<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: MacBook Pro]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbook pro</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'macbook pro']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Control Your Mac With an iPhone, the Patent]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/6a0120a5580826970c012876567c21970c-800wi.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_6a0120a5580826970c012876567c21970c-800wi.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>A newly unearthed <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #applepatent" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/applepatent/">Apple patent</a> application describes a process in which an iPhone could control a MacBook or iMac, remotely.</p>

<p>Essentially, the iPhone establishes a connection with the computer, then it can control the OS in a similar manner to a TV remote. Using a virtual d-pad, users navigate through apps, open them remotely and even print. But what's possibly more promising that buttoning around an OS is that voice commands could be deployed to skip many of these navigational hassles.</p>
<p>Apple's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #remoteapp" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/remoteapp/">Remote app</a>, which allows the control of iTunes over a local network, is still one of my favorite apps on the iPhone. If Apple were to evolve that app into what we see in this patent, it'd only become more handy. [<a href="http://www.patentlyapple.com/patently-apple/2009/12/a-future-iphone-will-control-your-desktop-remotely.html">Patently Apple</a> via <a href="http://www.9to5mac.com/apple_remote_mac_iphone_controller_30204?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+9To5Mac-MacAllDay+%289+to+5+Mac+-+Apple+Intelligence%29">9to5Mac</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5427796/control-your-mac-with-an-iphone-the-patent]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5427796]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[remote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[remote app]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 16 Dec 2009 09:59:22 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5427796&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[All the Jocks at This University Got Macbook Pros, But Are They Happy?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/usflap_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_usflap_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>This is the athletic department of the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #universityofsouthflorida" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/universityofsouthflorida/">University of South Florida</a> and every single person in it was given a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #macbookpro" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbookpro/">Macbook Pro</a> by the school. But judging by some expressions in a close-up shot, not everyone's entirely excited about it.</p>
<p>No, really. Click on this second picture for a closer view. I can't be imagining that many annoyed expressions and grimaces, can I?</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/bullsfaces.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_bullsfaces.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>If nothing, it's an interesting bit of a contrast to these smiling folks:</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5422723,4,'');
</script></p>
<p>Happy or not, the students don't keep the laptops permanently, instead they use them like loaners during school semesters. Still a pretty sweet arrangement unless you really prefer a non-Apple product. [<a href="http://www.gousfbulls.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=7700&ATCLID=204846263">USF</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5422771/all-the-jocks-at-this-university-got-macbook-pros-but-are-they-happy]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5422771]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[image cache]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[school]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[schools]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[students]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[university of south florida]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[usf]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[usf macbook pro]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 09 Dec 2009 17:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5422771&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[MacBook EFI Firmware Update 1.8 Muffles Noisy Optical Drives]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/firmwareupdate18.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_firmwareupdate18.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>A handful of updates from now available Apple, all fixes: Nearest and dearest to us is EFI firmware update 1.8, which promises to mute the optical drive's munchy sounds on startup in MacBook Pros and should alleviate some of the wonkiness from update 1.7. [<a href="http://apple.com">Apple</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5421911/macbook-efi-firmware-update-18-muffles-noisy-optical-drives]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5421911]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[firmware]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[updates]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:10:17 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5421911&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[BassJump Review]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_img_7743bj.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />On your desk, it's about the size and thickness of a triple-decker Wonder bread sandwich. But the BassJump, an aluminum micro subwoofer to match your <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #macbookpro" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbookpro/">MacBook Pro</a>, made me salivate more than soft, refined carbs covered in mayo ever did.</p>

<h1>The Price</h1>
<p>$80</p>
<h1>The Verdict</h1>
<p>It looks better than it tastes..err...sounds.</p>
<p>I can't deny, my MacBook Pro's tinny speakers have never sounded better than when complemented by the BassJump. Through USB (and some unobtrusive bundled software), the BassJump mixes with your existing laptop speakers to give you a more balanced audio experience.</p>
<p>The tenor range, generally underrepresented by my MBP, is audible with the BassJump. The Beatles, especially, were hugely improved through the richer vocals and guitar riffs provided by the mini sub. Walking to the next room and closing my eyes, I decided my MacBook now sounded like a low-level iPod dock.</p>
<p>Still, the audio isn't especially clear. And despite the BassJump's name, it doesn't really give you bass. It's more like a midrange speaker that's still incapable of bumping R&B.<br>
<script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5415381,3,'');
</script><br>
So while the BassJump certainly looks adorable and legitimately turns MBP music from unpalatable to sort of listenable, its low end capabilities can't match a real dedicated subwoofer. And its overall audio effect, while passable, would be thwarted by most any 2.1 speaker system in its price range. [<a href="http://twelvesouth.com/products/bassjump/">BassJump</a>]</p>
<p><br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3_04.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Charming aesthetic<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3_04.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Quality build<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/giznormal_03.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Improves midrange audio but lacks brilliance<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizminus_04.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Lacks bass<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizminus_04.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Needs to be either cheaper or better</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5415373/bassjump-review]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5415373]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bassjump]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[speakers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[subwoofers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[twelve south]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5415373&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Every Mac Price-Compared Across Retailers]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/appledeals.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_appledeals.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>AppleInsider has a ridiculously handy chart that compares prices on Mac sales across various retailers. Granted, it's not taking into account Apple's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #blackfriday" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/blackfriday/">Black Friday</a> deals, but there are hundreds of dollars to be saved if you're interested. [<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/11/25/apple_authorized_resellers_launch_black_friday_sales_early.html">AppleInsider</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5412869/every-mac-price+compared-across-retailers]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5412869]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[dealzmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple black friday]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[black friday]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac mini]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:59:59 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5412869&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Gifts for Apple Cultists Who've Grown Beyond Shame]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p>If you're reading this, there's at least a 50 percent chance you or someone you know is a complete Mactard. Here's their wish list (SPOILER: It's all Apple stuff):</p>
<p>BTW, if you hate the gallery format as much as the Grinch hated Christmas, click <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5411982/gifts-for-diehard-mactards/">here</a>.</p>

<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_mouse5.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #magicmouse" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/magicmouse/">Magic Mouse</a>:</strong> It's a bit too expensive for stocking stuffer territory, but we've called the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5385892/so-long-nipples-this-time-you-wont-be-missed">nipple-less</a> design the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5386202/apple-magic-mouse-review">best mouse</a> Apple has ever made. And if you can't appreciate touch-sensitive scrolling, you have no soul (or, at least not one that we can see). <b>$70</b> [<a href="http://store.apple.com/us/go/product/MB829?aid=AIC-WWW-NAUS-K2-BUYNOW-MAGICMOUSE-INDEX">Apple</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_hellboybuffy.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>Buffy Gelaskins:</strong> Loving Apple will only half-fill one's necessary geek quotient. Your loved one will do well filling the other half with Buffy, now that Dark Horse comics has teamed up with Gelaskins re-stickable case skins for the iPhone and MacBooks. <b>$15 iPhone, $30 MacBook</b>. [<a href="http://www.darkhorse.com/Search/Browse/GelaSkins/PpwNwkt8">Dark Horse</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_apple_imac_27inch.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>iMac (27-inch i7):</strong> You simply won't find a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5388567/apple-imac-review-27-inches-and-less-chin">more striking desktop</a> on the market, but maybe more importantly, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5407204/benchmarked-the-quad+core-i7-imac-is-super-fast">benchmarks</a> on Apple latest top-tier iMac are <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5411073/why-its-gotten-straight-stupid-to-buy-a-mac-pro">currently challenging</a> far more expensive Mac Pros. Plus, the line has just seen a refresh, so it's a good time to buy. <b>$2200+</b> [<a href="http://www.apple.com/imac/">Apple</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_picture_2_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>BookArc Stand:</strong> No, it's not the gift for everyone. But if you know a guy who just docks his MacBook anyway, the BookArc Stand is a far more elegant solution than sitting a laptop on a desk (especially since the laptop should run cooler given the increased surface area for airflow). [<a href="http://www.twelvesouth.com/products/bookarc/">BookArc</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_apple-tshirt.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>Doesn't Fall Far From the Tree (T-Shirt):</strong> Who says the apple doesn't fall far from the tree? This t-shirt, that's who. $18. [<a href="http://www.goapeshirts.com/products/019/">Go Ape Shirts</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_ioutab_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>Apple Tablet IOU:</strong> Apple fanboys love Apple's products. But true Apple fanboys&mdash;those who take commitment and fanaticism to the next level&mdash;could never be pleased with what Apple currently has on the table. They need the Next Big Thing. <a href="gizmodo.com/t/apple-tablet">We're about 1000% certain</a> that Apple will release a tablet some time in 2010. Promise your loved ones that you'll camp overnight and drop the cash so they get the Apple Tablet first. Of course, they'll still bitch about it, anticipating version 2.0. <strong>Price Unknown, Costs Some Dignity</strong></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_dbmbp.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>DON'T BUY <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #macbookpro" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbookpro/">MacBook Pro</a>:</strong> There has simply never been a worse time to buy a new MacBook Pro. With Core i5/i7 tech inevitably waiting to make its way into Apple's premium laptops, your hard-earned cash will almost certainly buy a vastly more powerful, more future-proof machine less than a month after Christmas. The same can probably be said about Mac Pros, too. Oh, and that 27-inch iMac we keep raving about? What a glorious alternative to the aging, 30-inch Apple Cinema Display! [<strike><a href="http://www.apple.com/macbookpro/">Apple</a></strike>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_wallofsoundnew.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>Wall of Sound iPod Dock:</strong> There are iPod docks, and there are iPod docks. This is most definitely the latter, a handcrafted, 3x4-foot, 225lb, 125W beast. And one day, when Apple inevitably tweaks the iPod port, this behemoth will be useless&mdash;feeding into the general regret and dissatisfaction critical to Apple fandom. [<a href="http://www.thewosexperience.com/">Wall of Sound</a>]</p>
