<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: Microsoft]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/microsoft</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'microsoft']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New Zune HD Colors Coming December 1]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_zune2_newcolors_text.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Remember those non-existent Zune HD colors that <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5360354/pink-magenta-purple-and-atomic-revealed-as-possible-new-zune-hd-colors">popped up</a> in the Zune software source code? Well, looks like some of them made it to production. The Purple and Magenta versions land on December 1. [<a href="https://zunestore.net/us/catalog/index.aspx">Zune Store</a> via <a href="https://twitter.com/yegr/status/6122524352">@yegr</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5414284/new-zune-hd-colors-coming-december-1]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5414284]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[zunehd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[zune]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5414284&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Killed Windows 7 Family Guy Special Even More Horrible Than I Imagined]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/KjzyBZZr8vM&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/KjzyBZZr8vM&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object>Microsoft's posted the clips from <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #familyguy" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/familyguy/">Family Guy</a>'s killed <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5381164/family-guys-seth-macfarlane-and-microsoft-team-up-for-hackiest-hackathon-that-ever-hacked">hackathon</a> that would've shilled for <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windows7" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows7/">Windows 7</a>, and they're even more brain-liquefyingly stupid than I thought. Just watch, but when your brains leak out your ears, don't say I didn't warn you.</p>

<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_1"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/F-daXbYL4hY&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/F-daXbYL4hY&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/f-daxbyl4hy.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display: none;"/></p>
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_2"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/C7pSAa-77mc&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/C7pSAa-77mc&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/c7psaa-77mc.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display: none;"/></p>
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_3"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Yk_-4HQ4RSg&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Yk_-4HQ4RSg&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/yk_-4hq4rsg.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display: none;"/><br>
Okay, actually, I kind of like this one. [<a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/WindowsVideos">YouTube</a> via <a href="http://www.neowin.net/news/main/09/11/26/microsofts-windows-7-family-guy-clips-revealed">NeoWin</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5414046/the-killed-windows-7-family-guy-special-even-more-horrible-than-i-imagined]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5414046]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[family guy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:05:06 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5414046&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[You Don't Need a TiVo Anymore]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/tivo-subscribers-1009-590x472.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_tivo-subscribers-1009-590x472.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>This <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5412735/tivo-is-slowly-dying">chart of TiVo's slipping subscriber numbers</a> may be surprising, seeing as TiVo is <i>the</i> television recording device (and it's so good), but it's something we've seen coming for a while. We love you TiVo, but you're fast becoming obsolete.</p>
<p>The typical TiVo user is a person who just wants their TV recordings to work, regardless of the monthly fee. They may or may not be tech savvy, but chances are TiVo was their first DVR&mdash;since we've found, anecdotally, people gravitate back to the first DVR interface they use. So why is their marketshare down to 2004 levels? The answer is simple: cheap DVRs from providers are eating TiVo from the low end, and everyone else can now use <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windows7" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows7/">Windows 7</a> and a tuner to act as a DVR just fine.</p>
<p>Cheap DVRs from Comcast, or Time Warner or your satellite provider have gotten good&mdash;or rather, less shitty&mdash;enough to make them actually viable options for home recording. Even I couldn't turn down only paying an extra $5 per month to have a recorder that works well enough to watch stuff with, even if you don't have show recommendations, and fast forwarding barely functions well enough to stop where you want. But it's $5. $5. Five. Dollars. And that's without having to pay upfront for the box. You can rent three of these for the price of one TiVo subscription.</p>
<p>As for the big reason why you don't need a TiVo anymore, in the future, you can thank Microsoft and Windows 7. Just take a look at that Windows 7 PC you have. Yeah, the one in your office. That can be your DVR. CableLabs finally took off their <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5356007/normal-people-can-now-install-cablecard-tuners-on-windows-7-pcs">ridiculous OEM restriction</a> on who can install CableCARD tuners&mdash;the device that actually takes a digital cable signal and turns it into something your computer can understand and record&mdash;so you can go and get one of these yourself for about $200. So for $200, with no future fees except for your normal cable bill, you can have yourself a home DVR that's arguably as good as TiVo. And, much easier to expand and augment, both storage and functionality-wise, than a set top box.</p>
<p>And if you don't want a computer in your living room (you need that thing in your office anyway), all you have to do is get an Xbox 360 and extend it. Multiple Xboxes mean streaming to multiple rooms, something that's not even possible on a TiVo.</p>
<p>Of course there's going to be a core group of TiVo users who really enjoy TiVo functionality, really appreciate their interface and can't imagine using something else. But is that enough to sustain a business when so many other options are cheaper and just as good? <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5412735/tivo-is-slowly-dying">The numbers say no.</a></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5413053/you-dont-need-a-tivo-anymore]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5413053]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rant]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cablecard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cablelabs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dvr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[predictions]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[recording]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tivo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tivo is dead]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5413053&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Windows 7 Passes Mac OS X Install Base]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It was going to happen eventually, since Windows has 18 times <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #osx" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #osx" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/osx/">OS X</a>'s marketshare, but <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windows7" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windows7" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows7/">Windows 7</a> already passed Apple's install base about a month after having been released. Again, not a surprise, but it is interesting how many people already upgraded to Windows 7 (or bought a new machine with Windows 7 on it). [<a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9141424/Windows_7_passes_Mac_OS_X_in_market_share_race">Computerworld</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5412987/windows-7-passes-mac-os-x-install-base]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5412987]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7 marketshare]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:59:32 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5412987&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The PC Lounge at Saks Fifth Avenue Looks Uncomfortable]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/sakkkkks.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_sakkkkks.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>This is the Microsoft PC Lounge at Saks Fifth Avenue. Looks a tad uncomfortable!</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/twittwerinws.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_twittwerinws.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Also, <em>Twitter</em>. Microsoft is sponsoring a Twitter feed with the hashtag <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/holidaywindows/" class="posthashtag">#HolidayWindows</a> that runs in a window outside. The results are, um, interesting so far. Surely you can do better, try it.</p>
<p><strong>Update</strong>: Microsoft says there are "filters in place to make sure that in opening them up to Twitter feeds we had content that was appropriate for the general public to view and was within the holiday theme. This filter includes any attempt to spam the windows with negative commentary that is not in the spirit of the holidays." So nothing nasty actually makes it up to Saks' windows, supposedly. [<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/2009/nov09/11-23SaksWindows7.mspx">Microsoft</a> via <a href="http://9to5mac.com/rofl_windows_v_mac_at_saks_30115">9to5Mac</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5412683/the-pc-lounge-at-saks-fifth-avenue-looks-uncomfortable]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5412683]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[saks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[saks fifth ave.]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shopping]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5412683&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Windows Home Server Power Pack 3 Available Now]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windowshomeserver" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windowshomeserver" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windowshomeserver/">Windows Home Server</a>'s <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5408474/windows-home-server-power-pack-3-available-november-24th">Power Pack 3</a> is available now, and all you have to do is go into your Windows Update section of your <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #homeserver" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #homeserver" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/homeserver/">Home Server</a> and hit Update to access the new features. Unless you're one of those who accessed PP3 before it was final, in which case you have to <a href="http://windowsteamblog.com/blogs/windowshomeserver/archive/2009/11/24/power-pack-3-instructions-for-users-running-pre-release-versions.aspx">follow these instructions instead</a>.</p>
<p>What do you get with PP3? Windows 7 Library support, better Windows Search, the ability to automatically transfer Windows Media Center recordings to the Home Server storage (off your recorder's hard drive) and various fixes.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5412763/windows-home-server-power-pack-3-available-now]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5412763]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[windows home server]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[home server]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[power pack 3]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[update]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[whs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows home server power pack 3]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:21:52 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5412763&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Xbox Elegant Edition]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/bild-2-1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_bild-2-1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>"To hell with IPs!" <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #xbox360" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/xbox360/">Xbox 360</a> cried to TiVo HD. And for one night, there were no movies watched nor games played while the wire-crossed lovers embraced in the warm glow of the plasma TV.</p>

<p>The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #xboxelegantedition" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/xboxelegantedition/">Xbox Elegant Edition</a>, though born an orphan, need but look in the mirror to find his parents. But just because you know where home is doesn't mean you can go there.*<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/bild-1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_bild-1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
<em>* Some details of this story were altered for dramatic purposes. The Xbox Elegant Edition is really just a mod by Sweden design group <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #industrirepro" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/industrirepro/">Industri Repro</a>. It' s an Xbox, reboxed with more fans and stuff. And it sounds like you could write them and maybe even buy and XBEE of your own.</em> [<a href="http://www.industrirepro.se/xbee/">IndustrirePro</a> via <a href="http://technabob.com/blog/2009/11/24/xb-elegant-edition-xbox-360-casemod/">techabob</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5412584/the-xbox-elegant-edition]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5412584]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[xbox 360]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[industri repro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xbox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xbox elegant edition]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:27:27 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5412584&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Xbox 360 Wireless N Adapter Review]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_x360ad.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Sure, wireless n is great and everything, but if you told me I'd be streaming media between 2 and 3x faster through Microsoft's new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #xbox360wirelessadapter" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/xbox360wirelessadapter/">Xbox 360 Wireless Adapter</a> (802.11a/b/g/n) than their old a/b/g version, I'd never have believed you.</p>

