<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: Mac]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/mac</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'mac']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Registers TabletMac Trademark After Dueling Axiotron MacBook Modders]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_apple-tabletmac.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />It may be a case of Apple simply protecting its brand name, but in light of all the Apple tablet rumors, we're treating its recent purchase of the "TabletMac" trademark as yet more evidence stacking up in our favour.</p>
<p>Taking on Axiotron, whose MacBook mod impressed us so much in our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/363137/axiotron-modbook-review-verdict-a-touchscreen-macbook-done-right">review last year</a>, Apple has acquired its TabletMac name in the last 12 months, with documents showing the registration request dated November 6th, 2008. The actual transfer date between Axiotron and Apple for the name isn't clear, but with all of the Apple tablet rumors heating up in recent months, it's a tidy little coincidence. [<a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2009/11/29/apple-takes-control-of-tabletmac-trademark/">MacRumors</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5416199/apple-registers-tabletmac-trademark-after-dueling-axiotron-macbook-modders]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5416199]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[appletablet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[axiotron]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tabletmac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 01 Dec 2009 11:19:46 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kat Hannaford]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5416199&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple's Black Friday Sale?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/apple_black_friday_2009.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_apple_black_friday_2009.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Oh, it's on. [<a href="http://store.apple.com/us/browse/campaigns/holiday/giftguide/black_friday">Apple</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5413750/apples-black-friday-sale]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5413750]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[black friday]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod touch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 27 Nov 2009 03:41:25 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5413750&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Every Mac Price-Compared Across Retailers]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/appledeals.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_appledeals.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>AppleInsider has a ridiculously handy chart that compares prices on Mac sales across various retailers. Granted, it's not taking into account Apple's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #blackfriday" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/blackfriday/">Black Friday</a> deals, but there are hundreds of dollars to be saved if you're interested. [<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/11/25/apple_authorized_resellers_launch_black_friday_sales_early.html">AppleInsider</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5412869/every-mac-price+compared-across-retailers]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5412869]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[dealzmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple black friday]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[black friday]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac mini]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:59:59 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5412869&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[What Happens When You Bring a 22-Year-Old Mac to the Genius Bar?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object width="500" height="320" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://bg-video.cp.motionbox.com/motionboxons/flash/VideoPlayer.swf?video_uid=0096dabe111de2c88f&type=sd&security_token=prod3.02a5c966e4f4516b">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always">
<embed src="http://bg-video.cp.motionbox.com/motionboxons/flash/VideoPlayer.swf?video_uid=0096dabe111de2c88f&type=sd&security_token=prod3.02a5c966e4f4516b" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="320" allowscriptaccess="always" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><br>
I didn't know, so I figured I'd give it a shot. I brought an ancient and non-functioning 1987 Macintosh Plus 1MB to the Apple Store in the Meatpacking District in NYC, and this is what happened.</p>
<p>Overall, they were surprisingly unfazed by my request for repairs. They were impressed that I had it, and seemed genuinely interested in helping me get it fixed. They couldn't do anything for me, since Apple only keeps equipment from the last five years on hand, but they pointed me towards Tekserve, another Apple-centric store in NYC.</p>
<p>Thanks to Nick McGlynn and <a href="http://gawker.tv">Gawker.tv</a> for shooting the hidden camera footage!</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5406566/what-happens-when-you-bring-a-22+year+old-mac-to-the-genius-bar]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5406566]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[genius bar]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pranks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5406566&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Microsoft Disowns Manager For Suggesting That A Mac OS Inspired Windows 7]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_win7.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Poor Microsoft Partner Group Manager <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #simonaldous" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/simonaldous/">Simon Aldous</a>. His Microsoft brethren is calling him uninformed and practically disowning him for the quotes he threw out earlier about <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5402589/microsoft-manager-admits-mac-influence-amidst-other-nonsense">Windows 7 basing its UI on the Mac OS</a>.</p>
<p>A post on the Windows Blog entitled " How we really designed the look and feel of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windows7" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows7/">Windows 7</a>" renounces Simon's quotes with a curt, yet harsh line:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>I hate to say this about one of our own, but his comments were inaccurate and uninformed.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Youch. That's gonna be a fun day at work tomorrow for ya, Simon. [<a href="http://windowsteamblog.com/blogs/windows7/archive/2009/11/11/how-we-really-designed-the-look-and-feel-of-windows-7.aspx">Windows Blog</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5402782/microsoft-disowns-manager-for-suggesting-that-a-mac-os-inspired-windows-7]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5402782]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac osx]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[simon aldous]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7 mac]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:15:37 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5402782&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Microsoft Manager Admits Mac Influence Amidst Other Nonsense]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/screen_shot_2009-11-11_at_3.55.48_pm.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_screen_shot_2009-11-11_at_3.55.48_pm.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windows7" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows7/">Windows 7</a> has taken some heat for aping a few Mac OS UI features, but it's certainly not a copycat OS&mdash;something Microsoft Partner Group Manager <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #simonaldous" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/simonaldous/">Simon Aldous</a> might not know, given his recent quote.</p>
<p>Aldous is not a designer or developer, but works with Microsoft partners&mdash;sales, essentially. But his quotes are pretty odd despite their authoritative tone. Check it:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>What we've tried to do with Windows 7 – whether it's traditional format or in a touch format – is create a Mac look and feel in terms of graphics.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Windows 7 and Snow Leopard may have some similarities in UI, but certainly not in graphical design&mdash;Windows 7's airy, sky-blue aesthetic makes liberal use of transparency effects, while Snow Leopard dials back OS X to a more slick, grey-scale efficient look that matches its hardware design. Yeah, the Windows 7 Start Bar <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5131933/giz-explains-why-the-windows-7-taskbar-beats-mac-os-xs-dock">is inspired by</a> the Mac Dock, but even they don't look anything alike. Then there's this:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>We've significantly improved the graphical user interface, but it's built on that very stable core Vista technology, which is far more stable than the current Mac platform, for instance.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>What? Not to kick a dead OS, but what? We're not taking this as an official Microsoft statement, since nobody on the Windows team would ever say either of those quotes, but Microsoft better rope in their middle managers and teach 'em about interview technique. [<a href="http://www.pcr-online.biz/features/328/Microsofts-new-vision">PCR</a> via <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/11/11/microsoft_official_admits_windows_7_design_inspired_by_mac_os_x.html">AppleInsider</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5402589/microsoft-manager-admits-mac-influence-amidst-other-nonsense]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5402589]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blockquote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[simon aldous]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7 mac]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:35:09 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5402589&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Orb Media Streaming Finally Available For Macs]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/orbscreen.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_orbscreen.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Orb's been out for a while, but now there's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #osx" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/osx/">OS X</a> 10.5 and 10.6 compatibility. Mac users can finally use the app to stream all sorts of media from iTunes to nearly any internet-connected device. Oh, and it's completely free.</p>
<p>You can download the Orb application right <a href="http://orb.com/download_orb/">here</a>. You'll have to look for porn to stream on your own. [<a href="http://orb.com/download_orb/">Orb</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/06/orb-for-mac-finally-arrives-streams-media-from-os-x-to-any-inte/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5398664/orb-media-streaming-finally-available-for-macs]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5398664]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[media streaming]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac os x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[orb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[orb for mac os x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:33:54 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398664&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Steve Jobs' Original Name for the iMac Was So Horrifying It Would Explode Your Ears]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/imac.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_imac.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The iMac revived Apple after a decade of sickly malaise. The name is so obviously iconic. So it's shocking that <a href="http://www.cultofmac.com/20172/20172">Steve Jobs hated it</a> and wanted to call it something so awful it would "curdle your blood."</p>
<p>That's according to the man who named it, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #kensegall" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/kensegall/">Ken Segall</a>, who talked to Leander at Cult of Mac. Segall worked at Apple's agency TBWA\Chiat\Day, and not only christened the iMac, but was the man behind Apple's pitch-perfect "Think Different" campaign.</p>
<p>It's ironic that Segall, who <em>knew</em> iMac was the perfect name and pitched it to Jobs over and over after being rejected again and again, thought that the computer itself was stupid: "We were guarded. We were being polite, but we were really thinking, ‘Jesus, do they know what they are doing? It was so radical."</p>
