<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: Smartphone]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/smartphone</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'smartphone']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Screenshots of Samsung's Bada OS Leak]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/bada5_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_bada5_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The details about Samsung's Bada OS <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5421422/samsung-bada-details-fleshed-out-3g-multitouch-handsets-on-their-way-soon">have been scarce</a>, and while even these leaked screenshots don't tell us much that we didn't know, we can at least look forward to an eye-pleasing interface design.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5429244,7,'');
</script></p>
<p>It's a shame that these screenshots don't really reveal much aside from social media integration, a music player, a dialer, and the obligatory Twitter app. That aside, is it me, or is there something familiar-feeling about the interface? [<a href="http://de.engadget.com/photos/samsung-bada-os-screenshots/">Engadget Germany</a> via <a href="http://www.unwiredview.com/2009/12/17/lots-of-samsung-bada-os-screenshots-leaked/">Unwired View</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5429245/screenshots-of-samsungs-bada-os-leak]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5429245]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bada]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung bada os]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:00:43 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5429245&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Verizon Waives $21,917 Monthly Bill Caused by 13 Year-Old Data Hog]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/thumb160x_americanteen.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /> Attention, teenagers of America: things cost money, even when plucked out of thin air. And attention parents of America: buy a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #dataplan" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/dataplan/">data plan</a>, already.</p>
<p>When Ted Estarija added his son to his cell phone plan, he probably wasn't expecting the adorable little scamp to download 1.4GB in a month. But these kids, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5204394/teen-sends-4800-worth-of-text-messages-dad-hammers-teens-phone">that's they do</a>! Anyway, in a show of uncustomary magnanimity, Verizon has forgiven all charges for the month, and Estarija the Younger has been cut off, so everything's back the way it should be. Except for the fact that apparently a kajillion percent (approximately) increase in data usage didn't send up any flags at Verizon as it was happening, which is pretty unfortunate customer relations. [<a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/news/ci_13990032">AP</a> via <a href="http://consumerist.com/2009/12/teen-runs-up-22000-verizon-bill.html">Consumerist</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5425940/verizon-waives-21917-monthly-bill-caused-by-13-year+old-data-hog]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5425940]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[data plan]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[teens]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Barrett]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5425940&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Texthook Makes a Great Stroller For a Terrible Parent]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/texthook_01.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /> Be honest, parents. What's your least favorite part about parenting? It's all that darn <em>parenting</em>, am I right? Lucky for you there's Texthook, a smartphone mount that lets you totally ignore your child on pleasant afternoon strolls.</p>
<p>The worst part about this, if I had to pick just one, is that it actually positions your phone perfectly so that you can't see your baby and he or she can't see you, even when you're not texting. So enjoy swapping gossip with your buddies with your Texthook, Terrible Parent! And later explaining to your spouse why the kid calls your iPhone "dada." [<a href="http://www.thetexthook.com/">Texthook</a> via <a href="http://www.ohgizmo.com/2009/12/11/texthook-lets-you-text-while-ignoring-your-child/">OhGizmo</a>, Photo via <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/lifestyle/shopping_guide/2009/12/09/2009-12-09_txtng_with_tots_in_tow_gizmo_gives_wired_parents_blackberry_fix_while_they_wheel.html">NY Daily News</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5424566/the-texthook-makes-a-great-stroller-for-a-terrible-parent]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5424566]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[parenting]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mount]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[texthook]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 12 Dec 2009 09:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Barrett]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5424566&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Week's Best iPhone Apps]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_iphoneappstopspr.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />In this week's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5423771/in-which-a-telco-executive-makes-taking-sound-like-giving">mildly paranoid</a> iPhone app roundup: Prices, slashed for the holidays! iPhones, recklessly tilted! Amazing classic games, handily ported! A decent camera app, sold for nothing! Cheap tickets, booked! Dictations, taken! Movies trivia, two ways! And much, much more...</p>

<h2>This Week's Apps</h2>
<p>If you hate hate <em>hate</em> galleries, click <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5424575/apps-gallery">here</a> to view the apps as a single page.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5424575,11,'');
</script></p>
<h2>Honorable Mentions</h2>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_screencap_2009-12-11_at_7.16.43_pm.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
• <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/google-mobile-app/id284815942?mt=8">Google Mobile</a>: This update keeps the app from launching into Safari as much as it used to, and widens its voice capabilities. A minor but useful upgrade.</p>
<p>• <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/head-shoulders-knees-and-toes/id337532553?mt=8">My Name</a> and <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/head-shoulders-knees-and-toes/id337532553?mt=8">Head Shoulders Knees & Toes</a>: I suspect most of you don't reader these roundups to find ways to entertain your children. But <em>if you do</em>, My Name, which will teach your tot how to spell whatever is on his birth certificate, and Head, Shoulders Knees and Toes, which makes a simple touch game out of the children's song, will distract them long enough for you to gobble up enough Zoloft to keep the gears moving without anyone noticing.</p>
<p>• <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/wolframalpha/id334989259?mt=8">Wolfram Alpha</a>: Once a comical $50, this mega calculator app is now a slightly less comical $20.</p>
<p>• <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/super-monkey-ball-2/id340056794?mt=8">Monkey Ball 2</a>: Last week, I noted that this app seemed to have a widespread crashing problem, and therefore couldn't recommend it, despite the fact that it's a worthy&mdash;if not revolutionary&mdash;followup to one of the iPhone's best launch titles. The bug has been identified: If you have a jailbroken phone, avoid this one. If you don't, and you loved Monkey Ball numero uno, give it a shot.</p>
<p>• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5422712/iclassic-app-lets-you-revist-the-good-old-days-of-click-wheel-ipods">iClassic</a>: Replaces your music interface with a faux-clickwheel. Jailbreak-only.</p>
<p>• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5421761/voltron-iphone-game-unfortunately-doesnt-require-five-people-to-play/gallery/">Voltron</a>: A name and a concept worth getting excited about, let down by mediocre execution.</p>
<p>• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5421808/aqua-forest-2-iphone-physics-game-review">Aqua Forest 2</a>: Same deal as above: A game with a pedigree and a soild concept, but on which the developers didn't quite follow through well enough.</p>
<h2>This Week's iPhone News On Giz</h2>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_500x_fanboy_phone.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5424355/mega+iphone-dorks-who-idolise-rambo-strap-this-on-for-size">Mega-iPhone Dorks Who Idolise Rambo, Strap This On For Size</a></p>
<p>• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5424231/apple-countersues-nokia">Apple Countersues Nokia</a></p>
<p>• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5424504/analyst-claims-iphone-users-are-suffering-from-stockholm-syndrome">Analyst Claims iPhone Users Are Suffering From "Stockholm Syndrome"</a></p>
<p>• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5424077/apple-patent-shows-dock-made-from-elastic-sponge+like-substance-that-conforms-to-shape-of-ipodiphone">Apple Patent Shows Dock Made From 'Elastic Sponge-Like Substance' That Conforms To Shape of iPod/iPhone</a></p>
<p>• <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5423771/in-which-a-telco-executive-makes-taking-sound-like-giving">In Which a Telco Executive Makes Taking Sound Like Giving</a></p>
<p><em>This list is in no way definitive. If you've spotted a great app that hit the store this week, give us a heads up or, better yet, your firsthand impressions in the comments. And for even more apps: see our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/the-week-in-iPhone-apps/">previous weekly roundups here</a>, and check out our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphone-apps-directory">Favorite iPhone Apps Directory</a>. Have a great weekend, everybody!</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5424677/the-weeks-best-iphone-apps]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5424677]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dragon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dragon dictation]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dragon's lair]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[driver]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[kayak]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the week in iPhone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tomtom]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5424677&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[VMWare: Your Next Smartphone Might Run Two OSes At Once]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In an <a href="http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/328811/vmware_developing_dual_os_smartphone_virtualisation?pp=1&fp=16&fpid=1">interview with Computerworld</a>, VMWare's head of mobile phone virtualization has indicated that the company wants to move beyond dual-boot systems to allow phones to run a private and work operating system at the same time. They've already <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5160685/vmware-for-mobile-devices-lets-you-run-windows-and-android-simultaneously">demonstrated the potential</a> on a Nokia N800 running Windows CE and Android concurrently; now they're looking into multiple user interface scenarios for current generation smartphones. [<a href="http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/328811/vmware_developing_dual_os_smartphone_virtualisation?pp=1&fp=16&fpid=1">Computerworld</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5420663/vmware-your-next-smartphone-might-run-two-oses-at-once]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5420663]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[virtualization]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vmware]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 07 Dec 2009 11:53:31 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Barrett]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5420663&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Remainders - Things We Didn't Post]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p>Microsoft Takes Aim at <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #appstore" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/appstore/">App Store</a>'s Useless Fluff...<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #monstercable" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/monstercable/">Monster Cable</a>'s <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #milesdavis" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/milesdavis/">Miles Davis</a> Headphones Cost a Month's Rent...Baseless Analyst Speculation Over Google Hardware Makes Me Furious...New Partnership May Mean Cheaper <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #ebookreaders" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ebookreaders/">Ebook Readers</a>...</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/Screen_shot_2009-10-21_at_8.17.01_PM.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><br>