<p><i>Don't forget to recommend your own favorite Apple gear in comments-include pics and pricing if possible.</i></p>
<p><i><a href="http://gizmodo.com/t/giftguide2009">All Giz Wants</a> is our annual round-up of favorite gift ideas, including amazing attainable objects and a few far-out fantasies. We'll be popping guides catered to different interests several times per day for the next week, so keep checking back.</i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5411982/gifts-for-apple-cultists-whove-grown-beyond-shame/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5411982]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gift guide]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple gift guide]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gelaskins]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gift Guide 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[giftguide2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[magic mouse]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5411982&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[BassJump Brings MacBooks a Bit of Bump]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_bassjump.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />BassJump is, quite simply, a dedicated subwoofer to complement your MacBook&mdash;in both aesthetics and sound.</p>

<p>Rather than merely plugging in through USB, the BassJump uses proprietary software to remix all audio coming out of your laptop, essentially treating those tinny integrated speakers as tweeters while the BassJump handles the lows.</p>
<p>I can't believe that this solution works better than simply plugging in a whole new 2.1 speaker system, but I must admit, the Mac Mini styling coaxes my fanboyism to at least give the idea a shot. $80 and available now. <script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5411738,8,'');
</script>[<a href="http://twelvesouth.com/products/bassjump/">BassJump</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5411734/bassjump-brings-macbooks-a-bit-of-bump]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5411734]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[speakers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bass jump]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bassjump]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[twelve south]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:09:11 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5411734&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[AViiQ Aluminium Laptop Stand Review]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/img_7693a.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_img_7693a.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>AViiQ is a new company that makes just one product: a portable, aluminum laptop stand that supports systems up to 17 inches while folding up like an accordion.</p>

<h1>The Price</h1>
<p>$80 on pre-order now.</p>
<h1>The Verdict</h1>
<p>I like it both more and less than I expected to.</p>
<p>On one hand, AViiQ's portable laptop stand matches my MacBook while angling my keyboard at a truly perfect 12 degrees. And it folds, with relative ease, down to an absurdly thin, near-weightless strip of aluminum that can squeeze into any bag, I'm certain.<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/img_7691a.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_img_7691a.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>On the other, the stand feels cheaper than I'd expect for its $80 price. Sure, we're talking about aluminum, but more like flimsy, pop can aluminum than unibody Mac aluminum. And it folds through a plastic connective tissue that loosens over time but never feels 100% in terms of general structural integrity.<br>
<script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5410985,4,'');
</script><br>
For $20, the investment would be a no-brainer. For $80...well, it's a bit more complicated. Do what you will depending on your particular socioeconomic status.</p>
<p><br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3_04.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Super light<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3_04.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Crazy-thin<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3_04.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Excellent ergonomics<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizminus_04.jpg" width="20" height="20"> I can't help but worry about long-term durability<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizminus_04.jpg" width="20" height="20"> $80</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE: This, from AViiQ:</strong></p>
<blockquote>
<p>"The product IS very light so it may seem less substantial, but in this case, it's a purposeful part of the design to make the product ultralight for easy travel. Alcan, the developer of Hylite, says that the hinges can be folded more than 5000 times without any wear. As for the price tag, like titanium or carbon fiber, lightweight often equals more expensive and Hylite certainly adheres to that truth. We tried making it out of a material that was lightweight and inexpensive, but feathers just don't have the structural strength we required (not to mention the sneezing it caused in the studio)."</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5410981/aviiq-aluminium-laptop-stand-review]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5410981]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[AViiQ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[AViiQ review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptop stands]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5410981&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[MacMall Early Black Friday Sale, Discounted Hardware Galore]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_macmall_sale.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />MacMall's running a hardware sale all weekend. You can expect price cuts on par with the edu discount, so if you've lost a little too much hair to use that student ID anymore, MacMall has you covered. [<a href="http://www.macmall.com/n/Apple-Sale-2009/macCustomPages-1249">MacMall</a> via <a href="http://www.i4u.com/article28356.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+I4UNews+%28I4U+News%29">I4U</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5404690/macmall-early-black-friday-sale-discounted-hardware-galore]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5404690]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[dealzmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macmall]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 14 Nov 2009 12:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5404690&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Reminder: Your Unibody MacBook's Trackpad Is Magical]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/by_default_2009-11-09_at_3.18.19_pm.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_by_default_2009-11-09_at_3.18.19_pm.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Hey you, with the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #unibodymacbook" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/unibodymacbook/">unibody MacBook</a>. You probably heard that your trackpad supports <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5062857/next+generation-macbook-ditches-plastic-becomes-macbook-pro-mini">11-point multitouch</a>, but do you know what the actually means? <a href="http://lericson.blogg.se/code/2009/november/multitouch-on-unibody-macbooks.html">FingerMgmt</a> shows you.</p>

<p>Even though this free app doesn't really <em>do</em> anything except display exactly what your trackpad is sensing, it's still spectacular. Even with all ten fingers moving in different directions, inputs seem to be monitored just as precisely as with a single finger. I have no idea how you're supposed to map 10 finger inputs into anything useful, but man, the pointless toy potential here is <em>massive</em>. <strong>Update</strong>: As is, evidently, the dick joke potential. 11 bravos, to be shared amongst you. [<a href="http://lericson.blogg.se/code/2009/november/multitouch-on-unibody-macbooks.html">Lericsson</a> via <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/a2jpw/view_multitouch_points_on_macbook_trackpad_or/">Reddit</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5400674/reminder-your-unibody-macbooks-trackpad-is-magical]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5400674]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[btw]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fingermgmt]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook multitouch app]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[multitouch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[unibody macbook]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:19:54 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5400674&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Mac OS 10.6.2 Leaks New Core i5/i7 MacBook Pros?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/macproupdate102509.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_macproupdate102509.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>It'd be the most obvious leak in history, but the 10C531 build of OS 10.6.2 references the "<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #macbookpro" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbookpro/">MacBook Pro</a> 6.1 and the MacBook Pro 6.1b." All current MacBook Pros are strictly "5" status.</p>

<p>Of course, this appears to be confirmation of the obvious, that Apple will be updating their MacBook Pro line to include <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #corei5" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/corei5/">Core i5</a>/i7 chips following the white MacBook's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5386688/unibody-apple-macbook-review">Pro-level spec bump</a> last week. (Apple will need to adopt these new chipsets to stay competitive.) Now we just need an answer to the far more important question: When? [<a href="http://www.applesana.es/foro/24/22604/nuevos-macbook-pro-6-1-horizonte-quad-core.html">Foro Applesana</a> via <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/10/25/evidence_points_to_new_macbook_pros_on_horizon.html">AppleInsider</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5389926/mac-os-1062-leaks-new-core-i5i7-macbook-pros]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5389926]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core i5]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Core i7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core i7 macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[i5]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[i7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:54:54 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5389926&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Today Show Helps Microsoft Launch Windows 7 On a MacBook Pro]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/today_show_macbook.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_today_show_macbook.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Good thing Microsoft CEO <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/steveballmer/">Steve Ballmer</a> didn't turn around during his spot on <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #thetodayshow" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/thetodayshow/">The Today Show</a>. Clearly, someone at NBC either really loves Macs or can't tell the difference between a MacBook and a PC.</p>
<p><object width="512" height="296"><param name="movie" value="http://www.hulu.com/embed/o574vSOD9z1Oao5XiDyTZA">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.hulu.com/embed/o574vSOD9z1Oao5XiDyTZA" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="512" height="296"></object></p>
