<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: Macworld]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/macworld</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'macworld']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Origin of the Twin Copy-Paste T-Shirts]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/16d79ad1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_16d79ad1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Back in 1986, Gizmodo reader and artist Christopher C. DeSantis foresaw the twin <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #copyandpaste" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/copyandpaste/">copy and paste</a> t-shirts. There is only one problem, Christopher. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5392373/twin-apple-fangirls-pwn-twin-pc-clones">Blonde sisters</a> or <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5390916/i-want-to-have-twins-just-to-get-them-these-awesome-t+shirts">mischievous brothers</a>? Cute. Two bald guys with pony tails walking through a park? Creepy.</p>
<p>Christopher created this cartoon for Macworld magazine, back in 1986. Thanks for sending it!</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5392910/the-origin-of-the-twin-copy+paste-t+shirts]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5392910]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[t-shirts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[copy and paste]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[retromodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 29 Oct 2009 23:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5392910&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[No, Apple Still Isn't Going to CES]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/340x_macworld-expo-logo-apple3.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />The WSJ says they <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/07/29/will-apple-ceo-headline-ces-10/">totally are</a>. <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged RYAN BLOCK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ryan-block/">Ryan Block</a> says that the WSJ is <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/wsj-apple-going-to-ces-2010-reality-nope/">full of shit</a>. But wait, haven't we had this conversation before? Like, a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5127242/apple-going-to-ces-next-year-source-says">few</a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5111896/will-trade-shows-survive">times</a>?</p>

<p>The reason this is even a subject again is because of an oddly (and perhaps tellingly) vague <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/07/29/will-apple-ceo-headline-ces-10/">piece</a> posted on the the WSJ's Digits blog by Ben Charny, who flat out claims that that Apple plans to use CES to replace Macworld, which it walked away from last year:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Apple plans to attend the show's 2010 version, marking the first time in memory the Cupertino, Calif., consumer-electronics giant will be there.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>That sounds clear enough, but it's buried in a piece that otherwise <em>seems</em> to be about how the chief executive of the CEA, Gary Shapiro, can't get in touch with Steve Jobs. But hey, he's probably just being vague, and drew his conclusion from quotes that he didn't include! That's what journalists do, sometimes! Except the meeting from which Charny drew his conclusion was a dinner with <em>multiple attendees</em>, one of whom happens to be ex Engadget editor and current CEA advisor Ryan Block. He took issue with Charny's reading of events:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>[I]t's also specious and flatly wrong. I was seated directly across from Gary, and present for the entire conversation, wherein a dozen or so other journos chatted with him and one another. When asked about the CEA's ongoing contact with Jobs, Gary joked that every once in a while Steve might even return his email &mdash; to which we all laughed knowingly. Yep, that's our Steve. Shapiro went on to mention that Apple was a great and long-standing supporter of the efforts of the CEA, but that their only direct involvement was sending a check each year to pay their membership dues.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>As far as the WSJ post goes, this is pretty damning. But it really just rules out Charny's version of this dinner, not the possibility that Apple will actually go to CES. As far as that question goes, we're left with the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5127242/apple-going-to-ces-next-year-source-says">same evidence</a> we had last time rumors like this went around, all the way back in January. The verdict then, and still, is that they probably won't: January's a pretty terrible time to launch new products, but more to the point, Apple doesn't even care about industry <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged TRADE SHOWS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/trade-shows/">trade shows</a>&mdash;which CES epitomizes in all the worst ways&mdash;anymore. Their statement from all those months ago hasn't been followed up:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Apple is reaching more people in more ways than ever before, so like many companies, trade shows have become a very minor part of how Apple reaches its customers. The increasing popularity of Apple's Retail Stores, which more than 3.5 million people visit every week, and the Apple.com website enable Apple to directly reach more than a hundred million customers around the world in innovative new ways.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Apple would gain <em>nothing</em> from going large at CES, so until a credible story comes along that says otherwise, that's the word. [<a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/07/29/will-apple-ceo-headline-ces-10/">WSJ</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/30/wsj-apple-going-to-ces-2010-reality-nope/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5326293/no-apple-still-isnt-going-to-ces]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5326293]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Apple CES]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ces]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ryan block]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[trade shows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wsj]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5326293&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Is CES Still Trying To Seduce Apple?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/macworld-expo-logo-apple3.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/>Apple announced this year that they would no longer attend the decade-old Macworld conference, leading some to speculate that the company would <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5127242/apple-going-to-ces-next-year-source-says">shift their focus</a> to CES. Well, the CEA is now <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-10246930-37.html?tag=mncol">shifting <em>their</em> focus</a> to Apple, but why?</p>

<p>The floorplan for <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged CES 2010" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ces-2010/">CES 2010</a> sees the iLounge&mdash;the section for Mac accessory retailers&mdash;expanded to six times its previous size. Why would they do this? Macworld, despite Apple's absence, is still happening, albeit one month later, so it's not like CES is addressing a trade show void. On the surface, it looks like the CEA might actually be trying to seduce Apple into attending their conference.</p>
<p>But just <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5127242/apple-going-to-ces-next-year-source-says">as before</a>, something about such rumors is odd: Apple left Macworld because it <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5111914/apple-always-wanted-to-get-out-of-macworld">didn't <em>need</em> Macworld</a>, so a move to CES, which they need even less, would be hard to understand. A more likely explanation is that CES is just trying to kill what remains of Macworld. There may not be a void in the Apple tradeshow world <em>right now</em>, but that doesn't mean the CEA wouldn't like to create one, which they would gladly fill in 2011. [<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-10246930-37.html?tag=mncol">CNET</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5265625/is-ces-still-trying-to-seduce-apple]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5265625]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple ces 2010]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cea]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ces 2010]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ces 2010 ilounge]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ilounge]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 22 May 2009 05:50:59 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5265625&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[NBC's Chuck Parodies MacWorld With Chevy Chase As Steve Jobs]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/04/ScreenHunter_02_Apr._07_23.32_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/ScreenHunter_02_Apr._07_23.32_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>MacWorld and our good buddy Stevesie are ripe for parody, and NBC's comedy-with-stuff-blowing-up <em>Chuck</em> has stepped up to the plate. Check out the clip below, it's got some great zingers.</p>
<p><object width="512" height="296"><param name="movie" value="http://www.hulu.com/embed/8_2vIA9cIrAmk8psl_jzjw/963/1276">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.hulu.com/embed/8_2vIA9cIrAmk8psl_jzjw/963/1276" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="512" height="296"></embed></object></p>
<p>Yep, right before <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged CHEVY CHASE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/chevy-chase/">Chevy Chase</a> (sorry, "Ted Roark," which we're really, really hoping isn't an obtuse Ayn Rand reference) walks out on stage, you can hear the strains of "Around the Bend" by The Asteroids Galaxy Tour, otherwise known as "<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GRboa0M9oRI&feature=related">that song from the iPod touch commercial</a>." <em>Chuck</em> has made their version of Apple, Roark Instruments, a software-only company sort of reminiscent of Google, at least in their casual but high-tech office building, but this announcement is pure Apple. The nerds' rapt attention is great, but the best line is "Must be my rock star magnetism." Oh, Chevy Chase, even in your ornery old age you don't fail to charm. [<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&ct=res&cd=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nbc.com%2FChuck%2F&ei=shncSY3tMIjmlQfN8ZX5DQ&usg=AFQjCNG7prqB6g_IDOLKuP7bUfjsrHrpsA">Official Site</a>, <em>thanks Isaac!</em>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5203049/nbcs-chuck-parodies-macworld-with-chevy-chase-as-steve-jobs]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5203049]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chevy chase]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chuck]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[good-natured ribbing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[steve jobs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 08 Apr 2009 00:28:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5203049&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Dates Are Set for Macworld 2010]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Even though Apple has pulled out of Macworld, IDG has again confirmed that the show will go on by booking the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MOSCONE CENTER" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MOSCONE CENTER" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/moscone-center/">Moscone Center</a> from February 9 - 13, 2010 (that's about one month later than usual, meaning that Macworld will no longer compete with CES for the public's attention). [<a href="http://www.macworldexpo.com/">Macworld </a>via <a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2009/03/30/macworld-expo-2010-to-be-held-february-9th-13th/">MacRumors</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5191022/the-dates-are-set-for-macworld-2010]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5191022]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[idg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[idg world expo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld 2010]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[moscone center]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:51:53 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5191022&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Going to CES Next Year, Source Says]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/01/340x_macworld-expo-logo-apple3.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />A <a href="http://cultofmac.com/apple-ditching-macworld-in-favor-of-ces/6800">Cult of Mac's</a> source says that Apple will "go large" at CES next year, replacing Macworld. Wait, didn't Apple just say that they were killing Macworld because they think trade shows are irrelevant?</p>

<p>While Cult of Mac's—Wired's Mac centric blog—source says “it’s a done deal" citing "friends who work at Apple", this doesn't match Apple's previous statement regarding trade shows:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Apple is reaching more people in more ways than ever before, so like many companies, trade shows have become a very minor part of how Apple reaches its customers. The increasing popularity of Apple’s Retail Stores, which more than 3.5 million people visit every week, and the Apple.com website enable Apple to directly reach more than a hundred million customers around the world in innovative new ways.</p>
<p>Apple has been steadily scaling back on trade shows in recent years, including NAB, Macworld New York, Macworld Tokyo and Apple Expo in Paris.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>If Apple is <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5111914/apple-always-wanted-to-get-out-of-macworld">shifting from Macworld and tradeshows to do their own low cost show-n-tells</a> whenever they want, it doesn't make much sense to believe they are "going large" at that big mammoth-graveyardish wasteland of electronics and press releases that some people like to call CES. Or does it? Whatever it is, something smells here, and it's not <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5125327/sick-of-ces-then-check-how-bacon-is-made">all that bacon</a>. [<a href="http://cultofmac.com/apple-ditching-macworld-in-favor-of-ces/6800">Cult of Mac</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5127242/apple-going-to-ces-next-year-source-says]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5127242]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Apple CES]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ces]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[trade shows]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 09 Jan 2009 09:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5127242&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Keynote Beer Goggles to Become Obligatory in 2009]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/01/apple-beer-googles3.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/apple-beer-googles3.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>This one slipped even below Jim Goldman's <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5107042/rumor-smash-no-zune-phone-at-ces">rumor radar</a>: The Apple Keynote Beer Goggles. Judging from today's snoringfest, I won't be surprised if they make them obligatory for every event in 2009.</p>

<p>Many people are bashing the Philnote because it was a bore and there were no new new NEW toys. In reality, the keynote wasn't very different from many other that Steve Jobs did in the past. I remember some who were mostly the same: Endless software demonstrations plus a hardware update here or there. In fact, I think there were even worse keynotes, like that time when an endless parade of third-party software directors came on stage to show their support to Mac OS X. It took me several Guinness pints to get over that one.</p>
<p>So given what he had to present today—and I've to say that I love the new iPhoto and iMovie—El Schillerino did quite a good job. But even while he was good, apparently he's not Steve Jobs and people weren't as enthusiastic as when El Esteban is on stage. I don't know what's going to happen when <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5063281/is-steve-jobs-preparing-his-farewell">Jobs finally retires from Apple</a>, but maybe the key for success goes through free beer for everyone at the door. And probably <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5124415/giz-liveblog-pizza-bingo-follow-the-keynote-here-win-free-pizza">free pizza</a> too. [Image based on the original beer goggles from <a href="http://www.urbanspectacles.com/beergoggles.htm">Urban Spectacles</a> via <a href="http://www.darkroastedblend.com/">Dark Roasted Blend</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5124909/apple-keynote-beer-goggles-to-become-obligatory-in-2009]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5124909]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[fakemodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Apple Keynote Beer Googles]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5124909&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Did You Enjoy The Keynote Any Less Without Steve Jobs?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/01/schillerkeynote.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/schillerkeynote.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>Aside from the actual speculated products, the big news surrounding the Apple Macworld keynote was that Steve Jobs would be out sick. But as I refreshed the Gizmodo liveblog, I wondered, did it matter?</p>