<p>It strikingly highlights the difference between people who create things and the people who sell them: Apple could see they had a brilliant product, but a terrible way to sell it. TBWA saw a terrible product, but had a brilliant way to brand it. Unfortunately, Segall won't actually reveal Jobs' terrible name, fearing it would open the ninth gate of Hell and bring forth the Apocalypse choo-choo.</p>
<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0BHPtoTctDY&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0BHPtoTctDY&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object></p>
<p>Steve never actually told Segall he'd accepted iMac&mdash;he just started silk-screening it on prototypes to see how it looked.</p>
<p>Check out the full interview over at Cult of Mac, there are way more tidbits, like how Segall came up with "iMac," that definitely make it worth the read. [<a href="http://www.cultofmac.com/20172/20172">Cult of Mac</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396945/steve-jobs-original-name-for-the-imac-was-so-horrifying-it-would-explode-your-ears]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396945]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ken segall]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macintosh]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[steve jobs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tbwa\chiat\day]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:59:24 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396945&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Parallels 5 Runs Windows 7 Right Next to Snow Leopard With Full Multitouchiness]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/parallels5.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_parallels5.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>It's a virtual war: <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5390751/vmware-fusion-3-fuses-snow-leopard-and-windows-7-with-full-64+bit-power">VMWare Fusion 3</a> for Snow Kitty and Win7 popped out last week, and now here's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #parallels5" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/parallels5/">Parallels 5</a>. It's also fully 64-bit, with Windows apps that behave like native ones, including full multitouch gestures, and more zoomzoom.</p>
<p>Like Fusion, Parallels supports OpenGL 2.1 and DirectX 9 Shader Model 3.0 for the full Aero 3D interface and 7x better graphics performance than before. It also has a migration tool to move a PC's info to your <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #virtualmachine" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/virtualmachine/">virtual machine</a>. Overall performance-wise, it's three times faster than before, supports 8 virtual CPUs and automatically pauses the virtual machine whenever no Windows apps are running. <strong>Update</strong>: The Parallels guys point out that Fusion supports OpenGL 2.1 just in XP, but only 1.4 in Vista and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windows7" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows7/">Windows 7</a>, while Parallels supports 2.1 in every version, which they say means games will run better in Parallels. We'll definitely be checking that out.</p>
<p>The new Crystal mode promises to make "Windows completely disappear" so apps run feel completely native, with full support for multitouch trackpad gestures and the Apple Remote, with a persistent Windows apps folder in the Dock. Parallels 5 is out today for $80 for the full version or $50 for the upgrade, though we don't blame you if you can't tell it apart from Fusion 3, so we'll be checking them out head to head soon. [<a href="http://www.parallels.com/">Parallels</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396590/parallels-5-runs-windows-7-right-next-to-snow-leopard-with-full-multitouchiness]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396590]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[parallels]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[parallels 5]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[virtual machine]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 04 Nov 2009 03:01:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396590&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[More Giz Readers Own Macs Than PCs]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/macvspc.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_macvspc.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Surprisingly, our our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5392835/do-you-use-a-mac-or-a-pc-as-your-personal-home-computer">poll yesterday</a> revealed that Mac owners were running neck and neck with PC owners, each commanding 41% of the vote. Although Mac owners have maintained an extremely slight edge over the last few hours in actual numbers.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/poll.JPG"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_poll.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_os_tracking_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<p>People who own PCs and Macs, the category I fall into, got 15% of the vote, which was also a little higher than I expected. Make of this what you will, but the difference between the poll compared to our OS tracking graphic pictured here should indicate why we wanted to focus on your own hardware&mdash;not the computer you use at work. At any rate, the race is really still too close to call. You have time to cast your vote and help tip the scales in your favor.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5393703/more-giz-readers-own-macs-than-pcs]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5393703]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[os]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac vs pc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5393703&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Do You Use a Mac Or a PC As Your Personal Home Computer?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/macvspc.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_macvspc.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Now that <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/pst/windows7/">Windows 7</a> and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/pst/snowleopard/">Snow Leopard</a> are both out in the wild, it is time, once again, to take stock of the state of home computing. That is to say, are you using a Mac or a PC?</p>
<p>Before you answer the poll, keep this in mind: work machines don't count. Presumably, you made a personal choice between a Mac or a PC for your private computer&mdash;and that is the one we want to know about.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8" src="http://static.polldaddy.com/p/2185493.js">
</script><noscript><br>
<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/2185493/">Do You Use a Mac or a PC As Your Personal Home Computer?</a><span style="font-size:9px;">(<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com">opinion</a>)</span><br></noscript></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5392835/do-you-use-a-mac-or-a-pc-as-your-personal-home-computer]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5392835]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[question of the day]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac vs pc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[qotd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5392835&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Image.jpg Could Be The First Analog Digital Photo Frame]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/c889_image_photo_frame.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_c889_image_photo_frame.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Save those precious moments for posterity with the image.jpg photo frame. Digital and analog worlds collide with a silk-screened, wooden representation of a Mac image window that will contain a picture you probably took with a digital camera.</p>
<p>For added authenticity, the frame also features a backing that simulates a transparent background. For even more crossover amusement, give one to Grandma so she has something to put her wedding photos in. This is one program <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5381567/carol-brady-creates-the-worst-tech-support-job-on-the-face-of-the-earth">even a computer novice can handle</a>. [<a href="http://www.thinkgeek.com/geektoys/cubegoodies/c889/">ThinkGeek</a> via <a href="http://www.random-good-stuff.com/">RGS</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5390966/imagejpg-could-be-the-first-analog-digital-photo-frame]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5390966]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[analog]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[frames]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[image.jpg frame]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5390966&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[VMWare Fusion 3 Fuses Snow Leopard and Windows 7 With Full 64-Bit Power]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/fusion3.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_fusion3.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>VMWare's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #fusion3" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/fusion3/">Fusion 3</a>&mdash;with full support for <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #snowleopard" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/snowleopard/">Snow Leopard</a> and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windows7" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows7/">Windows 7</a>&mdash;is out today. Besides being natively 64-bit in Snow Leopard, it lets you migrate a PC to your <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #virtualmachine" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/virtualmachine/">virtual machine</a>, launches Windows apps like native apps, and more.</p>
<p>It now supports OpenGL 2.1 and DirectX 9 Shader Model 3.0, giving you some more graphics powah in Windows, so you can run Windows' Aero interface with Flip3D (and play games, if you're daring). The more integrated Windows apps respond to commands like cmd+q and yes, work with Dock Expose. It's $80 for a fresh copy or $40 for an upgrade. [<a href="http://www.vmware.com/landing_pages/fusion-3-preorder.html/?src=ONLINE_09Q4_DRND_OTHER_WEBSTORE-FUSION-FREE-UPGR&ClickID=ckknwisiilelliqkzvlefpilnp7e4kewpnea">VMWare</a> via <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/10/27/vmware_releases_fusion_3_for_mac_with_full_windows_7_support.html">AppleInsider</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5390751/vmware-fusion-3-fuses-snow-leopard-and-windows-7-with-full-64+bit-power]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5390751]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fusion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fusion 3]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[virtual machine]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vmware]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 27 Oct 2009 09:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5390751&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The iMac Cylon Mask Is Both Trick and Treat]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("/imac-cylon_gizmodo.flv", 500, 375,"");
</script>Giz reader Gary Katz has definitely fixed his <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5386087/imac+o+lantern-will-make-any-fanboy-look-even-dorkier-than-usual">iMac-o'-lantern error</a> with this wonderful and even dorkierer <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #imaccylonmask" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/imaccylonmask/">iMac Cylon Mask</a>. It uses an old <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #lampimac" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/lampimac/">lamp iMac</a> base and Larson Scan Kit, like the one used in the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5372548/create-your-own-cylon-pumpkin">Cylon Pumpkin</a>. [Thanks <a href="http://www.macmd.com/">Gary</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5389627/the-imac-cylon-mask-is-both-trick-and-treat]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5389627]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[halloween]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cylon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[galactica]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iMac Cylon Mask]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lamp imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 25 Oct 2009 20:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5389627&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Kills ZFS Plans for Snow Leopard]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/snowkitty.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_snowkitty.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Don't hold your breath for the ZFS filesystem to appear in any future <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #snowleopard" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/snowleopard/">Snow Leopard</a> updates. A message yesterday on the project's homepage very clearly acknowledges that development has stopped completely.</p>
