<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: penryn]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/penryn</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'penryn']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Intel's Six-Core Xeon 7400 "Dunnington" Processor Shipping on September 15th]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/09/340x_intel-dunnington.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />According to CNET sources, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/359995/intel-planning-6+core-dunnington-microprocessor">Intel's six-core "Dunnington"</a>processor will begin rolling out to servers on September 15th under the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #xeon7400" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/xeon7400/">Xeon 7400</a> series. The new chip is Intel's first foray beyond four cores as well as their first to fuse multiple cores on a single die. It also features 16MB of L3 cache to help boost performance. The design is the last of the Penryn-class, and if the rumors hold true, we should see <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5035279/intel-nahalem-chip-moniker-begets-core-i7-branding">Core i7 (Nehalem)</a> by the end of the year. [<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-10032313-64.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-20">CNET</a> via <a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/08/09/04/intel.xeon.7400.leak/">Electronista</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5045481/intels-six+core-xeon-7400-dunnington-processor-shipping-on-september-15th]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5045481]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[6 core]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Core i7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dunnington]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nehalem]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[penryn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[servers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[six core]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xeon 7400]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 04 Sep 2008 13:36:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5045481&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Intel's Insanely Tiny Processor Roadmap: "Clear Path" to 10nm Chips]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/07/89/a5/340x_89a5ad651c3c4c4100025d1534cdc9f1.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/>Think Intel's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/giz-explains/giz-explains-whats-the-f-is-a-penryn-335090.php">breakthrough 45-nanometer chips</a> are impressive stuff? Intel thought at one time dipping below 100nm would be miraculous, but Intel exec Pat Gelsinger says that "today we see a clear way to get to under 10 nanometers," and it'll be within the next 10 years.</p>
<p>The next die shrink is the 32nm Westmere chips next year, followed by 14nm a few years later and then the crazy sub-10nm chips after that. But they're probably going to have to make use of something like carbon nanotubes or spintronics to get below 10. The result of all that processing power, says Gelsinger, will be "a dramatic restructuring of the user interface." Yes! I've always wanted true 3D computing <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5014301/battlemodo-of-highest-res-video-goggles-zeiss-cinemizer-vs-myvu-crystal">goggles</a>. [<a href="http://www.crn.com/hardware/208801780">CRN</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5021907/intels-insanely-tiny-processor-roadmap-clear-path-to-10nm-chips]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5021907]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[10nm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[32nm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[45nm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cpus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[penryn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[westmere]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 Jul 2008 12:07:23 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5021907&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Retailers Corroborate iMac Refresh Rumor For Next Week]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/04/imac.preview.jpg"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/04/imac.preview.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Things are looking good for <a href="http://gizmodo.com/383708/updated-imacs-coming-next-week">a now probable iMac refresh</a> this coming week, with MacRumors' retail sources confirming that new iMac part numbers have shown up in their systems. Delivery should hit about Monday or Tuesday and fall in line with the current pricing ($1199, $1499 and $1799). And according to MacRumors, the Penryn processor switchout doesn't make a whole lot of gain for desktop units (reduced power consumption there is just meh), so the storage increase and speed bump should be the reason why you'd want to grab this over an older model. [<a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2008/04/26/retail-sources-confirm-imac-refresh/">MacRumors</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/384459/retailers-corroborate-imac-refresh-rumor-for-next-week]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-384459]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac refresh]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[penryn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[update]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 27 Apr 2008 15:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=384459&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Lenovo's Entire New ThinkPad Line Leaked, X300 Gets Siblings]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/04/Lenovo3.jpg"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/04/Lenovo3.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a>A few months back, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/346797/ultralight-lenovo-x300-series-thinkpad-leaked">we broke</a> news on Lenovo's ultra-thin, ultra-functional X300 laptop. Now we've gotten an update on what the company's been up to during the interim. All of their lines are seeing a major refresh, but the biggest news is that starting this September, the famous X300 will have a family.</p>
<p>Soon joined by the 12-inch X200, the 14.1-inch X400 and the 15.4-inch X500 (all armed with 45nm Penryn processors), customers will be able to pick the precise display size of their choice on one of the most lust-worthy laptops on the market. The X-Series will also feature HSDPA <em>and</em> EVDO, 25% improved battery life, beefy 6MB L2 cache and lots of fanboy drool.</p>
<p>Here's the rest on Lenovo's new ThinkPad line-up:</p>

<p><strong>R-Series (refreshed)</strong><br>
This line will continue representing the entry level. We're light on specs, but we know it will include the R400 (5.1lbs) and R500 (6.4lbs). Expect these to be refreshed in July 2008.<br>
<strong><br>
T-Series (refreshed)</strong><br>
This line will continue to represent the mid-range, featuring 256 or 512MB ATI HD3650 discreet graphics that can be turned off to conserve battery life. We don't have sizes, but the T400 will weight 4.3lbs and the T500 will clock in at 5.8lbs. Shipping starts June 3rd, 2008.<br>
<strong><br>
W-Series (brand new)</strong><br>
The W-Series is a completely new line. Where the "W" used to stand for "Widescreen," now it stands for "workstation replacement." Described to us as less bulky than similar machines from Dell, the 15-inch W900 will feature the same discreet graphics as the T-Series. A 17-inch version is in the works for the future.</p>
<p>And here's the good stuff:</p>
<p><strong>Many or All Models Will Have:</strong><br>
&bull; 6MB of L2 cache<br>
&bull; Turbo Memory option (think Ready Boost, up to 2GB)<br>
&bull; Blu-ray drive option<br>
&bull; Two PCI Express Slots<br>
&bull; 1.6GHz DDR3 RAM<br>
&bull; LED Backlighting (excludes R Series)<br>
&bull; HSDPA <em>and</em> EVDO (Lenovo claims to have no deals with Sprint)<br>
&bull; 9 cell batteries (same form factor as former 6-cell, 25% more life)<br>
&bull; GPS, WiMAX, and wireless USB are scattered through models<br>
&bull; The x300's solid state hard drive option (excludes W)</p>
<p>Lenovo is starting new ThinkPad manufacturing in May so that there are plenty of units to fuel demand. And from the sound of it, some of the X300's most appealing features are making their way to the entire ThinkPad line. We're just wondering what the pricing will look like between the X200 and X300. Will we be paying a premium for size or for screen space?</p>
<p><em>Thanks Odd Job!</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/378504/lenovos-entire-new-thinkpad-line-leaked-x300-gets-siblings]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-378504]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[unconfirmed]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[announcements]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[home entertainment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lenovo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[penryn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[peripherals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[portable media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[r400]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[r500]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t400]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t500]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[thinkpad]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[x200]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[x300]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[x400]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[x500]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:49:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=378504&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[AMD Quad-Core Phenom X4 9850 Reviewed (Verdict: Owned by Intel Quad Cores)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/03/thumb160x_amd_logo_purdy.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />The Phenom X4 9850 is at the top of AMD's latest heap of quad-core Phenoms. It's free of the <a href="http://techreport.com/discussions.x/13724">performance-sapping bug</a> that plagued the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/chip-wars/amd-rolls-out-phenom-x2-and-phenom-x4-processors-fasn8-platform-260149.php">first</a> batch of Phenoms, and AMD hopes it'll claw back some <a href="http://gizmodo.com/335899/intel-delays-45nm-quad+core-cpus-to-give-amd-a-breather">ground from Intel</a>. Maximum PC stacked it up against two quad-cores from Intel&mdash;the mid-rangeish Penryn <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged CORE 2 QUAD" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/core-2-quad/">Core 2 Quad</a> Q9300, as well as an older Core 2 Q6600. Ouchies for AMD, the Intel pair blew past it.</p>
