<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: Red One]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/red one</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'red one']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Gifts for Video Geeks Who Think They're The Next Scorsese]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p>Maybe you know someone in film school, or just some guy who really likes going to movies and cutting YouTube mash-ups? Here's what you can buy them&mdash;and also what you shouldn't:</p>
<p>BTW, if you hate the gallery format as much as the Grinch hated Christmas, click <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5406853/gifts-for-people-who-wont-shut-up-about-scorsese/">here</a>.</p>

<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_ultra_glam.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #flipultrahd" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/flipultrahd/">Flip Ultra HD</a>:</strong> We <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5401862/ultimate-pocket-camcorder-comparison">tested basically every pocket camcorder in existence</a>, and this was the best one we found. It shoots 720p HD and is easy enough for your grandma to use. If you're buying a gift for someone looking to experiment on a budget or simply shoot vacation videos, this is a great little cam. <strong>$150</strong> [<a href="http://www.theflip.com/en-us/Products/ultra.aspx">Flip</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_clapboard__reup.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>Clapboard:</strong> No, I'm serious. Though this might just look like a cheesy prom prop (and that's what it is), little has changed about the most recognized icon of the film industry. And for filmmakers, it's still extremely handy in tracking good takes, and syncing sound, if needed. The novelty ones are cheap (and many are probably more for show); but splurge on a fancy dry erase version if you really love the recipient. <strong>$2 to $30</strong> [<a href="http://www.promwishescatalog.com/prom/Directors-Clapboard-with-Chalk.cfm">Prom Wishes</a> ; <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/573959-REG/Pearstone_SADC_7562_SADC_7562_Acrylic_Dry_Erase.html">B&H</a>]</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/50376967.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_50376967.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><strong>Vintage Hollywood Photographs from <em>Life</em> Magazine:</strong> Vintage posters are neat, but I'd contend that these <em>Life</em> prints feel a tad more heart-felt. From Kubrick working on <em>2001</em> to Marilyn Monroe doing her thing, there are many gems to be found in Life's archives. <b>About $100</b> [<a href="http://www.life.com/image/50377029/in-gallery/24631/2001-a-space-odyssey"><i>2001</i> Series</a>; <a href="http://www.life.com/service/shop">More Life Photos</a>]<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_tonynewnew.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>Iron Man Arc Reactor:</strong> Most people's latent super powers are still off in hiding, but you never know when a nemesis will rip out your power core, forcing you to crawl across your home for a spare. Don't look at the Iron Man Arc Reactor as a superfluous purchase; see it as an investment your loved one's health. <strong>$150</strong> [<a href="http://www.museumreplicas.com/p-1008-iron-man-arc-reactor-tony-starks-heart.aspx">Museum Replicas</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_sonysnewnew.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>Sony UWP-V1 Wireless Lavalier Mic:</strong> During my tenure in broadcast and commercial production, I found a good, wireless lavalier mic to be the most versatile tool in my bag. It can be hidden anywhere on a body/prop, and the pickup frequencies are surprisingly decent for foleying. Sony's entry level mic, the UWP-V1, should serve any young filmmaker well. <strong>$485</strong> [<a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/553681-REG/Sony_UWP_V1_3032_UWP_V1_Wireless_Lavalier_ENG.html">B&H</a>]<br clear="all"></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/504x_img_8014.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_504x_img_8014.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><strong>Kodak Five-Day Cinematography Workshop:</strong> Few of us will ever have the chance to shoot on real, 35mm film. But Kodak's boot camp will teach you the basics of 35mm cinematography and give you a chance to burn some 35mm stock while experts hold your hand. The tuition is by no means a non-factor, but come on, it's pretty much the coolest fantasy camp without Michael Jordan or spaceships. <strong>$2,000</strong> [<a href="http://motion.kodak.com/US/en/motion/Education/Workshops/cineWkshp.htm">Kodak</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_backnobuy.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>DON'T BUY <em>Back to the Future 2</em> Hat:</strong> I know, it's neat you can buy this hat. But it looked dumb on Marty McFly and it will look even worse on whoever you give it to. [<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001RJ1U6G">Amazon</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_redonenew.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>4K <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #redone" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/redone/">Red One</a> Camera:</strong> Yes, the body itself starts at nor far under $20,000&mdash;without lenses, mounts, CF modules or pretty much anything you'll need to use it. Yes, this camera is just as hard to shoot with as any full-fledged film camera (if not even harder). But it's also the cheapest 4K camera you can acquire, and for the price of one extended 35mm camera rental, you'll have a system that's "free to use" again and again. Just make sure to gift those cinematography classes first. <strong>$17,500 and Up</strong> [<a href="http://static.red.com/store">Red</a>]</p>
<p><i>Don't forget to recommend your own favorite gift ideas for movie buffs in comments&mdash;include pic and pricing if possible.</i></p>
<p><i><a href="http://gizmodo.com/t/giftguide2009">All Giz Wants</a> is our annual round-up of favorite gift ideas, including amazing attainable objects and a few far-out fantasies. We'll be popping guides catered to different interests several times per day for the next week, so keep checking back.</i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5406853/gifts-for-video-geeks-who-think-theyre-the-next-scorsese/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5406853]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gift guide]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flip ultra hd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gift Guide 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[giftguide2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gifts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[holidays]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[presents]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[production]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5406853&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Watch Turbo (That Video Game Movie Shot on a Red One) Now]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=6932347&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=6932347&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/6932347.jpg"></a>A few months back, I wrote about <em>Turbo</em>, a USC graduate thesis shot for under $100K on a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/red-one">Red One</a> camera that used some well-designed effects to capture one potential future of gaming. Now it's online for free.</p>

