<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: Star Trek]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/star trek</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'star trek']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Star Trek LED DIY Boldly Goes Where No Menorah Has Gone Before]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/startrekpezmenorah.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_startrekpezmenorah.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a> It's almost time for Hanukkah, and what better way to celebrate the Festival of Lights than with Kirk, Spock, Scotty and the the gang? The answer is none. There is no better way.</p>
<p>If you want to make your own, all you'll need are some <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #startrek" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/startrek/">Star Trek</a> Pez heads, a <a href="http://www.evilmadscientist.com/article.php/menorah">Deluxe LED Menorah Kit</a>, and a healthy disregard for tradition. In keeping with the holiday spirit, couldn't they have made room for Khan? [<a href="http://www.evilmadscientist.com/article.php/tosmenorah">Evil Mad Scientist</a> via <a href="http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2009/12/star_trek_pez_led_menorah.html">Make</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5423453/star-trek-led-diy-boldly-goes-where-no-menorah-has-gone-before]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5423453]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[diy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hanukkah]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[holiday]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[led]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[menorah]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek menorah]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Barrett]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5423453&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Absolute Most Important Development in Twitter Yet]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_klingontweet.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />140 characters. Automatically translated into Klingon. The future. (<em>Note: technically, you're limited to 100 characters to accommodate the idiosyncrasies of Klingon phonetics, but explaining that sorta kills the dramatic presentation of this post</em>.) [<a href="http://tweetinklingon.com/">Tweet in Klingon</a> via <a href="http://mashable.com/2009/12/06/tweet-in-klingon/">Mashable</a> via <a href="http://www.shinyshiny.tv/2009/12/fed_up_with_twe.html">ShinyShiny</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5421460/the-absolute-most-important-development-in-twitter-yet]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5421460]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[klingon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[klingon twitter]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 08 Dec 2009 09:00:31 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5421460&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Remainders - The Good, Bad and Ugly Stuff We Didn't Post (and Why)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p>Today in the musty sub-basement of Gizmodo we call Remainders, <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #startrek" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/startrek/">Star Trek</a></em>'s <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #simonpegg" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/simonpegg/">Simon Pegg</a> is having AppleCare difficulties, Santa gives you GPS directions, <em>Star Trek: TNG</em> gets bizarrely and hilariously re-dubbed, Adult-Swim-style, and Sony renames their ebook store.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/thumb160x_simon-pegg-no-inglorious-bastards-r.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /></p>
<h2>Apple, Why Must You Make Simon Pegg So Sad?</h2>
<p>Twartered by Simon Pegg (star of <em>Hot Fuzz</em>, <em>Shaun of the Dead</em>, <em>Spaced</em>, and some movie about spaceships or something) earlier today:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>My Macbook Air has been in hospital for two weeks. Please, Apple Store, Brent Cross give me my baby back!!!!!</p>
</blockquote>
<p>And later:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Got my old Macbook Pro to fill the void but it's lost its looks, refuses to behave and is full of shit. Like a teenager. Miss the wee one.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Dear Simon,</p>
<p>I know what you're going through. My own 2009 MacBook Pro has needed several major repairs since I paid Apple lots of money (so much money) for it five months ago, and each time it's been a rough separation. You'll pull through, I know it. After all, I did. Semper fi, brother.</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br>
Dan. [<a href="http://twitter.com/simonpegg/status/6442773233">Twitter 1</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/simonpegg/status/6444268401">2</a>]</p>
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ypjH1ExWSRQ&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ypjH1ExWSRQ&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object></p>
<h2>Santa: "Ho Ho Ho, Make a U-Turn, You Idiot"</h2>
<p>Sometimes I get tired of that stern robot lady from Google that barks directions at me through my Droid, but I don't know that I've ever wished she could be replaced by Santa Claus. But Telenav went ahead and added a $1 Santa voice for its GPS Navigator, which is available for a host of phones (mostly BlackBerry, WinMo, and PalmOS, not carrier-specific). If you want Christmas cheer in a kind of weird way, it's available now. [<a href="http://blog.telenav.com/blog/2009/12/get-santas-voice-for-your-telenav-gps-navigator-and-well-give-all-proceeds-to-toys-for-tots/">Telenav</a>]</p>
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_1"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/414TmP12WAU&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/414TmP12WAU&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object></p>
<h2>What In God's Name Is Going on on the USS Enterprise</h2>
<p>Okay you guys this Star Trek overdub is so simultaneously weird, hilarious and impressive that I don't want to spoil it by making any pithy little remarks. Suffice to say, are you for panda rape? Crazy woman! [<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=414TmP12WAU">YouTube</a>]</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/screen_shot_2009-12-07_at_10.23.16_pm.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_screen_shot_2009-12-07_at_10.23.16_pm.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<h2>Sony Updates eBook Store</h2>
