<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: Smartphones]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/smartphones</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'smartphones']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The New Mobile Twitter Site Is Actually, Um, Nice]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/mobiletweetmain.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_mobiletweetmain.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The mobile Twitter site had been a vastly more miserable experience compared to even the worstest apps, <a href="http://mobile.twitter.com">but now</a>, it's a strikingly good web app, with full Twitter powers, all while actually looking clean and respectable.</p>
<p>It's currently most optimized for WebKit browsers&mdash;iPhone, Android, webOS and Symbian&mdash;but BlackBerrys work too. It's built entirely using Twitter's own APIs, hence the announcement post's title, "<a href="http://blog.twitter.com/2009/12/takeout-dogfood.html">Takeout Dogfood</a>." (Why not <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5416404/dog-food--ice-cream&mdash;msn-search&mdash;bing">ice cream</a>?) For now, you'll have to go to mobile.twitter.com to use it, but they'll eventually be transitioning m.twitter.com over to the new site as they work out all the kinks. And so far, it's pretty impressive, even if it does feel a tad slower than I'd like at the moment.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5418988,4,'');
</script> [<a href="http://mobile.twitter.com">Twitter</a>, <a href="http://blog.twitter.com/2009/12/takeout-dogfood.html">Twitter</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5419004/the-new-mobile-twitter-site-is-actually-um-nice]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5419004]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[symbian]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[webos]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 04 Dec 2009 11:39:50 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5419004&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Nokia to Halve Smartphone Production in 2010, Official Suicide Watch Starts Now]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/nokia-slide-6700.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Despite the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5346818/nokia-n900-maemo-is-a-phone-makes-the-n97-look-silly">N900</a> looking like a return to the days of quality Nokia phones, it's announced it will halve production of its smartphones in 2010, instead concentrating on dumbphones, or "mid to low end smartphones," as they see it.</p>
<p>Our suspicions were raised three days ago when they stated they'd <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5415964/nokia-to-shoot-itself-in-the-foot-and-release-just-one-maemo-device-in-2010">only be releasing one Maemo device</a> in 2010, being a figurative bullet in the foot of the Finnish company, considering the N900 is the best thing they've released for years. Even with the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5401888/the-nokia-n900-isnt-a-phone-its-a-psychotic-shapeshifter">rather odd advert</a>.</p>
<p>Now, in a webcast yesterday, Nokia's Chief of Smartphones Jo Harlow claimed:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"We see ... really fierce competition certainly in the high end, but we also see it in the mid to low end of smartphones increasing"</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This tactic of releasing dumbed-down handsets which look, feel and act exactly like the last 50 models to be sold was mentioned at Nokia Capital Markets Day earlier in the week by Olli-Pekka Kallasvuo, who wants to bring prices down to increase margins.</p>
<p>Cutting smartphone production in half for 2010, Nokia's claiming it launched around 20 high-end devices this year. 20? They obviously have a different opinion on what's considered a premium handset, if that's true. Antti Vasara, the Head of Smartphones R&D at Nokia, stated that:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"We have cut down unnecessary differentiation, so that we have a far more focused portfolio for next year"</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Is releasing <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5415964/nokia-to-shoot-itself-in-the-foot-and-release-just-one-maemo-device-in-2010">just one Maemo device</a> (the far-superior platform to Symbian) considered "unnecessary differentiation"? We would've called it "offering punters what they want," keeping in mind the N900 has far outsold expectations, forcing Nokia to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5389075/waiting-for-a-nokia-n900-keep-waiting">delay sales</a> in both the US and Europe.</p>
<p>Even at Mobile World Congress, when Nokia first introduced the N900, you could see they didn't value the device as being a worthy of flagship status, devoting just a couple of minutes at the end of the presentation to it, calling it a "niche" product. Even the lack of exclusive carrier support suggests that Nokia wasn't pushing it hard enough, instead <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5346818/nokia-n900-maemo-is-a-phone-makes-the-n97-look-silly">focusing its energies on the pitiful N97</a>.</p>
<p>Sorry Nokia, but if you do indeed release more "dumbphones" than smartphones in 2010, you're going to run into trouble, and even your impressive market share can't stop us scheduling an urgent intervention meeting. We're worried, Nokia. It's time to talk. [<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSGEE5B227R20091203">Reuters</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5418797/nokia-to-halve-smartphone-production-in-2010-official-suicide-watch-starts-now]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5418797]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nokia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dumbphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[maemo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[n900]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nokia n900]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nokia smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[symbian]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 04 Dec 2009 07:49:47 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kat Hannaford]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5418797&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Senator Introduces Bill to Smack Down Early Termination Fees]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_500x_e169s.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #amyklobuchar" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/amyklobuchar/">Amy Klobuchar</a>, True America Hero and Senator of Minnesota, introduced a bill in Congress today in response to Verizon's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5396828/verizon-to-double-early-termination-fee">doubled early termination fees</a>, aiming to limit them.</p>
<p>Verizon's response:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>A broad array of Americans who might not otherwise be able to afford broadband connections to the Internet with a home PC, or by paying full price for a smartphone, have an affordable way of participating in the online world when they choose a subsidized option.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Also noted is the fact that smartphones are available at full, unsubsidized price, although it's not mentioned that the monthly fee doesn't change with an unsubsidized phone and that said unsubsidized phones are incredibly expensive. Hey Verizon, haven't you heard that this is a <em>recession</em>? Have some consideration. [<a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/70503-klobuchar-bill-would-limit-cellphone-cancellation-fees">The Hill</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5418692/senator-introduces-bill-to-smack-down-early-termination-fees]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5418692]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[amy klobuchar]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[contracts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[early termination fees]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[etf]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 04 Dec 2009 03:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5418692&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Leaked Motorola Sholes Returns, With a Disturbing Lump in Its Side]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/sholes-tablet-rumor-rm-eng.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_sholes-tablet-rumor-rm-eng.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Looking awfully similar to a recent <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5417155/motorola-sholes-returns-looks-like-a-keyboard+less-droid">leak</a>, the Chinese-for-now Sholes has leaked yet again. It mostly looks like the same device&mdash;except now we can see it's got some kind of upsetting tumor on its right side.</p>
<p>The phone (or tablet, as it's sometimes called for some reason), similar to the Droid but lacking a keyboard, is said to have a 3.7-inch screen, FM radio, and HDMI port (though we can't see that in any of the pictures), running <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #android21" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/android21/">Android 2.1</a>. Android 2.1, by the way, doesn't look different from Android 2.0 in the pictures, though apparently it's faster and more stable. It's also clearly shown here as having a 5MP camera, like the Droid, and not the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5417155/motorola-sholes-returns-looks-like-a-keyboard+less-droid">rumored 8MP camera</a>.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5418628,4,'');
</script></p>
<p>It's also now clear that it's got some sort of unfortunate medical condition on its lower right side that results in a weird, asymmetrical but not ergonomic lump. What's it for? A radio antenna for OTA TV? The HDMI port? Who knows, but I hope it sees a doctor before coming Stateside, if it's headed our way. [<a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=1&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.androidin.net%2Fbbs%2Fthread-34432-1-1.html&sl=auto&tl=en">Androidin</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/android-2-1-equiped-motorola-sholes-tablet-spied-in-china-as-xt7/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5418629/leaked-motorola-sholes-returns-with-a-disturbing-lump-in-its-side]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5418629]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[leaks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android 2.1]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola sholes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sholes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:20:31 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5418629&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Creative's Android-Wielding Zii Trinity Captured on Video]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><center><script language="JavaScript" src="http://asia.cnet.com/i/js/s_code.js"></script><img name="s_i_cnetasiacom" alt="" width="1" border="0" height="1"><img alt="" name="s_i_cnetasiacom" src="http://cnetasiapacific.122.2O7.net/b/ss/cnetasiacom/1/H.1-pdv-2/s77068754229239?[AQB]&amp;ndh=1&amp;t=3/11/2009%2019%3A28%3A35%204%20480&amp;ns=cnetasiapacific&amp;pageName=Hands-on%20with%20the%20Trinity%20concept%20phone&amp;g=http%3A//asia.cnet.com/crave/2009/12/03/hands-on-with-the-trinity-concept-phone/&amp;cc=USD&amp;events=event3&amp;products=tv%3Auploaded%3Bziitrinity-mp4&amp;v1=45157708&amp;pe=lnk_o&amp;pev2=video%20tracking&amp;s=1280x800&amp;c=24&amp;j=1.3&amp;v=Y&amp;k=Y&amp;bw=1151&amp;bh=618&amp;p=Default%20Plugin%3BJava%20Embedding%20Plugin%200.9.7%3BWebEx%20General%20Plugin%20Container%3BMoveNetworks%20Quantum%20Media%20Player%3BQuickTime%20Plug-in%207.6.4%3BShockwave%20Flash%3BSilverlight%20Plug-In%3BLoki%20Plugin%3BGoogle%20Talk%20Browser%20Plugin%3BJuniper%20Networks%20Safari%20Extensions%3BiPhotoPhotocast%3B&amp;[AQE]" width="1" border="0" height="1"><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://asia.cnet.com/i/08/tv/flash/proteus-ve.swf" name="mymovie" quality="high" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" flashvars="paramsURI=http://asia.cnet.com/tv/0,3800019768,45157708p-40000132q,00.htm?auto=0" id="mymovie" width="500" height="308"><br  /></center>Some new video footage of Creative's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #ziitrinity" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #ziitrinity" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ziitrinity/">Zii Trinity</a> reference hardware, giving us a closer look at the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5415760/zii-lives-first-look-at-the-1080p-android+powered-trinity-phone">hardware-for-hire</a>. It looks pretty diminutive, but also pretty unfinished.</p>
<p>The phone looks tiny, especially compared to the iPhone-sized Creative Zii Egg, but it seems the kinks haven't quite been worked out&mdash;some gestures, like swiping between homepages, result in opening the app tray by mistake. But the hardware looks nice, if a little generic (although it's probably designed to be generic, since it'll be optioned by different OEMs). I like the idea of the swappable microUSB/mini-HDMI port on the bottom, but time will tell if that feature stays in the final product. [<a href="http://asia.cnet.com/crave/2009/12/03/hands-on-with-the-trinity-concept-phone/">CNET Asia</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/zii-trinity-smartphone-concept-handled-on-video/">Engadget</a>]</p>
</embed>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5418615/creatives-android+wielding-zii-trinity-captured-on-video]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5418615]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[creative]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[creative zii trinity]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[zii]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[zii trinity]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 Dec 2009 23:40:05 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5418615&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Now Available]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p>In this installment of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #nowavailable" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/nowavailable/">Now Available</a>: Dell's snazzy Vostro 1015 laptop, WowWee's sweet-as-cinnamon pico projector, the not-so-hot <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #samsungomniaii" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/samsungomniaii/">Samsung Omnia II</a>, and the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #nokian900" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/nokian900/">Nokia N900</a>, a smartphone that's so smart it's not even a smartphone.</p>

