<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: Rf]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/rf</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'rf']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Undress a Woman Using Radio Frequencies]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_intimacy-500px.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />A dress that gradually disappears as you get a magic ball near to it? Yaishplease. That's exactly what Daan Roosegaarde, V2 Lab, and Maartje Dijkstra have created, using a flexible plastic material and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #radiofrequency" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/radiofrequency/">radio frequency</a> technology. Very pretty too:</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5434415,8,'');
</script></p>
<p>Called Intimacy, the dress' smart fabric reacts to variations in the electric current, smoothly changing its opacity until it gets completely transparent&mdash;and viceversa. The change is controlled by a ball, which has an RF tag that gets detected by circuitry in the dress' collar. On a related note, this is what happens to my underpants whenever <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5433912/the-y2k%252B10-holiday-card">my fiancée</a> gets close to me, with no RF tag involved whatsoever. [<a href="http://www.studioroosegaarde.net/">Roosegaarde</a> and <a href="http://www.v2.nl/archive/articles/fashion-transparency-intimacy">v2</a> via <a href="http://www.styleguru.org/entry/intimacy-creative-and-sensual-clothing-by-roosegaarde/">Styleguru</a> via <a href="http://www.fashioningtech.com/profiles/blogs/intimacy-a-sensual-hautetech">Fashion Tech</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5434427/undress-a-woman-using-radio-frequencies]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5434427]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nsfw]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fashion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intimacy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[radio frequency]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rf]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smart foils]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tags]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 25 Dec 2009 21:58:40 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5434427&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Rēmote Turns Your iPhone Into a Universal RF Remote]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/thumb160x_2handswithremote-300x209.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />New Kinetic has an RF attachment accessory for the iPhone that gives it all the power of a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #universalremote" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/universalremote/">universal remote</a>, except way, way better. This is the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/331711/all-giz-wants-a-real-universal-remote">universal remote we want</a>.</p>
<p>The accessory plugs into the docking port on an iPhone (or presumably iPod Touch), and includes features like an extensive library of IR codes, customizable buttons, and RF learning from other remotes. It's a great idea; my iPod Touch doesn't get much use as a PMP, but Remote, VLC Remote and Boxee Remote make it a great remote control for my HTPC, so I'm all for extending the functionality to RF. We don't know much about this gadget yet&mdash;but it'll be officially announced at CES, and we'll give you more info (like price and availability) then. [<a href="http://www.chipchick.com/2009/12/re-remote-control-iphone.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ChipChick+%28Chip+Chick%29">Chip Chick</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5429866/rmote-turns-your-iphone-into-a-universal-rf-remote]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5429866]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[accessories]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone universal remote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[remote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rf]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[universal remote]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 18 Dec 2009 20:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5429866&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New Bluetooth Runs for a Year Off a Watch Battery]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/tibt.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />There's little stopping Bluetooth from making its way into more devices, but its battery drain is many times that of, say, tried and true IR. But a new, lower power Bluetooth is coming next year.</p>

<p>By <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #texasinstruments" href="http://gizmodo.comhttp://gizmodo.com/tag/texasinstruments/">Texas Instruments</a>, a new, 6mm-square Bluetooth system-on-a-chip can operate for "more than a year" on a small button-cell battery (like you see in watches or very tiny remotes). Everything from cellphones to laptops could get a battery boost from the technology, but low power, low cost Bluetooth also opens to door to sticking the technology in more places, too (imagine an RF remote or console controller that you don't need to recharge).</p>
<p>It'll be interesting to see how many companies adopt the new tech when it's available next year, along with how many side with the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5381623/new-wi+fi-direct-to-connect-gadgets-without-routers">latest developments in Wi-Fi</a> instead. [<a href="http://www.ti.com/ww/en/analog/bluetooth/index.htm?DCMP=BluetoothLowEnergy&HQS=NotApplicable+OT+bluetoothlowenergy&DCMP=hpa_rf_general&HQS=Other+PR+bluetoothlowenergy-pr">Texas Instruments</a> and <a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/texas-instruments-demonstrates-worlds-first-coin-cell-demo-for-bluetoothr-low-energy-applications-at-bluetooth-low-energy-technology-conference-in-munich-64718712.html">Press Release</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5384727/new-bluetooth-runs-for-a-year-off-a-watch-battery]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5384727]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[bluetooth]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[new bluetooth]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rf]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[texas instruments]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:10:45 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5384727&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[X10 iconRemote RF Universal Remote Review]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/x10.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_x10.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>X10, whose website is the only place where animated gifs still remain king, just released a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged UNIVERSAL REMOTE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/universal-remote/">universal remote</a> that can handle both X10's home appliance controls as well as all your A/V gear in your home theater.</p>