<p>I'm a sucker for any Apple keynote, whether I'm in the stands with the press or F5'ing away at my browser like most of you. There's a certain hypnotic timing to them, a clean presentation and a controlled, meticulous unveiling process that makes even the less exciting products seem monumental in scope.</p>
<p>During today's <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5123052/macworld-2009-the-last-keynote-liveblog">last Apple Macworld keynote</a>, not having been there, I actually forgot at times that <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5123345/steve-jobs-skips-macworld-because-of-his-health">Steve Jobs wasn't presenting</a> with Phil Schiller taking his place instead. Indeed, from the text/content alone, I wouldn't have even noticed. The presentation style was intact&mdash;from the clean slides to the dramatic structure, it was an Apple keynote, even if it wasn't <em>Steve's</em> Apple keynote. But I want to know, do you feel the same way?<br>
<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src="http://static.polldaddy.com/p/1252480.js">
</script><noscript><a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/1252480/">Did You Enjoy The Keynote Any Less Without Steve Jobs?</a><br>
<span style="font-size:9px;">( <a href="http://www.polldaddy.com">surveys</a>)</span></noscript></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5124770/did-you-enjoy-the-keynote-any-less-without-steve-jobs]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5124770]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[qotd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aluminum]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cinema display]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[display]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[displays]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ilife]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ilife 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iwork]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iwork 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[keynote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac mini]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phil schiller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phil schiller vs steve jobs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[steve jobs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[unibody]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5124770&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Watch the Entire Macworld 2009 Event]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/01/340x_keynote.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/>Our <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5123052/macworld-2009-the-last-keynote-liveblog?skyline=true&s=x">liveblog</a> is good, but nothing beats seeing the last Macworld keynote with your own eyes. Fortunately, Apple has posted the entire event online in QuickTime. [<a href="http://events.apple.com.edgesuite.net/0901ouabdcaw/event/index.html">Apple</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5124896/watch-the-entire-macworld-2009-event]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5124896]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[event]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[keynote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:57:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5124896&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Confirms $179 Battery Swap Cost for 17" MacBook Pro]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/01/340x_MacBook_Pro_17_battery_swap.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/>We just confirmed with Apple that swapping out the <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5124539/17-macbook-pro-unibody-first-hands-on">17" MacBook Pro's</a> non-removable battery will cost $179. Fortunately, says Apple, the swap might not be needed for a long time:</p>

<p>From a spokesperson at Apple:<br></p>
<blockquote>It will likely be years before you need to replace it (1000 cycles at 200 cycles/year = 5 years). You can have the battery replaced at any Apple Store or Apple-authorized reseller. The replacement battery is priced at $179, which includes installation of the new battery and environmentally-responsible disposal of the old battery.</blockquote>
<p>The non-removable MacBook Air battery costs $129 to replace, though the lifespan is not promised to be as great. [<a href="http://www.apple.com/macbookpro/features-17inch.html">Apple</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5124811/apple-confirms-179-battery-swap-cost-for-17-macbook-pro]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5124811]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[17-inch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[17-inch unibody macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[keynote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro 17-inch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phil]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phil schiller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[schiller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[unibody]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:21:39 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5124811&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[iMovie '09: Video Tour]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("/imovie_09_2_giz.flv", 475, 316,"");
</script><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/01/imovie_09_2_giz.flv.jpg"></a>In this shakey cam tour (sorry) we go over the three most interesting functions in iMovie 09: The globetrotting map animations, an automatic shake stabilizer, and the zoomed in precision editor.</p>

<p>Maps:<br>
&bull; There are 4 versions of maps, each also in a flat mode (along with the original globe). One is a photorealistic map, one is a school map, one has beige continents and one has green continents.<br>
&bull; If you're adding map animations from scratch, they take a bit of time to render. You have to select a starting and end point (Madrid or Disneyland), and the program will map it.<br>
&bull; Putting two animations back to back, using the same destination and departure city, makes the animation a seamless multi city tour.<br>
&bull; You can update the type of map by dragging the style onto the existing thumbnail in the project line.</p>
<p>Shake Stabilizer:<br>
&bull; It analyzes the entire picture and steadies the motion very, very well.<br>
&bull; If a scene cannot be corrected, because of an overage of movement, iMovie marks the section with a squiggly red line.<br>
&bull; The rendering for this correction has to be done on a case by case or project basis; all the rendering must be done ahead of time and Apple says, "it takes awhile but is worth it".</p>
<p>Precision Editor:<br>
&bull; Basically, precision editor zooms into the transition between two clips.<br>
&bull; It's laid out as follows: the upper segment is the first clip, and the bottom segment is the second clip.<br>
&bull; The left side highlights the first and upper clip, because that's active, and the lower right hand quadrant is also active (as the second clip). Moving the slider inbetween them (the y axis) shifts the transition point. Very easy.</p>
<p>And at long last, slow motion is back.</p>
<p>iMovie 08 was criticized for having a brilliant UI but lacking power, and so many people still use 06 which accepts plug ins. Perhaps 09 is a step in the right direction.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('imovie09macworld', 3, '');
</script></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5124789/imovie-09-video-tour]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5124789]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imovie]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imovie 09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[keynote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:03:47 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5124789&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[iPhoto '09 Video Tour]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("/iphoto_09_2_giz.flv", 506, 305,"");
</script><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/01/iphoto_09_2_giz.flv.jpg"></a>Here are a few best features of iPhoto '09, including Faces and Places, which recognizes people in your albums and the locations you took those photos in.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('iphoto09macworld', 11, '');
</script></p>
<p>Cool stuff: separating your photos by people, which you can then scrub (move your mouse) over and see all the images of them you have. iPhoto is smart enough to try and recognize which people are which with semi-decent accuracy, and you'll have to confirm each one as you go. Once you're done, you have a corkboard full of Polaroids of the people you know.</p>
<p>Geolocation is great for travelers, and if you go to a lot of different countries, your "Places" section will have a rich map made up of all the pins you've been to. You can fill in location data yourself, or if you have an iPhone or other GPS-enabled camera, it's automatically filled in for you.</p>
<p>Other cool stuff is Facebook and Flickr integration (includes tagging as well), plus themed slideshows. [<a href="http://www.apple.com/ilife/iphoto/">iPhoto</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5124739/iphoto-09-video-tour]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5124739]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ilife]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ilife 09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ilife 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iwork 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[keynote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phil schiller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:24:10 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5124739&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Where's the Mac Mini? And Other Rumor Smashes!]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/01/340x_nomacmini.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/>If Wired, TUAW and Macrumors are independently reporting a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MAC MINI" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/mac-mini/">Mac Mini</a> is on its way, we know it exists. Evidently, we're just not going to see it at Macworld. So what about other rumors?</p>

<p>From our original <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5123135/macworld-2009-rumors-round+up">Macworld 2009 rumor roundup</a>, here's the rundown on how all the rumors panned out.</p>
<p><br clear="all">
<em><strong>Came True:</strong></em><br>
<a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5124196/apple-revamps-ilife-for-09-with-iphoto-facial-recognition-and-more">iLife</a> and <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5124555/apple-sends-iwork-to-the-clouds-introduces-iworkcom">iWork '09</a> (with iWork in the cloud)<br>
<a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5124588/itunes-gets-drm-free-new-prices-purchase-over-3g">DRM-Free iTunes</a><br>
<a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5124539/17-macbook-pro-unibody-first-hands-on">17-inch Macbook Pro</a></p>
<p><em><strong>Didn't Come True:</strong></em><br>
New <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5121681/new-mac-mini-at-macworld-will-look-like-imac-%252B-time-capsule">Mac Mini</a><br>
Updated <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5123135/macworld-2009-rumors-round+up">30-inch Cinema Displays</a></p>
<p><em><strong>Didn't Come True Stretches:</strong></em><br>
<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5111464/analyst-hot-for-apple-netbook-at-macworld">iPod Touch Jumbo/XL/Pro/Netbook/Thing</a><br>
<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5118216/fakemodo-undeniable-evidence-of-iphone-nano-3g-zomg">iPhone nano</a><br>
<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5120123/apple-home-server-will-share-music-movies-and-photos-over-the-internet">Home Server</a><br>
<a href="http://gizmodo.com/search/snow+leopard/bydate/?timerange=all">Snow Leopard Availability</a><br>
<a href="http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=654">New iMacs</a></p>
<p>Seeing as many of the rumors were an admitted wild shot at best, we'd put the real rumor batting average around .400, even if it's closer to .266 on paper.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5124706/wheres-the-mac-mini-and-other-rumor-smashes]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5124706]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aluminum]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple rumors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cinema display]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[display]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[displays]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ilife]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ilife 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iwork]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iwork 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[keynote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac mini]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phil schiller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor smash]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[unibody]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:54:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5124706&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Story Behind the 17" MacBook Pro's Amazing Long-Lasting Battery]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("/MBP17battery_gizmodo.flv", 475, 286,"");
</script><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/01/MBP17battery_gizmodo.flv.jpg"></a><iframe src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http://digg.com/apple/The_Story_Behind_the_17_Inch_MacBook_Pro_s_Battery" align="right" frameborder="0" height="82" scrolling="no" width="55"></iframe> Battery life is limited, but Apple built a non-removable battery for the <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5124539/17-macbook-pro-unibody-first-hands-on">17" MacBook Pro</a> that lasts up to 8 hours. [<a href="http://www.apple.com/macbookpro/">Apple</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5124705/the-story-behind-the-17-macbook-pros-amazing-long+lasting-battery]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5124705]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[17-inch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[17-inch unibody macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[keynote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro 17-inch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phil]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phil schiller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[schiller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[unibody]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:50:59 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5124705&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[17" MacBook Pro Unibody First Hands On]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/01/macbookprounitopsm.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/macbookprounitopsm.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>The new 17" MacBook Pro with a unibody construction and an integrated battery feels thinner than the previous version and really looks beautiful. Check out our gallery to see for yourself.</p>