<p>A message on MacOS Forge tersely states,</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The ZFS project has been discontinued. The mailing list and repository will also be removed shortly.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>There have been multiple explanations as to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5349861/why-did-apple-drop-zfs-from-snow-leopard">why Apple dropped ZFS support</a> in Snow Leopard, and now there's more speculation to add into the mix. This time the story goes that when Oracle bought Sun, Oracle didn't want continue development on ZFS because they already had their own filesystem (BTRFS) in the oven.</p>
<p>ZFS was also apparently facing patent suits at the time. It all sounds like a complicated legal and political mess, which is probably why Apple just dropped it.</p>
<p>Whatever the true causes behind ZFS' sudden fall from grace may be, it's disappointing that we'll have to wait longer for a true filesystem upgrade in <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #osx" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/osx/">OS X</a>. [<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/10/23/apple_shuts_down_zfs_open_source_project.html">AppleInsider</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5389101/apple-kills-zfs-plans-for-snow-leopard]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5389101]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[10.6]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[btrfs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[oracle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os x 10.6]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sun]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[zfs]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 24 Oct 2009 12:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5389101&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Psystar's $50 Software Lets You Put Snow Leopard on a Non-Hacked PC]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/thumb160x_Hardware-300x274.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Not content with waging a crazy <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/psystar">legal battle with Apple</a> based on just selling hardware with <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #snowleopard" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/snowleopard/">Snow Leopard</a> on it, Psystar is now selling <i>software</i> that lets you put <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #osx" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/osx/">OS X</a> on any new PC.</p>
<p>You can actually download a trial version yourself before you hand over your $50. Keep in mind that you'll need to have a machine with one of these processors in order for this to work: Intel Core 2 Duo, Core 2 Quad, i7 or Xeon Nehalem. We haven't tested <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #rebelefi" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/rebelefi/">Rebel EFI</a>, so we can't say how well it works. Let us know if you've had luck with it. [<a href="http://store.psystar.com/rebel-efi-preview.html">Psystar</a> via <a href="http://www.loopinsight.com/2009/10/22/psystar-releases-software-to-install-mac-os-x-on-regular-pcs/">LoopInSight</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5387915/psystars-50-software-lets-you-put-snow-leopard-on-a-non+hacked-pc]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5387915]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[psystar]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hackintosh]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rebel efi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:09:17 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5387915&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[How to Survive Boot Camp (and Run Win 7 on a Mac)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/win7top.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_win7top.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windows7" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows7/">Windows 7</a> and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #snowleopard" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/snowleopard/">Snow Leopard</a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5330609/windows-7-review-you-can-quit-complaining-now">are</a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5346418/snow-leopard-review-lightened-and-enlightened">great</a>. And <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5361767/college-students-get-windows-7-for-30">cheap</a>. <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #bootcamp" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/bootcamp/">Boot Camp</a>'s the free, <em>official</em> way to run them both natively on one machine. It's easy to setup, and just works, except when it doesn't. Here's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #howto" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/howto/">how to</a> survive Boot Camp.</p>

<p>Boot Camp, to be clear, is different from virtualization software like Parallels or VM Ware Fusion or <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5383982/how-to-virtualize-any-os-for-free">Virtual Box</a>, which you let you run Windows inside of OS X, almost like an application. Boot Camp runs Windows natively on a Mac&mdash;you power on, click the Windows icon at the boot manager, and it starts it up, just the same as if you'd powered on a Dell. Why Windows straight up on a Mac? To live a little. Or in my case, to play PC games.</p>
<h1>What you'll need</h1>
<p>&bull; A Windows 7 disc<br>
&bull; A Snow Leopard disc<br>
&bull; An Intel-based Mac<br>
&bull; Free disc space!</p>
<p>More on system requirements <a href="http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1899">here</a>.</p>
<h1>It's easy, probably</h1>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/Screen_shot_2009-10-19_at_10.07.35_AM.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_Screen_shot_2009-10-19_at_10.07.35_AM.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Boot Camp, and the process of installing Windows in most cases, couldn't be more straightforward, at least as far as <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #operatingsystem" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/operatingsystem/">operating system</a> installs usually go. After you've got your Mac up and running like normal, fire up an app called Boot Camp Assistant (just use Spotlight). It'll warn you to back up your disk before installing Windows, which you should, since you are asking favors of the hard drive gods here.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/Screen_shot_2009-10-19_at_10.13.03_AM.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_Screen_shot_2009-10-19_at_10.13.03_AM.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Boot Camp Assistant will ask how much of your hard drive you wanna dedicate to Windows. You want more than the laughably small 5GB of space it suggests. Since I keep around 3-4 games on my Windows partition at a time, and I want some breathing room just in case, I stick with 40GB, but you probably really want no less than 20GB. Slide the bar toward the Finder face, granting Windows how much hard drive space you want it to have. After you click partition, Boot Camp Assistant will start getting your hard drive divvied up for some Windows action, which'll take a few minutes. Once that's done, you'll need your Windows disk.</p>
<p><strong>If everything went according to plan, skip this next section!</strong></p>
<h1>If something went wrong</h1>
<p>It's possible you'll get an error that says Boot Camp Assistant wasn't able to create the partition because some files couldn't be moved, and you need to format the drive into a single partition. Basically, what's happened here, most likely, is that your hard drive is fragmented like a mofo, and there's not enough contiguous space for Boot Camp Assistant to create the Windows partition. Yeah, disk fragmentation. In OS X. Believe it. From here, there a couple possible solutions.</p>
<p>If you're extraordinarily lucky, it's possible you might be able to simply restart your computer and stuff will just work. Probably not! From there, you proceed to the <a href="http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=7311606">free and easy solution</a>. Using Disk Utility, resize your main OS X partition, reducing it by 40GB (or however much you plan on making your Windows partition). Hit apply, and pray. If that goes peachy, you'll have 40GB of unused space on your disk. Go back to Disk Utility, and re-expand your OS X partition to reclaim the 40GB. After that's all done, run Boot Camp Assistant again, and since the hard work of moving files around on the disk was done by Disk Utility, you should be golden.</p>
<p>If, on the other hand, Disk Utility also refused to change your drive's partitions, you have two choices. The nuclear option is to back up, format your hard drive completely, then run Boot Camp and divide your hard drive into partitions from the Snow Leopard installation before restoring all of your OS X data via machine. Since my Snow Leopard install was practically virginal, as a totally clean (not restored) install that was only around 10 days old [<em>ed. note&mdash;how the hell did your hard drive get so fragmented then?</em>], I said screw that. Which led me to <a href="http://www.coriolis-systems.com/iDefrag.php">iDefrag</a>.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/DSC_0093.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_DSC_0093.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>It's a $30 defragmenting program. I don't know if my hard drive was really as disgustingly fragmented as it said, or if it'll ultimately help my Mac's performance, but it perfectly executed what I bought it for. Basically, you make a startup DVD (using your Snow Leopard install disc, so keep it handy), boot into it, and it shows you how gross and fragmented your hard drive is before going to work defragging it for a couple hours. Restart, you're back in OS X, and Boot Camp Assistant won't talk back to you again. At least, it didn't to me.</p>
<h1>The part where you actually install Windows, so grab some tea</h1>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/Screen_shot_2009-10-20_at_12.39.14_AM.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_Screen_shot_2009-10-20_at_12.39.14_AM.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Okay, welcome back, people without problems. After the partioning is successful, Boot Camp Assistant will ask you to pop in your Windows disc. If you've got one of <a href="http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1846">these Macs</a> and 4GB of RAM, you should install the 64-bit version. If not, go 32-bit. Now, all of the pains and glories of installing Windows will actually commence.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/DSC_0103.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_DSC_0103.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>After you pick the language and accept the terms, it'll ask you want kind of Windows installation you want. Pick custom, and you should get a list of hard drives to install Windows on. <strong>Make sure you highlight the correct partition</strong> and click format, which will transform it to Windows' native NTFS file system, if you're doing a partition that's bigger than 32GB for Windows. Then tell Windows to install itself there. Go make a drink, and come back 20 minutes later.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/DSC_0096.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_DSC_0096.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Welcome to Windows land.</p>
<h1>Now what?</h1>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/DSC_0113.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_DSC_0113.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>To pick between booting into OS X or Windows when you turn on your Mac, start holding down the Alt key before the gray screen appears when you power on. (You gotta be fast.) It'll give you the option to boot into Mac or Windows. Pick Windows, obviously. Once you're totally in Windows, like with the desktop and everything, you need to pop in the Snow Leopard installation disc, and run the Boot Camp installer, which puts in place all the drivers Windows needs to actually run decent on your Mac.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/DSC_0149.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_DSC_0149.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>After that, you should run Windows Update to grab the latest goods from Microsoft, and I'd suggest, especially if you're running a unibody MacBook (or Pro) going to <a href="http://www.nvidia.com/Download/index.aspx?lang=en-us">Nvidia's site</a> and downloading their latest Windows 7 drivers for your graphics card (the 9M series for unibody MacBook Pros, 8M for the previous, non-unibody generation).</p>
