftguide2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lenovo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[thinkpad t400s]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[toshiba]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Toshiba qosmio x505]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Spoonauer]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5421823&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Dell Vostro V13 Hands On: Bruce Wayne's Laptop]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/vostromaiiin.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_vostromaiiin.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Magnesium alloy. Aluminum. Zinc. That's what <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5421211/vostro-v13-dells-new-450-065+inch-ultraportable">Dell's Vostro V13</a> is built with. It's as <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5205524/dell-adamo-full-review-macho-outside-sissy-inside">thin as Dell's primo Adamo</a> at 0.65 inches, but it weighs less, 3.5 pounds. Yet somehow, it's $450.</p>

<p>Well, part of the somehow is that the default $450 configuration uses a Celeron processor and comes with Ubuntu. You don't play in Windows land 'til you hit $600, and don't reach ULV Core 2 Duo brains&mdash;<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5381760/giz-explains-intels-entire-confusing-armada-of-chips">which ain't exactly heavy duty</a>&mdash;until you drop $650.</p>
<p>The V13 is a collision of high end&mdash;the design, angled and thin, heavily echoing <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5205524/dell-adamo-full-review-macho-outside-sissy-inside">the original Adamo's silhouette</a>, and build quality, as sturdy as any non-unibody laptop we've tried to bend&mdash;and low rent&mdash;the keyboard is straight off Dell's budget Inspiron line and well, I already told you what's inside (there's other spec sparseness as well, like 2GB RAM, VGA out and 2 USB ports, one of which is a combo eSATA number). The 13.3-inch, LED-backlit, anti-glare display is nice enough though, at a resolution of 1366x768. The 6-cell sealed battery is rated for 4 hours and 42 minutes, according to Dell, but expect less <em>actually using it</em>, obviously.</p>
<p>Still, at $650, let alone $450&mdash;netbook level&mdash;you expect some compromise, and if it wasn't at the expense of the design and materials, it had to cut somewhere. (Conversely, you can buy raging monsters from Asus, filled with blistering silicon, but it's powering machines that are ugly, bloated plastic.) Un-compromise is expensive, but the V13 straddles the line fairly skillfully, erring on the side that most don't, and that's something that's commendable. If the Adamo was Batman's laptop, this more human and vulnerable rendition for suits is Bruce Wayne's.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5421916,12,'');
</script> [<a href="http://www.dell.com/us/en/business/notebooks/vostro-v13/pd.aspx?refid=vostro-v13&s=bsd&cs=04">Dell</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5421997/dell-vostro-v13-hands-on-bruce-waynes-laptop]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5421997]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dell vostro v13]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[v13]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vostro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vostro v13]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 08 Dec 2009 19:05:45 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5421997&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Linux Owns 1/3 of the Netbook Marketshare]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_linuxnew.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Lots of people use Linux. That's known. But usually those people are computer science majors flipping major corporations the bird (before they sell out to said corporations after graduation), not consumers buying systems with Linux preloaded.</p>

<p>According to a new report by Jeff Orr, an analyst at ABI, Linux preinstalls represent 32% of the 35 million netbooks shipping this year (a number consistent with Dell's own reports). And it makes sense. Pretty much any variation of Linux is lighter weight than Windows (even the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5133092/windows-7-runs-so-much-better-than-vista-on-a-netbook">improved performance of 7</a> over Vista is paid for <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5402670/windows-7-netbook-battery-life-sucks-worse-than-windows-xp">in battery life</a>). And in the lowest end of the hardware market, I'd bet consumers are a lot more cognizant of the impact an OS has on the final price of a computer. [<a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140343/Linux_s_share_of_netbooks_surging_not_sagging_says_analyst">Computer World</a> via <a href="http://mobile.slashdot.org/story/09/12/08/0028237/Linux-Reaches-32-Netbook-Market-Share?from=rss&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Slashdot%2Fslashdot+%28Slashdot%29">Slashdot</a> and <a href="http://cpfc.org/images/MaxLinuxPenguin.jpg">Awesome Image</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5421500/linux-owns-13-of-the-netbook-marketshare]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5421500]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[linux netbooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[netbooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ubuntu]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 08 Dec 2009 09:50:59 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5421500&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[64-bit Chromium Now Available for Mac Users]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/chromium64bit.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_chromium64bit.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Up until now, the unofficial Google Chrome for Macs, Chromium, has only been <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5279835/google-chromium-alpha-builds-available-for-os-x-linux">available in a 32-bit download</a>, but today you can grab the ChromiumOS64 if you're more RAMmed-up.</p>
<p>Teo en Ming, the ChromiumOS64 project lead, says of the download:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"The original Chromium OS project does not support 64-bit platforms. This is because the majority of the netbooks in the market are based on Intel Atom processors, which are mostly 32-bit."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>With Chrome OS <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5408504/everything-you-need-to-know-about-chrome-os">launching properly</a> at the tail-end of 2010, we've got a full year to wait before we see anything more solid become available. And even then, it'll only be available on Google-branded devices, with <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5416887/acer-wants-to-be-first-with-a-chrome-os-netbook">Acer hoping to launch</a> the first official netbook running it.</p>
<p>Let us know how you get on with the 64-bit Chromium browser below. [<a href="http://www.chromiumos64.com/">ChromiumOS64</a> via <a href="http://www.techradar.com/news/software/operating-systems/64-bit-chromium-os-surfaces-656314">TechRadar</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5420470/64+bit-chromium-now-available-for-mac-users]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5420470]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[chromeos]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[64bit]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chromeosnetbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chromium]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chromium 64bit]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chromiumos64]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[googlechromeos]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac os x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[netbooks]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 07 Dec 2009 08:15:54 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kat Hannaford]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5420470&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[How To Clean Your Filthy Gadgets]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/cleantop.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_cleantop.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Hey, you, your gadgets are <em>disgusting</em>. And wiping them with your greasy shirt sleeve isn't making things any better. Here's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #howto" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/howto/">how to</a> clean your gadgets, the right way.</p>
<h2>HDTVs and Monitors</h2>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_500x_led.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
This is the number one cleaning question I get from friends and family, and it's one of the simplest to answer. HDTVs and monitors are the worst kind of dirt magnets, begging to be touched&mdash;by your boss who wants to show you something on your computer screen, by your greasy little cousin who's getting restless during his umpteenth viewing of <em>Finding Nemo</em>, by your drunk old buddy from college who somehow still thinks it's funny to grope actresses onscreen on his way to the bathroom&mdash;and sitting in total vulnerability: in the case of your LCD screen, within sneezing range; in the case of your flatscreen TV, in your dusty living room.</p>
<p>The tempting, nearly instinctual response to a oily, dusty, mucousy panel of glass or glasslike material is to reach under the sink, grab that bottle of Windex and the paper towels and spray that stuff down. <b>Do not do this.</b> There are <em>some</em> TVs and displays for which Windex will do the job&mdash;CRT televisions, for example, and some glass-paneled screens&mdash;and if you've been using Windex in the past without incident, don't worry too much. But also, <em>stop</em>.</p>
<p>Spraying any kind of cleaner onto a screen isn't a great idea. These panels aren't weatherproof, so if your sprayed solvent runs into the crack between the panel surface and the display bezel, there will be <a href="http://gizmodo.com/251527/this-is-why-you-shouldnt-clean-your-hdtv-with-windex">tragedy</a>. Furthermore, Windex is a glass cleaner: a lot of your screens' outer layers aren't glass, or have some kind of delicate coating. Ammonia-based cleaners, for example, can microscopically abrade some plastic surfaces, causing your screen to become slightly foggy over time. And for your cleaning tool, paper towels aren't terrible, but they're also somewhat risky&mdash;screen coatings can be extremely delicate, and paper towels can sometimes be a little rough. Plus, they're prone to leaving streaks, no matter what liquid you're using.</p>
<p>So, what's the trick? Water. Water and a soft, lint-free (<a href="http://www.amazon.com/3M-Microfiber-Electronics-Cleaning-Cloth/dp/B00006IBLQ">ideally microfiber</a>, which is better at picking up greasy smudges) towel. To clean your panel, dampen your cloth and strain it out as best you can&mdash;you don't want any drippage here&mdash;then run it, folded, gently <em>across</em> your screen, repeating until the screen has been thoroughly covered and any sticky residue has been removed. (For larger displays, perform cleaning in sections, so as not to let the water dry or collect and run.) Now do the same with a dry cloth, applying slightly more pressure, to lift away the dirt and moisture. Repeat if there are still grease deposits. That's it! A few bucks for some soft cloths, a little bit of water, and your screen is as good as new.</p>
<p>And those specialty cleaning kits? They do work, for the most part, but they're not necessary.</p>
<h2>TV and Game Controllers</h2>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/xbox360controller.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_xbox360controller.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
By the time your TV is in need to a deep cleaning, your remote&mdash;or your videogame controller&mdash;is probably in even worse shape. The kind of dirt a remote gathers is an order of magnitude more disgusting (and more human) than your panel, so you're not just cleaning, you're disinfecting. Interestingly enough, the cleaning method isn't too far from the one above: A damp cloth, with some water. This time, though, you'll want to throw a little isopropyl alcohol in the mix&mdash;a 40/60 booze and water split works&mdash;to help disinfect the buttons, and remove the oily brown buildups you can get between buttons. Again, soft cloth is better than paper towels, this time it tends to be a bit better at reaching between buttons than stiff, thin paper. Use wooden toothpicks for reaching into cracks, but nothing harder.</p>
<p>These are unique in that they're shared gadgets. And shared gadgets are, almost without fail, fantastic vectors for germs. So what I'm saying is, <em>clean them or die</em>.</p>
<h2>Cameras</h2>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/nikon-d90-01_1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_nikon-d90-01_1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
<strong>Body</strong>: Cleaning your camera body is like cleaning almost any other gadget&mdash;a very slightly damp towel will do the trick. (Though be gentle around openings, since point-and-shoot camera guts lurk awfully close to the surface, and any intruding water can wreak serious havoc.)</p>
