<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: Patent]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/patent</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'patent']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Nintendo Files Trademark For Zii, Is It The Wii 2 Though?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_wiizii.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />If Nintendo's follow-up to the Wii is actually called the Zii, I think that's the first mistake right there. But could this mysterious trademark, filed in Japan in October, actually be for the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #wii2" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/wii2/">Wii 2</a>, or something else?</p>
<p>It was spotted on a trademarks database yesterday by the eagle-eyed Siliconera, who rightly points out that it "seems kind of late to protect Wii typos since the console is three years old." Perhaps it's that <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5364077/next-generation-wii-coming-with-hd-graphics-and-new-controller-in-2011">HD Wii</a> which has been oft-rumored? Whatever it is, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5419976/a-quick-look-at-the-creative-zii-trinity-pumping-out-wall+e-in-smooth-hd">Creative won't be too happy</a>. [<a href="http://www.siliconera.com/2009/12/14/what-is-the-nintendo-zii/">Siliconera</a> via <a href="http://kotaku.com/5426648/nintendo-patents-zii-in-japan">Kotaku</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5426713/nintendo-files-trademark-for-zii-is-it-the-wii-2-though]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5426713]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[highdef]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[highdefinition]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nintendo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nintendo zii]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wii]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Wii 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wiihd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[zii]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 15 Dec 2009 07:20:13 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kat Hannaford]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5426713&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Patent Shows Dock Made From 'Elastic Sponge-Like Substance' That Conforms To Shape of iPod/iPhone]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_apple-dock-patent.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Apple patents are flowing in thick and fast, with yesterday's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5423663/new-apple-patent-prevents-you-from-screwing-with-the-hardware">anti-tampering idea</a>, and now a universal dock which can be molded to the shape of whichever iPod or iPhone you put in it. Is Apple messing with us?</p>
<p>First filed in June 2008 but just unearthed by AppleInsider, it's been called the "Aesthetically pleasing universal dock" and is made from an "elastic sponge-like substance." It would be able to -</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"retain its shape between uses or could be reset using a button placed on the front of the dock for use with a different device. This would eliminate the current problem of differing generations of iPods/iPhones needing adapters to fit into certain docks and chargers."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>A shape-shifting iPod dock to match your <a href="http://www.thedesignblog.org/entry/jaguar-c-xs-shape-shifting-car-bends-to-the-needs-of-the-rider/">shape-changing Jaguar C-XS</a> car, perhaps? [<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/12/10/apples_plans_for_universal_dock_revealed_in_patent_application.html">AppleInsider</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5424077/apple-patent-shows-dock-made-from-elastic-sponge+like-substance-that-conforms-to-shape-of-ipodiphone]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5424077]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dock]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shape shifting]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 11 Dec 2009 05:30:54 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kat Hannaford]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5424077&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Microsoft Patents The Sudo Command]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/sudowich_01.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Microsoft has been granted a patent for a sudo command, because apparently you can patent a command that goes back to the mainframe days as long as you explain that it's a "personalized version" with a GUI.</p>
<p>Groklaw has an explanation of the history of sudo and details about the patent, but it all boils down to this: Someone at the US Patent Office must've been snoozing when they approved this patent application. Either that or the command worked on a person. [<a href="http://patft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=7,617,530.PN.&OS=PN/7,617,530&RS=PN/7,617,530">USPTO</a> via <a href="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20091111094923390">Groklaw</a>]</p>
<p><i>Photo by <a href="http://xkcd.com/149/">xkcd</a></i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5402796/microsoft-patents-the-sudo-command]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5402796]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft sudo patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sudo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5402796&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Microsoft Getting Cleverer and Cleverer With New Multitouch Screen Keyboard]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/desk-tron_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_desk-tron_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Oh, those smart rascals at Microsoft are on a roll. I love their <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5365299/courier-first-details-of-microsofts-secret-tablet">Courier tablet concept</a>, and now they may have found the way to make on-screen multitouch keyboards actually work great&mdash;even for touch typists like me.</p>
<p>The problem with screen keyboards is that you actually have to look at the screen to hit the keys correctly. With real keyboards, touch typists have a physical reference to position their hands. That's why they type blind. With a flat <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SCREEN KEYBOARD" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/screen-keyboard/">screen keyboard</a>, however, you lose the physical reference frame.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/virtualkeyboard_thumb.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_virtualkeyboard_thumb.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>The patent for this screen keyboard, however, uses multitouch technology to automatically align the keys to the position of the hand. Since the keys are always in the same relative position to your fingers, you will always have a physical point of reference: Your own hand. That way, you can blindingly hammer your keys against the screen, knowing that your fingers will always hit the keys they are aiming for.</p>
<p>The patent also details the way this virtual keyboard would appear anywhere on the screen: Just place your hands as you would normally do while typing, and the keyboard will pop up. [<a href="http://aiw2.uspto.gov/.aiw?Docid=20090237361&homeurl=http%3A%2F%2Fappft1.uspto.gov%2Fnetacgi%2Fnph-Parser%3FSect1%3DPTO2%2526Sect2%3DHITOFF%2526p%3D1%2526u%3D%25252Fnetahtml%25252FPTO%25252Fsearch-bool.html%2526r%3D37%2526f%3DG%2526l%3D50%2526co1%3DAND%2526d%3DPG01%2526s1%3Dmicrosoft.AS.%2526OS%3DAN%2Fmicrosoft%2526RS%3DAN%2Fmicrosoft&PageNum=&Rtype=&SectionNum=&idkey=62FB1564FFCD">USPTO</a> via <a href="http://wmpoweruser.com/?p=8236">WMPowerUser</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5368149/microsoft-getting-cleverer-and-cleverer-with-new-multitouch-screen-keyboard]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5368149]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[multitouch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[keyboard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Multitouch keyboard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Tablet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[screen]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[screen keyboard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 25 Sep 2009 20:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5368149&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[IBM Files Patent For Tweeting TV Remote]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/ibm_twitter_remote.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_ibm_twitter_remote.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Good lord, this is all we need. A TV remote that allows users to easily ramble on about the shows they watch via their blog or twitter account. For better or worse, IBM appears to be working on this technology.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/ibm_twitter_remote_2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_ibm_twitter_remote_2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<blockquote>
<p>A viewer selects a media program to view by use of a remote controller with networking capability.</p>
<p>Upon the viewer wishing to send a blog posting to a blog, the viewer determines whether a tag to be included in the blog posting is to be a pre-existing tag or a custom tag, wherein the blog posting comprises program information about the media program useful to identify the media program. If the tag is to be a pre-existing tag, the viewer selects the pre-existing tag from a plurality of pre-existing tags using the remote controller and if the tag is to be a custom tag, the viewer generates the custom tag using the remote controller.</p>
<p>If a protocol provided by the remote controller to send the blog posting to the blog allows a snapshot of the media program to be included in the blog posting, the remote controller takes the snapshot of the media program and includes it in the blog posting.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>So, the device would let you blog or tweet and communicate with your followers about what you are watching via a networked remote control. Again, it's only a patent at this point, but is this remote something you could see yourself using? [<a href="http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=5&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=Facebook&OS=Facebook&RS=Facebook">Patent</a> via <a href="http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/news/technology/2009/08/ibm_building_a_tv_remote_that.html">BaltTech</a> via <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/08/28/ibm-files-patent-for-geek-couch-potato-dream-a-tv-remote-that-tweets/">TechCrunch</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5347971/ibm-files-patent-for-tweeting-tv-remote]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5347971]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[concept]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[twitter remote]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5347971&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sony PS3 Laugh Detector Patent Has Very Juvenile Sense of Humor]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/sonylaughdetectorskynet.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_sonylaughdetectorskynet.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Come on, Sony. A repeating boot-to-the-butt wheel? Everyone knows the only surefire kick-based humor must involve the crotch.</p>