<h1>The Price</h1>
<p>$100ish (cheaper at retail)</p>
<h1>The Verdict</h1>
<p>If you upgrade to the new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #xbox360" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/xbox360/">Xbox 360</a> Wireless Adapter from the old, 802.11g version, you won't notice any difference while gaming. But media streaming over your home network will see a legitimate speed increase.</p>
<p>For a moment, let's ignore Microsoft's traditionally ridiculous price for their Xbox 360 Wi-Fi adapters. Instead, let's just focus on performance.</p>
<p>Upgrading from 802.11g networking to 802.11n has a few key advantages: range is longer, speeds are faster and, since 802.11n sits on the 5GHz band, you won't interfere as much with 2.4GHz frequencies used by 802.11g and basically everything else in existence.</p>
<p>But there's one big thing that stops 802.11n from being any better than 802.11g for gaming: latency. Overall throughput may be faster on 802.11n (the pipe is bigger), but latency is really no less present than on 802.11g (it takes just as long for that first burst of water to come through). So those quick gaming commands aren't faster on n, and my multiplayer testing (<em>Modern Warfare 2</em> and <em>Borderlands</em>...it was a real chore) confirmed it. Then again, I didn't really notice any lag over my 802.11g adapter to begin with.</p>
<p>Media streaming, however, is where those big throughputs pay off. Using Connect360, I streamed HD episodes of <em>Mad Men</em> from my Mac to the Xbox. I timed from the moment I hit play to to the first frame of video playback. And the difference was noticeable.<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_speedgraph.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Buffering occurred between 2 and 3x faster, which was well beyond my expectations, despite how fast 802.11n is on a spec sheet. Clips went from taking as many as 15 seconds to playing (rounding up) to actually breaking the 5 second barrier. I'd love to have tested 1080P streaming over Live as well, but my DSL is the bottleneck in that scenario.</p>
<p>Yes, the Xbox 360 Wireless Adapter is still profanely expensive. No, if you have an older adapter (or you're just using <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5133447/how-to-add-wi+fi-to-your-xbox-360-smartly-and-cheaply">some other solution</a>), I wouldn't recommend the upgrade (nor do I think Microsoft is even marketing it that way). But it's nice to see a tangible improvement all the same.</p>
<p><br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3_04.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Streams intra network media between 2 and 3x faster<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3_04.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Tiny formfactor still unique to the industry<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/giznormal_03.jpg" width="20" height="20"> No perceivable speed increases gaming<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizminus_04.jpg" width="20" height="20"> It's $100.<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizminus_04.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Costs half the price of a new 360<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizminus_04.jpg" width="20" height="20"> It'll set you back a month of dinners at McDonalds<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizminus_04.jpg" width="20" height="20"> I don't even want to think about what that is in White Castles</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5411279/xbox-360-wireless-n-adapter-review]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5411279]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[360]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wi-fi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xbox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xbox 360]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xbox 360 wireless adapter]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5411279&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Remainders - Stuff We Didn't Post (and Why)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #philschiller" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/philschiller/">Phil Schiller</a> Talks App Approval, Avoids Saying Much of Anything...Microsoft Reiterates Smackdown on Pirate Xbox Users...iPhone Magnification Camera Mod Came From the Recycle Bin...Another Anonymous Netbook/Sleeping Aid Hits Wireless Carrier...</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/1120_philip_schiller.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>Phil Schiller Talks App Approval, Avoids Saying Much of Anything</h2>
<p>There are lots of legitimate concerns about Apple's app approval (app!) policy, and in a recent profile in Business Week, Senior VP Phil Schiller goes out of his way to not respond to any of them. Yes, we understand that there are legitimate reasons for having an extensive approval process, and we even appreciate the complication-free results. But Schiller neglected to respond to any of the real problems with the process, like, say, the Google Voice ban. We're always interested to hear an Apple higher-up discuss the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #appstore" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/appstore/">App Store</a>, but we prefer it when something's actually said. [<a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/nov2009/tc20091120_354597.htm">Business Week</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/custom_1258890556169_thor.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>Microsoft Reiterates Smackdown on Pirate Xbox Users</h2>
<p>In response to Microsoft's mass banning of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #xboxlive" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/xboxlive/">Xbox Live</a> users with pirate leanings, said pirates are contemplating hitting them with a class-action lawsuit&mdash;but Microsoft doesn't seem even a little bit scared. MS's response:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Piracy is illegal and modifying an Xbox 360 is a violation of the Xbox Live Terms of Use. Microsoft is well within its legal rights to ban these users from Xbox Live.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Translation: Hey, you guys down there, you piratey types? Cute lawsuit and all, but you ain't got a chance in hell of winning this.</p>
<p>This winds up in Remainders because the lawsuit is still, as of now, speculative&mdash;no such suit has actually been filed. Still, that's about as big an ice burn as you're likely to see from the big MS. [<a href="http://kotaku.com/5410196/microsoft-responds-to-class-action-claim-against-xbox-live-bannings">Kotaku</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/screen-shot-2009-11-23-at-4.57.17-pm.png" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>iPhone Magnification Camera Mod Came From the Recycle Bin</h2>
<p>Bummed about the iPhone's lack of zoom? Bummed enough to attach the lid from a pickle jar to the back of your iPhone? Here's a tutorial for how to create a multi-zoom add-on with items found in your recycle bin and a few lenses pried off deceased cameras. It's ungainly as hell, and I'm not totally sure the iPhone's camera is good enough to be worth such effort ugliness, but it does seem like it would work and it even has an external flash. And, of course, we've seen much <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5077150/iphone-unnecessarily-hacked-to-add-real-keyboard">dumber mods before</a>. [<a href="http://www.instructables.com/id/S2NCAEIG1BBBZG1/">Instructables</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/23/iphone-camera-mod-for-magnification-because-you-can/">Engadget</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/lg_x120-130109.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>Another Anonymous Netbook/Sleeping Aid Hits Wireless Carrier</h2>
<p>Another day, another netbook. AT&T brings the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #lgx120" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/lgx120/">LG X120</a> 10.1-incher Stateside to be sold, subsidized of course, through Radioshack.com and the obviously so much more hip brick and mortar version, The Shack. It'll be sold for $180 with a 2-year contract, which requires a $60 per month data charge. As far as specs, it's got a 160GB hard drive, 1GB memory, a 1.6GHz Atom and Windows XP, and in case of emergency will function as a sleeping aid so potent you might never wake up. What I'm saying is, it's in Remainders because seriously you guys, snore. [<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/23/lg-x120-netbook-comes-to-the-us-with-2-year-atandt-contract/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5411508/remainders-+-stuff-we-didnt-post-and-why/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5411508]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[app store]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gizmodo remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lg x120]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phil schiller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xbox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xbox live]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5411508&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Microsoft Sued By Datel For Killing Off Third Party Xbox 360 Memory Units]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/xboxmemory.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Datel, a company selling memory units for <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #xbox360" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/xbox360/">Xbox 360</a> consoles, filed an antitrust suit against Microsoft for blocking unauthorized third party memory units. Microsoft claims innocence, as the block is meant to reduce cheating on Xbox Live, not reduce competition.</p>
<p>Datel maintains that Microsoft is "disabling or erecting technological barriers to Datel accessories" and thereby favoring its own products. For reference, Microsoft's 512MB memory unit is about $30, while a 2GB version from Datel is $40. Sounds like it might be worth supporting the little guy in this one. [<a href="http://www.techflash.com/seattle/2009/11/datel_sues_microsoft_over_xbox_360_memory_unit_crackdown.html">Techflash</a>]</p>
<p><i>Sorry about the previous typo, it's 512MB for $30 on the Microsoft memory unit, <b>not</b> 12MB.</i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5411298/microsoft-sued-by-datel-for-killing-off-third-party-xbox-360-memory-units]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5411298]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[xbox 360]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[datel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xbox 360 memory]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:10:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5411298&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Definition of Evil: Microsoft's Search Wars Hurt Us All]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/mrburns.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_mrburns.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Microsoft may pay Murdoch to delist from Google. If it happens, it sets a bad precedent. Imagine if all the world's content is exclusive to some engines and we have to search them all to find what we want? Hell!</p>
<p>This started when Microsoft and Google paid for access to Twitter's millions of tweets and Bing paid Facebook and Twitter for access to their pages. Think about this perspective, if you ran Fox the WSJ and other major content makers, wouldn't you think that your content is worth more than all those 140 character posts? Right, you would. And if those sites are charging 100s of millions and up, for their content, wouldn't you ask for a lot more? You probably would, and if you're Murdoch, the most powerful man in media, you'd probably get what you want. Pulling out of Google would be just another part of Murdoch setting up his paywall. But it's going to set a nasty precedent for the rest of the short tail of mega media companies to get a lot of Google's cash. Maybe a lot of these companies value Google's help in promoting their stuff, but it never hurts to ask for money, especially when media and publishing are super duper hard up on cash these days, in general. I'm not an investor in big media or any tech companies, so its not a problem to me, in that way. But it is a problem to me as a guy who lives and works through search engines.</p>
<p>Microsoft is just being evil again. Now, this isn't typical Microsoft bashing &mdash; someone has to fight Google. And in a way, you have to hand it to Microsoft. They're the underdog here fighting a Google that grows in power every day, and their Facebook content deal won't likely be matched by Google any time soon. But this is so typically Bad Microsoft, because they've cleverly short cut the straightforward fight for marketshare by features and gone for a deal-based solution to the problem. Like the PC and OS fight in the 80s they're competing with business tactics instead of quality. (And Bing is great, so I'm not making a complete 1:1 comparison to Windows.) We're sort of left with&mdash;instead of a David and Goliath&mdash;a Clash of the Titans situation with pieces of rock and lighting falling from the sky and crushing us. Microsoft fails to see/care that the fragmentation that Microsoft is trying to achieve is not only going to hurt Google &mdash; it is going to hurt YOU AND ME.</p>
<p>This is the Microsoft we know from the last century, before great underdog products like Xbox and Zune. This is from a company who's CEO recently told us that sales are more important than critical acclaim, preferring profit over better product. And this is a company that gets in its anticompetitive digs when it can: For example, in Internet Explorer, it's really hard to set Google as your default browser, not being listed in the alternative choices to Bing. Yet, in Google Chrome, it's easy to set Bing as the default search.</p>
