<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: Solid-State Drives]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/solid-state drives</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'solid-state drives']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[A Guide To Finding The Best SSD For Your Money]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/ocz-vertex.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_ocz-vertex.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></a>If you want to boost your computer's performance, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SOLID STATE DRIVES" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/solid-state-drives/">solid state drives</a> can deliver. However, if you find the choices out there to be daunting, <a href="http://www.laptopmag.com/review/storage/high-speed-ssd-shootout.aspx">LaptopMag's comprehensive SSD roundup</a> can help you get the most performance for your money.</p>
<p>They tested seven 2.5-inch 128GB SSDs with SATA that ranged in price between $200 and $450. In the end the OCZ Vertex came out on top in terms of overall performance, but the Kingston SSDNow V-Series held its own with a "budget" price tag of $249. Hit up Laptop Mag for the full breakdown. [<a href="http://www.laptopmag.com/review/storage/high-speed-ssd-shootout.aspx?page=1">LaptopMag</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5325776/a-guide-to-finding-the-best-ssd-for-your-money]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5325776]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[solid state drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5325776&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Clickfree Traveler External SSD is Credit-Card Sized For Convenience]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/05/clickfree_traveler.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/clickfree_traveler.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a>Clickfree's new external SSD comes in 16GB ($80), 32GB ($150), and 64GB ($250) capacities. Roughly the size of a credit card, the Traveler is a compact but pricey drive.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/clickfree_dvd_transformer.jpg" width="504" height="173" style="display:block;">Clickfree has also released the DVD Transformer ($40), which plugs in like a standard USB drive, but automatically scans your computer for personal files and other important data then backs it up on CD or DVD. [<a href="http://buy.goclickfree.com/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=FL320-1003-100">Clickfree</a> via <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10235694-1.html?part=rss&tag=feed&subj=Crave">CNET</a> and <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/clickfree-traveler-and-dvd-transformer-auto-backup-systems-0743105/">Slashgear</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5244646/clickfree-traveler-external-ssd-is-credit+card-sized-for-convenience]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5244646]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[backups]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clickfree]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clickfree dvd transformer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clickfree traveler]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[solid state drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 07 May 2009 18:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5244646&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[DDRdrive's X1 SSD is Superfast and Superexpensive]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/05/ddrdrive.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/ddrdrive.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>It may not compare to the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5168424/fusion+io-iodrive-duo-is-the-worlds-fastest-ssd">io-Drive</a>, but DDrdrive's X1 still packs a punch in terms of speed and price.</p>
<p>Unlike other SSDs, the X1 utilizes two types of memory&mdash;4GB DRAM and 4GB NAND aligned on a PCIe card. Because RAM can be volatile, the NAND kicks in and safely backs up the information. According to a <a href="http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=704&type=expert&pid=1">PC Perspective review</a>, the drive features "single sector IOPS (input/output operations per second) unmatched by any other device available" and has the benefit of a IOPS cost that is about 1/5 of the io-Drive.</p>
<p>So, essentially you are getting a lot of bang for your buck here&mdash;but at the end of the day you are still talking $1495 for a drive with 4GB capacity. Obviously, that means the majority of us will have to wait a while longer to experience this kind of performance. [<a href="http://www.ddrdrive.com/">DDRdrive</a> and <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10233350-1.html?part=rss&tag=feed&subj=Crave">CNET</a> and <a href="http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=704&type=expert&pid=1">PC Perspective</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5241079/ddrdrives-x1-ssd-is-superfast-and-superexpensive]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5241079]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ddrdrive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ddrdrive x1]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flash memory]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pci express]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcie]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[solid state drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[x1]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 05 May 2009 14:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5241079&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Fusion-io ioDrive Duo is the Worlds Fastest SSD]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/03/iodrive-duo-ssd.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/iodrive-duo-ssd.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a>Fusion-io's <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5107281/fusion+io-iodrive-is-the-fastest-storage-device-in-the-world">original ioDrive</a> was stupid fast, but the next generation makes even that look pathetic. Try 1.5GB sustained read speeds and 1.4GB sustained write speeds. Yeah, let that sink in for a minute.</p>
<p>Fusion-io has also blown the slot capacity of their previous model out of the water with versions of the PCI Express Duo available in 160GB, 320GB, 640GB and 1.28TB sizes. Three of the four versions will be available starting in April with the 1.28GB version slated for the second half of 2009. If you are wondering how much it will cost, that probably means you cant afford it. Specifics have not been made available, but we are talking tens of thousands of dollars on the high end here.</p>
<p>If you recognize Fusion-io, it's the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5146762/woz-joining-fusion+io-as-chief-scientist">company Woz just joined as Chief Scientist</a>. Since he just joined, we doubt he had anything to do with the ioDrive's inception and production, but he'll most likely have a hand in doing their upcoming products. [<a href="http://www.fusionio.com/PressDetails.php?id=69">Fusion-io</a> via <a href="http://hothardware.com/News/Fusionio-Reveals-Wicked-Fast-ioDrive-Duo-SSDs/">Hot Hardware</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5168424/fusion+io-iodrive-duo-is-the-worlds-fastest-ssd]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5168424]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flash memory]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fusion-ion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iodrive duo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[solid state drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5168424&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Intel SSDs May Suffer From Irreparable Fragmentation Slowdowns]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/02/340x_ssd.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/><a href="http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=669&type=expert&pid=1">PC Perspective's</a> review of Intel's X25-M SSD, a custom-designed <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SOLID STATE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/solid-state/">solid state</a> drive, showed that the manufacturer's sector remapping actually lowered overall performance dramatically over time as the drive became irreparably fragmented.</p>
<p>Some background info. First, sector remapping&mdash;a custom solution from Intel&mdash; is a method that makes sure wear and tear on the drive is spread over the entire space instead of just in a small area (which would cause the drive to fail earlier). Intel's algorithm unfortunately makes files become fragmented eventually, and defragmenting software currently on the market just screw things up further.</p>