<p>The Penryn-based Q9300 "owned the night," with the Q6600 trailing, and Phenom in back of both. It wasn't "so far behind as to be dead in the water" but "it doesn't quite go head-to-head with the Penryn lite." (They call the Q9300 Penryn-lite because it has half the cache of the higher-end Penryn quad-cores.)</p>
<p>The 9850 X4 is the fastest AM2 chip around, however, so if you're sticking with that board "it's a pretty good upgrade." The bigger problem is that AMD still has nothing to touch Intel's top quad cores, and won't for months, at least. [<a href="http://www.maximumpc.com/article/amd_s_new_x4_quad_core">Maximum PC</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/372738/amd-quad+core-phenom-x4-9850-reviewed-verdict-owned-by-intel-quad-cores]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-372738]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 quad]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cpus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[penryn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phenom]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:57:39 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=372738&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Reports of Mac mini Demise Greatly Exaggerated]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/03/Mac_Mini_Kneel.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Contrary to earlier reports, Kasper at AppleInsider is now saying that the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #macmini" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macmini/">Mac mini</a> has a long life ahead of it. Well, at least 12 months worth. According to his sources, "A small team of engineers have recently been tasked with gutting the diminutive desktop and applying fresh internals." Such as...?</p>
<p>The current 65nm chips will be tossed in favor of 45nm Core 2 Duos, starting with 2.1GHz, 3MB of shared L2 cache, 800MHz front-side bus and a better integrated graphics processor, namely the same Intel GMA X3100 found in today's 13" MacBooks. (Kasper is also reporting rumors of a similar bump up for iMacs, which would get pimp Penryns as nice as the 2.8GHz Core 2 Extreme.)</p>
<p>We have to ask, though, who still wants a mini? And more importantly, will the price ever drop below $500? I'd probably rather take an older $400 mini than a brand new Intel-awesome-o-fied $700 one. [<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/03/21/eating_our_words_apples_mac_mini_to_rock_on.html">AppleInsider</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/370903/reports-of-mac-mini-demise-greatly-exaggerated]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-370903]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[45nm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[65nm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac mini]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mini]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[penryn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 21 Mar 2008 18:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=370903&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Intel's Six-Core Dunnington and Nehalem Microarchitecture Get Official]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/03/Dunnington.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;float:none;"/> The pair of 45nm Intel chips that Sun oh-so-kindly <a href="http://gizmodo.com/360476/intels-6+core-nehalem-and-xeon-dunnington-processors-leaked">leaked last month</a> just got all official-like. Dunnington is "the first IA (Intel Architecture) processor with 6-cores, is based on the 45nm high-k process technology, and has large shared caches." Six cores, exciting! But not as exciting as Nehalem, which is Intel's "dynamically scalable" new processor microarchitecture which'll bring "dramatic performance and energy improvements" to Intel's chips. And that means what?</p>
<p>The platform will scale from two to eight cores, and eventually from "notebooks to servers." That's the scalable part, so you'll see it everywhere. Simultaneous Multi-Threading will let each core run two threads at once, plus it quadruples the memory-bandwidth of the current top-o'-the-line Xeons. It's also got an 8MB level-3 cache, Quickpath interconnects (up to 25.6GB per second), integrated memory controller (AMD what?) and supports up to DDR3-1333 memory, plus a bunch of other hardcore geek stuff, which you can scope out at Intel. [<a href="http://rss.intel.com/click/~rss-90004-c1-199710/www.intel.com/pressroom/archive/releases/20080317fact.htm%253Fiid%253Dpr1_releasepri_20080317fact">Intel</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/369076/intels-six+core-dunnington-and-nehalem-microarchitecture-get-official]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-369076]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cpu]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cpus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dunnington]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nehalem]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[penryn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 18 Mar 2008 09:24:55 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=369076&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Details Emerge on Intel's First Mobile Quad-core Processor]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/03/intel-logo.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Chinese-language site HKEPC is reporting that Intel's first mobile quad-core processor will be the 45nm Penryn-based Core 2 Extreme QX9300. The chip will clock speeds of 2.53 GHz, have 12 MB of L2 Cache and 1066 MHz FSB. The QX9300, however, won't be part of the Q2 Centrino 2 launch because it is a 45W processor and current motherboards are designed for 35W chips. [<a href="http://www.hkepc.com/?id=886&fs=c3nh">HKEPC</a> via <a href="http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2008/03/14/intel_core_2_qx9300_details/">Register Hardware</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/368228/details-emerge-on-intels-first-mobile-quad+core-processor]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-368228]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[penryn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[quad-core]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[qx9300]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:20:57 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Covert]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=368228&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New Macbook Pro Review (Verdict: Penryn + LEDs = Efficiency)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/02/mbpptop.JPG"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/02/mbpptop.JPG" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a><iframe src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http://digg.com/apple/New_Macbook_Pro_Review_Verdict_Penryn_LEDs_Efficiency" align="right" frameborder="0" height="82" scrolling="no" width="55"></iframe>The new <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MACBOOK PRO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbook-pro/">Macbook Pro</a> is not much of a bump up from its predecessors, but it is a step in the right direction. The addition of Multi-Touch is a great new feature, even on a touchpad that's smaller than the one on the Air. However, the Penryn-powered processor in this MBP is running at roughly the same speed as the last generation's chips, GHz to GHz, and give no good reason to upgrade from machines that are less than a year old. The most interesting point here is the boost in efficiency the now-pervasive LED backlighting and 45nm Penryn chips bring to the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #macbookpro" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbookpro/">MacBook Pro</a>, which together give an hour extra battery life over older models with CCFL screens and 65nm CPU technology. That makes this the most efficient Macbook Pro yet. Here's more on the 2.6GHz 4GB 15-inch MacBook we got to play with. <script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('macbookpropenrynreview', 6, '');
</script></p>

<p><strong>Multi-Touch Trackpad</strong><br>
<script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("mbpmultitouch.flv", 475, 286,"");
</script><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/stills/mbpmultitouch.flv.jpg" style="display:block;display: none;">After a month of getting used to the Multi-Touch touchpad on the MacBook Air, I have to say that the Pro's touchpad is not quite as good in comparison. Comparatively, the Pro's touchpad is slightly narrower in width and a whole half of an inch shorter in height. (It's identical to the touchpad on the last Gen MBP's pad.) My initial thoughts were that the smaller touchpad would make using Multi-Touch more difficult, but that wasn't exactly the case.</p>
<p>Initially, in iPhoto, Multi-Touch on the smaller pad was more difficult, but after a few minutes we realized we were trying to use fingers in the same fashion as we did on the Air, where we had more room to gesture. For example, on the Air we skipped through photos with our fingers vertically but because of the Pro's size it's not comfortable to do this. So we placed our three fingers horizontally and it worked perfectly.</p>
<p>We came to the same conclusion with the rotate function. Instead of trying to move our rotate finger from the top of the touchpad to the bottom, we realized that by simply doing the rotate movement with more of a flick, iPhoto and Preview correctly rotated our photo to the next layout.</p>
<p>For testing zoom, we did a side-by-side comparison with the Air and found that the Pro's smaller touchpad actually zoomed into the same position as it did using the Air.</p>
<p><strong>Screen</strong><br>
One thing to note though is that the LED matte screen on the version we got was less bright than the glossy screen on the MacBook Air. This might be the matte vs. glossy difference, or it might be that the MacBook Air's screen is just brighter.</p>
<p><strong>Keyboard</strong><br>
The updated keyboard now has the F-key functions, same as the MacBook Air, and we think the additional Dashboard and Expose buttons use the F-keys nicely. We might not actually use buttons for these features but we think it's cool that the buttons are now clearly labeled.</p>
<p><strong>Benchmark</strong><br>
