<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: pc world]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/pc world</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'pc world']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[PC World Gets Confused, Releases Best of 2008 List in May]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/05/340x_pcworldeditors.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;float:none;"/>Look at <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged PC WORLD" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/pc-world/">PC World</a>'s just-released Best Tech of 2008 list. Yes, it's May, the fifth month of 2008. The hot, bleeding edge tech that made the list? The New York Times website! YouTube! Windows XP!</p>
<p>The top three tech products of 2008 are Hulu, the iPhone and Facebook. Since the new version of the iPhone hasn't come out or been announced yet, I assume they mean the first version, which came out last year. Hulu was in beta for the last couple months of 2007, and Facebook has been around for years. So apparently the best tech of 2008 didn't come out in 2008.</p>
<p>The list is full of boring, predictable choices that are years old, such as Photoshop, Flickr, Gmail, Leopard and the Wii. I honestly have no idea why they made this list or what a product had to do to be included other than existing. And the fact that it's claiming to be the best of 2008 so early in the year means they already missed out on some great 2008 products, such as the Netflix set-top box, making the list look outdated and misinformed already. [<a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,146161-page,12-c,electronics/article.html">PC World</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/393454/pc-world-gets-confused-releases-best-of-2008-list-in-may]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-393454]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lists]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pc world]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 27 May 2008 18:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=393454&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[PC World Editor-In Chief Harry McCracken Moving On]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/05/thumb160x_spartacuskirk2.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #pcworld" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/pcworld/">PC World</a> Editor-in-Chief <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #harrymccracken" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/harrymccracken/">Harry McCracken</a> announced in a blog entry today that he will be stepping down in June to build his own tech site from scratch. McCracken gained notoriety last May, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/meta/incorruptible-editor-mccracken-resigns-from-pc-world-257590.php">after temporarily resigning</a> due to the publisher's pressure to kill an anti-Apple piece. Giz wishes Harry the best of luck in the next stage of his career. [<a href="http://blogs.pcworld.com/techlog/archives/006938.html">PC World</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/389717/pc-world-editor+in-chief-harry-mccracken-moving-on]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-389717]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[harry mccracken]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[meta]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pc world]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 12 May 2008 18:19:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Covert]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=389717&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[PCWorld's Test Center Director Remembered]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>PCWorld's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #ulrikediehlmann" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #ulrikediehlmann" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ulrikediehlmann/">Ulrike Diehlmann</a> passed away on January 17th, succumbing to cancer after a long battle. She was responsible for developing the performance charts of PC gear and later HDTV reviews. Rest in Peace, Uli. [<a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,141538-page,1-c,workplace/article.html">PCWorld</a>]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/348281/pcworlds-test-center-director-remembered]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-348281]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ulrike diehlmann]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:10:51 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=348281&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[PCWorld Calls Vista the Biggest Tech Disappointment of 2007]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/vista-box3.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />PCWorld has listed the 15 Biggest Tech Disappointments of 2007, and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windowsvista" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windowsvista/">Windows Vista</a> went for the gold. Their article begins, "Five years in the making and this is the best Microsoft could do?" and really just snowballs from there. While PCWorld enjoys Aero, better networking and faster searches, they thought that both the price and third party hardware incompatibilities were unacceptable. And this clever turn of phrase made us laugh out loud:</p>

<blockquote>No wonder so many users are clinging to XP like shipwrecked sailors to a life raft, while others who made the upgrade are switching back. And when the fastest Vista notebook PC World has ever tested is an Apple MacBook Pro, there's something deeply wrong with the universe.</blockquote>
It's true, while Vista is an improvement in a multitude of ways, there is that (large) segment of the XP-using population who knows that there's a hole in the raft and it can't stay inflated forever. But you'd be damned if they're gonna take a pass at swimming for shore quite yet.
<p>And why should they? XP just <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/upgrades/windows-xp-to-get-10-performance-boost-328930.php">got a major speed bump</a> in its latest Service Pack update. [<a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,140583-page,5-c,techindustrytrends/article.html">pcworld</a>]</p>
<p><em>Oh, and a note to people mad about the Mac joke, the iPhone came in at <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/5/" class="posthashtag">#5</a>.</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/334641/pcworld-calls-vista-the-biggest-tech-disappointment-of-2007]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-334641]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[sad]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows vista]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows xp]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xp]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 17 Dec 2007 09:26:04 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=334641&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[MacBook Pro Fastest Windows Laptop? Not So Fast]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/NdeUsxChb3E&rel=1">
<param name="wmode" value="transparent">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/NdeUsxChb3E&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object><br>
"The fastest Windows notebook we tested this year is a Mac," writes <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #pcworld" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/pcworld/">PC World</a></em> about the MacBook Pro after it scored an 88 on its <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,130469/article.html">WorldBench 6 Beta 2 benchmark</a>. Only problem is, it looks like that same publication reviewed a Eurocom D900C Phantom-X laptop that achieved a better score on that same benchmark, a 97 (higher number is better). So what gives? Too bad <em>PC World</em> contradicted itself, but the Apple propaganda machine played right along, trumpeting in one of its annoying spots the humiliating results of a MacBook Pro running Windows better than any other laptops. Not quite. Check out <em>PC World</em>'s benchmark tables of the two machines, side-by-side:</p>