<h1>The Price:</h1>
<p>$100</p>
<h1>The Verdict:</h1>
<p>Actually a good deal.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/x10remote3.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_x10remote3.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>There are two components of the remote that, depending on your habits, you may use more or less of. There's the "universal remote" part of the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged ICONREMOTE RF" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iconremote-rf/">iconRemote RF</a>, which acts similar to the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/harmony">Logitech Harmony</a> remotes in that it controls all your electronics, but it doesn't have the fancy software programming suite to back it up. And there's the X10 part of the remote, which acts as a wireless control&mdash;via the included wireless receiver and appliance/lamp modules&mdash;to various appliances around your house.</p>
<h1>The Remote:</h1>
<p>The iconRemote RF is a so-so universal remote, and you program it like you do the old style ones you buy at Radio Shack; you point it at your TV and you stop cycling when the TV turns on. Repeat as many times as you have A/V equipment you want to control.</p>
<p>This method makes initial setup actually <i>easier</i> than the Logitech Harmony remotes, but limits you to how much fine-grained control you have. The remote may "know" how to turn on and off your receiver, but it doesn't understand how many HDMI inputs there are or how to switch between them. So it's a universal remote only for more simple systems with just a TV and maybe a DVD player.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/x10remote1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_x10remote1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>One nice feature the iconRemote introduces is the semi-hard coded favorites, which has network logos on screen that you can click to jump to. And, as the name of the remote implies, it has an RF to IR blaster included, so you can eschew line-of-sight and put your equipment in a cabinet and still be able to change channels.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizplus.jpg" width="20" height="20">Package includes an RF to IR blaster<br clear="all">
<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizminus.jpg" width="20" height="20">It's only a rudimentary universal remote<br clear="all">
<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizminus.jpg" width="20" height="20">Also, it's kind of gigantic<br clear="all"></p>
<h1>The X10 Wireless Control:</h1>
<p>X10 has dialed down their popup ads in recent years, but their product is the same: home automation via light, appliance and electronics controls. The package includes one wireless transceiver, one lamp module and one appliance module. The transceiver takes the wireless signals and shoots them over your powerline, which them gets interpreted by your lamp or appliance module to turn on/off whatever's plugged in.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/x10-2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_x10-2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Its major flaw is the fact that the whole transceiver + module has to be on the same circuit. A transceiver upstairs wouldn't control a lamp downstairs, for example, because they weren't able to talk to each other over the electrical system. You'll have to go and buy more transceivers to control every room of your house this way.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/x10-3.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_x10-3.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>But, once you do have everything set up, being able to dim lights, turn on and off appliances, and otherwise interact with other X10 home automation devices, is a pretty valuable thing to have in your universal remote.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizplus.jpg" width="20" height="20">Controls X10's home automation modules<br clear="all">
<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizplus.jpg" width="20" height="20">Comes with one transceiver and two control modules<br clear="all">
<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gizminus.jpg" width="20" height="20">You'll have to buy a lot more to control your entire house<br clear="all"></p>
<p>At $100, the iconRemote RF is a pretty interesting package. It's not great enough of a remote to replace a Logitech Harmony for hardcore users, but it is decent enough to be a step up from those <em>cheaper</em> universal remotes you may have. Coupled with the fact that it's an X10 remote, it's a very handy thing to have at all times.</p>
<p>To get the package, add both the iconRemote RF and the Remote-Controlled Dimmable Theater Lighting to your cart before checkout. [<a href="http://www.x10.com/promotions/ir32a_remote_automation.html">X10</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5372182/x10-iconremote-rf-universal-remote-review]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5372182]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iconremote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iconremote rf]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[remote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[remotes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rf]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[universal remote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[x10]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[x10 iconremote rf review]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 01 Oct 2009 16:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5372182&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[AT&T RF Anywhere Changes Channels From the Darkest, Most Isolated Areas of Your Home]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/340x_CY-RC303-AT.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />As I blindly played Wii Sports from the kitchen the other day&mdash;the TV completely out of sight&mdash;I couldn't help but wonder why many remotes still implement hindering line-of-sight IR to work properly. Enter the RF Point Anywhere.</p>

