<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: Q]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/q</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'q']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Timbuk2's Hemlock and Q Backpacks Have Swing Around Easy Access to Your Laptop]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/timbuk2backpacks.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_timbuk2backpacks.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></a>I haven't carried a Boy Scout backpack in years, but the laptop feature in Timbuk2's latest sounds great: The sleeve is sideloading, meaning you can pull out your laptop without busting open your whole bag and spilling crap everywhere.</p>
<p>You'll actually notice that all of the bags have laptop compartments&mdash;that's because going forward, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged LAPTOP BAGS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/laptop-bags/">laptop bags</a> won't be a separate category for Timbuk2, but a "function" of all of their bags. All of them hold 15 or 17-inch laptops, depending on the size bag you get. Up top, respectively, is Hemlock, Q and Swig. Swig doesn't have the sideloading awesomeness that Hemlock and Q do, but it's the first backpack of Timbuk2's that you can personalize the colors on. They come out later this month. Here's all the details:</p>

<blockquote>
<p>Hemlock<br>
Made for the urbanite that needs a pack to schlep around town in style â€“ from the office, to the rock climbing gym, to courtside at the game, the pack features a rolled, expandable top, Swing Around Accessâ„¢, a side-access compartment designed to fit a 17-inch laptop (15-inch in the small) and signature Timbuk2 D-ring bottle opener. Available in solid, color block and the official camo of the Navy Special Ops and the retail price is $90 for Small and $100 for Medium.</p>
<p>Design features include:</p>
<p>* Durable Ballistic nylon<br>
* Waterproof flap liner<br>
* Compression straps<br>
* Accessory attachment loops<br>
* Quick access pockets under front flap<br>
* Padded back panel<br>
* Lightweight Ergonomic Shoulder Straps<br>
* And stash pocket hidden in the back</p>
<p>"Q" Computer Backpack<br>
Appropriately named after the gadget inventor of the Bond movies, the "Q" has a place for everything. This pack is designed to fit a 15-inch laptop with multiple grab handles for convenience and Swing Around Accessâ„¢. Available in dark brown/black, army/spinach, rev red/gun metal, and black and the retail price is $100.</p>
<p>Design features include:</p>
<p>* Durable Ballistic nylon<br>
* Swing Aroundâ„¢ access<br>
* Padded laptop compartment<br>
* Multiple grab handles<br>
* Lightweight Ergonomic Shoulder Straps<br>
* Pocket for cords and peripherals with outside access</p>
<p>H.A.L.<br>
H.A.L. (Heuristically programmed Algorithmic Computer) is the "Q's" older brother, named after HAL 9000 of the Space Odyssey saga, which was capable of speech recognition, lip reading, art appreciation as well as maintaining all systems on the ship. Similarly, the H.A.L. almost thinks for its owner and easily runs a mobile office. Designed to fit a 17-inch laptop, the backpack has multiple grab handles and plenty of capacity as well as Swing Around Accessâ„¢. Available in dark brown and black and the retail price is $120.</p>
<p>Design features include:</p>
<p>* Durable Ballistic nylon<br>
* Swing Aroundâ„¢ access<br>
* Padded laptop compartment<br>
* Multiple grab handles<br>
* Lightweight Ergonomic Shoulder Straps<br>
* Pocket for cords and peripherals with outside access</p>
<p>Swig<br>
A messenger-inspired carry-all pack built for dudes AND ladies (Hallelujah!). Two large internal compartments accommodate loads of stuff and the organization panel makes it easy to find your keys. This sleek pack features a front-flap closure that comes in two sizes to fit a 15- or 17-inch laptop with a dedicated padded laptop compartment and the signature Timbuk2 bottle opener. Available in black/gun metal, moss/camo, gun metal/blue, and dark brown/orange and the retail price is $80 for Small and $90 for Medium.</p>
<p>Other features include:</p>
<p>* Accessory attachment loops<br>
* Waterproof flap liner<br>
* Quick access pockets under front flap<br>
* Padded back panel<br>
* Lightweight Ergonomic Shoulder Straps<br>
* And stash pocket hidden in the back<br>
* Customizable beginning August 2009 at www.timbuk2.com</p>
</blockquote>
<p>[<a href="http://www.timbuk2.com">Timbuk2</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5306653/timbuk2s-hemlock-and-q-backpacks-have-swing-around-easy-access-to-your-laptop]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5306653]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[bags]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hal]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hemlock]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptop bags]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[timbuk2]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5306653&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Want to Be the Real Q? Apply Here]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/04/thumb160x_694cbf6744e3c3c807be4789838a9233.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />If you want to be the gadget inventor for Her Majesty's Intelligence Service, the MI5British Military Intelligence Section 5 is actually offering the <i>real</i> post now. The best thing: It's part-time.</p>