<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/thumb160x_dellvostro1015.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><br>
<b>Dell's Vostro 1015</b>, the rare business laptop that brings a halfway elegant design to the boardroom table, is now available. The base model of the 15.6" laptop costs $429 but only comes with a 2.2GHz Celeron 900 processor, so you will likely want to make the jump to the $629 model which sports a 2.1GHz Core 2 Duo T6670. You know, to ensure that Excel performs snappily. Or at least for making sure you can snappily Alt-Tab back to Excel when the boss strolls by. The $629 price tag also gets you 3GB of RAM, a 320 GB HD and Windows 7 Professional. To check out more details on the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #dellvostro" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/dellvostro/">Dell Vostro</a> 1015, head over to <a href="http://www.dell.com/us/en/business/notebooks/laptop-vostro-1015/pd.aspx?refid=laptop-vostro-1015&s=bsd&cs=04">Dell</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_omniaiishipping.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
The <b>Samsung Omnia II</b> is now available at Verizon for $200. Though the Omnia II sports a pretty 3.7" touch screen, that beauty is only skin-deep; John thought just about everything else was <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5417413/samsung-omnia-ii-review">a hot mess</a>. The phone runs WinMo 6.5 mucked up with Samsung's 3D-Cube TouchWiz 2.0 UI and is the first phone to feature Swype input technology, which <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5411779/swype-vs-qwerty-fight">may or may not save you some time</a> when you're texting all your friends to tell them that your new phone sucks. The Omnia II packs a 5-megapixel camera, an 8 GB HD, and supports both social networking widgets and Microsoft Office Mobile. To be the first person to submit an expense report via Swype, head to <a href="http://www.verizonwireless.com/b2c/store/controller?item=phoneFirst&action=viewPhoneDetail&selectedPhoneId=5110">Verizon</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_n900shipping.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
The <b>Nokia N900 Maemo</b> which, Nokia will have you know, is mobile computer and not a smartphone, is now available. For $570 you can fetch an unlocked N900 with a 600 MHz processor, a 32 GB hard drive, a 5-megapixel camera capable of capturing 800 x 400 video, and all the other expected bells and whistles. The N900 has a slide-out hardware keyboard for all your texting&mdash;err, <i>mobile computing</i>&mdash;needs, supports playback of a wide range of both audio and video file formats and offers VoIP integration. All of this is packed into Nokia's Debian-based Maemo OS which the company's <a href="http://www.nokia.com/press/press-releases/showpressrelease?newsid=1337594?">announcement</a> boasted as offering "computer-grade performance in a compact size". Ooh and ahh at the impressive N900 and its correspondingly grandiose website <a href="http://maemo.nokia.com/n900/">here</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/cineminshipping.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><br>
The <b>Cinemin Swivel Pico Projector</b> by WowWee, a $300 pocket-size projector designed for use with other pocket-size devices, is now yours for the having. The Cinemin swivels on a 90-degree hinge for versatile projection without a tripod, which is sweet like cinnamon but only offers 480 x 320 resolution, which is like the minimum of cinema, thus Cinemin. That might not be what they had in mind with the name but I'm sticking to it. You can get your hands on the little guy over at <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Cinemin-Swivel-Multimedia-Pico-Projector/dp/B002AKKF12">Amazon</a>.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5417444/now-available]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5417444]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[now available]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cinemin]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cinemin swivel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dell vostro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[n900]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nokia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nokia n900]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[now shipping]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[omniaii]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[projectors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung omnia ii]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vostro1015]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wowwee]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 Dec 2009 16:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kyle VanHemert]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5417444&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Motorola's Playing With Multitouch Tech That Figures Out Where You Press Using Sound Waves]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_500x_drooooooid__008.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Motorola's just dumped a bunch of money in Sensitive Object, a French company that's developed an acoustic touch technology that figures out where you touch by analyzing sound waves, and can scale to any size device. Iiiinteresting. [<a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/12/03/moto-gets-more-serious-about-touch/">GigaOm</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5418082/motorolas-playing-with-multitouch-tech-that-figures-out-where-you-press-using-sound-waves]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5418082]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sensitive objective]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[touch]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 Dec 2009 11:42:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5418082&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Nokia Previews Faster, Prettier Symbian User Interface for 2010]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/nokiasymbian1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_nokiasymbian1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>We were surprised yesterday to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5417062/nokia-has-no-plans-to-give-up-on-symbian-or-maemo">hear</a> that Nokia is moving ahead with <em>both</em> Symbian and Maemo phones, but reassured by their admission that the Symbian UI kinda blows. Well, now we have juicy screenshots of improvements they've got in mind.</p>
<p>Nokia's device top dog, Kai Öistämö, reiterated that they don't see the Symbian OS as the problem&mdash;just the interface. Accordingly, they're planning two big interface milestones for 2010, the first of which will arrive by mid-year. They plan to:</p>
<p>"Use a new optimized graphic architecture with a focus on graphics and responsiveness, showcased beautifully on a large capacitive screen. Later in the year, a completely new visual architecture re-working of the UI will drastically reduce the complexity throughout and bring fresh appeal. We will execute here." Big screens hey? That concept tablet in the slides sure looks interesting...</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5417898,7,'Nokia Symbian 2010 Concepts Gallery');
</script></p>
<p>Beyond reduced clutter, Nokia also plans to improve input methods (including multi-touch and single tap controls). "Two taps to get to music and video instead of 8, and email access in two steps instead of four….There will also be a significantly improved browser experience."</p>
<p>"The interface will be over three times faster than our current high-end devices in many areas…Scrolling will move up to over 60fps compared to 15fps on our current high-end devices."</p>
<p>If they deliver, it may help Symbian phones (both smartphone and dumb) level off out of their nosedive into irrelevance. And interestingly, Nokia also <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5417062/nokia-has-no-plans-to-give-up-on-symbian-or-maemo">plans</a> to release its first <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5377966/nokias-next-os-maemo-6-could-look-like-this">Maemo 6-powered</a> "mobile computer" late next year, too. FYI: The screens are from yesterday's webcast of Nokia's Capital Market Day for investors: [<a href="http://cmd.nokia.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=107224&p=irol-cmd09_overview">Nokia</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5417896/nokia-previews-faster-prettier-symbian-user-interface-for-2010]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5417896]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nokia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[concepts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[maemo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[maemo 6]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[s60]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[symbian]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 Dec 2009 08:19:31 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5417896&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Samsung Omnia II Review]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/samsungtop.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_samsungtop.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Samsung, <em>stop doing this.</em></p>

<p>The Omnia II is frustrating from the second you pick it up to the moment you lay it back on your desk, defeated and distraught. There was so much potential here, so much <em>obvious</em> potential. Through a series of bizarre decisions and grating software design, Samsung has managed to squander it. Every. Last. Ounce.</p>
<h1>The Hardware Is Decent</h1>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/redback.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_redback.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>This handset is categorically impressive, shipping with a 480x800 AMOLED screen, an 800MHz processor, a 5MP camera with 720x480px video capture, 8GB of internal storage with room for microSD expansion, and FM radio, complementing the standard smartphone trio of GPS/Wi-Fi/3G connectivity.</p>
<p>The screen is beautifully sharp, though the whites&mdash;as seems to be <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5389187/samsung-moment-review-the-ed+209-of-android-phones">common</a> in Samsung's AMOLED screens&mdash;often render as slightly blue. It's not that distracting as long as you don't have a whiter screen for reference, and the screen's brightness, sharpness and general color reproduction are satisfying. It's a resistive display, which is still kind of a necessary evil on <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windowsmobile" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windowsmobile/">Windows Mobile</a>; as much as I enjoyed the capacitive panel on the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5400593/htc-touch-hd2-review-a-tragedy">Touch HD2</a>, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windowsmobile65" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windowsmobile65/">Windows Mobile 6.5</a>&mdash;and specifically, some of its app selection&mdash;isn't quite ready to kick the stylus. The screen is no more squishy than any other 3.7-inch layered plastic display.</p>
<p>The design could be described as clean and conservative, if not for two features: the chrome buttons on the front, and the ill-advised secret red accents on the back. It's a bit too tuner-car chic for my tastes, but neither detail is all that offensive. The sides of the phone, which are fairly narrow (the handset is only about 13mm thick&mdash;about as thin as a HTC Hero, and slightly thinner than a closed Pre) are littered with buttons and ports, including the 3.5mm headphone jack, the volume rockers, an "OK" button, a microUSB port for charging, and lock and camera shutter buttons, which are a bit close for comfort.<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/imagesample.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_imagesample.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>(sample shot)</p>
<p>The 5MP camera benefits from extensive settings options, and the sensor itself is good enough to replace an entry-level point-and-shoot in daytime. The video, though it suffers from motion distortion more than your average pocket camcorder, will suffice in most situations.</p>
<p>The conclusion here is unsurprising: Though it's no <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5400593/htc-touch-hd2-review-a-tragedy">HD2</a>, the Omnia II is an impressive piece of hardware. This, sadly, doesn't really matter.</p>
<h1>The Software Is Terrible</h1>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/inttop.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_inttop.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
The Omnia's got a veritable arsenal of software tricks behind that spongy little screen, from the ability to broadcast video over DLNA, to the newest version of Opera Mobile, to the semi-lauded <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5411779/swype-vs-qwerty-fight&autoplay=true">Swype keyboard</a>, which lets you type without lifting your finger, and which takes fairly bold&mdash;but generally effective&mdash;guesses at what you're gesturing toward. And the crowning achievement, the reason that the Omnia II is worthy of a review over the rest of the same-y Windows Phones that are flooding the market right now, is <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #touchwiz20" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/touchwiz20/">TouchWiz 2.0</a>, Samsung's take on total interface conversion, which reaches far deeper than the original TouchWiz did on the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5098458/samsung-omnia-review">first Omnia</a>.</p>
<p>And it is a <em>disaster</em>.</p>
<p>It's flawed in the most basic ways a phone interface can be, violently convulsing from one interface paradigm to another through a series of inconsistent, layered, and most importantly <em>slow</em> animations. Seriously, what's going on here? How did all these images come from one phone?:</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5417456,8,'');
</script></p>
<p>The widget menu feels like its always about to freeze, and the widgeting system as a whole is laggy and disorganized, more of a free canvas for thoughtlessly-sized shortcuts than an actual, interactive dashboard. The Cube&mdash;oh, that horrible fucking cube&mdash;is just a six-sided spinning shortcut menu for multimedia apps, which feels like an obstacle, not an interface. Ugh.</p>
<p>And stuff like this is <em>everywhere</em> on the Omnia II&mdash;you can't avoid it. Windows Mobile's new Start Menu has been replaced with an iPhone-style set of icon panels, which would be fine if they didn't register half my swipes as taps, <em>opening</em> applications, sometimes more than one at a time, instead of just cycling between screens. The new dialpad crunches the inbuilt recent calls list into a two-item-tall sliver. The SMS interface has been replaced, but only in bits and pieces. Closing an app with one "x" button reveals a second "x" button of a different color and size, attached to that bright green start menu. The Wi-Fi selector is a floating orb of icons, in which you drag one bubble&mdash;representing a network&mdash;into a larger bubble&mdash;representing your phone. The task switcher alternates between a set of panels and a Cover Flow-esque turnstile. The media player app looks like it was hastily ripped from one of Samsung's older PMPs, and the remaining Windows Mobile native elements have been doomed to wear a black and blue neon color scheme that harks back to Windows 98's High Contrast Mode. Haptic feedback accompanies almost all animations, which makes the lagging transitions feel like they're <em>literally grinding.</em></p>
<p>I won't go on too long about how this interface looks. Let's just say it's oppressively ugly, and leave it at that. But the way it functions is inexplicable, and inexcusable. It's as if Samsung assigned each tiny piece of this phone's software to a different team, and ordered them not to speak to one another under any circumstances. This isn't design by committee. This is worse than design by committee. And the effect on user experience is crippling: Fiddling with this thing for a few minutes is akin to being yelled at by a panel of six men, none of whom speak languages you've ever heard before, and all of whom take pleasure in your cranial pain. You could <em>conceivably</em> get used to this with enough time, but it's an order of magnitude less usable than the regular Windows Mobile 6.5 interface, which hey, <em>isn't that good.</em> Perhaps more importantly, everyone I handed this to was visibly frustrated within seconds. You can't turn it off, either: With a little effort you can kill the homescreen, but the rest of the modifications are there to stay.</p>
<p>The most alarming thing about this interface is that it's Samsung's <em>entire design philosophy</em> now. Matt said of the Android Behold's UI:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>TouchWiz is the first custom Android interface that's worse than the standard one, and shows what kind of horrible things emerge when Samsung's interface designers are left unchecked.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It only got <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5406912/samsung-behold-ii-non+review-oh-god-the-ugly">more scatological</a> from there. The Omnia II's UI is essentially the same concept, adapted for Android and intended to penetrate a little deeper. There are even some striking similarities between the Omnia II's interface and that of the Omnia HD, a <em>Symbian</em>-based phone from a few months ago. In short, TouchWiz is an epidemic at Samsung. And for all intents and purposes, the pathogen is fatal.</p>
<h2>What To Buy Instead</h2>
<p>At the $200 price point, it's hard to recommend anything else but the Droid on Verizon's network&mdash;it's their clear flagship, and it's an extremely capable phone. But even if you're specifically set on buying a Windows Mobile phone, there are better options, like the HTC <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5375371/htc-imagio-review-htc-is-microsofts-best-critic">Imagio</a>, which benefits from HTC's vastly better TouchFlo or "Sense" UI overhaul, or even the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5335326/t+mobile-htc-touch-pro2-review-wait-how-much">Touch Pro2</a>, which despite having Windows Mobile 6.1 (which you can probably just upgrade yourself) offers a much more pleasant experience. Because unless you replace the software entirely, a pleasant experience is miles from what you'll be having with an Omnia II in your pocket.</p>
<p><br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/gizplus3.jpg"> It's another in what I expect to be a long line of impressively spec'd Windows Mobile handsets<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/gizplus3.jpg">The camera is better than average, though it still suffers in low light<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/giznormal_01.jpg">It's a Windows Mobile phone, which will be a dealbreaker for some, and a feature for others.<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/gizminus_01.jpg">It's almost always laggy, despite a fast processor<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/gizminus_01.jpg">It gives you a headache to use, like reading tiny text in the dark, or reciting the alphabet backwards when drunk</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5417413/samsung-omnia-ii-review]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5417413]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung omnia 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung omnia ii]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[touchwiz]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[touchwiz 2.0]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Windows Mobile 6.5]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 02 Dec 2009 18:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5417413&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Mirror's Edge Coming to the iPhone In January]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_500x_mephone2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Love it, hate it, or occasionally <a href="http://kotaku.com/5026052/mirrors-edge-motion-sickness">vomit because of it</a>, you have to admit that <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #mirrorsedge" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/mirrorsedge/">Mirror's Edge</a></em> was one of the more interesting games of the last few years. And now it's <a href="http://kotaku.com/5416905/mirrors-edge-running-straight-to-the-iphone">coming to the iPhone</a>.</p>