<p>Developed by AT&T, the Anywhere uses RF tech to control your various home entertainment baubles from anywhere in the room. Behind a couch; with the cable box behind an opaque cabinet door; or even from the dark basement dungeon you set up for when the AT&T U-verse guy shows up late for his ambiguously defined 9-5 appointment window (yes, it's back lit!).</p>
<p>We've covered RF remotes before, most notably the recent <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5290975/the-loop-controls-your-tv-like-the-wii-for-100">Loop Remote</a>, which controls TVs using a mix of Wii-like wonder, some pointing, and plenty of kitsch. The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #rfanywhere" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/rfanywhere/">RF Anywhere</a> is perhaps a bit more practical, but again you need to be a U-verse user to enjoy it.</p>
<p>The remote will cost U-verse customers $50 (slightly more than the one they get with service), and that includes the RF dongle. After that's paid up, you're free to change channels blindly from the pooper at your convenience. [<a href="http://www.store.att.com/catalog/productdetails.asp?ProductId=CY-RC303-AT&CategoryId=catUTVRemotes&show=Features">AT&T</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/09/walls-are-no-longer-a-limitation-for-u-verse-with-new-rf-point-a/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5333412/att-rf-anywhere-changes-channels-from-the-darkest-most-isolated-areas-of-your-home]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5333412]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[remotes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[remote controls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rf]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[RF ANywhere]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 09 Aug 2009 18:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Loftus]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5333412&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The World's Smallest, Potentially Seediest GPS, GSM and RF Tracker]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_gpstracker.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;">It looks like a nondescript battery, but this is actually the world's smallest GPS, GSM and RF tracking device.</p>
<p>The recently released CATS.i measures just 45mm x 35mm x 12mm, and makers say it can be used to track cars, pets and even people. Given that they also claim this is the "most covert" tracking device of its type and is "almost undetectable when being worn", I'm not sure I want to know who their normal customers are.</p>
<p>The device uses a built-in GSM sim chip to report back its GPS data, either constantly or at set intervals, which can then be tracked online. It is battery powered but can also be hardwired to vehicles, or even solar power&mdash;though the makers don't specify how. Quad band GSM, GSP and RF ensures you should be able to monitor the people you are stalking&mdash;sorry, <em>tracking</em>&mdash;wherever they go. [<a href="http://www.cats-i.net/">Cats.i</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5296567/the-worlds-smallest-potentially-seediest-gps-gsm-and-rf-tracker]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5296567]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cats-i]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gps tracking]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gsm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[GSM tracker]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[live position data]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[navigation]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rf]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[RF Tracker]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 19 Jun 2009 08:07:36 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon Crisp]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5296567&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[RF Cochlea Is a Super-Powered Signal Processor Modeled After the Inner Ear]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_custom_1245204234860_rf_cochlea_and_antenna.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;">RF <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SIGNAL PROCESSORS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/signal-processors/">signal processors</a> are pretty commonplace in consumer electronics. Which is exactly why it's exciting that two MIT researchers have created a super-radio based around the function of the human ear that's substantially faster and 100x more power efficient than today's signal processors.</p>
<p>The inner ear is able to take in all the noise in a surrounding area, and adapt how it processes the sound accordingly. Gizmag says that in a similar fashion, the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged RF COCHLEA" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/rf-cochlea/">RF Cochlea</a> is able to analyze a wide range of frequencies, and maximize how it routes data for maximum bandwidth and minimal power consumption. In testing, these designs have been faster than anything they've ever seen before.</p>
<p>What this means for the rest of us is the development of faster, smarter radios for signals such as television channels, cellphones, wi-fi, etc... These "smart radios" could not only take unused bandwidth from one application and put it to work in another, but they could also learn to avoid certain frequencies based on the radio waves in their current location. The end result would be stronger, clearer wireless signals.</p>
<p>The researchers also think it would be possible to commercialize this technology within a couple of years, if someone was so motivated. I like that. [<a href="http://www.gizmag.com/human-ear-inspires-super-radio-design/11964/">Gizmag</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5293297/rf-cochlea-is-a-super+powered-signal-processor-modeled-after-the-inner-ear]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5293297]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[future tech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[data transmission]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[radios]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rf]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[RF Cochlea]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[RF Cochlea Signal Processor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rf signal processors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[signal processors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[signals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 17 Jun 2009 01:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Covert]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5293297&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Tablet Likely Described in Patent]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/02/custom_1233676934834_medium_2167867785_21c57ec5d9_o-1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/02/custom_1233676934834_medium_2167867785_21c57ec5d9_o-1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Hidden within the usual litany of claims in a patent awarded this January-titled "Display Housing for Computing Device", which covers their current portable displays-Apple describes a tablet display, with the display housing the computer device.</p>

