<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: Shuffle]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/shuffle</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'shuffle']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Mini MP3 DV Cam Gives The iPod Shuffle Video Capability]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/shuffle_spy_cam.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />While leaving video out of the iPod touch had everyone up in arms, nobody expected Apple to add a camcorder to the shuffle. Leave it to the Chinese to fill that enormous void with the Mini MP3 DV Cam.</p>
<p>Of course, even the miniest of mini camcorders cannot be crammed into the shell of an existing shuffle, so Xiangyun Industry Co did the sensible thing and sacrificed the music player to focus on transforming the device into a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SPY CAMERA" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/spy-camera/">spy camera</a>. Features include a 1.3 megapixel sensor with VGA resolution and the ability to capture 1,280 x 960 still photos. Not bad for $15-$30, but you are going to need to outfit an entire spy ring if you want to get your hands on one. Orders are only taken in bulk with a 100 unit minimum. [<a href="http://xiangyun.manufacturer.globalsources.com/si/6008834727789/pdtl/Hidden-camera/1021814538/Mini-MP3-Cam-DVR.htm">Global Sources</a> via <a href="http://www.redferret.net/?p=16384">Red Ferret</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5379799/mini-mp3-dv-cam-gives-the-ipod-shuffle-video-capability]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5379799]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camcorder]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle spy camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[spy camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:50:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5379799&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple 9/9/09 Liveblog]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/pic_1.JPG"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_pic_1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
Archive Below:</p>