<p>My favorite guilty pleasure moments? The opening fight scene (the best one, imho) and a moment when the protagonist's head goes through a crane game.</p>
<p>Don't get me wrong, <em>Turbo</em> manages to cram all of Hollywood's cheesiest motifs into one 20-minute flick. But everything from the visual effects to the cinematography to the fight choreography look pretty freaking good for such a low budget action short. And hey, the plot is still better than any <em>Mortal Kombat</em> and/or <em>Street Fighter movie</em> yet produced.</p>
<p>And if you really dig it, Wonder Woman screenwriter Brent Strickland is shopping around a feature-length screenplay now. [<a href="http://www.turbothemovie.com/">Turbo</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5376161/watch-turbo-that-video-game-movie-shot-on-a-red-one-now]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5376161]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[image cache]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[turbo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 07 Oct 2009 09:50:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5376161&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Using the Red One and 5d Mark II to Create Living Magazines]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/3WeaC5QDUpg&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/3WeaC5QDUpg&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object>Magazines are going down the crapper as a medium, but the crew at Alexx Henry photography envisions a world where OLED and eInk screens put motion into mags and makes them cutting-edge.</p>
<p>Is this what the future of publishing looks like? Well, I'd be pretty surprised if these techs became anywhere close to disposable anytime soon. Instead, we'll be seeing things like the Apple Tablet and Microsoft Courier coming along to load up stuff like this. But despite the packaging differences, the finished product loaded on these next-gen displays could be pretty similar to this. And it looks pretty badass. [<a href="http://livingartmedia.com/outside/">Living Art Media</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5374801/using-the-red-one-and-5d-mark-ii-to-create-living-magazines]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5374801]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[5d mark ii]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[alex henry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 05 Oct 2009 19:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5374801&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Red Epic Used to Shoot Sexiest Woman Alive, Kate Beckinsale, at 5K Resolution]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/kate-beckinsale-sexiest-woman-alive-cover-1109-84740340.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_kate-beckinsale-sexiest-woman-alive-cover-1109-84740340.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MEGAN FOX" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/megan-fox/">Megan Fox</a> may have been sexy enough to use the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5229743/megan-fox-esquire-cover-shot-in-video-not-stills">3K resolution Red Epic video camera</a> to shoot with, but the <i>sexiest woman alive</i> needs 5K. <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged KATE BECKINSALE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/kate-beckinsale/">Kate Beckinsale</a> is an extra 2K sexier than Megan Fox.</p>
<p><object id="flashObj" width="486" height="412" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,47,0"><param name="movie" value="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9/4250084001?isVid=1&publisherID=4249779001">
<param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF">
<param name="flashVars" value="videoId=42085298001&playerID=4250084001&domain=embed&">
<param name="base" value="http://admin.brightcove.com">
<param name="seamlesstabbing" value="false">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<param name="swLiveConnect" value="true">
<param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always">
<embed src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9/4250084001?isVid=1&publisherID=4249779001" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashvars="videoId=42085298001&playerID=4250084001&domain=embed&" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" width="486" height="412" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" swliveconnect="true" allowscriptaccess="always" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></object></p>
<p>It's technologically interesting since, with both the 3K and the 5K Red cameras, they're able to take video and strategically take out frames to use as stills. This makes it a lot easier on the photographer since he doesn't need to know, intuitively, when the best few seconds are to snap a stream of shots&mdash;he can just point the thing and tell Kate to be sexy.</p>
<p>It's too bad for Kate though, because in order to crown a new Sexiest Woman Alive next year, Esquire will have to have her put down. [<a href="http://www.esquire.com/the-side/video/sexy-kate-beckinsale-video">Esquire</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5373051/red-epic-used-to-shoot-sexiest-woman-alive-kate-beckinsale-at-5k-resolution]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5373051]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[5k]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[esquire]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[kate beckinsale]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[megan fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video camera]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:41:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5373051&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Esquire's Sexiest Woman Alive, Filmed at Delicious 5K Super High Resolution]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/sexiestwoman.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Last year, <em>Esquire</em> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5229743/megan-fox-esquire-cover-shot-in-video-not-stills">shot Megan Fox</a> in 3K resolution using the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged RED ONE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/red-one/">Red One</a>. This year, <a href="http://www.esquire.com/the-side/video/who-is-the-sexiest-woman-alive-2009">they're going to 5K</a> (<a href="http://gizmodo.com/379670/reds-5k-4k-and-3k-pro-cameras-what-the-resolution-really-means">yes, 5K</a>, meaning you can see her pores) for the Sexiest Woman Alive, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/379537/red-launches-5k-red-epic-flagship-camera">using Red's Epic</a>. Here's a (low res) taste:</p>

<p><object id="flashObj" width="486" height="412" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,47,0"><param name="movie" value="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9/4250084001?isVid=1&publisherID=4249779001">
<param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF">
<param name="flashVars" value="videoId=40054316001&playerID=4250084001&domain=embed&">
<param name="base" value="http://admin.brightcove.com">
<param name="seamlesstabbing" value="false">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<param name="swLiveConnect" value="true">
<param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always">
<embed src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9/4250084001?isVid=1&publisherID=4249779001" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashvars="videoId=40054316001&playerID=4250084001&domain=embed&" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" width="486" height="412" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" swliveconnect="true" allowscriptaccess="always" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></object></p>
<p>We'll have to wait another month for another teaser as they pull the slow reveal. Still, not a bad way to show off the Epic's Mysterium-X sensor. [<a href="http://www.esquire.com/the-side/video/who-is-the-sexiest-woman-alive-2009">Esquire</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5359080/esquires-sexiest-woman-alive-filmed-at-delicious-5k-super-high-resolution]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5359080]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[5k]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[epic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[high def]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red epic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5359080&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Red One vs. 5D Mark II vs. Lumix GH1 Video Test Stuns for Several Reasons]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object width="502" height="377" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5981422&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5981422&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="377" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/5981422.jpg"></a>I suppose one lesson of this short clip&mdash;comparing footage from the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged RED ONE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/red-one/">Red One</a>, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5160540/canon-5d-mark-ii-vs-nikon-d700-review-shoot+out">Canon 5D Mark II</a>, and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5304887/panasonic-lumix-dmc+gh1-review-a-1500-misfit">Panasonic Lumix GH1</a> with a range of lenses&mdash;is that a woman in a black dress makes for great test video.</p>
<p>Oh, and I'm admittedly surprised by how well the GH1 appears to keep up with the Red One and 5D Mark II. Of course, at full resolution, it might be a different story. But if you were <em>really torn</em> between the Red One and GH1 for some reason, I guess your decision got a bit harder.</p>
<p>Click over to Vimeo to watch it in HD for the full impact. [<a href="http://vimeo.com/5981422?hd=1">Vimeo</a> via <a href="http://www.birnsandsawyer.com/">via</a> <a href="http://www.imaginginsider.com/?p=100947">Imaging Insider</a> via <a href="http://www.pdnpulse.com/2009/08/red-one-vs-canon-5d-mark-ii-vs-panasonic-gh1-video.html">PDN Pulse</a> via <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/08/10/video-red-one-v-canon-5d-mark-ii-v-panasonic-gh1/&quot;">CrunchGear</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5333986/red-one-vs-5d-mark-ii-vs-lumix-gh1-video-test-stuns-for-several-reasons]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5333986]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon 5d mark ii]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[panasonic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[panasonic lumix gh1]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5333986&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Using the Red One Camera to Make a 'Living Movie Poster']]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><object width="502" height="377" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5004964&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5004964&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="377" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object>We've seen the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged RED ONE" title="Click here to read more posts tagged RED ONE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/red-one/">Red One</a> blur the line between DSLRs and HD cameras with <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5229743/megan-fox-esquire-cover-shot-in-video-not-stills">Esquire's video-still Megan Fox cover</a>, but this video shows how a photography studio that shoots movie posters has used it to blend photography and video even more.</p>
<p>And here's one of the finished products:<br />
<object width="502" height="377" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5103405&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5103405&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="377" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object>[<a href="http://alexxhenry.com/blog/?p=475">Alexx Henry</a>]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5286954/using-the-red-one-camera-to-make-a-living-movie-poster]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5286954]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dlsrs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[redone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5286954&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The First Foxy Magazine Cover to Be Shot In Video]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/05/megan-fox-esquire-cover.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/megan-fox-esquire-cover.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>Last week we told you that Esquire had <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5229743/megan-fox-esquire-cover-shot-in-video-not-stills">shot their June magazine cover</a> in <em>video</em>. This week, we see that <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MEGAN FOX" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/megan-fox/">Megan Fox</a> photo in all its...wait, there is <em>no way</em> "Fox" is her real name.</p>