<p>Again, imagine that half of the top 500 media companies are delisted from Google. And imagine that Google stoops to this strategy and buys out the other half of that 500. Now imagine you have to search for something and now have to type it in twice because who the fuck is going to remember (no one) which search engine covers which content? *</p>
<p>People, I'm telling you, this is bad news. People talk about net neutrality like it's only about the data's prioritization over the pipes. But what good is equivalence in data speed and prioritization if you can't find it in the first place?</p>
<p>*the fix for all this is that we'll use search engine aggregators, which is just another layer of bullshit to sort through.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5411045/the-definition-of-evil-microsofts-search-wars-hurt-us-all]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5411045]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[murdoch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[news corp]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rupert murdoch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:32:34 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5411045&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Windows 7 Sales Are Great (Just Like Vista Sales in 2007)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/uncle-ballmer.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><a href="http://gizmodo.com/247337/microsoft-sells-2520-milllion-vistas-ooh-thanks-to-new-pc-bundles-sales-bah">March, 2007</a>: <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windowsvista" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windowsvista/">Windows Vista</a>'s initial sales are great, <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/2007/mar07/03-26VistaDebut.mspx">"more than doubling"</a> those of its predecessor, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windowsxp" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windowsxp/">Windows XP</a>. Flash forward to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5398343/remainders-+-stuff-we-didnt-post-and-why/gallery/1">November, 2009</a>: <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windows7" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows7/">Windows 7</a> initial sales are 234% higher than Vista's. Those numbers sound awfully similar...</p>
<p>What does this all mean? To be honest, not all that much&mdash;mostly, it means that there are just more computers out there every year. But what's kind of heartening, to me at least, is that it also means the general public is more and more tech-savvy: An OS release is a huge deal for nerds like us, but it's starting to be a big deal for Joe Sixpack as well. Given that Windows 7-packaged hardware sales are actually <em>lower</em> than Vista-packaged hardware in this time period, it means that people are installing a new OS on existing computers, something that's no big deal for us but could be intimidating for a tech neophyte. So this is a victory for nerds everywhere. Go us! [<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/2007/mar07/03-26VistaDebut.mspx">Microsoft</a> via <a href="http://twitter.com/nytimesbits/status/5905494736">NYTimes Twitter</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5409737/windows-7-sales-are-great-just-like-vista-sales-in-2007]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5409737]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[flashback]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7 sales]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows vista]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows xp]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5409737&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Remainders - Stuff We Didn't Post (and Why)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p>Apple Patent Describes iPod UI "Pushed" to Other Devices...Philips Announces Very Pretty Pro LCD Line...NYTimes Columnist Proposes Boycott of "Pro-Communist China" Bing...Ooma Adds New Handsets and International Plan...</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/110925-gui_pushing_accessory_500.png" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>Apple Patent Describes iPod UI "Pushed" to Other Devices</h2>
<p>An Apple patent filed in May 2008 describes a way of pushing whatever UI Apple wants to non-Apple hardware, for consistency's sake. That non-Apple hardware could include car stereos or something like the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5403517/chumby-one-review-totally-frivolous-but-totally-adorable">Chumby One</a> (which has iPod functionality, but with a lookalike UI). It's a nice idea for Apple, but could be tricky given the myriad different hardware that might want to take advantage. What if the hardware has a resistive touchscreen, or a shitty processor? Might it just be better to use a custom interface for iPod integration? Regardless, it's in Remainders because it's not really that unexpected or interesting in its implications. [<a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2009/11/19/apple-researching-methods-for-pushing-user-interfaces-to-accessories-from-media-devices/">MacRumors</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/philipsledpronovember09.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>Philips Announces Very Pretty Pro LCD Line</h2>
<p>Philips' new high-end LCD line looks pretty fantastic, with two important caveats. First, let's drool a little: The two models (40- and 46-inch) have a 5,000,000:1 contrast ratio, 1ms response time, 5 HDMI ports (not sure why you'd need that many, but whatever) and a 200Hz refresh rate, with a nice brushed-aluminum look. Now, the caveats. First, they're UK only, and second, they're prohibitively expensive at about $3,000 and $4,100, respectively. Still, drool-worthy. [<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/20/philips-launches-9704-led-pro-televisions-in-the-uk/">Engadget</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/051201_tiananmen-square_ex.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>NYTimes Columnist Proposes Boycott of "Pro-Communist China" Bing</h2>
<p>NY Times columnist Nicholas Kristof has proposed a boycott of Microsoft's Bing search engine due to its supposed pro-Chinese-government censorship of search terms like "Dalai Lama" and "Tienanmen" when searched in simplified Chinese characters. In English and other non-Chinese languages, the results you'd expect from "Tienanmen" show up, but in Chinese, apparently it returns sanitized results (no massacre, in that case). Since I'm not really sure how to type simplified Chinese characters on an all-Amurrican MacBook Pro keyboard, I haven't tested it myself&mdash;but if true, it's a little underhanded on Microsoft's part, although certainly paling in comparison to, you know, the Chinese government. What's odd is that Google's Chinese search also returns censored results, but "to a much lesser extent," so I guess it's okay. Weird stuff. [<a href="http://www.techflash.com/seattle/2009/11/nyts_kristof_calls_for_bing_boycott.html">TechFlash</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/oomatelo-lg.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>Ooma Adds New Handsets and International Plan</h2>
<p>Internet phone company Ooma began shipping its new Telo handset as well as offering a very cheap international calling plan (500 minutes for $5 per month). Ooma, for those who don't know (I assume this includes everyone) varies from other VoIP services like Vonage by cutting out the monthly fees, instead packing them into a fairly expensive set-top box, at $250. So this international plan requiring a monthly fee is a big deal for them, but it winds up in Remainders because I honestly had not even heard of Ooma until this morning. Oops. [<a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/09/11/20/ooma.telo.adds.handsets.international.plan/">Electronista</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5409786/remainders-+-stuff-we-didnt-post-and-why/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5409786]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gizmodo remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ooma]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[philips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5409786&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Windows 8 Expected in 2012 According to Roadmap]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_windows81.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Apparently we won't have to deal with upgrading our Microsoft-driven computers for another three years. According to a tentative roadmap, the next version of the OS, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windows8" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows8/">Windows 8</a>, won't be arriving until 2012.</p>
<p>This release date would be consistent with the schedule Microsoft has been maintaining, but I suggest they don't rush it. I still can't let go of some Windows XP installs, much less jump to Windows 8 so quickly. [<a href="http://msftkitchen.com/2009/11/windows-8-more-roadmaps.html">MSFT Kitchen</a> via <a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/09/11/20/next.windows.again.on.3.year.schedule/">Electronista</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5409668/windows-8-expected-in-2012-according-to-roadmap]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5409668]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 8]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 8 roadmap]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:29:25 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5409668&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Microsoft Denies Programming NSA-Accessible Backdoors Into Windows 7]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/nsa_seal.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Hey now! Just because the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5408648/the-nsa-helped-microsoft-improve-windows-7-security">NSA helped Microsoft hone</a> the security of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windows7" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows7/">Windows 7</a> doesn't mean Microsoft designed special backdoors for the organization to spy on us...right?</p>

<p>In a response to Computerworld's article on NSA involvement in Windows 7 development, Microsoft stated: "Microsoft has not and will not put 'backdoors' into Windows."</p>
<p>Not to nitpick here, but doesn't this denial leave another "door" open? As in, couldn't the NSA have stuck their own backdoor into Windows 7 while official Microsoft employees turned a blind eye? Or&mdash;and this may come as really shocking&mdash;could Microsoft have simply lied to us in the interest of national security??</p>
<p>Of course, but if you freak out over this potential lack of digital autonomy, you're clearly a terrorist. [<a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9141182/Microsoft_denies_it_built_backdoor_in_Windows_7">Computerworld</a> via <a href="http://feeds.digg.com/~r/digg/popular/~3/0X-_YdG9Ox4/Microsoft_denies_it_built_backdoor_in_Windows_7">Digg</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5409420/microsoft-denies-programming-nsa+accessible-backdoors-into-windows-7]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5409420]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nsa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nsa windows 7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:32:37 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5409420&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Banned Xbox Users Plan a Class-Action Lawsuit, Accuse Microsoft of a Vast Conspiracy]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/ebaybanned360.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_ebaybanned360.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Microsoft recently banned a whole lot of modded consoles. Was it to prevent piracy, or was it a <i>conspiracy</i>? A new lawsuit is positing the latter theory.</p>
<p>Here's what Texas-based law firm <a href="http://www.abingtonlaw.com/Xbox-Live-class-action.html">AbingtonIP</a> says to justify their new suit:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Although modification of Xbox consoles is arguably against the terms of use for Xbox/Xbox Live, Microsoft 'conveniently' timed the Xbox console ban to coincide with the release of the new Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 game and less than two months after the release of the very popular Halo 3: ODST game.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I'm not sure that modding consoles is "arguably" against the terms of use; it <i>is</i> against the terms of use. And why wouldn't they want to keep people from pirating their biggest game of the year?</p>
<p>Certainly, anyone who is banned who hasn't modded their console has a legitimate bone to pick with Microsoft, and there's no defending their heavy-handed banning tactics and their collateral damage. But to suggest they're intentionally banning legit accounts in order to get people to sign up again, well, that's pretty stupid. [<a href="http://www.tgdaily.com/games-and-entertainment-features/44750-xbox-modders-unite-in-class-action-suit">TG Daily</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/20/banned-xbox-modders-get-a-class-action-lawsuit-to-call-their-own/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5409271/banned-xbox-users-plan-a-class+action-lawsuit-accuse-microsoft-of-a-vast-conspiracy]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5409271]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[xbox 360]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xbox]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:02:29 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5409271&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple vs Microsoft Wars Pit Shareholders Against Steve Ballmer]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_ms-bad-image-quote.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />This year's Microsoft shareholder meeting wasn't a lot of fun for Microsoft CEO <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #steveballmer" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/steveballmer/">Steve Ballmer</a> and Chairman Bill Gates, thanks to shareholders grilling him about Apple and the iPhone with questions like the above. Ballmer smacked him right back:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>There's certainly always opportunities for improvement. There is a group of people with whom our market share is less. You take any country, including this one, and you say, how are we doing? The truth of the matter is, we do quite well. Even among college students, we do quite well. Do we have an opportunity for improvement? We do. Some of that is marketing some of that is phase of life.</p>