<p>On the other hand, Maybe Ballmer noticed and didn't care. In the spot he discusses hardware diversity and this sort of proves his point. After all, you <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5387353/how-to-survive-boot-camp-and-run-win-7-on-a-mac">can run Windows 7 on a Mac</a>. It's an amusing gaffe, but beyond that, the clip is interesting because it touches on <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windows7" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows7/">Windows 7</a>, the image battle between Apple and Microsoft and the issue of CEO pay all inside five minutes. [<a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/10/23/video-hilarity-windows-7-launched-on-a-macbook-pro-on-nbcs-the-today-show/">Crunchgear</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5388595/the-today-show-helps-microsoft-launch-windows-7-on-a-macbook-pro]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5388595]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[steve ballmer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the today show]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7 launch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7 liftoff]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5388595&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple's Performance Update 1.0 for Leopard and Snow Leopard: Addresses Hard Drive Issues]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Today Apple released <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged PERFORMANCE UPDATE" title="Click here to read more posts tagged PERFORMANCE UPDATE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/performance-update/">Performance Update</a> 1.0 for <a href="http://support.apple.com/kb/DL946">Leopard</a> and <a href="http://support.apple.com/kb/DL947">Snow Leopard</a>, aiming to fix the intermittent hard drive problems reported by some users. We'd love to hear if it actually fixes those issues <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5341187/your-freezing-clicking-macbook-pro-hard-drive-just-got-better">this time</a>&mdash;let us know! [<a href="http://www.loopinsight.com/2009/10/14/apple-releases-performance-update-1-0/">TheLoop</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5381916/apples-performance-update-10-for-leopard-and-snow-leopard-addresses-hard-drive-issues]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5381916]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple performance update 1.0]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[leopard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[performance update]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:48:49 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5381916&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Mini DisplayPort to HDMI Adapter (With Digital Audio) Review]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/cable.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_cable.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>It's the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5372059/the-mini-displayport-to-hdmi-adapter-now-has-digital-audio">digital audio version</a> of the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5325723/kanex-mini-displayport-adapter-with-audio-review-someone-finally-gets-it-right">Kanex Mini DisplayPort Adapter</a> we reviewed before, which takes your digital audio and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #minidisplayport" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/minidisplayport/">Mini DisplayPort</a> video and mixes it into one HDMI signal for your TV.</p>
<h1>The Price:</h1>
<p>$70</p>
<h1>The Verdict:</h1>
<p>It works, but damn if it isn't expensive.</p>
<p>If you're not really married to the higher quality digital audio, you might be better off getting the <a href="http://www.kanexlive.com/products/item.aspx?id=3323">USB audio version</a> for <strike>$50</strike> $60, which performs basically the same service for <strike>$20</strike> $10 less.</p>
<p>As for this unit, it definitely works&mdash;we've been using it on a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #macmini" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macmini/">Mac Mini</a> hooked up to a 1080p TV for a week&mdash;and there are no dropouts or weird signal noise inconsistencies that we can see. Everything is plug and play, and you should have no problem using it on your 5.1 audio system.</p>
<p>Again, at $70, it's only really useful if Mini DisplayPort is your only display output, otherwise you can come up with a cheaper solution involving a series of cheaper tubes. [<a href="http://www.kanexlive.com/products/item.aspx?id=3495">Kanex Live</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizplus_01.jpg" width="20" height="20">It works<br clear="all">
<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizminus_02.jpg" width="20" height="20">It's very expensive<br clear="all"></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5380669/mini-displayport-to-hdmi-adapter-with-digital-audio-review]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5380669]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[adapter]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[adapters]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[displayport]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdmi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[kanex]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac mini]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mini displayport]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mini displayport hdmi adapter]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5380669&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[MacBook Pro Shocking the Crap Out of This Poor Reader]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/shocker.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_shocker.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Giz reader Nicholas has a little problem with his <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MACBOOK PRO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbook-pro/">MacBook Pro</a>: It's shocking the crap out of him. It "sparks right at the bottom center of the trackpad." But Apple Geniuses tell him it's actually just fine.</p>
<p>While it's <em>possible</em> Nicholas is just building up static and shocking himself, he says it happens "everywhere," and that when he used his friend's MacBook for a week, he went electrotherapy free. It's rare, but he's <a href="http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=9761980%C3%AF%C2%BF%C2%BD">not</a> <a href="http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=9837609%C3%AF%C2%BF%C2%BD">entirely</a> <a href="http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=9789913">alone</a> in his account.</p>
<p>The most often suggested solution is to stick to using the three-prong adapter, plugged into a grounded outlet. That won't help Nicholas so much, since he says it happens on battery power, too. Besides getting Apple to finally replace MacBook or wearing gloves, do guys have any possible solutions for Nicholas?</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5379910/macbook-pro-shocking-the-crap-out-of-this-poor-reader]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5379910]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[broken]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:10:10 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5379910&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ColcaSac MacBook Sleeves Look Natural, Yet Protective]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/red_adapter_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_red_adapter_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>These MacBook and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MACBOOK PRO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbook-pro/">MacBook Pro</a> sleeves from ColcaSac are the type of sleeves you would get if you wanted to protect your laptop while carrying it to and from your comparative literature lectures at Wellesley. That doesn't mean they're ugly.</p>
<p>Besides being made of "environmentally friendly fabrics", the sleeves are pretty well padded (hemp has a lot of cushioning, it seems) and have an "earthy" feel. If you're the type of person who likes to advertise your love of things that come from the ground, while at the same time protecting your electronics investment, you could do worse. And at $30ish each, it's not like they're overcharging you for being green either. [<a href="http://www.colcasac.com/sleeves.html">ColcaSac</a>]</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5367285,15,'');
</script></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5367287/colcasac-macbook-sleeves-look-natural-yet-protective]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5367287]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[colcasac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptop sleeves]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro colcasac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sleeve]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sleeves]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5367287&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[HP Envy Hands On: MacBook Pro Clone Better Than the Real Thing?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/hpenvy.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_hpenvy.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>It looks like a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MACBOOK PRO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbook-pro/">MacBook Pro</a>. It feels like a MacBook Pro&mdash;aluminum body, chiclet keys, even a buttonless trackpad. But the Envy's got an HP logo etched onto its lid. And it might just be better.</p>

<p>Don't act surprised that the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged ENVY 13" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/envy-13/">Envy 13</a> and 15 have chiclet keyboards and buttonless multitouch trackpads because HP certainly isn't hiding the fact that they absolutely stole their look and ergonomics from the Macbook Pros. The $1,700 13-inch Envy isn't as powerful as the $1,800 <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged ENVY 15" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/envy-15/">Envy 15</a>'s mobile Core i7 processor, but it's more like a MacBook Air at just over 3 pounds, and its beautiful screen has been in my dreams. Neither are as strong as the MacBook Pro's unibody though&mdash;they're a bit more flexy, but if unibodies rated a 9, these would be a 7 or 8.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/DSC_0344_01.JPG"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_DSC_0344_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><strong>Envy 13</strong><br>
The Envy 13 is almost more Air than Pro, at .8-inches thin and 3.74 pounds. (The Air is .76 inches thick and weighs 3 pounds.) Its screen, framed by the same style glossy black bezel as the unibody MacBook family, is absolutely stunning. Dubbed HP Radiance, the 410-nit display is apparently two times as bright as other LED displays and it looks it. Apple doesn't list the MacBook Pro's display brightness in nits, but the Envy's display definitely looked brighter and clearer.</p>
<p>It pulls the dual processor trick the 13-inch Pros don't, with switchable ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4330 graphics and an Intel ultra low voltage Core 2 Duo processor inside. Its removeable battery promises 7 hours of battery life, however its add-on extra battery is sweet: It magnetically clips to the bottom of the notebook to make it look like it is part of the actual build. HP promises 18 hours of juice with that thing clipped on. Did I mention it has Dr. Dre's fingers all over it with Beats Audio integration?</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5359427,9,'');
</script></p>
<p><strong>Envy 15</strong><br>
Where the Envy 13 leaves off in performance the Envy 15 picks up. The 15.6-inch version looks pretty similar to the 13, but is laser etched all around (on the palmrest and the lid) and lacks the flush glass display with the high-quality Radiance technology. But it'll outperform pretty much any other laptop out there so far, since it'll have Intel's next generation mobile<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5099060/giz-explains-why-intels-core-i7-processor-is-a-beautiful-monster">Core i7 processors</a>, ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4830 graphics and support for up to 16GB of RAM. The beast will also have two hard drive bays, which you can fill with SSDs. But it's still only an inch thick and 5.18 pounds, making it that much more impressive.</p>
<p>Both will be available on October 15, though it's probably worth waiting the extra week for Windows 7.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>HP Redefines the Premium Notebook PC with ENVY<br>
Precision-crafted, high-performance notebooks are bright, thin,deliver superb experience</p>
<p>PALO ALTO, Calif., Sept. 15, 2009 – HP today redefines the premium notebook PC experience with the introduction of the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged HP ENVY" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/hp-envy/">HP ENVY</a> sub-brand, which offers customers precision-crafted, high-performance models featuring HP Metal Etching and concierge service and support.</p>
<p>The new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged HP ENVY 13" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/hp-envy-13/">HP ENVY 13</a> boasts the brightest display in its class, and the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged HP ENVY 15" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/hp-envy-15/">HP ENVY 15</a> is the company's fastest consumer notebook PC ever. "HP ENVY includes the latest in materials and technology inside and out and pushes the technological and performance boundaries of what can be done in sleek, powerful and lightweight notebook PCs," said Ted Clark, senior vice president and general manager, Notebook Global Business Unit, Personal Systems Group, HP. "Discerning consumers will get a premium experience and performance."</p>
<p>With HP ENVY, the focus is on designing an entire premium experience to satisfy the most demanding customers – from the products to the packaging to the service and support.</p>
<p>Breakthrough HP Metal Etching on the lid and palmrest of the ENVY 15, and on the palmrest of the ENVY 13, subtly signals luxury. The combination of materials provides exceptional mobility and a compelling metal look and feel, while<br>
using energy-responsible manufacturing methods.</p>
<p>The HP ENVY line – building upon the Voodoo ENVY legacy – includes leadingedge components optimized to yield power and performance. HP partnered with Beats by Dr. Dre to develop a unique, high-performance subsystem tuned<br>
for today's music and available exclusively on the HP Envy: Beats Audio. Envy users will feel the music – not just listen – and enjoy music the way the artist intended.</p>
<p>The lightweight heavyweight: ENVY 13<br>
The ENVY 13 balances style and substance. Carefully crafted details inside and out will satisfy the cravings of demanding mobile customers.</p>
<p>The HP Radiance display is twice as bright as other notebook displays in its class – 410 nit (a measurement of display brightness) – and provides an exceptional movie and photo experience, even in high ambient light conditions. With 82<br>
percent color gamut (versus standard 45-60 percent), photos appear richer with amazing color depth. Additionally, with fast 8-millisecond response time, customers can view movies with TV-like performance.</p>
<p>The ENVY 13's strong performance is delivered in a small frame – less than an inch thin and weighing 3.74 pounds.(1) The exterior's aluminum and magnesium construction provides durability in a sleek design. An etched-metal palmrest<br>
further sets the PC apart from others, and a VGA webcam(3) optimized for low light also is included.</p>