<p>The patent describes several forms for these displays-most of them already in use in current Apple laptops-, describing displays attached to portable computers. However, one of the claims describes the display as a "housing for a computer device", which would include the computer electronics within the display housing, sandwiched between front and back shells.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>[0015]<b>As a housing for a computer device</b>, one embodiment of the invention includes: a front shell; a back shell coupled to said front shell to produce said housing, <b>electrical components for the computer device being internal to said housing</b>; and a foam stiffener provided internal to said housing to substantially fill unused space internal to said housing, thereby providing stiffness to said housing.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>According to our patent expert R. Polk Wagner, Professor of patents law at University of Pennsylvania Law School:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>What might be fair to say is that Apple's patent is significant in that it shows something about the company's thinking: that they are thinking about "portable computing devices" where the display (and/or keyboard) are <i>larger</i> than the volume required to house the components inside - thus allowing or even requiring a stiffener. Maybe this means Apple is thinking about tablets (i.e., "big iPhones") or maybe they're just thinking about further miniaturization of components / lighter weight in existing form factors. Hard to know.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>So there you have it. To me, the patent claim quoted above leans clearly to a potential tablet device. In any case, remember that patents don't have to materialize into products, but it's always comforting to see Apple thinking about creating such a device. Or at least, contemplating the possibility seriously enough to cover all bets in a patent. [<a href="http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-adv.html&r=1&p=1&f=G&l=50&d=PG01&S1=%28%28apple.AS.+AND+%28%22DISPLAY+HOUSING+COMPUTING+DEVICE%22.TTL.%29%29+AND+20090108.PD.%29&OS=an/apple+and+ttl/%22DISPLAY+HOUSING+FOR+COMPUTING+DEVICE%22+and+pd/01/08/2009&RS=((AN/apple+AND+TTL/%22DISPLAY+HOUSING+FOR+COMPUTING+DEVICE%22)+AND+PD/20090108)">USPTO</a> via <a href="http://www.electronicpulp.net/2009/02/03/apple-patent-shows-possible-design-for-upcoming-tablet-pcmid/">Electronic Pulp</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5145104/apple-tablet-likely-described-in-patent]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5145104]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple tablet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[displays]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook touch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rf]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Feb 2009 04:30:21 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5145104&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New Paint Could Block Wi-Fi From Nosey Neighbors]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/01/340x_wifipaint.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Living in an apartment building, I can spot about twenty active Wi-Fi networks at a time. And the worst part is that they can all see me, too.</p>

<p>While we've had RF-blocking paint to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/naturalnano-develops-cellphoneblocking-paint-157991.php">cellphone signals</a> for some time, manufacturers have been thwarted when attempting to stop higher frequencies, like we have on home networks.</p>
<p>Now a team of researchers from the University of Tokyo has developed an aluminium-iron oxide that blocks radio frequencies up to four times beyond existing anti-RF technologies. The paint puts out a magnetic field that resonates at the same frequency as the electromagnetic wave (in this case, a radio frequency) you're looking to block.</p>
<p>The good news is that the material shouldn't be expensive to produce. Right now it's estimated to run $14 per kilogram. Assuming our math is correct, if the average gallon of paint runs 2 pounds, then a can of Wi-Fi blocking paint would be $50 to manufacture. That's not super cheap, but neither is the lifetime of blackmail after your neighbor deciphers your network password and threatens to show the world your earnest, self-shot modeling portfolio. [<a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/158288/paint_secures_wifi.html">PCWorld</a> via <a href="http://www.unplggd.com/unplggd/how-to/secure-your-wireless-networkwith-paint-074846">Unplggd</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5139315/new-paint-could-block-wi+fi-from-nosey-neighbors]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5139315]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[emerging tech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[decor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[home]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[networking]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[radio frequencies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rf]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rf paint]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wi-fi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wi-fi paint]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5139315&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[R/C License Plate Covers Are a Tempting But Unwise Purchase]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/10/340x_rflicensenew.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />All of us have considered it at one time or another. What if we just didn't have a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #licenseplate" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/licenseplate/">license plate</a>? The cops could spot us speeding, we'd ditch out on a side street and then we'd drive the same car to work the next day without a hitch (or tasering). It was a fun daydream, but now with these RF <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #licenseplatecovers" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/licenseplatecovers/">License Plate Covers</a>, we can <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5069422/the-muppets-animal-caught-speeding-driving-police-crazy">live</a> that dream.</p>

