Gizmodo
The OpenMoko Neo1973 linux-powered smartphone first crossed our radar last november. Then the iPhone came out and made us double-take on the device's multi-touch screen, and coincidentally similar interface. Yesterday we sat down with the Neo1973, and learned more about its features, three-phase road map, pricing, and how open software collaborators will be compensated for their contributions. We also took a gallery full of pictures. Read on...
Much to our chagrin, the Neo1973 was not powered up during our demo. Product manager Sean Moss-Pultz promised to send video today, but our BS meter immediately hit the red. But Moss-Pultz did give us a slew of details on the hardware and upcoming software.
The Road Map
The device shown here is the "developer's edition." From now until September, it will be sold to developers who want to contribute to the open code base (more on this in the next section). By May or June, the plan is to release the phone to "power users." By the end of the year, Moss-Pultz hopes to have a stable platform for a mass market phone that would sell for $350. Given the generally closed systems that Verizon and Cingular favor, the biggest hope seems to lie with Sprint and T-Mobile for U.S. carriers. And along with the Neo1973, there will be five other "Neo" devices running on the OpenMoko platform, and not all will be handsets. The early adopters are likely to be big businesses that want to deploy OpenMoko using mobile enterprise apps tailored to their workforce.
The name Neo1973 is a reference to Dr. Martin Cooper, who made the first mobile phone call in 1973.
Hardware
The specs:
FIC Neo1973:
* 120.7 x 62 x 18.5 (mm)
* 2.8" VGA (480x640) TFT Screen
* Samsung s3c2410 SoC @ 266 MHz
* Global Locate AGPS chip
* Ti GPRS (2.5G not EDGE)
* Unpowered USB 1.1
* Touchscreen
* micro-sd slot
* 2.5mm audio jack
* 2 additional buttons
* 1200 mAh battery (charged over USB)
* 128 MB SDRAM
* 64 MB NAND Flash
* Bluetooth (2.0)
The handset is manufactured by FIC (First International Computer, Inc.), a Taiwanese OEM that makes notebooks for HP and Gateway, and sold about a million phones in China last year. That company is also funding the development—OpenMoko is essentially an offshoot. The phone weighs 184 grams, and is just a bit thicker and taller than the iPhone.
Software
Why is the Neo1973 the anti-iPhone? Because it's totally open source. The idea is to collaborate with developers who will create all the basic apps. OpenMoko/FIC will then certify a bundle of those apps and mass market them with the phone along with support. The developers will be rewarded with some kind of revenue sharing deal for the software sold by OpenMoko. Power users will always have the ability to get freeware apps from the community as well.
This is why Moss-Pultz calls the Neo1973 the anti-iPhone. The iPhone is a closed system, and OpenMoko, obviously, is not. The SDK for the open platform is available starting today. The basic OS is running off of the Linux 2.6.17 kernel, with GTK and Matchbox running on top of it for the UI. While the drivers and everything else are under GPL, the data sheets for most of the hardware components are under NDA, in particular the touch screen, which is designed to be used with both fingers and styli.
Ubiquitous Computing
One of the cool software ideas Moss-Pultz had was for location-based profiles that would utilize the GPS system to automatically launch the phone into different settings based on where you are. For instance, there could be a "meeting mode" which would automatically engage various settings once you entered the office, and a different set of settings that would be triggered once you were home. Another interesting idea, feasible with an ecosystem of open source phones, would be scheduled "meetings" between two phones, where a conversation would be automatically set up at a certain time based on openings one each phone's calendar.
Lowdown
OpenMoko's goal is to change phones from being disposable gadgets with rapidly declining value and into mobile computers that get more valuable as you customize them. These ideas and concepts sound great in theory, and would do well if they ever make it to the mass market. The problem is implementation and access—will the promise be fulfilled any time soon? Will US carriers be willing to host a phone with an open development ecosystem? We would be a lot more optimistic about the prospects if Moss-Pultz had shown us a prototype with a screen that powered up. But given the sorry state of handsets and phone platforms today, we'd be crazy not to champion open software efforts like this one.