<div style='float:right; margin-left:-9px;'><script type="text/javascript">
digg_skin = 'compact'; digg_bgcolor =
'#f1f8fa'; digg_url =
'http://digg.com/apple/17_Inch_MacBook_Pro_Unibody_First_Hands_On';
</script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript">
</script></div>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('17prounibody', 26, '');
</script></p>
<p>The 17" MacBook Pro is basically a supersized 15" with an Air no battery bottom, which is at the least aesthetically pleasing. But with no battery compartment there is now no way to easily change Ram or Hard drive. So have your #00 Phillips ready.</p>
<p>The unibody construction makes the machine feel much more compact when picking up and overall condenses the already thin casing. It does indeed feel heavier than any other MacBook model but that's to be expected from a 17" casing. The trackpad has also been updated to the same no physical button pad found in the other MacBook models and even though the 17" MacBook Pro is bigger the trackpad has not grown.</p>
<p>The 17" Glossy LCD looks crisp as it did on the previous version but the new black plastic border makes colors pop just as it does on the 15" Pro and 13" MacBook. For some reason apple is only showing the regular glossy LCD model today so we can't yet report on the new anti-glare model.</p>
<p>Overall the new 17" MacBook Pro with unibody construction is nothing we haven't seen from the other models in the MacBook line. With the 15" MacBook Pro look and the Air's no battery bottom the new 17" MacBook pro can now stand proudly inline with its smaller siblings.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5124539/17-macbook-pro-unibody-first-hands-on]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5124539]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[17]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[17 MacBook Pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aluminum]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[keynote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phil]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[schiller"]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[steve]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[unibody]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:09:34 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Mascari]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5124539&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Testing the iPhone's New Wireless iTunes Downloads]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/01/3gitunes.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/3gitunes.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>Today iPhone users can download music from iTunes not just through their computers or Wi-Fi, but AT&T's 3G network. So how does it work? Testing it in Vegas, we can say rocky but functional.</p>

<div style='float:right; margin-left:-9px;'><script type="text/javascript">
digg_skin = 'compact'; digg_bgcolor =
'#f1f8fa'; digg_url =
'http://digg.com/apple/Testing_the_iPhone_s_New_Wireless_iTunes_Downloads';
</script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript">
</script></div>
<p>I tried downloading Radiohead's <em>Bodysnatchers</em> in an area providing 3 bars of 3G reception. With no fanfare, I was able to enter the iTunes store without a Wi-Fi hotspot and purchase the song.</p>
<p>So far, so good. No firmware updates needed or anything!</p>
<p>Then the download stalled for a moment. Then the iPhone pulled that classic "you're on 3G, oops, you're really on EDGE" maneuver. I wondered what would happen. Would the download stall and wait for 3G? Or would it slowly trudge on?</p>
<p>It trudged on. I guess that's both a good an a bad thing. While I was able to download the song, it took me nearly 10 minutes to grab the 3.7MB file. Wilson Rothman ran the same test from nearby and was also booted to EDGE, though the download only took him about 5 minutes.</p>
<p>Overall, I'm glad that truly <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged WIRELESS ITUNES" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/wireless-itunes/">wireless iTunes</a> downloads are here. Hopefully more and better 3G coverage will make them live up to the generally pleasant iTunes experience. [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/search/macworld%202009">Gizmodo Macworld 2009 Coverage</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5124637/testing-the-iphones-new-wireless-itunes-downloads]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5124637]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aluminum]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cinema display]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[display]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[displays]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hands-on]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ilife]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ilife 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[itunes 3g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iwork]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iwork 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[keynote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac mini]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phil schiller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[unibody]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wireless itunes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wireless itunes downloads]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:06:24 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5124637&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[17-inch MacBook Pro is Unibody, $2799]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/01/mbpofficial.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/mbpofficial.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>Finally providing a noticeable difference between the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5063492/macbook-and-macbook-pro-dual-review">MacBook and MacBook Pro</a>, Apple has pushed the Pro's screen to 17 inches, its price to $2799, and thrown in a high-capacity (non-replaceable!) battery.</p>

<div style='float:right; margin-left:-9px;'><script type="text/javascript">
digg_skin = 'compact'; digg_bgcolor =
'#f1f8fa'; digg_url =
'http://digg.com/apple/Apple_Makes_MacBook_Pro_Bigger_17_Big';
</script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript">
</script></div>
<p>The new Pro has the unibody aluminum build&mdash;and virtually everything else&mdash;in common with its smaller 15" brother. But now you won't have to put your fancy new notebook next to the cheaper 13" variant to see what you've paid for. There are precious few under-the-hood upgrades:</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/macworld2009keynotec74.jpg" width="640" height="425" style="display:block;float:none;">Available late this month, it's just under an inch thick, weighs in at 6.6 pounds, and is claimed to be the "thinnest and lightest" 17" notebook on the market.</p>
<p>The 1920x1200 screen has LED backlighting standard, with a 140x120 viewing angle, an impressive 700:1 contrast ratio and 60% greater color gamut than the last 17-inch display. There's also an optional anti-glare coating option for the screen that'll run you $50.<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/macworld2009keynotec49.jpg" width="640" height="425" style="display:block;float:none;">Overall, the specs are mostly identical to the last MBP iteration, with the notable exception of the battery.</p>
<p>Apple says it's the longest lasting MacBook battery ever&mdash;it's a <strong>non-removable</strong> lithium polymer battery with "three times" the industry standard lifecycle, courtesy of "adaptive charging." How long does it last? 7 hours with discrete graphics, 8 hours with integrated graphics. That's 3 more hours than the previous-gen 17" MBP. And it'll cycle through that at least 1000 times with minimal wear.</p>
<p>The new MBP comes in just one base configuration: At $2799, you get the 2.66 ghz processor, 4gb ram, the dual-video card solution, a 320GB HDD and the Superdrive. It's available for pre-order now.<br>
<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('macbookpro2009', 8, '');
</script><br>
This is roughly in keeping with the same pattern Apple set in 2006 with the original <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MACBOOK PRO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbook-pro/">MacBook Pro</a>, which debuted with a 15-inch screen and saw the two-inch upgrade just a few months later. [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macworld-2009">Macworld 2009 Coverage</a>]<br></p>
<blockquote>Apple Introduces 17-inch MacBook Pro With Revolutionary New Built-in Battery That Delivers Eight Hours of Use & 1,000 Recharges
<p>SAN FRANCISCO, Jan. 6 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ &mdash; Apple(R) today unveiled the new 17-inch MacBook(R) Pro featuring a durable and beautiful precision aluminum unibody enclosure, and a revolutionary new built-in battery that delivers up to eight hours of use and up to 1,000 recharges for more than three times the lifespan of conventional notebook batteries. The new 17-inch MacBook Pro has a high resolution LED-backlit display and the same large glass Multi-Touch(TM) trackpad introduced with the new MacBook family in October. In addition, the new 17-inch MacBook Pro includes state of the art NVIDIA graphics and the latest generation Intel Core 2 Duo mobile processors. As part of the industry's greenest notebook family, the new 17-inch MacBook Pro is made of highly recyclable materials, meets stringent energy efficiency standards and is made without many of the harmful toxins found in other computers.<br>
"We've developed new battery technology that is better for the user and better for the environment," said Steve Jobs, Apple's CEO. "Apple's advanced chemistry and innovative technology deliver up to eight hours of use on a full charge cycle and up to 1,000 recharges."</p>
<p>Apple uses advanced chemistry, intelligent monitoring of the system and battery, and Adaptive Charging technology to create a revolutionary new notebook battery that delivers up to eight hours of wireless productivity on a single charge and up to 1,000 recharges without adding thickness, weight or cost to the MacBook Pro's incredible design.* The longer battery lifespan equals fewer depleted batteries and less waste, which is better for the environment.</p>
<p>The new 17-inch MacBook Pro includes an ultra-thin, widescreen glossy 1920 x 1200 display with 78 percent more pixels than the 15-inch MacBook Pro and a 60 percent greater color gamut that delivers desktop-quality color in a notebook. The LED-backlit display has brilliant instant-on performance, uses up to 30 percent less energy and eliminates the mercury found in industry standard fluorescent tube backlights.</p>
<p>Measuring just 0.98-inches thin and weighing 6.6 pounds, the 17-inch MacBook Pro is the world's thinnest and lightest 17-inch notebook. The 17-inch MacBook Pro is the most powerful Mac(R) notebook yet with the latest Intel Core 2 Duo processors available up to 2.93 GHz, up to 8GB DDR3 main memory and a graphics architecture that allows users to switch between the NVIDIA GeForce 9400M integrated graphics processor for better battery life and the powerful NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT discrete graphics processor for higher performance. The new 17-inch MacBook Pro includes a 320GB 5400 rpm hard drive standard with a 320GB 7200 rpm hard drive and 128GB and 256GB solid state drives as options. As with the rest of the new MacBook family, the 17-inch MacBook Pro includes a next generation, industry-standard Mini DisplayPort to connect with the new Apple LED Cinema Display featuring a 24-inch LED-backlit widescreen display with a built-in iSight(R) video camera, mic and speakers.</p>
<p>The new 17-inch MacBook Pro joins the aluminum unibody MacBook family in setting new standards for environmentally friendly notebooks with every model achieving EPEAT Gold status.** Each MacBook unibody enclosure is made of highly recyclable aluminum and comes standard with energy efficient LED-backlit displays that are mercury-free and made with arsenic-free glass. The new MacBook family meets stringent Energy Star 4.0 requirements, contains no brominated flame retardants and uses internal cables and components that are PVC-free. The battery in the new 17-inch MacBook Pro provides additional environmental benefit because its extended lifespan means fewer depleted batteries resulting in less waste. Depleted batteries can be replaced for $179 which includes installation and disposal of your old battery in an environmentally responsible manner.</p>
<p>Pricing & Availability<br>
The new 17-inch MacBook Pro will be shipping at the end of January and will be available through the Apple Store(R) (http://www.apple.com), Apple's retail stores and Apple Authorized Resellers for a suggested retail price of $2,799 (US), and includes:</p>
<p>&mdash; 17-inch widescreen LED-backlit 1920 x 1200, glossy display;<br>
&mdash; 2.66 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo with 6MB shared L2 cache;<br>
&mdash; 1066 MHz front-side bus;<br>
&mdash; 4GB 1066 MHz DDR3 SDRAM;<br>
&mdash; NVIDIA GeForce 9400M integrated graphics;<br>
&mdash; NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT discrete graphics with 512MB GDDR3 video<br>
memory;<br>
&mdash; 320GB Serial ATA hard drive running at 5400 rpm, with Sudden Motion<br>
Sensor;<br>
&mdash; a slot-load 8X SuperDrive with double-layer support (DVD+/-R<br>
DL/DVD+/-RW/CD-RW) optical drive;<br>
&mdash; Mini DisplayPort for video output (adapters sold separately);<br>
&mdash; built-in AirPort Extreme(R) 802.11n wireless networking and Bluetooth<br>
2.1+EDR;<br>
&mdash; Gigabit Ethernet port;<br>
&mdash; built-in iSight video camera;<br>
&mdash; three USB 2.0 ports;<br>
&mdash; one FireWire(R) 800 port (FireWire 400 compatible);<br>
&mdash; ExpressCard/34 expansion card slot;<br>
&mdash; one audio line in and one audio line out port, each supporting both<br>
optical digital and analog;<br>
&mdash; glass Multi-Touch trackpad and illuminated keyboard;<br>
&mdash; built-in, 95WHr lithium polymer battery; and<br>
&mdash; 85 Watt MagSafe(R) Power Adapter.</p>
<p>Build-to-order options for the 17-inch MacBook Pro include a 2.93 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor, 8GB 1066 MHz DDR 3 memory, 320GB 7200 rpm hard drive, a 128GB or 256GB solid state drive, anti-glare display for $50 (US), Mini DisplayPort to DVI Adapter, Mini DisplayPort to Dual-Link DVI Adapter (for 30-inch DVI display), Mini DisplayPort to VGA Adapter, Apple Remote, Apple MagSafe Airline Adapter and the AppleCare Protection Plan.</p>
<p>*A properly maintained Apple 17-inch MacBook Pro battery is designed to retain 80 percent or more of its original capacity during a lifespan of up to 1,000 recharge cycles. Battery life and charge cycles vary by use and settings. For more information visit<br>
http://www.apple.com/macbookpro/17inch-battery.</p>
<p>**EPEAT is an independent organization that helps customers compare the environmental performance of notebooks and desktops. Products meeting all of the 23 required criteria and at least 75 percent of the optional criteria are recognized as EPEAT Gold products. The EPEAT program was conceived by the US EPA and is based on IEEE 1680 standard for Environmental Assessment of Personal Computer Products. For more information visit http://www.epeat.net.</p>
<p>Apple ignited the personal computer revolution in the 1970s with the Apple II and reinvented the personal computer in the 1980s with the Macintosh. Today, Apple continues to lead the industry in innovation with its award-winning computers, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged OS X" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/os-x/">OS X</a> operating system and iLife and professional applications. Apple is also spearheading the digital media revolution with its iPod portable music and video players and iTunes online store, and has entered the mobile phone market with its revolutionary iPhone.</p>
<p>(C) 2009 Apple Inc. All rights reserved. Apple, the Apple logo, Mac, Mac OS, Macintosh, MacBook, Multi-Touch, iSight, Apple Store, AirPort Extreme, FireWire and MagSafe are trademarks of Apple. Other company and product names may be trademarks of their respective owners.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5124514/17+inch-macbook-pro-is-unibody-2799]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5124514]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[17-inch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[17-inch unibody macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[keynote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro 17-inch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phil schiller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[unibody]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:18:43 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5124514&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[iWork '09 Includes iWork.com, Costs $79 + Subscription]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/01/340x_iwork.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/>Just as <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5121835/rumor-apple-iwork-going-to-the-cloud">rumored last week</a>, Apple is taking <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged IWORK '09" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iwork-.09/">iWork '09</a> online with file hosting and group editing services. Think of it as MobileMe, but for your documents. And that's not all.</p>

