<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: Red]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/red</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'red']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The More We Know About the RED Scarlet Camera, the Better It Looks]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/red4.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_red4.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>My head has barely stopped spinning over the sneak peek of the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5393970/the-red-digital-film-cameras-spec-lists-are-as-big-as-their-prices">RED Scarlet 2/3" camera</a>, yet there's already a schedule for her release and some more pictures of the beauty. Best part? Looks like she'll be available this summer.</p>
<p>As a refresher, Scarlet brings some rather nice features:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>* Increased REDCODE data rates<br>
* New FLUT Color, Gamma and Sensitivity Science. Now same as EPIC.<br>
* More extensive modular system integration.<br>
* Interchangeable Lens mounts including focus and iris control of electronic RED, Canon and Nikon lenses, along with Zoom data (Scarlet 2/3" Interchangeable)<br>
* "Touch Focus Tracking" with electronic lens mounts and RED touchscreen LCD's (Scarlet 2/3" Interchangeable and 8x Fixed)<br>
* Two independent microphone level channels, balanced input circuits, 48V Phantom Power, digitized at 24-bit 48KHz.<br>
* GigaBit Ethernet port<br>
* Scaled 1080P at 60fps</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Now onto the eye candy we both know you came here for. Meet Scarlet and her band of lenses and accessories:</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5415746,8,'');
</script></p>
<p>Assuming everything goes according to schedule, we'll be seeing this line of cameras in the summer of 2010, while some of the lenses will be out as early as December. Yeah, I won't be getting them either, but I'll keep drooling anyway. [<a href="http://reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=38274">RedUser</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5415748/the-more-we-know-about-the-red-scarlet-camera-the-better-it-looks]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5415748]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red scarlet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[scarlet]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:15:04 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5415748&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The RED Digital Film Cameras' Spec Lists Are As Big As Their Prices]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/red2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_red2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>We've drooled over <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5376661/red-accessories-coming-to-kick-more-digital-video-ass-or-destroy-the-galaxy">accessories</a> for RED's digital still and motion cameras, but now we've got specs for the actual DSMCs. No release dates yet, but looks like the EPIC-X with it's $28,000 price will come first. <b>Updated:</b>: Lotsa pictures.</p>
<p>The first of the two models we're being teased with is the incredibly high-end EPIC-X which will be released in four stages, beginning with a pre-production model dubbed TATTOO and ending with the wide-spread final release model. The details explain the $28,000 price tag:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>* New MYSTERIUM-X 5K sensor<br>
* 5K (2:1) at 1-100fps<br>
* 4K (2:1) at 1-125fps<br>
* Quad HD at 1-120fps<br>
* 3K (2:1) at 1-160fps<br>
* 2K (2:1) at 1-250fps<br>
* 1080P (scaled from full frame) at 1-60fps<br>
* Increased Dynamic Range, reduced noise<br>
* Time Lapse, Frame Ramping<br>
* REDCODE 250<br>
* ISO 200-8000<br>
* New FLUT Color Science<br>
* Completely Modular System, each Module individually upgradeable<br>
* Independent Stills and Motion Modes (both record full resolution REDCODE RAW)<br>
* 5 Axis Adjustable Sensor Plate<br>
* Multiple Recording Media Options (Compact Flash, 1.8" SSD, RED Drives, RED RAM)<br>
* Wireless REDMOTE control<br>
* Touchscreen LCD control option<br>
* Bomb-EVF, RED-EVF and RED-LCD compatible<br>
* Multiple User Control Buttons<br>
* Interchangeable Lens mounts including focus and iris control of electronic RED, Canon and Nikon lenses (along with Zoom data)<br>
* "Touch Focus Tracking" with electronic lens mounts and RED Touchscreen LCDs<br>
* LDS and /i Data enabled PL Mount<br>
* Rollover Battery Power<br>
* Independent LUTs on Monitor Outputs<br>
* Independent Frame Guides and Menu overlays on Monitor Outputs<br>
* Monitor Ports support both LCD and EVF<br>
* True Shutter Sync In/Out and Strobe Sync Out<br>
* 720P, 1080P and 2K monitoring support<br>
* Gigagbit Network interface and 802.11 Wireless interface<br>
* 3 Axis internal motion sensor, built in GPS receiver<br>
* Enhanced Metadata<br>
* Full size connectors on Pro I/O Module. AES Digital Audio input, single and dual link HD-SDI<br>
* Support for RED, most Arri 19mm, Studio 15mm, 15mm Lite, Panavision and NATO accessories<br>
* Dimensions- Approx. 4"x4"x5.5"<br>
* Weight (Brain only)- Approx. 6 lbs (2.72kg)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The other temptress is the Scarlet 2/3-inch, which is "more akin to current video-shooting DSLRs, though it doesn't have a full frame sensor." As with the EPIC-X, there's no release date given. There are some great specs though:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>* Increased REDCODE data rates<br>
* New FLUT Color, Gamma and Sensitivity Science. Now same as EPIC.<br>
* More extensive modular system integration.<br>
* Interchangeable Lens mounts including focus and iris control of electronic RED, Canon and Nikon lenses, along with Zoom data (Scarlet 2/3" Interchangeable)<br>
* "Touch Focus Tracking" with electronic lens mounts and RED touchscreen LCD's (Scarlet 2/3" Interchangeable and 8x Fixed)<br>
* Two independent microphone level channels, balanced input circuits, 48V Phantom Power, digitized at 24-bit 48KHz.<br>
* GigaBit Ethernet port<br>
* Scaled 1080P at 60fps</p>
</blockquote>
<p><b>Update:</b> Now we've got a bunch of pictures of the gadgets to drool over (or mock):</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5394052,9,'Actual RED Pre-Production Unit, Parts, and Details');
</script></p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5394053,6,'Accessory and Camera Renders');
</script></p>
<p>Word is that there'll be more information at the end of the month, but that won't stop us from already fantasizing about <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5373051/red-epic-used-to-shoot-sexiest-woman-alive-kate-beckinsale-at-5k-resolution">what to do with the cameras</a>. [<a href="http://reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=37011">Red User</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/red-dsmc-specs-detailed-prices-start-at-28-000-for-epix-x-low/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5393970/the-red-digital-film-cameras-spec-lists-are-as-big-as-their-prices]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5393970]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[digital film]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital s]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red dsmc]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:45:22 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5393970&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Red Accessories Coming to Kick More Digital Video Ass or Destroy the Galaxy]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/redbombevf_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_redbombevf_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Red has just unveiled eight accessories for their cameras, to be released this month. No prices have been announced, but these things look so amazingly sleek and menacing that they could be parts stolen from alien spaceships in Area 51.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5376646,8,'Red Accessories');
</script></p>
<p>Parts of alien spaceships, or Darth Vader's sexual toys. I can go both ways. Check each accessory name and description in the gallery, along with the Epic and Scarlet camera bodies. [<a href="http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=35497">Red User Forums</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5376661/red-accessories-coming-to-kick-more-digital-video-ass-or-destroy-the-galaxy]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5376661]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[digital film]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red accessories]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 07 Oct 2009 18:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5376661&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Red Epic Used to Shoot Sexiest Woman Alive, Kate Beckinsale, at 5K Resolution]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/kate-beckinsale-sexiest-woman-alive-cover-1109-84740340.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_kate-beckinsale-sexiest-woman-alive-cover-1109-84740340.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MEGAN FOX" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/megan-fox/">Megan Fox</a> may have been sexy enough to use the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5229743/megan-fox-esquire-cover-shot-in-video-not-stills">3K resolution Red Epic video camera</a> to shoot with, but the <i>sexiest woman alive</i> needs 5K. <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged KATE BECKINSALE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/kate-beckinsale/">Kate Beckinsale</a> is an extra 2K sexier than Megan Fox.</p>
<p><object id="flashObj" width="486" height="412" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,47,0"><param name="movie" value="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9/4250084001?isVid=1&publisherID=4249779001">
<param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF">
<param name="flashVars" value="videoId=42085298001&playerID=4250084001&domain=embed&">
<param name="base" value="http://admin.brightcove.com">
<param name="seamlesstabbing" value="false">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<param name="swLiveConnect" value="true">
<param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always">
<embed src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9/4250084001?isVid=1&publisherID=4249779001" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashvars="videoId=42085298001&playerID=4250084001&domain=embed&" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" width="486" height="412" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" swliveconnect="true" allowscriptaccess="always" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></object></p>