<p>Once installed, you simply press a button to command motorized panels to cover your front and back plates. At this point, while you can still see your car, it's technically invisible. Then press down on the gas, put two wheels on the sidewalk and you'll really see what those license plate covers can really do.</p>
<p>Priced at $121, just remember, there's always a magical place called the race track if you want to drive like a douche. [<a href="http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.16963">DealExtreme</a> via <a href="http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/10/28/remote-license-plate-cover-saves-time-and-money-at-toll-booths/">OhGizmo!</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5069750/rc-license-plate-covers-are-a-tempting-but-unwise-purchase]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5069750]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[vehicles]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cars]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[license plate]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[license plate covers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[r/c]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rf]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sanyo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:15:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5069750&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Patent Forsees Gadget RF Connectivity Everywhere, From Shirts to Cars]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/10/340x_apple-rf-modules.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Apple's just filed a patent titled "Personal area network systems and devices and methods for use thereof" which is speculative, but basically offers us a sniff of how the future of gadget interconnectivity might be. Apple imagines small, intelligent and efficient RF transmitter-receivers that can handshake and pass data between gadgets and which are embedded <i>everywhere</i>, literally from your socks upwards.</p>

<p>The embeddable modules would be smart enough to ID themselves and enable both short-range (i.e. home network-style) and long-range (GSM, 3G, WiMax) connections between your portable gadgets, in an automated manner. It's in a similar vein to the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/using-the-human-body-as-a-transfer-medium-for-chips-153800.php">personal area net</a> tech that's been mooted for ages, but Apple's suggesting that it could become ubiquitous: you'd plug your iPod into an RF-enabled shirt that'd connect it up, or slip a device into a handbag that has RF connections built-in, and so on.</p>
<p>Possible? We'll have to wait and see. But if Apple's vision proves accurate, and your iPod ends up talking to your shoes which then hook themselves up to your in-car network, then we'll all be bathed in even more RF waves than we are now. [<a href="http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/10/23/apple-looks-forward-to-add-rf-communications-to-everything/">Unwiredview</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5067537/apple-patent-forsees-gadget-rf-connectivity-everywhere-from-shirts-to-cars]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5067537]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[RF everywhere]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple patent RF everywhere]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[communications]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[networking]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rf]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 23 Oct 2008 06:44:42 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kit Eaton]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5067537&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[3M Mobile ID Reader Helps Big Brother Take Your Identity More Efficiently]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/09/handheld_mobile_reader.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/handheld_mobile_reader.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>3M's new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #mobileidreader" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/mobileidreader/">Mobile ID Reader</a> scans MRZ and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #rfchip" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/rfchip/">RF chip</a> data from passports and visas and immediately checks them against local or international watch lists by using wifi or GSM/GPRS EDGE networks. It seems like a great tool to further make you feel like you're living in some scary dystopian sci-fi novel, especially when you hear that dastardly monopolist Bill Gates got his little-loved <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windowsmobile" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windowsmobile/">Windows Mobile</a> 6 OS onto the device.</p>
<p>The Mobile ID Reader boasts an 8GB capacity, so when hackers crack the “encrypted formats feature,” they'll have access to tons of personal and privileged data. Other features include a sunlight-safe touchscreen and a capacitive fingerprint sensor. The device is meant to be used by authorities at event checkpoints, like its first tryout at the Euro Cup 2008 soccer tournament, but it shouldn't be long before you see it at your local Trader Joe's, checking up on the hippies. [<a href="http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2008/09/give-away-your.html">Wired</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5055822/3m-mobile-id-reader-helps-big-brother-take-your-identity-more-efficiently]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5055822]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[the future is terrifying]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3m]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hacker]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mobile id reader]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[passport]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rf]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rf chip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sci-fi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[visa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[watch list]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows mobile]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 27 Sep 2008 10:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5055822&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Napkin PC Concept Utilizes Multi-Touch E-Paper Display and RF Technology]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="napkin_pc.