<p>Sony may think this minor change is an "Important eBook Store Update," but then, they kind of have to. They changed the name of the store, from "The eBook Store from Sony" (which is admittedly sort of cumbersome) to "<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #readerstore" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/readerstore/">Reader Store</a>," and all new ebooks will be in the ePub standard. So why is it in Remainders? I'd tell you if my face wasn't slowly sinking into my keyboard out of boredomghhhhhgggggghhhhhhh. [<a href="http://direct.ebookstore.sony.com/P/v3/r.asp?r=T1_Url2&e=91319%3B913952%3B585415980%3B3%3B02&a=1007">Sony</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5421254/remainders-+-the-good-bad-and-ugly-stuff-we-didnt-post-and-why/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5421254]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[christmas]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gizmodo remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[reader store]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[santa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[simon pegg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[telenav]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 08 Dec 2009 01:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5421254&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Magnetic Shields to Protect Spaceships From Re-Entry and Klingon Attacks]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_star-trek-inspirational-poster.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Do you know why James T. Kirk is happy? Because those crazy Europeans are developing a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #magneticshield" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/magneticshield/">magnetic shield</a> that will protect spaceships when entering the Earth's atmosphere. Well, that and because he's thinking about doing naughty things with Uhura.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/magnetic_heat_shield_test_rocket.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_magnetic_heat_shield_test_rocket.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>The new magnetic heat shield&mdash;developed by EADS Astrium, the German aerospace center, and the European Space Agency&mdash;is expected to complement or replace traditional ceramic heat shields entirely. The field will be generated by a super-conducting coil, deflecting atmosphere particles from the surface of the spaceship and, therefore, eliminating friction.</p>
<p>If everything goes as they expect, it will be tested with a Russian Volna launcher in the next decade, which will enter the atmosphere at Mach 21. [<a href="http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2009/11/24/335327/magnetic-heat-shield-test-could-use-russian-launcher.html">Flight Global</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5418521/magnetic-shields-to-protect-spaceships-from-re+entry-and-klingon-attacks]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5418521]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[DLR]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[eads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[esa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[magnetic heat shields]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[magnetic shield]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[superconductors]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 Dec 2009 19:53:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5418521&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Scientists Develop Phaser That Can Stun (Worms)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/phaser.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />The good news: scientists have developed a <i><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #startrek" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/startrek/">Star Trek</a></i>-like phaser that can be set to stun. The bad news: it only works on worms so far.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Researchers have now found a way to paralyse tiny worms when they expose them to ultraviolet light. Even when the ultraviolet light was turned off the animals stayed stunned. However, if they were subsequently exposed to a different form of light they recovered again and were able to move.</p>
<p>The researchers claim that this is the first time that such an effect has been demonstrated in an animal. Although some of the worms died, most of them lived through the process.</p>
<p>The effect is caused by using a molecule which changes its shape when exposed to ultraviolet light.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Well, it's a start I suppose. [<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/6607725/Star-Trek-like-phaser-developed.html">Telegraph</a> via <a href="http://thedw.us/post/250271479/this-x-that-happy-world-toilet-day">The Daily What</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5409252/scientists-develop-phaser-that-can-stun-worms]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5409252]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phaser]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5409252&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Man Spoke Only Klingon to His Son for Three Years (And Wrote Us a Letter)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #darmondspeers" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/darmondspeers/">d'Armond Speers</a> isn't really a huge <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #startrek" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/startrek/">Star Trek</a> fan. The reason he spoke only in Klingon during his son's first three years of life was to learn about language acquisition processs. Yeah, sure. What a <a href="http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/PetaQ#petaQ">petaQ</a>. <b>Updated: Speers wrote in.</b></p>
<p>Yes, I think That Speers is such a horrid person that I had to learn how to say so in Klingon from our intern Don. It just baffles me that Speers actually sounds genuinely proud of his personal pseudo-academic project:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>I was interested in the question of whether my son, going through his first language acquisition process, would acquire it like any human language. He was definitely starting to learn it."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It's great that he wanted to see how languages are picked up, but did he not think that there's potential that he hindered his son's social development by keeping focus away from a real language? I'm all for teaching foreign languages early on, but lets make it ones that are spoken on this planet, please. [<a href="http://blogs.citypages.com/blotter/2009/11/dinkytown_dad_s.php">Citypages</a> via<a href="http://www.geekologie.com/2009/11/dhttpwwwgeekologiecommtmtcgiad.php">Geekologie</a>]</p>