<p>It is important to remember that 96 times out of 100 worldwide, people choose a PC with Windows, that's a good thing. Even in the toughest market, which would be the high end of the consumer market here in the U.S., 83 times out of 100 people choose a Windows PC over a Mac.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gatesballmer09shareholders_01.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Ballmer also remarked that Apple has gained a few "couple of tenths of a percent of market share," but when the audience chuckled, he was prompt to say correct them:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Every couple of tenths matter. They matter when we're increasing our Bing market share, too.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Ooooooh, you are good, Mr Ballmer, you are <i>good</i>. There were many other piercing questions about the iPhone, Android. Check them out at [<a href="http://www.techflash.com/seattle/2009/11/shareholders_quiz_ballmer_about_macs_windows_mobile_phones.html">Techflash</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5409192/apple-vs-microsoft-wars-pit-shareholders-against-steve-ballmer]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5409192]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blockquote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft vs apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[steve ballmer]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5409192&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Microsoft, You Can't Win by Coming in Last Place]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/dean_pdc_2-1.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_dean_pdc_2-1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>I know Microsoft has only recently broken ground on <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #internetexplorer9" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/internetexplorer9/">Internet Explorer 9</a>, but why would you ever release a graph in which you were the admitted worst at a task?</p>

<p>The graph above is a JavaScript performance comparison in which the same machine ran the SunSpider test (so shorter bars are better). Microsoft is comparing one, specific (but incredibly important) browser task to the competition's numbers, and as you can see, boy has IE improved over the years!</p>
<p>But it's still not enough.</p>
<p>I mean, kudos for the improvements, but you can't win by coming in last place. The disclaimer, of course, is a sort of "this is where we are today...just wait until you see us tomorrow!" kind of mentality. But you could ethically slap a "today" on everyone else on that graph.</p>
<p>For the optimists out there, Microsoft talked about some other big improvements coming to IE9, including HTML 5 support and GPU acceleration. More about that here: [<a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2009/11/18/an-early-look-at-ie9-for-developers.aspx">IEBlog</a> via <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/182603/microsofts_thoroughly_modern_ie9.html">PCWorld</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/20/internet-explorer-9-to-sport-gpu-acceleration-and-html5-support/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5409115/microsoft-you-cant-win-by-coming-in-last-place]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5409115]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ie9]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[internet explorer 9]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:22:37 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5409115&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Remainders - Stuff We Didn't Post (and Why)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p>Trade in Your DVDs, Plus a Couple Bucks, and Get the Blu-ray Versions...<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #steveballmer" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/steveballmer/">Steve Ballmer</a> Acknowledges Apple's Gains, Remains Cocky...Sanyo to Build Houses Powered by Solar Energy and Li-Ion Batteries...Sony Announces Vague "iTunes-Like" Store on <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #playstationnetwork" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/playstationnetwork/">PlayStation Network</a> for Books, Movies, Music...</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/dvd2b_newsletter03a.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>Trade in Your DVDs, Plus a Couple Bucks, and Get the Blu-ray Versions</h2>
<p>Warner set up a DVD to Blu-ray exchange program called, appropriately enough, DVD2Blu, as sort of a more-tempting version of its HD-DVD to Blu-ray version. The problem is, it's not actually that great of a deal; you're limited to Warner movies, obviously, but it also costs $8-10 per DVD, plus $5 shipping, for the exchange. You might actually be better off just hitting Best Buy or Walmart or whatever and looking for sales, since DVD2Blu could cost you 18 bucks plus the agony of waiting for your new HD copy of <em>The Wedding Singer: Totally Awesome Edition</em> to arrive. [<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/19/warners-dvd2blu-trade-in-swaps-blu-rays-for-your-dvds-leland-g/">Engadget</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gatesballmer09shareholders.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>Steve Ballmer Acknowledges Apple's Gains, Remains Cocky</h2>
<p>Microsoft held a shareholder's meeting this morning, led by the always-dynamic Steve Ballmer, and an interesting question came up: Why does Microsoft have such a lousy reputation among certain demographics, like, say, upper-middle-class college kids? Ballmer admitted that Apple's been seeing some gains that, while small, are a clear sign that Microsoft has room for improvement, either in marketing or product positioning. It's a pretty clear-headed statement from Ballmer&mdash;after all, he notes, Microsoft still has an insane marketshare, even in the high-end consumer demo, so despite Apple's visibility, Microsoft doesn't exactly have cause for concern. That level-headedness is why this story's in Remainders: Where's the explosive, frothing-at-the-mouth, prone to Bidenesque gaffes Ballmer we all know and, um, know? [<a href="http://www.techflash.com/seattle/2009/11/shareholders_quiz_ballmer_about_macs_windows_mobile_phones.html">TechFlash</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/screen_shot_2009-11-19_at_9.03.21_pm.png" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>Sanyo to Build Houses Powered by Solar Energy and Li-Ion Batteries</h2>
<p>Sanyo, considered Japan's "greenest" electronics manufacturer (sort of like being the best-dressed homeless person), is about to start building solar-powered, lithium-ion-based homes in its native country. The houses are all equipped with LED lighting, solar-powered water heater, all that stuff. They'll be a little pricey, at around $355,000&mdash;an equivalent non-green house would cost $62,000 less, although the Sanyo houses come with a $30,000 government subsidy. It's in Remainders because it's Japan only, and because I don't understand enough Japanese to learn any more about it. [<a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/11/19/solar-energy-and-lithium-ion-batteries-sanyo-now-builds-green-homes-in-japan/">Crunchgear</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/3-10-09psn.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>Sony Announces Vague "iTunes-Like" Store on PlayStation Network for Books, Movies, Music</h2>
<p>Sony announced the tentatively named <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #sonyonlineservice" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/sonyonlineservice/">Sony Online Service</a> today&mdash;it's described as an "iTunes-like" service on the PlayStation Network, offering movies, music, and books, all media for which Sony also sells accompanying hardware. It'll also allow users to upload their own video, and will probably have support for independent app development later on down the road. We don't really know much else, like, say, a launch date or pricing (or even a final name), so it winds up here, alone in the dark corner of Gizmodo we call Remainders. [<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/11/19/sony_announces_itunes_competitor_for_music_movies_books.html">AppleInsider</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/19/sony-to-expand-playstation-network-into-sony-online-service-sel/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5408923/remainders-+-stuff-we-didnt-post-and-why/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5408923]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blu-ray]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dvd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dvd2blu]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gizmodo remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[itunes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[playstation network]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sanyo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sony Online Service]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[steve ballmer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[warner]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5408923&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The NSA Helped Microsoft Improve Windows 7 Security]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/nsa_seal.jpeg" class="left image340" width="340" />While some of us are likely to associate the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #nationalsecurityagency" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/nationalsecurityagency/">National Security Agency</a> with daydreams of espionage, the organization is also highly involved in improving security standards in software. They've even consulted with Microsoft during the development of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windows7" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows7/">Windows 7</a>.</p>
<p>According to the NSA's Information Assurance Director, Richard Schaeffer, it's important for the agency to work with Microsoft and other software makers because otherwise the increasing reliance on "private-sector computing products" could put national security at risk. By creating and maintaining high security standards, the agency hopes to reduce the danger of the "rising threat of cyberattacks." Whew. That actually sounds quite reasonable and like a good thing, rather than cause to panic after seeing "NSA" and "Microsoft" in the same sentence. [<a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2009/11/nsa_microsoft_windows_7.html">NPR</a> via <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/11/19/shocking-the-nsa-helped-make-windows-7/">Crunch Gear</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5408648/the-nsa-helped-microsoft-improve-windows-7-security]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5408648]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[national security agency]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nsa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7 security]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5408648&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Windows Home Server Power Pack 3 Available November 24th]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windowshomeserverpowerpack3" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windowshomeserverpowerpack3" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windowshomeserverpowerpack3/">Windows Home Server Power Pack 3</a> will be available worldwide on November 24th. Note that Power Pack 3 will be a <em>free</em> update to anyone already using <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windowshomeserver" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windowshomeserver" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windowshomeserver/">Windows Home Server</a> through Windows Update. [<a href="http://windowsteamblog.com/blogs/windowshomeserver/default.aspx">Windows Home Server Blog</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5408474/windows-home-server-power-pack-3-available-november-24th]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5408474]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows home server]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows home server power pack 3]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:33:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5408474&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Most Versions of Windows Banned From Sale in China Because of Two Fonts]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Courts ruled that Chinese language editions of Windows 98 SE, 2000, XP, Server 2003 will be banned from being sold in China due to Microsoft infringing on the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #intellectualproperty" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #intellectualproperty" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/intellectualproperty/">intellectual property</a> of a Beijing-based software company. By using two Chinese fonts.</p>
<p>According to  Zhongyi Electronics, Microsoft "only paid to use [their] software for its Windows 95 system." They say that the two fonts weren't even covered in the agreement to begin with. Yikes. Microsoft is appealing the court's decision by claiming that the fonts were in fact covered by the agreement and that there was "legitimate right" to use them. [<a href="http://obamapacman.com/2009/11/microsoft-lost-intellectual-property-infringement-case-in-chinese-court-versions-of-windows-banned-in-china/">Obama Pacman</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5408056/most-versions-of-windows-banned-from-sale-in-china-because-of-two-fonts]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5408056]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:56:38 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5408056&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Microsoft Office 2010 Beta Is Now Available]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/microsoft-office2010.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />The next version of the best-selling software of all time, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #microsoftoffice2010" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/microsoftoffice2010/">Microsoft Office 2010</a>, is finally available in beta today. Get used to the new Office: We're all going to use this stuff at some point or another.</p>