<p>HP placed the same focus on design into its optional Slim Fit Extended-Life Notebook Battery. Taking the form of a "slice," it preserves the sleek look of the ENVY 13 while giving users up to 18 hours of battery life with the extended-life battery.(2) The standard battery is user-replaceable. ATI Switchable Graphics technology dynamically switches between ATI Mobility Radeon™ HD 4330 discrete graphics and the Intel® integrated graphics processor for either high-powered graphics processing or low power consumption for long battery life without booting the notebook. The Intel Core™ 2 Duo processor provides the power of dual processor cores while delivering extended battery life when the notebook is unplugged.</p>
<p>Designed with the most demanding mobile user in mind, the ENVY 13 notebook's premium AC adapter is small and light. It draws minimal power, has built-in surge protection and includes a rubberized strap that keeps the cables<br>
organized and the adapter from slipping off a slick surface. An optional HP USB Ethernet Adapter also is available.</p>
<p>The performance powerhouse: ENVY 15<br>
This lean, mean, dream machine is HP's fastest consumer notebook. The full metal case features a sleek, subtly crafted, laser-etched metal design on the lid that is repeated on the palmrest. The magnesium alloy casing provides<br>
lightweight durability in a 1-inch thin, 5.18-pound package. (1)Customers have maximum speed and mobility with the future Intel Core i7 processor(4) and up to 16 gigabytes (GB) of DDR3 1,066-MHz system memory in four SODIMM memory slots. Versatile storage options include the ability to add two solid-state drives in a RAID-0 configuration to improve the overall speed of the ENVY 15 while providing excellent disk performance. Creative users will appreciate the ENVY 15 notebook's performance and full versions of Corel® Paint Shop Pro® Photo X2 and Corel VideoStudio® Pro X2 for creating photo and video content.</p>
<p>Power users and gamers can take advantage of premium graphics performance via ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4830 graphics with 1 GB of dedicated video memory for visually intense applications, DirectX® 10.1 games and highdefinition video playback.</p>
<p>A choice of two 15.6-inch HP Brightview high-resolution LED backlit displays, including the Full High Definition LED HP Ultra BrightView Widescreen Display with up to 300-nits brightness, provides a superb display experience for a<br>
notebook in this class. A Nightvision VGA webcam that is optimized for low-light or zero-light conditions is standard on the HP ENVY 15, incorporating an infrared LED that assists the webcam(3) by providing the necessary illumination in dark environments.</p>
<p>The ENVY 15 has an optional Slim Fit Extended-Life Notebook Battery, giving users up to seven hours of battery life.(2)</p>
<p>Designing the ENVY experience<br>
The HP ENVY line includes a 360-degree approach to product design – from the products to the packaging:<br>
• Building upon HP's success with instant-on technology, HP QuickWeb allows customers to access key applications without booting the PC. In less than 30 seconds, users can access the Internet, music, videos and photos, and<br>
email.(3)<br>
• HP Clickpad integrates the buttons into the touchpad and allows for fluid movements, while also allowing users to disable the clickpad if desired.<br>
• The keyboard's direct-action keys (versus typical function keys) allow users to quickly access often-used commands such as print and volume adjustment.<br>
• Minimal desktop clutter and trial software adds to notebooks' simplicity.<br>
• An optional external optical drive complements the ENVY design and gives users the flexibility to carry the extra weight only when necessary. Two USB ports also transform the drive into a dock for additional capability.<br>
• The ENVY 13 and 15 are presented in streamlined paper carton boxes using minimal ink. Included in the packaging is a simplified setup poster and documentation contained within an SD card.</p>
<p>Concierge service and support<br>
The ENVY experience extends to premium service and support via the awardwinning HP Total Care program. This includes expert agents dedicated to addressing ENVY customers' questions via phone, online chat and email as well<br>
as next-day shipping for hardware customer service.</p>
<p>Pricing and availability<br>
The HP ENVY 13 and ENVY 15 are expected to be available in the United States on Oct. 18 with a starting price of $1,699 and $1,799, respectively.(5) Register for availability notification at www.hpdirect.com/go/newfromhp.<br>
Additional information about HP ENVY is available at www.hp.com/go/ENVY.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>[<a href="http://www.hp.com/go/ENVY">HP</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5359331/hp-envy-hands-on-macbook-pro-clone-better-than-the-real-thing]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5359331]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[envy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[envy 13]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[envy 15]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hp]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[HP Envy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[HP Envy 13]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[HP Envy 15]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:01:59 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joanna Stern]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5359331&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Are You Having Problems With Your MacBook Pro After the SATA Firmware Update?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>EFI Firmware 1.7 was <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5300174/apple-releases-firmware-update-to-boost-new-macbook-pro-sata-interface-speed">the update Apple released </a>to boost the speed of some <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MACBOOK PRO" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MACBOOK PRO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbook-pro/">MacBook Pro</a>'s hard drive controller, which was capped at 1.5Gbps. But some people&mdash;<a href="http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2054387&start=0&tstart=0">72 pages worth</a>&mdash;are saying it's been making their machine crash and freeze and otherwise do bad things. How's yours?</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5351925/are-you-having-problems-with-your-macbook-pro-after-the-sata-firmware-update]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5351925]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[efi firmware update 1.7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[firmware]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 Sep 2009 12:19:21 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5351925&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[How's Your Battery Life and Hard Drive Space With Snow Leopard?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/blood.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_blood.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>You've had the weekend to play <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5346418/snow-leopard-review-lightened-and-enlightened">with Snow Leopard</a> and have stuff run faster, apps break and all the other glories of a new OS. But how much extra space did you get, and how's your <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged BATTERY LIFE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/battery-life/">battery life</a>?</p>
<p>On Twitter we noticed that everybody seemed to get back more space from <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SNOW LEOPARD" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/snow-leopard/">Snow Leopard</a> than the guy before him: "I got back 9GB, wow!" "Hey, I got back 12GB, jeez." "Holy mother, I got back 20 gigs, whoooooa!" So by now, some of you should've gotten back like a terabyte&mdash;on your 250GB hard drive. We got back around 6GB, what Apple advertised.</p>
<p>Battery-wise haven't noticed much of a difference compared to Leopard, but if you have, let us know and what kind of machine you're using.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8" src="http://static.polldaddy.com/p/1938731.js">
</script><noscript><br>
<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/1938731/">How much hard drive space did you get back from Snow Leopard?</a><span style="font-size:9px;">(<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com">trends</a>)</span><br></noscript></p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8" src="http://static.polldaddy.com/p/1938407.js">
</script><noscript><br>
<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/1938407/">How's your battery life with Snow Leopard?</a><span style="font-size:9px;">(<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com">trends</a>)</span><br></noscript> [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/snow-leopard">Giz's Snow Leopard Coverage</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5349432/hows-your-battery-life-and-hard-drive-space-with-snow-leopard]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5349432]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[question of the day]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[battery]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[battery life]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[leopard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pair]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[qotd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 31 Aug 2009 17:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5349432&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Rumor: Plastic MacBooks Aren't Dying, They're Just Waiting for a Makeover]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/Picture_120.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_Picture_120.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>I've been assuming for a while now that Apple was close to giving up on the aging <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/white-macbook">polycarbonate MacBooks</a>, but apparently not: AppleInsider's <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/08/25/apple_to_retain_redesign_plastic_macbook_family.html">got a source</a> saying that, pending a "industrial design overhaul," they're here to stay.</p>

<p>Lately, the plastic MacBook has felt like an unwanted orphan. It's a tired generation-old design that looks stodgy next to the slick new unibodies, but without it, Apple's cheapest laptop would cost $1200&mdash;a little too high for a lot of prospective Mac users, and most importantly, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/laptop-hunters">Laptop Hunters</a>. (<em>Think of the <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5186672/microsoft-marketing-team-now-exclusively-advised-by-internet-commenters-but-it-works">Laurens</a>! The <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5206175/third-windows-laptop-hunter-ad-picks-a-sony-vaio-instead-of-a-mac-obviously">Jacksons</a>!</em>)</p>
<p>Apple needs <em>something</em> at or below the $1000 price point, but it'd help it it wasn't a product that was designed in 2005. So, <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/08/25/apple_to_retain_redesign_plastic_macbook_family.html">this</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>[The MacBook's] industrial design overhaul... will see them reemerge in the coming months with a slimmer, lighter enclosure and restructured internal architecture to boot.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This makes plenty of strategic sense, and I wouldn't be at all surprised if this turned out to be true, and if they well well below $1000. So, what would it look like? This description doesn't really narrow things down, so it could just as easily be a design child of the unibodies as of the old polycarb. Or something new entirely, which would obviously be <em>much</em> more interesting. [<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/08/25/apple_to_retain_redesign_plastic_macbook_family.html">AppleInsider</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5345324/rumor-plastic-macbooks-arent-dying-theyre-just-waiting-for-a-makeover]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5345324]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[white macbook]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:42:05 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5345324&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Your Freezing, Clicking MacBook Pro Hard Drive Just Got Better]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Have one of those 500GB 7200rpm hard drives in your <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MACBOOK PRO" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MACBOOK PRO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbook-pro/">MacBook Pro</a> that's pissing you off 'cause you bought for speed, but it's like freezing and clicking and stuff? Apple's just dropped the fix&mdash;well, they've released the firmware update for the drive, hopefully it's the fix. [<a href="http://support.apple.com/downloads/Hard_Drive_Firmware_Update_2_0">Apple</a> via <a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2009/08/19/apple-releases-fix-for-macbook-pro-hard-drive-issues/">MacRumors</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5341187/your-freezing-clicking-macbook-pro-hard-drive-just-got-better]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5341187]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[firmware]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:50:26 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5341187&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Airport Update Fixes OS 10.5.8 Issues]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I know of a few people who've encountered weird Wi-Fi problems since the OS 10.5.8 update. Now Apple has released a Macbook/<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MACBOOK PRO" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MACBOOK PRO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbook-pro/">Macbook Pro</a> patch for the networking issues claimed to occur under low battery power. Hopefully things will be all better now. [<a href="http://support.apple.com/downloads/AirPort_Client_Update_for_MacBook_and_MacBook_Pro">Apple</a> via <a href="http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2009/08/airport-update-addresses-portable-issues-created-by-1058.ars?utm_source=microblogging&utm_medium=arstch&utm_term=Main%20Account&utm_campaign=microblogging">Ars</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5335875/airport-update-fixes-os-1058-issues]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5335875]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[patches]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[airport]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple airport update]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:39:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5335875&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Matte Screen Option Returns To 15-inch MacBook Pros, Will Cost You $50]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/MacbookProMatte.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_MacbookProMatte.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>We've <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5315235/apple-might-be-going-to-the-matte-display">mentioned</a> that this could be on the cards, and now it's official. Apple has <a href="http://store.apple.com/us/configure/MB985LL/A?mco=NjcxMTU1Mg">reinstated</a> the anti-glare screen option for 15-inch MacBook Pros&mdash;but it'll cost you $50 for the privilege, and you'll lose that full-screen glass look.</p>