<p>Captured on the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/red-one">4K RedOne</a> (that's a frame resolution of 4096x2304, or 9.4 megapixels), the video-sourced cover image is thought to be a first in the magazine industry, challenging traditional SLR photography and the distinctions of photo vs video.</p>
<p>In other good news, there's a pile of leftover Megan Fox footage that's up at Esquire now. But in one of humanity's great travesties, the clips have been downrezzed for web streaming. [<a href="http://www.esquire.com/the-side/video/megan-fox-video">Esquire</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5239128/the-first-foxy-magazine-cover-to-be-shot-in-video]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5239128]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[4k]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[june esquire]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[megan fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[megan fox esquire]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[redone]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 04 May 2009 10:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5239128&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Megan Fox Esquire Cover Shot In Video, Not Stills]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/04/thumb160x_fa8332deeb0508a5d43591e8f481885d.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />If the fusion of video cameras and dSLRs hadn't blurred enough before, Esquire shot their June issue cover of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MEGAN FOX" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/megan-fox/">Megan Fox</a> in <em>video</em>&mdash;a purported first in the magazine world.</p>

<p>Rather than click and endless series of stills, photographer <a href="http://www.gregfoto.com/">Greg Williams</a> shot the cover with the 4K <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/red-one">Red ONE</a> video camera. Fox essentially acted out a scene for 10 minutes, the best moment of which will appear on the June 2009 cover. (Not to be wasteful of Megan Fox footage, the video will also be uploaded to Esquire's site, of course.)</p>
<p>It's fascinating that as digital cameras evolve, so will the roles of photographers, models and publications. I can't see traditional photography ever dying, but whether photos will always be captured in photographs is another question. [<a href="http://www.esquire.com/the-side/video/megan-fox-images-0609">Esquire</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5229743/megan-fox-esquire-cover-shot-in-video-not-stills]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5229743]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dslrs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[esquire]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[megan fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[megan fox esquire cover]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[redone]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5229743&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[RED Scarlet Test Footage Hits the 'Nets Looking Like a Gift From the Gods]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/03/custom_1236984418725_1_izzy2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/03/custom_1236984418725_1_izzy2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>I love that RED's upcoming <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5085242/red-unloads-modular-cameras-a-dslr-3d-and-28k">Scarlet camera</a> will cost around $2500 and can produce beautiful footage <a href="http://redgrabs.com/izzy/">like this</a>. Paired with a 100mm RED PRIME PRO lens here, the 2/3" Scarlet captures footage at 3K resolution.</p>
<p>Jarred Land from RED says this is the first footage from the 2/3" Scarlet prototypes and that the frame above was pulled straight from the <a href="http://redgrabs.com/izzy/">video</a>. He also says this "heavily compressed" and "quick and dirty." We should all aspire to assemble things as quickly and dirtily as this. [<a href="http://reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=27537">RED Forums</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5169834/red-scarlet-test-footage-hits-the-nets-looking-like-a-gift-from-the-gods]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5169834]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[video cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red scarlet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[scarlet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[scarlet 2/3]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 13 Mar 2009 21:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Covert]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5169834&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Sanctuary Crew Sure Does Like Their RED Cameras]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="http://dvice.com/archives/2009/01/how_the_red_one.php"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/Picture_5.jpg" width="408" height="306" style="display:block;"></a><em>Sanctuary</em> isn't a terribly popular (or interesting) show, but it does <em>look</em> nice. It's no coincidence, then, that they're the first North American production to exclusively use RED cameras .</p>
<p>As a production, <em>Sanctuary</em> has taken a lot of risks&mdash;they were also the <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/375590/first-entirely-green-screen-show-coming-to-tv">first TV show to go almost completely green-screened</a>, depending on rendered backgrounds for many of their shots. Oddly enough, this technique allowed the RED to really shine.</p>
<p>The crew gushes over the RED One, speaking mostly about its ease of use and versatility, and hinting that its reasonable price allowed the cameramen to spend a bit more on cinema-grade lenses. The most important ability of the RED, as far as <em>Sanctuary</em> is concerned, is resolution. With digital chopping an manipulation the name of the game, it's vital that individual components of the video can be cut and integrated into a composite scene without losing clarity, something which the One's massive 4k sensor makes possible.</p>
<p>It's also interesting to note how using a camera like this changes the production dynamics of a show; reviewing and editing footage occurs almost instantly, rather than hours later as in a traditional film production. So interesting is the production scheme, in fact, that it's the most interesting thing about this entire show. Oh well! [<a href="http://dvice.com/archives/2009/01/how_the_red_one.php">Dvice</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5130039/the-sanctuary-crew-sure-does-like-their-red-cameras]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5130039]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red cameras sanctuary]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sanctuary]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sci-fi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sci-fi channel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 13 Jan 2009 05:52:04 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5130039&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Red Reduces Prices, Announces Trade-In Program]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/12/redepic.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/redepic.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a>Jim Jannard has announced a price reduction on their Scarlet and EPIC cameras, their latest <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5085242/red-unloads-modular-cameras-a-dslr-3d-and-28k">modular systems for still and motion photography</a>. Plus, now there are multiple trade-in upgrade paths:</p>

<blockquote>
<p>1. Keep your RED ONE and shoot great images. Get continual free firmware upgrades.</p>
<p>2. Keep your RED ONE and upgrade your sensor to Mysterium-X for $4,500.</p>
<p>3. Trade your RED ONE in, and receive $17,500 credit, towards the purchase of an EPIC-X S35 Private Reserve package, which is only available to RED ONE customers.</p>
<p>4. Trade your RED ONE in, and receive $17,500 credit, towards the purchase of an EPIC FF35 Pro Cinema "Brain".</p>
<p>5. Trade your RED ONE in, and receive $17,500 credit, towards the purchase of an EPIC 645 Pro "Brain".</p>
<p>6. Trade your RED ONE in, and receive $17,500 credit, towards the purchase of an EPIC 617 Pro "Brain".</p>
<p>7. Keep your RED ONE and purchase a Scarlet System (one time only) with a 12% discount.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Remember that, if you have a Red One, a) you can only use one upgrade per camera—once you use it, the serial number is done; and b) we hate you.</p>
<p>Here is the price list:</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/red-scarlet-epic-specs.jpg" class="center" width="804" height="959" style="display:block;float:none;"></p>
<p>Until we get our own, I will be playing with <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5093557/at-gizmodo-gallery-the-red-one-camera">the one on loan at the Gizmodo Gallery</a>. Come and check it out too. [<a href="http://reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=23112">Red User</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5101184/red-reduces-prices-announces-trade+in-program]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5101184]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camcorder]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cinema]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[discounts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dsmc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[epic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Red camera discount]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red digital cinema]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red epic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[scarlet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[trade-in]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 02 Dec 2008 22:35:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5101184&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[RED to Make Another, Even Bigger Announcement on December 3rd]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/11/thumb160x_Picture_42.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />RED CEO <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #jimjannard" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/jimjannard/">Jim Jannard</a>, who generally manages to construct all sentences using only intensifiers and superlatives, is getting <em>really</em> excited on the <a href="http://reduser.net/forum/">RedUser forums</a> again:<br></p>
<blockquote>New announcement on Dec. 3rd. Everything has changed... just as we promised. :-)</blockquote>
<p>:-)? <strong>:-)?</strong> <em>What do your cryptic smilies mean, Jim?</em></p>