The Penryn MacBook Pro has already been <a href="http://gizmodo.com/361699/macbook-pro-first-benchmarks-are-a-bit-of-a-disappointment">benched and compared</a> to the previous generation MBP, and its clear it's about the same performance, per GHz. With that in mind we tested the new Penryn MBP agaisnt a year old Merom MBP and found a slight increase in speed. Also not surprising.<br>
<br>
In a video encoding test, the Penryn MBP exported a 2.5min HD trailer in 11 minutes, where as the older Merom MBP took 13 min. (The basic config on the older machine included a 2.33GHz processor and 2GB of RAM; the Penryn had a 2.6GHz processor and 4GB of RAM, so this test is just a rough guide.) As noted in the temperature section, the Penryn did use much more of its power to accomplish the encoding which produced more heat. If you would like to see the Xbench results and compare it to your own machine you can check them out <a href="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/02/macbookpro_penryn_xbench.txt">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Temperature</strong><br>
While idling, the Penryn MBP's CPU was running at 127 F&mdash;slightly cooler than the Merom MBP which had 133 F. But as for the actual experience, the new Penryn MBP felt much cooler on your lap than the older Merom.</p>
<p>While performing a video encode in iMovie with the new Penryn MBP CPU was operating at a temperature of 170 F; actually warmer than the older Merom MBP at 165 F. The increase in operating temperature during a video encode is likely because the more efficient machine is still doing more work every second at its higher clock rate.</p>
<p><strong>Battery</strong><br>
So why do Apple's battery ratings look the same or lower in comparison to the last generation's Macbook Pro ratings? Simple: They made the tests harder. Again, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/361001/apple-says-macbook-and-macbook-pro-battery-life-has-improved-slightly">according to numbers provided by Apple</a>, for this and the last generation's MacBook Pro's battery life, you get about half an hour more due to the Penryn redesign, and half an hour more from the LED backlights. <strong>As with the AirBook ratings, your mileage will definitely vary.</strong> Downwards. But relative to the older books, these are more miserly.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion</strong><br>
Overall this MacBook Pro update is nothing amazing. The Multi-Touch touchpad and the Penryn processor are nice upgrades, but not necessarily something that a previous generation MacBook Pro user would feel an urgency to upgrade to. This update is more about efficiency than power gains.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/362049/new-macbook-pro-review-verdict-penryn-%252B-leds--efficiency]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-362049]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[handson]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[penryn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[testing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[update]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:00:38 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Mascari]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=362049&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[MacBook Pro Now With Penryn Processors, Multitouch Trackpad]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/02/new-macbookpros2.jpg"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/02/new-macbookpros2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><iframe src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http://digg.com/apple/New_MacBook_Pro_More_Powerful_Has_Multitouch_Trackpad" align="right" frameborder="0" height="82" scrolling="no" width="55"></iframe>More powerful versions of the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #macbookpro" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbookpro/">MacBook Pro</a> have been released today with up to 2.6GHz Intel Core 2 Duo Penryn processors, and the MacBook Air's trackpad, which allows for multi-touch gestures. The 2.5 and 2.6GHz models come with a new NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT with 512MB of GDDR3 RAM. The MacBook has also been upgraded (yay!), but <i>no</i> multitouch (boo!), probably to make a distinction between them and the MacBook Air. The good, the bad and the ugly, specs and price list after the jump.</p>
<p><b>The good</b><br>
&bull; New Core 2 Duo versions across the board, which are supposed to be about 50% faster and more power efficient.<br>
&bull; New GeForce 8600M GT with 512MB.<br>
&bull; Multitouch pad on MacBook Pro.<br>
&bull; New LED option on top of the line 17" screen.</p>
<p><b>The bad</b><br>
&bull; <a href="http://gizmodo.com/360805/why-no-macbook-multitouch-the-official-apple-non+answer">No multitouch</a> or LED on MacBooks.<br>
&bull; Multitouch trackpad on MacBook Pro is smaller than Air.<br>
&bull; Apple Remote is now a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/360770/apple-remote-now-a-19-add+on">$19 option</a>.</p>
<p><b>The Ugly</b><br>
&bull; Design whores like me will have to wait for the next generation for a new chassis. Clearly, this is a minor bump as we wait for the real things.</p>

<blockquote>CUPERTINO, Calif., Feb. 26 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ &mdash; Apple(R) today updated its popular MacBook(R) and MacBook Pro notebook lines with the latest Intel Core 2 Duo processors, larger hard drives and 2GB of memory standard in most models. In addition, MacBook Pro includes the latest NVIDIA graphics processors, now with up to 512MB of video memory, and Apple's innovative Multi-Touch(TM) trackpad, first introduced in MacBook Air(TM). All Mac(R) notebooks include a built-in iSight(R) video camera for video conferencing on-the-go*, Apple's MagSafe(R) Power Adapter that safely disconnects when under strain and built-in 802.11n wireless networking for up to five times the performance and twice the range of 802.11g.**
<p>The new MacBook Pro features the latest Intel Core 2 Duo technology with up to a 2.6 GHz processor with 6MB of shared L2 cache; up to 4GB of 667 MHz DDR2 SDRAM memory and up to a 300GB hard drive, plus NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT graphics with up to 512MB of video memory. Every MacBook Pro now includes a trackpad with Multi-Touch gesture support for pinch, rotate and swipe, making it more intuitive than ever to zoom and rotate photos in iPhoto(R) or Aperture(TM) 2 or browse web pages in Safari(TM); an illuminated keyboard that makes it ideal for dimly lit environments such as airplanes, studios or conference halls and a built-in ambient light sensor, which automatically adjusts the brightness of the keys as well as the brightness of the display for optimal visibility.</p>
<p>Featuring a gorgeous 13-inch glossy widescreen display, and with prices still starting at just $1,099, the new MacBook lineup comes in three models and includes faster processors and larger hard drives across the line; sleek white 2.1 GHz and 2.4 GHz models with 120GB or 160GB 5400 rpm hard drives and a stunning black 2.4 GHz model with a massive 250GB 5400 rpm hard drive, previously only available as an option. The 2.4 GHz MacBook models ship with 2GB of memory standard, expandable up to 4GB across the line.</p>
<p>Every MacBook and MacBook Pro includes a built-in iSight video camera for video conferencing on-the-go; Apple's MagSafe Power Adapter that magnetically connects the power cord and safely disconnects when under strain; the latest generation of 802.11n wireless networking for up to five times the performance and twice the range of 802.11g; built-in 10/100/1000 BASE-T Gigabit Ethernet for high-speed networking; Bluetooth; analog and digital audio inputs and outputs; USB 2.0; FireWire(R) and a built-in SuperDrive(R).</p>
<p>Every Mac in the Apple lineup comes with iLife(R) '08, the most significant update ever to Apple's award-winning suite of digital lifestyle applications, featuring a major new version of iPhoto and a completely reinvented iMovie(R), both seamlessly integrated with the new .Mac Web Gallery for online photo and video sharing***. Every Mac also includes Leopard(R), the sixth major release of the world's most advanced operating system which introduces Time Machine(TM), an effortless way to automatically back up everything on a Mac; a redesigned Finder(TM) that lets users quickly browse and share files between multiple Macs; Quick Look, a new way to instantly see files without opening an application; Spaces, an intuitive new feature used to create groups of applications and instantly switch between them; a brand new desktop with Stacks, a new way to easily access files from the Dock and major enhancements to Mail and iChat(R). .Mac members can use the new Back to My Mac feature to browse and access files on their home computer from a Mac over the Internet while out on the road.</p>
<p><b>Prices</b><br>
The 2.1 GHz, 13-inch white MacBook $1,099 (US)<br>
The 2.4 GHz, 13-inch white MacBook $1,299 (US)<br>
The 2.4 GHz, 13-inch black MacBook $1,499 (US)<br>
The 2.4 GHz, 15-inch MacBook Pro $1,999 (US)<br>
The 2.5 GHz, 15-inch MacBook Pro $2,499 (US)<br>
The 2.5 GHz, 17-inch MacBook Pro, for a suggested retail price of $2,799 (US)</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/360753/macbook-pro-now-with-penryn-processors-multitouch-trackpad]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-360753]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[multitouch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[penryn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=360753&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Intel Planning 6-Core "Dunnington" Microprocessor]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/02/Dunnington%20GI.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />According to the chaps at the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #eclipsedevelopersjournal" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/eclipsedevelopersjournal/">Eclipse Developer's Journal</a> (EDJ), Intel is planning a six-core microprocessor, which will go by the Dunnington moniker.</p>
