<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: Lifehacker]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/lifehacker</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'lifehacker']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Giz Explains: What Everyone Should Know About Cameras]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/camera-lineup.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_camera-lineup.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Talking to a camera nerd&mdash;or even reading about new cameras&mdash;can feel like translating from a different language. But it doesn't need to! Here, <em>in this here post</em>, is everything you need to know about cameras, without the noise.</p>
<p>When you buy a camera, you'll be pelted with specs from a salesperson, many of which are confusing, and even misleading. You will cower, and may cover your head for protection. He will keep pelting. And really, he has to&mdash;spec sheets and jargon are integral to camera marketing, at least for now. Here's what it all means, in one handy cheat sheet.</p>
<h2>Types of Cameras</h2>
<p>Before you set out to buy a new camera, or even just to get to know yours a little better, you've got to know the difference between the different types or cameras. Here are the ones you're likely to come across.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/500x_canon_powershot_s90_1_01.jpg" width="160" height="131"><strong>Point-and-Shoots</strong>: Also known as compact cameras. If you don't know what kind of camera you're looking for, or what kind your have, it's probably one of these. They're the smallest style of camera, typically&mdash;at least in the last few years&mdash;trending toward a boxy, mostly featureless shape. The lens is non-removable. The flash unit is built in. They have LCD screens on the back, not just for reviewing photos, but to use as a viewfinder as well. When you press the shutter button on a point-and-shoot, there is a slight delay before the photo is actually recorded. Many new point and shoot cameras will take video, and some even manage to record in HD.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/500x_012808_fuji_s100fs.jpg" width="160" height="147"><strong>Bridge/Superzoom Cameras</strong>: These cameras often look like DSLRs, but don't be fooled: They're just juiced-up point-and-shoots. They will typically come with longer lenses and slightly more impressive specs than your average P&S, and will give you a bit more photographic flexibility to play with. Sadly, they suffer from the same picture-taking delay, or "shutter lag," as point and shoots. The problem with bridge cameras, especially now, is that in order to get a decent one you have to spend at least a few hundreds dollars, at which point you may as well get a...</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/500x_500x_nikond90.jpg" width="160" height="120"><strong>DSLRs</strong>: This unwieldy acronym stands for Digital Single Lens Reflex. Narrowly, this means that the camera has a mirror mechanism which allows photographers to see through the camera's lens while setting up a shot, and which flips up, exposing the image sensor (the equivalent to film in a digital camera). Widely, this means that the camera will have interchangeable lenses, a larger sensor than a point and shoot, and to an extent, more image controls. When you press the shutter button on a DSLR, it takes the photo instantly&mdash;no lag, like in a point-and-shoot. Many new DSLRs at mid-to-high price points shoot HD video; some manage 720p, some manage 1080p, but all turn out impressive results, if simply because of the cameras' lenses. That said, they're not really ready to replace proper video cameras yet, because amongother things, no DSLR to date has got the autofocus during video thing right.</p>
<p>These are the cameras that photographers, or people who call themselves photographers, use. They're also the ones that are capable of taking the best photos.</p>
<p>As a rule, DSLRs are more expensive than point and shoots. But they're getting cheaper. Much, much cheaper. Olympus, Nikon, Pentax and Sony all have DSLRs that can be had for under $500&mdash;and these are <em>real cameras</em>&mdash;rendering the entire category of bridge cameras kind of pointless.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/500x_olympus-ep-1_01.jpg" width="160" height="120"><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #microfourthirds" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/microfourthirds/">Micro Four Thirds</a>/Digital Rangefinder</strong>: Micro Four Thirds cameras are interchangeable-lens cameras, minus the straight-through-the lens viewfinder that defines a DSLR. In other words, they have larger sensors like DSLRs, have swappable glass like DSLRs, but use an LCD screen as viewfinderlike a point-and-shoot. This saves space inside the camera, meaning that&mdash;at least this is the theory&mdash;it can be more portable than an equivalent DSLR, while maintaining the same versatility and image quality. Most of them record video, too, and they're pretty good at it: They don't have the complex viewfinder/mirror system of a DSLR, so it's <em>technically</em> simpler to record video. Some of these cameras are styled like DSLRs, like the Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1, while some are styled more like portable cameras, like the Olympus EP-1.</p>
<p>This is a small category for now, and accordingly, prices are still high, starting at about $750. Panasonic and Olympus are basically the only game in town.</p>
<h2>Sensors</h2>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_k-7_cmos.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />The sensor is the part of the camera that actually records the image. In other words, it <em>is</em> your camera.</p>
<p><strong>Megapixels, and image resolution</strong>: Megapixels have been central to digital camera marketing since the beginning (it just sounds like a 90s term, doesn't it?). A megapixel, quite simply, is one million pixels. If a one-megapixel image (or sensor) was perfectly square, it would be 1000x1000 pixels. They're usually rectangular, at 4:3 or 3:2 ratios, which means their resolutions look more like this: 2048x1536 pixels for a 3-megapixel camera; 3264x2448 pixels for an 8-megapixel camera, and so on.</p>
<p>As digital cameras mature, this number means <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5155942/giz-explains-why-more-megapixels-isnt-always-more-better">less and less</a>&mdash;it's easy to cram megapixels in a camera, but without good optics and light sensitivity, it doesn't mean that it's going to turn out an honest, clean, high-quality images at such a high resolution. My cellphone shoots at five megapixels, but the images look like screenshots from some kind of ghosthunting show. My DSLR shoots at 10.1 megpixels, but turns out images more than twice as clean and clear as my phone. My point-and-shoot is rated at 12.1 megapixels, but on close examination, its images are effectively blurrier than those from the DSLR.</p>
<p>If you're planning on making huge prints, or need to crop your images a lot, a high megapixel count is necessary, but beyond a certain point, the returns are minimal. You'll read a lot of guidance from camera manufacturers about how many megapixels you need to print different sized photos, which you can ignore, because they seem to change with every generation of cameras. Unless you're printing billboards or in magazine or something, don't sweat it too much.</p>
<p>Aside from indicating how many dots a camera is capable of capturing, megapixels can be a helpful indicator of how old a camera's guts may be. Megapixel count has been increasing fairly steadily over the years, so within a given manufacturer's camera line, increased megapixels could correlate to newer sensors, which could, along with high resolution, take richer, less noisy pictures.</p>
<p><strong>ISO</strong>: This indicates how fast your camera's sensor collects light&mdash;the higher your ISO, the more sensitive your camera is to light, the less light you need to take a picture. And while high-ISO capability is most useful in low light, it also comes in handy when you're shooting extremely fast exposures in the daytime, like at a sports game. With higher ISOs, though, comes more noise&mdash;some point-and-shoot cameras advertise extremely high ISOs, on the order of 6400. Shots at this sensitivity will invariably look like ass. DSLRs, which have larger sensors that are better at gathering light, can sometimes shoot at 6400 ISO and higher without too much noise.</p>
<p>It might help to think of it like this: ISO ratings are actually a callback to the days of film. You used to have to anticipate how you'd be shooting, and buy film based on how sensitive it was, as expressed in an ISO or ASA rating. The ratings got carried over to digital cameras, despite film getting replaced with sensors.</p>
<p><em>Anyway</em>, don't buy a camera for its ISO rating alone, because there's a good chance its top two to three settings will be useless.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/sensor.jpg" width="160" height="141"><strong>CCD and CMOS</strong>: From our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5163903/whats-the-difference-between-cmos-and-ccd-giz-explained-it">previous</a> <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #gizexplains" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/gizexplains/">Giz Explains</a> on the subject:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>There are two major types of image sensors for digital cameras and camcorders: CCD (charged-couple device) and CMOS (complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor, sometimes also known as active pixel sensor). We're not going to get into the really geeky differences, because you don't really need to know or care. What you should know is that higher-end digital SLRs (the big cameras with a removable lens) use CMOS because it's easier to make bigger CMOS sensors; and mobile phones do because CMOS uses less power. That said, most point-and-shoot cameras and most camcorders use the more common CCD sensor.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><strike>Things are a little different now, and CCDs are common in DSLRs nowadays.</strike> The difference for consumers is minimal&mdash;don't be alarmed to see either on your camera's spec sheet. <strong>UPDATE</strong>: As some commenters have pointed out, this isn't quite right: DSLRs are still trending more towards CMOS sensors, including most of the latest/greatest cameras. Anyway: still more of a curiosity than a purchasing point, for most people.</p>
<p><strong>White Balance</strong>: Have you ever seen a set of indoor pictures that's totally, inexplicably orange? That's a white balance problem. Your camera can adjust to compensate for different light temperatures&mdash;tungsten lights have that orange hue, and sunlight will turn your photos kind of blue&mdash;and correct your image's color accordingly. Virtually all cameras let you adjust white balance with presets, though it's best if you can adjust it manually, too.</p>
<p><strong>Sensor size, and crop factor</strong>: Some cameras have sensors that are roughly the same size as 35mm film, at 36x24mm. These are called full frame cameras. They tend to be more expensive&mdash;like Canon's 5D and 1D series, or Nikon's D3s&mdash;and their bodies tend to be a bit bigger. Semi-pro to pro equipment, basically.</p>
<p>APS-C sensors, on the other hand, are what almost all consumer DSLRs ship with. These sensors are about 22x15mm, which is significantly smaller than a full frame's sensor. Why does this matter? Larger sensors provide more room for each pixel, which makes them better at picking up light. (A <a href="http://gizmodo.com/383170/giz-explains-digital-camera-image-sensors">bucket analogy</a> is useful here.) More importantly for APS-C users, though, is crop factor. A smaller sensor will pick up a smaller section of what's coming through a lens, so: A 200mm lens on a full frame DSLR becomes a 300m lens on an APS-C camera, a 50mm becomes a 75mm, etc. Of course, camera manufacturers make APS-C -specific lenses which are <em>designed</em> for the smaller sensors, but the listed focal lengths aren't adjusted&mdash;they're still 35mm-equivalent numbers. Just be aware the any given lens will shoot differently from one type of camera to another.</p>
<h2>Optics</h2>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_504x_the_lenses_you_ll_know.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<p>The optics are the the parts <em>through which</em> your camera sees. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5160891/giz-explains-why-lenses-are-the-real-key-to-stunning-photos">They're the eyeballs</a>, basically.</p>
<p><strong>Swappable lenses</strong>: There are two kinds of swappable lenses, generally speaking. Ones that zoom in and out, which are called "zoom" lenses, and ones that don't move. These are called "primes." They're all classified by focal length. Strictly speaking, focal length refers to the distance required for a lens system to focus light. In real terms, focal length <em>roughly</em> correlates to physical lens length, and helps indicate how much a lens magnifies an image. 18mm focal length on a DSLR is considered wide, 200mm or more would be considered a telephoto lens.</p>
<p><strong>Point-and-Shoot Lenses, and the X Factor</strong>: The second most prominently featured number on your point-and-shoot's obnoxious feature sticker is the zoom rating. It'll be expressed as a number, with an x: 5x, 10x, etc. You'll also see a printed range, something like 5.0-25mm, which describes the focal length of the lens. Here's a trick: Divide the larger focal length measurement by the smaller one. The result should match your "x" zoom rating, because, well, that's <em>all it is:</em> the quotient of the maximum lens length and the minimum lens length.</p>
<p>This is misleading labeling. Mounted on the same camera, a lens that zooms from 50mm to 100mm would be called a 2X lens, while a lens that zooms from 18mm to 42mm would be called a 3X lens, even though at the longest, it doesn't zoom in as far as the 50-100mm lens does at its shortest. Take this equation into account when comparing point-and-shoots, but most of all, try them. You'll see the difference.</p>
<p><strong>Shutter, shutter speed, and shutter lag</strong>: You shutter is the little door that opens up between your lens and your sensor, allowing for photographic exposure. Shutter speed ranges are advertised with the intention of implying that the camera will be useful at both ends: from the 10-second long exposure to the 1/4000th-second high-speed shot. Keep in mind, for both numbers, that shutter speed alone doesn't guarantee anything. If your camera can shoot at 1/4000th of a second, but it's got a small aperture and low ISO rating, your shots will probably be too dark.</p>
<p>Shutter lag is something else entirely. You know how on a point and shoot, there's a frustrating gap between when you press the button and when your shot actually takes? That's it. The lower the shutter lag, the better, though many camera manufacturers don't even bother to advertise this.</p>
<p><strong>Aperture</strong>: This is the hole through which light passes after its been through part of your lens, and before it hits your sensor. The bigger the hole, the more light gets in. The smaller the hole, the less light gets in. Larger apertures allow you to take pictures in lower light situations, but only allow you to focus on a thin plane&mdash;either your background or your foreground will be out of focus. Smaller apertures let you keep more of a scene in focus but they let less light through, and require longer exposure times. Apertures are described by f-numbers&mdash;these are the ration between the width of an aperture and the focal length of a lens. The smaller the number, the larger the aperture.</p>
<p><strong>Optical vs Digital Zoom</strong>: Another scourge of the camera buyer is digital zoom. Optical is magnification by your lens&mdash;in other words, it's <em>true</em> zoom. Digital zoom is just your camera taking the optically zoomed image and blowing it up, like you'd do in Photoshop. It's only useful for framing shots and <em>sometimes</em> helping your camera focus properly. Otherwise, it's a gimmick: Ignore it, shoot wide and crop your shots later.</p>
<p><strong>IS, or Antishake</strong>: Image stabilization is fast becoming a standard feature on even the cheapest cameras, though you'll find some sub-$150 point-and-shoots without it. The point of image stabilization is to correct for camera movements during an exposure, which cause blurry shots.</p>
<p>There are two types: Digital IS, which you'll find mostly in point-and-shoots, corrects the image with software, and can be somewhat effective, though the results are often passable, not perfect. Optical image stabilization physically moves some part of the camera to counteract shaking. In some cameras, like Nikons and Canons, the moving parts are in the lens. In most other other manufacturers' DSLRs, it's the <em>sensor</em> that actually moves to stabilize the image. Optical IS almost always works better, but it's not magic&mdash;you won't be able to shoot a freehand four-second exposure just because it's on, but you might be able to keep things together for a half-second or more.</p>
<h2>Software</h2>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/camera_ui.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_camera_ui.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
<strong>"Modes," Face Detection, Smile Detection</strong>: Your camera's modes are <em>assistive tools,</em>, not hard features. They're generally just collected presets for settings that you can adjust yourself, like equalizer presets on your iPod. They can be useful, though you'll be a better photographer if you manage settings yourself.</p>
<p>Face and smile detection, again, are like crutches. Face detection guesses when there's a human in the photo so the camera can adjust exposure, white balance and focus to make sure that said human doesn't end up blurry. Smile detection is a crude algorithm that measures facial features, and won't take a photo until the subjects are judged to be SUFFICIENTLY CONTENTED, by which I mean they have vaguely crescent-shaped mouth holes. It's a good way to ensure that nobody is ruining a photo with a grimace. Also, to ensure that none of your photos are ever interesting.</p>
<p><strong>Image formats</strong>: You digital camera doesn't have film, but your photos have to go <em>somewhere.</em> In today's cameras, the digitally stored photos are either JPEGs or RAW files. JPEG files are compressed, which means that they are encoded in such a way that they don't take up much space, but lose a small amount of quality. This is how point-and-shoot cameras almost always store images, and how DSLRs store images by default, generally.</p>
<p>If JPEGs are like photo prints (they're not, really, but bear with me) then RAW files are like the digital negatives. (In fact, one popular RAW format, .DNG, crudely stands for "digital negative"). Raw files contain almost exactly what your sensor has recorded, which means you can change values like exposure, white balance and coloration after taking the photo, to a surprisingly high degree. It feels like cheating! There is a downside: larger image files. And, depending on the type of RAW file&mdash;different camera manufacturers have different ones&mdash;you may need special software to view and edit your photos. Shoot in RAW if you can, and buy a camera that'll let you. This is a huge feature.</p>
<p>As a bonus, most cameras that shoot RAW will also let you shoot RAW and JPEG files simultaneously, so you have a lightweight, ready-to-print-or-upload file right away, as well as the RAW source, for later editing. It takes up a ton of space, but hey, space is cheap nowadays. Spend a few bucks on a bigger memory card, and <em>live your life.</em></p>
<p><strong>Video</strong>: Most new cameras, including some DSLRs, shoot video. But just because your camera shoots stills at 10 megapixels doesn't mean that it'll shoot anywhere near that kind of resolution in motion. The standard resolution for most point-and-shoot cameras is VGA&mdash;that's just 640x480 pixels of video, which is good enough for YouTube&mdash;while DSLRs, and some nicer point-and-shoots, record in either 720p or 1080p, which are HD resolutions, which translate to 1280x720 pixels and 1920×1080 pixels, respectively.</p>
<h2>Storage</h2>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_storage.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
Point and shoot cameras usually come with a small amount of onboard storage. This, I'm about 100% sure, is there so that the camera technically works when you buy it, making your inevitable extra storage purchase seem more like a choice, and less like a mandatory camera tax. Anyway, with any camera, you're going to need to buy some memory, or storage.</p>
<p>There are a few peripheral memory card formats <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5057252/giz-explains-an-illustrated-guide-to-every-stupid-memory-card-you-need">still kicking around</a> (Sony, can you please just put Memory Stick Pro out of its misery? Thanks!) but there are only two that matter.</p>
<p><strong>SD</strong>: Also seen as SDHC, or SDXC, these little guys are the card of choice for point-and-shoot and bridge cameras, and some newer DSLRs. They're small, they works fine, and they're available in just about any capacity you could ever want. <em>Almost</em>: Most cameras are only SDHC-compatible, a standard which maxes out at 32GB. SDXC, the next evolution of the SD standard, maxes out at a theoretical 2TB, though almost no cameras support it yet.</p>
<p><strong>Compact Flash</strong>: These cards are chunkier, <em>can</em> be faster, and are more durable, and anecdotally less prone to temperature and weather damage. These are what you'll find in DSLRs.</p>
<p><strong>Speed ratings</strong>: Memory cards come in different speeds. These are advertised in a variety of different ways, <em>for no good reason</em>. You'll see a couple of numbers on most cards, in the "133x" syntax. Ignore them&mdash;they are inflated, unregulated and therefore, basically meaningless. What you're looking for on SD cards is a <em>Class</em> rating, from 1-6. The official <a href="http://www.sdcard.org/developers/tech/speed_class/">SD Association chart</a>:<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_speed_class_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />For Compact Flash cards, your best bet is to look for an actual transfer speed on the card, expressed in MB/s.</p>
<h2>Further Reading</h2>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/cameralead_2_02.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_cameralead_2_02.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
<strong>Reviews</strong>: One gadget blog, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/cameras/reviews">try as we may</a>, can't cover the hundreds of cameras that come out every year. We'll leave that to the obsessives. See:</p>
<p>• <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/">DPReview</a></p>
<p>• <a href="http://www.photographybay.com/">The Photography Bay</a></p>
<p>• <a href="http://www.photographyreview.com/">Photography Review</a></p>
<p>• <a href="http://Photo.net">Photo.net</a></p>
<p>You really shouldn't buy a camera without consulting these guys first. They have a habit of lapsing into jargon at times, but hey, if you've read this far, you'll be able to get by.</p>
<p><strong>Taking Photos</strong>: So now you've got your new piece of neck candy, and you feel awfully cool. You know what would make you cooler? Learning how to shoot, for god's sake. A few of out recent guides:</p>
<p>• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5116662/how-to-use-your-new-digital-camera">The Basics</a>: Your new camera has been removed from the box. It has been fiddled with. You cat has been photographed multiple times. Now what?</p>
<p>• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5376271/giz-explains-when-not-to-use-your-cameras-flash">When Not to Use Flash</a>: The answer: Pretty much always.</p>
<p>• <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5168454/how-to-create-stunningly-realistic-high-dynamic-range-photographs">How To Shoot HDR</a>: Taking hyperreal photos by combining multiple exposures, without, as we call it, the "clown vomit."</p>
<p>• For general advice, <a href="http://Photo.net">Photo.net</a>'s comically extensive set of photography guides provides instructions for virtually any scenario. Need to shoot some, say, nudes? In, say, Namibia's uniquely harsh sunlight? They've got you covered.</p>
<p>And although broad guides are useful, I've learned more about photography and cameras from Flickr than any other resource. Join the Flickr group for your camera, and spend some time on the message boards. You'll learn clever tricks for getting the most out of your hardware, but in doing so, with the help of a gracious community, you'll learn just as much about photography as a whole.</p>
<p><em>Still something you wanna know? Send questions about DSLRs, P&Ses, B&Bs or BBQs <a href="tips@gizmodo.com">here</a>, with "Giz Explains" in the subject line.<br></em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5422004/giz-explains-what-everyone-should-know-about-cameras]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5422004]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[giz explains]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera guide]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dslrs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[guides]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lenses]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[micro four thirds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[point-and-shoots]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sensors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 09 Dec 2009 17:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5422004&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Can My iPod Make This Airplane Explode?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/takeoff_logo_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_takeoff_logo_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Listening to an iPod or reading a Kindle during takeoff isn't dangerous. It's time the airlines stopped pretending that it is.</p>
<p>For years we've been told that gadgets produce EMI&mdash;electromagnetic interference&mdash;that cause glitches in an aircraft's avionics. A cellphone could interrupt communication between pilots and the tower for a crucial second, or a child's Game Boy could cause a light on a flight computer to go on the fritz.</p>
<p>We can't take excess liquids on a plane on only the slimmest evidence of any real threat. If gadgets were such a threat to safety, they'd be banned entirely.</p>