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/01/napkin_pc.jpg" width="478" height="359" class+"center"/>We have all doodled an idea or a bit of important information <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/inspirational/napkin-notebook-an-idea-so-good-it-must-have-been-written-on-a-napkin-325182.php">on a napkin</a> at one point or another, but designer Avery Holleman takes it a step further with the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #napkinpc" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #napkinpc" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/napkinpc/">Napkin PC</a>. The device is intended to help creative groups collaborate on designs more effectively. Here's how it works: data is sent to the  multi-touch e-paper "napkin" interface via the pen using short range <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #radiofrequency" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #radiofrequency" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/radiofrequency/">radio frequency</a> (RF). The pen and the napkin also communicate with the base station PC via long-rage RF. More after the break.<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">galleryPost('napkinpc', 8, '');</script></p>

<p>The result is a device that allows users to share ideas with greater ease. The napkins are also modular, so large-scale layouts can be formed by connecting them together. If all of that wasn't improbable enough, the Napkin PC uses so little power that it has no need for a battery&mdash;instead, it features a single-layer flexible circuit board that utilizes inductive power. It sounds like a really awesome idea, if you can get past the fact that it  would cost a fortune to produce one device that probably wouldn't work. [<a href="http://www.yankodesign.com/index.php/2008/01/04/high-tech-napkins/">Yanko Design</a>] </p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/340835/napkin-pc-concept-utilizes-multi+touch-e+paper-display-and-rf-technology]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-340835]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[concept]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[e-ink]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[e-paper]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[multitouch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[napkin pc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[radio frequency]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rf]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 04 Jan 2008 18:00:25 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=340835&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Keyspan RF Remote for Windows Vista Sees Through Walls]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/08/keyspan_remote.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Use this Keyspan RF (radio frequency) remote to control your Windows Vista PC from 90 feet away, a distance the company takes great glee in exclaiming is three times the distance of infrared remotes. You just plug that USB receiver into your PC, and you're good to go, remote-controlling all those movie files you've ripped off, or even the scant few you've bought, with the greatest of ease. How would we use such a thing?</p>
<p>In our <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #hometheater" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/hometheater/">home theater</a>, we like having the PC tucked away in the server closet in the next room, completely out of earshot but still close enough for its cable to reach the projector. Since this Keyspan RF remote can see through walls like some sort of electro-Superman, it will give us a computer viewing experience that's decidedly TV-like. It might be worth a try for $49. [<a href="http://www.keyspan.com/products/erv2/homepage.spml">Keyspan</a>]<br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/286851/keyspan-rf-remote-for-windows-vista-sees-through-walls]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-286851]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[media center control]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[home entertainment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[home theater]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[keyspan]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[remote controls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[remotes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rf]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 07 Aug 2007 12:15:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie White]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=286851&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[PMA 07: Elinchrom EL-Skyport for Remote Flash Operation on the Cheap]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2007/03/skyport_front.jpg"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/03/skyport_front.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>When working with off-camera flash, there are several ways to do it, but RF is the most versitile and long range. For years now, PocketWizards have been the de-facto industry standard and that probably won't change. Great as they are, they're kinda pricey. That's where the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #elinchromelskyport" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/elinchromelskyport/">Elinchrom EL-Skyport</a> system shines: the price is right. Though not compatible with the PocketWizard system, it's cheaper and has some extra capabilities.</p>
<p>There are 4 products in the line, 2 types of transmitters and 2 types of receivers. The basic transmitter unit attaches to the hotshoe of any camera. The USB transmitter hooks to a computer and when paired with the software (Mac/PC), it allows for some additional control of lights and even allows saving of light setups.</p>
<p>Check out the gallery for details, and jump for more info.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('skyport', 10, 'Elinchrom EL-Skyport');
</script><br></p>