<p>The suite is getting a pretty strong set of new features&mdash; some fluffy, but many meaty and delicious. See the full list, updated as we get new info, below. But first, <em>the cloud</em>.</p>
<div style='float:right; margin-left:-9px;'><script type="text/javascript">
digg_skin = 'compact'; digg_bgcolor =
'#f1f8fa'; digg_url =
'http://digg.com/apple/Apple_Takes_iWork_09_Online';
</script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript">
</script></div>
<p>Pretty much the whole suite gets towed online here&mdash; Pages, Numbers and Keynote all now feature the same online storage and collaboration capabilities, including editing, notation and conversion services. There are two modes of access, too: An online interface, at iWork.com, and transparent integration into the actual apps.</p>
<p>The suite is clearly intended to take on Microsoft SharePoint and Google Docs, but approaches online document management somewhat differently. Rather than editing and organizing documents <em>only</em> through a web interface, Apple has integrated the online aspect into the familiar native iLife apps as well.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('macworldiwork2009', 12, '');
</script></p>
<p><strong>New Features:</strong></p>
<p><strong>Keynote:</strong><br>
<br>
Motion Move: This Keynote effect will create object transitions between slides, like when teenagers morph into werewolves on low-budget TV shows.</p>
<p>Interstitial slideshows: This interrupts your presentations to display standalone slideshows. Thanks?</p>
<p>Text transitions: There are some news ones! You can slide, twirl, shimmer, etc. All the things that made you hate PowerPoint can now help you hate Keynote, too.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/01/custom_1231267063673_macworld2009keynotec13_01.jpg" width="158" height="105"></p>
<p>Keynote iPhone Remote: This $0.99 app lets cue your Keynote presentation over Wi-Fi, from your iPhone. It's pretty basic, but also has the capability to display presenter's notes.</p>
<p>Integrated online file storage: Simultaneous group editing with revision control, <em>a la</em> Google Docs.</p>
<p><strong>Pages</strong>:<br>
<br>
Fullscreen: Pages should have always had a fullscreen-ish option. Now it does!</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/01/custom_1231266985802_macworld2009keynotec16_01.jpg" width="158" height="105"></p>
<p>Advanced outlining, listing: A sensible alternative to a standalone outlining/planning application, it's meant help you plan out longer projects. It's also dynamic, so any embedded document links will automatically update on changes.</p>
<p>Mail merge: Mail merging with Numbers! Again, long overdue, but at least now you can easily do your Xmas cards on your Mac.</p>
<p>MathType: Are you a scientist, mathematician or student? No? Then this doesn't matter for you. The whole suite now has many more functions and full MathType capabilities, for writing formulas into your documents.</p>
<p><strong>Numbers:</strong><br>
<br>
Boring! MathType is the biggest addition here, but users also get drag and drop formulas, new chart types, multiple axes, trend lines, and error bars, along with dynamic linked charts. And lest we forget, lots of templates.</p>
<p>iWork 2009 is available now from the Apple Store for $79, a $99 "family pack" for five licenses, or $49 with the purchase of any Mac. The subscription fee for iWork.com will be announced at a later date. Press release below.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macworld-2009">Macworld 2009 Coverage</a>]</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Apple Unveils iWork '09</p>
<p>Introduces iWork.com Public Beta for Online Document Sharing</p>
<p>SAN FRANCISCO, Jan. 6 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ &mdash; Apple(R) today introduced iWork(R) '09, the latest version of Apple's popular office productivity suite, which adds powerful new features without sacrificing Apple's legendary ease of use. Keynote(R) '09 introduces advanced object transitions, which automatically animate objects with a choice of effects and Magic Move, an innovative way to create sophisticated animations just by applying a simple transition. Pages(R) '09 features a new Full Screen view that helps you focus on your writing and an outline mode to organize your thoughts. Numbers(R) '09 introduces a quick way to group and summarize data and a dramatically simplified way to create complex formulas. Apple also announced iWork.com public beta, a new service Apple is developing to share iWork '09 documents online.</p>
<p>"Millions of Mac users have fallen in love with iWork," said <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged STEVE JOBS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/steve-jobs/">Steve Jobs</a>, Apple's CEO. "With iWork '09, Apple continues to demonstrate that innovation is possible in office productivity software, and that creating impressive presentations, documents and spreadsheets doesn't need to be complicated."</p>
<p>Keynote '09 introduces Magic Move, which allows you to apply a simple transition to automatically animate the position, scale, rotation and opacity of any image, graphic or text that is repeated on consecutive slides. New text transitions morph text from one slide to the next. New advanced object transitions animate objects off one slide while simultaneously animating objects onto the next slide with a choice of effects. 3D charts now include cylinder shapes, beveled-edge pie charts, new textures and four new 3D build effects. The Keynote Remote application, sold separately in the App Store, lets you view slides and presenter notes and control your presentation with your iPhone(TM) or iPod(R) touch.</p>
<p>Pages '09 Full Screen view lets you focus on your document without any distractions and reveals the menus, format bar and page navigator only when needed. Outline mode includes templates that help to quickly build the framework for your document and allow you to collapse, expand and rearrange elements, even inline graphics, with ease. MathType 6 support lets engineers, mathematicians and students easily add sophisticated equations to their documents and EndNote X2 integration lets users add and edit comprehensive bibliographic references. Pages '09 also includes 40 new Apple-designed templates, including newsletters, posters, certificates and coordinated stationery.</p>
<p>Numbers '09 provides a great way to quickly categorize data by column, which you can then collapse, expand and summarize to easily make sense of large sets of data. Numbers '09 makes formula writing dramatically easier with an enhanced function browser which includes built-in help for over 250 functions, and visual placeholders with tool tips that explain each variable in a formula. Use the new Formula List to view all formulas in your entire spreadsheet and jump directly to any formula cell with a single click. Expanded chart options include mixed chart types, two-axis charts, and the ability to apply trend lines and error bars. Numbers charts pasted into Pages or Keynote are linked, and can be updated with a single click.</p>
<p>Apple also introduced iWork.com public beta, a new service Apple is developing to share iWork '09 documents online. Using your Apple ID, just click the iWork.com icon in the Keynote, Pages or Numbers toolbar to upload your document and invite others to view it online. Viewers can provide comments and notes, and download a copy of your document in iWork, <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MICROSOFT OFFICE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/microsoft-office/">Microsoft Office</a> or PDF formats. A consolidated online list of all your shared documents indicates when your viewers have posted comments.</p>
<p>Pricing & Availability</p>
<p>iWork '09 is now available through the Apple Store(R) (http://www.apple.com), Apple's retail stores and Apple Authorized Resellers for a suggested retail price of $79 (US). iWork '09 is available for $49 (US) with the purchase of any Mac(R) through the Apple Store, Apple's retail stores and Apple Authorized Resellers.</p>
<p>iWork '09 requires Mac OS(R) X version 10.4.11 or Mac OS X version 10.5.6 or later, a Macintosh(R) computer with an Intel processor, PowerPC G5, or 500 MHz or faster PowerPC G4, 512MB of RAM (1GB recommended), 32MB of video RAM, QuickTime(R) 7.5.5 or later, a DVD drive for installation and 1.2GB of available disk space. iWork.com Public Beta is not included with the purchase of iWork '09. Account setup and activation are required. Fees may apply. Internet access and iWork '09 are required. Terms of service apply and are available at http://www.apple.com/legal/iworkcom/en/terms.html.</p>
<p>Apple ignited the personal computer revolution in the 1970s with the Apple II and reinvented the personal computer in the 1980s with the Macintosh. Today, Apple continues to lead the industry in innovation with its award-winning computers, OS X operating system and iLife and professional applications. Apple is also spearheading the digital media revolution with its iPod portable music and video players and iTunes online store, and has entered the mobile phone market with its revolutionary iPhone.</p>
<p>(C) 2009 Apple Inc. All rights reserved. Apple, the Apple logo, Mac, Mac OS, Macintosh, iWork, Keynote, Pages, Numbers, iPhone, iPod, Apple Store and QuickTime are trademarks of Apple. Other company and product names may be trademarks of their respective owners.</p>
<p>(Photo: http://www.newscom.com/cgi-bin/prnh/20090106/AQTU044)</p>
<p>SOURCE Apple</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5124555/iwork-09-includes-iworkcom-costs-79-%252B-subscription]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5124555]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ilife]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ilife 09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imovie]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphoto]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iwork]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iwork '09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iwork 09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[keynote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac mini]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft office]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mobileme]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phil schiller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:13:24 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5124555&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Keynote Remote for iPhone Will Make Corporate Drones Horny]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/01/340x_custom_1231264778162_macworld2009keynotec11.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/>The new Keynote Remote will allow you to control the new Keynote 09 straight from your iPhone. Unlike the free Apple Remote for iPhone—which control iTunes in your computer—this one costs .99 cents.</p>