<p>Sony's PS3 emotion-detecting patent would ostensibly work by picking up physical cues like laughter, though we're not exactly sure how it'll detect some of the other emotions it claims to, including sadness, boredom, joy, excitement and anger. It's kind of a cool idea&mdash;a game could adjust to your growing frustration by decreasing the difficulty before you heave the PS3 out the window in a fit of rage, for example. But if they plan on using humor, they better get out of the Humor Stone Age where the butt-kick wheel resides. May I suggest Glenn Beck, Fox News' fantastic up-and-coming satirist? [<a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2009/08/15/patent-says-ps3-just-wants-to-see-you-laugh/">Joystiq</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5338109/sony-ps3-laugh-detector-patent-has-very-juvenile-sense-of-humor]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5338109]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[butt]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[emotion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[kick]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laugh detection]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ps3]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony ps3 laugh detector]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 15 Aug 2009 13:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5338109&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Bill Gates Patent Could Save Us From Another Hurricane Katrina]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_bill_gates_hurricane_plan-2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500">Not content with being the world's richest man, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged BILL GATES" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/bill-gates/">Bill Gates</a> is planning on extending his power to control the weather. More specifically, he has filed a patent for a system that he hopes will prevent the next Katrina.</p>
<p>Along with ex-Microsoft CTO Nathan Myhrvold, Gates has applied for five patents that call for a fleet of specially equipped vessels to be deployed in a hurricane's path&mdash;vessels that are capable of reducing the surface temperature of the ocean by mixing in colder water from greater depths. This would reduce the heat-driven condensation that fuels hurricanes.</p>
<p>Of course, significantly altering the surface temperature of a large body of water is going to require many, many ships...a reality that is not lost on Gates. In the patent filings, there are a few proposals on how an endeavor like this one could be financed&mdash;including selling insurance policies in areas that are prone to major storms. While I seriously doubt the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5101912/it-could-be-possible-to-stop-hurricanes-with-supersonic-jets">plausibility of such a scheme</a>, if anyone can pull it off it would be Bill Gates. Besides, even if this doesn't work out he always has his important work with <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5302082/bill-gates-applies-for-patent-on-high-tech-keg">high tech kegs</a> to fall back on. [<a href="http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=%2220090173386%22.PGNR.&OS=DN/20090173386&RS=DN/20090173386">Patent</a> via <a href="http://www.techflash.com/microsoft/One_force_of_nature_vs_another_Bill_Gates_wants_to_stop_hurricanes_50385622.html">Tech Flash</a> via <a href="http://news.slashdot.org/story/09/07/10/0522210/Can-Bill-Gates-Prevent-the-Next-Katrina?from=rss">Slashdot</a> via <a href="http://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2009-07/bill-gates-files-patent-hurricane-killer-plan">PopSci</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5312045/bill-gates-patent-could-save-us-from-another-hurricane-katrina]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5312045]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[weather]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bill gates]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hurricane]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5312045&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Vizio Import Ban Overturned, Free To Ship TVs To US]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_vx240m_summer_angled-vizio_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500">US customs has cleared Vizio in an <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5285629/ban-on-vizio-hdtv-imports-upheld-but-does-it-even-matter">ongoing patent dispute</a> with Funai, meaning that they will be allowed to freely ship their HDTVs into the US once more.</p>
<p>In all likelihood, Funai will appeal the ruling&mdash;but outside of a courtroom miracle, this should effectively bring the situation to a close. The reality is that patent infringement cases like this <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5302231/sharp-lcd-tvs-monitors-may-be-banned-from-import-into-the-us">pop up from time to time</a>, and victory seems rare. [<a href="http://www.vizio.com/about.aspx?cid=3623&id=1318">Vizio</a> via <a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/09/07/09/vizio.clears.patent.woes/">Electronista</a>]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5311012/vizio-import-ban-overturned-free-to-ship-tvs-to-us]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5311012]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[vizio]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ban]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[funai]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[home entertainment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[import]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[import ban]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vizio patent infringement]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 09 Jul 2009 12:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5311012&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Samsung's New Smartphone QWERTY Idea: Keep Trying, Guys]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5310600/samsungs-new-smartphone-qwerty-idea-keep-trying-guys">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a>Samsung filed a <a href="http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html&r=17&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PG01&s1=samsung.AS.&OS=AN/samsung&RS=AN/samsung">patent</a> for this avian-looking smartphone concept: Two spring-loaded half-keyboards burst from the sides of the phone, which in theory provides both a larger keyboard and more screen space, since hands are out of the way. <em>In theory</em>.</p>
<p>It's a half-baked idea, of course, which is why we're only seeing it in a patent and not in actual hardware. Unless the half-keyboards were incredibly strong, the whole device would feel like it's itching to break into pieces, and wouldn't it have to be twice as thick as standard QWERTY sliders to accommodate double the amount of hardware? So it's just a patent, and it'll almost certainly stay that way. But at least somebody's trying to figure out a way to keep hardware keyboards alive. [<a href="http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2009/07/08/samsung_folding_keyboard/">Reg Hardware</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5310600/samsungs-new-smartphone-qwerty-idea-keep-trying-guys]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5310600]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[mock-ups]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[concept]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[keyboard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[qwerty]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung keyboard smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5310600&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple's Future iPhone Patents Show Fingerprint ID For Different Gestures, Plus More]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_apple-fingerprint.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;">MacRumors found three interesting patents that point to various new interaction techniques. The most interesting is the fingerprint ID directly on the screen so that the iPhone can see which finger you're using and accept gestures appropriately.</p>
<p>The fingerprint ID also, of course, can theoretically act as a security device so that only you can activate your phone. There's also haptic (physical) feedback when you're hitting things, as well as using the touchscreen as an RFID reader. None of the three are really mindblowing in themselves, on the surface, but if implemented intelligently might make for a big step forward in the iPhone product line. [<a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2009/07/02/haptic-feedback-fingerprint-identification-and-rfid-tag-readers-in-future-iphones/">Macrumors</a> via <a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/07/02/new-apple-patents-include-tactile-haptic-feedback-fingerprint-id-and-rfid-tag-readers/">Boy Genius</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5306642/apples-future-iphone-patents-show-fingerprint-id-for-different-gestures-plus-more]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5306642]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple fingerprint patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fingerprint]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fingerprint recognition]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fingerprints]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[haptics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rfid]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 02 Jul 2009 18:54:29 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5306642&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[iPhone Patents Promise to Automate Our Relationships at Last]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="http://www.unwiredview.com/2009/07/02/iphone-4-0-os-event-based-modes-intellingent-and-scheduled-communications/">Unwired View</a> uncovered three new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged IPHONE PATENTS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphone-patents/">iPhone patents</a> that promise to turn everything from calling grandma on her birthday to turning off your phone in a movie theater into gloriously mindless activities.</p>

<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_DImg-5.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"><br>
<a href="http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=%2220090170492%22.PGNR.&OS=DN/20090170492&RS=DN/20090170492">Scheduled Communications</a><br>
"<em>A communications device may be programmed to initiate a communications operation when a particular condition is met. The user may set any suitable condition, including for example a date and time, location, event, received or sent communications operation...</em>"<br>
In other words, automatically email grandma on her birthday, or automatically send your wife a text message when you land in another state "I'm sorry honey, I'm seeing someone else...please pack up my clothing neatly and ship it to me."</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_DImg-6.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"><br>
<a href="http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=%2220090170480%22.PGNR.&OS=DN/20090170480&RS=DN/20090170480">Intelligent and Customizable Communication</a><br>
"<em>The communications system can provide intelligent communications between devices, in which the system can identify appropriate communication modes for incoming communications requests based on a user's preferences and availability. The communications system can determine whether a user is participating in an activity. In response to determining that a user is participating in an activity, the communications system can automatically identify one or more preferred communication modes that are available to the user</em>."<br>