<p><b>Update 1:</b> Turns out that d'Armond Speers is a daily Gizmodo reader and not too excited about what I or some of you have said. To his credit though, he wrote me a very polite email and at no point called me any number of foul words that I might not understand.</p>
<p>Among other things, in his email Speers explained that his son is 15 now and has turned into a great kid. While he didn't remark about which languages his son speaks or studies now (or about how the boy feels about his childhood language experiment), the general implication is simply that he's a happy camper without any social scars.</p>
<p>As far as the main issue went, Speers told me that the only time he spoke Klingon around his son during those three years was when the two were interacting directly. His son was primarily exposed to English in his environment and also observed Speers speaking the language to others, which was why this whole thing didn't work as planned:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>This ultimately was the reason the attempt failed, because it was an extra effort for him to speak Klingon to me, that was obviously not necessary because I obviously spoke English.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Clever kid. Why should he be speaking in tongue-twisters to dad when he doesn't have to? Sounds like a slightly-too-early example of teenage rebellion and no reason it shouldn't, because according to Speers, aside from the Star Trek influence, his son had a pretty normal childhood:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Second, just because I spoke Klingon does not mean that I was teaching him to wield a bat'leth or drink black ale. It was a language, and we did normal things that other parents do.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>While even after Speers' email (and his unexpected sense of humor), I still don't think that Klingon (or any constructed language) is the best language to teach a child who's still barely grasping his mother tongue, the man behind the story seems a lot more human now. And while I or some of you may not agree with his methodologies or that his child was his subject for study, Speers didn't seem to let his academic curiosities overpower his primary prerogative as a parent. So, final disagreement or not, I take back the petaQ.</p>
<p><b>Update 2:</b> Original post image removed at the request of the fellow in it.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5408022/man-spoke-only-klingon-to-his-son-for-three-years-and-wrote-us-a-letter]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5408022]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chlidren]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[d'armond speers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[klingon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[languages]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wtf]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5408022&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Confirmed: R2-D2 Finally Discovered In Star Trek]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/r2d2_star-trek.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_r2d2_star-trek.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>At last, here's the droid we were all looking for. In this frame you can clearly see R2-D2's cameo in JJ Abrams' <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #startrek" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/startrek/">Star Trek</a>. This time there's absolutely no doubt about it: It's been confirmed by ILM.</p>
<p><i>Click on the image to see the high resolution version</i></p>
<p>Can you see him floating there, on the left, right below the huge arrow that I also missed when I saw the movie? That's obviously him, a fact that has been confirmed to me by one of the movie's sequence supervisors at Industrial Light & Magic&mdash;the same guy <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5286649/mystery-solved-this-is-where-r2+d2-is-in-star-trek">who said this previous sighting</a> was just the shuttle.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http://digg.com/movies/Confirmed_R2_D2_Finally_Discovered_In_Star_Trek_IMAGE" align="right" frameborder="0" height="82" scrolling="no" width="55"></iframe>I don't know about you but, right now, I feel like what I imagine my dog Jones feels every time I take his collar off to scratch his neck. Oh yesyeyeyeyes. YES. Harf. Woof. [Image capture from <a href="http://www.sciencefictionstuff.com/2009/10/finally-spotted-r2d2-in-star-trek.html">Science Fiction Stuff</a>&mdash;Thanks ILM tipster]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5405276/confirmed-r2+d2-finally-discovered-in-star-trek]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5405276]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ilm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[r2-d2]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 15 Nov 2009 20:31:19 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5405276&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[DIY Star Trek Bluetooth Communicator Almost Makes Regular Bluetooth Headsets Look Stylish]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/TueSAiSGWTs&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/TueSAiSGWTs&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object>This DIY <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #startrek" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/startrek/">Star Trek</a> Bluetooth Communicator instantly reminded me of <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5372521/fabric-antenna+based-personal-communicator-makes-most-of-my-star-trek-fantasies-reality#c15756632">a comment</a> a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/people/omg-ponies/">dear reader</a> left <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5372521/fabric-antenna+based-personal-communicator-makes-most-of-my-star-trek-fantasies-reality">when I shared a Star Trek fantasy</a>. He was right: Bluetooth is the ruin of Star Trek. But this is a fun quick-n-dirty project.</p>
