<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: Science]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/science</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'science']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Know Your Place, Meat Creatures]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_compdie.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #katherinehayles" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/katherinehayles/">Katherine Hayles</a>, author of "How We Became Posthuman" goes bio, reminding us that machines <em>aren't</em> the ones in charge. The catch? Neither are we. [<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/14/AR2009121403347.html">WaPo</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5427351/know-your-place-meat-creatures]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5427351]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blockquote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Katherine Hayles]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[scifi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[symbionts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[symbiotes]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:00:24 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5427351&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Watch Man Grow Snowflakes for the First Time]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_growsnow.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />In the 1930s, researcher <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #ukichironakaya" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ukichironakaya/">Ukichiro Nakaya</a> set to be the first human to grow snow. He succeeded using a cloud-simulating chamber and a rabbit's hair. And his personal footage, seen here, captures eureka in[frosty]carnate. <strong>UPDATE: Video pulled.</strong></p>

<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=4745126&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=4745126&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/4745126.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_4745126.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display: none;"/></a> It's like the science of Hallmark without the sacrifice of a unicorn. [<a href="http://www.itsnicethat.com/">It's Nice That</a> via <a href="http://www.neatorama.com/2009/12/14/the-first-artificial-snow/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Neatorama+%28Neatorama%29">Neatorama</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5426763/watch-man-grow-snowflakes-for-the-first-time]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5426763]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[snowflakes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ukichiro Nakaya]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:47:23 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5426763&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[An Extremely Brief History of Octopus Gadgetry]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_500x_091214-coconut-octopus-02.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Today, there is only the coconut. But by my <a href="http://www.livescience.com/health/091111-origin-tool-use.html">calculations</a>, octopods will invent smartphones in 2.6 million years, give or take. We will be dead, and they will be debating about desktop OSes and mobile app store economies.</p>
<p><object id="flashObj" width="486" height="412" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,47,0"><param name="movie" value="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9/2227271001?isVid=1&publisherID=981571807">
<param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF">
<param name="flashVars" value="videoId=57069207001&playerID=2227271001&domain=embed&">
<param name="base" value="http://admin.brightcove.com">
<param name="seamlesstabbing" value="false">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<param name="swLiveConnect" value="true">
<param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always">
<embed src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9/2227271001?isVid=1&publisherID=981571807" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashvars="videoId=57069207001&playerID=2227271001&domain=embed&" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" width="486" height="412" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" swliveconnect="true" allowscriptaccess="always" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed></object></p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18281-octopuses-use-coconut-shells-as-portable-shelters.html?DCMP=OTC-rss&nsref=online-news">New Scientist</a> via <a href="http://io9.com/5426109/octopus-uses-coconut-shells-as-portable-armor">io9</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5426356/an-extremely-brief-history-of-octopus-gadgetry]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5426356]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[animal tech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[animals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[coconuts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[octopods]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[octopus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[octopus coconut]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:40:39 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5426356&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[3-D Broadcast Fails To Win Over Crowd At Actual 3-D Game]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/11/2009/12/nfl_u_stadium12_600_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/11/2009/12/500x_nfl_u_stadium12_600_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Yesterday, in a stupendous moment of technological flimflammery, <a href="http://deadspin.com/5343235/cowboys-massive-new-stadium-not-big-enough-to-play-football-in">the infamously large HDTV</a> that hangs over the field at <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #cowboysstadium" href="http://deadspin.com/tag/cowboysstadium/">Cowboys Stadium</a> broadcast stunning 3-D images to the crowd....of the live three-dimensional football game taking place directly below it.</p>
<p>Yes, the ad wizards at Jerry Jones Heavy Manufacturing Concern, LLC, decided that their eleventy-billion dollar show palace, $14 hamburgers, <a href="http://deadspin.com/5370499/couple-christens-dallas-cowboys-stadiums-new-bathroom-stalls">live sex shows</a> (NSFW), cheerleaders, and "Party Passes" (oh, and an NFL game) would not be enough to entertain the 80,000 people who bothered to show up for the 'Boys latest December nightmare. So at the start of the second half against the Chargers, they turned the 160' by 90' superstructure over midfield into a 3-D movie theater so that fans in attendance could experience the wonder of football with length, width <em>and</em> depth! It's like you're actually there!</p>
<p>Now stop and think about this for a second, since no one who works for the organization apparently did. In order to see 3-D images on a television, you need to wear special glasses&mdash;glasses that impair your vision of the real, physical world around you. This means that the Cowboys were literally asking fans to ignore the actual live football game taking place before their very eyes, so that they could watch it on television instead. For $300 a ticket. Because that would be more "realistic." The effect certainly is mind boggling.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/11/2009/12/500x_cowboy.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
<p>Since many fans chose not to put on (or couldn't figure out?) the stupid glasses, the video replay board became a blurry red and blue mess to their eyes. According to reports, <a href="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2009/dec/14/nothings-cheap-jerrys-place/">the loudest cheer of the day</a> came when they finally shut it off halfway through the third quarter.</p>
<p>Of course, the dirty secret of JerryWorld's massive video board is that it so overshadows the playing field that <a href="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2009/dec/14/nothings-cheap-jerrys-place/">most fans end up staring at it</a> anyway, rather than the flesh-and-blood players on the field in front of them. (Granted, <a href="http://deadspin.com/5344216/cowboys-stadium-offers-valuable-seating-behind-this-brick-wall">some don't have any choice</a>.) I'm sure that thought will comfort DeMarcus Ware when he <a href="http://blogs.nfl.com/2009/12/14/cowboys-hopeful-to-have-ware-back-this-season/">wakes up from his coma</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/spt/football/cowboys/columns/stories/121409dnspocowgrant.3f50318.html">It's hard to see what Dallas Cowboys saw in 3D call</a> [Dallas Morning News]<br>
<a href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/14/3d-experiment-falls-flat-at-cowboys-stadium/">3D experiment falls flat at Cowboys Stadium</a> [PFT]<br>
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/14/cowboys-stadium-3d-scoreboard-experiment-doesnt-go-so-well-tur/">Cowboys Stadium 3D scoreboard experiment doesn't go so well, turned off in less than seven minutes</a> [Second image via Engadget]<br>
<a href="http://www.fox43.com/news/kdaf-cowboys-3d-story,0,4004546.story">"3-D" a "3-Dud" at Cowboys Stadium</a> [WPMT]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://deadspin.com/5426164/3+d-broadcast-fails-to-win-over-crowd-at-actual-3+d-game]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5426164]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cowboys stadium]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dallas cowboys]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:15:39 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dashiell Bennett]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5426164&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[NASA Launches New Infrared Telescope to Capture Hidden Space Objects]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/milkyway_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_milkyway_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>NASA just launched the new Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer, or WISE, this morning. It'll be used to detect light- and heat-emitting objects that the Hubble might miss. Such as spaceships, I'll bet!!!</p>
<p>The WISE will be in orbit for the next nine months, snapping a photo every 11 seconds to map the entire universe in infrared. Eventually it'll cover the entire sky 1.5 times over.</p>
<p>It'll be looking for any objects that have a potential of hitting Earth as well as distant objects such as brown dwarfs and far-away galaxies shrouded in dust. Also, alien spacecraft. I mean, duh. [<a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/space/12/14/wise.spacecraft.launch/index.html">CNN</a>, image <a href="http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/12/hubble_space_telescope_advent_1.html">via</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5425933/nasa-launches-new-infrared-telescope-to-capture-hidden-space-objects]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5425933]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[infrared]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nasa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[telescope]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wise]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 14 Dec 2009 10:29:47 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5425933&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Perfect Gift For the Physicist Who Thinks In Ten Dimensions]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_31515-44.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Holiday shopping can be tough. Holiday shopping for that special someone can be tougher&mdash;especially if that someone happens to be a theoretical physicist. Luckily, for the brainiac who has everything there's this beautiful Calabi-Yau Manifold crystal.</p>