In other words, if I'm at the gym (tracked by my location) or running from the cops (tracked by the jostling of my iPhone since my GPS is off), my family and friends can see that I'd prefer text messages instead of calls.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_DImg-4.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"><br>
<a href="http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=%2220090170532%22.PGNR.&OS=DN/20090170532&RS=DN/20090170532">Life Event Based Modes</a><br>
"<em>One or more event-based modes of operation may be automatically or selectively applied to the device when a new life event is detected...The event-based modes of operation may be used to restrict access to certain applications or functionalities on the device, enforce or restrict certain user interface or other types of settings, and add or remove or rearrange the priority of device assets. The new life events associated with event-based modes of operation may be of various types, including location-based events, environment-based events, calendar-based events, news-based events, and usage-based events</em>."<br>
In other words, if you walk into a movie theater, your phone could automatically deactivate the ringer and text message notifications, plus it might turn off all push notifications to save some battery life while you weren't actively using your iPhone. Combined with a patent above, potential callers could even see that since you were at a movie, maybe they should delay the call, wait for you in the theater's alley and then threaten you, at knife-point, that you never should have taken out a loan you couldn't pay back just to buy a stupid iPhone.</p>
<p>I'll take it all, Apple. Thanks. [<a href="http://www.unwiredview.com/2009/07/02/iphone-4-0-os-event-based-modes-intellingent-and-scheduled-communications/">Unwired View</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5306167/iphone-patents-promise-to-automate-our-relationships-at-last/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5306167]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone patents]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod touch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 02 Jul 2009 09:10:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5306167&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Bill Gates Applies for Patent on High Tech Keg]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_cervesa2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;">The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/336644/">cerveza mogul himself</a> Señor <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged BILL GATES" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/bill-gates/">Bill Gates</a> is listed on a new patent for a "<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged THERMALLY SEALED CONTAINER" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/thermally-sealed-container/">thermally sealed container</a>." And yes, one of its potential functions is to hold beer.</p>

<p>Gates is one of many names on the patent from Searete LLC, the company you may recognize behind another recent Gates-signed work, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5205606/">an electromagnetic engine</a>.</p>
<p>Apparently the new invention is not quite a keg or thermos, but a system that "may include more segments principally defining at least one storage region; and one or more regions of substantially thermally sealed connections between at least one of the one or more surface regions of the one or more segments wherein the one or more regions of substantially thermally sealed connections and the one or more segments form an integrally thermally sealed storage region."</p>
<p>In its simplest terms, that sounds a lot like a thermos wrapped in many layers of specialty insulation complete with sensors and displays&mdash;the ultimate beer home. And indeed, the patent app describes a container that could hold everything from a "liquid or beverage" such as "<em>beer</em> or distilled spirits" to artificial plasma and hot mix asphalt.</p>
<p>Nice attempt to hide international beer trade under philanthropic construction and medical uses, Señor Gates. But we're on to you. [<a href="http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=%2220090145912%22.PGNR.&OS=DN/20090145912&RS=DN/20090145912">Patent</a> via <a href="http://www.techflash.com/microsoft/Bill_Gates_wants_a_better_beer_keg48998721.html">TechFlash</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5302082/bill-gates-applies-for-patent-on-high-tech-keg]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5302082]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[beer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bill gates]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bill gates beer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tecate]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[thermally sealed container]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5302082&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Microsoft Wins Patent for Crippling Your Computer Until You Pay Up]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/05/win7bsod_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/win7bsod_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>Oh ho ho. Microsoft <a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/05/19/1931249">just got a patent</a> for crippling your computer until you pay them dammit.</p>
<p>Specifically it's for "making selected portions and functionality of the operating system unavailable to the user or by limiting the user's ability to add software applications or device drivers to the computer" until an "agreed upon sum of money" is paid to unlock everything.</p>
<p>You likely have little to fear from it, however&mdash;since filing for this patent in 2005, Microsoft's consistently <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/windows/microsoft-kills-off-vista-anti+piracy-kill-switch-329603.php">moved toward</a> being less annoying, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5244086/windows-7-will-annoy-pirates-even-less-than-vista">even to pirates</a>.</p>
<p>Still it's interesting to read the patent to see how Microsoft thought through the problem of locking down an open architecture. (You can leave your "What? They patented BSoDs?" quips at the door, BTW, since I already took care of that.) [<a href="http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=7,536,726.PN.&OS=PN/7,536,726&RS=PN/7,536,726">USPTO</a> via <a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/05/19/1931249">Slashdot</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5261677/microsoft-wins-patent-for-crippling-your-computer-until-you-pay-up]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5261677]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows vista]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 19 May 2009 20:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5261677&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Patent Hints at iTunes Kiosks]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/05/thumb160x_a91f404e49f23e33cedd02303b6224c0.gif" class="left image158" width="158" />A recent Apple patent application hints at the creation of iTunes kiosks for local and remote media downloading in public areas, such as airports, malls, hotels and even public transportation.</p>
<p>With these kiosks, consumers on the run would be able to browse selective, popular media&mdash;such as new releases&mdash;and purchase then download the content into the handhelds after swiping their credit card. Although it sounds quite simple, means of getting the content into the actual handheld could prove to be quite difficult as device connectors could be worn down or tampered with, and Wi-Fi hotspots could get hacked or overloaded. [<a href="http://www.ipodnn.com/articles/09/05/07/itunes.kiosks.coming/">iPodnn</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5244844/apple-patent-hints-at-itunes-kiosks]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5244844]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple itunes kiosk]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple itunes kiosk patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple patents]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[itunes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[itunes kiosk]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[itunes kiosk patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[kiosk]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[kiosk patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 07 May 2009 20:30:13 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andi Wang]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5244844&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New Apple Patent Points at Next-Gen iPhone Video Chat Again]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/045834-movement3.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/>A new Apple patent on a motion-aware iPhone user interface <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5144555/next-generation-iphone-may-have-videoconferencing-at-last">points again</a> at the possibility of a front-facing video camera for <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged VIDEO CHAT" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/video-chat/">video chat</a> in next generation iPhones. One that won't require <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5015395/apple-introduces-iphone-3g-videoconferencing-kit-zomg">the 3G videoconferencing kit</a>.</p>

<p>The new patent describes a morphing interface that will adapt to the motion of the user. For example, if you are in a shaky bus, the elements on a list will get bigger so you can target them better with your fingers. In the patent, the drawings depict a front-facing video camera that&mdash;if implemented&mdash;will enable the possibility of having face-to-face real-time communications between two iPhone users or&mdash;hopefully&mdash;one iPhone user and a desktop iChat user. And yes, with "face-to-face real-time communications" we really mean <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5172615/iphone-os-30-will-turn-your-phone-into-a-revolutionary-sex-toy">video sex</a>. [<a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2009/04/16/apple-researching-movement-aware-interfaces-for-iphones/">MacRumors</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5214572/new-apple-patent-points-at-next+gen-iphone-video-chat-again]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5214572]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chat]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[front camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[front facing camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video chat]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video conference]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:50:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5214572&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Patent Implies iPod to Get a Unibody]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/ipodpatent.gif" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/>Last October, Apple started using unibody designs in their MacBook and MacBook Pro. A newly uncovered patent suggests that the next product to incorporate this aluminum case may be the iPod.</p>