<p><strong>Lenses</strong>: Lenses are dirt magnets, and if they're dirty, you simply <em>don't get good pictures</em>. They're also delicate and expensive, so you can't just reach in there with a paper towel and be done with it. Lens cleaning kits are available at every camera store, and include a light cleaning solution and microfiber cloth. These are safe bets, but don't spend more than $15 bucks on them. Lens pens also work, but they're a riskier proposition&mdash;there's such a limited cleaning surface on those things, and I always get the sense that after a few uses, the cleaning element has been sort of tainted.</p>
<p>Again, though, stay safe with this one: Buy a microfiber cloth, and simply rub the lens with a circular motion until all visible smudges are gone. Never apply too much pressure&mdash;any dust or dirt on the lens can get picked up in your cloth and scratch your lens&mdash;and fold/refold your cloth to ensure you're using a fresh surface at least once during a lens cleaning.</p>
<p>Two small notes on lenses: Don't forget the clean the rear glass on any DSLR lens. There's a lot less surface area there, and since it spends most of its time inside the camera or a locking lens cover it probably won't be as dirty, so this should take much effort. And if you can, treat each of your DSLR lenses to a UV filter. While this is called a filter, it only block light that humans can't naturally see, meaning that in most photos, the effect will be generally unnoticeable. (More on that <a href="http://photo.net/equipment/filters/">here</a>) Point is, you don't have much to lose by buying one of the dirt-cheap filters, and it will provide a layer of transparent protection from dirt and scratches over your lenses at all times. And since they're flat and thin, they're easier to clean than convex lenses.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE</strong>: I've gotten a couple of emails from photo pros about this, and I think it bears mentioning: Before rubbing your lenses, it's good practice to blast them with a little air. Air pumps (like the one mentioned in the following subsection) and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #cannedair" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/cannedair/">canned air</a> will do the job, as will, in a bind, your lungs. The thinking here is that you should remove any potentially abrasive particles from the lens before rubbing it, so as not to drag them around, causing permanent damage. <em>&mdash;Thanks, Jody and Ned!</em></p>
<p><strong>Sensors</strong>: Point-and-shoot and bridge camera users don't have to worry about this, but DSLR users, who provide a chance for dirty to enter their camera bodies every time they change a lens, may need to clean a sensor one day. It's not as scary as it sounds!</p>
<p>First of all, you'll never have to actually clean a sensor, since DSLR sensors all have some manner of filter, either IR or UV, built in. But still, the surface is delicate, so you'll want to be cautious. Most cameras include some kind of sensor-cleaning function in their software; since most sensor taint is comprised of a stray speck of dust or two, a quick, severe vibration will usually do the trick.</p>
<p>If that doesn't work, and your photos are showing persistent, faded, unmoving spots in every photo, it's time for phase II: air. For this, I defer to <a href="http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/cleaning.htm#ccd">Ken Rockwell</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>After 17,000 shots I finally got a speck on my D70. Remember I also change lenses a lot. The Shop Vac wasn't enough. This time I used an ear syringe (blower bulb) from the drug store which you can get <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00006L7VQ/kenrockwellcom">here</a>. I put the D70 on BULB and pounded the bulb with my fist to create a jarring blast of air. That worked.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Rockwell advises to use an ear syringe; I'd say go with a purpose-design lens blower, since they're still <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Giottos-Rocket-Blaster-Air-Blower/dp/B0013J0502/ref=sr_1_6?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1260041623&sr=1-6">only about $10</a>, and you'll get better results without running the risk of pulverizing your DSLR's guts while trying to get muscle enough airflow through a hard rubber earwax remover.</p>
<p>Beyond built-in sensor cleaning and a few blasts of air, there are <a href="http://www.cleaningdigitalcameras.com/methods.html">plenty more methods</a> for cleaning a sensor, but they're all risky to varying degrees. Unless you're supremely confident (and careful) it may be best to leave this one to the guys are your local camera shop, assuming you still have one. A ruined sensor, in most cases, is a ruined camera, so tread carefully.</p>
<h2>Laptops</h2>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/laptops_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_laptops_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
Screen grime is the most common cleaning problem with laptops, and with the display cleaning section of this guide, we've got that covered. That said, laptops collect filth in a variety of other ways, and they can get <a href="http://lifehacker.com/387598/why-you-should-clean-your-keyboardright-this-minute">real microbial</a>, real fast.</p>
<p>To clean a typical keyboard&mdash;that is, a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chiclet_keyboard">non-chiclet</a> design&mdash;you've got three steps to try. First, use a damp cloth with the aforementioned 40/60 alcohol/water mixture, turn off the laptop, and run it across the keys. Fold it a few times and use the edge to reach between the keys. You can use this same cloth to clean the rest of your laptop as well, excluding the screen, but <em>including</em> the touchpad. If that doesn't do the trick, and you can spot some dust or hair in between keys, it's time for some canned air. You can pick this stuff up at most big box electronics stores or online for $10 or less, and using it is as simple as tilting your laptop sideways, and blowing air in the cracks.</p>
<p>If this doesn't work, it's time to start popping off keys. Since you're disassembling a keyboard that really isn't meant to be taken apart, there's a definite inherent risk here, but the results are practically guaranteed to be good. Here's an <a href="http://www.howtocleanstuff.net/things/electronics/how-to-clean-a-laptop-keyboard/">extremely thorough guide</a>, if you're game for it. To give you an idea of what this entails, there's a point in this tutorial at which all your laptop's keys are swirling in a cereal bowl full of soapy water. It's gruesome.</p>
<p>Another problem area for laptops is fans, air intake vents and heatsinks. These all stand in the pathway between outside air and your processor, which needs said air to keep cool. Any blockage can cause your laptop to run hot, your fans to run high, and consequently, your battery to run low. Disassembly instructions will vary from laptop to laptop, and typically will involve removing your entire keyboard. Once you've done this, though, removing the dust is a matter of blasting with air, scraping with a clean toothbrush or even just wiping with your finger. It's not about total cleanliness here, it's about clearing your computers' windpipe.</p>
<p>Another helpful trick: Those white, last-gen MacBooks have a disgusting tendency to accumulate a beige (then brown, then black) residue where users' palm touch the laptop. This discoloration is more of a stain than a buildup, so you can't fix it with water or alcohol. The fix? Acetone. Seriously, the best way to wipe that crap off is with nail polish remover.</p>
<h2>Desktops</h2>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_dirtypc_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
We've covered how to clean most of the external pieces of a laptop already: any plastic surface gets a moist wipe-down; keyboards get compressed air. That's it! Your desktop is sparking clean! <em>This feels so good!</em> Now slide of your desktop's side panel, and weep. If you've had your desktop for more than a few months, and particularly if you keep it in a carpeted room, it's probably an absolute horror show.</p>
<p>The first thing to do is, you guess it, pull out that microfiber cloth. Wipe down every surface that's <em>finished</em>, which is to say covered in rubber (wires) painted (the inside of the case, and the plastic shell of an internal optical drive, or the decorated exterior of a video card) or inert (the blades of a fan, or the exterior of your heatsink). You can slightly dampen the cloth to help pick up dust from the corners of the case, but your probably don't need to, and it's best to keep this a dry operation, beginning to end. Next, whop out that can-o-air, and <em>have at it.</em> Pay special attention to dust buildup areas, like the heatsinks on your processor and video card, and the fan inside your power supply. This will likely cause some dust to resettle elsewhere, so you may need to repeat your wipedown/blow process once more. Again&mdash;cleaning the inside of your tower is less about maintaining a spotless appearance than it is making sure dirt, dust and hair buildup won't negatively affect your computer's performance, so don't get too anal about it, cosmetically speaking.</p>
<p>[image <a href="http://proserver.pro-cable.com:9500/servicecontracts.htm">via</a>]</p>
<h2>Cellphones and Media Players</h2>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_500x_smartphoooones.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
Cellphones, iPods and other media players are designed to be pocketed, so you can be a little rough on them during the cleaning process. A very slightly damp cloth or paper towel will remove whatever fingerprint or residue your shirt or jeans won't.</p>
<p>As much as these gadgets are intended to live in pockets, they have an irritatingly high number of places for dust to hide itself. Cellphones have keypads, or, increasingly, sets up buttons at the base of a touchscreen or on the sideof the handset, all of which give dirt a place to accumulate. The grilles over cellphones' mics and speakers is another refuge for sludge, and they're totally immune to simple wipedowns. For this, you've got to go one step further. Luckily, you've probably got all the supplies you need in your house already.</p>
<p>Wooden toothpicks and old toothbrushes help reach into cracks and crevices, like those around buttons or running around the perimeter of some display panels. (Samsung and HTC are particularly guilty of leaving spaces in places like that.)</p>
<p>Sometimes, as in the case of the tiny little mic/speaker grilles on some phones, you don't want to push dirt in, but rather pull it out. For those situations, lay a strip of scotch tape over the afflicted area, run your finger over it a few times, and pull it off. If that doesn't work, upgrade to duct tape&mdash;though you'll want to be a bit more gentle with that, since applying too much pressure can leave adhesive on your device, which is a pain to wipe off.</p>
<h2>Your Tips and Tricks</h2>
<p>If you have more cleaning tips and tools to share, please drop some links in the comments-your feedback is hugely important to our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/how-to">Saturday How To</a> guides.</p>
<p><em>And if you have any topics you'd like to see covered here, please <a href="mailto:jherrman@gizmodo.com">let me know</a>. Happy housekeeping, folks!</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5419737/how-to-clean-your-filthy-gadgets]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5419737]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[how to]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canned air]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cleaning]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtv cleaning]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[how to clean your cellphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[how to clean your gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[how to clean your hdtv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[how to clean your ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microfiber towels]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pmps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windex]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5419737&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Netbooks: What You Need to Know About the Next 6 Months]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_asus1201_hero.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />A bunch of great netbook upgrades are on the way&mdash;next-gen Intel processors in January; smooth HD video playback&mdash;but to spare you the brain hemorrhage of keeping track, we've laid it all out. Here's what you need to know.</p>
<p>Netbooks with Intel's next-gen Pineview <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #atomn450" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/atomn450/">Atom N450</a> CPUs arrive in January, and the faster N470 chip may hit in March. There are also more netbooks with Ion graphics coming down the pipe, including the first Ion-based Eee PC. AMD is still kicking around the netbook space, too.</p>
<p>Little netbook keyboards will still make you feel like a basketball player driving a Mini Cooper, but the damn things are just so cute and cheap we can't stay away. (It's a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5042815/why-i-love-netbooks">love</a> / <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5042814/why-i-hate-netbooks">hate</a> relationship). And though HD video is most definitely a reality for netbooks, not all the new models will give you that smooth HD Hulu loving you crave.</p>