<p>But what is it, you ask? Why, put simply, it's a great representation of something we primitive humans will never be able to observe directly:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>According to string theory, space-time is not four-dimensional as you might expect, but actually 10-dimensional. The extra six dimensions are believed to be compactified or rolled up into such a small space that they are unobservable at human scales of sight. Their size and six dimensions make Calabi-Yau spaces difficult to draw. But, this model shows a three-dimensional cross-section of this likely space to reveal its structure and shape. - <a href="http://scientificsonline.com/product.asp_Q_pn_E_3151544">Scientifics Online</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>And all that mind-bending fun is just $90! String theory, in the palm of your hand! Or, if you don't subscribe to string theory, it's a paperweight. [<a href="http://scientificsonline.com/product.asp_Q_pn_E_3151544">Scientifics Online</a> via <a href="http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/12/11/2149983.aspx">MSNBC</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5425269/the-perfect-gift-for-the-physicist-who-thinks-in-ten-dimensions]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5425269]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Calabi-Yau]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cubes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gifts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[strong theory]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[theories]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 13 Dec 2009 10:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Loftus]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5425269&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[MakerBot Industries Shows Us the Big Deal About 3D Printing]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object><embed><object id="bbg_player" width="500" height="297" data="http://www.babelgum.com/embed/4020782" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"></object>RADAR's got a great short documentary about our friends at <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #makerbotindustries" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/makerbotindustries/">MakerBot Industries</a> (who were at the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/t/gizgallery09">Gizmodo Gallery</a>). Check out what they're doing, and why they believe we'll all have 3D printers on our desks someday. [<a href="http://radar.workbookproject.com/2009/12/episode-19-makerbot/">RADAR</a>, thanks <em>Houseoftrim</em>]</object></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5425074/makerbot-industries-shows-us-the-big-deal-about-3d-printing]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5425074]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[makerbot]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3d printer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3d printing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[makerbot industries]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[printing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 12 Dec 2009 21:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5425074&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Pen de Touch, for Driving Light Cycles]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/pendetouch.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_pendetouch.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #pendetouch" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/pendetouch/">Pen de Touch</a> provides haptic feedback while interacting with virtual objects. It also looks like Jeff Bridges could streak across the interface any second.</p>
<p>If the device "senses" contact with a virtual boundary, it reacts accordingly. For example, If you're drawing on a virtual surface, the pen pulls in the opposite direction to represent friction.<br>
<object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/6uFgixaLJYs&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/6uFgixaLJYs&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/pendetouch2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_pendetouch2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The idea is to use the device in museum applications and such, but let's face it. This thing was built as a Light Cycle control device. All other uses are secondary. [<a href="http://tachilab.org/modules/projects/pendetouch.html">Tachi Lab</a> via <a href="http://www.designboom.com/weblog/cat/16/view/8464/pen-de-touch.html">Designboom</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5425012/the-pen-de-touch-for-driving-light-cycles]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5425012]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3d]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[concepts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[interface]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pen de touch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 12 Dec 2009 15:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5425012&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Google Demonstrates Quantum Algorithm Promising Superfast Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/google_quantum_search_cpu.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_google_quantum_search_cpu.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #quantumcomputing" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/quantumcomputing/">Quantum computing</a> has long dangled the possibility of superfast, super-efficient processing, and now search giant Google has jumped on board that future.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18272-google-demonstrates-quantum-computer-image-search.html"><i>New Scientist</i></a> reports that Google has spent the past three years developing a quantum algorithm that can automatically recognize and sort objects from still images or video.</p>
<p>The promise of <a href="http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2009-11/scientists-test-first-universal-programmable-quantum-computer">quantum computing</a> rests with the bizarre physics that occurs at the subatomic level. Different research teams have worked on creating <a href="http://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2009-06/first-solid-state-quantum-computer-processor-created">quantum processors</a> that store information as qubits (quantum bits), which can represent both the 1 and 0 of binary computer language at the same time. That dual possibility state allows for much more efficient processing and information storage.</p>
<p>To take an example cited by Google, a classical computer might need 500,000 peeks on average to find a ball hidden somewhere within a million drawers. But a quantum computer could find the ball by just looking into 1,000 drawers &mdash; a nice little stunt known as Grover's algorithm.</p>
<p>Google has been using a quantum computing device created by D-Wave, a Canadian firm. But a lack of information about how D-Wave's chip works has led to outside skepticism regarding whether it does indeed count as a quantum computer.</p>
<p>"Unfortunately, it is not easy to demonstrate that a multi-qubit system such as the D-Wave chip indeed exhibits the desired quantum behavior and experimental physicists from various institutions are still in the process of characterizing the chip," wrote Hartmut Neven, head of Google's image recognition team, on the Google <a>research blog</a>.</p>
<p>Whatever D-Wave built has apparently worked for Google. Neven described a new algorithm based on the work of MIT that can sort images of cars from among 20,000 photos faster than anything running in a Google data center today &mdash; although the team first trained the algorithm by hand-labeling cars in a test photo batch.</p>
<p>Google's image recognition team has previously made its algorithms work for better <a href="http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2009-11/googles-image-swirl-provides-dynamic-search-interface-online-picture-seekers">online image searches</a> and <a href="http://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2009-06/google-analyzes-your-vacation-snaps-figure-out-where-you-were">automatic photo organization</a>. Perhaps we shouldn't be too surprised that the Google folk have also delved into quantum computing, or at least something much faster than existing classical computing.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18272-google-demonstrates-quantum-computer-image-search.html">New Scientist</a>]</p>
<p><a href="http://www.popsci.com"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/logo-gawk.png" width="164" height="45"></a><i>Popular Science is your wormhole to the future. Reporting on what's new and what's next in science and technology, we deliver the future now.</i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5424928/google-demonstrates-quantum-algorithm-promising-superfast-search]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5424928]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[quantum computing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[quantum]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Popular Science]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5424928&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Internet: Now Available at the Bottom of the Ocean]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/wally.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_wally.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>No, Google is not trying to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5419155/are-you-comfortable-with-googles-level-of-control-over-your-data">corner the market</a> on undersea searches. Actually, the "Neptune" internet network is designed to make it easier for researchers to communicate with robots and submarines.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5422620,3,'Neptune');
</script></p>
<p>Many attribute the technical difficulties involved with communicating under large bodies of water as being one of the major reasons why our knowledge of the depths is so limited. Neptune will change all that using a 497-mile ring of fiber-optic cable sitting off the coast of Canada. The ring has five nodes that will stream data from hundreds of undersea devices directly to the internet. Wally, the robot pictured above, is an example of one of those devices. He just happens to be the world's first internet-operated deep-sea crawler.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"It's revolutionary in that it brings two new components into the ocean environment, which are power and high-bandwidth Internet," says Project Director Chris Barnes, from the project's offices at the University of Victoria in British Columbia. "We're really on the verge of wiring the oceans."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Outside of the scientific community, I'm willing to bet that the military would be interested in this kind of technology as well. Check out Scientific American for a full gallery of images. [<a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=first-undersea-science-station">Scientific American</a> via <a href="http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2009-12/undersea-base-now-comes-internet">PopSci</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5422604/the-internet-now-available-at-the-bottom-of-the-ocean]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5422604]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ocean]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ocean research]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[submarines]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 09 Dec 2009 14:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5422604&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Animations of X-rays of Mouths Talking Make Me Never Want to Talk Again]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/x-ray-mouth.jpg"></a><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/talking1.gif" class="left image340" width="340" />The human body is a majestic and unsettling thing, isn't it? Just look at these absolutely insane animations of mouths as they talk. They make me feel all... funny.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/thumb160x_talking2_01.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /> [<a href="http://hundertmarkblog.de/christine-ericsdotter-x-ray-analyses-of-speech/">Hundertmark</a> via <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/12/09/x-ray-videos-of-peop.html">BoingBoing</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5422603/animations-of-x+rays-of-mouths-talking-make-me-never-want-to-talk-again]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5422603]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mouths]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[x-rays]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 09 Dec 2009 13:35:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5422603&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Giant Mysterious Spiral Takes Over the Skies of Norway]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/fenomen_over_borras_340152c.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_fenomen_over_borras_340152c.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>People are freaking out all over Norway because of what you are seeing here. According to Norwegian news outlets, the spooky <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #giantspiral" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/giantspiral/">giant spiral</a> was seen, photographed, and recorded on video from all over the country. <b>Updated.</b></p>