<p>The patent shows that the iPod's new casing will be carved out of a single, large and thick block of sheet metal, making the device lighter, thinner and sturdier. Although it may be a significantly stronger product, with it being made out of one slab of metal, it seems that it would be harder to take the iPod apart for second-hand replacements and repairs, meaning that consumers would have to turn to Apple directly for all their iPod needs.</p>
<p>However, having it made out of one block of sheet metal would reduce the costs of creating it. Does this also mean it'll be cheaper for consumers as well? Please, Apple, let it be so. [<a href="http://www.ipodnn.com/articles/09/04/09/unibody.ipods.in.works/">iPodNN</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5206049/apple-patent-implies-ipod-to-get-a-unibody]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5206049]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple patents]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod unibody]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipods]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[speculation]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[unibody]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 09 Apr 2009 20:09:13 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andi Wang]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5206049&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple's Patent Hints at iChat AV Video Answering Machine Message]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/ichatpat.jpg" width="122" height="102" />This patent for automatically sending an audio or video reply to an iChat call has us excited, because it could point to automated replies not just on computers, but via the iPhone as well.</p>
<p>The original iChat AV <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged ANSWERING MACHINE PATENT" title="Click here to read more posts tagged ANSWERING MACHINE PATENT" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/answering-machine-patent/">answering machine patent</a> was filed in October 2007, and detailed ways of iChat (or the iChat server) playing back an automated video or audio message when the user can't be reached. What's cool about this is that it's not that useful for computer to computer calling, but very useful for iPhone to computer calling, or computer to iPhone calling. When an iPhone user is out of range, or if a computer isn't on, it's convenient to know within, say, 10 seconds, instead of waiting there and wasting your phone's battery.</p>
<p>Plus, if there is video recording in iPhone 3.0, you may be able to record your messages directly on the phone itself. Bad ass (if true). [<a href="http://www.macnn.com/articles/09/04/09/ichat.videomail.patent/">Macnn</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5205483/apples-patent-hints-at-ichat-av-video-answering-machine-message]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5205483]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[answering machine patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[audio]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ichat]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ichat av patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone 3g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone av]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iPhone chat]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video chat]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video message]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 09 Apr 2009 14:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5205483&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Patents Movement Gestures for the iPhone]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/iphone-movement-gestures.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/>Apple recently applied for a patent for "movement-based interfaces for personal media devices," which means a more advanced accelerometer and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MOVEMENT GESTURES" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/movement-gestures/">movement gestures</a> for the iPhone.</p>
<p>Following in the footsteps of Sony Ericsson, Apple doesn't seem to be satisfied with just the ability to switch between landscape and portrait orientations or simple screen-tilting in games. Just to name a couple of examples, with more gesture controls, you could switch between different webpages with a slight tilt, or change songs by shaking the gadget. That sounds pretty cool and all, but how will that work with my allergies? Sneeze or song change? Apple won't know. [<a href="http://www.unwiredview.com/2009/04/02/movement-gestures-in-iphone-os-40-or-50/">Unwired View</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5196297/apple-patents-movement-gestures-for-the-iphone]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5196297]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple iphone patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movement]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movement gesture]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movement gesture patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movement gestures]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 02 Apr 2009 22:00:13 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andi Wang]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5196297&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Shot of Jailbroken iPhone Sneaks Into Apple Patent Application]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/03/3-27-09applepatentjbc.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/3-27-09applepatentjbc.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a>Looks like somebody over at the Apple legal department has been enjoying a little Jailbreak action, because a sketch in <a href="http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PG01&s1=Apple.AS.&OS=AN/Apple&RS=AN/Apple">a recent patent application</a> includes some features a stock iPhone just doesn't have. <strong>Update:</strong></p>
<p>Let's see here, we've got a custom wallpaper, that's not allowed. We've got the Installer and SMBPrefs apps, you're not going to find either of those in the Officially Apple-Controlled Apple-Permitted App Store By Apple. <strong>Update:</strong> So after reading, it turns out that this image is actually illustrating a point, and isn't a mistake. The patent explains that it covers all uses of the iPhone, including a customized background and other bonuses available to the Jailbreak community. This is interesting in itself; Apple seems to be at the least permitting Jailbreaking enough to cover it in a patent. [<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/28/apple-uses-a-jailbroken-iphone-in-patent-application/#comments">Engadget</a>, <em>thanks Travis!</em>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5188290/shot-of-jailbroken-iphone-sneaks-into-apple-patent-application]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5188290]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jailbreak]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jailbroken]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 28 Mar 2009 10:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5188290&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple's Ideas for Seamless Biometric Security on iPhone and MacBook]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/03/bios.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/bios.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a>To me, the biometric readers you see on most laptops are obnoxious blemishes&mdash;they really can't make them more discrete? Apple feels the same way, so I like <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/03/27/apple_developing_stealth_biometric_security_for_iphone.html">their ideas</a> for seamless biometric security.</p>
<p>The most realistic and likely biometric tool is a hidden sensor within a touchscreen or notebook's trackpad that would detect fingerprints, vein patterns or even the shape of your ear when you use the phone or notebook like normal, making the whole process nearly invisible. The patent also considers face recognition using the webcam&mdash;but considering our past experience with <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/387199/lenovo-ideapad-u110-review-verdict-short-ride-in-a-reasonably+paced-machine">VeriFace's tech</a> and <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5141741/what-to-know-about-iphoto-09-face-detection-and-recognition">iPhoto's face recognition</a>, that sounds kinda lousy. The "ew, creepy" solution they propose is collecting a user's DNA to recognize their genetic makeup when they come into contact with the machine.</p>
<p>Oh and there's a couple ideas like arranging shapes or patterns that are sorta Android's neato puzzle lock. [<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/03/27/apple_developing_stealth_biometric_security_for_iphone.html">AppleInsider</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5187178/apples-ideas-for-seamless-biometric-security-on-iphone-and-macbook]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5187178]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[biometric]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[biometrics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[notebook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:50:35 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5187178&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Tablet Likely Described in Patent]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/02/custom_1233676934834_medium_2167867785_21c57ec5d9_o-1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/02/custom_1233676934834_medium_2167867785_21c57ec5d9_o-1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Hidden within the usual litany of claims in a patent awarded this January-titled "Display Housing for Computing Device", which covers their current portable displays-Apple describes a tablet display, with the display housing the computer device.</p>

<p>The patent describes several forms for these displays-most of them already in use in current Apple laptops-, describing displays attached to portable computers. However, one of the claims describes the display as a "housing for a computer device", which would include the computer electronics within the display housing, sandwiched between front and back shells.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>[0015]<b>As a housing for a computer device</b>, one embodiment of the invention includes: a front shell; a back shell coupled to said front shell to produce said housing, <b>electrical components for the computer device being internal to said housing</b>; and a foam stiffener provided internal to said housing to substantially fill unused space internal to said housing, thereby providing stiffness to said housing.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>According to our patent expert R. Polk Wagner, Professor of patents law at University of Pennsylvania Law School:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>What might be fair to say is that Apple's patent is significant in that it shows something about the company's thinking: that they are thinking about "portable computing devices" where the display (and/or keyboard) are <i>larger</i> than the volume required to house the components inside - thus allowing or even requiring a stiffener. Maybe this means Apple is thinking about tablets (i.e., "big iPhones") or maybe they're just thinking about further miniaturization of components / lighter weight in existing form factors. Hard to know.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>So there you have it. To me, the patent claim quoted above leans clearly to a potential tablet device. In any case, remember that patents don't have to materialize into products, but it's always comforting to see Apple thinking about creating such a device. Or at least, contemplating the possibility seriously enough to cover all bets in a patent. [<a href="http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-adv.html&r=1&p=1&f=G&l=50&d=PG01&S1=%28%28apple.AS.+AND+%28%22DISPLAY+HOUSING+COMPUTING+DEVICE%22.TTL.%29%29+AND+20090108.PD.%29&OS=an/apple+and+ttl/%22DISPLAY+HOUSING+FOR+COMPUTING+DEVICE%22+and+pd/01/08/2009&RS=((AN/apple+AND+TTL/%22DISPLAY+HOUSING+FOR+COMPUTING+DEVICE%22)+AND+PD/20090108)">USPTO</a> via <a href="http://www.electronicpulp.net/2009/02/03/apple-patent-shows-possible-design-for-upcoming-tablet-pcmid/">Electronic Pulp</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5145104/apple-tablet-likely-described-in-patent]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5145104]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple tablet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[displays]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook touch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rf]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Feb 2009 04:30:21 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5145104&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Patent Would Automatically Adjust iPhone, Mac Volume]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/sound-sensor-patent.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/>A newly published Apple patent reveals that the company has worked out a system that would auto-adjust the volume of the iPhone or MacBook speakers based on the levels of ambient noise.</p>