<p>Instead, an arbitrary set of rules established by the FAA and extended by the airlines prohibits iPods during takeoff, but <a href="http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&rgn=div8&view=text&node=14:2.0.1.3.10.1.4.11&idno=14">explicitly allow electric shavers to be used during flight</a>.</p>
<p>Hundreds of travelers at this very moment are using electronic gadgets during takeoff after the flight attendants have taken their jump seats. We're told it's dangerous. It isn't. Let's drop the pretense.<small>*</small></p>
<h1>The EMI Lie</h1>
<p>In 1993, the International Association of Transport Aircraft (IATA) suggested that airlines prohibit the use of personal electronic devices during takeoff and landing, despite a lack of evidence that these gadgets had caused a single accident. The IATA's Terry Denny <a href="http://www.flightsafety.org/ccs/ccs_sep-oct93.pdf">then said</a>, "We haven't been able to trace an accident to the use of one of these devices...but we are convinced that this could happen."</p>
<p>In the intervening decades, gadgets became something more than a toy for the rich or nerdy, but an intrinsic sidekick for nearly everyone. Especially the iPod.</p>
<p>In 2006, the Federal Aviation Administration <a href="http://www.faa.gov/news/fact_sheets/news_story.cfm?newsId=6275&print=go">commissioned a study</a> to see if "intentionally transmitting" gadgets like cellphones and Wi-Fi caused interference with avionics. The final report "said there is insufficient information to support a wholesale change in policies that restrict use of PEDs." ("PEDs" is FAA-speak for a gadget, or "Personal Electronic Device(s)"; a PED with a radio transmitter is a "T-PED".)</p>
<p>Which is to say, they couldn't find a reason to change their policy&mdash;but there hadn't been a whole lot of evidence to begin with.</p>
<p>Yet the FAA has approved in-flight Wi-Fi service for a variety of airlines. While the routers and systems must undergo an FAA certification, there's nothing magical about the onboard 2.4GHz signal broadcast that prevents it from interfering with the plane's avionics. The thousands of flights completed safely each day&mdash;a marvelous and commendable record, it should be noted&mdash;clearly indicate that having activated gadgets on board aircraft does nothing of negative consequence.</p>
<p>So your laptop's Wi-Fi won't mess up the planes avionics, but your Kindle might? How fragile are these planes?</p>
<h1>"But it's about paying attention"</h1>
<p>I've had conversations with pilots and other employees of airlines about this issue before, and after they realize the electromagnetic interference argument isn't going to fly, they invariably change tack to "safety". "Takeoff and landing are the most dangerous parts of the flight," they say. "And it's important that passengers be able to hear instructions from the crew in case something goes wrong."</p>
<p>That's a nice idea, but look around the cabin of an embarking aircraft. Parents are soothing cranky kids. People are asleep. Many passengers are drunk or medicated to help address anxiety.</p>
<p>If there <em>were</em> an accident, alerting an unaware person with headphones would take no more effort than nudging a sleeping person next to you. It's not prohibited to sleep during takeoff, just as it isn't prohibited to read a book or magazine or to be deaf. (This also presumes that a passenger could do anything to protect themselves or others during a takeoff accident, even though we all know that in a majority of incidents, there's little to do except pray.)</p>
<p>Ah, but what about gadgets flying around the cabin as missiles if there is turbulence? It could happen, sure, but is a Kindle appreciably more dangerous than a hardcover book? If a Nintendo DS could hurt someone during an unexpected loss of altitude, why are they ever allowed to be unstowed? The answer is simply that the likelihood of these things happening is far less than the likelihood that customers will go absolutely apoplectic if they aren't allowed some sort of inflight entertainment.</p>
<p>If the airlines are already able to make a judgement between ultimate safety and convenience, why not loosen up just a little more?</p>
<h1>Little things matter</h1>
<p>I have a lot of sympathy for flight attendants. Herding and soothing a few dozen passengers, many of whom are belligerent and rude, is a thankless job. Their jobs should be easier. They're the ones who have to explain to passengers why <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/10/26/airliner.flyby/index.html">the pilots were too busy playing with their laptops to land the plane</a>.</p>
<p>But <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5366128/giz-explains-how-to-fix-the-airlines-stupid-portable-gadget-rules">every time a flight attendant perpetuates the lie</a> that these harmless gadgets are somehow a threat to safety, it erodes the faith that they should be cultivating with their customers. How are we to trust someone telling us that reading a Kindle during takeoff is dangerous as we stare across a field of EMI-spewing LCD seat-back screens?</p>
<p>Here's a deal: I'll listen attentively to the flight safety demonstration, make doubly sure to note where the exit doors are and who I'll have to climb over to get to them&mdash;and you guys will let me listen to my iPod after the flight attendants are in their seats and I'm making peace with my god.</p>
<p>Trust me, I'll be a lot more apt to listen to flight attendants commands if they don't start the flight with a well-intentioned deception. And more likely to believe the FAA and the TSA when it comes to other security and safety concerns when some of their policies aren't demonstrable half-truths.</p>
<p><small>* I'm not talking about using Wi-Fi or cellphones during takeoff. I'm in complete support of "Airplane Mode" during takeoff, if not the entire flight. What anecdotal evidence there is about EMI from gadgets is almost exclusively suspected to be from <a href="http://www.rvs.uni-bielefeld.de/publications/Incidents/DOCS/Research/Rvs/Article/EMI.html">radios and other transmitters</a>.</small></p>
<p><em><a href="http://twitter.com/joeljohnson">@joeljohnson</a> deals primarily with first-world problems, but hopes it does not interfere with your pursuit of fixing third-world ones. This isn't the last he's got to say about this issue.</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5420641/can-my-ipod-make-this-airplane-explode]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5420641]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[takebacktakeoff]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[airlines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[airplanes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flight]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hypocrisy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[in flight electronics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[kindle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[planes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[travel]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 07 Dec 2009 13:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joel Johnson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5420641&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
					
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo and Lifehacker Meetup Tonight in NYC]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_bw.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Are you in NYC? Because Lifehacker and Gizmodo are, and we're going to have a small meetup tonight in NYC.</p>
<p>Here's the place: <a href="http://nymag.com/listings/bar/black_and_white/#">Black and White</a> at 86 E. 10th St. Special guests include Adam Pash, Gina Trapani, Jason Chen and Brian Lam, who are here from the west coast for a limited time only. All the normal NYC guys like Adam Frucci will be there too.</p>
<p>We'll start heading there at 6 or 7PM, and if you're in the area, come say hello. [<a href="http://nymag.com/listings/bar/black_and_white/#">Location</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5407743/gizmodo-and-lifehacker-meetup-tonight-in-nyc]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5407743]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[announcements]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gizmodo meetup]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[meetup]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:17:26 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5407743&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Review: SurfShelf Treadmill Stand For Laptops Is Brilliant]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/surfshelf0a.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_surfshelf0a.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The SurfShelf does what many home-made and Ikea-bought shelves, tables and stands do: put your laptop in front of your face while you're walking on a treadmill. And it works beautifully.</p>
<p><strong>The Price</strong>: $40</p>
<p><strong>The Verdict</strong>: This is one of my favorite inventions ever. Treadmill computing&mdash;or using a treadputer&mdash;is one of those ideas that's ideal for out-of-shape people who work at home, since you're still capable of doing all the work you were doing before, except now your legs are moving. Its major barrier is the fact that you had to have a treadmill, plus a stable enough platform to keep your laptop on. If you could rig that up yourself, great, but most of us were too lazy or too disinclined to. Now it just costs $40.</p>
<p>To answer your first question, yes, it is ill-advised to type and run at the same time. But typing and walking fast, or running and just watching something on your computer works just fine. In fact, I'm typing this entire review up while I'm walking on my treadmill.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/surfshelf2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_surfshelf2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><b>How it works</b>: The SurfShelf consists of two interlocking polycarbonate pieces supported by either one or two straps to your treadmill, elliptical or stationary bike. If rigged up correctly&mdash;something I had to ask for help with&mdash;it's incredibly stable, capable of supporting somewhere in the neighborhood of 55 pounds. Plenty solid enough for your laptop provided you don't constantly lean on it.</p>
<p>This thing has basically turned working into exercise. By spending 2-3 hours a day typing, emailing, and reviewing while <i>walking</i>, you basically get free calorie burn doing something you'd be doing anyway! According to Nike+, 2 hours of fast walking while working burns 1,000 calories. And even if you're not lucky enough to work from home, being able to watch YouTube or BitTorrented content makes any workout go faster.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5350491,3,'');
</script></p>
<p>Assuming you already own a treadmill that's gathering dust, the SurfShelf is the easiest way of getting you back on that thing. And if you're a freelancer or the type of person who spends much of your day on a computer, this could be the healthiest gadget you buy this year. [<a href="http://www.surfshelf.com/">SurfShelf</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/gizplus2.jpg" width="40" height="20">Makes treadputering an incredibly straightforward process<br clear="all">
<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/gizplus.jpg" width="20" height="20">Relatively cheap<br clear="all">
<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/gizplus.jpg" width="20" height="20">Stable enough that you can trust your laptop to it<br clear="all">
<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/giznormal.jpg" width="20" height="20">Instructions aren't universal enough for every type of exercise machine, but you can get the idea fairly easily<br clear="all"></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5350492/review-surfshelf-treadmill-stand-for-laptops-is-brilliant]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5350492]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bestmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[surfshelf]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[surfshelf review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[treadmill]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[treadputer]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 01 Sep 2009 18:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5350492&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Snow Leopard Review: Lightened and Enlightened]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/Apple_OS_X_Snow_Leopard.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_Apple_OS_X_Snow_Leopard.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged OS X" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/os-x/">OS X</a> <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SNOW LEOPARD" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/snow-leopard/">Snow Leopard</a> seems to do nothing really new. And yet, it could be their most important OS since 10.0.0. <strong>Updated the Bad Stuff section.</strong></p>

<p>Snow Leopard, as a follow up to Leopard, is almost absurdly insubstantial at first glance. The new operating system takes the same old boring, every day tasks like opening files, for example, and makes them happen subtly faster. But that performance is not being utilized by any third-party programs right now. And there are practically no new first-party programs by Apple. Nope, mostly just rewritten old ones and dozens of little interface tweaks. Some fanboys will ask, incredulously, "This is a new operating system?!" Those people are missing the point.</p>
<p>On deeper inspection, Snow Leopard's inconspicuous aspects&mdash;performance squeezed from underused CPU multicores/GPUs and basic UI tweaks&mdash;are found to be the kind of refinement generally reserved for virtuosity. These speed optimizations are deep, reminding me of when a master martial artist puts the entirety of his weight behind a strike (while a neophyte would flails his limbs like a henchman in a Bruce Lee movie). The little UI tweaks are no different than when a great sculptor's chisel works to remove everything non-essential during the final steps on a statue. Challenging 30 years of ever more bloated software tradition, the changes here are about becoming a more effective middleware between the media and the hardware, reducing friction while becoming more useful by, well, being lighter, less visible.</p>
<p>And if you think that's bullshit, well, I can't say you're completely out of your mind, but there's always the consolation that this OS upgrade <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5335039/the-real-cost-of-upgrading-to-mac-os-x-snow-leopard">costs about the same as a used Xbox game</a>.</p>
<h1>Performance</h1>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5345354,10,'');
</script></p>
<p>After some <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5345354/snow-leopard-benchmarks/gallery">benching</a> on a first-generation MacBook Air, an older MacBook Pro 15 and a pair of current-gen 13-inch MacBook Pros, it's clear that Snow Leopard is faster&mdash;sometimes drastically&mdash;but almost never in third-party applications. Some people like charts. If you feel like skipping them, here's a summary:</p>
<p>&bull; In preview, where opening six 35MB 20,000-pixel-wide images of Tokyo's cityscape each took half the time in Snow.<br>
&bull; Safari's javascript processing, using Snow's specific tech, is about 40% faster&mdash;useful for all those Ajax-heavy websites we all use now.<br>
&bull; Time Machine backed up a 1GB dataset nearly 40% faster than on Leopard.<br>
&bull; There was no discernible improvement in non-optimized 32-bit programs: Photoshop testing and Handbrake DVD ripping times were identical. High-def playback on QuickTime 7 (not the new QuickTime 10 version) was identical in CPU usage, too.<br>
&bull; Synthetic benchmark results were interesting: The aging Xbench app, which tests everything from graphics to disks to memory, took a slight performance dip, implying older software may, too. Geekbench, a multicore optimized, newer benchmark available in both 32- and 64-bit saw a lift on Snow. But the test is only focused on theoretical CPU and memory performance, which may not translate into every day use.</p>
<p>Here's a video of those JPEGs cranking open in parallel, rather than serial, fashion:</p>
<p><object width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=6288652&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=6288652&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/6288652_04.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_6288652_04.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display: none;"/></a></p>
<p>Impressed yet?! You shouldn't be. Well, not by the act of opening images. But you definitely should once you realize what it <em>really</em> shows: Apple just pulled 2X performance out of my hardware, by software alone. Tada!</p>
<h1>How is Snow Leopard Getting Faster?</h1>
<p>There are three fundamental reasons for these performance increases: Better multicore processor support through what Apple calls GCD (Grand Central Dispatch&mdash;which <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5346616/giz-explains-snow-leopards-grand-central-dispatch">we explain here</a>); OpenCL APIs for utilizing the processing power in any graphics cards above the GeForce 8600 Series for video acceleration <em>and</em> general purpose computing; and they've rewritten almost all the applications that ship with Snow Leopard to run in 64-bit mode while taking advantage of GCD and CoreCL. So it's making processing for today's chips more efficient and easier for developers. And giving programs a way to utilize the power of the video card when it's not playing games. It also allows programs to run in 64-bit mode, the main theoretical advantage of which is to allow these programs to access more than 4GB of RAM on systems that have it. (More on all that at the bottom of the page.*)</p>
<p>Snow Leopard is efficient in other ways too. Install size is down to 10GB from 16GB, most of that weight shed by losing printer drivers and the PowerPC part of universal binaries. (Snow Leopard runs only on Intel hardware and downloads printer drivers it needs from the net, as you need them.) Installation is also quicker by about 30% on any given piece of hardware (consistent with the smaller install footprint). And in a move that can only be categorized as showing off, Snow Leopard can finish its installation if you accidentally power it down midway through.</p>
<p>But I'm digressing. The bottom line on performance is that the programs included with this operating system will do just about everything faster on modern machines that support those technologies&mdash;that is, most of the multicore Macs or those running Nvidia 8600 series video cards or higher. And not just a bit faster, but faster on the scale of 25 to 50% which means there's typically a good amount of latent processing juju in your video card and CPU. Great, but to be honest, it's a bit less impressive than it sounds in real life today, because all the basic system tasks happen fast anyhow. (When was the last time you sat around while a JPEG opened up?) Again, no other apps that use GCD or OpenCL are available from software makers outside of Apple. But if the theoretical gains are here to be had via easier programming methods, I'd bet those apps will come soon.</p>
<h1>Interface Streamlining</h1>
<p><object width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_1"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=6273312&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=6273312&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/6273312_02.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_6273312_02.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display: none;"/></a></p>
<p>There are 5 major changes in the UI:</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/finder.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_finder.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Finder</strong><br>
Icons now scale, courtesy of a little slider on the bottom right of the pane, up to 512 pixels wide. It sounds wasteful, except that video files can be played directly from the finder window. Honestly, I don't prefer it more than the QuickLook (hitting spacebar to popup a quick preview window) in Leopard and carried over in Snow Leopard. I don't mind the option, but I have no use for this feature.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/dockexpose.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_dockexpose.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Dock</strong><br>
OS X's dock has been interactive for some time. You could drag a file to an icon there to somehow get the two to interact, but you could never use the dock to select which window instance of an app to use. Now clicking and holding (empty handed or with a file) triggers Expose, Apple's window management doohickey, for that particular application. Being able to quickly pop out an app's windows and then select the right one in a single step is terrific, but you still can't use Expose to quickly find the browser tab you want within a window. That's an increasingly big problem as the time spent in browsers goes up.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/Performance_JPG.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_Performance_JPG.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Expose</strong><br>
Expose itself has been improved, too. When viewing all the windows for one application in Expose's zoomed-out view, the items are now arranged in a grid instead of a single, impossible to read line, and each window has a text label. (That's helpful when you're trying to recognize a particular window amongst lots of similar looking&mdash;and rendered tiny by Expose&mdash;text documents or emails.) Minimized windows are also now shown at the bottom of the screen under a faint line dividing it from other maximized windows from the same application.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5346414,2,'');
</script></p>
<p><strong>Stacks</strong><br>
When Stacks made its debut in Leopard, the dock mounted quick file viewer was too twitchy to use. You'd try to move a file andit would snap close, offended you'd try to do anything but open a file. And the space was always too limited in fan or grid mode to display more than a few icons. Stacks improves on this by allowing scrolling in the Grid view, but by also adding a smart list view capable of showing numerous files at once. It's an improvement.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5346410,4,'');
</script></p>
<p><strong>QuickTime 10</strong><br>
Putting QuickTime in this list is questionable, but aside from its acceleration, there are some major changes here. That is, as you mouse away, the video screen loses all borders and buttons, appearing like the video equivalent of an infinity pool or one of those ultra thin LCDs. The program has a new capture system for encording video and audio clips and even voice annotated screen capture sessions. It also borrows the trimming thumbnail line from iMovie '09. I love it.</p>
<p>Let's face it, in the big picture, calling these changes "major" is generous. But there are literally dozens of even smaller examples, all welcome, all reducing friction points in the OS's usage, eliminating clicks needed and making the OS less obtuse. You can read about all of these additions in the gallery below, or <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5345506">here on one page</a>, if you're curious to read about them all. If not, take my word for it: They all make things better.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5345506,24,'');
</script></p>
<p>While it's not UI- or performance-related, one additional Snow Leopard benefit is free Exchange support, so your mail, address books and calendars can all sync through it. I don't work at a corporation, so I don't care, but you may.</p>
<h1>Bad Things</h1>
<p>What kind of sick fanboy would I be if I didn't mention the imperfections?</p>
<p>And Safari 4's ability to segment unstable browser plugins made itself useful when many more flash powered pages crashed in Snow Leopard than Leopard.</p>
<p>Other reviewers have discovered that Snow Leopard has disabled or quirk-ified some of their apps.</p>
<p>I've also noticed that Expose doesn't work as smoothly with spaces now. You sometimes select a window on another virtual spaces desktop and it won't bring the window up top.</p>
<p>If you've got some third part mission critical app that you need to run every day, you should double check its compatibility and wait for a new version before upgrading your OS. Look before you leap here. The OS isn't so radically new that you have to have it right this moment.</p>
<h1>Meow</h1>
<p>The changes here are modest, and the performance gains look promising but beyond the built in apps, just a promise. If you're looking for more bells and whistles, you can hold off on this upgrade for at least awhile. But my thought is that Snow Leopard's biggest feature is that it doesn't have any new features, but that what is already there has been refined, one step closer to perfection. They just better roll out some new features next time, because the invisible refinement upgrade only works once every few decades.</p>
<p><br>
<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/gizplus_03.jpg" height="20" width="20">Uses latent multicore and GPU power to speed up<br>
the apps it comes with by relatively huge amounts<br clear="all">
<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/gizplus_03.jpg" height="20" width="20">Costs $30 to upgrade<br clear="all">
<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/giznormal_05.jpg" height="20" width="20">Still haven't seen any third party apps<br>
rewritten to take advantage of Snow Leopard's speed yet<br clear="all">
<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/gizminus_05.jpg" height="20" width="20">No major new functionality might turn off<br>
some<br clear="all"></p>
<p>[Back to our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5352889/mac-os-x-snow-leopard-the-complete-guide">Complete Guide to Snow Leopard</a>]</p>
<p><em><strong>*Performance Background: You May Skip This Section.</strong><br>
Today's chips have hovered in the 2-3.6GHz range for some time, with gains in theoretical processing power made by increasing the number of CPU cores on one chip and optimizing the silicon in those cores. Think about it as roof shingles: It's easier to protect your roof with lots of little shingles than one huge one. Unfortunately, the power afforded by the additional CPU cores has largely gone to waste, because it's difficult to write code that takes full advantage of multiple cores. The programmer has to write the application in a way that breaks down large problems into multiple smaller problems (called threads), each of which runs on a single CPU core. The application then becomes a traffic cop keeping threads in sync. If any part gets out of sync, the app crashes or hangs.</em></p>
<p><em>This problem is made more complex because many apps are written with a maximum number of threads in mind. While some workloads, such as video encoding or photo processing can take advantage of many cores innately, most need to have some work done to add support for more threads, so future-proofing has been difficult. I don't know if programming GCD is easier than straight-up multiple-core programming&mdash;we cover <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5346616/giz-explains-snow-leopards-grand-central-dispatch">some of those details here</a>&mdash;but the key here is that Apple's created a middleware that developers can write for, which automatically scales up to work with the number of CPU cores or other hardware in your system. The developer writes for GCD, while the system handles the gruntwork. Apple hopes more people will use this easier, more future-proofed way to tap into multiple-core power. Of course, no one has so far, except Apple programmers themselves. This explains why Finder, Preview and basically everything else that ships with Snow Leopard run faster. But in my tests, Photoshop, still a 32-bit program on the Mac and written without any support of GCD or OpenCL, showed less than 1% variation from Leopard to Snow Leopard. Still, as we can see from the system apps, there's potential here. And let's face it, the majority of us are not rendering Photoshop files all day, so this is performance you can put in your pocket today.</em></p>
<p><em>There's a story of efficiency here, too, however. Because GCD is better at managing resources, a program like, Mail, for example, shows less system impact (thread usage, cpu usage) while sitting idle in Snow Leopard, than on Leopard. When testing OpenCL's hardware acceleration, something Windows machines have had for awhile, by playing a 1080p trailer of James Cameron's awesome new Avatar movie, CPU usage dropped drastically when machines were using the 64-bit CoreCL and GCD supported version of QuickTime. Any modern machine can play 1080p video well, but here, we were talking about Snow Leopard causing the strain on the system to take total CPU usage from 30% to 16% on the 13-inch MacBook Pros. Other apps will eventually be able to use these GPU superpowers, but what Apple claims is the real potential for GPU processing is that OpenCL will let computers use video cards for not only 3D acceleration, video encoding, and heavy math, but more general computing tasks, too, because its written in a non-specific (C-based) programming language.</em></p>
<p><em>Furthermore, there have been a number of good articles questioning the speed benefits of 64-bit computing. Apple only goes so far to claim that math-based tasks benefit from the larger bus, but generally the only concrete advantage of 64-bit computing is the ability apps gain to manipulate over 4GB of RAM, a 32-bit limitation. Apple's dev docs go on to say that some apps will incur a penalty if going 64-bit. So, rewriting apps in 64-bit versions is not a surefire recipe for speed improvement.</em></p>
<p><em>In many cases, with many of the built-in apps, Apple attributes the performance improvements to all three core technologies above. That stuff that means not so much today, but might mean a lot tomorrow as GPUs get faster and CPUs gain more cores and there's already an infrastructure in place to take advantage of all that.</em></p>
<p><em>[Back to our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5352889/mac-os-x-snow-leopard-the-complete-guide">Complete Guide to Snow Leopard</a>]</em></p>
<p><em><iframe src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http://digg.com/apple/Snow_Leopard_Review_Lightened_and_Enlightened" align="right" frameborder="0" height="82" scrolling="no" width="55"></iframe></em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5346418/snow-leopard-review-lightened-and-enlightened]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5346418]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[leopard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[operating systems]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[snow]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[snow leopard review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:00:34 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5346418&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Android Hacking For The Masses]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/androidhacktop.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_androidhacktop.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Reasons to hack, or "root," your Android handset: Custom OS upgrades, PC tethering, full-phone SD backups. Reason <em>not</em> to: It's really scary. At least it was, until now.</p>

<p>RyeBrye has pieced together an Android app that <a href="http://www.ryebrye.com/blog/2009/08/16/android-rooting-in-1-click-in-progress/">does all the rooting legwork</a>, a process that used to range from mildly intimidating to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5336000/mytouch-3g-rooted-ready-for-your-custom-roms">headache-inducing</a>. In either case, the prospect was always daunting for the mainstream, which kept the joys of an unbound Android from most G1 and MyTouch owners. With this app, here's the new, <a href="http://androidandme.com/2009/08/news/how-to-root-a-t-mobile-g1-and-mytouch-3g-android-phone/">streamlined procedure</a>:</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/thumb160x_android_01.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />• Download "Recovery Flasher" From the Android Market (or <a href="http://www.ryebrye.com/blog/2009/08/16/android-rooting-in-1-click-in-progress/">sideload it</a>)<br>
• Run it<br>
• Tap "Back up recovery image"<br>
• Tap "Flash Cyanogen Recovery 1.4"<br clear="all"></p>
<p>Seriously, that's it. Now your Android phone is splayed wide open, and ready for you to have your way with it. But, uh, what does that mean, exactly?</p>
<p>Plenty of things! The biggest draw to rooting is the ability to install a new ROM&mdash;in other words, replace the operating system on your phone. There are two ways to go with this, both equally awesome. The first is to go with a super-customized community ROM. These are tweaked and enhanced versions of the phone's default software, often grafted with pieces of Google's forthcoming updates to Android, some <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/cupcake">near</a>, some <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/donut">far</a>, and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5314130/google-plans-three-more-android-updates-this-year-named-after-decreasingly-popular-desserts">all dessert-themed</a>. Practically, this means multitouch&mdash;since the G1 and MyTouch already support this on the hardware side&mdash;app storage on SD cards, tethering, more home screens, new system keyboards, and perhaps most importantly, <em>vastly</em> improved performance. A lot of users say using one of these is a night-and-day difference, and given the kinds of things the HTC ROM community has done with <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5074850/dealzmodo-hack-cooked-software-revives-htc-phones">Windows Mobile phones</a>, I'm inclined to believe them.</p>
<p>Your second path is to go full Hero&mdash;in other words, to install the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged HTC HERO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/htc-hero/">HTC Hero</a>'s heavily customized OS, which is <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5318860/htc-hero-review-ambitious-but-tragically-flawed">nothing short of fantastic</a>, and about to get <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5340981/software-update-fixes-the-htc-heros-only-real-problem">even better</a>. This is a full phone conversion, and even in its current, slightly precarious state, well worth it.</p>
<p>In either case, you're going to need to choose a ROM, download it, and put it on your phone's SD card. You can select from an expansive list <a href="http://db.androidspin.com/android_build_information.asp">here</a>&mdash;for reference, the MyTouch 3G is also known as the Magic 32B&mdash;but as far as non-Hero ROMs go, your best bet is the near-legendary, well-supported <a href="http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=537204">CyanogenMod</a>. The newest release, out just two days ago, is fully compatible with the G1 and MyTouch. But don't stress too much over which ROM to choose, since changing them over is a breeze now that you're fully unlocked. An overview from <a href="http://androidandme.com/2009/08/news/how-to-root-a-t-mobile-g1-and-mytouch-3g-android-phone">Android and Me</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>• Power off your phone.<br>
• Boot into recovery mode. Press and hold the Home key, then hit the power button.<br>
• Before you flash a rom file, perform a wipe. Press Alt+W to wipe the data and cache folders. You must wipe when going form different builds of Android.<br>
• Wait for the wipe to finish and the recovery image to display again, then select "apply any zip from sd". Flash the zip file of your choice.<br>
• After flashing any zip you should be able to reboot your system and watch it load to the home screen.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>You'll want to read their full rooting and flashing guide for caveats, but that easy little list there is about the size of it.</p>
<p>A few more reasons to root that don't involve totally flashing your phone:</p>
<p>• <a href="http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=459830">Full backups to SD cards</a><br>
• <a href="http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=444004">Wi-Fi tethering</a>!<br>
• <a href="http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=451139">Autorotation for all apps</a><br>
• <a href="http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=462882">Install apps to an SD card</a></p>
<p>This alongside a treasure trove of smaller tweaks and tricks you can find at the every-active <a href="http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=537204">XDA forums</a>. And of course, it should go without saying: this is potentially risky, and could brick your phone. The rooting process is almost foolproof, but before you jump in, make sure you've <a href="http://androidandme.com/2009/08/news/how-to-root-a-t-mobile-g1-and-mytouch-3g-android-phone/">got the right hardware</a> (American MyTouch 3Gs and G1s only) and have backed up any important data. Happy hacking! [<a href="http://www.ryebrye.com/blog/2009/08/16/android-rooting-in-1-click-in-progress/">RyeBrye</a>, <a href="http://androidandme.com/2009/08/news/how-to-root-a-t-mobile-g1-and-mytouch-3g-android-phone/">AndroidAndMe</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5341915/android-hacking-for-the-masses]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5341915]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[hackmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android hacks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android rooting]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc hero]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rooting]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile g1]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile mytouch 3g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5341915&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The State of Hackintosh: Which Netbooks to Hack]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/hackintop.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_hackintop.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></a>BoingBoing Gadgets' <a href="http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2008/12/17/osx-netbook-compatib.html">netbook compatibility chart</a> is a great resource for putting Mac OS on netbooks. But before taking the Hackintosh plunge, here are the major contenders' strengths, pitfalls and quirks to consider, plus guides for when you (carefully) jump in.</p>