<p>There's a lot new about <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #office2010" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/office2010/">Office 2010</a>: Word, Excel, PowerPoint and Outlook all come with evolved UIs, taking cues from Office 2007's "ribbon" UI by using tabs instead of traditional menus. Word offers the new "backstage view," which replaces the old File menu with a sort of visual representation of it: You'll get a sidebar with live previews, which could come in handy for things like print preview. Besides that, Word (along with PowerPoint and Excel) also adds minor photo and video editing tools like color adjustment, cropping and trimming. PowerPoint brings the new "broadcast slideshow" feature, allowing you to beam a presentation to any connected PC with a one-click interface; and Excel adds some smart enhancements like automatically shading the highest numbers in a given chart, and Sparklines, which are word-sized graphs that can be added inside charts.</p>
<p>There are a boatload of minor changes in Office 2010, and we won't go into them all. The biggest change, and the one that's most exciting to us, has been around <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5101347/skydrive-upgrade-goes-live-with-25gb-of-space">for awhile</a> in some form or another: SkyDrive, Microsoft's online storage, now includes what's essentially the Office take on Google Docs. With any version of Office 2010, you get 25GB of storage space. That storage gives you the ability to create and edit Word, Excel and PowerPoint documents on the fly, with simultaneous group editing, just like in Google Docs.</p>
<p>There are two main versions of Office 2010: The full version, the price of which has not yet been announced, and the Starter version, which offers limited-feature (we might say crippled) versions of the three main programs in the suite, and will come free with many new PCs. With either option, you'll get the 25GB of storage space and access to SkyDrive. Office 2010 will be released sometime in the first half of 2010.</p>
<p>Right now, it's just technically available for Technet and MSDN subscribers, but you should be able to get a copy in another way, if you know what we mean. [<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/office/2010/">Microsoft</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5407212/microsoft-office-2010-beta-is-now-available]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5407212]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[excel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Office 2010]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[office 2010]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[powerpoint]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[word]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5407212&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Microsoft's Bag-Based Computer Interface, For Poking]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_heytechreviewpleasepostbiggerimagespleasethanks.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Bag-based? Sack-based? Balloon-based? Balloon-<em>boy</em>-based? There's no shortage of ways to describe <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #microsoftresearch" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/microsoftresearch/">Microsoft Research</a>'s new tactile interface concept, which lets people interact with prods, pokes, massages and squeezes instead of clicks or taps.</p>

<p>The bag you see above isn't actually the core component of interface device&mdash;that'd be the sensor tile at its base, which generates and monitors a magnetic field. Any disturbances in the field&mdash;that's where the bag, filled with some kind of magnetic substance, like iron filings, comes in&mdash;can be translated into movement, whether it be simple X/Y gestures around a flat plane, or more complex gestures that take into account prod pressure. <em>Technically</em> interesting, but I feel like this concept needs <a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/computing/23969/?a=f">a little something extra</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>[A researcher said] making a device that could switch between an input and output device would be challenging. While moving ball bearings using magnetic fields shouldn't be too hard, "[moving] ferrous fluid bladders would be trickier," he says.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>WHO SAID ANYTHING ABOUT OUTPUT? Consider <em>this</em>, mouse jockies: a few years from now, your Intellipoint might be an actively pulsating pouch of magnetic fluid. John C Dvorak, <a href="http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/01/12/jan-1984-how-critics-reviewed-the-mac/">1984</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The nature of the personal computer is simply not fully understood by companies like Apple (or anyone else for that matter). Apple makes the arrogant assumption of thinking that it knows what you want and need. It, unfortunately, leaves the "why" out of the equation - as in "why would I want this?" The Macintosh uses an experimental pointing device called a ‘mouse'. There is no evidence that people want to use these things. I dont want one of these new fangled devices.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Just replace "mouse" with "undulating sack of ferrofluid" and <em>then</em> tell me I'm crazy. Anyone? [<a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/computing/23969/?a=f">Technology Review</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5407454/microsofts-bag+based-computer-interface-for-poking]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5407454]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[interfaces]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bag interface]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bags]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft research]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft tactile interface]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tactile interfaces]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[what]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:53:48 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5407454&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Of Course, Microsoft Denies Those Project Natal Pricing 'Rumors']]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_prjctntl-f_2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />I trust a mole more than a company spokesperson any day, but Microsoft has officially denied the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #projectnatal" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/projectnatal/">Project Natal</a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5402077/leak-project-natal-shipping-in-november-2010-with-14-games-for-under-80">"impulse buy" pricing with 14 games</a> by offering a simple "[the alleged leaks] weren't accurate, they were rumors." [<a href="http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/microsoft-dismisses-natal-launch-rumours">Gamesindustry</a> via <a href="http://kotaku.com/5407078/microsoft-kindasmashes-natal-launch-rumor">Kotaku</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5407364/of-course-microsoft-denies-those-project-natal-pricing-rumors]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5407364]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[360]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[leaks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[natal]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Project Natal]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xbox 360]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:07:27 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5407364&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Microsoft's Ray Ozzie: "Apps Don’t Make Your Phone Special"]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_ozzie.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Microsoft's chief software architect <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #rayozzie" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/rayozzie/">Ray Ozzie</a> was discussing smartphones at Microsoft's Professional Developers Conference earlier. Apparently, we just don't <i>get</i> what is and what isn't important in the smartphone battle, because according to him, apps don't really matter.</p>
<p>We're focusing too much on the number or type of apps available on the different platforms, according to Ozzie:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>All the apps that count will be ported to every one of them. It's a completely different situation from the PC market, where software's built to run on a Windows or a Mac. Mobile apps require very little development, so it's much easier to bring them onto every platform.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Ozzie, Ozzie, Ozzie. You're just jealous that the Windows Mobile Market doesn't have enough fart apps, aren't you? Or did you <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5386729/microsoft-mocks-apples-app-store">watch that App Lab video</a> one too many times? [<a href="http://venturebeat.com/2009/11/17/microsofts-ray-ozzie-apps-dont-make-your-phone-special/">Venture Beat</a> via <a href="http://twitter.com/bxchen/status/5810233427">Brian X. Chen</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5407068/microsofts-ray-ozzie-apps-dont-make-your-phone-special]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5407068]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blockquote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ray ozzie]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:42:17 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5407068&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Reminder: Xbox 360 Twitter, Last.fm and Zune Video Go Live Today]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_500x_dsc_9988_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Today is the <em>day</em>, people! The day that your <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #xbox360" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/xbox360/">Xbox 360</a> will start showing you new dashboard panels so you can awkwardly Twitter from your console and listen to Last.fm radio, that is! And a few more things.</p>

<p>The update should propagate sometime today&mdash;<strong>UPDATE</strong>: It's live!&mdash;but if your Xbox hasn't given you the good news yet, here's what you're in for:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&bull;Facebook – Update your status to share what movie, game or entertainment you're enjoying, connect with friends and view their Facebook stream, status updates and photos on the big screen – all seamlessly integrated and custom-built for Xbox 360. You can even compare your Xbox LIVE and Facebook friends lists to see which of your friends are on LIVE.<br>
&bull; Zune – Zune video on Xbox LIVE offers a full fidelity experience with instant on HD in 1080p and 5.1 channel surround sound. No waiting for downloads or buffering, it's there at the press of a button. You can also share the experience with up to seven friends through voice chat and Avatar integration on the TV screen – it puts a whole new spin on "movie night."<br>
&bull; Twitter – Stay in the know by discovering, posting and replying to Tweets right on your Xbox 360. You can even view friend profiles, trends and conversations, or search to see who's tweeting about your favorite game.<br>
&bull; Last.fm – Discover more music and explore endless personalized radio stations with Last.fm on Xbox 360. Skip, "ban" or "love" tracks to create your perfect mix-we've even built in "Gamer Stations" with game-related types of music selected specifically for the gaming community (Available in the U.S. and UK)</p>
<p>In addition to these social features, Xbox LIVE will also be debuting "News and More," a new section of the "Inside Xbox" channel, transforming Xbox LIVE into a full-fledged media portal. With a regularly-updated stream of content from MSNBC, The New Yorker and Dilbert, "News and More" brings the latest in current events, arts and entertainment right to your fingertips.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5406559/reminder-xbox-360-twitter-lastfm-and-zune-video-go-live-today]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5406559]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[xbox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dashboard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dashboard update]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software update]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[update]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xbox 360]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xbox 360 update]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:33:36 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5406559&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Awkward Microsoft Store Dances Are Why I Shop Online]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/microsoftdance.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_microsoftdance.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>These staffers at the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #microsoftstore" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/microsoftstore/">Microsoft Store</a> in <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #missionviejo" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/missionviejo/">Mission Viejo</a>, CA might <em>seem</em> really excited, but the clearly rehearsed dance routine comes across more like some kind of Stockholm syndrome.</p>
<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/TSAXEVXvNz8&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/TSAXEVXvNz8&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object></p>
<p>I've heard the Microsoft Store <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5365053/microsoft-stealing-from-apple-again-this-time-its-retail-staff">pays well</a> and all, but seriously, what a dick move for making employees do this. That's what Disney World, Cruise Lines, and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5387860/i-had-a-one+man-windows-7-launch-party-and-it-didnt-end-well">Windows 7 parties</a> are for. [<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSAXEVXvNz8&feature=player_embedded#">YouTube</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/microsoft-store-employees-break-out-in-dance-video/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5406546/awkward-microsoft-store-dances-are-why-i-shop-online]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5406546]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft store]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[MICROSOFT STORE dance]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft stores]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mission viejo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[store]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wtf]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:26:40 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5406546&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Microsoft Co-Founder Paul Allen Diagnosed With Cancer]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #paulallen" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #paulallen" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/paulallen/">Paul Allen</a>, known both as the co-founder of Microsoft and for his multitude of philanthropic pursuits, has been diagnosed with non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, a form of cancer. </p>