<p>The patent indicates that the levels could adjust based on user preferences and the presence of headphones. It might even be able to sense an echo in the room and suggest a switch to headphones or even cancel out the effect by changing its sound output. So far, there is no indication that Apple plans on doing anything with this technology, but as far as I'm concerned, it would be a welcome extension to the ambient light sensors they already use. [<a href="http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PG01&s1=20090022329.PGNR.&OS=DN/20090022329RS=DN/20090022329">Patent Office</a> via <a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/09/01/22/apple.adaptive.mic.patent/">Electronista</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5137992/apple-patent-would-automatically-adjust-iphone-mac-volume]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5137992]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[automatically adjust]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook speakers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sound]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sound sensor patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[volume]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:36:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5137992&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Tiny Company Sues Apple, Microsoft, and Google, Has Balls the Size of Texas]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/12/thumb160x_frivolous_lawsuits.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Cygnus Systems Inc, a small Michigan company, was recently awarded a patent for thumbnail previews of a file, and celebrated by immediately suing the biggest names in town.</p>
<p>Cygnus has named Microsoft's Vista, Apple's OSX and Cover Flow, and Google's Chrome as infringing on their thumbnail preview patent filed back in 2001. Plenty of other products would fall under the scope of the patent including all modern web browsers, Adobe's Photoshop, and even web apps like Flickr.</p>
<p>This is one of those patents for an idea rather than a product, and might have even been filed with lawsuits in mind. It's telling that they went after the big dogs first, and have no claim that their company has actually been harmed by any patent violation. I don't imagine they'll get very far against the combined legal might of Microsoft, Apple, and Google, anyway. [<a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20081226-microsoft-apple-google-sued-over-icon-software-patent.html?utm_source=microblogging&utm_medium=pingfm&utm_term=main_ars_account&utm_campaign=microblogging">Ars Technica</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5119074/tiny-company-sues-apple-microsoft-and-google-has-balls-the-size-of-texas]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5119074]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[frivolous lawsuits]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cygnus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flickr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[violation]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 27 Dec 2008 15:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5119074&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Patents For Liquid-Cooled Portables Surface]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/12/applepatent.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/applepatent.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>While us normal folk were gorging on turkey and fixings, the tireless US Patent Office was busy filing an interesting Apple patent detailing a mobile liquid cooling system—something that looks like it could be used in a future portable device.</p>

<p>Initially filed in May of 2007 (it's government, people!), the patent app describes a two-part cooling system for small form factors. In the first part a liquid coolant is used to transfer heat away from components (such as a quad-core mobile processor, perhaps?). In the second phase, the heat is transferred from the liquids onto a large aluminum plate which would then pass it off into the environment just as most laptop temperature management systems work today.</p>
<p>Whether this is just another defensive or out-there research patent, or an actually useful new way to cram more power into a smaller space via liquid cooling remains to be seen. Let's hope Apple's next patent is for a brand new battery juicy enough to power the whole system for more than 20 minutes. [<a href="http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PG01&s1=%22Liquid-cooled+portable+computer%22&OS=%22Liquid-cooled+portable+computer%22&RS=%22Liquid-cooled+portable+computer%22">US Patents Office</a> via <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/12/02/apple-patent-for-liquid-cooled-portable-computer-submitted/">CrunchGear</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5101121/apple-patents-for-liquid+cooled-portables-surface]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5101121]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cooling]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[liquid cooling]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seung Lee]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5101121&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Hit With Bizarre, Poorly Scanned iPhone Browsing Patent Suit]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/11/340x_patent.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Granted, there aren't that many <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5059881/apple-sues-school-for-using-the-same-fruit-in-a-logo">original</a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5092638/apple-gets-judge-to-dismiss-psystars-antitrust-counterclaim">ways</a> to sue Apple anymore, but this one is just peculiar. <a href="http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9900E2DE133BF934A35753C1A962948260">Elliot Gottfurcht</a>, a successful commercial real estate developer, is suing the company because he claims to hold a patent for "the way the iPhone navigates the Internet." He was indeed granted an internet-ish patent in late October, but it's hard to see how exactly it relates to Apple, or how this isn't just another example of Hail Mary patent extortion plot. <strong>UPDATE:</strong>It looks like the crux of Gottfurcht's claim against Apple is buried in the middle of the patent, and regards a number of methods for navigating web content.</p>
<p><strong>The wording is vague, and whether or not this holds up will remains to be seen, but the claim is probably <em>not</em> centered around the reformatting of web pages, as described elsewhere in the patent and below.</strong></p>
<p>The <a href="http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=7,441,196.PN.&OS=PN/7,441,196&RS=PN/7,441,196">patent</a> abstract is as follows:<br></p>
<blockquote>A method and apparatus of simplified navigation. A web page is provided having a link to a sister site. The sister site facilitates simplified navigation. Pages from the sister site are served responsive to actuation of the sister site link. In one embodiment, the sister site includes matrix pages to permit matrix navigation.</blockquote>
<p>Further reading, along with the patent's crappy mockup (above), helped confirm what looked obvious from the above description: Gottfurcht is suing Apple because they think they hold a patent on the <em>entire <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #mobileweb" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/mobileweb/">mobile web</a>.</em> Never mind the fact that the iPhone was touted as the first phone <em>not</em> to need mobile-optimized websites &mdash; even if the iPhone <em>only</em> visited stripped-down WAP sites, that would have almost nothing to do with the iPhone itself. [<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/internetNews/idUSTRE4AN6G220081124">Reuters</a> and <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/11/25/apple_iphone_browsing_suit/">The Register</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5098535/apple-hit-with-bizarre-poorly-scanned-iphone-browsing-patent-suit]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5098535]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[elliot gottfurcht]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mobile Browsers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mobile browsing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mobile safari]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mobile web]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[safari]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 25 Nov 2008 07:32:46 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5098535&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Patent Forsees Gadget RF Connectivity Everywhere, From Shirts to Cars]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/10/340x_apple-rf-modules.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Apple's just filed a patent titled "Personal area network systems and devices and methods for use thereof" which is speculative, but basically offers us a sniff of how the future of gadget interconnectivity might be. Apple imagines small, intelligent and efficient RF transmitter-receivers that can handshake and pass data between gadgets and which are embedded <i>everywhere</i>, literally from your socks upwards.</p>

<p>The embeddable modules would be smart enough to ID themselves and enable both short-range (i.e. home network-style) and long-range (GSM, 3G, WiMax) connections between your portable gadgets, in an automated manner. It's in a similar vein to the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/using-the-human-body-as-a-transfer-medium-for-chips-153800.php">personal area net</a> tech that's been mooted for ages, but Apple's suggesting that it could become ubiquitous: you'd plug your iPod into an RF-enabled shirt that'd connect it up, or slip a device into a handbag that has RF connections built-in, and so on.</p>