<p>The six-core beast will be succeeded by the even meatier, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/pcs/intels-conroe-replacement-already-pumping-iron-231999.php">Nehalem</a> micro-architecture, which will support greater than eight cores. The work regarding the Dunnington project is still under wraps, but our friends at EDJ insist Intel has already put together a die, the size of a postage stamp, with three dual-core <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/giz-explains/giz-explains-whats-the-f-is-a-penryn-335090.php">45nm Penryn</a> chips on it sharing a 16MB L3 cache. Allegedly, we'll see the Dunnington in either Q2 or Q3, this year&mdash;we'll be sure to keep you posted on any developments. [<a href="http://eclipse.sys-con.com/read/505602.htm">EDJ</a> via <a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news/2008/02/23/intel-readies-six-core-chip">The Inquirer</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/359995/intel-planning-6+core-dunnington-microprocessor]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-359995]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[45nm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[45nm penryn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[65mm tukwila itanium]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[65nm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clarksboro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clarksboro chipset]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dunnington]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dunnington 6-core]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[eclipse developer's journal]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[edj]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microchips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microprocessors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nehalem]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[penryn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tukwila itanium]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xeon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 23 Feb 2008 13:08:09 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haroon Malik]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=359995&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Intel Santa Rosa Successor "Montevina" Knighted as "Centrino 2"]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/02/centrino2.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Four of Intel's mobile chipsets&mdash;including its most recent and well-known, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/complete/ultimate-intel-santa-rosa-launch-guide-259188.php">Santa Rosa</a>&mdash;have been Centrino as far as your mom is concerned. To help us keep things a little straighter and make it obvious they're actually updating stuff, Intel's upcoming Penryn-oriented mobile chipset, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/montevina">Montevina</a>, which'll be pushing <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #santarosa" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/santarosa/">Santa Rosa</a> aside, will be branded <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #centrino2" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/centrino2/">Centrino 2</a>. Thanks, Intel, for bringing just a little bit of logic to chip branding. Core 2 Duo is still a mouthful, though. [<a href="http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20080218PD210.html">Digitimes</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/357498/intel-santa-rosa-successor-montevina-knighted-as-centrino-2]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-357498]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[centrino]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[centrino 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[montevina]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[penryn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[santa rosa]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 18 Feb 2008 04:00:43 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=357498&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Event on February 26 Launches iPhone SDK and MacBook Pro?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/02/macbookiphone.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />9to5 Mac is reporting that Apple will have yet another event on February 26 in order to launch the iPhone and iPod Touch SDK, which will have <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #nativeapps" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/nativeapps/">native apps</a> that reportedly offer Exchange and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #lotusnotes" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/lotusnotes/">Lotus Notes</a> support. And the best part is that updated MacBook Pros with Penryn and possibly the MacBook Air trackpad could also debut there.</p>
<p>Apparently the date was finalized after Apple pulled out of the National Association of Broadcasters show, which means they might save the Final Cut Pro server announcement (if there is one) for the Feb 26 event as well. Remember, no one can confirm what Apple's announcing until they announce it, but this is what we know so far. [<a href="http://www.9to5mac.com/apple-event-february-sdk-52465">9to5Mac</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/354365/apple-event-on-february-26-launches-iphone-sdk-and-macbook-pro]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-354365]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple event]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cpu]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[exchange]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone sdk]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[launch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lotus notes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[native apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[penryn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sdk]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 08 Feb 2008 13:34:27 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=354365&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sony VAIO FZ Laptop Adds HDMI Out, Penryn Processor]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/01/vaiofz.jpg"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/05/vaiofz.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/santa-rosa-ahoy%21/sony-vaio-fz-burns-blu+ray-discs-looks-like-a-macbook-259055.php">Sony FZ VAIO</a> now comes with a T8100 Penryn Processor and HDMI out. The LT is selling for $2200.</p>

<blockquote>Media Alert: Sony Transforms PCs into Ultimate Dream Machines
<p>Subject: New VAIO PCs Feature Supercharged Models<br>
<br>
Body: Sony today announced it would be shipping super-charged versions of its VAIO® PCs. Dubbed VAIO Premium, these units will empower users with lighting-fast processing speeds, massive amounts of storage, and innovative technologies to improve performance.</p>
<p>Fueling these dream machines will be the new Intel® Core™ 2 Duo Processors&mdash; T9000 and T8000 series. Among the very first to ship with these chipsets, these PCs will provide business travelers and multimedia enthusiasts alike with unparalleled power and multi-tasking capabilities. The result: high-definition content management, fast-paced gaming and performance like never before.</p>
<p>High Performance High-Def</p>
<p>VAIO FZ485U Premium Notebook: This portable, multimedia notebook features a 15.4-inch XBRITE-HiColor™ widescreen display and is HDMI equipped to output to HDTV in Full HD 1080. Doubling as a mobile high-definition movie studio, it utilizes the latest Intel Core2 Processor T8100, 4 gigabytes of RAM, a 256 megabytes dedicated graphics card and Blu-ray Disc technology for viewing and managing HD content. The FZ notebook is priced at about $2,200.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/341004/sony-vaio-fz-laptop-adds-hdmi-out-penryn-processor]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-341004]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ces 2008]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fz]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[penryn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vaio]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:30:01 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Covert]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=341004&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sony VAIO LT All-In-One PC Now With Blu-ray, Penryn]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/01/LT80DB_70DB_90S_o_.jpg"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/09/LT80DB_70DB_90S_o_.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>This <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/sony/sonys-l+type-vaios-bring-three-kinds-of-sexiness-to-your-home-303258.php">22-inch all-in-one</a> gains Blu-ray burning capability, 2.5 GHz Penryn processor, and 1TB of storage (100 hours TV recording). Still no internal CableCard though. It sells for $3300.</p>

<blockquote>Media Alert: Sony Transforms PCs into Ultimate Dream Machines
<p>Subject: New VAIO PCs Feature Supercharged Models<br>
<br>
Body: Sony today announced it would be shipping super-charged versions of its VAIO® PCs. Dubbed VAIO Premium, these units will empower users with lighting-fast processing speeds, massive amounts of storage, and innovative technologies to improve performance.</p>
<p>Fueling these dream machines will be the new Intel® Core™ 2 Duo Processors&mdash; T9000 and T8000 series. Among the very first to ship with these chipsets, these PCs will provide business travelers and multimedia enthusiasts alike with unparalleled power and multi-tasking capabilities. The result: high-definition content management, fast-paced gaming and performance like never before.</p>
<p>High Performance High-Def</p>
<p>VAIO LT29U Premium HD PC/TV: This all-in-one model incorporates an unrivaled terabyte of storage so it can record up to 100 hours of HDTV programming - five times more than a standard DVR. It is equipped with 4 gigabytes of RAM and powered by the new Intel Core2 Processor T9300. Sporting a 22-inch XBRITE-HiColor™ widescreen display, it also features an external CableCARD compliant TV tuner and Blu-ray technology. The LT model is priced at about $3,300.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/341003/sony-vaio-lt-all+in+one-pc-now-with-blu+ray-penryn]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-341003]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ces 2008]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lt]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[penryn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vaio]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:30:01 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Covert]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=341003&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[VAIO AR Performance Laptop Gets Penryn Bump]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Sony's top-of-the-line "desktop replacement" is even more spec'd out than before. With a 2.5 GHz T9300 Penyrn processor. It also has a 400 GB  HDD, 512 MB NVIDIA graphics card, and 4 GB RAM, which add to the  17" 1080p screen, HDMI out and Blu-ray burner. All for $3300.</p><blockquote>Media Alert: Sony Transforms PCs into Ultimate Dream Machines

<p>Subject:  New VAIO PCs Feature Supercharged Models <br />
 <br />
Body: Sony today announced it would be shipping super-charged versions of its VAIO® PCs. Dubbed VAIO Premium, these units will empower users with lighting-fast processing speeds, massive amounts of storage, and innovative technologies to improve performance.</p>