<p>If you don't have any idea what I'm talking about, here's Mirror's Edge in a nutshell: Parkour, with bullets. Which is an unusually hearty mix! The few early screens show what looks like a 3D sidescroller/platformer, which means that the iPhone version is a sort of hybrid game, somewhere between the original and the fantastic <a href="http://mirrorsedge2d.com/">2D Flash version</a> that EA posted for free. Either way: awesome.<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_500x_mephone.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
Especially since this is one of the few types of games that could actually <em>benefit</em> from the iPhone's tilt-based controls, as opposed to most franchise translations, which see every last ounce of joy sucks from their essence by that cursed accelerometer, and that god-forsken panel of <em>glass</em>. [<a href="http://kotaku.com/5416905/mirrors-edge-running-straight-to-the-iphone">Kotaku</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5417120/mirrors-edge-coming-to-the-iphone-in-january]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5417120]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mirror's edge]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:11:12 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5417120&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Nokia Has No Plans To Give Up On Symbian Or Maemo]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/n97_shot_1_800.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_n97_shot_1_800.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Symbian's problem isn't that it lacks capabilities, it's with the user experience: namely the clunky, awkward, and occasionally <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5308440/nokia-n97-review-nokia-is-doomed">terrible</a> S60 interface. Enter <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5346818/nokia-n900-maemo-is-a-phone-makes-the-n97-look-silly">Maemo</a>, to save the day! And also, apparently, a newer, friendlier Symbian. Nokia wants to get <em>better</em>, please.</p>
<p>The latest of Nokia's reliably rousing <a href="http://www.nokia.com/press/press-releases/showpressrelease?newsid=1358666">Capital Markets Day reports</a> points to two goals, both of which sit decidedly <em>forward</em> from here:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>In 2010, we will drive user experience improvements, and the progress we make will take the Symbian user interface to a new level...[Nokia will] deliver our first <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #maemo6" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/maemo6/">Maemo 6</a>-powered mobile computer, with an iconic user experience, in the second half of 2010.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Forward in terms of time, obviously, but more importantly in terms of progress: Symbian is getting stale and needs this UI update badly, while Maemo, despite a generally positive reception, is still a little raw, with a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5415964/nokia-to-shoot-itself-in-the-foot-and-release-just-one-maemo-device-in-2010">slim device selection</a> for at least another year. You can probably assume that Maemo 6 will be more polished and ready for the mainstream, but for now it's just words on paper.</p>
<p>That said, Nokia's self-help regimen will take time. Nokia expects their mobile device volume market share to stay flat for 2010, partly due to their conspicuous absence from the growing US smartphone scene, but mostly, I'm guessing, because even in their European strongholds, Symbian devices are starting to feel plain <em>old</em>.</p>
<p>So yeah, all eyes on Nokia, because things are just about to get exciting! In a year. [<a href="http://www.nokia.com/press/press-releases/showpressrelease?newsid=1358666">Nokia</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5417062/nokia-has-no-plans-to-give-up-on-symbian-or-maemo]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5417062]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nokia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[maemo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[maemo 6]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[s60]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[symbian]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 02 Dec 2009 10:18:47 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5417062&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[iPhone Fitted With SLR Lens (It Was Bound to Happen)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_phone-o-scope_1-thumb-600x399-39383.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />We've seen plenty of those tiny lens add-on kits for cellphones, but never before have we seen the equal of the Phone-O-Scope: 18-55mm glass attached to the iPhone. And it's no wonder, because the process was anything but simple.</p>

<p>ILM Research Engineer Bhautik Joshi disassembled his iPhone only to stuff in part of his DVD player, the laser pickup, which houses three miniature magnifying lenses. These lenses are what made it possible for the iPhone to accept the light/images beaming through the 18-55mm lens, which was carefully positioned through PVC pipe, duct tape and cursing.</p>
<p>The results?<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_iphoneslr.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
(<em>iPhone left, modded version right</em>)</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The Phone-O-Scope doesn't take especially superb images, and it's a bit clumsy to handle. On the other hand, it's fun to shoot with and produces very analog (almost Holga-like) results.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>We're just glad someone did it, finally, so we didn't need to duct tape our iPhone to our dSLR <em>Flight of the Conchords</em> style. [<a href="http://cow.mooh.org/2009/12/phone-o-scope-attaching-slr-lenses-to.html">captin nod</a> via <a href="http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2009/12/attach_a_slr_lens_to_an_iphone_with.html">MAKE</a> via <a href="http://www.ohgizmo.com/2009/12/02/phone-o-scope-slr-lens-mount-for-the-iphone/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Ohgizmo+%28OhGizmo!%29">OhGizmo!</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5417033/iphone-fitted-with-slr-lens-it-was-bound-to-happen]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5417033]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mods]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phone-o-scope]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:53:01 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5417033&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Patch Your Blackberry Server Software, Lest a PDF Take Over]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>A new exploit allows PDFs attached to emails opened on a BlackBerry to take over Blackberry servers. Luckily, a fix is already out for Enterprise Server and Professional software, available <a href="http://www.blackberry.com/btsc/search.do?cmd=displayKC&docType=kc&externalId=KB19860">here</a>. [<a href="http://www.blackberry.com/btsc/search.do?cmd=displayKC&docType=kc&externalId=KB19860">RIM</a> via <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/12/02/blackberry_pdf_security_patch/">The Register</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5416996/patch-your-blackberry-server-software-lest-a-pdf-take-over]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5416996]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry pdf]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pdf]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 02 Dec 2009 08:59:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5416996&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Strechable, Flexible, Twistable Antennas]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/flexible-antenna_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_flexible-antenna_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Traditional copper antennas are rigid yet delicate. And in the age when almost every gadget we use requires some sort of antenna, they're a lousy solution. Luckily, new tech is on its way.</p>

<p>Researchers at North Carolina State University have developed an alloy antenna that can be bent a la pretzel before resuming its native shape. The feat is accomplished through the micro liquid metal chambers that form as the building blocks of the antenna, allowing the device to so receive RF like metal, but maintain flexibility, like liquid.</p>
<p>Of course, as with any promising technology, the military is slated to get it first. And after hundreds of thousands of our service men and women develop strange, liquid-metal-related tumors, the public will get to buy an ever so safer 2.0 version. [<a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/12/flexible-antennas/">Gadget Lab</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5416975/strechable-flexible-twistable-antennas]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5416975]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[antennas]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flexible antennas]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 02 Dec 2009 08:46:25 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5416975&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Augmented Reality Twitter App Shows You Exactly Where Your Friends Are Tweeting]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_screencap_2009-12-01_at_3.17.49_pm.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Augmented reality Twitter isn't new to the App Store, but their official geolocation service is just a few weeks old. How? <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5381846/androids-best-augmented-reality-app-hits-the-iphone">Hacks</a>! <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #twitter360" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/twitter360/">Twitter 360</a> is the first augmented reality Twitter app to support the official API, and it looks fantastic.</p>
<p>Previously, the only way to grab location data from Twitter was to scrape through user profiles or to rely on some kind of third-party geodata service, with which Twitter users could upload their current locations as individual Tweets. It worked, sort of, but it was janky and awkward. Now that Twitter lets you embed your location in each tweet without taking up any characters, things are different.<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_screencap_2009-12-01_at_3.18.01_pm.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
Most new iPhone Twitter clients support the GPS tagging feature, so there's no shortage of location data to play with, and Twitter 360 is one of the first apps to really take advantage of it. You can basically watch your Twitter friends leave a trail of narcissistic word nuggets all over town <em>in real time</em>, rendered on a map or through your iPhone's camera. It's fascinating, if, you know, you're into loose acquaintances' latitudes and longitudes. (Which is an acceptable thing, in this 2009.)</p>
<p>Twitter 360 is $3 and only available for the iPhone 3GS, since a compass is necessary to properly orient the tweets on screen. And the app itself is executed well enough, though its function are fairly narrow&mdash;if you can stand to wait, I'm sure free multipurpose AR apps like <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/layar">Layar</a> will get support for Twitter geolocation soon enough. [<a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/twitter-360/id330158239?mt=8">iTunes</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5416427/augmented-reality-twitter-app-shows-you-exactly-where-your-friends-are-tweeting]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5416427]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[geolocation]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[twitter 360]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:19:30 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5416427&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Android 2.1 (With HTC Sense) Leaked for HTC Hero]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>If you wanted to get an early taste of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #android21" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #android21" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/android21/">Android 2.1</a> complete with <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #htcsense" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #htcsense" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/htcsense/">HTC Sense</a>, Hero owners can download the leaked ROM now. But you're probably OK waiting, since this new version is still "a disaster," according to our resident Android expert John Herrman. [<a href="http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=592596">XDA Developers</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/01/htc-hero-gets-a-leaked-android-2-1-rom-with-sense/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5416241/android-21-with-htc-sense-leaked-for-htc-hero]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5416241]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android 2.1]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc hero]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc sense]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 01 Dec 2009 11:59:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5416241&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Zii Lives: First Look at the 1080p Android-Powered Trinity Phone]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/zii.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_zii.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Remember the Creative/ZiiLabs StemCell <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5126090/confirmed-zii-stemcell-computing-is-media+savvy-system-on-a-chip">system-on-a-chip</a> from a while back? The one that spawned that <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5324542/creative-zii-egg-plaszma-android+wielding-ipod-touch">Android PMP design</a>? Well, the Zii project is marching on, which means new hardware, <em>including</em> the dual OS Trinity phone, 360º HD webcam and more.</p>
<p>Creative and ZiiLabs are showing off a pile of Zii reference hardware to potential hardware licensors in China today, in hopes that someone will manufacture it. The Zii phone reference design, pictured for the first time above, is the only one we can see right now, and promises full 1080p video playback over HDMI, OpenGL 2.0 accelerated gaming, and support for both Android OS and ZiiLabs' Plaszma software. And that's just the phone&mdash;ZiiLabs also has a 360º full HD webcam, a PCI-E video coprocessor, a pocket synthesizer and, well, <em>lots</em>.</p>
<p>But before we get to the rest of the new stuff, a little timeline for you. Back in January, Creative announced, with of an offshoot company called ZiiLabs, "<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5126090/confirmed-zii-stemcell-computing-is-media+savvy-system-on-a-chip">Zii StemCell Computing</a>." There were not adjectives strong enough, no superlatives super enough, no words <em>wordy</em> enough to describe the wonders of this StemCell computing. Unlimited Flexibility! Incredible Scalability! High Energy Efficiency! ET! CET! ER! A!</p>
<p>But wait, what <em>is</em> this thing? The Zii StemCell processor is basically an extremely flexible system-on-a-chip, which is to say a multi-talented slab of hardware with an ARM Cortex chip at its core, intended to power all manner of multimedia devices, from PMPs to phones to settop boxes to, well, whatever. Creative promised low power consumption, high processing power, and plenty of uses. The platform would be licensed to hardware manufacturers, and eventually, we'd find these Zii-powered gadgets in our possession, under familiar brands. (But not necessarily Creative itself.)</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_504x_zii-egg-hand-shot-01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Then we were shown the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5324542/creative-zii-egg-plaszma-android+wielding-ipod-touch">Zii Egg</a>&mdash;pictured above&mdash;which is an Android-powered PMP with an alternate OS called Plaszma. This was actual <em>hardware</em>&mdash;that's more like it&mdash;and it looked compelling: media playback was strong, and the device itself was hot, and most importantly for Creative, new. But this, like anything else out of ZiiLabs, was reference hardware&mdash;unless someone picked it up for manufacture, it was strictly for developers.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_ziilabs.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br clear="all">
Fast-forward to this month, and the project is finally springing some leaks. A <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5394662/creative-zii-mediabook-could-combine-ebook-and-pmp-features">smartbook</a> shows up out of nowhere. Rumors about <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5400596/ziilabs-zms+08-system+on+a+chip-to-bring-1080p-and-full-flash-acceleration-to-netbooks">netbooks</a>, which could leverage the Zii chip's power for 1080p video playback, real-time encoding, HD video conferencing, Flash acceleration and more, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5400596/ziilabs-zms+08-system+on+a+chip-to-bring-1080p-and-full-flash-acceleration-to-netbooks">emerge</a>. And finally, today, an announcement. ZiiLabs is pitching more reference designs, like the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #ziiegg" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ziiegg/">Zii Egg</a>, to manufacturers:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The line-up of Zii Powered devices on display include a dual OS concept mobile phone which supports the Plaszma OS and Android OS, a desktop touch screen video conferencing device, a web-box, a 360° multi-view camera system, a PCI Express add-on card that instantly empowers notebooks with HD video encoding for high quality video conferencing, a pocket-sized synthesizer that can emulate the sound of some of the world's best pianos, as well as the world's smallest credit card-sized Blu-ray quality media player – based on the ZMS-08 chip.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The headliner here is obviously the Trinity phone, which can count itself among the first wave of 1GHz Android phones, and promises serious media and 3D support. The reference hardware, as you can see, is conservatively designed, though undeniably nice&mdash;and apparently iPhone skinny.<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_trinit2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
But the other Zii Wares are compelling in their own ways. The videoconferencing system can apparently process a distortion-free 360° view in full HD. The PCI Express add-on card will do video offload duties, <em>a la</em> Nvidia's GPGPU systems. And that little "Blu-ray quality" media player, well, I really don't know. All of the Zii hardware is propped up by the Plaszma-centric ZiiLife suite, which includes videoconferencing software with media sharing, educational software, and an app store.</p>
<p>As they are now, these gadgets will probably never see the light of day&mdash;it'll be up to hardware manufacturers to pick up the reference designs, after which they'll undoubtedly put their own spin on each concept. And as far as the associated software goes, it'll most likely remain under wraps until there are actual products to use it with. At any rate, over the next few months we can <em>probably</em> expect to see some of these Zii-powered gadgets show up as actual, <em>buyable</em> products, whatever forms they may take. And honestly, I'm eager to see them. [<a href="http://www.ziilabs.com/">ZiiLabs</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5415760/zii-lives-first-look-at-the-1080p-android+powered-trinity-phone]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5415760]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[creative]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[arm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[plaszma]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[system on a chip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[zii]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[zii egg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ziilabs]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:01:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5415760&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Dolphin Browser Gives Droid the Multitouch It Should've Had From the Start]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/dolf.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />As far as phones go, the Droid is an olympian. A supermodel. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5396168/motorola-droid-review">A <em>movie star</em></a>. But without multitouch, it's a movie star with rickets, and awkward inflection. That is: mildly disappointing! That's where the Dolphin browser comes in.</p>