<p>It's technologically interesting since, with both the 3K and the 5K Red cameras, they're able to take video and strategically take out frames to use as stills. This makes it a lot easier on the photographer since he doesn't need to know, intuitively, when the best few seconds are to snap a stream of shots&mdash;he can just point the thing and tell Kate to be sexy.</p>
<p>It's too bad for Kate though, because in order to crown a new Sexiest Woman Alive next year, Esquire will have to have her put down. [<a href="http://www.esquire.com/the-side/video/sexy-kate-beckinsale-video">Esquire</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5373051/red-epic-used-to-shoot-sexiest-woman-alive-kate-beckinsale-at-5k-resolution]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5373051]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[5k]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[esquire]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[kate beckinsale]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[megan fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video camera]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:41:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5373051&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Esquire's Sexiest Woman Alive, Filmed at Delicious 5K Super High Resolution]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/sexiestwoman.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Last year, <em>Esquire</em> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5229743/megan-fox-esquire-cover-shot-in-video-not-stills">shot Megan Fox</a> in 3K resolution using the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged RED ONE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/red-one/">Red One</a>. This year, <a href="http://www.esquire.com/the-side/video/who-is-the-sexiest-woman-alive-2009">they're going to 5K</a> (<a href="http://gizmodo.com/379670/reds-5k-4k-and-3k-pro-cameras-what-the-resolution-really-means">yes, 5K</a>, meaning you can see her pores) for the Sexiest Woman Alive, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/379537/red-launches-5k-red-epic-flagship-camera">using Red's Epic</a>. Here's a (low res) taste:</p>

<p><object id="flashObj" width="486" height="412" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,47,0"><param name="movie" value="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9/4250084001?isVid=1&publisherID=4249779001">
<param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF">
<param name="flashVars" value="videoId=40054316001&playerID=4250084001&domain=embed&">
<param name="base" value="http://admin.brightcove.com">
<param name="seamlesstabbing" value="false">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<param name="swLiveConnect" value="true">
<param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always">
<embed src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9/4250084001?isVid=1&publisherID=4249779001" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashvars="videoId=40054316001&playerID=4250084001&domain=embed&" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" width="486" height="412" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" swliveconnect="true" allowscriptaccess="always" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></object></p>
<p>We'll have to wait another month for another teaser as they pull the slow reveal. Still, not a bad way to show off the Epic's Mysterium-X sensor. [<a href="http://www.esquire.com/the-side/video/who-is-the-sexiest-woman-alive-2009">Esquire</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5359080/esquires-sexiest-woman-alive-filmed-at-delicious-5k-super-high-resolution]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5359080]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[5k]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[epic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[high def]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red epic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5359080&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Red One vs. 5D Mark II vs. Lumix GH1 Video Test Stuns for Several Reasons]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object width="502" height="377" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5981422&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5981422&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="377" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/5981422.jpg"></a>I suppose one lesson of this short clip&mdash;comparing footage from the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged RED ONE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/red-one/">Red One</a>, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5160540/canon-5d-mark-ii-vs-nikon-d700-review-shoot+out">Canon 5D Mark II</a>, and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5304887/panasonic-lumix-dmc+gh1-review-a-1500-misfit">Panasonic Lumix GH1</a> with a range of lenses&mdash;is that a woman in a black dress makes for great test video.</p>
<p>Oh, and I'm admittedly surprised by how well the GH1 appears to keep up with the Red One and 5D Mark II. Of course, at full resolution, it might be a different story. But if you were <em>really torn</em> between the Red One and GH1 for some reason, I guess your decision got a bit harder.</p>
<p>Click over to Vimeo to watch it in HD for the full impact. [<a href="http://vimeo.com/5981422?hd=1">Vimeo</a> via <a href="http://www.birnsandsawyer.com/">via</a> <a href="http://www.imaginginsider.com/?p=100947">Imaging Insider</a> via <a href="http://www.pdnpulse.com/2009/08/red-one-vs-canon-5d-mark-ii-vs-panasonic-gh1-video.html">PDN Pulse</a> via <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/08/10/video-red-one-v-canon-5d-mark-ii-v-panasonic-gh1/&quot;">CrunchGear</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5333986/red-one-vs-5d-mark-ii-vs-lumix-gh1-video-test-stuns-for-several-reasons]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5333986]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon 5d mark ii]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[panasonic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[panasonic lumix gh1]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5333986&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Using the Red One Camera to Make a 'Living Movie Poster']]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><object width="502" height="377" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5004964&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5004964&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="377" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object>We've seen the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged RED ONE" title="Click here to read more posts tagged RED ONE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/red-one/">Red One</a> blur the line between DSLRs and HD cameras with <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5229743/megan-fox-esquire-cover-shot-in-video-not-stills">Esquire's video-still Megan Fox cover</a>, but this video shows how a photography studio that shoots movie posters has used it to blend photography and video even more.</p>
<p>And here's one of the finished products:<br />
<object width="502" height="377" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5103405&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5103405&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="377" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object>[<a href="http://alexxhenry.com/blog/?p=475">Alexx Henry</a>]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5286954/using-the-red-one-camera-to-make-a-living-movie-poster]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5286954]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dlsrs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[redone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5286954&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Megan Fox Esquire Cover Shot In Video, Not Stills]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/04/thumb160x_fa8332deeb0508a5d43591e8f481885d.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />If the fusion of video cameras and dSLRs hadn't blurred enough before, Esquire shot their June issue cover of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MEGAN FOX" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/megan-fox/">Megan Fox</a> in <em>video</em>&mdash;a purported first in the magazine world.</p>

<p>Rather than click and endless series of stills, photographer <a href="http://www.gregfoto.com/">Greg Williams</a> shot the cover with the 4K <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/red-one">Red ONE</a> video camera. Fox essentially acted out a scene for 10 minutes, the best moment of which will appear on the June 2009 cover. (Not to be wasteful of Megan Fox footage, the video will also be uploaded to Esquire's site, of course.)</p>
<p>It's fascinating that as digital cameras evolve, so will the roles of photographers, models and publications. I can't see traditional photography ever dying, but whether photos will always be captured in photographs is another question. [<a href="http://www.esquire.com/the-side/video/megan-fox-images-0609">Esquire</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5229743/megan-fox-esquire-cover-shot-in-video-not-stills]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5229743]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dslrs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[esquire]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[megan fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[megan fox esquire cover]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[redone]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5229743&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Crank: High Voltage Directors Talk Cameras and Filming While Rollerblading]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/04/crank-9.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/crank-9.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a>As you can probably guess from their movies, <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged CRANK: HIGH VOLTAGE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/crank%7c-high-voltage/">Crank: High Voltage</a></em> directors Mark Neveldine and Brian Taylor have sort of a different filmmaking philosophy that's as dangerous and awesome as what they produce.</p>
<p>In a recent interview, the two directors discuss their need to use handheld, consumer cameras (from RED, Canon, and Sony), as well as their tendency to make the filming of their movies as badass as the movies themselves. Many of the scenes are filmed while rollerblading (sometimes while hanging onto cars), and they acknowledge that filming the <em>Crank</em> movies is a legitimately dangerous task.</p>