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMcSNfrT-4M">Microsoft's new "Inside the Apps Lab" video</a> takes the App Store to task for its boatloads of useless apps&mdash;a valid point, to be sure, but Microsoft might be living in a glass house here. Or a nonexistent house. Sure, there's tons of bullshit in the app store&mdash;there was a legal debate over <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5153778/ifart-vs-pull-my-finger-the-battle-for-iphone-fart-app-supremacy">fart apps</a>, for god's sake&mdash;and I like some of the ideas Microsoft's putting forth here. That Virtual Sundial is damnably close to believable, for one thing. But the ad is a plug for Windows Marketplace, which admittedly doesn't have the crap, but only because it also, um, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5350163/first-windows-mobile-65-phones-and-windows-marketplace-launch-october-6">barely exists</a>. Sort of funny, but not enough self-awareness, and so it plops into Remainders. [<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMcSNfrT-4M">YouTube</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/milesTrib_headphones_back_side.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><br>
If you're a big Miles Davis fan, and have somehow missed the news that even when Monster Cable products don't outright suck, they're criminally overpriced, have I got a product for you! The Miles Davis Tribute Set includes Monster Cable's gaudy, gold-plated Miles Davis earbuds, a few accessories, and some kind of deluxe version of <em>Kind of Blue</em> (even though <em>Bitches Brew</em> is better YEAH I SAID IT JAZZ NERDS. DEAL.), all for the outrageously high price of $400! Why's it in Remainders? Screw Monster Cable, that's why. [<a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/10/21/and-now-miles-davis-has-himself-a-pair-of-monster-cable-headphones/">CrunchGear</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/iwanttobelieveel4.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><br>
The Street "exclusively" reports what seems to be totally unfounded speculation from an industry analyst: Google is coming out with their own Android smartphone hardware. What evidence is there to back up this theory? Well, um, Google wants lots of people to use Android, and, well...this analyst talked to Google's design partners about it! Design partners who remain anonymous and give absolutely no concrete details to back up a "plan" that runs counter to the overall Android concept! Plus there's this awful, wrong-on-several-levels sentence that acts like a beacon transmitting "WARNING. WARNING. ABANDON ALL HOPE YE WHO ENTER THIS STORY" in Morse Code:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>By bypassing the carriers, who keep tight controls over the features and applications that are allowed on phones, Google will presumably offer a device that lets users determine the functions.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Oh right, because somehow a Google-made Android phone would...not need a wireless network? And <em>darn</em> those carriers for crippling Android phones&mdash;oh wait that hasn't happened, at all.</p>
<p>In the parlance of our times: Sweet exclusive, bro. [<a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10614007/1/exclusive-google-plans-its-own-android-phone.html?cm_ven=GOOGLEN">The Street</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/500x_500x_bnnook118.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><br>
The two companies who supply the most vital parts of any ebook reader, Freescale (processor) and E Ink (display) have joined forces in a "development deal" that they say will both lower costs of existing readers and give the option for increased capability in the future. That's pretty sweet and all&mdash;it could mean ebook readers finally hit their magic price point, whether it's $200 or $100&mdash;but without concrete results, we're keeping this little tidbit in Remainders purgatory. Keep us updated, Free-Ink (get it?). [<a href="http://www.techflash.com/seattle/2009/10/kindle_technology_supplier_e_ink_forms_partnership_to_speed_ebook_evolution.html">TechFlash</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5387257/remainders-+-things-we-didnt-post/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5387257]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[app store]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[e-ink]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[earbuds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ebook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ebook readers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ereaders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[freescale]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gizmodo remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[miles davis]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[monster cable]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:59:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5387257&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The JD Power Smartphone Satisfaction Ratings Give Apple a Win, Motorola a Big Lose]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/jdpower.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_jdpower.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged JD POWER" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/jd-power/">JD Power</a>'s annual ratings put Apple on top with an 811, beating the industry average of 765. What's surprising is that only Apple and LG are above the average, whereas <b>everyone else</b> is below.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/jdpoweeerr.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />What's not surprising is that Motorola is dead last. Up until their <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/cliq">Android Cliq</a> they really didn't have much going for them&mdash;and neither did Palm, until their Pre. So our guess is that these ratings will look a little different next year with Palm moving up a slot or two, and Motorola pulling out of the shame spot.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/dumphones.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_dumphones.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Motorola doesn't do too bad on the dumbphone ratings, on the other hand.</p>
<p>Also, LG? [<a href="http://www.jdpower.com/corporate/news/releases/pressrelease.aspx?ID=2009224">JD Power</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5377572/the-jd-power-smartphone-satisfaction-ratings-give-apple-a-win-motorola-a-big-lose]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5377572]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ratings]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jd power]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jd power 2009 ratings]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 08 Oct 2009 19:50:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5377572&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Fujitsu F-Circle Rotary Smartphone Comes from Past's Future]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/ceatec_6_large.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_ceatec_6_large.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Fujitsu says that their F-Circle concept phone&mdash;designed by Yuji Ito and shown at CEATEC in Japan&mdash;has a "timeless appearance." Liars. I know your cellphone comes straight from the 60s, and apparently it can detect land mines. [<a href="http://www.pinktentacle.com/2009/10/photos-ceatec-japan-2009/">Pink Tentacle</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5377050/fujitsu-f+circle-rotary-smartphone-comes-from-pasts-future]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5377050]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[concept]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ceatec]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[F-Circle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fujitsu]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 08 Oct 2009 08:50:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5377050&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Dell Bringing Mini 3i Android Smartphone to US?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/500x_dellmini2_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_500x_dellmini2_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>We knew <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5337228/dells-android-smartphone-new-photos-and-specs">Dell's Mini 3i</a> Android-based smartphone would be <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5334773/dell-android-phone-is-real-if-you-happen-to-live-in-china">coming to China</a>, but now <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/10/06/exclusive-dells-android-phone-is-coming-to-the-u-s/">Crunchgear hears</a> that Dell might bring an altered version of the device Stateside.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5338815/dells-mini3i-phone-confirmed-and-photographed-lacks-3g-and-wi+fi">Chinese version</a> of the phone was simply not fit for the US market, lacking 3G and Wi-Fi, but according to a tipster, Dell will change some of the internals before it debuts here. The tipster specifically names an improved camera (5MP, up from 3MP) but we'll assume that if the rumor is true, it'll also get a bump in the wireless department to 3G. Interestingly, Dell is said to be messing with Android's internals for some reason, making some apps incompatible, though we can't imagine what purpose that would serve other than customer frustration.</p>
<p>The phone is said to be thinner than the iPhone, though with a similar icon list and feels "plasticky, like the Palm Pre," which would be fairly in line with the Chinese model. This is unconfirmed for now, but we'll keep you updated if we hear anything else on Dell's possibly entering the US smartphone arena. [<a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/10/06/exclusive-dells-android-phone-is-coming-to-the-u-s/">Crunchgear</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5375824/dell-bringing-mini-3i-android-smartphone-to-us]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5375824]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3i]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dell mini 3i]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mini]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mini 3i]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[unconfirmed]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:53:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5375824&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Samsung SCH-W880: The Digital Camera that Can Call]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/w880.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_w880.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>You don't fool us, Samsung. With its camera mode dial and dedicated shutter button, your 12 megapixel <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SAMSUNG SCH-W880" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/samsung-sch_w880/">Samsung SCH-W880</a> with HD video recording, and 3x optical zoom looks a lot more like a real compact camera than a phone.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/samsung-sch-w880_1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_samsung-sch-w880_1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>Apart from its clearly camera design, the Samsung SCH-W880 comes loaded:</p>
<p>• 3.3-inch AMOLED WGA screen.<br>
• UMTS/HSDPA connectivity.<br>
• Wi-Fi<br>
• GPS<br>
• Bluetooth<br>
• Slot for microSD cards.<br>
• HD video at 30fps<br>
• Macro mode.<br>
• Xenon flash.</p>
<p>We haven't tried yet, but this looks like the first cameraphone that can actually satisfy the photographer/Peeping Tom in us. [<a href="http://www.samsunghub.com/2009/09/28/sch-w880-phone-is-more-than-12mp-and-optical-zoom/">Samung Hub</a> via <a href="http://samsung.hdblog.it/2009/09/28/samsung-sch-w880-la-prima-digitale-che-si-crede-un-telefono/">HDblog</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/28/samsungs-sch-w880-12-megapixel-phonecamera-with-3x-optical-zoom/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5369252/samsung-sch+w880-the-digital-camera-that-can-call]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5369252]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Samsung SCH-W880]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sch-w880]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 28 Sep 2009 08:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5369252&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Portable Media Player Is Dead, Long Live the... Portable Media Player]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/ipod-vs-ipod-touch.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_ipod-vs-ipod-touch.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The portents have hung in the air for a while, but it's clear now that the traditional dumb PMP is dead, like a dull and rusted Swiss army knife. In their stead we'll have...smart PMPs.</p>
<p>Not to put too fine a point on it, but yeah, we're talking about the iPod touch model: It's about <em>platforms</em>. That run apps. That people can develop awesome little programs for. In other words, a good PMP won't just have great codec support and be able to push HD video, it'll get you on Twitter or Facebook or tell you what's good to eat nearby.</p>
<p>Not convinced? Check out <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5358355/archos-5-internet-tablet-hands-on-android-power-but-wheres-the-flash">the new Archos 5</a>, which <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5060305/archos-5-lightning-review">dumps the old OS</a> for Android. Or <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5326548/creative-zii-egg-android-pmp-makes-its-hands+on-debut">the Creative Zii</a>, also allegedly launching with Android. If you're in the second tier, grabbing a popular app-friendly platform is not a bad way to compete.</p>