<p>Intel says it's working on a solution, but currently customers with the X25-M can only completely wipe the drive and start fresh in order to reclaim that lost performance. It's not a death knell to SSDs, since the problem can (theoretically) be fixed by either allowing defragmentation software access to the distribution algorithm so as to actually defragment, or having the SSD controller keep track of the fragmentation in the first place and try and minimize it. [<a href="http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=669&type=expert&pid=1">PC Per</a> via <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news/2009/02/sector-remap-fragmentation-slowing-intel-x25-m-ssds.ars">Ars Technica</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5157015/intel-ssds-may-suffer-from-irreparable-fragmentation-slowdowns]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5157015]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[solid state]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[solid state drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ssd fragmentation]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[x25-m]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:15:08 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5157015&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Super Talent SSDs Boost Netbook Flash Storage To 64GB For $169]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/01/340x_64GB_ssd_supertalent.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/>Not a bad price at all on a mini-PCIe solid-state drive. These are intended for the <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5066842/hands-on-asus-eee-s101-just-as-slim-and-air+y-in-person">Eee PC S101</a>, but will work with any machine that can take mini-PCIe add-ons.</p>

<p>As <a href="http://jkontherun.com/2009/01/28/ssd-for-asus-s101-in-mlc-or-slc/">JKOnTheRun</a> points out, these are not the blazing-est SSDs you'll find (they're rated at 90 MB/s read and 55 MB/s write), but for $169 it's not a bad boost for your S101's paltry 16GB drive. [<a href="http://www.supertalent.com/products/ssd_detail.php?type=SATA%20Mini%20PCIe">Super Talent</a> via <a href="http://jkontherun.com/2009/01/28/ssd-for-asus-s101-in-mlc-or-slc/">JKOnTheRun</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5141058/super-talent-ssds-boost-netbook-flash-storage-to-64gb-for-169]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5141058]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ssds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[eee pc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[eee pc s101]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flash memory]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[netbooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[s101]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[solid-state drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Mahoney]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5141058&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Fusion-io ioDrive Is The Fastest Storage Device in the World]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/12/fusion-io_iodrive_005.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/fusion-io_iodrive_005.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a>The <a href="http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/1683/1/exclusive_look_at_fusion_io_iodrive_pcie_solid_state/index.html">ioDrive</a> is a PCI Express storage card that can write at up to 368 MB/s and read at 473 MB/s to its NAND flash memory—or, for the layman: really, really damn fast.</p>
<p>To put it into perspective, that's nearly 2x the read speed of <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5046755/intel-80gb-solid+state-drives-get-official-and-high-price-tag-are-blazing-fast">Intel's already fast SSDs</a>, and roughly 5x the write speed. The ioDrive uses the same NAND flash memory of an SSD, but since it plugs in to a PCI Express bus rather than SATA and only works with 64-bit systems, it can achieve speeds nothing else can touch. And yes, here we are talking megaBYTEs, not megaBITs—a lower metric often used for data transmission speeds.</p>
<p>For now it's for enterprise stuff exlusively—an 80GB version will set you back $3,000, on up to $14,400 for 320GB. If you are interested in this kind of thing, the boys at Tweaktown have written a ten pager on it. [<a href="http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/1683/1/exclusive_look_at_fusion_io_iodrive_pcie_solid_state/index.html">Tweaktown</a> via <a href="http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2008/12/11/iodrive-drives-fast.html">BBG</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5107281/fusion+io-iodrive-is-the-fastest-storage-device-in-the-world]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5107281]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[enterprise]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flash memory]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fusion-io]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fusion-io ioDrive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iodrive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pci-express]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcie]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[solid state drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ssds]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Mahoney]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5107281&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Samsung Manufacturing 256GB SSDs, Just Like They Promised]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/11/340x_Untitled-7.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/>It was nearly six months ago when Samsung <a href="http://gizmodo.com/393198/blazing-samsung-256gb-ssd-is-the-one-weve-been-waiting-for">laid out their plan</a> to manufacture an affordable, super-fast 256GB SSD by the end of the year. It sounded a little bit optimistic at the time, but as of today, they're here. Sort of. Samsung says that manufacturing has begun, but still hasn't let loose on the most important nugget: price. They have, however, elaborated a little bit on their claims of "disruptive" performance: the news SSDs will offer speed "analogous to having a 15,000rpm drive, without all of its size, noise, power and heating drawbacks." They also claim to have decreased the read/write speed gap to about 10% and dropped power consumption to a slight 1.1w. This all sounds great, it's cost that'll win the SSD war. [<a href="http://www.akihabaranews.com/en/news-17057-Samsung+Now+Producing+256GB+Solid+State+Drives.html">Akihabara</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5094074/samsung-manufacturing-256gb-ssds-just-like-they-promised]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5094074]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ssds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[256gb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[netbooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung SSDs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[solid state drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 20 Nov 2008 07:07:02 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5094074&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Seagate Won't Do Flash SSDs, Waiting For Next-Gen Tech]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/11/thumb160x_ssd.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Just last month we were reporting "<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5062127/seagate-to-begin-switch-to-ssd">Seagate to begin to switch to SSD</a>" and now company CEO Bill Watkins has said that that's not quite the truth. Seagate will indeed be launching an enterprise-level SSD in 2009, but will not enter the "mobile SSD" market. Whyever not? Because there's no money to be made there: "Right now if you look at it whether it's Micron or Samsung or SanDisk - they're selling at a loss. To do the product is not a big deal but to make money at it - it's important to us." he notes. Instead the company is banking on post MLC technology, something like "a spin around magnetic RAM, it could be a phase shift type of process" says Watkins. Seagate <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #harddrives" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/harddrives/">hard drives</a> might be around for a while longer. [<a href="http://hardware.silicon.com/storage/0,39024649,39337820,00.htm?r=1">Silicon</a> via <a href="http://www.mram-info.com/seagate-were-putting-lot-money-next-gen-memory-technologies">MRAM-info</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5078086/seagate-wont-do-flash-ssds-waiting-for-next+gen-tech]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5078086]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard disks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mlc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[seagate]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[seagate ssd tech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[solid state drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ssds]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 06 Nov 2008 05:03:36 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kit Eaton]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5078086&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Intel's Superfast SSDs Make For Even Speedier RAID 0 Rig]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/10/340x_intel-ssd.