<p>More to our interests, Neveldine and Taylor seem to be <a href="http://gizmodo.com/386778/crank-2-high-voltage-being-shot-with-cheapo-best-buy-hd-cameras-still-ridiculous">total camera nerds</a>, using dozens of different cameras to capture exactly the right feel for each scene. They're early adopters and even joke that "Pretty soon, I think we'll both walk to set with BlackBerrys that have HD capabalities, and then we'll just shoot the movie on our little phones."</p>
<p>Check out the interview, it's great to see exactly how these guys are making the sometimes-dreary action movie genre totally fun again. [<a href="http://www.movieline.com/2009/04/crank-2-directors-neveldinetaylor.php">Moveline</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5217764/crank-high-voltage-directors-talk-cameras-and-filming-while-rollerblading]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5217764]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[filmmaking]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[crank]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[crank 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Crank: High Voltage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jason statham]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:45:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5217764&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[RED Scarlet Test Footage Hits the 'Nets Looking Like a Gift From the Gods]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/03/custom_1236984418725_1_izzy2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/03/custom_1236984418725_1_izzy2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>I love that RED's upcoming <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5085242/red-unloads-modular-cameras-a-dslr-3d-and-28k">Scarlet camera</a> will cost around $2500 and can produce beautiful footage <a href="http://redgrabs.com/izzy/">like this</a>. Paired with a 100mm RED PRIME PRO lens here, the 2/3" Scarlet captures footage at 3K resolution.</p>
<p>Jarred Land from RED says this is the first footage from the 2/3" Scarlet prototypes and that the frame above was pulled straight from the <a href="http://redgrabs.com/izzy/">video</a>. He also says this "heavily compressed" and "quick and dirty." We should all aspire to assemble things as quickly and dirtily as this. [<a href="http://reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=27537">RED Forums</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5169834/red-scarlet-test-footage-hits-the-nets-looking-like-a-gift-from-the-gods]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5169834]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[video cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red scarlet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[scarlet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[scarlet 2/3]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 13 Mar 2009 21:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Covert]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5169834&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Red Xbox Coming]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Kotaku notes that a NZ Halo Wars press release makes mention of an EB exclusive <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged RED XBOX" title="Click here to read more posts tagged RED XBOX" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/red-xbox/">Red Xbox</a> 360 Elite. [<a href="http://kotaku.com/5156170/red-xbox-360-mentioned-officially-by-microsoft">Kotaku</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5157014/red-xbox-coming]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5157014]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[elite]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red xbox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xbox]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:01:26 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5157014&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Sanctuary Crew Sure Does Like Their RED Cameras]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="http://dvice.com/archives/2009/01/how_the_red_one.php"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/Picture_5.jpg" width="408" height="306" style="display:block;"></a><em>Sanctuary</em> isn't a terribly popular (or interesting) show, but it does <em>look</em> nice. It's no coincidence, then, that they're the first North American production to exclusively use RED cameras .</p>
<p>As a production, <em>Sanctuary</em> has taken a lot of risks&mdash;they were also the <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/375590/first-entirely-green-screen-show-coming-to-tv">first TV show to go almost completely green-screened</a>, depending on rendered backgrounds for many of their shots. Oddly enough, this technique allowed the RED to really shine.</p>
<p>The crew gushes over the RED One, speaking mostly about its ease of use and versatility, and hinting that its reasonable price allowed the cameramen to spend a bit more on cinema-grade lenses. The most important ability of the RED, as far as <em>Sanctuary</em> is concerned, is resolution. With digital chopping an manipulation the name of the game, it's vital that individual components of the video can be cut and integrated into a composite scene without losing clarity, something which the One's massive 4k sensor makes possible.</p>
<p>It's also interesting to note how using a camera like this changes the production dynamics of a show; reviewing and editing footage occurs almost instantly, rather than hours later as in a traditional film production. So interesting is the production scheme, in fact, that it's the most interesting thing about this entire show. Oh well! [<a href="http://dvice.com/archives/2009/01/how_the_red_one.php">Dvice</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5130039/the-sanctuary-crew-sure-does-like-their-red-cameras]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5130039]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red cameras sanctuary]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sanctuary]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sci-fi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sci-fi channel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 13 Jan 2009 05:52:04 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5130039&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[iPhone 3G Red Looks Cool but It's Fake]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/01/red-edition-iphone-thumb.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/red-edition-iphone-thumb.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a>French site Nowhereelse has their hands on some photos that look suspiciously like a (RED) version of the 16GB iPhone 3G. However, it's lacking the telltale (RED) badge, making this pic dubious at best. <strong>Update.</strong></p>

<p>Also, it could be the way the pic was taken, but the red color just doesn't seem right. Or maybe I'm starting to go color blind. Either way, it could be a case or a legit (RED) iPhone 3G. Or maybe it's just a nice, glossy paint job by someone who wishes there were a (RED) 3G out there in the wild.</p>
<p>Regardless, this kind of simple announcement is one we could easily expect to see Apple making at <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5123052/macworld-2009-the-last-keynote-liveblog-here-this-tuesday">MacWorld</a> this week.</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> Thanks to Julio, we have a <a href="http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Housse-Coque-Facade-Cover-ARRIERE-pour-3G-iPhone-8-16GO_W0QQitemZ220334350782QQcmdZViewItemQQptZFR_JG_T%C3%A9l%C3%A9phonie_Accessoires_Mobiles?hash=item220334350782&_trksid=p3911.c0.m14&_trkparms=72:1301|66%3A2|65%3A12|39%3A1|240%3A1318">link to the source</a>. It's a real product, but a fake (RED) iPhone. No surprises there. [<a href="http://www.nowhereelse.fr/iphone-red-edition-14497/">Nowherelese</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5123068/iphone-3g-red-looks-cool-but-its-fake]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5123068]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[fake]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3g iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[speculation]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[unconfirmed]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 04 Jan 2009 14:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Loftus]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5123068&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Ninendo DS In Red Mario Bros Limited Edition On Black Friday]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/11/marioredds.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/marioredds.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>It's not a special <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/black-friday/">Black Friday</a> deal, but DS fans may think it's a bit special all the same: Nintendo's launching a limited edition Mario Red DS bearing the M logo this Friday. It'll also come with a bundled copy of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #newsupermariobros" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/newsupermariobros/">New Super Mario Bros</a>, and it'll set you back $150. There's another limited edition bundle too, mixing up the ice-blue DS with a custom matching-color carrying case and a copy of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #brainage" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/brainage/">Brain Age</a>, for the same price...but it sounds like way less fun than Mario. [<a href="http://www.nintendo.com/ds">NintendoDS</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5098556/ninendo-ds-in-red-mario-bros-limited-edition-on-black-friday]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5098556]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nintendo ds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[brain age]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[colors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[DS in limited Mario Red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[handheld gaming]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mario]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[new super mario bros]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nintendo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 25 Nov 2008 08:20:18 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kit Eaton]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5098556&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[RED to Make Another, Even Bigger Announcement on December 3rd]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/11/thumb160x_Picture_42.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />RED CEO <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #jimjannard" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/jimjannard/">Jim Jannard</a>, who generally manages to construct all sentences using only intensifiers and superlatives, is getting <em>really</em> excited on the <a href="http://reduser.net/forum/">RedUser forums</a> again:<br></p>