<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2007/12/mac_vs_pc.jpg"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/mac_vs_pc.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a> Don't believe everything you read, especially when it's coming from Cupertino. [<a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,135062-page,1-c,notebooks/article.html">PC World (MacBook Pro)</a>, and <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,138526-page,1-c,notebooks/article.html">PC World (Eurocom D900C Phantom-X</a>), via <a href="http://joes-blog-canada.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!DA2B394806986D5D!250.entry">Joe's Blog</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/331223/macbook-pro-fastest-windows-laptop-not-so-fast]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-331223]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[selling it]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac vs. pc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pc world]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[propaganda]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 07 Dec 2007 09:57:24 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie White]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=331223&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[PC World's Newbie Guide To Buying Flat Panel TVs]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>With the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #blackfriday" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #blackfriday" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/blackfriday/">Black Friday</a> deals just hours away, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #pcworld" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #pcworld" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/pcworld/">PC World</a> gives neophytes a guide to buying a flat-screen TV. [<a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,125816/article.html#">PC World</a>]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/325007/pc-worlds-newbie-guide-to-buying-flat-panel-tvs]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-325007]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[tvs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[black friday]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pc world]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 22 Nov 2007 10:15:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[hook]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=325007&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[MacBook Pro Is the Fastest Windows Vista Notebook]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/10/mbprowind.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Looking for a shiny new notebook to slap your shiny new <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged WINDOWS VISTA" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows-vista/">Windows Vista</a> on that'll run it all super snappy and buttery smooth? According to <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged PC WORLD" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/pc-world/">PC World</a>'s tests, the fastest <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged WINDOWS VISTA" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows-vista/">Windows Vista</a> notebook this year is (or ever): the <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MACBOOK PRO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbook-pro/">MacBook Pro</a>. Yeah, it makes throw up in my mouth a little bit before forcing me to contemplate succumbing to Apple's siren song. Anyway, for the record, its WorldBench 6 Beta 2 score of 88 bests Gateway's E-265M by one point, making it the king of Windows on the road, at least for now. It's just a little sad, that's all. [<a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,136649-page,3-c,notebooks/article.html">PC World</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/317060/macbook-pro-is-the-fastest-windows-vista-notebook]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-317060]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[irony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pc world]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows vista]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 31 Oct 2007 00:45:34 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=317060&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[PC World's McCracken wonders who the "brilliant...]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>PC World's McCracken wonders who the "brilliant engineer" behind iMovie '08 is. Apple generally doesn't glorify individual engineers, so he won't get an official answer. Anyone know? [<a href="http://blogs.pcworld.com/techlog/archives/005121.html">PC World</a>]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/287893/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-287893]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mccracken]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcworld]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 09 Aug 2007 11:53:52 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=287893&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[PC World Editor Harry McCracken Returns Victorious]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/05/spartacuskirk2.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2">In an interesting reversal, departed <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #pcworld" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #pcworld" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/pcworld/">PC World</a> Editor <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/pc-world">Harry McCracken</a> has returned to the magazine as "vice-president, editor in chief" as of this morning. What's even more surprising is that CEO <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #colincrawford" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #colincrawford" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/colincrawford/">Colin Crawford</a> has been dropped from the CEO position and is taking up the executive vice president, online position. He's even given the editorial staff an apology for killing the story. His blog has removed the post about the EIC changes at PC World. The situation sounds sour for him, but I doubt Harry would have returned to work with Crawford after such a public disagreement.</p>

<p>But really, PC World had no choice. After 16 years of service to IDG, and the this current episode highlighting his integrity, the magazine couldn't really move forward without looking like editorial corruption was in place. Unless Harry came back. </p>