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5046755/intel-80gb-solid+state-drives-get-official-and-high-price-tag-are-blazing-fast">Intel's solid state drives</a> are real fast—$600 for 80GB kind of fast. It should come as no surprise, then, that they make a mighty quick RAID 0 setup, which does not provide data redundancy but does give twice the data throughput. Hot Hardware's numbers were a blazing 396MB/s read and 130MB/s write times (the fastest they've ever tested), making this quite a speedy 160GB volume. Head over to Hot Hardware for more numbers. [<a href="http://hothardware.com/News/Intel-SSDs-RAID-0-A-Case-Study-In-Speed-Take-2/">Hot Hardware</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5065801/intels-superfast-ssds-make-for-even-speedier-raid-0-rig]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5065801]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ssds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flash memory]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[raid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[solid state drives]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Mahoney]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5065801&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Intel 80GB Solid-State Drives Get Official (and High) Price Tag, Are Blazing Fast]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/09/340x_intel-ssd.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Intel's slightly delayed leap into the SSD game is now official, with the company announcing a $595 pricetag for an 80GB SSD, which comes in 1.8-inch (X18-M) or 2.5-inch (X25-M) sizes for the same price, with 160GB versions coming later this year. While that's a considerably higher price-per-gigabyte ratio than what can be found on more generic SSDs, Intel will hopefully bring the performance standards so badly needed in the SSD world, where actual real-world performance can vary greatly from what's stated (take everyone <a href="http://gizmodo.com/353324/the-macbook-air-ssd-performance-boost-pretty-much-non+existent">upset about the MacBook Air's SSD</a>, for instance). Intel's SATA drive is rated for 250MB/s reads and 70MB/s writes, with 85-<em>microsecond</em> latency. Full details follow.</p>

<p><strong>UPDATE</strong>: <a href="http://www.hothardware.com/Articles/Intel-X25M-80GB-SATA-Solid-State-Drive-Intel-Ups-The-Ante/">Hot Hardware</a> has gotten their hands on one and given it a full top-to-bottom run-through for more specs and shots. <em>Thanks, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5046755/intel-80gb-solid+state-drives-get-official-and-high-price-tag#c7651834">YasinKhawam</a></em></p>
<blockquote>
<p>Intel Introduces <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #solidstatedrives" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/solidstatedrives/">Solid-State Drives</a> for Notebook and Desktop Computers</p>
<p>New Intel(R) High-Performance SATA Solid-State Drive Offers Users Responsive, Rugged, Reliable and Low-Power Storage Solution to Replace Hard Disk Drive<br>
SANTA CLARA, Calif. &mdash;(Business Wire)&mdash; Sep. 8, 2008 Intel Corporation announced today it has begun shipping Intel(R) X18-M and X25-M Mainstream SATA Solid-State Drives (SSDs) based on multi-level cell (MLC) NAND flash technology for laptop and desktop computers. The new high-performing data storage devices give computer buyers a new level of system responsiveness in a lightweight, rugged, low-power package that can replace traditional hard disk drives.</p>
<p>Validated for Intel-based computers, the X18-M is a 1.8-inch drive and the X25-M a 2.5-inch drive, offering several advantages over <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #harddrives" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/harddrives/">hard drives</a> including faster overall system response, boot and resume times. With no moving parts, SSDs run cooler and quieter and are a more reliable option than hard drives. In addition, SSDs remove input/output (I/O) performance bottlenecks associated with hard disk drives that help maximize the efficiency of Intel processors, such as the company's Core(TM) family of products. For example, lab tests show that the Intel X18-M and X25M increase storage system performance nine times over traditional hard disk drive performance.</p>
<p>"Validated by our rigorous testing and OEM customer feedback, we believe that we have developed an SSD that delivers on the promises of SSD computing," said Randy Wilhelm, Intel vice president and general manager of the NAND Products Group. "By combining our experience in flash memory design with our processor and computing expertise, we have added advances such as our parallel 10-channel architecture, proprietary controller, firmware and memory management algorithms that address write amplification and wear leveling issues to redefine SSD performance and reliability for computing platforms."</p>
<p>The Intel X18-M and X25-M Mainstream SATA SSDs are available in 80 gigabyte (GB) capacities, with 160GB versions sampling in the fourth quarter of this year. The 80GB drive achieves up to 250MB per second read speeds, up to 70MB per second write speeds and 85-microsecond read latency for fast performance. The 80GB version is priced at $595 for quantities up to 1,000. These SSDs are available now and end-customer products containing the Intel(R) High-Performance SATA SSDs are expected to begin shipping in the next few weeks.</p>
<p>The company is also expected to introduce a line of single-level cell (SLC) SSDs for the server, storage and enterprise environments within the next 90 days. Called the Intel(R) X25-E Extreme SATA Solid-State Drive, these products are designed to maximize the Input/Output Operations Per Second (IOPS), which equates to higher performance and lower enterprise costs. Since SSDs lower energy consumption, maintenance, cooling and space costs, an SSD-based data center will reduce overall infrastructure costs while increasing performance-per-square-foot by as much as 50x.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5046755/intel-80gb-solid+state-drives-get-official-and-high-price-tag-are-blazing-fast]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5046755]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ssds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[centrino]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[solid-state drives]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:19:05 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Mahoney]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5046755&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Samsung Working With Developers To Optimize Solid State Drive Performance In Operating Systems]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/08/340x_samsung-256gb-flash-ssd-thumb.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Samsung is working with software developers to increase the performance of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #solidstatedrives" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/solidstatedrives/">Solid State Drives</a> for computers using the Sun's ZFS file system, which the next version of OSX Server, aka Snow Leopard, can take advantage of. The way traditional HDDs handle data transfers is different than how SSDs do, and it's Samsung's goal to make sure future operating systems are optimized for SSDs as well as HDDs. The performance upgrades could mean overall operational increases for OSX-equipped Macs that use SSDs. Currently the MacBook Air is the only Mac that ships with the option, but if Apple decides to make SSDs available on all MacBooks then this development would make the SSD option more desirable than it is now. Samsung is also starting talks with Microsoft to work the same enhancements into the next version of Windows. When all major operating systems have optimized support for them, SSD could finally replace HDDs as promised. [<a href="http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/08/07/Samsung_Microsoft_in_talks_to_speed_up_SSDs_on_Vista_1.html?source=rss&url=http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/08/07/Samsung_Microsoft_in_talks_to_speed_up_SSDs_on_Vista_1.html">InfoWorld</a> via <a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2008/08/08/zfs-and-snow-leopard-to-speed-up-solid-state-drive-performance">MacRumors</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5035062/samsung-working-with-developers-to-optimize-solid-state-drive-performance-in-operating-systems]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5035062]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[solid state drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sun]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[zfs]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 09 Aug 2008 02:30:10 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Hickey]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5035062&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Micron Starts Production of Super-Fast RealSSD Solid-State Drives]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/08/340x_micron.