<blockquote>New announcement on Dec. 3rd. Everything has changed... just as we promised. :-)</blockquote>
<p>:-)? <strong>:-)?</strong> <em>What do your cryptic smilies mean, Jim?</em></p>

<p>He goes on to say that the new announcement will make <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5085242/red-unloads-modular-cameras-a-dslr-3d-and-28k">November 13th</a> seem 'insignificant', which is, let's be honest here, quite a claim to accompany such a vague pre-announcement. [<a href="http://reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=22754">RedUser</a> <em>&mdash;Thanks, Øyvind</em>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5098546/red-to-make-another-even-bigger-announcement-on-december-3rd]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5098546]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jim jannard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red dslr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red mysterium]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red scarlet]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 25 Nov 2008 07:51:20 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5098546&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Video Game "O Faces" Captured with RED Camera]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/11/23game.1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/23game.1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>British photographer Robbie Cooper used stills from the video taken by his <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/red/">RED camera</a> to show that look of total concentration achieved by kids as they play some particularly absorbing video games, including Grand Theft Auto IV and Call of Duty 4.</p>
<p>Cooper had the kids look at a reflection of the game in a plane of glass, and put his camera behind the glass so the kids wouldn't be self-conscious about the giant fancy camera pointed right in their faces. This technique is evidently Cooper's homage to Errol Morris' "Interrotron" that the filmmaker used for many of his documentaries. The interplay between the real and unreal worlds is Cooper's ostensible subject, but mostly the photos are just great to look at.</p>
<p>The stills are fantastic quality and it's an odd bit of voyeurism to look straight into somebody's eyes when they're concentrating on something totally different. The other galleries on the site are all really impressive, but this one hit me hard: I'm sure that's how I look right now, staring at my laptop screen. [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2008/11/18/magazine/20081123-games_2.html">New York Times</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5096852/video-game-o-faces-captured-with-red-camera]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5096852]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5096852&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[At Gizmodo Gallery: The Red One Camera]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/11/340x_gizmodo-gallery-red.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/>We'll have a lot more than the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5091517/at-gizmodo-gallery-ancient-apple-phone-prototypes-from-frog-design">1983 Apple Phone</a> prototype at the upcoming <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5082811/gizmodo-gallery-our-wonderful-world-of-gadgets-on-display-in-nyc">Gizmodo Gallery</a>. Perhaps you were interested in getting a good look at the famous Red One camera? That's good, because we sorta know a guy.</p>

<p>The Red One camera was never really interested in capturing HD video (1920x1080). Instead, the system's Super 35mm-sized Mysterium sensor captures footage at 4K (3626x2664) in precious RAW format. The camera starts at only $17,000, but once you get it fully loaded, the system can approach $80,000. Sound like a lot of money? It is. But seeing as it doesn't require purchasing or developing costly film and it still manages to nip the heels of 35mm quality, the Red One represents the democratization of an ever-opening Hollywood system.</p>
<p>The Red One will be at <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5082811/gizmodo-gallery-our-wonderful-world-of-gadgets-on-display-in-nyc">Gizmodo Gallery</a> this December 4th-7th, in NYC.</p>
<p>[Thanks to <a href="http://www.thereedspace.com/">REED ANNEX</a> and thanks to our benefactor <a href="http://www.gizmine.com/">gizmine.com</a>]</p>
<p><b>Gizmodo Gallery</b><br>
<a href="http://www.thereedspace.com/">Reed Annex</a><br>
<a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?q=151+orchard+street+ny&ie=UTF8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&ll=40.721226,-73.989122&spn=0.009741,0.015814&z=16&g=151+orchard+street+ny&iwloc=addr">151 Orchard Street</a><br>
New York, NY 10002</p>
<p><strong>Gizmodo Gallery Reader Meetup</strong><br>
The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5099673/at-giz-gallery-reader-meetup-with-a-back-to-the-future-delorean">reader meetup</a> takes place across the street from the Gallery, at a place called <a href="http://www.theannexnyc.com/">The Annex</a> (not to be confused with REED ANNEX where the gallery is hosted.) The address is <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?q=152+Orchard+Street+ny&ie=UTF8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&ll=40.721112,-73.988628&spn=0.00914,0.013411&z=16&g=152+Orchard+Street+ny&iwloc=addr">152 Orchard Street</a> and we'll be there at <strong>9 PM SHARP on Friday December 5th</strong>.</p>
<p>Gallery Dates:<br>
December 4th-7th</p>
<p>Times:<br>
12/4 Thursday<br>
12-8</p>
<p>12/5 Friday<br>
12-8</p>
<p>12/6 Saturday<br>
11-8</p>
<p>12/7 Sunday<br>
11-4</p>
<p>[Read more about our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5082811/gizmodo-gallery-our-wonderful-world-of-gadgets-on-display-in-nyc">Gizmodo Gallery here</a> and see what else we'll be <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/Gizmodo%20Gallery">playing with</a> at the event.]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5093557/at-gizmodo-gallery-the-red-one-camera]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5093557]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gizmodo gallery]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[4k]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:15:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5093557&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[RED Unloads Modular Cameras, a DSLR, 3D and 28k]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/11/dslr.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/dslr.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Rumors of a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #reddslr" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/reddslr/">RED DSLR</a> had been <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5048028/red-confirms-dslr-says-its-bigger-revolution-than-red-one">confirmed a long time ago</a>, but what of the Scarlet and EPIC übercamcorders? On the <a href="http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=21835&page=2">REDUser forums</a>, RED CEO Jim Jannard has explained it all: Scarlet and EPIC <em>are</em> the DSLR &mdash; all cameras are "part of the same DSMC system", so each and every camera will be part of a modular, build-your-own, still and video product line based on the Scarlet and EPIC 'Brains'. To do this, RED has furnished an insanely diverse new collection of components, with sensors ranging from the $2500 3k Scarlet to the $55,000, <em>28k</em> EPIC 617 Mysterium Monstro. <script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('redannounce1', 10, '');
</script></p>

<p>The core of the new line is made up of the new 'Mysterium' brains, pictured in the gallery above and detailed in the gallery below. These boxy sensors can be built up into <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5078123/its-official-the-canon-5d-mk-ii-will-turn-us-all-into-professional-cinematographers">5D-esque</a> DSLRs, compact prosumer camcoders, full-fledged professional video cameras or even a 3D unit with a new line of lenses, flash storage, frames, mounts and other add-ons, outlined with the new sensors below. In addition to their own lenses, the new cameras mercifully support gear built for Nikon and Canon standards with mount adapters, so you don't have to re-buy all of your optics. <script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('reddetails', 6, '');
</script>In spring, when the first of the new units are intended to ship, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #redone" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/redone/">RED One</a> users won't be left out in the cold &mdash; they'll get purchase credit towards new cameras, or if they'd just like to throw one of the new sensors into their existing rig, credit towards that. I guess this is what Jannard meant when he said RED had a 'new vision'.</p>
<p>For the full release, click <a href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/Untitled-10.jpg">here</a>. <em>Warning &mdash; comically giant JPEG</em>. [<a href="http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=21835&page=3">RED</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5085242/red-unloads-modular-cameras-a-dslr-3d-and-28k]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5085242]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[28k]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3d cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3k]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[5k]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[epic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[modular]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red dslr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red epic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red scarlet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[scarlet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 13 Nov 2008 05:40:10 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5085242&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[RED Re-Teases Nov 13 Announcement With Camera Ports, More Hyperbole]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/11/9_monsterrigxxxx.6a.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/9_monsterrigxxxx.6a.