<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: MacBook]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbook</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'macbook']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[BassJump Review]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_img_7743bj.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />On your desk, it's about the size and thickness of a triple-decker Wonder bread sandwich. But the BassJump, an aluminum micro subwoofer to match your <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #macbookpro" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbookpro/">MacBook Pro</a>, made me salivate more than soft, refined carbs covered in mayo ever did.</p>

<h1>The Price</h1>
<p>$80</p>
<h1>The Verdict</h1>
<p>It looks better than it tastes..err...sounds.</p>
<p>I can't deny, my MacBook Pro's tinny speakers have never sounded better than when complemented by the BassJump. Through USB (and some unobtrusive bundled software), the BassJump mixes with your existing laptop speakers to give you a more balanced audio experience.</p>
<p>The tenor range, generally underrepresented by my MBP, is audible with the BassJump. The Beatles, especially, were hugely improved through the richer vocals and guitar riffs provided by the mini sub. Walking to the next room and closing my eyes, I decided my MacBook now sounded like a low-level iPod dock.</p>
<p>Still, the audio isn't especially clear. And despite the BassJump's name, it doesn't really give you bass. It's more like a midrange speaker that's still incapable of bumping R&B.<br>
<script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5415381,3,'');
</script><br>
So while the BassJump certainly looks adorable and legitimately turns MBP music from unpalatable to sort of listenable, its low end capabilities can't match a real dedicated subwoofer. And its overall audio effect, while passable, would be thwarted by most any 2.1 speaker system in its price range. [<a href="http://twelvesouth.com/products/bassjump/">BassJump</a>]</p>
<p><br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3_04.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Charming aesthetic<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3_04.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Quality build<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/giznormal_03.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Improves midrange audio but lacks brilliance<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizminus_04.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Lacks bass<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizminus_04.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Needs to be either cheaper or better</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5415373/bassjump-review]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5415373]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bassjump]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[speakers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[subwoofers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[twelve south]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5415373&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Every Mac Price-Compared Across Retailers]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/appledeals.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_appledeals.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>AppleInsider has a ridiculously handy chart that compares prices on Mac sales across various retailers. Granted, it's not taking into account Apple's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #blackfriday" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/blackfriday/">Black Friday</a> deals, but there are hundreds of dollars to be saved if you're interested. [<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/11/25/apple_authorized_resellers_launch_black_friday_sales_early.html">AppleInsider</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5412869/every-mac-price+compared-across-retailers]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5412869]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[dealzmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple black friday]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[black friday]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac mini]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:59:59 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5412869&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Gifts for Apple Cultists Who've Grown Beyond Shame]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p>If you're reading this, there's at least a 50 percent chance you or someone you know is a complete Mactard. Here's their wish list (SPOILER: It's all Apple stuff):</p>
<p>BTW, if you hate the gallery format as much as the Grinch hated Christmas, click <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5411982/gifts-for-diehard-mactards/">here</a>.</p>

<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_mouse5.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #magicmouse" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/magicmouse/">Magic Mouse</a>:</strong> It's a bit too expensive for stocking stuffer territory, but we've called the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5385892/so-long-nipples-this-time-you-wont-be-missed">nipple-less</a> design the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5386202/apple-magic-mouse-review">best mouse</a> Apple has ever made. And if you can't appreciate touch-sensitive scrolling, you have no soul (or, at least not one that we can see). <b>$70</b> [<a href="http://store.apple.com/us/go/product/MB829?aid=AIC-WWW-NAUS-K2-BUYNOW-MAGICMOUSE-INDEX">Apple</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_hellboybuffy.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>Buffy Gelaskins:</strong> Loving Apple will only half-fill one's necessary geek quotient. Your loved one will do well filling the other half with Buffy, now that Dark Horse comics has teamed up with Gelaskins re-stickable case skins for the iPhone and MacBooks. <b>$15 iPhone, $30 MacBook</b>. [<a href="http://www.darkhorse.com/Search/Browse/GelaSkins/PpwNwkt8">Dark Horse</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_apple_imac_27inch.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>iMac (27-inch i7):</strong> You simply won't find a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5388567/apple-imac-review-27-inches-and-less-chin">more striking desktop</a> on the market, but maybe more importantly, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5407204/benchmarked-the-quad+core-i7-imac-is-super-fast">benchmarks</a> on Apple latest top-tier iMac are <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5411073/why-its-gotten-straight-stupid-to-buy-a-mac-pro">currently challenging</a> far more expensive Mac Pros. Plus, the line has just seen a refresh, so it's a good time to buy. <b>$2200+</b> [<a href="http://www.apple.com/imac/">Apple</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_picture_2_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>BookArc Stand:</strong> No, it's not the gift for everyone. But if you know a guy who just docks his MacBook anyway, the BookArc Stand is a far more elegant solution than sitting a laptop on a desk (especially since the laptop should run cooler given the increased surface area for airflow). [<a href="http://www.twelvesouth.com/products/bookarc/">BookArc</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_apple-tshirt.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>Doesn't Fall Far From the Tree (T-Shirt):</strong> Who says the apple doesn't fall far from the tree? This t-shirt, that's who. $18. [<a href="http://www.goapeshirts.com/products/019/">Go Ape Shirts</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_ioutab_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>Apple Tablet IOU:</strong> Apple fanboys love Apple's products. But true Apple fanboys&mdash;those who take commitment and fanaticism to the next level&mdash;could never be pleased with what Apple currently has on the table. They need the Next Big Thing. <a href="gizmodo.com/t/apple-tablet">We're about 1000% certain</a> that Apple will release a tablet some time in 2010. Promise your loved ones that you'll camp overnight and drop the cash so they get the Apple Tablet first. Of course, they'll still bitch about it, anticipating version 2.0. <strong>Price Unknown, Costs Some Dignity</strong></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_dbmbp.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>DON'T BUY <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #macbookpro" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbookpro/">MacBook Pro</a>:</strong> There has simply never been a worse time to buy a new MacBook Pro. With Core i5/i7 tech inevitably waiting to make its way into Apple's premium laptops, your hard-earned cash will almost certainly buy a vastly more powerful, more future-proof machine less than a month after Christmas. The same can probably be said about Mac Pros, too. Oh, and that 27-inch iMac we keep raving about? What a glorious alternative to the aging, 30-inch Apple Cinema Display! [<strike><a href="http://www.apple.com/macbookpro/">Apple</a></strike>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_wallofsoundnew.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>Wall of Sound iPod Dock:</strong> There are iPod docks, and there are iPod docks. This is most definitely the latter, a handcrafted, 3x4-foot, 225lb, 125W beast. And one day, when Apple inevitably tweaks the iPod port, this behemoth will be useless&mdash;feeding into the general regret and dissatisfaction critical to Apple fandom. [<a href="http://www.thewosexperience.com/">Wall of Sound</a>]</p>
<p><i>Don't forget to recommend your own favorite Apple gear in comments-include pics and pricing if possible.</i></p>
<p><i><a href="http://gizmodo.com/t/giftguide2009">All Giz Wants</a> is our annual round-up of favorite gift ideas, including amazing attainable objects and a few far-out fantasies. We'll be popping guides catered to different interests several times per day for the next week, so keep checking back.</i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5411982/gifts-for-apple-cultists-whove-grown-beyond-shame/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5411982]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gift guide]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple gift guide]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gelaskins]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gift Guide 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[giftguide2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[magic mouse]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5411982&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[BassJump Brings MacBooks a Bit of Bump]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_bassjump.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />BassJump is, quite simply, a dedicated subwoofer to complement your MacBook&mdash;in both aesthetics and sound.</p>

<p>Rather than merely plugging in through USB, the BassJump uses proprietary software to remix all audio coming out of your laptop, essentially treating those tinny integrated speakers as tweeters while the BassJump handles the lows.</p>
<p>I can't believe that this solution works better than simply plugging in a whole new 2.1 speaker system, but I must admit, the Mac Mini styling coaxes my fanboyism to at least give the idea a shot. $80 and available now. <script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5411738,8,'');
</script>[<a href="http://twelvesouth.com/products/bassjump/">BassJump</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5411734/bassjump-brings-macbooks-a-bit-of-bump]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5411734]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[speakers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bass jump]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bassjump]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[twelve south]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:09:11 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5411734&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[AViiQ Aluminium Laptop Stand Review]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/img_7693a.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_img_7693a.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>AViiQ is a new company that makes just one product: a portable, aluminum laptop stand that supports systems up to 17 inches while folding up like an accordion.</p>

<h1>The Price</h1>
<p>$80 on pre-order now.</p>
<h1>The Verdict</h1>
<p>I like it both more and less than I expected to.</p>