<p><b>Confirmed: It was a failed Russian missile launch. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5422792/this-is-how-the-mysterious-giant-spiral-happened">Click here for the full explanation</a>.</b></p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5422563,14,'');
</script></p>
<p>Could it all be a hoax? Maybe it's a massive joke, but all kinds of Norwegian news sites are reporting on it. According to NKR&mdash;Norway's national TV channel&mdash;it could be related to a rocket fired from a Russian submarine in the White Sea. The Russians are denying any part on it at this at the moment. Nick Banbury, a witness located at Harstad, described how it all happened:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>We are used to seeing lots of auroras here in Arctic Norway, but on my way to work this morning I saw something completely unexpected. Between 7:50 and 8:00 a.m. local time, there was a strange light in the sky. It consisted initially of a green beam of light similar in colour to the aurora with a mysterious rotating spiral at one end. This spiral then got bigger and bigger until it turned into a huge halo in the sky with the green beam extending down to the earth.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("/giz-norsespiral.flv", 500, 375,"");
</script></p>
<p>As hard as it is to believe, you can't dispute the fact that the strange spiral was witnessed and <i>recorded</i> by thousands of people from hundreds of miles away, which means that the phenomenon occurred at a very high altitude. Even Phil Plait from <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/">Bad Astronomy</a> agrees that this is real, and says that it was probably a rocket out of control. Norwegian astronomers and news outlets have actually confirmed that <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5422792/this-is-how-the-mysterious-giant-spiral-happened">this was a failed Russian missile launch</a>.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http://digg.com/space/Giant_Mysterious_Spiral_Takes_Over_the_Skies_of_Norway" align="right" frameborder="0" height="82" scrolling="no" width="55"></iframe>So barring any epic group joke, expect your new alien overlords to arrive at any time now. We can only hope they are all peace-loving voluptuous blondes with blue eyes. [<a href="http://www.altaposten.no/lokalt/nyheter/article316411.ece">Altaposten</a>, <a href="http://www.vg.no/nyheter/vaer/artikkel.php?artid=596359">VG</a>, <a href="http://www.nrk.no/nyheter/distrikt/nordland/1.6902336">NRK</a> via <a href="http://www.spaceweather.com/archive.php?view=1&day=09&month=12&year=2009">SpaceWeather</a> via <a href="http://www.universetoday.com/2009/12/09/weird-giant-spiral-seen-in-sky-over-norway/">Universe Today</a>&mdash;thanks Gonzalo Oxenford]</p>
<p><i>If you know Norwegian and have any information, contact me on AIM or by mail.</i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5422574/giant-mysterious-spiral-takes-over-the-skies-of-norway]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5422574]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Giant Spiral]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rocket]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[russians]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[weather]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 09 Dec 2009 13:05:44 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5422574&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[It Took The New York Times 49 Years to Believe Isaac Newton]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/correctionscience_copy.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_correctionscience_copy.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>It may have taken me ages to hear about this story, but it took The New York Times 49 years to issue a correction to an editorial dismissing space travel. I guess they'd finally opened up their high school textbooks.</p>
<p>Somehow I suddenly feel better about the frequent typos or errors I make. [<a href="http://www.kottke.org/09/07/best-correction-ever">Kottke</a> via <a href="http://www.gregsopinion.com/archives/009507.html">Greg's Opinion</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5421943/it-took-the-new-york-times-49-years-to-believe-isaac-newton]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5421943]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[image cache]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[correction]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[newspaper]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[newspaper correction]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rockets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 08 Dec 2009 22:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5421943&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[World's First Bionic Finger Gives New Meaning to SuperPoke]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_prodigits.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /> Over 30 people are currently outfitted with ProDigits, bionic fingers that can actually grab and pick up objects in a way that previous prostheses couldn't. You've got to see these in action.</p>
<p>ProDigits can be controlled two ways: by myoelectric sensors that register muscle signals from the palm or the remnant finger, or by a pressure sensitive switch from a force resistive sensor. The degree of functionality they give back to people is truly incredible, as you can see in the video below (patient demonstrations start at 1:18).</p>
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/klrcvKzPPtY&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/klrcvKzPPtY&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object></p>
<p>We at Gizmodo have been known to have a soft spot for all things <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/pst/thiscyborglife/">cybernetic</a>, but it's especially cool and gratifying to see technology used to help people get their normal lives back. [<a href="http://www.touchbionics.com/ProDigits-press/press-release">Touch Bionics</a> via <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/touch-bionics-unveils-worlds-first-bionic-finger-0865428/">Slashgear</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5421467/worlds-first-bionic-finger-gives-new-meaning-to-superpoke]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5421467]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[bionic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cyborg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[prodigits]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 08 Dec 2009 09:17:14 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Barrett]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5421467&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[MIT Plans to Rebuild Artificial Intelligence from the Ground Up]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/thumb160x_artificial_intelligence_mit.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />After 50 years and countless dead ends, incremental progress, and modest breakthroughs, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #artificialintelligence" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/artificialintelligence/">artificial intelligence</a> researchers are asking for a do-over.</p>

<p>The $5 million <a href="http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2009/ai-overview.html">Mind Machine Project</a> (MMP), a patchwork team of two dozen academics, students and researchers, intends to go back to the discipline's beginnings, rebuilding the field from the ground up. With 20/20 hindsight, a few generations worth of experience, and better, faster technology, this time researchers in AI &mdash; an ambiguous field to begin with &mdash; plan to get things right.</p>
<p>The study of AI is a half a century old, beginning with lofty expectations at a 1956 conference but quickly fragmenting into different specializations and sub-fields. The MMP wants to roll back the clock, fixing early assumptions that are now foundations of the field and redefining what the objectives of AI research should be.</p>
<p>The fundamental problem, it seems, is that the mind, memory and body function both together and separately to solve any number of problems, and the way they work together (and alone) varies from problem to problem. The human mind alone applies various systems and functions to any given problem. Many AI solutions have attempted to solve all the problems with one system or function rather than multiple systems working together as in the human mind, a "silver bullet" approach that hinders real progress.</p>
<p>Likewise, when it comes to memory, researchers have created models that work more like computers, where everything is either one or zero. Real memory is filled with gray areas, ambiguities and inconsistencies, but functions in spite of not always being congruent. MMP researchers also intend to bring computer science and physiology together, forcing computers to work within the confines of physical space and time just like the body does.</p>
<p>The team even proposes discarding the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_test">Turing Test</a>, the long-recognized standard for determining artificial intelligence. Instead, MMP researchers want to test for a machine's comprehension of a children's book &mdash; rather than a human's comprehension of another human being &mdash; to gain a better understanding or the AI's ability to process and regurgitate thought.</p>
<p>It's a big-picture approach to a big challenge, and while it's perhaps unlikely that the team can re-imagine AI in the ambitious five-year window they've given themselves, it very well could shore up some of the loose underpinnings of a discipline that has boundless potential to shape a better world (or, for you SkyNet junkies, limitless potential to destroy it). If nothing else, it's a responsible admission from the scientific community that they simply don't have it quite right, that we need to rethink what we think we know.</p>
<p>Climatologists, take notes.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2009/ai-overview.html">MIT News</a>]</p>
<p><a href="http://www.popsci.com"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/logo-gawk.png" width="164" height="45"></a><i>Popular Science is your wormhole to the future. Reporting on what's new and what's next in science and technology, we deliver the future now.</i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5421106/mit-plans-to-rebuild-artificial-intelligence-from-the-ground-up]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5421106]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ai]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mit]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 08 Dec 2009 02:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[ Popular Science]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5421106&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Bionic Lenses Aren't Just for Cataracts Anymore]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/iol_patient.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />As someone who's been nearsighted since I was a kid, I'm loving the new developments in intraocular lenses. There's a new procedure gaining popularity that could give me super vision, without the irreversibility of LASIK.</p>