<p>His conditions? That "editors were allowed to be editors." He made no comment about whether or not Colin's reshuffled position were the terms of his return.<br />
</p><p>IDG is going start a search for a CEO for both PC World and Macworld, two magazines that Colin Crawford used to be the CEO of. Our thoughts? All the reader outrage online after the story <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/meta/incorruptible-editor-mccracken-resigns-from-pc-world-257590.php">first broke</a> is what caused the sudden 180. Or, we suppose it's probably more of a 540 since PCWorld actually went ahead and published a tame <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/meta/pc-world-publishes-tame-10-things-we-hate-about-apple-story-258456.php">10 Things We Hate About Apple</a> anyway. </p>

<p>As an aside, I think it could have been better to have PC World write the "Apple Love" piece, and Macworld write the "Apple Hate" piece. Nothing better than to provide surprising thoughts to your already hypnotized user base.<span class="byline">&ndash; Jason Chen and Brian Lam</span></p>

<p><a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,131702-page,1/article.html">Editor in Chief Harry McCracken Returns to PC World</a> [PCWorld]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/259146/pc-world-editor-harry-mccracken-returns-victorious]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-259146]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[meta]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[colin crawford]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[editorial]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[harry mccracken]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pc world]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcworld]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 09 May 2007 19:20:33 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=259146&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[PC World Publishes Tame "10 Things We Hate About Apple" Story]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/05/spartacuskirk2.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2">Everyone was talking late last week about <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #harrymccracken" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #harrymccracken" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/harrymccracken/">Harry McCracken</a> and his <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/meta/incorruptible-editor-mccracken-resigns-from-pc-world-257590.php">resignation from PC World</a> due to a breach of the editorial/advertising wall. The story, in short, was that Harry wanted to run something called "10 Things We Hate About Apple", and the CEO didn't, because of possibly upsetting advertisers (namely, Apple). Well, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #pcworld" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #pcworld" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/pcworld/">PC World</a> ran the story today anyway.</p>

<p>After reading it, we wondered if this was the actual story Harry resigned over&mdash;it's quite tame. Complaints about Apple being really secretive, the "i" monicker, lack of Blu-ray, mis-managed hardware like the Puck Mouse or the Toilet Seat iBook, lack of gaming and limited selection has been said and re-said for years. What gives? Was the story de-fanged?<br />
</p><p>Also, in all the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/corruption-of-gadget-press/pc-world-editorial-firewall-breach-part-2-257652.php">talk last week</a>, there was no mention of a <i>sister article</i> entitled "10 Things We Love About Apple". Was this one thrown together after the fuss in order to both justify the posting of the "hate" article and to soften the blow? We have no idea.</p>

<p>Plus, on the top of both articles there's a link to an editorial note with zero reference to Harry's leaving, the editorial fiddling by the CEO, or any of the controversy itself. They also claim that these pieces were supposed to be "conversation starters" and "not weighty journalism". </p>

<p>In any case, we still wish Harry good luck wherever he ends up next. We also wish the staffers at PC World good luck as well, since it looks like an uphill battle with your new CEO. <span class="byline">&ndash; Jason Chen</span></p>

<p><a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,130994-c,macs/article.html">10 Things We Hate About Apple</a> [PC World]</p>

<p><a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,130980-page,2-c,macs/article.html">10 Things We Love About Apple</a> [PC World]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/258456/pc-world-publishes-tame-10-things-we-hate-about-apple-story]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-258456]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[meta]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[harry mccracken]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[idg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pc world]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 07 May 2007 21:30:27 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=258456&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[PC World Editorial Firewall Breach, Part 2]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="spartacuskirk2.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/05/spartacuskirk2.jpg" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="2" height="250" width="166">Wired has an interesting follow-up piece about <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/harry-mccracken">Harry McCracken's resignation from PC World</a>. Crawford's <a href="http://colincrawford.typepad.com/idg/2007/05/eic_change_at_p.html">blog says</a> that "We have and will continue to run editorial and content that both praises and criticizes as appropriate without regard to the vendor relationship." </p>

<p>But then a statement from IDG's Howard Sholkin: "The reason is that Colin and Harry had a disagreement on one opinion piece related to Apple and they could not come to a settlement as to how the differences should be resolved so Harry felt that necessitated him resigning." Hello IDG knuckleheads: The fact that management even has a say in editorial matters is wrong. </p><p>Crawford simply doesn't have the damn right, and this isn't a tiny little trade mag struggling to survive. Crawford claims the magazine is doing well enough this year, and that sort of financial breathing room should allow for even higher levels of integrity, not less. In the long run, selling out editorial will not lead to financial strength. Get your hands out of the pot, Crawford!</p>

<p>Epicenter's sources paint a picture of a staff meeting where he declares the opposite, though:<blockquote><br />
Will the next editor-in-chief have last-call on what goes in the magazine or will Crawford, essentially, always be asserting his rank over editors?</p>