<p>7:12 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Man it's early. About 3 hours left to go. More expect more updates from now until then, as usual.</p>
<p>7:20 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Schiller NEEDS to do today's presentation with the I am T-Pain app.</p>
<p>7:53 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Sitting on public transportation is a lot like sitting on the toilet. Reading makes the time go by faster, but eventually you're going to get hit in the face with the smell of urine. If you're lucky it'll just be the smell.</p>
<p>7:57 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
What does everyone think about the Palm Pixi? I like it. Even if it's slightly less powerful than the Pre, the size and the better keyboard make up for the losses, somewhat.</p>
<p>8:01 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
If Apple's inevitable tablet has ebook reading functionality I will personally shake the hand of everyone who worked on that team. Having to switch back and forth between reading a book on the kindle and reading a website on a laptop makes me feel like I'm getting a workout, sure, but if I wanted to exercise I wouldn't have thrown out all those 24 hour fitness fliers.</p>
<p>8:09 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Oh and I probably wouldn't personally shake their hands–I'd send an intern to do it. Gotta watch out for that piggy flu.</p>
<p>8:14 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
I'm wondering what "rock" songs will be playing before the event starts today, seeing as it's a "rock" theme. Rock Lobster? Schoolhouse Rock? Rachmaninoff?</p>
<p>8:18 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
I think sitting down on a train while someone is standing right in front of you is one of the few times where you can stare intently into a person's crotch without other people hassling you about it.</p>
<p>8:18 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/pic_1.JPG"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_pic_1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>8:20 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
OH HELLO! Good morning. Dan Nosowitz, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged APPLE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/-apple/">Apple</a> liveblog virgin, and I are at the Yerba Buena center downtown. Nothing starts for 1 hour and 40 minutes but we thought we'd get here early.</p>
<p>8:21 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Nice of you to qualify that last statement with "Apple liveblog."</p>
<p>8:22 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Dan Nosowitz:<br>
There's someone pointing a video camera at me right now. Little does he know I'm just catching up on last night's celebrity gossip.</p>
<p>8:23 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
Just waiting for Jason to get here. Wonder how traffic is coming from the east bay…probably bad, as usual.</p>
<p>8:30 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
Everyone's talking about iPods but I think it makes sense to see new iTunes today, too. I mean, that's no revelation but I did notice when reviewing snow leopard that iTunes was not rewritten in 64-bits. One of the few apps still native to os x in 32 bits.</p>
<p>8:33 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Dan Nosowitz:<br>
Everyone thinks Apple's going to add a camera onto the Nano and Touch but, especially for the Nano, I think it's kind of a dumb idea. Maybe it's just me but I don't need another crappy camera in my life.</p>
<p>8:40 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
Hey Guys, turning off the live blog poll for for now. I'll let you know when its back on, so you can vote on the news. You can do it by clicking on the love/hate buttons, as many times as you want–it'll count each vote and chart it with the rest of the votes from other readers–or hit H or L keys while focused on the flash widget. But that's later. Oh, also, I forgot what the event is called "Only Rock and Roll", not Let's Rock. I get these damn events confused now.</p>
<p>8:41 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Dan Nosowitz:<br>
I'd love to see a major iTunes refresh. Maybe we could finally get a "play next" function, like Winamp's had since about the last Ice Age.</p>
<p>8:49 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Dan Nosowitz:<br>
On Apple event mornings I like to try to guess which indie band Apple's going to feature. My bet/hope for today: Discovery. You know, just indie enough to be hip but not so much they'll be scary to old folks.</p>
<p>8:50 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
There's a crew of 20 old people with swords around the corner.</p>
<p>8:53 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/pic_2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_pic_2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
its cold but sunny. The crowd is dressed in suits, generally.</p>
<p>8:54 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Dan Nosowitz:<br>
Brian and I are liveblogging in sunglasses, because 1) we're cool rebels and 2) the sun hurts our frail blogger eyes.</p>
<p>8:58 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
That treadmill shelf for laptops really works. I walked three blocks and was not winded.</p>
<p>9:01 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Someone asked me if there are going to be any surprises. I think it's going to be Grey's Anatomy in space. (The seven of you who got that joke are high fiving yourselves now.)</p>
<p>9:02 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Dan Nosowitz:<br>
My press pass says "9.09.09″ but if I look down at it it looks like "06.06.6," THE MARK OF THE BEAST. What are you trying to tell me, Apple?</p>
<p>9:13 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
The usual people are here–analysts, media and other people who I don't recognize. Bald count stands at about 8.</p>
<p>9:13 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Dan Nosowitz:<br>
<object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/iX48KYXIQ8g&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/iX48KYXIQ8g&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/iX48KYXIQ8g.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display: none;"/></p>
<p>9:15 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Dan Nosowitz:<br>
Catering update: Apple's spread of fruits and breads is totally pedestrian. Does this have an implication for the event to come? Discuss. At length.</p>
<p>9:16 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Wilson Rothman:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/pic_3.JPG"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_pic_3.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>9:17 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
40 minutes left. Greg Grunberg is here, and I hope I spelled his name right. Nice guy, and looks exactly like he does on TV. It's like the makeup department said "meh" and moved on.</p>
<p>9:20 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Dan Nosowitz:<br>
Every time I see the tagline "It's Only Rock and Roll" I start humming Billy Joel's "It's Still Rock and Roll to Me." Please tell me I'm not the only one.</p>
<p>9:20 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
I don't know why, but someone is eating a banana and it is hilarious to me.</p>
<p>9:22 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
There is a 13-year-old boy here. I hope for his sale he doesn't do like I did when I was 13 and get inappropriate erections.</p>
<p>9:22 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Wilson Rothman:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/pic_4.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_pic_4.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>9:26 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Think about the person in your life that doesn't have an iPod already. Think about the last time he or she offered to pay for dinner. YOU CAN'T CAN YOU?!</p>
<p>9:27 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Wilson Rothman:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/pic_5.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_pic_5.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>9:30 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Oh and if you want to follow us on Twitter, our names are on the masthead on the main Gizmodo.com page. And mine is @diskopo .</p>
<p>9:32 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Dan Nosowitz:<br>
I want to display my Zune in a prominent place so everyone knows my commitment to objective journalism (and to buying shit on Woot).</p>
<p>9:34 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Wilson Rothman:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/pic_6.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_pic_6.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>9:35 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
What are your 3 predictions for announcements today? Mine are iPods, iPods and more iPods. But also a new version of iTunes that forces your musical tastes upon Twitter and facebook.</p>
<p>9:40 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Wilson Rothman:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/pic_8.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_pic_8.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>9:47 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Wilson Rothman:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/pic_9.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_pic_9.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>9:48 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/pic_10.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_pic_10.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>9:49 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
We're inside. People are scrambling for seats, and I'm hungry.</p>
<p>9:50 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Dan Nosowitz:<br>
First three songs: Aerosmith's "Walk This Way," The Who's "Baba O'Reilly" and Green Day's "When I Come Around." Didn't Apple used to be cool?</p>
<p>9:51 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Thanks to the guys at Hypermac for their awesome external batteries. Saves us a lot of battery switching/worrying.</p>
<p>9:53 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Eight minutes left. Put your phones on vibrate and tell your coworkers you're going to be in a meeting.</p>
<p>9:54 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Eric Schmidt is here, despite having been kicked off the Apple board. It's like attending your old high school's prom after you were expelled for vandalism and sent to the other high school under the bridge.</p>
<p>9:55 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Definitely "rock" songs playing today. No Coldplay or John Mayer. The rift between Mayer and Apple has never been bigger. Please, someone just apologize already.</p>
<p>9:56 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Dan Nosowitz:<br>
I guess they're doing different decades with the music, since Hendrix is playing now. Super boring stuff though. If Steve wants to borrow my Zune I can show him some good tunes.</p>
<p>9:57 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
Hey, I'm having some image difficulty, but we'll be back in a minute, before things start.</p>
<p>9:58 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Nevermind, that was just a bad transition. Another song's up now.</p>
<p>10:00 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
The Stones are playing.</p>
<p>10:01 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/pic_11.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_pic_11.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:01 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
The lights are dimming, and something is happening soon. Get ready.</p>
<p>10:02 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Steve Jobs is on stage and is getting a standing ovation.</p>
<p>10:02 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/PIC_12.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_PIC_12.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:02 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Applause, applause, sustained applause.</p>
<p>10:03 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
"I'm very happy to be here with you all. As some of you might know, I had a liver transplant." He said he now has the liver of a 20 year old who died in a car crash, and he thanks him for his generosity.</p>
<p>10:03 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Steve also wants to thank everyone in the Apple community for the "heartfelt support", and thank Tim Cook and all the other execs at Apple.</p>
<p>10:04 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Steve's voice seems a little bit softer than we remember, a little bit of a hoarse whisper, but all in all he seems able-bodied (if still skinny).</p>
<p>10:05 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
He's going to have Phil Schiller join him for part of the presentation. In 2+ years, Apple's sold 30 million iPhones.</p>
<p>10:05 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
"One of the reasons for that is the remarkable app store." They have more than 75,000 apps, and users have downloaded 1.8 billion apps. That does not include updates (obviously).</p>
<p>10:06 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
"Today we have something new for iPhone and iPod Touch owners." It's iPhone 3.1.</p>
<p>10:06 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Now, Genius makes application suggestions based on the apps you own in order–just like Genius for iTunes music.</p>
<p>10:09 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
The second thing is ringtones to the iTunes store. They have 30,000 ringtones from the majors, and will be $1.29.</p>
<p>10:09 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/pic_13.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_pic_13.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:09 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
iTunes is the number one music retailer in the world. They've sold 8.5 billion songs, and there are 100 million accounts in iTunes. This leads up to iTunes 9.</p>
<p>10:10 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Something else new: Genius mixes–Genius applied to another area. 54 billion songs submitted and analyzed since the Genius feature launched.</p>
<p>10:10 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/pic_14.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_pic_14.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:11 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Genius mixes is a Genius DJ playing songs from your library that it thinks will go well together. iTunes will make 12 by default, and all you have to do is click on one and it'll start playing indefinitely.</p>
<p>10:12 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Also new: improved syncing. So when you sync now you can sync these playlists, but you can now also select genres or artists directly from the Music sync tab.</p>
<p>10:12 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/pic_15.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_pic_15.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:12 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
This applies to Photos as well, selecting Events, people as well as albums that you've already set up.</p>
<p>10:13 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Or movies, syncing the most recent movies or something, and always having one movie.</p>
<p>10:13 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
What's even better is better app syncing for the iPhone, allowing you to manage pages and app locations on iTunes directly.</p>
<p>10:13 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
New "home sharing" in iTunes lets you copy songs, movies and TV shows among the 5 authorized computers in your house.</p>
<p>10:13 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/pic_16.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_pic_16.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:14 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Now you can drag songs from other libraries into YOUR library and it will copy it.</p>
<p>10:15 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Also, a redesigned iTunes store that's better looking (but not all that different from what you've seen before). It's "cleaner", says Steve, but it doesn't seem like a huge jump.</p>
<p>10:15 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Lastly, iTunes LP.</p>
<p>10:16 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
For iTunes LP, it'll include videos, liner notes, credits and other customized content that you used to get when you bought LPs in the past, except now it's digital.</p>
<p>10:16 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/pic_17.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_pic_17.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/pic_18.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_pic_18.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/pic_19.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_pic_19.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:17 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
And now, Jeff Robin comes up for a demo of iTunes 9.</p>
<p>10:18 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
First he's going to show App Organization (the rearranging of your apps on iTunes). Click on Applications and you'll get all the apps and pages. You can click and drag apps from one page to another, or deselect apps from the left hand side and not sync them. You can also drag multiple items at once.</p>
<p>10:18 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/pic_20.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_pic_20.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/pic_21.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_pic_21.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:18 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/pic_22.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_pic_22.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/pic_23.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_pic_23.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:23 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
First he's going to show App Organization (the rearranging of your apps on iTunes). Click on Applications and you'll get all the apps and pages. You can click and drag apps from one page to another, or deselect apps from the left hand side and not sync them. You can also drag multiple items at once.</p>
<p>10:23 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Double-clicking an app on the left-hand side will take you directly to the page that it's on. There's search (type in the name and it'll show the app), and page rearranging, meaning you can move whole pages up or down the queue.</p>
<p>10:23 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Next, home sharing. You can view other people's libraries, as you can now, and just select and drag songs to your library. It'll disappear from the list of other people's libraries if you select to only show "items not in my library."</p>
<p>He's demoing the iTunes store now, and all pages have been redesigned to match the new style. There are also quick-view popups for albums, allowing you to see the entire album from wherever you are, instead of having to go into the album page.</p>
<p>Oh and Facebook/Twitter sharing: you can now click on content and share links directly to them from the store.</p>
<p>10:24 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
As for iTunes LP, you can flip through photos and individual songs, which displays lyrics directly in iTunes for you to Karaoke along with.</p>
<p>10:26 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
There can also be custom interviews (in video) that comes with the iTunes LP purchases.</p>
<p>10:26 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/pic_24.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_pic_24.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:26 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/pic_25.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_pic_25.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:26 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
There are iTunes Extras for movies as well, giving you extra features (think DVD extras) but more interactive. And different.</p>
<p>10:27 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/pic_26.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_pic_26.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:27 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
iTunes demo over. Steve Jobs is coming back on stage.</p>
<p>10:27 AM ON Sep 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
iTunes 9 is available today.</p>
<p>10:28 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Now, the iPod. Phil Schiller is coming up and taking over.</p>
<p>10:28 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock40.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock40.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:28 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Apple's sold 225 million iPods to date.</p>
<p>10:28 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
I think our server troubles are over? Let's hope!</p>
<p>10:29 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
As for Marketshare, iPod's got 73.8%, Sandisk has 7.2%, and Microsoft has around 1%. The rest is "other".</p>
<p>10:29 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock42.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock42.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:29 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
The fastest growing iPod is the iPod Touch.</p>
<p>10:30 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<img src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock43.jpg"></p>
<p>10:30 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Apple's sold 20 million iPod touches. Add that to the iPhone number and you'll get a big number of devices that can run your apps.</p>
<p>10:30 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
Hey, we disabled the poll. Looks like you guys really liked clicking on it. Caused some problems with the servers.</p>
<p>10:31 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Phil is going over the talking points of the iPod Touch; the same things you already know. It runs apps, playing music and watching video.</p>
<p>10:32 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock48.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock48.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:32 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
You can also use Genius Mixes (the feature introduced in iTunes 9) on the iPod Touch, with the songs you've already loaded onto there.</p>
<p>10:33 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock49.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock49.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:33 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Phil, the consummate salesman, is going through the features of the iPod Touch as if it hasn't been available for 2 years now.</p>
<p>10:33 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock50.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock50.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:34 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
"Not everybody's computer fits in your pocket", Phil says, as he points to a photo of a dude shoving a Dell laptop into his ass pocket.</p>
<p>10:35 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock51.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock51.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:35 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Phil is comparing games on the PSP to the DS, saying they have no multitouch and that they're expensive. You even have to GO TO A STORE TO BUY A GAME. Nobody ever says Phil doesn't have the balls to say things like this on stage with a straight face.</p>
<p>10:36 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock53.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock53.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:36 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock54.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock54.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:36 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Here's an image of the comparison between the amount of iPhone games vs. the amount of PSP and DS games. Misleading graph if anything, seeing as the amount of games doesn't indicate that they are all GOOD games.</p>
<p>10:37 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock55.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock55.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:37 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
And now a montage of games from various iPod Touch Action Titles.</p>
<p>10:38 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Phil's inviting up Ubisoft to demo Assassin's Creed. It's NOT Jade Raymond, unfortunately.</p>
<p>10:39 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Assassin's Creed 2 is being demoed now. It's a sidescrolling game, and has some pretty decent graphics.</p>
<p>10:39 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock56.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock56.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:39 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
You can even put your face into the wanted posters with the camera. Does this mean that the iPod Touch is getting a camera??</p>
<p>10:39 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock57.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock57.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:40 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Ubisoft is releasing this app on the same day as the Assassin's Creed game for consoles.</p>
<p>10:40 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Ubisoft is releasing this app on the same day as the Assassin's Creed game for consoles.</p>
<p>10:40 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock58.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock58.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:41 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Their latest game mixes music and racing.</p>
<p>10:41 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Next up, Tapulous, which makes Tap Tap Revenge.</p>
<p>10:42 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock59.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock59.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:43 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Riddim Ribbon is their latest game, making you a "DJ". You're "racing" down a track by tilting the phone, and you can choose different remixes of the current song you're on. You can flick the phone up to jump and add custom sounds. The guy playing the game is really into it.</p>
<p>10:43 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
After you're done playing the game you'll have made your own "mix" of the song, which you can share.</p>
<p>10:43 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock63.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock63.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:44 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Next is Gameloft. They're shipping 35 gaming titles in the App Store right now, with 20 million downloads.</p>
<p>10:44 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock66.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock66.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:44 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Nova, a first person shooter, puts you into the shoes of a space marine. SPACE MARINE, how come nobody's come up with this before?</p>
<p>10:45 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
The HUD looks a lot like Halo, and it feels quite a bit like Halo.</p>
<p>10:45 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock69.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock69.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:45 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock71.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock71.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:45 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
You use the left side of the screen for the analog stick, and the right side to shoot. Plus the middle for changing weapons.</p>
<p>10:46 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
There will be multiplayer over Wi-Fi and Bluetooth.</p>
<p>10:46 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Last is EA.</p>
<p>10:47 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock72.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock72.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:47 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Here's a game that's been around "for over 20 years." It's Madden, which has been announced already, and looks like PlayStation 1 graphics.</p>
<p>10:48 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock75.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock75.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:48 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock77.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock77.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:49 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
The analog stick controls motion, just like the normal Madden, and John Madden gives super obvious advice, again, just like the normal Madden.</p>
<p>10:49 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
"Usually the team that makes the least mistakes will win the game," declares Madden.</p>
<p>10:49 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Need For Speed Shift, Command and Conquer and NBA Live are also coming to the App Store.</p>
<p>10:50 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Phil says the iPod Touch is the "most affordable gateway to the App Store," which is true.</p>
<p>10:51 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Phil says "$199 is a magic price point in the iPod market." So, they're lowering the iPod Touch price to $199 for the 8GB version.</p>
<p>10:52 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
The 32GB will be $299 and 64GB will be $399.</p>
<p>10:52 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock83.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock83.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:52 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Also, the $299 and $399 versions of the iPod Touch will be 50% faster, and run OpenGL ES 2.0–the same as the iPhone 3GS.</p>
<p>10:53 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock84.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock84.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:53 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
So, the 8GB version is running the older processor and the 32 and 64GB are running the newer one.</p>
<p>10:54 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
There's an iPod Touch ad showing off multiplayer by having multiple people play at the same time, showing off interactions.</p>
<p>10:54 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock85.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock85.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:54 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Next up is the iPod Classic. Today, there's a 120GB version for $249. They're going to raise the size to 160GB for the same $249.</p>
<p>10:54 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B.Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock89.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock89.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:54 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Then, the iPod Shuffle.</p>
<p>10:55 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock90.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock90.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:55 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock91.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock91.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:55 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Customers wanted to "expand" the range of headphones that work for the iPod Shuffle, which include Beats by Dre.</p>
<p>10:56 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock92.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock92.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:57 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock93.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock93.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:57 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
What's new? New colors that's what. Black, silver, pink, green and blue. A lower price of $59 for 2GB, in addition to the $79 at 4GB.</p>
<p>10:57 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
All these ship today.</p>
<p>10:57 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
There's also a $99 special 4GB model made of polished steel. Special Edition.</p>
<p>10:57 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
And here's Steve again.</p>
<p>10:57 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock94.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock94.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock95.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock95.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:58 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
One more thing…</p>
<p>10:58 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
A video camera?</p>
<p>10:58 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock96.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock96.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:58 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
My guess is a camera on the iPod Touch. But we'll see in a second.</p>
<p>10:59 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock97.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock97.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:59 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
He's comparing a Flip at $149 with 4GB of memory. "So what are we gonna do?" They're going to use an 8GB model, and it will be "free". Yep, it's going to be on the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged IPOD NANO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ipod-nano/">iPod Nano</a>. There's a camera and a microphone.</p>
<p>10:59 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock100.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock100.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock99.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock99.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>10:59 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
There will be a speaker as well, for playback.</p>
<p>11:00 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock102.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock102.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>11:00 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock103.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock103.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>11:01 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
"So how good is it?" Steve shows a demo video shot with the Nano.</p>
<p>11:01 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
He's making us watch the same lame video twice.</p>
<p>11:01 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock104.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock104.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>11:02 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock105.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock105.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>11:02 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Apple's sold 100 million iPod nanos to make it the "most popular music player in the world." They're adding voiceover, a genius mix feature, and FM radio.</p>
<p>11:03 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Also, a pedometer and a voice recorder. You can sync the pedometer directly to Nike+ as well, to keep track of your steps.</p>
<p>11:03 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock105.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock105.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock106.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock106.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock107.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock107.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock108.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock108.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock109.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock109.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>11:03 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock111.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock111.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>11:03 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
And, new colors. "We've finally figured out how to do colors that are unimaginably beautiful. They're polished anodized aluminum."</p>
<p>11:03 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
There are two models. 8GB for $149 and 16GB for $179. They're available today.</p>
<p>11:04 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock112.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock112.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock113.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock113.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>11:04 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Here's an ad for it.</p>
<p>11:04 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
We're turning off live refresh, so you'll have to click refresh to get new updates. Please, refresh!</p>
<p>11:05 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock117.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock117.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock118.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock118.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock119.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock119.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>11:05 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock120.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock120.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>11:05 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Now the obligatory Environmental Checklist. Arsenic, BFR, Mercury, PVC-free.</p>
<p>11:06 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
That's not it, Steve has some more to say.</p>
<p>11:06 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
"Like you, we love music. There's no better way to remind us all than to have a live performance. We are really lucky today that Norah Jones is joining us." Norah Jones yay!</p>
<p>11:06 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock121.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock121.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>11:07 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Norah Jones is coming up on stage, and she looks Norah Jonesey. Very nice.</p>
<p>11:07 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock122.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock122.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock124.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock124.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>11:08 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock125.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock125.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>11:08 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Not only is she a great singer, she was good in the Wong Kar Wai movie as well. The movie itself wasn't all that fantastic, but SHE was good in it.</p>
<p>11:09 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
B. Lam:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/appleletsrock/appleletsrock126.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_appleletsrock126.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>11:10 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
My knee hurts like a mofo from sitting so long. I am officially an old man.</p>
<p>11:11 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Here's a new song that they're going to release this November.</p>
<p>11:13 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Here's a new song that they're going to release this November.</p>
<p>11:14 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
So to recap, no real new "designs" in any of the iPods, but there are some lower prices and new features. No camera for the iPod Touch, but there is one for the Nano.</p>
<p>11:14 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Steve Jobs is coming back on stage to thank Norah Jones.</p>
<p>11:15 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
I feel like he's gonna say "Goodnight everybody, stay tuned for Craig Ferguson."</p>
<p>11:16 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Steve thanks everyone for coming, and Brian, Dan and I thank you all for reading!</p>
<p>11:16 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
You guys really loved pushing that button so much that it crashed our machines, so we'll make sure to put more button-handling in there for next time. October, maybe? There's always the tablet.</p>
<p>11:17 AM ON SEP 9 2009<br>
Jason Chen:<br>
Time to get some hands-on with the new iPods. See you all soon on the main Gizmodo page. BYE!</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5355957/apple-9909-liveblog]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5355957]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[liveblog]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[9"]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[archive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[edition]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod nano]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod nano 5g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iPod Nano Camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[itunes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[limited]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lp]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[steve]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[touch]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:36:38 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Don Nguyen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5355957&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Scosche TapStick Makes iPod Shuffle 3G Significantly Less Annoying, More Usable]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_1848.13223.600x400.CAR.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;">Some think the button-less <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged IPOD SHUFFLE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ipod-shuffle/">iPod shuffle</a> is <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5169174/ipod-shuffle-review-2009">just okay</a>, and others see it as near-unusable, impractical and irritating. The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SCOSCHE TAPSTICK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/scosche-tapstick/">Scosche TapStick</a> adds buttons and supports normal headphones, in case you hated the shuffle but for some reason bought it anyway.</p>
<p>The TapStick is a case that moves the awkward headphone-based controls onto the front of the gadget where they belong, which in turn frees up the headphone jack to use any pair of 'phones you choose, not just the ones Apple packages in. In effect, while these features make the shuffle easier to use, they also remove everything that separates it from previous-gen shuffles.</p>
<p>The TapStick also costs $29, nearly half the price of the $79 shuffle itself, and for that combined $110 you've got yourself a player with no screen, incredibly basic controls, the worst sound quality in the iPod family, and you've lost the slick look of the uncased shuffle. You could double your memory and get a far more feature-packed player in the 8GB iPod nano for only $40 more! This might just be a lipstick-on-a-pig situation. [<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10258208-1.html?part=rss&tag=feed&subj=Crave">CNET</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5280310/scosche-tapstick-makes-ipod-shuffle-3g-significantly-less-annoying-more-usable]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5280310]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[accessories]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cases]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pmps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[scosche]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[scosche tapstick]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5280310&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[iPhone Nano Wannabe Actually Looks Like It Came From Cupertino]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/hiphone-n3-gizmodo.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/hiphone-n3-gizmodo.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>This is the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged HIPHONE NANO N3" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/hiphone-nano-n3/">HiPhone Nano N3</a>+, a 2.8-inch touchscreen based with swivel screen cellphone. It's a Chinese clone of an Apple product that never happened, but which actually looks like it <i>could</i> have happened.</p>