<p>Overall, Boot Camp 3.0 in Snow Leopard works way better and more smoothly than before: Multitouch trackpads on MacBooks feel way less janky; shortcut keys, like for brightness or volume, work exactly like in OS X (before, you pressed the function key); and you can read your OS X partition's files from Windows now. (Back in OS X, you won't be able to write to your Windows partition if it's the NTFS format.) By the way, the command key, by default, is mapped as the Windows key, so you're probably gonna annoyingly bring up the start menu a whole bunch. It's natural.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5387353/how-to-survive-boot-camp-and-run-win-7-on-a-mac]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5387353]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[how to]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[boot camp]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5387353&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Microsoft's Favorite Windows 7 Statistic]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Sure, 91 percent of release candidate testers surveyed said they'd recommend <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windows7" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windows7" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows7/">Windows 7</a> to friends and family. But, undoubtedly Microsoft's favorite statistic is that 80 percent of Mac users in the survey said they'd recommend Windows 7 to friends and family too. </p>
<p>Of course, just 'cause I tell my mom this minivan would perfect for her doesn't mean <em>I'd</em> actually drive one.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5387485/microsofts-favorite-windows-7-statistic]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5387485]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5387485&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[10 Things You Need to Know About Apple's New Stuff]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/apple10.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_apple10.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Cupertino released a lot of new products today, and it was easy to miss something in the press release onslaught. To stay versed in the Tome of Apple, here are <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #10things" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/10things/">10 things</a> you need to know:</p>

<p><strong>1. iMacs Get Next-Gen Processors</strong><br>
The most important upgrade to iMacs is that they'll now support <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5385841/apple-imac-hands-on">Intel Core i5 and i7 processors</a> for prices starting at $2000. You can buy a Core 2 Duo model for $800 less, but...I mean...<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5381760/giz-explains-intels-entire-confusing-armada-of-chips">really</a>?</p>
<p><strong>2. The iMac Is a Cheap Monitor, By Apple's Standards</strong><br>
A 30-inch Cinema Display will still run you $1,800 while a new 27-inch iMac starts at $1700. Oh, and now the iMac can work simply as a monitor through its mini DisplayPort, too.</p>
<p><strong>3. Apple Sees the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #macmini" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macmini/">Mac Mini</a> as a Server, Not an HTPC</strong><br>
Apple may have given the Mac Mini a slight <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5385817/mac-mini-updates-faster-processors-more-memory-and-a-dual-hard-disk-server">spec boost</a> and the option to load Leopard Server, but it still missing the critical feature it needs to be a competitive home theater PC&mdash;the HDMI port.</p>
<p><strong>4. New Metal Remote Looks Like an iPod Design Reject</strong><br>
For those who couldn't stand the humiliation of using a white, plastic remote with their black-and-silver iMac, there's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5385894/new-imac-finally-gets-matching-apple-remote">a remote</a> for that.</p>
<p><strong>5. Replaceable Batteries Are Dead in Apple's Entire Laptop Line</strong><br>
The trusty old <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #whitemacbook" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/whitemacbook/">white MacBook</a> was holding out, battling designers' attempts to replace its swappable battery with a longer-life non-swappable version you see in every other modern Apple laptop. Today, it <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5385837/new-unibody-led-macbook-hands-on">lost that battle</a>.</p>
<p><strong>6. Apple Still Hates Buttons, Nubs, Etc</strong><br>
The multitouch <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5385834/apple-magic-mouse-hands-on">Magic Mouse</a> has risen over the Mighty Mouse's corpse, and as Jesus points out, the whole no-button design is <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5385892/so-long-nipples-this-time-you-wont-be-missed">déjà vu</a>.</p>
<p><strong>7. Jobs' Polycarbonate MacBook Must Have Slipped Off His Lap</strong><br>
Not only is Apple keeping the white MacBook around, they've <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5385837/new-unibody-led-macbook-hands-on">added a non-slip rubber bottom</a> in what may be the most aggressive design change since May 16, 2006, when the model original launched.</p>
<p><strong>8. Time Capsules Should Be 60% Less Frustrating</strong><br>
Anyone who's grown tired of the ridiculously slow experience of interfacing with the Time Capsule, know that Time Capsules have seen a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5385940/time-capsule-and-airport-extreme-grow-new-antennas-to-get-faster-and-stronger">tacit spec boost</a> promising to make systems "60 percent faster than before."</p>
<p><strong>9. <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #jonathanive" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/jonathanive/">Jonathan Ive</a> Could Still Sell a Ketchup Popsicle to a Fanboy in White Gloves</strong><br>
Also of note, sales on Hanes midnight blue tees are going <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5385876/video-the-new-imac-looks-even-more-gorgeous-narrated-by-jony-ive">through the roof</a>, and big muscles don't make you look dumb so long as you speak with an Essex-region English accent.</p>
<p><strong>10. No, the Nook Is Not an Apple Product</strong><br>
But it's about <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5385938/barnes--nobles-dual+screened-nook-260-eats-the-kindles-lunch">a bajillion times closer</a> than the Kindle.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5386047/10-things-you-need-to-know-about-apples-new-stuff]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5386047]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[roundups]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[10 things]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple news]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jonathan ive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac mini]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[magic mouse]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[white macbook]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5386047&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New Unibody LED MacBook Hands On]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/newmacbooktop.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_newmacbooktop.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>At the center of today's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/apple">minor product explosion</a>, Apple's refreshed $1000 <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #whitemacbook" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/whitemacbook/">White MacBook</a> is the only right-fielder: It's got a rubberized bottom, multitouch trackpad, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #ledbacklighting" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ledbacklighting/">LED backlighting</a>, the MacBook Pro's non-replaceable battery, and healthy spec bumps. <b>UPDATED</b></p>

<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5385970,16,'');
</script></p>
<p>The multitouch trackpad and LED backlighting feel like necessary catch-up&mdash;they're less like "Pro" perks than they are standard technologies, so it's good to see them trickle down. Likewise, the spec bumps basically just keep up with inflation: the processor jumps from 2.13GHz to 2.26 GHz, the HDD from 160GB to 250GB, while the 2GB of DDR2 RAM has been swapped for the same amount of slightly faster DDR3 memory. And in the same divisive trade the 13" MacBook Pro made a few months back, the old removable battery has been switched out for the non-replaceable 7-hour unit.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5385845,2,'');
</script></p>
<p>There was talk of an <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5345324/rumor-plastic-macbooks-arent-dying-theyre-just-waiting-for-a-makeover">industrial design overhaul</a> back in August, and that's what this refresh is really about. The bottom is now entirely rubberized, which seems to serve two purposes: One, to bring something, <em>anything</em>, visually new to Mac's unwittingly retro baseline laptop; and two, to bring some semblance of durability and friction to the the case, which to anyone who's watched a marred, scratched polycarb MacBook effortlessly slide off their corduroys onto the tile floor, probably sounds like a great idea.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE</strong>: Brian had a chance to paw the new MacBook for a few minutes. Here's what he noticed:</p>
<p>• The glass trackpad is the same size as the Pro's, and noticeably bigger than last gen's.<br>
• It feels bigger&mdash;like, fatter&mdash;than the last gen white Macbook<br>
• Small visual cues in the cover have been tweaked to look more like the Pro line<br>
• The uniformly white bezel makes the body look chunky<br>
• Now that the base is just a flat piece of rubber, airflow seems like it could be an issue. [<em>Ed. note: I mean, is rubber a good heatsink? It's more of an insulator, right?</em>]<br>
• The eight screws in the base complement the finish on the aluminum MacBook well; here, they stand out, and look kinda ugly<br>
• The edges are curvier, but again, the whole think feels chubbier.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>CUPERTINO, Calif., Oct. 20 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ &mdash; Apple® today updated its popular MacBook® with a new, durable polycarbonate unibody design featuring a brilliant LED-backlit display, a glass Multi-Touch™ trackpad and Apple's innovative built-in battery for up to seven hours of battery life. Inheriting technology and design features from the MacBook Pro line, the new MacBook is an ideal consumer notebook for students and new Mac® users, and is available for $999.</p>
<p>"The new MacBook includes many of the great features found on the innovative MacBook Pro, such as an LED-backlit display, glass Multi-Touch trackpad and built-in long-life battery," said Philip Schiller, Apple's senior vice president of Worldwide Product Marketing. "With the only lineup of notebooks all featuring unibody enclosures, LED-backlit displays and long-life battery technology, there's never been a better time to switch to a Mac."</p>
<p>The new MacBook features a unibody, polycarbonate enclosure that makes it lighter and more durable. The new design includes a unique non-skid bottom surface and at just 4.7 pounds, the sleek MacBook slides easily into a backpack or briefcase. MacBook comes standard with a bright, LED-backlit display with the same wide-angle viewing technology used in the MacBook Pro line. The new MacBook has a 2.26 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor, 2GB RAM, a 250GB hard drive, and powerful NVIDIA GeForce 9400M integrated graphics.</p>
<p>The new MacBook includes Apple's innovative built-in notebook battery for up to seven hours of wireless productivity on a single charge, and up to 1,000 recharges.* At nearly three times the lifespan of conventional notebook batteries, Apple's built-in battery results in fewer depleted batteries and less waste. Depleted batteries can be replaced for $129, which includes installation and environmentally responsible disposal of your old battery.</p>
<p>The energy-efficient MacBook joins the industry's greenest lineup of notebooks, with every Mac notebook achieving EPEAT Gold** status and meeting Energy Star 5.0 requirements. The entire Mac notebook line now comes standard with energy efficient LED-backlit displays that are mercury-free and made with arsenic-free glass. Mac notebooks contain no brominated flame retardants, use internal cables and components that are PVC-free and are constructed of recyclable materials.</p>