<p>The MI5 is looking for a a chief scientific adviser to "lead and coordinate its scientific work." Someone that has "world-class scientific expertise and credibility, excellent strategic skills, outstanding influencing and communication skills" and a successful record of "managing critical projects and processes in a complex environment." No word on having to wear tailor-made three-piece suits.</p>
<p>Professor John BeddingtonUK's chief scientific advisersays the role of Q would be to keep the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged BRITISH INTELLIGENCE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/british-intelligence/">British intelligence</a> ahead of enemieswhich I guess means Russia, Argentina, and Spain. He says that "it will involve a sort of future gazing to see where technology will be taking us in a year or so," so Tarot readers and crystal balls may be a plus.</p>
<p>And yes, it's not the MI6which is the secret intelligence service in which James Bond workedbut the MI5 works alongside them, so you may get part of the action. Yes, <i>that</i> kind of action. Only part-time though: Two ro three days a week, the ad says. The rest of the time you could keep your job as a supermarket cashier in Tesco's, which will be your secret identity. [<a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1170944/The-real-Q-uest-MI5-seeks-chief-scientific-adviser-lead-technology-work.html?ITO=1490">Daily Mail</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5216130/want-to-be-the-real-q-apply-here]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5216130]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Bond, James]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[british intelligence]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mi5]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mi6]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:25:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5216130&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Samsung Saga and Renown for Verizon Available Online, In Stores Dec. 1]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/11/thumb160x_samsung-renown-saga.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5068367/next-month-on-verizon-samsung-omnia-htc-touch-pro-and-more">Just like we thought</a>, Samsung's i770 Saga QWERTY phone and clamshell world phone Renown are available online. The Saga is for sale as of yesterday, going for $200 after a $70 mail-in rebate and with a 2-year contract, and the Renown will go live on November 19th for $180 after a $50 MIR with the 2-year lock-in. The Saga is most notable at this point for being the first phone to require <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5086655/more-information-on-verizons-alleged-mandatory-data-plan">Verizon's mandatory $29.99 a month plan</a>. Specs after the jump.</p>
<p>Samsung i770 "Saga"<br>
- Quad-Band CDMA, EV-DO<br>
- 2.55" 320x320 display<br>
- full QWERTY keyboard<br>
- Bluetooth 2.0 and Wi-Fi<br>
- optical mouse navigation button<br>
- MicroSD(HC) slot (up to 16GB)<br>
- Windows Mobile 6.1 Professional</p>
<p>Samsung Renown<br>
- Quad-Band GSM, "Global Mode"<br>
- Visual Voicemail<br>
- Bluetooth 2.0<br>
- 2.0 MP camera<br>
- 240x320 TFT display</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5088423/samsung-saga-and-renown-for-verizon-available-online-in-stores-dec-1]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5088423]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clamshell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[qwerty]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[renown]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[saga]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 15 Nov 2008 09:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5088423&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Minox Spy Camera Goes Digital, Still Tiny Enough to Please Q]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/10/340x_minoxsdigispy1.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Spy-technology aficionados will know about Minox's miniature camera and it's genuine espionage heritage, and now the camera's gone all modern with a digital face lift. A 5-megapixel sensor's been plopped into the Digital SpyCam, which remains tiny at just 3 and 3/8 x 1 and 3/16 x 7/8-inches and weighing in at 2.1 ounces: small enough to disappear into a leather-clad fist when it needs to be concealed. With a lithium battery, and 42mm equivalent lens, plus capability of saving onto 16GB memory cards, it's no slouch either. Budding spys, and perhaps genuine ones (<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5056749/mi6-camera-with-secret-images-bought-on-ebay-for-30">Mi6 take note</a>) will be able to grab one now for $199. [<a href="http://www.minox.com">Minox</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5065762/minox-spy-camera-goes-digital-still-tiny-enough-to-please-q]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5065762]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[spy cams]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[espionage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[minox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[minox digital spy camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[spycam]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 20 Oct 2008 05:02:20 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kit Eaton]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5065762&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Q Totally Phones in Bond's New Quantum of Solace VAIO]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/10/bond_zseries_vaio.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/bond_zseries_vaio.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Overheard in MI6 4th-floor martini lounge: "Man, it used to be fun heading down to Q's lab. Shit blowing up all the time, everyone just grinning and shaking their head knowingly (oh, <em>James</em>) when I accidentally incinerated prototype after expensive and high-time-investment prototype. Now? Dude's just going to down to the high street shops and slapping some logos on. Look at this laptopâ€”it's garden variety Z-series: 13.3 inches, Core 2 Duo, 128GB SSD, 4GB RAM, 3G connection, Blu-ray. And he's billing M £3,000 ($5,300) for it. Same for <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5032621/james-bonds-sony-ericsson-c902-cybershot-to-go-public">my phone</a>. I mean, they're nice and all, but WTF?" [<a href="http://www.gadgetreview.com/2008/10/sonys-quantum-of-solace-007-vaio-laptop-makes-its-debut.html">Gadget Review</a>, <a href="http://www.t3.com/news/video-official-james-bond-sony-vaio-z-series-laptop?=36846">T3</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5057963/q-totally-phones-in-bonds-new-quantum-of-solace-vaio]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5057963]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[james bond]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[quantum of solace]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[quantum of solace laptop]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vaio]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[z-series]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 02 Oct 2008 09:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Mahoney]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5057963&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Question of the Day: Do You Miss the "Q" Character in the New James Bond Films?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/09/340x_quantum-of-solace-q.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />As most of you already know, <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #quantumofsolace" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/quantumofsolace/">Quantum of Solace</a></em> is scheduled to hit theaters on November 14th. The second trailer for the film came out last week and while it does seem to feature some <em>Minority Report</em>-style gadgetry, there is still no "Q" gadget guru in the film. Personally, I love the direction that the Bond character is going in, so I haven't really missed the over-the-top gadgetry. But what about you? Do you miss the "Q" character?</p>
<p><script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript" src="http://polls.gawker.com/poll.js.php?key==cTOyUTM">
</script><noscript>
<p><b>Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.</b></p>
</noscript></p>
<p><object width="494" height="400"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/kQW2MtibAmk&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/kQW2MtibAmk&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="494" height="400"></embed></object></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5051750/question-of-the-day-do-you-miss-the-q-character-in-the-new-james-bond-films]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5051750]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[question of the day]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[james bond]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[john cleese]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[quantum of solace]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5051750&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Motorola's Q Going Windows Mobile 6.1 Through AT&T]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/08/thumb160x_q.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #motorolaq" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/motorolaq/">Motorola Q</a> is finally getting the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windowsmobile" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windowsmobile/">Windows Mobile</a> 6.1 treatment through AT&amp;T, who's stores are said to be taking in shipments of a new silver version of the handset. This is good news for enterprise customers who are tied into the WinMo world. No word yet on when these will hit the shelves, or if there will be an upgrade available for current AT&amp;T Q9h owners, but it's likely we'll hear something soon. [<a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2008/08/19/new-silver-motorola-q9h-with-windows-mobile-61-hits-att-stores/">BGR</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5039186/motorolas-q-going-windows-mobile-61-through-att]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5039186]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[windows mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola q]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[upgrade]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows mobile 6.1]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[winmo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 19 Aug 2008 22:00:01 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Hickey]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5039186&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Motorola's "Napolean" Q World Phone Gets Leaked: CDMA + GSM Included]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/07/fe/08/340x_fe0849619abbbb8509b9cc06d731380a.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/></p>
<p>Motorola's got another Q in the queue in the form of the new Napolean world phone. It's a CDMA smartphone for Verizon that does double duty with GSM, so you can use it pretty much anywhere. It also includes Wi-Fi if you're not feeling like using its EV-DO Revision A or EDGE data, runs <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windowsmobile" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windowsmobile/">Windows Mobile</a> 6.1, and includes a fingerprint scanner and a 2-megapixel camera with flash. It sounds like a great phone for world travelers, but probably overkill for anyone else. [<a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2008/07/03/motorola-napolean-q9-verizons-world-phone/">BGR</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5022131/motorolas-napolean-q-world-phone-gets-leaked-cdma-%252B-gsm-included]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5022131]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Napolean]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cdma]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gsm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[world]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 Jul 2008 19:30:47 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Hickey]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5022131&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Veldini Q Wristwatch Was Inspired By James Bond: And it Has the Spy Gadgets to Prove It]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/05/340x_veldini-q.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;float:none;"/>Even if eavesdropping on your co-worker's personal phone calls is the closest you will ever get to becoming a spy, a watch filled with spy gadgets is hard for any man to resist. Perhaps that is why Veldini plans on releasing at least 3 different models of their new "Q" <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged JAMES BOND" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/james-bond/">James Bond</a> inspired wristwatch. Each will feature its own set of tools geared towards a specific scenario: outdoor use, spy use, and everyday use.<br>
<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('qwatch', 3, '');
</script></p>