<p>IOLs have been around since the late ‘40s, but recent developments have made them pretty amazing. The newest procedure involves inserting the lens into the eye with the basic focus worked out. Then, once the eye heals, doctors can direct UV light at highly specific areas on the lens to fine tune the focus. The end result is amazing, custom tuned vision, better than 20/20 in many cases.</p>
<p><object width='497' height='280'><param name='movie' value='http://news.sky.com/sky-news/app/flash/SkyvideoWrapper.swf?playerType=embedded&type=sky_prod_v7&videoSourceID=2123483&flashVideoUrl=/feeds/skynews/latest/flash/ACT-BB-TH-P20441-LENSES-041209.flv'>
<param name='allowFullSceen' value='true'>
<param name='allowScriptAccess' value='always'>
<embed src='http://news.sky.com/sky-news/app/flash/SkyvideoWrapper.swf?playerType=embedded&type=sky_prod_v7&videoSourceID=2123483&flashVideoUrl=/feeds/skynews/latest/flash/ACT-BB-TH-P20441-LENSES-041209.flv' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' width='497' height='280'></embed></object></p>
<p>Not a new idea, sure, but one that resonated with me. I've always thought about getting LASIK, but I'm scared by how once that laser burns away at your cornea, there's no going back. If my vision ever got worse, it'd probably be back to glasses and contacts. I'm sure plenty of you readers have had wonderful experiences with the procedure, but I'm really risk averse.</p>
<p>The amazing thing about most IOLs is that they're reversible. If my vision ever changed, I could just get a new lens implanted. The surgery may not be as easy as that right now, but maybe someday the procedure will be so minimally invasive replacement will be a non-issue.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, this new procedure only corrects for cataracts and farsightedness right now. Here's to hoping nearsightedness is next on the list. [<a href="http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-News/Eye-Patients-Fitted-With-Artifical-Lens-That-Allows-Them-To-See-In-High-Definition/Article/200912115485724?lpos=UK_News_Carousel_Region_2&lid=ARTICLE_15485724_Eye_Patients_Fitted_With_Artifical_Lens_That_Allows_Them_To_See_In_High_Definition_">Sky News</a> via <a href="http://www.smartplanet.com/business/blog/smart-takes/artificial-lens-implant-to-give-patients-high-definition-vision-better-than-2020/2558/">SmartPlanet</a> via <a href="https://twitter.com/editorialiste">@editorialiste</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5419838/bionic-lenses-arent-just-for-cataracts-anymore]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5419838]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[medicine]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intraocular lens]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lasik]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 05 Dec 2009 21:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5419838&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Scientists Thwart the Invisibility Cloak (Again)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_invisibility_cloak_altered.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Invisibility cloaks don't even exist (unless you're <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5397102/liu-bolin-creates-slowest-least-practical-invisibility-cloak-ever">Liu Bolin</a>), yet scientists keep trying to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5044833/the-anti+invisibility-cloak-discovered-nooooooooooo">ruin the fun</a>. C'mon, guys. Wouldn't it be more enjoyable to figure out the awesome uses for one instead of trying to get us all caught?</p>
<p>This latest bummer involves two parts. The first is pretty simple. An <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #invisibilitycloak" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/invisibilitycloak/">invisibility cloak</a> would only deflect specific wavelengths, either part or all of visible light. So if you were to blast it with, say, wavelengths in the IR or ultraviolet spectrum, then sensors could easily see through the cloak.</p>
<p>The second is a way to measure the radiation of electrons as they pass through the cloak. Identifying abnormal radiation patterns would get you caught and ruin your spy career.</p>
<p>Again, too, the researchers point out that you could easily detect a by "throwing a stone at it," or, for a much more humiliating "Gotcha!," tar and feathers.</p>
<p>There's still some small sliver of hope, at least. The researchers admit that this is all theoretical, so here's to hoping no one ever figures it out. Either way, both science and common sense keep trying to kill the dream. [<a href="http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/50418/title/Chink_found_in_armor_of_perfect_cloak">ScienceNews.org</a> via <a href="http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/12/05/2131200/How-To-See-Through-an-Invisibility-Cloak">Slashdot</a></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5419819/scientists-thwart-the-invisibility-cloak-again]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5419819]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[invisibility]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[invisibility cloak]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 05 Dec 2009 20:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5419819&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Place Your Bets on the LHC]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/higgs-boson-betting.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_higgs-boson-betting.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Particle colliding is the new dog racing. Stephen Hawking <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5047152/stephen-hawking-bets-against-large-hadron-colliders-success">bet against</a> the LHC discovering the Higgs-Boson, and now you can get in on the action too.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bet-on-the-higgs.com/index.html">Alexander Unzicker</a> set up an options market for the LHC, where you can bet on the discovery of the Higgs Boson within a certain time frame. If you sincerely believe researchers either will or won't find the "God Particle," or if you just like making wild guesses on subjects in which you have little to no understanding, put your money where your mouth is. But make sure to factor <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5397970/large-hadron-collider-overheats-due-to-dropped-chunk-of-bread">futurebird</a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5417152/lhc-knocked-out-by-futurebird+caused-power-failure">destruction</a> into your time frame.</p>
<p>CERN should probably take this to the next level. Set up a grandstand and hire a few bookies. Might be a good way to recoup the LHC's $3 billion cost. [<a href="http://www.bet-on-the-higgs.com/index.html">Bet on the Higgs</a> via <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/shortsharpscience/2009/12/taking-bets-on-the-god-particl.html?DCMP=OTC-rss&nsref=online-news">New Scientist</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5419638/place-your-bets-on-the-lhc]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5419638]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[lhc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[betting]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[higgs bosson]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[large hadron collider]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 05 Dec 2009 14:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5419638&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Death of the Biggest Star Ever Reads Like a Comic Book]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/thumb160x_nasa_supernova_comic_book.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />This ain't your standard supernova. A while ago, astronomers noticed an exploding star that was about 50 to 100 times brighter than normal. Here's why: It was freakin' huge.</p>
<p>After two years of studying light output from the star's death, one scientist is proposing that this star might have been the biggest ever known. About 200 times larger than a standard solar mass.</p>
<p>And when huge stars explode, it involves some really cool words. Check out this description:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>But in the case of an extremely massive star, while its core is still made of oxygen, it releases photons that are so energetic, they create pairs of electrons and their anti-matter opposites, positrons. When the matter and antimatter meet, they annihilate each other.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Electrons and positrons? Matter and anti-matter? All fighting to annihilate each other and creating what may be the biggest nuclear explosion EVER? Man that sounds awesome.</p>
<p>I hope I get an FPS-style killcam view of the universe when I die, just so I can see stuff like this go down. [<a href="http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/091202-violent-massive-supernova.html">Space.com</a> via <a href="http://www.gearlog.com/2009/12/massive_star_explosion_breaks.php">Gearlog</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5419604/death-of-the-biggest-star-ever-reads-like-a-comic-book]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5419604]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[explosions]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nasa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[supernova]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 05 Dec 2009 10:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5419604&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Space Butterflies Stop Flying]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/o56u-XWrkro&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/o56u-XWrkro&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object> The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5416712/butterflies-fly-in-space-for-the-first-time-to-creep-the-beheyzeus-out-of-me">horrifying space butterflies</a> have stopped flying, and now they are just walking around their cage, having a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5418874/space-beer-has-cleared-the-tower">few space beers</a>, and smoking a few astroturf joints. And man, they were really pissed off.</p>
<p>This is what happened, according to the experiment project manager Stefanie Countryman:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>They basically learned really quickly not to fly. When they try to fly, because there's no gravity to stabilize them, they basically tumble.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This is what happened, according to the butterfly:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>So I was like, you know, taking this nap, and then I woke up and I was like, Huh? What? What? Fuck. I'm not a worm anymore. Oh, and I had these things on my back, you know? Wings. So I said: hey, let's try to fly for a little b*WHOAWHOAWHOAWHOAWHOA!!! What the fuck was that? The hell... I was like, going like crazy, man. So I got back down, or up, or whatever the fuck, I don't know, this is space, you know. And I was like OK, let's try ag*WHOAOHFUCKOHFUCKOHFUCK!!! What fuckassery is this? I don't know man. Fuck that flying thing. I'm staying on the ground.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>True story. [<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aZtV.sy5uwsg">Bloombert</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5419131/the-space-butterflies-stop-flying]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5419131]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[butterflies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 04 Dec 2009 14:18:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5419131&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Prairie Vole Embryos Injected With Glowing Jellyfish Gene Grow Up To Glow Too]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_glowing-voles.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />No, they're not chewed-up pieces of gum, quit salivating. These are the world's first <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #transgenicprairievoles" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/transgenicprairievoles/">transgenic prairie voles</a>, which were injected with a jellyfish gene as embryos, resulting in glowing baby voles.</p>