<p>Rob's chart, with all its scary red marks and mysterious orange ovals, has the tendency to give the impression that the outlook is fairly bleak; almost every row of "confirmed working!" ticks is broken up by at least one pesky caveat, and some netbooks on the list are not sold anymore. But your prospects really aren't <em>so</em> bad. Buck up, kids! Here's what that chart means, practically, with a real-world rundown of what these netbooks can offer, what they can't, and how best to try your hand at Hackintosh.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/thumb160x_843ba0dcc26d4a98b6faca3a3fead90f.jpg" class="left image158" width="158"><strong>The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged HP MINI 100" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/hp-mini-100/">HP Mini 100</a>0</strong><br>
<strong>Status:</strong> In production<br>
Now that the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged DELL MINI 9" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/dell-mini-9/">Dell Mini 9</a> has passed on, in retail terms, this is your best option. Main components are compatible across the board.<br>
<strong>What you get:</strong> A well-styled 10.2-inch machine with respectable guts, a notoriously great keyboard and an increasingly reasonable price. In fact, the slightly smaller Windows-less 16GB SSD version, a prime candidate for <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged OS X" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/os-x/">OS X</a>-ification, is listed on Best Buy's site for $280 <a href="http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?skuId=9254406&st=hp+mini+1000&lp=2&type=product&cp=1&id=1218069452351">right now.</a><br>
<strong>What you sacrifice:</strong> I think the styling works; some people get turned off by the large bezel around the screen, though it's on par with other 10-inch netbooks. Many Hackintoshers find little gremlins after install&mdash;lack of fan speed control and temperamental Wi-Fi control, to name two&mdash;which can generally be fixed, though rarely simply. By and large, though, this is as good as OS X gets on a cheap netbook.<br>
<strong>Resources:</strong> <a href="http://myhpmini.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=1445">Install guide</a>, with video; <a href="http://myhpmini.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=17">support forums</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/thumb160x_cc5729206b65e6bc169adae373297552.jpg" class="left image158" width="158"><strong>Dell Mini 9</strong><br>
<strong>Status</strong>: Out of production<br>
This was, and still is, a fantastic candidate for Hackintoshing. As such, they're not that easy to find for a reasonable price. Even Dell's been getting in on the post-Mini-9 action, rereleasing the little laptop for <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10295333-1.html">brief period</a> last week. <strong>UPDATE</strong>: The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5214462/the-dell-vostro-a90-is-familiar-for-a-reason">Vostro A90</a>, the Mini 9's equally Hackintoshable business counterpart, is still around in some retail channels.<br>
<strong>What you get:</strong> Just like the HP, Dell's Mini 9 lays claim to near-total hardware compatibility, including mobile broadband support. The fact that everything just kinda <em>works</em> is pretty wild, if you think about it.<br>
<strong>What you sacrifice:</strong> Battery life isn't great. And since release, the Mini 9's hardware has aged a bit. That said, entry-level netbooks all more or less live on the verge of obsolescence by definition, so having a slightly older Atom processor than your friends shouldn't be much of a concern.<br>
<strong>Resources:</strong> Our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5156903/how-to-hackintosh-a-dell-mini-9-into-the-ultimate-os-x-netbook">definitive install guide</a>; <a href="http://www.mydellmini.com/forum/faqs-how-tos/">support forums</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/thumb160x_9447cc6c3eace21846f7227d4711ffc0.jpg" class="left image158" width="158"><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged DELL MINI 10V" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/dell-mini-10v/">Dell Mini 10v</a></strong><br>
<strong>Status</strong>: In production<br>
For some time after release this Mini 9 replacement was held up by Mac driver difficulties. Now it works fairly well, and could serve as a replacement Mini 9 for <em>some</em> Hackintoshers.<br>
<strong>What you get:</strong> In some ways, this is better than the Mini 9. It's a newer unit, updated to address some of the general population's broader problems with the Mini 9: The screen is slightly larger, and more importantly, the keyboard has some room to stretch. It's cheap&mdash;often cheaper than the a coveted used Mini 9&mdash;at about $300 new.<br>
<strong>What you sacrifice:</strong> The Mini 10v is patchier than its predecessor across the board. The onboard microphone is difficult to get working, video drivers are still a little precarious, often causing crashes when external monitors are connected, and sleep and hibernation modes aren't very reliable, which is crucial for a totable netbook. If you're willing to bet on driver support improving, it's a prudent purchase. That's a big if, by the way.<br>
<strong>Resources:</strong> The Anguish <a href="http://www.mydellmini.com/forum/mac-os-x/8694-mini-1011-mini-10v-os-x-info-updated-audio.html">Install+Fixes Guide</a>; <a href="http://www.mydellmini.com/forum/dell-mini-10-forums/">User forums</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/thumb160x_38fccea6e30047e83ca5edb315941867.jpg" class="left image158" width="158"><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged LENOVO S10" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/lenovo-s10/">Lenovo S10</a></strong><br>
<strong>Status:</strong> Out of production<br>
Like the Mini 1000, the S10 is a worthy replacement for the Mini 9. Or, it was, before it was replaced by a touchier, more erratic S10-2. (More on that below).<br>
<strong>What you get:</strong> Another capable machine, though it was&mdash;and still is&mdash;a little too expensive for what you get. Hardware works across the line, down to the webcam and two-finger touchpad scrolling.<br>
<strong>What you sacrifice:</strong> Ethernet doesn't work, which could kill the S10's usefulness as a travel device (old hotels, etc) and the 3-cell battery is a little anemic. It too suffers from age: The cheapest version and most popular spec comes with 512MB of RAM, which will suck the joy right out of your OS X experience.<br>
<strong>Resources:</strong> <a href="http://www.s10lenovo.com/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=2581">Multi-boot guide</a> (attached to linked post in PDF); <a href="http://www.s10lenovo.com/viewforum.php?f=15">User forums</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/thumb160x_1a74c665ee8664510fd913262bb5bb85.jpg" class="left image158" width="158"><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged LENOVO S10-2" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/lenovo-s10_2/">Lenovo S10-2</a></strong><br>
<strong>Status:</strong> In production<br>
This bears the outward appearance of a minor update to the S10. As far as Hackintoshing is concerned, it's a major step backwards.<br>
<strong>What you get:</strong> Compared to the S10, a better touchpad, bigger keyboard, nicer case design, slimmer profile, more default RAM, and lower price. Great!<br>
<strong>What you sacrifice:</strong> Any semblance of usability in OS X. Adding to the lack of ethernet support, everything from sleep to external video to stability is lost, to the point that the S10-2 isn't really much of an option.<br>
<strong>Resources:</strong> The same <a href="http://www.s10lenovo.com/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=2581">S10 guide</a>, with <a href="http://s10lenovo.com/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=2682">caveats</a>; <a href="http://www.s10lenovo.com/viewforum.php?f=15">User forums</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/thumb160x_93ce043ac97b7acf8db9ae6b77c1dbb5.jpg" class="left image158" width="158"><strong>MSI Wind U100</strong><br>
<strong>Status:</strong> Out of production<br>
A perennial Hackintosh classic, it's still a safe choice, and fairly easy to track down used.<br>
<strong>What you get:</strong> A Mini 9 level of compatibility, with very similar hardware. Styling is clean, but not as pleasing as the Dell, Lenovo, or HP alternatives, and the keyboard is usable.<br>
<strong>What you sacrifice:</strong> Again, we're dealing with old-ish hardware here, and again, the three-cell battery won't run marathons. The touchpad is janky, and, I almost forgot, <a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/04/six-months-with-a-hackintosh-netbook-it-aint-pretty/">this guy</a> <em>really</em> doesn't like them.<br>
<strong>Resources:</strong> A whole bunch of <a href="http://forums.msiwind.net/osx-guides/?sid=4e157714074bbe7968f7de314879845b">install guides and support info.</a></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/thumb160x_0db59e905a79453cf1a8e10fbe321652.jpg" class="left image158" width="158"><strong>Acer <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged ASPIRE ONE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/aspire-one/">Aspire One</a></strong><br>
<strong>Status:</strong> In production<br>
A hugely popular, widely available and all-around decent netbook, the Aspire One is a cautionary tale: No matter how tempted you are to pick one up, Hackintosh development has come too slowly to justify buying one for that. This rule applies to other netbooks not shown, too.<br>
<strong>What you get:</strong> An expensive-looking, cheap-as-chips workhorse.<br>
<strong>What you sacrifice:</strong> Virtually everything, including the biggest dealbreaker of them all: Wi-Fi. Lots of netbooks don't work, but I wanted to include this one as an example: Just because a netbook is wildly popular and bolstered by a huge community of support forums doesn't mean that Hackintosh will eventually work. Some hardware and software issues are just beyond the hobbyists' purview, so don't buy a netbook with the hopes that issues will be resolved. They might not be, and you'll be stuck swapping out hardware components just to get basic features working.<br>
<strong>Resources:</strong> <a href="http://www.aspireoneuser.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=10197">Install guide</a> with some fixes, wi-fi recommendations; <a href="http://www.aspireoneuser.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=14">user forums</a>.</p>
<p>Despite losing its <a href="http://publish.gizmodo.com/ged/5156903/how-to-hackintosh-a-dell-mini-9-into-the-ultimate-os-x-netbook">greatest soldier</a> (well, almost), the Hackintosh netbook movement is still alive and well, to the point that buying one of the more compatible netbooks listed above with the express purpose of turning it into an unofficial mini-MacBook is a great idea. Take your pick.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5325775/the-state-of-hackintosh-which-netbooks-to-hack]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5325775]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[hackintosh]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[acer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aspire one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dell mini 10v]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dell mini 9]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hacks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hp]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hp mini 100]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lenovo s10]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lenovo s10-2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac os x netbook chart]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mods]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[netbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5325775&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Rejects Official Google Voice iPhone App]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/504x_googlevoice.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_504x_googlevoice.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></a>Now we know why <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GOOGLE VOICE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/google-voice/">Google Voice</a> apps were <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5314857/google-voice-apps-coming-to-android-and-blackberry-iphone-users-must-wait">only released for BlackBerry and Android</a>. Apple <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/27/apple-is-growing-rotten-to-the-core-and-its-likely-atts-fault/">rejected Google's official Google Voice app</a> when it was submitted for approval six weeks ago. What. The. Shit.</p>
<p>Here's the quote from the Google spokesperson to TechCrunch:<br></p>
<blockquote>"We work hard to bring Google applications to a number of mobile platforms, including the iPhone. Apple did not approve the Google Voice application we submitted six weeks ago to the Apple <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged APP STORE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/app-store/">App Store</a>. We will continue to work to bring our services to iPhone users - for example, by taking advantage of advances in mobile browsers."</blockquote>
<p>This news comes on the heels of Sean Kovacs' GV Mobile Google Voice app <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5324003/gv-mobile-google-voice-iphone-app-getting-booted-from-app-store-for-usual-ridiculous-reasons">being pulled from the store</a> for "duplicating features." Even though, TechCrunch relates, Phil Schiller himself personally approved GV Mobile and called Kovacs to apologize when its initial approval was delayed months ago.</p>
<p>TechCrunch suspects, probably correctly, that apps for Google Voice are being rejected at least in part through AT&T's influence, since Google Voice lets you send free text messages and delivers cut-rate international calls&mdash;on top of making phone numbers even more meaningless&mdash;making it scary to AT&T in way like Skype VoIP over 3G. Either way, it seems obvious the Google Voice service is being targeted for extinction, at least as a native app on the iPhone.</p>
<p>Google plans to take the same route it was forced to take <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5321583/google-latitude-for-iphone-is-a-lame-web-app-because-apple-thinks-were-easily-confused">with Latitude on the iPhone</a>&mdash;web app land. It's an interesting switch for Google and Apple on the app front, actually. Google was noted for <a href="http://daringfireball.net/2008/11/google_mobile_uses_private_iphone_apis">getting away with using private APIs</a> in its Google Mobile app to make the voice search command work. Now Apple's rejected two of its major apps in a row, in a way validating Google's belief that web apps are the future anyway.</p>
<p>It seems somewhat silly, and a bit of a reach, to insinuate the rejections are signs of brewing hostilities between Apple and Google, but you have to figure if there weren't any behind the rejections, they've at least got to be causing some anxiety by now.</p>
<p>Whatever the reasons, it sucks, and as Jason Kincaid says, what's really troubling about this rejection is that it appears that "Apple is now actively stifling innovation." And the whole black box app approval process doesn't exactly alleviate that sinking feeling either. After all, if Google doesn't stand a chance, how does anybody else? [<a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/27/apple-is-growing-rotten-to-the-core-and-its-likely-atts-fault/">TechCrunch</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5324268/apple-rejects-official-google-voice-iphone-app]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5324268]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[app store]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[app tyranny]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google voice]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:34:03 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5324268&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Confirmed: iTunes 8.2.1 Breaks Pre Syncing]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_presync.jpg" class="left image500" width="500">We just confirmed it on our own machines: iTunes 8.2.1 breaks Pre syncing. Apple <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5293219/apple-fine-print-warns-that-palm-pre-itunes-syncing-could-die">warned that they may cut off the sync</a>, and Palm said <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5293605/palm-responds-to-apples-warning-that-pre-itunes-syncing-could-die">it would be a direct blow to their users</a>. Direct Blow, she is a'here. <b>Updated</b></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_update.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></p>
<p>Obviously if you're a Pre user you should <b>not</b> update to the latest iTunes. Not, at least, until Palm strikes back with some kind of firmware update to enable syncing again. It's not like 8.2.1 has all that many new features either, so you don't really <i>need</i> to update. [<a href="http://www.prethinking.com/home/2009/7/15/itunes-821-breaks-palm-pre-sync-capability.html">Pre Thinking</a>]</p>
<p><b>Update</b>: Here's Palm's official statement:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Palm's media sync works with iTunes 8.2. If Apple chooses to disable media sync in iTunes, it will be a direct blow to their users who will be deprived of a seamless synchronization experience. However, people will have options. They can stay with the iTunes version that works to sync their music on their Pre, they can transfer the music via USB, and there are other third-party applications we can consider.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><b>Update 2</b>: Here's Apple's official statement to <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/ByteOfTheApple/blog/archives/2009/07/apple_to_palm_i.html">Businessweek</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>iTunes 8.2.1 is a free software update that provides a number of important bug fixes. It also disables devices falsely pretending to be iPods, including the Palm Pre. As we've said before, newer versions of Apple's iTunes software may no longer provide syncing functionality with unsupported digital media players.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5315386/confirmed-itunes-821-breaks-pre-syncing]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5315386]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[pre]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[itunes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[itunes sync]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[itunes update]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm pre itunes sync]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[update]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:39:44 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5315386&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Jailbreak and Unlock iPhone 3.0]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p>There's no need to be intimidated. I'm here to hold your hand every step of the way while you jailbreak or unlock your original iPhone, iPhone 3G or iPod Touch, and it's really not much hassle at all. (<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5302123/step-by-step-guide-to-jailbreak-and-unlock-iphone-30/">One Page</a>)</p>