<p>On one hand, AViiQ's portable laptop stand matches my MacBook while angling my keyboard at a truly perfect 12 degrees. And it folds, with relative ease, down to an absurdly thin, near-weightless strip of aluminum that can squeeze into any bag, I'm certain.<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/img_7691a.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_img_7691a.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>On the other, the stand feels cheaper than I'd expect for its $80 price. Sure, we're talking about aluminum, but more like flimsy, pop can aluminum than unibody Mac aluminum. And it folds through a plastic connective tissue that loosens over time but never feels 100% in terms of general structural integrity.<br>
<script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5410985,4,'');
</script><br>
For $20, the investment would be a no-brainer. For $80...well, it's a bit more complicated. Do what you will depending on your particular socioeconomic status.</p>
<p><br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3_04.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Super light<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3_04.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Crazy-thin<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3_04.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Excellent ergonomics<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizminus_04.jpg" width="20" height="20"> I can't help but worry about long-term durability<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizminus_04.jpg" width="20" height="20"> $80</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE: This, from AViiQ:</strong></p>
<blockquote>
<p>"The product IS very light so it may seem less substantial, but in this case, it's a purposeful part of the design to make the product ultralight for easy travel. Alcan, the developer of Hylite, says that the hinges can be folded more than 5000 times without any wear. As for the price tag, like titanium or carbon fiber, lightweight often equals more expensive and Hylite certainly adheres to that truth. We tried making it out of a material that was lightweight and inexpensive, but feathers just don't have the structural strength we required (not to mention the sneezing it caused in the studio)."</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5410981/aviiq-aluminium-laptop-stand-review]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5410981]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[AViiQ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[AViiQ review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptop stands]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5410981&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Dumb iPhone That Thinks It's a MacBook]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/q300-ultra-1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_q300-ultra-1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>I know I've said that <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5279250/dumb-cellphones-must-die">dumb cellphones must die</a>, but what about a dumb cellphone called iPhone that looks like a white MacBook? Yeah, smash those too.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5410895,3,'1990s iPhone Clone');
</script></p>
<p>This 2.2-inch clamshell aberration&mdash;technically the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #appleq300ultra" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/appleq300ultra/">Apple Q300 Ultra</a>&mdash;costs around $70, which is $70 too much. [<a href="http://www.shanzai.com/index.php/bandit-gadgets/phones/447-if-apple-had-designed-an-iphone-in-1999">Shanzai</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5410903/the-dumb-iphone-that-thinks-its-a-macbook]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5410903]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Apple Q300 Ultra]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:45:43 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5410903&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[MacMall Early Black Friday Sale, Discounted Hardware Galore]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_macmall_sale.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />MacMall's running a hardware sale all weekend. You can expect price cuts on par with the edu discount, so if you've lost a little too much hair to use that student ID anymore, MacMall has you covered. [<a href="http://www.macmall.com/n/Apple-Sale-2009/macCustomPages-1249">MacMall</a> via <a href="http://www.i4u.com/article28356.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+I4UNews+%28I4U+News%29">I4U</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5404690/macmall-early-black-friday-sale-discounted-hardware-galore]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5404690]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[dealzmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macmall]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 14 Nov 2009 12:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5404690&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sometimes We Unintentionally Endorse Bad Companies, Like MacPadd]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/macpadd4.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_macpadd4.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>When <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5108595/macpadd-aluminum-mousepad-lightning-review">we reviewed the MacPadd</a>, the anodized aluminum mousepad designed to match a MacBook Pro, we were <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5108595/macpadd-aluminum-mousepad-lightning-review">highly complimentary of the product</a>. And while we still stand by the product, we have to disown the company selling it.</p>

<p>A very long, detailed account over at <a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/news/macpadd-qms-business-scam-fraud,8972.html">tom's hardware</a> lists your stereotypical, horrifying buying experience. The money is sent; the package doesn't arrive; an email is sent; a bullshit email is sent back. The email cycle repeats with choice phrases from the company contact like "Get out of my f***ing life!" and "Make this world war III or handle this in a civil manner."</p>
<p>Of course, it's not just this one story, but the many since that have surfaced like it (tracked down by tom's hardware and in our own comments) that force us to pull our recommendation. Needless to say, companies often treat us more sweetly than they treat you, but those instances can be tough to predict. [<a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/news/macpadd-qms-business-scam-fraud,8972.html">Tom's Hardware</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5402260/sometimes-we-unintentionally-endorse-bad-companies-like-macpadd]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5402260]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[broken]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macpadd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mouse]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mouse pad]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mousepad]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5402260&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[VESA Officially Adopts Apple's Mini DisplayPort]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It was <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5131032/apples-mini-displayport-will-be-official-part-of-displayport-12-specification">bound to happen</a>: Apple's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #minidisplayport" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #minidisplayport" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/minidisplayport/">Mini DisplayPort</a> is now officially part of the Video Electronics Standards Association's DisplayPort 1.1a standard. [<a href="http://www.vesa.org/">VESA</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5401561/vesa-officially-adopts-apples-mini-displayport]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5401561]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[displays]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cables]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[displayport]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdmi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mini displayport]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ports]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vesa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:38:52 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5401561&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Lego Minifig Macbook Decal: Too Cute to Let Go]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_macbookdecal.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Like that <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5189297/snow-white-macbook-cover-can-only-be-awakened-with-steve-jobss-kiss">Snow White</a> Macbook cover, I love how this Minifig interacts with the logo, instead of just covering it. MacSlap's shop on Etsy says it's sold-out right now&mdash;maybe enough interest would inspire more. [<a href="http://www.etsy.com/view_listing.php?ref=vl_other_1&listing_id=34132272">Etsy</a> via <a href="http://www.iphonesavior.com/2009/11/lego-my-apple-macbook-decal-fills-me-with-happy-gas.html">iPhone Savior</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5401173/lego-minifig-macbook-decal-too-cute-to-let-go]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5401173]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[casemod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[etsy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lego macbook cover]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macslap]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:49:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5401173&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Reminder: Your Unibody MacBook's Trackpad Is Magical]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/by_default_2009-11-09_at_3.18.19_pm.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_by_default_2009-11-09_at_3.18.19_pm.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Hey you, with the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #unibodymacbook" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/unibodymacbook/">unibody MacBook</a>. You probably heard that your trackpad supports <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5062857/next+generation-macbook-ditches-plastic-becomes-macbook-pro-mini">11-point multitouch</a>, but do you know what the actually means? <a href="http://lericson.blogg.se/code/2009/november/multitouch-on-unibody-macbooks.html">FingerMgmt</a> shows you.</p>

<p>Even though this free app doesn't really <em>do</em> anything except display exactly what your trackpad is sensing, it's still spectacular. Even with all ten fingers moving in different directions, inputs seem to be monitored just as precisely as with a single finger. I have no idea how you're supposed to map 10 finger inputs into anything useful, but man, the pointless toy potential here is <em>massive</em>. <strong>Update</strong>: As is, evidently, the dick joke potential. 11 bravos, to be shared amongst you. [<a href="http://lericson.blogg.se/code/2009/november/multitouch-on-unibody-macbooks.html">Lericsson</a> via <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/a2jpw/view_multitouch_points_on_macbook_trackpad_or/">Reddit</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5400674/reminder-your-unibody-macbooks-trackpad-is-magical]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5400674]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[btw]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fingermgmt]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook multitouch app]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[multitouch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[unibody macbook]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:19:54 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5400674&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Mac OS 10.6.2 Leaks New Core i5/i7 MacBook Pros?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/macproupdate102509.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_macproupdate102509.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>It'd be the most obvious leak in history, but the 10C531 build of OS 10.6.2 references the "<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #macbookpro" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbookpro/">MacBook Pro</a> 6.1 and the MacBook Pro 6.1b." All current MacBook Pros are strictly "5" status.</p>