<p>Possible? We'll have to wait and see. But if Apple's vision proves accurate, and your iPod ends up talking to your shoes which then hook themselves up to your in-car network, then we'll all be bathed in even more RF waves than we are now. [<a href="http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/10/23/apple-looks-forward-to-add-rf-communications-to-everything/">Unwiredview</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5067537/apple-patent-forsees-gadget-rf-connectivity-everywhere-from-shirts-to-cars]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5067537]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[RF everywhere]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple patent RF everywhere]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[communications]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[networking]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rf]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 23 Oct 2008 06:44:42 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kit Eaton]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5067537&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Tivo and Echostar DVR Patent Saga Ends With $104 Million Payout to Tivo]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/10/thumb160x_tivoblast.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />After getting <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/home-entertainment/tivo-beats-echostars-butt-167267.php">resoundly swatted</a> in court by Tivo time and again for walking all over its patent for a "multimedia time warping system" (cool retro-future speak for a DVR), Echostar (now just Dish) is finally admitting defeat once and for all. Following <a href="http://gizmodo.com/378918/tivo-defeats-echostar-for-stealing-dvr-patent-in-epic-court-battle-once-and-for-all">its loss to TiVo</a> in a US Appeals court earlier this year, Echostar appealed to the Supreme Court, which just decided <a href="http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2008-10/breaking-echostar-dish-to-finally-pay-tivo/">not to hear the case</a>, leaving Echostar nowhere else to turn.</p>
<p>So Echostar has decided that it will in fact be handing TiVo a check for $104 million plus interest, though TiVo is looking for further damages apparently, due to "EchoStar’s continued infringement of our Time Warp patent." More importantly, their victory here opens the door for TiVo to start hunting down everyone else selling a DVR, so the real ugly might still be on the way. [<a href="http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2008-10/breaking-echostar-dish-to-finally-pay-tivo/">Zatz Not Funny</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5059553/tivo-and-echostar-dvr-patent-saga-ends-with-104-million-payout-to-tivo]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5059553]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[tivo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dish]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dvr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[echostar]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pvr]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 06 Oct 2008 15:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5059553&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Automatic Cameraphone Zoom Shows Up In Sony Ericsson Patent App]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/10/340x_autozoooooom.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />I guess the complicated combination of accelerometers and proximity sensors isn't trivial technology, but this one really should have been done by now: <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #automaticzoom" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/automaticzoom/">automatic zoom</a> based on camera movement. In a new <a href="http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=%2220080240698%22.PGNR.&OS=DN/20080240698&RS=DN/20080240698">patent application</a>, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #sonyericsson" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/sonyericsson/">Sony Ericsson</a> has detailed technology that judges your intention to zoom by measuring the camera's distance from your body, zooming in as it moves further away. The patent is just for cameraphones at the moment, but there's no reason that it couldn't (or shouldn't) crop up in the next generation of point and shoots as well. [<a href="http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/10/02/sony-ericsson-is-working-on-automatic-zoom-for-its-cameraphones/">UnwiredView</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/03/sony-ericsson-patent-app-takes-the-tedium-out-of-zooming-your-ca/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5058497/automatic-cameraphone-zoom-shows-up-in-sony-ericsson-patent-app]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5058497]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[auto zoom]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[automatic zoom]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[autozoom]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameraphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameraphone zoom]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameraphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent application]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent applications]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony ericsson]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 03 Oct 2008 05:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5058497&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Google 'Instant Bid' Wireless Patent Could Threaten Cellular, Wi-Fi Providers]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/09/340x_instantbid.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />If Android <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5054638/ex+google-mobile-product-manager-nails-the-g1-with-good-reason">sputters out</a> and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5053925/why-android-is-bad-for-business">fades away</a>, Google might have another plan to shake up the phone industry. In a patent filed and 2007 and published this week, Google details plans for an "<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #instantbid" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/instantbid/">Instant Bid</a>" system for dealing with wireless connections. The concept is pretty straightforward: devices broadcast their request for service, and available networks automatically return a list of price offers for that service. The system makes perfect sense for locations with competing Wi-Fi hotspots, but the application specifically talks about telecommunication devices. That's where things get interesting.</p>
<p>With the national dominance of a few wireless carriers, there's little threat of this technology taking off, but the concept is exciting to consider. For example, open network bidding would make price comparisons between carriers a constant concern, rather than a one-off choice, at least in the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #payasyougo" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/payasyougo/">pay as you go</a> space. Conversely, it might also negate the need for smaller network to lease coverage from larger ones when their users roam, leaving that task up to the individuals.</p>
<p>That said, this might be one big paygo pie in the sky. Google has basically said as much, telling New Scientist "We file patent applications on a variety of ideas that our employees come up with. Some of those ideas later mature into real products or services, some don't." [<a href="http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PG01&s1=20080232574.PGNR.&OS=DN/20080232574&RS=DN/20080232574">Patent</a> via <a href="http://technology.newscientist.com/channel/tech/dn14808-instant-auctions-could-replace-cellphone-contracts-.html">New Scientist</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5055176/google-instant-bid-wireless-patent-could-threaten-cellular-wi+fi-providers]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5055176]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cell phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[instand bidding]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[instant bid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pay as you go]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wi-fi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 26 Sep 2008 08:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5055176&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Patents DRM For Pairing Only Official Nike Shoes With Nike+ Sensor]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/09/340x_segwaypolice_nike.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Everyone knows joggers can make the worst criminals—look at them, all smug with their fitness, rubbing it in your face on the sidewalk in front of your house as they make a quick and effortless getaway from whatever malfeasance they've just hoisted on an innocent and unsuspecting car-preferring public. And the intellectual property violations? Boy, don't get me started. But now those degenerates may be getting what's been coming—the days of pairing <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5049441/review-nike%252B-ipod-touch-workout-app">Nike+</a> with shoes other than those made by Nike may be numbered, if a recent Apple patent has anything to say about it.</p>
<p>Filed last year and published only in the last few days, <a href="http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html&r=5&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PG01&s1=garment.TTL.&OS=TTL/garment&RS=TTL/garment">the patent</a> frames the problem as such:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>In order to accommodate the sensor and provide appropriate data to the iPod nano, the shoe must be a Nike+ model with a special pocket in which to place the sensor. However, some people have taken it upon themselves to remove the sensor from the special pocket of the Nike+ shoe and place it at inappropriate locations (shoelaces, for example) or place it on non-Nike+ model shoes.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yes, someone has taken it upon themselves to use the $29 Sport Kit's sensor in shoes other than those with a tiny pouch specifically engineered by Nike to be the only way to get accurate data from the sensor. So this obviously calls for action:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>A method of electronically pairing a sensor and a garment, comprising:(a) establishing a communication link between the sensor and the garment; (b) determining if the garment is an authorized garment; and(c) electronically pairing the garment and the sensor.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Granted, the system also calls for some useful two-way communication between your shoes and the Nike+ software, including potential wear notifications when your toe is about to jump out of your kicks, if you didn't know already. But as is SOP for patent filings, all bases are covered, which means that when our smart auto-drying jackets have to phone home to a Auto-Drying Jacket Genuine Advantage server before firing up after we've taken a dip in the clock tower reflecting pool, we can all thank Apple, who just made two cents off of the transaction. [<a href="http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html&r=5&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PG01&s1=garment.TTL.&OS=TTL/garment&RS=TTL/garment">US Patent Filing</a> via <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080915-apple-wants-to-tie-your-shoes-to-your-clothes-with-drm.html">Ars Technica</a> via <a href="http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2008/09/16/apple-patents-smartg.html">BBG</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5050456/apple-patents-drm-for-pairing-only-official-nike-shoes-with-nike%252B-sensor]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5050456]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[DRM absurdities]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[drm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nike+]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pairing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 16 Sep 2008 10:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Mahoney]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5050456&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Creative Patent Looks Like an Internet Tablet, Digital Camera and More!]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/09/340x_creative2.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />This newly discovered patent by Creative, whether actually in production or not, looks like a pretty neat device. Because from what we can make out from the diagrams, it appears to be much more than just a another media player. <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #internettablet" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/internettablet/">Internet tablet</a> seems to make sense, with that right oval on the side being a logical (OK, remotely possible) indication of a Wi-Fi antenna. But we've seen stuff like this before. Flip it around to the backside, however, and surprise! There's a camera.</p>