<p>The outdoor version will include a flat Phillips screwdriver, flint stick and combo edge blade while the spy version will utilize a diamond tip glass cutter, Phillips head screwdriver, lock pick, magnifying glass and a straight edge blade. Users interested in the everyday version will get a flat Phillips screwdriver, bottle opener, refillable pen, magnifying glass and a combo-edge blade. As an added touch, the design of the "Q" watch resembles the hammer mechanism of 007's Walther PPK pistol.</p>
<p>The watches are currently in pre-production and a timetable for their release has not yet been determined. However, expect to pay far out the ass to feel like <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #jamesbond" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/jamesbond/">James Bond</a>to the tune of $2-$3,000 for the sterling silver model, $5-$7000 for Gold or Rose Gold and $10-$15,000 for platinum. [<a href="http://www.veldini.com/">Veldini</a> via <a href="http://www.bornrich.org/entry/veldini-q-bond-inspired-luxury-wrist-watch/">BornRich</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/393169/the-veldini-q-wristwatch-was-inspired-by-james-bond-and-it-has-the-spy-gadgets-to-prove-it]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-393169]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[watches]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[james bond]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[luxury]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[luxury watches]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[spy watches]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[timepieces]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[veldini]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[veldini q]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 25 May 2008 19:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=393169&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Official: Motorola Q Coming to AT&T]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/09/motoqatt.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />For those of you who were waiting, praying for the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #motorolaq" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/motorolaq/">Motorola Q</a> to come to AT&amp;T, we have two things to say. One, you can quit it, because AT&amp;T's just put up a promo page detailing that their Q wil have WM6, 3G, integrated GPS, quad-band GSM, BlackBerry Connect, Push Email, XPress Mail, and the same old <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #motoq" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/motoq/">Moto Q</a> design. The second thing: get some taste in phones. Motorola Q's are <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/wm6-sux/first-moto-q9m-unbox-and-grope-mini+review-and-gallery-292281.php">pretty darn lousy</a>, as both Wilson and Charlie can attest to. [<a href="https://www.wireless.att.com/businesscenter/motoqglobal/success.jsp?emailAddr=matullol@hotmail.com&amp;_requestid=16369">AT&amp;T</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/299225/official-motorola-q-coming-to-att]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-299225]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[moto q]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola q]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows mobile 6]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wm]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 12 Sep 2007 17:00:01 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=299225&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Motorola Q Goes Global with Moto q9 and Moto GSM]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/02/motoq-q9.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Now people all over the world can be annoyed by the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #motorolaq" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/motorolaq/">Motorola Q</a>, with the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #motoqq9" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/motoqq9/">Moto Q q9</a> officially rolling out in Barcelona with the ability to handle that quick like a bunny HSDPA connectivity. There's also a Moto Q GSM model debuting, so now you can connect up all over the world on the Q with quad-band GPRS and Edge capability. Plus, both of the these latest Q family members have the latest Microsoft Windows Mobile 6 software on board.</p>
<p>If you're familiar with the first generation Motorola Q, you might notice the styling updates in these new models, too, where no longer do you see that big honking Jay Leno chin on the thing, and the keys look like they're little easier to navigate as well. And of course, there's that obvious difference, where this one is available in that oh so cool black color.</p>
<p>If only Motorola had released this design initially, perhaps we'd be a bit more fond of our Motorola Q. <span class="byline"> Charlie White</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.motorola.com/mediacenter/news/detail.jsp?globalObjectId=7722_7651_23">Press Release</a> [Motorola]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/235856/motorola-q-goes-global-with-moto-q9-and-moto-gsm]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-235856]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3gsm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gsm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[moto q q9]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola q]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 12 Feb 2007 11:16:35 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie White]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=235856&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Motorola Q Pro Spotted Again, Next to Lesser Q]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2007/01/30wb02c.jpg"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/01/30wb02c.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The upgraded <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/q/">Motorola Q</a> has been spotted <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/smartphones/picture-surfaces-of-motorola-q-pro-in-the-wild-207896.php">yet again</a>. This time it is resting cozily next to its lesser, insignificant brother, the regular Q. It looks like Motorola ditched the red letter <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/smartphones/motorola-pro-q-spotted-in-hungary-213674.php">seen earlier</a> for some normal, white letters.</p>
<blockquote>Not much info. My friend just told me it was "fast", so I'm betting it has HSDPA/UMTS.</blockquote>
Hopefully this Q will be a bit better so people will stop their bitching already. <span class="byline">Travis Hudson</span>
<p><a href="http://www.howardforums.com/showthread.php?t=1096295">Motorola Q2/GSM Q Live Picture</a> [HowardForums]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/231575/motorola-q-pro-spotted-again-next-to-lesser-q]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-231575]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q2]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 25 Jan 2007 17:30:10 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Travis Hudson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=231575&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Black Motorola Q: Improved, or Just More Expensive?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/12/blackq.jpg" class="right image158" width="158" />While the only visible difference between the black <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #motorolaq" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/motorolaq/">Motorola Q</a>, and the $50 cheaper regular Motorola Q is the coat of paint, there are actually various improvements on the inside as well.</p>