<p>Of course, this appears to be confirmation of the obvious, that Apple will be updating their MacBook Pro line to include <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #corei5" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/corei5/">Core i5</a>/i7 chips following the white MacBook's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5386688/unibody-apple-macbook-review">Pro-level spec bump</a> last week. (Apple will need to adopt these new chipsets to stay competitive.) Now we just need an answer to the far more important question: When? [<a href="http://www.applesana.es/foro/24/22604/nuevos-macbook-pro-6-1-horizonte-quad-core.html">Foro Applesana</a> via <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/10/25/evidence_points_to_new_macbook_pros_on_horizon.html">AppleInsider</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5389926/mac-os-1062-leaks-new-core-i5i7-macbook-pros]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5389926]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core i5]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Core i7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core i7 macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[i5]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[i7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:54:54 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5389926&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Today Show Helps Microsoft Launch Windows 7 On a MacBook Pro]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/today_show_macbook.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_today_show_macbook.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Good thing Microsoft CEO <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/steveballmer/">Steve Ballmer</a> didn't turn around during his spot on <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #thetodayshow" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/thetodayshow/">The Today Show</a>. Clearly, someone at NBC either really loves Macs or can't tell the difference between a MacBook and a PC.</p>
<p><object width="512" height="296"><param name="movie" value="http://www.hulu.com/embed/o574vSOD9z1Oao5XiDyTZA">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.hulu.com/embed/o574vSOD9z1Oao5XiDyTZA" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="512" height="296"></object></p>
<p>On the other hand, Maybe Ballmer noticed and didn't care. In the spot he discusses hardware diversity and this sort of proves his point. After all, you <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5387353/how-to-survive-boot-camp-and-run-win-7-on-a-mac">can run Windows 7 on a Mac</a>. It's an amusing gaffe, but beyond that, the clip is interesting because it touches on <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windows7" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows7/">Windows 7</a>, the image battle between Apple and Microsoft and the issue of CEO pay all inside five minutes. [<a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/10/23/video-hilarity-windows-7-launched-on-a-macbook-pro-on-nbcs-the-today-show/">Crunchgear</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5388595/the-today-show-helps-microsoft-launch-windows-7-on-a-macbook-pro]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5388595]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[steve ballmer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the today show]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7 launch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7 liftoff]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5388595&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Unibody Apple MacBook Review]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/macbooktop.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_macbooktop.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>It was inevitable that Apple would take their <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5287179/macbook-pro-2009-review">unibody manufacturing prowess</a> from their MacBook Pros and focus it on the MacBook line. We just never expected the new MacBook to be as enticing as the 13-inch Pro.</p>
<h1>It's Basically a White Macbook Pro</h1>
<p>To illustrate just how good the internals are on the MacBook, just compare them to the current base 13-inch MacBook Pro. Both have a 2.26GHz Core 2 Duo with a 3MB L2 cache, a 1066 MHz frontside bus and a 2GB default RAM. They also have a really similar LED backlit display, which eliminates the problem of narrowed viewing angles that we docked the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5063492/macbook-and-macbook-pro-dual-review">first generation unibody MacBooks for</a>, and both now have the same contrast ratio. The only difference is that the Pro has a 60% greater color gamut.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/comparison1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_comparison1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<h1>The new body</h1>
<p>The rounded edges and a reduced number of seams make the new MacBook appear to be a flattened marshmallow. A glossy, rubber-bottomed marshmallow. It's an immediately more appealing shape than the previous generation of white MacBooks, marking the end of the transition of Apple laptops to unibody construction. That rubber bottom is also pretty satisfying, both in the fact that it grips surfaces better to not slide around, and because it's a more thigh-friendly material when the machine heats up. The whole body is more solid, thanks to an aluminum sheet and some more structural supports found in the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5386218/macbook-polycarbonate-unibody-ripped-apart">teardown</a>.<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/back.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_back.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Otherwise, there are many other small design changes you'll appreciate. The trackpad is now the standard glass multitouch type found on the Pros, the screen has a more prominent bezel and the iSight is circular instead of square. Keyboard layout is the same, but on-key shortcuts have been updated to the latest standards. It also comes with Apple's new 60W power adapter, which has a tip that looks more like the MacBook Air than any of the previous chargers.<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/trackpads_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_trackpads_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>In general, the build quality is more solid and more "Pro" than ever before, despite the material being polycarbonate instead of aluminum. It's like trading up from a Toyota Yaris to a Camry&mdash;not luxury, but it's a noticeable difference.</p>
<h1>Benchmarks and Battery Life</h1>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/geekbench.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_geekbench.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Comparing the 13-inch aluminum unibody MacBook of 2008 to the 13-inch aluminum unibody MacBook Pro to the 13-inch MacBook now shows that there really isn't a big difference between the three models. The small discrepancies fall inside the margin of error, and some change can probably be attributed to the fact that the first two machines were running Leopard, whereas the machine we have now is running Snow Leopard.</p>
<p>Point is, this MacBook isn't really that much faster or slower than the one last year.<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/battery_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_battery_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Just as the transition to non-replaceable batteries <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5287179/macbook-pro-2009-review">increased MacBook Pro runtime,</a> so too has the transition benefited the Macbook. Except for the fact that there's no external battery display on this unit for some reason, and that there's no infrared port for Apple Remotes.</p>
<p>The new MacBook ran <em><strong>4 hours and 12 minutes</strong></em>, longer than the two most recent MacBook Pros, using the same metrics as we did before: Wi-Fi on, keyboard backlight on low, non-stop H.264 movie playback. In real-world circumstances, that battery life can only get better. Our testing is processor-intensive.</p>
<p>What's also interesting, according to the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5386218/macbook-polycarbonate-unibody-ripped-apart">teardown</a>, is that the battery is only 60 watt-hours vs. 55 on the old one, yet it gets a lot more battery life. This is probably due to internal optimizations that Apple made, not just because there's a fatter battery.</p>
<h1>Some new problems</h1>
<p>&bull; A consequence of having an improved, unibody construction is that you can no longer replace the battery yourself. It also means that native battery life will be longer, as demonstrated in the testing above. In fact, unlike Pro machines where people really do want to swap batteries for extended field use, an improved internal battery will serve regular users much better.</p>
<p>&bull; For some reason, Apple decided to make the entire area surrounding the keyboard as glossy as the outer shell, meaning that your wrists have a more sticky feel when you're typing. It's not a huge deal, but it is less usable when compared to previous generations or the MacBook Pro line.</p>
<p>&bull; Again, like the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5386202/apple-magic-mouse-review">Magic Mouse</a>, the white polycarbonate (plastic) will get scratched easily, and will show scratches if you look at it from a certain angle. It doesn't diminish performance, but it is annoying if you're anal about your stuff.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/closeup.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_closeup.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<h1>Where does that leave us?</h1>
<p><em>Right now</em> is the brief window in time when MacBooks just got bumped up in specs to match the low-end MacBook Pros, in order for the MacBook Pros to have room to grow without leaving the entry-level machines too far behind. If you're in the market for a MacBook, this could be the best time for you to buy and feel good about your purchase, knowing that you'll get the same performance as a machine that costs $200 more.</p>
<p>But keep in mind, this development basically implies that the MacBook Pros will be getting the Core i5 and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5099060/giz-explains-why-intels-core-i7-processor-is-a-beautiful-monster">i7 processors</a> some time in the next year.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5386700,14,'');
</script></p>
<p>The unibody construction was an inevitable upgrade to the MacBook line, and one that brings many more benefits than it does faults. There shouldn't be a drastic change in the MacBook design any time soon, so <i>now</i> is probably the furthest away from the next generation as you're going to get. [<a href="http://www.apple.com/macbook/">Apple</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizplus_05.jpg" width="20" height="20">Polycarbonate unibody construction looks, feels great<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizplus_05.jpg" width="20" height="20">Has just about the same specs as the 13-inch MacBook Pro, so you're getting a good deal<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizplus_05.jpg" width="20" height="20">Finally get Pro stuff like the multitouch glass trackpad<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/giznormal_07.jpg" width="20" height="20">Glossy wrist area is slightly too sticky<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/giznormal_07.jpg" width="20" height="20">Can't swap out batteries, but you do get longer life in return<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizminus_07.jpg" width="20" height="20">Firewire port is gone</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5386688/unibody-apple-macbook-review]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5386688]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bestmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5386688&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Tax Repealed? Comparisons Suggest It's So]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Our friends at Laptop compiled a chart comparing the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5385837/new-unibody-led-macbook-hands-on?skyline=true&s=x">new $999 white unibody MacBook</a> to similarly weighted 13" laptops from Dell, Acer and Samsung within $100. There are tradeoffs, but at least at this price level, Apple fights on even ground, and makes up for lacks (no SD slot, smaller HDD, less RAM) with perks (LED backlighting, multitouch trackpad) and a <em>much longer</em> stated <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #batterylife" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #batterylife" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/batterylife/">battery life</a>. Feel free to scream it out below, or check Laptop for the full chart and spec rundown. [<a href="http://blog.laptopmag.com/mac-tax-repealed-new-macbook-compares-favorably-to-similarly-priced-pcs">Laptop</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5386155/apple-tax-repealed-comparisons-suggest-its-so]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5386155]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[acer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple tax]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[battery life]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[unibody macbook]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:13:22 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5386155&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[10 Things You Need to Know About Apple's New Stuff]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/apple10.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_apple10.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Cupertino released a lot of new products today, and it was easy to miss something in the press release onslaught. To stay versed in the Tome of Apple, here are <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #10things" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/10things/">10 things</a> you need to know:</p>