<p>Apple itself noted that old-school iPods <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5319722/apple-made-a-lot-of-money-as-traditional-ipods-march-to-extinction">were on a death march</a>&mdash;so the company added a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5356015/ipod-nano-5th-gen-review">video camera to the nano</a>, to keep it alive for a generation or two more. True, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5325036/sony-x+series-walkman-review-so-close-and-yet-so-far">Sony's X-Series</a> appears to be keeping on keeping on, but it feels like an anacrhonism, albeit with a nice screen&mdash;no extendability, and a horrible internet browser.</p>
<p>The argument really comes down to the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged ZUNE HD" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/zune-hd/">Zune HD</a>, launching this week. It finds itself in an awkward position, essentially because of the effective limbo Microsoft's mobile OS is in&mdash;in other words you can't easily develop apps for both Zune HD and Windows Mobile, which Zune's Brian Seitz <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/technologybrierdudleysblog/2009867170_microsoft_launches_zune_clarif.html">basically admitted to the Seattle Times</a>: "What we didn't want to do was build two parallel app store experiences that didn't work together."</p>
<p>So there's no open app store, but in the meantime, Microsoft's providing the apps with a handful of chosen developers, so we're stuck with games, and soon a Twitter and Facebook app. But what is clear is that Zune is a platform that people can develop for. And it seems inevitable that'll be common with the <em>next</em> version of Windows Mobile, or the mysterious project Pink, if that is something else&mdash;at least, if Microsoft's actually serious about the Zune having a future.</p>
<p>In other words, it's startlingly clear now that the traditional PMP is history, replaced by PMPs powered by mobile platforms. They're smartphones without the "phone," and even lacking that major element, they're surprisingly valuable, more pocket computer&mdash;with internet and apps&mdash;than glorified video player.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5360197/the-portable-media-player-is-dead-long-live-the-portable-media-player]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5360197]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[pmp]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[archos]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[archos 5]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[creative]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[creative zii]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dap]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[portable media player]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[zune]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[zune hd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[zunehd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5360197&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sony Ericsson Xperia X2 Official, Runs Windows Mobile 6.5]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/x2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_x2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Hard to believe <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5323710/xperia-x2-steps-up-its-special-effects-for-the-sequel">Sony Ericsson's Xperia X2</a> wasn't official until this moment&mdash;honestly, we care more about the awesome <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5319495/android+based-sony-ericsson-xperia-x3-full-specs-and-large-images">the Android-powered X3</a> at this point&mdash;but Sony just made it real, it running <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged WINDOWS MOBILE 6.5" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows-mobile-6%275/">Windows Mobile 6.5</a>.</p>
<p>The hard specs: 3.2-inch WVGA touchscreen, 8.1MP camera, HSPA, Wi-Fi, GPS, TV-out. And oh yes, the panels custom interface on top of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged WINDOWS MOBILE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows-mobile/">Windows Mobile</a> is back, though refined, as we saw earlier. It'll be out later this year for 699 euros, so um, <em>not cheap</em> if it ever comes to the US. [<a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?prev=hp&hl=en&js=y&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.computerbild.de%2Fartikel%2Fcb-News-Handy-Sony-Ericsson-Xperia-X2-Windows-Mobile-Smartphone-4662516.html&sl=de&tl=en&history_state0=">Computerbild</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5350874/sony-ericsson-xperia-x2-official-runs-windows-mobile-65]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5350874]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Xperia X2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony ericsson]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sony Ericsson Xperia X2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Windows Mobile 6.5]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[x2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xperia]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:49:37 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5350874&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[First Windows Mobile 6.5 Phones and Windows Marketplace Launch October 6]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/504x_windows-phone-65.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_504x_windows-phone-65.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The best part about <a href="http://windowsteamblog.com/blogs/windowsphone/archive/2009/09/01/windows-phones-are-coming-on-october-6th.aspx">this post</a> on the Windows Team blog announcing that <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows-mobile-6.5">Windows Mobile 6.5</a> phones start landing on October 6?</p>
<p>"Interestingly enough, we discovered that most people who carry a Windows phone don't realize it's running <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windowsmobile" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windowsmobile/">Windows Mobile</a>."</p>
<p>Well. I'll just leave it at that. Except to wonder precisely <em>which</em> <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windowsmobile65" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windowsmobile65/">Windows Mobile 6.5</a> phones we'll see on Oct. 6&mdash;T-Mobile is oddly missing from the list of North American carrier partners&mdash;and um, when, dear god, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5342619/windows-mobile-7-epically-delayed">will we see Windows Mobile 7</a>? And please tell me by now they've come up with a better plan <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5341177/oh-god-please-tell-me-this-isnt-microsofts-plan-for-windows-mobile">than this</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Update</strong>: Also opening Oct. 6 is <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5314285/windows-marketplace-for-mobile-will-app+ify-all-6x-handsets-not-just-65">the Windows Marketplace</a>, Microsoft's app store for all 6.X Windows phones, which we're interested to see how it pans out. [<a href="http://windowsteamblog.com/blogs/windowsphone/archive/2009/09/01/windows-phones-are-coming-on-october-6th.aspx">Windows Team</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5350163/first-windows-mobile-65-phones-and-windows-marketplace-launch-october-6]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5350163]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[windows mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Windows Mobile 6.5]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 01 Sep 2009 09:10:36 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5350163&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Motorola's Giving Android a Full Makeover, Just Like HTC and Sony]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/504x_motorola-morrison-phandroid-550x412.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/504x_504x_motorola-morrison-phandroid-550x412.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></a>HTC <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5301948/htc-debuts-hero-with-fresh-face-for-android">kicked it off</a> with Sense, and Sony <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5310236/sony-ericssons-android-rachael-ui-makes-me-want-to-ditch-my-iphone">wasn't far behind</a> with Rachael. Now Motorola, with their upcoming "Blur" social-networking-centric Android interface, has confirmed the trend: plain vanilla Android is a thing of the past.</p>

<p>BGR <a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/08/07/exclusive-motorola-bringing-a-webos-to-android-called-blur/">coaxed a few details</a> about the skin/shell/application set/whatever from a Motorola insider:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>It will combine all personal contacts and social networking sites into a clean and easy to use interface...The skin/OS is named "Blur" by Motorola and will be heavily web-connected. All Android devices will be able to upgrade different sections of the OS and interface all over the air.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Given how vague and strange the language is, it's hard to glean exactly what to expect, but I get the feeling the reality of Blur will be somewhat familiar: an HTC-Sense-like social networking layer, with custom widgets and a systemwide skin. This concept <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5318860/htc-hero-review-ambitious-but-tragically-flawed">works for the Hero</a>, and looks fantastic <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5310236/sony-ericssons-android-rachael-ui-makes-me-want-to-ditch-my-iphone">coming from Sony</a>. As for how Motorola will actually execute this, we'll have to wait and see. Hey, guys, when's that <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5319498/motorola-morrison-spied-again-this-time-with-android">Morrison</a> supposed to come out again? [<a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/08/07/exclusive-motorola-bringing-a-webos-to-android-called-blur/">BGR</a>, Image from <a href="http://phandroid.com/2009/07/21/motorola-morrison-picture-snapped-appears-black-and-blue/">Phandroid</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5332457/motorolas-giving-android-a-full-makeover-just-like-htc-and-sony]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5332457]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android skins]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blur]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc sense]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[morrison]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola blur]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola morrison]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony rachael]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 07 Aug 2009 13:15:54 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5332457&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Samsung's 1GHz ARM Chip May Come to Next-Gen iPhone and Pre]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/iphone-speed.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_iphone-speed.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></a>Samsung and Intrinsity have announced one of the fastest ARM Cortex A8-based processors yet&mdash;the same chip design in the iPhone 3GS and Palm Pre&mdash;clocking in at 1GHz.</p>

<p>Code-named "Hummingbird," this new chip is designed with smartphones in mind as it balances power consumption and high clock speeds, and matches the single core end of <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5277326/mobile-chipsets-wtf-are-atom-tegra-and-snapdragon">Qualcomm's Snapdragon platform</a>.</p>
<p>Analysts suggest it could be easily dropped into a new iPhone or Pre:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Samsung could drop Hummingbird into the existing S5PC100 design with few or no changes," Halfhill said in response to an e-mail query, referring to the S5PC100 processor now used in the iPhone 3GS. "Bingo! A next-gen iPhone that could run at speeds up to 1.0GHz," he said.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>But more than likely, we'll see them in Android-based or other smartphones first, just like we're seeing <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5320175/htc-firestone-has-snapdragon-and-a-capacitive-screen-prefers-to-go-by-leo">1GHz Snapdragon chips pop up</a> in other phones <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5319575/toshiba-tg01-passes-through-fcc-immigration-gates-suitcase-full-of-snapdragon">right now</a>.</p>
<p>I just know that my heart rate matches a hummingbird's at the thought of a 3G S(uper) S(peedy). [<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-10296754-64.html?part=rss">CNET</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5324186/samsungs-1ghz-arm-chip-may-come-to-next+gen-iphone-and-pre]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5324186]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hummingbird]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Intrinsity]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pre]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 27 Jul 2009 21:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5324186&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[DIY Fixes for the Palm Pre's Unfortunate "Oreo" Effect]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/thumb_450_pre-slider-tabs-oreo.png" class="left image340" width="340" />The Pre Oreo effect&mdash;as in, twisting an Oreo&mdash;is definitely an unwanted and unpleasant flaw some have experienced in the Pre's hardware. Pre Central has a few DIY, probable-warranty-voiding methods to fix the problem.</p>