<p>There's improved power management that gives you longer battery life, Bluetooth headset volume control, email client fixes, and a rubberized grip for less slippage. Seeing as it's only $50, and the black does look better than the silver, we'd recommend this improved one over the original. But you knew we would say that. <span class="byline"> Jason Chen</span></p>
<p><a href="http://crunchgear.com/2006/12/13/black-q-its-whats-inside-that-counts/">Black Q: It's What's Inside That Counts</a> [Crunchgear]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/221671/black-motorola-q-improved-or-just-more-expensive]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-221671]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[black]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola q]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:40:06 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=221671&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Motorola Q Spotted, Defiled By Sprint]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2006/12/sprintq.jpg"><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/12/sprintq.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Eager Sprint users should finally be getting their <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/smartphones/motorola-q-reviewed-verdict-excellent-176536.php">Motorola Q</a> <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windowsmobile" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windowsmobile/">Windows Mobile</a>-based smartphone soon. After months of waiting for the exclusive Verizon/Motorola agreement to be over, pictures have finally surfaced of the Q's Sprint branding.</p>
<p>If you forgot what the Q can do, read our <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/smartphones/motorola-q-reviewed-verdict-excellent-176536.php">review</a>. But as a short refresher, it's got <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/windows-mobile">Windows Mobile</a>, a QWERTY keyboard, EV-DO, Bluetooth 1.2, a 320x240 screen, but no touchscreen capabilities. <span class="byline"> Jason Chen</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/29/pictures-emerge-of-sprints-motorola-q/">Pictures emerge of Sprint's Motorola Q</a> [Engadget Mobile via <a href="http://www.phonearena.com/htmls/Sprint-PCS-gets-slim-black-Motorola-Q-smartphone-article-a_1689.html">Phone Arena</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/218738/motorola-q-spotted-defiled-by-sprint]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-218738]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola q]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sprint]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows mobile]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 01 Dec 2006 16:45:28 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=218738&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Motorola Q Pro Early 2007?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/10/motorola-q-4.JPG" class="right image158" width="158" /></p>
<p>According to one report from Gartner Symposium ITxpo, the Motorola Q Pro is confirmed for launch in the first quarter of 2007. Aside from unspecific hardware upgrades, the Moto Q Pro will come in black (the new black) and sport the Motorola MOTOPRO Mobility Suite - allowing remote device and application management along the ability to disable the camera. Interesting catch-phrases, but it's all propaganda until we see how this new software actually functions.</p>
<p>The other upgrades focus on corporate data security - including features like virtual private networking and data-encrypted emailing. Yawn - no one is interested in what I have to say, trust me. There is not word on price, but we do know it will cost more than the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/smartphones/motorola-q-reviewed-verdict-excellent-176536.php">Motorola Q</a>. <span class="byline"> Mark Wilson</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.buywindowsmobile.com/Blog/tabid/139/Default.aspx">Motorola Q Pro Spotted in the Wild</a> [buywindowsmobile]<br>
<em>Thanks Michael!</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/207695/motorola-q-pro-early-2007]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-207695]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA["motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA["motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA["motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pdas]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[portable media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pro"]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 15 Oct 2006 14:50:35 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=207695&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sizemodo: T-Mobile Dash vs. Motorola Q vs. Palm Treo 700w]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/10/sizemodo.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
<img alt="sizemododash.jpg" src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/10/sizemododash.jpg" width="345" height="417" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2">How does the newest <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/cellphones/tmobile-dash-handson-review-verdict-windows-mobile-and-qwerty-arrive-in-a-thin-body-206702.php">slim smartphone on the block</a> stack up to the reigning Windows Mobile champs, the Motorola Q and the Palm Treo 700w? Pretty well, actually.</p>
<p>The T-Mobile Dash is tied for shortest with the Treo 700w, tied for widest with the Motorola Q, and just 0.06 inches thicker than the first place Moto. The Palm is the porker at almost twice the fatness as both phones, but the Dash does measure just about the same as the Motorola Q. <span class="byline"> Jason Chen</span></p>
<p><i>Thanks to <a href="http://sizeasy.com/page/sizeup">Sizeasy</a></i>.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/206867/sizemodo-t+mobile-dash-vs-motorola-q-vs-palm-treo-700w]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-206867]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dash]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[700w]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dash]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dash]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sizemodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[treo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:15:26 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=206867&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Video of Motorola Vending Machine]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<center><object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hxkod80F1qo"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hxkod80F1qo" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object></center>This lousy video of the Motorola vending machine is blurry because it was taken on a Motorola RAZR. Still, you can see that it looks similar the the Sony one we <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/sony/sony-vending-machine-in-action-crecente-style-183120.php">saw before</a>, and features various RAZRs and SLVRs waiting to drop down into your ham-soaked hands. 