<p>Researchers inserted the prairie vole genomes with a glowing jellyfish's gene, which contains a fluorescent protein that makes it glow. Once the embryos grew into prairie voles, the jellyfish gene was evident in its glowing skin, and even their children had similar strengths of luminescence. These prairie voles will help scientists discover genetic secrets of pair bonding, social behaviors, understand psychiatric disorders better, and also intrigue and fascinate. Look! Glow in the dark voles! [<a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/12/091201131734.htm">Science Daily</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5419058/prairie-vole-embryos-injected-with-glowing-jellyfish-gene-grow-up-to-glow-too]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5419058]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[glowing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jellyfish]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[prairie]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[transgenic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[transgenic prairie voles]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voles]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:35:17 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kat Hannaford]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5419058&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[A Robot Who Can Be Your Real-Life Avatar]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/t5ttfvTuMa4&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/t5ttfvTuMa4&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object> One of the dreams of robotics has been to create a machine that can act as a remote version of its operator - like the movie <em>Surrogates</em>, only cool. Now a group of Korean engineers have brought us closer to this goal.</p>
<p>According to Plastic Pals:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The Korea Institute of Science & Technology (KIST) held an open house Technology Exhibit, where some of their latest research and development projects were showcased . . . Mahru III, a humanoid robot co-developed by KIST and Samsung, copies the movements of a human wearing a special suit which senses muscle movements.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>via <a href="http://www.plasticpals.com/?p=18447">Plastic Pals</a></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5418680/a-robot-who-can-be-your-real+life-avatar]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5418680]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[mad robotics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[awesome]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[korea]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[robots]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Annalee Newitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5418680&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Mostest Amazing Scientific Photos of the Year]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/hairy-hearing.gif"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_hairy-hearing.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Popular Science has a <a href="http://www.popsci.com/node/36702">massive gallery</a> of the year's most fantastic scientific images, and they're pretty incredible. Here's our favorites.</p>
<p>See if you can figure out what they are before you read the description.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5418009,8,'');
</script></p>
<p>And of course, check out their full gallery here: [<a href="http://www.popsci.com/node/36702">Popular Science</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5418014/the-mostest-amazing-scientific-photos-of-the-year]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5418014]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[image cache]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 Dec 2009 18:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5418014&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[13 More Embryonic Stem Cell Lines Approved for US Research]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_85331614st.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />For the first time in 8 years, US researchers will have access to 13 new lines of embryonic <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #stemcells" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/stemcells/">stem cells</a>. The lines meet new ethical requirements and were created from leftover fertility clinic embryos using private money. [<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8391924.stm">BBC</a> and GettyImages]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5417883/13-more-embryonic-stem-cell-lines-approved-for-us-research]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5417883]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[stem cells]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 Dec 2009 08:12:32 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5417883&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[50 Hour Livestream of Patient H.M.'s Brain Being Sliced]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_brainslice.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Studying Henry Gustav Molaison, more commonly known as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HM_(patient)">Patient H.M.</a>, and his memory impairments has revolutionized our understanding of human memory organization. Researchers will analyze his brain next, but first they're slicing it up in a 50 hour long livestream.</p>
<p>You can follow along <a href="http://thebrainobservatory.ucsd.edu/hm_live.php">right here</a> and watch H.M.'s brain be turned into super-thin slices and mounted onto glass plates for later study. Now, as much as I would love to watch all 50 hours of that process right with you, I will need to sleep at some point, so I'd think anyone who catches particularly nifty screengrabs from the stream and posts them in the comments would be super awesome. [<a href="http://thebrainobservatory.ucsd.edu/hm_live.php">The Brain Observatory</a> via <a href="http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/12/02/2248233/Brain-of-Patient-HM-Brain-Being-Sliced-Streamed-Live?from=rss&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Slashdot%2Fslashdot+(Slashdot)">Slashdot</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5417532/50-hour-livestream-of-patient-hms-brain-being-sliced]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5417532]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[brains]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[brain]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patient h.m. brain]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patient hm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[uscd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 02 Dec 2009 19:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5417532&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[LHC Knocked Out By FutureBird-Caused Power Failure]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/bustedlhc.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_bustedlhc.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Someone or something out there doesn't want the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #largehadroncollider" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/largehadroncollider/">Large Hadron Collider</a> to spin up to full speed. Either that, or it's the most complex piece of machinery ever built so kinks are expected. But that's a less fun explanation.</p>
<p>The current snafu involves a power failure so serious that not only was the LHC itself knocked out, but so were all of its websites. Oops!</p>
<p>The good news is that the crucial cryogenics are fine and no serious damage was done. But it's just another setback in what's becoming a long line of them. It's OK, LHC! We believe in you! I'm sure you'll get up and running eventually. [<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/12/02/lhc_power_failure_again/">The Register</a> via <a href="http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/12/02/1528211/LHC-Knocked-Out-By-Another-Power-Failure">SlashDot</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5417152/lhc-knocked-out-by-futurebird+caused-power-failure]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5417152]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[lhc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[large hadron collider]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:57:29 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5417152&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Strechable, Flexible, Twistable Antennas]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/flexible-antenna_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_flexible-antenna_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Traditional copper antennas are rigid yet delicate. And in the age when almost every gadget we use requires some sort of antenna, they're a lousy solution. Luckily, new tech is on its way.</p>

<p>Researchers at North Carolina State University have developed an alloy antenna that can be bent a la pretzel before resuming its native shape. The feat is accomplished through the micro liquid metal chambers that form as the building blocks of the antenna, allowing the device to so receive RF like metal, but maintain flexibility, like liquid.</p>
<p>Of course, as with any promising technology, the military is slated to get it first. And after hundreds of thousands of our service men and women develop strange, liquid-metal-related tumors, the public will get to buy an ever so safer 2.0 version. [<a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/12/flexible-antennas/">Gadget Lab</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5416975/strechable-flexible-twistable-antennas]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5416975]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[antennas]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flexible antennas]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 02 Dec 2009 08:46:25 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5416975&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Butterflies Fly in Space for the First Time to Creep the Beheyzeus Out of Me]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_4149900637_1b06a57b93.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />By the Holy circumcised foreskin of baby Jesus! What in the name of all that is creepy and filmed by Roger Corman is this? Larvae hatching and butterflies flying in space? If I were an astronaut, I'd be freaking out.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5416421,4,'Butterflies in Space Gallery');
</script></p>