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />The inexorable march of solid-state drive technology continues forward with news from Micron Technology (one of the worlds leading semiconductor suppliers) that they're going to produce SSD's with a read speed of 250MBps. That's more than twice the speed of the drives <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5023222/samsung-starts-mass-production-of-cheap-128gb-mlc-solid-state-drives">Samsung</a> announced last month (90MBps.)</p>

<p>Micron's P200 RealSSD drives will use single-level cell technology for the Enterprise market, and the C200 versions use multi-level cell tech for the home PC market. The P200 will be available in 16GB to 128GB sizes in a 2.5-inch form factor, while the C200 will come in a 2.5-inch format up to 256GB. Clearly aiming at the UMPC market, the C200 will also come in a 1.8-inch drive with up to 128GB capacity. The drives peak read speed is that impressive-sounding 250MBps, with a write speed of 100MBps. They'll operate at around 0.3 to 2.5 W, and be SATA compatible.</p>
<p>Micron claims the usual power consumption benefits, and that the drives are "10 times faster at accessing transactional data" compared to HDDs. The drives will ship in the fourth quarter of this year, price to be decided. [<a href="http://66.102.9.104/translate_c?hl=en&sl=ja&u=http://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/2008/0805/micron.htm">PC Watch</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5033130/micron-starts-production-of-super+fast-realssd-solid+state-drives]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5033130]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ssds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[c200]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fast]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[micron]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[p200]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[realssd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[solid state drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 05 Aug 2008 04:23:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kit Eaton]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5033130&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[SanDisk Blames Vista For Slow Deployment in SSDs]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/07/thumb160x_sandisk-ssd.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />You know how <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #solidstatedrives" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/solidstatedrives/">solid state drives</a> aren't very common right now? SanDisk laid the blame for that directly onto Microsoft's face, accusing <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windowsvista" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windowsvista/">Windows Vista</a> of not being optimized for those SSDs. The next-generation drives due out soon require more advanced controllers (the stuff that interfaces with the drive itself), which "need to basically compensate for Vista's shortfalls."</p>
<p>SanDisk's chairman and CEO follows up with "performance in the Vista environment falls short of what the market really needs and that is why we need to develop the next generation." Seriously though, if this is true, we hope <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windows7" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows7/">Windows 7</a> solves these issues so we can finally get some flash action up in our laptops. Then again, it could just be SanDisk covering up their own failure to get products to market with some finger pointing. [<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-9996317-64.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-20">CNET</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5027778/sandisk-blames-vista-for-slow-deployment-in-ssds]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5027778]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[deployment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sandisk]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[slow]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[solid state drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows vista]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5027778&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Tom's Hardware Corrects Study, Says Solid State Drives Do Improve Battery Life]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/07/340x_workstation-io-power.png" class="left image340" width="340" /><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #tomshardware" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/tomshardware/">Tom's Hardware</a> tested battery life in laptops with SSDs yet again and found that they aren't such a power suck, correcting a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5021166/swindled-solid-state-drives-dont-extend-battery-life-they-shorten-it">previous study</a>. SSDs didn't outperform their HDD counterparts in all tests, but combined with <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5022346/new-study-says-solid-state-drives-are-better-for-battery-life-not-worse">Laptop Mag's</a> study I think we can safely put the issue to rest for now. [<a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ssd-hard-drive,1968.html">Tom's Hardware</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5025285/toms-hardware-corrects-study-says-solid-state-drives-do-improve-battery-life]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5025285]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[tests]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[harddrives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[solid state drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tom's hardware]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 15 Jul 2008 09:45:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benny Goldman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5025285&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New Study Says Solid State Drives Are Better for Battery Life, Not Worse]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/07/1f/24/340x_8c518373ce2a7bdbfc593c765c8f97ae.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;float:none;"/>I hope this SSD good/bad theme doesn't turn into one of those long-running "good for you/bad for you" food fiascoes (is coffee on the good list again, by the way? Blogging is thirsty work.) A new bit of investigation by Laptopmag seems to challenge the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5021166/swindled-solid-state-drives-dont-extend-battery-life-they-shorten-it">Tom's Hardware</a> study that put SSD's battery performance in the shade. Citing flaws in the original method, the new study tried the drives under a more "real world use" test regime: cycling through webpages over and over.</p>

<p>They took a Gateway T-6828 with Vista Home Premium SP1 and tried it with its native Western Digital Scorpio WD2500BEVS and two SSDs: a Samsung SATA II 64GB, and a SanDisk SATA 5000 32GB.</p>
<p>And guess what? Both SSD's resulted in an extra 10 minutes of battery life, versus the native hard drive. That's not a huge difference, sure, but it's a completely different story to the Tom's Hardware study which showed <i>worse</i> battery performance.</p>