<h1>Next-Gen Intel Chips</h1>
<p>As our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5381760/giz-explains-intels-entire-confusing-armada-of-chips">break down</a> of Intel's line-up explains, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5264212/intels-next+gen-atom-puts-cpu-and-gpu-on-one-fun+lovin-chip">"Pineview" Atom processors</a> (like the single-core N450 or the eventual dual-core 510) integrate the CPU, GPU, and memory controller on the same chip. The benefits: Better graphics, and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5344620/msi-confirms-wind-u150-netbook-with-touchscreen-and-intels-next-atom#comments">according</a> to MSI, at least 20 percent better power consumption.</p>
<p>MSI previously gave us the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5344620/msi-confirms-wind-u150-netbook-with-touchscreen-and-intels-next-atom#comments">scoop</a> that <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #pinetrailm" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/pinetrailm/">Pine Trail-M</a> netbooks, using Pineview processors, are slated for a big CES debut. Their upcoming 10-inch convertible touchscreen U150 with Windows 7 will use one. Though Intel still hasn't set an official date (publicly at least), <em>DigiTimes</em> is <a href="http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20091204PD218.html">reporting today</a> that the launch date will be January 10. That means Asus, Acer, Lenovo and MSI, which had planned to launch Atom N450-based netbooks in December, are all now expected to make their new models available from January 11 onwards. As mentioned, we expect to preview them at CES the week before.</p>
<p><em>DigiTimes</em> goes on to say that the follow-up N470 chip (likely 1.83GHz) is expected to land in March. That syncs with <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5391509/rumor-select-intel-atom-cpu-netbooks-to-be-allowed-2gb-ram">apparent leaks</a> of the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #pinetrail" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/pinetrail/">Pine Trail</a>-M roadmap that have floated around. And even though netbook makers already ship machines with more than 1GB of RAM, word is that Intel will actually <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5391509/rumor-select-intel-atom-cpu-netbooks-to-be-allowed-2gb-ram">encourage</a> 2GB of memory for the N470. An upgrade over previous Microsoft/Intel limitations imposed to prevent cannibalization of ultra-portable notebooks.</p>
<p>So will N450-based netbooks handle HD video? According to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/22/eyes-on-with-intels-pine-trail-cpu-gpu-hybrid-and-new-gulftown/"><em>Engadget</em></a>, not without an extra chip like the Broadcom Crystal HD video accelerator, which should add about $30 to the overall price. Apparently, native HD video is still a little down Intel's roadmap path.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_PineTrail.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<h1>So What About Nvidia Ion Netbooks?</h1>
<p>I'll be very interested to see just how close Pine Trail-M netbooks get to Ion performance, and for those with an HD video chip, how well they handle high-definition video, too. The integrated nature of Pine Trail-M could give it an advantage in price. But will the price/performance ratio be enough?</p>
<p>Nvidia also has a little ace in the hole called Flash video acceleration. They recently demonstrated an Ion-powered HP Mini 311 playing stutter-free YouTube HD video on an external monitor. Watch the demo below. The final version of <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5374115/flash-101-full-flash-for-everyone-but-iphone-actually-playable-hd-vids">Flash 10.1</a> will make this an everyday occurrence sometime mid-next year. And you can <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5406488/flash-101-tests-hardware-accelerated-hd-hulu-and-youtube-video-yes-please">try the Beta now</a>.</p>
<p>News also dropped today that Asus' <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5415096/asus-121+inch-netbook-arrives-in-the-us-amd-congo-and-nvidia-ion-versions-coming">12.1-inch Eee PC 1201N</a>, its first Eee PC with Ion graphics, is finally up for <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Seashell-1201N-PU17-BK-12-1-Inch-Netbook-Black/dp/B002ZLOR56">pre-order</a> over at Amazon for $500. It'll be available in January, and join existing Ion-based netbooks like the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5355296/hp-mini-311-an-116+inch-netbook-with-nvidia-ion-le-graphics">HP Mini 311</a> (11.6-inch), <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5341846/nvidia-ion-lenovo-ideapad-s12-pushed-off-until-windows-7-launch">Lenovo IdeaPad S12</a> (12.1-inch), and the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5334738/samsung-n510-ion-netbook-arriving-next-month-for-599">Samsung N510</a> (11.6-inch). But here's the thing: they all use existing Diamondville-class Atom processors.</p>
<p>The good news is that Intel has actually <a href="http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=15190">pointed out</a> that despite having integrated graphics, Pineview processors are compatible with Ion. We've not seen such a netbook with both yet, but CES is just around the corner. Nvidia has also <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/nvidia-ion-2-confirmed-for-2009-launch-0959788/">reportedly</a> said that its <strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #ion2" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ion2/">Ion 2</a></strong> (<em>yep, gen 2</em>) chipset for Atom netbooks will arrive by the end of the year. I'm betting we'll see some Ion 2-based netbooks at CES in January, but my guess is we won't be able to buy one until March or April at the earliest.</p>
<p>A netbook with Ion graphics <em>and</em> an <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #intelpineview" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/intelpineview/">Intel Pineview</a> processor like the N450 sounds pretty sweet, right? Hopefully that's what we have to look forward to.</p>
<p><embed src="http://www.metacafe.com/fplayer/3464576/next_gen_flash_runs_720p_movie_smoothly_on_a_netbook_demo.swf" width="500" height="431" wmode="transparent" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" name="Metacafe_3464576"><br>
<font size="1"><a href="http://www.metacafe.com/watch/3464576/next_gen_flash_runs_720p_movie_smoothly_on_a_netbook_demo/">Next Gen Flash Runs 720p Movie Smoothly on a Netbook, Demo</a> - <a href="http://www.metacafe.com/"></a></font></p>
<h1>Distractions, Distractions</h1>
<p>Real quick: I'm not ignoring AMD. Having left it too late to join the netbook fray, their upcoming <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5356028/amds-next+gen-ultrathin-notebook-platform-promises-1080p-video-and-decent-battery-life">Congo platform</a> will instead <em>mostly</em> complete with <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5345017/intel-next+gen-mobile-platforms-make-windows-7-launch-an-awesome-time-to-buy-a-laptop">Intel's ultra-low voltage processors</a>. We're talking about notebooks with 12 to 13-inch displays. I say <em>mostly</em>, because Asus is <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5415096/asus-121+inch-netbook-arrives-in-the-us-amd-congo-and-nvidia-ion-versions-coming">readying</a> an <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #amdcongo" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/amdcongo/">AMD Congo</a>-based version of that 12.1-inch Eee PC I mentioned above. The unit's ATI Radeon HD3200 graphics will handle 1080p video.</p>
<p>It's going to be one hell of an interesting Consumer Electronics Show. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5360684/via-and-arm-still-trying-to-beat-intel-atom-and-get-inside-netbook-trousers">ARM and VIA</a> are still trying to get inside netbook trousers: Asus has an Android-based "Smartbook" <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5393399/android+based-asus-smartbook-arrives-early-next-year">planned</a> for early next year, and Nvidia is pushing its competing ARM-based <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5277326/mobile-chipsets-wtf-are-atom-tegra-and-snapdragon">Tegra chip</a>. Asus also wants to be <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5416887/acer-wants-to-be-first-with-a-chrome-os-netbook">first with a Chrome OS netbook</a> when Google completes it in the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5310406/giz-explains-what-the-hells-google-chrome-os">second half of 2010</a>. Finally, there are a ton of interesting <a href="http://gizmodo.com/search/ereaders">eReaders</a> and touchscreen <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/Tablets/">tablets</a> on the horizon...and don't even start me on the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/Apple-Tablet/">Apple Tablet</a>.</p>
<p>A number of these devices might replace what you thought would be your next netbook. Either way, whatever we see, you'll hear about them here in almost pornographic detail. Personally, the tech behind my next $500 netbook&mdash;still no small investment&mdash;will almost certainly be something we first see under the bright lights of Vegas. Hopefully they'll be better-looking by then, too.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5383463/netbooks-what-you-need-to-know-about-the-next-6-months]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5383463]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[netbooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[advice]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[amd congo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[arm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Atom N450]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[buying]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[congo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[deals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel atom]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel pineview]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ion 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ion2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[N450]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[n470]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Netbook roadmap]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[netnote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pine trail]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Pine Trail-M]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pineview]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[via]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5383463&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Acer's Aspire 8942G-728G1280TWN: World's First, Longest-Named DX11 Notebook]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/thumb160x_acerdx11.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />The timing and price are up in the air, but Acer's next high-end gaming notebook will be the first using DirectX 11 graphics. It's also going to be insane.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.fudzilla.com/content/view/16684/41/">Fudzilla's</a> reporting that the Aspire 8942G-728G1280TWN is going to be a beast, shipping with a Core i7 processor at 1.6GHz, 8GB of DDR3 RAM, and the all-important <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5366053/ati-radeon-hd-5800-series-is-first-to-support-directx-11-drive-180-inches-of-monitors">ATI Radeon HD5850 graphics card</a>. The other specs are equally over the top&mdash;18.4" 1980x1080 LED display, two 640GB hard drives, 8-cell battery&mdash;but what we're most excited about are graphics like this:</p>
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/HNlglowwBXA&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/HNlglowwBXA&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/hnlglowwbxa_03.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display: none;"/></p>
<p>Expect it on the market in early 2010 for a whole lot of cash. It also weighs over 10 pounds, so make sure to lift with your legs. [<a href="http://www.fudzilla.com/content/view/16684/41/">Fudzilla</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5418105/acers-aspire-8942g+728g1280twn-worlds-first-longest+named-dx11-notebook]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5418105]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[directx11]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[acer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[atiradeon5850]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[directx11notebook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dx11]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 Dec 2009 12:13:53 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Barrett]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5418105&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Acer Wants to be First with a Chrome OS Netbook]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/acer11.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_acer11.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The dual-booting <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5380353/acers-dual+bootin-android-lovin-aspire-one-netbook-almost-here">Aspire One AOD250</a> was the first Android netbook available, and even though it hasn't been a hot seller, Acer wants to be first again with Google's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #chromeos" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/chromeos/">Chrome OS</a> next year.</p>