<p>He goes on to say that the new announcement will make <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5085242/red-unloads-modular-cameras-a-dslr-3d-and-28k">November 13th</a> seem 'insignificant', which is, let's be honest here, quite a claim to accompany such a vague pre-announcement. [<a href="http://reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=22754">RedUser</a> <em>&mdash;Thanks, Øyvind</em>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5098546/red-to-make-another-even-bigger-announcement-on-december-3rd]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5098546]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jim jannard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red dslr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red mysterium]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red scarlet]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 25 Nov 2008 07:51:20 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5098546&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[At Gizmodo Gallery: The Red One Camera]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/11/340x_gizmodo-gallery-red.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/>We'll have a lot more than the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5091517/at-gizmodo-gallery-ancient-apple-phone-prototypes-from-frog-design">1983 Apple Phone</a> prototype at the upcoming <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5082811/gizmodo-gallery-our-wonderful-world-of-gadgets-on-display-in-nyc">Gizmodo Gallery</a>. Perhaps you were interested in getting a good look at the famous Red One camera? That's good, because we sorta know a guy.</p>

<p>The Red One camera was never really interested in capturing HD video (1920x1080). Instead, the system's Super 35mm-sized Mysterium sensor captures footage at 4K (3626x2664) in precious RAW format. The camera starts at only $17,000, but once you get it fully loaded, the system can approach $80,000. Sound like a lot of money? It is. But seeing as it doesn't require purchasing or developing costly film and it still manages to nip the heels of 35mm quality, the Red One represents the democratization of an ever-opening Hollywood system.</p>
<p>The Red One will be at <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5082811/gizmodo-gallery-our-wonderful-world-of-gadgets-on-display-in-nyc">Gizmodo Gallery</a> this December 4th-7th, in NYC.</p>
<p>[Thanks to <a href="http://www.thereedspace.com/">REED ANNEX</a> and thanks to our benefactor <a href="http://www.gizmine.com/">gizmine.com</a>]</p>
<p><b>Gizmodo Gallery</b><br>
<a href="http://www.thereedspace.com/">Reed Annex</a><br>
<a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?q=151+orchard+street+ny&ie=UTF8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&ll=40.721226,-73.989122&spn=0.009741,0.015814&z=16&g=151+orchard+street+ny&iwloc=addr">151 Orchard Street</a><br>
New York, NY 10002</p>
<p><strong>Gizmodo Gallery Reader Meetup</strong><br>
The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5099673/at-giz-gallery-reader-meetup-with-a-back-to-the-future-delorean">reader meetup</a> takes place across the street from the Gallery, at a place called <a href="http://www.theannexnyc.com/">The Annex</a> (not to be confused with REED ANNEX where the gallery is hosted.) The address is <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?q=152+Orchard+Street+ny&ie=UTF8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&ll=40.721112,-73.988628&spn=0.00914,0.013411&z=16&g=152+Orchard+Street+ny&iwloc=addr">152 Orchard Street</a> and we'll be there at <strong>9 PM SHARP on Friday December 5th</strong>.</p>
<p>Gallery Dates:<br>
December 4th-7th</p>
<p>Times:<br>
12/4 Thursday<br>
12-8</p>
<p>12/5 Friday<br>
12-8</p>
<p>12/6 Saturday<br>
11-8</p>
<p>12/7 Sunday<br>
11-4</p>
<p>[Read more about our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5082811/gizmodo-gallery-our-wonderful-world-of-gadgets-on-display-in-nyc">Gizmodo Gallery here</a> and see what else we'll be <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/Gizmodo%20Gallery">playing with</a> at the event.]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5093557/at-gizmodo-gallery-the-red-one-camera]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5093557]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gizmodo gallery]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[4k]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:15:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5093557&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[RED Unloads Modular Cameras, a DSLR, 3D and 28k]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/11/dslr.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/dslr.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Rumors of a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #reddslr" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/reddslr/">RED DSLR</a> had been <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5048028/red-confirms-dslr-says-its-bigger-revolution-than-red-one">confirmed a long time ago</a>, but what of the Scarlet and EPIC übercamcorders? On the <a href="http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=21835&page=2">REDUser forums</a>, RED CEO Jim Jannard has explained it all: Scarlet and EPIC <em>are</em> the DSLR &mdash; all cameras are "part of the same DSMC system", so each and every camera will be part of a modular, build-your-own, still and video product line based on the Scarlet and EPIC 'Brains'. To do this, RED has furnished an insanely diverse new collection of components, with sensors ranging from the $2500 3k Scarlet to the $55,000, <em>28k</em> EPIC 617 Mysterium Monstro. <script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('redannounce1', 10, '');
</script></p>