<p>The universal receiver uses a rechargeable Li-Ion Nokia phone battery and triggers via standard sync cord while the RX receiver allows remote adjustment of the power output and modeling lights of compatible Elinchrome RX series strobes.</p>
<p>Pricing hasn't been set yet, as these are still undergoing FCC approval testing for US sale, but a receiver/transmitter kit should sell for less than a single PocketWizard. Look for them Q2 2007.</p>
<p><strong>Here's the good stuff:</strong><br>
2.4ghz RF, 8 channels, 40bit security<br>
Syncs at up to 1/1000<br>
165ft indoor range and 395ft outdoor range<br>
4 workgroups for different control options</p>
<p><span class="byline">&ndash; <a href="http://curtisjoewalker.blogspot.com/">Curtis Joe Walker</a></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.elinchrom.com/">Product Page</a> [Elinchrom]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/243010/pma-07-elinchrom-el+skyport-for-remote-flash-operation-on-the-cheap]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-243010]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[el-skyport]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[elinchrom]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[elinchrom el-skyport]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[photography accessories]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[remote flash]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rf]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 09 Mar 2007 13:15:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie White]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=243010&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Cell Sensor Measures Your Slow Death From Killer Cellphones, Radiation]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/02/cellsensor.jpg" class="right image158" width="158" />Get out the tin foil hats, folks, 'cause the radiation's coming! Wait, it's already here. Run for your lives! This <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #cellsensor" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/cellsensor/">Cell Sensor</a> EMF detector will make you even more paranoid by measuring both <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #electromagneticfields" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/electromagneticfields/">electromagnetic fields</a> (EMF) and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #radiofrequency" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/radiofrequency/">radio frequency</a> (RF) radiation. Jeez, that sounds so dangerous and scary: Radiation. That's gotta hurt.</p>
<p>Find out just how much of those deadly rays are surrounding you 24/7 with this $39.95 device, priced for the home fraidycat. Might be a good tool for a movie theater owner, to keep those cell-talking jabberjaws out of the cineplex. <span class="byline">&ndash; Charlie White</span></p>
<p><a href="http://scientificsonline.com/product.asp?pn=3081604&cmc=CROSS_SELL&Electromagnetic+Field+Gaussmeter&bhcd2=1172672412&bhcd2=1172685565">Product Page</a> [Scientifics Online, via <a href="http://www.redferret.net/?p=8364">Red Ferret</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/240403/cell-sensor-measures-your-slow-death-from-killer-cellphones-radiation]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-240403]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cell sensor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[electromagnetic fields]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[emf]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[radiation]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[radiation detector]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[radio frequency]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rf]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 28 Feb 2007 13:30:01 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie White]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=240403&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Wave Bubble Jams Your Way Into RF Bliss]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/12/wavebubble.jpg" class="right image158" width="158" />If you've ever dreamed of jamming FM, cellphones, cordless phones, GPSes, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or various other RF stations, the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #wavebubble" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/wavebubble/">Wave Bubble</a> is a small, Creative Commons-licensed design that you can build together yourself. This isn't an easy project, so if you're not familiar with SMT soldering, you may want to hop down to ITT Tech and make some friends.</p>
<p>Oh, and this device is kinda illegal, seeing as you can block frequencies that aren't supposed to be blocked. But it should be fun to take into a crowded theater. <span class="byline">&ndash; Jason Chen</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.ladyada.net/make/wavebubble/index.html">Project Page</a> [Ladyada - Thanks <a href="http://makezine.com/">Phil!</a>]<br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/224346/wave-bubble-jams-your-way-into-rf-bliss]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-224346]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blocker]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[diy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rf]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wave bubble]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 26 Dec 2006 19:40:43 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=224346&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Philips Releasing Multiple Vista Remotes, Most Are Ugly]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2006/12/vistaremotes.gif"><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/12/vistaremotes.gif" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Remember the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/home-entertainment/windows-vista-media-center-remote-control-208210.php">ugly Vista remote</a> that we thought was <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/peripherals/real-windows-vista-media-center-remote-218050.php">swapped out in favor of a better looking one</a>? Turns out it's still getting produced, albeit by Philips.</p>