<p>Acer has been developing a Chrome-based netbook since mid-2009, and its Chairman, JT Wang, has told <em>DigiTimes</em>, he wants it to be the first netbook out there when Chrome OS is released in the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5310406/giz-explains-what-the-hells-google-chrome-os">second half of 2010</a>. [<a href="http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20091202PD212.html">DigiTimes</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5416887/acer-wants-to-be-first-with-a-chrome-os-netbook]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5416887]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[chromeos]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[acer aspire one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chrome os]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Chrome OS Netbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Google Chrome OS]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[netbooks]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 02 Dec 2009 05:58:34 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5416887&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[What's Wrong With a USB 3.0 ExpressCard?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/usb_30_expresscard.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_usb_30_expresscard.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Well, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/pst/usb30/">there really isn't much you can do with USB 3.0 yet</a> for starters. And people who still have laptops with ExpressCard slots don't strike me as the early adopter type. Oh, and then there is the AC adapter.</p>
<p>You see, in order to supply the full 900mA for each port you will need weigh yourself down with the optional AC adapter when out and about. Plus, the whole thing is so damned bulky in general that you are liable to break it sooner or later. At least StarTech is offering a lifetime warranty on it. Of course, with a product like this, StarTech probably won't be around long enough for you to get your $50 worth. [<a href="http://www.startech.com/item/ECUSB3S2-2-Port-ExpressCard-SuperSpeed-USB-3-Card-Adapter.aspx">StarTech</a> via <a href="http://www.everythingusb.com/startech-2-port-usb-3.0-expresscard-18079.html">EverythingUSB</a> via <a href="http://www.ubergizmo.com/15/archives/2009/12/startech_usb_30_expresscard.html">Ubergizmo</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5416428/whats-wrong-with-a-usb-30-expresscard]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5416428]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[expresscard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[peripherals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[startech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[usb 3.0]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:48:06 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5416428&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[HP Envy (15-inch) Review]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/img_77788hp.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_img_77788hp.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>I've been avoiding this review for the better part of a month because, with all the hype the Envy line has gotten (some deserved), I took the Envy 15 out of the box and had one thought: "Cheap."</p>

<p><strong><em>In brief, the Envy is indeed light system with plenty of power, but it never feels premium, nor does the battery life reach adequate levels.</em></strong></p>
<p>Sure, it comes in a nice black box labeled "ENVY" with properly monolithic upscalism. And the computer itself is wrapped in a very, very soft black cloth.</p>
<p>But once removed, I can't distinguish this $1,800 laptop from any random PC on a table at Best Buy. HP's premium laptop, one that's been oooh'd and ahhh'd ad nauseam, could have been a $600 budget system.<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/img_7773hp.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_img_7773hp.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The aluminum magnesium body, which works well enough in the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5370592/hp-envy-13-review-the-macbook-imitated-not-duplicated">13-inch Envy</a>, scales to become a big, synthetic-feeling disappointment. Yes, it's just an inch thick and 5.2lbs (about a pound lighter than peers), but the footprint is so large that, upon opening the packaging, I at first believed HP had sent me a 17-inch system (keep in mind, there's still no room for an internal optical drive).</p>
<p>It was a surprising thought, but at that moment, I realized something: HP is the new Dell. Disregarding their impressive <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5380088/hp-touchsmart-600-review-multitouch-multimedia-mogul">TouchSmart desktops</a>, HP has built the quintessential drab PC laptop and labeled it as "designer." Meanwhile, Dell, with their fashion-forward Adamo line, has left rivals like HP somewhere back in 1995.</p>
<p>Kudos, Dell.</p>
<p>I almost hate to continue describing the system, lest I beat a dead horse. The keyboard is adequate, but every impact reverberates through your finger, making the laptop feel more fragile than it probably is. The trackpad, despite multitouch promises, is dreadful to use. Two-finger scrolling is met with a perpetual half-second (or greater) delay, and clicking the buttonless pad (engineered much like a MacBook Pro pad) screams unfinished prototype.<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/img_7782hp.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_img_7782hp.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>There's simply nothing elegant about the mechanics, even though the 1920x1080 screen is indeed sharp, HDMI and eSATA connections are convenient and the Beats-branded speakers are very balanced and rich...for laptop speakers.</p>
<h1>Performance</h1>
<p>But my hate-fest for the Envy ends there. If you don't mind the aesthetics and feel&mdash;and at this price, you really should&mdash;the system won't disappoint. The 1.6GHz Core i7, coupled with 6GB of RAM, 500GB 7200RPM HDD, and ATI Mobility Radeon 4830 (with 1GB RAM) has gotten performance nods from around the web.</p>
<p>While the system can't best 20fps in the higher tiers of Crysis, it can reach 32fps if you scale the graphics down to 1024x768, according to Notebookcheck. Older and less insane titles <a href="http://www.notebookcheck.net/Review-HP-Envy-15-Notebook.22272.0.html">perform even better</a>.</p>
<p>PCMag's <a href="http://www.pcmag.com/image_popup/0,1871,iid=247344,00.asp">cross-laptop testing</a> found that the Envy isn't the fastest laptop out there, but it keeps pace with other Core i7 systems to the point that such a distinction doesn't really matter. And it'll shame Core2Duo systems, like the aging MacBook Pro.</p>
<p>In real world use, the speed is a pleasure, and a welcome level of overkill for mediacentric web browsing in an era when Atoms are chugging to just get the job done.</p>
<h1>Battery Life</h1>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/img_7809hp.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_img_7809hp.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>But all this performance comes at a heavy, heavy price. You should only expect the Envy to get a measly <strong>1 hour, 20 minutes</strong> of battery life*. Given this system's sizable footprint, it needs to last more than 2 hours under moderate use. Stick a bigger battery in there, HP. Something. Please.</p>
<p>(*<em>nonstop web browsing, Wi-Fi on, screen at 3/4 brightness</em>.)</p>
<h1>Misguided Envy</h1>
<p>Some of you will be fooled by the light body covered in laser-etched paisley&mdash;probably the same among you who can drink instant coffee, listen in 92kbps MP3s and think that SD broadcasts look identical to Blu-ray movies.<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/img_7768hp_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_img_7768hp_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>And that's fine. I can understand why someone might like the Envy, especially given the processing power and modest 5.2lb weight. It's just a shame that anyone would pay so much for it.</p>
<p>HP, Acer, Toshiba, etc, you think I like giving Apple all my money? There's a staggering amount of design talent in the world. Find it. Fund it. And give it a chance to wipe the smug grin off Cupertino. Offer us all something that we should really be envying.<br>
<script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5416208,8,'');
</script><br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3_04.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Light<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3_04.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Fast<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3_04.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Respectable I/O<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizminus_04.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Feels cheap<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizminus_04.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Wretched battery life</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5413076/hp-envy-15+inch-review]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5413076]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[envy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hp]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[HP Envy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 01 Dec 2009 12:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5413076&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Dell Precision M6500 Workstation Has Hardcore Guts]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/m6500-1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_m6500-1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Dell's Precision M6500 refreshes their hardcore workstation with ass-beating guts: It's the first with Intel's Core i7-920XM Quad Core Extreme, Nvidia's new QuadroFX 3800M, and up to 16GB of RAM running at 1600MHz.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5415963,4,'Dell Precision M6500 Workstation');
</script></p>
<p>Besides all of those "firsts" (which will be exclusive only temporarily, undoubtedly, since Intel and Nvidia gots to play with everybody else too) it's got a 17-inch, 1920x1080 LED-backlit display that pops 100 percent of the Adobe color gamut. Plus, it now has user-selectable color profiles, so it's easy to switch 'em around.</p>
<p>The 8.4-pound monster is for "creative professionals" in animation, CAD work, oil & gas stuff, and federal/defense, so you know it's ungodly expensive for that much gear goodness, before you even ask how much.</p>

<blockquote>Processors<br>
Intel® CoreTMi7 Extreme Edition Quad Core, CoreTMi7Quad Core Processors<br>
Operating System<br>
Genuine Windows Vista® Ultimate 32-Bit Genuine Windows Vista® Ultimate 64-Bit Genuine Windows Vista® Business 32-Bit Genuine Windows Vista® Business 64-Bit Genuine Windows 7 Ultimate 32-bit Genuine Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit Genuine Windows 7 Professional 32-bit Genuine Windows 7 Professional 64-bit Genuine Windows® XP Professional available via downgrade rights Genuine Windows® XP Professional x64 Edition available via downgrade rights Red Hat® Linux 5.3 64-Bit<br>
Displays<br>
17" WXGA+ UltraSharp LED Display (1440x900) Resolution 17" WUXGA UltraSharp LED Display (1920x1200) Resolution 17" WUXGA RGB LED Back-Lit Display (1920x1200) Resolution 17" WUXGA RGB LED Edge To Edge Back-Lit Display (1920x1200) Resolution (Covet only)<br>
Memory<br>
Dual Channel DDR3 Memory Available DIMM Slots: Four Memory slots offering up to 16GB4 Memory Bandwidth: 1066MHz, 1333MHz and 1600MHz<br>
Primary Storage<br>
Support for one, two, or 3 storages devices with optional RAID0, RAID1, or RAID5 Configuration 7200RPM Free Fall Sensor Hard Drive up to 500GB 5 7200RPM Encrypted FFS Hard Drive up to 160GB 5 Solid State Hard Drive up to 256GB 5<br>
Optical Drives<br>
DVD-ROM, DVD+/-RW slot load, Blu Ray<br>
Graphics Cards<br>
ATI® FirePro® M7740 Graphics with 1GB2 dedicated memory NVIDIA® Quadro FX 2800M Graphics with 1GB2 dedicated memory NVIDIA® Quadro FX 3800M Graphics with 1GB2 dedicated memory<br>
Connectivity<br>
WLAN<br>
Wireless LAN, Bluetooth® 2.1 and Ultra-Wideband (UWB - selected countries only)<br>
Next Generation Mobile Broadband6, GPS<br>
Wireless: Dell Wireless 1397 802.11g Mini-Card<br>
Dell Wireless 1510 802.11 a/g/n 2x3 Mini-Card Intel Wireless 5300 802.11a/g/n 3x3 Mini-Card WWAN Dell Wireless 5620 HSPA - EVDO Rev A (selected countries only)<br>
Security<br>
Physical Security: Steel-reinforced Cable Lock Slots, Media Module and Hard Drive Locks. User & System Security: Smart Card Reader and optional Contactless Smart Card Reader Fingerprint Reader (optional) FIPS Fingerprint Reader (optional) TPM 1.2 (where available) Wave Embassy Trust Suite Network Security: 802.11 WiFi® Protected Access (WPA), 802.11i (WPA2), Virtual Private Networks (VPN) 802.1x with EAP modes and compatible with CCX 4.0<br>
Multimedia<br>
2 speakers, optional dual array microphones Optional 2MP camera, 3MP camera option coming soon<br>
Expandability<br>