<p>This one only had PEBLs and SLVRs since they were out of Q's. We wonder if there's a warning to tell people that the Q's only work on a certain provider? <span class="byline">&ndash; Jason Chen</span></p>

<p><a href="http://crunchgear.com/2006/09/27/crappy-video-of-motorola-vending-machine/">Crappy Video Of Motorola Vending Machine</a> [Crunchgear]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/203758/video-of-motorola-vending-machine]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-203758]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[razr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[machine]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[razr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[razr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[slvr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vending]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 27 Sep 2006 20:45:41 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=203758&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Motorola Q Heading to Sprint Nextel Q4 2006]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/08/sprintq.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Good news to all you poor bastards who are tied to Sprint Nextel because that's the service that some schmuck at workwho's long gone by the waydecided the company should use. Sprint Nextel's CEO Len Lauer said that they're going to get the Motorola Q come Q4 2006. Their poor financial results discussed at during today's conference call were seen by some analysts as caused by not carrying the popular Motorola phones like the RAZR or SLVR.</p>
<p>Check out all our previous <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/q">Q</a> coverage to see what's in store for you and whether you want to switch phones. <span class="byline"> Jason Chen</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.chicagobusiness.com/cgi-bin/news.pl?id=21604">Sprint Nextel to add Moto's Q and Slvr to lineup</a> [Chicago Business via <a href="http://www.qusers.com/">Q Users</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/191985/motorola-q-heading-to-sprint-nextel-q4-2006]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-191985]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nextel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sprint]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 Aug 2006 20:32:53 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=191985&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Possible HTC Excalibur Picture]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/07/htcexcalibur.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Is the HTC phone with the codename <i>Excalibur</i> this phone? Smartphone thoughts thinks it is, and says it's only a few millimeters thicker than the Samsung i320 and 2 millimeters shorter. The keyboard on the front makes this a Motorola Q/Samsung i320 contender, and the Quad-band and WiFi connectivity makes GSM users (Cingular, T-Mobile) jump for joy.</p>
<p>Another interesting feature is the touch-strip control on the right that they chose to go with instead of a jog-dialif this is indeed the Excalibur, and not the phone-in-the-stone. They were actually two different swords, a fact I was reminded of while playing Tomb Raider over the weekend. <span class="byline"> Jason Chen</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.smartphonethoughts.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=75563&amp;sid=4d7a2a5c233b832e257f2f170c9d7138">- Exclusive First Picture of HTC's New QWERTY Smartphone</a> [Smartphone Thoughts via <a href="http://jkontherun.blogs.com/jkontherun/2006/07/htc_excalibur_e.html">JkOnTheRun</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/191027/possible-htc-excalibur-picture]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-191027]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[excalibur]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows mobile]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 31 Jul 2006 18:47:38 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=191027&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Motorola Q: A Deal at $75, on Amazon.com]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/07/motoQimage.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><br>
Just a heads up for bargain hunting Gizmodo readers. Over at Amazon, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/cellphones/motorola-q-officialness-175382.php">Moto Q</a> is now as cheap as it is thin, at $75 after Verizon and Amazon rebates. We find that the phone runs a little slower than we'd like, and the design isn't as nice as the RAZRs. But at this price, I'd call it the best deal of all the smartphones.<span class="byline"> Brian Lam</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000FYU4SO/002-9149503-0846468?redirect=true">Moto Q at Amazon</a> [ Via <a href="http://mobilitytoday.com/news/006756/motorola_q_ninetynine">Mobility Today</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/190971/motorola-q-a-deal-at-75-on-amazoncom]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-190971]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[deals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 31 Jul 2006 13:49:39 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=190971&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Samsung Set to Ship SGH-i320 QWERTY Smartphone]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2006/07/samsung_smartphone3.jpg"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/images/2006/07/samsung_smartphone3.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>
<div class="FloatHack"></div>
<p>Not much to say that we haven't <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/pocket-pc/samsung-sghi320-smartphone-gets-fcc-approval-180580.php">already said</a> about the slim <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/cellphones/samsung-i320-smartphone-154893.php">Samsung SGH-i320</a> Smartphone, except that it's now about to be unleashed, ready to hit the streets and get up in the face of the Motorola Q for a Battle Royale of the Alpha <strike>smartclones</strike> smartphones.</p>
<p>A near-clone of the Motorola Q, it has a 2.2-inch LCD, 1.3-megapixel camera and a microSD slot, and its 11.5mm thickness exactly matches the Q, too. Heck, from spitting distance, you might think someone was holding a black Q. That must've been the general idea.</p>
<p>Although the SGH-i320 missed its Q2 ship date announced at 3GSM in Barcelona in February, it will surface in parts of Europe this month, with the rest of Europe and Southeast Asia getting it shortly after that. Samsung's not telling when it will be available in the United States. <span class="byline"> Charlie White</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.mobilemag.com/content/100/340/C8550/">Samsung SGH-i320 Smartphone Gets FCC Approval</a> [MobileMagazine]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/185194/samsung-set-to-ship-sgh+i320-qwerty-smartphone]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-185194]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q"]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung sgh-i320: samsung sgh-i320 shipping]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 05 Jul 2006 12:27:40 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie White]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=185194&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The invisibleSHIELD Reviewed With A Key and a Motorola Q]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<center><object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/1eDXaalNPAE"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/1eDXaalNPAE" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350"></embed></object></center>