<p>The Vista <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #mediacenter" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/mediacenter/">Media Center</a> remote from Philips comes in a basic version, an IR learning backlit version, and an advanced IR learning backlit version. Luckily for them, they also have a more traditional remote (right), a PC Express card version for laptops, and even an RF version with receiver for rigs that are hidden from line-of-sight IR. No word on when they're going to be released, but we're guessing shortly after January. <span class="byline">&ndash; Jason Chen</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.remotecontrol.philips.com/index.cfm?id=1336">Product Page</a> [Philips via <a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/chrisl/archive/2006/12/20/438419.aspx">Chris Lanier</a> via <a href="http://www.ubergizmo.com/15/archives/2006/12/philips_vista_media_center_remotes.html">uber gizmo</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/223695/philips-releasing-multiple-vista-remotes-most-are-ugly]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-223695]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[peripherals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ir]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[media center]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[philips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[remotes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rf]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 21 Dec 2006 17:40:45 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=223695&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Monster AVL300 Crazy Remote Reviewed (Verdict: Looks Like Star Trek, Works Like Star Trek)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="avl300.jpg" src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/12/avl300.jpg" width="91" height="324" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"/>The Monster Central Control System AVL300 may look like a Phaser, but the only person you're going to kill is yourself. Why? Because if you can control everything in your house from your couch, you'll never get up again.</p>

<p>Setting the remote up is easy, using their walkthrough which lets you name rooms, devise "scenarios", and come up with stuff you want to control. There's web connectivity as well, allowing you to update the software and the remote.</p>

<p>Not only is the AVL300 a breeze to set up, the IlluminEssence Lighting Modules worked from corner to corner of a 2,500 sqft house using RF to control all lighting throughout. Controlling the entertainment system using IR worked flawlessly as well, with 19 out of 20 tries being successful (the last was blamed on user error).</p>

<p>It's a bit pricey&mdash;$549 on Amazon&mdash;but if you're into home automation then the AVL300 is a good way to go. <span class="byline">&ndash; Jason Chen</span></p>

<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B000CQP5YS/ref=pd_luc_mri/105-9327174-6098068?%5Fencoding=UTF8&m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&v=glance">Product Page</a> [Amazon via <a href="http://www.remoteshoppe.com/index.php?itemid">RemoteShoppe</a>]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/222247/monster-avl300-crazy-remote-reviewed-verdict-looks-like-star-trek-works-like-star-trek]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-222247]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[automation]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[avl300]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[home]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[illuminessence]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ir]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lighting]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[modules]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[monster]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[remotes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rf]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:15:10 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=222247&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[RF Locking USB Flash Drive]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/images/2006/04/RFLOCK.jpg" class="right image158" width="158" />For those extra-secure computer users, this USB <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #flashdrive" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/flashdrive/">flash drive</a> may just what you need to protect the cherished pictures of your pet cat you store on that flash drive. The flash drive includes a RF transmitter. Once the transmitter is 2 meters out of range the drive will lock and nobody will be able to gain access. Don't fret if you happen to drop the transmitter in the 'loo, a password can unlock the flash drive. There is also a timer that can lock out the flash drive anywhere from 1 minute to 8 hours. A mere $29 will make you the most anal retentive geek in the office.</p>
<p><a href="http://gadget.brando.com.hk/prod_detail.php?prod_id=00291">Product Page</a> [Via <a href="http://www.redferret.net/?p=6821">Red Ferret</a>]<br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/167114/rf-locking-usb-flash-drive]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-167114]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flash drive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lock]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rf]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 13 Apr 2006 15:56:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Travis Hudson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=167114&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[RF iPod Wrist Remote]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://us.gizmodo.com/images/scoschewristbandipodremote_small.jpg" class="right image158" width="158" />Today seems to be chock full of products similar fashion to this one. This is a good idea, but the design is poorly done. The wristband remote portion appears to be pretty cheap and doesn t look very iPodish. Although the upside of a product like this is my dream of having an RF iPod remote surgically attached to my body may becoming a reality. Honestly, reaching into my pocket is just too much hassle.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.redferret.net/?p=6076">iPod Wristband Remote</a> [Red Ferret]</p>
<p><a href="http://www.scosche.com/scosche_ipod.aspx?CategoryID=127&ItemID=IPRFES">Product Page</a> [Scosche]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/137163/rf-ipod-wrist-remote]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-137163]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[portable media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[remotes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rf]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 15 Nov 2005 06:00:53 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Travis Hudson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=137163&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