Slots: 8-in-1 card reader; ExpressCard 54; PC Card Docking: Advanced E-Port, E-Port, Legacy Port Replicator, Ergo Flat Panel Stand, Basic Monitor Stand, E-View Notebook Stand Modular Options: E-Family modular media dock: DVD-ROM, DVD+/-RW, Second Hard Drive<br>
Chassis<br>
Aluminum LCD back and base Dell PrecisionTM industrial design Weight & Dimensions: Preliminary weight starting at: 8.42lbs/3.xxkg7 with WXGA+ panel, DVD-ROM, 9-cell battery. Width: 15.4"/393mm Depth: 11.0"/280.5mm Height: 1.35"/34.5mm(F), 1.5"/38.5mm(B) Ports: 1394 Powered 6-pin, USB 2.0 (x4), VGA, Display Port, RJ-45, Audio, eSATA</blockquote>
<p>[<a href="http://www.dell.com/content/products/productdetails.aspx/precision-m6500?c=us&l=en&s=bsd&cs=04">Dell</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5415834/dell-precision-m6500-workstation-has-hardcore-guts]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5415834]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dell precision]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dell precision m6500]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[m6500]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[precision]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 01 Dec 2009 06:04:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5415834&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[BassJump Review]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_img_7743bj.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />On your desk, it's about the size and thickness of a triple-decker Wonder bread sandwich. But the BassJump, an aluminum micro subwoofer to match your <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #macbookpro" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbookpro/">MacBook Pro</a>, made me salivate more than soft, refined carbs covered in mayo ever did.</p>

<h1>The Price</h1>
<p>$80</p>
<h1>The Verdict</h1>
<p>It looks better than it tastes..err...sounds.</p>
<p>I can't deny, my MacBook Pro's tinny speakers have never sounded better than when complemented by the BassJump. Through USB (and some unobtrusive bundled software), the BassJump mixes with your existing laptop speakers to give you a more balanced audio experience.</p>
<p>The tenor range, generally underrepresented by my MBP, is audible with the BassJump. The Beatles, especially, were hugely improved through the richer vocals and guitar riffs provided by the mini sub. Walking to the next room and closing my eyes, I decided my MacBook now sounded like a low-level iPod dock.</p>
<p>Still, the audio isn't especially clear. And despite the BassJump's name, it doesn't really give you bass. It's more like a midrange speaker that's still incapable of bumping R&B.<br>
<script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5415381,3,'');
</script><br>
So while the BassJump certainly looks adorable and legitimately turns MBP music from unpalatable to sort of listenable, its low end capabilities can't match a real dedicated subwoofer. And its overall audio effect, while passable, would be thwarted by most any 2.1 speaker system in its price range. [<a href="http://twelvesouth.com/products/bassjump/">BassJump</a>]</p>
<p><br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3_04.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Charming aesthetic<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3_04.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Quality build<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/giznormal_03.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Improves midrange audio but lacks brilliance<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizminus_04.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Lacks bass<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizminus_04.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Needs to be either cheaper or better</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5415373/bassjump-review]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5415373]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bassjump]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[speakers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[subwoofers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[twelve south]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5415373&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[A Taste of Home via a Laptop and a Movie]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/laptopsoldiers.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_laptopsoldiers.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>This is a great shot of three soldiers relaxing at their base in Afghanistan, watching movies on their laptops. The real question: what movies are they watching? [<a href="http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/11/afghanistan_november_2009.html">Big Picture</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5412917/a-taste-of-home-via-a-laptop-and-a-movie]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5412917]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[image cache]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[afghanistan]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[soldiers]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5412917&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[NES Netbook]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/il_fullxfull.104681189.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_il_fullxfull.104681189.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>If you don't have at least one NES-style accessory incorporated into your daily routine, you've haven't just failed us, you've let down everyone who ever believed in you. Score this <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #nesnetbookcase" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/nesnetbookcase/">NES netbook case</a> for $50. [<a href="http://www.etsy.com/view_listing.php?listing_id=35155971">Etsy</a> via <a href="http://www.liliputing.com/2009/11/handmade-nes-controller-case-for-netbooks-is-just-plain-awesome.html">Lilliputing</a> via <a href="http://www.ubergizmo.com/15/archives/2009/11/nes_controller_pouch_for_netbooks.html">UberGizmo</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5412821/nes-netbook]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5412821]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[netbooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cases]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nes netbook case]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nintendo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5412821&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Dell's Studio 17 Touch (Their First Multitouch Laptop) Starts at $800]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_dell17.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />While Dell has made tablets for years, their quietly announced Studio 17 Touch is their first multitouch laptop, and it's one big machine.</p>

<p>With a 17.3-inch (1600x900) display, the 7lb system starts with a 2.1GHz Dual Core T4300, DVD burner, 320GB HDD, 4GB RAM, 512MB Radeon 4570 and a footprint that can support a slew of ports&mdash;two USBs, one USB/eSATA, HDMI, Display Port, VGA, and Firewire.</p>
<p>But you can scale the power all the way up to an i7.</p>
<p>The multitouch display (we're looking for confirmation on whether or not it's capacitive tech) supports the pre-installed Windows 7 along with Dell's own touch software.</p>
<p>The Studio 17 Touch is on sale now to ship this December. [<a href="http://www.dell.com/us/en/home/notebooks/studio-1747/pd.aspx?refid=studio-1747&s=dhs&cs=19&~ck=mn%20&ST=dell%20studio%2017%20touch%20%28Exact%29&dgc=ST&cid=50451&lid=1307842&acd=52183,8,0,89020253,753959675,1258661351,,19901551">Dell</a> via <a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/09/11/19/dell.studio.17.touch.appears/">Electronista</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5408625/dells-studio-17-touch-their-first-multitouch-laptop-starts-at-800]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5408625]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dell studio 17]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[i7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[studio]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[touchscreen]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:19:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5408625&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Super Cheap, Super Small Lenovo X100E Leaks]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_4115870252_29b7edb730.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Lenovo's new X100E ultrathin laptop just leaked out, and it's looking pretty sweet: 11.6-inch screen, redesigned chiclet keyboard, a supposed starting price of less than $500, and colors. Colors, you guys. On a ThinkPad.</p>
<p>The X100E looks to be a substantial physical redesign from Lenovo, who typically falls so thoroughly on the function side of the form vs. function debate that they may not even be aware there <em>is</em> another side. The new chiclet (or "island") keyboard looks great, much less busy than previous ThinkPad layouts, and the overall design seems to have calmed down significantly. Hell, it'll even be available in colors. Colors! From Lenovo! (Looks like red, white and black are the extent of the palette, but still).</p>
<p>It should be packing a low-power AMD Athon "Neo" processor, 4GB of memory, up to 500GB of hard drive storage, and boast a 5.1-hour battery life while weighing less than 3 pounds. But the most enticing part has to be the price: Previous ThinkPads have been extremely pricey, often even more than equivalent Macs, yet the X100E is rumored to come in at $500 to start. No info quite yet on a release date, but we'll keep you updated. [<a href="http://www.ubergizmo.com/15/archives/2009/11/lenovo_thinkpad_x100e_details_light_sexy_and_cheap.html">Ubergizmo</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5407955/super-cheap-super-small-lenovo-x100e-leaks]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5407955]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[leaks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[athlon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lenovo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lenovo x100e]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[neo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[thinkpad]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ultralight]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:45:04 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5407955&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Asus G51J 3D Laptop Is '3D Done Right']]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_img_8190.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />We reviewed Acer's 3D laptop not so long ago. We found it fun, but reeking of gen 1 quirks. Now <a href="http://blog.laptopmag.com/hands-and-eyes-on-with-the-asus-g51j-3d-notebook">Laptop Mag</a> has played with a new 3D laptop by Asus and found it to be pretty fantastic.</p>

<p>The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #asusg51j" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/asusg51j/">Asus G51J</a> 3D is the first laptop to feature NVIDIA's new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #3dvision" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/3dvision/">3D vision</a> technology, and it takes advantage of a high performance, 15.6-inch 120Hz LCD that, when coupled with shutter glasses (yup, you still need glasses) garnered these praises from Laptop:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>...unlike the TriDef technology that powers Acer's 3D laptop, titles optimized for 3D vision give you a great sense of depth without negatively affecting gameplay. On first person shooters, for example, we found it difficult to aim when using the Acer 5738DG. On the Asus G51J 3D, you don't make any compromises in terms of control or accuracy.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>For the 3D tech, you'll take a resolution hit (there's no 3D 1080P display option) and pay a $200 premium, making the full gaming $1,700.</p>
<p>Keep in mind that Acer's system, while utilizing only rudimentary polarized glasses 3D, costs under $800. [<a href="http://blog.laptopmag.com/hands-and-eyes-on-with-the-asus-g51j-3d-notebook">Laptop Mag</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5407435/the-asus-g51j-3d-laptop-is-3d-done-right]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5407435]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3d]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3d vision]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[asus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[asus g51j]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:42:53 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5407435&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Flash 10.1 Is Good News for Hackintosh Netbooks]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/mini-9-osx.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_mini-9-osx.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>High-Def Flash video is a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5389166/how-to-hackintosh-a-dell-mini-10v-into-the-ultimate-snow-leopard-netbook?skyline=true&s=x">stretch</a> on some hacktintosh netbooks, but Flash 10.1 brings it into the realm of possibility. I just installed it on my MSI Wind running Leopard, and damn: HD YouTube and Vimeo videos were <em>almost</em> watchable.</p>