<p>For the first time in history, butterfly larvae&mdash;who were only six days old at launch time&mdash;have hatched in space. It happened on November 10, 2009, as part of the STS-129 "<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #butterfliesinspace" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/butterfliesinspace/">Butterflies in Space</a>" experiment, on board the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #internationalspacestation" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/internationalspacestation/">International Space Station</a>. I can only imagine their confusion as they discovered there was no gravity. I don't have to imagine how itchy I feel by just looking at these images. [<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/32587739@N07/sets/72157622645748488/">Flickr</a> via <a href="http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2009-12/two-butterflies-hatch-space-first-time">Popular Science</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5416712/butterflies-fly-in-space-for-the-first-time-to-creep-the-beheyzeus-out-of-me]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5416712]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[butterflies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[butterflies in space]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[international space station]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iss]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5416712&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Scientists Grow Pork Meat in a Lab, Annoying PETA People To Disappear Soon]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/littleowlporkchop.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_littleowlporkchop.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Scientists in the Netherlands have successfully synthesized some real-deal pork meat without having to kill any pigs. Sure, it's not quite edible yet, but they predict you'll be eating labmeat in a mere five years.</p>
<p>What they made this time is what they're calling "soggy pork," which is fake pig muscle that's pretty gross because it's never been exercised. But once they figure out how to tone it up in the lab, you'll be looking at guilt-free pork chops.</p>
<p>And it's amazing news, really. Not only will vegetarians get to enjoy the deliciousness that is meat without guilt, but it'll do wonders for the environment. Do you realize how horrible the beef industry is for ol' Mother Nature? Very, very horrible. If we could replace all those factory farmed animals with slabs of meat rolling off an assembly line, we'd be doing the planet and animals a whole lot of good.</p>
<p>That is, provided it tastes good. If it doesn't, no one will eat it, and this will all be for naught. So make sure it's succulent, scientists! [<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/foodanddrink/6684854/Scientists-grow-meat-in-laboratory.html">Telegraph</a> via <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/11/30/scientists-engineer.html">Boing Boing</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5415434/scientists-grow-pork-meat-in-a-lab-annoying-peta-people-to-disappear-soon]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5415434]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lab grown meat]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lab meat]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[meat]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:12:16 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5415434&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Rainbow Trapped for First Time, Using Convex Lens and Glass]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_rainbow-convex-lens.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Baltimore citizens aren't just dealing drugs and installing wiretaps, some of them are busy using convex lenses to trap rainbows, which could be put to good use with <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #opticalcomputing" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/opticalcomputing/">optical computing</a>&mdash;making hardware faster! Stronger! More powerful!</p>
<p>And pretty on the inside.</p>
<p>University professors coated one side of a 4.5 millimetre diameter lens with a 30 nanometre thick coat of gold film, which they then put on a sheet of glass also splashed with a helping of gold. After shining a laser beam at the space between the curved lens and the glass, a rainbow appeared trapped between the elements when looked down on with a microscope. No pot of gold appeared, but a little dancing McNulty, dressed in a leprechaun costume, could be seen under the rainbow. [<a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.4464">Arxiv</a> via <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18205-rainbow-trapped-for-the-first-time.html?DCMP=OTC-rss&nsref=tech">New Scientist</a>]</p>
<p><em>Image credit <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/hauntedpalace/1533972958/">Carla216</a></em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5414009/rainbow-trapped-for-first-time-using-convex-lens-and-glass]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5414009]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[optical computing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[baltimore]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rainbow]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[trapped]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[trapped rainbow]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 27 Nov 2009 21:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kat Hannaford]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5414009&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Chemistry of Thanksgiving]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7745311&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7745311&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/7745311.jpg"></a>Pop-up timers, mashed paper towels, rubber nipples, and stomach acid are no longer the big mysteries of Thanksgiving, because Diane Bunce, Ph.D., is here to explain them. And yes, she <i>is</i> wearing a pilgrim costume under that lab coat.</p>
<p>Oh, Dr. Bunce, where have you been all my life, especially when I was dozing off in chem class? [<a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/editors/24451/">Technology Review</a> via <a href="http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2009/11/the_chemistry_of_thanksgiving.html">Make</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5413535/the-chemistry-of-thanksgiving]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5413535]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chemistry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chemistry of thanksgiving]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[thanksgiving]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[videos]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5413535&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Obama's Plan to Help Next Generation Science Geeks]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_obama-science2_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Wow, this is great. The "<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #educatetoinnovate" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/educatetoinnovate/">Educate to Innovate</a>" campaign will aim to improve U.S students' grounding in science, technology, engineering, and math education through $260 million in public-private partnerships, plus the first "<a href="https://www.nationallabday.org/">National Lab Day</a>" to update school science labs.</p>
<p>The president also said he's introducing an annual White House Science fair with the winners of national competitions in science and technology. " If you win the NCAA championship, you come to the White House. Well, if you're a young person and you've produced the best experiment or design, the best hardware or software, you ought to be recognized for that achievement, too. "</p>
<p>Students will launch rockets, construct miniature windmills, and get their hands dirty. They'll have the chance to build and create &mdash; and maybe destroy just a little bit &mdash; to see the promise of being the makers of things, and not just the consumers of things. [<a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/issues/education/educate-innovate">White House</a> via <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/24/science/24educ.html?_r=1">NY Times</a>]</p>
<p><object width="480" height="300"><param name="movie" value="http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/all/modules/swftools/shared/flash_media_player/player.swf">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<param name="bgcolor" value="282828">
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always">
<param name="flashvars" value="path_to_player=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/all/modules/swftools/shared/flash_media_player&path_to_plugins=http://www.whitehouse.gov//sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/wh_jwplayer&path_to_captions=&file=http://www.whitehouse.gov/videos/2009/November/112309_EEOB.m4v&image=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/audio-video/video_thumbnail/P112309LJ-0018.jpg&controlbar=bottom&frontcolor=AAAAAA&plugins=http://www.whitehouse.gov//sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/wh_jwplayer/captions,http://www.whitehouse.gov//sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/wh_jwplayer/hat&captions.file=&stretching=fill&menu=false">
<embed src="http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/all/modules/swftools/shared/flash_media_player/player.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="300" flashvars="path_to_player=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/all/modules/swftools/shared/flash_media_player&path_to_plugins=http://www.whitehouse.gov//sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/wh_jwplayer&path_to_captions=&file=http://www.whitehouse.gov/videos/2009/November/112309_EEOB.m4v&image=http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/audio-video/video_thumbnail/P112309LJ-0018.jpg&controlbar=bottom&frontcolor=AAAAAA&plugins=http://www.whitehouse.gov//sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/wh_jwplayer/captions,http://www.whitehouse.gov//sites/default/modules/wh_multimedia/wh_jwplayer/hat&captions.file=&stretching=fill&menu=false"></embed></object></p>
<blockquote>
<p>Industry leaders like Sony are launching a nationwide challenge to design compelling, freely available, science-related video games. And organizations representing teachers, scientists, mathematicians, and engineers &mdash; joined by volunteers in the community &mdash; are participating in a grassroots effort called "National Lab Day" to reach 10 million young people with hands-on learning.</p>
<p>Business leaders from Intel, Xerox, Kodak, and Time Warner Cable are teaming up with Sally Ride, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, as well as the Carnegie Corporation, to find and replicate successful science, math, and technology programs all across America. Sesame Street has begun a two-year initiative to teach young kids about math and science. And Discovery Communications is going to deliver interactive science content to 60,000 schools reaching 35 million students.</p>
<p>These efforts extend beyond the classroom. Time Warner Cable is joining with the Coalition for Science After School and FIRST Robotics &mdash; the program created by inventor Dean Kamen, which gave us the "Cougar Cannon" &mdash; to connect one million students with fun after-school activities, like robotics competitions.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5411657/obamas-plan-to-help-next-generation-science-geeks]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5411657]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[barak obama]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Educate to Innovate]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Obama Educate to Innovate]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[u.s. government]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:51:51 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5411657&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[LHC First Particle Beams Collision Doesn't Obliterate World, Universe]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/alice.png" class="left image340" width="340" />Hey, we are alive! In the end we didn't need <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5015451/final-countdown-for-large-hadron-collider-activation-prepare-your-escape-pods">any escape pods</a>: The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5047732/large-hadron-collider-why-you-really-wont-die-today">Large Hadron Collider</a> has smashed two particle beams together for the first time. However, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5409618/ok-now-im-nervous-about-the-large-hadron-collider">the unknown is still ahead of us</a>, as they ramp things up:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Next on the schedule is an intense commissioning phase aimed at increasing the beam intensity and accelerating the beams. All being well, by Christmas, the LHC should reach 1.2 TeV per beam, and have provided good quantities of collision data for the experiments' calibrations.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>1.2 tera-electro volts? Great. Hookai, so, until Christmas you have two options: One, you can keep going on with your normal beige life, not taking any chances or risks, typing away in your hamster wheel. Two, remember that life can end at any moment, and get out of the wheel. To a beach. Preferably with another hamster. One with a nice butt and a pretty smile.</p>