<p><br clear="all">
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/IMG_4739.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_IMG_4739.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></a><br>
<strong>Step 1</strong><br>
Let's check to see if jailbreaking or unlocking an iPhone makes sense for you by explaining what they actually mean: Jailbreaking allows you to load <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5152714/the-week-in-iphone-apps-essential-jailbreak-apps">non-iTunes, third-party apps like these</a> onto the phone, at your own risk. Unlocking lets you use another company's SIM card (for T-Mobile or international travel). That's it. And if you don't like it, you can restore the original Apple software any time using iTunes' Restore button&mdash;we've done it plenty of times.</p>
<p>This guide is for the original iPhone, iPhone 3G and iPod Touch running the new iPhone 3.0 firmware. If you own a 3GS, you'll need to wait since it hasn't been hacked quite yet. But if you're ready to hack your iPhone, grab your Mac or PC, iPhone and the USB adapter cable. Let's do this. (Oh, and go to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5302123/step-by-step-guide-to-jailbreak-and-unlock-iphone-30/">THIS LINK</a> if you'd rather see all of the instructions on one big page.)<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/Picture_13_01.png" class="center image1024" width="1024"><br>
<strong>Step 2</strong><br>
Even if all you want to do is unlock the phone, you need to jailbreak it first, and that requires redsn0w, a Mac/PC jailbreaking program. Download the official redsnow torrent files <a href="http://thepiratebay.org/user/iphonedev/">HERE</a>, then download redsn0w via your Bittorrent client of choice. Make sure you've backed up your iPhone to your computer before moving forward. That creates a data restore point in case you want to ditch the jailbreak apps. Done? OK. Last, if you're moving your phone to T-Mobile, disable 3G before going on to the next step.<br>
<br clear="all">
<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5302123/jailbreak-and-unlock-iphone-30/gallery/">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a><br>
<strong>Step 3</strong><br>
Redsn0w works by patching the iPhone firmware file on your computer, then loading it onto your iPhone without using iTunes. So open redsn0w. Follow its instructions to select your .ipsw (iPhone firmware) file. On Macs, you can find the file at Home Folder/Library/iTunes/iPhone Software Updates. Or just download a new one from <a href="http://www.iclarified.com/entry/index.php?enid=750">HERE</a>. Once you've found your .ipsw, move on.<br>
<br clear="all">
<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5302123/jailbreak-and-unlock-iphone-30/gallery/">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a><br>
<strong>Step 4</strong><br>
Begin patching, but keep in mind this one setting: Redsn0w will ask if you want to install Cydia or Icy or Both. (These are apps that can load programs on jailbroken phones and will be needed to unlock the phone later.) JUST INSTALL CYDIA, NOT BOTH, OR ERRORS ARE PRONE TO ARISE LATER. TRUST ME. Once the .ipsw file is patched, make sure to plug in your iPhone then turn it off while still plugged. When you see the screen "Click NEXT when your iPhone is both OFF and plugged in..." go on to the next step.<br>
<br clear="all">
<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5302123/jailbreak-and-unlock-iphone-30/gallery/">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a><br>
<strong>Step 5</strong><br>
Now you need to put your phone into DFU mode to load the patched firmware. You'll hold the top power button for two seconds, then hold the Home button with it for 10. Then you'll release the top button and just hold Home for 30 or so. It's not as hard as it sounds, and if you mess up you can just try again, but you need to pay attention, so make sure you're holding your phone and watching the computer screen when you hit "next." Redsn0w will guide you through the pattern of holding the top and home buttons in timed succession. If you're successful, redsn0w will inform you that your phone is being jailbroken and you can stop holding the Home button. If you're not, redsn0w will reset the process and you'll probably need to manually restart your iPhone.<br>
<br clear="all">
<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5302123/jailbreak-and-unlock-iphone-30/gallery/">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a><br>
<strong>Step 6</strong><br>
Wait as the jailbroken firmware loads onto your iPhone. (You'll see a disk drive on the phone's screen, then this cute pineapple graphic as it installs.) After a few minutes, the phone will reboot just as it does with official firmware. Congratulations, your phone is jailbroken! Most of you are done&mdash;just load Cydia (which is now an app on your iPhone) and search for apps you'd like to install. Others need to continue this tutorial for the unlock.<br>
<br clear="all">
<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5302123/jailbreak-and-unlock-iphone-30/gallery/">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a><br>
<strong>Step 7</strong><br>
If you want to unlock your original or 3G iPhone so it can take a T-Mobile or international SIM, follow these next steps. You're done with your computer, so make sure your iPhone is on a Wi-Fi connection. We're going to use Cydia to download and install ultrasn0w, which unlocks your iPhone.<br>
<br clear="all">
<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5302123/jailbreak-and-unlock-iphone-30/gallery/">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a><br>
<strong>Step 8</strong><br>
Cydia will first ask what kind of interface you'd like. I'm no hacker, so I chose the graphical view. Then Cydia will want to download at least 2 Essential Upgrades. Let it by choosing "complete upgrade." If Cydia's successful, you'll see a bunch of install code and the option to "Close Cydia (Restart)." Hit that button. (Note: If you are getting errors in this step, it may be because you installed both Cydia and Icy. If you did that, restore your iPhone with official 3.0 firmware via iTunes and start the process over.)<br>
<br clear="all">
<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5302123/jailbreak-and-unlock-iphone-30/gallery/">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a><br>
<strong>Step 9</strong><br>
Reopen Cydia. Go to Manage -&gt; Sources -&gt; Edit - &gt; Add and then enter "repo666.ultrasn0w.com" in the text field. This should add ultrasn0w as a Cydia source so that you can download the ultrasn0w software. Choose to return to Cydia and then click "Done".<br>
<br clear="all">
<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5302123/jailbreak-and-unlock-iphone-30/gallery/">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a><br>
<strong>Step 10</strong><br>
Click the repo666.ultrasn0w.com listing under your Sources. Click repo666.ultrasn0w.com again at the next screen (redundant, we know). Then click Install. You'll see a black screen with some text and, after a few seconds, it should read "Complete". Reboot your phone with your new SIM.</p>
<p>Congratulations, your iPhone is unlocked! But if you're having any type of problems (it's not our fault!!) check out the <a href="http://blog.iphone-dev.org/">Dev Team blog</a>. Chances are that if you've encountered a particular issue, so has someone else.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5302123/jailbreak-and-unlock-iphone-30/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5302123]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[jailbreak unlock iPhone 3.0]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jailbreak]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[unlock]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[unlock iphone 3.0]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5302123&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Linksys WRT160NL Is Fully Linux Powered, 802.11n, and Acts As Media Server]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_linksyslinux.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;">After years of having people load <a href="http://lifehacker.com/344765/turn-your-60-router-into-a-user+friendly-super+router-with-tomato">custom Linux-based firmwares</a> onto their routers, Linksys decided to just go ahead and make a router with Linux on there from the start. Computer Science grad students are all awkwardly high fiving each other.</p>
<p>The guts of the machine are a 400MHz processor, 32MB RAM, and 8MB flash memory, plus two external antennas for wider coverage. You can also stream media from USB drives through the USB port to UPnP devices. It's 802.11n compliant, of course, and will retail for $120.</p>
<p>Main point? That it's Linux-based, so people can shove apps on there like BitTorrent downloaders and whatever else you can find that runs on Linux. [<a href="http://www.linksysbycisco.com/US/en/products/WRT160NL">Linksys</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5301321/linksys-wrt160nl-is-fully-linux-powered-80211n-and-acts-as-media-server]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5301321]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[linksys]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cisco]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[firmware]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[linksys firmware]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[linksys wrt160nl]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wrt160]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wrt160nl]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:51:57 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5301321&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[How To Enable Palm Pre Tethering]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5291473/how-to-enable-palm-pre-tethering">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a>Palm may have <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5290871/palm-warns-about-pre-tethering-hack-+-because-sprint-wont-like-it">warned against hacking the Pre</a> for tethering, but <a href="http://www.isyougeekedup.com/palm-pre-how-to-guide-to-enable-tethering/">instructions on how to accomplish the task</a> have already made their way onto the internet. Attempt at your own risk. [<a href="http://www.isyougeekedup.com/palm-pre-how-to-guide-to-enable-tethering/">isyougeekedup</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/pre-data-tethering-is-a-go-sprint-be-damned/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5291473/how-to-enable-palm-pre-tethering]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5291473]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[palm pre]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm pre hacking]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm pre tethering]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sprint]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tethering]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:04:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5291473&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[VoiceCentral iPhone App Controls Google Voice Somewhat Better]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/05/vc.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/vc.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a>We covered <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5231485/gv-mobile-iphone-app-hands-on">GV Mobile</a> last week, which interfaces nicely with the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GOOGLE VOICE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/google-voice/">Google Voice</a> app from your iPhone, but VoiceCentral actually does the same thing slightly better.</p>
<p>Both apps are essentially the same. They let you make calls and send SMS out from your Google Voice number to any other number in your contact list. You can check your voicemail and see your history, plus control which phones ring when someone calls into your Google Voice number (useful for using your landline to answer calls when you're at home). In general, they're the same.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/IMG_0023.PNG" width="320" height="480">But where VoiceCentral has GV Mobile beat is execution. The app may not be pretty (a lot of the buttons and icons look mis-matched, colorwise), but it rarely crashes, whereas GV Mobile crashes somewhat often when performing certain tasks. Also, VoiceCentral correctly matched up the history with my contact list.</p>
<p>They're both $3, but if we had to recommend one, we'd recommend VoiceCentral, despite it being somewhat ugly to look at. But GV Mobile also has a free version, if you only want to make calls. [<a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=310081988&mt=8">VoiceCentral</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5239932/voicecentral-iphone-app-controls-google-voice-somewhat-better]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5239932]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google voice]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[googlevoice]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voicecentral]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voicecentral review]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 04 May 2009 20:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5239932&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Windows 7 Release Candidate 1's Best Surprise New Features]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/04/windows7100.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/windows7100.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>A hot <em>official</em> copy of <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5169801/windows-7-release-candidate-changes-increase-productivity-and-workflow">Windows 7 RC1</a> is on our desktop and we're poking around. But here are the three best <em>new</em> new things in <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged WINDOWS 7" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows-7/">Windows 7</a> Build 7100. This crazy background? Baked in.</p>
<p><strong>Stream Your Library Over the Internet With Windows Media Player</strong><br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/windows7stream.jpg" width="804" height="503" style="display:block;float:none;">This is <em>hot</em>&mdash;it'd be hotter if it was easier to set up. Windows Media Player's Remote Media Sharing will let you access your media library from anywhere over the internet. You need a Windows Live ID that you associate with your Windows 7 user account using a tool you have to download. (This could grow to include other "online identities," like Facebook I'm guessing, but I wouldn't hold your breath for your Gmail account.) You also need the same version of Windows Media Player running on both computers. After everything's all associamated, then your home library you wanna stream from should show up just like a local library under the "Other Libraries" section in the side navigation pane. Can't do this in iTunes, buddy.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/xpcompatbility.jpg" width="504" height="321" style="display:block;"><strong>Windows XP Mode</strong><br>
To encourage enterprise people to let loose and rock Windows 7, it runs a full-fledged Windows XP virtual environment using Microsoft's Virtual PC. It requires an additional download (booo), but you won't have to worry about your applications breaking like with Vista. <strong>Update</strong>: <a href="http://community.winsupersite.com/blogs/paul/archive/2009/04/24/secret-no-more-revealing-virtual-windows-xp-for-windows-7.aspx">Paul Thurrott has more info</a> and a <a href="http://www.winsupersite.com/win7/xp_mode_pre_shots.asp">huge walkthrough</a> on XP Mode, including the crushing revelation it's gonna be free for Windows 7 Pro, Enterprise and Ultimate, not Home Premium, which is the version regular people are going to be running.</p>
<p><strong>The Most Insane Default Backgrounds Ever</strong><br>
Look at these. Yes, these are just a handful of the ridiculously awesome backgrounds packed inside Windows 7. Some are the products of acid trips through a nightmare land of anime hell that I would never wish on anybody, and some are simply stunning. Just wow. Click to make bigger, obvs. <strong>Update</strong>: Okay, the backgrounds were in some of the builds between the Public Beta and the upcoming RC, but they weren't, you know, public. <script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('windows7backgrounds2', 3, '');
</script><strong>UPDATE</strong>: You can download <a href="http://windows7-wallpaper.com/windows-7-rc1-wallpaper.html">all of them here</a>. Or you can find them in <a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/gizmodopool/">the Gizmodo Flickr pool</a>.<br>
<br>
These are simply in addition to all of the new <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5169801/windows-7-release-candidate-changes-increase-productivity-and-workflow">things we already knew about</a>, like <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5161147/whats-new-in-the-next-release-of-windows-7">tweaks to Aero Peek, better shortcuts</a>, UI improvements and of course, lots of bug squishing. We'll be testing everything in depth soon! [<a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/tag/windows-7">Windows 7 Coverage at Giz</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5226696/windows-7-release-candidate-1s-best-surprise-new-features]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5226696]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Windows 7 RC1]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:25:11 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5226696&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Hulu iPhone App Coming, and It's "Badass"]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/04/huluphone_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/huluphone_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a>Sweet jesus. <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/hulu-iphone-app-coming-soon-badass-2009-4">Alley Insider reports</a> Hulu is developing an iPhone app that'll stream over 3G and Wi-Fi, and it's "badass." It'll hit "within a few months." I've been dreaming of this moment <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5100018/joost-video-streaming-iphone-app-makes-us-dream-of-hulu">since Joost's app</a>.</p>
<p><em>30 Rock</em>, <em>Dollhouse</em>, <em>Terminator: Sarah Connor Chronicles</em>, <em>Arrested Development</em>, oh yes. Any hope AT&T has of charging people a monthly fee for mobile TV dies with a Hulu app, especially once <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5195388/hulu-and-disney-deal-could-be-struck-any-day-now">ABC jumps onboard</a> and it hits other mobile platforms (which it surely will). If it truly delivers the full Hulu experience&mdash;every video with a great UI&mdash;the potential awesomeness literally blows my mind. Hulu CEO Jason Kilar said <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/381520/hulu-video-service-going-mobile">one year ago</a> that mobile is "ripe for the Hulu experience" but it "may not be identical" on every platform. I'd hope the iPhone is as close to the real thing as it can get, though that obviously depends on NBC and Fox to allow it, as well. And Apple <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/17/hulu-for-the-iphone-yes-please-but-dont-get-your-hopes-up-just-yet/">has to approve it</a>, obviously.</p>
<p>But still, mobile TV was not very exciting to me until this moment. [<a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/hulu-iphone-app-coming-soon-badass-2009-4">Alley Insider</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5216849/hulu-iphone-app-coming-and-its-badass]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5216849]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hulu]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone 3g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone hulu]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[streaming video]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vod]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:19:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5216849&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[VMWare Fusion vs. Parallels Desktop for Mac: Which Is Faster?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/parallels.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/parallels.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Ironically, it's one of the biggest decisions you make when you get a Mac: How should I run Windows on it? Parallels or Fusion? An <a href="http://www.mactech.com/articles/mactech/Vol.25/25.04/VMBenchmarks/">exhaustive battery of benchmarks by MacTech</a> reveals a clear winner.</p>

<p>The short story is that in most cases, Parallels runs a solid 14-20 percent faster than Fusion, except in the rather limited scenario of running Windows XP 32-bit on two virtual processors.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/fig01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/fig01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Overall, running 32-bit Windows OSes with a single virtual processor, Parallels is 14 percent faster; with two virtual processors, Parallels is 20 percent faster with Vista, while Fusion is 10 percent faster with XP; and for 64-bit Vista, Parallels is 15 percent speedier. Depending on the task, the numbers vary&mdash;like transcoding MP3s can be up to 30 percent faster on Parallels.</p>
<p>MacTech's tests are ridiculously comprehensive, spanning multiple machines with tons of different applications&mdash;the whole them took a couple months&mdash;so if you want the full, chart-heavy breakdown, head over there: [<a href="http://www.mactech.com/articles/mactech/Vol.25/25.04/VMBenchmarks">MacTech</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5167056/vmware-fusion-vs-parallels-desktop-for-mac-which-is-faster]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5167056]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[windows on mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fusion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[parallels]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[virtualization]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vmware]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5167056&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Officially Brings Back MobileMe's Push, Improves Features]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/02/mobileme3.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/mobileme3.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>Apple just sent out an email to MobileMe subscribers to let them know of some new(ish) features. The biggest bullet point is the fact that <b>push is back</b>.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Faster syncing with Mac and PC. Changes you make to contacts and calendars on your Mac (Address Book and iCal) or PC (Microsoft Outlook) are now automatically pushed up to the cloud every time you make an update. Likewise, changes you make on me.com, iPhone, or iPod touch are automatically pushed to your Mac or PC. As a result, your contacts and calendars update faster across all your devices. To take advantage of faster syncing, be sure you're running Mac OS X Leopard 10.5.6 (Mac) or MobileMe Control Panel 1.3 (Windows).</p>
</blockquote>
<p>After a <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5033128/mobileme-not-up-to-apples-standards-says-steve-jobs">lousy launch in 2008</a>, Apple decided to avoid associating the word "push" with <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MOBILE ME" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/mobile-me/">Mobile Me</a> until they could get synchronization between computers and mobile devices (iPhones, iPod touch) down to acceptable times. Looks like it's close enough now to bring the term back.</p>
<p>Another new feature, iDisk file sharing, has been around since the 13th. Improved iPhone notification and syncing and better <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged WEB APP" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/web-app/">web app</a> performance round out the improvements.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Dear MobileMe member:</p>
<p>Over the past few months, we have been working hard to make MobileMe the best service it can be. Here is a summary of the improvements and performance enhancements that have recently been completed.<br>
Easy file sharing. iDisk now makes it even easier to share files that are too big to email. Simply select a file in the iDisk web app and click the Share File button to generate an email with a download link. You can also optionally add password protection and set an expiration date for the link. For more details, view this tutorial.</p>
<p>Faster syncing with Mac and PC. Changes you make to contacts and calendars on your Mac (Address Book and iCal) or PC (Microsoft Outlook) are now automatically pushed up to the cloud every time you make an update. Likewise, changes you make on me.com, iPhone, or iPod touch are automatically pushed to your Mac or PC. As a result, your contacts and calendars update faster across all your devices. To take advantage of faster syncing, be sure you're running Mac OS X Leopard 10.5.6 (Mac) or MobileMe Control Panel 1.3 (Windows).</p>
<p>Improved notifications and sync on iPhone. Reliability of new email notifications and syncing of contacts and calendar with MobileMe have both been improved. To get the best MobileMe experience on your iPhone or iPod touch, you should be running iPhone Software 2.2 or later.</p>
<p>Better web app performance. We have also improved the overall performance of the web apps at me.com including faster start time in Calendar and searching in Contacts. For more details, see this support article.<br>
Remember, to take advantage of these improvements, your computers and devices must be running the latest software versions indicated above.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5161256/apple-officially-brings-back-mobilemes-push-improves-features]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5161256]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[mobile me]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[contacts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[idisk]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mobile me features]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mobileme]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[push]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[syncing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[web app]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[webapp]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:37:48 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5161256&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Giz Explains: Why Lenses Are the Real Key to Stunning Photos]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/02/realenses.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/realenses.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>When most of us <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5160540/canon-5d-mark-ii-vs-nikon-d700-review-shoot+out?skyline=true&s=x">talk digital cameras</a>, <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5155942/giz-explains-why-more-megapixels-isnt-always-more-better">we talk megapixels</a>, ISO, image noise, shot-per-second speed and image processing. We're tech geeks. But really, none of that stuff matters as much as your camera's lens.</p>

<p>The lens is, after all, your camera's eyeball&mdash;the image sensor or film can only record what comes in through the lens. It's what defines the picture's perspective, clarity and way more.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/nikkorzoomdai.jpg" class="right" width="450" height="182" style="display:block;">Lenses are actually a really complicated thing to talk about&mdash;if your job was to steer photons through tunnels of stretched glass, people would call you complicated too&mdash;so we're gonna try to keep it to field basics, you should know to get around, rather than dive into the crazy physics and mathematical ratios and stuff.</p>
<p><b>Lens Terminology</b><br>
Before we get into the basic lens types, you should know the two major numbers you're looking at you when you talk about lenses: Focal length and aperture.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/focaldiagram_02.jpg" width="478" height="138" style="display:block;"><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/learn/?/key=focal+length">Focal length is the distance</a> between the optical center of the lens and the point where it focuses the light coming into the lens (when a shot is in focus, that's the image sensor or film). The diagram above, from <a href="http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/camera-lenses.htm">Cambridge In Colour</a> shows, very simply, what focal length refers to, and how it affects your pitchas. Here's another <a href="http://www.paragon-press.com/lens/lenchart.htm">pretty excellent, easy to understand explanation</a>, with pictures showing the results of using different focal lengths on the same shot.</p>
<p>Practically, what you need to know is that focal length measured in millimeters, and that's where you get, say, an 18-55mm lens, a 400mm telephoto or a <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5155516/canon-sx1-20x-superzoom-has-10mp-cmos-sensor-shoots-1080p-video">28-560mm lens found in a super-zoom camera</a>. (You probably know this, but when you see "20x zoom lens," the spec refers to the ratio of the longest focal length to the shortest&mdash;so 560 divided by 28.) Basically, the longer the focal length, the more magnified or "zoomed in" your photo can be.</p>
<p>Aperture is the other major spec on a lens, and something you deal with most on DSLRS. <a href="http://www.photoxels.com/tutorial_aperture.html">The aperture</a> is the hole that actually lets the light into the camera, and you make can make it bigger or smaller. The size of the hole is expressed in terms of F-stops, or as you might see a lot F/2.8 or F2.8 or F8 or F11 or whatever.</p>
<p>The bigger the F number, the smaller the aperture, or hole. The smaller the number, the bigger the hole, which means the more light it lets in. The reason that's good is that means you can shoot with a faster shutter speed, so you don't get blurry photos, or when you're shooting in low light, since more light can get through, which means you're not forced to choose between shooting dark, blurry things or excessively grainy photos as you crank up the ISO (light sensitivity) to compensate for the lack of light. So, when someone's talking about a "fast" lens, they're talking about one with a big aperture, like F/1.8&mdash;easy to remember, you can shoot with faster shutter speeds with less light.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/aperturediagrama_02.jpg" width="804" height="265" style="display:block;float:none;">With a big aperture, you also have a shallower depth of field&mdash;subjects in focus are sharp, but everything around it is soft and blurry. A tighter aperture (higher F-stop number) lets you focus more at once, as you can see in the diagram above <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aperture">combined from Wikipedia</a>. There's more on depth of field <a href="http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/depth-of-field.htm">here</a>. Overall, we're staying on the easy-to-swallow side, but if you've really got a hankering for F-stop knowledge, <a href="http://www.uscoles.com/fstop.htm">here's a crazy detailed explanation</a>.</p>
<p><b>Lens Types</b><br>
Having fun yet? There are a few basic <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photographic_lens">types of lenses</a>, and of course, a whole bunch of specialized ones beyond that, like <a href="http://photo.net/learn/macro/">macro</a> or tilt lenses. But here are the basics.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/normalist_01.jpg" width="804" height="336" style="display:block;float:none;">A <a href="http://photonotes.org/articles/beginner-faq/lenses.html">normal lens</a> is one with a perspective that looks a lot the perspective of the human eye. With a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/135_film">35mm</a> or <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full-frame_digital_SLR">full-frame</a> camera, that's about a 50mm lens, though it varies depending on the size of the film or image sensor. For instance, this <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5150061/nikons-new-dx-35mm-f18-prime-the-first-lens-you-should-buy-for-any-dx-nikon-dslr">35mm Nikon lens</a> is for their DX cameras, DX meaning it has a sensor that's not "full" (equal to 35mm film). When that lens is attached to a DX camera, it's the equivalent to a 50mm lens on a full-frame camera&mdash;making it normal.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/wideangleex.jpg" width="804" height="321" style="display:block;float:none;"><a href="http://tips.romanzolin.com/articles/article045.php">A wide-angle lens</a> is, most basically, one with a focal length that's way shorter than a normal lens (which, again, varies depending on the size of the film or sensor). Wide angles are useful for take wide shots&mdash;-panoramas, or just trying to squeeze a huge group of people in a single picture without being 10 light years away. You can also do neato distortion tricks&mdash;a fisheye is just a crazy kind of wide-angle lens. <em>Example Image: <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/ekilby/1843346816/">Ekilby</a>/Flickr</em></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/teleexample.jpg" width="804" height="232" style="display:block;float:none;">A <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephoto_lens">telephoto lens</a> is one with a really long focal length (like 400mm). Since they're designed like telescopes, they are physically more compact than their focal lengths, but they can still get pretty damn massive. They're good for shooting stuff far, far away. <em>Example Image <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/shinythings/559686086/">Shiny Things</a>/Flickr</em></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/primediagram.jpg" width="275" height="245"><a href="http://photocritic.org/prime-lens/">A prime lens</a> is just one with a fixed focal length&mdash;you can't zoom in or out&mdash;and typically they produce sharper pictures than all-but-the-priciest zoom lenses. Any of the above lens types can be prime lenses, or zoom, below. This fisheye is a prime lens.</p>
<p>A <a href="http://www.adorama.com/catalog.tpl?op=article_030303">zoom lens</a> is one you can adjust the focal length on&mdash;zoom in and out&mdash;so you can shoot a variety of stuff with a single lens. The aperture tends to vary based on the focal length, unless you get a really pricey zoom lens that's also "fast."</p>
<p><b>Lens Brands and Compatibility</b><br>
But, even looking at one company at a time, lenses are complicated and sticky. Take Canon, for instance. They've got a million different kinds of lens mounts (where the camera and lens fit together) for their single-lens reflex cameras, depending on how far back in time you go. Currently they've got <a href="http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=MultiMiscPageAct&key=Lens_Advantage_Select&fcategoryid=140">two major kinds of lens mounts</a>: EF (electro-focus because the focusing motor action is built into the lens) and and EF-S. The latter is for their entry-level to mid-range DSLRs only, because it's made for their smaller (not full-frame, i.e., not 35mm equivalent) image sensors. Standard EF lenses will work on cameras with an EF-S mount, but EF-S lenses won't work on cameras with a regular EF mount. And before that, there was <a href="http://www.photoethnography.com/ClassicCameras/index-frameset.html?Lens-FD.html~mainFrame">the FD mount</a>, which totally doesn't work on DSLRs <a href="http://www.bobatkins.com/photography/reviews/canon_fd_eos_adapters.html">without an adapter</a>.</p>
<p>Nikon isn't quite as bad as here&mdash;they've had the same F-mount for over 40 years, so all their lenses with physically fit on the camera, but with their DSLRs, you've gotta watch out for their FX lenses (full-frame lenses like for the D700) vs. <a href="http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/dx-lenses.htm">their DX lenses</a> (like Canon, meant for their cameras with smaller APS-C sensors). When used on full-frame cameras, DX lenses will block out the corners of the picture since they're supposed to cover a smaller image area. But overall, with Nikon you have the advantage of being able to use older lenses in a way you can't with Canon gear. Ken Rockwell has a comprehensive tome <a href="http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/nikortek.htm">about Nikon lenses and types for more</a>.</p>
<p><b>The High Cost of Optics</b><br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/lensdiagrama.jpg" width="804" height="301" style="display:block;float:none;">Okay, great. Here's a real question: Why are lenses so goddamned expensive? Well, as Steve Heiner, Nikon SLR-division technical marketing manager, told us, "You're paying for materials and the process of creating the lens," which, as you might guess, improves image quality. Faster apertures&mdash;which require larger glass elements in pro zoom lenses&mdash;heavier materials like metal, for durability, and touches like a nano-crystal coating that minimizes reflections for low-light shooting are things that make lenses cost hundreds or thousands or dollars. As a rep from Canon told us, there's no real getting cheaper over time, like most other mechanical components. Precision optical glass just doesn't work that way.</p>
<p>Materials are also what separate crummy lenses from good ones, which is why cheap lenses in cellphones suck&mdash;they've gotta be cheap, really tiny and really light and well, you can't change physics&mdash;and why even cheap DSLR lenses aren't as good as expensive-as-hell ones. <strong>Update</strong>: Daniel pointed out this pretty excellent video showing how lenses are made, which shines more light on why they're so damn pricey: <object width="506" height="311" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/X7_wL0ZZi6k&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/X7_wL0ZZi6k&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="506" height="311" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/X7_wL0ZZi6k_01.jpg" style="display: none;" class="embeddedVideoThumbnail"></p>
<p>At the same time, there is a lot of progress in lens tech happening&mdash;look at all the ultra wide-angle lenses popping up in point-and-shoots now. Canon says that's cause you've got smaller image sensors (which as we noted above, changes the relation of the focal length), more aspherical lens elements (<a href="http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/opinion/html/aspherical.htm">which are cheaper to make</a>), a new kind of ultra high refractive index aspherical optical glass (uhhhh, don't ask me) and the miniaturization of mechanical parts like AF motors.</p>
<p>There's a lot we had to leave out, like <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/learn/?/Glossary/Optical/chromatic_aberration_01.htm">chromatic aberration</a> and <a href="http://pcin.net/update/2007/01/24/lens-flare-digital-photography-tip-of-the-week/">lens flare</a>, but we hope we gave you a pretty good starting point to learn about lenses. Real camera pros, feel free to leave more in the comments.</p>
<p><em>Still something you still wanna know? Send any questions about lenses, upskirts, or crazy weird Japanese photographers who swarm cosplayers to tips@gizmodo.com, with "<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GIZ EXPLAINS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/giz-explains/">Giz Explains</a>" in the subject line. Also, thanks to Nikon for the lens diagrams!</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5160891/giz-explains-why-lenses-are-the-real-key-to-stunning-photos]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5160891]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[giz explains]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera lenses]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dslrs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lenses]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5160891&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Super Bowl HDTV and Gadget Deals]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/01/superbowl-hdtv.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/superbowl-hdtv.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Even if you are a Giants fan like me, there are plenty of reasons to get excited about the Super Bowl. It's an excuse to drink beer, eat little cocktail weenies&mdash;and get great gadget deals.</p>
<div style='float:right; margin-left:-9px;'><script type="text/javascript">
 digg_skin = 'compact'; digg_bgcolor = '#f1f8fa'; digg_url = 'http://digg.com/gadgets/Your_Guide_To_Super_Bowl_XLIII_Gadget_Deals'; 
</script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript">
</script></div>
<p><strong>HDTV</strong><br>
Alright, first thing's first&mdash;we need to talk HDTVs again. With the game looming, you may be thinking about an upgrade or, in some cases, your first HDTV set. In this economy, spending money is always an issue, but at this point, waiting for even cheaper HDTVs will probably keep you on the sidelines for a <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5114159/wtf-bad-economy-actually-slowing-hdtv-price-drops">good long while</a>. In the meantime, you are missing out on all the crystal-clear action. I mean, even <a href="http://www.televisionbroadcast.com/article/73630"><i>The Simpsons</i> are going high-def</a> this year.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/01/thumb160x_vizio.JPG" class="left image158" width="158" />No worries though&mdash;retailers are busting out some great deals on HDTVs in anticipation of the Super Bowl crowd. Here are some examples:</p>
<p>• <a href="http://www.macmall.com/macmall/shop/detail.asp?Redir=1&description=Westinghouse%2D32%22+LCD+with+Built%2DIn+HDTV+Tuner%2DVideo&dpno=7249618">Westinghouse 32'' 1080p LCD HDTV for $364.99</a> (normally $564.99&mdash;use <a href="http://www.macmall.com/macmall/RebateCoupon~promoid~19571MacMall.asp">this rebate form</a>).<br>
• <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0014175NE/ref=asc_df_B0014175NE697975?smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER&tag=dealt82248-20&linkCode=asn">Samsung 40'' 1080p LCD HDTV for $1,108.83 plus free shipping and a $200 gift certificate to NFLShop.com</a> (normally $1,699.99&mdash;use <a href="http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/00/00/03/28/02/77/328027790._V237450806_.pdf">this gift certificate claim form</a>. Valid through 1/31).<br>
• <a href="http://www.yugster.com/default.aspx">Vizio 42'' 1080p Widescreen LCD HDTV (factory refurbished) for $589.97</a> (normally $999.99).<br>
• <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16889253162&nm_mc=AFC-Bensbargains&cm_mmc=AFC-Bensbargains-_-NA-_-NA-_-NA">Toshiba 42" 1080p LCD HDTV for $749 plus free shipping</a> (normally $1,399. Use coupon code "MMCHTV50").<br>
• <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16889253165">Toshiba Regza 46'' 1080p LCD HDTV for $999.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $1,499.99).<br>
• <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16889101138&nm_mc=AFC-Bensbargains&cm_mmc=AFC-Bensbargains-_-NA-_-NA-_-NA">Sharp Aquos 52" 1080p LCD HDTV for $1,449.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $2,099.99. Use coupon code "MMCHTV50").<br>
• <a href="http://www.walmart.com/browse/TVs/All-TVs/_/N-73jgZ1z0ftvs?ic=24_0&path=0%3A3944&ref=125875.331180+500921.4293837064">Walmart's Super Bowl HDTV sale&mdash;$100 off/$100 Walmart gift card included</a> (for example: 32'' Samsung for $498, 46'' Sony for $1,298).</p>
<p>If you decide to take advantage of these sales or any others you may have found through shopping comparison sites like <a href="http://www.pricegrabber.com/">PriceGrabber.com</a> and <a href="http://www.shopping.com/">Shopping.com</a>, there are a few things you need to keep in mind. Most importantly, you need to know which HDTV is going to work for you and your budget. Our guide <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5067130/giz-explains-how-to-choose-an-hdtv-like-a-pro">How to Choose and HDTV Like a Pro</a> and the followup <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5099489/how-to-buy-an-hdtv-today-or-any-day">How To Buy and HDTV Today (Or Any Day)</a> will give you all the information you need to make smart decisions.</p>
<p>It's a good idea to carry around a web-enabled cellphone to comparison shop in the store, or have a friend at a computer standing by. If they have an in-store pickup service, that <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5131147/use-your-cellphone-to-save-big-money-at-best-buy">could lead to even bigger savings</a>&mdash;not to mention a guarantee to have your TV before the game on Sunday.</p>
<p><strong>What To Watch Out For</strong><br>
As always, it's almost always a good idea to avoid <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5139264/sears-plasma-tvs-have-to-be-recharged-every-5-years-so-buy-our-pricey-warranty">pricey warranties</a>, profit-heavy accessories <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/282725/the-truth-about-monster-cable-+-grand-finale-part-iii">like HDMI cables</a> and <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5119861/best-buy-turns-to-component-cable-deception-to-sell-hdtv-calibration-service">unnecessary services</a> offered in the store. There is a 99% chance you are getting screwed.</p>
<p>Don't fall for liquidation sales. You may feel that the <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5132968/circuit-city-to-liquidate-prices-may-go-up-to-msrp">demise of Circuit City</a> presents an ideal opportunity to score some new gear for the game. The reality is, if you're not constantly cross-checking those supposedly slashed prices, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5140260/avoid-getting-fleeced-at-liquidation-sales">quite the opposite may be true</a>.</p>
<p><strong>It Isn't All About the TV</strong><br>
The Super Bowl isn't just about a big HDTV. It's about people getting together, getting drunk and yelling at that HDTV. It's also a good time to pick up some of the extras you are going to need like cool remotes, cooking equipment, and other football-related gear. Here are some of the best deals going:</p>