<p>I say almost, because there was still some noticeable frame dropping. But still, I could actually watch HD flash video (windowed and full-screen) without it stuttering like a slideshow. One issue with YouTube: the CPU pretty much went into overload once the video was playing, and on the third viewing I had to Force Quit Firefox to wrestle back control.</p>
<p>But this is good news for hackintoshes, and netbooks in general. This <strong>is not</strong> hardware GPU acceleration (limited to Windows right now), it just seems to be better CPU usage. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5406488/flash-101-tests-hardware-accelerated-hd-hulu-and-youtube-video-yes-please">Earlier today</a> I also posted about <em>AnandTech's</em> Flash 10.1 CPU-utilization tests: they still noticed improvements under <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #osx" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/osx/">OS X</a>, too. If you've given <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5406488/flash-101-tests-hardware-accelerated-hd-hulu-and-youtube-video-yes-please">Flash 10.1</a> a try, post a comment here so other readers can see what sort of netbook you have, and if it's worth trying.</p>
<p>For the record, my MSI Wind U100 has 2GB of memory, a 1.6GHz Atom N270 processor, and integrated Intel 945 graphics. (Pic above is of the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/search/dell%20mini%209%20hackintosh">Dell Mini 9</a>).</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5406670/flash-101-is-good-news-for-hackintosh-netbooks]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5406670]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[hackintosh]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[adobe flash]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[adobe flash 10.1]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flash 10.1 hacktintosh]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[leopard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[netbooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:10:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5406670&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Laptop Reliability Study: Asus and Toshiba Come Out on Top]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/squaretrade3.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_squaretrade3.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>New data from SquareTrade (one of the bigger warranty providers) says Asus and Toshiba have the least hardware malfunctions over 3 years, while one-in-four HP laptops are projected to experience problems. Oh, and crappy netbooks are worst of all.</p>
<p>They say that sub-$400 netbooks are 20 percent more likely to fail in the first year. But no real surprises there.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/squaretrade2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_squaretrade2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>SquareTrade says it randomly selected over 30,000 laptops and netbooks covered by its warranty plans for the study. Brands with a minimum of 1000 laptops included Acer, Apple, Asus, Dell, Gateway, HP, Lenovo, Sony, and Toshiba. Accidental damage and software issues handled by the retailer were not included in the numbers.</p>
<p>Summary below, while the full report can be found at: [<a href="http://www.squaretrade.com/pages/laptop-reliability-1109/">SquareTrade</a>]</p>
<blockquote>
<p>• Over 31 percent of laptops will fail in the first three years of ownership.<br>
• Of these failures, two-thirds came from hardware malfunctions (20.4 percent) and one-third (10.6 percent) was reported as accidental damage.<br>
• Asus and Toshiba were the most reliable manufacturers, with fewer than 16 percent having a hardware malfunction over three years.<br>
• Netbooks are projected to have a 20 percent higher failure rate from hardware malfunctions than more expensive laptop computers.<br>
• Manufacturers proved to be a more reliable determinant of reliability than the type of laptop and should be a greater factor in making a purchase decision.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5406415/laptop-reliability-study-asus-and-toshiba-come-out-on-top]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5406415]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[charts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptop reliability study squaretrade]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[netbooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[reliability]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[squaretrade]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[study]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Nov 2009 06:16:16 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5406415&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Intel's 32nm Arrandale Core i5 and i7 Chips for Anorexic Notebooks]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_intelshot.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />We know, the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #corei7" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/corei7/">Core i7</a>-i5-i3 stuff <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5381760/giz-explains-intels-entire-confusing-armada-of-chips?skyline=true&s=x">is confusing</a>. Not to make it worse, but <a href="http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20091112PD202.html">Digitimes outs</a> some of Intel's notebooks plans for next year: a triplet of processors of Core i7 and i5 processors, codenamed Arrandale, for skinny laptops.</p>
<p>The key feature about Arrandale, versus current <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #corei5" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/corei5/">Core i5</a>/i7 processors, is that it's manufactured using a 32nm process, meaning it'll be less power hungry. Remember the jump to the Penryn Core 2 chips a couple years ago? Same speeds, better efficiency? Like that. The three coming out in the first half of 2010 are the Core i7-640UM (1.2GHz), Core i7-620UM (1.06GHz) and Core i5-520UM, all for "ultra thin" laptops.</p>
<p>We'll also see some 32nm chips for the desktop, codenamed Clarksdale, announced in January. Mmm, chips. [<a href="http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20091112PD202.html">Digitimes</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5403468/intels-32nm-arrandale-core-i5-and-i7-chips-for-anorexic-notebooks]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5403468]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[unconfirmed]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[arrandale]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core i5]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Core i7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cpus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:04:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5403468&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Windows 7 Netbook Battery Life Sucks Worse Than Windows XP]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/dell7_01_01_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_dell7_01_01_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Yeah, netbooks feel so much <em>nicer</em> running <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windows7" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows7/">Windows 7</a> than <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windowsxp" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windowsxp/">Windows XP</a>, but you're paying a secret price: Your battery. On average, Windows 7 seem to suck all the life out of it <a href="http://blog.laptopmag.com/stick-with-xp-windows-7-battery-life-worse-on-netbooks">47 minutes faster</a> than Windows XP.</p>
<p>It varies from netbook to netbook&mdash;Toshiba's NB205 hardier withstood Windows 7's power greediness better than HP's Mini 311, but you definitely lose juice quicker. It's somewhat expected, though, with features like the fancier Aero user interface to name one probable cause. Personally, I'll take Windows 7 and the dead battery. [<a href="http://blog.laptopmag.com/stick-with-xp-windows-7-battery-life-worse-on-netbooks">Laptop</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5402670/windows-7-netbook-battery-life-sucks-worse-than-windows-xp]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5402670]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[batteries]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[battery]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[netbooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows xp]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:33:08 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5402670&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Nokia Booklet 3G Review]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/img_7556.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_img_7556.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #nokiabooklet3g" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/nokiabooklet3g/">Nokia Booklet 3G</a> is one of the nicest netbooks you can buy, with a build that aspires to be a 10-inch MacBook Pro. But it's still just a netbook, and therein lies the problem.</p>

<h1>Price</h1>
<p>$300 with 2-year AT&T contract, $600 à la carte</p>
<h1>Verdict</h1>
<p>Nokia has built a great netbook, but they've done nothing to redefine the genre. Their 10-inch <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #booklet3g" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/booklet3g/">Booklet 3G</a> has your typical 1.6GHz Atom, 120GB hard drive and 1GB of RAM. Running Windows 7, that means the performance is just passable. I'd be <em>this close</em> to pounding my head against the wall when a program would begin installing or a video would load.</p>
<p>That's typical.</p>
<p>What's ever so less typical is the sharp, sub-3lb unibody-esque construction (complete with sweet MacBook-like under-hatch battery and a hinge that bends nearly 180-degrees), HDMI output (not that you can really playback HD videos smoothly on an Atom) and, of course, solid integrated 3G and integrated GPS (though Nokia's bundled Ovi software apparently requires a phone or PC to activate, and after 30 minutes of fiddling, I honestly gave up on mapping.)<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/img_7543.jpg" width="800" height="533">The battery life is impressive, too. In nonstop 3G browsing and app running with the screen at 80% brightness, the machine's svelte 16-cell battery ran for a bit over 6 hours and 30 minutes. That was a <em>strenuous</em> test, and dimming the screen and/or browsing through Wi-Fi should truly be enough to get you through the workday sans-recharge. (For instance, CrunchGear's John Biggs reported a pretty remarkable <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/11/10/review-nokia-booklet-3g/">10 hours</a> of movie playback.)</p>
<p>But alas, even for a nice netbook, the Booklet's price is a bit too opulent for what you're really getting: an ever-so gussied up version of the same machine you could buy from Acer, Asus, HP, etc, for half the price (before subsidies). Meanwhile, there are <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5387914/win-7-laptop-battlemodo-thin-and-lights-for-under-800">plenty of ULV systems in the $700 range</a> with bigger screens, better performance and portable-minded design (of course, they'll mostly require 3G dongles).</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5402305,4,'');
</script></p>