<p>Fueling these dream machines will be the new Intel® Core™ 2 Duo Processors&mdash; T9000 and T8000 series. Among the very first to ship with these chipsets, these PCs will provide business travelers and multimedia enthusiasts alike with unparalleled power and multi-tasking capabilities. The result: high-definition content management, fast-paced gaming and performance like never before. </p>

<p>High Performance High-Def</p>

<p>VAIO AR790U Premium Notebook: Featuring a 17-inch XBRITE-HiColor™ Full HD 1080 widescreen display, the AR model is powered by the new Intel Core2 Processor T9300 for mind-blowing, high-definition content management and gaming. It comes loaded with 4 gigabytes of RAM, a massive 400 gigabytes of storage, a 512 megabytes dedicated graphics card, and Blu-ray® Disc technology. Priced at about $3,300, this PC also has an external CableCARD™ compliant TV tuner for viewing or recording HDTV programming. </blockquote></p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/341005/vaio-ar-performance-laptop-gets-penryn-bump]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-341005]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ar]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ces 2008]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[penryn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t9300]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vaio]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:30:01 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Covert]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=341005&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sony, Fujistu, Acer Penryn Laptops Leaked]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/Vaio%20Penryn%20GI.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />We've been <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/giz-explains/giz-explains-whats-the-f-is-a-penryn-335090.php">harping on about Penryn processors</a> for a while, but a few more models have just leaked:</p>
<p><br></p>

<p>&bull;Acer will be adding to their Aspire line with five new models (2920, 4920, 5920, 7720 and 9920). Their Travelmate line will also gain two new machines (6492 and 6592G.)</p>
<p>&bull;Fujitsu-Siemens will join the parade with the Amilo Xi 2550 / 2428</p>
<p>&bull;Sony will have a piece of the Penryn pie with five new VAIO lappies (FZ31, TZ2, SZ71, CR31 and AR61.)</p>
<p>[Notebook Italia; <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fnotebookitalia.it%2Facer-aspire-2920-4920-5920-7720-e-9920-con-intel-penryn.html&langpair=it%7Cen&hl=en&ie=UTF-8">Aspire</a>, <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fnotebookitalia.it%2Facer-travelmate-6492-e-6592g-refresh-a-penryn-anche-per-i-portatili-professi.html&langpair=it%7Cen&hl=en&ie=UTF-8">Travelmate</a>, <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fnotebookitalia.it%2Ffujitsu-siemens-amilo-pi-2550-e-amilo-xi-2428-con-cpu-penryn.html&langpair=it%7Cen&hl=en&ie=UTF-8">Amilo</a>, <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fnotebookitalia.it%2Fsony-vaio-fz31-sz71-cr31-ar61-con-processori-intel-penryn.html&langpair=it%7Cen&hl=en&ie=UTF-8">Vaio</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/29/slew-of-penryn-laptops-shown-off-from-acer-sony-and-fujitsu-sie/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/338967/sony-fujistu-acer-penryn-laptops-leaked]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-338967]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[roundup]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[acer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[amilo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[aspire]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fujitsu-siemens]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[penryn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[travelmate]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vaio]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xi]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 29 Dec 2007 22:45:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haroon Malik]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=338967&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Dream PC: 8-Core Workstation Rocks the Penryns (Verdict: WOW!)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/hp_xw8600_tease.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;float:none;"/><iframe src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http://digg.com/hardware/Dream_PC_8_Core_HP_Rocks_the_Penryns_Verdict_WOW" align="right" frameborder="0" height="82" scrolling="no" width="55"></iframe>HP is cranking out some smoking workstations these days, and the latest Intel Xeon <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged QUAD CORE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/quad-core/">quad core</a> processors, affectionately known as the Harpertown chips with 45-nanometer Penryn technology inside, take Windows performance to the next level. HP shipped us the fastest workstation they could muster, with a total of eight processor cores, along with a 15,000 RPM SAS (Serial-Attached SCSI) drive on two separate disks, one with Windows XP and the other with Windows Vista, plus a 250GB SATA drive for applications. We opened the box, ran <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/vista-vs-vista-sp1-rc1/battlemodo-windows-vista-service-pack-1-rc1-vs-shipping-vista-337768.php">a bunch of benchmarks</a> and our jaws promptly dropped. How much workstation can you get for $8,551? Join us for the smokefest.</p>

<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/HP-Workstation_front.jpg" class="center" width="463" height="782" style="display:block;float:none;">As soon as Intel released these 5400 series Penryn processors this month, HP sent us this top-of-the-line xw8600 workstation with <i>two</i> of them inside. <img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/intel%20quad-core.jpg" class="center" width="400" height="365" style="display:block;float:none;">This expensive machine&mdash;aimed at oil and gas explorers, video editors and animators&mdash;is not really a gamer's box, but instead showcases the capabilities of these new four-way processors. Our test machine's 3.16GHz quad-core "Harpertown" processors (officially called the Intel Xeon E5460 <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #quadcore" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/quadcore/">Quad Core</a>), use Intel's latest 45nm Penryn microarchitecture. Yep, those are as fast as these suckers get. The catch? They each cost $1550 more than the lowest-cost Xeon quad-core chip offered, the 2GHz 5405.<br>
<img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/intel-quad-core2.jpg" class="center" width="463" height="316" style="display:block;float:none;">Due to their finer geometry (going from 60nm down to 45nm), you get 50% more cache, resulting in 6MB of shared cache between each dual core, totaling 12MB of cache in each processor&mdash;that's 24MB total in our test machine. In addition to that, the frontside bus is also running at 1333MHz, giving you a 30% speed boost over its predecessor.</p>
<p>Check out this pic (and another larger one in the gallery showing the task manager along with the graphic it's rendering) that tells the story of all eight cores screaming away at the same time, rendering a complex graphic on the CineBench benchmark. Here it's just finished the render:<br>
<img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/taskmanager2.jpg" class="center" width="502" height="419" style="display:block;float:none;">Video editors and scientists like to be able to expand everything inside one of these boxes. Although we had a "paltry" 4GB of RAM inside, you'll be able to cram 128GB up in there as soon as 8GB RAM sticks are available&mdash;Q1 of next year, we're told. You can also fill the thing up with storage, using your choice of eight Serial Attached SCSI (SAS) ports or six SATA connections, in addition to FireWire ports on the front and back, and dual Gigabit Ethernet. (You can lash them together for faster networking.) If you wanted to, you could set up a disk array on those SAS ports to get 2GB/sec drive performance.</p>
<p>HP included the <a href="http://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro_fx_5600_4600.html">NVIDIA FX 4600 workstation-class graphics card</a> in the package, but there's room for two PCI Express x16 graphics cards tied together, certain to be a favorite of animators and those oil and gas explorers who need to simulate all kinds of complex graphics. The FX 4600 has 768MB of GDDR3 memory on board, useful for CAD designers working with huge graphics. And yes, it could most definitely play <em>Doom</em>.</p>
<p>We especially like this workstation's case. Normally they're staid and gray-looking, but HP stuck on some special sticky graphics that may look a bit cheesy, but are an improvement over the typical plain-Jane exterior. Never mind the visuals, HP's made this an extraordinarily quiet machine too, where even though it's packed with hardware, you can hardly hear it running next to you. We also like its tool-less chassis: Once you get the hang of it, you can take out drives and fans in a snap with nary a screwdriver in sight. Overall, it's an outlandishly configurable and powerful platform, practically begging you to turn it into whatever kind of monster workstation your heart desires.</p>
<p>Check out the benchmarks below, and you'll see that this $8,551 machine slam-dunks last year's fastest HP xw8400 workstation:<img alt="benchmarks222.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/benchmarks222.jpg" width="439" height="349" class="center">It's fast. Blazingly fast, and on some benchmarks it's a whole lot quicker than last year's model. Its speed is just unreal, and you can feel it with every click. Impressive. [<a href="http://h71016.www7.hp.com/dstore/MiddleFrame.asp?page=config&ProductLineId=433&FamilyId=2698&BaseId=24336&oi=E9CED&BEID=19701&SBLID=">HP xw8600 Workstation</a>]<br>
<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('HPxw8600', 12, '');