<p>Every Mac comes with Mac OS® X Snow Leopard®, the world's most advanced operating system, and iLife®, Apple's innovative suite of applications for managing photos, making movies and creating and learning to play music. Snow Leopard builds on a decade of OS X innovation and success with hundreds of refinements, new core technologies and out of the box support for Microsoft Exchange. iLife features iPhoto®, to easily organize and manage photos; iMovie® with powerful easy-to-use new features such as Precision Editor, video stabilization and advanced drag and drop; and GarageBand® which introduces a whole new way to help you learn to play piano and guitar.</p>
<p>Pricing & Availability<br>
The new MacBook is available immediately through the Apple Store® (www.apple.com), Apple's retail stores and Apple Authorized Resellers.</p>
<p>The new MacBook, for a suggested retail price of $999 (US), includes:<br>
13.3-inch widescreen LED-backlit 1280 x 800 glossy display;<br>
2.26 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo with 3MB shared L2 cache;<br>
1066 MHz front-side bus;<br>
2GB 1066 MHz DDR3 SDRAM, expandable to 4GB;<br>
NVIDIA GeForce 9400M integrated graphics;<br>
250 GB serial ATA hard drive running at 5400 rpm, with Sudden Motion Sensor;<br>
a slot-load 8X SuperDrive® with double-layer support (DVD+ / -R DL/DVD+ / -RW/CD-RW);<br>
Mini DisplayPort for video output (adapters sold separately);<br>
built-in AirPort Extreme® 802.11n wireless networking and Bluetooth 2.1+EDR;<br>
Gigabit Ethernet port;<br>
built-in iSight® video camera;<br>
two USB 2.0 ports;<br>
one audio line in/out port, supporting optical digital out and analog in/out;<br>
glass Multi-Touch trackpad;<br>
built-in, 60WHr lithium polymer battery; and<br>
60 Watt MagSafe® Power Adapter.</p>
<p>Build-to-order options for the MacBook include the ability to upgrade to 4GB 1066 MHz DDR3 SDRAM, or 320GB 5400 rpm, 500GB 5400 rpm hard drive, Mini DisplayPort to DVI Adapter, Mini DisplayPort to Dual-Link DVI Adapter (for 30-inch DVI display), Mini DisplayPort to VGA Adapter, Apple MagSafe Airline Adapter and the AppleCare Protection Plan.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5385837/new-unibody-led-macbook-hands-on]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5385837]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[led backlighting]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[polycarbonate macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[white macbook]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:03:36 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5385837&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Crushes Recession by Selling More Macs and iPhones Than Ever Before]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/stevedollar.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_stevedollar.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Apple just sold more Macs and iPhones than ever before: 3.05 million Macs and 7.4 million iPhones. iPods, doomed that they are, are still dying. But, Steve promises "some really great new products in the pipeline for 2010." <strong>Updated live</strong>.</p>

<p><strong>Update 2</strong>: Q & A time.</p>
<p>Analyst dude asks what Apple thinks of wannabes "like Android." Answer: Apple "feels very good about suiting up against anyone" since they've got 85,000 apps. COO Tim Cook says, "Frankly, I think people are still just trying to catch up with the first iPhone 2 years ago."</p>
<p>Man, this is the most boring ass Apple earnings call ever. <em>Nobody</em>'s asked a stupid tablet question to elicit a really snippy reply from Tim Cook, which has pretty much ruined it for me.</p>
<p>The earnings call starts in 25 minutes, and we'll be bringing it to you live.</p>
<p>There's some funky accounting going on now with some new accounting guidelines that lets them officially recognize the revenue from an iPhone, iPod touch and Apple TV (stuff they've been reporting revenue from over 24-month periods previously), so that's something to watch for over the next quarter or so. Business Insider explains <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/henry-blodget-live-analysis-apple-earnings-2009-10">what all that means</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Update</strong>: $9.87 billion was the second highest revenue ever, next to last Christmas season.</p>
<p>Mac's growing 17 percent, while the rest of the market only growing at 2 percent. Laptops are over 74 percent of Macs sold. Desktops are dead, biatches. Most educational Macs shipped ever, they're indoctrinating our youth. Half of Macs sold in Apple Stores still sold to first-time Mac buyers.</p>
<p>Snow Leopard upgrade box sales double Leopard's at release.</p>
<p>10.2 million iPods sold, down from 11 million a year ago (down 8 percent). iPod touch sales were up 100 percent though, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5319722/apple-made-a-lot-of-money-as-traditional-ipods-march-to-extinction">showing, again,</a> where the growth is. This is <em>crazy</em>: 50 percent of recent iPod buyers were buying their first iPod. They've still got 70 percent of the MP3 player market.</p>
<p>7.4 million iPhones. Half a billion app downloads, weeee.</p>
<p>They're opening a new Apple Store on the Upper West Side in NY, which means Genius Bar reservations should start being slightly easier to snag than one for Momofuku Ko.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Apple Reports Fourth Quarter Results</p>
<p>Most Profitable Quarter Ever; Record Mac and iPhone Sales</p>
<p>CUPERTINO, Calif. Oct. 19 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ &mdash; Apple® today announced financial results for its fiscal 2009 fourth quarter ended September 26, 2009. The Company posted revenue of $9.87 billion and a net quarterly profit of $1.67 billion, or $1.82 per diluted share. These results compare to revenue of $7.9 billion and net quarterly profit of $1.14 billion, or $1.26 per diluted share, in the year-ago quarter. Gross margin was 36.6 percent, up from 34.7 percent in the year-ago quarter. International sales accounted for 46 percent of the quarter's revenue.</p>
<p>In accordance with the subscription accounting treatment required by GAAP, the Company recognizes revenue and cost of goods sold for iPhone™ and Apple TV® over their estimated economic lives. Adjusting GAAP sales and product costs to eliminate the impact of subscription accounting, the corresponding non-GAAP measures* for the quarter are $12.25 billion of "Adjusted Sales" and $2.85 billion of "Adjusted Net Income."</p>
<p>Apple sold 3.05 million Macintosh® computers during the quarter, representing a 17 percent unit increase over the year-ago quarter. The Company sold 10.2 million iPods during the quarter, representing an eight percent unit decline from the year-ago quarter. Apple sold 7.4 million iPhones in the quarter, representing seven percent unit growth over the year-ago quarter.</p>
<p>"We are thrilled to have sold more Macs and iPhones than in any previous quarter," said Steve Jobs, Apple's CEO. "We've got a very strong lineup for the holiday season and some really great new products in the pipeline for 2010."</p>
<p>"We are delighted with our September quarter and fiscal 2009 results," said Peter Oppenheimer, Apple's CFO. "For the full year, we grew revenue by 12 percent and net income by 18 percent in extraordinarily challenging times. Looking ahead to the first fiscal quarter of 2010, we expect revenue in the range of about $11.3 billion to $11.6 billion and we expect diluted earnings per share in the range of about $1.70 to $1.78."</p>
<p>Apple will provide live streaming of its Q4 2009 financial results conference call utilizing QuickTime®, Apple's standards-based technology for live and on-demand audio and video streaming. The live webcast will begin at 2:00 p.m. PDT on October 19, 2009 at www.apple.com/quicktime/qtv/earningsq409/ and will also be available for replay for approximately two weeks thereafter.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5385183/apple-crushes-recession-by-selling-more-macs-and-iphones-than-ever-before]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5385183]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[earnings]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:35:53 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5385183&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[OS X 10.6.2 Beta Addresses Hard Drive Killing Bug]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>We know that Apple <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5380101/apple-aware-of-snow-leopard-user-account-bug">is aware</a> of the data-annihilating <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #guestaccountbug" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #guestaccountbug" href="http://gizmodo.comhttp://gizmodo.com/tag/guestaccountbug/">Guest Account bug</a> in <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #snowleopard" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #snowleopard" href="http://gizmodo.comhttp://gizmodo.com/tag/snowleopard/">Snow Leopard</a>, and it looks like a fix is on the way. The latest 10.6.2 beta seeded to developers specifically addresses the issue, and throws in a few other tweaks for good measure. If you're staring at that Guest Account on the login screen with fear and loathing, sit tight. Hopefully this will all be resolved soon. [<a href="http://www.9to5mac.com/apple_fixes_guest_bug_in_latest_OSX_beta">9to5 Mac</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5383891/os-x-1062-beta-addresses-hard-drive-killing-bug]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5383891]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bugs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[guest account bug]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 17 Oct 2009 08:31:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5383891&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[You'll Be Seeing Justin Long's Smarmy Apple Face a Lot More Soon]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Y_Ompf5Qtxg&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Y_Ompf5Qtxg&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windows7" href="http://gizmodo.comhttp://gizmodo.com/tag/windows7/">Windows 7</a> launches a week from today, so you're probably ready for the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5381164/family-guys-seth-macfarlane-and-microsoft-team-up-for-hackiest-hackathon-that-ever-hacked">Microsoft advertising blitz</a> that's already started. But are you prepared for the <em>Apple</em> Windows 7 <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/09_43/b4152000782247.htm">onslaught</a>?</p>
<p>Oh, that's right. Apple sees Windows 7 as an opportunity for them just as much as it is for Microsoft, since people are looking to replace their computers. So, BusinessWeek says that a tidal wave of new ads is coming that'll, for instance, make fun of the fact that upgrading to Windows 7 from XP ain't easy. (Though, to be fair, of the three things that come in the Windows 7 box, one is a warning to XP users.)</p>
<p>Maybe, just maybe though, Apple will grant us an early Christmas gift in the form of actually new "<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #getamac" href="http://gizmodo.comhttp://gizmodo.com/tag/getamac/">Get a Mac</a>" ads that aren't from like 2006 (as much I appreciate John Hodgman's brilliance in them). Somehow I doubt it. [<a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/09_43/b4152000782247.htm">BW</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5382365/youll-be-seeing-justin-longs-smarmy-apple-face-a-lot-more-soon]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5382365]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[get a mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5382365&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[You Can Use Google Chrome for Mac Right Now]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/chromium.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_chromium.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Google CEO Eric Schmidt says Chrome for Macs is <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5378143/chrome-for-mac-coming-in-months-says-guy-nominally-in-charge-of-google">coming in a couple months</a>, but if you're impatient and only mildly adventurous, you can run it a surprisingly solid <strong>early</strong> version <em>right now</em>.</p>
<p>Google warns that the early access developer release "still lacks certain privacy features, and is not appropriate for general consumer use." Fair enough, but if you're just dicking around and want to get a feel for the interface and speed (which we like), it's good enough now you can watch Hulu and do everyday without crashies (though you might see some weird drawing errors when there's Flash involved).</p>