<p>We don't know much about his prognosis, though a letter from his sister says he's "feeling OK." Allen came down with Hodgkin's Lymphoma back in 1983 and beat it, and we're all hoping he can do it again. [<a href="http://www.techflash.com/seattle/2009/11/paul_allen_diagnosed_with_non-hodgkins_lymphoma.html">TechFlash</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5406343/microsoft-co+founder-paul-allen-diagnosed-with-cancer]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5406343]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[sad]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lymphoma]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[paul allen]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5406343&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Microsoft's Pseudo Sudo Patent]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/thumb160x_linux_windows_copy.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />So, how exactly did Microsoft&mdash;those bastards!&mdash;end up <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5402796/microsoft-patents-the-sudo-command">patenting Sudo</a>, a years-old Linux command line tool, without <em>someone</em> stepping in to stop them? Easy! They didn't.</p>

<p>The story inspired widespread hyperventilation last week, most of which revolved around a few impassioned quotes:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Here it is, patent number7617530. Thanks, USPTO, for giving Microsoft, which is already a monopoly, a monopoly on something that's been in use since 1980 and wasn't invented by Microsoft. Here's Wikipedia's description of sudo, which you can meaningfully compare to Microsoft's description of its "invention".</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This from <a href="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20091111094923390">Groklaw</a>, a site that specializes in free and open source software legal affairs, i.e. exactly this kind of thing. But for whatever reason&mdash;zeal? clicks?&mdash;their reading of the patent, which <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5402796/microsoft-patents-the-sudo-command">we picked up</a>, turn out to overblown. Says Sudo maintainer Todd Miller, via <a href="http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/11/microsofts-psuedo-sudo-patent-doesnt-really-cover-sudo.ars">Ars</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>I've already received a number of questions about US patent 7,617,530 that some people seem to believe might cover sudo. I don't think that is the case," he wrote. "Sudo simply doesn't work this way. When a command is run via sudo the user is actively running the command as a different user. What is described in the patent is a mechanism whereby an application or the operating system detects that an action needs to be run with increased privileges and automatically prompts the user with a list of potential users that have the appropriate privilege level to perform the task.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>So, if not this, then what does the Microsoft patent cover? Back to <a href="http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/11/microsofts-psuedo-sudo-patent-doesnt-really-cover-sudo.ars">Ars</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Specifically, it describes a user interface which displays accounts that have the necessary rights to perform an action when the user is blocked from performing an action that requires higher access privileges.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>These are similar, but not <em>patent</em> similar.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/sudowich_01_01.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Turns out, though, that there is a Linux tool called PolicyKit just like what Microsoft patented, which prompts users to switch to a higher-level user account when they hit against a permissions barrier. It was created <em>after the patent was filed,</em> but before it was made public. So, Microsoft, on all counts: not guilty. [<a href="http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/11/microsofts-psuedo-sudo-patent-doesnt-really-cover-sudo.ars">ArsTechnica</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5405753/microsofts-pseudo-sudo-patent]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5405753]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Groklaw]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft sudo patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sudo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sudo patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[unix]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:34:31 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5405753&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Best Windows 7 Song You’ll Hear Today]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/2bAVcJ-vq_U&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/2bAVcJ-vq_U&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object>It's official: <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windows7" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows7/">Windows 7</a> mania has reached a fever pitch. First a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5394184/i-ate-the-windows-7-burger">burger</a> dedicated to the OS, now fifth-grader Will Smith gives us this adorable performance of "<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windowsrising" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windowsrising/">Windows Rising</a>," set to the tune of CCR's "Bad Moon Rising."</p>
<p>According to the source, Will wants to program for Microsoft when he gets older. Let me tell you something, kid: If you show this video to anyone at Microsoft, there's no way they won't give you a job on the spot.</p>
<p>And one other thing, Will: You do far more justice to your source material than the majority of CCR cover bands out there. Keep up the good work. [<a href="http://www.techflash.com/seattle/2009/11/windows_7s_biggest_little_fan.html">TechFlash</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5404863/the-best-windows-7-song-youll-hear-today]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5404863]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ccr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cute]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[song]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[videoc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows rising]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 14 Nov 2009 21:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5404863&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Windows 7 Hacked (Again) for Keyless Activation]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/windows7_logo2.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Lo! Yet another <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windows7" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows7/">Windows 7</a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5325652/windows-7-rtm-cracked-what-took-so-long">activation hack</a> appears. This one's a little more creative in that it doesn't require an OEM key at all, and instead bypasses the verification DLL completely.</p>
<p>The new hack nullifies sppcompai.dll, and even deactivates all the reminder popups that would otherwise ask you to activate indefinitely. But don't expect the party to last long. This crack closely mirrors an old Vista key workaround, and if Microsoft patched it easily then, they'll patch it easily now.</p>
<p>There's one point to this story I find particularly annoying. According to <a href="http://www.mydigitallife.info/2009/11/06/removewat-or-chew-wga-bypass-activate-windows-7-and-server-2008-r2-forever-loader-alternative-to-remove-disable-activation-technologies/">My Digital Life</a>,</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The crack is possible probably due to leniency allowed on the part of Microsoft on [the] activation mechanism to avoid getting too many false-positive or complaint on activation error [sic].</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It just sucks that this game will continue. Microsoft obviously wants to make activation as painless as possible, but will probably beef up the security next time to fix these sort of exploits. Like most of you, I'm sick of DRM causing headaches for the ones who legally purchased the software, and developments like this certainly won't help.</p>
<p>And please, let me say this: I love you guys, and I really do love getting emails from readers. But I don't know how to do this hack. I have no idea how the hack specifically works. I don't even have a copy of Windows 7. So please, send me emails about anything else, but not about how to unlock your new copy of Windows 7. Gracias. [<a href="http://www.mydigitallife.info/2009/11/06/removewat-or-chew-wga-bypass-activate-windows-7-and-server-2008-r2-forever-loader-alternative-to-remove-disable-activation-technologies/">My Digital Life</a> via <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/14/windows_product_activation_hacked/">The Register</a> via <a href="http://www.ubergizmo.com/15/archives/2009/11/windows_7_product_activation_bypassed.html">Ubergizmo</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5404781/windows-7-hacked-again-for-keyless-activation]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5404781]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[drm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hacks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7 hack]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 14 Nov 2009 18:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5404781&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[How To: Make Windows 7 Play Nice With All Your Gadgets]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/win7gadg.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_win7gadg.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Generally speaking, upgrading to Windows 7 is a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5330609/windows-7-review-you-can-quit-complaining-now">no-brainer</a>. "But what about my gadgets?" you might ask, eyes watering slightly, "<em>will they be OK?</em>" Yes, yes they will. Here's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #howto" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/howto/">how to</a> make Windows 7 play nice with all your favorite toys.</p>
<h2>Your Phone</h2>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/device-manager-new.png" class="left image340" width="340" /><strong>Windows Mobile</strong>: To sync with your Windows Mobile phone in Windows 7, you're going to need Windows Mobile Device Center 6.1. Just like in Vista! Except this time around, Windows is savvy enough to autoinstall the suite, which saves a little time and potentially a lot of Googling. (Just give it a minute after you plug in your device via USB&mdash;if nothing happens, go <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsmobile/en-us/downloads/microsoft/device-center-download.mspx)">here</a>.<br clear="all"></p>
<p>This will take care of calendar, contact and media syncing for the most part, though a lot of newer Windows Mobile phones depend on microSD storage for music and movies. For this, you simply mount the disk as a folder, and drag and drop.</p>
<p><strong>iPhone</strong>: As always, this is a job for iTunes. However, Windows 7 is compatible with <a href="http://www.doubletwist.com/dt/Home/Index.dt">doubleTwist</a>, an alternative media manager that doesn't just sync with your iPhone&mdash;it works with almost anything else, too.</p>
<p>Speaking of which, <strong>Android</strong>: Android generally isn't a "syncing" kind of OS, intended instead to be kept up to date by tapping into Google's services over the internet. That said, <a href="http://www.doubletwist.com/dt/Home/Index.dt">doubleTwist</a> will work for music syncing with most Android phones, and <a href="http://www.htc.com/www/support.aspx">HTC Sync</a> will keep their phones, like the G1, MyTouch and Hero, in sync with your Outlook Address book, contacts and calendar.</p>
<p><strong>BlackBerry</strong>: <a href="http://na.blackberry.com/eng/services/desktop/">BlackBerry Desktop Manager</a> and Media Sync still reign supreme, for contacts, apps, media and software upgrades.</p>
<p><strong>Palm Pre/Pixi</strong>: <a href="http://www.doubletwist.com/dt/Home/Index.dt">doubleTwist</a>, again, at least until Palm fully withdraws from their <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5393038/apple-and-palm-the-itunes-syncing-fight-is-officially-dumb">silly slapfight</a> with Apple over iTunes and makes their own client.</p>
<h2>Your Zune, iPod, or other PMP</h2>
<p><strong>Zune</strong>: Zune's software plays nice with Windows 7, but it's you only choice. And even moreso than Apple products, the Zune HD is locked to its client software, meaning there aren't any alternative for the time being. Luckily, <a href="http://www.zune.net/en-US/">Zune 4.x</a> is fantastic software&mdash;it's just a shame it's not optional, and that it doesn't work with other devices.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/itunes_windows7_2.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><strong>iPod</strong>: As with the iPhone, you're more or less stuck with iTunes or an app like doubleTwist for music and movie syncing, but that's not so bad: iTunes in Windows 7 comes with some nice enhancements, including jump list shortcuts that can quickly take you to the iTunes Store, and <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5356390/itunes-9-sports-windows-7-taskbar-jump-list-enhancements">hoverable controls</a>, which give you quick access to skip, play and pause functions. In some ways, iTunes is actually better on Windows 7 than it is on OS X. [<a href="http://lifehacker.com/5356390/itunes-9-sports-windows-7-taskbar-jump-list-enhancements">via</a>]<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/thumb160x_win7ds-av.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><strong>Other PMPs</strong>: PMPs that rely on raw mass storage never took an advanced degree to use, so it's interesting to see that they've gotten a little simpler in Windows 7. The "Devices and Printers" system in Windows 7 can claim a few advantages over its predecessors, with much better icons&mdash;you generally get an reasonable approximation of whatever you've plugged in on the devices screen&mdash;customized Device Stage interfaces, seen left, and something called Device Containers, which group components of the same device into one icon. Like, if your 3rd-party PMP has internal and expandable storage, Windows won't just act as if there are two different devices attached; it'll group them together. Just click them to expand.<br clear="all"></p>