<p>Sure it's not perfect and it lacks the finesse of Apple's designsand I shiver thinking about the software this thing packsbut look at it. There are MacBooks in there. And iPod nanos and even part of the old iPod shuffle in that internal ringnot <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5222717/can-the-ipod-shuffle-be-swallowed">the one Heather tried to swallow</a>.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('hiphonenanon3', 4, '');
</script></p>
<blockquote>
<p><b><a class="tagautolink autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged HIPHONE NANO N3" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/hiphone-nano-n3/">HiPhone Nano N3</a>+</b><br>
2.8" TouchScreen Tri-band Flip Phone w/ Dual Standby, Shake Control, Camera - HiPhone Nano N3+</p>
<p>• Clamshell iPod Nano design<br>
• 2.8-inch (3.0-inch) touchscreen QVGA + stylus<br>
• Triband GSM, GPRS<br>
• Dual SIM with dual stand-by<br>
• TouchWiz control<br>
• Shake control<br>
• Magical Voice<br>
• Bluetooth<br>
• Video and music support<br>
• FM tuner<br>
• 1.3 megapixel camera<br>
• TF card slot (1GB TF comes with the phone)<br>
• 2800mAh battery</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This clone of hardware from an alternative Earth can be yours for $190. [<a href="http://chinagrabber.com/2-8-touchscreen-tri-band-flip-phone-w-dual-standby-shake-control-camera---hiphone-nano-n3.aspx">China Grabber</a> via <a href="http://www.pmptoday.com/2009/04/23/hiphone-nano-n3-flip-phone-unbelievably-apple-listically-beautiful/">PMP Today</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5226194/iphone-nano-wannabe-actually-looks-like-it-came-from-cupertino]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5226194]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hiphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hiphone nano n3]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[n3]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nano]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:20:23 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5226194&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Kindle 2 and iPod Shuffle Perform Blade Runner]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/bladereader.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/bladereader.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged KINDLE 2" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/kindle-2/">Kindle 2</a> and new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged IPOD SHUFFLE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ipod-shuffle/">iPod shuffle</a> both feature new text-to-speech modes. So how well can the duo read the opening scene from Bladerunner?</p>

<p><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://wgtclsp.scifi.com/o/48e10f5e9dbb50aa/49f0949083b30d4c/49f082a6c0450a4c/4b11cf2e/-cpid/837e816d1af554b0" id="W48e10f5e9dbb50aa49f0949083b30d4c" width="400" height="400"><param name="movie" value="http://wgtclsp.scifi.com/o/48e10f5e9dbb50aa/49f0949083b30d4c/49f082a6c0450a4c/4b11cf2e/-cpid/837e816d1af554b0">
<param name="wmode" value="transparent">
<param name="allowNetworking" value="all">
<param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></object>As you'd expect, not all that well. However, we'd give the Kindle 2 an enthusiastic one-clap for its moments of natural-sounding cadence. The Shuffle, on the other hand, was streamlined-mediocre. [<a href="http://dvice.com/archives/2009/04/talking-gadget.php">DVICE</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5224690/the-kindle-2-and-ipod-shuffle-perform-blade-runner]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5224690]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[kindle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[kindle 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[text-to-speech]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5224690&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ChocoShuffle Case Turns iPod Into Something No More Edible]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/chocoshuffle.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/chocoshuffle.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>The $8.99 ChocoShuffle looks delicious, turning your new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged IPOD SHUFFLE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ipod-shuffle/">iPod shuffle</a> into milk chocolate, white chocolate or...some sort of strawberry chocolate. But buyer beware.</p>

<p>It could happen on a deserted island, or it could happen on a particularly long wait in the subway. Either way, it's only a matter of time before, in a moment of extreme hunger, you eye your MP3 player for snacking. As your teeth penetrate the tasteless silicon shell, you'll find the aluminum center to be ever so harder on tooth enamel than nougata point to which your dentist will concur.</p>
<p>Plus you'll still be hungry. <script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('chocoshuffle', 4,'');
</script>[<a href="http://www.switcheasy.com/products/ChocoShuffle/ChocoShuffle.php">SwitchEasy</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5216267/chocoshuffle-case-turns-ipod-into-something-no-more-edible]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5216267]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[case]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cases]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chocolate]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chocoshuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle case]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[kitchen]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[kitchentech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[switcheasy]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5216267&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New Shuffle Costs Apple $21.77 to Build]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/ipodshuffle_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/ipodshuffle_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>According to a new <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5169281/ipod-shuffle-teardown-confirms-that-its-tiny-on-the-inside-to">teardown</a> report by iSuppli, the $79, third generation <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5182659/we-discover-the-dark-side-of-the-new-ipod-shuffle">iPod shuffle</a> costs Apple a total of $21.77 to build and box. Here's the cost per component:</p>

<p><strong>Main Processing Chip</strong> (Samsung)<br>
$5.98</p>
<p><strong>4GB Flash Memory</strong> (Samsung)<br>
$6</p>
<p><strong>Lithium Ion Battery</strong> (Smallest iSuppli had ever seen)<br>
$1.20</p>
<p><strong>Various Capacitors and Resistors</strong> (Smallest iSupply had ever seen, a grain of salt a pop)<br>
Less than a penny each</p>
<p>The prices of the headphones, body and case were unspecified, but apparently those components make up the other half of the shuffle's component cost to Apple. And with the build price at just 28% of the sale price, the shuffle should be Apple's most profitable iPod ever, even if iSuppli's report doesn't account for expenses like R&amp;D. [<a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/apr2009/tc20090410_507831.htm">BusinessWeek</a> and <a href="http://www.ifixit.com/Guide/First-Look/iPod-Shuffle-3rd-Generation/673/1">image</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5209850/new-shuffle-costs-apple-2177-to-build]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5209850]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle cost]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[isuppli]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[profits]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5209850&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[iTunes 8.1 Kindly Suggests You Get New iPod Shuffle By Scrambling Old Shuffle's Brains]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/shuffleimperial.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/shuffleimperial.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a>iTunes 8.1 adds lot of lovely features, <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5168529/itunes-81-now-available">like iTunes DJ</a>, and apparently, a new passive-aggressive personality that's in cahoots with the <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5182659/we-discover-the-dark-side-of-the-new-ipod-shuffle">evil new iPod shuffle</a>: It <a href="http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=9194084">completely screws up syncing</a> with older gen iPod shuffles.</p>