<p>We've seen the invisibleSHIELD around here a couple of times, but are you confident in its protective power? Dave from Mobility Today is&mdash;he's got bigger huevos than us&mdash;and he put his money where his Q was by taking a key and trying to scratch up his brand new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #motorolaq" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #motorolaq" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/motorolaq/">Motorola Q</a>. The result, no damage whatsoever. </p>

<p>Now you can feel safe with your $199 iPod Nano when the shield is strong enough protect a $500 smartphone. <span class="byline">&ndash; Jason Chen</span></p>

<p><a href="http://mobilitytoday.com/articles/invisible_shield_protection.html"> The invisibleSHIELD</a> [Mobility Today]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/183052/the-invisibleshield-reviewed-with-a-key-and-a-motorola-q]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-183052]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[invisibleshield]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola q]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:48:52 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=183052&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Q Rocks Mario]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/aSL4mp6rqsc"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/aSL4mp6rqsc" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350"></embed></object></p>

<p>Man, I didn't know Motorola was teaming up with Nintendo! Apparently, the Q can run the Pocket NES emulator, which means <A HREF="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/smartphones/motorola-q-reviewed-verdict-excellent-176536.php">this ultra-thin sex kitten</A> just got more ultra-thinish and sex-kittenish.</p>

<p>via <A HREF="http://www.mobilemag.com/content/100/345/C8234/">MobileMag</A></p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/180110/q-rocks-mario]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-180110]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[emulator]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mario]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nintendo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 12 Jun 2006 14:57:13 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[johnb]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=180110&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Motorola Q Slingbox Mobile Video]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<center><object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/INemttubwE8"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/INemttubwE8" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350"></embed></object></center>

<p>Here's a video of the recently released <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/cellphones/updated-slingbox-mobile-ups-res-features-176682.php">Slingbox Mobile</a> update that allows Windows Mobile Smartphones to get in on the fun of TV on the go.</p>

<p>In the video, live TV, TiVo Interaction, and viewing recorded movies. <span class="byline">&ndash; Jason Chen</span></p>

<p>Update: Fixed video. Original video courtesy of <a href="http://www.mobileburn.com/gallery.jsp?Id=2382">Mobile Burn</a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.techeblog.com/index.php/tech-gadget/video-slingbox-mobile-on-the-motorola-q">(Video) SlingBox Mobile on the Motorola Q  </a> [TechEBlog]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/177428/motorola-q-slingbox-mobile-video]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-177428]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola q]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[slingbox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[slingbox mobile]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 31 May 2006 14:43:03 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=177428&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Motorola Q Officialness]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="motq_new.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/images/2006/05/motq_new.jpg" width="156" height="205" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"/>Yes, finally, the Motorola Q has gone official. Basically meaning the plethora of rumors and speculation that we have posted <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/q/">in the past</a> are no longer rumors because a fancy press release says so. Here it is&mdash;get ready&mdash;it is big and monumental.</p>

<p>The Motorola Q will be available from Verizon wireless online on May 31 and in stores in June! Wowee! Wasn't that spectacular? Additionally the Motorola Q will retail for $199 after a $100 instant rebate as long as you sign your soul over to Verizon for two years. That is a pretty good price compared to the other Windows Mobile-powered phones out there.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.mobilitysite.com/2006/05/press_release_windows_mobilepowered_moto.php">Press Release: Windows Mobile-powered Motorola Q available</a> [Mobility Site]<br />
</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/175382/motorola-q-officialness]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-175382]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 22 May 2006 11:47:39 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Travis Hudson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=175382&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Motorola Q and Samsung i-320 Video]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<center><object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/fQvcYks9MAw"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/fQvcYks9MAw" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350"></embed></object></center>

<p>Taken at Israel Tech Ed last week, the video shows off both the Motorola Q and the Samsung i-320. The Q's UI looks pretty responsive, and the screen's quality is pretty good. </p>

<p>The Samsung's keys also look interesting, with a BlackBerry-like dual purpose keys. Instead of horizontally dividing the keys, Samsung divided them vertically. You'll have to watch the video to see what we mean.</p>