<p><strong>1. iMacs Get Next-Gen Processors</strong><br>
The most important upgrade to iMacs is that they'll now support <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5385841/apple-imac-hands-on">Intel Core i5 and i7 processors</a> for prices starting at $2000. You can buy a Core 2 Duo model for $800 less, but...I mean...<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5381760/giz-explains-intels-entire-confusing-armada-of-chips">really</a>?</p>
<p><strong>2. The iMac Is a Cheap Monitor, By Apple's Standards</strong><br>
A 30-inch Cinema Display will still run you $1,800 while a new 27-inch iMac starts at $1700. Oh, and now the iMac can work simply as a monitor through its mini DisplayPort, too.</p>
<p><strong>3. Apple Sees the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #macmini" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macmini/">Mac Mini</a> as a Server, Not an HTPC</strong><br>
Apple may have given the Mac Mini a slight <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5385817/mac-mini-updates-faster-processors-more-memory-and-a-dual-hard-disk-server">spec boost</a> and the option to load Leopard Server, but it still missing the critical feature it needs to be a competitive home theater PC&mdash;the HDMI port.</p>
<p><strong>4. New Metal Remote Looks Like an iPod Design Reject</strong><br>
For those who couldn't stand the humiliation of using a white, plastic remote with their black-and-silver iMac, there's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5385894/new-imac-finally-gets-matching-apple-remote">a remote</a> for that.</p>
<p><strong>5. Replaceable Batteries Are Dead in Apple's Entire Laptop Line</strong><br>
The trusty old <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #whitemacbook" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/whitemacbook/">white MacBook</a> was holding out, battling designers' attempts to replace its swappable battery with a longer-life non-swappable version you see in every other modern Apple laptop. Today, it <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5385837/new-unibody-led-macbook-hands-on">lost that battle</a>.</p>
<p><strong>6. Apple Still Hates Buttons, Nubs, Etc</strong><br>
The multitouch <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5385834/apple-magic-mouse-hands-on">Magic Mouse</a> has risen over the Mighty Mouse's corpse, and as Jesus points out, the whole no-button design is <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5385892/so-long-nipples-this-time-you-wont-be-missed">déjà vu</a>.</p>
<p><strong>7. Jobs' Polycarbonate MacBook Must Have Slipped Off His Lap</strong><br>
Not only is Apple keeping the white MacBook around, they've <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5385837/new-unibody-led-macbook-hands-on">added a non-slip rubber bottom</a> in what may be the most aggressive design change since May 16, 2006, when the model original launched.</p>
<p><strong>8. Time Capsules Should Be 60% Less Frustrating</strong><br>
Anyone who's grown tired of the ridiculously slow experience of interfacing with the Time Capsule, know that Time Capsules have seen a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5385940/time-capsule-and-airport-extreme-grow-new-antennas-to-get-faster-and-stronger">tacit spec boost</a> promising to make systems "60 percent faster than before."</p>
<p><strong>9. <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #jonathanive" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/jonathanive/">Jonathan Ive</a> Could Still Sell a Ketchup Popsicle to a Fanboy in White Gloves</strong><br>
Also of note, sales on Hanes midnight blue tees are going <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5385876/video-the-new-imac-looks-even-more-gorgeous-narrated-by-jony-ive">through the roof</a>, and big muscles don't make you look dumb so long as you speak with an Essex-region English accent.</p>
<p><strong>10. No, the Nook Is Not an Apple Product</strong><br>
But it's about <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5385938/barnes--nobles-dual+screened-nook-260-eats-the-kindles-lunch">a bajillion times closer</a> than the Kindle.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5386047/10-things-you-need-to-know-about-apples-new-stuff]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5386047]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[roundups]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[10 things]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple news]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jonathan ive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac mini]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[magic mouse]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[white macbook]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5386047&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Check Out These Hands-On Galleries Of the Apple Gear]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gallerytop_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_gallerytop_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>We've got hands on galleries of the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5385834/apple-magic-mouse-hands-on">Magic Mouse</a>, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5385841/apple-imac-hands-on">iMac</a> and the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5385837/new-unibody-led-macbook-all-the-details-and-hands+on-impressions">13-inch MacBook</a>. Check them out in their respective posts.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5385972/check-out-these-hands+on-galleries-of-the-apple-gear]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5385972]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gallery]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[magic mouse]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mouse]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:47:37 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5385972&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New Unibody LED MacBook Hands On]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/newmacbooktop.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_newmacbooktop.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>At the center of today's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/apple">minor product explosion</a>, Apple's refreshed $1000 <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #whitemacbook" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/whitemacbook/">White MacBook</a> is the only right-fielder: It's got a rubberized bottom, multitouch trackpad, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #ledbacklighting" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ledbacklighting/">LED backlighting</a>, the MacBook Pro's non-replaceable battery, and healthy spec bumps. <b>UPDATED</b></p>

<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5385970,16,'');
</script></p>
<p>The multitouch trackpad and LED backlighting feel like necessary catch-up&mdash;they're less like "Pro" perks than they are standard technologies, so it's good to see them trickle down. Likewise, the spec bumps basically just keep up with inflation: the processor jumps from 2.13GHz to 2.26 GHz, the HDD from 160GB to 250GB, while the 2GB of DDR2 RAM has been swapped for the same amount of slightly faster DDR3 memory. And in the same divisive trade the 13" MacBook Pro made a few months back, the old removable battery has been switched out for the non-replaceable 7-hour unit.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5385845,2,'');
</script></p>
<p>There was talk of an <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5345324/rumor-plastic-macbooks-arent-dying-theyre-just-waiting-for-a-makeover">industrial design overhaul</a> back in August, and that's what this refresh is really about. The bottom is now entirely rubberized, which seems to serve two purposes: One, to bring something, <em>anything</em>, visually new to Mac's unwittingly retro baseline laptop; and two, to bring some semblance of durability and friction to the the case, which to anyone who's watched a marred, scratched polycarb MacBook effortlessly slide off their corduroys onto the tile floor, probably sounds like a great idea.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE</strong>: Brian had a chance to paw the new MacBook for a few minutes. Here's what he noticed:</p>
<p>• The glass trackpad is the same size as the Pro's, and noticeably bigger than last gen's.<br>
• It feels bigger&mdash;like, fatter&mdash;than the last gen white Macbook<br>
• Small visual cues in the cover have been tweaked to look more like the Pro line<br>
• The uniformly white bezel makes the body look chunky<br>
• Now that the base is just a flat piece of rubber, airflow seems like it could be an issue. [<em>Ed. note: I mean, is rubber a good heatsink? It's more of an insulator, right?</em>]<br>
• The eight screws in the base complement the finish on the aluminum MacBook well; here, they stand out, and look kinda ugly<br>
• The edges are curvier, but again, the whole think feels chubbier.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>CUPERTINO, Calif., Oct. 20 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ &mdash; Apple® today updated its popular MacBook® with a new, durable polycarbonate unibody design featuring a brilliant LED-backlit display, a glass Multi-Touch™ trackpad and Apple's innovative built-in battery for up to seven hours of battery life. Inheriting technology and design features from the MacBook Pro line, the new MacBook is an ideal consumer notebook for students and new Mac® users, and is available for $999.</p>
<p>"The new MacBook includes many of the great features found on the innovative MacBook Pro, such as an LED-backlit display, glass Multi-Touch trackpad and built-in long-life battery," said Philip Schiller, Apple's senior vice president of Worldwide Product Marketing. "With the only lineup of notebooks all featuring unibody enclosures, LED-backlit displays and long-life battery technology, there's never been a better time to switch to a Mac."</p>
<p>The new MacBook features a unibody, polycarbonate enclosure that makes it lighter and more durable. The new design includes a unique non-skid bottom surface and at just 4.7 pounds, the sleek MacBook slides easily into a backpack or briefcase. MacBook comes standard with a bright, LED-backlit display with the same wide-angle viewing technology used in the MacBook Pro line. The new MacBook has a 2.26 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor, 2GB RAM, a 250GB hard drive, and powerful NVIDIA GeForce 9400M integrated graphics.</p>
<p>The new MacBook includes Apple's innovative built-in notebook battery for up to seven hours of wireless productivity on a single charge, and up to 1,000 recharges.* At nearly three times the lifespan of conventional notebook batteries, Apple's built-in battery results in fewer depleted batteries and less waste. Depleted batteries can be replaced for $129, which includes installation and environmentally responsible disposal of your old battery.</p>
<p>The energy-efficient MacBook joins the industry's greenest lineup of notebooks, with every Mac notebook achieving EPEAT Gold** status and meeting Energy Star 5.0 requirements. The entire Mac notebook line now comes standard with energy efficient LED-backlit displays that are mercury-free and made with arsenic-free glass. Mac notebooks contain no brominated flame retardants, use internal cables and components that are PVC-free and are constructed of recyclable materials.</p>
<p>Every Mac comes with Mac OS® X Snow Leopard®, the world's most advanced operating system, and iLife®, Apple's innovative suite of applications for managing photos, making movies and creating and learning to play music. Snow Leopard builds on a decade of OS X innovation and success with hundreds of refinements, new core technologies and out of the box support for Microsoft Exchange. iLife features iPhoto®, to easily organize and manage photos; iMovie® with powerful easy-to-use new features such as Precision Editor, video stabilization and advanced drag and drop; and GarageBand® which introduces a whole new way to help you learn to play piano and guitar.</p>