<p>"And the answer was no, I'm going to have last call," the source said Crawford told them. "The response, essentially, was that the same damn thing would happen again (if someone clashed with him)."</blockquote></p>

<p>I've known plenty of great <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #pcworld" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #pcworld" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/pcworld/">PC World</a> editors over the years, and I respect them all. Personally, I'm sorry they have to work under these conditions. <span class="byline">&ndash; Brian Lam</span></p>

<p><a href="http://blog.wired.com/business/2007/05/update_pc_world.htmlhttp://blog.wired.com/business/2007/05/update_pc_world.html">PC World Update</a> [Wired Epicenter]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/257652/pc-world-editorial-firewall-breach-part-2]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-257652]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[corruption of gadget press]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[colin crawford]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[harry mccracken]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pc world]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 May 2007 22:43:25 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=257652&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Incorruptible Editor McCracken Resigns from PC World]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/05/spartacuskirk2.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />In case you weren't aware from coverage at our sister sites <a href="http://www.valleywag.com/tech/in-brief/apple-criticism-costs-magazine-editor-his-job-257292.php">Valleywag</a> and <a href="http://www.gawker.com/news/core-principles/steve-jobs-may-be-hazardous-to-your-job-257411.php">Gawker</a>, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #pcworld" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/pcworld/">PC World</a> Editor in Chief <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #harrymccracken" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/harrymccracken/">Harry McCracken</a> has resigned. The reason he resigned&mdash;the company's CEO killing a story entitled "Ten Things We Hate About Apple"&mdash;shows how the magazine's editorial is fighting hard to keep its integrity, and that McCracken's departure shows that he's not going to put up with this crap.<br></p>

<p>You see, CEO Crawford apparently told editors that their reviews and articles were too critical of the vendors&mdash;the same vendors who advertise in their magazine. Hence, the order came down that they "had to start being nicer to advertisers."</p>
<p>Another reason why it's interesting: according to <a href="http://blog.wired.com/business/2007/05/pc_world_editor.html">Wired</a>, the newly minted CEO of PC World, Colin Crawford, used to be CEO of MacWorld. When Colin was at his former job, Steve Jobs would call him up any time the Apple CEO had a problem with a story MacWorld was working on. The two mags, MacWorld and PC World, are owned by the parent company IDG.</p>
<p>Any time ad dollars influence reviews is a bad thing, but when the CEO issues an order directly, well, that's just bad news bears. Maybe the CEO thinks he's helping the company make money, but when no one is buying mags or reading editorial because the CEO's padding the review with ad money, that's going to be pretty bad for business.</p>
<p>When reached for comment, Harry had this to say:</p>
<blockquote>...I resigned yesterday over a disagreement about editorial stuff, and I'm not angry at anyone, and continue to admire IDG and PC World. This company has been very, very good to me&mdash;and I have many friends here who I know will continue to do top-notch work. (I'll probably continue to do some writing for PCW, too.)</blockquote>
<p>To Crawford: If you want to make a ton of money, keep editorial sacred, bring back Harry with a raise, apologize to him and the staff, and try to understand that no one wants to read corrupt editorial.</p>
<p>It couldn't have been a decision Harry made lightly, but he made it without hesitation and we commend him for it. And we'd like to take this minute to reiterate that no matter where Gizmodo's ad dollars are coming from, it will in no way affect our reviews. Nobody can pay for pantsworthiness. <span class="byline">&ndash; Jason Chen and Brian Lam</span></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/257590/incorruptible-editor-mccracken-resigns-from-pc-world]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-257590]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[meta]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[harry mccracken]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pc world]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 May 2007 18:21:08 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=257590&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[PC World vs. PC Mag: Windows Geeks Take a Gander at Apple TV]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/03/apple_tv_media.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Here's another perspective on <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #appletv" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/appletv/">Apple TV</a> from non-Mac devotees: A reviewer at <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #pcworld" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/pcworld/">PC World</a></em> took Apple's media streaming device out for a spin, and generally liked what he saw. It's a good read, praising the easy setup and straightforward operation.</p>
<p>But that's nothing you couldn't get here. When you go to the trouble of reading PC mags of old, you want the kind of depth we saw in PC Magazine's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/home-entertainment/apple-tv-pulp-bite-nyts-pogue-faces+off-the-streamer-with-foes-pc-mag-goes-deep-246434.php">gonzo 10,000 word article</a>. Then again, if you must have the most concise Windows Lover's standpoint:</p>