<p>You can also try the <a href="http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/snapshots/chromium-rel-mac/">nightly builds of Chromium</a> (the open source part of Chrome, essentially). Just don't cry if you run into any bugs, 'cause we're not even talking beta here, k? [<a href="http://www.google.com/chrome/intl/en/eula_dev.html?dl=mac">Direct Download</a> (DMG file), <a href="http://dev.chromium.org/getting-involved/dev-channel">Chrome Dev Channel</a>, <a href="http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/snapshots/chromium-rel-mac/">Chromium Builds</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5379795/you-can-use-google-chrome-for-mac-right-now]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5379795]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[btw]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chromium]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Google Chrome]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google chrome mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:32:33 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5379795&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Buffy and Hellboy Skins on Apple Products, Dual-Fanboys Ascend to Nirvana]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/hellboybuffy.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_hellboybuffy.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged DARK HORSE COMICS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/dark-horse-comics/">Dark Horse Comics</a> (Buffy, Hellboy) and GelaSkins (those dudes who make reusable sticky skins for iPhones, Macbooks, etc) have conceived and birthed a line of products to which all geeks will find themselves un-immune.</p>

<p>Hellboy, Buffy and a bunch of other <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged DARK HORSE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/dark-horse/">Dark Horse</a> IPs are now available in GelaSkin form (heck, there's even some Bettie Page thrown in there for good measure). iPhone skins go for $15 while 13 and 15-inch Macbook/general laptop skins cost $30.</p>
<p>You've likely seen the iconic art before, but that's alright. I could stare at Sarah Michelle Gellar's estranged cousin for days.<br>
<script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5379594,8,'');
</script>[<a href="http://www.darkhorse.com/Search/Browse/GelaSkins/PpwNwkt8">Dark Horse</a> via <a href="http://www.lostateminor.com/2009/10/12/dark-horse-gelaskins/">Lost at E Minor</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5379595/buffy-and-hellboy-skins-on-apple-products-dual+fanboys-ascend-to-nirvana]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5379595]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cases]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[buffy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[comics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dark horse]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dark horse comics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dark horse gelaskins]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gelaskins]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hellboy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5379595&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Final Round of Psystar vs Apple Might Be Called Off]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/psystar.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_psystar.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>I'm pissed. For <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5325537/psystar-sobers-up-lawyers-up-prepares-to-die-go-to-court">months</a>, I've been waiting for the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged PSYSTAR VS APPLE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/psystar-vs-apple/">Psystar vs Apple</a> trial to hit the court. And now both companies are filing motions for summary judgments and potentially denying me a show?</p>

<p>As a result of the individual motions by both companies, two hearings have been set for November 12 to determine whether there'll be a January trial. I'm not-so-secretly hoping that Judge William Alsup will look at the "user license agreements for both <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MAC OS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/mac-os/">Mac OS</a> X 10.5 and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MAC OS X" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/mac-os-x/">Mac OS X</a> 10.6," arguments about <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged DIGITAL MILLENNIUM COPYRIGHT ACT" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/digital-millennium-copyright-act/">Digital Millennium Copyright Act</a>, and the whole disc protection circumvention mess and make Apple and Psystar duke it out in court. Hell, I'll volunteer to transcribe the case for everyone's entertainment, stupid argument by stupid argument. Just make it happen. [<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/10/09/psystar_apple_both_look_to_avoid_2010_trial.html">AppleInsider</a> via <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/10/09/apple-psystar-ask-for-summary-judgemets-looking-to-avoid-trial/">Crunch Gear</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5378425/final-round-of-psystar-vs-apple-might-be-called-off]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5378425]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[psystar]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital millennium copyright act]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hackintosh]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac os]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac os x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[psystar vs apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[trial]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:05:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5378425&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Chrome for Mac Coming in Months Says Guy Nominally in Charge of Google]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I'm not sure how much we can weight we can put in the prognostications of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged ERIC SCHMIDT" title="Click here to read more posts tagged ERIC SCHMIDT" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/eric-schmidt/">Eric Schmidt</a>, since <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5376550/well-this-explains-so-much-about-google">he doesn't even know</a> when the company he's theoretically in charge of buys entire other companies for millions of dollars, BUT if you're just looking for some hope, he says that Chrome for Mac will be done in months. Not too surprising, though, since the Chromium builds have been getting more solid <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5336976/google-chromium-on-mac-kicks-every-other-mac-browsers-ass">for a while</a> now. [<a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20091007/live-from-new-york-google-cofounder-sergey-brin-meets-the-press/">MediaMemo</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5378143/chrome-for-mac-coming-in-months-says-guy-nominally-in-charge-of-google]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5378143]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[eric schmidt]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Google Chrome]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google chrome mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 09 Oct 2009 13:05:57 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5378143&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Microsoft: There's Still a Sliver of Hope For Zune On Apple Products]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/500x_ScreenHunter_01_Sep._15_08.54.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_500x_ScreenHunter_01_Sep._15_08.54.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Microsoft's all about letting <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5375477/project-natal-is-gonna-be-priced-like-a-console">little</a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5375506/robbie-bach-promises-windows-mobile-wont-evolve-so-damn-glacially-from-now-on">nuggets</a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5375547/microsoft-on-phone-hardware-no-were-not-going-to-do-that">loose</a> this fine afternoon: a Microsoft rep <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=4157">just told</a> Mary Jo Foley that the company is mulling "port[ing] the Zune software and services to other platforms, including Apple's." Hey, yes! Do that!</p>

<p>But before I get all bossy about it, it's worth figuring out what this would mean, exactly. Foley goes straight for the most exciting, and by far least likely scenario, in which the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5094974/how-i-plan-to-taste-music">gloriously unlimited</a> <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged ZUNE PASS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/zune-pass/">Zune Pass</a> would be compatible with iPods and iPhones (without <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5309642/stream-zune-songs-to-your-iphone">hacks</a>, of course):</p>
<blockquote>
<p>[The Microsoft rep] noted that with the addition of the ability to stream music from a browser that is part of the new Zune 4.0 experience, Mac and Linux users already can stream music to their systems if they have a Zune Pass subscription. The streaming capability isn't limited to Internet Explorer; it works with any browser, he said.</p>
<p>So what would it mean to take the Zune experience to Apple users? simply make it easier for iPods/iTouch devices to connect to Zune Pass and to run the Zune software? I didn't get any more specifics from Pinero.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Something seems like it's lost in translation here, since getting Zune Pass DRM content onto iPods would entail drastic action on Apple's part as well as Microsoft's. Not likely.</p>
<p>What this probably means&mdash;and this is still a pretty big deal&mdash;is that Microsoft is open to porting their Zune software over to Mac, meaning that the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged ZUNE HD" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/zune-hd/">Zune HD</a> might one day (one day!) be able to natively sync with OS X, and that Mac users will get to use the visually spectacular, surprisingly useful Zune desktop software. But as far as further device support goes, all is not lost:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Zune is a music and video service from Microsoft. Period... Our next step is mobile phones, but we haven't talked about a timeline for when that will happen</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Ballmer's been <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5058357/zune-on-windows-mobile-confirmed-by-steve-ballmer">harping on</a> about Zune on other devices, namely mobile for a while, but it's good to know that the dream, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5374876/windows-mobile-65-review-theres-no-excuse-for-this">such as it is</a>, isn't dead. [<a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=4157">ZDNet</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5375735/microsoft-theres-still-a-sliver-of-hope-for-zune-on-apple-products]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5375735]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[zune]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[zune hd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[zune on mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[zune os x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[zune pass]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[zune pass on mac]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 06 Oct 2009 18:02:26 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5375735&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Almost Nobody Owns Just Macs]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/pc-to-mac-switch.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_pc-to-mac-switch.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged NPD'S " href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/npd.s-/">NPD's</a> <a href="http://npd.com/lps/Household_Penetration/">Household Penetration Study</a> found a 3% uptick in Mac households for 2009. This makes sense! What's surprising (or not) is that of the 12% of homes with a Mac, less than 2% are Mac-<em>exclusive</em>.</p>

<p>The 2% figure is extrapolated from NPD's less direct assessment:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>[A]pproximately 12 percent of all U.S. computer owning households own an Apple computer, up from 9 percent in 2008. While Apple ownership is growing, those households are decidedly in favor of mixed system environments. Of those 12 percent, nearly 85 percent also own a Windows-based PC.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>At first glance, these stats almost seem <em>wrong</em>, but when you start think about it, they make sense: The survey polled "households," which, on account of grandma's Compaq or your roommate's gaming PC, clobbers the exclusivity figure. (I live in what any reasonable person would call a "Mac household"&mdash;three people who use Macs almost exclusively&mdash;but that little Acer netbook sitting on the table means we're not.)</p>