<p>Pricing & Availability<br>
The new MacBook is available immediately through the Apple Store® (www.apple.com), Apple's retail stores and Apple Authorized Resellers.</p>
<p>The new MacBook, for a suggested retail price of $999 (US), includes:<br>
13.3-inch widescreen LED-backlit 1280 x 800 glossy display;<br>
2.26 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo with 3MB shared L2 cache;<br>
1066 MHz front-side bus;<br>
2GB 1066 MHz DDR3 SDRAM, expandable to 4GB;<br>
NVIDIA GeForce 9400M integrated graphics;<br>
250 GB serial ATA hard drive running at 5400 rpm, with Sudden Motion Sensor;<br>
a slot-load 8X SuperDrive® with double-layer support (DVD+ / -R DL/DVD+ / -RW/CD-RW);<br>
Mini DisplayPort for video output (adapters sold separately);<br>
built-in AirPort Extreme® 802.11n wireless networking and Bluetooth 2.1+EDR;<br>
Gigabit Ethernet port;<br>
built-in iSight® video camera;<br>
two USB 2.0 ports;<br>
one audio line in/out port, supporting optical digital out and analog in/out;<br>
glass Multi-Touch trackpad;<br>
built-in, 60WHr lithium polymer battery; and<br>
60 Watt MagSafe® Power Adapter.</p>
<p>Build-to-order options for the MacBook include the ability to upgrade to 4GB 1066 MHz DDR3 SDRAM, or 320GB 5400 rpm, 500GB 5400 rpm hard drive, Mini DisplayPort to DVI Adapter, Mini DisplayPort to Dual-Link DVI Adapter (for 30-inch DVI display), Mini DisplayPort to VGA Adapter, Apple MagSafe Airline Adapter and the AppleCare Protection Plan.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5385837/new-unibody-led-macbook-hands-on]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5385837]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[led backlighting]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[polycarbonate macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[white macbook]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:03:36 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5385837&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New Apple Products Leaked, Sources Claim]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/newsstuf.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_newsstuf.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>AppleInsider claims that they got word of all the product announcements coming today from Apple, including specs for a new iMac, new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #macmini" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macmini/">Mac Mini</a>, and some other surprises. <b>Update:</b> K84 BEST BTR product may be a new MacBook.</p>
<p>MC207LL/A - K84 BEST BTR- USA<br>
MC238LL/A - MAC MINI 2.26/2x1GB/160/SD/AP/BT-USA<br>
MC239LL/A- MAC MINI 2.53/2x2GB/320GB/SD/AP/BT-USA<br>
MC340LL/A - <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #airportextreme" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/airportextreme/">AIRPORT EXTREME</a> (SIM DUALBAND) - USA<br>
MC343LL/A - <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #timecapsule" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/timecapsule/">TIME CAPSULE</a> 1TB (SIM DUALBAND) -USA<br>
MC344LL/A - TIME CAPSULE 2TB (SIM DUALBAND) - USA<br>
MC408LL/A - MAC MINI 2.53/2x2GB/1TB/NO ODD/AP-BT-USA<br>
MC413LL/A - IMAC 21.5"/3.06/2x2GB/1TB/4670-256MB-USA<br>
MC434LL/A - <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #applevesamountadapter" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/applevesamountadapter/">APPLE VESA MOUNT ADAPTER</a><br>
MC461LL/A - MACBOOK 60W MAGSAFE POWER ADAPTER - USA</p>
<p>K84 Best BTR? Sounds like a new Bluetooth Keyboard. SIM dualband? Are the AirPort and Time Capsules tying in with cellphones? Apple VESA mount adapter? Since when Apple does that kind of accessory?</p>
<p>The new products will not be earth-shattering material&mdash;Apple won't announce anything wowiezowie without an event&mdash;but I'm curious about the whole SIM dualband thing.</p>
<p><b>Update:</b> MacRumors claims that the ""MC207LL/A" product is a MacBook running at 2.26 GHz with a 250 GB hard drive and 2 GB of 1066 MHz DDR3 RAM." They say this is unconfirmed, though. [<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/10/20/sources_reveal_part_of_apples_new_mac_product_lineup.html">AppleInsider</a> and <a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2009/10/20/rumored-product-introductions-today-mac-minis-imac-airport-time-capsules/">MacRumors</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5385786/new-apple-products-leaked-sources-claim]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5385786]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[airport]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[airport extreme]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple vesa mount adapter]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[k84]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac mini]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[time capsule]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:56:02 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5385786&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple's Performance Update 1.0 for Leopard and Snow Leopard: Addresses Hard Drive Issues]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Today Apple released <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged PERFORMANCE UPDATE" title="Click here to read more posts tagged PERFORMANCE UPDATE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/performance-update/">Performance Update</a> 1.0 for <a href="http://support.apple.com/kb/DL946">Leopard</a> and <a href="http://support.apple.com/kb/DL947">Snow Leopard</a>, aiming to fix the intermittent hard drive problems reported by some users. We'd love to hear if it actually fixes those issues <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5341187/your-freezing-clicking-macbook-pro-hard-drive-just-got-better">this time</a>&mdash;let us know! [<a href="http://www.loopinsight.com/2009/10/14/apple-releases-performance-update-1-0/">TheLoop</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5381916/apples-performance-update-10-for-leopard-and-snow-leopard-addresses-hard-drive-issues]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5381916]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple performance update 1.0]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[leopard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[performance update]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:48:49 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5381916&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Mini DisplayPort to HDMI Adapter (With Digital Audio) Review]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/cable.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_cable.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>It's the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5372059/the-mini-displayport-to-hdmi-adapter-now-has-digital-audio">digital audio version</a> of the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5325723/kanex-mini-displayport-adapter-with-audio-review-someone-finally-gets-it-right">Kanex Mini DisplayPort Adapter</a> we reviewed before, which takes your digital audio and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #minidisplayport" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/minidisplayport/">Mini DisplayPort</a> video and mixes it into one HDMI signal for your TV.</p>
<h1>The Price:</h1>
<p>$70</p>
<h1>The Verdict:</h1>
<p>It works, but damn if it isn't expensive.</p>
<p>If you're not really married to the higher quality digital audio, you might be better off getting the <a href="http://www.kanexlive.com/products/item.aspx?id=3323">USB audio version</a> for <strike>$50</strike> $60, which performs basically the same service for <strike>$20</strike> $10 less.</p>
<p>As for this unit, it definitely works&mdash;we've been using it on a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #macmini" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macmini/">Mac Mini</a> hooked up to a 1080p TV for a week&mdash;and there are no dropouts or weird signal noise inconsistencies that we can see. Everything is plug and play, and you should have no problem using it on your 5.1 audio system.</p>
<p>Again, at $70, it's only really useful if Mini DisplayPort is your only display output, otherwise you can come up with a cheaper solution involving a series of cheaper tubes. [<a href="http://www.kanexlive.com/products/item.aspx?id=3495">Kanex Live</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizplus_01.jpg" width="20" height="20">It works<br clear="all">
<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizminus_02.jpg" width="20" height="20">It's very expensive<br clear="all"></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5380669/mini-displayport-to-hdmi-adapter-with-digital-audio-review]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5380669]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[adapter]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[adapters]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[displayport]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdmi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[kanex]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac mini]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mini displayport]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mini displayport hdmi adapter]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5380669&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Design Your Own Laptop, Phone or Kindle GelaSkin]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gela.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_gela.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>GelaSkins makes stylish, reusable skins for iPhones/iPods, Blackberries laptops and Kindles. But now, instead of choosing from their designs, you can upload your own art to customize your gear.</p>

<p>(Disregard the indescribable ugliness of the lead shot and reach out with your imaginations.)</p>
<p>While GelaSkins can't come out and make this point, their new design process is probably the best way to get your favorite niche, licensed art wrapped around your gadgets. (It's easier for me to just rip and upload what I want than GelaSkins cutting more deals with companies like Dark Horse.)</p>
<p>The most enticing piece, however, is that the customization process doesn't seem to run a price premium over standard GelaSkins. Phone skins still hover around $15 with laptop skins running $30. [<a href="https://www.gelaskins.com/create.php">GelaSkins</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5380503/design-your-own-laptop-phone-or-kindle-gelaskin]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5380503]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[skins]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gelaskin]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gelaskins]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:10:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5380503&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[MacBook Pro Shocking the Crap Out of This Poor Reader]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/shocker.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_shocker.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Giz reader Nicholas has a little problem with his <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MACBOOK PRO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbook-pro/">MacBook Pro</a>: It's shocking the crap out of him. It "sparks right at the bottom center of the trackpad." But Apple Geniuses tell him it's actually just fine.</p>
<p>While it's <em>possible</em> Nicholas is just building up static and shocking himself, he says it happens "everywhere," and that when he used his friend's MacBook for a week, he went electrotherapy free. It's rare, but he's <a href="http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=9761980%C3%AF%C2%BF%C2%BD">not</a> <a href="http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=9837609%C3%AF%C2%BF%C2%BD">entirely</a> <a href="http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=9789913">alone</a> in his account.</p>