<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/creative1.jpg" width="494" height="258">Well, it sure looks like a camera at least. How great would such a device be if coupled with a super powerful image search engine?</p>
<p>Really great. That's how great. Really great. [<a href="http://www.anythingbutipod.com/archives/2008/09/new-creative-zen-media-player-or-zen-interenet-tablet.php">anythingbutipod</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5048516/creative-patent-looks-like-an-internet-tablet-digital-camera-and-more]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5048516]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[creative]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[creative zen]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[internet tablet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[zen]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 11 Sep 2008 15:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5048516&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Leaked Apple Patent Filing is Full of New Multitouch Tech For a Mac Tablet]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/08/patent080828-3.gif"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/08/patent080828-3.gif" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Appleinsider has <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/08/28/apple_details_next_gen_multi_touch_techniques_for_tablet_macs.html">gotten their hands on</a> a large patent filing from Apple that we haven't seen before, and it's loaded with plans for how a multitouch interface would work on a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #tabletmac" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/tabletmac/">tablet Mac</a> running full-blown OS X. It covers how small interface buttons will be handled, iPhone-like scrolling through lists, details on a full multi-touch keyboard, and a nifty pop-up scroll wheel. And on top of all that, it seems like it'll even work if you have freaky alien fingers! Let's take a closer look.</p>
<p>The full QWERTY keyboard above has provisions not just for multiple finger keystrokes, but for accepting inputs from all fingers of both hands for touch typing, including multiple key combinations like ctrl-alt-delete and shift/option commands.<br>
<img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/08/patent080828-1.gif" width="600"><br>
As for solving the problem of the many places in OS X where tiny buttons may be difficult to tap (window control buttons, for instance), it looks like we'll see the same pop-up monocle zoom as the iPhone for getting a clearer view of what needs to get tapped.<br>
<img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/08/patent080828-4.gif" width="600"><br>
And a virtual scroll wheel design element can pop up when needed, and be manipulated with single finger swipes, or moved around the desktop with a double-finger drag.</p>
<p>This seems like the most fleshed-out set of multitouch tablet tech we've seen from Apple. It's just a patent filing (dated April 15, 2008), but it seems like things are getting a bit more serious on the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #mactablet" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/mactablet/">Mac Tablet</a> front. And I maintain, being a patent filing illustrator has got to be one of the weirdest, if not best, jobs for someone handy with drawing.<br>
More at: [<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/08/28/apple_details_next_gen_multi_touch_techniques_for_tablet_macs.html">Appleinsider</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5043024/leaked-apple-patent-filing-is-full-of-new-multitouch-tech-for-a-mac-tablet]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5043024]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[mac tablet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[multitouch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tablet mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[touchscreens]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:58:30 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Mahoney]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5043024&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple's Multi-Touch Gesture Patent Has So Many Combinations It's a Shocker]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/07/340x_apple-multi-touch-gesture-language.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/>You can already do a handful of gestures on the new MacBook Air and MacBook Pro's trackpad, but Apple's going in and patenting a whole bunch more. Not only are there gestures in this application that involve a thumb and three fingers—something casual users will probably never use—but there's even a sample of how this would work for games like Tetris (shown after the jump) or <i>Final Fantasy</i>. Each "chord" would correspond to a character or movement or attack or something, which is definitely not simple like the Firefox/Opera mouse gestures we've gotten used to. Still, more gestures are always good, and we're sure the end product won't be ridiculous like these. [<a href="http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/07/03/apple-wants-to-teach-us-multi-touch-gesture-language">Unwired View</a> via <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/07/03/apple-patent-shows-entire-new-language-developed-for-multi-touch-displays/">Crunchgear</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/07/apple-multi-touch-gesture-game.jpg" style="display:block;"></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5021912/apples-multi+touch-gesture-patent-has-so-many-combinations-its-a-shocker]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5021912]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[multi-touch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gestures]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[multitouch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 Jul 2008 12:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5021912&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Patent Shows Apple Researching Advanced iPhone Sensor Use, iChat Integration]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/06/7b/de/340x_7bde74be05013cf69fcd311faa5943ce.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;float:none;"/>Over at <a href="http://www.macrumors.com">Mac Rumors</a> they've unearthed a recent patent that shows Apple is researching cleverer use of the iPhone's many <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5017802/a-possible-problem-with-iphone-gaming-when-you-tilt-the-screen-you-cant-see-much">sensors</a>. More nifty than turning the screen off when you put it to your ear, the new uses may include things like working out it's in your pocket (by temperature, proximity and ambient light) and then auto-switching to vibrate mode. Intriguingly, there's a hint that by detecting you've docked the phone, it may pass an ongoing phone call to a VoIP call over iChat. This all makes sense: making best use of those sensors and the iPhone's power... but like all Apple patents, we may never see these ideas in a real-life software update. [<a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2008/06/19/iphone-sensors-and-ichat-voip-integration/">MacRumors</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5017896/patent-shows-apple-researching-advanced-iphone-sensor-use-ichat-integration]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5017896]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone 3g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[advanced sensor use]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[auto-detection]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ichat]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ichat integration]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sensors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:53:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kit Eaton]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5017896&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Retromodo: Microsoft Takes a Few Steps Back With "The Veda" Computing System]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/06/microsoft-veda.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />While The Veda concept is a fairly new idea out of Microsoft's R&D labs, the design itself looks as though it was picked out of a time capsule sealed in the mid '90's. Apparently, the Veda can be used as a phone when the screen is closed, as a multimedia player when the screen is open, and as a normal portable PC by opening the screen and extracting the keyboard. It also looks about the same size as a library dictionary.</p>
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/06/microsoft-veda-remote-interface.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2">The question here is: Why the hell would anyone want to build such a device? Microsoft's justification for the project is that PCs can often do the same things that dedicated devices can do (like cellphones), but there is a learning curve involved :</p>
<blockquote>
<p>User studies carried out on a number of users have shown that entertainment, communication and information retrieval are the three main motivating factors for people to use devices like a personal computer. However since a personal computer is a general purpose device, some amount of learning is associated with achieving the same task as compared to achieving the same task using a special purpose device like a telephone, a music player, or the like.</p>