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>In case you forgot there's a big <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5074784/red-teases-nov-13th-announcement-with-cryptic-renders-more-hyperbole">RED announcement happening this week on November 13</a>, RED CEO Jim Jannard is again lighting up the RED User forums with another cryptic tease. Saying nothing more than "Not sure what this means..." the outspoken exec lets fly some ports for the company's upcoming übercamera. As CrunchGear rightly notes, we're probably looking at two XLR ports, video outs and a proprietary connector. We'll know all on Thursday. And for all the pre-buzz, the RED people have made some really spectacular gear and we can't wait to see it trickle into consumer level gear. [<a href="http://www.reduser.net/forum/showpost.php?p=316638&postcount=528">RED User</a> via <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/11/08/another-red-tease-ports-spied/">Crunch Gear</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5081258/red-re+teases-nov-13-announcement-with-camera-ports-more-hyperbole]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5081258]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jam jannard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jannard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red dslr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red scarlet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tease]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 09 Nov 2008 15:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Loftus]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5081258&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[RED Teases Nov 13th Announcement With Cryptic Renders, More Hyperbole]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/11/340x_red2.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />RED CEO Jim Jannard is either an incredible visionary or prone to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5069157/reds-ceo-confirms-incredible-product-re+jig-announcement-november-13">serial exaggeration</a>. Just yesterday, he deigned to visit the RED forums, promising that "[RED is] doing things we never thought possible... When we do post, it will be very obvious why we needed a bit more time to 'spill the beans'." As a teaser, he decided to spill two of those beans early, in the form of vague, zoomed-in renders of RED's new HIV-curing, hunger-ending, climate-stabilizing übercamera.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/red1.jpg" width="494" height="494">Owners of any number of popular DSLRs will notice some familiar controls in these renders, but what does that mean? It seems obvious that Jannard's lovable breathlessness is for his new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #reddslr" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/reddslr/">RED DSLR</a> (or <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5048028/red-confirms-dslr-says-its-bigger-revolution-than-red-one">DSMC</a>, I guess), and that his enthusiasm hasn't been diminished in light of the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5050819/canon-5d-mark-iis-full-hd-video-is-so-stunning-our-eyes-explode">stunning video performance</a> of Canon's 5D DSLR. RED certainly has a track record of innovation, but could Canon have beat them to the DSLR HD video punch? [<a href="http://reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=21335&page=2">RedUser</a> via <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/11/02/enticing-teaser-renders-of-reds-newest-creation/">Crunchgear</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5074784/red-teases-nov-13th-announcement-with-cryptic-renders-more-hyperbole]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5074784]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon 5d]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dsmc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jam jannard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jannard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red dslr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red scarlet]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 03 Nov 2008 07:24:52 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5074784&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Red's CEO Confirms "Incredible" Product Re-Jig Announcement, November 13]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/10/thumb160x_scarlet-cam.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />We already knew Red was going to totally <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5053579/red-scarlet-cam-replaced-with-a-new-vision">revise</a> its Epic and Scarlet cameras, and there was a rumor about a Red <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5048028/red-confirms-dslr-says-its-bigger-revolution-than-red-one">DLSR</a> too: but Jim Jannard&mdash;Red's CEO&mdash;has just popped up on the RedUser forums and confirmed that there's going to be an announcement about the new Epics and Scarlets on November 13th. And if that news alone isn't interesting enough, get what Jim has to say about it:</p>

<blockquote>
<p>I want to say that no one has any idea how incredible this announcement will be. Call this hype... please. I am quite sure that the announcement will be called a "scam". Should be a lot of fun to hear the reactions. I can't wait.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Doesn't that sound like something you definitely want to hear about? It's a pretty bold move making such a statement in so public a forum, and that's got our collective camera-geek brains ticking over. Could it be the fabled 4k video capture, a response to Canon and Nikon's recent <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5051331/giz-explains-why-dslrs-are-finally-shooting-video">video DSLR</a> maneuver? We can't tell, of course...but at least we've not got long to wait to find out. [<a href="http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=21039">RedUser</a> <i>Thanks Brad!</i>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5069157/reds-ceo-confirms-incredible-product-re+jig-announcement-november-13]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5069157]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[epic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red epic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red scarlet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[scarlet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video cameras]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 27 Oct 2008 09:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kit Eaton]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5069157&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Mitsubishi LaserVue vs. Pioneer Kuro Plasma: The High-End Throwdown]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/10/IronMan_Comparison_Web.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/IronMan_Comparison_Web.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>The dudes over at The Tech Lounge sat down for a real-world&mdash;not canned&mdash;comparison of Mitsubishi's cutting-edge, 65-inch LaserVue HDTV with the current reigning champ, Pioneer's 60-inch Kuro plasma set. Does Mitsubishi's fancy new tech really make for a better high-def experience? The tests show, at the very least, that <a href="http://www.thetechlounge.com/article/585-3/Mitsubishi-LaserVue-65-HDTV-We-Meet-Again/">the LaserVue can certainly hold its own</a> against maybe <a href="http://gizmodo.com/388080/pioneer-kuro-2008-first-impressions-new-thin-plasma-and-projector-beat-all">the best HDTV in the world</a>: "You're not going to find a set that is capable of displaying colors quite like this one."</p>
<p>The Kuro still held strong with its deep, bottomless blacks, but the LaserVue is noticeably better on colors, especially reds. The LaserVue is also better able to handle scenes with tons of motion than the Kuro, especially during action scenes in <em>Iron Man</em>. You can see above that the Kuro, on the right, makes the red of Iron Man's suit look too simple, while the LaserVue on the left has all the dirt and scars of a real battle. Below, the LaserVue's reds really pop, able to show the difference between the hues in the woman's top and skirt much more clearly than the Kuro&mdash;which is even from <em>Pioneer</em>'s demo disc. <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/Kuro_Disc_Comparison_Web.jpg" width="494" height="198" style="display:block;float:none;"></p>
<p>We've seen the LaserVue <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5061513/mitsubishis-7000-65+inch-laservue-hdtv-reviewed-verdict-lasers-are-awesome">reviewed</a> before, but only while using Mitsubishi's hand-picked content, which doesn't necessarily make for the most accurate test. Kurtis and Cameron at The Tech Lounge got themselves a Panasonic DMP-BD30K Blu-Ray player and a copy of both <em>Ice Age: Meltdown</em> and <em>Iron Man</em> to test out color, clarity, and motion on the "normal" settings of both HDTVs. They came away impressed with the color, but not with the hefty $7000 price tag. Still, if you can afford it, and you don't mind its fatty rear-projection girth, the LaserVue is definitely the cream of the crop. [<a href="http://www.thetechlounge.com/article/585/Mitsubishi-LaserVue-65-HDTV-We-Meet-Again/">Tech Lounge</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5065464/mitsubishi-laservue-vs-pioneer-kuro-plasma-the-high+end-throwdown]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5065464]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[laservue]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[age]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[black]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[color]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ice]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iron]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[kuro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[man]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mitsubishi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pioneer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[plasma]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[price]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 18 Oct 2008 13:45:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5065464&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Xbox 360 Controller, in Red!]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/10/thumb160x_redcontrollernew.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />That red <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #xbox360" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/xbox360/">Xbox 360</a> controller that <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5025166/red-and-green-limited-edition-xbox-360-controllers-coming-in-september">we told you about</a> is out now (except it's lacking its rumored green counterpart). Nothing special is going on with the buttons or functions, but each controller is forcibly bundled with a Play & Charge kit, meaning that they run a steep $65 a pop. The price may seem crazy, but if you actually search retailers for the limited edition package, you'll see it's really selling for somewhere around $53.75. [<a href="http://kotaku.com/5057186/a-new-red-360-controller-just-in-time-for-gears-2">Kotaku</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5057294/xbox-360-controller-in-red]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5057294]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[360]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red controller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xbox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xbox 360]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xbox 360 red controller]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 01 Oct 2008 08:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5057294&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Red Scarlet Cam Replaced With a "New Vision"]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/09/thumb160x_scarlet-cam.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Red's Jim Jannard has told fans in the RedUser forums to "Wipe your minds of the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5023884/new-red-scarlet-cam-prototype-looks-rugged-can-probably-kill-you-with-death-rays">past announced Scarlet</a>. Forget the design and forget the price. It is all different now. We think you will be surprised." In his words, "the market has changed and we have discovered a lot of things in the process. We have a new vision." So it is not as though the Scarlet cam has been scrapped&mdash;what we are talking about here is a ground up redesign that should be a positive thing for consumers. That having been said, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/379537/red-launches-5k-red-epic-flagship-camera">RED EPIC</a> is going to receive a similar treatment as well.</p>