<p>And if you third-party PMP <em>does</em> have a syncing app, be wary. Many of them, especially for older players, won't have been update for Windows 7. Install them in a <a href="http://www.sevenforums.com/tutorials/316-compatibility-mode.html">compatibility mode</a> for XP or Vista&mdash;whichever they're most compatible with&mdash;to avoid any potential problems. [pic <a href="http://www.anythingbutipod.com/archives/2009/02/device-stage-on-windows-7.php">via</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Your Camera</strong>: Camera support is <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/compatibility/windows-7/en-us/Browse.aspx?type=Hardware&category=Cameras%20%26%20Photo&subcategory=Digital%20Cameras">pretty great</a> in Windows 7 so you'll often be able to just plug your camera in and go. As with PMPs, printers and the like, cameras with multiple storage devices will be lumped into the same icon in Device Stage, which will also (hopefully) display other device info, like remaining battery, photo import options and alternative sync apps.<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/d90.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_d90.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Windows also <a href="http://windowsteamblog.com/blogs/windowsexperience/archive/2009/01/08/device-stage-a-new-way-of-interacting-with-devices-in-windows-7.aspx">puts quick shortcuts in the taskbar</a> for supported cameras.<br>
Unfortunately, Windows 7 doesn't add anything in the way of RAW support, so you're going to have to go 3rd-party for that. FastPicture's <a href="http://www.downloadsquad.com/2009/10/21/raw-image-support-windows/">codec pack</a> supports most of the popular RAW formats used in DSLRs from Nikon, Canon, Sony and the like, and it's perfectly compatible with Windows 7. And free!</p>
<h2>Your Displays</h2>
<p>Adding a second monitor to Windows has never been particularly complicated, but the methods have never been all that apparent, either. Along with a refreshed multi-monitor displays settings interface, Windows 7 adds a fantastic shortcut: Windows+P will bring up a monitor management widget, which lets you set your monitor to either off, display duplicate or display extend.</p>
<p>The shortcut also works for enabling a projector. Laptop manufacturers have been adding functionality like this with their own software for years, so it's good to see Microsoft taking their ideas onboard in 7&mdash;it's easier for everyone that way.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/504x_win7monitor_01.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_504x_win7monitor_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>Windows 7 also ships with a monitor calibration tool&mdash;again, something that had to be previously furnished by third-party software or monitor manufacturers. It helps you adjust brightness, contrast, gamma and color settings with a simple wizard, accessible by navigating to the Display panel in Appearance and Personalization in the Control Panel</p>
<h2>Your Other Computers</h2>
<p>These are the gadgets your Windows 7 PC has to play nicely with&mdash;your other computers. Windows 7 file sharing has gain some new features, but just as many quirks.</p>
<p>Windows 7 PCs: Since most people just want to share some files and get networking setup <em>over with</em>, Windows 7 includes a feature called Homegroups, which lets you share files and media between Windows 7 PCs with almost not setup at all. Think of it as the old network setup wizard from XP and Vista, except much, much simpler. To create a Homegroup, you need to have a version of Windows 7 that's better, or, er, more <em>expensive</em> than Starter or Home Basic&mdash;those two can connect to Homegroups, but they can't initiate one.<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/homegroup.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_homegroup.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
To create one, just navigate to "Network and Internet" in the Control Panel, or search "Homegroups" in the Control Panel search bar. At the "Share with other computers running Windows 7 page, select "Create a Homegroup," and designate the types of media you'd like to share. Joining a Homegroup in Windows 7 from Windows 7 should be easy: as soon as you connect to a network with available Homegroups, Windows will prompt you to join. Just enter the passkey generated during the Homegroup creation process.</p>
<p>Windows XP and Vista: Homegroups are nice and new and WOW and all, and they don't work directly, as Homegroups, with Windows XP and Vista. Thing is, under all the fresh trappings, Homegroups are the same old Windows networking protocols. Accordingly, XP and Vista can still access Windows 7 PCs, just not under the official "Homegroups" guise. So, first: <a href="http://www.neowin.net/news/main/09/01/13/windows-7-homegroup-overview">Set up a user account</a> for your client PCs to log in to:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Click the Start button, type "user accounts" in the search box, and then click User Accounts and Family Safety.<br>
Click Add or remove user accounts, and then click Create a new account.</p>
<p>Type a name for the new account, such as "share."</p>
<p>Click Standard user, and then click Create Account.</p>
<p>Click the tile for the user account you just created, and then click Create a password.</p>
<p>Log on as the user you created (for example, share), and then log off. (This is required so that the user account is created with the correct credentials.)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Now that you've got the account set up, connecting should be easy: On Vista, just click Start, then Network, then open the computer you want to access&mdash;it should be listed by default. Enter the user name and password you've just created, and you're there. For XP, the process is similar: Just go to My Network Places, the click View Workgroup Computers, open the computer you want to access and enter your credentials.</p>
<p>From a Mac, the process <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=80b1aa5d-1b5a-4447-8036-acc918ba7af2&displaylang=en">isn't necessarily so straightforward</a>. If you're lucky, your Windows 7 share will just show up in your Finder sidebar, where you can click on it and enter login info when prompted. (Windows 7 still uses basic SMB shares, which OS X is more than equipped to access.) If it doesn't show up, the process is a little more complicated. Deferring again to MS:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>In [Finder] the toolbar, click Go, and then click Connect to Server (or use keyboard shortcut Command +K).<br>
In OS X 10.3.x and later, click Browse, select the computer running Windows 7, and then click Connect. (Or follow the common instructions below.)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>If that doesn't work, click Connect to Server again, and manually enter smb://username@computername/users as the network address, where username is your newly created user account, computername is your Windows 7 machines network name, and users is literally the word users&mdash;don't change that. Alternately, you can use the smb://username@ipaddress/users syntax, where ipaddress is your Windows 7 computers local IP. (as in 10.0.0.2, or 192.168.1.102)</p>
<h2>Your Streaming Devices and Consoles</h2>
<p><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #playto" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/playto/">Play to</a></strong>: Play To was one of the most touted features in Windows 7, and yeah, it's pretty cool. Here's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5146859/windows-7-windows-media-player-12-play-to-and-media-compatibility">a breakdown</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>One of the most potentially groundbreaking features of Windows 7 is "Play To," the ability to send music, video and photos to any compatible devices on the network, without running any kind of proprietary software, and without any initial setup. Sending a song to a Sonos or a video to an Xbox is-theoretically-just a right-click away.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The important thing to remember here is that "compatible devices" include&mdash;or rather, will include&mdash;anything that adheres to the DLNA 1.5 standard, from connected TVs to your Xbox 360 to other Windows 7 PCs with Windows Media Player 12. Play To devices show up automatically once they're connected to your network, it's just just a matter of <a href="http://windows7news.com/2009/10/29/windows-7-guides-using-play-to-in-wmp-12/">enabling the functionality in Windows</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Before using Play To, you will first need to turn on Streaming. To do this, with media player open, click Stream and then click Turn on media streaming. You will then be given some options for sharing media and which devices you wish to allow.<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/play_to_songs.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_play_to_songs.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
You can right-click the item that you wish to play and move your cursor to the Play To option and select the device you want to receive that media file.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>That's it! To allows a Windows 7 PC to receive Play To streaming, just enable Play To in the receiving computers' Media Streaming options, located in the Network and Sharing Center in the control panel.</p>
<p><strong>Consoles</strong>: As I said before, Play To will stream to the Xbox 360 if it's in Media Extender mode (that is, connected to a Windows Media Center PC). Chances are, though, you're going to just want to stream media from your Windows 7 PC to your Xbox 360, controlled from your Xbox 360. Good news: the same old methods work fine here, so shared files with certain codecs, or anything in your Windows Media Center library, are all fair game, and should work straight away. Likewise, the PS3 will play a limited number of video and audio formats streamed from your PC with virtually no configuration, but the utility is limited&mdash;especially if you do a lot of downloading, or archive video in a rare codec or container. For both, the solution is the same: Get TVersity, because it's <em>awesome</em>. Setup isn't super-easy, but the results are worth it: Pretty much any video you can come up with can be transcoded on the fly to stream on your console. Full instructions are <a href="http://http://www.maximumpc.com/article/streaming?page=0%2C0">here</a>.<br></p>
<p><em>So that's about it! I've only scratched the surface here&mdash;this is like Windows 7 Gadget Mediation 101, or maybe 102&mdash;so add you favorite tips and trick in the comments, since your feedback is a huge benefit to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/how-to">our Saturday guides</a>. And if you're still curious about Windows 7 in general, look no further than our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5150298/windows-7-the-complete-guide">Complete Windows 7 Guide.</a> Have a nice weekend!</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5404743/how-to-make-windows-7-play-nice-with-all-your-gadgets]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5404743]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[how to]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[guides]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[play to]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7 device compatibility]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7 gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7 how to]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7 itunes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7 play to]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5404743&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Bill Gates Praises Steve Jobs For Saving Apple From Disaster]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_gates_quote_2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Clearly, there is a mutual respect and admiration between <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #billgates" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/billgates/">Bill Gates</a> and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #stevejobs" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/stevejobs/">Steve Jobs</a>. Both have been complementary of each other in the past, but Gates had this to say about Jobs on CNBC last night.</p>
<p>Here is the full quote in context from the program <em>Warren Buffett and Bill Gates: Keeping America Great</em>.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"Well, he's done a fantastic job," Gates said. "Apple is in a bit of a different business where they make hardware and software together. But when Steve was coming back to Apple, which was actually through an acquisition of NeXT that he ran, Apple was in very tough shape. In fact, most likely it wasn't going to survive."</p>
<p>He continued: "And he brought in a team, he brought in inspiration about great products and design that's made Apple back into being an incredible force in doing good things. And it's great to have competitors like that. We write software for Apple, Microsoft does. They compete with Apple. But he, of all the leaders in the industry that I've worked with, he showed more inspiration and he saved the company."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Awww...how touching. [<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/11/13/bill_gates_praises_steve_jobs_for_saving_apple.html">AppleInsider</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5404233/bill-gates-praises-steve-jobs-for-saving-apple-from-disaster]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5404233]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blockquote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bill gates]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cnbc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[quote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[quotes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[steve jobs]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5404233&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Mad Catz Modern Warfare 2 Throat Mic and Controller Review (Xbox 360)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/img_7609.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_img_7609.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Madcatz has two new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #xbox360" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/xbox360/">Xbox 360</a> peripherals out to compliment <em>Call of Duty: <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #modernwarfare2" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/modernwarfare2/">Modern Warfare 2</a></em>, a controller with mappable buttons and a badass <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #throatmic" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/throatmic/">throat mic</a>. I actually like them both.</p>