<p>Apple forums are lit up with complaints about how iTunes 8.1 smacks around the older iPod shuffles: It dupes existing files on the iPod, it copies podcasts out-of-order, doesn't remove deleted podcasts, and won't play when connected to the computer are what's documented (and seconded and thirded) by one user. It seems to have issues with Smart playlists too.</p>
<p>Right now the only solution seems to be downgrading back to iTunes 8.0 until there's a fix. Oh, and isn't that photo Charlie found <em>the best</em>? [<a href="http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=9194084#9194084">Apple Forums</a> via <a href="http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2009/04/forced-upgrade.html">Gadget Lab</a>, <em>Image: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bfishadow/3387711694/">bfshadow</a>/Flickr</em>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5206766/itunes-81-kindly-suggests-you-get-new-ipod-shuffle-by-scrambling-old-shuffles-brains]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5206766]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA["itunes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[8.1]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[itunes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 10 Apr 2009 10:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5206766&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[We Discover the Dark Side of the New iPod Shuffle]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><br clear="all" /><object width="506" height="311" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/jKnI51HOy9w&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/jKnI51HOy9w&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="506" height="311" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object>The new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged IPOD SHUFFLE" title="Click here to read more posts tagged IPOD SHUFFLE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ipod-shuffle/">iPod Shuffle</a> might seem innocent enough, but after having to listen to your music selection hour after hour, even it reaches its breaking point.</p>
<p>We teamed up with our friends over at <A href="http://www.ucbcomedy.com">UCBComedy.com</a> to create this, our first original comedic video. It was written by myself and Mark Wilson, directed by <a href="http://www.ucbcomedy.com/talent/view/24">Will Hines</a>, edited by Nate Dern, and stars me. </p>
<p>Let us know what you think! Unless you don't like it, in which case keep your opinions to your damn self. We're sensitive. [<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKnI51HOy9w&fmt=22">UCBComedy</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5182659/we-discover-the-dark-side-of-the-new-ipod-shuffle]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5182659]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[comedy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ucb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ucbcomedy]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5182659&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The New Shuffle Available in Pretty Colors for $129, Unofficially]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/shuffles.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/shuffles.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>While Apple insists on grey and black for the <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5169174/ipod-shuffle-review-2009">new iPod shuffle</a>, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged COMPUTER CHOPPERS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/computer-choppers/">Computer Choppers</a> is happy to do some custom color anodizing for you.</p>

<p>Any model in the pictured spectrum can be yours for $129, or a $50 premium over the stock <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged IPOD SHUFFLE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ipod-shuffle/">iPod shuffle</a>. But there are other options as well, such as copper, rose gold and platinum, that can push the price up to $200.</p>
<p>Of course, Apple will probably get around to releasing the shuffle in a wide array of colors. But you know the drillthey generally wait until you've already bought one. [<a href="http://computer-choppers.com/index.html">Computer Choppers</a> via <a href="http://technabob.com/blog/2009/03/19/ipod-shuffle-3g-gets-candy-coated-colors/">technabob</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5174993/the-new-shuffle-available-in-pretty-colors-for-129-unofficially]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5174993]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[computer choppers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle colors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:01:24 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5174993&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Confirmed: Your iPod Shuffle Earbuds Need Proprietary Chip to Function]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/ipodshuffleg3chip.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/ipodshuffleg3chip.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a>We followed up on <a href="http://www.ilounge.com/index.php/reviews/entry/apple-ipod-shuffle-third-generation/P6">iLounge</a> and <a href="http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2009/03/14/we-found-the-chip-in.html">BBGadgets</a>' finds this weekend about rumors that the <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5169174/ipod-shuffle-review-2009">iPod Shuffle</a> has an <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged AUTHENTICATION CHIP" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/authentication-chip/">authentication chip</a> in its headphone controller in order to work with the new control scheme. It does. <b>Updated</b></p>
<p>iLounge was apparently first mention the presence of a possible authentication scheme, and Boing Boing Gadgets was the first to find <b>some</b> kind of chip inside the headphoneswhether or not it was an <i>authentication</i> chip was unknown.</p>
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/v+moda">V-Moda</a>, one of the <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5169478/v+moda-announces-their-own-ipod-shuffle+compatible-headphones">manufacturers who announced shuffle-compatible headphones last week</a>, just confirmed to us that yes, an "authentication chip IS required to enable to volume control functionality with the new shuffle (as well as the latest gen of iPod and MacBooks)." The difference here is that iPods and MacBooks worked with headphones that didn't have the authentication chip. The shuffle does not. <b>Update</b>: This statement was retracted by V-Moda. See bottom of post for details.</p>
<p>V-Moda also says that they've collaborated with Apple for the past few months developing the technology. <strike>It seems safe to conclude two things. One, manufacturers who want their headphones to work with the shuffle need to work with Apple in order to get access to the tech inside the authentication chip. Two, only people who Apple "like" are going to get this tech and make compatible headphonesbut it's likely that Apple likes almost anybody with the money to pay for licensing.</strike></p>
<p><strike>Whatever the consequences, it does look like Apple is going down the path of locking down <i>headphones</i>, hoping to crunch out another revenue stream from all the manufacturers offering ways of getting sound from your iPod to your ears, whether it be through earbuds or through car adapters.</strike></p>
<p><i>Image courtesy <a href="http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2009/03/14/we-found-the-chip-in.html">Boing Boing Gadgets</a></i></p>
<p><b>Update</b>: Another source, plus the original contact at V-Moda, are telling me something different about the chip. V-Moda is retracting their original statement and saying "it is NOT an authentication nor a DRM chip", which I am trying to get clarification on now. The other source says it's supposedly closer to a proprietary control chip that houses the new control scheme, and is an "additional component for the 'made for iPod' program". Again, the phrase "authentication chip" was their language, which they are retracting now. Further updates to come.</p>
<p><b>Update 2</b>: <a href="http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2009/03/16/manufacturer-confirm.html">Joel @ BBG</a> says he spoke to Apple, and they denied the fact that there's any encryption or authentication in the chip. What's also interesting is that another tipster says the chip is relatively easy to clone (a fact Apple strangely corroborates), meaning the reason why the manufacturers are licensing and using Apple's version is most likely to get to market as fast as possible to beat their competitors. And, because they like the fact that they have a made for iPod certification.</p>
<p><b>Update 3</b>: Spoke to someone else at V-Moda, and they assured me that it was not an authentication chip, but a control chip as part of the "made for iPod" program that they receive from Apple. They've also got no plans to go and duplicate the functionality without the "made for iPod" label, as is probably the case with all other major manufacturers.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5170797/confirmed-your-ipod-shuffle-earbuds-need-proprietary-chip-to-function]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5170797]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[authentication]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[authentication chip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[breaking]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle authentication chip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[v-moda]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5170797&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Dexim Shu-Lip Adds Direct Headphone-To-USB Donglage To the New Shuffle]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/dexim_shulip.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/>Remember how you could just plug the original Shuffles into USB and have it act as a thumbdrive as well as sync? This $10 dongle for the new Shuffle essentially does the same thing.</p>