<p>Plus, PCs are cheap and they linger, and Macs, being pricier, tend to find their way into richer households, where more than one computer is almost a given. That, combined the fact that most Macs sold are laptops, and therefore a little more likely to be a <em>supplemental</em> computer, makes the 2% figure look a little less crazy, but still, 2%? Fanboys, <em>you're slacking</em>. [<a href="http://npd.com/lps/Household_Penetration/">NPD</a> via <a href="http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=798130">Macrumors</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5374499/almost-nobody-owns-just-macs]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5374499]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[mac vs pc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flamebait]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[household]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[npd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[NPD's]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ownership]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pc mac apple microsoft windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[penetration]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[share]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[study]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[x]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5374499&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Download BlackBerry Desktop Manager for Mac Now]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It's out, and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5372381/blackberry-desktop-manager-for-mac-review-oh-thank-god">you should get it</a>, if you own a BlackBerry and a Mac. That's about it. [<A href="http://na.blackberry.com/eng/services/desktop/desktop_mac.jsp">BlackBerry</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5372947/download-blackberry-desktop-manager-for-mac-now]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5372947]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry desktop]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry desktop manager]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 02 Oct 2009 11:39:48 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5372947&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Gene Roddenberry's 1984 Original Macintosh for Sale]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/mac-gene.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_mac-gene.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Would you like to write a saga about a spaceship with a womanizing captain, an awkward scientist/philosopher, a maniacal doctor, a drunk engineer, a voluptuous communications officer, a communist pilot, and a gay helmsman? Well, this Macintosh 128 won't help.</p>
<p>If your name were <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GENE RODDENBERRY" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/gene-roddenberry/">Gene Roddenberry</a>, however, that would have been a piece of cake. Still, if you are an <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged STAR TREK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/star-trek/">Star Trek</a> fan, you may be interested in bidding for this original Macintosh 128 with serial number F4200NUM0001, owned by the sci-fi genius himself. According to that number, it was the 776th Mac 128, manufactured during the 20th week of 1984 in Fremont, California.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/firstmacplus-thumb-550x367-24309.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_firstmacplus-thumb-550x367-24309.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>It's exactly <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5269088/what-to-do-with-an-original-1984-macintosh">like the one I have</a>&mdash;including the Macintosh team signatures etching inside&mdash;except mine was manufactured on the 28th week of 1984.</p>
<p>Profiles in History&mdash;who got <i>all</i> their facts wrong in their press release, hopefully not the bit about this being Roddenberry's computer&mdash;is going to auction the computer and the extra floppy drive at the beginning of October. It has an estimated sale price of $800 to $1200, which seems quite cheap, knowing who the owner was. [<a href="http://dvice.com/archives/2009/09/own-the-first-a.php">Dvice</a>]</p>

<p><b>Gizmodo Gallery 2009</b><br>
<a href="http://www.16sur20.com/">Groupe</a><br>
<a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=267+Elizabeth+Street+New+York&sll=37.0625,-95.677068&sspn=33.847644,62.666016&ie=UTF8&ll=40.724966,-73.993864&spn=0.007903,0.015299&z=16&iwloc=A">267 Elizabeth Street</a><br>
New York, NY 10012</p>
<p>Gallery Dates:<br>
September 23rd-27th</p>
<p>Times:</p>
<p>9/22 Tuesday<br>
Media Day by appointment only. For info please contact <a href="mailto:gallery@gizmodo.com">gallery@gizmodo.com</a>.</p>
<p>9/23 Wednesday<br>
12-8</p>
<p>9/24 Thursday<br>
12-8</p>
<p>9/25 Friday<br>
12-8</p>
<p>9/26 Saturday<br>
11-8<br>
9-? - Live KCRW Show</p>
<p>9/27 Sunday<br>
11-6</p>
<p><em>Read more about our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5350574/gizmodo-gallery-2009-were-back-for-another-year">Giz Gallery 09 here</a>, follow <a href="http://twitter.com/gizgallery">@gizgallery</a> on Twitter and see what else we'll be <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/giz-gallery-09/">playing with</a> at the event. And special thanks to Toyota's Prius &mdash; without their sponsorship, there would be no Gizmodo Gallery.</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5361983/gene-roddenberrys-1984-original-macintosh-for-sale]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5361983]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gene roddenberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[giz gallery 09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macintosh]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5361983&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Macintosh as Designed By Leonardo da Vinci]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/big.on.site.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_big.on.site.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>I really liked the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5141137/the-iphone-as-designed-by-leonardo-da-vinci">iPhone as designed by Leonardo t-shirt</a>, but I absolutely love this one, showing the original&mdash;<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5269088/what-to-do-with-an-original-1984-macintosh">and still my favorite</a>&mdash;1984 Macintosh in the same style. Pretty:</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/isteammac.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_isteammac.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>Nice to have as a $20 alternative to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5249399/exploded-original-mac-128k-is-a-must-buy-for-any-gadget-freak">the classic exploded Mac 128K</a>. [<a href="http://www.explodedstore.com/">Exploded Store</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5359081/the-macintosh-as-designed-by-leonardo-da-vinci]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5359081]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[isteammac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macintosh]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Macintosh t-shirt]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5359081&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[First Snow Leopard Update: 10.6.1 Is Here]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/snow_leopard_10-6-1_update.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_snow_leopard_10-6-1_update.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>We knew it was <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5352907/first-snow-leopard-patch-released-to-developers">in the works</a>, but now it's here&mdash;the 10.6.1 update, with newer Flash plug-in and tweaks for 3G modems, DVD playback, Dock, Mail and other areas. Have at it. [<a href="http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3810?viewlocale=en_US">Apple</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5356794/first-snow-leopard-update-1061-is-here]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5356794]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[10.6.1]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac os]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac os x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software update]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:57:42 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5356794&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Mac vs PC: Battle It Out Bobby Fischer Style]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/Mac_vs_PC_Chessboard_concept.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_Mac_vs_PC_Chessboard_concept.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Who would win in a chess match between <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/i.m-a-mac/">Mac and PC</a>? Chess seems like PC's game, but winning won't be easy on a board that's Apple's home turf.</p>
<p>Needless to say, the execution on this concept chessboard leaves something to be desired, but the idea has potential. I can see a whole series of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MAC VS PC" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/mac-vs-pc/">Mac vs PC</a> board games springing from this. So, who killed Mac with the wrench in the library? (Psst...it's probably PC.) [<a href="http://www.coroflot.com/public/individual_file.asp?individual_id=251216&portfolio_id=2410331&">Coroflot</a> via <a href="http://www.walyou.com/blog/2009/09/03/mac-vs-pc-chessboard/">Waylou</a> via <a href="http://craziestgadgets.com/2009/09/03/mac-vs-pc-chess-set/">Craziest Gadgets</a> via <a href="http://www.slipperybrick.com/2009/09/mac-vs-pc-chess-set/">SlipperyBrick</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5354798/mac-vs-pc-battle-it-out-bobby-fischer-style]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5354798]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[chess]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[concept]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[im a mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac vs pc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pc]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 08 Sep 2009 17:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5354798&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Mac OS X Snow Leopard: The Complete Guide]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/sno_guide.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_sno_guide.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Though you might mistake <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SNOW LEOPARD" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/snow-leopard/">Snow Leopard</a> for plain old Leopard when you first boot it up, there's a lot of subtle stuff happening on screen and under the hood. Here's our guide to everything new in the latest Mac OS.</p>

<h1>Table of Contents</h1>
<h2>Intro</h2>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/leopardreview.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_leopardreview.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><strong><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5346418/snow-leopard-review-lightened-and-enlightened">What It All Means: Snow Leopard Review</a></strong><br>
So much of what's going on with Snow Leopard is almost invisible&mdash;especially until developers can take advantage of it&mdash;so what does all that <em>really</em> add up to?<br clear="all"></p>
<h2>Chapter 1</h2>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/thumb160x_sadmac.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><strong><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5335039/the-real-cost-of-upgrading-to-mac-os-x-snow-leopard">The Real Cost of Upgrading to Snow Leopard</a></strong><br>
Sure the box price is $29&mdash;<em>if</em> you meet the right conditions, like running Leopard on an Intel-powered Mac. But what if you don't? Find out what it'll really cost you.<br clear="all"></p>
<h2>Chapter 2</h2>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/thumb160x_prep.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><strong><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5345690/prep-your-mac-for-snow-leopard">Getting Ready for Snow Leopard</a></strong><br>
For most people, Snow Leopard might be the easiest upgrade ever, but to make sure it's really as painless as possible, there's a few things you should to do to get ready, from better-safe-than-sorry sister site Lifehacker. (Backup! Backup! Backup!)<br clear="all"></p>
<h2>Chapter 3</h2>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/thumb160x_qtx.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><strong><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5345506/snow-leopard-visual-guide//gallery">Hey, There's Actually a Buncha New Features Here</a></strong><br>