<p>At first glance the browser is a bit of a mess: its Android Market listing is subliterate, and its interface&mdash;the tabs, specifically&mdash;look kind of assy on the Droid's higher-resolution screen. Beyond the glitches, though, it's a capable browser, with gesture support, RSS integration and yes, multitouch.</p>
<p>Dolphin's multitouch implementation works on a number of handsets aside from the Droid, from the Hero, which supports multitouch out of the box, to Cyanogen-modded G1s and MyTouch 3Gs, which don't. It works much better on faster hardware though: where it's a bit laggy on a stock Hero, it's surprisingly smooth on Motorola's speedier terminator phone. At any rate, it's free, and available now in the Market, so, <em>go</em>. [<a href="http://sites.google.com/a/mgeek.mobi/browser/home">Dolphin</a> via <a href="http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/11/29/dolphin-browser-for-android-adds-multitouch-support-on-droid/">Engadget Mobile</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5415419/dolphin-browser-gives-droid-the-multitouch-it-shouldve-had-from-the-start]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5415419]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[android apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[droid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[droid multitouch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mobile Browsers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Motorola Droid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[multitouch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[webkit]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:44:04 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5415419&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[LG Expo: It's Got a Pico Projector Bolted to the Back, Of Course]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/340x_lgexpo.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Sure, the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #lgexpo" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/lgexpo/">LG Expo</a> is the first 1GHz phone in the US, but what really matters is that it has an optional <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #picoprojector" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/picoprojector/">pico projector</a> you can slap onto the back with an 8-foot projection distance.</p>
<p>The projector adds another 1.8 ounces, and as you can see, a bit of an ass to it. Besides the 1GHz goodness, the slider's running <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windowsmobile65" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windowsmobile65/">Windows Mobile 6.5</a>, has a 3.2-inch touchscreen and a 5MP camera for $200 on contract. Specifically a "minimum $69.99 plan." The projector add-on's $180, though it'll follow the phone's Dec. 7 drop date by a few weeks.</p>

<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5415332,4,'');
</script></p>
<blockquote>
<p>AT&T AND LG MOBILE PHONES ANNOUNCE THE FIRST 1GHZ SMARTPHONE IN THE UNITED STATES, THE LG EXPO</p>
<p>7.2 HSPA-capable Smartphone from AT&T and LG Mobile Phones Packs a Powerful Punch, Features Optional Mobile Projector</p>
<p>DALLAS, November 30, 2009 - AT&T* and LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc., today announced the LG eXpo will be available online beginning December 7. Featuring the first 1 GHz processor in the United States, the LG eXpo allows business professionals to meet their demanding data sharing needs while on the go. Available exclusively for AT&T customers, the handset will be compatible with AT&T's High Speed Packet Access (HSPA) 7.2 Mbps technology, which provides a considerable speed boost to the nation's fastest 3G network.</p>
<p>The LG eXpo is the first device in North America to support an optional integrated pico projector. The LG Mobile Projector snaps onto the back of the device and allows users to share presentations, slideshows and even online videos straight from their mobile phone. Weighing only 1.8 ounces and small enough to fit into the palm of your hand, the LG mobile projector provides users with powerful new technology in a compact design, featuring a projection distance as far as eight feet</p>
<p>"LG eXpo adds to our growing portfolio of smartphones that operate on the latest upgrade to our 3G network and offer customers a great choice," said Michael Woodward, vice president, Mobile Phone Portfolio, AT&T Mobility and Consumer Markets. "As we move to HSPA 7.2 technology, it is crucial to provide our customers innovative and future-proof smartphones."</p>
<p>With the upgrade to HSPA 7.2 technology, AT&T continues its investments to deliver the nation's fastest 3G network. AT&T plans to deploy HSPA 7.2 initially in Charlotte, Chicago, Dallas, Houston, Los Angeles and Miami by the end of the year. The company plans to deploy HSPA 7.2 in 25 of the nation's 30 largest markets by the end of 2010, and to reach about 90 percent of its existing 3G network footprint with HSPA 7.2 by the end of 2011.</p>
<p>LG eXpo also eliminates the need for pin codes and passwords with the exclusive "Smart Sensor" fingerprint recognition from AuthenTec, which delivers a new level of added smart and personal security unlike any other mobile phone in the market. AT&T is the first to offer U.S. subscribers a smartphone that leverages the features and functions of a smart sensor. The Smart Sensor complements the touchscreen user interface of the eXpo by also providing precise cursor control for text editing, 4-way menu navigation, and AuthenTec's unique turbo-scroll feature for rapid browsing of long emails, contact lists or websites.</p>
<p>The LG eXpo is loaded with Windows Mobile® 6.5 Professional to help power users stay more connected with email, calendar and Microsoft® Office Mobile. The phone's projection feature allows users to display Web pages, documents, photos and videos on the go.</p>
<p>"LG eXpo is the perfect balance of mobile innovation and design" said Ehtisham Rabbani, vice president of product strategy and marketing for LG Mobile Phones. "Enabling users to meet their professional and personal computing needs from the palm of their hands, LG eXpo makes on-the-go communication an effortless luxury."</p>
<p>Boasting a 3.2-inch external touchscreen with 16M color, LG eXpo features a sophisticated slider design with a full size QWERTY keypad. For the dynamic multi-tasker, LG eXpo provides users with powerful functionality that supports an RSS Viewer, Podcast and aGPS. In addition to a crystal clear 5.0 megapixel camera with built-in auto flash, LG eXpo can support up to a 16GB removable microSD memory card for premium music and photo storage.</p>
<p>Beginning December 7, LG eXpo will be available to enterprise customers and for purchase online at www.att.com/lgexpo for $199.99 after mail-in rebate. Pay $299.99 and after mail-in rebate receive a $100 AT&T Promotion Card. Two year agreement on a minimum $69.99 plan required. The LG Mobile Projector will be available in the coming weeks for $179.99.</p>
<p>For the complete array of AT&T offerings, visit www.att.com.</p>
<p>For more information and detailed disclaimer information, please review this announcement in the AT&T newsroom at http://www.att.com/newsroom.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5415331/lg-expo-its-got-a-pico-projector-bolted-to-the-back-of-course]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5415331]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[expo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lg expo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pico projector]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Windows Mobile 6.5]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:09:40 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5415331&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[LEAK: The Google Phone "Is a Certainty"]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_androidgoogevoice.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />According to a trusted source who's seen it with their own eyes, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5407245/the-true-google-phone-may-be-coming-soon">Google Phone</a> "is a certainty."</p>

<p>And by "<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #googlephone" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/googlephone/">Google Phone</a>" we don't simply mean another Android handset. We're talking about Google-branded hardware running a version of Android we haven't yet seen.</p>
<p>Over the next few weeks, Google Phones (most probably in early, prototype form) will flood the Mountain View campus. They'll don large LCDs while running a new version of Android&mdash;either Flan or the version of Android beyond it&mdash;which our source spotted running on Google's handset as well as a laptop. (Whatever the software was, it most certainly wasn't <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5410862/chrome-os-and-android-are-destined-to-merge-somehow">Chrome OS</a>, we were assured.)</p>
<p>But maybe the most intriguing bit is what someone said to our source offhandedly, that the current Android, the we all know and love, is not the "real" Android. So what makes for a "real" version of Android?</p>
<p>Our best guess is an Android OS with <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5407660/screw-the-voice-plan-the-rumored-google-phone-may-be-datavoip-only">Google Voice at its heart</a>.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5415169/leak-the-google-phone-is-a-certainty]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5415169]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flan]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google phone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google voice]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[leak]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[leaks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:29:57 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5415169&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Why You Should Ignore Black Friday Cellphone Deals]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_blackfriday_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Forget TVs, laptops and Blu-ray players, this year's go-to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5409460/black-friday-deals-the-only-list-you-need?skyline=true&s=x">Black Friday doorbusters</a> are smartphones. And as tantalizing as the deals might look, do yourself a favor. <em>Pretend you never saw them.</em></p>