<p>These are the computer images showing the first collisions:</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5411232,5,'LHC Collision Gallery');
</script></p>
<blockquote>
<p><b>Two circulating beams bring first collisions in the LHC</b></p>
<p>Geneva, 23 November 2009. Today the LHC circulated two beams simultaneously for the first time, allowing the operators to test the synchronization of the beams and giving the experiments their first chance to look for proton-proton collisions. With just one bunch of particles circulating in each direction, the beams can be made to cross in up to two places in the ring. From early in the afternoon, the beams were made to cross at points 1 and 5, home to the ATLAS and CMS detectors, both of which were on the lookout for collisions. Later, beams crossed at points 2 and 8, ALICE and LHCb.</p>
<p>"It's a great achievement to have come this far in so short a time," said CERN* Director General Rolf Heuer. "But we need to keep a sense of perspective – there's still much to do before we can start the LHC physics programme."</p>
<p>Beams were first tuned to produce collisions in the ATLAS detector, which recorded its first candidate for collisions at 14:22 this afternoon. Later, the beams were optimised for CMS. In the evening, ALICE had the first optimisation, followed by LHCb.</p>
<p>"This is great news, the start of a fantastic era of physics and hopefully discoveries after 20 years' work by the international community to build a machine and detectors of unprecedented complexity and performance," said ATLAS spokesperson Fabiola Gianotti.</p>
<p>"The events so far mark the start of the second half of this incredible voyage of discovery of the secrets of nature," said CMS spokesperson Tejinder Virdee.</p>
<p>"It was standing room only in the ALICE control room and cheers erupted with the first collisions," said ALICE spokesperson Jurgen Schukraft. "This is simply tremendous."</p>
<p>"The tracks we're seeing are beautiful," said LHCb spokesperson Andrei Golutvin, "we're all ready for serious data taking in a few days time."</p>
<p>These developments come just three days after the LHC restart, demonstrating the excellent performance of the beam control system. Since the start-up, the operators have been circulating beams around the ring alternately in one direction and then the other at the injection energy of 450 GeV. The beam lifetime has gradually been increased to 10 hours, and today beams have been circulating simultaneously in both directions, still at the injection energy.</p>
<p>Next on the schedule is an intense commissioning phase aimed at increasing the beam intensity and accelerating the beams. All being well, by Christmas, the LHC should reach 1.2 TeV per beam, and have provided good quantities of collision data for the experiments' calibrations.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I'm happy it worked for you, people, because I'm for sure glad of not being sucked in by a Black Hole right now. Life is good, my dear boys and girls. Life is good.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5411237/lhc-first-particle-beams-collision-doesnt-obliterate-world-universe]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5411237]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cern]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[large hadron collider]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lhc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[LHC first collision]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:10:19 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5411237&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Astronaut Self-Portrait]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/astrosp.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_astrosp.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Some time during a six-hour space walk last week, astronaut <a href="http://www.jsc.nasa.gov/Bios/htmlbios/satcher-rl.html">Robert Satcher</a> managed to capture this shot of himself...via himself. Today, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5405725/atlantis-at-dawn">STS-129</a> will be completing their third and final space walk. [<a href="http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image_feature_1524.html">NASA</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5410752/astronaut-self+portrait]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5410752]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[image cache]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[astronaut]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[astronaut self-portrait]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nasa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[STS-129]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5410752&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Earth's Weather Like You Have Never Seen It Before]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("/gizmodo-clouds.flv", 500, 375,"");
</script>This video shows Earth's weather from August 17 to August 26, 2009. It also shows how beautiful this planet is, and how insignificant we are. It was created at a 7-kilometer resolution with NASA's GEOS-5 atmospheric general circulation model.</p>
<p>The GEOS-5 atmospheric model was developed by NASA Goddard's scientists. It's based on the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ESMF">Earth System Modeling Framework</a>, an <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #opensource" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/opensource/">open source</a> project "for building climate, numerical weather prediction, data assimilation, and other Earth science software applications."</p>
<p>To really appreciate its beauty, you can watch the 1080p high definition video at NASA. [<a href="http://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a003600/a003657/comp_geos5_7km.mp4">NASA</a> via <a href="http://twitter.com/NASAGoddard">@NASAGoddard</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5409638/earths-weather-like-you-have-never-seen-it-before]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5409638]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Earth weather]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[GEOS-5]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[goddard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nasa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[opensource]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[satellite]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5409638&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[OK, Now I'm Nervous About the Large Hadron Collider]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_lhc-gizmodo.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />I used to think that <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5047732/large-hadron-collider-why-you-really-wont-die-today">nothing would happen with the Large Hadron Collider</a>. I even made fun of the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5046578/world-doesnt-end-on-wednesday-and-you-can-watch-it-live">nutters saying it's going to destroy the world</a>. After reading CERN Director for Accelerators's latest statement, I'm not so sure:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The LHC is a far better understood machine than it was a year ago. We've learned from our experience, and engineered the technology that allows us to move on. That's how progress is made.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Wait wait wait. WAIT, Mr. Director for Accelerators Steve Myers Sir. What do you mean that the machine is "far better understood" now? How could they spend a billion brazillion dollars in this thing and don't understand it in the first place? Do we really know what are we up to here? Should I book a ticket to Costa Rica and go watch the end of the world from the beach?</p>
<p>The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5409452/reminder-the-large-hadron-collider-is-starting-up-this-weekend">LHC is now circulating beams</a> for the first time since September 2008, when it suffered a serious malfunction. It has taken them a year to repair it, which will explain the origin of the Universe or kick all our atomic asses out of it.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The LHC is back</p>
<p>Geneva, 20 November 2009. Particle beams are once again circulating in the world's most powerful particle accelerator, CERN*'s Large Hadron Collider (LHC). This news comes after the machine was handed over for operation on Wednesday morning. A clockwise circulating beam was established at ten o'clock this evening. This is an important milestone on the road towards first physics at the LHC, expected in 2010.</p>
<p>"It's great to see beam circulating in the LHC again," said CERN Director General Rolf Heuer. "We've still got some way to go before physics can begin, but with this milestone we're well on the way."</p>
<p>The LHC circulated its first beams on 10 September 2008, but suffered a serious malfunction nine days later. A failure in an electrical connection led to serious damage, and CERN has spent over a year repairing and consolidating the machine to ensure that such an incident cannot happen again.</p>
<p>"The LHC is a far better understood machine than it was a year ago," said CERN's Director for Accelerators, Steve Myers. "We've learned from our experience, and engineered the technology that allows us to move on. That's how progress is made."</p>
<p>Recommissioning the LHC began in the summer, and successive milestones have regularly been passed since then. The LHC reached its operating temperature of 1.9 Kelvin, or about -271 Celsius, on 8 October. Particles were injected on 23 October, but not circulated. A beam was steered through three octants of the machine on 7 November, and circulating beams have now been re-established. The next important milestone will be low-energy collisions, expected in about a week from now. These will give the experimental collaborations their first collision data, enabling important calibration work to be carried out. This is significant, since up to now, all the data they have recorded comes from cosmic rays. Ramping the beams to high energy will follow in preparation for collisions at 7 TeV (3.5 TeV per beam) next year.</p>
<p>Particle physics is a global endeavour, and CERN has received support from around the world in getting the LHC up and running again.</p>
<p>"It's been a herculean effort to get to where we are today," said Myers. "I'd like to thank all those who have taken part, from CERN and from our partner institutions around the world."</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5409618/ok-now-im-nervous-about-the-large-hadron-collider]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5409618]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blockquote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cern]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jibbajabba]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lhc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5409618&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Gifts for Science Nerds Who Love To Experiment]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p>Meteorites, microscopes, or mixing things to go boom. Your <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #sciencenerd" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/sciencenerd/">science nerd</a> loves it all. Here are a couple of gift ideas for that space explorer, mad scientist, or engineer in your life.</p>