</script><br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/338507/dream-pc-8+core-workstation-rocks-the-penryns-verdict-wow]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-338507]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[eight core]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hp xw8600 workstation]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[monster pc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[penryn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[quad core]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 28 Dec 2007 12:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie White]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=338507&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Giz Explains: What's the F is a Penryn?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/penyrynhand.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;float:none;"/><a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/penryn">Penryn</a>'s sort of a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/intel/intel-reveals-new-mobile-ssd-umpc-concepts-the-skulltrail-gaming-platform-and-penryn-and-santa-rosa-updates-334227.php">buzzword lately</a>. If you don't know what the hell that is, chances are, you're not alone: Penryn is Intel's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/launch/intel-penryn-arrives-in-16-flavors-for-desktops-and-servers-321435.php">latest generation</a> of processors, manufactured with a 45-nanometer process that lets them cram more transistors onto the processor than ever before. They're shrunken Core 2 Duo chips of this generation, with a few extra tricks.</p>
<p>The result is that they're <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/pcs/moores-law-rescuscitated-by-new-intel-chip-tech-231990.php">smaller, faster, cooler</a> and more energy efficient than the last generation of chips, so bet on the cram-as-many-cores-as-you-can processor race to really start heating up in 2008, with quad-core and higher becoming increasingly common. These chips also have the fourth generation of SSE instructions for faster technical and multimedia computing. You'll see Penryn chips in everything from <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/alienware/alienware-intros-new-penryn+based-pcs-322174.php">gaming PCs</a> to beefy servers to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/rumor/leaked-intel-penryn-chips-just-in-time-for-macworld-330196.php">MacBook Pros</a>.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/335090/giz-explains-whats-the-f-is-a-penryn]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-335090]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[giz explains]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cpus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[penryn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 19 Dec 2007 02:10:30 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=335090&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Intel Reveals New Mobile SSD, UMPC Concepts, the Skulltrail Gaming Platform and Penryn and Santa Rosa Updates]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/Intel_ZP140_with_US_Penny.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />At Intel's Pre-CES briefing today, execs discussed a new super-small solid state drive, WiMax-capable devices, and 45nm Penryn chips in everything from UMPCs to television sets to slender desktop all-in-ones from your favorite computer makers. Here's the rundown:</p>
<p>&bull; In January, Intel will introduce what they claim is the smallest SSD in the industry. Officially named the Z-P140 PATA SSD, the drive holds 2GB or 4GB and is 12x18x8mm (about the size of a penny if you couldn't tell from the pic), and 0.6 grams. The Z-P140 can act as a controller for compatible NAND memory, which means these drives are expandable to 16GB. Intel says that this new style of SSD should be showing up soon in several UMPCs and other mobile internet devices from companies such as Asus, BenQ, Clarion, Lenovo and more.</p>
<p>&bull; Intel will also bring WiMax and other wireless connectivity options to these devices. A WiMax/Wi-Fi combo chip, code-named Echo Peak, will also come to market in 2008. Of the 25 devices in the mobile computing category planned for next year, Intel says that 20% will have WiMax, 60% will have 3G and 40% will have GPS. 100% will of course support both Wi-Fi and Bluetooth.</p>
<p>&bull; For desktop users, processor capacity and hi-def performance will see major enhancements in 2008. "Skulltrail", a new dual-processor based platform, will enable high-end and professional computer users to run dual quad-core Core 2 Extreme processors for a massive 8-core performance, for gamers and other hardcore users. In addition, a new feature called HD Boost is an instruction set that will provide faster video encoding/decoding, 3D rendering and photo editing.</p>
<p>&bull; <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #consumerelectronics" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/consumerelectronics/">Consumer electronics</a> such as set-top boxes and digital televisions will also get a boost from "Canmore", a "system-on-a-chip" that combines 1GHz processing core with A/V processing and graphics and I/O components onto a single chip. Intel sees increased internet connectivity in these types of devices, and cited examples such as playing video games over your cable box as possible implementations.</p>
<p>&bull; <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #santarosa" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/santarosa/">Santa Rosa</a> Refresh, an updated version of the Centrino processor, is a 45nm Penryn chip with better graphics capabilities. The Refresh will be offered in notebooks and desktops and is geared to improving the quality of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #hddvd" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/hddvd/">HD DVD</a> and Blu-ray, among other graphic intensive applications.</p>
<p>&bull; Finally, Intel says that the Gateway One and Dell XPS All-In-One will get the Penryn boost next year, and I was also told that they are "talking to Apple."<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('intelpreces', 6, 'Intel CES Preview');
</script>[<a href="http://www.intel.com/pressroom/kits/events/ces2008/index.htm">Intel</a>]<br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/334227/intel-reveals-new-mobile-ssd-umpc-concepts-the-skulltrail-gaming-platform-and-penryn-and-santa-rosa-updates]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-334227]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[45nm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blu-ray]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canmore]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[consumer electronics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gateway]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hd dvd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[penryn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[santa rosa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[skulltrail]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[umpc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wi-fi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wimax]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[z-p140]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:52:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benny Goldman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=334227&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Moore's Law is a Farce, Says Intel Video]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><object width="463" height="391"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/dNw-oCjE_Yg&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/dNw-oCjE_Yg&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object><br />
Did you ever think that <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/moore.s-law%7C-the-motion-picture/gizmodos-video-salute-to-moores-law-332051.php">Gordon Moore's famous law </a>was just a clever way to impress PC buyers every two years? Watch here as young Gordy Moore cuts right to the chase and invents the 45nm Penryn chip at his kitchen table by mixing a pinch of chips, a dash of metal gates, a dollop of hafnium, and the sweet, malty deliciousness of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #core45" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #core45" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/core45/">Core 45</a>. If this footage is real, why was I forced to grow up with a 486 chip?</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/333422/moores-law-is-a-farce-says-intel-video]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-333422]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[malt transistor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[45nm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 45]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gordon moore]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[moore's law]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[penryn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 13 Dec 2007 10:09:15 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benny Goldman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=333422&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Intel Chips 1971 to 2007, Plus a Timeline of the Transistor's 60 Years]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/Intel_Chips_Lineup.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;float:none;"/>As promised, here are stats for 20 different Intel chips from the past 35 years, most of which I included briefly in the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/moore.s-law%7C-the-motion-picture/gizmodos-video-salute-to-moores-law-332051.php">Moore's Law video I made earlier</a>, along with bonus factual tidbits I came across while looking over some Intel stuff today. Here you can enjoy it at your own pace (and without the music that some of you found not to your liking), but sadly the pics are not in any particular order, thanks to the way we serve up Flickr galleries. Enjoy it, but remember, it's only Intel's side of the story. Perhaps AMD would be kind enough to shoot over a similar dossier of fun facts. After the chip gallery is a timeline of transistor-related happenings from 1947 up to today.</p>

<p><b>Intel Chips from 1971 to 2007:</b><br>
<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('IntelChips1971to2007', 20, '');
</script><br>
<b>Intel's History of the Transistor:</b><br>
<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('IntelTransistorHistory', 4, '');
</script><br>
[<a href="http://www.intel.com/">Intel</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/332203/intel-chips-1971-to-2007-plus-a-timeline-of-the-transistors-60-years]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-332203]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[286]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[386]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[486]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[itanium]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[moore's law]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[penryn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pentium]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[semiconductors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xeon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 10 Dec 2007 19:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=332203&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Leaked Intel Penryn Chips, Just in Time for Macworld]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/imacpenryn.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Intel's latest and greatest mobile Penryn processors have (near positively) been leaked for the world to see. These new Core 2 Duo and Core 2 (Extreme!!!) processors are built on the 45nm scale (as opposed to 65nm architecture). Smaller, faster, cooler and all around better, they will most likely be officially announced at the start of CES this January...right in time for Macworld (*cough* tablet please *cough*). Here are the prices and specs:</p>