<p>Though Palm or Sprint will likely replace a Pre with obvious wiggle, sometimes you just want to get your hands dirty and do it yourself. The problem seems to be a bit too much give in the tabs that hold the two halves of the phone to the sliding mechanism, so you can fix it by bending the tabs (risky) or even applying a layer of superglue to the rails to make them thick enough to fit the too-loose tabs (riskier). It'd take a confident tinkerer to mess with such delicate hardware, but anything to avoid dealing with wireless carrier customer service, right? [<a href="http://www.precentral.net/battling-palm-pre-oreo-effect-diy-style">Pre Central</a>, image from same source]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5321509/diy-fixes-for-the-palm-pres-unfortunate-oreo-effect]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5321509]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[palm pre]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[diy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[oreo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm pre oreo fix]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pre]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[slider]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sprint]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[warranty]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5321509&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Windows Marketplace for Mobile Will App-ify All 6.x Handsets, Not Just 6.5]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_504x_winmomarket_02.jpg" class="left image500" width="500">Fantastic news for current <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged WINDOWS MOBILE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows-mobile/">Windows Mobile</a> users: Windows Marketplace for Mobile, Microsoft's forthcoming app store, <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/168369/microsoft_to_let_older_phones_use_its_app_store.html">will work</a> on 6.0 and 6.1 handsets as well. When? Still a cryptic "Fall," unfortunately.</p>

<p>Developers will be able to submit applications to get started on the vetting process as soon as July 27th, giving Microsoft a little lead time to ensure a healthy selection at launch.</p>
<p>If Microsoft didn't explicitly state that the Marketplace would be exclusively available on Windows Mobile 6.5, they certainly <em>implied</em> it, touting the service as one of the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5154116/windows-mobile-65-announced-leaks-confirmed">great new features</a> of the OS&mdash;<a href="http://windowsteamblog.com/blogs/windowsphone/archive/2009/07/14/get-ready-windows-marketplace-for-mobile-offers-millions-of-potential-new-customers.aspx">they're even launching together</a> in Fall. Wider availability makes sense, since the core components of the OS are largely unchanged, and apps will generally be cross compatible. Basically, this is great for the scores of Windows Mobile users who can't&mdash;or don't want to&mdash;upgrade.</p>
<p>That said, it leaves Microsoft, and 6.5, in an awkward position. Without the draw of the Marketplace, there really isn't much left to be excited about in 6.5. Intertial scrolling? A new Start menu and home screen? As someone who's been using a late build of the OS for <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5281397/how-to-install-windows-mobile-65-right-now">quite some time</a>, I can say that it's a welcome upgrade, but improves things to a degree you'd expect from a third-party shell replacement like Touchflo 3D or Touchwiz, not a proper OS upgrade. [<a href="http://windowsteamblog.com/blogs/windowsphone/archive/2009/07/14/get-ready-windows-marketplace-for-mobile-offers-millions-of-potential-new-customers.aspx">Microsoft</a> via <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/168369/microsoft_to_let_older_phones_use_its_app_store.html">PCWorld</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5314285/windows-marketplace-for-mobile-will-app+ify-all-6x-handsets-not-just-65]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5314285]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[windows mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows mobile 6.0]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows mobile 6.1]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows mobile marketplace]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5314285&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Samsung's New Smartphone QWERTY Idea: Keep Trying, Guys]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5310600/samsungs-new-smartphone-qwerty-idea-keep-trying-guys">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a>Samsung filed a <a href="http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html&r=17&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PG01&s1=samsung.AS.&OS=AN/samsung&RS=AN/samsung">patent</a> for this avian-looking smartphone concept: Two spring-loaded half-keyboards burst from the sides of the phone, which in theory provides both a larger keyboard and more screen space, since hands are out of the way. <em>In theory</em>.</p>
<p>It's a half-baked idea, of course, which is why we're only seeing it in a patent and not in actual hardware. Unless the half-keyboards were incredibly strong, the whole device would feel like it's itching to break into pieces, and wouldn't it have to be twice as thick as standard QWERTY sliders to accommodate double the amount of hardware? So it's just a patent, and it'll almost certainly stay that way. But at least somebody's trying to figure out a way to keep hardware keyboards alive. [<a href="http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2009/07/08/samsung_folding_keyboard/">Reg Hardware</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5310600/samsungs-new-smartphone-qwerty-idea-keep-trying-guys]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5310600]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[mock-ups]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[concept]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[keyboard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[qwerty]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung keyboard smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5310600&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Samsung Glyde 2 for Verizon: Better Luck Second Time Around?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p>Leaked photos of a Verizon-branded <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GLYDE 2" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/glyde-2/">Glyde 2</a> (aka U960) smartphone show it has a streamlined design, a fourth row added to the keyboard, and now uses Samsung's TouchWiz interface. It all sounds promising, but what about that sluggish touchscreen?</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/Glyde2-1.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_Glyde2-1.png" class="left image500" width="500"></a></p>
<p>When our very own Matt Buchanan conducted last year's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5017957/iphone-clone-battlemodo-which-one-is-the-iphoniest">iPhone Clone Battlemodo</a>, his verdict on the first generation Glyde was as succinct as it was scathing:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"The Glyde is just a truly terrible phone. Most clay bricks are more responsive than its touchscreen, especially around the edges, and the crappy, sluggish Verizon software doesn't help. And its keyboard ain't much better."</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/Glyde2-2.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_Glyde2-2.png" class="left image500" width="500"></a></p>
<p>I do like the idea of a competitive haptic touchscreen rival to the iPhone. So here's hoping that Samsung and Verizon have lifted their game. It's early days, so no word yet on pricing or availability. [<a href="http://www.howardforums.com/showthread.php?t=1515275&page=5&pp=15">HowardForums</a> via <a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/09/07/03/samsung.glyde.2.leak/">Electronista</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5307886/samsung-glyde-2-for-verizon-better-luck-second-time-around]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5307886]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[glyde]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[glyde 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone clone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 05 Jul 2009 13:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5307886&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Is Dell Working On An Android Smartphone?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_dellphone2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;">Is this <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/dell/cellphones">Dell's</a> first cellphone? That is at least what one man and his blurry camera seem to think.</p>
<p>After what seems like years of 'will they? won't they?' speculation, this pic has appeared on the Chinese site PDAFans and is at the least a vaguely Pre-looking device baring a Dell logo. It is rumored to be released by the end of the year and assuming this is real it looks like it will be running <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/android">Android</a>. [<a href="http://PDAFans.com/">PDAFans</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/15/is-this-dells-android-smartphone-ditty/">engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5290781/is-dell-working-on-an-android-smartphone]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5290781]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[dell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 15 Jun 2009 05:20:42 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon Crisp]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5290781&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Every Mobile Browser Should Give Up and Just Go WebKit]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/zunebrowser.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/05/504x_zunebrowser.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></a><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5270945/zune-hd-is-real-has-multitouch-web-browsing-oled-screen-and-hd-video?skyline=true&s=x">The ZuneHD</a> looks like a lovely catchup to the original iPod touch&mdash;you know, before apps allowed it to be so much more&mdash;except for one thing. That damn browser. It's not just they're basing it off hellacious and reviled IE&mdash;it's that it's not WebKit-based.</p>
<p>There simply isn't a better mobile browser than WebKit right now. It powers the internet in the iPhone, Android, Symbian S60 and Palm Pre, and destroyed all comers <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5090988/mobile-browser-battlemodo-which-phones-deliver-the-real-web">in our Battlemodo</a>. It's <a href="http://www.betanews.com/article/Google-Chrome-2-is-20-faster-than-Chrome-1-in-physical-speed-tests/1243046066">fast</a>, it's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid3">competent</a> and most importantly from a development perspective, it's open source. Meaning Microsoft could adopt it for its mobile devices with (relatively) little shame (okay, maybe a lot of shame) and it's ready to go <em>right now</em>, meaning there's no wasting time building a new engine just to attempt to play catchup to a browser that handily delivers the best mobile internet experience right now across multiple platforms.</p>
<p>Mozilla's Fennec <em>could</em> become a contender to the throne, true, but it's still far from final. Opera and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5271209/skyfire-leaves-beta-steals-windows-mobile-browsing-crown">Skyfire</a> are interesting and good, but they're both proprietary, meaning there's no chance in hell they'd ever be adopted by Microsoft or RIM, much less the entire industry, as the basis for their mobile browsers. <strong>Update</strong>: BTW, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5079630/ballmer-on-webkit-we-may-look-at-that">Ballmer himself mentioned</a> they might look at WebKit.</p>
<p>You could rail against the idea of WebKit becoming a "monopoly," but you'd be foolish to do so: Web standards are important, and WebKit, which is again, open source, <a href="http://webkit.org/projects/goals.html">is dedicated</a> to standards compliance and performance. A performance and compliance standard that web developers could count on in every single mobile device wouldn't be a bad thing&mdash;far from it. It would mean <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5202502/redesigned-mobile-gmail-for-iphone-and-android-is-faster-appier-awesomer">even more amazing web apps</a>, since developers would know they'd run on any mobile device, no matter what "OS" they were running underneath&mdash;the web would be the real OS.</p>
<p>That day is coming. I just hoped I'd see it a little sooner.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5271098/every-mobile-browser-should-give-up-and-just-go-webkit]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5271098]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[com]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mobile webkit]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[webkit]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[zune]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[zune hd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 27 May 2009 13:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5271098&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[AT&T Giving Away a Refurbished HTC Fuze With Contract]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/04/htc-fuze-refurb_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/htc-fuze-refurb_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>AT&T is getting aggressive with their refurb deals. Last week it was a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5223116/att-selling-refurbished-16gb-iphone-3gs-for-149">16GB iPhone 3G for $149</a>, and this week it is a free <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/htc-fuze/">HTC Fuze</a> with a 2-year contract and new activation.</p>