<p>Ditching the dock cord, the Shu-Lip mates directly to the headphone jack on one end for immediate USB insertion. Adding yet another accesory to the the already ridiculously accesory-prone new $80 Shuffle. [<a href="http://www.dexim.net/product/A-V/DWA031.html">Product Page</a> via <a href="http://www.ilounge.com/index.php/news/comments/dexim-previews-shu-lip-for-ipod-shuffle-3g/16428">iLounge</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5169511/dexim-shu+lip-adds-direct-headphone+to+usb-donglage-to-the-new-shuffle]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5169511]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[accessories]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dexim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dexim shu-lip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dongles]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod accessories]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shu-lip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:58:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Mahoney]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5169511&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[V-Moda Announces Their Own iPod Shuffle-Compatible Headphones]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>They join <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5168913/shuffle+compatible-headphones-trickle-in-from-etymotics-klipsch-monster-and-scoche">Etymotics, Klipsch, Monster and Scoche</a>, who announced theirs yesterday. Theirs should support the newest shuffles, plus the latest MacBooks and nanos.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5169478/v+moda-announces-their-own-ipod-shuffle+compatible-headphones]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5169478]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[headphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle headphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[v-moda]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:36:30 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5169478&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[iPod Shuffle Review (2009)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/ipodshuffle.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/ipodshuffle.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>Zero buttons. That's as minimalist as it gets.</p>
<p>Removing all buttonsor to clarify, moving them to the headsetshrinks down the size of the new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged IPOD SHUFFLE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ipod-shuffle/">iPod Shuffle</a> dramatically, but it also creates control problems when running, snowboarding or doing anything other than sitting.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('ipodshuffle3gcompare', 5, '');
</script></p>
<p><strong>Design</strong><br>
This new iPod shuffle is about half the volume of the previous iPod shuffle. <strong>HALF</strong>. By moving all the controls from the face onto the headphone cable, Apple was able to reduce the width and thickness to almost 50%, even if the length grew slightly. This wasn't totally sensible: Although the headphones do offer a comprehensive <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5168478/apples-control-scheme-for-the-ipod-shuffle-looks-like-friggin-morse-code">control scheme</a>, the button position on the headphone cord becomes really difficult to use unless you're sitting still. It also limits your choice of headphones to the ones Apple gives you, or new shuffle-specific ones made by other manufacturers.</p>
<p>But there's one point where this shuffle beats the hell out of the previous shuffle, and that's the audio feedback interface. Apple calls this UI, which speaks to you, VoiceOver. It's a set of text-to-speech files transparently associated to each track on your iPod that will speak the title and artist of your current song. Hold the button down long enough, and the voice will cycle through all your playlists, one by one, reading the names. Hit it again to jump directly to that playlist.</p>
<p>The player itself is also fine, even if the blank, monolithic face takes a while to get used to (and stop reaching for when you want to change tracks). Yes, it only comes in black and silver, instead of the whimsical shuffle/nano palette we're used to.</p>
<p>Its front and back are made of aluminum. And just like the nano (and the previous generation shuffle), the edges are a little too sharp. The clip is made out of stainless steel, like the back of the iPod touch and older generation nanos, so it attracts fingerprints and gets scratched up incredibly easily. The front, luckily, does not have this problem.</p>
<p>The package comes with headphones and a three-inch USB connector. Apple's tendency to remove stuff from the iPod package continues with the removal of the free dock; which is a shame, since you'll instead be leaving this strewn about your desk, and because it's so damn tiny, you'll have probably have a hard time finding it again.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/ipodcompare1.jpg" width="804" height="478" style="display:block;float:none;"></p>
<p><strong>Syncing and Playback</strong><br>
The entire iTunes sync screen is improved. There's now support for podcasts and playlist syncing. Yeah, you don't have to use autofill or manually drag tracks and playlists over one by one, because you can now jump between playlists using the VoiceOver feedback system.</p>
<p>These voices, which are generated and synced on the fly when you choose playlists, sound pretty great, assuming you have Mac OS X Leopard. Those who do will get to take advantage of "Alex", the newer text-to-speech voice shipped in the OS. If you're on Windows, or if you ever want to use the 13 languages other than English, you'll default to the VoiceOverKit downloadable pack that comes with iTunes 8.1. Even the supposedly lousier TTS agent works decently enough, because these are your songs and you should be able to at least guesstimate what artist/track it is. But Alex prounounces stuff like "Yeah Yeah Yeahs" and "Jamiroquai" correctly, whereas the other one (a lady's voice) doesn't.</p>
<p>Voice data is fairly small, with 400MB worth of songs only taking up about 20MB of voice track data. That's going to be about 175MB of voice data if you fill up all 3.5GB of usable space.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/language.jpg" width="504" height="129" style="display:block;">I tested actual Chinese and Japanese track names and artist names and they all came out sounding correct, if a bit robotic. You can override language selections by song or globally if you want all your music to be read back to you in the English voicefor example, if you have a bunch of classical music labeled in Italian. But if you have a mix and match song, with a Japanese title and an English artist name, the iPod will pronounce everything using the Japanese voice, including the English portion. Which is funny if you're an ass (like me) that gets a chuckle from non-native English speaker accents.</p>
<p>The 255-character limit to song and artist fields still applies, so you can't shove lyrics or eBooks in there and expect your iPod to read them back to you. And blank data in both fields results in complete silence; it doesn't say "untitled track" unless the track name is actually "untitled track."</p>
<p>It does say other things, however, including its battery status, if you flick the hold switch off and on again. This <a href="http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1510">chart displays</a> the possible blinks and audible alerts.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('ipodshuffle3gnano', 4, '');
</script></p>
<p>As for the shuffle's sound quality, since the shuffle only works with the included headphones and not <i>any other regular set of headphones</i>, we ran a couple playback tests as best we could. The frequency response, using a specially-encoded frequency sweep MP3, was decent but not phenomenal. The start of the sweep was at 16Hz, and we couldn't hear anything until half a second later when it got above 50Hz. It definitely peaked well under 20KHz (probably close to 16KHzish), but some of that could be due to my own high frequency hearing loss. And, because these headphones are quite lousy. When I compared frequency response to the old shuffle and to the nano with the same earphones, they were all about equal.</p>
<p>Max volume definitely was louder on this shuffle than the 2G version. It wasn't quite as loud as the latest iPod nano, but it was damn close. Again, since we could only use the default headphones to test, there wasn't any real difference in audio quality, even with high-quality 320kbps MP3s.</p>
<p>We're also going to check whether or not the 10-hour battery life claim is accurate, but Apple themselves claim that it's down from 12 hours in the previous generation.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/ipodshufflebig.jpg" width="804" height="317" style="display:block;float:none;"></p>
<p><strong>Usage</strong><br>
Because the shuffle's now only half as wide as the old one, the clip is only about half as strong. There's less surface area, and it's no longer jaggedit's just two bits of metal on top of each other. There's still quite a bit of strength in it, but you'll be able to yank it off from your jeans using just the headphone cable, so it could mean trouble.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/headphonecord.jpg" width="504" height="346" style="display:block;">Since one of the major uses of the shuffle is for exercise, we had to take it on a 30-minute run, testing usability in active conditions. Although the clip is fine, the controls are pretty crappy. The stock headphones suck because the controls are up on the right hand cord, up near the ear. You pause, forward, rewind and seek by hitting the middle button in <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5168478/apples-control-scheme-for-the-ipod-shuffle-looks-like-friggin-morse-code">various ways</a>. This is fine when you're sitting, but when you're running, it's really hard to hold your arm still up in that awkward position to change tracks. And when you're <em>really</em> tired, your arms start flailing and it's very, very difficult to not yank the earbud out of your ear when you're changing songs.</p>
<p>Here's the solution. Apple should move the controls down to where the two earbud cords split. It's much more convenient down there, plus lefties wouldn't have to suck it up and use their right hand. This major problem might get fixed by one of the <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5168913/shuffle+compatible-headphones-trickle-in-from-etymotics-klipsch-monster-and-scoche">major headphone manufacturers</a> releasing their own compatible pairs. I'd pay $100 for a good pair that doesn't have the controls placed in a lousy place, or maybe even has larger controls on the cable.</p>
<p>I don't have a pair of snowboarding gloves, but I do have a pair of regular gloves, and when using the shuffle with them on, it's hard to feel where the groove of the play/pause button stops and the volume +/- buttons start. It would be much worse for even thicker gloves that offer zero tactile feedback. But on the bright side, the body itself is at least as water-resistant as the old shuffle. Probably even more so, since there are fewer cracks and openings for water to leak into.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('ipodshufflepill', 6, '');
</script></p>
<p>So where's this all headed? If Apple wasn't so absolutely married to the fact that physical controls <b>need</b> to be in a trademark click-wheel shape, they could have easily spread out the five play/next/prev/vol. up/vol. down buttons along the smooth face of the shuffle. But they didn't.</p>
<p>There's also a limit to how much smaller the shuffle can go. I wouldn't expect such a dramatic decrease next time around. In fact, I predict a re-emergence of the wheel, so that the entire player is thinner, but squarish with only the wheel on the front. After all, the previous generation's wheel wasn't even a real wheel anyway because you couldn't actually scroll with it by thumbing around in a circle. Apple seems to enjoy alternating between different design shapes in their iPod nano (2G nano was thin, 3G nano was fat, 4G nano was thin) line, so it's not out of the realm of possibility that they're going to do this with the shuffle as well.</p>
<p>If you need something like this for exercise, or if you just hate the fact that there are no buttons on this one, buy the last-gen shuffle before they're all gone, or wait till next year when Apple changes its mind. To tell the truth, this new shuffle is just okay. We don't know what kind of a statement they were trying to make with it, but suffice it to say, the message wasn't received. [<a href="http://www.apple.com/ipodshuffle/">Apple</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/gizplus3.jpg">VoiceOver text-to-speech feedback is neat, and improves usability dramatically<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/gizplus3.jpg">New 4GB storage means more songs for about the same price<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/giznormal_01.jpg">Half the size of the previous generation shuffle<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/giznormal_01.jpg">Default headphones have the controls placed in an awkward position on the cord<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/giznormal_01.jpg">Battery life has decreased from 12 hours to 10<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/gizminus2.jpg" width="40" height="20">It's very difficult to work the in-line controls while running or wearing thick gloves<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/gizminus2.jpg" width="40" height="20">You can only use proprietary headphones, or buy one of the as-of-yet unreleased adapters<br clear="all"></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5169174/ipod-shuffle-review-2009]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5169174]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5169174&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[iPod Shuffle Teardown Confirms It's Tiny on the Inside, Too]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/ipodshuffle_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/ipodshuffle_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>Every time a gadget of note comes out, one unlucky unit is indifferently plucked from the lineup, sent to iFixit and vivisected, piece by piece, for the world to gawk at. Your turn, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged NEW SHUFFLE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/new-shuffle/">new Shuffle</a>!</p>

<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('ipodshuffleteardown', 3, '');
</script>This teardown is a little different than most, mainly because of just how simple this device is; once it was cracked open, there was <em>one</em> screw to worry about. The pictures tell the story here, so check out the gallery below or the whole gruesome ordeal at [<a href="http://www.ifixit.com/Guide/First-Look/iPod-Shuffle-3rd-Generation/673/1">iFixit</a><em>Thanks, Jivesh!</em>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5169281/ipod-shuffle-teardown-confirms-its-tiny-on-the-inside-too]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5169281]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[teardowns]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ifixit]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle teardown]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle third generation]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle third generation teardown]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipods]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[new shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 13 Mar 2009 04:53:25 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5169281&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Shuffle-Compatible Headphones Trickle In From Etymotics, Klipsch, Monster and Scoche]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>We're just starting to get word on Shuffle VoiceOver-friendly headphones coming from third-party manufacturers. In addition to the news we've already seen from <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5168683/scosche-earbuds-first-to-support-new-shuffles-voiceover-controls">Scosche</a>, there's <a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/139357/2009/03/klipsch.html">a $100 pair from Klipsch</a>, and we're being told that there will be more announced from Monster and Etymotics shortly, if not already. Shure confirmed to us that it does not have a Shuffle-ready headset or any kind of adapter. Stay tuned for details, but that's the tally right now.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5168913/shuffle+compatible-headphones-trickle-in-from-etymotics-klipsch-monster-and-scoche]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5168913]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[earbuds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[earphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[etymotics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[headphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[klipsch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[monster]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[scosche]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shure]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voiceover]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:58:19 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5168913&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Twenty Five Years Ago: The First Time an Apple Computer Spoke]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("/talkingmacintosh_gizmodo.flv", 506, 423,"");
</script>Have you heard? The new shuffle <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5167946/new-ipod-shuffle-moves-buttons-to-headphones-adds-text-to-speech">speaks</a>! Which reminds me of the 1984 Mac launch, where the computer became the first talking Apple device, ever.</p>

<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("/appleshuffleguidedtour.flv", 847, 499,"");
</script><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/stills/appleshuffleguidedtour.flv.jpg" style="display:block;display: none;"><br>
The accent, that of a robot that actually dislikes you, like it does all fleshbags, is not all that different. Both of the voices are synthesized from your computer, too, as we realized <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5168274/how-the-ipod-shuffle-voiceover-works">in this patent</a>.</p>
<p>If micronization trickles up like this voice application has trickled down, I suppose one day the phones and computers will be shuffle sized, too. Like in <a href="http://pogue.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/03/11/an-ipod-so-small-its-controls-are-found-on-the-cord/?ref=technology">Zoolander</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/856357878_3b39728b22.jpg.jpeg" width="500" height="346" style="display:block;"></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5168501/twenty-five-years-ago-the-first-time-an-apple-computer-spoke]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5168501]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[retromodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[zoolander]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 12 Mar 2009 07:00:32 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5168501&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Laser Engraving Fixes For That Blank Shuffle Face]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/nanoface.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/nanoface.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>Deviantart user <a href="http://petercui.deviantart.com/art/Saving-the-New-iPOD-115597686">petercui</a> comes up with this solution to the absolute blankness of the <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5167946/new-ipod-shuffle-moves-buttons-to-headphones-adds-text-to-speech?skyline=true&amp;s=x">new iPod shuffle</a>: lasering. [<a href="http://petercui.deviantart.com/art/Saving-the-New-iPOD-115597686">DeviantArt</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5168469/laser-engraving-fixes-for-that-blank-shuffle-face]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5168469]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[image of the day]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[engraving]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iotd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle engraving]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5168469&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple's Control Scheme for the iPod Shuffle Looks Like Friggin' Morse Code]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/apple_control_scheme.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/apple_control_scheme.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>So using the new <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5167946/the-new-ipod-shuffle-ditches-buttons-features-text-to-speech">iPod Shuffle</a> revolves around clicking the headphone remote in Morse Code-like combinations.There must be an easier way, guys. What is this, <em>The Diving Bell and the Butterfly</em>? [<a href="http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3458">Apple</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/11/the-new-ipod-shuffle-explained/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5168478/apples-control-scheme-for-the-ipod-shuffle-looks-like-friggin-morse-code]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5168478]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle controls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mp3 players]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[music players]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:38:24 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Covert]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5168478&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[How the iPod Shuffle VoiceOver Works]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/untitledsong.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/untitledsong.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a>As you probably know, the new Apple <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5167946/new-ipod-shuffle-moves-buttons-to-headphones-adds-text-to-speech?skyline=true&amp;s=x">iPod shuffle can speak up</a> the name of your songs, artists, and playlists. I initially thought it was a new text-to-speech chip. It is not:</p>