<blockquote>X9000 2.8 GHz, 44W, 6MB Price: $851
<p>T9500 2.6 GHz, 35W, 6MB<br>
Price: $530</p>
<p>T9300 2.5 GHz, 35W, 6MB<br>
Price: $316</p>
<p>T8300 2.4 GHz, 35W, 3MB<br>
Price: $241</p>
<p>T8100 2.1 GHz, 35W, 3MB<br>
Price: $209</p>
</blockquote>
For a long time I wouldn't take laptops seriously because they were so whimpy. Those days are very much over. [<a href="http://www.dailytech.com/Intels+Penryn+Mobile+Processor+Schedule+Revealed/article9893.htm">dailytech</a>]]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/330196/leaked-intel-penryn-chips-just-in-time-for-macworld]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-330196]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macworld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mbp]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[penryn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[portable media]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 05 Dec 2007 10:22:48 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=330196&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Dell Launches Quad-Core Precision T5400 and T7400 Workstations]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/11/dellprecision2.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />The latest in Dell's line of <a href="http://gizmodo.com/search/penryn">Penryn</a>-based PCs comes to us in the form of these super-beefy T5400 and T7400 Precision workstations. Both systems can hold up to two of Intel's quad-core Xeon 5200 and 5400 processors and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/peripherals/nvidia-ships-128+core-graphics-cards-for-high+end-film-editors-graphics-pros-apple-excited-241478.php">Quadro FX 5600</a> cards. The base T5400 and T7400 units start out at $1,589 and $1,839 respectively. Both systems are available now. [<a href="http://www.dell.com/content/topics/topic.aspx/global/products/precn/topics/en/us/precn_t5400_t7400_landing?c=us&l=en&s=gen">Dell</a> and <a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/07/11/27/dell.precision.with.penryn/">Electronista</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/327188/dell-launches-quad+core-precision-t5400-and-t7400-workstations]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-327188]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[workstations]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[45-nanometer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[penryn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[quad core]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t5400]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t7400]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xeon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:10:07 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=327188&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Alienware Intros New Penryn-based PCs]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>As soon as Intel finished announcing <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/launch/intel-penryn-arrives-in-16-flavors-for-desktops-and-servers-321435.php">the arrival of the new 45nm Penryn chips</a>, Alienware announced an upgrade of their own, incorporating a 3GHz Penryn into their <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #area51alx" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #area51alx" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/area51alx/">Area-51 ALX</a> desktop.  Using their advanced cooling system, Alienware claims that this PC will run at 4GHz. Starting at $5500, it will ship shortly after Christmas. [<a href="http://www.alienware.com/product_detail_pages/Area-51_ALX/area-51_overview.aspx?SysCode=PC-AREA51-ALX-R7&SubCode=SKU-DEFAULT#pdp-nav">Alienware</a>]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/322174/alienware-intros-new-penryn+based-pcs]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-322174]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[alienware]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[45nm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[alex]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[area-51 alx]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 extreme]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[penryn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 12 Nov 2007 12:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benny Goldman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=322174&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Intel Penryn Arrives In 16 Flavors for Desktops and Servers]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/11/penrynarrive.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;float:none;"/>The wait's over: <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/penryn">Penryn</a> is here, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/it.s-official/-289615.php">as promised</a>, in 16 flavors. On the high-end desktop front is the no-stranger-to-us 3GHz quad-core <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/intel-penryn-45nm/-316556.php">Core 2 Extreme QX9650</a> (seen on <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/thinkstation/lenovo-intros-first-penryn-based-pcs-319692.php">Lenovo's newest Thinkstations</a>) which runs a not-so-low-power $1000 in bulk (1000 chips or more).</p>
<p>We've also got 12 quad-core Xeons ranging from 2 to 3.2GHz with 1333Mhz or 1600MHz frontside bus options, as well as a triplet of dual-core Xeons that run up to 3.4GHz, but with half the L2 cache (6MB) of the other Penryns. The dual-cores also have a 30-day wait.</p>
<p>The cheapest Penryn you can score appears to be the $177 1.86GHz dual-core E5205 Xeon with a 1066MHz FSB. Quad-core wise, it'd be a 2.0 GHz E5405 Xeon for $209. All of those prices are given in bulk, too. So, race ya to Newegg? [<a href="http://www.intel.com/pressroom/archive/releases/20071111comp.htm?iid=pr1_releasepri_20071111m">Intel</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/321435/intel-penryn-arrives-in-16-flavors-for-desktops-and-servers]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-321435]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[launch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[45nm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 extreme]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cpus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[penryn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 12 Nov 2007 04:00:46 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=321435&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Lenovo Intros First Penryn Based PCs]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/11/lenovothinkstationd10.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Today Lenovo unveiled the first computers to use Intel's fast, energy efficient new 45nm Penryn chips. The newly branded <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #thinkstationd10" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/thinkstationd10/">ThinkStation D10</a> and S10 will offer <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #quadcore" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/quadcore/">quad core</a> performance along with a "passive venting system" that helps to cool the system quietly.</p>
<p>Further spec details are scarce, but Lenovo did mention that the D10 is outfitted with a 5400 Xeon processor and the S10 with a 3GHz <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #core2extreme" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/core2extreme/">Core 2 Extreme</a> QX9650. They also noted that both computers would use NVIDIA graphics and dual Gigabit Ethernet and multiple slots, bays and USB ports for expandability. Expect the D10 and the S10 to be released this January for $1,739 and $1,199 respectively. [<a href="http://www.lenovo.com/news/us/en/2007/11/thinkstation.html">Press Release</a> and <a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/07/11/06/lenovo.thinkstation.x10/">Electronista</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/319692/lenovo-intros-first-penryn-based-pcs]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-319692]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[thinkstation]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[45nm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 extreme]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[desktops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lenovo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[penryn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[quad core]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[s10"]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[thinkstation d10]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xeon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 06 Nov 2007 20:00:52 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=319692&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Intel rolls out first 45nm processor, the...]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="intel_9650.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/10/intel_9650.jpg" width="133" height="63" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"/>Intel rolls out first 45nm processor, the quad-core <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #core2extreme" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #core2extreme" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/core2extreme/">Core 2 Extreme</a> QX9650 desktop CPU. Penryn architecture brings 1,333MHz front-side bus up in there, lower energy consumption and whoa, it's faster, too. [<a href="http://www.i4u.com/article12419.html">I4U</a> and reviews at <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,138844-pg,1/article.html">PC World</a>, <a href="http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2007/10/29/intel_core_2_extreme_qx9650/1">Bit-tech</a>, <a href="http://www.legitreviews.com/article/583/1/">Legit Reviews</a>, and <a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/10/29/intel_penryn_4ghz_with_air_cooling/">Tom's Hardware</a> overclocking the mutha to 4GHz] </p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/316556/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-316556]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[intel penryn 45nm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[45nm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core 2 extreme]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel core 2 extreme qx9650]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[penryn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[qx9650]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 29 Oct 2007 10:16:34 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie White]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=316556&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Penryn production starts today at Intel's...]