<p><b>Remotes:</b><br>
• <a href="http://www.pcrichard.com/catalog/product.jsp?modelNo=HARMONY550">Logitech Harmony 550 Universal Remote Control for $59.97 plus free shipping</a> (normally $99.97)<br>
• <a href="http://www.target.com/Logitech-Harmony-Advanced-Control-915-000081/dp/B001G6LTL6/?mid=906795-2-0-ARTICLE-0">Logitech Harmony 610 Universal Remote Control for $49.99</a> (normally $79.99)</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/01/thumb160x_speakers.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><b>Other Home Entertainment Gadgets:</b><br>
• <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?SID=906267-2-42-ARTICLE-woot-flash-09&Item=N82E16882082008&nm_mc=AFC-DealNews&cm_mmc=AFC-DealNews-_-NA-_-NA-_-NA">Sling Media Slingbox Pro-HD for $259.99</a> (normally $299.99)<br>
• <a href="http://www.cambridgesoundworks.com/store/category.cgi?item=53CW0015AA101&akhg1999=WBZRTECSG5">Cambridge Soundworks Surround Speakers for $99.99</a> (normally $299.99)<br>
• <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16882290110">Polk Audio Two-way Floorstanding Loudspeaker for $99.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $199.99)<br>
• <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16882117255">Pioneer HTP-2920 5.1 Surround-Sound System for $199.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $329.99)</p>
<p><b>Gaming:</b><br>
• <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16879200674&CMP=AFC-C8Junction">Madden 2009 on PS3 for $36.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $56.99 / Great for exacting revenge on a blown season. Damn you Giants!)</p>
<p><b>DVDs:</b><br>
• <a href="http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/searchtools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=1675799&SRCCODE=GOOGLEBASE&cm_mmc_o=TBBTkwCjCVyBpAgf%20mwzygtCjCVRqCjCVRq"><em>NFL History of the Pittsburgh Steelers</em> on DVD for $13.99</a> (normally $26.98)<br>
• <a href="http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=4183918&sourceid=1500000000000003260390&ci_src=14110944&ci_sku=4183918"><em>Pittsburgh Steelers: Super Bowl Champions</em> on DVD for $8.86</a> (normally $19.98)<br>
• <a href="http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=1100859&sourceid=1500000000000003260390&ci_src=14110944&ci_sku=1100859"><em>Any Given Sunday</em> on DVD for $4.86</a> (normally $14.96, and Wilson's favorite Oliver Stone film)<br>
• <a href="http://www.buy.com/retail/product.asp?sku=40701647&listingid=22259345&dcaid=17902"><em>Friday Night Lights</em> for $3.15</a> (normally $12.98)<br>
• <a href="http://www.buy.com/retail/product.asp?sku=40148960&listingid=22287337&dcaid=17902"><em>Remember the Titans</em> for $5.73</a> (normally $14.99)<br>
• <a href="http://www.inetvideo.com/Items/N01-0116746"><em>The Comebacks</em> on DVD for $4.99</a> (normally $14.98)<br>
• <a href="http://www.deepdiscount.com/viewproduct.htm?productId=5741698&extid=df_googlebase&ci_src=14110944&ci_sku=COL002066"><em>Jerry McGuire</em> on DVD for $8.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $19.95)<br>
• <a href="http://www.tower.com/little-giants-rick-moranis-dvd/wapi/107022812"><em>Little Giants</em> on DVD for $6.99</a> (normally $14.97)<br>
• <a href="http://www.supermart.com/p-30930-waterboy-the.aspx"><em>The Waterboy</em> on DVD for $8.26 plus free shipping</a> (normally $19.99)<br>
• <a href="http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?id=1657233&skuId=8446023&type=product&ref=06&loc=01&ci_src=14110944&ci_sku=8446023"><em>We Are Marshall</em> for $4.99</a> (normally $14.98)</p>
<p><b>Grills:</b><br>
• <a href="http://www.sears.com/shc/s/p_10153_12605_00990736000P?mv=cf&vName=Lawn+%26+Garden&cName=Grills&sbf=Clearance&sid=I0084400010000100312&aff=Y">Tool Box Jumbo Grill with Stand for $24.97</a> (normally $99.99)<br>
• <a href="http://www.fatwallet.com/forums/hot-deals/897011">Coleman Outdoor Grill and Stove for $32.36</a> (normally $82.99, in Target stores only)<br>
• <a href="http://www.homedepot.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?storeId=10051&productId=100656730&langId=-1&catalogId=10053&ci_src=14110944&ci_sku=100656730&cm_mmc=1hd.com2froogle-_-product_feed-_-D29X-_-100656730">Hamilton Beach HealthSmart Grill for $18.99</a> (normally $36.11)<br>
• <a href="http://apexexpress.stores.yahoo.net/chsigefogrma.html">George Foreman Champ Grill for $19.99</a> (normally $39.99)</p>
<p><b>Beer and Popcorn:</b><br>
• <a href="http://www.fatwallet.com/forums/grocery-coupons/894987">A handful of deals and rebates on beer</a> (This is what it is all about)<br>
• <a href="http://www.provantage.com/nostalgia-electrics-ofp-501~7NOSG007.htm">Nostalgia Movietime Popcorn Maker for $22.54</a> (normally $36.23)<br>
• <a href="http://paylessmerchandise.com/cart/index.php?main_page=product_info&products_id=68&currency=USD">Presto PopLite Hot Air Popcorn Popper for $14.99</a> (normally $29.99)<br>
• <a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/Orville-Redenbacher's-ORIGINAL-Popping-CORN-KERNELS-_W0QQitemZ380096288847QQcmdZViewItem">Orville Redenbacher's Original Popping Corn Kernels for $6.95</a> (normally $26.95)</p>
<p><b>For the Ladies:</b><br>
• <a href="http://www.allbooks4less.com/default.asp?Nsl=1834&Ix=645&R=9780764539367B&Rt=2058"><em>Football for Dummies</em> for $7.99</a> (normally $19.99)<br>
• <a href="http://www.fanhoodgear.com/fde035.html">Arizona Cardinals earrings for $5.99</a> (normally $21.95)<br>
• <a href="http://www.wackyplanet.com/cardinals-property-of-football-apron.html">Arizona Cardinals apron for $12.95</a> (normally $14.95)<br>
• <a href="http://cycleoutlet.ecrater.com/product.php?pid=3068464">Pittsburg Steelers earrings for $3.99</a> (normally $13.95)<br>
• <a href="http://www.wackyplanet.com/steelers-property-of-football-apron.html">Pittsburg Steelers apron for $12.95</a> (normally $14.95)<br>
• <a href="http://www.orientaltrading.com/ui/browse/processRequest.do?requestURI=processProductsCatalog&categoryId=377320&&BP=10311&cm_mmc=Pricegrabber-_-pricegrabber-_-pricegrabber-_-pricegrabber&sku=4/3747&srccode=cii_5784816&cpncode=21-4772760-2">5 lbs. of Holiday Chocolate for $1.49</a> (normally $24.99 - use coupon code "AVA910")</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/01/thumb160x_diet-dr-pepper.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><b>Hobomodo:</b><br>
• <a href="http://theexerciseguru.com/SuperBowl/">Mini Football for $0</a> (use fake e-mail address, could possibly be spam)<br>
• <a href="http://www.artscow.com/">1,200 Digital Photo Prints for $0</a> (use coupon code "FREE800")<br>
• <a href="http://www.freedietdrpepper.com/">Diet Dr. Pepper for $0</a><br>
• <a href="https://secure.startsampling.com/sm/100576/captureAddress.iphtml?item=100576&source=ralphs">Orville Redenbacher Natural Gourmet Popcorn for $0</a><br>
• <a href="http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3172252">Bruce Springsteen Songs for Guitar Hero World Tour for $0</a> (valid until 2/04)<br>
&bull;<a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5139579/tips-for-hd-and-3d-viewing-on-superbowl-sunday">3D glasses for Super Bowl commercials for $0</a> You may want to <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5139211/3d-porn-is-coming-three-guesses-as-to-what-will-be-sticking-straight-off-the-screen">hold on to these</a>.</p>
<p>Now get out there and enjoy the game. And I would like to take this opportunity to say that the last six weeks or so of the Giant's season made me want to puke. If I wanted to see a team look like crap, I would go back to a standard-def TV.</p>
<p><em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #profdealzmodo" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/profdealzmodo/">Prof. Dealzmodo</a> is a regular section dedicated to helping budget-minded consumers learn how to shop smarter and get the best deals on their favorite gadgets. If you have any topics you would like to see covered, send your idea to tips@gizmodo.com, with "Professor Dealzmodo" in the subject line.</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://lifehacker.com/5140613/super-bowl-hdtv-and-gadget-deals]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5140613]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[prof. dealzmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bowl]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dealzmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[super]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[super bowl deals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[super bowl hdtv deals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[super bowl xliii]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5140613&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[OnPar: GPS Rangefinder with iPhone Aesthetics]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/01/onpar-gps.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/onpar-gps.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;"></a>There are a slew of GPS rangefinders out there for golfers, but not many are built with all the style, portability and one-touch interface of a premium touchscreen smartphone.</p><p>The <a class="tagautolink autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #onpar" href="http://gizmodo.comhttp://stage.gizmodo.com/tag/onpar/">OnPar</a> features a 3.5-inch screen and a reasonable thickness of .63 inches, making it just a tad stubbier than an iPhone. It stores up to 300 courses in its memory and operates without subscription fees. But beyond mere yardage to the pin, it seems that the <a class="tagautolink autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #onpar" href="http://gizmodo.comhttp://stage.gizmodo.com/tag/onpar/">OnPar</a>'s touchscreen is put to good use in that it allows you to track yardage to anywhere on the hole, like a water hazard or sand trap, with a simple touch of the screen.</p>
<p>The <a class="tagautolink autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #onpar" href="http://gizmodo.comhttp://stage.gizmodo.com/tag/onpar/">OnPar</a> will be available next month. No word on price. [<a href="http://www.onpargps.com/index.php">OnPar</a> via <a href="http://www.navigadget.com/index.php/2009/01/28/onpar-gps">Navigadget</a>]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://lifehacker.com/5140919/onpar-gps-rangefinder-with-iphone-aesthetics]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5140919]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[golf]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[on par]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[on par gps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[onpar]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[onpar gps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rangefinder]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sports]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5140919&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Win 7 Tip: Sleep/Hibernate Mode Is Buggy, May Incapacitate Your Machine]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/01/power3.PNG"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/power3.PNG" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>When I came home last night, I thought my previously healthy Windows 7 machine was dead. It was making a horrendous squeal and refused to reboot multiple times. Turns out it was asleep.</p>
<p>I'm not sure what kind of sleep it was in (I was only gone for 6 hours and I've left it alone for half a day before and it was fine), but a regular reboot refused to restart it. So I did that ten times in a row, before giving up. I had to pull out the power cable (it's a desktop) and let the motherboard's lights go off and battery drain out. After this, it was able to correctly boot up again to a "Resuming Windows" screen, which then didn't respond to any keyboard/mouse inputs, so I had to reset again.</p>
<p>It's not like previous the sleep mode in Windows versions worked perfectly, but the manufacturer usually tests it once or twice to make sure that it's compatible enough that you don't have to jump through crazy hoops to re-enable your system. So our hint is to disable sleep/hibernate/power save mode on your system, in case it's incompatible, for now to save yourself headaches later.</p>
<p>And yes, it's a beta, so we're hoping compatibility gets fixed by release time.</p>
<p><em>View our other Windows 7 tips and our continuing coverage <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows-7">here</a>.</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5133399/win-7-tip-sleephibernate-mode-is-buggy-may-incapacitate-your-machine]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5133399]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bugs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hibernate]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[win 7 tip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[win 7 tips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7 sleep]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7 tip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7 tips]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 16 Jan 2009 19:10:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5133399&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Win 7 Tip: Problem Steps Recorder is Amazing, Needs to Be In Every OS]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/01/win7psr.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/win7psr.png" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>We mentioned the Problem Steps Recorder blackbox error reporting app back in our <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5070219/giz-explains-why-windows-7-will-smash-vista">Win 7 Giz Explains</a>, but it wasn't until I tried it for myself that I saw just how amazing it is.</p>
<div style='float:right; margin-left:-9px;'><script type="text/javascript">
digg_skin = 'compact'; digg_bgcolor = '#f1f8fa'; digg_url = 'http://digg.com/microsoft/Win_7_Tip_Problem_Steps_Recorder_Makes_Troubleshooting_Easy'; 
</script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript">
</script></div>
<p>The quick summary of PSR is that it's a recording app you activate to record any inputs you make to your Windows 7 machine (mouse clicks, keyboard presses) along with screenshots of every step. When done, PSR generates one big HTML slideshow of all your actions complete with an <i>English language description</i> of what you did.</p>
<p>This is great for developers and tech support so they can see what an end-user is doing without actually standing over their shoulder or VNCing into their machine, but it's also useful whenever you have to tech support your parents over the phone (<a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5029743/john-mayer-does-apple-tech-support-for-his-dad-fails-miserably">like John Mayer</a>). You can just have them record the steps and you'll view it at home, seeing EXACTLY what went wrong!</p>
<p>Seriously, this is awesome, Microsoft. Now let's have it in every OS please.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5131234/win-7-tip-problem-steps-recorder-is-amazing-needs-to-be-in-every-os]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5131234]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[win 7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[win 7 tip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[win 7 tips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[win7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7 black box]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7 problem steps recorder]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7 tip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7 tips]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5131234&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Dealzmodo Hack: Make Your Old USB Stick Into a Digital Multitool]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/12/usbtop.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/usbtop.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>With 8GB flash drives available for under $20 and 32GB drives edging into the mainstream, nobody can blame you for shelving old USB sticks. But there are a surprising number of uses for those rickety, sub-gigabyte keychains.</p>
<p>There are nearly endless ways to bring a USB stick out of retirement, and they're not just gimmicks: virtually all USB sticks, 32MB USB 1.1 dinosaurs included, can be repurposed into anything from a lifesaving troubleshooting tool to an entire portable OS. Here are your best options:</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/bitlocker_01.jpg" width="150" height="137"><strong>Turn it into a physical "key" for your computer</strong><br>
For security freaks or the extraordinarily literal-minded, Vista has built-in software to <a href="http://lifehacker.com/software/vista/windows-vista-tip-enable-bitlocker-with-a-usb-drive-234459.php">convert your USB key into an actual key</a>, such that your PC won't boot without having it inserted. It might not be ideal if your key may be old enough that it is likely to fail on you, if you have a propensity to lose tiny things, or if your laptop only has one or two USB ports to begin with, but it definitely offers a special kind of peace of mind. For Macs, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5037637/rohos-logon-key-converts-any-usb-stick-to-a-mac-login-key">Rohos essentially does the same thing</a>, but at $30, it's not particularly recession-friendly.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/linux_01.jpg" width="150" height="181"><strong>Install a portable OS</strong><br>
This is actually simpler and less esoteric than it sounds&mdash;installing a wide array of Linux systems is pretty easy nowadays, and will more importantly net you a fully functional desktop that you can take with you wherever you go. Lifehacker recently assembled a <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5069054/battle-of-the-thumb-drive-linux-systems">useful comparison</a> of popular USB-able Linux distributions, in which they recommend the fantastic <a href="http://unetbootin.sourceforge.net/">UNetbootin</a> or creating the bootable keys in the first place. It's worth noting that two of these distros will work on keys at less than 128MB capacity (DSL is just 50MB, total) and all carry a legitimately useful range of apps.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/portapps_01.jpg" width="150" height="148"><strong>Use portable apps to create a pocketable user profile</strong><br>
Most free software now comes in a portable variety, meaning that at least under Windows, programs that normally extend their tentacles into your user profile and registry can be installed completely&mdash;user data included&mdash;onto a USB stick. All you do is insert the stick and find the desired .exe, and you're good to go.</p>
<p>The most obvious advantage to this is profile portability&mdash;in other words, your portable <a href="http://portableapps.com/apps/internet/firefox_portable">Firefox</a> (or <a href="http://www.opera-usb.com/operausben.htm">Opera</a> or <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5045439/portable-chrome-puts-chrome-on-your-thumb-drive">Chrome</a>) isn't just the app, it's your favorites, history, user preferences and cookies too. The <a href="http://portableapps.com/apps/internet/pidgin_portable">portable version of Pidgin</a>, a multiprotocol IM program, can hold your account data, transcripts and settings. Most of these installations are quite small&mdash;Firefox is just 8MB, for example&mdash;so you can build an extensive user profile on all but the oldest keys.</p>
<p>The very best one-stop shop for portable apps is the, well, aptly named <a href="http://portableapps.com/suite">PortableApps.com</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/ubcd_01.jpg" width="150" height="112"><strong>Create a powerful troubleshooting toolbelt</strong><br>
Portable <a href="http://portableapps.com/apps/utilities/clamwin_portable">antivirus</a> and file <a href="http://www.recuva.com/">recovery apps</a> are convenient, but a USB key can be loaded up with much more powerful software. <a href="http://www.ubcd4win.com/index.htm">Ultimate Boot CD for Windows</a> is a sort of software panacea which, in addition to including a selection of Windows maintenance apps, carries a veritable treasure trove of low-level troubleshooting programs, made accessible by booting into a sort of temporary "Windows Lite" desktop. It can manage disk deletion and partitioning, software and hardware diagnostics and a huge variety of lifesaving recovery functions. Despite the "CD" part of its name, Ultimate Boot CD for Windows can be loaded onto a USB key, though it requires a Windows installation disc from which to build the aforementioned "Windows Lite" environment. If you don't run Windows but still want a basic DOS-based suite of hardware diagnostics and disk tools, the <a href="http://www.ultimatebootcd.com/">vanilla Ultimate Boot CD</a> has you <a href="http://www.pendrivelinux.com/2006/03/25/install-and-boot-ultimate-boot-cd-ubcd-from-a-usb-device/">covered</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/emu_01.jpg" width="150" height="131"><strong>Convert it into a tiny SNES, Genesis, MAME, etc.</strong><br>
Emulators are tiny, and most ROMs are even tinier; a USB key, no matter the size or speed, can probably hold more vintage console games than you can find the time to play. Many popular emulators come in a portable flavor, so your display settings, saved games and cheats will follow you everywhere. Without the need to install anything, this potentially opens up work, school or other public PCs to most pre-PlayStation gaming. Popular portable <a href="http://fceultra.sourceforge.net/">NES</a>, <a href="http://www.snes9x.com/">SNES</a>, <a href="http://boycottadvance.emuunlim.com/Downloads.htm">Game Boy</a>, <a href="http://www.gens.ws/downloads.shtml">Genesis</a>, and <a href="http://mameui.classicgaming.gamespy.com/">arcade</a> emulators. As for ROMs, that's on you. (Pro tip: GOOGLE).</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/vnc_01.jpg" width="150" height="150"><strong>Carry a portal to your home computer</strong><br>
Virtual Network Computing (VNC) sounds more complicated than it is&mdash;it simply lets you see and control your computer screen remotely. Whatever OS you run (<a href="http://www.uvnc.com/install/installation.html">Windows</a>, <a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/osxvnc/">Mac OS X</a>, <a href="http://www.tightvnc.com/download.html">Linux</a>), VNC servers are simple to set up and, if configured correctly, plenty secure. While many provide web interfaces to be accessed through a browser, they're almost always clunky, Java-based monstrosities. A simple <a href="http://www.uvnc.com/download/index.html">VNC client</a> (download the binary archive version) will carry your settings, run responsively and offer more quality, speed and transfer options than its bastard HTTP brother, transporting a home computer's desktop to wherever you happen to be.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/charity_01.jpg" width="150" height="112"><strong>Donate it to charity</strong><br>
If you're some kind of ingrate who doesn't see the potential in any of the above options (or you're just a good, charitable person), <a href="http://www.inveneo.org/">InVineo</a>, a non-profit tech outreach organization will find someone who does. They'll <a href="http://www.inveneo.org/?q=Thumbdrive">gladly take</a> your 64MB Cruzers and send them to developing countries to be used in schools or local governments.</p>
<p>Hat tip to <a href="http://Lifehacker.com">Lifehacker</a> and <a href="http://portableapps.com">Portable Apps</a>.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/dealzmodo-hacks">Dealzmodo Hacks</a> are intended to help you sustain your <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5059598/zero+cost-gadget-upgrades-for-the-next-great-depression">crippling gadget addiction through tighter times</a>. If you come across any on your own that are particularly useful, send it to our tips line (Subject: Dealzmodo Hack). <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/dealzmodo-hacks">Check back</a> every other Thursday for free DIY tricks to breathe new life into hardware that you already own.</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5101651/dealzmodo-hack-make-your-old-usb-stick-into-a-digital-multitool]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5101651]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[dealzmodo hack]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bitlocker]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dealzmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dealzmodo hacks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[diy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[emulators]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flash drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hacks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[inveneo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[opera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[portable]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[portable apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[thumb drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[usb drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[usb keys]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[usb sticks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vnc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 05 Dec 2008 12:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5101651&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[5 Gadgets You Can't Skimp On (And How to Save Money Buying Them)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/11/fivethings.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/fivethings.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a></p>
<div style='float:right; margin-left:-9px;'><script type="text/javascript">
digg_skin = 'compact'; digg_bgcolor = '#f1f8fa'; digg_url = 'http://digg.com/gadgets/5_Gadgets_You_Can_t_Skimp_On_And_How_to_Save_Money_Buying'; 
</script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript">
</script></div>
<p>The Financiapocalypse can't stop Christmas, but it can sure as hell suck some of the joy out of it. At the very least, it's probably making you reconsider just how much you wanna spend on toys for yourself and others this holiday season. You're probably looking to cut corners here and there, on <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5083319/dont-support-illicit-christmas-light-cartels">dollar-store Christmas lights</a>, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5059293/walmart-unwittingly-sells-ipod-nano-knockoff-as-actual-ipod">iPod knockoffs</a> and the like. That's all fine and dandy, but we've made a list of things you can't afford to cheap out on, because doing so will bite you in the ass later. Still, since we like you, we're also sharing how to save a bit of money in the process, so the whole not-cheaping-out thing doesn't hurt as much.</p>