<p>Laptopmag admits that the absolute hardware choices both studies make may have a large impact, but they conclude "in real-world use, SSDs offer a small improvement in battery life." And, of course, there's the potentially faster loading times you get from SSD's, meaning your laptop's uptime may be more productive. [<a href="http://blog.laptopmag.com/web-surfing-test-shows-ssds-better-for-battery-life">Laptopmag</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5022346/new-study-says-solid-state-drives-are-better-for-battery-life-not-worse]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5022346]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[battery]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[solid state drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[swindled]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 06 Jul 2008 14:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kit Eaton]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5022346&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Swindled: Solid State Drives Don't Extend Battery Life, They Shorten It]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/07/92/43/340x_9243d02ae24e8ecd3597c55ff37459ce.png" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/><a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SOLID STATE DRIVES" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/solid-state-drives/">Solid state drives</a> (SSDs) are the inevitable future of mobile computing, but a new experiment by Tom's Hardware is extremely disappointing. It ends up that the touted power savings of SSDs over their moving-parts-laden cousins are nonexistent. In fact, SSDs are sucking <em>more</em> power than conventional <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged HARD DRIVES" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/hard-drives/">hard drives</a>. How is this possible? Tom's Hardware thinks they know.</p>

<p>While moving <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #harddrives" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/harddrives/">hard drives</a> have higher power requirements on paper, in reality, those peaks are only reached when random data is being searched out. On average, these drives have become very power efficient and rarely peak even when data is being accessed.</p>
<p>SSDs, on the other hand, pretty much have an "on" mode and an "off" mode. That's it. So while you are using your hard drive, that mode is pretty much always going to be the "on" one. SSD manufacturers haven't focused on other power saving principles at this time. And until they do, don't expect things to get any better.</p>
<p><em>Note: the benchmarks were all completed on the same Dell laptop. A 5400 RPM hard drive would have even lower power consumption than the 7200 RPM model tested.<br></em><br>
<br>
As for buying that new SSD for your notebook...I'd suggest you wait a bit longer, even if you have the cash. [<a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ssd-hdd-battery,1955.html#">Tom's Hardware</a> via <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/07/01/shock-horror-apparently-ssds-dont-save-you-any-power/">Crunchgear</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5021166/swindled-solid-state-drives-dont-extend-battery-life-they-shorten-it]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5021166]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor smashed]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[solid state drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5021166&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Intel Bringin' SSD Drama: 160GB Capacity, 50% Price Drop]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/03/Intel_SSD_Over_Samsung.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />We already told you about <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/intel/intel-reveals-new-mobile-ssd-umpc-concepts-the-skulltrail-gaming-platform-and-penryn-and-santa-rosa-updates-334227.php">Intel's new ultramobile SSDs</a>, but their tiny size means high cost and low capacities, only up to 16GB. That's why the company promised SATA-II SSDs in the 1.8" and 2.5" sizes with capacities up to 160GB, with read and write speeds exceeding Samsung's 100MB/s and 70MB/s, respectively. Best of all, Intel says its goal is to drive down the currently exorbitant prices of solid-state storage to something less punitive, predicting two subsequent 50% drops in 2009 and 2010. [<a href="http://www.dailytech.com/Intel+to+up+Stakes+in+SSD+Market/article11013.htm">Daily Tech</a>]<br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/366145/intel-bringin-ssd-drama-160gb-capacity-50-price-drop]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-366145]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sata]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sata-ii]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[solid state drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=366145&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Ridata Intros 128GB SATA SSDs, Speeds Past Competition]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/01/ridatassd.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Ridata introduced three SSDs today, in 32-, 64-, and 128GB capacities. We've seen SSDs this large before, but Ridata claims 170MB/sec read and 105MB/sec write speeds, blowing out <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/solid-state-drives/toshiba-introduces-3-new-ssd-flavors-128gb-is-the-tastiest-332171.php">their recent competition</a>. Full release after the jump.</p>

<blockquote>Ridata Ramps Up 2.5" SATA SSD Read Speed to Sizzling 300MBPS
<p>Read: Up to 170MB/per sec.; Write: Up to 105MB/per sec.</p>
<p>Available in Up to 128GB Capacity</p>
<p><br>
Diamond Bar, Calif.&mdash;Jan. 07, 2008 &mdash;Advanced Media, Inc., manufacturer and marketer of the popular Ridata brand of recordable CD and DVD media, electronic storage products, and digital media accessories, announced the introduction of a non-volatile 2.5" SATA Solid State Disk (SSD) that truly burst reads at an amazing rate of 300MB per second. The faster speed Serial ATA (SATA) drive is available in 32GB, 64GB and 128GB capacities.</p>
<p><br>
"SSD drives offer a host of benefits over traditional hard disk drives. Cool and silent running; fast data access times; dependability and resistance to harsh environments make SSD drives a serious contender for virtually replacing Hard Disc Drives," remarked Harvey Liu, Advanced Media President. "The read rate of our 2.5" SATA SSD drive provides users with a phenomenally fast speed. For instance, it reduces boot up and seek times to mere seconds, while installation of new software programs can be accomplished in seconds rather than minutes."</p>
<p><br>
Data Integrity<br>
The Ridata SSD drive is inherently resistant to vibration, shock, and temperature extremes. It is very reliable with more than 4,000,000 hours Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF). Data integrity is further supported by static wearing leveling and Reed-Solomon ECC(RS-ECC 6/8/10 symbols). With a SMART features and write endurance cycle (P/E) of more than 2,000,000 times, the Ridata SSD drive is built to securely write and store critical data.</p>
<p><br>
NAND Flash Technology</p>
<p>The Ridata 2.5" SATA SSD drive is a cutting-edge solid-state flash disk, based on NAND flash technology. It has no moving parts, which allows it to be virtually silent, run cooler, and use less power than a traditional hard disk drive. It is NAND technology that provides the drive's data transfer rates of up to 170MB per second for maximum sequential read.</p>
<p><br>
Using single-level-chip technology, the Ridata SSD drive provides consistent performance, handles operating temperature up to 85˚F, and has extremely low-power consumption in comparison to a traditional hard drive. The Ridata SSD is among the lightest-weight storage drives available. It is excellent for performance-driven and rugged environments, such as laptops, and industrial, professional, and military applications.</p>
<p><br>
Performance</p>
<p>The drive requires only a five-volt power supply. Because of its low-power consumption, user time on a laptop or other mobile computing application is dramatically extended. Having no mechanical parts, low power consumption, and minimal heat generation, the Ridata SSD drive is a natural alternative for a greener environment.</p>
<p><br>
Mechanical<br>
Meeting bus interface industry standard Serial ATA (SATA) ensures there are no host compatibility or upgrading issues. The Ridata drive offers reliable temperature (0 to 70C) and humidity resistance, assuring long-lasting data storage. The 2.5" drives weighs 64.5 grams with dimensions of 101.85 x 69.85 x 9mm.</p>
<p><br>
Availability</p>
<p>The Ridata burst read up to 300MB/ps and up to 170MB sequential read transfer rate 2.5" SATA - as well as its 1.8" IDE - based SSD cards are available through system integrators, selected retailers, and Ridata distributors. Visit www.ritekusa.com for more information.</p>
<p><br>
About Advanced Media (RITEK USA)</p>
<p>Advanced Media, Inc. is a subsidiary of RITEK Corporation, the world's largest optical media manufacturer. Advanced Media is the sole North and South American marketer and distributor of the RIDATA brand of recordable CD and DVD media as well as other types of electronic storage media. , Since its formation in 2001, Advanced Media has experienced phenomenal annual growth and is already a leading marketer of electronic storage products in the American market.</p>