<p>If you buy new, you are looking at spending an additional $300 with a contract&mdash;so this is one hell of a deal. If you have a problem with second-hand stuff, get over it. As it is in this case, <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5075525/why-you-should-buy-a-refurbished-laptop">buying refurbs can be a great move</a>. [<a href="http://www.wireless.att.com/cell-phone-service/packages/packages-details.jsp?q_package=sku3680286&_requestid=232007">AT&T</a> via <a href="http://www.fuzemobility.com/att-is-giving-away-refurb-fuzes-for-free-2/">Fuze Mobility</a> via <a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/04/25/att-offering-refurbished-htc-fuze-models-for-free/">BGR</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5229595/att-giving-away-a-refurbished-htc-fuze-with-contract]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5229595]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[dealzmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fuze]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc fuze]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc touch pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[refurb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[refurbished]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[refurished htc fuze]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows mobile]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5229595&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[HTC Touch Diamond 2 Hands On: I Might Like the Original Better]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/04/htc_touch_diamond_2_0000.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/htc_touch_diamond_2_0000.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5154108/htc-touch-diamond2-and-touch-pro2-feature-bigger-screens-better-battery-life">HTC Touch Diamond 2</a> is similar to the Touch Pro 2, but without the keyboard, special speakerphone and conference calling capability. And though it's a fine phone, I prefer the original Touch Diamond's design.</p>
<p>Everything I said about the software on the <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5194645/hands+on-htc-touch-pro-2-hot-item-buy-now-nice-screens-and-big-keyboards-update-gallery-update">Touch Pro 2</a> holds true with the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged TOUCH DIAMOND 2" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/touch-diamond-2/">Touch Diamond 2</a>. It's all a great implementation of the WinMo platform and looks pretty.</p>
<p>But the TD2 hardware doesn't blow me away. For one, it lacks the angled backside of the original Touch Diamond, though some may have considered that excessive design. But I loved the way that design tapered the Touch Diamond. With the TD2, the phone is much more boxy and straight forward, lacking the same chic feel as its predecessor. The metallic silver body feels somewhat sterile, and the only real design flourish is a silver patch on the back. It's also slightly thicker than the original (11.5mm vs 11.3mm)</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('htctd2', 3, '');
</script></p>
<p>Obviously the TD2's screen is bigger and better, the guts are a little more powerful and the battery life is improved from the original TD, but I can't help but want more from this follow-up.</p>
<p>Still, if you don't need the keyboard&mdash;or the extra heft&mdash;and want this new HTC UI, pay attention to the Touch Diamond 2 when it finally launches in the second half of this year. It may be worthwhile.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5196481/htc-touch-diamond-2-hands-on-i-might-like-the-original-better]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5196481]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ctia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ctia 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[HTC Touch Diamond 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[touch diamond 2]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 03 Apr 2009 00:12:56 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Covert]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5196481&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Motorola Evoke QA4 Looks Like the Bastard Son of the iPhone and Pre]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/03/custom_2766g2fl10oml_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/custom_2766g2fl10oml_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a>The Evoke QA4 may be one of Motorola's very few last chances against their market irrelevance and the unstoppable touchscreen cellphone wave. One that looks like a genetic experiment between an iPhone and a Pre.</p>

<p>Of course, if it uses the same operating system as previous Motorola cellphones, the good looks and its 2.8-inch touchscreen won't amount to a hill of beans in the land of iPhone OS, Android, Web OS, and software applications. The Evoque QA4 also has a sliding 12-key pad for some clickity-clack calling action.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/03/custom_1238421639408_custom_2765d5vo7jux.jpg" width="504" height="994" style="display:block;"></p>
<p>The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MOTOROLA EVOQUE QA4" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/motorola-evoque-qa4/">Motorola Evoque QA4</a> will be shown at CTIA. [<a href="http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/03/30/motorola-announces-evoke-qa4-evokes-memories-of-the-iphone/">Mobilecrunch</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5190332/motorola-evoke-qa4-looks-like-the-bastard-son-of-the-iphone-and-pre]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5190332]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ctia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ctia09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Evoque]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Motorola Evoque QA4]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[QA4]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[touchscreen]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5190332&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Touchscreen, Trackball-Less BlackBerry Bold Leaked]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/03/rogers-blackberry-9900.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/rogers-blackberry-9900.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a>That rumored <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged BLACKBERRY BOLD" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/blackberry-bold/">BlackBerry Bold</a> with a touchscreen was just a whisper before, but now we've got a shot of the packaging to prove its existence. Let's see what we know about this new hybrid.</p>
<p>We'd known it as the Pluto, but now it's been given a traditional RIM numeric identification as the 99xx series. It's got just about the same form factor as the Bold, including the QWERTY keyboard, but with one notable addition and one notable feature missing: It's got a touchscreen in place of the trackball.</p>
<p>This blurry shot shows a Rogers-branded 99xx (a major Canadian carrier), and the 3G device is allegedly due for a late 3rd quarter release up north. "Late 3rd quarter release" is code for "don't bank on this until the 4th quarter", but we're excited nonetheless. We'll continue with updates as we get more info. [<a href="http://crackberry.com/exclusive-blackberry-9900-touchscreen-blackberry-bold">CrackBerry</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5170004/touchscreen-trackball+less-blackberry-bold-leaked]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5170004]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[99xx]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry bold]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bold]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rogers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[touchscreen]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[trackball]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 14 Mar 2009 13:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5170004&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Samsung Memoir 8-Megapixel Cameraphone Lightning Review]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/02/samsungmemoir1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/samsungmemoir1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a><strong>The Gadget</strong>: <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5146804/samsung-8mp-touchscreen-memoir-cellphone-is-the-uss-first">Samsung Memoir</a>, which is the 8-megapixel upgraded version of the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5097677/t+mobile-samsung-behold-lightning-review">Samsung Behold</a>&mdash;both of which have Samsung's TouchWiz-based touchscreen interface. It's also got a Xenon flash that works quite well.</p>
<p><strong>The Price</strong>: $250 with two-year contract, $50 rebate and qualifying data plan</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('samsungmemoirhands', 7, '');
</script></p>
<p><strong>The Verdict</strong>: A pretty damn good cameraphone. The TouchWiz UI is pretty much the same as the version on the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5097677/t+mobile-samsung-behold-lightning-review">Samsung Behold</a>. In short, it's more usable as a touchscreen phone (keyboard is fairly decent) than Windows Mobile phones, but not quite as good as say, Android or the iPhone. It does have haptic feedback, meaning there's a slight rumble as you press down on the screen. And yes, that implies that the Memoir doesn't have capacitive touch. You still have to press down when you want to click things. Let it be known that Jesús Diaz <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5154841/how-not-to-make-a-touchscreen-phone">does not like some Samsung touchscreen UIs</a>.</p>
<p>The front of the phone looks like a Samsung touchscreen phone, but the back actually looks a lot like a Samsung camera. Which is kind of the point. The 8-megapixel camera is very good. So good, in fact, that it's (give or take) about as good as my Samsung NV3 point and shoot from a few years ago. The gallery below has comparison shots.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('samsungmemoircompare', 2, '');
</script></p>
<p>And here's how well the Memoir's Xenon flash works in complete darkness. Spoiler: Pretty damn well.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('samsungmemoirflash', 1, '');
</script></p>
<p>I haven't had enough experience with Nokia's high end N-series cameraphones to say whether or not the Memoir is better. We've already established that <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5155942/giz-explains-why-more-megapixels-isnt-always-more-better">more megapixels isn't always better</a>, but if the Memoir can take photos that are just about as good as Samsung's NV3 (which doesn't take FANTASTIC images, we have to admit), it's a great alternative for a point and shoot camera.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5159832/samsung-memoir-8+megapixel-cameraphone-lightning-review]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5159832]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung memoir]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[8-megapixel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera phone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameraphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[megapixel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[memoir]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung memoir review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:00:01 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5159832&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Why Do the Android Phones Have Chins?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><object width="506" height="380" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=3254307&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=3254307&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="506" height="380" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object>Have you noticed the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5062977/t+mobile-g1-google-android-phone-review">G1</a> and <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5135926/android-g2-photos-thinner-and-no-keyboard">G2</a> both share one common physical trait? Yeah, they both have chins. And there's a reason for it *cue in Bernard Herrmann's Vertigo music*</p>
<p>According to HTC: Personality. The Androids are like people, they have chins, they have personality. The other reason: They also have protruding nippleballs: Having a chin allows the HTC engineers to pull the trackballs out more than competing devices, making them easier to use while protecting them with the chin.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">galleryPost('bigchinandroind', 4, '');</script></p>