OpenMoko Neo1973 [Product Page]
Comments
Very cool but could that time frame be a little far out? Surely another manufacturer will release a linux powered smartphone and then the linux community will pretty much take over from there as far as apps, right?
Forgive me if that's naive...
PS the specs don't seem really anything to get excited over either..?
OpenMoko Neo1973, from the people who gave you the command line.
Its a great start. As it is price to feature it's better than the iPhone. It all starts somewhere.
Just what I wanted the iPhone to be. Maybe a little on the chunky side though. I'll buy one, if it's real.
Gotta remember, this is the developer's phone. By the time they are ready for mass market, the phone will probably have double the power and half the thickness... at least we can only hope.
Also, I am pretty sure Sprint, like Verizon, puts their own Sprint OS on their phones now. At least that's what I saw when I sold cell phones this last holiday season.
Ubiquitous Computing: functions, which I can ALREADY use today! I use automatic profile switching based on cell information (it's not perfectly accurate outside, but works better in buildings than GPS) and also Calendar information (meeting/pager/silent profile during meetings, outdoor on the metro etc.).
It works on Nokia phones, but I guess other Symbian/non-symbian phones also. The "presence" based functions (availability, office, meeting, etc) are also enabled in Nokia phones (for a year or two now!)
Sum: Sounds interesting, although it seems a bit pathetic, trying to position it against the iPhone.
The form factor is not great with the round top and bottom. Not only does it look like some kind of baby monitoring device but it's not gonna be very convenient to keep in your pocket, in your car, etc.
The openness is the cool part, which will limit its market to ultrageeks but it's still cool. Nothing wrong with that. Apple is already coming up with all sorts of lame reasons why they want to keep it close (like... the carriers don't want geeks to mess with their infrastructure, blah blah).
Is that a (gasp) replacable battery? You mean someone figured out that 4 hours of talk time on the iPhone might require the ability to swap out the battery? Genius!
Id buy that for a dollar.
We'll see where they end up. As of right now that thing is f'ing ugly - and a design nightmare with those curved end pieces. Put all those features in a regular candybar and you've got a winner. Don't try to product design, too - it ain't working so far.
Not if you take into account the next question: Will the iPhone play Doom?> Given the generally closed systems that
> Verizon and Cingular favor, the biggest
> hope seems to lie with Sprint and T-Mobile
> for U.S. carriers.
Bzzt! WRONG. Is there a proof checker in the house?
Cingular uses GSM as does T-Mobile and Cingular plans to phase out 800MHz in favor of PCS (1900MHz).
Sprint, like Verizon, is a CDMA carrier.
I had seen photos on another site they didn't look real to me....so it is good to see that the device actually exists. I just wish that we could get a review from someone who has got to use the phone for a few weeks. I'm looking forward to it and glad that it is releasing before the iphone.
John
http://www.monomachines.com
K7AAY: Mr. Moss-Pultz said they can do a CDMA version if they get a carrier, though for the time being it is GSM only. In terms of likely carriers, likelihood in this context refers to their possible receptiveness to an open phone, at least as Mr. Moss-Pultz sees it.
I've read several comments here and at other sites bemoaning the shape of the device. While I agree that it does look childish, the rounded corners have two major advantages in real world use.
They will prevent your phone from slowly rubbing holes in your pants (I can see the "imprint" of my phone on the outside of my pants after about a year). The rounded edge will greatly slow this process down.
And when your phone is in your pocket, and you are in your car, how many times have you missed a call because the edges of the phone (not to mention the external antenna nub!) get snagged on the rim of your pocket?
Not sure if the design team had those kinds of issues in mind, but I didn't even think of them as soluble problems until I saw this device.
An iPhone with a Dvorak keyboard? Count me in. Just don't "approve me;" how nauseating.
Start a discussion:
Login with your username and password below. Or comment on this post via email.
Forgot your username or password? New User?