<p>The core of the new line is made up of the new 'Mysterium' brains, pictured in the gallery above and detailed in the gallery below. These boxy sensors can be built up into <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5078123/its-official-the-canon-5d-mk-ii-will-turn-us-all-into-professional-cinematographers">5D-esque</a> DSLRs, compact prosumer camcoders, full-fledged professional video cameras or even a 3D unit with a new line of lenses, flash storage, frames, mounts and other add-ons, outlined with the new sensors below. In addition to their own lenses, the new cameras mercifully support gear built for Nikon and Canon standards with mount adapters, so you don't have to re-buy all of your optics. <script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('reddetails', 6, '');
</script>In spring, when the first of the new units are intended to ship, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #redone" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/redone/">RED One</a> users won't be left out in the cold &mdash; they'll get purchase credit towards new cameras, or if they'd just like to throw one of the new sensors into their existing rig, credit towards that. I guess this is what Jannard meant when he said RED had a 'new vision'.</p>
<p>For the full release, click <a href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/Untitled-10.jpg">here</a>. <em>Warning &mdash; comically giant JPEG</em>. [<a href="http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=21835&page=3">RED</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5085242/red-unloads-modular-cameras-a-dslr-3d-and-28k]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5085242]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[28k]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3d cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3k]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[5k]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[epic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[modular]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red dslr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red epic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red scarlet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[scarlet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 13 Nov 2008 05:40:10 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5085242&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[RED Re-Teases Nov 13 Announcement With Camera Ports, More Hyperbole]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/11/9_monsterrigxxxx.6a.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/9_monsterrigxxxx.6a.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>In case you forgot there's a big <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5074784/red-teases-nov-13th-announcement-with-cryptic-renders-more-hyperbole">RED announcement happening this week on November 13</a>, RED CEO Jim Jannard is again lighting up the RED User forums with another cryptic tease. Saying nothing more than "Not sure what this means..." the outspoken exec lets fly some ports for the company's upcoming übercamera. As CrunchGear rightly notes, we're probably looking at two XLR ports, video outs and a proprietary connector. We'll know all on Thursday. And for all the pre-buzz, the RED people have made some really spectacular gear and we can't wait to see it trickle into consumer level gear. [<a href="http://www.reduser.net/forum/showpost.php?p=316638&postcount=528">RED User</a> via <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/11/08/another-red-tease-ports-spied/">Crunch Gear</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5081258/red-re+teases-nov-13-announcement-with-camera-ports-more-hyperbole]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5081258]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jam jannard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jannard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red dslr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red scarlet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tease]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 09 Nov 2008 15:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Loftus]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5081258&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[RED Teases Nov 13th Announcement With Cryptic Renders, More Hyperbole]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/11/340x_red2.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />RED CEO Jim Jannard is either an incredible visionary or prone to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5069157/reds-ceo-confirms-incredible-product-re+jig-announcement-november-13">serial exaggeration</a>. Just yesterday, he deigned to visit the RED forums, promising that "[RED is] doing things we never thought possible... When we do post, it will be very obvious why we needed a bit more time to 'spill the beans'." As a teaser, he decided to spill two of those beans early, in the form of vague, zoomed-in renders of RED's new HIV-curing, hunger-ending, climate-stabilizing übercamera.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/red1.jpg" width="494" height="494">Owners of any number of popular DSLRs will notice some familiar controls in these renders, but what does that mean? It seems obvious that Jannard's lovable breathlessness is for his new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #reddslr" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/reddslr/">RED DSLR</a> (or <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5048028/red-confirms-dslr-says-its-bigger-revolution-than-red-one">DSMC</a>, I guess), and that his enthusiasm hasn't been diminished in light of the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5050819/canon-5d-mark-iis-full-hd-video-is-so-stunning-our-eyes-explode">stunning video performance</a> of Canon's 5D DSLR. RED certainly has a track record of innovation, but could Canon have beat them to the DSLR HD video punch? [<a href="http://reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=21335&page=2">RedUser</a> via <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/11/02/enticing-teaser-renders-of-reds-newest-creation/">Crunchgear</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5074784/red-teases-nov-13th-announcement-with-cryptic-renders-more-hyperbole]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5074784]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon 5d]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dsmc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jam jannard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jannard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red dslr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red scarlet]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 03 Nov 2008 07:24:52 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5074784&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Red Confirms DSLR, Says It's Bigger "Revolution" Than Red One]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/reddslr.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"/>Red, makers of the famous<a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/red-one/"> Red One camera</a>, have confirmed their <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5043816/red-may-be-making-a-dslr-camera">upcoming DSLR</a> while dropping breadcrumbs of specs for us to gobble up. First things first, don't call it at SLR&mdash;it's a "replacement for DSLRs" going internally by the name DSMC (Digital Still and Motion Camera). And if we're reading between the lines correctly, they're teasing that the camera will feature video content above hi def.</p>
<blockquote><p>While (insert code name) is not a replacement for Epic or Scarlet, it is strategically targeted at the DSLR space. As <a href="http://gizmodo.com/search/d60">Nikon</a> and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5043240/unconfirmed-more-canon-eos-5d-mark-ii-specs-leak-lookin-good">Canon</a> release their 720P and 1080P, respectively, DSLRs with video capture... RED has a more advanced view of the future.</p></blockquote>
<p>My <em>personal</em> reading on this is that the company is aiming for 4K capture. They also dropped this other tidbit, in case you aren't excited enough:<br />
<blockquote>I won't comment on any specifics until the 1st of the year. But "revolution" applies more to this than the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #redone" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #redone" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/redone/">RED ONE</a> did to cinema.</p></blockquote>
<p>They'll hear from us January 1st. [<a href="http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=18710">Red User </a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/10/more-details-on-reds-dsmc-digital-still-and-motion-camera/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5048028/red-confirms-dslr-says-its-bigger-revolution-than-red-one]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5048028]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red dslr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[slr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:19:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5048028&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[75FPS Snowball Fight Filmed With Red One Video Camera Shows Snowy Decimation]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("redonesnowfight.flv", 475, 286,"");
</script><a href="http://www.wonderhowto.com/">WonderHowTo</a> rented a <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/red-one">Red One</a> video camera (the camera that shoots 4K resolution footage), took 30 kids up into the mountains and shot some snowball fight footage. The result, shown here at just <em>slightly</em> lower resolution than the Red can support, still shows off how much their own Perez Hilton lookalike got pelted with snowballs. Hit the jump for a higher quality version that will murder your browser.</p>
<center><script type="text/javascript" src="http://blip.tv/scripts/pokkariPlayer.js?ver=2007111701">
</script> <script type="text/javascript" src="http://blip.tv/syndication/write_player?skin=js&posts_id=619673&source=3&autoplay=true&file_type=flv&player_width=&player_height=">
</script>
<div id="blip_movie_content_619673"><a rel="enclosure" href="http://blip.tv/file/get/Wonderhowto-2KSnowballFightShotOnTheREDCAMERA484.mp4" onclick="play_blip_movie_619673(); return false;"><img alt="Video thumbnail. Click to play" src="http://blip.tv/file/get/Wonderhowto-2KSnowballFightShotOnTheREDCAMERA484.mp4.jpg" border="0" title="Click To Play"></a><br>
<a rel="enclosure" href="http://blip.tv/file/get/Wonderhowto-2KSnowballFightShotOnTheREDCAMERA484.mp4" onclick="play_blip_movie_619673(); return false;">Click To Play</a></div>
</center>
<p>[<a href="http://www.wonderhowto.com/">WonderHowTo</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/347280/75fps-snowball-fight-filmed-with-red-one-video-camera-shows-snowy-decimation]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-347280]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[75fps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fight"]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[snowball]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:00:30 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=347280&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Red One Super Video Camera Unboxed]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><script type="text/javascript">newVideoPlayer("redoneunbox_gawker.flv", 475, 286);</script>The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #redone" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #redone" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/redone/">Red One</a> Camera, which we <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/eyes+on-the-red-camera-real-and-beautiful-4k-support-promised-on-launch-%5Bupdated%5D-252798.php">saw in person</a> back in April at NAB, just got unboxed. Yes, it's the same camera that Peter Jackson used to shoot the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/digital-cameras/red-and-peter-jacksons-crossing-the-line-clip-shot-on-red-one-cameras-254672.php">Crossing the Line</a> short film proof-of-concept, but he seemed to like it enough that maybe, just maybe, he's buying a crapload to shoot the Halo movie with. Watch the clip to see what you can expect when you grab a Red One for yourself. [<a href="http://www.hdforindies.com/2007/10/so-what-comes-in-box-from-red.html">HDForIndies</a> via <a href="http://crunchgear.com/2007/10/01/red-one-unboxing-video/">Crunchgear</a>]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/305896/red-one-super-video-camera-unboxed]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-305896]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video camera]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 01 Oct 2007 20:58:59 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=305896&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Red and Peter Jackson's "Crossing the Line" Clip Shot on Red One Cameras]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2007/04/movie-clipping-1.jpg"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/04/movie-clipping-1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>If you didn't get enough of our coverage of <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/red-one/">Red and their Red One</a> 4K camera at NAB, here's one more thing to tide you over until the release. It's a clip of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #peterjackson" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/peterjackson/">Peter Jackson</a>'s "Crossing the Line" video that was shot entirely with "Boris" and "Natasha," the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #redone" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/redone/">Red One</a> prototypes.</p>
<p>This video is only 1/4 the resolution, so you'll probably only be 1/4 as impressed as people were when they saw it live. <span class="byline">&ndash; Jason Chen</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1883">RedUser</a> [via <a href="http://crunchgear.com/2007/04/23/clip-from-peter-jacksons-crossing-the-line-online-shot-with-red-one-prototypes/">Crunchgear</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/254672/red-and-peter-jacksons-crossing-the-line-clip-shot-on-red-one-cameras]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-254672]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[peter jackson]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[redone]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:30:15 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=254672&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Eyes-On the Red Camera: Real and Beautiful, 4K Support Promised on Launch [UPDATED]]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2007/04/red_front.jpg"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/04/red_front.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>For a while, Gizmodo had been wondering if the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/nab07-hands+on-red-one-4k-digital-cinema-camera-gallery-252750.php">$17K Red On 4K camcorder</a> was genuine or just another piece of vaporware. That's why we're glad to see the camera at NAB 07 in front of our faces, with support from Apple, Peter Jackson, and others. We had a chance to talk with <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #redone" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/redone/">Red One</a> "Leader of the Rebellion" Ted Schilowitz, allowing him to calm our worries about the <del>historically problematic</del> ever-shifting <del>shipping</del> target dates and 4k support that may or may not be available at launch. [Ed.- While I stand by Stephen's statement and reporting 100%, Ted just wrote in to <em>promise 4k Support out the gate</em>. Minor miscommunication aside, this is exciting confirmation, and we're glad for it.]<br>
[UPDATE: We apologize for confusing Ted's words &mdash; His two statements, one on 4k and one on what features would ship, were separate, not serially linked. ]</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('redoone', 4, 'Red One 4K Camcorder');
</script></p>