While Snow Leopard isn't pack the Leopard-like explosion of 300 new features, there's actually a decent bit of new stuff going on: QuickTime X is a whole new QuickTime, there's built-in text substitution, and the wireless networking interface is actually useful now.</p>
<p>Also check out the <strong><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5349881/15-snow-leopard-tricks-you-have-to-try/gallery/">Buncha New Stuff, Express Edition</a></strong>, a condensed version of what's new and noteworthy with 15 tricks you can actually see and play with.<br clear="all"></p>
<h2>Chapter 4</h2>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/thumb160x_gcd.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><strong><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5346616/giz-explains-snow-leopards-grand-central-dispatch">Grand Central Dispatch, or Snow Leopard's Embracing Multicore Awesomeness</a></strong><br>
One of the most key under-the-hood technologies in Snow Leopard, Grand Central Dispatch is Apple's solution to the tricky problem of coding apps to take full advantage of the mostly untapped power of the multicore processors inside today's computers.<br clear="all"></p>
<h2>Chapter 5</h2>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/thumb160x_gpgpu.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><strong><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5252545/giz-explains-gpgpu-computing-and-why-itll-melt-your-face-off">GPGPU Computing Is Going to Make It a Little Toasty for Snow Kitties</a></strong><br>
The other major leap toward harnessing all of the power a modern computer truly offers is Snow Leopard's inclusion of OpenCL 1.0, a framework that lets programmers easily use the tons of cores inside your graphics card for a whole lot more than gaming.<br clear="all"></p>
<h2>Bonus Content</h2>
<p>&bull; <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5349720/most-complete-snow-leopard-compatibility-list-yet">The Snow Leopard Incompatibility List</a><br>
&bull; <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5351485/how-to-build-a-hackintosh-with-snow-leopard-start-to-finish">How to Build a Hackintosh With Snow Leopard</a><br>
&bull; <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5350413/56-redesigns-of-the-snow-leopard-box">What the Snow Leopard Box Should've Looked Like</a><br>
&bull; <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5285452/os-x-snow-leopard-vs-windows-7-the-final-countdown">Snow Leopard vs. Windows 7</a><br>
&bull; <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5347871/10-takes-on-osx-snow-leopard-furry-and-ferocious">10 Takes on Snow Leopard</a></p>
<p><em>Is there something missing, a discussion you were hoping to have but aren't seeing here? We want to be thorough, so let's have it. Go ahead and hit us up, either in direct emails or to our tips line, with the subject "<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SNOW LEOPARD GUIDE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/snow-leopard-guide/">Snow Leopard Guide</a>."</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5352889/mac-os-x-snow-leopard-the-complete-guide]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5352889]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[livegizmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os 10.6]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Snow Leopard Guide]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[snow pussy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 05 Sep 2009 12:00:01 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5352889&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[BlackBerry Desktop Manager for Mac Leaked (Download It Now)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/MacDesktopSummary.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_MacDesktopSummary.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>I caught the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5318749/at-long-last-blackberry-desktop-comes-to-mac">long-awaited BlackBerry Desktop Manager for Mac</a> in action a bit ago, and it's pretty damn nice&mdash;it's even better than the Windows equivalent, since one app syncs <em>everything</em>. You can download a leaked beta here: [<a href="http://crackberry.com/leaked-blackberry-desktop-manager-mac">CrackBerry</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5352922/blackberry-desktop-manager-for-mac-leaked-download-it-now]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5352922]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry desktop manager]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry desktop manager for mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 04 Sep 2009 15:05:52 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5352922&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[First Snow Leopard Patch Released To Developers]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/snow_leopard.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_snow_leopard.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>As <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5352300/remainders-+-things-we-didnt-post/gallery/?selectedImage=3">rumored</a>, less than a week after the release of <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5346418/snow-leopard-review-lightened-and-enlightened?skyline=true&s=x">Snow Leopard</a>, Apple has already dropped the first patch on developers for testing. The 71.5 MB download includes several fixes related to 3G modems, the Dock and Motion 4.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The 10.6.1 Update is recommended for all users running Mac <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged OS X" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/os-x/">OS X</a> <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SNOW LEOPARD" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/snow-leopard/">Snow Leopard</a> and includes general operating system fixes that enhance the stability, compatibility, and security of your Mac, including fixes for:</p>
<p>* compatibility with some Sierra Wireless 3G modems<br>
* an issue that might cause DVD playback to stop unexpectedly<br>
* some printer compatibility drivers not appearing properly in the add printer browser<br>
* an issue that might make it difficult to remove an item from the Dock<br>
* instances where automatic account setup in Mail might not work<br>
* an issue where pressing cmd-opt-t in Mail brings up the special characters menu instead of moving a message<br>
* Motion 4 becoming unresponsive</p>
</blockquote>
<p>MacRumors Forums have also included some unofficial notes on the update:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>- Network Diagnostics now offers to remove manually-entered DNS values for DHCP configurations<br>
- Software Update for printer drivers of Bonjour/USB printers<br>
- HICocoaView double-redraw during live resize<br>
- Bluetooth connection to nearby printers on startup<br>
- libdispatch object use after deallocation<br>
- Sending of messages with Mail where the SMTP server response has no text<br>
- Upgraded email accounts and SMTP servers that require authentication on port 587 but not port 25<br>
- Printer custom keywords added/edited by auto setup tool are now migrated after software update<br>
- Generic drivers are now visible in printer driver list<br>
- WWAN devices that use the AppleWWANSupport2 component<br>
- Updated to Flash 10.0.32.18</p>
</blockquote>
<p>[<a href="http://news.worldofapple.com/archives/2009/09/03/first-snow-leopard-update-hits-developers-seed-notes/">World of Apple</a> and <a href="http://forums.macrumors.com/showpost.php?p=8416152&postcount=15">MacRumors Forums</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5352907/first-snow-leopard-patch-released-to-developers]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5352907]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[10.6.1]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os x snow leopard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patch]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 04 Sep 2009 13:59:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5352907&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Creative Vado HD Pocketcam V2 Features Direct Transfer to iMovie, Slightly Better OS X Support]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/thumb160x_41B_04E7_-L._SL500_AA280_.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Creative today announced their second-generation line of <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5105475/creative-vado-hd-pocket-camcorder-now-available">Vado HD</a> pocket camcorders. The most interesting tidbit is the new Mac-friendlier Vado Central software, which allows for easy direct transfer to iMovie. Even better, that software will also work for older Vados.</p>
<p>The hardware itself doesn't seem much changed; the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged VADO HD" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/vado-hd/">Vado HD</a> will <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Creative-Labs-Camcorder-Storage-Digital/dp/B001LK8P14/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=photo&qid=1251842719&sr=1-1">still</a> be available in a $200 8GB version and will be joined by a new 4GB version priced at $180. There'll also be two new colors, but the big news is really the software. The two new Vado HDs are available for pre-order today from <a href="http://www.creative.com/">Creative</a> (though they don't seem to be up on the site quite yet), and the software should be released early this month. [<a href="http://www.creative.com/">Creative</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5350524/creative-vado-hd-pocketcam-v2-features-direct-transfer-to-imovie-slightly-better-os-x-support]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5350524]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[creative]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camcorders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[creative vado hd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imovie]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pocketcam]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vado]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vado hd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:45:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5350524&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[56 Redesigns of the Snow Leopard Box]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/snowleopardboxes.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_snowleopardboxes.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Not blown away by the box <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SNOW LEOPARD" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/snow-leopard/">Snow Leopard</a> comes in? What a life you must lead to be bothered by such things! Allow me to soothe your soul with a veritable tsunami of redesigns, most of them much, much worse.</p>
<p><b>First Place</b><br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/Karl_Eastwood.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_Karl_Eastwood.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
<b>Second Place</b><br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/Ben_Jesustron.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_Ben_Jesustron.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
<b>Third Place</b><br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/MatthewLFaerber.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5350412,56,'Snow Leopard Box Redesigns');
</script></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5350413/56-redesigns-of-the-snow-leopard-box]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5350413]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[photoshop contest]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[contests]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[photoshop]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 01 Sep 2009 14:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5350413&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Other Snow Leopard Review You Should Read]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Twenty. Three. Pages. Ars' deeply technical review of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SNOW LEOPARD" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SNOW LEOPARD" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/snow-leopard/">Snow Leopard</a> ain't for the faint of heart, but if you want to dive deep inside Snow Leopard's guts, after <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5346418/snow-leopard-review-lightened-and-enlightened?skyline=true&s=x">our comparatively breezy take</a>, the entry point is here: [<A href="http://arstechnica.com/apple/reviews/2009/08/mac-os-x-10-6.ars">Ars</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5350127/the-other-snow-leopard-review-you-should-read]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5350127]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[leopard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 01 Sep 2009 08:41:21 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5350127&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