<p><a href="http://mobilitytoday.com/news/motorola_q_israel.html"> First video of an Israeli Motorola Q?</a> [Mobility Today]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/175157/motorola-q-and-samsung-i+320-video]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-175157]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[i-320]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[israel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 19 May 2006 20:00:41 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=175157&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Motorola Q Not Really Launching On Verizon Next Week?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/images/2006/05/motorolaqverizon.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Either Motorola CEO <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #edzander" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/edzander/">Ed Zander</a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/smartphones/motorola-q-to-launch-next-week-174293.php">is confused</a>, or some spokesperson is going to get a whuppin'.</p>
<p>Contradicting Zander's statements earlier this week, a Verizon spokesperson claimed that there is going to be no launch event next week. Perhaps Zander was using the announcement to force Verizon's hand early, maybe as a result of the Q being delayed so many times.</p>
<p>Either way, the Q should be out fairly soon. They've even got a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/smartphones/motorolas-q-contest-173913.php">contest</a> to win one.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.brighthand.com/default.asp?newsID=12233">Verizon Denies Motorola Q Launching Next Week</a> [Brighthand]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/175062/motorola-q-not-really-launching-on-verizon-next-week]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-175062]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ed zander]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 19 May 2006 13:56:56 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=175062&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Motorola Q To Launch Next Week]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="motq_new.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/images/2006/05/motq_new.jpg" width="156" height="205" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"/>None other than Motorola's CEO and President Ed Zander proclaims that Motorola's Q is launching next week. The smartphone is being released on EVDO, which means Verizon and Sprint will get it first, the GSM UMTS and possibly HSDPA version should roll out sometime later this year. </p>

<p>After suffering delays, the Q will go up against Nokia's E61, the Treo 700p and 700w, and all the BlackBerry devices. It will compete against all sorts of Windows Mobile phones that are purchasable over the internet from overseas. </p>

<p>Why is the Q better than all the rest? You tell us. Why are you looking forward to the Q rather than buying another Windows Mobile device already?</p>

<p><a href="http://www.infoworld.com/article/06/05/16/78378_HNmotoq_1.html?source=rss&url=http://www.infoworld.com/article/06/05/16/78378_HNmotoq_1.html">Motorola Q set to take on BlackBerry</a> [InfoWorld]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/174293/motorola-q-to-launch-next-week]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-174293]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sprint]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 17 May 2006 07:00:16 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=174293&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Motorola's Q Contest]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/images/2006/05/qcontest.png" class="left image340" width="340" />The marketing campaign for the Motorola Q is heating up. And by heating up, we mean it's no longer nonexistent. Cashing in on <i>The Da Vinci Code</i> fever, Motorola is holding a contest where you can enter to win your own Q (not John de Lancie). This is only available in the US, so tough luck Denmark.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.findtheq.com/">Find the Q</a> [Thanks George!]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/173913/motorolas-q-contest]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-173913]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 15 May 2006 20:19:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=173913&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[E3 2006: Motorola Q Spotted In The Wild]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/images/qatmse3pressevent.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<p>We forget who this Microsoft guy onstage with <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #billgates" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/billgates/">Bill Gates</a> at Microsoft's E3 press event just now is, but he was very proud to be using a Motorola Q. Stil no idea when this thing is coming out, but we can tell you now that if wearing Hammer Pants are a requirement for Q usage, we're going to have to pass.</p>
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/cellphones/motorola-q-on-verizons-site-168308.php">Motorola Q On Verizon's Site</a> [Gizmodo]<br>
<a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/smartphones/motorola-q-gets-delayed-again-163271.php">Motorola Q Gets Delayed... Again</a> [Gizmodo]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/172640/e3-2006-motorola-q-spotted-in-the-wild]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-172640]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bill gates]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 09 May 2006 18:26:43 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[gizmodo.com]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=172640&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Motorola Q On Verizon's Site]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/images/2006/04/mot_q.jpg" class="right image158" width="158" />Pretty sneaky. Reader Torben sent us a link to a test server on Verizon's website showing the Motorola Q in all her badged glory. Feast your eyes on her, friends, for she is majestic.</p>
<p><a href="http://testman.verizonwireless.com/images_b2c/phones/lg/mot_q.jpg">Image Page</a> [Verizon]<br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/168308/motorola-q-on-verizons-site]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-168308]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[leaks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:22:04 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[johnb]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=168308&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Motorola Q Gets Delayed ... Again]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/images/2006/03/q_2.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />The <a href="http://us.gizmodo.com/gadgets/q/index.php">Motorola Q news</a> has been running rampant lately. We've seen it being rumored to be released last month, seen it in the wild and even heard about it's latest abandonment of a European release, but today we are hit with another shocker as the Q gets officially delayed another month. The Q had an initial release date of Q1 2006 and with this delay the Q might be pushing that estimated release to its furthest boundaries. At this point we are just hoping to see it by the 2006 holiday season.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2006/03/27/moto_q_to_ship_april/">Motorola Q smart phone 'available April'</a> [Reg Hardware]<br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/163271/motorola-q-gets-delayed--again]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-163271]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[delay]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 27 Mar 2006 14:57:09 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Travis Hudson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=163271&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Verizon To Release Motorola Q Next Week?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://us.gizmodo.com/images/motorola-q-500x350.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />We're not sure how reliable the source is, but in an interview this week, a Motorola design manager told one of your faithful Gizmodo newshounds that the Q could be released as soon as next week. What makes us think it might be legit? He was holding a working model in his hands, and it was up and running on Verizon's network.</p>
<p>Our first impressions from holding it in our hot little hands for a few minutes: this sucker's extremely thin, although a bit wider than our Treo 650. The screen is a bit squat for our liking, though, even if it's crisp; with the soft-key icons running along the bottom and an info bar across the top, we weren't able to display a ton of information on it all at once. On the flip side, though, the buttons have a nice tactile feel; and the side jog-dial is pretty handy indeed. Maybe the GSM version will be even more sexy? Only time will tell.<br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/156814/verizon-to-release-motorola-q-next-week]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-156814]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 24 Feb 2006 13:06:41 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Travis Hudson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=156814&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Motorola Q Phone Says Buh-Bye to Europe?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://us.gizmodo.com/gadgets/motoqnews.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><br>
BargainPDA is passing on the rumor (via the French website Mobinaute) that "the Motorola Q has been cancelled in Europe and the only model that will see the light of day is the CDMA version to be released in the US on the Verizon network." You may remember that the Q phone was originally slated for this month, then Motorola announced it would be available for Christmasbut never delivered on the promise. The fate of this phone is anyone's guess, but after getting some hands-on time with it at CES I don't see why Motorola would continue delaying it. Unless, of course, they want to replace the Windows Mobile 5 with that new Linux OS (the one they announced with the ROKR E2), which would be more than fine by me.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bargainpda.com/default.asp?newsID=2785">Rumor - GSM Version of Motorola Q Cancelled</a> [BargainPDA]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/149774/motorola-q-phone-says-buh+bye-to-europe]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-149774]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:17:54 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Noah R]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=149774&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Motorola Q in Home Stretch]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Q-main1.jpg" src="http://us.gizmodo.com/gadgets/images/Q-main1.jpg" width="135" height="195" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="2"/>We've told you about the upcoming <A HREF="http://us.gizmodo.com/gadgets/smartphones/motorola-q-in-the-wild-138247.php">Motorola Q smartphone</A>, but now comes word that it's been approved for Verizon by the FCC. Initially being released only for the CDMA network, it includes a 1.3-megapixel camera, QVGA display, Windows Mobile for Smartphones Operating System version 5.0, and a memory expansion slot for miniSD cards, as well as a keyboard for easy email writing. Also includes EV-DO.</p>