<p>Give me some rhinestones and a bit more power, and we'll talk. Or just hand me back my iPhone.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3_03.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Quality build<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3_03.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Long battery life<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/giznormal_03.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Plastic monitor back makes whole thing feel cheaper<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizminus_03.jpg" width="20" height="20"> It's still a $600 netbook</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5401607/nokia-booklet-3g-review]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5401607]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[booklet 3g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[netbooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nokia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nokia booklet 3g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5401607&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Connect-a-Desk Seamlessly Blends Man With Machine]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/5UzVNeQtAvo&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/5UzVNeQtAvo&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object>It might be quite a while before science and medicine are able to make you better, stronger and faster with bionics, but there is an easy and inexpensive way to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/thiscyborglife/">blend man and machine</a> that's available today&mdash;<a href="http://gizmodo.com/345827/connect-a-desk-for-stand-up-computing">Connect-a-Desk</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks to space age harness technology and alien plastics gleaned from UFO crashes, you can now seamlessly integrate a laptop into your body. It goes where you go&mdash;like an extension of your flesh and bone. Amazingly, this upgrade only costs $40&mdash;but if you act now our trained team of scientists and surgeons will <a href="http://gizmodo.com/254266/low+tech-solutions-hands+free-cell-phone-kit">implant a cellphone directly on your skull</a> for no extra charge. [<a href="http://connect-a-desk.com/">Connect a Desk</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5400750/connect+a+desk-seamlessly-blends-man-with-machine]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5400750]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[this cyborg life]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[connect a desk]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cyborg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[desk]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[humans]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[robots]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5400750&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Haglöfs Laptop Drybags Have a Design Almost as Awesome as Their Name]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_drybags.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Maybe I'm just a sucker for umlauts and radioactive thresholds of orange, but these 15 and 17-inch <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #haglfslaptopdrybags" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/haglfslaptopdrybags/">Haglöfs Laptop Drybags</a> have me sold on both their padding and Ziplock-style watertight compartment. They run about $30. [<a href="http://www.haglofs.se/prd/visaprod.asp?id=1808&CatNr=235&CatNr2=0&xCatNr=0&nid=1325&lang=de&Q=2&Str=drybag&show=&ak=1422&iad=0&iac=0&nid2=1422">Haglöfs</a> via <a href="http://www.stilsucht.de/10/2009/haglofs-laptop-drybag/">Stilsucht</a> via <a href="http://www.ohgizmo.com/2009/11/09/haglofs-laptop-drybags-for-serious-bloggers/">OhGizmo!</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5400309/haglofs-laptop-drybags-have-a-design-almost-as-awesome-as-their-name]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5400309]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Haglöfs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Haglöfs Laptop Drybags]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Laptop Drybags]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5400309&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Mavizen's 130 mph Electric Motorcycle Has Built-In Web Server, WiFi and Linux]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/mavizen_motorcycle.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_mavizen_motorcycle.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Mavizen's TTX02 electric motorcycle is being dubbed as "a laptop on wheels". A really, really fast laptop on wheels.</p>
<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/p4vthf_QdYM&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/p4vthf_QdYM&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object></p>
<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_1"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/jkukw1uAS08&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/jkukw1uAS08&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object></p>
<p>Besides it's impressive top speed, the interesting thing about the bike is that it features a dedicated IP address, on-board <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #webserver" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/webserver/">web server</a>, WiFi and Linux.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Mavizen is calling the TTX02 a "laptop on wheels", signaling their approach to electric motorcycles via a consumer electronics perspective. According to Azhar Hussain, TTXGP founder and entrepreneur, the consumer electronics perspective comes from the notion that "we are living in a click culture and connectivity is the key, across the board. Our approach was to find how we could make a laptop go racing. We think electric vehicles have more in common with consumer electronics than traditional automotive."</p>
</blockquote>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5398068,3 'Mavizen TTX02');
</script></p>
<p>Of course, the "consumer" part of all this doesn't necessarily mean you or I will be checking our email flying down the road on this thing. The bike is going to be produced in a limited 50-unit run and aimed towards the racing scene&mdash;a development platform of sorts that can be used by professionals to customize the bike to fit their needs. Although, I suppose it is not impossible for the average Joe to get their hands on one&mdash;if you are willing to pony up the $41,300 asking price that is. [<a href="http://www.asphaltandrubber.com/bikes/2010-mavizen-ttx02-sema-unveiled/">Asphalt and Rubber</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5398054/mavizens-130-mph-electric-motorcycle-has-built+in-web-server-wifi-and-linux]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5398054]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[motorcycles]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mavizen]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mavizen ttx02]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ttx02]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[web server]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wifi]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398054&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Dell Adamo XPS Hands On: Insanely Thin (and Just Insane)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/adamoxpshands__123.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_adamoxpshands__123.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #adamoxps" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/adamoxps/">Adamo XPS</a> is a daring slice of design and engineering. Quite frankly, it's batshit insane.</p>
<p>I mean that in the best possible way.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/adamoxpshands__119.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_adamoxpshands__119.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>It really is impossibly thin. I felt like I was holding a single sheet of aluminum that was contoured into the curved shape of a laptop. I set it down, gingerly, because I didn't want to break it, since I didn't know at the moment that it was $1800. My finger <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5387613/video-dell-adamo-xps-can-only-be-opened-by-rubbing-it">slid across the latch</a> to disengage the heat-sensitive capacitive latch.</p>
<p>There was no visible sign my stroke was the lucky one, so I waited a second before prying the top half upward. It wasn't entirely seamless&mdash;I had to hold the bottom half down as with a single finger as I pulled the display open and the keyboard slid forward, like a notebook out of a Pierce Brosnan-era James Bond era. The metal keys were cold. Which I kind of liked, actually.</p>
<p>When it's in full bloom, the entire computer is propped up, resting on the front edge of the keyboard and outer edge of the display, so from the side it looks like an L that's had its foot broken. It's one reason I think the Adamo XPS is insane&mdash;there's just nothing else like it, and that's what I love about it, all practical issues aside. Like one I suspected initially, and confirmed when I had to balance it near the window&mdash;it's going to be tricky to actually use in your lap. Do you let the overhang reset against your kneecaps? Or do you perform a balancing act, resting the slim edges on your legs, hoping you don't lean one way or the other? The design's not simply to show off your $1800 Ginsu blade by Dell, either&mdash;it's for heat dissipation.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/adamoxpshands__107.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_adamoxpshands__107.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The 1366x768 LED display is sunken, so there's a rim around it. That's because the bottom folds up into the top, with a puffy lip, holding the webcam and mic, hanging over it. I worry slightly about the camera lens getting scratched, since it's exposed whenever the Adamo XPS is closed.</p>
<p>I didn't get to actually <em>use</em> the computer much, but it's got essentially the same ultralight guts <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5205524/dell-adamo-full-review-macho-outside-sissy-inside">as the original Adamo</a>, with the important distinction that it's running Windows 7, so it should be a smoother ride in theory. The 20Whr battery, however, is only <em>rated</em> to deliver 2 hours and 36 minutes of battery life, so it's going to be a very short ride. There's a 40Whr battery available that doubles the life, but it murders the whole point of the Adamo XPS. It has 2 USB ports, DisplayPort video out (with an optional HDMI dongle) and a dongle for ethernet.</p>
<p>Really, it's more a work of art and engineering than a functional computer, but honestly? That's just fine, though, because it's a pretty fantastic one.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5397392,12,'');
</script><br>
<object width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7444139&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7444139&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/7444139.jpg"></a></p>

<blockquote>DELL ANNOUNCES ADAMO XPS, A DAZZLING GIFT IDEA FOR STYLE-MINDED THIS HOLIDAY SEASON<br>
· World's Thinnest Laptop is 0.4-inch thin
<p>· Adamo XPS Reinforces Dell's Commitment to Craftsmanship and Design</p>
<p>· Advanced Head-Turning Design Offers Full Feature Set for On-The-Go Computing</p>
<p>ROUND ROCK, Texas, Nov 5, 2009 … Last spring Dell set the computing industry abuzz with the introduction of its Adamo brand, and along with it the world's thinnest laptop PC. Today, the world meets a new champion of thin: The Dell™ Adamo XPS™, measuring 9.99mm or just four-tenths of an inch. Both laptops set new standards for craftsmanship, design and engineering excellence.</p>
<p>Adamo XPS is a stunning laptop whose design provides a unique experience. With the swipe of a finger, the keyboard appears from under the display as the system is open. The feature set challenged engineers to build the latest technology into a compact space, including:</p>
<p>· 4GB* DDR3 800 memory;</p>
<p>· Intel Core 2 Duo (1.4Ghz) ultra-low voltage processor;</p>
<p>· Thin 128GB SSD for faster, cooler, quieter and more durable storage than traditional hard drives;</p>
<p>· A 13.4-inch high-definition display.</p>
<p>The attention to detail is apparent in the black, jewelry box-like packaging that is as striking as the laptop itself. A tug on a cloth loop reveals the Adamo XPS and assorted accessories that accompany the system. The Adamo XPS was recently recognized as the hottest Windows 7 product by leading technology analyst Rob Enderle with Digital Trends.</p>
<p>Adamo, derived from the Latin word meaning "to fall in love," is a flagship in a line of products created to disrupt the personal computing space with the combination of new design aesthetics, personalization choices and sought-after technologies.</p>
<p>The Adamo by Dell brand was launched last March with the first Adamo laptop, which combined high-performance technologies in a finely-machined aluminum case only .65-inch thick.</p>
<p>The pencil-thin Adamo XPS weighs just over 3 pounds** and measures 13.39 x 10.71 inches. Dell expects to begin taking orders and shipping the Adamo XPS with Microsoft® Windows® 7 pre-installed in time for the holidays. The Adamo XPS is priced starting at $1799. More information is available at www.adamobydell.com</p>
</blockquote>
<p>[<a href="www.adamobydell.com">Dell</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5397393/dell-adamo-xps-hands-on-insanely-thin-and-just-insane]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5397393]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[dell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[adamo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Adamo XPS]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Dell Adamo XPS]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xps]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5397393&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Monster Monster Laptop Stand Will &#*@ing Chomp Your Face (Or Just Sit There)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_monstermonster.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Who would have thought that six acrylic limbs could transform a MacBook into something so evil...so powerful? Luckily the designer hasn't designed the legs as articulating and retractable, or we'd really be screwed. $40. [<a href="http://www.monstermonstermonster.com/">MonsterMonster</a> via <a href="http://www.unplggd.com/unplggd/laptop-accessories/monster-monster-may-be-the-scariest-laptop-stand-100428">Unplggd</a> via <a href="http://www.core77.com/blog/object_culture/this_just_inbox_arachnoid_laptop_stand_15097.asp">Core77</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5397002/monster-monster-laptop-stand-will-ing-chomp-your-face-or-just-sit-there]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5397002]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[accessories]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptop stands]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[monster monster]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[monstermonster]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[peripherals]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5397002&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Nvidia Confirms Intel's Senseless USB 3.0 Delay Until 2011]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_340x_usb3_04_full.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Bad news: Nvidia has confirmed Intel's stance on <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #usb30" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/usb30/">USB 3.0</a>&mdash;no Intel chipsets will support the new standard until 2011. Short of Intel stating something different, USB 3.0 probably won't hit mass consumption until then. Is there <em>any</em> hope?</p>