<p><iframe src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http://digg.com/tech_news/Why_Do_the_Android_Phones_Have_Chins" align="right" frameborder="0" height="82" scrolling="no" width="55"></iframe>There you have it. Now you'll be able to sleep tonight.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5155008/why-do-the-android-phones-have-chins]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5155008]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Android G2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[g1]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[g2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hands on]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc magic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mobile world congress]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mwc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[MWC 09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[MWC'09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vodafone]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5155008&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Android G2 Hands On: Close to Perfection]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/02/android.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/android.png" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a>HTC and Google are getting closer to perfection with the new <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5154859/android-g2-htc-magic-officially-announced">Android G2, the HTC Magic</a>. Nice finish, great form factor. Check out our video, including the obligatory comparison with Apple's iPhone, and hands-on impressions:</p>

<p>The bad news first: Apart from my gripes about the user interface&mdash;which are still there&mdash;there is one but. A big BUT, bigger than Ramona's, the planetary lady with accidental moustache who serves the <i>bocadillos</i> down at one of the fair's restaurants: The software keyboard. On this first touch, the keyboard felt cramped, probably a result of the screen size, which is smaller than the iPhone's&mdash;which is the obvious soft keyboard reference, since it was the first one to implement a finger-touch software keyboard.</p>
<p><object width="506" height="380" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=3253877&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=3253877&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="506" height="380" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/3253877.jpg" style="display: none;" class="embeddedVideoThumbnail">In addition to that, there's an additional user interface problem, this time having to do with perception: Instead of popping up above your finger&mdash;like in the iPhone so you can clearly see what you pressed&mdash;the keys appear on the sides. They flash quickly as you press them, and I found it extremely distracting. They said that they put them on the sides not to obstruct the view, but knowing the over-the-key implementation in the iPhone's software keyboard, it doesn't make much sense. Furthermore, when you are typing with one finger only&mdash;like I often do&mdash;you will be obstructing the view of the flashing key with your finger. The reason: When you type on the right side of the keyboard, the flashing keys appear on the left. When you click on the right, they pop out on the left.</p>
<p>Other than this, the rest is great. There's a new Google Mail feature to delete or classify mail in bulk, as well as a faster camera, which now can take video&mdash;which obviously means you can play back video as well. The rest of the interface and features is what you already have in the Android G1. However, what really steals the show here is the hardware itself.</p>
<p>HTC has got a very smooth phone, which feels great on your hands and in your pants' pockets. While it's sightly thicker than the iPhone, the narrower, rounded body, and weight makes it feel the same size. For sure, a lot less bulky than the G1, which looks like a brick next to this. And as you have seen in the shots, the final <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged HTC MAGIC" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/htc-magic/">HTC Magic</a> is quite pretty. Have no doubt: This thing alone will make many consumers put up with the less-than-ideal software keyboard.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http://digg.com/gadgets/Android_G2_Hands_On_Close_to_Perfection" align="right" frameborder="0" height="82" scrolling="no" width="55"></iframe>Overall, the first feeling is that we got a potential winner here. If they can manage to make the software keyboard better, Apple will definitely have a formidable enemy in the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged ANDROID G2" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/android-g2/">Android G2</a>.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5154984/android-g2-hands-on-close-to-perfection]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5154984]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[htc magic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Android G2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[g2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hands on]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mobile world congress]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mwc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[MWC 09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[MWC'09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vodafone]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:17:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5154984&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Android G2: HTC Magic Officially Announced]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/02/htc-magic-android-g2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/htc-magic-android-g2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>Vodafone has taken the <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5135926/android-g2-photos-thinner-and-no-keyboard">HTC Magic</a> out of their big red hats in their MWC 2009 press conference. The <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5154174/htc-magic-the-fabled-android-g2-looks-like-its-headed-to-vodafone-in-europe">rumors were true</a>: You can see the fabled <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged ANDROID G2" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/android-g2/">Android G2</a> from every angle after the jump.</p>

<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/android-g2-htc-magic.jpg" width="804" height="603" style="display:block;float:none;"></p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('htcmagicandroidg2', 6, '');
</script></p>
<p>For sure, it is lot prettier that T-Mobile's G1. Here are the specs:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Processor<br>
Qualcomm® MSM7201a™, 528 MHz</p>
<p>Operating System<br>
Android</p>
<p>Memory ROM: 512 MB<br>
RAM: 192 MB</p>
<p>Dimensions 113 x 55 x 13.65 mm ( 4.45 x 2.17 x 0.54 inches)<br>
Weight 118.5 grams ( 4.18 ounces) with battery<br>
Display 3.2-inch TFT-LCD flat touch-sensitive screen with 320x480 HVGA resolution<br>
Network HSDPA/WCDMA: 900/2100 MHz, Up to 2 Mbps up-link and 7.2 Mbps down-link speeds<br>
Quad-band GSM/GPRS/EDGE: 850/900/1800/1900 MHz<br>
(Band frequency and data speed are operator dependent.)</p>
<p>Device Control Trackball with Enter button</p>
<p>GPS Internal GPS antenna</p>
<p>Connectivity Bluetooth® 2.0 with Enhanced Data Rate<br>
Wi-Fi®: IEEE 802.11 b/g<br>
HTC ExtUSB™ (11-pin mini-USB 2.0 and audio jack in one)</p>
<p>Camera<br>
3.2 megapixel color camera with auto focus</p>
<p>Audio supported formats AAC, AAC+, AMR-NB, MP3, WMA, WAV, AAC-LC, MIDI, OGG<br>
Video supported formats MP4, 3GP</p>
<p>Battery Rechargeable Lithium-ion battery<br>
Capacity: 1340 mAh</p>
<p>Talk time:<br>
Up to 400 minutes for WCDMA<br>
Up to 450 minutes for GSM</p>
<p>Standby time:<br>
Up to 660 hours for WCDMA<br>
Up to 420 hours for GSM<br>
(The above are subject to network and phone usage.)</p>
<p>Expansion Slot microSD™ memory card (SD 2.0 compatible)<br>
AC Adapter Voltage range/frequency: 100 ~ 240V AC, 47/63 Hz<br>
DC output: 5V and 1A<br>
Special Features G-sensor<br>
Digital Compass</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5154859/android-g2-htc-magic-officially-announced]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5154859]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[breaking]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Android G2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[g2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc magic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mobile world congress]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mwc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[MWC 09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[MWC'09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vodafone]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Feb 2009 06:32:19 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5154859&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Samsung Omnia HD Hands On Video: Amazing Screen, Still Bad Response]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><object width="506" height="380" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=3250935&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=3250935&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="506" height="380" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object>When I tried the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5043789/samsung-omnia-isnt-going-to-kill-ianything">original Omnia</a> I said it had "a poorly designed interface, lousy response time, buggy software, and it felt cheap and fat on my hand." The <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5154136/samsung-omnia-hd-makes-calls-shoots-720p-video">Omnia HD</a> changes <i>some</i> things.</p>
<p>The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SAMSUNG OMNIA HD" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SAMSUNG OMNIA HD" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/samsung-omnia-hd/">Samsung Omnia HD</a> still has the same lousy response when it comes to the touch part, even while its screen is capacitive instead of resistive. Many times, the phone will fail responding at the touch. And when it didn't fail, sometimes the software registered the click but it didn't respond. The unit was pre-release, but I found the same problem with all the Samsung phones in display (the Beat DJ and the Ultra Touch). I just hope it's just a beta thing, but I find hard to believe all these phones have such problems with the most basic feature in its design.</p>
<p>And it is too bad, because the Omnia HD has a lot of good qualities hardware wise. Besides de two built-in speakers&mdash;which can get really loud, although obviously they are not hi-fi material&mdash;, the 8GB/16GB built-in memory, the 32GB microSD memory expansion card slot, or the wireless video and DLNA connectivity, the really amazing thing is the high resolution AMOLED screen. The quality of this QHD 16:9 screen is simply mindblowing. I haven't seen any telephone&mdash;-or any other device, for that matter&mdash;which such a clear, colorful screen. The vision angle is amazing, and no matter how much you turn it, the color and contrast remain the same.</p>
<p>The other big feature of the Omnia HD is the video recording in high definition: 720p at 24 frames per second. The quality was really good and clear. Granted, it's not film material, but it's hard to believe you can obtain such an amazing picture quality from such a small device.</p>
<p>If Samsung could get their touchscreen act together and get a decent operating system on top of this (Android or maybe <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5154385/windows-mobile-65-hands-on-the-new-interface-rocks">Windows Mobile 6.5</a>), they would have a winner. But as long as first hands on impressions go, this great hardware is still in need of matching software.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5154843/samsung-omnia-hd-hands-on-video-amazing-screen-still-bad-response]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5154843]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[MWC'09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mobile world congress 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mwc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[MWC 09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mwc09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[omnia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung omnia hd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Feb 2009 04:40:04 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5154843&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Windows Mobile 6.5 Hands On: The New Interface Rocks]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/02/winmo.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/winmo.png" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a>I like the new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged WINDOWS MOBILE 6.5" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows-mobile-6%275/">Windows Mobile 6.5</a> interface, specially the new home screen, which is brilliantly executed. Running on the new <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5154108/htc-touch-diamond2-and-touch-pro2-feature-bigger-screens-better-battery-life">HTC Touch Diamond 2</a>, everything looked smoother, cleaner, and matched the iPhone's lick factor.</p>

<p><object width="506" height="380" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=3240086&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=3240086&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="506" height="380" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/3240086.jpg" style="display: none;" class="embeddedVideoThumbnail">While everything seems to have been touched up, simplified, and polished to no end, what really makes this version of Windows Mobile 6.5 isn't the new, revamped browser&mdash;which uses the engine deployed in 6.1 but feels a lot faster and has a good new interface&mdash;or the honeycomb start screen&mdash;which I don't find particularly impressive&mdash;or the cleaner UI designed for one-finger operation or the speed or the touch gestures.</p>