<p>We had a chance to see three working Red One cameras in the company booth. One was connected to a 720p monitor to show the live output. The other two had working LCD viewfinders as well as film-style video eyepiece finders that potential fan boys could get all touchy-feely with, and there were plenty of those wonks getting their mitts on the camera.</p>
<p>With all the talk of 4K, we were very surprised the live video was only being shown on a 720p monitor. The response? There aren't any 4K monitors to show the full output. [Ed.- What about those Sony 4k Projectors below?]</p>
<p>According to Schilowitz the first batch of cameras that go out may indeed be lacking certain features and functions, but he wouldn't comment on what features those might be.</p>
<p>When asked if 4K works, he said yes, but didn't know if 4K would be available in the first cameras. [Ed.- As above, I stand by Stephen's statement and reporting 100%. But Ted now <em>promises 4k Support out the gate</em>. Minor miscommunication aside, this is exciting confirmation.][UPDATE: We apologize for confusing Ted's words &mdash; His two statements, one on 4k and one on what features would ship, were separate, not serially linked. ]</p>
<p>Will early adopters be screwed? Schilowitz did say that when the camera starts shipping, owners can follow two option paths; take the camera as-is and get a free upgrade when all of the features have been enabled, or simply wait until the features are ready and pick up the camera then. If they can upgrade a camera from non 4k to 4k for free, more power to em.</p>
<p>When asked when the camera would ship, Schilowitz emphasized the company's spin on shipping. In his words, Red is an engineering company that would rather rely on "target dates" than ship dates. When asked the "target date," he responded the Red One camera has a target range between the end of April and the middle part of May of 2007.</p>
<p>Even if the company makes this target, those eager to purchase one may still have to wait as the company has been able to convince 1500 individuals and companies to plunk down a hefty down payment to reserve one of these beauties.</p>
<p>In an effort to put to rest the doubt that this camera is actually working or simply a pyramid scheme to bilk old ladies from their fortune, Jim Jannard ushered visitors into a small movie theatre to show them an 11-minute film shot entirely with two Red One alpha prototypes he named "Boris" and "Natasha".</p>
<p>Sure anyone can crank out 11 minutes of beauty shots and call it a film, but it is an entirely different matter when that 11-minute film is an original narrative piece, written and directed by Peter Jackson. Yes, <em>that</em> Peter Jackson. Jackson invited the Red crew to Masterton, New Zealand for a two day shoot to capture a WWI story involving a doughboy on the ground, an ace pilot, a picture of a loved one, a teddy bear, and those accursed Nazis.</p>
<p>We were able to learn the two cameras only had Run/Stop triggers, 180-degree shutters running at 24fps, recorded to a Red Drive at 27Mbps and encoded in Red Raw. Not a lot of fancy schmancy at all. The short was projected using Sony's 4K projector, but as previously announced, Red is working on its own line of 4K projectors and monitors. Jackson decided to skip using the Red lenses in favor of the Cooke S4 24-90mm lenses with which he was more familiar.</p>
<p>This film was full of action and drama as only Jackson can deliver, and throughout the piece, we watched closely for telltale signs of artifacting, blown highlights, or false colors. While a lot of the story takes place on bare dirt, scenes in the air presented a full range of colors that proved this camera can capture some very dynamic images.</p>
<p>We noticed some jumpiness during some of the high-action fast-moving shots, but didn't know if that was a fault of the camera, the digital projection, or our hypersensitivity to digital projection. Regardless, those instances were very few, and after, we had a chance to talk for a moment with two cinematographers sitting next to us who were accustomed to shooting on Viper and Genesis cameras. They were both impressed with the results and had no complaints with the technology.</p>
<p>So for now, the Red One camera has moved from vaporware to reality, but with the "target date" still a month off and the long line for delivery, you aren't going to be able to pick one up anytime soon, let alone at the local Best Buy. But good tech always trickles down, and we're moving in the right direction with these cameras.<span class="byline">&ndash; Stephen Schleicher</span><br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/252798/eyes+on-the-red-camera-real-and-beautiful-4k-support-promised-on-launch-[updated]]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-252798]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camcorders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nab07]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 16 Apr 2007 22:14:23 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie White]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=252798&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[NAB07 Hands-On: Red One 4K Digital Cinema Camera Gallery]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">galleryPost('redoone', 20, 'Red One 4K Camcorder');</script><iframe src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http://digg.com/gadgets/Gallery_NAB07_Hands_On_Red_One_4K_Digital_Cinema_Camera" align="right" frameborder="0" height="82" scrolling="no" width="55"></iframe><br />
Here it is, the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #redone" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #redone" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/redone/">Red One</a> 4K camcorder, tucked away in its crimson booth at NAB. In addition to showing the camcorder, the company also announced a smaller camcorder it will call "Mini Red" shipping at an unspecified date, a line of 4K projectors, and a not-quite-complete digital cinema camera that's still in Beta, yet "nearly ready." More details later&mdash;take a gander at these pics, hot from the show floor. </p>