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/intel/next+gen-penryn-cpu-benchmarks-show-intel-still-toasting-amd-253459.php">Penryn</a> production starts today at Intel's schmancy new $3 billion Arizona plant that's the first to mass produce 45 nm chips. They'll hit the market in just over two weeks, Nov. 12. [<a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=technologyNews&storyid=2007-10-25T171149Z_01_N24603099_RTRUKOC_0_US-INTEL-FACTORY.xml">Reuters</a>]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/315138/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-315138]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[45nm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[penryn]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:16:59 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=315138&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Intel Talks Up Quad-Core Mobile Chip, Fancy New Cooling Tech]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/10/fantasticquad.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;float:none;"/>At its developer forum in Taiwan today Intel showed off its Penryn-based <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/laptops/intel-preps-quad+core-cpu-for-lappies-253242.php">quad-core mobile chip</a> we heard rumbles of in April that's set to drop in the latter half of 2008 as part of its <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/montevina/">Montevina</a> chipset, which will be replacing Santa Rosa. They also bandied about some new cooling ideas, like one based on compressor tech&mdash;think fridges and ACs&mdash;that'll drop notebook temps by 10 degrees Celsius.</p>
<p>The chip will run at a power envelope 45W, which AppleInsider notes is higher than its mainstream thermal design power of 35W, so its processing jujitsu&mdash;they demoed it running Enemy Territory: Quake Wars&mdash;will suck up a requisite amount of battery juice.</p>
<p>Aside from showing off external cooling units using compressors, like a notebook stand and cooling system, and demoing how they could be built into a laptop's heatsink and fan setup, Intel also talked up a material that air can pass through but liquids can't. It'd be useful for letting air come in through a notebook's keyboard for cooling while keeping your coffee from also reaching your computer's guts, allowing for more flexibility in notebook design. Unfortunately, this mystical material probably won't hit production systems for another year or so as Intel refines the necessary voodoo to produce it. [<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/07/10/15/intel_shows_off_mobile_quad_core_chip_new_cooling_technology.html">Apple Insider</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/311096/intel-talks-up-quad+core-mobile-chip-fancy-new-cooling-tech]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-311096]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[montevina]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[penryn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:40:28 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=311096&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Penryn 3.2GHz Processors for Upcoming Mac Pros?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img alt="macpro.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/10/macpro.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2">The chaps at The Inquirer have been busy chatting with the snoops in Tokyo, and word on the street is that Apple has purchased out all of the upcoming <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/intel/next+gen-penryn-cpu-benchmarks-show-intel-still-toasting-amd-253459.php">Penryn 3.2GHz processors</a>. With the processors clocking in at that speed, we shall guess they are intended for the anticipated refresh to the Mac Pro's insides. If true, Apple are sure to have put down a pretty penny on the deal to ensure the lion's share of Intel's goodies.</p>
<p><br></p>

<p>Theoretically, this would push Mac Pros to 3.2GHz with a 1600MHz front side bus, which would be increased from the current 1333MHz. We think it all fits nicely, it certainly sounds like a move Apple would pull off, but talk of the town is, as ever, far from fact. [<a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news/2007/10/05/intel-extreme-penryn-shortage">The Inquirer</a> via <a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2007/10/05/apple-buying-up-high-end-penryn-processors/">MacRumors</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/307869/penryn-32ghz-processors-for-upcoming-mac-pros]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-307869]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[penryn]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 06 Oct 2007 09:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haroon Malik]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=307869&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Intel quad-core 45nm Yorkfield chip to launch...]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Intel quad-core 45nm Yorkfield chip to launch at 3GHz with 1333MHz front side bus, to be about 10% faster than predecessor [<a href="http://www.bit-tech.net/news/2007/09/20/yorkfield_to_launch_at_3ghz/1">Bit-Tech</a>]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/301917/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-301917]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[idf fall 07]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[idf]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[penryn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[yorkfield]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 20 Sep 2007 11:24:24 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie White]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=301917&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Intel "Penryn" 45nm Xeon processors to ship...]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="penryn_mini.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/08/penryn_mini.jpg" width="100" height="83" />Intel "Penryn" 45nm Xeon processors to ship November 11 [<a href="http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2007/08/15/intel_penryn_xeon_launch/">Reg Hardware</a>]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/289615/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-289615]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[it's official]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[45nm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cpu]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[penryn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 15 Aug 2007 07:42:02 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie White]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=289615&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Next-Gen Penryn CPU Benchmarks Show Intel Still Toasting AMD]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/04/penrynsystem.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;float:none;"/> Intel has given the world a quick glimpse at what their next-gen Penryn processors are capable of. The dual- and quad-core chips (which clock in at speeds of over 3GHz and carry up to a 12MB L2 cache) showed as much as a 22% performance boost when pitted against Intel's current king, the quad-core QX6800. Keep in mind that these are Intel's numbers, so you may wanna tone your enthusiasm a bit, but until AMD's Barcelona steps up to the plate, it looks like Intel will continue wearing the heavyweight belt. <span class="byline">&ndash; Louis Ramirez</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/intel/showdoc.aspx?i=2972&p=1">Intel Penryn Performance Preview</a> [Anandtech]<br>
<a href="http://www.dailytech.com/Intel+Unveils+Penryn+Performance/article6958.htm">Intel Unveils Penryn Performance</a> [DailyTech]<br>
<a href="http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/31669/135/">IDF: Intel Releases 45nm Penryn Benchamrk Numbers</a> [TG Daily]<br>
Image courtesy <a href="http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/intel/showdoc.aspx?i=2972&p=1">Anandtech</a><br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/253459/next+gen-penryn-cpu-benchmarks-show-intel-still-toasting-amd]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-253459]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cpus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[penryn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:48:29 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Louis Ramirez]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=253459&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Intel Preps Quad-Core CPU for Lappies]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/04/flaming-laptop_200x149.jpg" class="right image158" width="158" /> 2008 is gonna be an interesting year if Intel keeps its promises. You see, on their 2008 roadmap sits a quad-core Penryn mobile processor designed for intense gaming and hardcore power users. Quad-core to go? You better believe it.</p>
<p>Intel's not saying how they plan on achieving this or what kinda battery life these lappies will have, but as long as they don't fry my kneecaps or burst into flames, this will definitely be worth waiting for, even if only for bragging rights. <span class="byline">&ndash; Louis Ramirez</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.laptoplogic.com/news/detail.php?id=2322&PHPSESSID=df704507a3c2f40af21abd21de86a45d">Intel to Offer Quad Core Mobile CPUs in 2008?</a> [LaptopLogic]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/253242/intel-preps-quad+core-cpu-for-lappies]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-253242]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cpus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[penryn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[quad-core]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Apr 2007 10:25:23 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Louis Ramirez]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=253242&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