<p>For example making a telephone call using a computer involves knowing what application is used on a computer to make a call, starting the application and figuring out how to use it using input devices attached to the computer like keyboard and mouse. Instead if the device had a hardware keypad that is normally used in a telephone, along with appropriate software then dialing a call would just involve pressing “Dial” button, followed by the numbers to be dialed on hardware keypad and the required software will come up and complete the call for the user. In this way the interaction of the user with the device would be the same as the interaction with a special purpose device for making a telephone call.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>So, instead of focusing on user friendly smartphones and portable PC software, they have basically duct-taped a cellphone to a laptop. The future is here...today! [<a href="http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/ia.jsp?IA=US2007009701&REF=RSS&DISPLAY=DESC">WIPO</a> via <a href="http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/06/16/microsoft-veda-new-look-at-mobile-convergence/">Unwired View</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5016974/retromodo-microsoft-takes-a-few-steps-back-with-the-veda-computing-system]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5016974]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[retromodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[concept]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[convergence]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[design.]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[home entertainment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft veda]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[multimedia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[portable devices]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[veda]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5016974&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Full Apple Patent Shows iPhone Future Possibilities]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/05/patentiphone.jpg"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/05/patentiphone.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The US Patent and Trademark Office has published today a 372-page document detailing every known and unknown aspect of the iPhone. As you can imagine, the most interesting bits of patent 20080122796 are the features never detailed before&mdash;like video conference, GPS, widget creator, multimedia messaging, and video recording. Apple secrecy often pushes USPTO patent publication to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/391960/iphone-3g-launch-date-confirmed">just mere days</a> before the release of the actual product, to avoid the disclosure of new products or features. Could this mean that we will see some&mdash;if not all&mdash;of these new listed features in the upcoming iPhone 2.0? We don't know for sure, but here's the complete list for you to judge.</p>
<p>&bull; Communication Module<br>
&bull; <b>Contact</b>/Motion Module<br>
&bull; Graphics Module<br>
&bull; Text Input Module<br>
&bull; <b>GPS Module</b></p>
<p><b>Applications</b><br>
&bull; Contacts Module<br>
&bull; Telephone Module<br>
&bull; <b>Video conference Module</b><br>
&bull; E-mail Client Module<br>
&bull; Instant messaging Module<br>
&bull; <b>Blogging Module</b><br>
&bull; Camera Module<br>
&bull; Image Management Module<br>
&bull; Video Player Module<br>
&bull; Music Player Module<br>
&bull; Browsing Module</p>
<p><b>Widgets</b><br>
Weather<br>
Stocks<br>
Calculator<br>
Alarm Clock<br>
<b>Dictionary</b><br>
<b>User-created widget</b><br>
<b>Widget Creator Module (Web clip?)</b><br>
<b>Search Module</b></p>
<p>What feature would you like to see in the next generation iPhone, apart from bloody copy and paste? [<a href="http://cellpassion.mobi/2008/05/29/apple-gets-iphone-patent-shows-off-gps-and-video-conferencing-modules.aspx">Cellpassion</a>&mdash;thanks Jon]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/394246/full-apple-patent-shows-iphone-future-possibilities]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-394246]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple iphone patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 30 May 2008 11:45:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=394246&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Cellphone Call Quality Warning System: Useful or Redundant?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/05/340x_dropincalls.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />We were talking today in Campfire&mdash;Giz's virtual office&mdash;about Apple's newly uncovered patent on a system that warns you about bad quality or dropping cellular or Wi-Fi connections "ahead of time." Jason thought it could be useful to know that, so you could just avoid making the call. I thought that it wouldn't be useful at all, because if I needed to call, I would call anyway&mdash;and if the connection dropped, I would call again. Are we missing something? Do you really want to know the quality of a call beforehand, especially if you are traveling, and said quality is constantly changing as you move? And don't cellphones <i>already</i> warn you about dropping calls?</p>
<p>The moment the quality starts going to hell, you know it may drop, so I imagined that if my telephone warned me about it, not only would I not find it useful&mdash;as I already knew about it&mdash;but I would think it would be totally annoying. Like:</p>
<p>iPhone: "Warning: your call may be about to drop."<br>
Me: "No fracking kidding!"</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
<p><script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript" src="http://polls.gawker.com/poll.js.php?key==QTM5QTM">
</script><noscript>
<p><b>Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.</b></p>
</noscript></p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/05/29/apple_concept_would_warn_iphone_users_ahead_of_dropped_calls.html">Apple Insider</a>]<br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/394090/cellphone-call-quality-warning-system-useful-or-redundant]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-394090]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[question of the day]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dropped calls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[qotd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 29 May 2008 15:57:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=394090&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Files Patent To Put Solar Cells on Portable Devices]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/05/340x_apple-solar-patent.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Is Apple planning on giving their MacBooks, iPods and possibly the iPhone a solar powered boost of energy? Doubtful&mdash;but we know they have thought about it thanks to a recently published patent for "solar cells on portable devices." According to the patent, Apple would completely cover a device in a thin layer of solar cells&mdash;including the display to maximize the amount of power that the device could harness from the sun.</p>
<p>Motorola has already toyed with an idea involving <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/cellphones/motorola-turns-to-the-sun-to-power-its-future-cellphones-254661.php">infusing their LCDs with solar panels</a>, and to be honest, most if not all of the major companies out there have at least investigated the possibilities. However, given the limitations of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #solarpower" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/solarpower/">solar power</a>, it seems unlikely that a major manufacturer would go this route in the near future. [<a href="http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PG01&s1=20080094025&OS=20080094025&RS=20080094025">Patent Filing</a> <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2008/05/26/apple-solar-portable-markets-equity-cx_mlm_0526markets14.html?partner=yahoobuzz&ybf1=1">Forbes</a> and <a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2008/05/26/solar-lcd-powered-ipods-iphones-and-laptops/">MacRumors</a> via <a href="http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/05/27/apple-files-solar-patent-ipod-going-solar/">Inhabitat</a>]<br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/393505/apple-files-patent-to-put-solar-cells-on-portable-devices]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-393505]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[solar]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[solar power]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 27 May 2008 16:41:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=393505&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Nintendo Billed $21 Million For Patent Infringement]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/05/340x_b00005bosf01lzzzzzzz.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />A federal jury has ordered Nintendo to pay Anascape $21 million for infringing on patents, and almost ironically, all of this has nothing to do with the Wiimote. Instead, their violations were for the GameCube, WaveBird and Wii Classic controllers. The news doesn't come as any huge surprise, as during the last generation of consoles all three of the big manufacturers found themselves in hot <strike>coffee</strike> water for various controller patent issues&mdash;Microsoft just settled with Anascape for an undisclosed amount earlier this month. Nintendo is expected to seek an appeal using the argument, "It'sa not-ta me, Mario!" [<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080515/ap_on_hi_te/nintendo_patent_dispute">Yahoo News</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/390724/nintendo-billed-21-million-for-patent-infringement]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-390724]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[anascape]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[controllers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gamecube]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nintendo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wavebird]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wii]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wiimote]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 15 May 2008 08:55:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=390724&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[High-Pressure Tooth Spray Cleans Teeth With Water, Not Bristles]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/05/tooth_brush-732582.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Toothbrush-like contraptions that spray water into your teeth holes have been around for years, but Philips' new patent has several innovations that makes sure you don't blast your gums into submission. The spray head has probes that can detect how far away it is from your teeth, ensuring optimum distance.</p>
<p>Plus there's talk of having a light beam that reflects off your enamel to determine how clean your teeth are and when you need to move on. We'd take one of these if they integrated the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #waterspray" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/waterspray/">water spray</a> into one of their Sonicare brushes, which work fantastic already. Try and make enough money to pay back your student loans now, dentists! [<a href="http://www.newscientist.com/blog/invention/2008/05/high-pressure-tooth-spray.html">New Scientist</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/390062/high+pressure-tooth-spray-cleans-teeth-with-water-not-bristles]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-390062]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[philips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[philips sonicare]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sonicare]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[spray]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tooth]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tooth spray]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[water spray]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 13 May 2008 18:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=390062&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