<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/graphics.jpg" class="center" width="807" height="251" style="display:block;float:none;"><strong>Graphics Cards</strong><br>
<br>
When you're configuring a laptop online, you get a ton of options unless it's a Mac (ooooo burn). Anyway, the popular wisdom is that juicing the processor is always the best way to allocate your dollars to boost performance, since more megahertz is more betterer, right? Wrong. Take this Dell Studio configuration here. Spending $75 on the discrete ATI Mobility Radeon is a way better buy than $50 200MHz upgrade to the processor.</p>
<p>The performance difference those couple hundred megahertz buys you is negligible, while a discrete graphics card from ATI or Nvidia will deliver serious performance benefits over Intel's integrated graphics crap. This is especially true if you do even light 3D gaming, HD video playback or anything else mildly graphically intensive like running Vista's Aero interface (oooo another burn). Also, if you plan to keep a laptop for more than two years, buying the graphics card makes it more future-proof, since Windows 7&mdash;and many resource-intensive apps&mdash;will grab hold of graphics cards for extra computing muscle, too.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/memory.jpg" class="center" width="807" height="324" style="display:block;float:none;"><strong>Memory</strong><br>
<br>
Memory (aka RAM) is another place to sock your computing dollars instead of blindly bumping up the megahertz. Adding RAM almost always gives your computer a more noticeable performance boost for the same price (especially if you're going from like 1GB to 3GB), allowing you to multitask more and run crazier programs without dragging your computer down. And really, you shouldn't even try to run Windows Vista on anything less than 2GB. (If you can get 4GB and run Vista 64-bit, that's really magical.)</p>
<p>There is a trick to this, however. You don't buy the extra RAM as part of the computer configuration process, since your computer maker of choice will charge you by the arse-hairs for it. Instead, if you're comfortable doing an at-home installation, buy a laptop with the lowest amount of RAM, then buy it separately from Newegg, who even has a helpful tool to pick the right RAM that won't blow up your computer. Crunch the numbers first, of course, but chances are, in big RAM jumps, you will save money.</p>
<p>Another memory tip for those taking the not-as-hard-as-it-sounds cost-cutting step of building their own desktop PC: DDR2 memory is significantly cheaper than DDR3 memory (<a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820220353">$60</a> vs. <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820148150">$120</a>), and at equivalent speeds, the performance difference isn't very noticeable. Your best bet&mdash;following our not-skimping guidelines&mdash;is to get twice as much DDR2 memory for the same price.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/lenses.jpg" class="center" width="807" height="352" style="display:block;float:none;"><strong>Camera Lenses</strong><br>
<br>
The secret about DSLRs that Nikon and Canon don't wanna tell you in the middle of their arms race is that what really matters is the glass&mdash;the lens. A Canon 20D&mdash;or hell, an XT&mdash;with an awesome lens will take better pictures than a 40D with a crummy lens every single time. Besides, if you really want to maximize your DSLR's potential, you're going to need to expand beyond the kit lens that came in the box. It's literally like getting new glasses after a decade of avoiding the eye doctor. Unfortunately, like glasses, camera lenses are one of those things where price really does tend to be commensurate with quality. Don't expect fire sales.</p>
<p>Don't go crappy, instead go used. A used or refurbished lens is always cheaper than a brand new one. Of course, you should always buy from a reputable retailer with a good warranty and return policy, in case there's something wonky with it. (That applies for new lenses too, really.) Here's a <a href="http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Canon-Lenses/Where-To-Buy-Used-Canon-Lenses.aspx">list of places to buy used Canon glass</a>. With older lenses, there might be a few caveats like the lack of autofocus, but as Charlie at Gadget Lab notes in <a href="http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2008/10/dslr-lenses-on.html">his account of using some more "antique" Nikon glass</a>, the experience with those limitations can actually be rewarding, and help you learn about more photography in the process. (And isn't learning why you got a DSLR in the first place?)</p>
<p>If the used route frightens you, another approach is to go with a cheaper camera, and spend the extra money on quality glass. And guess what? Just because a new camera model pops out every six to nine months, it doesn't magically make the older models take less excellent pictures.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/gps.jpg" class="center" width="807" height="361" style="display:block;float:none;"><strong>Portable GPS Navigation Devices</strong><br>
<br>
What? The GPS navigation in your phone isn't enough? Okay, it probably isn't if you actually get behind a wheel to go places. There are lots of GPS navigation devices, and some of them look pretty good for pretty cheap. We're gonna get real specific with our advice here: Get a Garmin Nuvi. Every. Time.</p>
<p>We've road-tested pretty much every navigation device out there, from the smartest cellular connected machines to the dumbest WinCE systems falling off the truck from China, and time and again, we come back to the Nuvi. That's not to say you have to spend $200 more on a navigator. Maybe you could track down last year's top models that are now on sale. The maps wouldn't have changed <i>that</i> much in 12 months. Regardless, even if the Garmin is $25 or $50 more than the TomTom or Magellan on the shelf next to it, get the Garmin. The product will last longer and be more simple to use, resulting in your happiness and the happiness of the people stuck in the car with you. It's worth the extra scratch.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/headphones.jpg" class="center" width="807" height="450" style="display:block;float:none;"><strong>Headphones</strong><br>
<br>
Like liquor, strippers and accountants, when it comes to headphones, you get what you pay for. In this dimension there's no such thing as <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Stereo-Earbud-Headphone-Apple-shuffle/dp/B000OPCH52/ref=pd_bbs_sr_2_s9_rk?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&s9r=8a02b5411685bd5d0116911e464401bc&itemPosition=2&qid=1227597607&sr=8-2">good $2 headphones</a>. You might tolerate them because you know don't any better (or you are simply a knowing masochist) but I guarantee you, they sound like the Tin Man's rusty ass.</p>
<p>You may recall that our amazing, extensive no-BS headphones battlemodo breaks down the best and the worst in <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5033455/ultimate-cut+the+crap-in+ear-headphone-battlemodo">every price category worth considering</a>, and is a great place to start. The trend of the piece, you might notice, is that you can't go wrong with Shures, which don't cost as much as some audiophile earphones, but generally have list prices starting at $100. Good news, my favorites for the money, Shure's E2c sound-isolating headphones, now can be had <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Shure-E2c-n-Sound-Isolating-Earphones/dp/B000E5GKW8/ref=pd_bbs_sr_2?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1227595870&sr=8-2">for $60 easy</a>, or as low as $40 on sale. Some people prefer those to their current replacement the SE110 (the E2c's are slightly bassier), that list for $100 but sell for <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Shure-Isolating-Earphone-Balanced-Armature/dp/B000VHUE0S/ref=dp_ob_title_ce?ie=UTF8&qid=1227595870&sr=8-2">$75 at Amazon at the moment</a>. I know that a few editors at Gizmodo prefer the SE110s, but either way, the "hundred dollar" headphones stomp the cheap-skate models.</p>
<p>That's the real point: The extra $40 for a good pair of headphones delivers such a fantastical world of difference&mdash;especially to those commuters and workout buffs who spend a decent amount of time wearing them&mdash;that it is very much worth the extra cash. The only "catch" is that you will finally hear how bad your MP3s sound if you ripped them at a super-low bitrate. MP3s under 192Kbps might need to be re-ripped, since you will hear actually, at long last, hear the compression.</p>
<p><strong>Your Turn</strong><br>
<br>
Alright, that's five from us. Surely you guys have got advice on other gear and accessories you should never skimp on. If so, though, you better be prepared to share ways to buy them cheaper than list price. Retail is for suckers! Come on, let's hear from you in the comments.</p>
<p><strong>More Advice for the Black Friday Fray:</strong><br>
&bull; The aforementioned <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5095164/the-ultimate-black-friday-survival-guide?skyline=true&s=x">Ultimate Survival Guide</a>.<br>
&bull; <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5098461/5-gadgets-you-cant-skimp-on-and-how-to-save-money-buying-them">5 Gadgets You Can't Skimp On (And How to Save Money Buying Them)</a><br>
&bull; <a href="%3Ca%20href=" class="top">Best of Black Friday Deals Complete Roundup</a>"&gt;All the best deals in one place<br>
&bull; Plus these late breaking ones from Cupertino: <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5099725/apple-black-friday-deals-include-some-decent-third+party-discounts">Apple Black Friday Deals Include Some Decent Third-Party Discounts</a><br>
&bull; Warnings: <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5099183/7-crappy-black-friday-deals-that-arent-really">7 Crappy Black Friday "Deals" That Aren't Really</a><br>
&bull; <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5099489/how-to-buy-an-hdtv-today-or-any-day" class="top">How To Choose an HDTV on Black Friday (or Any Day)</a><br>
&bull; <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5098917/how-to-calibrate-your-new-hdtv-and-not-lose-your-mind">How to set up that new HDTV you just got</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Photochop Contest:<br></strong>&bull; <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5098754/brutally-honest-black-friday-ads-showcase-retailers-on-the-brink">Brutally Honest Black Friday Ads Showcase Retailers on the Brink</a></p>
<p><strong>Why You Might Want to Avoid Shopping on Black Friday, altogether:</strong><br>
&bull; <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5098946/10-reasons-were-doomed-black-friday-edition" class="top">10 Reasons We're Doomed: Black Friday Edition</a><br>
&bull; <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5099819/walmart-worker-trampled-to-death-by-deal+crazed-black-friday-shoppers">WalMart Worker Trampled to Death by Deal-Crazed Black Friday Shoppers</a></p>
<p>[<a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/black%20friday">Complete Black Friday Gadget Coverage at Giz</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5098461/5-gadgets-you-cant-skimp-on-and-how-to-save-money-buying-them]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5098461]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[black friday deals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dealzmodo guide]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ati]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[black friday]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[black friday]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cpu]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[deals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dealzmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dealzmodo guide]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[desktops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dslrs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[earbuds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[earphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadget deals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[garmin nuvi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[graphics cards]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[headphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hp]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lenovo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[navigation]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nikon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nuvi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[professor dealzmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[retail is for suckers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shure]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[zune]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5098461&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[10 Really Cool Windows 7 Media Center Features]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/11/Windows_7_MC_First_Look.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/Windows_7_MC_First_Look.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<div style='float:right; margin-left:-9px;'><script type="text/javascript">
digg_skin = 'compact';
digg_bgcolor = '#f1f8fa';
digg_url = 'http://digg.com/microsoft/10_Really_Cool_Windows_7_Media_Center_Features';
</script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript">
</script></div>
<p>A few days back, I showed you <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5093261/windows-7-touch-control-makes-media-center-more-awesome">the new touch interface for Media Center PCs running Windows 7</a>, and though I had to pull the video, I promised a walkthrough of proposed <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windows7" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows7/">Windows 7</a> <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #mediacenter" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/mediacenter/">Media Center</a> features. I say "proposed" because, like everything else about Windows 7, this is all alpha and subject to change. But these features are very cool, and really should be included. One more thing: These screens were projected on a wall in a well-lit room, so they look horrible, but anyone familiar with Media Center (and Microsoft has shipped like 100 million of them, so that should be plenty of ya) will have a good idea of the pleasantness to come. Or you can just drink in the following prose descriptions:<br>
<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('10coolwin7mcfeatures', 3, '');
</script></p>

<p>&bull; <strong>Shows appear dissolved behind menus</strong> - When you're watching something and want to pull up a menu to add a new show or browse the channel guide, or even go into another area of the Media Center, the current show stays on, not as a picture-in-picture, but tastefully dissolved into the background.</p>
<p>&bull; <strong>Chronological turbo scroll for channel guide</strong> - When you're looking at the channel guide, but want to go from Tuesday to Sunday in a hurry, you just hold down the arrow button on the remote, and the days start to whip by. Listings become a blur, but the days of the week, and the portions of the day, appear floating over the listings to give you an idea of when to stop.</p>
<p>&bull; <strong>Live thumbnail forward and rewind</strong> - During HD video playback, you might want to jump around. Grab the time marker and drag it forward or back, and as you do, you see a miniature version of the show playing backwards or forwards at the same speed.</p>
<p>&bull; <strong>Launch TV from Start menu</strong> - Media Center can occupy a pole position in the Start menu, and when you hover over the MC logo, a list of recently recorded shows pops up, along with other frequently used MC features.</p>
<p>&bull; <strong>Floating Media Center gadget</strong> - Not only can you access shows from the Start menu, you can browse MC features from the desktop with the gadget. I am not clear whether or not you'll get to have actual video playing in it, but for people who need MC at their fingertips, this appears to be a nice, subtle execution.</p>
<p>&bull; <strong>Alphabetical turbo scroll for music</strong> - The chronological turbo scroll on the channel guide is cool, but this one will come in more handy for me: As you scroll through the countless artists in your music collection, the names become a blur but your location in the alphabet is denoted by two letters, probably so that those longer letters like J, M, R and S can be broken up better.</p>
<p>&bull; <strong>Drifting cover art grid</strong> - When you're playing a song, the album art for that track appears with some basic metadata, and all the cover art for every other track you own materializes and drifts in the background. The primary cover art jumps from side to side and top to bottom, so that everything is in constant, fluid motion.</p>
<p>&bull; <strong>Scattered photos picture show</strong> - As you're playing music, you can opt for a photo show that essentially reaches into a folder, grabs a handful of shots, scatters them evenly around the page, and then zooms in on one at a time. A nice touch: In the wide angle, all the photos look like desaturated black-and-whites, but as each shot gets its own screen time, it magically becomes full color.</p>
<p>&bull; <strong>Copy remote content</strong> - If you are browsing multiple libraries or Media Center PCs and come across a show you like, you can watch it or save it for later by hitting "make a copy." As long as there's no broadcast flag or some other DRM, the vid will flow over to your local HDD so you can watch it when you've left the network.</p>
<p>&bull; <strong>Virtual channels without TV tuner</strong> - One of the new Media Center's central concerns is the new popularity of internet-based video, not just YouTube clips but whole TV episodes like those shown on Hulu. DVR functionality is key to making the most of an MC, but at launch there will be loads of virtual channels with shows you can watch just as easily. Microsoft demoed a special MSNBC channel that had clips and full shows; it's of course feasible for them to build similar channels for third-party web video services too. [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows-7">Windows 7 on Giz</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5095414/10-really-cool-windows-7-media-center-features]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5095414]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mce]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[media center]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[media center pc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7 media center]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5095414&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Hands-On With Newber, The Location-Aware Call Redirector For Your iPhone]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/11/newber.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/newber.png" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Think of Newber as sort of a location-aware <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/grandcentral">GrandCentral</a> <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #calldirecting" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/calldirecting/">call directing</a> service that lives on your iPhone and can forward calls automatically to whatever landline is closest to your location. Other features, like being able to swap phones in the middle of a conversation, making and receiving calls from a "Newber" number and automatically sending all incoming calls to voicemail are super neat, but it's missing a few features that the older and free-er GrandCentral service provides.</p>
<p>The call redirection worked great in our tests. You can manually set calls to route to either your iPhone or your "local" landline, which is programmed via location detection and can automatically switch when you get to a certain place, like home or work. Outgoing calls from your Newber number are shown as your Newber number, which is fantastic for hiding your real number from business contacts or people you don't quite trust. What's not cool, unfortunately, is Newber doesn't have access to your favorites list, so you'll have to re-add your favorites from your contacts list (which it does have access to).</p>
<p>Compared to GrandCentral, Newber is still missing features like being able to ring multiple phones simultaneously, listening in on voicemail as it's being recorded, and having people announce their names before you pick up (or deny) the call.</p>
<p>The biggest difference between the two is that Newber costs $5 a month and 2 cents a minute, whereas GrandCentral is free. Is being able to route your calls to your landline automatically worth what's essentially long distance rates? Tough to say. But they're still in beta, and it may be possible that they'll tweak prices a bit before launching fullscale. [<a href="http://www.mynewber.com/">Newber</a> via <a href="http://www.chipchick.com/2008/11/newber_app_offers_line_iphone.html">Chip Chick</a>]<br>
<br>
Related: <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/app-directory">Gizmodo's Essential Iphone Apps</a></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5091050/hands+on-with-newber-the-location+aware-call-redirector-for-your-iphone]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5091050]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[call]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[call directing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[calls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[grandcentral]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone newber]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[newber]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[newber review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[redirection]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[routing]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5091050&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Windows 7 Walkthrough, Boot Video and Impressions]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/10/Win7_Welcome_Startup.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/Win7_Welcome_Startup.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<div style='float:right; margin-left:-9px;'><script type="text/javascript">
digg_skin = 'compact'; digg_bgcolor = '#f1f8fa'; digg_url = 'http://digg.com/microsoft/Windows_7_Walkthrough_Boot_Video_and_Impressions'; 
</script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript">
</script></div>
<p>Like Elvis in '68, Microsoft is itching for a "comeback," and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windows7" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows7/">Windows 7</a> is the perfect excuse. In fact, this week in LA at the <a href="http://www.microsoftpdc.com/">Professional Developers Conference</a>, Windows 7 officially shoved Vista aside. Having suffered through the often deserved criticisms of that ill-fated OS installment, Microsoft's people are thrilled to tears to be able to talk about something (anything!) else. On Sunday, they took journalists through a lively 7-hour orientation on Win 7, then handed off a Dell XPS M1330 loaded with pre-beta Build 6801. Thankfully for the overworked, underappreciated developers at Redmond, it's surprisingly stable, and its look and feel already puts Vista to shame.</p>
<p>Here's a walkthrough of the system I'm looking at, some videos showing its basic performance, and then shots of more interface and system details demoed at PDC that will show up in the first beta build.</p>