<p>From the iTunes App Store:</p>
<p>• With Keynote Remote, you can control your Keynote slide presentation on your computer from your iPod touch or iPhone.</p>
<p>• Swipe to advance or return to the previous slide.</p>
<p>• In portrait mode, see your presenter notes on your iPod touch or iPhone. In landscape mode, preview your next slide.</p>
<p>• Keynote Remote works with your Wi-Fi network, so you can control slide playback from anywhere in the room.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/tag/macworld-2009">Macworld 2009 coverage</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5124577/keynote-remote-for-iphone-will-make-corporate-drones-horny]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5124577]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iwork 09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[keynote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[keynote 09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[keynote remote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld 09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mw2009]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:58:22 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5124577&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sting Teaches You to Play Guitar in Garageband '09]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/01/macworld2009keynoteb83_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/macworld2009keynoteb83_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>In one of the odder announcements during the <a href="http://live.gizmodo.com/">Macworld keynote</a>, Sting, along with others like Norah Jones, will teach you to play guitar and piano in <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5124196/apple-revamps-ilife-for-09-with-iphoto-facial-recognition-and-more">Garageband '09</a>.</p>

<div style='float:right; margin-left:-9px;'><script type="text/javascript">
digg_skin = 'compact'; digg_bgcolor =
'#f1f8fa'; digg_url =
'http://digg.com/apple/Apple_s_Garageband_09_Allows_Sting_to_Teach_You_Music';
</script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript">
</script></div>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5124569/sting-teaches-you-to-play-guitar-in-garageband-09]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5124569]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aluminum]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[artist lessons]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cinema display]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[display]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[displays]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[garageband]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ilife]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ilife 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iwork]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iwork 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[keynote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac mini]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phil schiller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[unibody]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:51:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5124569&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Revamps iLife for '09: $79 for iPhoto Facial Recognition, Improved iMovie and More]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/01/340x_macworld2009keynotec_iLife.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/>Today at <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MACWORLD 2009" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macworld-2009/">Macworld 2009</a>, Apple showed off a new iPhoto with true facial recognition, a better iMovie and other iLife updates&mdash;$79 solo, $99 for family, requires Leopard, available late January.</p>

<div style='float:right; margin-left:-9px;'><script type="text/javascript">
 digg_skin = 'compact'; digg_bgcolor = '#f1f8fa'; digg_url = 'http://digg.com/apple/Apple_Revamps_iLife_for_09_with_iPhoto_Facial_Recognition'; 
</script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript">
</script></div>
<p>It's a good solid upgrade full of very nice features. One big catch, though: You need Leopard for it to run. Here's the rundown, app by app:</p>
<p><strong>iPhoto stuff:</strong><br>
<img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/macworld2009keynote/macworld2009keynoteb22.jpg" style="display:block;"><br clear="all">
<br>
<strong>Faces:</strong> Goes through and identifies distinct faces, automatically tagging them so you don't have to slog through all your photos yourself.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/macworld2009keynote/macworld2009keynoteb27.jpg" style="display:block;"><br clear="all">
<br>
<strong>Places:</strong> Geotagging, basically. iPhoto gives you a map with pins of where photos are taken. If your camera or iPhone encodes GPS info, iPhoto can figure out if the shot was taken at a particular landmark.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/macworld2009keynote/macworld2009keynoteb37.jpg" style="display:block;"><br clear="all">
<br>
<strong>Facebook and Flickr support:</strong> Automatically upload your pics straight to your service of choice. (So glad to hear that one!) iPhoto will even grab Facebook image tags and use them in Faces. Flickr geo tags can be used in Places.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/macworld2009keynote/macworld2009keynoteb44.jpg" style="display:block;"><br clear="all">
<br clear="all">
<br>
<strong>Themes:</strong> Page layouts for slideshows, with different fonts, caption boxes, etc., with crazy transitions. You can save slideshows to iPhone and iPod touch. It can detect faces in shots, so that they are centered during the slideshow. There's a geo-tag slideshow called Travel Books that looks and acts like a scrapbook.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><strong>iMovie stuff:</strong> Sounds like they're finally putting back some power functionality&mdash;let's hope so...<br>
<img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/macworld2009keynote/macworld2009keynoteb54.jpg" style="display:block;"><br clear="all">
<br>
<strong>Precision editor:</strong> It's an expanded timeline for audio and video, for tighter cutting.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/macworld2009keynote/macworld2009keynoteb58.jpg" style="display:block;"><br clear="all">
<br>
<strong>Advanced drag and drop:</strong> You can drag one video on top of another and get advanced context menus.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><strong>Themes:</strong> Select a theme and it automatically sets style for titles, transitions and credits.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/macworld2009keynote/macworld2009keynoteb73.jpg" style="display:block;"><br clear="all">
<br>
<strong>Advanced travel maps:</strong> Put in starting and ending points, and it renders a 3D globe of where you traveled.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/macworld2009keynote/macworld2009keynoteb67.jpg" style="display:block;"><br clear="all">
<br>
<strong>Video stabilization:</strong> Helps you fix shaky shooting when you're editing. Takes some processing time, but the results are amazing.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><strong>Other editing features:</strong> Skimming, seeing edits (before and after cuts), overlaying audio.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/macworld2009keynote/macworld2009keynoteb66.jpg" style="display:block;"><br clear="all">
<br>
<b>New project library:</b> Organize videos in a more logical way with helpful thumbs.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><b>Garageband stuff:</b><br>
Yes, Garageband is still getting developed, even though I think it's been a while since even Walt Mossberg recorded a solo project. (Knowing Pogue's talents, <i>he</i> probably has a nice ProTools rig, or at least Logic.) Good thing this version is apparently looking for new musical recruits...</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/macworld2009keynote/macworld2009keynoteb77.jpg" style="display:block;"><br clear="all">
<br>
<b>Learn to play:</b> It has an instructional feature that helps teach you how to play instruments like guitar and piano.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/macworld2009keynote/macworld2009keynoteb89.jpg" style="display:block;"><br clear="all">
<br>
<b>Artist Lessons:</b> Norah Jones, Sarah McLachlan, John Fogerty, Sting and other FOJ jam for your edification. Only $5 a lesson. Hmmm. (<a href="http://digg.com/apple/Apple_s_Garageband_09_Allows_Sting_to_Teach_You_Music">More</a> on this.)<br clear="all"></p>
<p>There are also updates to iWeb and iDVD, but Apple didn't feel the need to show them off, so they must not be terribly exciting. Here's the press release:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Apple Introduces iLife '09</p>
<p>Major Upgrades to iPhoto, iMovie & GarageBand</p>
<p>SAN FRANCISCO, Jan. 6 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ &mdash; Apple(R) today introduced iLife(R) '09, which features major upgrades to iPhoto(R), iMovie(R) and GarageBand(R), and includes iDVD(R) and an updated version of iWeb(TM). iPhoto '09 builds on the ability to automatically organize photos into Events by adding Faces and Places as breakthrough new ways to easily organize and manage your photos. iMovie '09 expands on the revolutionary super fast movie creation introduced in iMovie '08 by adding the depth users want through powerful easy-to-use new features such as the incredible new Precision Editor, video stabilization, advanced drag and drop, and animated travel maps. GarageBand '09 introduces a whole new way to help you learn to play piano and guitar with 18 basic lessons and optional lessons from top artists such as Sara Bareilles, John Fogerty, Norah Jones and Sting. iLife '09 is included with every new Mac(R) purchase and available as a $79 upgrade for existing users.</p>
<p>"iLife continues to be one of the biggest reasons our customers choose to get a Mac," said Steve Jobs, Apple's CEO. "With iLife '09, we've made working with photos, making movies and learning to play music a lot more fun, and iMovie users are especially going to love the advanced but easy-to-use new features."</p>
<p>iPhoto '09 makes it even easier to browse and search photos, not only by when they were shot (Events), but by who appears in them (Faces) and where they were taken (Places). iPhoto automatically scans photos to detect people's faces and when you assign a name to any face iPhoto will automatically find more pictures of that person. The library can be searched by name or browsed using the new Faces View. Places automatically imports photo location data from a GPS-enabled camera or any iPhone(TM) or you can manually assign a location to any photo, group of photos or event. Once iPhoto knows where photos were taken, you can easily explore them with a simple search or an interactive map. iPhoto '09 lets you easily publish photos to Facebook or Flickr. Photos published to Facebook include assigned names, and name tags added on Facebook sync back to iPhoto. You can also share photos by creating a themed slideshow to play on your Mac, iPhone or iPod(R), or create a beautiful travel book, complete with customized maps of your journey.</p>
<p>iMovie '09 adds powerful, yet easy-to-use new features to let you create a movie quickly, or add refinements and special effects to your project if you have more time. Drag and drop one clip on top of another to reveal new advanced editing options, including replace, insert, audio only, and even picture-in-picture or green screen. With the revolutionary Precision Editor, you can skim and click on a magnified filmstrip to view clips up close and fine tune any edit, like identifying precisely how much to keep, where to cut, use sound from one clip with video from another and more. iMovie '09 analyzes video and reduces camera shake in clips when added to your project. New titles, transitions, cinematic effects, speed changes and animated travel maps add professional polish to your movie.</p>
<p>GarageBand '09, the updated version of Apple's popular software used by millions to play and record music, now gives budding musicians a fun new way to learn to play piano and guitar. Basic Lessons let you learn the fundamentals at your own pace with Apple instructors in beautiful HD video synchronized to animated instruments and notation. Artist Lessons feature original artists showing how to play their hit songs with everything from finger positions and techniques to the story behind the song. Choose from lessons by popular artists including: Sara Bareilles, Colbie Caillat, John Fogerty, Ben Folds, Norah Jones, Sarah McLachlan, Fall Out Boy's Patrick Stump, OneRepublic's Ryan Tedder and Sting. Artist Lessons are sold separately at the new GarageBand Lesson Store, available inside the GarageBand '09 application. GarageBand '09 also includes exciting new guitar amp and stomp-box effects, and Magic GarageBand Jam that lets you play along with a virtual band that you create.</p>
<p>iLife '09 includes iWeb '09 for authoring custom websites and iDVD '09 for creating DVDs. iWeb '09 adds new iWeb Widgets, such as iSight(R) video and photos, a countdown timer, YouTube video and RSS feeds. New integrated FTP publishing allows you to publish your website to virtually any hosting service and updates to your site can now be automatically added to your Facebook profile.</p>
<p>Pricing & Availability</p>
<p>iLife '09 will be available this month for a suggested retail price of $79 (US) through the Apple Store(R) (http://www.apple.com), Apple's retail stores and Apple Authorized Resellers. The iLife Up-To-Date upgrade package is available to all customers who purchased a qualifying new Mac system from Apple or an Apple Authorized Reseller on or after January 6, 2009 for a shipping and handling fee of $9.95 (US). Artist Lessons are available through the GarageBand Lesson Store for $4.99 (US) each.</p>
<p>iLife '09 requires Mac OS(R) X version 10.5.6 or later, a Macintosh(R) computer with an Intel processor, a PowerPC G5 or 867 MHz or faster PowerPC G4, 512MB of RAM (1GB recommended), QuickTime(R) 7.5.5 or later (included), a DVD drive for installation and 4GB of available disk space. iPhoto print services and GarageBand Artist Lessons are available in select countries. Full system requirements and more information on iLife '09 can be found at http://www.apple.com/ilife.</p>
<p>Apple ignited the personal computer revolution in the 1970s with the Apple II and reinvented the personal computer in the 1980s with the Macintosh. Today, Apple continues to lead the industry in innovation with its award-winning computers, OS X operating system and iLife and professional applications. Apple is also spearheading the digital media revolution with its iPod portable music and video players and iTunes online store, and has entered the mobile phone market with its revolutionary iPhone.</p>
<p>(C) 2009 Apple Inc. All rights reserved. Apple, the Apple logo, Mac, Mac OS, Macintosh, iLife, iPhoto, iMovie, GarageBand, iDVD, iWeb, iPhone, iPod, iSight, Apple Store and QuickTime are trademarks of Apple. Other company and product names may be trademarks of their respective owners.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('ilife09', 18, '');
</script></p>
<p>[<a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macworld-2009">Macworld 2009 Full Coverage</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5124196/apple-revamps-ilife-for-09-79-for-iphoto-facial-recognition-improved-imovie-and-more]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5124196]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ilife]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ilife 09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imovie]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphoto]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iwork]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iwork 09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[keynote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac mini]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft office]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mobileme]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phil schiller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:12:11 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5124196&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Makes DRM Deal with Big Three Music Labels, Plus 3G Downloads Coming?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/01/thumb160x_drmdeathwatch.gif" class="left image158" width="158" />According to CNET sources, Apple has signed deals with <a href="http://gizmodo.com/340598/drm-officially-dead-last-major-label-sony-bmg-plans-to-finally-drop-drm">Sony BMG</a>, Universal, and Warner to bring flexibly-priced DRM-free music to iTunes while simultaneously introducing music downloads to the iPhone's 3G service.</p>