<p>We've already seen an Intel motherboard hit the market <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5392576/this-is-the-first-usb-30-motherboard">with USB 3.0</a>, but it's technically manufactured by Asus, and it's running a third-party USB (3.0) controller. So we'll see USB 3.0, especially in the custom PC market, before 2011 (because we already are). But like we said, in terms of the standard arriving in mass anytime soon, things are looking grim. [<a href="http://www.tgdaily.com/hardware-features/44493-nvidia-our-nforce-chipsets-are-qbetterq-than-intels">TGDaily</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/nvidia-confirms-intel-chipsets-wont-support-usb-3-0-until-2011/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396965/nvidia-confirms-intels-senseless-usb-30-delay-until-2011]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396965]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[peripherals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[usb 3.0]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:19:55 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396965&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Litl Webbook Banks On Cute, Overlooks Practical]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/litl_lifestyle_07.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_litl_lifestyle_07.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>How did Asus, Acer and all the other netbook manufacturers miss such an obvious ploy? The word "<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #litlwebbook" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/litlwebbook/">Litl Webbook</a>" must be the most cutely named gadget since the "Chumby." And it's also an interesting product in its own right.</p>

<p>But I did say "interesting," not "buyable."</p>
<p>The Litl Webbook is a 12-inch netbook that can flip from laptop to easel, making it ever so more aesthetically pleasing while watching movies or displaying photos. Extra design touches like a nob and optional remote smooth the transition from laptop to artsy laptop, but the Litl Webbook is not a tablet&mdash;it lacks those last few degrees of flexibility, plus there's no touchscreen.</p>
<p>As for the hardware specs, it's a typical 1.6GHz Atom, 1GB RAM and...wait...just 2GB of flash storage? Yes. The Webbook wants to be a cloud computing machine that runs widgets (on top of Linux, we assume) instead of a full OS. So you're supposed to store all of your precious files somewhere else and rely on the service's automatic software updates.</p>
<p>The idea is alright, but not for $700. At that price, you're in full-out capacitive multitouch laptop territory.</p>
<p>And you know what? Double-checking my spelling on "Litl Webbook" has gotten super annoying by this point, too. Drop the price by $300, hook a guy up with some extra vowels, and then we'll talk. <script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5396810,12,'Litl Webbook Gallery');
</script><br>
[<a href="http://www.litl.com/easy-to-use/intuitive-interface.htm">Litl</a> via <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/litl-webbook-gets-official-cloud-netbook-for-699-0462724/">Slashgear</a> via <a href="http://www.netbookchoice.com/2009/11/04/litl-webbook-unveiled-available-to-order-now/">Netbook Choice</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396815/litl-webbook-banks-on-cute-overlooks-practical]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396815]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[netbooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[litl]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[litl webbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[webbook]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:34:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396815&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Disposable Laptop Works Better as a Metaphor Than as an Actual Product]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_displap.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />There's no doubt about it: Today, the concept of a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #disposablelaptop" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/disposablelaptop/">disposable laptop</a> is totally ridiculous. But you know what else was ridiculous? Disposable cameras, <a href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/04/05/the-first-disposable-camera/">60 years ago</a>. And this thing just <em>looks</em> fantastic, so I'll let it slide. Also: symbolism!</p>

<p>There are a lot of holes you could poke in this concept, like the flippant use of meaningless terms like "bio chip" and buzzwords like "convergence" and "high technology," and the fact that by the time vital components like the battery and display are cheap enough to throw away&mdash;that'll be 2020, according to the designer's completely arbitrary calculations&mdash;laptops, or whatever we're using, probably won't be shaped like this.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5396376,3,'');
</script></p>
<p>But if you think about it, we're heading toward this kind of design anyway: flimsy, dirt-cheap netbooks seem to have a short intended lifespan, and hell, even my polycarbonate MacBook felt like it was beginning to disintegrate after about two years of heavy use. It may not have been cardboard, but in its own way, it sure <em>felt</em> disposable. [<a href="http://www.yankodesign.com/2009/11/03/disposable-paper-laptops/">Yanko</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396377/disposable-laptop-works-better-as-a-metaphor-than-as-an-actual-product]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396377]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[concepts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[disposable laptop]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[disposable laptop concept]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:35:03 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396377&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Rest In Peace, Ridiculous Dual-Screen OLPC XO-2]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/xolaptop20.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_xolaptop20.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>It has always been an unspoken fear&mdash;or assumption, even&mdash;that the dual-touchscreen followup to the original OLPC, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/392060/olpc-xo-laptop-20-has-dual-touchscreens-looks-amazing-and-future+y">XO-2</a>, would never come to pass. But we let the dream live! Until today: the XO-2 is <a href="http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/11/02/negroponte-outlines-the-future-of-olpc-hints-at-paperlike-design-for-third-generation-laptop/2/">officially scrapped</a>.</p>

<p>Almost worse than the news that we'll never see this folding, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/343446/olpc-is-fd-defected-xo-laptop-designer-plans-new-75-laptop">hybrid LCD/E ink</a> budget computer in the flesh is how the news was delivered: By Nick Negroponte, in a low-profile interview with <a href="http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/11/02/negroponte-outlines-the-future-of-olpc-hints-at-paperlike-design-for-third-generation-laptop/2/">Xconomy</a>, as if it everyone already knew:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>2.0 (the XO-2) has been replaced by two things: 1) model 1.75, same industrial design but an ARM inside, 2) model 3.0, totally different industrial design, more like a sheet of paper.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Right, so all those mockups, all the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5125892/negroponte-halves-olpc-staff-phases-out-sugar-linux-to-focus-on-dual+screen-xo">talk</a> of focusing on the next generation product, all that <em>hope</em>, dashed, and replaced an incremental upgrade&mdash;to a faster ARM processor, from the current model's AMD Geode&mdash;and vague promises of a <em>3.0</em> product:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>3.0 is a single sheet, completely plastic and unbreakable, waterproof, 1/4" thick, full color, reflective and transmissive, no bezel, no holes. 1W. $75, ready in 2012</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This from the guy who just vaporized a year and a half of buildup for his last project with a passing comment, so take it with a grain of salt.</p>
<p>Whatever happens next&mdash;and mind you, things <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5125892/negroponte-halves-olpc-staff-phases-out-sugar-linux-to-focus-on-dual+screen-xo">aren't looking too great</a> for the project as a whole&mdash;this is a sad situation. As ambitious as the project was, and as little chance as it ever had to come to pass, it was a rare phenomenon: it was genuinely cool, tied to a reputable organization and conceived with a good cause in mind. And now it's dead. [<a href="http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/11/02/negroponte-outlines-the-future-of-olpc-hints-at-paperlike-design-for-third-generation-laptop/2/">Xconomy</a> via <a href="http://www.olpcnews.com/people/negroponte/negroponte_xo-175_goes_arm_xo-2_is_cancelled.html">OLPC News</a> via <a href="http://www.liliputing.com/2009/11/olpc-scraps-xo-2-dual-screen-laptop-moves-toward-arm-based-xo-1-75.html">Liliputing</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396273/rest-in-peace-ridiculous-dual+screen-olpc-xo+2]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396273]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[obits]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[concepts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nicholas negroponte]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[olpc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[OLPC XO-2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[one laptop per child]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[oplc 3.0]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sad]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xo-2]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:18:28 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396273&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Acer's Big Ass Aspire 8940: 18.4-inch Screen, Core i7 Processor]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_Acer8940.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />With an oversized LED-backlit 18.4-inch display, Core i7 720QM processor, and Windows 7, the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #aspire8940" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/aspire8940/">Aspire 8940</a> is set to face off with HP's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5381645/massive-core-i7-hp-pavilion-dv8-ready-to-take-up-tons-of-retail-shelf-space">Pavilion dv8</a> and Toshiba's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5365990/toshiba-qosmio-x500-has-ferrari-looks-core-i7-speed">Qosmio X500</a> in the uber desktop replacement stakes. And it'll probably cost less.</p>
<p>$1350 also gets you 4GB of 1066-DDR3 memory, 500GB storage, 1GB Nvidia GeForce GTS 250M graphics, and a Blu-ray drive. Unfortunately, there's no integrated TV tuner, but you do get nice touches like Acer's touch-capacitive media control interface, and surround sound via 5 built-in speakers.</p>
<p>The series will be user configurable, and is expected to arrive "this holiday season".</p>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>Acer Aspire AS8940G-6865</strong><br>
• Intel® Core(TM) i7 Processor 720QM (1.60GHz, 6MB L3 Cache, 1333MHz FSB)<br>
• 18.4" Full HD Widescreen CineCrystal(TM) LED-backlit Display<br>
(1920x1080 Resolution, 16:9 Aspect Ratio)<br>
• 4GB DDR3 Dual-Channel 1066MHz Memory<br>
• NVIDIA® GeForce® GTS 250M with 1GB dedicated DDR3 VRAM<br>
• 500GB 5400RPM SATA Hard Drive (1)<br>
• 4X Blu-ray Disc(TM)/DVD SuperMulti Double-Layer Drive<br>
• Multi-in-1 Digital Media Card Reader<br>
• Intel® Wireless WiFi Link 5100 802.11a//bg/Draft-N Wi-Fi CERTIFIED®<br>
• Acer Crystal Eye(TM) Integrated Webcam<br>
• Touch-Capacitive Media Control Interface<br>
• 5 USB 2.0 Ports, 1 HDMI Port, 1 eSATA Port<br>
• 8-cell Li-Ion Battery (4800mAh)<br>
• Dolby Home Theater® Audio Enhancement<br>
• Acer CineSurround Sound System (5 built-in speakers)<br>
• Windows® 7 Home<br>
• MSRP $1,349.99</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5395899/acers-big-ass-aspire-8940-184+inch-screen-core-i7-processor]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5395899]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[acer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Acer Aspire 8940]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Acer Core i7 Laptop]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aspire 8940]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 07:55:36 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5395899&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