<p><br>
The Ridata brand offers an extensive line of flash memory products including the cutting edge Solid State Drive (SSD) Series and up to 16GB 266X CF Cards. The brand also features USB EZ Drives including the award-winning Yego USB Hub drive and other USB drives such as the Twister USB drive. Ridata's cornerstone products include Blu-Ray DVD series, HD DVD series, DL DVD-R/+R, DVD+/-R/RW, and CD-R/RW</p>
<p><br>
RITEK for years has been defining and redefining the optical storage market. Around the world, its name is synonymous with innovation, quality, and unparalleled consistency. Its ISO 14001, ISO 9001, ISO 9002, OHSAS 18001, and Green mark certification from the EPA prove RITEK's commitment to quality control.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/341055/ridata-intros-128gb-sata-ssds-speeds-past-competition]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-341055]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ces 2008]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[128gb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[32gb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[64gb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ridata]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[solid state drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ssds]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:00:01 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benny Goldman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=341055&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Giz Explains: What's So Solid About Solid State Drives?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/01/solidsolid.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />The best way to explain why <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ssd">SSD</a> is a buzz acronym for the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #solidstatedrives" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/solidstatedrives/">solid state drives</a> we want in our notebooks is to show the problems with practically stone-age spinning <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #harddrives" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/harddrives/">hard drives</a> inside most computers (and iPod classics). Since they have platters w/ magnetized surfaces that spin fast as they read or write data&mdash;think record player&mdash;they can be quite slow, and are really fragile. Anyone who's owned a computer or iPod knows (or will one day learn) that if the read/write head bumps into the platter, it's all over. SSDs aren't like that at all.</p>
<p>SSDs have no moving parts, so seek time is <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/clips/conventional-vs-solid-state-hard-drive-race-sony-tz91-328872.php">drastically reduced</a>. No spinning=less battery vampirage, so your laptop lasts longer too. And finally, the lack of a deadly read-write head means you can drop your SSD-powered lappy with far less chance of weeping. Right now, SSDs are usually made with either SDRAM (like RAM used in computers) or NAND flash (like in thumb drives, iPod nanos, etc.). Flash is more common, since it doesn't need a battery even though it's slower. Problems: Gig for gig, SSD is way expensive. The beefiest you'll be able to get soon is 128GB (or maybe 256GB)&mdash;but the current 64GB 2.5" SSDs go for $1,100 and up. Still got questions?</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/339598/giz-explains-whats-so-solid-about-solid-state-drives]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-339598]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[giz explains]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[portable media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[solid state drive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[solid state drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 02 Jan 2008 13:55:29 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=339598&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Crucial Announces Line of SSDs...Again]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Crucial issued a press release today announcing their forthcoming line of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #solidstatedrives" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #solidstatedrives" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/solidstatedrives/">Solid State Drives</a>, but it appears to be the same news we covered in <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/solid-state-drives/micron-unveils-realssd-solid-state-drives-in-32gb-64gb-flavors-327554.php">November</a>. [<a href="http://www.crucial.com/company/media/releases/pressrelease.aspx?id=9F0DC714EFA2B68E">Crucial</a>]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/339760/crucial-announces-line-of-ssdsagain]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-339760]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[64 gb ssd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[crucial]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lexar]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[micron]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[solid state drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ssds]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 02 Jan 2008 13:26:50 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Covert]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=339760&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Toshiba Introduces 3 New SSD Flavors, 128GB is the Tastiest]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/toshiba2.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Toshiba is throwing its hat into the SSD business with a new line of multi-level cell (MLC) NAND SSDs in three distinct flavors: 32GB, 64GB and 128GB. They will also be available in three distinct form factors: embedded module, 1.8-inch and 2.5-inch drive enclosures. Expect 100MB/s peak read speed, 40MB/s peak write speed, a SATA II interface, and a lifespan of 1,000,000 hours. No word yet on pricing, but we should be able to see these on store shelves starting in March 2008. [<a href="http://www.infosyncworld.com/news/n/8685.html">infosync</a> and <a href="http://www.macbidouille.com/news/2007-12-10/#15452">MacBidouille</a> via <a href="http://www.ubergizmo.com/15/archives/2007/12/128gb_ssd_drive_from_toshiba.html">Ubergizmo</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/332171/toshiba-introduces-3-new-ssd-flavors-128gb-is-the-tastiest]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-332171]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[solid state drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[128gb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[32gb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[64gb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mlc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[toshiba]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:50:34 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=332171&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Micron's Future Concept of SSD is RAM-Module Like]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/11/Micron_ssd_module.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><iframe src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http://digg.com/gadgets/Obvious_Yet_Genius_The_Future_of_Solid_State_Drive_Looks_More_Like_RAM" align="right" frameborder="0" height="82" scrolling="no" width="55"></iframe>In addition to Micron's traditional <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #solidstatedrives" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/solidstatedrives/">solid state drives</a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/solid-state-drives/micron-unveils-realssd-solid-state-drives-in-32-gb-64-gb-flavors-327554.php">announced today</a>, they also showed off a concept for a SSD module that resembles RAM in physical design and would fit into a similarly designed port. It's obvious but genius: while the SSD drives with SATA interfaces are terrific because they can be used in current laptops with no mods, the real performance of flash mem is only going to be unlocked when we cast aside the legacy of spinning disks and their cases and interfaces and mount SSDs on the mobo like we do RAM modules.</p>