<p>What they are planning at this point is unclear, however threads in the RedUser forum confirm this much: the names will remain the same, new specs and working models should be available by the 2009 NAB show with a release to follow soon thereafter, and RED is aiming to fulfill initial orders before the fall of 2009. Jannard also noted that "the prices will be very near our target" with regard to Scarlet, so we could be in for an even better camera at a price point similar to the $3000 quoted initially. [<a href="http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=19381">RedUser</a> and <a href="http://www.scarletuser.com/showthread.php?t=1054">RedUser Redesign</a> via <a href="http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2008/09/23/red-scarlet-camera-c.html">Boing Boing Gadgets</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5053579/red-scarlet-cam-replaced-with-a-new-vision]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5053579]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[camcorders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[epic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red epic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red scarlet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red scarlet replaced]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[redesign]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5053579&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Red Confirms DSLR, Says It's Bigger "Revolution" Than Red One]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/reddslr.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"/>Red, makers of the famous<a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/red-one/"> Red One camera</a>, have confirmed their <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5043816/red-may-be-making-a-dslr-camera">upcoming DSLR</a> while dropping breadcrumbs of specs for us to gobble up. First things first, don't call it at SLR&mdash;it's a "replacement for DSLRs" going internally by the name DSMC (Digital Still and Motion Camera). And if we're reading between the lines correctly, they're teasing that the camera will feature video content above hi def.</p>
<blockquote><p>While (insert code name) is not a replacement for Epic or Scarlet, it is strategically targeted at the DSLR space. As <a href="http://gizmodo.com/search/d60">Nikon</a> and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5043240/unconfirmed-more-canon-eos-5d-mark-ii-specs-leak-lookin-good">Canon</a> release their 720P and 1080P, respectively, DSLRs with video capture... RED has a more advanced view of the future.</p></blockquote>
<p>My <em>personal</em> reading on this is that the company is aiming for 4K capture. They also dropped this other tidbit, in case you aren't excited enough:<br />
<blockquote>I won't comment on any specifics until the 1st of the year. But "revolution" applies more to this than the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #redone" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #redone" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/redone/">RED ONE</a> did to cinema.</p></blockquote>
<p>They'll hear from us January 1st. [<a href="http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=18710">Red User </a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/10/more-details-on-reds-dsmc-digital-still-and-motion-camera/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5048028/red-confirms-dslr-says-its-bigger-revolution-than-red-one]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5048028]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red dslr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red one]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[slr]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:19:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5048028&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sprint's HTC Touch Diamond Groped Ahead of Release by WSJ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/09/340x_cdmatouchdi1.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />We've been keeping you up to date on the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5039844/leaked-shot-of-htc-touch-diamond-shows-cdma-version-ate-all-the-pies">CDMA version</a> of <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5041851/cdma-htc-touch-diamond-has-release-date-price-fatness+highlighting-red-rear">HTC's Touch Diamond</a>, coming soon to Sprint, but the lucky buggers over at the Wall St Journal got their mitts on one ahead of its launch. It's fatness turns out to be 0.6-inches in size, partly due to that 1,350 mAh battery good for 4.2 hours of talk time. It comes with Windows Mobile 6.1 Professional Edition with a Sprint-customized TouchFLO interface plus a bunch of extras like Dataviz's Documents to Go Suite, Opera browser, a YouTube app and it works with Sprint TV and the Sprint Music Store. There's also 4GB of internal memory, a 3.2-megapixel camera, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth A2DP. The price is now set at $250, apparently, with 2-year contract, and it's now due mid-September. [<a href="http://solution.allthingsd.com/20080903/htc-cant-disguise-windows-mobile-flaws/">WSJ</a> via <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-10030420-7.html?part=rss&tag=feed&subj=NewsBlog">CNET</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5045294/sprints-htc-touch-diamond-groped-ahead-of-release-by-wsj]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5045294]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[fat phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cdma]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fat]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc touch diamond]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sprint]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[touch diamond]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 04 Sep 2008 08:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kit Eaton]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5045294&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[RED May Be Making a DSLR Camera]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/08/reddslr.jpg" width="114" height="114" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"/>The RED camera's Jim Jannard mentions the next generation Mysterium "Monstro" sensor, which be offered as a free upgrade to the Mysterium-X piece shipping in the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/epic">Epic cam</a>. Then he blows my mind by revealing he's getting into the DSLR race with the same kit. [<a href="http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=18278">REDUSER</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/30/reds-next-move-monstro-dslrs/">Engadget</a>, <em>image not of anything remotely made by RED</em>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5043816/red-may-be-making-a-dslr-camera]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5043816]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[dslrs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[4k]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camcorders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[epic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[monstro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mysterium]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sensor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 30 Aug 2008 12:17:59 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5043816&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[CDMA HTC Touch Diamond Has Release Date, Price, Fatness-Highlighting Red Rear]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/08/340x_cdmatouchdi1.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />We suggested the CDMA version of the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #touchdiamond" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/touchdiamond/">Touch Diamond</a> had <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5039844/leaked-shot-of-htc-touch-diamond-shows-cdma-version-ate-all-the-pies">eaten all the pies</a> last week: Now word is out on its release and Sprint and HTC have chosen not to disguise it. Oh no... they've dolled that large rear-end up in a striking red color. Bizarre, though I guess its in the "if you can't hide it, make a feature of it" school of thinking. We can at least partly forgive its 0.55-inch depth, though, which is due to a 1350mAh battery. It's due out August 28th on Sprint, costing $549 for the bare phone, and $299 on a two-year contract. [<a href="http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/08/24/sprints-htc-touch-diamond-confirmed-for-release-on-august-28th/">Unwiredview</a> via <a href="http://www.newlaunches.com/archives/sprint_to_launch_the_htc_touch_diamond_cdma_on_august_28.php">NewLaunches</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5041851/cdma-htc-touch-diamond-has-release-date-price-fatness+highlighting-red-rear]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5041851]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[buff]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cdma]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fat]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc touch diamond]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sprint]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[touch diamond]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 26 Aug 2008 10:11:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kit Eaton]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5041851&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Red Sprint HTC Diamond Spotted? ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/08/340x_8321.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Maybe it's real. Maybe it's a Photoshop. Either way, here's a red <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5028696/htc-touch-diamond-rom-gives-faster-touchflo-and-850mhz-support">HTC Diamond</a> with a Sprint logo on it. The image goes along with months of rumors about a Sprint-based <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #htcdiamond" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/htcdiamond/">HTC Diamond</a>&mdash;one that will have a more <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5026191/htc-diamond-to-lose-its-crinkles-get-smooth-back+side-codename-victor">curved case</a> than its GSM counterpart along with a battery boost from 900 mAh to 1340 mAh (over 30%). But whether the image is confirmation of these rumors or just a product thereof is not yet known. [<a href="http://www.brighthand.com/default.asp?newsID=14276">Brighthand</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5037471/red-sprint-htc-diamond-spotted-]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5037471]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[htc diamond]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[diamond]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sprint]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 15 Aug 2008 10:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5037471&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Red and Green Limited Edition Xbox 360 Controllers Coming in September]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/07/controllerred.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Microsoft is rolling out limited edition green and red <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #xbox360" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/xbox360/">Xbox 360</a> controllers at the end of September for $64 each. The red one which we see <a href="http://www.xbox.com/en-US/hardware/x/xbox360limitededitionredwirelesscontroller/">here</a> has black accents plus comes with a bundled Play & Charge with red battery pack. The green one isn't listed on xbox.com yet, but Kotaku has a picture of it <a href="http://kotaku.com/5025125/microsoft-releasing-le-red-green-360-controllers">here</a>. If you really want red and green controllers NOW, you can always go <a href="http://www.colorwarepc.com/">Colorware</a>. [<a href="http://www.xbox.com/en-US/hardware/x/xbox360limitededitionredwirelesscontroller/">Xbox.com</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5025166/red-and-green-limited-edition-xbox-360-controllers-coming-in-september]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5025166]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[xbox 360]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[controllers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xbox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xbox 360 controllers]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:38:14 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5025166&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New Red Scarlet Cam Prototype Looks Rugged, Can Probably Kill You with Death Rays]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/07/7a/87/7a8722c37d13b6b7fa6d7e546cc76f0e.jpg"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/07/9_scarletsidesm.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The high definition wizards at RED have a new design update on their <a href="http://gizmodo.com/379530/red-scarlet-3k-hd-pocket-pro-camera-under-3000">Red Scarlet HD Pocket Pro</a>, their handy high definition camera priced under $3,000, which can shoot 3k resolution 120fps video. Looking at the new rugged exterior, it can probably shoot anti-matter beams or armor-piercing grenades too. We want. [<a href="http://scarletuser.com/showthread.php?t=415">Scarlet user</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5023884/new-red-scarlet-cam-prototype-looks-rugged-can-probably-kill-you-with-death-rays]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5023884]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Red Scarlet HD Pocket Pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camcorders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camcorders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red scarlet]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:29:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5023884&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Red's 5k, 4k, and 3k Pro Cameras: What the Resolution Really Means]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/04/redchart.png"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/04/redchart.png" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Here's why we're excited about Red's announcements of their <a href="http://gizmodo.com/379530/red-scarlet-3k-hd-pocket-pro-camera-under-3000">3K Scarlet</a> and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/379537/red-launches-5k-red-epic-flagship-camera">5K Epic</a> <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #digitalcameras" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/digitalcameras/">digital cameras</a>. Their insane resolution. It's one thing to talk about resolution as an abstract number, but Red has a fantastic chart comparing these resolutions to things you're actually familiar with, like your HDTV or your old SDTV. Even the Scarlet, the most affordable of their cameras, dwarfs your 1080p TV in the way that Wilt Chamberlain's "scoring" record dwarfs ours. [<a href="http://www.red.com">Red</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/379670/reds-5k-4k-and-3k-pro-cameras-what-the-resolution-really-means]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-379670]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3k]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[4k]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[5k]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chart]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red epic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red scarlet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[resolution]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[super hd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=379670&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[RED RAY Drive Plays 4K, 2K HD Video from RED Disc, RED Express and CompactFlash]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/04/redray.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />RED's last announcement for the day is the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #redray" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/redray/">RED RAY</a> disc drive, which looks like Darth Vader's optical drive of choice. It plays 4K, 2K (<a href="http://gizmodo.com/379537/red-launches-5k-red-epic-flagship-camera">Epic's insane 5K</a> looks like it's off the table, but what about <a href="http://gizmodo.com/379530/red-scarlet-3k-hd-pocket-pro-camera-under-3000">Scarlet's 3K</a>?) and 1080p video down through standard-def off of RED Disc or RED Express, plus native RAW R3D files off of a CompactFlash card. It's due early 2009 with Epic and Scarlet, but again "specifications, delivery dates and design are subject to change...count it." [<a href="http://www.red.com/nab/red_ray">RED</a>]<br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/379566/red-ray-drive-plays-4k-2k-hd-video-from-red-disc-red-express-and-compactflash]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-379566]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[red ray]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:37:18 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=379566&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[RED Launches 5K RED EPIC Flagship Camera]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/04/red_epic_1.jpg"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/04/red_epic_1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>RED just announced their new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #redepic" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/redepic/">RED EPIC</a> flagship video camera at NAB, which uses a new, full-frame S35mm Mysterium X sensor. The Mysterium X matches the quality of 35mm film at 5k resolution and one ups the 4k Mysterium sensor found in the RED ONE. The EPIC can also shoot framerates up to 100 FPS.</p>
<p>Other features of the Aluminum-framed beast include full size, dual-link HD SDI, 2 XLR audio inputs, HDMI, Wi-Fi, Firewire 800 and USB 2.0. It also weighs 6 pounds. And if any of you happened to purchase the $17500 RED ONE, you can exchange it and receive full credit towards the RED EPIC (which currently has no price tag). RED currently plans on an early 2009 release for the EPIC. [<a href="http://www.red.com/nab/epic">RED</a>]</p>
<p><img alt="red_5k_epic_hero.png" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/04/red_5k_epic_hero.png" width="650" height="424" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"></p>
<blockquote>SPECIFICATIONS:
<p>* <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #fullframe" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/fullframe/">FULL FRAME</a> S35MM NEW MYSTERIUM X SENSOR<br>
* 1-100 FPS<br>
* UP TO 100 MB/SEC. REDCODE RAW AND RGB RECORDING TO REDFLASH<br>
* FULL SIZE DUAL LINK HD-SDI, 2-XLR AUDIO INPUTS AND HDMI<br>
* WI-FI CONTROL<br>
* FIREWIRE 800 and USB2<br>
* 6 POUND FULLY MACHINED ALUMINUM BODY WITH HYBRID STAINLESS PL MOUNT<br>
* COMPATIBLE WITH MOST RED ONE ACCESSORIES<br>
* FULLY UPGRADABLE SENSOR, BODY, BOARDS AND MOUNT.</p>
<p>SPECIFICATIONS, DELIVERY DATES AND DESIGN ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE... COUNT ON IT.</p>
</blockquote>