<p>It's a reliable rule of thumb for the rest of the year, made invaluable by the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #blackfriday" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/blackfriday/">Black Friday</a> hype: Unless you are planning on buying a smartphone anyway&mdash;a <em>specific</em> smartphone, on a specific carrier&mdash;upfront price deals are a trap. And even though this may seem obvious to a lot of people, some advice is worth repeating, especially with National Irresponsible Impulse Buy Day bearing down on us like some kind of perfectly prophesied minipocalypse. A friendly reminder, about math and the human psyche, from your Gizmodo!</p>
<p>Take the <a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2356312,00.asp">$80 Motorola Cliq</a> at Radio Shack. It's advertised as a huge cut; implicit in the deal is that you're getting 60% off of your new Android phone, which feels <em>great</em>. But what you're really getting is a 6% discount off your total cumulative cost of owning the phone, which, if you get a data plan, is originally <em>at least</em> $1880.</p>
<p>Granted, $120 is still $120, and if you were planning on entering a multi-thousand-dollar two-year contract with T-Mobile <em>anyway</em>, the deal is worth a look. Just don't decide to start a new contract because of one of these deals. You're going to be living with this phone, this carrier, and this contract for two whole years&mdash;hen you're standing in line at Best Buy, with a misleadingly-priced cellphone in hand and four months left on your current contract, make sure that the five bucks you're going to be saving each month is really worth it to you.</p>
<p>Because chances are, it's not. [Deal via <a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2356312,00.asp">PC Mag</a> (not PCW, as previously written)]</p>
<p><em>While you're busy not buying a new smartphone, make sure to check out Sean's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5411057/black-friday-anti+deals-what-not-to-buy">definitive master list</a> of other crappy deals to avoid.</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5412905/why-you-should-ignore-black-friday-cellphone-deals]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5412905]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[black friday]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[advice]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[black friday cellphone deals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[deals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dealzmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[math]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:53:38 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5412905&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Waze Turn-By-Turn App Lets You Play Pac-Man With Your Car]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/wazebigger.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Free, crowd-sourced turn-by-turn app Waze might not navigate quite as well as the Navigons and Telenavs of the world, but it's got one killer feature that they don't: cherries, to chomp <em>with your car.</em></p>

<p>The cherries (and various other icons) are part of Waze's new "Road Goodies" program, which essentially turns the navigation service&mdash;which has, by most counts, gotten a lot better over the past few months&mdash;into a simple point-gathering game. The <em>point</em> of these points? Well, the treasures are placed wherever there are gaps in Waze's map data:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>For instance, if there's an area where we detect a disconnect in two streets on the map, we'll place a goodie over there in what we believe is the point of intersection. Then, when someone heads over to munch the 'goodie', it will solve the disconnect, telling the waze system that these two streets do indeed intersect.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The points don't get you anything outside of Waze, ahem, <em>street cred</em>, so this is basically just a big ploy by the company to extract free labor from their user base. Which is fine! Though I feel Waze should probably scatter a few di, for when people start driving into deadly ravines in the name of fake treasure.</p>
<p>The new version of Waze is live in the App Store and Android App Market right now. [<a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/id323229106?mt=8">iTunes</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5412800/waze-turn+by+turn-app-lets-you-play-pac+man-with-your-car]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5412800]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[navigation]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pac-man]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pacman]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[turn-by-turn apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waze]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:02:31 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5412800&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Don't Worry Palm, Everything's Going To Be OK]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/fartappz.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />If two new paid <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #fartapps" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/fartapps/">fart apps</a> in <em>one day</em> isn't a sign of a maturing <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #appcatalog" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/appcatalog/">App Catalog</a>, I don't know what is. Rest easy, Rubinstein. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5392799/how-palm-lost-like-apple-in-the-80s">For once</a>. [<a href="http://twitter.com/palm/status/6024788970">Palm</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5412688/dont-worry-palm-everythings-going-to-be-ok]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5412688]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[image cache]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[app catalog]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[app store]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fart apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm pixi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm pre]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Palm Pre Apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[webos]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[webos apps]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:14:18 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5412688&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Else Intuition OS Looks Pretty Sweet on First Phone Expected Q2 Next Year]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/elsefirst-1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_elsefirst-1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>This video is the best-look yet at the slick OpenGL-accelerated OS from Else (formerly Emblaze) and Access (who developed a next-gen <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #palmos" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/palmos/">Palm OS</a> before Palm ditched it for their own). The big news: The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #firstelse" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/firstelse/">First Else</a> phone arrives next-year.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" width="500" height="303" id="viddler"><param name="movie" value="http://www.viddler.com/simple_on_site/6dba3970">
<param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<param name="flashvars" value="fake=1">
<embed src="http://www.viddler.com/simple_on_site/6dba3970" width="500" height="303" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" flashvars="fake=1" name="viddler"></embed></object></p>
<p>Confusingly, the name of Else's first phone is actually "First Else". As we <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5388566/else-intuition-the-surprisingly-not+sad-fate-of-palm-os">mentioned in October</a>, the phone has a 3.5-inch (480 x 854-pixel) touchscreen display, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, GPS, and 5-megapixel camera (capable of 480p video at 30fps). It's also very likely to have a TI OMAP 3430 processor, a 1450mAh battery, up to 32GB internal memory, and a 3.5mm headphone jack. Apparently, it may only support HSDPA 3G and EDGE (no Verizon).</p>
<p>As for the Linux-based OS, it uses a one-thumb wheel that avoids digging through menus, has GPS aware reminders, can record voice calls/messages and store them along with when the call was made, and straight-up looks sci-fi.</p>
<p>It seems that Linux-based mobile operating systems like Android and webOS will soon have a new competitor. [<a href="http://www.firstelse.com/#/Touch/TouchrEvolution">First Else</a> via <a href="http://www.pocket-lint.com/news/29776/first-else-photo-gallery-phone">Pocket-Lint</a> and <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/emblaze-first-%20else-struts-new-ui-in-video-demo-2564402/">SlashGear</a> | Video via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/24/emblazes-first-else-unveiled-in-london-promises-to-be-a-game-c/">Engadget</a>]</p>
<blockquote>
<p>ELSE INTUITION™ is a complete mobile platform developed by ACCESS and Emblaze Mobile. Thanks to the combination of ACCESS Linux Platform v3.0 and an advanced user interface engine, jointly developed by Emblaze Mobile and ACCESS, ELSE INTUITION™ delivers a highly compelling and differentiated user experience, coupled with state-of-the-art hardware, accelerated 2D/3D graphics and elegant transition effects. ELSE INTUITION™ takes advantage of ACCESS Linux Platform v3.0 to provide advanced flexibility and configurability, enabling users to run multiple applications simultaneously, switching between them with ease. All data and content, including contacts, appointments, videos and photos can be rendered anywhere, not just within a single dedicated application, giving users faster, easier and more consistent access to their information</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5412542/else-intuition-os-looks-pretty-sweet-on-first-phone-expected-q2-next-year]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5412542]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA['Linux]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[access]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[access emblaze else intuition]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[else]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Else First]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[else first intuition OS]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[emblaze]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[first else]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intuition]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[limo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm os]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palmos]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[platform]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[v3.0]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 25 Nov 2009 07:55:04 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5412542&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Best Smartphones on Every Carrier]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/smartphoooones.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_smartphoooones.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>For the first time ever, every major carrier in the US actually has smartphones worth buying, meaning you don't have to break up to get a good phone. Here's the best phones on each one, along with the best deals.</p>

<p>If you hate the gallery format, click <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5411351/the-best-smartphones-on-every-carrier/">here</a>.</p>
<p><em>All pricing shown is with a new 2-year contract, and some deals may be temporary.</em></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/topshot2.jpg" width="804" height="565"></p>
<h1>AT&T</h1>
<p><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #iphone3gs" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphone3gs/">iPhone 3GS</a></strong><br>
The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5293388/iphone-3gs-review">iPhone 3GS</a> is the best overall smartphone you can buy. It's really that simple. Best user interface, best internet, best apps, best media support&mdash;the list goes on. Okay, not the best network, but nothing's perfect. <a href="http://www.wireless.att.com/cell-phone-service/packages/packages-details.jsp?q_package=sku3790236&amp;_requestid=120494">$199</a></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/bbold9700__088.jpg" width="804" height="537"><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #blackberrybold9700" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/blackberrybold9700/">BlackBerry Bold 9700</a></strong><br>
I miss the original BlackBerry Bold's king-sized keyboard, but <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5397391/blackberry-bold-9700-impressions-small-and-chirpy-like-a-black-hummingbird">the Bold 9700</a> squeezes the best of the BlackBerry for CEOs into an impressively tight form factor&mdash;faux leather back included&mdash;making it very possibly the best BlackBerry you can buy. <a href="http://walmart.letstalk.com/product/product.htm?prId=35946">$10</a></p>
<p><strong>Bonus: <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #nokiae71x" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/nokiae71x/">Nokia e71x</a></strong><br>
It's free, and an actually good smartphone&mdash;my favorite Nokia phone on the planet. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Nokia-E71x-Phone-Black-AT/dp/B0027A7XWE/ref=amb_link_84232451_4?pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_s=auto-sparkle&pf_rd_r=03BG5E6P2DMXF74VG9M6&pf_rd_t=301&pf_rd_p=475996731&pf_rd_i=e71x">Free</a></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/drooooooid__002.jpg" width="804" height="536"></p>
<h1>Verizon</h1>
<p><strong>Droid</strong><br>
It's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5396168/motorola-droid-review">a terminator</a>. A huge, disgustingly high-res screen, Batman-worthy industrial design, and the full power <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5395801/android-20-review-almost-human">of Android 2.0</a> make it the best phone on Verizon&mdash;and the fact that it's running on arguably the best network in the US make it the second best smartphone you can buy, period. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Motorola-Droid-A855-Verizon-Wireless/dp/B002UUTCKC/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=wireless&qid=1259070645&sr=1-2">$150</a></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/bbtour.jpg" width="504" height="482"><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #blackberrytour" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/blackberrytour/">BlackBerry Tour</a></strong><br>
Sure, it's notorious for trackball problems and it's missing Wi-Fi, but this is the BlackBerry of choice for email warriors if they're not on AT&T or T-Mobile&mdash;and it sure as hell beats anything running Windows Mobile. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/BlackBerry-Tour-Phone-Verizon-Wireless/dp/B002GJTS3I/ref=sr_1_13?ie=UTF8&s=wireless&qid=1259070717&sr=8-13">$50</a></p>
<p><strong>Bonus: <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #droideris" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/droideris/">Droid Eris</a></strong><br>
If you're desperate to save $100 over the Droid, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5401220/droid-eris-review">Droid Eris</a> will run Android 2.0 soon enough, and is smoother, smaller, and friendlier, if a little blander. <a href="http://www.verizonwireless.com/b2c/store/controller?item=phoneFirst&action=viewPhoneDetail&selectedPhoneId=5070">$100</a></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/bodysmall.jpg" width="504" height="399"></p>
<h1>Sprint</h1>
<p><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #palmpre" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/palmpre/">Palm Pre</a></strong><br>
<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5277499/palm-pre-review">The Pre</a> offers one of the best user experiences of any smartphone with Palm's webOS, and it's probably the best phone on Sprint, hardware build issues and comparatively dinky App Catalog aside. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Palm-Pre-100-Phone-Sprint/dp/B002JIO4JY/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&s=wireless&qid=1259070251&sr=8-4">$80</a></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/DSC_1100.jpg" width="1024" height="683"><strong>HTC Hero</strong><br>
The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5361245/sprint-hero-review-faster-stronger-uglier">best Android phone</a> not running Android 2.0, HTC's Sense UI makes the sometimes confusing Android interface more digestible and has a few nifty tricks of its own, like integrated social networking. <a href="http://wireless.bestbuy.com/specialoffer.aspx?cid=34308_a5abbe52b26b4c05afe33717acc0697f">$100</a></p>
<p><strong>Bonus</strong>: There is none. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5406001/palm-pixi-review">The Pixi's</a> close (<a href="http://wsf0-walmart.letstalk.com/product/product.htm?prId=35990">$25</a>), but the fact that you can get the Pre for nearly as cheap undercuts a lot of the value, as much as we like the design and form factor.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/thescreen.jpg" width="800" height="533"></p>
<h1>T-Mobile</h1>
<p><strong>Motorola Cliq</strong><br>
<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5381995/motorola-cliq-review">Motorola's other Android phone</a> is gussied up with Blur, a custom interface that's bright and friendly, with widgets for keeping track of everything happening on your social network. It's our favorite Android phone on T-Mobile. <a href="http://wsf0-walmart.letstalk.com/product/product.htm?prId=35848">$100</a></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/IMG_4739.jpg" width="804" height="536"><strong>Unlocked iPhone</strong><br>
No, I'm not kidding. A <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5302123/jailbreak-and-unlock-iphone-30/gallery/">jailbroken and unlocked</a> iPhone, even without 3G powers, is the second best smartphone you can use on T-Mobile.</p>
<p><strong>Bonus: BlackBerry <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #bold9700" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/bold9700/">Bold 9700</a></strong><br>
The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5397391/blackberry-bold-9700-impressions-small-and-chirpy-like-a-black-hummingbird">BlackBerry Bold 9700 is</a> the first BlackBerry with 3G on T-Mobile, which is reason enough, really, but it's good the reasons listed above, too. <a href="http://wsf0-walmart.letstalk.com/product/product.htm?prId=35982">$130</a></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5411351/the-best-smartphones-on-every-carrier/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5411351]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry bold 9700]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry tour]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bold]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bold 9700]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cliq]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[droid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[droid eris]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[e71x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gift guide]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gift Guide 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone 3gs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nokia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nokia e71x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm pixi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm pre]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pixi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pre]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sprint]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tour]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5411351&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Swype vs QWERTY: FIGHT!!!!!]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/pTooBnKAdSw&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/pTooBnKAdSw&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object>QWERTY is pretty much the king of smartphone text input. But there's a new challenger on the horizon. It's called Swype, it works with one-hand input and, yeah, it is pretty fast.</p>