<p>While <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/home-entertainment/official-emi-to-release-music-drm+free-248836.php">EMI</a> is already offering DRM-free music on iTunes, they represent only 10% of the music market. With "the big three" on board, a majority of iTunes' music could be DRM-free. But the new pricing options may be the real cost of it all to consumers. While catalog titles will now start at 79 cents, the studios will be able to price music above 99 cents (to undisclosed amounts)&mdash;though CNET's source says that all music will eventually return to 79 cents.</p>
<p>So while it sounds like Apple finally caved to the music industry, at least consumers may get something decent out of it. Hopefully we'll hear about it all today at the keynote. [<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10131761-93.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-20">CNET</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5124390/apple-makes-drm-deal-with-big-three-music-labels-plus-3g-downloads-coming]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5124390]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[unconfirmed]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aluminum]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cinema display]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[display]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[displays]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[drm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[drm-free]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[emi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ilife]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ilife 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[itunes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[itunes drm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iwork]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iwork 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[keynote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac mini]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phil schiller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony bmg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[steve jobs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[unibody]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[warner music]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:13:11 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5124390&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[How to Turn Off Apple Coverage]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/26044351_fa9bf19dc5.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/>Today is <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5123052/macworld-2009-the-last-keynote-liveblog-here-this-tuesday?skyline=true&s=x">the Macworld keynote</a>, which means you will be buried in Apple news for a large chunk of the day. Unless! You <em>turn off</em> Apple coverage. It's easy.</p>
<p>All you've gotta do is <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/not:apple">click here</a>. You can even subscribe to it as an RSS feed, so you can read 100 percent Apple-free Giz 99.9 percent of the time. The trick works for any other tag too: Replace "Apple" in that URL with Microsoft, boobs or unicorns and you can avoid them too, though we can't guarantee it'll work when you walk away from your computer and march into the real world. Which is unfortunate, because the unicorns are pretty bloodthirsty this time of year, at least in the North. [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/not:apple">Apple-free Giz</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5123731/how-to-turn-off-apple-coverage]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5123731]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[announcements]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple sucks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[not:apple]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5123731&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New Mac Mini Stuffed With Up to 1TB Storage]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/01/340x_horriblemacmini.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/>More evidence that <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5121681/new-mac-mini-at-macworld-will-look-like-imac-%252B-time-capsule">the new Mac minis</a> are at least partly geared toward the cheap server market: SeeFile dropped their press release pimping support of the "new Apple Mac Mini hardware" <a href="http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.ars/2009/01/05/macworld-ars-company-may-have-spilled-mac-mini-beans">just a little early</a>.</p>

<p>They specifically mention a complete bundled system with a "Mac mini server with 1 terabyte of storage." A SeeFile spokesperson confirmed to Ars that storage is internal, so <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5121681/new-mac-mini-at-macworld-will-look-like-imac-%252B-time-capsule">the rumor that the mini</a> will have a build-to-order option for dual hard drives&mdash;good for enterprise servers, because of more storage and RAID support&mdash;looks more plausible.</p>
<p>Check out our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5123135/macworld-2009-rumors-round+up">Macworld rumor round up</a> to see what else is likely to happen tomorrow. [<a href="http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.ars/2009/01/05/macworld-ars-company-may-have-spilled-mac-mini-beans">Ars</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5124004/new-mac-mini-stuffed-with-up-to-1tb-storage]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5124004]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac mini]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mini]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[seefile]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5124004&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[iPhone 3G Tethering Plan Coming This Week]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/01/340x_iphone-tether-head.png" class="left image340" width="340" />The long-awaited (<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5078562/confirmed-3g-tethering-coming-to-iphone">previously confirmed</a>) iPhone 3G tethering plan for AT&T is coming this week for Macworld, says TUAW. Standard AT&T tether plan pricing: $30/month with a 5GB cap. Who's excited??? [<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2009/01/05/rumor-watch-atandt-tethering-plans-may-be-announced-this-week/">TUAW</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5123812/iphone-3g-tethering-plan-coming-this-week]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5123812]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone 3g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone tethering]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tethering]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5123812&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Rumor: 17-inch Apple MacBook Pro Finally Receiving Update, Better Battery]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/01/thumb160x_new_macbook_pro_0029.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Word from Asia today is that the 17-inch MacBook Pro, which conspicuously lacked the aluminum update its smaller brethren and cousins received earlier this year, will finally receive its refresh at MacWorld&mdash;with a twist.</p>

<p>The big news isn't the aluminum unibody construction&mdash;it's that the portable rig is getting a slimmer, more efficient battery. But, and this is a <em>big</em> (<em><strong>unconfirmed</strong></em>) but, the battery will apparently be inaccessible, a la the iPhone and iPod. What's the deal with that?</p>
<p>Expect more at <a href="http://gizmodo.com/search/macworld/bydate/?timerange=all">MacWorld</a>, which may or may not have <a href="http://gizmodo.com/search/macworld/bydate/?timerange=all">big or small announcements</a> of any kind. [<a href="http://9to5mac.com/17-inch-unibody-macbook">9to5 Mac</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5123000/rumor-17+inch-apple-macbook-pro-finally-receiving-update-better-battery]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5123000]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aluminum]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[unibody]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 04 Jan 2009 12:15:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Loftus]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5123000&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Spy Photos of Apple's Macworld 2009 Booth]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/01/moscone09inside04fb3.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/moscone09inside04fb3.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a>Ooooooooh, black curtains! Apple says they won't have "revolutionary" products for Macworld 2009, but maybe this means that their new products are worth the secrecy.</p>

<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/moscone09inside02.jpg" width="600" height="303" style="display:block;"><br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/moscone09inside06dz5.jpg" width="600" height="450" style="display:block;"><br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/macworld-organizers-are-smoking-something-really-good.jpg" width="600" height="570" style="display:block;"><br clear="all"></p>
<p>Or maybe it is just that Apple doesn't give a damn about Macworld anymore and this is why these guys were able to sneak in. Whatever it is, we will have to wait and see.</p>
<p>Head to The Apple Lounge for a lot more images. [<a href="http://www.theapplelounge.com/">The Apple Lounge</a> via <a href="http://setteb.it/news-Esclusiva-l-anteprima-dello-stand-di-Apple-al-Macworld-2009-01-02-005455.xhtml">SetteB.it</a>—Thanks Fabio]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5122647/spy-photos-of-apples-macworld-2009-booth/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5122647]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mwsf]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[MWSF 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[MWSF09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[spy photos]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 02 Jan 2009 22:11:17 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5122647&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New Mac Mini at Macworld, Will Look Like iMac + Time Capsule]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/12/340x_horriblemacmini.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/><a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2008/12/31/rumor-watch-new-mac-mini-go-for-launch/">TUAW has</a> the most complete description yet of the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5114277/new-mac-mini-will-use-nvidia-chipset-helloooo-full-hd-video">new Mac mini widely rumored/expected</a> to launch at Macworld. It'll be topped with iMac-esque black plastic instead of white, and have a lip <a href="http://www.apple.com/timecapsule/">like Time Capsule.</a></p>

<p>The lip conceals the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MAC MINI" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/mac-mini/">Mac mini</a>'s optical drive slot, which is useful now since TUAW says that the new drive will be SATA, meaning it can be swapped out for a second hard drive, probably as a custom build option. The second drive is boon to the business crowd that uses Mac minis in server farms (<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/philliecasablanca/2291221710/">like this one</a>), since it not only adds more storage, but makes RAID1 mirroring easy.</p>
<p>No other details on specs&mdash;we're pretty interested in what processor these things will be packing&mdash;though it's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5114277/new-mac-mini-will-use-nvidia-chipset-helloooo-full-hd-video">looking fairly certain</a> (as certain as these things ever look, anyway) that they'll have Nvidia's GeForce 9400m chipset from the new MacBooks in tow.</p>
<p>We'll know in about a week, along with whatever other surprises Macworld has in store. What would you like to see in the new Mac mini, besides a Blu-ray drive? (Cause that's what everyone wants.) [<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2008/12/31/rumor-watch-new-mac-mini-go-for-launch/">TUAW</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5121681/new-mac-mini-at-macworld-will-look-like-imac-%252B-time-capsule]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5121681]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac mini]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5121681&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Rumor: Apple iWork Going to the Cloud?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/12/thumb160x_iwork09cloud_01.png" class="left image158" width="158" /><a href="http://9to5mac.com/iwork-going-cloud">9 to 5's latest Apple rumor</a> is that the iWork suite, Apple's Office competitor, is going to the cloud.</p>

<p>Which is good news because I hardly use Office and find myself in Google Docs when I need to use a word processor or spreadsheet. If true, there's no doubt in my mind it'll require use of the paid MobileMe service, which is right now a bit over priced. Adding more functionality to the service is a great way to add value, but Google Docs <em>is</em> free. [<a href="http://9to5mac.com/iwork-going-cloud">9to5mac</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5121835/rumor-apple-iwork-going-to-the-cloud]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5121835]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cloud]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iwork]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumors]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:05:04 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5121835&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Rumor: Apple Launching Giant iPod Touch Next Fall]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/12/340x_ipodtouchhd.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/>Citing "three independent sources close to Apple," one who has "actually held the device," <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/30/large-form-ipod-touch-to-launch-in-fall-09/">TechCrunch says Apple</a> is planning to release a giant <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged IPOD TOUCH" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ipod-touch/">iPod touch</a> device with a seven- or nine-inch screen next fall.</p>