<p>The design uses a SATA interface and is only 4 mm thick. Micron claims the advantages of such a design are the small size and the ability to line up multiple drives next to each other. In addition, this design requires no wires or attaching the motherboard with screws, reducing the risk of the SSD becoming disconnnected or loose inside a computer. While this product is nowhere near ready for market, Micron says they would need to work with an OEM or someone who can offer a compatible computer solution. [<a href="http://www.micron.com">Micron</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/327613/microns-future-concept-of-ssd-is-ram+module-like]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-327613]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[solid state drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard disks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sata]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:37:52 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Covert]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=327613&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Micron unveils RealSSD Solid State Drives in 32GB, 64GB Flavors]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/11/micronssd.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Micron announced today that they will be releasing the RealSSD line of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #solidstatedrives" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/solidstatedrives/">solid state drives</a>, including a 64GB drive. While the entire line ranges from 1GB to 64GB, the 32 and 64 GB models are geared toward notebook and desktop use. The drives feature a SATA II interface and draw a mere 2 watts of power.<br>
<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('micronssd', 3, 'Micron RealSSD');
</script></p>
<p>The 32GB drive will come in 1.8" and 2.5" sizes, while the 64GB will only ship in a 2.5" size. Micron, who also owns memory makers Lexar and Crucial, will release an SSD USB enclosement under the Crucial brand, making SSD expansion easier for users. Micron also expressed an interest in making a 128GB SSD, but have no definite plans as of yet. Pricing is still undetermined on the 32GB and 64GB models, but Micron expects the products to ship in Q1 2008. [<a href="http://www.micron.com">Micron</a>] <script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('micronssd', 3, 'Micron RealSSD');
</script><br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/327554/micron-unveils-realssd-solid-state-drives-in-32gb-64gb-flavors]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-327554]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[solid state drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[crucial]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard disks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[micron]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nand]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:06:40 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Covert]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=327554&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Samsung Unveils New 64GB SATA II SSDs]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/11/samsungssd.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Samsung is intent on leading the way in SSD adoption with their new 1.8-inch and 2.5-inch 64GB <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #solidstatedrives" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/solidstatedrives/">solid state drives</a> featuring a super-fast <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #sataii" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/sataii/">SATA II</a> interface. With a combination of speed, 100 MBps write speed and a 120MBps read speed and lower power consumption, it won't be long before we see these babies popping up in a lot more devices. Unfortunately, prices are still a barrier, and that is not expected to change when Samsung finally announces how much these drives will cost. [<a href="http://www.akihabaranews.com/en/news-15052-Samsung+Reveals+High-performance+64GByte+SATA+II+SSDs+for+High-end+PC+and+Server+Storage+Markets.html">Akihabara News</a> via <a href="http://blog.scifi.com/tech/archives/2007/11/07/samsung_unveils_1.html">SciFi Tech</a> via <a href="http://www.uberreview.com/2007/11/64gb-samsung-sata-ii-ssd.htm">Uberreview]</a></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/320117/samsung-unveils-new-64gb-sata-ii-ssds]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-320117]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sata]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sata ii]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[solid state drives]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 07 Nov 2007 10:30:34 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=320117&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Samsung's 1.8" 64GB SSD Gets Mass-Production Go-Ahead]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/06/64GB-1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/><br>
Samsung has announced plans to put its 1.8-inch 64GB Solid State Drive into mass production. Consisting of 64 eight Gigabit single-level cell flash memory chips (each one's circuitry is 1/2500th the width of a human hair) the new SSDs will be making devices faster, more efficient, and should boost battery life by up to 20 per cent. This move makes the Korean company the largest producer of high-capacity SSDs worldwide.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.samsung.com/PressCenter/PressRelease/PressRelease.asp?seq=20070625_0000356219">SAMSUNG Mass Producing Industry's First 1.8-inch, 64GB Solid State Drive, Targeted for Notebook PCs</a> [Press Release]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/271800/samsungs-18-64gb-ssd-gets-mass+production-go+ahead]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-271800]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[solid state drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[64gb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 25 Jun 2007 04:33:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[AddyDugdale]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=271800&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[PNY and SanDisk Boost SSD Offerings; SSD Lappies Imminent]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/06/ssd-5000-family-64gb.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />PNY and SanDisk have some pretty slick new offerings on the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #solidstatedrives" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/solidstatedrives/">solid state drives</a> front, inching us ever closer to the time when all new laptops will come with flash hard drives for faster, quieter and more efficient access.</p>

<p>First, SanDisk announced their 1.8-inch 64GB UATA 5000 and 2.5-inch 64GB SATA 5000 SSDs. Not too shabby. Then PNY went ahead and busted out their 2.5-inch 128GB SSD, which is even better. Neither company has touched <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/laptops/pqi-teases-us-with-speedy-256gb-solid+state-drive-264197.php">PQI's insane 256GB 2.5-inch SSD</a>, but that thing is going to cost the price of a small island, so what we're really seeing at this point is a race to reasonable prices.</p>
<p>With bigger SSDs coming out for less and less every day (although none of the above mentioned products have price tags as of yet), it's only a matter of months until we start seeing the transition to SSD laptops start in full effect. Get excited. <span class="byline">&ndash;Adam Frucci</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www2.pny.com/pressroom/pressReleases.aspx?year=2007">PNY</a> and <a href="http://www.sandisk.com/Oem/Default.aspx?CatID=1477">SanDisk</a> [via <a href="http://crunchgear.com/2007/06/04/pny-sandisk-solid-state-drives-in-sizes-worth-buying/">CrunchGear</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/266087/pny-and-sandisk-boost-ssd-offerings-ssd-lappies-imminent]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-266087]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[solid state drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pny]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pqi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sandisk]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 05 Jun 2007 12:25:22 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=266087&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Asus to Sell $199 Flash-based Laptops]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/04/Asus%20Budget.