<p>Yes, the first thing you may notice is that Swype technically uses a QWERTY layout. But instead of pushing each key individually, you drag your finger from letter to letter.</p>
<p>It's tough to tell if the speed gains are legitimate, given this video has been created by the Swype camp. I will say, however, given that this demo is one hand vs. two, the technology certainly holds its own. What do you think? Would you be willing to part with traditional QWERTY to spell words through nonsensical doodles?</p>
<p>Swype will debut in Verizon's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5409079/samsung-omnia-ii-hits-verizon-december-2-for-200">Samsung Omnia II</a> arriving early next month before making its way to an unnamed Android phone next year. [<a href="http://swypeinc.com/">Swype</a> via <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/23/swype-iphone-leaked-video-android/">TechCrunch</a> via <a href="http://www.ohgizmo.com/2009/11/24/verizons-samsung-omnia-ii-to-be-first-to-sport-swype-text-input/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Ohgizmo+%28OhGizmo!%29">OhGizmo!</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5411779/swype-vs-qwerty-fight]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5411779]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[omnia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[qwerty]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung omnia ii]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[swype]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Windows Mobile 6.5]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:53:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5411779&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[This Is How Multitasking Should Work On the iPhone]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/multitask.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />In 2009, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #iphonemultitasking" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphonemultitasking/">iPhone multitasking</a> is a bit like apps were in the early jailbreak days. That is to say painfully, <em>clearly</em> possible, but simply not allowed. These jailbreak apps show how it could&mdash;and should&mdash;be done.</p>

<p>What you're seeing here is really the combination of two apps, standby jailbreak justifier and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5394321/jailbreak-backgrounder">essential iPhone app</a> Backgrounder, which lets your designate any app to run in the background, and new task switcher interface called Multifl0w. (There are other, more basic task switchers already, the most widespread being Kirikae) The new combo feels like magic: It's a little bit Android, a lotta bit Pre, and more importantly, an obvious improvement, at least on the speedier 3GS.<br>
<object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/YrGLGoB88So&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/YrGLGoB88So&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/yrglgob88so.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display: none;"/><br>
Granted, anyone who's used background knows that for the sake of your battery, you have to be careful how many apps you open, and how many you leave running. Honestly though? Every other smartphone manufacturer trusts their users to <em>mind their own damn processes</em>, which seems to work out pretty well. So, uh, when will we get this by default? OS 4.0? 5.0? Shut up, blogger?</p>
<p>You can give it a try now in jailbreak app manager Rock, and Cydia's on its way. Sadly, it's only free on a trial basis, after which it'll cost your five dollars. Backgrounder and Kirikae, though? They're still free, in all sense of the word. [<a href="http://multifl0w.com">MultiFl0w</a>-<em>-Thanks, William!</em>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5411304/this-is-how-multitasking-should-work-on-the-iphone]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5411304]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[btw]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone multitasking]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jailbreak]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[multifl0w]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[multiflow]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:24:15 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5411304&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[iPhone and Android Are Taking Over the (Mobile) Internet]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/smartphoneshareusoct.png" class="left image340" width="340" />So, what does it take to snatch a combined 75% of US mobile internet traffic? Two operating systems, a handful of phones, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5271098/every-mobile-browser-should-give-up-and-just-go-webkit">and one great browser core</a>.<br clear="all"></p>

<p>That the iPhone is a massive source of online traffic isn't a surprise&mdash;that's been apparent since the week it launched. What's interesting here is Android's rise, which is dramatically quickening, already accounting for a <em>fifth</em> of mobile traffic in the US, when the real marketing push for the OS, starting with the MyTouch ads and the massive Droid launch, is only recently starting in earnest. What is a surprise, or at the very least a Sad Thing, is how poorly Palm is faring. Their tiny sliver of market share might seem understandable since they really only had one new phone for the duration of the survey, but this phone was supposed to be their savior; in the year since it was introduced, their mobile traffic actually <em>fell</em>.<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/smartphonesharewwoct.png" class="left image340" width="340" />Google and Apple's stark gain in the stats, collected by mobile advertising firm <a href="http://metrics.admob.com/2009/11/october-2009-mobile-metrics-report/">AdMob</a>, is a little less spectacular worldwide, mainly because Symbian's established, but waning, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5404274/2009-the-year-apple-and-rim-ate-everyone-elses-lunch">40% smartphone market share</a> helps it snatch about 25% of mobile web traffic. Still though, two things are clear: Android and the iPhone are who mobile web developers are going to have to cater to, and WebKit, which Symbian uses in its browser too, is basically <em>it.</em><br clear="all"></p>
<p>Anyway, how about a bonus chart! Ever wondered how common the different Android handsets are, which is most popular, and which don't register? Well hello, extra pie: <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/android-distribution-nov-18.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><br>
<br clear="all">
The G1 is the predictable star here, but the Droid is <em>exploding</em>. [<a href="http://metrics.admob.com/2009/11/october-2009-mobile-metrics-report/">AdMob</a> via <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/23/apple-and-android-now-make-up-75-percent-of-u-s-mobile-web-traffic/">Techcrunch</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5411253/iphone-and-android-are-taking-over-the-mobile-internet]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5411253]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[charts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mobile browsing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[symbian]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:31:30 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5411253&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Google Maps Navigation Hits the G1, MyTouch, All Other 1.6 Handsets]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/google-maps-navigation.png" class="left image340" width="340" /><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #googlemapsnavigation" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/googlemapsnavigation/">Google Maps Navigation</a>, even if it's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5393935/google-navigator-for-android-review-good-for-free-but-far-from-perfect">not perfect</a>, was one of the juiciest features of <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/android">Android 2.0</a>. Today, Google's finally set it free: It's <a href="http://googlemobile.blogspot.com/2009/11/happy-thanksgiving-travels-google-maps.html">now available</a> for any phone with Android 1.6 Donut, including the G1 and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #mytouch3g" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/mytouch3g/">MyTouch 3G</a>.</p>

<p>The download is live in the App Market&mdash;just grab the newest version of Maps, and Nav is included&mdash;and Google's free turn-by-turn navigation software is <em>mostly</em> identical to the version found on the Droid. Mostly:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Some features of Android 2.0 are not available on Android 1.6, for example, the ability to use the "navigate to" voice command as shown in our demo video. However, you can still create a shortcut that will allow you to launch Navigation and start getting directions to a specific place from your current location with just a single touch from your home screen. For example, you can create a "Home" shortcut to quickly navigate home, no matter where you are. Just use the "Add" menu item from the home screen, then choose "Shortcuts", then "Directions." Please visit our forum to give us feedback, or our Help Center to get help using <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #googlemaps" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/googlemaps/">Google Maps</a> Navigation.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Still though, <em>free turn-by-turn for all,</em> unless you have a Hero or one of Samsung's ditties, for which you are permitted to make one (1) extremely sad face. Let us know how it works in the comments. [<a href="http://googlemobile.blogspot.com/2009/11/happy-thanksgiving-travels-google-maps.html">Google</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5411138/google-maps-navigation-hits-the-g1-mytouch-all-other-16-handsets]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5411138]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[donut]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google maps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google maps navigation]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google maps navigation android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mytouch 3g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile g1]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[turn-by-turn]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:34:31 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5411138&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[There Can Be Only One: Part Deux]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_androidrev.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />App developers have it hard enough on the iPhone; on Android, they've got to keep prices just as low, and sell to a much smaller audience. So how are some of them coping? By packing up and leaving, like Gameloft.</p>