<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/140748145_56d3d508be_o.jpg.jpeg" width="500" height="663" style="display:block;">As you can see in this flowchart, the trick happens in your computer. Apple patented the process a while back, and it's going to implement the mechanism in the next revision of iTunes. iTunes 8.1 will use the text-to-speech capabilities of your computer to generate sound bites, embedding the name of the artist and the song in every tune.</p>
<p>This explains why the voices are different depending on the platform you sync your <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged IPOD SHUFFLE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ipod-shuffle/">iPod shuffle</a> with: iTunes 8.1 uses the text-to-speech engines available on each operating system with different settings. The only thing that the iPod does is playback those sound bites when you click on the central button, located in the headphones cable (<a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5167997/bad-idea-moving-ipod-shuffles-controls-to-the-headphones?skyline=true&amp;s=x">sadly</a>.) [<a href="http://9to5mac.com/itunes-8-1">9 to 5</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5168274/how-the-ipod-shuffle-voiceover-works]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5168274]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[new ipod shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[text-to-speeh]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voice over]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voiceover]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5168274&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[A Demo of the iPod Shuffle's New Remote and Stereotypical, Robotic VoiceOver]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("/appleshuffleguidedtour.flv", 847, 499,"");
</script><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/stills/appleshuffleguidedtour.flv.jpg"></a>This is the <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5167946/new-ipod-shuffle-moves-buttons-to-headphones-adds-text-to-speech">new iPod Shuffle</a>, as presented by Apple employee Hannah. She likes gray clothing and she's not married. She'll walk you through the new VoiceOver and remote features while we nap.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5168056/a-demo-of-the-ipod-shuffles-new-remote-and-stereotypical-robotic-voiceover]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5168056]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[demo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[new ipod shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5168056&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Just How Small Is the 3rd Generation iPod Shuffle?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/sizemodoshufflenewss.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/sizemodoshufflenewss.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>Apple's <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5167946/new-ipod-shuffle-moves-buttons-to-headphones-adds-text-to-speech">new iPod Shuffle</a> is supposed to be the "world's smallest music player." So what's that mean, really? How do Apple's minuscule measurements size up in real dimensions?</p>

<p>We compared a pack of cards, matchbox, the 2nd gen iPod Shuffle and the new iPod Shuffle (in that order) to give you a better idea. You'll notice that while the new Shuffle is taller than the old Shuffle, repositioning those controls <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5167997/bad-idea-moving-ipod-shuffles-controls-exclusively-to-the-headphones">to the headphones</a> bought a lot of space in every other way. We're also guessing that the new clip has been streamlined a bit to make the svelte 1.8x0.7x0.3-inch body possible. [<a href="http://sizeasy.com/page/size_comparison/22540-Pack-Of-Playing-Cards-vs-Box-Of-Matches-vs-2nd-Gen-Shuffle-vs-iPod-Shuffle">Sizeeasy</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5168027/just-how-small-is-the-3rd-generation-ipod-shuffle]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5168027]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[sizemodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle size]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[new ipod shuffle size]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5168027&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Bad Idea: Moving iPod Shuffle's Controls to the Headphones]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/trouble.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/trouble.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a>The popular <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged IPOD SHUFFLE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ipod-shuffle/">iPod shuffle</a> <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5167946/the-new-ipod-shuffle-ditches-buttons-features-text-to-speech">has been updated today</a> with new text-to-speech voiceover technology in a reduced size. It's really cool except for one thing: It moves all controls to the headphones. <b>Updated.</b></p>

<p>I like the idea of having controls on my headset's cable. I use that feature every time with my iPhone. However, I've used every single iPod, iPod mini, iPod nano, and iPod shuffle ever madeadvantages of being a journalist and getting evaluation unitsand every one of the Apple headphones that came with them have been a failure. Invariably, I had to replace them with other earbuds.</p>
<p>I'm not talking about the sound quality, which has improved since the awful first generationnow it's still not good or amazing, but acceptable. I'm talking about them literally failing on me, one after the other.</p>
<p>I don't mistreat my gadgets and the iPod/iPhone's headphones have been no exception. Invariably, however, they all have finished in the dumpster after a few months. Whether it was failing neodymium-schmdynium drivers making popping noises or breaking cables, every one of them have proved to be too flimsy, too fragile for continuous daily use.</p>
<p><b>More concerns</b><br>
I'm sure that there will be plenty of third-party headsets options for the new tiny iPod, so it won't be a problem to replace them. However, it still will suck to have the headphones rendering your shuffle useless until you get new ones.</p>
<p>On top of that, most probably the new replacement headphones will be more expensive than any regular ones, since they have to include extra electronics and they will be perceived as "special" by the market. And then, their variety will also be limited. Sure, you don't need <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5167690/lightning-review-nixon-master-blaster-headphones">huge DJ-quality headphones</a> for the shuffle, but what about if you want an specific kind of in-ear earbuds?</p>
<p><iframe src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http://digg.com/apple/Bad_Idea_Moving_iPod_Shuffle_s_Controls_to_the_Headphones" align="right" frameborder="0" height="82" scrolling="no" width="55"></iframe>Still, we don't know how the new headphones are. Hopefully, Apple put extra care in making their earbuds more durable than previous models. Maybe not to last for as long as the shuffle itself, but for more than the three to six months lifetime I've experienced. [<a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5167946/the-new-ipod-shuffle-ditches-buttons-features-text-to-speech">New iPod shuffle</a>]</p>
<p><b>Update:</b> We have talked with Apple and they said that they will sell an adapter for third-party headphoneswhich solves the issue about picking any headphones, even if it is for an added cost.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5167997/bad-idea-moving-ipod-shuffles-controls-to-the-headphones]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5167997]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[headphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[new ipod shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rant]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5167997&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New iPod Shuffle Moves Buttons to Headphones, Adds Text to Speech]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/shuffle-big_01.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/shuffle-big_01.png" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>Apple has quietly released a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged NEW IPOD SHUFFLE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/new-ipod-shuffle/">new iPod Shuffle</a> design that mimics the original's pack of gum aesthetics. It costs $80, holds 4GB of songs, uses inline controls and boasts text-to-speech.</p>

<p>" 4GB or 1,000 Songs<br>
" Silver or black color options, stainless steel clip<br>
" Controls have been moved to the earbud line<br>
" "VoiceOver" Text to speech artist and track names and battery life in 14 languages<br>
" 10 hours of playback (Down from 12 hours in previous gen)<br>
" The 1GB, 2nd gen <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged IPOD SHUFFLE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ipod-shuffle/">iPod shuffle</a> is still around for $50</p>
<p>So what do you think? Is this design better than the last iPod Shuffle? Personally, I really dislike that the new form costs users 2 hours of battery life. <script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('ipodshuffle3g', 3, '');
</script></p>
<blockquote>
<p>CUPERTINO, Calif., March 11 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/  Apple® today introduced the all-new iPod® shuffle, the world's smallest music player at nearly half of the size of the previous model, and the first music player that talks to you. The revolutionary new VoiceOver feature enables iPod shuffle to speak your song titles, artists and playlist names. The third generation iPod shuffle is significantly smaller than a AA battery, holds up to 1,000 songs and is easier to use with all of the controls conveniently located on the earphone cord. With the press of a button, you can play, pause, adjust volume, switch playlists and hear the name of the song and artist. iPod shuffle features a gorgeous new aluminum design with a built-in stainless steel clip that makes it ultra-wearable.</p>
<p>"Imagine your music player talking to you, telling you your song titles, artists and playlist names," said Greg Joswiak, Apple's vice president of iPod and iPhone™ Product Marketing. "The amazingly small new iPod shuffle takes a revolutionary approach to how you listen to your music by talking to you, also making it the first iPod shuffle with playlists."</p>
<p>iPod shuffle is based on Apple's incredibly popular shuffle feature, which randomly selects songs from your music library. And now, when you can't remember the name of a song or an artist playing, with the press of a button iPod shuffle tells you the name of the song and artist. iPod shuffle can even tell you status information, such as battery life. With the ability to hold up to 1,000 songs and the VoiceOver feature, you can now easily switch between multiple playlists on your iPod shuffle. iPod shuffle can speak 14 languages including English, Czech, Dutch, French, German, Greek, Italian, Japanese, Mandarin Chinese, Polish, Portuguese, Spanish, Swedish and Turkish.</p>
<p>The new iPod shuffle comes in silver or black and features a sleek and ultra-wearable design with a built-in stainless steel clip. iPod shuffle is the smallest music player in the world and is incredibly easy to clip to almost anything and take with you everywhere you go. iPod shuffle features up to 10 hours of battery life.*</p>
<p>Pricing &amp; Availability</p>
<p>The third generation 4GB iPod shuffle is now shipping and comes in silver or black for a suggested price of $79 (US) through the Apple Store® (www.apple.com), Apple's retail stores and Apple Authorized Resellers. iPod shuffle comes with the Apple Earphones with Remote and the iPod shuffle USB cable. iPod shuffle requires a Mac® with a USB 2.0 port, Mac OS® X v10.4.11 or later and iTunes® 8.1 or later; or a Windows PC with a USB 2.0 port and Windows Vista, Windows XP Home or Professional (Service Pack 3) or later and iTunes 8.1.</p>
<p>*Battery life and number of charge cycles vary by use and settings. Seewww.apple.com/batteries for more information. Song capacity is based on four minutes per song and 128-Kbps AAC encoding; in 256-Kbps AAC format, song capacity is up to 500 songs; actual capacity varies by encoding method and bit rate.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>[<a href="http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/shop_ipod/family/ipod_shuffle?mco=MTE2NTU">Apple</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5167946/new-ipod-shuffle-moves-buttons-to-headphones-adds-text-to-speech]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5167946]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[new ipod shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[third gen ipod shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 11 Mar 2009 08:42:36 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5167946&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New iPod Shuffle: Same Chip-Clip, Now With Nano's Hand-Me-Down Colors]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/shuffles_colors.jpg"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/shuffles_colors.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>At this point, the housing can't get much smaller without coming with a serious child-safety choking warning etched into the back—but obviously not wanting to leave any iPod untouched today, Apple spread some more saturated ROYGBIV love to the shuffles (the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/apple-showtime/apple-showtime-ipod-nano-update-photos-200116.php">nano's old digs, actually</a>), ditching the lighter pastels. They remain $50/$70 for 1GB/2GB.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5047010/new-ipod-shuffle-same-chip+clip-now-with-nanos-hand+me+down-colors]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5047010]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[new ipod shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[appleletsrock]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod nano]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod touch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipods]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[itunes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nano]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[new ipods]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[portable media players]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[touch]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 09 Sep 2008 14:12:38 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Mahoney]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5047010&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[iPod Classic Gets 120GB Boost For $250, 160GB Discontinued]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/ipodclassic_01.png"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/ipodclassic_01.png" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<div style='float:right; margin-left:-9px;'><script type="text/javascript">
digg_skin = 'compact';
digg_bgcolor = '#f1f8fa';
digg_url = 'http://digg.com/apple/New_iPod_Classic_Gets_120GB_Boost_For_250';
</script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript">
</script></div>
<p>The iPod classic looks like it's getting the runt's end of the "Let's Rock" magic wand today—with boosted storage to 120GB for $250, up from 80GB for the same price. And it's death for the 160GB thickie, matching the Zune's lineup to a tee. Same form factor and colors as last time. Now, the largest iPod money can buy has been downgraded by 40GB—seem like a strange move to backtrack like this to anyone else?</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5047012/ipod-classic-gets-120gb-boost-for-250-160gb-discontinued]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5047012]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[New iPod Classic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[appleletsrock]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[classic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod nano]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod touch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipods]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[itunes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nano]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[new ipods]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[portable media players]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[touch]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 09 Sep 2008 13:17:48 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Mahoney]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5047012&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Last Minute Apple Leaks on New iPod Nano, Shuffle, Classic and Touch?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/09/340x_letsrockevent-2.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/09/09/last_minute_ipod_nano_with_sensor_ipod_touch_ipod_classic_ipod_shuffle.html">AppleInsider</a> claims to have two independent sources confirming identical information about upcoming Apple iPod refreshes. The biggest overhaul appears to be on the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #ipodnano" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ipodnano/">iPod nano</a>, which would explain <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5047148/first-look-at-new-ipod-nano-interface">all of the rumors</a> we've seen on the device. It will come in nine colors and be the first non-touch iPod to support a motion/orientation sensor.</p>