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /> Those <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/laptops/apple-to-put-solid-state-nand-memory-into-laptops-by-2007-181090.php">flash-based laptops</a> we're all dreaming about may be a lot cheaper than we expected. Asus just announced their plans to make five budget, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/peripherals/sandisk-unveils-32gb-drop+in-replacement-drive-for-notebooks-225980.php">solid state</a> laptops this year priced from $199 to $549. Each machine will have a 7-inch display, and depending on the model it'll have a flash drive ranging from 1GB to 40GB. The lappies are expected later this year (the pic above isn't one of them). <span class="byline">&ndash; Louis Ramirez</span><br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/biz/archives/2007/04/17/2003357074">Asustek Venturing into Budget Laptops</a> [Taipei Times via <a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=38981">Inquirer</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/252892/asus-to-sell-199-flash+based-laptops]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-252892]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[asus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[asustek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flash drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[portable media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[solid state drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:45:33 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Louis Ramirez]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=252892&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Samsung Warns of Severe NAND Flash Shortage]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/03/samsungflash-lg1.jpg" class="right image158" width="158" /> It seems like just yesterday Samsung was proudly touting around their <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/samsung/samsung-64gb-solid+state-drive-keeps-apple-fans-drooling-247405.php">64GB solid state drive</a>, but today they're singing a different tune, claiming there's gonna be a severe NAND flash shortage during the second half of the year.</p>
<p>Curiously, they don't state the reason for the shortage (they could be inflating their own chests) although a safe assumption is the demand for high-capacity 4GB and 8GB gadgets, like MP3 players and music-playing cell phones. So the bad new is it looks like <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #flashmemory" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/flashmemory/">flash memory</a> prices are gonna go up. <span class="byline">&ndash; Louis Ramirez</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=38559">Samsung Raises Alarm About Flash Shortage</a> [The Inquirer]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/247729/samsung-warns-of-severe-nand-flash-shortage]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-247729]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[peripherals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flash memory]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nand flash memory]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[solid state drives]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:36:32 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Louis Ramirez]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=247729&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Fujitsu Gives Its LifeBook Tablets Solid State Drives]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/03/fujitsulifebookp1610.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /> Our hats go off to Fujitsu this morning for giving two of their Tablet PCs <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/peripherals/sandisk-announces-cheap-32gb-25+inch-solid+state-drives-243771.php">flash drive makeovers</a>. The 12.1-inch LifeBook B6210 and 8.9-inch P1610 will both have the option of coming with either a 16GB or 32GB solid state drive. Because <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #flashdrives" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/flashdrives/">flash drives</a> have no moving parts, they'll help speed up performance and save battery life, although the drives will add a $700 (16GB) and $1,200 (32GB) premium to the tablets' prices. <span class="byline">&ndash; Louis Ramirez</span></p>
<p><a href="http://laptopmag.com/News/Notebooks/Fujitsu-LifeBook-B6210-and-P1610-Go-Flash.htm">Fujitsu LifeBook B6210 and P1610 Go Flash</a> [Laptop]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/245222/fujitsu-gives-its-lifebook-tablets-solid-state-drives]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-245222]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flash drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fujitsu]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fujitsu lifebook b6210]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fujitsulifebook p1610]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lifebook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[solid state drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:48:36 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Louis Ramirez]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=245222&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[SanDisk Announces Cheap 32GB 2.5-inch Solid-State Drives]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/03/Sandisk_SSD.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />CeBit, the largest consumer electronics show in the world, starts up on Thursday, and it's gotten to be a favorite time for disc manufacturers to roll out 32GB 2.5-inch <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #solidstatedrives" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/solidstatedrives/">solid-state drives</a>. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/peripherals/samsungs-32gb-flash-drive-hard-disk-killer-161923.php">Samsung announced its 2.5-inch 32-gig drive</a> last year at the show, and now SanDisk is getting in on the act, with the big news being its $350 price.</p>
<p>Seems like just yesterday <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/peripherals/sandisk-unveils-32gb-dropin-replacement-drive-for-notebooks-225980.php">SanDisk rolled out its $600 1.8-inch 32GB SSD</a> (it was in early January), but this 2.5-inch form factor is significant because it fits right in where more of those spinning hard drives have been firmly ensconced for the past few years. It's a drop-in replacement Serial ATA (SATA) drive, and at these prices, it looks like the revolution moving away from moving parts is well underway. <span class="byline">&ndash; Charlie White</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.tracyandmatt.co.uk/blogs/index.php/2007/03/13/sandisk_introduce_32gb_2_5_solid_state_d">SanDisk introduce 32GB 2.5" Solid State Disk</a> [Tracy and Matt's Blog]<br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/243771/sandisk-announces-cheap-32gb-25+inch-solid+state-drives]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-243771]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[peripherals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[2.5-inch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[32gb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sandisk]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sandisk 32gb 2.5-inch solid-state drive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[solid-state drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 13 Mar 2007 11:54:05 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie White]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=243771&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[A-Data's 128GB Solid State Drive Sees the Light of Day]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2007/01/128gb_ssd.jpg"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/01/128gb_ssd.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>A-Data was showing off this 128GB 2.5-inch solid-state drive in the back rooms of CES, and finally a picture of the largest-capacity SSD in the world has surfaced. Not much is known about it except that it's a SATA II drive and might be shipping about six months from now.</p>
<p>The biggest unanswered question: How much will it cost? Anybody have a guess? Take a look at another pic of the other side of this drive:</p>

<p><br>
<img alt="adata_ssd_back.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/01/adata_ssd_back.jpg" width="530" height="227" class="center"><br>
A-Data's not the only one building drives like this, we can just smell it. It won't be long before all disks will be made this way, and not a moment too soon! <span class="byline">&ndash; Charlie White</span></p>
<p><a href="http://aving.net/usa/news/default.asp?mode=read&c_num=34046&C_Code=02&SP_Num=53">A-DATA to present its 2.5 inch 128GB SSD</a> [AVing USA]<br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/231693/a+datas-128gb-solid-state-drive-sees-the-light-of-day]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-231693]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[peripherals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[solid state]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[solid-state drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 26 Jan 2007 09:26:39 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie White]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=231693&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