<p>The most often suggested solution is to stick to using the three-prong adapter, plugged into a grounded outlet. That won't help Nicholas so much, since he says it happens on battery power, too. Besides getting Apple to finally replace MacBook or wearing gloves, do guys have any possible solutions for Nicholas?</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5379910/macbook-pro-shocking-the-crap-out-of-this-poor-reader]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5379910]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[broken]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:10:10 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5379910&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Hard Graft's U MacBook Sleeve Has Actual Style]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/Usleeve-white.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_Usleeve-white.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The big draw of the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged U MACBOOK SLEEVE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/u-macbook-sleeve/">U MacBook sleeve</a> is its external, two-segmented pocket for an iPod, phone, small notebook or whatever, but I'm more impressed by the understated style of the thing. My current black neoprene case suddenly feels so...middle-school.</p>
<p>Made of grey wool, dark leather and herringbone-patterned elastic, it's the first sleeve I've seen that matches both my shoes and my belt, which obviously is my most important criterion for gadget accessories. Unfortunately it has the pricetag to match, <a href="http://shop.hardgraft.com/product/u-macbook-sleeve">coming in at 79 euros (about $116USD)</a>. Guess I'll have to stick with the neoprene. [<a href="http://blog.hardgraft.com/?p=649">Hard Graft</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5378696/hard-grafts-u-macbook-sleeve-has-actual-style]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5378696]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[accessories]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cases]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard graft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook sleeve]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pocket]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sleeve]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[u macbook sleeve]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 10 Oct 2009 11:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5378696&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Dutch Google Ads Reveal Thin is In For Rumored iMac, MacBook Refreshes]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/apple-store-091003-2.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />The Google gods have spoken this weekend, and the message is "thin"&mdash;at least when it comes to a few MacBook and iMac ads that popped up in the Netherlands anyway.</p>

<p>Of course, we kind of knew this to be the case already, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5373016/new-even-smaller-apple-bluetooth-keyboard-whispers-new-imacs-to-us">thanks to the FCC</a>, but this little bit of info helps solidify exactly what's going to be descending down from Cupertino very soon. The adWords (translated):</p>
<blockquote>
<p>MacBook: Thinner, lighter and stronger! Free delivery. Order today.<br>
iMac: Ultra Thin 20 & 24 inch models. From only € 1099. Apple Store<br>
<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MAC MINI" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/mac-mini/">Mac mini</a>: Faster and more affordable than ever. From only € 499. Order immediately.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>So no real news on the innards, just aesthetics and weight loss. Note that the pricing on the mini is also €100 lower this time around. <strong>Update:</strong> Fixed incorrect source citation to AppleInsider. [<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/10/03/apple_ads_hint_at_thinner_imacs_lighter_macbooks_cheaper_mac_minis.html">AppleInsider</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5373841/dutch-google-ads-reveal-thin-is-in-for-rumored-imac-macbook-refreshes]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5373841]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac mini]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[unconfirmed]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 04 Oct 2009 11:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Loftus]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5373841&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ColcaSac MacBook Sleeves Look Natural, Yet Protective]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/red_adapter_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_red_adapter_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>These MacBook and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MACBOOK PRO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbook-pro/">MacBook Pro</a> sleeves from ColcaSac are the type of sleeves you would get if you wanted to protect your laptop while carrying it to and from your comparative literature lectures at Wellesley. That doesn't mean they're ugly.</p>
<p>Besides being made of "environmentally friendly fabrics", the sleeves are pretty well padded (hemp has a lot of cushioning, it seems) and have an "earthy" feel. If you're the type of person who likes to advertise your love of things that come from the ground, while at the same time protecting your electronics investment, you could do worse. And at $30ish each, it's not like they're overcharging you for being green either. [<a href="http://www.colcasac.com/sleeves.html">ColcaSac</a>]</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5367285,15,'');
</script></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5367287/colcasac-macbook-sleeves-look-natural-yet-protective]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5367287]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[colcasac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptop sleeves]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro colcasac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sleeve]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sleeves]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5367287&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[How's Your Battery Life and Hard Drive Space With Snow Leopard?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/blood.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_blood.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>You've had the weekend to play <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5346418/snow-leopard-review-lightened-and-enlightened">with Snow Leopard</a> and have stuff run faster, apps break and all the other glories of a new OS. But how much extra space did you get, and how's your <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged BATTERY LIFE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/battery-life/">battery life</a>?</p>
<p>On Twitter we noticed that everybody seemed to get back more space from <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SNOW LEOPARD" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/snow-leopard/">Snow Leopard</a> than the guy before him: "I got back 9GB, wow!" "Hey, I got back 12GB, jeez." "Holy mother, I got back 20 gigs, whoooooa!" So by now, some of you should've gotten back like a terabyte&mdash;on your 250GB hard drive. We got back around 6GB, what Apple advertised.</p>
<p>Battery-wise haven't noticed much of a difference compared to Leopard, but if you have, let us know and what kind of machine you're using.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8" src="http://static.polldaddy.com/p/1938731.js">
</script><noscript><br>
<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/1938731/">How much hard drive space did you get back from Snow Leopard?</a><span style="font-size:9px;">(<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com">trends</a>)</span><br></noscript></p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8" src="http://static.polldaddy.com/p/1938407.js">
</script><noscript><br>
<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/1938407/">How's your battery life with Snow Leopard?</a><span style="font-size:9px;">(<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com">trends</a>)</span><br></noscript> [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/snow-leopard">Giz's Snow Leopard Coverage</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5349432/hows-your-battery-life-and-hard-drive-space-with-snow-leopard]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5349432]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[question of the day]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[battery]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[battery life]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[leopard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pair]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[qotd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 31 Aug 2009 17:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5349432&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[BookArc Stand Turns a MacBook Into a Desktop]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/BookArc_3Qtr_desktop_hires_804x653.shkl.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_BookArc_3Qtr_desktop_hires_804x653.shkl.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Designed to accommodate a MacBook Air to a 17-inch MacBook Pro, the BookArc stand helps you to free up desk space by turning your laptop into a desktop.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5345139,4,'bookarc');
</script></p>
<p>The product page goes on about the benefits of running your MacBook closed when using an external display and whatnot, but the bottom line here is that it elegantly orients your laptop vertically. If you use an external display at home with your laptop and you don't mind spending $50 on a stand, you can get one now at an Apple Store near you.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>New stand turns Apple MacBook into a desktop</p>
<p>Charleston, SC&mdash;August 25, 2009&mdash;Twelve South announces the formal release of BookArcTM, a metal stand designed to hold any Apple® MacBook, from MacBook Air to the 17-inch MacBook Pro. The stand is designed to free up desk space and create a cleaner, less cluttered workspace by allowing the MacBook to operate while in a closed vertical position. BookArc is available now at the Apple Store and retails for $49.99. A BookArc "six-pack" geared towards design studios and Mac-based offices is being offered at a bundled discount price of $249.99. More information and images can be found at http://twelvesouth.com.</p>
<p>When a MacBook is placed into the heavy gauge steel stand, it is held in place by a soft silicone cushion. Three different sizes of easy-to-install cushions are included in the box, ensuring the right fit for various Mac models. Silicone footpads also protect the surface of your desk from scratches. BookArc has a compact footprint of just 10 by 4 inches, a fraction of what a MacBook normally takes up when sitting on a desk.</p>
<p>"Our vision behind BookArc was twofold," said Andrew Green, co-founder and design principal of Twelve South. "First, we see the MacBook as a beautiful piece of art that deserves to be put on display. Second, using your laptop as a desktop when not on the road is how many Mac users work today, including myself. Running the MacBook in a BookArc tucked behind a beautiful Cinema Display frees up valuable space and provides a less cluttered modern-looking workspace."</p>
<p>Along with a contemporary design and improved ergonomics, BookArc can actually boost the performance of MacBooks when used with external monitors. When a MacBook is running closed in the BookArc, the MacBook will automatically dedicate 100% of its video memory to the external display - instead of splitting it with the built-in display. The result is a noticeable speed increase when working in Photoshop, Aperture, iPhoto and other graphics-intensive applications.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>[<a href="http://twelvesouth.com/products/bookarc/">Bookarc</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5345141/bookarc-stand-turns-a-macbook-into-a-desktop]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5345141]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bookarc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[stand]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5345141&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Rumor: Plastic MacBooks Aren't Dying, They're Just Waiting for a Makeover]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/Picture_120.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_Picture_120.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>I've been assuming for a while now that Apple was close to giving up on the aging <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/white-macbook">polycarbonate MacBooks</a>, but apparently not: AppleInsider's <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/08/25/apple_to_retain_redesign_plastic_macbook_family.html">got a source</a> saying that, pending a "industrial design overhaul," they're here to stay.</p>