<p>Finance director for the company, Alexandre de Rochefort, says that even a company that's done extremely well on the iPhone can have trouble breaking even on Google phones:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>We have significantly cut our investment in Android platform, just like ... many others ... [The Android Market] is not as neatly done as on the iPhone. Google has not been very good to entice customers to actually buy products. On Android nobody is making significant revenue.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>That's the essence of <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5378390/the-app-store-effect-are-iphone-apps-headed-for-oblivion">the App Effect</a>: High volume, customer pressure and nudging from Apple drive iPhone app prices down break-even levels, which gives app developers two options. They can either charge higher prices for equivalent apps on Android, for which they will be <em>crucified</em> by customers, or they can match their prices, and hope that enough of Android's comparatively small, fragmented user base just happens to stumble across said app in the barely navigable App Market. An attractive business proposition, I say!</p>
<p>So what needs to happen? Either Android adoption grows (which it's doing), the App Market gets much easier to navigate (a desktop app, maybe?), or you know, both. <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSTRE5AJ1EU20091120">Reuters</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5409546/there-can-be-only-one-part-deux]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5409546]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blockquote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gameloft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the app effect]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5409546&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New Palm Prices: Pixi at $25 and Pre at $80]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_palm-pixi-review.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Palm's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5406001/palm-pixi-review">new Pixi</a> just got $5 cheaper, less than 2 weeks after its launch, selling for $25 at Wal-mart and now Amazon. The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #palmpre" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/palmpre/">Palm Pre</a> is also $80.</p>
<p>I call this a deal on a phone with a terrific UI on a terrific network, but I'd pay double these rates if the Palm had a more sizable app library. But if your'e set on palm, remember what we said: For $80, even if 3x as much, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5406001/palm-pixi-review">the Pre is a much nicer piece of hardware</a>. All Things D's John Paczkowski says it best: "If Things Get Really Bad, Palm's Pixi Will Make a Great Happy Meal Prize" [<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Palm-Pixi-P120-Phone-Sprint/dp/B002VPE1CK/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=wireless&qid=1258612507&sr=1-2">Amazon</a> via <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091119/if-things-get-really-bad-palms-pixi-will-make-a-great-happy-meal-prize/">All Things D</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5408311/new-palm-prices-pixi-at-25-and-pre-at-80]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5408311]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[dealzmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cheap]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[deals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm pixi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm pixi price]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm pre]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pixi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pre]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wal-mart]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:48:10 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5408311&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 to Cost $880? What The?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/img_1942.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_img_1942.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Yesterday we lamented that the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5407805/sony-ericsson-xperia-x10-hands-on-why-arent-my-pants-on-fire">Android-powered X10</a> lacks a certain <em>je ne sais quoi</em>, despite its beautiful 4-inch display, Nexus UI, and 1GHz Snapdragon processor. Now more bad news: The <em>WSJ</em> reports it'll cost about 6000 Swedish kronor ($880) off-contract.</p>
<p>No wonder they "desire to have a carrier relationship" to subsidize the price. Sony's long had a tough time cracking the U.S market on its own, and the X10 deserves better.</p>
<p>Bonus news: Remember how <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #sonyericsson" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/sonyericsson/">Sony Ericsson</a>'s page said it would <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5405817/sony-xperia-x10-landing-sometime-in-february">arrive this February</a>? Well, it's now gone back to "to be announced". Don't be too concerned if you've got your eye on one...it's still slated to arrive by mid-next year. [<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20091118-708436.html">Wall Street Journal</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5408234/sony-ericsson-xperia-x10-to-cost-880-what-the]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5408234]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Xperia X10]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nexus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony ericsson]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[x10]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xperia]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:13:54 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5408234&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 Hands On: Why Aren't My Pants on Fire?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/img_1942.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_img_1942.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>I've been wondering why there hasn't been drooling, crazy-eyed hype for <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5395712/sony-ericsson-xperia-x10-announced-sonys-first-android-device">Sony Ericsson's Xperia X10</a>, which sounds like a wet dream on paper: Android, 1GHz Snapdragon processor, awesome 8MP camera, massive 800x480 display and a very pretty interface. I know now.</p>
<p>Well, rather, I know that it's definitely something about the phone itself. It's missing that spark, the emotional drippings of OMG, that say, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5391825/motorola-droid-first-hands-on-its-a-terminator">the Droid has</a>. The X10 is perfectly <em>fine</em>. It's just that everything outwardly belies the specialness of what's going on inside. The all plastic-build feels just slightly better than cheap, the shape is kind of awkward unless you have gorilla hands, the design&mdash;it all just feels, well, incredibly ordinary.</p>
<p>What stood out in terms of hardware was the screen (at 4 inches, with a resolution of 854x480 it's big), and the camera, which borders on amazing for a phone. The extra betaness of the software meant we couldn't really get a grasp on how deadly the 1GHz Snapdragon processor is, since while things were quite speedy, the phones also froze a lot, apps crashed or wouldn't start, etc.</p>
<p><object width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7691669&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7691669&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/7691669.jpg"></a><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #sonyericsson" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/sonyericsson/">Sony Ericsson</a>'s approach to customizing Android with its own Nexus interface is mercifully respectful of your boundaries. That is, if you don't want to use their TimeScape or MediaScape UI for managing for your contacts and media (though you probably want to in the latter case), you don't have to&mdash;the default Android contacts app, and everything else, is still there. The only thing you can't escape is all the blue, which is skinned on pretty much everything, from messaging to contacts. If you take Windows Media Center and imagine it ported to a phone, that's pretty much the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #xperiax10" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/xperiax10/">Xperia X10</a>. But with more "infinite buttons."</p>
<p>MediaScape actually feels like Media Center, the way it arranges and presents your photos, music and videos. The concept behind TimeScape should be pretty familiar at this point. Everything from a contact, like Facebook, emails, Twitter, photos, text messages, calls, whatever are integrated into a single interface, so you can check their status updates or get a hold of them however you want from one screen. That infinite button is what coagulates all of the services into a cohesive contact, and shows you everything you have on your phone about that person.</p>
<p>For the most part, I think the Nexus interface works (even as crashy as it was today on these pre-production phones). It's easy enough to navigate, it stands out against the other custom Android interfaces with lots of bright colors and transparencies and it's not bad too look at. More than that, you only use it as much as you want. (Some people might want a more complete Android UI overhaul, and that Nexus doesn't quite deliver.) I don't see how Sony Ericsson is going to get developers to put out apps just for Nexus, though I'm not sure how much that matters. It's an example of Android's potential in the hands of phonemakers who actually know how to design interfaces.</p>
<p>Sony Ericsson's always had trouble getting their smartphones to crack the US, since they haven't had carriers footing the bill for phones to make them actually affordable. It seems like they're trying to make that change with the X10, saying it's "our desire to have a carrier relationship for this product." So you might actually get to use one. It still doesn't set my pants on fire like the Droid did, at least not yet, so I'm not sure how much you actually <em>want</em> to. But maybe it just needs more time.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5407704,12,'');
</script></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5407805/sony-ericsson-xperia-x10-hands-on-why-arent-my-pants-on-fire]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5407805]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Xperia X10]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nexus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony ericsson]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[x10]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xperia]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:40:27 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5407805&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sony Ericsson's Custom Android Interface Is Called Nexus]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/timescape.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_timescape.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #sonyericsson" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/sonyericsson/">Sony Ericsson</a>'s <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5395865/watch-the-xperia-x10s-rachael-interface-in-action">custom interface for Android</a> on <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5395712/sony-ericsson-xperia-x10-announced-sonys-first-android-device">the X10</a>&mdash;and other OSes, like Symbian and Windows Mobile in time-is going to be called Nexus. Like other custom UIs du jour, it'll integrate a bunch of services, like for social networking.</p>
<p>Example: Sony Ericsson Timescape, the "signature" Nexus app, sounds a lot like HTC's Sense in that it pulls in a bunch of services like Facebook and Twitter for your contacts, but it's more straightforwardly organized around timelines, which you can break down by service, events or whatever. There's also an <em>infinite button</em>. For <em>infinite</em> discoveries.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/mediascape.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_mediascape.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>MediaScape looks uncannily like Windows Media Center, if you stuck it on a phone. It's actually nice. The camera software is swanky, with facial recognition and tagging like a real Sony camera.</p>
<p>Apparently, it's not going to be restricted to just smartphones, but could reach some of their more "mainstream" phones. How they're going to get developers to develop apps for Nexus though, is another question entirely.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5407638/sony-ericssons-custom-android-interface-is-called-nexus]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5407638]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[sony ericsson]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nexus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[symbian]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:03:39 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5407638&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The True Google Phone May Be Coming Soon]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/google-phone-2.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />TechCrunch is hearing some veeeeeery interesting talk about a true <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #googlephone" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/googlephone/">Google Phone</a>: Not just an Android device, but a phone designed top-to-bottom by Google to fulfill their dream of exactly what Android can be. It's a resilient rumor.</p>
<p>We've heard <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5024696/actual-google-phone-rumors-revived-designed-by-ammunition-group">rumors like this</a> before, but this time there are a few distinct elements that seem credible, maybe even enough to make us rethink <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5394191/just-to-clarify-google-will-not-release-its-own-hardware">our previous position</a>. We're basing this all on Michael Arrington's sources&mdash;his article is a bit vague, but points to an outsider-made but Google-dictated device, sort of like how Microsoft's first Zune was actually made by Toshiba&mdash;and in the case of the Google Phone, there are a couple options for the possible manufacturer. The obvious choice is HTC, who's been the major hardware manufacturer of Android devices, but TechCrunch hears that the source of the hardware will be Korean, not Taiwanese, which likely points to either Samsung or LG.</p>
<p>Samsung has a long-standing relationship with Apple, supplying tons of parts for the iPhone, so maybe LG would step up to the plate and develop this phantom device. LG's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5358727/gw620-lgs-first-android-phone-gets-official">no stranger</a> to Android, but has been a minor player up to this point&mdash;maybe they've been working on this mysterious Google Phone in the meantime, which is supposedly aiming for an early 2010 release.</p>
<p>Right now, we don't know much of anything, so we're reaching out to you guys&mdash;if you've heard anything about a possible Google Phone, please shoot us an email. [<a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/17/thegoogle-phone/">TechCrunch</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5407245/the-true-google-phone-may-be-coming-soon]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5407245]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google phone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:13:32 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5407245&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Microsoft's Ray Ozzie: "Apps Don’t Make Your Phone Special"]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_ozzie.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Microsoft's chief software architect <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #rayozzie" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/rayozzie/">Ray Ozzie</a> was discussing smartphones at Microsoft's Professional Developers Conference earlier. Apparently, we just don't <i>get</i> what is and what isn't important in the smartphone battle, because according to him, apps don't really matter.</p>
<p>We're focusing too much on the number or type of apps available on the different platforms, according to Ozzie:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>All the apps that count will be ported to every one of them. It's a completely different situation from the PC market, where software's built to run on a Windows or a Mac. Mobile apps require very little development, so it's much easier to bring them onto every platform.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Ozzie, Ozzie, Ozzie. You're just jealous that the Windows Mobile Market doesn't have enough fart apps, aren't you? Or did you <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5386729/microsoft-mocks-apples-app-store">watch that App Lab video</a> one too many times? [<a href="http://venturebeat.com/2009/11/17/microsofts-ray-ozzie-apps-dont-make-your-phone-special/">Venture Beat</a> via <a href="http://twitter.com/bxchen/status/5810233427">Brian X. Chen</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5407068/microsofts-ray-ozzie-apps-dont-make-your-phone-special]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5407068]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blockquote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ray ozzie]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:42:17 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5407068&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Samsung Behold II Non-Review: Oh God, the Ugly]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/img_1837.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_img_1837.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Samsung's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #beholdii" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/beholdii/">Behold II</a> is the most impressively ugly Android phone in existence. The custom interface is so bad, so gaudy and so confusing it turned my brains into ooze.</p>