<h1>Price</h1>
<p>$30 for the throat mic. $50 for the controller.</p>
<h1>Verdict</h1>
<p>Both peripherals are decent, but both could stand a $10-$15 price drop, too.<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/img_7616.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_img_7616.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The throat mic is pure adolescent fun. You wrap the ring around your neck and stick a headphone in one ear, and you either feel like a special ops assassin or an erotic asphyxiation aficionado. Either way it's a joy. Unlike a real throat mic, you actually speak at normal volume rather than whisper. Testing online, I was told my voice sounded "fine," just like the standard 360 headset. Unfortunately, the audio I received wasn't quite as good&mdash;I noticed an abnormal amount of digital compression in my ear&mdash;abnormal but far from inaudible.</p>
<p>The controller, on the other hand, is designed for practicality. Look beyond the green LEDs and the snow camo finish, and you'll notice two mappable buttons on the underside of the controller. They allow you to relocate the XYAB buttons to a position that won't require you take any fingers off the analog sticks. (If you've ever tried to aim in an FPS and melee at the same time, you know what I'm talking about.)<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/img_7587.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_img_7587.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>At first, I found the controller off-putting just because it's different from your stock controller. But when I actually played a game with it, I quickly adjusted to less grippy analog sticks and the somewhat awkward position of the small, mappable buttons.</p>
<p>Still, I'd like to see <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #madcatz" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/madcatz/">Mad Catz</a> refine their modded controller. At the moment, it's wired (be it wired through a very practical nylon woven cord). And as I said, those mappable buttons are pretty minuscule. As long as Mad Catz is breaking the rules of the traditional controller, I'd like to see them create an even more practical, polished rendition.<br>
<script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5403283,4,'');
</script><br>
But if you're OK with the price and above mentioned limitations, I'd say you can buy either product without resignation. Also, how great is it that mainstream generic controllers are finally incorporating mods and innovative into the mix?</p>
<p><br>
<strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #xbox360throatcommunicator" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/xbox360throatcommunicator/">Xbox 360 Throat Communicator</a></strong><br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3_03.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Clear audio out<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3_03.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Functional, faux badass design<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizminus_03.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Compressed, digital-sounding audio in</p>
<p><br>
<strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #xbox360combatcontroller" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/xbox360combatcontroller/">Xbox 360 Combat Controller</a></strong><br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3_03.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Controller itself feels decent in your hands<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3_03.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Mappable buttons are as handy as you'd hope<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/giznormal_03.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Corded, but the cord itself is premium<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizminus_03.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Mappable buttons could be larger and better positioned</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5403298/mad-catz-modern-warfare-2-throat-mic-and-controller-review-xbox-360]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5403298]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mad catz]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[modern warfare 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[modern warfare controller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[modern warfare throat mic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[throat mic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xbox 360]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Xbox 360 Combat Controller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Xbox 360 Throat Communicator]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5403298&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Now Is a Bad Time to Buy a Used Xbox 360]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_rrodnew.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />You know those <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5397218/official-microsoft-policy-if-you-a-buy-a-used-xbox-360-thats-banned-from-xbox-live-youre-just-screwed">Xboxes</a> that were banned last week because they were modified to play pirated games? They're being dumped onto eBay and Craigslist by their owners, and they won't all tell you that those consoles are banned from Live.</p>
<p>So our recommendation is that if you really can't spare the money to buy a new Xbox&mdash;which you should really do, since the failure rate still isn't that low&mdash;is to make sure you ask the seller whether or not it's been banned from Live. If you're buying it in person, off of Craigslist, make sure you have them plug it in and show you that it can. If you're buying it on eBay, well, you'll just have to take their word. Just be careful, because Microsoft has no pity on you for <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5397218/official-microsoft-policy-if-you-a-buy-a-used-xbox-360-thats-banned-from-xbox-live-youre-just-screwed">buying a used Xbox that's been banned</a>. [<a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/181993/">PCWorld</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5403544/now-is-a-bad-time-to-buy-a-used-xbox-360]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5403544]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ban]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[banned]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[banning]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[used xbox 360]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xbox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xbox 360]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:27:32 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5403544&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Xbox 360's Facebook, Twitter, Last.FM and Zune Video Come November 17]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_DSC_9988_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />All those features we went over in our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5384920/facebook-twitter-zune-and-lastfm-on-xbox-live-hands-on-hrm-thats-interesting">Xbox 360 update impressions post</a> are finally rolling out to everyone on November 17.</p>
<p>To recap, here's what's new:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&bull;Facebook – Update your status to share what movie, game or entertainment you're enjoying, connect with friends and view their Facebook stream, status updates and photos on the big screen – all seamlessly integrated and custom-built for <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #xbox360" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/xbox360/">Xbox 360</a>. You can even compare your Xbox LIVE and Facebook friends lists to see which of your friends are on LIVE.<br>
&bull; Zune – Zune video on Xbox LIVE offers a full fidelity experience with instant on HD in 1080p and 5.1 channel surround sound. No waiting for downloads or buffering, it's there at the press of a button. You can also share the experience with up to seven friends through voice chat and Avatar integration on the TV screen – it puts a whole new spin on "movie night."<br>
&bull; Twitter – Stay in the know by discovering, posting and replying to Tweets right on your Xbox 360. You can even view friend profiles, trends and conversations, or search to see who's tweeting about your favorite game.<br>
&bull; Last.fm – Discover more music and explore endless personalized radio stations with Last.fm on Xbox 360. Skip, "ban" or "love" tracks to create your perfect mix-we've even built in "Gamer Stations" with game-related types of music selected specifically for the gaming community (Available in the U.S. and UK)</p>
<p>In addition to these social features, Xbox LIVE will also be debuting "News and More," a new section of the "Inside Xbox" channel, transforming Xbox LIVE into a full-fledged media portal. With a regularly-updated stream of content from MSNBC, The New Yorker and Dilbert, "News and More" brings the latest in current events, arts and entertainment right to your fingertips.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5403376/xbox-360s-facebook-twitter-lastfm-and-zune-video-come-november-17]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5403376]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[xbox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dashboard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dashboard update]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software update]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[update]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xbox 360]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xbox 360 update]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:14:44 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5403376&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Responds to Microsoft's New Retail Stores]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_applehead2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #ronjohnson" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ronjohnson/">Ron Johnson</a>, Apple VP of retail, had this to say in response to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5387880/microsofts-first-retail-store-opens-like-apple-store-with-more-colors">Microsoft's move</a> into the world of retail stores during Apple's Manhattan store opening today.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5403171/apple-responds-to-microsofts-new-retail-stores]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5403171]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blockquote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ron johnson]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:07:52 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5403171&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Windows Mobile Marketplace Adds Non-Mobile App Store]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/screen_shot_2009-11-11_at_9.40.46_pm.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_screen_shot_2009-11-11_at_9.40.46_pm.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Microsoft added a few nice new features to its <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windowsmobile" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windowsmobile/">Windows Mobile</a> Marketplace today, including enhanced security and a nice-looking store that can be accessed from your computer's browser, much like Xbox Live.</p>
<p>The security features are really more like anti-piracy measures, but that's developer stuff&mdash;what about us consumers? Well, the new online portal seems like a solid idea, albeit one that implicitly acknowledges that app browsing is not that great on a WinMo 6.5 phone. You can access <a href="http://marketplace.windowsphone.com/">the portal</a> from any browser, taking advantage of your computer's larger screen and faster loading to find apps that much quicker. They'll be downloaded as soon as you open the Marketplace app on your WinMo device. The site looks nice, too&mdash;cleanly organized and easy to use. It's not a substitute for a good on-device app store, but it's a nice feature to have. [<a href="http://windowsteamblog.com/blogs/wmdev/archive/2009/11/11/announcing-new-features-in-windows-marketplace-for-mobile.aspx">Windows Team Blog</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/12/windows-marketplace-for-mobile-updates-tackle-piracy-adds-onlin/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5402821/windows-mobile-marketplace-adds-non+mobile-app-store]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5402821]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[windows mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows marketplace]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows mobile marketplace]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[winmo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:47:54 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5402821&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Microsoft Patents The Sudo Command]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/sudowich_01.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Microsoft has been granted a patent for a sudo command, because apparently you can patent a command that goes back to the mainframe days as long as you explain that it's a "personalized version" with a GUI.</p>
<p>Groklaw has an explanation of the history of sudo and details about the patent, but it all boils down to this: Someone at the US Patent Office must've been snoozing when they approved this patent application. Either that or the command worked on a person. [<a href="http://patft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=7,617,530.PN.&OS=PN/7,617,530&RS=PN/7,617,530">USPTO</a> via <a href="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20091111094923390">Groklaw</a>]</p>
<p><i>Photo by <a href="http://xkcd.com/149/">xkcd</a></i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5402796/microsoft-patents-the-sudo-command]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5402796]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft sudo patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sudo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5402796&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