<p>It's really hard to piece together everything I experienced at the seminar, so I'm going to start with the real, actual improvements I see in the system I've been fiddling with, and then expand into the more rhetorical stuff.</p>
<p><b>WHAT I'VE ACTUALLY SEEN</b><br>
For starters, even the early build of Windows 7 feels like a fast, stable environment. There's a lot going on behind the scenes to make the OS more usable, one monumental improvement being how video memory is allocated for unseen windows. (Hint: It's <i>not</i>.) The result is a highly responsive machine that gets decent battery life. Though specs aren't out yet, Windows boss Steve Sinofsky confirmed that it could run on systems with just 1GB of RAM.</p>
<p>As you might expect, I'm already seeing smarter user-interface decisions. Here are three great examples:</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/Win7_Wi-Fi_access.jpg" width="800" height="500" class="center"><b>Choosing a Wi-Fi network now takes just one click, straight from the system tray.</b> How much of a no-brainer was that? Instead of the clicking on the insulting "networks are available" pop-up, you actually get <i>the available networks</i>. Speaking of the system tray, it now gives you more complete control over what you see&mdash;instead of just hide or show, you can get it to display particular notifications, as you see here:</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/Win7_systray_mgmt.jpg" width="800" height="500" class="center"><br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/Win7_UAC_setting_slider.jpg" width="800" height="500" class="center"><b>The dreaded User Account Control lives up to its name with <i>more control</i>.</b> Yes, this slider is how you will be able to reduce the number of pesky pop-up warnings, eliminating all the ones that come from Windows, for instance. There are four tiers of security in total, so basically two settings between Vista's tell-me-everything and don't-tell-me-squat modes.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/Win7_floaty_gadgets.jpg" width="800" height="500" class="center"><b>The sidebar is dead&mdash;the gadgets roam free!</b> Why should keeping one or two gadget/widgets alive mean sacrificing a fifth of your clickable screen? Now when you add gadgets, they stack up on the right, but you are at liberty to put them wherever you want, and they're always there, hiding under your windows. This is an idea I wish Apple would incorporate too. Speaking of Apple and things hiding under windows, there's an upcoming "peek" feature that I will show below in the up-coming section.</p>
<p>There are some other new interface elements that might be quite useful. Microsoft is sort of the opposite of Apple when it comes to organizing your media files: Apple helps you put them all in one place, while Microsoft says it's okay to leave them scattered around. Up until now, though, it was hard for Microsoft's software to keep track of everything. But there are two new tools, one local and one networked, that will help you track all kinds of media files.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/Win7_Libraries.jpg" width="800" height="500" class="center"><b>Libraries let you clump together same-type content no matter where it is on the system.</b> If you have pictures in one set of folders, and other pictures in another, and you damn well aren't going to merge the folder, you can still track them together by adding them both to the Photo Library. Libraries even show the contents of local external storage drives you add to them, though when you unmount the external drive, Library offers to ditch its folder.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/Win7_HomeGroup.jpg" width="800" height="500" class="center"><b>HomeGroup is a re-do of classic workgroup networking, only with the home in mind.</b> The feature will only work on Windows 7, so to test it I'd need a second loaner unit. Still, having set up a basic HomeGroup, at least the initial interface and Microsoft's literature suggest that this will simplify viewing content across multiple machines, and sharing printers and other products. Let's hope so, because it could also be one of those classic "Why won't this work for me????" networking wizards. (Or is it just me who gets those?)</p>
<p>Here are some other shots from the pre-beta unit I'm looking at, including:<br>
&bull; Ribbon interface now appearing on WordPad and Paint (and nothing else so far)<br>
&bull; Solutions Center that will soon be re-branded as Action Center<br>
&bull; New fast-launching "lightweight" Windows Media Player<br>
&bull; Subtler, but still cool, improvements to the main Windows Media Player<br>
&bull; Windows information page, so you can see the attributes of the system<br>
<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('win7screengrabs', 5, '');
</script></p>
<p><b>VIDEO</b><br>
I shot the following videos to get you some immediate sense of what it's like to use the Windows 7 laptop, but though in some instances it is compared to a reasonably similar system that is also fairly clean, this isn't any kind of test. It is interesting to note, though, that while the Win 7 boots way faster here (even with the other computer's BIOS startup out of the way), it actually takes longer than the other system to shut down. But yes, these are totally unscientific, just a nice thing to observe:</p>
<p><strong>Totally Unscientific Video of Boot-Up Time</strong><br>
<script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("/win7boot_giz.flv", 475, 320,"");
</script><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/stills/win7boot_giz.flv.jpg" style="display: none;"></p>
<p><strong>Totally Unscientific Video of Shut-Down Time</strong><br>
<script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("/win7shutdown_giz.flv", 475, 320,"");
</script><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/stills/win7shutdown_giz.flv.jpg" style="display: none;"></p>
<p><strong>Super Scientific Video of New Window Resizing Feature</strong><br>
<script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("/win7dragwindows_giz.flv", 475, 320,"");
</script><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/stills/win7dragwindows_giz.flv.jpg" style="display: none;"></p>
<p><b>WHAT MICROSOFT IS PROMISING</b><br>
The sad thing about the build that Microsoft handed out is that it's missing a lot of the neat stuff that they showed off at the conference, and have been hinting at elsewhere. Though we did see a lot of this stuff running on systems, we couldn't take photos or video&mdash;not even of the slides.</p>
<p><b>User Interface Improvements</b> In the last video above, I say more UI to come, and I mean "in the beta." Here are the new promised UI effects&mdash;all of which make Vista's Flip3D look like the OS equivalent of the infamous "Mission Accomplished" banner.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/Win7_peek.jpg" width="799" height="300" class="center">While I'm a fan of the mouse hot-corner "Peek" function in the above photo, that lets you see gadgets or icons that windows could be obscuring, the biggest improvement to the Windows UI is probably in the Taskbar. It's gone through quite a few evolutions already, but this latest one is pretty great. Click on an app, and contextual menus pop up, giving you options like opening recent documents. The Taskbar can pull information that's already part of the program, so new apps don't need special programming to work here. Another aspect of the new Taskbar will be the preview feature, which will show you floating glimpses of hidden windows. (I'm still hazy on this one, so we'll have to revisit it once the beta comes out.)<br>
<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('win7taskbar', 3, '');
</script></p>
<p>Other improvements come in the natural-interface category: You can now write in math equations. (I think this is cool, even though it's been a very long time since I've actually written out any math more complex than a bar tab.)</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/Win7_math_writing.jpg" width="645" height="279" class="center">Windows 7 will have great native touch and multitouch benefits too&mdash;none shown here unfortunately: Menus subtly enlarge when tapped with a finger instead of a mouse cursor; the mouse cursor disappears when the finger touches the screen; and iPhone/Surface-style pinching and stretching are now part of the OS.</p>
<p><b>Cool Device Tricks</b><br>
As a gadget lover like most of you, one of my favorite parts of the conference was the device discussion. I am happy to report that, for starters, Windows 7 is itself a more aggressive media playback system, natively handling both AAC and H.264 as well as DivX and Xvid without third-party download.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/Win7_Play_To.jpg" width="300" height="360" class="left">It's also a DLNA 1.5 system with some neat tricks up its sleeve. Windows Media Player has a "play to" feature (at left) that you can reach via the Taskbar&mdash;one click and you can pull up a song, start playing, and even jump to the next.</p>
<p>But here's the coolness: You can use that same feature to pull songs from other places on the network. And you can send the song to play through a Sonos or other compatible player on the network, rather than through your dinky laptop speakers. You can even, theoretically, if everything's visible on the net, pull DRM-free AAC files from a Mac, and tell it to play on the Sonos, re-encoding it on the fly if the Sonos doesn't support AAC. In this case, the compatibility is only as good as the interface, and the interface is only as good as the compatibility, so I am eager to see how this is executed.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/Win7_Devices-and-Printers.jpg" width="300" height="233" class="left">A nice servicey program for interfacing with gadgets and peripherals is called Device Stage. Yesterday <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5069282/windows-7-pre+beta-details-leak">in comments</a>, it got maligned a bit as the new PlaysForSure, but that's a branding it doesn't deserve. Not yet, at least. The system allows camera, phone, MP3 player and printer makers to create mini interfaces for their devices. The products appear in the Taskbar when connected, with their own pop-up menus of activities, like offloading pics or uploading music. In addition to the pop-up Taskbar menu, each device will have its own pop-up page with links to ordering supplies or downloading the manual in PDF format, plus a photorealistic icon that will appear wherever the device is referred to.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/Win7_Device-Stage.jpg" width="800" height="611" class="center">For Device Stage to work, the third-party brands will have to provide their own content, but it will get served throughout the world by Microsoft. If there is no Device Stage present, you get the basic AutoPlay pop-up that we've seen for ages. When I asked Microsoft how aggressive they would be in getting companies on board with Device Stage, they said that the companies themselves were excited about the chance to do it. As someone who was bitterly let down by PlaysForSure, I can tell you, this ain't the same.</p>
<p>I realize I covered far more of the external bits and far less of the internal guts than some of you folks wish&mdash;nor I even touched on the new Windows Live and IE8 features, both of which are somewhat visible already&mdash;but it's early yet, and while I will always focus on usability, there will be a lot more to look at in the coming months as the builds get richer and the testing is more reflective of the final product. As far as exact dates go, Microsoft is reluctant to carve anything too deep into granite, but can you blame them?</p>
<p>For now, we should just be happy that Windows 7 appears to be on the right track. You can almost look at consumer-level Windows&mdash;that is, 95, 98, Me, XP, Vista and Win 7&mdash;like the first six <i>Star Trek</i> movies: They pretty reliably alternate between crap and quality. All I can say is, screw the <em>Final Frontier</em>, and hellloooo, <em>Undiscovered Country</em>. That, and thanks to Microsoft for talking about Windows 7 early and often. It helps. Just don't screw it up! [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows-7/">Windows 7 News on Giz</a>]</p>
<p><b>UPDATE: For a brief technical look at what's great about Windows 7's innards, check out <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5070219/giz-explains-why-windows-7-will-smash-vista">Giz Explains: Why Windows 7 Will Smash Vista</a></b></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5069661/windows-7-walkthrough-boot-video-and-impressions]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5069661]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pdc 2008]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[PDC2008]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[win7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows vista]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:00:01 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5069661&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Android App Review Marathon Liveblog]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/10/340x_494x_runandroid.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5066950/t+mobile-g1-available-in-retail-stores-nationwide-today">T-Mobile G1 Android phone</a> is now available, and you've <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5062977/t+mobile-g1-google-android-phone-review">seen our review</a>. Now we're going to take on the apps in the Android Marketplace. How are they? Are they good enough to justify a two year commitment to T-Mobile? Read on and find out.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/tunewiki3_01.png" width="400" height="266" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"><b>TuneWiki</b>: <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/tunewiki">TuneWiki</a>, the lyrics + music video music player, is fantastic. We plugged in a live track of <em>Flight of the Conchords</em> and TuneWiki was smart enough to have the lyrics to it and sync them in time with the music. Impressive! Other features like "Top 50 Songs" Today/This Week/This Month come up with the music video and lyrics most of the type, and you can even search YouTube for your own favorite videos. Yes, <em>Never Gonna Give You Up</em> works.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/pacman_01.png" width="200" height="300" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"><b>PAC-MAN</b>: It's the same wakka wakka you've been playing for the last 20+ years, but now adapted to either the touchscreen or the roller ball. The swiping touchscreen motion works, but it's not wonderful&mdash;the ball is the way you want to go for this. Pac's sound effects are exactly the same as they were when you were a kid, so if you ever go back in time to tell the childhood version of you to buy Google stock at its IPO, you can bring this with you and blow his mind.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/accuweather.png" width="200" height="300" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"><b>Accuweather</b>: The app has today's weather, three-day prediction and radar view for easy home meteorology, but that's about it. No ten-day, no allergy conditions or anything more than just the barebones. What it does have is a very prominent link to their website under each view that launches your browser, which leads us to believe that they want you clicking over there (so they can collect ad money). Still, it's free and it shows you how hot it is. <b>Update: Go with the Weather Channel app, reviewed below</b>.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/imeemandroid.jpg" width="200" height="300" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"><b>Imeem</b>This Pandora like music service only allows you to search by artist name to play music based off similar artists, but there is also the option to play featured music which range from new and notable artists to the Top 100 imeem songs. The automatic song selection is decent and when listening to a song there is a menu option to buy it in the Amazon MP3 store. Overall the app works great over both WiFi and 3G, and surprisingly song buffer and sound quality are pretty good over either.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/twitroidscreen.png" width="400" height="267" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"><b>Twitroid</b>: The first Twitter client for Android. Visually, it looks very good, but when you switch back and forth between landscape and portrait you can tell that it's a beta app (it asks you to log in again). It does have features like direct messaging, picture attachments and even search. It's a pretty darn good Twitter client that looks even greater than some of the Twitter apps on the iPhone.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/anycut_01.png" width="200" height="300" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"><b>Any Cut</b>: A sort of system-level app that lets you create shortcuts on your home screen to directly call or text someone. You can also make a shortcut to just about any activity on your phone, such as Wi-Fi settings or SIM lock. They all work fine. This is one app you'll definitely have to pick up.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/shutterspeedandroid.jpg" width="200" height="300" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"><b>Shutter Speed</b>: This app allows you to enter your SLR or DSLR camera ISO and aperture settings and it will determine the exposure setting that's best. Unless you are a professional photographer this app is going to be very confusing and will seem useless. It only determines a single camera setting and has no ability to take pictures.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/wikimobile_01.png" width="200" height="300" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"><b>WikiMobile Encyclopedia</b>: A portable version of Wikipedia that requires an internet connection to grab articles from the actual Wikipedia and formats it to your screen. It's good&mdash;the text is legible and you can swipe from screen to screen&mdash;but for larger articles jumping from section to section is a bit of a pain. It's definitely better than reading the Wikipedia site on your browser, that's for damn sure. On a side note, someone needs to update our Wiki page. That thing's ancient.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/weatherchannel.png" width="200" height="300" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"><b>Weather Channel</b>: Much better than Accuweather, this thing displays wind speed, visibility, humidity and UV index along with a 10 day forecast. It's not filled with links to the Weather Channel site, either, which is great. Definitely a superior weather app compared to Accuweather.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/maverickandroid.jpg" width="200" height="300" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"><b>Maverick</b>: This Google Talk instant messenger app allows you to chat with your Google Talk buddies as well as send pictures, scribbles and your current location. The scribbles and pictures are sent by creating a Picasa web album under you Google Talk account. The web album link is sent in a message and the recipient can view it in their web browser. Same goes for sending your location, a link to a Maverick branded Google Maps is sent and the recipient can view it in their web browser. App works quick over both WiFi and 3G.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/breadcrumbz.png" width="200" height="300" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"><b>BreadCrumbz</b>: People can set up routes, which are made up of instructions, notes and photos, for anyone to follow. For example, one of the routes already online was for the "Best Study Room in Stanford", which lead you through the campus to the library, then an elevator, then a study room. I'm surprised there weren't more routes with the label "sexiest room on campus" which lead to some dude's dorm room where he's waiting for you in just a robe, but Android's only been out for a couple days. Neat app, definitely one we'll want to check out more as more routes are released.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/translate.png" width="400" height="267" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"><b>Translate</b>: Pretty much just a self-contained app that sends text to the Google translation services and displays it back in whatever language you want. There are 150 "language pairs" covering most of the major languages, so it seems fairly useful if you're traveling and want to ask someone something&mdash;just type it out in English and hit translate.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/iskootandroid.jpg" width="200" height="300" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"><b>iSkoot for Skype</b>: This app brings Skype calling and chatting to Android. Major downside is it doesn't allow true VOIP because it routes all calls through the cell line, even Skype to Skype calls. So cell minutes are being used on top of Skype credits. The call quality is good and the app works well under both WiFi and 3G.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/quicklist.png" width="200" height="300" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"><b>QuickList</b>: A super simple to do list that lets you type in what you want and tap to strike them out. It's so simple that it doesn't have line wrapping and any item more than two or three words get chopped off. Keep your list items short on this one.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/shopsavyandroid.jpg" width="200" height="300" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"><b>ShopSavy</b>: This barcode scanning app allows you to scan or enter a barcode of any product and will display a range of information. It will search the web and local retail stores, based on your location, for the cheapest prices. You can also read reviews and have an alert for when there is a price drop. The app works great and is really a must have tool for every frugal shopper.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/divide.png" width="200" height="300" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"><b>Divide and Conquer</b>: D&C is exactly like the old game you played on a PC 20 years ago (I forget the name) where you draw a line on the screen to box off bouncing balls without the balls hitting your line. The point is to trap the ball in something around 90% of the screen. It's just as fun now as it was then, and best of all it's free. A commenter tells us the old game is called Jezzball, just FYI.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/bonsaiblast.png" width="200" height="300" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"><b>Bonsai Blast</b>: The iPhone equivalent of this is Puzzloop, but it's a game very much like Bust-a-move, except instead of the balls dropping from the top, they go around a track and you have to hit them while they're moving. Definitely fun, and the touchscreen controls are precise enough that you should be able to get through the game without too many crazy misses unless you're a Shaq and you have sausage fingers.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/braintrain.png" width="400" height="300" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"><b>Brain Genius Deluxe</b>: Holy crap! This is like <em>Brain Training</em> for the DS, except free and on your phone. You have four types of exercises, which include observation (which type of leaf did you see the most of) and memory (how should we rotate this picture to get the previous picture). It's as polished a game as we've seen yet on Android, so definitely pick this one up if you're a fan of puzzles games or Brain Training.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/blackjack2.png" width="400" height="267" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"><b>CB Blackjack</b>: It's blackjack by Hudson Soft (maker of Bomberman and various other games). It's really difficult to screw up blackjack, but this version is slightly sluggish. Maybe it's the cheesy 1980s game soundtrack? It's blackjack, so if you want blackjack, it's blackjack. Blackjack.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/klondike.png" width="400" height="267" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"><b>CB Klondike (Solitaire)</b>: It's solitaire.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/reversi.png" width="200" height="300" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"><b>CB Reversi</b>: It's reversi, and you can play with either the scroll ball or by touching the screen. There are guide lines (shown above) if you play using your finger, which cuts down on accidental piece placement. The feel is so retro and so early '90s video game that you actually welcome how cheesy it is. Reversi (or Othello) has always been fun, and you can play this either by yourself or vs. a buddy.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/barcode_scanner2.jpg" width="400" height="266" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"><b>Barcode Scanner</b>: This app allows you to scan a products barcode with options to view a Google product search or web search based on the product's code. Because it doesn't appear to have any other functions ShopSavy is a much better Barcode scanning Android app.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/lightsout.png" width="200" height="300" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"><b>Lights Out</b>: Touch a spot to turn off (or on) the adjacent lights. Purpose is to get all the lights off. Same game you've played for years, so you should know whether or not you like it. No surprises on this one.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/compareeverywhereandroid.jpg" width="200" height="300" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"><b>Compare Everywhere</b>: A Barcode scanning app that allows for product searches by barcode or keyword and has the ability to create and save shopping / wish lists. By far the most robust barcode scanner app for Android. Will display online and location based prices providing complete store information with maps, directions, phone number and web address.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/picsaysaa.jpg" width="400" height="266" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"><b>PicSay</b>: This picture editor is extremely fun is basically a robust image manipulator. After selecting a picture you can add word bubbles, words, props, and effects to transform the image into anything you want. Once your art work is complete you can save to SD or share it using Google mail or messaging.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/locale.jpg" width="200" height="300" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"><b>Locale</b>: This app acts as a settings manager based on a few different personalized conditions. Depending on your battery, time, contact, time, or location your phone can have preset settings that change automatically depending on your set conditions. Right now the only settings options to be changed are ringer, volume, network twitter, and wallpaper. By far the best feature of this app is the ability to have the phone automatically detect your location and mute you ringer, which perfect for those who go to school or work and need to have their phone on silent.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/photostreamandroid.jpg" width="200" height="300" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"><b>Photostream</b>: This Flickr photo browser app allows you to search a Flickr contacts name and view their photos. There aren't that many features yet but you have the option to save a photo to your phone and also be notified when one of your contacts adds new photos.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/cab4melightandroid.jpg" width="200" height="300" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"><b>cab4me light</b>: This app will find cab companies that service your current or preferred location. Just tap Call Cap and it will give you a list of available cab companies and the ability to call them. Right now the app is pretty basic but the developer states it's currently titled light while they add more features and cab companies.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/tmobilehotspotandroid.jpg" width="200" height="300" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"><b>HotSpot Locator</b>: All this app does is locate the closest T-Mobile Hot Spots. Since the G1 lets you use WiFi for free at any T-Mobile HotSpot location it's kinda nice to have this feature at the touch of your finger. The app is utterly basic though because it's just a link to search results that pull up in the web browser, but still very usable.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/iSafeandroid.jpg" width="200" height="300" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"><b>iSafe</b>: I can't believe this app is one of the first in the Marketplace. This app searches your location for possible unsafe conditions like sex offenders, reported crime, weather, allergies, air-quality and speed limit so it can alert you if the area is unsafe. The best part about this app is if it detects a registered sex offender nearby it will sound an alert every few minutes saying "Potential Sex Offender Nearby!" Yea I'm not kidding around, this is a real Android app.. CRAZY!</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5067896/android-app-review-marathon-liveblog]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5067896]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[google android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[app review marathon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[applications]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google android app review marathon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[liveblog]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[review marathon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5067896&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Google Brings Push Gmail, Google Maps Street View, Other Tight Integration to the G1]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/09/g1google.jpg"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/g1google.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Android is here, and as to be expected with a Google-made mobile OS, there's a bit of Google App fanciness going on. In fact, it's designed with <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #googleapps" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/googleapps/">Google Apps</a> in mind so much that whether or not you're a user of Gmail and other services might determine how useful the phone will be to you.</p>
<p>The G1 will <s>be the first phone to</s> offer push Gmail, which is something we're expecting to see on the iPhone in the not too distant future. Gmail also features a Google Talk presence on Android, thanks to the fact that Gmail gets its own mail app while all other mail services are relegated to a simpler one. You can sync you contacts and appointments with the G1, but only via Google's services; no Outlook and Exchange support here. In fact, you <i>must</i> have a Google account to use this phone, according to <a href="http://mossblog.allthingsd.com/20080923/googles-g1-first-impressions/">Walt Mossberg</a>.</p>
<p><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #googlemaps" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/googlemaps/">Google Maps</a> offers street view that you can control using the built-in compass, turning the phone around and looking around like you're actually there. A neat gimmick, but we'll see how useful it actually ends up being.</p>
<p>Here's a video Google released on Google Mobile Apps integration: <object width="494" height="399"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/z7qbPa1O8Ys&hl=en&fs=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/z7qbPa1O8Ys&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="494" height="399"></embed></object></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5053349/google-brings-push-gmail-google-maps-street-view-other-tight-integration-to-the-g1]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5053349]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gmail]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google maps]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 23 Sep 2008 11:42:42 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5053349&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Review: EFiX Dongle Perfectly Transforms PC to Mac]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("/efix_giz.flv", 475, 286,"");
</script></p>
<div style='float:right; margin-left:-9px;'><script type="text/javascript">
digg_skin = 'compact'; digg_bgcolor = '#f1f8fa'; digg_url = 'http://digg.com/apple/Review_EFiX_Dongle_Perfectly_Transforms_PC_to_Mac';
</script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript">
</script></div>
<p>When we <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5016227/efix-usb-dongle-will-boot-and-install-os-x-on-any-pc-supposedly">first heard about EFiX</a>—a simple USB dongle that'll let you magically install Leopard on your PC—<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5018977/efix-instant-no+mess-hackintosh-usb-dongle-details-emerge">it sounded too fantastic</a> to be true. Well, I used it to turn my gaming PC into a Mac Pro over the weekend, and I'm somewhat amazed to say this, but it works perfectly.</p>

<p>I grabbed all the updates straight from Apple—including 10.5.5 last night, so you don't have to wait <a href="http://lifehacker.com/394027/how-to-update-your-hackintosh-to-1053">for a hacked patch</a> like <a href="http://lifehacker.com/software/hack-attack/build-a-hackintosh-mac-for-under-800-321913.php">you would running a typical Hackintosh</a>—installed a whole bunch of software and have been using it for several days. It runs beautifully, just like a real Mac Pro.</p>
<p><strong>The Process</strong><br>
<br>
There are, of course, rules you have to adhere to, as there tends to be when using black magic. The major one with EFiX, and its only real "catch," is that you have to use <a href="http://www.efi-x.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=26&language=english">the supported hardware</a>, not a very long list indeed. But outside of the Gigabyte motherboard requirement (reportedly some Asus boards using a P45 chipset also work), it's actually fairly generic. I just happened to have everything on the list.</p>
<p>If you've got the hardware, the whole process is simple, so that even if you've never cracked your desktop before, you could still get this done with a quick search online for the requisite know-how. I plugged the EFiX dongle into a USB header on my motherboard—not, as you might have assumed, to a USB port on the outside. That's really it for getting your hands dirty, though. I restarted my computer, selected EFiX as the boot device—it was listed under hard drives, actually—and was greeted with a drive selector. After selecting the Leopard disc, it started installing without a hitch.</p>
<p>Okay, there was a slight hitch. My video card, an Nvidia 8800GT, isn't supported by the firmware EFiX ships with. EFiX already has the update on the site, but its updater is only coded for 32-bit Windows. If, like me, you run Vista 64-bit, you will have to install Vista 32-bit on the drive you intend to put Leopard on, just to update the stupid firmware.</p>
<p>After I did that, everything was peachy. The only slight inconsistency is that my 8800GT shows up as a 256MB card, when it's actually a 512MB card, and my 1066MHz RAM is only running at 800MHz apparently. But that's sorta trivial. <script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('aboutefixmac', 3, '');
</script></p>
<p><b>The Numbers</b><br>
<br>
<img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/benchmarks_2.jpg" width="600" height="331" style="display:block;float:none;">Here are some benchmarks compared to some numbers Adam over <a href="http://lifehacker.com/software/benchmarks/hackintosh-vs-mac-pro-vs-macbook-pro-benchmarks-322866.php">at Lifehacker ran</a> for his Hacktinosh vs. a MacBook Pro and Mac Pro. Obviously, my hardware is newer—a 3GHz E8400 Wolfdale Core 2 Duo, 4GB RAM (running at the slower 800MHz, rather than 1066MHz) and an Nvidia 8800 GT (with the OS only recognizing half of the memory). The total guts of my computer cost just under $800 when I put it together in May, hard drive included. (Mac Pros start at $2,300.)</p>
<p><b>Day to Day</b><br>
<br>
One thing to keep in mind is that EFiX has to interlope every time you want to boot to Leopard, so a cold boot takes at least two minutes, between booting to EFiX, picking Leopard, then loading it up. And when you go into Windows, EFiX will show up as an attached USB drive. These aren't dealbreakers—once you're up, performance is great. Overall, the experience is really incredible for how smooth and seamless it is. Updates, installing software, everything is just like a real Mac. The best way to put it is this: I've got a Mac Pro now.</p>
<p>I occasionally feel like Windows is running just a smidge more slowly, but benchmarks compared to before I installed EFiX don't support that creeping feeling, so I chalk it up to paranoia.</p>
<p>Is the dongle worth <strike>$170</strike> $155 (EFiX USA originally quoted me $170)? That's a personal question. Do you wanna go through the usually more complicated—but free—Hackintosh process? Perhaps the best way to look at it is this: If you've already got the supported hardware, it's like buying a Mac for $155, since you can still have your trusty PC just a restart away on the same machine. Also, even as simplified as it is, you still need to know what you're doing. There's no official tech support, though there is a very active forum that provides helpful answers to queries.</p>
<p><b>Updated</b>: <a href="http://www.efixusa.net/">EFiX USA</a> is handing all of the distribution in the US for E-FiX.com, who actually doesn't do any of that. They were selling units <a href="http://stores.ebay.com/EFiX-USA">on eBay</a> but their main site looks like it's up now. So far in our dealings with the company (who sent us EFiX to review) we haven't had any reason to think they're scamming anyone, but it's understandable if you wanna approach this with caution. [<a href="http://efi-x.com/">EFiX</a>, <a href="http://www.efixusa.net/">EFiX USA</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5049756/review-efix-dongle-perfectly-transforms-pc-to-mac]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5049756]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[mac os x on PC]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bestmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bigvid=true]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[efix]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hackintosh]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hackintosh]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 16 Sep 2008 16:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5049756&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[A Complete Guide to Watching Your Favorite Shows (Legally) Without Paying a Dime]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/09/340x_tv22.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<div style='float:right; margin-left:-9px;'><script type="text/javascript">
digg_skin = 'compact';
digg_bgcolor = '#f1f8fa';
digg_url = 'http://digg.com/gadgets/Complete_Guide_Watching_Your_Favorite_Shows_Free_Legally';
</script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript">
</script></div>
<p>You can spend up to $100 a month for various cable and satellite services to watch the new season of programming that began this week. Or, if you've got an internet connection and are willing to be a little more creative than buying episodes for $2 off Amazon Unbox or iTunes, you can view most of it for free. There are limitations, of course, but after digging through each channel's website, I found the sheer amount of cost free (and often commercial free) content to be <em>staggering</em>&mdash;even for the traditional "cable" channels.</p>
<p>So here's how you get it.</p>