<p><object width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7670834&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7670834&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/7670834.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_7670834.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display: none;"/></a>TouchWiz is the first custom Android interface that's worse than the standard one, and shows what kind of horrible things emerge when Samsung's interface designers are left unchecked. Here's how I think the design process went, roughly: The designers dropped a bunch of acid, stared at old Atari games while binge eating Taco Bell, then proceeded to shit all over the phone for hours and hours.</p>
<p>If it's not inherently ugly, like text input screens with awful '80s neon orange and blue, it's gratuitous and redundant, like the 3D app cube. Or an entirely separate menu of Samsung icons for apps. And some things, like moving the slide-out menu to the left instead of its traditional place on the bottom, actually work against the way you use the phone&mdash;the menu gets in the way now, since I'd often bring it out by accident while changing between desktops. It's just... <em>terrible</em>. Worse, Home Switcher, an app that reverts phones back to the stock Android home screen, can't erase Samsung's disgusting mojo. The Behold II would be 10x better with a vanilla build of Android 1.6.</p>
<p>Even the phone hardware is a mess. The front of the phone is an orgy of buttons: seven, to be precise, not including a d-pad, with a dedicated button for the app cube. The lock key isn't just on the side but it's kind of hidden, flush against the bezel. The USB port is weirdly shoved on top. And, uh, what the hell is up with the back plate?</p>
<p>Two things are good about the Behold II&mdash;Samsung's custom camera setup comes straight out of their point-and-shoot cameras, and is packed with features, like extensive manual controls and burst shooting, and it's very fast, unlike the rest of the phone. The other is the AMOLED display which is nice, though marred by the same kind of bluish tint as Samsung's other AMOLED Android phone, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5389187/samsung-moment-review-the-ed+209-of-android-phones">the Moment</a>.</p>
<p>Take a good long look at the Behold II though: It's a warning to other developers what <em>not</em> to do, and a scary look at one dark possible future for Android, in its infinite permutations. Not just deep fragmentation of the platform, but customized crimes against humanity, perpetrated in the name of Android. It makes me want to cry, except that my brain's too mushy to make my eyes work.<br>
<script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5406809,8,'');
</script></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5406912/samsung-behold-ii-non+review-oh-god-the-ugly]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5406912]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nonreview]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[behold]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[behold ii]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Samsung Behold II]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[worstmodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5406912&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Palm Pixi Review]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/img_1810.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_img_1810.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Why prance around it? The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5355112/palm-pixi-hands-on-the-smaller-pre-with-a-better-keyboard-and-no-wi+fi">Palm Pixi's very existence</a> is a cruel joke.</p>
<p>The $100 Pixi made sense once upon a time, when the Pre was $200 and Palm needed a phone for the masses&mdash;like <a href="http://gizmodo.com/309196/palm-centro-unboxed-and-reviewed-verdict-yep-definitely-gonna-sell-loads-of-em">the Centro</a>, oncer upon a time&mdash;to establish the webOS as a real platform. A leaner, cheaper version of the Pre was a good idea. Now, you can get the real thing&mdash;faster, stronger, screenier&mdash;for <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Palm-Pre-100-Phone-Sprint/dp/B002JIO4JY/ref=sr_1_8?ie=UTF8&s=wireless&qid=1258399515&sr=8-8">under a hundred bucks</a>. The Pixi's existential crisis is not insignificant.</p>
<h1>What's Neutered vs. the Pre</h1>
<p>&bull; Slower processor (using an <a href="http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=cpu&id=a7627&c=qualcomm_msm7627">older ARM11 architecture</a> vs. <a href="http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=cpu&id=a3430&c=texas_instruments_omap_3430">faster ARM Cortex A8</a>)<br>
&bull; Smaller and squintier 400x320, 2.63-inch, 18-bit color screen (vs. 480x320, 3.1-inch, 24-bit color)<br>
&bull; 2-megapixel camera (vs. 3MP)<br>
&bull; No Wi-Fi</p>
<h1>Pixi Perfect Design (Just About)</h1>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/img_1724.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_img_1724.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>There has not been a candybar phone more perfectly designed and executed than the Pixi. It's exactly the size and shape a phone that aspires to be small should be. It's a Hot Pocket sliced in half, but flat and glossy on top and round and rubbery on the bottom. It almost feels fake, like a concept that you hope is a real phone but isn't, except that in this case, it really is. It fits inside of an iPhone, if you wanna get more literal.</p>
<p>Plastic, slightly sticky Rice Krispie keys, arranged in four rows form a keyboard so electrifyingly good it's thrilling, like finding an actually sweet wind-up toy in your cereal box (Rice Krispies, of course) every time you type. They keys are tiny, but have a deceptive amount of rise, so your fat thumbs can feel out individual nubs, which pop in this remarkably satisfying way when you click down. The size-to-goodness ratio might just be the best on any keyboard I've used. If there's any reason to pick the Pixi over the Pre, it's if you type a shocking amount on your phone, because the Pixi's is better by like an order of magnitude. Or eleventy.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/img_1792.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_img_1792.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Between the screen, with its shaved corners, and the keyboard is a stretch of empty space. Until you run your finger along it, and a spark&mdash;a line of light, really&mdash;emerges. The LED strip, invisible when it's not indicating something, replaces the ball on the Pre, which I always thought was a weird little speed bump when you stroked the gesture area, anyway. It's kind of beautiful, the stark aesthetic of it emotionally tinged with sci-fi imagery, from Gort to Cyclop's visor.</p>
<p>Two things are wrong. The screen lock button on the top left is a little too in touch with the overall robustness of the phone, so it's hard to push and doesn't provide enough feedback. On the opposite end of that spectrum, the trap door covering the micro USB port feels flimsy and aggravatingly snaps shut, making plugging in a USB cable a struggle worthy of a Homerian epic every single time.</p>
<h1>Tinkerbell Would Be Pissed</h1>
<p>The Pixi is slow.</p>
<p>Achingly.</p>
<p>Maddeningly.</p>
<p>Ripyourhairoutandsmashitagainstthewallingly.</p>
<p>It lags, it hangs, it stutters, it freezes. A lot. A simple fact: Multitasking isn't better than unitasking when it takes longer to get shit done. An example: I wanted to take a picture while I had the browser and and App Catalog open. Simple. The camera froze spectacularly, rendering the entire phone completely unusable for well over 30 seconds&mdash;whenever I tried to flick the camera card away (<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5277499/palm-pre-review">cards are apps</a>), it would shoot halfway off the screen, then appear back in its place. Somewhere between 30-45 seconds later, it regained composure. That's with just three <em>core</em> apps open, and no active syncing happening in the background.</p>
<p>True, I could sometimes have up to four apps running without problems, at least for a minute or so, before things starting getting cludgy. But it hangs even with just a single app running sometimes. (Just <em>try</em> loading the full Gizmodo page.) And every time you open an app, there's a solid expanse of time that elapses that you can <em>feel</em>, and it gets old real quick. Maybe webOS is just more transparent about load times than the iPhone, which masks them with title screens, but the whole experience of using this phone is like swimming through very pretty Jello, with one arm, wearing a cast-iron suit, or something like that.</p>
<h1>Screen, Camera and Other Hardware</h1>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/img_1793.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_img_1793.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>You get used to the smaller screen and its 80 fewer pixels, mostly. It's cramped, but you'll only be directly, painfully cognizant of it from time to time, like when you're reading some text outside of Palm's own apps or navigating web pages. It's not a crappy screen, but it's not exceptionally bright or vibrant, either. The touch accuracy seemed less spot-on than the Pre too, though that could've been the effect of smaller targets because of the tinier screen, like the drop down menu for apps in the top left corner, which is just a sliver on the Pixi.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/pixishot.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_pixishot.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The Pixi's 2MP camera is unimpressive. The comparison shot above&mdash;<a href="http://www.ippudo.com/ny/">of <em>ramen</em></a>, people&mdash;was taken with a 2MP iPhone 3G in the exact same lighting and place, snapped within 10 seconds of each other. The camera app, when it's not freezing up, is quick to shoot once you press the button though, which is definitely something.</p>
<p>And I'll just say it: No Wi-Fi sucks, since there are lots of place in NY where even Sprint's 3G can't penetrate.</p>
<h1>Software</h1>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/img_1790.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_img_1790.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The Pixi comes with <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5404679/webos-131-available-now">webOS 1.3.1</a>. Palm's definitely tuned things up since webOS originally shipped in June with stuff like more support for Yahoo services, the ability to buy songs over 3G, performance improvements and other interface sprucing up, but it's not a radically difference experience than the one Chen <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5277499/palm-pre-review">documented exhaustively here</a>. (In other words, read that for the software review, since it's basically the same, just much slooooower on the Pixi.)</p>
<p>What's different now is that there are over 300 apps in the App Catalog, and Palm's dumping fresh ones in every week. So the app situation is greatly improved. The problem is that it's still behind the rest of the pack though&mdash;iPhone, Android and BlackBerry&mdash;and being fourth-place development priority for cross-platform developers with limited resources it not a great place to be, so <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5392799/how-palm-lost-like-apple-in-the-80s">Palm's got a rough road here</a>. Oh, one interesting point, since this is supposed to be the smartphone OS for multitasking, is that while an app is downloading from the App Catalog, you can't browse for other apps&mdash;if you leave the download page, it cancels. So I hope you've got good Sprint reception in your house.</p>
<p>The other thing that's changed is iTunes. Palm's former official way to sync your media to your phone is broken. Irrevocably. Even if Palm does restore iTunes syncing with its dirty hack (no really, it is a dirty hack, impersonating an iPod with a false USB ID) the entire model is screwed. Putting people buying your phone in the middle of a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5393038/apple-and-palm-the-itunes-syncing-fight-is-officially-dumb">stupid pissing match</a> that you're destined to lose isn't cool. In the meantime, Palm's official solution is for people to sideload or use third-party apps like DoubleTwist.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5406076,12,'');
</script></p>
<h1>Don't Buy It</h1>
<p>The Pixi is screwed. It's totally cannibalized by the technologically superior Pre, which you can find for under $100. Even if you can get the Pixi for $30 at Walmart, it's worth trading up to the Pre for $40 or $50 more if you're absolutely wedded to the idea of a webOS phone, simply for the speed and screen. Mostly the speed, since the Pixi is brain damaged, three-legged dog slow, as nice as the hardware is on the outside.</p>
<p>Not to mention, for a hundred dollars, there are phones that just offer better experiences and aren't in the same awkward position Palm is in the smartphone fight. I'm talking of course, about <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5401220/droid-eris-review">the Droid Eris</a>, Android's 99-dollar darling on Verizon. The entire reason to buy the Pixi&mdash;a value proposition&mdash;has completely evaporated. And I almost feel bad about that. Almost.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplusplus_01.jpg" width="40" height="20">Incredible keyboard (for the size)<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3_04.jpg" width="20" height="20">Awesome design and build<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3_04.jpg" width="20" height="20">webOS is nice<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizminus_04.jpg" width="20" height="20">Camera sucks<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizminus_04.jpg" width="20" height="20">Palm's dumb iTunes fight<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizminus_04.jpg" width="20" height="20">Slow<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizminus2_01.jpg" width="40" height="20">I mean, slooooooooooooooooooooow</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5406001/palm-pixi-review]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5406001]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm pixi review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm pre]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pixi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pre]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[webos]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5406001&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[iPhone Apps Have to Be Approved by Robots Now, Too]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_appstore-blackhole.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Sounds sinister, right? That's probably because I replaced the word "computers" with "robots!" For effect! But no, still, this is at least insteresting: Developers are now reporting that apps are getting rejected, and not by humans.</p>

<p>Word is that Apple has added a new layer to the approval process, called a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #staticanalysistool" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/staticanalysistool/">static analysis tool</a>. This particular static analysis tool is intended to scan for the use of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #privateapis" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/privateapis/">private APIs</a> in submitted apps, and flag them if it finds any. For quite a few people, evidently, this means that apps that <em>were</em> kosher a while ago are, with their next updates, very suddenly not. Time for a FORENSIC RECAP! From Craig Hockenberry, developer of Twitterrific, and Guy Who Noticed This Early:<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/by_default_2009-11-16_at_3.32.36_pm.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_by_default_2009-11-16_at_3.32.36_pm.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
To which John Gruber (<a href="http://daringfireball.net">Daring Fireball</a>) knowingly responded: <a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/by_default_2009-11-16_at_3.31.14_pm.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_by_default_2009-11-16_at_3.31.14_pm.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
So yeah, what the <em>hell</em> does any of this mean?</p>
<p>Apple gives developers a bunch of public application programming interface (APIs) which are essentially documented, permitted tools or calls that they can invoke in their apps. For example, Apple has an API for recording microphone input, which developers can use, and which Apple, by publishing them, has basically promised to keep intact and working. Private APIs are calls and features that only Apple uses, and which they don't really tell developers about. There could be a few reasons for this: either they specifically don't <em>want</em> developers to use them, for security or consistency reasons, or they're not finished and subject to change, which means that for devs to use them would be risky&mdash;their apps could just break with the next system update, since these private APIs are, in effect, volatile. Remember all those early jailbreak apps, before the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #appstore" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/appstore/">App Store</a> was open? Those were built using entirely private APIs, many of which became public later. Anyway!</p>
<p>There's always been <a href="http://daringfireball.net/2008/12/private">an official ban</a> on the use of private APIs, but Apple hadn't really been enforcing it to date, partly because it's just hard to tell sometimes&mdash;unless the private API is used in a terribly obvious way, finding them is a matter of taking to apps with a fine-toothed code-comb, which the current crew obviously can't do, and which machines&mdash;as in, software&mdash;would be good at. With these new static analysis tools, Apple has created a machine filter for apps that breach this rule.</p>
<p>Given that actually App Store policy hasn't changed, this shouldn't amount to anything more than better rule enforcement for app devs. <em>Should</em>n't. Introducing something automated like this, even if it's a "serious tool, not simplistic" as Gruber claims, is bound to end in tears. Congratulations, developers! Your next appeal against app rejection will be to a piece of software, which has no capacity to feel <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5378390/the-app-effect">your pain</a>. Devs: Let us know if you've run up against this thing in the comments, and if it was fair. [<a href="http://twitter.com/chockenberry/status/5768098297">Twitt</a>-<a href="http://twitter.com/gruber/status/5768617360">ah</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5405978/iphone-apps-have-to-be-approved-by-robots-now-too]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5405978]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[app store]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[app store approval process]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[automated app approval]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone private apis]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[private apis]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[static analysis tool]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:41:09 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5405978&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Windows Mobile App Marketplace Now Open to All 6.x Phones]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_market.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />However you feel about <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windowsmobile" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windowsmobile/">Windows Mobile</a> 6.5, chances are you don't <em>have it</em>, so you (<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5378168/how-to-install-windows-marketplace-for-mobile-on-winmo-61">probably</a>) haven't been able to try out the new Marketplace for Mobile. Starting today&mdash;earlier than promised!&mdash;anyone with a 6.x handset <a href="http://windowsteamblog.com/blogs/windowsphone/archive/2009/11/16/windows-marketplace-for-windows-mobile-6-0-and-6-1.aspx">can access it</a>.</p>

<p>Microsoft's take on an app store got off to a timid start, so the accompanying news that the catalog has hit 800 apps is definitely promising, as is the expanded userbase: now that the millions of 6.0 and 6.1 handsets are part of the Marketplace's potential userbase, developers will be more enthusiastic about actually <em>developing</em> for it.</p>
<p>And even if it's not quite up to speed yet, it's a much easier way to find the basics than scavenging the app download hellscape that is the Greater Internet, and some of Microsoft's new codeveloped apps&mdash;Facebook, in particular&mdash;are pretty great. You can download by pointing your WinMo phone's browser to <a href="http://mp.windowsphone.com">mp.windowsphone.com</a>. [<a href="http://windowsteamblog.com/blogs/windowsphone/archive/2009/11/16/windows-marketplace-for-windows-mobile-6-0-and-6-1.aspx">Windows Team Blog</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5405926/windows-mobile-app-marketplace-now-open-to-all-6x-phones]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5405926]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[windows mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[marketplace]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows marketplace for mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows mobile marketplace]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows phone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[winmo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:31:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5405926&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