<p><A HREF="http://phonearena.com/htmls/Motorola-Q-CDMA-for-Verizon-was-approved-by-the-FCC-article-a_861.html"> Motorola Q CDMA for Verizon was approved by the FCC</A> [Phonearena]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/143257/motorola-q-in-home-stretch]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-143257]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cdma]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 15 Dec 2005 10:05:47 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[tgrumet]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=143257&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Motorola Q in the Wild]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://us.gizmodo.com/images/motoq1.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Some rascally rabbit out there got a hold of the not-yet-released Motorola Q and decided to feed the smartphone fan love by releasing some pictures and information. The Q is available through Verizon and the rumors bouncing around are placing a $2,500 price tag on this beast. Early reports are saying that the web browsing via EV-DO is amazing, but complaints are coming in regarding the key layout. This phone should be out in early 2006. Check out the linkage for more pictures.</p>
<p><a href="http://mobilitytoday.com/news/verizon_moto_q_shots.html">Motorola Q Verizon Style</a> [Mobility Today]</p>
<p><a href="http://gizmodo-cnet.com.com/Motorola_Q/4027-6454_7-31473357.html?tag=price&amp;part=&amp;subj=">Sign up for Motorola Q Product Alert</a> [CNET]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/138247/motorola-q-in-the-wild]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-138247]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 18 Nov 2005 12:37:02 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Travis Hudson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=138247&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Motorola Q In the Wild]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/images/47473911q.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Here we go. Let the cavalcade of Q leaks begin. BengalBoy is the first with his collection of Q photos sans his normal displays of horrible, filthy vulgarity involving his Kittens. What kind of man wants to watch scantily clad women writhing around a handheld? I blame Grand Theft Auto.</p>
<p>Anyway, close up shots, nothing terribly earth-shattering. Just wondering where Mr. Boy is grabbing his leaked hardware from.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bengalboy.com/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=117&amp;forum=8">"Desire" ... "Lust" ... "Obsession" .... The New Motorola "Q" !! Wet Dreams for the "Bleeding Edge"!</a> [BengalBoy]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/116899/motorola-q-in-the-wild]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-116899]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 11 Aug 2005 12:22:50 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[johnb]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=116899&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Motorola Q Launched, But You Can't Have It]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="t_motorolaQ.jpg" src="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/images/t_motorolaQ.jpg" width="120" height="120" align="right" hspace="4" vspace="2" />The Motorola Q, named after the affable yet superintelligently dangerous villain on Star Trek: The Force Is With You, will appear on store shelves in 6-9 months reminding us that, like the common house shrew and the human female, electronics have a lengthy gestation period.</p>

<p>The Q, which is known in some circles as the Blackberry-killer, won't be killing any Blackberries until Q1 2006. In the intervening months it will train with the famous swordsmith Hattori Hanzo in preparation for its massive showdown with the Blackberry in a sprawling, 4-star hotel in California.</p>

<p>What else? Not much. It's a skinny QWERTY phone running Windows Mobile and it quit clearly has quite a few hooks in at old Exchange Server Place so it can send and receive email like a champ. Other than that, I'm holding my breath until the RAZR 2007 comes out. It will be so thin that it will be just a piece of aluminum foil folded over once.</p>

<p><A HREF="http://davesipaq.com/news/motorola_announces_windows_mobile.html">The Thinnest, Lightest, Coolest QWERTY on the Planet</A> [Daves iPaq]<br />
<A HREF="http://www.livingroom.org.au/cameraphone/archives/moto_q.php">Moto Q</A> [Livingroom.org]<br />
<A HREF="http://www.motorola.com/motoinfo/product/details/0,,113,00.html">Press Release</A> [Motorola]<br />
<A HREF="http://www.bargainpda.com/default.asp?newsID=2603">Motorola Q Announced (pictures)</A> [BargainPDA]<br />
</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/114246/motorola-q-launched-but-you-cant-have-it]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-114246]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[q]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[qwerty keyboard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[release date: q1 2006]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:35:25 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[johnb]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=114246&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