<p>In other words, it's a tablet running the scaled down version of OS X that's on the iPod touch and iPhone&mdash;not <a href="http://gizmodo.com/326468/apple-touchscreen-tablet-contest-winner-and-gallery">the MacBook touch tablet</a> fanboys have been dreaming of since multitouch became a part of their fantasy lexicon, but very much like the Son-of-Newton PDA with an embedded version of OS X <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/mock-up/fabled-newton-2-%252B-ultrathin-notebook--apple-macbook-touch-303927.php">we'd heard about a year ago</a>. What makes this giganto iPod touch worthwhile, according to Arrington&mdash;over a full-fledged MacBook tablet&mdash;is the App Store. (Of course, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5027706/rumor-macbook-touch-coming-in-october">we'd heard rumors of touch tablet</a> running both the App Store <em>and</em> real Mac apps, though the inherent philosophical dissonance of an App Store + real Mac apps approach never quite neatly resolved itself in our minds.)</p>
<p>One piece of evidence pointing to <em>something</em> like Arrington describes (besides <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/mock-up/fabled-newton-2-%252B-ultrathin-notebook--apple-macbook-touch-303927.php">those earlier Son-of-Newton tablet whispers</a>) however, was <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5067405/macbook-nano-or-iphone-slate-caught-online-says-nyt">the mysterious tidbit in October</a> about an Apple product with "a display somewhere between an iPhone and a MacBook" spotted surfing the internets. An <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/12/apple-tablet-ipod-touch-hd">iPod touch HD</a> with 800 or 720x480 resolution would fit in that space pretty nicely, and be <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5066800/steve-jobs-on-netbooks-weve-got-some-interesting-ideas">an "interesting" take</a> on the netbook.</p>
<p>Still, TechCrunch doesn't say this is an absolutely guaranteed happening: "I'm not saying Apple is definitely launching a large form iPod Touch." As with all rumored Apple products, we'll see it when we see it, probably 12 hours before it's actually announced (if it ever is) in a slightly grainy photo. [<a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/30/large-form-ipod-touch-to-launch-in-fall-09/">TechCrunch</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5121277/rumor-apple-launching-giant-ipod-touch-next-fall]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5121277]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod touch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod touch hd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[MacBook nano]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook touch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld 2009]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 31 Dec 2008 02:11:19 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5121277&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Steve Jobs' Health Declining Rapidly, Reason for Macworld Cancellation]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/12/340x_steve_jobs_apple.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/>According to a previously reliable source, Apple misrepresented the reasons behind <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5111773/apple-announces-last-year-at-macworld-no-steve-jobs-keynote">Macworld and Jobs' keynote cancellation</a>. Allegedly, the real cause is his rapidly declining health. In fact, it may be even worse than we imagined:</p>

<blockquote>
<p>Steves health is rapidly declining. Apple is choosing to remove the hype factor strategically vs letting the hype destroy apple when the <b>inevitable news comes later this spring</b>.</p>
<p>This strategic loss will be less of a bang with investors. <b>This is why Macworld is a no-go anymore</b>. No more Steve means no more hype. Saying they are no longer needing [Macworld] is the cover designed by the worldwide "loyalty" department.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This source has repeatedly been 100% correct before. Those times, however, were always related to news and images of unreleased Apple products. I can only hope that, in this more personal matter, it is absolutely wrong. And that if he is not, that sentence just means that Steve Jobs is retiring <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5063281/is-steve-jobs-preparing-his-farewell">according to his plan</a>.</p>
<p>While <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5029524/steve-jobs-says-he-doesnt-have-cancer-and-why-its-not-your-business-anyway">Steve Jobs' health is nobody's business</a>—not the press, not investors, not the public—we believe that there's a line between saying "no-comment" and plainly misleading—once <a href="http://valleywag.gawker.com/5029459/steve-jobs-admits-katie-cotton-lied-for-him">again</a>—the public.</p>
<p>Steve Jobs have been giving Macworld Expo keynotes since he came back as interim CEO of the company in 1997. Since then he has never failed once, always introducing notable products both at Macworld San Francisco and Macworld New York. During his latest Macworld keynote, in 2008, he introduced the MacBook Air. Later this year, he used his WWDC presentation to announce the new iPhone 3G. In his last two show-n-tells, for the new iPods and the new MacBooks, he used less time on stage, giving <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5063281/is-steve-jobs-preparing-his-farewell">more limelight to key members of Apple's executive team</a>.</p>
<p>According to our Deep Throat's report, the fact seems to be that whether or not Apple <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5111914/apple-always-wanted-to-get-out-of-macworld">had other reasons to pull out of Macworld</a>, they weren't the only ones, and they certainly weren't the same ones used for not putting Steve Jobs through the ordeal of a two-hour presentation.</p>
<p><i>Apple did not comment on this story after being contacted.</i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5120687/steve-jobs-health-declining-rapidly-reason-for-macworld-cancellation]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5120687]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[alert]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Kattie Cotton]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[steve jobs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs' health]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 30 Dec 2008 12:15:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5120687&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Home Server Will Share Music, Movies and Photos Over the Internet]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/12/spaceimtmachine.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/spaceimtmachine.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>We love HP's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5119452/hp-mediasmart-ex487-server-has-remote-mp3-streaming-mac-time-machine-compatibility">new Time Machine-compatible MediaSmart Home Server</a>. <a href="http://9to5mac.com/apple-home-server">9to5Mac reports</a> that Apple is working on something similar, but it'll be tied into MobileMe and will share music, movies and more over the internet.</p>

<p>Here's the full list of features 9to5Mac has heard will make it to Apple's SpaceTime Thing:<br></p>
<blockquote>&bull; The device will tie in MobileMe with an Apple built-in Dynamic DNS system. For instance, if your MobileMe account was "9to5mac", your domain name would be "9to5mac.me.com". This is how you'd reach your filesystem throughout the Internet. Your media would also reside here.<br>
&bull; Built in AFP filesharing for Time Machine backups and centralized file stores.<br>
&bull; iTunes shared Library Database for not just music, but also video. Access over the Internet to all of your media.<br>
&bull; Photo database and tie in with with MobileMe.<br>
&bull; Sharing media with iPod Touch and iPhones both over the Internet and while at home. AppleTV as well.<br>
&bull; The box will be based on the Time Machine platform (ARM), not a more expensive Intel/Leopard Server configuration.<br>
&bull; Lots of power saving features like turning off hard drives when not in use.<br>
&bull; Multiple hard drive configurations would be made available with RAID 5 redundancy.</blockquote>
<p>Essentially, easy centralized media sharing and access&mdash;including video&mdash;not just over your home network, but over the internet, for all of your computers and iThings, plus a multi-drive backup server. Interestingly, it'll be running on the Time Machine platform, not as a Leopard server. Questions left to answer: How will it interface with Windows boxes? Will you need a MobileMe account? (Seems so. It would make the service a <em>much</em> better value proposition, and perhaps a must-buy.)</p>
<p>The larger picture makes sense to us, even if some of the details don't turn out quite right: Apple (main)streamlined backups and media streaming over the home network, this seems like a logical step from its <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged TIME CAPSULE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/time-capsule/">Time Capsule</a>, especially since they've got a bunch of the infrastructure in place. Constant access to your stuff from anywhere, like Apple's version of Windows Home Server. What would you want to see in an Apple SpaceTime Capsule media server thinger? [<a href="http://9to5mac.com/apple-home-serve">9to5Mac</a> via <a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2008/12/29/apple-developing-a-home-media-server/">MacRumors</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5120123/apple-home-server-will-share-music-movies-and-photos-over-the-internet]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5120123]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mobileme]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[spacetime machine]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[time capsule]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5120123&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Leaked OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard Screenshot Shows 32-bit Mode]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/12/340x_32bitmode_02.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/>Sevenmac Magazin got themselves some screenshots of Apple's new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged OS X" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/os-x/">OS X</a> update, <a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/snowleopard/">Snow Leopard</a>, and it looks like apps with 32-bit modules will need to run in 32-bit mode even if they are 64-bit.</p>

<p>We know that <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SNOW LEOPARD" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/snow-leopard/">Snow Leopard</a> isn't going to be any kind of massive overhaul, but <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5014789/snow-leopard-revealed-multi+core-optimized-gpu-lovin-os-upgrade-due-in-one-year">more of a refinement</a> of the existing OS. It's aiming for stability, speed, and power management.</p>
<p>All the other screenshots that Sevenmac have just look to be proving that they actually have a working version of Snow Leopard. This one, though, is definitely weird. You have to restart the preference app in 32-bit mode in order to access the Network preference pane? Is it because this developer version only has the 32-bit version of the Network PP done? Is that going to be a recurring issue, that 64-bit apps that have to somehow work with 32-bit code needs to start/restart in compatibility mode? It would be super annoying if the OS doesn't handle it transparently, so this has us scratching our heads.</p>
<p>It is, though, probably a side-effect of Snow Leopard's tighter 64-bit compatibility. For more on that, and why 64-bit is going to make 10.6 cool, head <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5076473/giz-explains-whats-so-awesome-about-64+bit">over here to Giz Explains</a>.</p>
<p>Sevenmac has a bunch of other pictures over <a href="http://74.125.93.104/translate_c?hl=en&sl=de&u=http://community.sevenmac.de/Sinan/albums/89/734&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dhttp://www.sevenmac.de/exklusive-bilder-zum-kommen-snow-leopard%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26hs%3Dglh&usg=ALkJrhgdx05A2zLUCBWCXNL_23mQJor2iw">here</a>. [<a href="http://www.sevenmac.de/exklusive-bilder-zum-kommen-snow-leopard">Sevenmac</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5119136/leaked-os-x-106-snow-leopard-screenshot-shows-32+bit-mode]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5119136]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[10.6]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[x]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 27 Dec 2008 18:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5119136&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Patent Shows Nifty Keyboard Gestures for the iPhone]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/12/340x_iphonegestures.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />While many non-imminent <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged APPLE PATENTS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/apple-patents/">Apple patents</a> can edge into the realm of wishful thinking, this one is pretty doable: <a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2008/12/25/multi-touch-swipe-gestures-for-iphone-keyboard/">useful little gestures</a> for the iPhone, which are received over the phone's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged ONSCREEN KEYBOARD" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/onscreen-keyboard/">onscreen keyboard</a>.</p>
<p>According to the patent application, simple input commands like delete and space would be controlled with simple back and forward-swipe motions. While remapping something that is already readily available through a screen key is of minor value, this technique could also be used to introduce completely new functions, and augment the iPhone's somewhat gimped text manipulation.</p>
<p>To this end, the patent describes customizable functions, which could lead to multitouch gestures that trigger the deletion of entire words, switching of keyboards, or quick input of specific characters. While many users would never take to a gesture system like this, it wouldn't get in anyone's way and could be silently slotted into the next firmware update without much effort or controversy, providing a nice little feature-add for iPhone and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged IPOD TOUCH" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ipod-touch/">iPod Touch</a> users. [<a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2008/12/25/multi-touch-swipe-gestures-for-iphone-keyboard/">MacRumors</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5118202/apple-patent-shows-nifty-keyboard-gestures-for-the-iphone]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5118202]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple patents]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gestures]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone keyboard gestures]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod touch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[onscreen keyboard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 26 Dec 2008 06:43:20 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5118202&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Choose Your Own Apple CEO Adventure]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/12/340x_adventure-cropped.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/></p>
<div style='float:right; margin-left:-9px;'><script type="text/javascript">
digg_skin = 'compact'; digg_bgcolor = '#f1f8fa'; digg_url = 'http://digg.com/apple/Choose_Your_Own_Apple_CEO_Adventure_2'; 
</script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript">
</script></div>
<p>Future, Cupertino &mdash; After a long and fruitful tenure as CEO, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged STEVE JOBS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/steve-jobs/">Steve Jobs</a> steps down in early 2009 to fanfare and industry fawning. Apple needs a new leader. It's time to <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged CHOOSE YOUR OWN ADVENTURE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/choose-your-own-adventure/">choose your own adventure</a>.</p>
<p>Much deliberation and coin tossing goes on in the back rooms of Apple. Their board of directors choose a person who they strongly believe can lead Apple into its next phase of growth, a person who can, at the very least, match Steve Jobs' product development whip cracking, if not his outsized public persona.<br clear="all"></p>
<p>The board chooses...</p>
<p>&bull; Jonathan Ive, Apple's Senior Vice President of Industrial Design. Turn to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5116394/apple-cyoa-page-10">page 10</a>.<br>
&bull; <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged PHIL SCHILLER" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/phil-schiller/">Phil Schiller</a>, Apple's Senior Vice President of Worldwide Product Marketing. Turn to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5116388/apple-cyoa-page-11">page 11</a>.<br>
&bull; <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged TIM COOK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/tim-cook/">Tim Cook</a>, Apple's Chief Operating Officer. Turn to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5116393/apple-cyoa-page-12">page 12</a>.<br>
&bull; <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged BILL GATES" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/bill-gates/">Bill Gates</a>, Super Rich Dude. Turn to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5116386/apple-cyoa-page-13">page 13</a>.<br>
&bull; Yourself, Super Poor Dude. Turn to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5116387/apple-cyoa-page-14">page 14</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/chooseadventure-final.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="619" height="1034" style="display:block;"></p>
<p><i>Choose Your Own Adventure is property of <a href="http://cyoa.com/">CYOA.com</a></i>.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5116396/choose-your-own-apple-ceo-adventure]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5116396]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple cyoa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bill gates]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ceo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[choose your own adventure]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[choose your own apple adventure]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cyoa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gates]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jon ive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phil schiller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[schiller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[steve ballmer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[steve jobs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tim cook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 24 Dec 2008 12:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5116396&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Rumor: New iMacs Shipping Next Month]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/12/340x_macupdate.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Plausible, but still rumor-y: Chinese paper Economic Daily News says new iMacs are coming <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macworld">next month</a>, which goes with what we've been hearing about <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5114277/new-mac-mini-will-use-nvidia-chipset-helloooo-full-hd-video">about Nvidia chipsets</a> and <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/11/19/apple_waiting_on_quad_core_desktop_chips_from_intel.html">new Intel quad-cores</a>. [<a href="http://www.digitimes.com/NewsShow/NewsSearch.asp?DocID=PB000000000000000000000000003947&query=APPLE">Digitimes</a> via <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/12/23/next_gen_imacs_due_in_january_says_paper.html">AppleInsider</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5117029/rumor-new-imacs-shipping-next-month]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5117029]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld 2009]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:50:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5117029&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Macworld Expo Organizers IDG Have No Plans To Bail on 2010 Show]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Even though <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5111773/steve-jobs-skipping-final-macworld-apple-keynote">Apple pulling out of Macworld</a> after this year <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5111896/will-trade-shows-survive">probably spells the end</a>, IDG is going on record saying they're <a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/137593/2008/12/kent_comment.html">barreling ahead with Macworld 2010</a>. No, it's not the most shocking announcement, since Macworld is arguably one of the brighter jewels in <a href="http://www.idg.com/www/idgproducts.nsf/typeform?readform&type=event">IDG's portfolio of trade shows</a> that includes everything from the DEMO conference and LinuxWorld to the Vietnam ComNet and Telecom World Expo. </p>
<p>If you ask me, though, I'm with <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5111896/will-trade-shows-survive">Wilson</a>: one less trade show is a good thing. And even though they're pledging activity for 2010, I don't see Macworld staying alive much longer after that. [<a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/137593/2008/12/kent_comment.html">Macworld</a> via <a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2008/12/16/apples-macworld-exit-due-to-politics-not-health-issues/">Mac Rumors</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5112288/macworld-expo-organizers-idg-have-no-plans-to-bail-on-2010-show]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5112288]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld 2010]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[steve jobs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[trade shows]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Mahoney]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5112288&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Always Wanted to Get Out of MacWorld]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/12/340x_macworld-expo-logo-apple2.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/>Apple bowing out of MacWorld after January 2009 comes as a shock to many. But, really, according to a source at Apple, they've been planning to get off MacWorld for a long, long time.</p>