<p>Getting our hands on the camera, we noticed it's not as heavy as we thought it would be due to the carbon fiber construction of its rail mounting system. It's small, about the size of a normal prosumer video camera with a fixed lens. Hang a lens up front on the Red One, and it's a bit bigger, but still surprisingly small. The grips were quite knarly, like off-road tires or hand grips on a BMX bike. It's extremely configurable. </p>

<p>Speaking of lenses, Red will offer a 5-lens prime kit for $19,975 available in Fall 2007, consisting of 15mm, 25mm, 35mm, 50mm  and 85mm lenses, and all have an f/1.9 aperture except for that 15mm lens, which will be f/2.8. There will also be an $6500 18mm - 50mm f/2.8, available this summer, according to Red. Finally, there's an f/2.8 300mm for $4950. There's more. Don't miss our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/eyes+on-the-red-camera-real-and-beautiful-but-4k-launch-support-in-question-252798.php">visual evaluation of the camera's output, and an interview with Red's Ted Schilowitz</a>. <span class="byline">&ndash; Charlie White</span></p>

<p><a href="http://www.studiodaily.com/main/news/7959.html">Red at NAB</a>  [Studio Daily]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/252750/nab07-hands+on-red-one-4k-digital-cinema-camera-gallery]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-252750]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camcorders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gallery]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nab07]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:37:45 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie White]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=252750&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Red's 4K HD Video Camera to Work With Apple ProRes: Here's what we know about Red]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2007/04/redcam-thumb.png"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/04/redcam-thumb.png" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a><a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged RED ONE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/red-one/">Red One</a>'s compatibility with Apple's ProRes was a welcome surprise. There was some worry on our part, after the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #redone" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/redone/">Red One</a> camera delays, and after the prototypes were nearly lost to thieves last year. So we're happy to see it taking off like this. Congrats to Ted Schilowitz, and his team.</p>
<p>To learn more about this 4k resolution super camcorder by the founder of Oakley glasses, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/red-one/">read here</a>.</p>
<p>And even though the pro cam is out of the range of most of our prices and needs, it can't hurt to take a look at the rad hardware designs.<span class="byline">&ndash;Brian Lam</span><br>
<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('redone', 8, 'Red One');
</script><br>
<a href="http://red.com/">Red One Camcorder</a> [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/red-one/">Gizmodo</a>]</p>
<p><br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/252412/reds-4k-hd-video-camera-to-work-with-apple-prores-heres-what-we-know-about-red]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-252412]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[4k]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camcorders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 15 Apr 2007 16:37:38 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=252412&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Red One Digital Cinema Camera Price List Now On Line, Still Not Shipping]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/03/red_one_access.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />The makers of that <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #redone" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/redone/">Red One</a> Digital Cinema camcorder that's supposedly able to crank out 4K resolution&mdash;that's super HD rez rivaling film&mdash;have finally rolled out a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #pricelist" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/pricelist/">price list</a> today, headed up by the already-announced $17,500 for the camera body. Considering that other cameras that can do similar things cost at least seven to 10 times more than that, that's groundbreaking. But that price is just for openers.</p>
<p>In addition to that initial cost of entry, the company will also offer two different production packs, one for $1250 that includes such basic things as a shoulder pad, mounting brackets, handles and rods, and then there's the $2750 premium production pack with even more of the same. Then there's a lot more exorbitantly-priced choices, such as power packs, monitor options and memory cards. What gives?<br></p>

<p>The "pizza syndrome" prevails here (What? You want cheese with that?), where it looks like if you want a fully equipped camera it's going to cost you much more than $17,500.</p>
<p>We'll take a closer look at this camera and its snail's pace progress at NAB in April. Still missing from the Red Cinema vaporware site? A firm shipping date. <span class="byline">&ndash; Charlie White</span></p>
<p><strong>Update to commenter SenorPants:</strong> Thanks for that challenge. 4K resolution? Why, it's 4520 x 2540 as seen in the Red One (<a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/red-digital-cinema-camcorder-sensor-reveals-first-footage-4k-digital-cinema-for-175k-199420.php">read my post about it here</a>, or <a href="http://hollywoodindustry.digitalmedianet.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=41553">read the two-part interview I did at last year's NAB with one of the camera's makers here</a>, or read the <a href="http://hollywoodindustry.digitalmedianet.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=40180">feature I wrote about the camera here</a>). Or sometimes it's quoted as 4096 x 2160. You are very smart for asking that question, and we all admire you for it. Have a nice day. <a href="http://www.charliewhite.net/bio.htm">CW</a></p>
<p><strong>One more update:</strong> Just to clarify why I mentioned the "snails pace" of the Red One's development, I noted that it's "still not shipping" because of a quote from Ted Schilowitz, Red's so-called "Leader of the Rebellion" who is in charge of the camera's development. He told me on April 25, 2006 in a face-to-face interview at NAB, of which I have an audio recording, that the company aimed to ship cameras by the end of 2006. Said Schilowitz, "Our goal is to have the first cameras shipping &mdash; how many we don't know yet &mdash; by the end of this calendar year. That's a target." Because this Gizmodo post was written on March 13, 2007, clearly that "target" date of December 31, 2006 had already passed without any cameras shipping. Read that <a href="http://hd.broadcastnewsroom.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=41555">full interview with Schilowitz here</a>. CW</p>
<p><a href="http://red.com/pricelist.htm">Red One Price List</a> [<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #reddigitalcinema" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/reddigitalcinema/">Red Digital Cinema</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/243779/red-one-digital-cinema-camera-price-list-now-on-line-still-not-shipping]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-243779]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camcorder]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[price list]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red digital cinema]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 13 Mar 2007 12:11:19 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie White]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=243779&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Red (err...Black/Silver) "Spike" Prototype]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2006/12/1_1167327929.jpg"><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/12/1_1167327929.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Remember the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/red-one-camera-169222.php">Red One</a> camera that we've all been wet dreaming over since NAB? You know, that camera that, if released, would give Hollywood a good <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/digital-cameras/red-one-cameras-first-1k-footage-available-for-download-204850.php">kick</a> in the nuts?</p>
<p>Well, apparently they've almost finished the prototype dubbed "Spike". The company released pictures of their new matte finished camera that's no longer glimmering like an American Chopper...a relief to gaffers everywhere. But then last night, they released shots of their matte black version, which is looking pretty good as well (pictures after the jump).</p>