<p><strong>Comparison Above:</strong> Glossy MBP (Left); Matte MBP (Right).<br>
Comparison from inknoise @ <a href="http://forums.macrumors.com/showpost.php?p=8288449&postcount=106">Macrumors</a>.</p>
<p>That's pretty much what went down with the 17-inch <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MACBOOK PRO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbook-pro/">Macbook Pro</a>, so it's not a huge surprise. But if the glossy screens annoy the bejesus out of you, $50 is still a better option than <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5134661/matte-screen-options-for-15+inch-superglossy-macbook-pro">paying $200</a> to have the screen replaced. The bad news: still no word on iMacs getting the same option. [Thanks Alexander!]</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/AppleMatteDisplay.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_AppleMatteDisplay.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5334657/matte-screen-option-returns-to-15+inch-macbook-pros-will-cost-you-50]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5334657]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro matte glossy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[matte]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 11 Aug 2009 05:47:41 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5334657&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Greatest Single Phone Call in History Gets Microsoft to Change Laptop Hunter Ads]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-XOtCFNaNUg&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/-XOtCFNaNUg&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo"></object> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5315666/microsoft-gloats-apple-begged-them-to-stop-running-laptop-hunter-ads">The "greatest single phone call"</a> Microsoft COO Kevin Turner's ever received apparently worked. Sort of. After Apple asked Microsoft to stop running the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged LAPTOP HUNTERS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/laptop-hunters/">Laptop Hunters</a> ads because they've dropped prices, Microsoft's edited at least one of the spots.</p>
<p>The original <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5256399/meet-microsofts-new-laptop-hunter-lauren-20-likes-pink">Lauren 2.0 spot's been pulled</a> off YouTube, and in the re-cut version, the reference to the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MACBOOK PRO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbook-pro/">MacBook Pro</a> costing two grand has been dropped (since "MacBook Pro," <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5284638/when-pro-doesnt-mean-pro-anymore">whatever that means now</a>, starts at $1200). Not that it actually changes the intent of ad <em>one bit</em>, since Lauren 2.0 still manages to get in there, "It seems like you're paying a lot for the brand."</p>
<p>Which is all it needs to say, really, since that's what most people already think because of Apple's own success at positioning itself as a premium brand, even as they cut prices on basically everything they make.</p>
<p>Success is a bitch that way sometimes. [<a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/WindowsVideos">YouTube</a> via <a href="http://adage.com/article?article_id=138117">AdAge</a> via <a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2009/07/24/microsoft-alters-laptop-hunters-ads-in-wake-of-apple-price-cuts/">MacRumors</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5322027/greatest-single-phone-call-in-history-gets-microsoft-to-change-laptop-hunter-ads]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5322027]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ad]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptop hunter]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptop hunters]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5322027&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[If You Buy a Computer That Costs Over $1000, It's Probably a Mac]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_504x_macbookpros.jpg" class="left image500" width="500">That's because according to NPD, in June, 91 percent of the market for computers that cost over $1000 <a href="http://www.betanews.com/joewilcox/article/Apple-has-91-of-market-for-1000-PCs-says-NPD/1248313624">belonged to Apple</a>.</p>
<p>Sure, it helps that Apple only sells two computers under $1000&mdash;the white MacBook and Mac mini&mdash;so if you get a Mac, it's probably going to cost over a grand. In fact, the average selling price of a Mac is $1400. But, consider that Apple claimed just 66 percent of the $1000+ market in the first three months of 2008, and 88 percent in May of this year.</p>
<p>It also means that people just aren't buying super tricked-out PCs&mdash;which is something Microsoft courted with its <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged LAPTOP HUNTERS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/laptop-hunters/">Laptop Hunters</a> ads, showing how cheap PCs were compared to Macs. To wit, the average selling price of all PCs in June was precisely half that of Mac: $700. (For Windows notebooks, sans netbooks, the average selling price was $569.) Which suggests there are way more <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5186672/microsoft-marketing-team-now-exclusively-advised-by-internet-commenters-but-it-works">Laurens</a> than <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5198677/shocking-new-microsoft-ad-implies-macs-are-inferior">Giampaolos</a> in the world.</p>
<p><strong>Update</strong>: It should be noted, however, that these numbers are for retail&mdash;not for business purchases or PCs people built themselves.</p>
<p>Of course, I would definitely prefer far more Laurens. [<a href="http://www.betanews.com/joewilcox/article/Apple-has-91-of-market-for-1000-PCs-says-NPD/1248313624">BetaNews</a> via <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/apple-has-91-share-of-premium-computer-market-research-firm-says-2009-7">BusinessInsider</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5321332/if-you-buy-a-computer-that-costs-over-1000-its-probably-a-mac]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5321332]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptop hunters]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5321332&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Might Be Going to the Matte (Display)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_medium_2942041029_511956e78f_o.jpg" class="left image500" width="500">AppleInsider says Apple's considering expanding the matte display option that's only available on the 17-inch <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MACBOOK PRO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbook-pro/">MacBook Pro</a> to other Macs, most likely the 13 and 15-inch MacBook Pros, to satisfy <a href="http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=7-10041-10146&sr=hotnews">professional customers</a>. We'll see. [<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/07/15/apple_may_extend_antiglare_display_option_to_more_macs.html">AppleInsider</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5315235/apple-might-be-going-to-the-matte-display]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5315235]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[anti-glare screen]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[display]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[displays]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:51:43 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5315235&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Matte Black MacBook Pro Looks Like a Deadly Stealth Ship]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p>This $6000 Colorware <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MACBOOK PRO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbook-pro/">MacBook Pro</a> isn't just impressive because of its price, it's impressive because it looks like what a real <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MATTE BLACK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/matte-black/">matte black</a> MacBook Pro from Apple would look like.</p>
<p>There are only ten available, and with each one costing $6000, you're probably not going to be one of the ten. So soak up the images and pretend that you can reasonably justify paying more than twice as much for a laptop just for it not to be so shiny and grey. [<a href="http://www.colorwarepc.com/p-183-stealth-macbook-pro.aspx">Colorware</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_8.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"><br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_5.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"><br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_0.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"><br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_4.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"><br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"><br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"><br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_6.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"><br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_3.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"><br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_7.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5305501/matte-black-macbook-pro-looks-like-a-deadly-stealth-ship/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5305501]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[customized]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[black]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[colorware]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro matte black]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[matte]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[matte black]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5305501&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Activate Multitouch Gestures in Firefox 3.5]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_fftwist.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;">During the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged FIREFOX 3.5" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/firefox-3%275/">Firefox 3.5</a> beta, a few people stumbled upon a neat, unadvertised feature. By twisting their fingers on a Macbook's multitouch pad, they were able to roll through their loaded tabs. But <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5304540/get-firefox-35-final-right-now">Firefox 3.5 (official)</a> deactivated the trick.</p>

<p>Luckily, as Crunchgear explains, the multitouch trick can be reactivated! You can read the very simple instructions over at their site, then realize that you can actually modify the settings to use gestures beyond the twist (like a three-finger swipe). But until we see incorporation of middle-finger-activated autotrolling, we're holding our excitement at bay. [<a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/06/30/be-still-my-heart-multi-touch-tab-switching-in-firefox/">Crunchgear</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5305394/activate-multitouch-gestures-in-firefox-35]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5305394]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[browsing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Firefox 3.5]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[firefox multitouch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5305394&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[MacBook Pro Firmware Update Doesn't Care For Third Party Hard Drives]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/macbookpros_01_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/macbookpros_01_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>To their credit, Apple addressed <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5291042/did-apple-downgrade-the-hard-drive-controller-in-the-new-macbook-pros">complaints</a> about a downgraded, slower SATA interface on their new MacBook Pros <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5300174/apple-releases-firmware-update-to-boost-new-macbook-pro-sata-interface-speed">fairly quickly</a>. Unfortunately, that hasty firmware update seems to be causing much more serious problems. For example! Not recognizing common hard drives.</p>

<p>A <a href="http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2054387&start=0&tstart=15">rapidly growing thread</a> over at Apple's Support site is brimming with people reporting that the new firmware update&mdash;which simply jacks up the MacBook's SATA interface to a maximum potential bandwidth of 3GB/s, like in older models&mdash;causes their laptops to fail to recognize a wide variety of third party hard drives, leaving their computers effectively crippled.</p>