<p>Lately, the plastic MacBook has felt like an unwanted orphan. It's a tired generation-old design that looks stodgy next to the slick new unibodies, but without it, Apple's cheapest laptop would cost $1200&mdash;a little too high for a lot of prospective Mac users, and most importantly, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/laptop-hunters">Laptop Hunters</a>. (<em>Think of the <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5186672/microsoft-marketing-team-now-exclusively-advised-by-internet-commenters-but-it-works">Laurens</a>! The <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5206175/third-windows-laptop-hunter-ad-picks-a-sony-vaio-instead-of-a-mac-obviously">Jacksons</a>!</em>)</p>
<p>Apple needs <em>something</em> at or below the $1000 price point, but it'd help it it wasn't a product that was designed in 2005. So, <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/08/25/apple_to_retain_redesign_plastic_macbook_family.html">this</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>[The MacBook's] industrial design overhaul... will see them reemerge in the coming months with a slimmer, lighter enclosure and restructured internal architecture to boot.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This makes plenty of strategic sense, and I wouldn't be at all surprised if this turned out to be true, and if they well well below $1000. So, what would it look like? This description doesn't really narrow things down, so it could just as easily be a design child of the unibodies as of the old polycarb. Or something new entirely, which would obviously be <em>much</em> more interesting. [<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/08/25/apple_to_retain_redesign_plastic_macbook_family.html">AppleInsider</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5345324/rumor-plastic-macbooks-arent-dying-theyre-just-waiting-for-a-makeover]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5345324]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[white macbook]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:42:05 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5345324&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Openbook Nano Review: The Lazy Man's Hackintosh Netbook]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/windnano2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_windnano2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>I'm a little torn. In even acknowledging the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged OPENBOOK NANO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/openbook-nano/">OpenBook Nano</a>, I ensure that Apple will shut down Macwind, the company selling stock <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MSI WIND" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/msi-wind/">MSI Wind</a> U100s preloaded with <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged OS X" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/os-x/">OS X</a> for $399. But that's not the worst of it.</p>

<p>Following handwritten correspondence and a voicemail, I'm fairly certain that "Macwind" is just one industrious high school kid with a nice website.</p>
<p>But Macwind has requested this review, and how could I possibly pass it up?</p>
<p>So Apple, I plead that you go easy on "Craig," the owner of Macwind, even if his practice of preloading OS X onto netbooks for resale (using <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5325775/the-state-of-hackintosh-which-netbooks-to-hack">publicly available tutorials</a>, I'm sure) is pretty unquestionably a breach of one or more laws.</p>
<p>His site shares your aesthetics, and the MSI Wind he's selling, loaded with a 1.6GHz atom, 1GB of RAM, 160GB hard drive and of course, OS 10.5.8, is really a pretty good product even for the $100 premium over a stock U100.</p>
<p>You guys should sell these things!</p>
<p>Because the build is solid with all the necessary drivers preloaded (some of which <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5109902/msi-encourages-hackintosh-leaks-os-x-wi+fi-drivers-for-the-wind">MSI has actually "leaked" themselves</a>). The 1024x600 screen displays your desktop beautifully, while most of they keyboard's function keys are operational (like brightness, volume and sleep).</p>
<p>You can even pop in an SD card to expand the storage, just like your latest Macbooks!</p>
<p>But alas, we know that you know that you must shut Craig down. We won't frown upon your actions. After all, just because the kid is young doesn't excuse him from your trademarks and copyrights.</p>
<p>We simply ask that you go easy on him. Make him cry, sure, but pity him, too. Don't crush him with a lifetime of legal debt. A kind call from Steve Jobs, a middle manager or one of those attractive ladies in Apple PR will probably clear up any legal misunderstandings. (His number is on the site, otherwise I'll be happy to provide it.)</p>
<p>And maybe, while Craig's first garage-based computer business has failed him, his next one will not. [<a href="http://www.macwind.net/">Macwind</a> (down)]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/gizplusplus_02.jpg" width="40" height="20"> No installs needed.<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/gizplusplus_02.jpg" width="40" height="20"> Reasonable price for the laziest among us.<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/gizminus2_05.jpg" width="40" height="20"> Oh right, this operation can't be legal.<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/gizminus2_05.jpg" width="40" height="20"> A kid might go to jail or something.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5344450/openbook-nano-review-the-lazy-mans-hackintosh-netbook]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5344450]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hackintosh]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[msi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[msi hackintosh]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[msi wind]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[msi wind hackintosh]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[openbook nano]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5344450&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple MacBook Knockoff For a Netbook Price]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/MacbookKnockOff.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_MacbookKnockOff.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>At first glance this MacBook knockoff doesn't look all that bad, but by picture three it looks like week old garbage. According to the not very official picture caption, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbook-mini/">"Macbook Mini"</a> has the specs of a netbook.</p>

<p>It is powered by a good old 1.6GHz Intel Atom N270, 1GB of RAM, a 160GB hard drive and a 3-cell battery. No word on an OS, but let's hope it is something that looks better than the SD card slot and ports on the right side of the chassis.</p>
<p>Frankly I'd rather the better smelling flowers it is pictured with and a decent <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5325775/the-state-of-hackintosh-which-netbooks-to-hack">Hackintoshed netbook</a>. But it can be yours for $2000 RMB (about $280) this September. [<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/38426606@N05/sets/72157622128929974/">M.I.C. Gadget Flickr</a> via <a href="http://micgadget.com/">micgadget.com</a>]<br>
<script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5344453,3,'');
</script></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5344461/apple-macbook-knockoff-for-a-netbook-price]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5344461]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Macbook Knockoffs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Apple Macbook knockoff]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[knockoff]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[netbooks]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joanna Stern]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5344461&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Snow Leopard Currently Restricts 64-Bit Booting to Newer Macs]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/SnowLeopard3_01_01_01.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />In the newest leaked build of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SNOW LEOPARD" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/snow-leopard/">Snow Leopard</a>, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5076473/giz-explains-whats-so-awesome-about-64+bit">64-bit</a> booting isn't enabled by default on certain older (though not that old) Macs, which instead boot automatically into 32-bit. The question: Is Apple backtracking on Snow Leopard's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5342695/psa-64+bit-apps-dont-always-run-faster">64-bit capabilities</a>? <strong>Updated:</strong></p>
<p>As it stands right now, with the current build (<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5336260/snow-leopard-10a432-available-probably-is-golden-master">10a432</a>, which may be the final release), the answer ranges somewhere between "sort of" and "no." Essentially, desktop and laptop Macs will by default boot into 32-bit. However, you can force 64-bit booting by holding the 6 and 4 keys while starting up, and even if you don't, those machines will still be able to run 64-bit programs without trouble. So the restriction from automatic 64-bit booting is an intentional move from Apple.</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> We've gotten some explanation from Apple on the issue at hand. The deal is, Mac desktops and laptops will indeed boot with a 32-bit kernel, while only the Xserve will be 64-bit. But this won't matter to the consumer. Our Apple contact explained:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The 32-bit kernel fully supports 64-bit applications, all system libraries that 64-bit applications use are fully 64-bit, and 64-bit applications have a full 64-bit virtual address space of 16 exabytes available to them on Mac OS X. The primary benefit of a 64-bit kernel is to improve the efficiency of accessing over 32GB of RAM.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>As a whole, machines with lots of RAM (over 4GB) are more efficient with a 64-bit kernel, but even though consumer Macs will have a 32-bit kernel, all Intel-based Macs will run 64-bit programs automatically, which gives you the most obvious benefits. So really the only benefit to having a 64-bit kernel is if you've got 32GB of memory, a frankly monstrous amount of RAM, and hell, the hardware won't even allow that much. All 64-bit applications will run on the Macs with either Intel Xeon or Intel Core 2 Duo processors, so this 32-bit brouhaha is pretty much a misunderstanding. [<a href="http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2009/08/latest-snow-leopard-build-limits-most-macs-to-32-bit-mode.ars">Ars Technica</a> and <a href="http://www.osnews.com/story/22009/Snow_Leopard_Seeds_Use_32bit_Kernel_Drivers_by_Default">OS News</a> and <a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/142379/2009/08/snow_leopard_64_bit.html">MacWorld</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5343443/snow-leopard-currently-restricts-64+bit-booting-to-newer-macs]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5343443]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[32-bit]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[64-bit]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[booting]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[build 10a432]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[snow leopard 64-bit]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 22 Aug 2009 20:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5343443&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Macbook Stand Built from the Macbook Packaging]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/F4ZXOIYFRXWH7SA.MEDIUM.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_F4ZXOIYFRXWH7SA.MEDIUM.