<p>To me, what really makes this new operating system great is the new home screen, combined with the lock screen. The lock screen doesn't look very good aesthetically&mdash;somehow, the elements don't appear tight enough&mdash;but it allows you to see what's cooking in your digital life with just one glance. Turn the screen on and you will see whatever pending alerts, mails, calls, short text messages, or any other element that requires your attention. No need to get deeper into the phone applications. From there, if you want to drill down, just slide-to-unlock the notification and you will be taken straight to the info.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('winmo6.5', 8, '');
</script></p>
<p>Once you unlock your phone, you are taken to the home screen. This is the true jewel in the operating system: A simple list of categories which let you access information without having to get into the phone applications. It sounds like the lock screen, but from here you can get deeper into the information itself. Here's how it works:</p>
<p>When you slide your finger over the list, it scrolls like it's passing through a visor. The visor transforms the text line into the information itself, so if you go through "text", it will show you the last received text message. Once you are looking at that, you will effectively have access to all your SMS messages right on that screen: Just swipe your finger like passing the pages of a book and it will change the text message. The same happens with all the other categories. There is even a custom "Favorites" category, that would allow you to navigate through whatever you want to put in there, from weather reports to Messenger's messages.</p>
<p>Then you have the start menu, which is accessible through the now-obligatory Windows flag start button, which must be present in all Windows 6.5 cellphones. Microsoft calls this the "start experience." I call it: "about time something makes sense in your damn phones." The start page shows all your available applications displayed as icons in a honeycomb. You can scroll up and down the honeycomb to start apps. No more start menu. The honeycomb is supposed to make it easier to see the icons and click on them. It works well.</p>
<p>Of course, Windows Mobile 6.5 is not perfect. I doesn't seem to support multitouch, for example. However, it's a huge leap over the previous fugly versions, which were completely unpalatable. If it fulfills its promise, this one will make Windows users think twice before getting an iPhone or an Android phone.</p>
<p>From this first touch on, it looks like Microsoft is back in the game. They don't have the upper hand yet, but they are clearly waking up. We will see what happens and how deep these changes really are once it gets released.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5154385/windows-mobile-65-hands-on-the-new-interface-rocks]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5154385]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[MWC'09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[6.5]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Diamond 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hands on]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[HTC Touch Diamond 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mobile world congress 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mwc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mwc09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[touch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Windows Mobile 6.5]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5154385&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sony Ericsson Idou's Interface: Hotter than Butter Down Beyoncé's Pants]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><br clear="all" /><object width="506" height="380" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=3236448&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=3236448&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="506" height="380" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object>As you can see in these videos, the <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5153954/sony-ericsson-idou-arrives-in-second-half-2009-with-169-touchscreen-12mp-camera">Sony Ericsson Idou's</a> is extremely smooth and elegant. I want it. Seriously, I want to lick it more than I want to lick Beyoncé's underpants. Portrait mode:</p>
<p>Check it out in portrait mode.</p>
<p><br clear="all" /><object width="506" height="380" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=3236480&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=3236480&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="506" height="380" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/3236480.jpg" style="display: none;" class="embeddedVideoThumbnail"/></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5154114/sony-ericsson-idous-interface-hotter-than-butter-down-beyonces-pants]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5154114]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[MWC'09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ericsson]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Idou]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[MCW 09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mobile world congress 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mwc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mwc09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sony Ericsson Idou]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 16 Feb 2009 06:01:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5154114&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Garmin Nuviphone G60 GPS Smartphone Video Hands-On]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><object width="506" height="380" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=3226259&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=3226259&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="506" height="380" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object>I got some quality time with a <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5152095/garmin+asus-nuvifone-g60-screenshots-and-specs">Garmin Nuviphone G60</a>, riding around Barcelona in the back of a jet-black Mercedes limo. My hands-on impression: This smartphone-meets-GPS-meets-media-player feels like a winner.</p>
<p>I don't know what it really is: A cellphone that is a GPS or a GPS that is a cellphone. Of course, the cellphone has everything you can expect from a such a device these days, including a 3-megapixel camera (with a real shutter button, like it should be) and a music player, everything tied to the GPS. This seems to be the main point of the Garmin G60: Everything revolves around geo-location.</p>
<p>Physically, the Garmin G60 has a good size: A good feeling on your hand, thicker than you-know-who, but light and comfortable. The thing is made to be integrated on your car dashboard&mdash;it comes with a cradle with a suction cup&mdash;but it works in your hand as a smartphone just fine.</p>
<p>The first thing I noticed was the complete lack of buttons, except for volume and camera shutter on the right side. On the front, there are no physical buttons whatsoever, just a nice, colorful 3.5-inch touchscreen.</p>
<p>As you can see in the video, the Linux-based operating system is quite agile and appeared solid, although the full HTML browser stalled forever trying to load a page-which is probably a fault of the 3G connection rather than the G60 itself, even while it is still a beta prototype.</p>
<p>The interface seems polished, it feels fast and responsive, very bright and clean, with colorful icons. It's centered around three main icons, which I'm sure are the ones Garmin wants to emphasize: Call, Search, and View Map. Call and View Map are quite straightforward, with Search giving you several options, from consulting the six million points of interests&mdash;already pre-loaded with the North America or European maps built-in the G60&mdash;to the on-the-fly Google local search application. This section feels very much like one of their previous GPS, giving you access to Favorites, Contact, or Recently Found addresses, and allowing to visit or calling any place on one click.</p>
<p>On the side (or bottom, if you are in landscape mode-the Garmin G60 has an accelerator to know this, although it didn't feel very sensitive while I was trying it) you can see a scrolling list of icons, which gives you access to the other features of the G60, from the camera to the web browser to the Ciao! geolocation based social service to widgets like weather. While the main three buttons can't be changed for the ones in the side list, the whole user interface is well organized and easy to use.</p>
<p>My impression from the hands-on is that Garmin has made what they know to do best&mdash;a GPS&mdash;and they combined it with a 3G smartphone is a smooth way. The result is a nicely balanced unit that has the advantage of having everything you expect in a GPS and all the features you expect in a modern smartphone, all under an easy to use interface.</p>
<p>We will give you a more extensive verdict once we get a final unit, which is supposed to arrive in the first half of 2009.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5153910/garmin-nuviphone-g60-gps-smartphone-video-hands+on]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5153910]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[MWC'09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[g60]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[garmin]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Garmin Nuviphone G60]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[MCW 09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mobile world congress 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mwc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mwc09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nuviphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 15 Feb 2009 14:05:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5153910&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Garmin Nuviphone M20 Smartphone (Aborted) Video Hands-On]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><object width="506" height="380" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=3227101&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=3227101&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="506" height="380" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object>I guess that if the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5153910/garmin-nuviphone-g60-gps-smartphone-video-hands+on">Garmin Nuviphone G60</a> is a GPS smartphone, the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GARMIN NUVIPHONE M20" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GARMIN NUVIPHONE M20" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/garmin-nuviphone-m20/">Garmin Nuviphone M20</a> Windows Mobile is a smartphone GPS. It's quite smaller than the G60, but the demo didn't work quite right.</p>
<p>It seems that the Garmin Nuviphone M20 we tried&mdash;which still doesn't have a release date&mdash;is an early prototype. As a result, we couldn't try the customized GPS-based search and maps programs: Every time we tried, it kept giving a location services initialization problem. We were told look very similar to the G60, but you just can't see it in the video. The rest of the phone-developed by Asus-seems OK after our brief hands-on. Garmin has created special skins to mask the furrible Windows Mobile interface. </p>
<p>Physically, the cellphone feels light and compact on your hand, with a nice, colorful finish. The fact that it requires a stylus&mdash;even while you can actually use your finger or nail, if you are Ming of Mongo&mdash;made it quite awkward to me, although that may just be my personal preference after hours of iPhone fingering.</p>
<p>We will have to wait for a more mature unit to give you our full impressions.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5153939/garmin-nuviphone-m20-smartphone-aborted-video-hands+on]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5153939]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[MWC'09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[garmin]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Garmin Nuviphone M20]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[m20]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[MCW 09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mobile world congress 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mwc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mwc09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nuviphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 15 Feb 2009 14:00:25 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5153939&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Samsung UltraTouch S8300 Comes Loaded, Runs at 7.2Mbps]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/02/custom_1234179344335_UltraTOUCH_still.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/02/custom_1234179344335_UltraTOUCH_still.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>Samsung is getting ready to try to shook your underpants at Barcelona's Mobile World Congress'09 with the new 0.5-inch-thin <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged ULTRATOUCH S8300" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ultratouch-s8300/">UltraTouch S8300</a> slider, this time with a 2.8-inch AMOLED touchscreen and 8-megapixel camera.</p>