<p><img alt="9_1167523301.jpg" src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/12/9_1167523301.jpg" width="550" height="368" class="center"><br>
<img alt="9_1167523379.jpg" src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/12/9_1167523379.jpg" width="550" height="368" class="center"><br>
<img alt="9_1167523439.jpg" src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/12/9_1167523439.jpg" width="550" height="368" class="center">While I want nothing more than for this camera to be the second coming of the video world, I'm remaining a skeptic until a real production model is in someone's hands. Still, nice pictures.<span class="byline">&ndash; Mark Wilson</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=3">Spike Silver</a><br>
<a href="http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=49">Spike Black</a><br>
[via <a href="http://www.dvguru.com/2006/12/31/red-alert-spike-in-black/">dvguru</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/225234/red-errblacksilver-spike-prototype]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-225234]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[camcorders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[spike]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 31 Dec 2006 10:30:19 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=225234&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Red One Camera Proto Recovered]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/10/red_camera.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />In the continuing saga of the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #redone" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/redone/">Red One</a> ultra-high-definition <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/digital-cameras/red-one-ultrahighdef-camcorder-secret-is-safe-203282.php">camera heist</a>, Oakley founder and Red leader Jim Jannard says some of the booty has been recovered:</p>
<blockquote>Our trained professional investigators have been able to recover much of what was taken in the break-in. We happily got our aluminum prototype back, a lens, some computers and drives that were mostly personal in nature, and some misc. stuff. What is still out there are computers that had most of the camera related development info.</blockquote>
As for the rest of the stuff? Jannard's team of private eyes and the cops are still on the case. "And they aren't done yet," adds Jannard.
<p>We've met Jannard and his team, and we're starting to think this camera will actually come to market as advertised. Plus, if anyone thinks they can do a better job of building a $17.5K 4K camcorder before the Red One is released using data on the company's computers, they're nuts. <span class="byline">&ndash; Charlie White</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/showthread.php?t=74013">Recovery...Mostly</a> [dvxuser, via <a href="http://crunchgear.com/2006/10/08/red-one-prototype-lens-found-remainder-remains-awol/">CrunchGear</a>]<br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/206155/red-one-camera-proto-recovered]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-206155]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA['jim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cinema]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jannard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 09 Oct 2006 10:56:46 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie White]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=206155&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Red One Camera's First 1K Footage Available for Download]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/10/red_one_camera_black.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #redone" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/redone/">Red One</a> ultrahigh-definition camera gave us the next bit of proof of its viability, with the Red <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #digitalcinema" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/digitalcinema/">Digital Cinema</a> company releasing its first official demo footage on the company's website. It's not the full 4K footage allegedly shot by the Red One and shown at the IBC convention in Amsterdam last month, but this is the first officially-released video from the company's Mysterium image sensor.</p>
<p>It's a <a href="http://red.com/gallery-video.htm">slow-downloading 100MB file</a>, and it's just 1K resolution&mdash;hardly even high-def yet&mdash;but still, it's <em>something</em>. Looks like those burglars really didn't <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/digital-cameras/red-one-ultrahighdef-camcorder-secret-is-safe-203282.php">get their hands on the good stuff</a> last week.</p>
<p>Anyway, if <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #reddigitalcinema" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/reddigitalcinema/">Red Digital Cinema</a> can actually deliver this 4K camera for $17.5K, I'm pumped. <span class="byline">&ndash; Charlie White</span></p>
<p><a href="http://red.com/index.htm">Product Page</a> [Red Digital Cinema, via <a href="http://www.dvguru.com/2006/10/03/first-official-red-footage-hits-the-web/">DV Guru</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/204850/red-one-cameras-first-1k-footage-available-for-download]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-204850]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camcorders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cinema]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red digital cinema]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Oct 2006 10:37:10 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie White]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=204850&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Red One Ultra-High-Def Camcorder Secret is Safe]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/09/red_camera.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />We have an update on the theft of that wild-looking <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/red-digital-cinema-camcorder-sensor-reveals-first-footage-4k-digital-cinema-for-175k-199420.php">Red One</a> ultra-high-definition <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #digitalcinema" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/digitalcinema/">digital cinema</a> camera, the $17.5K camcorder that's said to be packing enough megapixelidge to whip super cameras ten times its price. Oakley founder and Red proprietor <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #jimjannard" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/jimjannard/">Jim Jannard</a> gives us an update on the jacking of the shiny aluminum prototype in the picture above:</p>
<blockquote>"While items taken included many computers, drives, monitors, prototypes (including our shiny aluminum IBC prototype), ID files and our Scratch system... it appears that the thieves did NOT get any sensors, sensor information or our primary "Frankenstein" shooting camera. It took all the RED troops coming back in to put all the pieces together. We will resume shooting and testing tomorrow. This would be the easiest piece to identify as stolen."</blockquote>
So this prototype was just for show, and the real secrets contained in the company's Mysterium sensor are safe. Now we can all rest easy. But then, perhaps the secret is that there is no Mysterium sensor. It's a mystery, all right. <span class="byline">&ndash; Charlie White</span>
<p><a href="http://crunchgear.com/2006/09/25/red-theivery-update-prototypes-gone-mysterium-sensors-ok/">Red Theivery Update: Prototypes Gone, Mysterium Sensors OK</a> [CrunchGear]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/203282/red-one-ultra+high+def-camcorder-secret-is-safe]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-203282]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camcorder]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cinema]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jim jannard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:01:13 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie White]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=203282&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Shmancy Red One Camcorder Prototypes Stolen, $100k Reward for Info]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2006/09/redaastolen.jpg"><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/09/redaastolen.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Jim Jannard, founder of Oakley sunglasses, and the man behind the high-pixel-count <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/red-digital-cinema-camcorder-sensor-reveals-first-footage-4k-digital-cinema-for-175k-199420.php">Red One</a> HD camcorder has enemies. The camcorder, which is capable of ultra high-definition (4,520 x 2540 pixels) video in a $17.5K camera, had some prototypes and docs stolen from Red HQ last night. Since all competing gear is no less than $100K, industrial espionage isn't out of the question. Jannard is offering a reward of $100K to find out who stole the cam, and also relieves our pixel-hungry video junkies by saying that the theft won't throw off their '07 launch plans. Thanks for the tip, Curt. <span class="byline">&ndash; Brian Lam</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/showthread.php?t=72341">Red One Ultra HD Camcorder Prototype Ripped Off</a></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/202853/shmancy-red-one-camcorder-prototypes-stolen-100k-reward-for-info]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-202853]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camcorder]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[stolen]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:55:14 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=202853&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