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Before taking on this Macbook project yourself, heed this one-line review from Instructables: "just built it, verynice. but extremely annoying. it squeaks on my desk every time i click or press a button on the keyboard. grggggg." [<a href="http://www.instructables.com/id/Simple_Laptop_Stand_From_MacBook_Packaging/">Instructables</a> via <a href="http://www.unplggd.com/unplggd/diy-project/make-a-macbook-stand-from-the-packaging-093408">Unplggd</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5341693/macbook-stand-built-from-the-macbook-packaging]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5341693]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[mods]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[diy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook stand]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5341693&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Your Freezing, Clicking MacBook Pro Hard Drive Just Got Better]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Have one of those 500GB 7200rpm hard drives in your <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MACBOOK PRO" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MACBOOK PRO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbook-pro/">MacBook Pro</a> that's pissing you off 'cause you bought for speed, but it's like freezing and clicking and stuff? Apple's just dropped the fix&mdash;well, they've released the firmware update for the drive, hopefully it's the fix. [<a href="http://support.apple.com/downloads/Hard_Drive_Firmware_Update_2_0">Apple</a> via <a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2009/08/19/apple-releases-fix-for-macbook-pro-hard-drive-issues/">MacRumors</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5341187/your-freezing-clicking-macbook-pro-hard-drive-just-got-better]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5341187]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[firmware]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:50:26 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5341187&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Airport Update Fixes OS 10.5.8 Issues]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I know of a few people who've encountered weird Wi-Fi problems since the OS 10.5.8 update. Now Apple has released a Macbook/<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MACBOOK PRO" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MACBOOK PRO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbook-pro/">Macbook Pro</a> patch for the networking issues claimed to occur under low battery power. Hopefully things will be all better now. [<a href="http://support.apple.com/downloads/AirPort_Client_Update_for_MacBook_and_MacBook_Pro">Apple</a> via <a href="http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2009/08/airport-update-addresses-portable-issues-created-by-1058.ars?utm_source=microblogging&utm_medium=arstch&utm_term=Main%20Account&utm_campaign=microblogging">Ars</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5335875/airport-update-fixes-os-1058-issues]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5335875]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[patches]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[airport]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple airport update]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:39:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5335875&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[LG Puts 15-inch OLED Screen Into Production, Plans December Launch]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/LGOLED.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/504x_LGOLED.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></a>But with Sony's 11-inch <a href="http://gizmodo.com/372072/sony-xel+1-oled-tv-review-verdict-small-on-size-large-on-beauty">XEL-1 OLED</a> TV priced over $2000, how much will the damn thing cost? Then there are those rumors that LG may supply Apple with OLED screens for its future products…</p>
<p>Take it with a grain of salt, but a <a href="http://smarthouse.com.au/TVs_And_Large_Display/OLED_TV/S5K3G4D9">SmartHouse Australia</a> report from April claims to answer both those questions. It says a senior LG staffer reckons the OLED panels will initially "cost double, if not triple, the price of an LCD panel" (sounds about right), and that the 15-inch OLED screen will make its way into the next generation of MacBooks (wait, what?).</p>
<p>Here's what's more believable. According to <a href="http://www.oled-display.net/lg-15-inch-oled-screen-for-sales-in-december-2009">OLED-Display.Net</a>, the LG 15-inch OLED screens are already being made, and the company plans a global roll out soon after the display hits Korea in December.</p>
<p>As for the Apple speculation? Let us know your thoughts below. [via <a href="http://www.oled-display.net/lg-15-inch-oled-screen-for-sales-in-december-2009">OLED-Display.Net</a> and <a href="http://smarthouse.com.au/TVs_And_Large_Display/OLED_TV/S5K3G4D9">SmartHouse</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5331261/lg-puts-15+inch-oled-screen-into-production-plans-december-launch]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5331261]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[oled]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[oled-tv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 06 Aug 2009 03:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5331261&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Analyst Has Supposedly Seen Apple Tablet, Announcement in September]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_504x_504x_tablet-top_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_504x_504x_tablet-top_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>This is one small step forward in the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged APPLE TABLET" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/apple-tablet/">Apple Tablet</a> rumor. An anonymous Barron's analyst says he's seen the Apple Tablet and that the thing will be announced in September for a November launch.</p>
<p>He also says that what he saw was "close enough now to a final design," and may retail for $700 to $800. Every other manufacturer is waiting now to see what this is, since it's all over the supply chain in Asia." "[<a href="http://online.barrons.com/article/SB124907975033998015.html">Barrons</a> via <a href="http://www.9to5mac.com/apple-tablet-september-barrons">9to5Mac</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5328472/analyst-has-supposedly-seen-apple-tablet-announcement-in-september]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5328472]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple tablet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[barrons]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[itablet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook touch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[unconfirmed]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 02 Aug 2009 19:49:22 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5328472&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[This MacBook Cake Is Definitely a Pro]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p>We have seen many a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/cake">gadget cake</a> in our day, but this MacBook version is definitely up there in terms of craftsmanship. That's not surprising when you consider that it was made by pros at Bcake NY.</p>
<p>It's got everything: MacBook with on-screen message window and Super Friends, a Mighty Mouse, an iPhone and various desktop office supplies. It's just like being at work&mdash;assignments are piling up and you're eating candy while reading personal messages. [<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bcakeny/">Bcake's Flickr</a> via <a href="http://technabob.com/blog/2009/07/30/apple-macbook-pro-and-iphone-cakes/">Technabob</a>]</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/macbook_cake.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_macbook_cake.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></a><br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/macbook_cake_5.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_macbook_cake_5.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></a><br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/macbook_cake_2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_macbook_cake_2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></a><br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/macbook_cake_3.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_macbook_cake_3.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></a></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5327177/this-macbook-cake-is-definitely-a-pro/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5327177]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cake]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bcake]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook cake]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 31 Jul 2009 12:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5327177&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Tablet Reportedly Priced Between iPhone and Cheap MacBook For 2010]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_tablet-top_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_tablet-top_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/07/24/apples_much_anticipated_tablet_device_coming_early_next_year.html">Apple Insider</a>'s source claims that the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged APPLE TABLET" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/apple-tablet/">Apple Tablet</a> <i>is</i> coming in 2010&mdash;similar to the rumors we've already heard&mdash;but that it's coming at a price that's not too unreasonable.</p>
<p>The source says it's "expected to retail for somewhere between the cost of a high-end iPhone and Apple's most affordable Mac notebook", which means it's under $999 but over $299 (or $599, if you're talking about unsubsidized phones).</p>
<p>Apple Insider also reiterates what we've known before, that it'll be 3G enabled, that it'll be around 10-inches and be shaped like a large iPod Touch, and that Apple's not too happy with AT&T. Does this mean that the <a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10548621/1/tech-rumor-of-the-day-apple-verizon-team-up-on-tablet.html">rumor that Verizon will carry the tablet</a> is a good one?</p>
<p>And to add our own guesswork on top of this, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5287488/why-macbook-is-about-to-mean-something-else-entirely">MacBook</a> may actually be the name of this tablet. Why? We surmised that because Apple consolidated everything into the MacBook Pro family, there's no real room for the plastic white Macbook. Which is why the tablet is probably the new Macbook (or so we think). [<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/07/24/apples_much_anticipated_tablet_device_coming_early_next_year.html">Apple Insider</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5322169/apple-tablet-reportedly-priced-between-iphone-and-cheap-macbook-for-2010]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5322169]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[10-inch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[10-inch tablet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple tablet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook touch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:18:02 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5322169&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[If You Buy a Computer That Costs Over $1000, It's Probably a Mac]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_504x_macbookpros.jpg" class="left image500" width="500">That's because according to NPD, in June, 91 percent of the market for computers that cost over $1000 <a href="http://www.betanews.com/joewilcox/article/Apple-has-91-of-market-for-1000-PCs-says-NPD/1248313624">belonged to Apple</a>.</p>
<p>Sure, it helps that Apple only sells two computers under $1000&mdash;the white MacBook and Mac mini&mdash;so if you get a Mac, it's probably going to cost over a grand. In fact, the average selling price of a Mac is $1400. But, consider that Apple claimed just 66 percent of the $1000+ market in the first three months of 2008, and 88 percent in May of this year.</p>
<p>It also means that people just aren't buying super tricked-out PCs&mdash;which is something Microsoft courted with its <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged LAPTOP HUNTERS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/laptop-hunters/">Laptop Hunters</a> ads, showing how cheap PCs were compared to Macs. To wit, the average selling price of all PCs in June was precisely half that of Mac: $700. (For Windows notebooks, sans netbooks, the average selling price was $569.) Which suggests there are way more <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5186672/microsoft-marketing-team-now-exclusively-advised-by-internet-commenters-but-it-works">Laurens</a> than <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5198677/shocking-new-microsoft-ad-implies-macs-are-inferior">Giampaolos</a> in the world.</p>
<p><strong>Update</strong>: It should be noted, however, that these numbers are for retail&mdash;not for business purchases or PCs people built themselves.</p>
<p>Of course, I would definitely prefer far more Laurens. [<a href="http://www.betanews.com/joewilcox/article/Apple-has-91-of-market-for-1000-PCs-says-NPD/1248313624">BetaNews</a> via <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/apple-has-91-share-of-premium-computer-market-research-firm-says-2009-7">BusinessInsider</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5321332/if-you-buy-a-computer-that-costs-over-1000-its-probably-a-mac]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5321332]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptop hunters]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5321332&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