<p>You could argue that Apple's firmwares don't necessarily need to accommodate whatever modifications and third party hardware users might subject them to, but in this particular situation, that logic doesn't hold. The only way to even notice the MacBooks' decreased 1.5GB/s bandwidth would be to install an ultra-fast, aftermarket SSD, so Apple's firmware update was a <em>response</em> to its users' desire to use third party hardware. From the looks of it, this particular hiccup will affect more users than the first one, so Apple should be&mdash;pending an investigation&mdash;obligated to fix it. <em>Should</em>.</p>
<p>If you haven't applied the first update, Adam's initial <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5300174/apple-releases-firmware-update-to-boost-new-macbook-pro-sata-interface-speed">advice</a> has turned out to be very prescient:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>If you're not planning on swapping in an SSD, you don't need to worry about this firmware update.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>[<a href="http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2054387&start=0&tstart=15">Apple</a> via <a href="http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2009/06/26/macbook_firmware_drive_failure/">The Register</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5302822/macbook-pro-firmware-update-doesnt-care-for-third-party-hard-drives]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5302822]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[firmware]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro firmware]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro sata]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 26 Jun 2009 07:52:16 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5302822&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Releases Firmware Update to Boost New MacBook Pro SATA Interface Speed]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/macbookpros_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_macbookpros_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display: block; float: none;"></a>We <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5291042/did-apple-downgrade-the-hard-drive-controller-in-the-new-macbook-pros">reported earlier</a> that it looks like the new MacBook Pros have had their hard drive controllers downgraded. Now, Apple has released a new firmware update to jack those speeds back up.</p>
<p>It's called the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MACBOOK PRO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbook-pro/">MacBook Pro</a> EFI Firmware Update 1.7. Check it:<br></p>
<blockquote>MacBook Pro EFI Firmware Update 1.7 addresses an issue reported by a small number of customers using drives based on the SATA 3Gbps specification with the June 2009 MacBook Pro. While this update allows drives to use transfer rates greater than 1.5Gbps, Apple has not qualified or offered these drives for Mac notebooks and their use is unsupported.</blockquote>
<p>You'll still need an SSD to take advantage of these speeds, but if you really want to do that, now it looks like you've got the option. If you're not planning on swapping in an SSD, you don't need to worry about this firmware update. [<a href="http://support.apple.com/downloads/MacBook_Pro_EFI_Firmware_Update_1_7_">Applw</a> via <a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2009/06/22/apple-releases-macbook-pro-firmware-update-to-address-sata-interface-speeds/">MacRumors</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5300174/apple-releases-firmware-update-to-boost-new-macbook-pro-sata-interface-speed]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5300174]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[firmware]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sata]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:57:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5300174&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Did Apple Downgrade the Hard Drive Controller in the New MacBook Pros?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/macbookpros_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_macbookpros_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></a>Over the weekend, we got a number of reports that Apple has downgraded the SATA controller in the latest <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MACBOOK PRO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbook-pro/">MacBook Pro</a> 13-inch and 15-inch update, capping potential drive speeds. Going over the evidence, it looks like they were right. <strong>UPDATED</strong></p>

<p>The issue has been examined at length in the MacRumors <a href="http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=718516&page=37">forums</a>, where dozens of users are sharing their experiences, benchmarks and varying levels of disappointment. Here are the kinds of numbers they're finding with faster SSDs (<a href="http://forums.macrumors.com/showpost.php?p=7818191&postcount=910">excerpted</a>):</p>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>Older 13" MBA, 13" MB, 17" MBP (and old versions of 13"/15" MBP):</strong></p>
<p>Sequential READ = 225 MB/sec<br>
Sequential WRITE = 180 MB/sec</p>
<p><strong>New 13" MBP, 15" MBP</strong></p>
<p>Sequential READ = 115 MB/sec<br>
Sequential WRITE = 95 MB/sec</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This <em>sounds</em> terrible: the potential read speeds on the new MacBook Pros have essentially been cut in half. In real-world scenarios, though&mdash;particularly Apple-sanctioned real-world scenarios&mdash;the speed differences shouldn't matter much; since the MBPs ship HDDs that aren't quite fast enough to max out a 1.5Gb interface, the issue will go unnoticed by most users.</p>
<p>The problem, though, is with upgrades: there are SSDs on the market that can reach and pass the 1.5GB/s threshold, and in the near future they'll become much more common, and cheaper. There's speculation that this could be remedied with a firmware update, but many are saying this is unlikely; after all, reverting to an older firmware wouldn't have saved Apple any money, while reverting to cheaper <em>hardware</em> could have, albeit barely.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE</strong>: Hubert from UberGizmo, a guy who knows his Nvidia hardware, <a href="http://www.ubergizmo.com/15/archives/2009/06/sata-macbook.html">sees a software issue at most</a>:<br></p>
<blockquote>First of all, I believe that NVIDIA has never produced a single GeForce 9400M motherboard chipset (aka ION) that doesn't handle SATA-2 (3Gbps). And even if they did, it would not really save a buck on the chip, as long as the chip size is identical. Most importantly, a 1.5 Gbps SATA-I Geforce 9400M chipset does not exist, as far as I know.
<p>Then what happened? We're not sure, but consider these scenarios: what if some computer shipped with a SATA-I disk? What if 1.5Gbps consumes less power? Because the hardware supports SATA-II, there is a slight chance that this can be updated in the future. We'll be waiting for an official statement from Apple.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>[<a href="http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=718516">MacRumors</a> &mdash;<em>Thanks, James, Serrada and Kim!</em>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5291042/did-apple-downgrade-the-hard-drive-controller-in-the-new-macbook-pros]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5291042]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro sata downgrade]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro sata speeds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sata]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 15 Jun 2009 10:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5291042&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Why MacBook Is About to Mean Something Else Entirely]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/macbook-dead_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_macbook-dead_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></a>Historically, Apple loves cleanly delineated product lines, so <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5287179/macbook-pro-2009-review">the "MacBook Pro"</a> re-shuffling seems strange even if <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5284638/when-pro-doesnt-mean-pro-anymore">the socialist element</a> is a fun side effect. Unless they're clearing out the MacBook for something else entirely.</p>
<p>Think about it: Right now a single, lonely model bears the name MacBook. A model that's been around <em>forever</em>, too. On the other hand, there are three sizes of MacBook Pros in six, <a href="http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/shop_mac/family/macbook_pro?intcmp=AIC-WWW-NAUS-K2-BUYNOW-MACBOOKPRO-INDEX">count 'em</a>, six flavors. Lopsided much? The poor thing gets no promotion, either. It <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5271175/white-macbooks-upgraded-with-faster-processors-more-space-faster-ram&quot;">was quietly updated</a> to be as fast as the aluminium MacBook last week, warranting just a one-line mention during the WWDC Philnote. And where's the splash pic for Apple's most affordable Mac on the Mac page?</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/macbookno.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_macbookno.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></a></p>
<p>So, why is Apple basically wasting one of their most powerful brands, their "most popular Mac"?</p>
<p>Because they're about to call something else MacBook.</p>
<p>It's the only logical explanation for the muddled, complicated and totally un-Apple product line. Why all of their core notebooks are now called MacBook Pros. Why MacBook denotes a single notebook, one that perpetually seems like it's on its way out&mdash;because it very likely is on its way out.</p>
<p>There are two possibilities that stand out for MacBook: A new, even cheaper notebook, following the hard price cuts across the iMac and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MACBOOK PRO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbook-pro/">MacBook Pro</a> lines. Or at the very least, a completely redesigned MacBook family that looks way different than what Apple is currently calling MacBook Pro, and maybe even the current MacBook. That's the more conservative take.</p>
<p>The other possibility is mostly in fap-fap fantasyland, but we can't rule it out: What if Apple calls <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5249808/apples-tablet-the-story-so-far">that tablet thing</a> MacBook? (Indicating it's at least somewhat different than most people have been imagining.) What better way to use one of their most iconic brands than to signify a complete shift in mainstream computers? Calling the tablet a MacBook would be incredibly ballsy, but an incredibly powerful signal, too.</p>
<p>Either way, we're pretty sure Apple isn't just going to let the MacBook wither and die&mdash;<em>something</em> new has to be coming that's gonna be called MacBook, and we'd wager relatively soon, too.</p>
<p>Or maybe Apple's just becoming a little bit more like every other PC maker and doesn't know what the hell they're doing with their brands anymore. But I somehow doubt that.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5287488/why-macbook-is-about-to-mean-something-else-entirely]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5287488]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[thinking out loud]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac tablet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[notebook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[speculation]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5287488&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[MacBook Pro 2009 Review]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/macbookpros.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/macbookpros.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>You know those Microsoft <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/laptop-hunters">laptop hunter spots</a>? Apple may already have responded with <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5251676/new-apple-ad-mocks-microsoft-laptop-hunters-in-usual-smarmy-way">TV spots of their own</a>, but these MacBook Pros strike back at Microsoft better than any ad can: by doing.</p>
<p>Apple did two things simultaneously that are usually contradictory; they lowered the price of their entire <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MACBOOK PRO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbook-pro/">MacBook Pro</a> line while at the same time bumping up the specs. The 15-inch version now starts at $1699 and caps out at $2299, down from $1999 and $2499. What's even nicer is that the 13-inch MacBook&mdash;which previously didn't have a Firewire slot or a "nicer" screen&mdash;got absorbed into the MacBook Pro family and is now <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5284638/when-pro-doesnt-mean-pro-anymore">virtually indistinguishable</a> from the rest of the Pro line.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('macbook2009gallery', 8, '');
</script></p>