<p>Shaking the player activates Shuffle Mode and tilting allows scanning of Cover Flow when the nano is held in landscape. The nano's storage will jump to 8GB and 16GB.</p>
<p>Not a lot of information on the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #ipodclassic" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ipodclassic/">iPod classic</a> and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #ipodshuffle" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ipodshuffle/">iPod shuffle</a>. The classic is said to come in two colors (probably <strike>white</strike> silver and black) with the shuffle available in five colors.</p>
<p>The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #ipodtouch" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ipodtouch/">iPod touch</a> will have no color choices and retain the same storage options of 8, 16 and 32GB.</p>
<p>Oh, and the last juicy tidbit from the rumors: The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #newipods" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/newipods/">new iPods</a> are supposed to be available at Apple stores today. [<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/09/09/last_minute_ipod_nano_with_sensor_ipod_touch_ipod_classic_ipod_shuffle.html">AppleInsider</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5047162/last-minute-apple-leaks-on-new-ipod-nano-shuffle-classic-and-touch]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5047162]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[appleletsrock]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[classic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod classic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod nano]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod touch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nano]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[New iPod Classic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[new ipod nano]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[new ipod touch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[new ipods]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[touch]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 09 Sep 2008 09:21:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5047162&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Question of the Day: How Many iPods Have You Owned?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/04/340x_ipod-buy-more.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;float:none;"/>Yesterday's question involved how much <a href="http://gizmodo.com/383208/question-of-the-day-how-big-is-your-digital-music-collection">digital music you currently own</a>if you took part you may have noticed that the distribution was fairly even, but there are plenty of people out there with seriously large collections. That got me thinking about where all this music is being storediPods in particular. As my own feeble collection has grown, and my desire for better hardware has increased, I have upgraded my iPod a grand total of 3 times. My guess is that figure is probably pretty average (or even low) when compared to a serious music fanatic. So, my question to you is: how many iPods have you owned?</p>
<p><script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript" src="http://polls.gawker.com/poll.js.php?key==MjN3QTM">
</script><noscript>
<p><b>Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.</b></p>
</noscript></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/383668/question-of-the-day-how-many-ipods-have-you-owned]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-383668]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[question of the day]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod touch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mp3]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nano]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[portable media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:10:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=383668&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Next Gen Zune Could Have Smart Shuffling]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/03/zunesmartshuffy.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />At Microsoft's Techfest, a researcher was showing off a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #smartshuffle" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/smartshuffle/">smart shuffle</a> system that uses tags and meta data like tempo and genre to direct playlist creation in a portable music device. The demo was being done on a first generation Zune.</p>
<p>The system is being developed in direct response to the huge number of songs people carry around on their media players, and specifically the millions of songs a Zune library can stock using a Zune pass. The system automatically recommends new songs based on songs played, and the logic is continuously "steered" by voting tracks up and down.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/363819/next-gen-zune-could-have-smart-shuffling]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-363819]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[portable media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[concept]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smart]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smart shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[zune]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:51:04 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=363819&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[iStick: The iPod touch Tube Concept]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/02/istick.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;float:none;"/> The iStick concept is the size of lipstick tube. But it has <em>four</em> touchscreens for four times the Coverflow. I don't really get the white cube eating up a quarter of the stick thoughwhy not just make the whole thing a solid tube of touchscreen, with the bottom and top holding the single button and earphone jack? It also has Wi-Fi, for browsing the iTunes Store on a screen the size of your finger. <script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('istick', 3,'');
</script>[<a href="http://www.yankodesign.com/index.php/2008/02/22/i-meme-lipstick-istick/">Yanko Design</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/359901/istick-the-ipod-touch-tube-concept]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-359901]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[istick]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:20:36 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=359901&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[iPod Shuffle 2GB for $69]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>There's a new iPod shuffle 2GB for $69. Double the memory for $20 more, but same clip, same screen (none), same headphones, same deja vu. Full details (harf) in the press release after the jump.</p><blockquote>iPod shuffle Now Just $49

<p>New 2GB Model Priced at $69</p>

<p>CUPERTINO, California&mdash;February 19, 2008&mdash;Apple

 today announced that its iPod

 shuffle, the world's most wearable music player, is now even more affordably priced at $49 and that it is introducing a new 2GB model of the iPod shuffle for $69. The popular iPod shuffle is just half a cubic inch in volume, weighs just half an ounce, features an aluminum design with a built-in clip and comes in five colors&mdash;silver, blue, green, purple and a (PRODUCT) RED special edition.</p>

<p>"At just $49, the iPod shuffle is the most affordable iPod ever," said Greg Joswiak, Apple's vice president of Worldwide iPod Product Marketing. "The new 2GB model lets music lovers bring even more songs everywhere they go in the impossibly small iPod shuffle."</p>

<p>The iPod is the world's most popular family of digital music players with over 140 million sold. The lineup includes iPod shuffle, the world's most wearable iPod; iPod classic holding up to 40,000 songs*; the incredible iPod nano with video playback and the breakthrough iPod touch with a revolutionary Multi-Touch


 user interface. iPod owners can choose from a vast ecosystem of accessories with over 4,000 products made specifically for the iPod including cases, fitness accessories, speaker systems and iPod connectivity in over 75 percent of US automobiles.</p>

<p>Pricing & Availability <br />
The new 1GB iPod shuffle is available immediately for a suggested retail price of $49 (US) through the Apple Store

 (www.apple.com), Apple's retail stores and Apple Authorized Resellers. The 2GB iPod shuffle will be available later this month for a suggested retail price of $69 (US) through the Apple Store (www.apple.com), Apple's retail stores and Apple Authorized Resellers. iPod shuffle requires a Mac

 with a USB 2.0 port, Mac OS

 X 10.4.8 or later and iTunes

 7.4; or a Windows PC with a USB 2.0 port and Windows Vista or Windows XP Home or Professional (Service Pack 2) or later and iTunes 7.4 or later.</p>

<p>*Music capacity is based on four minutes per song and 128-Kbps AAC encoding.</p>

<p>Apple ignited the personal computer revolution in the 1970s with the Apple II and reinvented the personal computer in the 1980s with the Macintosh. Today, Apple continues to lead the industry in innovation with its award-winning computers, OS X operating system and iLife and professional applications. Apple is also spearheading the digital media revolution with its iPod portable music and video players and iTunes online store, and has entered the mobile phone market with its revolutionary iPhone.</blockquote></p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/358007/ipod-shuffle-2gb-for-69]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-358007]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[2gb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 19 Feb 2008 08:47:40 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=358007&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[iPod Shuffle Drops to $49]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/02/appleshuffle49.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Apple's just dropped the price of the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #ipodshuffle" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ipodshuffle/">iPod shuffle</a> to $49 from $79.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/357972/ipod-shuffle-drops-to-49]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-357972]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple store]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cupertino]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 19 Feb 2008 05:58:04 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kit Eaton]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=357972&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Patents Show Shuffle-Esque Remote Control, Other Goodies]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/01/Apple%20Patent%20GI.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Apple has just walked home with six new patents, one of which details an <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #ipodshuffle" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ipodshuffle/">iPod shuffle</a>-like remote control. The image may not tell us much, but a reverse side clip is clearly visible, as is some form of circular control, which could be a scroll wheel or four way control pad. The iPhone comes with a basic in-line remote; could this be a more sophisticated offering? The other four patents described the following. <strong>Update: These products do not seem to be bringing anything new. The lanyard looks to be an iPod nano peripheral; both iPod shuffle iterations indicate the current model, and the remote has a striking similarity to the current iPod remote control, with integrated FM radio. The image technology may still be a note worthy patent acquisition.</strong></p>

<p>A lanyard design, two iPod shuffle variations and a technology that allows production of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #smoothmotioncompensatedframes" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/smoothmotioncompensatedframes/">smooth motion compensated frames</a> by combining multiple interpolation results. Information is scant beyond that, but we do know the remote control patent was filed back in March 2007, and has just now been cleared. Bearing that in mind, the idea may have made it to the scrap heap, but we shall watch this space nonetheless. [<a href="http://www.macnn.com/blogs/?p=482">ipodnn</a> via <a href="http://www.mactropolis.com/apple-news/apple-patents-new-ipod-shuffle-like-remote-control/">Mactropolis</a>]</p>
<p><br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/349315/apple-patents-show-shuffle+esque-remote-control-other-goodies]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-349315]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[control]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lanyard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[remote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smooth motion compensated frames]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:18:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haroon Malik]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=349315&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Mini Speaker Add-On Recycles Your iPod Shuffle Box]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/01/shufflecase1.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Plug this tiny stereo speaker system into your <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #ipodshuffle" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ipodshuffle/">iPod shuffle</a>'s plastic box, and you get a mini boom box plus the satisfaction of using something that you'd normally have thrown away. This (slightly) eco-friendly system from <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #birdelectron" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/birdelectron/">Bird Electron</a> also fits inside a first- or second-gen iPod nano box and costs just $40. [<a href="http://www.geekalerts.com/ipod-recycling-speaker-by-bird-electron/">Geek Alerts</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/347870/mini-speaker-add+on-recycles-your-ipod-shuffle-box]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-347870]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bird electron]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[portable media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[recycling]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[speaker]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[speakers]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 23 Jan 2008 03:00:42 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kit Eaton]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=347870&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Images of the iPod Frozen Popsicles Don't Excite Our Tongues But Tickle Our Ears]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/kibonipodthumb.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><iframe src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http://digg.com/apple/Images_of_the_iPod_Shuffle_Inside_a_Frozen_Popsicle" align="right" frameborder="0" height="82" scrolling="no" width="55"></iframe>Remember that Unilever promotion that is giving away <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/frozen-ipods/ice-cream-company-gives-away-10000-frozen-ipods-inside-popsicles-333129.php">10,000 iPod shuffles frozen inside $1 fruit popsicles</a>? Well, we just got the pictures of how it actually looks inside:</p>
<p>A reader of our friends at Brazilian creativity blog Brainstorm9 got his prize and sent them the photos of the fake popsicle/package, designed to fool consumers and make the iPod sustain the sub-zero temperatures and the humidity of a freezer. The fake popsicle, which you can only see when you open the external packaging, was approved by Apple in Cupertino to guarantee that the shuffle didn't get damaged. If shows the following tag:</p>
<p><img alt="ipodkibon1g.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/01/ipodkibon1g.jpg" width="600" height="800" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2">Not very lickable, but hey, it's a free iPod! Here's what it says:</p>
<blockquote><b>Contratulations</b> You won an iPod shuffle from the iPod on a stick Kibon promotion. To ask for your headphones, charging dock and manual with warranty, call 0800 707 1315, give your information and the serial number of your iPod shuffle. It's very important that you save this popsicle to show when you receive the complements. Expires on August 31 2008. Limited edition.</blockquote>
<p>And then adds, <b>"Don't eat."</b> No kidding. Fortunately, they send you a real popsicle along with the iPod complements. And failing that, you can always use strawberry syrup. [<a href="http://www.brainstorm9.com.br/2008/01/06/veja-como-e-o-ipod-no-palito-da-kibon/">Brainstorm9</a>]</p>
<p><img alt="ipodkibon2g.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/01/ipodkibon2g.jpg" width="600" height="800" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"><br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/342608/images-of-the-ipod-frozen-popsicles-dont-excite-our-tongues-but-tickle-our-ears]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-342608]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[frozen ipods]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[brazil]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bullet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fruttare]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[kibon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 09 Jan 2008 06:30:50 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=342608&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Proof the iPod's White Earbuds Don't Suck...That Much]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/noyousuckheadphones2.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />We had a plan. After years of bitching and moaning about crappy, stock Apple earbuds, we were going to put Apple in their place, and once and for all, prove what a lousy product they were packaging with their iPodsthe one kink in their plan of global music player dominance. Obviously, the $30 stock earphones in the iPod would get destroyed versus more expensive competitors like those from Shure, Ultimate Ears or V-Moda. So we ordered a bunch of earbud-style headphones all under $20 for "testing". We use those quotes because we really meant "slaughter". Who would have thought that the disrespected Apple earbuds would hold their own?</p>