<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5111773/apple-announces-last-year-at-macworld-no-steve-jobs-keynote">They are not lying in their press release.</a> NAB, MacWorld Tokyo, AppleExpo in Paris, and Summer MacWorld at New York/Boston were the path to this not-really-<i>that</i>-shocking event. They almost <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2002/10/18/BU244624.DTL&hw=MACWORLD&sn=006&sc=656">quit in 2002</a>, but about two years ago I was sharing some wine with a friend from Apple and he told me: "We are going to phase out all trade shows". "Even MacWorld?," I asked. "Yes," he said, "MacWorld will go too. I don't know when, but it will."</p>
<p>I was a bit shocked then, but I understood. The effectiveness of these events in terms of media impact is not as important as it used to be. In fact, the impact is no different from the smaller press- and analyst-only events. These generate the same amount of buzz as a big fair. The first time I went to the Apple campus was for the first truly specialized Apple event: They presented the Xserve to a group of trade journalists and analysts. They got exactly the impact they wanted in exactly the media they wanted. In addition to this, the special events dates are set by Apple. They don't have to depend on other people's schedules.</p>
<p>But none of these reasons explain why Steve Jobs is not giving the final keynote himself. If any other thing, Steve Jobs retiring from active duty at Apple sooner than expected is the factor that has precipitated this cancellation. The company is not going to have a showman like him, capable of keeping the crowd with their mouths open during a two-hour long MacWorld presentation, so why do it? And with smaller events centered on single product families—where Steve absence won't be so hard to cover— who cares?</p>
<p>On the other side, it could all just be that they don't have anything to announce this time and Steve has had enough of this stupid yearly big bang that crushes everyone at engineering and marketing.</p>
<p>However, all the signs point to Steve preparing to transfer the company to new hands. The simplest explanation, following previous events, is that canceling MacWorld and having Phil Schiller to present it is just another part of His Plan. This doesn't mean that he is leaving the company tomorrow, however. it is just one more step towards that goal, as <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5063281/is-steve-jobs-preparing-his-farewell">I explained back in October.</a></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5111914/apple-always-wanted-to-get-out-of-macworld]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5111914]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[steve jobs]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:35:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5111914&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Will Trade Shows Survive?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/12/Chen_Macworld_Empty.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/Chen_Macworld_Empty.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a>Seeing Apple pull out of Macworld and hearing talk of poor turnout at CES make us speculate on the future of trade shows&mdash;like automakers and newspapers, are they another institution on the endangered-species list?</p>

<p>Apple's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5111773/apple-announces-last-year-at-macworld-no-steve-jobs-keynote">cited reason</a> for the withdrawal of Steve Jobs from the Macworld keynote, and the subsequent withdrawal of Apple from Macworld altogether, was that:<br></p>
<blockquote>Apple is reaching more people in more ways than ever before, so like many companies, trade shows have become a very minor part of how Apple reaches its customers....Apple has been steadily scaling back on trade shows in recent years, including NAB, Macworld New York, Macworld Tokyo and Apple Expo in Paris.</blockquote>
<p>This is true, but I don't think anyone really considers Macworld a "trade show" like CES, CEDIA or IFA.</p>
<p>It's a show, sure, but it's one where Stevie J is the main attraction. Maybe there are a few retail buyers here and there who need to hit up Macworld to see what's hot for Macs, but Apple doesn't really do this stuff for the attention of retail buyers anyway. When was the last time Macworld was a serious forum for independent software and accessories? Macworld will probably die without Apple, but I think it's because Macworld <i>is</i> Apple.</p>
<p>These other trade shows are buckling for different reasons. I can't speak to NAB or AES, which primarily foment business-to-business dealings, and which Apple did in the past support. I can speak to the myriad consumer electronics and computer shows that occur throughout the year, none of which have featured Apple at any time in my memory.</p>
<p>The easiest rationale for the decline of these shows is the current credit crunch and global economic downturn. A crappy economy means fewer awesome toys, one supposes. But even before the current crisis, a few factors were choking trade shows where it matters:</p>
<p>A true trade show is where retailers go to buy their year's inventory. But consolidation of the country's retailers into Best Buy, Amazon, Walmart and some other guys makes it easy for companies like Sony, Samsung, Mitsubishi and more to just set up shop in some sunny beachy spot and fly in the likeliest buyers. (Or, in Walmart's case, for makers to truck a bunch of crap to Bentonville, AR and see what sticks.)</p>
<p>Since showing up at a trade show doesn't threaten that big ole Best Buy order, it becomes optional at best, and an unneeded expense at worst.</p>
<p>The same goes for the media&mdash;a large side effect of the show. Companies don't need Macworld and CES to launch product. Sure, it's nice to see devices in person, but they're often mockups, and useless for making real judgment calls.</p>
<p>As fun as it is to rush off after the holidays to some convention center to eat crappy food, lose sleep and swap cold virus strains, the January time frame for Macworld and CES makes no sense for readers of blogs and other media, since they're not looking for new gadgets at that time. Again, retail buyers need to plan ahead, but for reviewers and consumers in the middle of the retail cycle's buying slump, this is more candy than sustenance.</p>
<p>Before the internet was a viable medium, or the CE space was big enough where many companies could spend in the hundreds of millions for mainstream TV/radio marketing, centralized marketing though trade shows was a cheap and easy way to get the news out. Echoing Apple's statement, now that they can get the word out online&mdash;and through retail locations and other more innovative outreach programs&mdash;spending money on PR and marketing not just to reporters but to millions of actual consumers, the tradeshow take the role of an opportunistic middleman rather than a needed facilitator.</p>
<p>One big threat to US trade shows is the declining value of the dollar. This year and last, we saw more and more stuff debut at IFA in Berlin than we did at NY's summer shows and CEDIA in September, in part because Asian electronics makers are encouraged to sell more to people who pay in stronger currency. CEDIA this past year was fun, but nearly every hot product we went to cover had already been announced in some form or another in Germany.</p>
<p>CEDIA's bread and butter isn't gadgetry, though, like IFA's is. It's really about home-theater components and systems engineered for custom installation inside rich people's homes. In this country, that's still dominated by an association of independent installers (known as, surprise surprise, CEDIA). And those guys have rich customers who don't actually suffer through depressions as much as you'd <s>like them to</s> think.</p>
<p>My guess is that while CEDIA and IFA are safe (for different reasons mentioned above), CES will change and probably shrink, and Macworld will likely die. Soon.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5111896/will-trade-shows-survive]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5111896]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[trade shows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cedia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ces]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ifa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[steve jobs]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:50:36 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5111896&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Do You Think Steve Jobs Is Retiring Very Soon?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/12/Steve_Jobs_obit.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/Steve_Jobs_obit.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a>Everyone's at least a little surprised that Steve Jobs <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5111773/apple-announces-last-year-at-macworld-no-steve-jobs-keynote">won't be giving Apple's final Macworld keynote</a>. But do you think it's because he's about to retire?</p>

<p><script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src="http://static.polldaddy.com/p/1203102.js">
</script><noscript><a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/1203102/">Is Steve Jobs About to Retire?</a><br>
<span style="font-size:9px;">( <a href="http://www.polldaddy.com">surveys</a>)</span></noscript></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5111901/do-you-think-steve-jobs-is-retiring-very-soon]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5111901]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[question of the day]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[steve jobs]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:21:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5111901&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