<p>Two other things changed on the build that make the Pros more appealing to regular consumers. The replaceable battery has been swapped for the same type of lithium-polymer internal battery previously found in the 17-inch MacBook Pro, which boosts battery life at the expense of not being able to be changed out in the field. This, for the large majority of people, is a good thing. The batteries last 1000 charge cycles, which at 200/cycles a year, would last you five years. Even if you go through one charge cycle every day, you'll still make it about three years before you need to take Apple up on the $129 replacement. (The $129 includes shipping, labor and disposal of the old battery.)</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/batterynew.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/batterynew.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>In our test, the 13-inch MacBook Pro got <b>3:31</b> of battery compared to the <b>3:46</b> of the 15-inch MacBook Pro. We used the same metrics as the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5063492">previous MacBook Pro test</a>&mdash;medium brightness, Wi-Fi on, keyboard backlight on low, H.264 movie&mdash;and got <b>about an hour more on each machine</b>. That's a pretty incredible jump just from a change (non-user replaceable battery) that most people won't notice.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/sdcard.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/sdcard.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The other interesting swap is the removal of the ExpressCard slot in favor of an SD card slot. According to Apple, there was only a "single digit" amount of customers that used the ExpressCard, whereas tons of people have digital cameras or other devices that use SD. Again, for the vast majority of mainstream customers, this decision was a smart one. And if you really do need ExpressCard, you can still find it on the 17-inch MacBook Pro&mdash;which doesn't have an SD card slot.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/screenside2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/screenside2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Then we have the improved LED-backlit display, which has a 60% greater color gamut than previous version. What this means to you is that even the 13-inch MacBook Pro will have a quality display even though it's a few hundred dollars cheaper than the 15-inch. The previous 13-inch MacBook, as you saw in our review, had a screen that was obviously inferior to the Pros, and distorted very noticeably as you stepped away or viewed the screen at an angle. Not anymore. From our tests, the 13 and 15 MacBook Pros looked just about identical, and both had superior color performance compared to older machines we had around.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/geekbenchnew.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/geekbenchnew.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>An even nicer picture is painted by the benchmarks. This is the first time the 15-inch has gone up over 3GHz (the CTO version), and the entire line has the ability to handle 8GB of RAM. We didn't test this 8GB configuration, but we're pretty eager to see how much faster it makes us in our daily work.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/xbenchnew.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/xbenchnew.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Both sets of scores are on par with the changes in specs on the new machines. Since the CPUs have been bumped up, the scores have risen to match. It also makes sense that the 2.53GHz 15-inch just about ties the 2.53GHz 13-inch from this year. The only weird drop is in the Integer section of Geekbench, where both machines this year have dropped. A change in Geekbench? A change in 10.5.7? We're not sure. But these are some good numbers nonetheless.</p>
<p>Although the removable latch has been exchanged for a screwed in panel, you can still get to the hard drive and RAM by removing ten screws and gently lifting off the back. The entire process should take you less than 10 minutes.</p>
<p>The 13-inch MacBook also has one fewer audio port, instead opting for a single audio port that supports digital in and out. If you need simultaneous in and out and don't want to go up to a 15-inch MacBook Pro, you can use a $29 USB audio adapter instead.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/macbooks.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/macbooks.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>So is there anything bad to say about the new MacBook Pro line? No, not really. It's cheaper, faster, has more consumer-friendly features and now even has a 13-inch option for people who need slightly more portability. Those people who were waiting for the second-iteration version of a new hardware design (a pretty smart rule to follow with Apple products in general) before upgrading can safely do so now&mdash;and get a better deal in the process. [<a href="http://www.apple.com/macbookpro/">MacBook Pros</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/gizplus_01.jpg" width="20" height="20">It's cheaper, faster and has a nicer screen<br clear="all">
<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/gizplus_01.jpg" width="20" height="20">SD card slot more useful than ExpressCard for vast majority of customers<br clear="all">
<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/gizplus_01.jpg" width="20" height="20">MacBook Pro line now has a 13-inch option<br clear="all">
<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/gizplus_01.jpg" width="20" height="20">Built-in battery means increased battery size, and that means about an hour longer battery life<br clear="all"></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5287179/macbook-pro-2009-review]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5287179]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bestmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5287179&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Stores Knock Hundreds Off Leftover MacBooks to Clear Inventory]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/macbookdis.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_macbookdis.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></a>What do you do when you've instituted a <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5283818/iphone-3gs-and-more-everything-at-wwdc-2009">bottom-to-top</a> refresh in your product line, your new shipments are imminent, but you still have hundreds of stores with leftover inventory? FIRE SALE, is what.</p>
<p><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged APPLE STORES" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/apple-stores/">Apple stores</a> have <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/06/10/apple_stores_holding_fire_sales_on_last_gen_mac_notebooks.html">discounted</a> nearly every MacBook in stock, and while the markdowns aren't huge, they're worth a look: MacBook Airs have been discounted anywhere from $400 to $800, which means the previous base model is now $100 cheaper than the most affordable new version. The 2.66GHz 17-inch <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MACBOOK PRO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbook-pro/">MacBook Pro</a> is discounted by $500, bringing it below the new model's $2500 starting price. 13-inch unibodies get $100-$300 markdowns, which, given the latest units' advantages, might not be worth it.</p>
<p>You'll want to stop by or call your local store on this one, since these offers depend on remaining inventory, and might not hold in <em>every</em> location. [<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/06/10/apple_stores_holding_fire_sales_on_last_gen_mac_notebooks.html">AppleInsider</a> via <a href="http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2009/06/brick-mortar-apple-stores-dealing-out-the-discounts-on-old-portables.ars?utm_source=microblogging&utm_medium=arstch&utm_term=Main%20Account&utm_campaign=microblogging">Ars</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5286833/apple-stores-knock-hundreds-off-leftover-macbooks-to-clear-inventory]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5286833]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[dealzmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple stores]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook air]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook discounts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 11 Jun 2009 05:02:28 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5286833&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[MacBook Pro Hands-On Gallery]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/macbooks.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_macbooks.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></a>We've got a delicious gallery of pics of the new 13 and 15-inch MacBook Pros.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('macbook2009gallery', 8, '');
</script></p>
<p>Just by looking at the 13 and 15-inch models together, you can tell that Apple was pretty much right when they said that they belong in the same family. The construction is almost identical. The only difference is that the 13-inch has one fewer audio jack and no side-board speakers, as been the case for the 13 for years now.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5286151/macbook-pro-hands+on-gallery]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5286151]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[battery]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook gallery]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[teardown]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:12:05 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5286151&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[HyperMac External MacBook Battery Review]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/hypermac.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_hypermac.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></a><strong>The Gadget</strong>: The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5239442/hypermac-external-battery-gives-macbooks-a-32-hour-boost">HyperMac</a> external laptop battery, which, through its Magsafe connection gives MacBook Airs up to 32 hours and MacBook Pros up to 8 extra hours of battery life. There's also a USB port for USB charging.</p>
<p><strong>The Price</strong>: $200 for 60Wh, $300 for 100Wh, $400 for 150Wh and $500 for 222Wh</p>
<p><strong>The Verdict</strong>: Enormous battery life. While we tested the 222Wh version, the only difference is the capacity, and you can do the math to figure out how much life each version has. In our test, the 222Wh was able to sustain a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MACBOOK PRO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbook-pro/">MacBook Pro</a> at full charge for eight straight hours. Couple that with the internal battery that the Pro already has, and you're into double digit work time if you buy one of these.</p>
<p>Unlike the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/tag/powergorilla">Powergorilla</a>, the HyperMac actually is capable of charging the Pro (there's a MacBook Air style charger as well). That means you can use this as a portable charging station as well as a constantly-tethered power supply. But you pay for that in terms of lugging around a heavy ass block of aluminum.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/IMG_8966.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_IMG_8966.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></a>The 222Wh battery itself weighs 4.7 pounds, and measures 10.1 x 5.91 x 1.34 inches. It's not small, but it's still slim enough to be shoved into a bag and carried around with you everywhere. It takes 3.7 hours to charge the HyperMac to full, and you can even continue powering your laptop while this charges, giving you an extra MagSafe charger at home.</p>
<p>One very sneaky use for this is taking the battery to work and filling it up with your company's power, then taking it home and powering your laptop(s) and USB devices off of this. Free power!</p>
<p>We passed one around yesterday at the liveblog and it was able to keep multiple MacBook Pros alive the entire time. And with the new built-in battery for the <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5283256/new-15+inch-macbook-pro-features-7+hour-battery-life-and-sd-card-slot">MacBook Pros</a>, we're going to be stocking up on these instead of extra internal batteries.</p>
<p>So it's up to you: how much power do you need? $500 and 222Wh may be too much for most people unless they work in the field a lot, but the cheaper versions are worth it just to have a backup for emergencies. [<a href="http://www.hyperdrive.com/HyperMac-External-MacBook-Power-s/91.htm">Hypermac</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5284867/hypermac-external-macbook-battery-review]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5284867]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[batteries]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[battery]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[external battery]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hypermac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hypermac review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5284867&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[When Pro Doesn't Mean Pro Anymore]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_prices.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;">It's kind of amazing how much Apple got right yesterday&mdash;and what they got wrong: Their product lines are completely scrambled. The Pro designation has become meaningless and $99 iPhones look just like $499 iPhones.</p>
<p>It's possible that when the subsidized <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged IPHONE 3G" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphone-3g/">iPhone 3G</a> dropped last year for $199, a new Apple was born. We just didn't see it clearly until today, with the announcement of the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged IPHONE 3GS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphone-3gs/">iPhone 3GS</a> and new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MACBOOK PRO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbook-pro/">MacBook Pro</a> line.</p>
<p>"Pro" used to be a real designation: A Pro machine was designed and built for working professionals. It had more power, better build quality and "top 10 percent" features for the users who needed it&mdash;or at least wanted to pay a lot more for it. Now, it's just a brand.</p>
<p>It's true that the unibody MacBooks were more like their brawnier "Pro" siblings than ever before&mdash;it was even the rationale <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5063492/macbook-and-macbook-pro-dual-review">behind our dual review</a>. But there were still very real dividing lines between them: Most importantly, Pro machines had <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5063832/giz-explains-why-does-the-new-macbook-pro-have-two-graphics-cards">dedicated graphics cards</a>. As of yesterday, that's not true. The $1700 15-inch Pro doesn't have one, and none of 13-inch newly designated Pro models have them either. Also, what kind of professional machine lacks a removable battery, anyway? (Swapping out batteries is how we got through the back-to-back Nintendo and Sony keynotes at E3 this year, though admittedly, the significantly improved battery life might be part of the answer.)</p>
<p>Don't get us wrong, we love that Apple brought many of the Pro hallmarks down to their consumer machines, like the aluminum chassis, and that now high-end Apple laptops are more affordable than ever. But now real pros probably won't even look at most of the Pro line.</p>