<p>BTW, if you hate the gallery format as much as the Grinch hated Christmas, click <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5404803/gifts-for-science-nerds-who-love-to-tinker/">here</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_4085805587_7185a008ea_b.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><b>Lego:</b> It's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5018990/lego-secret-vault-contains-all-sets-in-history">not really a secret</a> that Lego building blocks are widely loved. They're perfect for any age, but a particularly fun gift for an engineering or physics nerd who lacks some brightly-colored fun. Whether you go for a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5165255/the-building-of-the-lego-millennium-falcon-the-definitive-movie">Millennium Falcon</a>, a <a href="http://mindstorms.lego.com/en-us/Default.aspx">Mindstorms NXT</a> robot set, or a smaller kit, just be sure your beloved recipient has time for construction. If you've got a younger nerd-in-the-making, check out programs like Dean Kamen's <a href="http://www.usfirst.org/">FIRST</a>, which encourages learning and development of science, math, and technology through hands-on activities (many of which are Lego-based). <b>Prices vary widely</b> [<a href="http://shop.lego.com/Default.aspx">Lego</a>; <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5401363/carl-sagan-deep-space-ship-to-go-to-the-living-room-and-beyond">Image Source</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_buckyballs.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><b>BuckyBalls:</b> 216 pellet-shaped rare earth magnets may scream "physics lesson," but in reality they're a jar full of fun. Your science nut can construct all sorts of 3D shapes for hours of mindless&mdash;or extremely brain-intensive&mdash;entertainment. And should he ever manage to get bored with the balls, he can just use them for one heck of a refrigerator magnet collection. <b>$30</b> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5226084/bucky-balls-are-like-silly-putty-made-with-rare+earth-magnets">Link</a>; <a href="http://www.bustedtees.com/buckyballs">Busted Tees</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_starrydontbuy.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><b>DON'T BUY A Star:</b> I don't know how you could imagine that getting someone a sheet of paper proclaiming that you've named a star after her is a clever idea. It's <a href="http://www.wired.com/techbiz/media/news/2001/12/49345">a scam to begin with</a> and even the most thoughtless <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5404804/gifts-for-bookworms-who-live-for-lazy-weekend-reads/gallery/3">gift certificate</a> would be a better idea (and won't leave you stuttering that you thought she "likes space and umm..stuff").</p>
<p><i>Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/generated/3152875826/">jared</a></i></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_dorkyshirt.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /> I've never seen a stocking that didn't like being filled with a bit of awkward science-themed, cotton-based humor and somehow science nerds in particular have a soft spot for <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5341725/10-of-your-nerdiest-t+shirts/gallery/">geeky shirts</a>. You can head to <a href="http://www.thinkgeek.com/tshirts-apparel/">ThinkGeek</a>, <a href="http://www.threadless.com/">Threadless</a>, and <a href="http://www.snorgtees.com/index.php">Snorg Tees</a> if you're looking for <a href="http://gizmodo.com/t/tshirts">some of the shirts we've mentioned in the past</a>&mdash;my personal favorite is still the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5353609/t+shirt-shows-exactly-who-you-really-are">ingredient shirt</a>. <b>$19</b> [<a href="http://www.snorgtees.com/absolutezeroisthecoolest-p-941.html?osCsid=6204ddad6a178752fc659378988da4fc">Snorg Tees</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_30016-51.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><b>Chemistry Experiment Kit:</b>This one's more geared to the younger lab rats, but no science nerd should miss out on a proper chemistry set. This C3000 set is a nice splurge, and even guides you through building a DIY fire extinguisher for when experiments go wrong, but you can certainly go for a smaller kit or even <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5101942/how-to-build-your-own-chemistry-set">put one together on your own</a>. <b>$230</b> [<a href="http://scientificsonline.com/product.asp_Q_pn_E_3001651">Scientifics</a>]</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/casioslomo.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_casioslomo.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><b>Casio EX-FC100:</b> Science types want to document the entire world in pictures and video. Thanks to technological advancements, falling prices and <em>MythBusters</em>, highspeed slow-mo photography has carved out a nerdy niche in recent years. Casio's EX-FC100 may not be an <a href="http://gizmodo.com/t/exf1/">EX-F1</a>, but it's nice and small and has most of that slow mo covered, plus some nice nature-watcher tricks in still shooting, too. Despite the fact that still picture quality isn't as high as a similarly sized Canon, the FC100's set of unique talents make it a worthwhile toy for active observers of the physical world. <b>$226</b> [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5169120/casio-exilim-ex+fc100-slow+mo-pocket-cam-lightning-review">Review</a>; <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Casio-High-Speed-EX-FC100-Stabilized-2-7-inch/dp/B001OTZR1I/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1258750411&sr=8-2">Amazon</a>]</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/germygerms.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_germygerms.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><b>Giant Plush Microbes:</b> If you're in need of a stocking stuffer for a biology nerd, these plush microbes are a sure thing. They're cute (just look at syphilis!) and add a bit of silliness to many all-too-serious subjects. <b>$12</b> [<a href="http://www.thinkgeek.com/geektoys/plush/a55e/">Think Geek</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_supercomp.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><b>Processing Time on a Supercomputer:</b> If you've got a mad, crazy, number-crunching, super science nerd on your hands&mdash;along with your own pretty thick wallet&mdash;then you can go through a company like Exa and get them some quiet time with a supercomputer. Your nerd will be able to run her insane calculations using high-performance computing and save quite a bit of time, so be sure to have some hot chocolate for two ready for a calm evening after. <b>Prices vary, but they're gonna clean out your pockets</b> [<a href="http://www.exa.com/pages/services/ondemand_main.html">Exa</a>]</p>
<p><i>Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/argonne/3323018571/">Argonne National Laboratory</a></i></p>
<p><i>Don't forget to recommend your own favorite gift ideas for science nerds in comments&mdash;include pic and pricing if possible.</i></p>
<p><i><a href="http://gizmodo.com/t/giftguide2009">All Giz Wants</a> is our annual round-up of favorite gift ideas, including amazing attainable objects and a few far-out fantasies. We'll be popping guides catered to different interests several times per day for the next week, so keep checking back.</i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5404803/gifts-for-science-nerds-who-love-to-experiment/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5404803]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gift guide]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chemistry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[engineering]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gift Guide 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gift guide for science nerds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[giftguide2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gifts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[holidays]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[presents]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science nerd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science nerd gift guide]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5404803&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Large Hadron Collider Circulating Particle Beams Again]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/lhc1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_lhc1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>No, it's not going to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5391444/lhc-roars-to-life-begins-task-of-destroying-universe-yet-again">destroy the world</a>. But the collection of photos of the LHC at the Big Picture is a great reminder that this might be the most impressive piece of machinery humanity has ever built. [<a href="http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/11/large_hadron_collider_ready_to.html">Big Picture</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5409452/large-hadron-collider-circulating-particle-beams-again]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5409452]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[large hadron collider]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lhc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5409452&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Creating a Tornado Inside a Soap Bubble]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/WrVFS_smVSs&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/WrVFS_smVSs&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object>I'm not quite sure what exactly is going on here, me being somewhat of a dullard and all, but I do know one thing: this there is one neat video. [<a href="http://www.random-good-stuff.com/2009/11/20/tornado-in-a-bubble/">Random Good Stuff</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5409414/creating-a-tornado-inside-a-soap-bubble]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5409414]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bubbles]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5409414&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Scientists Develop Phaser That Can Stun (Worms)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/phaser.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />The good news: scientists have developed a <i><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #startrek" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/startrek/">Star Trek</a></i>-like phaser that can be set to stun. The bad news: it only works on worms so far.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Researchers have now found a way to paralyse tiny worms when they expose them to ultraviolet light. Even when the ultraviolet light was turned off the animals stayed stunned. However, if they were subsequently exposed to a different form of light they recovered again and were able to move.</p>
<p>The researchers claim that this is the first time that such an effect has been demonstrated in an animal. Although some of the worms died, most of them lived through the process.</p>
<p>The effect is caused by using a molecule which changes its shape when exposed to ultraviolet light.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Well, it's a start I suppose. [<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/6607725/Star-Trek-like-phaser-developed.html">Telegraph</a> via <a href="http://thedw.us/post/250271479/this-x-that-happy-world-toilet-day">The Daily What</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5409252/scientists-develop-phaser-that-can-stun-worms]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5409252]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phaser]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5409252&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