<p>Reviewer Edward Albro starts out characterizing the box as a big fish in a small pond:</p>
<blockquote>"To say that Apple TV is the world's best media streaming device could be considered faint praise, the tech equivalent of calling someone the world's tallest midget. After all, most previous versions of these devices, have been unreliable, hard to use and generally shunned by the buying public."</blockquote>
The astute reviewer pointed out, however, the mediocre quality of program material he downloaded from iTunes, and decried the glaring lack of HDTV programs on Apple's content delivery store, particularly ironic when using this device that will only work on widescreen TVs. In the end, Albro seemed mildly impressed, but noted that Apple TV is poised for improvement. <span class="byline">&ndash; Charlie White</span>
<p><a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,130095-page,1/article.html">Review: Apple TV Just Plain Works</a> [PC World]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/246553/pc-world-vs-pc-mag-windows-geeks-take-a-gander-at-apple-tv]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-246553]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[home entertainment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple tv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pc world]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 23 Mar 2007 10:24:38 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie White]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=246553&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[PC World Germany's $26K PC From Hell...Part Two]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2007/03/hellmachine-thumb.jpg"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/03/hellmachine-thumb.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>When I think of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #pcworld" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/pcworld/">PC World</a>, I think of them as solid, if not a little pale, lab rats of computer review. <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #harrymccracken" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/harrymccracken/">Harry McCracken</a>, Editor, blogs about his German counterparts, at PC Welt. As you can tell from this pet project $26k PC of theirs, the Höllenmaschine II, PC Welt is a little bit more about metal, S&M, and Hasselhoff. The "Machine from Hell...Part Two", includes top line parts, 4.3 TB of HDD, and a $1k Porsche paint job, and $2500 in watercooling. (What, no phase change?)</p>
<blockquote>It also features Triple Quad to operate Quad CPU, Quad Core, Quad Graphics and even 24 drives simultaneously.</blockquote>
I just want to understand how they spent that much loot and ended up with a mere 24-inch monitor. Oh, I see, they went with a RAID setup using a few 15k RPM Cheetahs SCSI Drives instead of SATA. Owie, that'll cost ya.
<p>The rest of the machine, from its Xeons, Dual Verto Geforce 8800 GTX GPUs, and CPUs are after the jump, if you must know. Did I mention they're giving it all away?<br>
<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('pcweltpc', 4, 'pcweltpc');
</script></p>

<blockquote>CPU: Two 2.67-GHz quad-core Xeons (meant for servers)
<p>MOTHERBOARD: A Tyan Tempest i5000XL workstation model</p>
<p>RAM: 4GB of fully-buffered, dual-channel Corsair DIMMs</p>
<p>GRAPHICS: Two PNY Verto Geforce 8800 GTX cards, each based on the DirectX 10-supporting Nvidia Geforce 8800 GTX GPU</p>
<p>HARD DISK: Nine (!) drives, with a total of 4.3 terabytes (!!) of space</p>
</blockquote>
<span class="byline">&ndash;Brian Lam</span>
<p><a href="http://www.pcwelt.de/news/englishnews/Hardware/74058/index2.html">Höllenmaschine II</a> [<a href="http://blogs.pcworld.com/techlog/archives/003855.html">PCWorld</a> Blog]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/243939/pc-world-germanys-26k-pc-from-hellpart-two]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-243939]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[harry mccracken]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hollenmaschine]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pc world]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 13 Mar 2007 21:17:10 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=243939&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[PC World's Secret HDTV Test Lab (AKA Nerd Cave)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/08/25176_g1.jpg" class="right image158" width="158" /><br>
Not many people know this, but <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #pcworld" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/pcworld/">PC World</a> does one hell of a job testing out TVs. According to my inside sources, they've a entire HDTV facility dedicated to LCD, Plasma, and CRT molesting. This week, editor Laura Blackwell spilled the beans on how they put the sets through the wringer to "evaluate technology products in a real-world setting, with applications that an average user is apt to use day in and day out." Like:<br></p>
<blockquote><br>
We use a color analyzer to choose the preset color temperature setting that most closely matches the recommended setting of 6500K.<br></blockquote>
<p>What, you don't have a color analyzer? Silly Eggheads &mdash; OMG, no one has a color analyzer at home! Likewise, Archnemesis PC Magazine at Ziff Davis has their own <a href="http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,1991432,00.asp">HDTV testing lab</a>. So, who has the bigger test bench? <span class="byline">&ndash; Brian Lam</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/126628-1/article.html">How We Test HDTVs</a> [ PC World ]<br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/192003/pc-worlds-secret-hdtv-test-lab-aka-nerd-cave]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-192003]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[tvs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pc world]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 Aug 2006 21:42:01 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=192003&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