<br>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/379537/red-launches-5k-red-epic-flagship-camera]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-379537]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[video cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[5k]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[epic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[full frame]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red epic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:04:48 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Covert]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=379537&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Red Scarlet 3K HD Pocket Pro Camera Under $3000]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/04/redscarlet.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Red's pocket-sized professional camera, Scarlet has made its <a href="http://gizmodo.com/339847/red-pocket-professional-camera-aka-scarlet-to-see-daylight-at-nab">promised debut</a> at NAB, and it is the tiny hotness. It shoots in heady 3k resolution with Red's new 2/3-inch Mysterium X sensor, shooting from 1-120fps (180fps burst) and up to 100MB/sec REDCODE RAW HD, recording to dual Compact Flash cards. It's got Wi-Fi control (sweet), and all the necessary ports: HDMI, HD-SDI, Firewire 800 and USB2. The 4.8-inch LCD should be more than adequate on this compact HD shooter. Besides coming with an 8X T2.8 Red zoom lens, it's compatible with most Red One accessories. Price? We're hearing under $3000, set for early '09, no pre-orders. But the note that specs and delivery dates could change is a bit ominous, since the Red One saw some delays. [<a href="http://www.red.com/nab/scarlet">Red</a>, <a href="http://red.cachefly.net/nab/nab2008.pdf">Brochure</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/379530/red-scarlet-3k-hd-pocket-pro-camera-under-3000]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-379530]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[red scarlet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camcorders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hd cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nab]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[scarlet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:44:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=379530&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Fire Red Sidekick Slide Coming May, Juneish]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/04/redsidekickslide.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />We know how much you kids love the Sidekicks, which is why you'll be excited at getting a completely new color: <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #firered" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/firered/">fire red</a>. Boy Genius has the image above, plus gives the estimated release date on T-Mobile at either late May or early June. It's no Sidekick 4, but it'll do for now. We're still wondering how much they had to pay Michelle Yeoh to pose for their promo shots. [<a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2008/04/07/fire-red-motorola-sidekick-slide-launching-on-t-mobile-late-may-early-june/">Boy Genius</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/377864/fire-red-sidekick-slide-coming-may-juneish]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-377864]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[danger]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fire red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red sidekick slide]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sidekick]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sidekick slide]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[slide]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 09 Apr 2008 14:50:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=377864&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Mr. T-Mobile Warns Mr. Engadget Mobile Over the Color Magenta]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/04/magenta-murdoch.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #mrt" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/mrt/">Mr. T</a> says I'm crazy and he may be right. I'm a bird! I'm a plane! I'm a choo-choo train! But Mr.T-Mobile is the only crazy one: they requested Engadget Mobile to stop using <i>their shade of magenta</i> in his logo because it may lead to "confusion in the marketplace." <i>Their</i> shade of magenta? I've known magenta since she was a kid! She was called Cynthia back then. Don't worry Mr. Block, it'll all pass. Just hold your breath, and remember your exercises! [<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/31/deutsche-telekom-t-mobile-demands-engadget-mobile-discontinue/">Engadget</a> via <a href="http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2008/04/deutshe-telekom.html">Gadget Lab</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/374662/mr-t+mobile-warns-mr-engadget-mobile-over-the-color-magenta]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-374662]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[magenta]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[color]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[logo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mr t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mr. t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pink]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:20:10 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kit Eaton]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=374662&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Red PSP Coming Bundled With God of War This Summer]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/02/gowpsp.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />There's no exact date yet, but Kotaku's reporting that a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #redpsp" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/redpsp/">red PSP</a> will be hitting this summer bundled with a copy of <i><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #godofwar" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/godofwar/">God of War</a>: Chains of Olympus</i> as well as <i>Superbad</i> and a gift certificate for a downloadable PlayStation Store game. It's similar to the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/e307/hands+on-with-the-darth-vader-star-wars-psp-278443.php">Star Wars PSP</a> from last summer in that it's a branded PSP, but instead of a bald disabled man with a deep voice, you're getting a bald Spartan with a deep voice. [<a href="http://kotaku.com/360928/red-psp-comes-stateside-with-god-of-war-summer-bundle">Kotaku</a>]</p>
<p><img alt="gowpsp2.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/02/gowpsp2.jpg" width="500" height="259"></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/360972/red-psp-coming-bundled-with-god-of-war-this-summer]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-360972]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[red psp]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[god of war]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[playstation]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[psp]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony psp]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:00:51 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=360972&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Microsoft Valentine's Day Zune Delayed; Sorry Seems to be the Hardest Word]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/02/redzuneGI.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Those chaps at Microsoft promised a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/345222/microsoft-picks-worst-day-of-the-year-to-announce-red-zune-80-for-valentines-day">special edition Zune 80</a> for <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #valentinesday" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/valentinesday/">Valentine's Day</a>, but the units have struck a delay and will not reach their destinations on time. That surely blows, but if your sweet was due to receive a Cupid <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #redzune80" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/redzune80/">red Zune 80</a>, fret not. Microsoft is doing the right thing&mdash;they're refunding the cash, and shipping the Zunes for free regardless. Jump for the note they sent out to the lucky/unlucky customers.<br></p>

<blockquote>We wanted to provide you with an update on your order status. Due to some issues in our fulfillment center there remains a chance we will miss getting your Zune to you by February 14th. We are working hard to get your order to you as quickly as possible and we currently plan to ship your Zune within the next 3-4 days. Once your order is in transit, we will send you a shipping confirmation with a link for tracking.
<p>Our goal is to provide a smooth customer experience for ordering, customization, and delivery. We sincerely apologize for not meeting that goal in this specific case. We will be refunding the entire amount of your order, which you should be able to see on your credit/debit card within 7-10 days. We hope you love your Zune and that you will accept our sincere apology.</p>
<p>If you have additional questions, please call 1.877.GET.ZUNE. For fastest service, press 5 then press 1 and have your order information ready.</p>
<p>The Zune Originals Team</p>
</blockquote>
To everyone who has profited from this turn of events: go and buy her a proper present, you Zune-loving cheapskate. [<a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080208-microsoft-says-sorry-with-free-valentines-zune-80-players.html">Ars Technica</a>]]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/354599/microsoft-valentines-day-zune-delayed-sorry-seems-to-be-the-hardest-word]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-354599]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pmp]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pmps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red zune 80]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[valentine's day]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[zune]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[zune 80]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 09 Feb 2008 10:55:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haroon Malik]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=354599&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Friday Caption Contest: Bill Gates, Bono and Michael Dell Walk into a Bar]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/01/gates_bono_dell_red_425.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Have you seen Bono more uncomfortable than this? Caption this picture of him supporting the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/347916/dell-and-microsoft-see-product-red-for-valentines-day">Dell & Microsoft RED campaign</a>. [<i>Image courtesy <a href="http://www.gadgetell.com/tech/comment/dell-makes-product-red-selection-available/">Gadgetell</a>]</i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/349044/friday-caption-contest-bill-gates-bono-and-michael-dell-walk-into-a-bar]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-349044]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[caption contest]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bill gates]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bono]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[captions]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[michael dell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:15:24 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=349044&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