<p>The new products also don't show how special you are for paying the most to buy the best. The cheap models and the pricey ones are <i>identical</i>. Your crazy high-end 32GB iPhone 3GS looks just like that other guy's $99 iPhone 3G. Every unibody MacBook is now a Pro&mdash;whether you spend $1200 or twice as much. The old distinctions have been erased.</p>
<p>A leveling of class distinctions in Apple products is going to sting people who valued the affectation of elitism that came with using Apple's top-of-the-line products. Even subtle differences&mdash;like the premium paid for the matte black MacBook over the otherwise identical shiny white one, were signals, beamed out to the others in the coffee shop, declaring who was "da boss." You know, the guys who wore the white earbuds with pride five years ago. Admittedly, sometimes those guys need a left hook to the kidneys (and sometimes, we are those guys). Maybe it's good to make the best technology accessible to everybody, with no indicators of who paid more for what.</p>
<p>Maybe Apple is trying to create good design that works for anyone and everyone. I can respect that. Still, the question remains: Does this make rich people look like poor people, or poor people look like rich people? The privileged <em>must know</em>.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5284638/when-pro-doesnt-mean-pro-anymore]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5284638]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone 3g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone 3gs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[notebook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 09 Jun 2009 15:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5284638&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[iPhone 3GS and More: Everything at WWDC 2009]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/WWDC_09_Wrapup_2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_WWDC_09_Wrapup_2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></a>Today was big for Apple, busting out hardware updates in the two hottest lines&mdash;iPhones and MacBooks&mdash;along with final details on the overhauls of their two operating systems, too. We saw everything but a tablet&mdash;and Steve Jobs.</p>

<p><b><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged IPHONE 3GS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphone-3gs/">iPhone 3GS</a></b><br>
• <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5283099/iphone-3gs-complete-feature-guide">iPhone 3GS Complete Feature Guide</a><br>
• <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5283468/iphone-3gs-vs-iphone-3g-feature-chart-comparison">iPhone 3G vs. iPhone 3GS Comparison Chart</a><br>
• <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5283793/iphone-3gs-video-tour-the-short-version">iPhone 3GS Video Walkthrough (Quick 4-Minute Version)</a><br>
• <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5283417/at-long-last-the-iphone-gets-voice-commands">iPhone 3GS Gets Voice Control</a></p>
<p><b>iPhone Pricing Issues: The Untold Story</b><br>
• <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5283568/real-cost-of-iphone-3gs-about-218-more-than-you-think">iPhone 3G Owners Will Have To Pay $200 Extra To Get iPhone 3GS Early</a><br>
• <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5283517/old-iphone-3g-16gb-marked-down-to-149-from-att-supplies-may-be-limited">Old 16GB iPhone 3G to Sell for $149</a><br>
• <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5283419/8gb-iphone-3g-will-sell-for-99-alongside-3gs">The Not-So-New $99 8GB iPhone</a><br>
• <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5283334/att-is-screwing-over-us-iphone-users">AT&T's Tethering and MMS Support Delay</a>&mdash;and <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5283562/att-mms-delay-may-be-due-to-opt+out-codes-70-tethering-plan-in-works">Possible Reason For It</a></p>
<p><b>iPhone OS and Apps</b><br>
• <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5283055/iphone-os-30-available-on-june-17th">iPhone 3.0: The Whole Story</a><br>
• <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5283371/find-my-iphone-lets-you-ping-remotely-erase-your-lost-phone-if-you-have-mobileme">"Find My iPhone" Is a Relief to Us Forgetful Types</a><br>
• <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5283376/wwdc-2009-iphone-30-app-roundup/gallery">App Roundup: iPhone 3.0</a></p>
<p><b>New MacBook Pros</b><br>
• <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5283256/new-15+inch-macbook-pro-features-7+hour-battery-life-and-sd-card-slot">New Amazingly Priced 15-Inch MacBook Pros</a><br>
• <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5283283/13+inch-macbook-pro-arrives-and-macbook-air-gets-a-price-cut">All-New, Low-Priced 13-Inch MacBook Pro, Plus Great Price Reductions for MacBook Air</a></p>
<p><b><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MAC OS X" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/mac-os-x/">Mac OS X</a> <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SNOW LEOPARD" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/snow-leopard/">Snow Leopard</a> and Safari</b><br>
• <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5283157/everything-you-need-to-know-about-snow-leopard">Mac OSX Snow Leopard: The Whole Story (Including $29 Upgrade Price!)</a><br>
• <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5283295/safari-4-available-now-dubbed-worlds-fastest-browser">Safari 4 Available, Dubbed "World's Fastest Browser"</a></p>
<p><b>The Whole Damn Keynote</b><br>
• <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5283820/apple-wwdc-2009-keynote-now-online">Wish You'da Been There, Elbow To Elbow With Bloggers, Feeling Chen's Hot Breath On Your Neck? Watch This, and Imagine</a></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5283818/iphone-3gs-and-more-everything-at-wwdc-2009]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5283818]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iPhone 3.0]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone 3g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone 3g s]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone 3gs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac os x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[roundup]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wwdc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wwdc 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wwdc 2009 roundup]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wwdc09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wwdc2009]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 08 Jun 2009 23:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5283818&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[WWDC 2009 Rumor Smash: Some Were Right, Most Were SUCK!]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_iPhone_Hulk_Smash_504.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;">Though Jesus debunked a number of the more fun WWDC rumors&mdash;what's a "unibody" iPhone?&mdash;in his <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5266037/last-minute-rumor-updates-on-apple-wwdc-09">sober-light-of-day roundup</a> last Friday, it's nice to run through them all, to see how many rumors were true, and how many were smashable.</p>

<p><b>iPhone Rumors</b><br>
The biggest batch of rumors had to do with the phone, and man were some of them off base:</p>
<p>&bull; "iPhone Video" name? NOPE</p>
<p>&bull; "<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged IPHONE 3GS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphone-3gs/">iPhone 3GS</a>" name? YEP</p>
<p>&bull; Video shooting? YEP</p>
<p>&bull; iPhone matte black finish? NOPE</p>
<p>&bull; iPhone front camera and videoconferencing? NOPE</p>
<p>&bull; $99 iPhone? YEP</p>
<p>&bull; Glowing Apple logo? NOPE</p>
<p>&bull; Autofocus 3-megapixel camera? YEP</p>
<p>&bull; Magnetometer/compass? YEP</p>
<p>&bull; OLED screen? NOPE</p>
<p>&bull; iPhone Speed and Memory Boost? YEP</p>
<p>&bull; Aluminum "unibody" iPhone? NOPE</p>
<p>&bull; Verizon iPhone or some other Apple phone? NOPE</p>
<p>&bull; iPhone Nano, whatever that is? NOPE</p>
<p><b>Other Apple Rumors:</b><br>
It was easy to dismiss the tablet rumor early on, but there were other speculations that were a little easier to swallow:</p>
<p>&bull; Apple tablet? NOPE</p>
<p>&bull; 13-Inch <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MACBOOK PRO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbook-pro/">MacBook Pro</a>? YEP</p>
<p>&bull; Marble look-and-feel for <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SNOW LEOPARD" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/snow-leopard/">Snow Leopard</a>? NOPE</p>
<p>&bull; 64GB iPod Touch? NOPE</p>
<p>&bull; Steve Jobs appearance? NOPE</p>
<p>(Note: If I left any out, go ahead and throw them into comments. There's no way I can verify that I got 'em all above.)</p>
<p>So, did we get took? Or did we take home quite a bit? From this tally, out of 19, only 7 came true, but when you factor that in with some unexpected fun, like the Find My Phone remote MobileMe feature, or the voice controls, or the MacBook Pro's new SD card slot (which is nice, though not an HDMI port), it was a decent haul despite any disappointment. In case you haven't had enough, here's the full coverage from WWDC. [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/wwdc-2009">WWDC 2009 on Gizmodo</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5283889/wwdc-2009-rumor-smash-some-were-right-most-were-suck]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5283889]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iPhone 3.0]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone 3g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone 3g s]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone 3gs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac os x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wwdc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wwdc 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wwdc 2009 rumor smash]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wwdc09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wwdc2009]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 08 Jun 2009 22:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5283889&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple WWDC 2009 Live Coverage]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_wwdc09-banner.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;">You've seen our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5285110/wwdc-09-liveblog-archive">liveblog</a> of today's big event, now jump below for links to all of the new software and gear, including the <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5283099/iphone-3gs-complete-feature-guide">iPhone 3GS</a>.</p><p><b><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged IPHONE 3GS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphone-3gs/">iPhone 3GS</a></b><br>
• <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5283099/iphone-3gs-complete-feature-guide">iPhone 3GS Complete Feature Guide</a><br>
• <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5283468/iphone-3gs-vs-iphone-3g-feature-chart-comparison">iPhone 3G vs. iPhone 3GS Comparison Chart</a><br>
• <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5283419/8gb-iphone-3g-will-sell-for-99-alongside-3gs">The Not-So-New $99 8GB iPhone</a><br>
• <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5283417/at-long-last-the-iphone-gets-voice-commands">iPhone 3GS Gets Voice Control</a><br>
• <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5283371/find-my-iphone-lets-you-ping-remotely-erase-your-lost-phone-if-you-have-mobileme">"Find My iPhone" Is a Relief to Us Forgetful Types</a><br>
• <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5283517/old-iphone-3g-16gb-marked-down-to-149-from-att-supplies-may-be-limited">Old 16GB iPhone 3G to Sell for $149</a><br>
• <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5283334/att-is-screwing-over-us-iphone-users">And the One Caveat: AT&T.</a></p>
<p><b>iPhone OS</b><br>
• <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5283055/iphone-os-30-available-on-june-17th">iPhone 3.0: The Whole Story</a><br>
• <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5283376/wwdc-2009-iphone-30-app-roundup">App Roundup: iPhone 3.0</a></p>
<p><b><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MAC OS X" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/mac-os-x/">Mac OS X</a></b><br>
• <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5283157/everything-you-need-to-know-about-snow-leopard">Mac OSX Snow Leopard: The Whole Story</a><br>
• <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5283295/safari-4-available-now-dubbed-worlds-fastest-browser">Safari 4 Available, Dubbed "World's Fastest Browser"</a></p>
<p><b>New MacBooks</b><br>
• <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5283256/new-15+inch-macbook-pro-features-7+hour-battery-life-and-sd-card-slot">New 15-Inch MacBook Pros</a><br>
• <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5283283/13+inch-macbook-pro-arrives-and-macbook-air-gets-a-price-cut">Introducing the New, Cheap, 13-Inch MacBook Pro</a></p>
<p><b><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged WWDC 2009" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/wwdc-2009/">WWDC 2009</a></b><br>
• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5285110/wwdc-09-liveblog-archive">Liveblog Archive</a></p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5280422/apple-wwdc-2009-live-coverage]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5280422]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iPhone 3.0]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone 3g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone 3g s]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone 3gs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[liveblog]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac os x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wwdc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wwdc 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wwdc 2009 liveblog]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wwdc09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wwdc2009]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 08 Jun 2009 16:10:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5280422&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