<p><strong>1. Maxell Digital Earbuds 191208</strong><br>
<img alt="31R4KH69G0L._SS500_.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/31R4KH69G0L._SS500_.jpg" class="center"><br>
Better fit, deep in the ear. Volume control on wire. But soft sound levels, and a slight static. Music was in the other room, not my ears.<br>
Price: <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Maxell-Digital-Earbuds/dp/B000JKWIP6/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&amp;s=electronics&amp;qid=1198869512&amp;sr=1-5">$15.95</a><br>
Verdict: Staticky, NOT BETTER</p>
<p><strong>2. Genius HP-02 Live</strong><br>
<img alt="41GE38PHT2L._AA280_.jpeg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/41GE38PHT2L._AA280_.jpeg" width="280" height="280" class="center"><br>
Once again, deep ear fit. These bad boys are exploring places of my body I didn't know I had. Sound doesn't have a bad balance, but once again, nothing spectacular here.<br>
Price: <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Genius-HP-02-Live-Earbuds-Enhanced/dp/B000KW5OFY/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=electronics&amp;qid=1198869587&amp;sr=8-1">$9.99</a><br>
Verdict: Frisky but NOT BETTER</p>
<p><strong>3. Philips SHE2650</strong><br>
<img alt="31NDCMSRWML._AA280_.jpeg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/31NDCMSRWML._AA280_.jpeg" width="280" height="280" class="center"><br>
Design is very similar to iPod headphones, as is the sound. But these are just a hair less sparkling than Apple's headphones with even less impressive lows.<br>
Price: <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Philips-SHE2650-37-Earbuds-Case/dp/B000G31SPW/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=electronics&amp;qid=1198869753&amp;sr=8-1">$7.99</a><br>
Verdict: Has a case, NOT BETTER</p>
<p><strong>4. Jlabs JBuds Hi-Fi</strong><br>
<img alt="418tP%2BV135L._AA280_.jpeg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/418tP%2BV135L._AA280_.jpeg" width="280" height="280" class="center"><br>
These had the strongest bass of any model we tested. And they gave Bolero, our test song, more of a stage feel. But fidelity was lacking. So while the headphones sound "big" they don't always sound so clear.<br>
Price: <a href="http://www.amazon.com/JBuds-Hi-Fi-Noise-Reducing-Buds-Black/dp/B000IG66VS/ref=cm_cr_pr_pb_t">$19.19</a><br>
Verdict: NOT BETTER</p>
<p><strong>5. Coby Super Bass CV-E92</strong><br>
<img alt="31Pq10j4T3L._SS400_.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/31Pq10j4T3L._SS400_.jpg" class="center"><br>
The balance reminded me of the jLab model we tested, possibly with even better clarity in some ranges. There is certainly more bass in these headphones than Apple's offerings, but while it makes us crave more lows in the iPod stock earbuds, Coby doesn't touch the present highs to mids of Apple. They're a pretty sweet deal for $5 though.<br>
Price: <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Coby-Super-Digital-Stereo-Earphones/dp/B000FOYMKU/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=electronics&amp;qid=1198869984&amp;sr=1-1">$4.88</a><br>
Verdict: A bargain, but NOT BETTER</p>
<p><strong>6. Koss BDZ1 Two-Pack Earbud Headphones with Case</strong><br>
<img alt="41WZDQ7HZGL._AA280_.jpeg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/41WZDQ7HZGL._AA280_.jpeg" width="280" height="280" class="center"><br>
Unresponsive. Very quiet at a given volume level compared to the ipod earbuds. But for this price, you get TWO sets of earbuds and a case.<br>
Price: <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Koss-BDZ1-Two-Pack-Earbud-Headphones/dp/B000288I4U/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=electronics&amp;qid=1198870030&amp;sr=1-1">$8.01</a><br>
Verdict: (NOT BETTER X 2) + Case</p>
<p><strong>7. Philips SHS3201/37 Flexible Earhook w/ Bud -White</strong><br>
<img alt="41EF4KPW8ZL._AA280_.jpeg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/41EF4KPW8ZL._AA280_.jpeg" width="280" height="280" class="center"><br>
I'd expected these fancy white headphones to sound better, given Philips' reputation and the solid placement coming from the earhooks, but they were loud, but less clear than the iPod's.<br>
Price: <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Philips-SHS3201-37-Flexible-Earhook/dp/B000FONSEQ/ref=pd_bbs_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=electronics&amp;qid=1198871407&amp;sr=8-1">$8.38</a><br>
Verdict: White, impossible to Shake Off, but NOT BETTER</p>
<p><img alt="s7_224919_imageset_01.jpeg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/s7_224919_imageset_01.jpeg" class="left">Also of note, the iPod earbuds fit the Nano a lot better than competitors. We think this is mostly because the earbud jack isn't bent on Apple's model, unlike all the other models which bend at a 90-degree angle before the wire. A non-bending plug translates to less cord rotation and subsequent static/pops.</p>
<p>As for fitting the ears, most models on the market now offer multiple sized earplug adapters. If Apple's earbuds aren't fitting you correctly, then don't think twice about finding something more comfortable or just using the black foam inserts. You'll never get optimal sound out of any headphone that doesn't fit you properly, anyway.</p>
<p>At the end of the day, Apple might not give us the best headphones around with our iPods, but they're not highway robbery either. Given that they were better than quite a few $20 and under models, we're thinking that $30 isn't the most ludicrous price in the world, and "free with iPod" is looking pretty freaking decent.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/338299/proof-the-ipods-white-earbuds-dont-suckthat-much]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-338299]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple earbud battlemodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[battlemodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[classic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[coby]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[earbud]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[earbuds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[headphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jlabs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[koss]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nano]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[philips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 29 Dec 2007 14:15:54 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=338299&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[iPod Enabled Umbrella on eBay: Hmm..I Wonder Where the Seller is From?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/rain_pod.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />If you take the time to develop an <a href="http://gizmodo.com/search/umbrella">umbrella</a> with an iPod and speakers embedded in the handle, chances are you live in an area that sees more than its fair share of rain. In this case, the seller comes from Seattle WA. In addition to the iPod, "Rain Pod" creator Tom Dukich adds an extra musically themed touch to the canopy of the umbrella in the form of drawings made with permanent marker. The item is currently available on eBay with a starting bid of $50. All proceeds will go to 826 Seattle, a group dedicated to developing children's writing skills. [<a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/The-Rain-Pod-Musical-Umbrella_W0QQitemZ140189042345QQihZ004QQcategoryZ4174QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem">eBay</a> via <a href="http://www.neatorama.com/2007/12/14/rain-pod/">Neatorama</a> and <a href="http://www.826seattle.org/">826 Seattle</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/334341/ipod-enabled-umbrella-on-ebay-hmmi-wonder-where-the-seller-is-from]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-334341]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hacks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[umbrella]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 14 Dec 2007 20:40:54 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=334341&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[John Harrington-Designed iPod shuffle]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/10/diamond-ipod-shuffle_48.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />It may be more tasteful than<a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/idiot-lure/diamond+encrusted-ipod-shuffle-takes-fool-and-his-money-prize-291394.php">this declaration of twuntiness</a>, but Brighton, UK, jeweler <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #johnharrington" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/johnharrington/">John Harrington</a>'s <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #ipodshuffle" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ipodshuffle/">iPod shuffle</a> still makes me uneasy. It's laser-etched with five titchy diamonds and it will cost you over $600. So, let's get this right: seven-and-a-half times more expensive than the real deal? Yet another exercise in customized iPointlessness. [<a href="http://www.johnharrington.co.uk/product.php?pid=47">John Harrington</a> via <a href="http://www.bornrich.org/entry/john-harringtons-diamond-ipod-shuffle/">Born Rich</a>]<br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/305472/john-harrington+designed-ipod-shuffle]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-305472]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bling]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[diamonds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[etched]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jeweller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[john harrington]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pointless]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[uk]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 01 Oct 2007 06:05:24 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[AddyDugdale]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=305472&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Facebook Picks an iPod]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/09/ipod-touch-facebook.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />After weighing all of the GB options and touchscreens versus scroll wheels, we're still not completely sure which iPod or iPhone to get yet, but those profile-happy kids over at Facebook seem to know. With a commanding 31% of the votes the iPod touch is the victor this time around. Although that doesn't tell you the whole story does it? Now for the poll breakdown.</p>

<p><img alt="Picture%2010.png" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/09/Picture%2010.png" width="620" height="186" class="center"></p>
<p>" By Gender"</p>
<p>While the iPod Touch did win in overall votes, women actually preferred the iPod nano more. The tiny competitor received 32% of their votes. And the poor shuffle, no matter what gender, only picked up 4% of the votes with either sex.</p>
<p><img alt="Picture%208.png" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/09/Picture%208.png" width="616" height="288" class="center"></p>
<p>" By Age"</p>
<p>With the 13-17, 18-24 and 25-34 crowds all favoring the iPod touch, there seems to be a trend going on here. Although the aging Facebook'ers, 35-49, gave the finger to the iPod Touch (Get it? The Finger. Touch. <em>Sorry-BL</em>) and heralded two new winners, the iPod nano and the iPhone both coming in with 30% of the geriatric vote.</p>
<p><img alt="Picture%209.png" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/09/Picture%209.png" width="618" height="385" class="center">[<a href="http://www.facebook.com/polls.php?poll_id=20260570920&amp;ref=pns">Facebook</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/297081/facebook-picks-an-ipod]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-297081]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[polls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[classic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nano]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[touch]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 06 Sep 2007 13:52:47 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[blongo3]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=297081&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple's Stock Drops 5.15%, Low Boom Count to Blame?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/09/Apple%20Stock%20Watch.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Wall Street can be such a fickle beast sometimes. Today, Apple revealed what could only be referred to as a monstrous unveiling of iPod-related material, and how do the investors repay them? With a 5.15% drop in the stock price. (Although we've done a few of our own calculations and have come to a striking realization.)</p>

<p>If you add the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #stevejobs" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/stevejobs/">Steve Jobs</a> <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #boomcount" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/boomcount/">boom count</a> (1 boom, 36 minutes into the presentation) to the number of hardware announcements (5-iPhone, touch, classic, nano &amp; shuffle), then subtract the closing day stock price at WWDC '07 ($120.19) divided by the opening day stock price ($145.12), and then finally subtract our two cents, you get 5.15the same as the percentage drop in Apple's stock today.</p>
<p>1+5-($120.19/$145.12)-.02=5.15 (rounded off)</p>
<p>See, we can be analysts too! [<a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http://finance.google.com/finance%3Fclient%3Dob%26q%3DAAPL&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=stock&amp;ct=title&amp;usg=AFQjCNHcdFowyunj3Wsh1U7wXvxbmgsEfA">AAPL</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/296868/apples-stock-drops-515-low-boom-count-to-blame]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-296868]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[stock]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[analysts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[boom count]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[classic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nano]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shuffle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[steve jobs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[touch]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 05 Sep 2007 21:16:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[blongo3]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=296868&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