<p><strong>Network Shows (HD)</strong> <strong>Grade: A+</strong><br>
We're going to knock out a big "duh" point right off the bat. If you have an HDTV with an integrated HD tuner, there's a good chance you can get all of the major networks (ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX and even PBS) in HD for no cost at all. How? Over the air (OTA) HD via antenna&mdash;a signal that probably has less compression than cable or satellite. Stick it to the man by purchasing any UHF/VHF antenna. If you don't have the time/money for a roof mounted antenna, we've had success with the flat (non rabbit eared) <a href="http://www.google.com/products?hl=en&q=RCA+ANT1500&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=X&oi=product_result_group&resnum=1&ct=title">RCA ANT1500</a>. It runs about $30. To find the OTA channels offered in your area, go <a href="http://www.antennaweb.org/aw/welcome.aspx">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Network Shows (Runner Up Options)</strong> <strong>Grade: Mostly Honor Roll</strong><br>
<img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/ScreenHunter_01_Sep._10_13.49.jpg" width="494" height="295"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/ScreenHunter_02_Sep._10_13.53.jpg" width="494" height="369"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/ScreenHunter_03_Sep._10_13.55.jpg" width="494" height="249">For NBC and Fox/FX programs including 30 Rock, The Office, Heroes, and House, Hulu is your best runner-up resource to OTA HD (full show list <a href="http://www.hulu.com/browse/alphabetical/episodes">here</a>). The quality isn't quite as good as you'd get in a standard def broadcast, but the shows are available commercial free online and play instantly in full screen mode. <a href="http://ABC.com">ABC.com</a> is superb as well, offering their highest rated shows like Desperate Housewives, Grey's Anatomy and even 4 seasons of Lost in HD streaming. <a href="http://www.cbs.com/video/?showname=primetime/big_bang_theory#video">CBS.com</a> is the most disappointing with somewhat random, limited offerings of their programming, and no episodes of their top-rated CSI shows available online.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.bravotv.com/">Bravo</a></strong> <strong>Grade: F</strong><br>
<img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/bravo.jpg" class="center"><br>
Our first cable channel starts with a strike-out. Bravo has a huge thumb print online, all of their content is chopped into tiny clips, as if sliced and diced by Top Chef contestants into a mocking plate of amuse bouche. Bravo's site lacks any full episodes of their big shows; Hulu lacks them too (which is a bit surprising because NBC owns both entities). Moving on...</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.cartoonnetwork.com/video/">Cartoon Network</a>/<a href="http://www.adultswim.com/video/index.html">Adult Swim</a></strong> <strong>Grade B+</strong><br>
<img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/ScreenHunter_04_Sep._10_13.57.jpg" width="494" height="249">Both Cartoon Network and its after dark Adult Swim alter-ego offer substantial content online. It's standard streaming quality, but the embedded video goes full screen and quite a few original shows (like The Boondocks) as well as syndicated shows (like Family Guy) are available in constantly rotating episodes.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.comedycentral.com/">Comedy Central</a></strong> <strong>Grade: A+</strong><br>
<img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/ScreenHunter_05_Sep._10_13.58.jpg" width="494" height="249">Sometimes it seems like Comedy Central plays nothing but <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/index.jhtml?episodeId=184108">The Daily Show</a> and <a href="http://www.comedycentral.com/colbertreport/full-episodes/">The Colbert Report</a>. Luckily, both of these programs are available in full online dating back several weeks (the price is that you have to put up with a few commercials). A huge amount of <a href="http://www.southparkstudios.com/guide/">South Park's</a> back catalog is available as well. But don't go to Comedy Central's main site. Instead, hit up the links that we cleverly hid in each show's title.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://video.discovery.com">Discovery Networks</a> (Discovery Channel, TLC, Animal Planet, etc) Grade: F-</strong><br>
<img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/ScreenHunter_08_Sep._10_14.02.jpg" width="494" height="309">This is where you take a blow for being cheap. The only programs currently offered online from Discovery Networks are Meerkat Manor, Flip That House, Smash Lab and Project Earth. Plus, you'll also have to download their player (ick) to watch these programs. One of, if not the highest rated show on Discovery Networks is What Not To Wear. Needless to say, it's not part of their online lineup. But kudos to Discovery for not compressing Sunrise Earth to YouTube sizes.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/broadband/espn360/index">ESPN</a></strong> <strong>Grade: A for Effort, C- for Execution</strong><br>
<img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/ScreenHunter_09_Sep._10_14.35.jpg" width="494" height="297">It's not HD. It's not even SD. But while the true sports fan might feel slighted by ESPN360's resolution, no one can question the content. Quite simply, there's more on ESPN360 than the real ESPN and ESPN2 combined. At any time, you can watch a multitude of live major sports games&mdash;over 10 while we're writing this. And if you forget to tune in, ESPN360 keeps the content online for 24-48 hours. The big catch: ESPN360 won't work with all internet providers (depending who your ISP is, you may not be able to access the player).</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.fxnetworks.com/">FX</a></strong> <strong>Grade: B- and Improving</strong><br>
<img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/ScreenHunter_14_Sep._10_14.44.jpg" width="494" height="247">On their site, FX promises complete shows "coming soon." But until then, we have an alternative. In case you didn't see the note above, many FX shows are available on Hulu. Their complete show listing is <a href="http://www.hulu.com/browse/alphabetical/episodes">here</a>. (<em>Note: Hulu claims to have The Shield, but its links come up dead</em>.)</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.mtv.com/"><strong>MTV</strong></a></strong> <strong>Grade: B+</strong><br>
<img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/ScreenHunter_10_Sep._10_14.38.jpg" width="494" height="251">MTV is now shoved full of so many advertisements that nobody should pay for it. Luckily (depending on your definition of the word), most (if not all) of their content appears to be available through their website. Music videos along with their top-rated show The Hills are available, as are many of their other shows including gems like True Life and Made. Aside from the commercials, the main catch is the spastic, often unorganized presentation of MTV.com.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.spike.com/network/spike"><strong>SpikeTV</strong></a> <strong>Grade: Incomplete</strong><br>
<img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/ScreenHunter_11_Sep._10_14.39.jpg" width="494" height="250">Good news and bad news. The good news is that SpikeTV has an excellent, high quality video player that offers most of their shows commercial-free, and shows are easy to find in straightforward episode lists. The bad news is that if you watch SpikeTV for Ultimate Fighter&mdash;their biggest show&mdash;you'll still have to tune in the old-fashioned way.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.travelchannel.com/"><strong>Travel Channel</strong></a> <strong>Grade: FF</strong><br>
<img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/ScreenHunter_12_Sep._10_14.41.jpg" width="494" height="250">Complete miss here. But if you enjoy one-minute clips of Samantha Brown, live it up. Their site is chock full of 'em. Otherwise you have to subscribe (!) to the channel or buy episodes through Unbox etc.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.usanetwork.com/"><strong>USA</strong></a></strong> <strong>Grade: B- for Execution</strong><br>
<img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/ScreenHunter_13_Sep._10_14.43.jpg" width="494" height="249">Does anyone watch USA anymore? If so, Monk, Psyche, Burn Notice and In Plain Sight are available on their site. Streaming is fast and quality is somewhere around SD widescreen. About three episodes of each show are available at a time in rotation and a pretty annoying DirecTV logo knocks the full screen player off center. If you're not satisfied with the USA website, <a href="http://www.hulu.com/browse/alphabetical/episodes">Hulu</a> has a nice selection of USA content as well.</p>
<p><strong>When It's Worth Paying For</strong><br>
If you don't have a media PC, then the convenience of watching television on your television may be worth the large premium for cable/satellite. Then again, a few hundred dollars can buy you a powerful media PC that will not only allow you to watch streaming content, but record OTA HD with a tuner. How much is your cable bill per month?</p>
<p>If you watch niche interest channels like TLC, Bravo or Travel Channel, you'll find that only limited content is available at all online (through services like Amazon Unbox) and, of course, it costs money. Still, if you only use Bravo for, say, Top Chef, buying a season through Unbox for $23 isn't the worst alternative to a multi-month cable subscription.</p>
<p>But most of all, if you want to watch non-network content in HD, cable and satellite are both, by far, your best options. Even with as much as Comcast and DirecTV compress HD signals, you'll be looking at a picture that's far more beautiful than streaming web content or what you can buy from Amazon or iTunes (at the time of this writing). But if your service provider still doesn't offer the smaller cable channels in HD, then just why are you renting that box again?</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5046345/a-complete-guide-to-watching-your-favorite-shows-legally-without-paying-a-dime]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5046345]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[free tv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ comcast directv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cable]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cable]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[central]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[comedy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[directv"]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[espn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[free]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[free]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[free]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[free]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[spiketv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[steal]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[steal]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[watch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[watch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[watch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[watch bravo free]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[watch free tv online]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 11 Sep 2008 11:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5046345&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[When Good Firmware Goes Bad... And Why You Should Wait To Update]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/08/340x_Firmware_Horror.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />"<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #firmwareupdate" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/firmwareupdate/">Firmware update</a>" sounds like something you'd want. Something solid, yet fresh and new. But lately deciding to update is getting more complicated. The newest firmware is no longer just a nice downloadable present from a benevolent electronics overlord; on many devices, it has been buggy or downright dangerous to install. Manufacturers like Apple, Nintendo and Sony are increasingly releasing firmware that disables functionality for business reasons&mdash;or that just make products worse by being halfbaked. Here is a rundown of firmware updates that weren't exactly beloved by users.</p>
<p><b>Sony PSP:</b> A healthy and thriving homebrew community had sprung up around Sony's PSP, with alternate, user-made firmware adding new functionality like a wider range of supported media codecs and the ability to share music. Oh, and, well, there was also that little issue of mass piracy of games. Sony issued a number of firmware upgrades&mdash;a whopping six each in 2006 and 2007&mdash;designed to curb the little thieves, but which had the unfortunate side effect of discouraging the more creative, less piratical wing of the homebrew community. Sony used the "carrot and stick" method, enticing users with marginal new functions when the real purpose of the upgrade was to stop the homebrewers. This led to users actually trying to downgrade, or move back to an earlier firmware. Sony in turn tried to make it harder to downgrade, escalating the squabble into a war with its own customers.<br>
<strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #degreeofevilness" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/degreeofevilness/">Degree of Evilness</a>: High.</strong> This is a deliberate attempt to harsh PSP users' buzz.</p>
<p><strong>Sony <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #playstation3" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/playstation3/">PlayStation 3</a>:</strong> The PS3's anticipated firmware 2.40, on the other hand, was a simple disaster. The famously expensive console was due to receive a major update, adding the flashy XMB interface to the mix. Unfortunately, while the update did work for some, it bricked a lot of PS3s, producing some very upset gamers. Sony pulled the update and re-released it, repaired, as 2.41, but Sony's mucked-up firmware was the Story of the Day. Bad press, ill will and useless hulking black machines. Not a great moment for Sony.<br>
<strong>Degree of Evilness: Low.</strong> Simple incompetence from a corporation that should know better.</p>
<p><strong>Apple iPod:</strong> Back in 2004, Real cracked Apple's FairPlay code in order to allow music purchased from Rhapsody to be played on iPods. When Apple released an update blocking Rhapsody users, Real cracked it again. Apple released another block update, and so on until Real ran out of steam. We doubt there was much demand for the service at the time, but Apple's clampdown was shameless. Hell, Apple could have played Real compatibility as yet another reason to buy an iPod.<br>
<strong>Degree of Evilness: Medium-High.</strong> In the end, it was more bratty than evil.</p>
<p><strong>Apple iPhone/<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #ipodtouch" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ipodtouch/">iPod touch</a>:</strong> When the first iPhone/iPod touch software was jailbroken, a few updates came out under the guise of bug fixing that just happened to make unauthorized use a lot more difficult. This time around, with the 2.0 release, the setbacks were more accidental than deliberate. The new 2.0 firmware may have creaked open the floodgates for third-party applications, but it also resulted in a lot of instability. Thanks to the update, iPhones have crashed at a rate never seen before (well, outside of my last couple Windows machines, that is), the keyboard gained a frustrating lag, "backing up" takes almost as long as the Iraq occupation (zing!), and, in a total affront to common sense, THERE IS STILL NO COPY-PASTE.<br>
<strong>Degree of Evilness: Middle.</strong> A mix of self-preservation and circumstance, with some brazen stubbornness from His Steveness thrown in.</p>
<p><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #nintendowii" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/nintendowii/">Nintendo Wii</a>:</strong> In Nintendo's Photo Channel 1.1 firmware update, the game maker quietly removed support for MP3 playback in their Wii console. They replaced it with support for the iPod-friendly AAC codec, a far-too-obvious hint at what we all suspected: Nintendo has been taken over by the White Devil. How else do we explain the move from that GameCube controller that was clearly designed for some moon octopus to a remote control so simple I can operate it with my genitals? What about the new and incredibly racist all-white color scheme, the minimalist design aesthetic, and the cavalier and haughty attitude toward competition? Readers, watch out, or Jobs will get you ne-AAAACK!<br>
<b>Degree of Evilness: Nintendo can do no wrong.</b> (And <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #stevejobs" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/stevejobs/">Steve Jobs</a> is perfect.)</p>
<p>Firmware updates that leave you worse off than you were before are a kick in the crotch. But what about the slow, increasingly painful wedgie of unfulfilled promises? Electronics companies often promise to deliver features in firmware updates that, for whatever reason, aren't included at the time of purchase. In the best of cases, this is frustrating: Samsung's P2, for instance, promised Bluetooth compatibility, games, skins and more upon release, but was only achieved, finally, months later. But what if, as in Samsung's Blu-Ray/HD DVD combo player, the product line dies before the promised features (Blu-Ray 2.0 compatibility) can be updated? Firmware updates should be a surprise, a freshly-wrapped hand-me-down present that makes your crappy old gadget seem somehow new again, not a license to shove an unfinished product out the door.</p>
<p>This is just a short list of troubling firmware updates&mdash;if you have some firmware horror stories of your own to share, be our guest. And for all of you who immediately click "YES PLEASE!" to all auto-updaters, take heed, and maybe wait 24 hours before doing the upgrade.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http://digg.com/gadgets/When_Good_Firmware_Goes_Bad_And_Why_You_Should_Wait" align="right" frameborder="0" height="82" scrolling="no" width="55"></iframe></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5033290/when-good-firmware-goes-bad-and-why-you-should-wait-to-update]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5033290]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[firmware]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[degree of evilness]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[firmware update]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod touch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nintendo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nintendo wii]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[playstation 3]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ps3]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[psp]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[steve jobs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wii]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5033290&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[First Footage: Same OLPC XO Boots Both Sugar and Windows XP]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("/olpcdualboot_giz.flv", 476, 356,"");
</script>This is the first footage of the same XO OLPC doing a dual-boot of Sugar Linux and <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged WINDOWS XP" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows-xp/">Windows XP</a>&mdash;something skeptics have said wasn't going to happen. Soon, XOs will ship with both Sugar and XP for Boot Camp-style dual-booting options. They will never come with only XP, though the team is working on adding more of the Sugar functionality, like the mesh network and the fun sharing apps, to the Windows side. Once again, little PCs are <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5012825/crazy-talk-why-small-laptops-are-going-to-save-windows-xp">coming to the rescue</a> of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windowsxp" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windowsxp/">Windows XP</a>.</p>

<p>To get both operating systems to run, the BIOS has been modified to behave more like standard PCs (rather than Macs or Linux machines). The original BIOS for the XO was originally conceived for AIX and Solaris servers, all running variants of UNIX.</p>
<p>In Windows, the screen flipper and directional pad both work fine, and I'm told by Michail Bletsas, OLPC's connectivity guru, that the camera is also not a problem, as the drivers were available for XP even before they were available for Linux.</p>
<p>You'll note that even sped up 3X what it actually took, Windows still seems a little slow to boot. Michail says it takes a little over a minute for Windows to boot on the XO with 2GB of onboard memory. 2GB of space is needed for Windows XP, though one gets the impression it would do a lot better with 4GB. The machines still have only 256MB of RAM.</p>
<p>And in case you're wondering what that red OLPC is doing in the background, we <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5018460/photos-red-olpc-limited-edition">explained that</a> last Friday. [<a href="http://laptop.org/">One Laptop Per Child</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5018780/first-footage-same-olpc-xo-boots-both-sugar-and-windows-xp]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5018780]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[OLPC Windows Sugar boot]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[giz does olpc hq]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nicholas negroponte]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[one laptop per child]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sugar]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows xp]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xp]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 23 Jun 2008 12:01:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5018780&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Confirmed: If You Bought a 1st Gen iPhone After May 27th, You get a 3G iPhone Free]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/06/05/d3/340x_05d3f014b152fb4ba29d81a91e187f68.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Do you plan on upgrading your now-obsolete iPhone on July 11th? Great—good for you big spender. Here's the skinny. AT&T informed us that anyone who bought an iPhone after May 27th will be able to swap out their handset with <em>no additional charges</em> for an <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #iphone3g" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphone3g/">iPhone 3G</a>. What about everyone else? If you signed a 2-year contract with AT&T when the iPhone came out (which you pretty much had to), you'll have to sign <em>another</em> new 2-year contract to score a new iPhone 3G. The good news is that AT&T will allow you to overwrite your old contract with your new contract. In other words, you're just locked into another 2 years, not 3.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5014748/confirmed-if-you-bought-a-1st-gen-iphone-after-may-27th-you-get-a-3g-iphone-free]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5014748]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iPhone Contracts Revealed]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone 3g]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:07:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5014748&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[How To Launch an Apple Product in 5 Easy Steps]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("Jobsisms2_gawker.flv", 506, 423,"");
</script>Ladies and gentlemen, after hours of studious dissection of Apple keynotes (requiring countless YouTube clips, a non-linear editing program and a pile of empty Hot Pockets boxes that reaches our ceiling), we've figured out just how Apple "does it" and presented "it" to you here. Launching a new iPod or iPhone isn't about the new-fangled technology; it's about the showmanship. And here are the five, snake-charming ways <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged STEVE JOBS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/steve-jobs/">Steve Jobs</a> lures you to buy a new version of what you already have. SPOILER ALERT: It may involve comparing things to pencils.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5013863/how-to-launch-an-apple-product-in-5-easy-steps]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5013863]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Apple's Tricks Explained]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[keynote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[steve jobs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wwdc 2008]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Jun 2008 10:55:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5013863&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Hands-on With Delicious Library 2.0 - It Tracks Gadgets and Tools!]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/05/deliciouslibrary.png"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/05/deliciouslibrary.png" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>I've been a big fan of <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged DELICIOUS LIBRARY" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/delicious-library/">Delicious Library</a> for a while, using it to conveniently keep track of what movies, games and books we own and where they are in the house in a visually appealing and searchable way. It revolutionized my DVD storage system, allowing me to shove them into multiple 50/100 disc spindles and then easily being able to see which one they're in just by using my computer. Now with version 2.0 out, <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged DELICIOUS MONSTER" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/delicious-monster/">Delicious Monster</a> has added three things Gizmodo readers will love: the ability to track gadgets, the ability to track tools and the ability to track toys. It's still fantastic.</p>
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/05/deliciouslibrary2.png" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="800" height="275" style="display:block;float:none;">Adding gadgets is the same as adding books. Just type in the name of your gadget and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #deliciouslibrary" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/deliciouslibrary/">Delicious Library</a> will search Amazon for similar items, allowing you to pick the one you have and adding it to your shelf. Other options are scanning in bar codes for stuff you just purchased either with your iSight or a Bluetooth scanner, or just manually entering in items and adding pictures yourself (the first two options automatically grab photos). We only had time to enter in a handful of our gadgets, but we like what we see.</p>
<p>Any complaints we have are minor, like having to use Safari if you want to manually drag in a URL, or the fact that you <i>need</i> OS X Leopard to run it. The new categories go really well with their lending feature, which you can use to keep track of who has your crap, or just keeping track of when you remove a tool from its home. For $40 ($20 for upgraders), it's a bargain if you're always misplacing your stuff. [<a href="http://www.delicious-monster.com/">Delicious Monster</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/393966/hands+on-with-delicious-library-20-+-it-tracks-gadgets-and-tools]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-393966]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[delicious library]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[delicious monster]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[organization]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tracking]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 29 May 2008 12:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=393966&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Leopard OSX 10.5.3 Now Available]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/05/340x_Leopard_1053.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;float:none;"/>Mac Software Update now contains Leopard OSX version 10.5.3, which addresses issues with AirPort and other networking reliability, and resolves a few <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged TIME MACHINE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/time-machine/">Time Machine</a> and Time Capsue problems&mdash;Aperture is now compatible, we're told. It also has improved Spaces usability. Check it out and let us know if you find anything else out. Full update list: [<a href="http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1141">Apple</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/393727/leopard-osx-1053-now-available]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-393727]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[10.5.3]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aperture]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[leopard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[osx]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[time capsule]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[time machine]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 28 May 2008 13:04:34 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=393727&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Windows 7: First Official Photos]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/05/allthingsd16.jpg"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/05/allthingsd16.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>The first legit shots of Windows 7, the successor to Windows Vista, were just unveiled by Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer in person at the <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged ALL THINGS D" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/all-things-d/">All Things D</a> conference. It's the evolution of the surface table, using multitouch on the desktop. Looks like Tablet PC. I'm not impressed so far, but only because it doesn't move that far beyond the Surface Table demos we saw last year. More photos in a bit. [<a href="http://allthingsd.com">All Things D</a>]<br>
<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('windows7unveil', 6, '');
</script></p>
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/393568/windows-7-features-revealed-coming-in-18-months">Here's the list of all new features announced in Windows 7</a>.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/393552/windows-7-first-official-photos]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-393552]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[all things d]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ballmer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gates]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 27 May 2008 22:30:49 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=393552&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[How-To: Use Time Machine with an AirPort Extreme]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("time_machine_airport_disk_3.flv", 475, 376,"");
</script>We happen to use an 802.11n <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #airportextreme" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/airportextreme/">AirPort Extreme</a> as our router, so we put today's new firmware upgrade to the test to see if <a href="http://gizmodo.com/369973/apple-time-machine-now-works-with-airport-disk">TIme Machine really does do networked backup to an AirPort Disk</a>. In case you're wondering, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/368573/official-apple-updates-99-airport-express-to-wireless-n">AirPort Express</a> never supported AirDisk, so it <i>won't do <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #timemachine" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/timemachine/">Time Machine</a> over the network</i>&mdash;our testing confirmed this. With the Extreme, it requires only a base-station firmware update and a plugged-in external HDD. When we logged into AirPort Extreme using the Finder and clicked on the folder representing our AirDisk, Time Machine was able to spot it, no problem. [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/time-machine/">Time Machine on Giz</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/370017/how+to-use-time-machine-with-an-airport-extreme]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-370017]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[airport disk]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[airport extreme]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[time machine]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:51:31 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Covert]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=370017&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