<p>Let's hope <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5043789/samsung-omnia-isnt-going-to-kill-ianything">it's a lot better this time</a>.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('ultratouchs8300', 5, '');
</script></p>
<blockquote>
<p>Samsung Sets the Style Crowd Alive With UltraTOUCH<br>
Discover the beauty of Samsung's latest full-touch mobile experience</p>
<p>Seoul, Korea, February 9, 2009 – Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., a leading mobile phone provider, today announced the launch of the elegant "UltraTOUCH", the perfectly beautiful and fully equipped full-touch slider phone. This debut comes ahead of Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, where Samsung will deliver its new vision for full-touch mobiles at the forefront of style and design. As with previous Ultra editions, the UltraTOUCH re-defines perfectionism in style, design and technology – now with full touch.</p>
<p>"With its refined contoured design, Samsung UltraTOUCH is our elegant full-touch hero at this year's Mobile World Congress, proving again that Samsung's mobile phones are at the forefront of style," said Mr. JK Shin, Executive Vice President and Head of Mobile Communication Division of Samsung Electronics. He added, "We are committed to strengthening our portfolio of full-touch phones by introducing a variety of handsets to suit every lifestyle. UltraTOUCH leads this portfolio as our most iconic, high-end phone and will further enhance Samsung's leadership in the premium full-touch market."</p>
<p>Ultimate Style<br>
Samsung has long been regarded as the most stylish mobile phone manufacturer. As the newest flagship edition to the Ultra range (Samsung's leading style brand), UltraTOUCH is a truly beautiful full-touch mobile, boasting revolutionary touch screen technology, sophisticated design and packed with multimedia features. Centre stage is the 2.8" AMOLED anti-scratch full touch screen, which offers astonishingly bright and vivid colours.</p>
<p>The ultra-slim 12.7mm body of UltraTOUCH unites perfect form and function with full-touch screen and additional 3x4 keypad slider. The subtle arcs and slender contoured silhouette in the design ensure a timeless beauty and the polished ‘silky back' design means that the phone looks fantastic from every angle. With a brushed metal frame for durability and an anti-scratch, anti-smudge screen, users can keep their phone in great condition.</p>
<p>Ultimate Multimedia<br>
As you would expect from Samsung, the UltraTOUCH is alive with technology. Its embedded 8 megapixel camera with dual power LED flash and smile shot mode means you can capture incredible photographs on your phone. In addition to the industry-leading mobile phone camera, UltraTOUCH offers GPS navigation, providing detailed maps to take users from door to door. Geo-tagging via the GPS chip allows you to tag photos with geographic information, making them easier to use on social networking and photo sites. The high quality 30fps@VGA video recording captures action smoothly, while the groovy music player means that you can listen to sounds as slick as your phone. Samsung UltraTOUCH is also powered with HSDPA 7.2 Mbps, offering speedy internet access.</p>
<p>Ultimate User Interface<br>
Samsung UltraTOUCH provides the best ever full-touch user experience and universal 3x4 keypads together. Users will enjoy being able to control the mobile easily and intuitively – flicking through photos, navigating through maps and surfing the web have never been easier and more interactive thanks to the upgraded TouchWiz user interface. Mobile widgets can be dragged and placed on the screen for one-click access to favourite applications, or the slide-out tactile 3x4 keypad offers a tangible alternative behind the attractive touch screen, creating endless customization opportunities to make your phone your own.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5149397/samsung-ultratouch-s8300-comes-loaded-runs-at-72mbps]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5149397]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[MWC'09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mwc09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Samsung UltraTouch S8300]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ultra touch S8300]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ultratouch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[UltraTouch S8300]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 09 Feb 2009 04:53:56 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5149397&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The "Zune Phone" Won't Be Made by Microsoft?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/02/340x_ballmer_01.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/>According to one of <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1936">Mary-Jo Foley's</a> sources, Microsoft is not building a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged ZUNE PHONE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/zune-phone/">Zune phone</a>. Instead, they're crafting sample chassis to inspire manufacturers as to what will excite the market.</p>

<p>In this way, Microsoft is able to have their cake and eat it too. They build the bar high through a concept, then they pit manufacturers against one another to polish and mass manufacture the idea. Are you confused? That's only because it <em>is</em> confusing. Foley summarizes the point better:<br></p>
<blockquote>There will be Zune phones. There will be other kinds of Zune-enabled mobile devices. But they won't be crafted - beyond the reference chassis - by Microsoft.</blockquote>
<p>Even the original Zune was made by Toshiba, technically. [<a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1936">ZDNet</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5148001/the-zune-phone-wont-be-made-by-microsoft]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5148001]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[zune]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[zune phone]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Feb 2009 11:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5148001&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Rumor Smash: Cupcake is an Android Dev Tool, Not the Upcoming Firmware]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/02/thumb160x_nocupcake.JPG" class="left image158" width="158" />Roy at the NYTimes fact checks the nickname for the upcoming Android software update, Cupcake, and discovered it's just the name of the development tool they're using in house to build the firmware. [<a href="http://gadgetwise.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/04/android-voice-recognition-yes-cupcake-no/">NYT</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5147541/rumor-smash-cupcake-is-an-android-dev-tool-not-the-upcoming-firmware]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5147541]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cupcake]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[firmware]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:17:05 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5147541&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Samsung Acme i8910 Loved by Coyotes Everywhere]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/02/340x_samsungacme11.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/>After their <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5043789/samsung-omnia-isnt-going-to-kill-ianything">dreadful Omnia</a>, Samsung is following up with the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SAMSUNG ACME I8910" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/samsung-acme-i8910/">Samsung Acme i8910</a>, a smartphone that-according to these allegedly leaked pictures-seems to be quite slim. I comes loaded with a ton of features too:</p>

<p>• 8 megapixel camera (yes!)<br>
• 8 or 16GB storage.<br>
• Front videoconferencing camera.<br>
• GPS.<br>
• HDMI output.<br>
• DNLA compatible.<br>
• DivX support.<br>
• High definition video recording.<br>
• Wi-Fi.<br>
• Stereo out.</p>
<p>I don't know how much this thing will cost, but my guess its price tag will be somewhere in between a Wholalotlot and Bwahahaha-NO. [<a href="http://www.gaj-it.com/7062/shush-samsung-acme-i8910-is-leaked/">Gaj It</a> - Thanks Patrick]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5146894/samsung-acme-i8910-loved-by-coyotes-everywhere]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5146894]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[acme]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[i8910]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[omnia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Samsung Acme i8910]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 05 Feb 2009 06:44:44 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5146894&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Toshiba TG01 Windows Mobile Smartphone In Action, Looks Even Better]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/02/custom_1233759383860_tg01-cellphone.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/02/custom_1233759383860_tg01-cellphone.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a>"Sleek, elegant design," says the official video of the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged TOSHIBA TG01" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/toshiba-tg01/">Toshiba TG01</a> smartphone. And it's true. But their interface demo also shows why it may be <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5145181/toshiba-tg01-may-be-best-windows-mobile-answer-yet-to-iphone-and-android-camps">the best Windows Mobile weapon</a> against Android, iPhone, and Blackberry.</p>

<p><object width="650" height="366"><param name="movie" value="http://www.megawhat.tv/swfs/KVPlayer.swf">
<param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<param name="FlashVars" value="playTrailer=0&clipID=745&autoPlayback=1&loopPlayback=0&allowFullScreen=true&clientConfig=2&muteOnLoad=1&muteOnLoadOverride=1&autoPlaybackOverride=0">
<embed src="http://www.megawhat.tv/swfs/KVPlayer.swf" quality="high" wmode="opaque" flashvars="playTrailer=0&clipID=745&autoPlayback=1&loopPlayback=0&allowFullScreen=true&clientConfig=2&muteOnLoad=1&muteOnLoadOverride=1&autoPlaybackOverride=0" width="650" height="366" bgcolor="#000000" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"></embed></object></p>
<p>As you can see, Toshiba not only has created a slim 9.9mm-thick smartphone with a generous 4.1-inch screen, but they seem to have redesigned the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged USER INTERFACE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/user-interface/">user interface</a> completely to avoid the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/what.s-wrong-with-windows-mobile/whats-wrong-with-windows-mobile-and-how-wm7-and-wm8-are-going-to-fix-it-333536.php">dreadful Windows Mobile's user interface</a> too.</p>
<p>Of course, this is a canned demo and we will have to wait until we have it in our hands to see if the changes are just on the first level or deep into the user experience. [<a href="http://www.pocket-lint.co.uk/news/news.phtml/21992/23016/toshiba-tg01-official-video-hands-on.phtml">Pocket Lint</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5146107/toshiba-tg01-windows-mobile-smartphone-in-action-looks-even-better]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5146107]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[promotional video]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tg01]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[TG01 video]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[toshiba]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[toshiba tg01]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[user interface]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wm6]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5146107&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Toshiba TG01 May Be Best Windows Mobile Answer Yet to iPhone and Android Camps]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/02/tg01_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/tg01_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>There may not be a Zune Phone, but Toshiba's—the original Zune manufacturer—new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged WINDOWS MOBILE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows-mobile/">Windows Mobile</a> 6-based TG01 smartphone is close enough. And with a 4.1-inch screen and 9.9mm thickness, it looks extremely good.</p>

<p>And for those who hate the Windows Mobile interface (guilty as charged), the new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged TOSHIBA TG01" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/toshiba-tg01/">Toshiba TG01</a> has a revamped interface that, on the surface, looks pretty. According to <a href="http://www.electricpig.co.uk/2009/02/03/toshiba-tg01-hands-on-photo-fest/">Electric Pig</a>, the new phone looks amazingly good, specially next to the iPhone and the BlackBerry Bold, making them look "tubby".</p>
<p>Head to Electric Pig for a large gallery with details and other angles. [<a href="http://www.electricpig.co.uk/2009/02/03/toshiba-tg01-hands-on-photo-fest/">Electric Pig</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5145181/toshiba-tg01-may-be-best-windows-mobile-answer-yet-to-iphone-and-android-camps]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5145181]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tg01]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[toshiba]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[toshiba tg01]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows mobile]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Feb 2009 09:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5145181&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