<p>Basically you're cramming a Bluetooth module and a microcontroller into a toy Communicator and then pairing everything with your phone. As long as you've got voice dialing, you can leave your phone out of sight and be the snazziest Trekkie on the streets. Just don't come crying to me if someone stuffs you into a locker, trashcan, or wormhole. [<a href="http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2009/11/star_trek_bluetooth_communicator.html">Make</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5398946/diy-star-trek-bluetooth-communicator-almost-makes-regular-bluetooth-headsets-look-stylish]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5398946]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[diy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bluetooth]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[communicator]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[diy bluetooth star trek communicator]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398946&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Own Your Own Starfleet Shuttle Simulator]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p>A Utah school is selling off its <i><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #startrek" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/startrek/">Star Trek</a></i>-inspired USS Galileo, which means this is your chance to own your very own spaceship simulator. It's perfectly practical! [<a href="http://www.publicsurplus.com/sms/all,ut/auction/view?auc=384131">Auction</a> via <a href="http://io9.com/5395746/own-your-very-own-starfleet-shuttle-simulator/gallery/">io9</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_galileo1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_galileo2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_galileo3.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_galileo4.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_galileo5.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_galileo6.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396123/own-your-own-starfleet-shuttle-simulator/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396123]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[spaceships]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[simulator]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396123&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Xbox 360 Bundle With Star Trek and Transformers 2 Movies]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_custom_1257137132893_Trek-1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #xbox360" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/xbox360/">Xbox 360</a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5388075/microsoft-says-no-xbox-blu+ray-drives-period-says-ballmer-was-talking-about-pcs">may or may not</a> be getting that Blu-ray drive, but a new marketing strategy bundles the console with <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #startrek" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/startrek/">Star Trek</a></em> or <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #transformers2" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/transformers2/">Transformers 2</a></em>.</p>

<p>Confirmed exclusively for the UK at the moment, the packages include an Xbox Elite, an extra controller and the related movie on USB (not DVD). You may also score some extra Microsoft points.</p>
<p>The offer is strange, not just because of the Hollywood branding or the lack of optical media. The offer is strange because Microsoft isn't promoting the free download of either movie through Xbox Live. USB sticks? Really? [<a href="http://www.mcvuk.com/news/36293/New-UK-360-bundles-revealedrn">MCV</a> and <a href="http://www.videogamer.com/news/star_trek_and_transformers_xbox_360_bundles_incoming.html">VideoGamer</a> via <a href="http://kotaku.com/5394845/star-trek-and-transformers-get-elite-bundles">Kotaku</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5395045/xbox-360-bundle-with-star-trek-and-transformers-2-movies]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5395045]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[xbox 360]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[paramount]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[transformers 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xbox 360 bundles]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 02 Nov 2009 08:06:55 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5395045&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[4GB Star Trek Flash Drive Comes Loaded With The New Film]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/startrek-usb.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged STAR TREK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/star-trek/">Star Trek</a>, merchandising and obsessive fans go hand in hand, so it is not surprising that the new film is being released on an individually numbered 4GB Starfleet insignia USB drive.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/star_trek_flash_drive.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_star_trek_flash_drive.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>Needless to say, the drive is also loaded up with DRM&mdash;but you are allowed to run it on 5 registered devices and burn it to DVD, so it's not unreasonable. And since it has been deemed as a "collectible", fans will surely line up to fork over their $29. [<a href="http://www.play.com/Gadgets/Gadgets/4-/11998344/Star-Trek-USB-Stick/Product.html#">Play</a> via <a href="http://www.ohgizmo.com/2009/10/12/get-the-new-star-trek-movie-on-a-limited-edition-flash-drive/">OhGizmo</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5379741/4gb-star-trek-flash-drive-comes-loaded-with-the-new-film]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5379741]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flash drive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movie]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek usb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[thumb drive]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5379741&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Fabric Antenna-Based Personal Communicator Makes Most of My Star Trek Fantasies Reality]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/dorkypatch.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_dorkypatch.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>My second biggest <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged STAR TREK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/star-trek/">Star Trek</a> fantasy? Being able to tap a badge to communicate. Silly, but not to a Finnish company who is improving on Star Trek design and my fantasies with flexible, fabric communicators toting built-in GPS to boot.</p>

<p>Over the last year and a half, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged PATRIA AVIATION OY" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/patria-aviation-oy/">Patria Aviation Oy</a> has worked on developing a flexible-yet-durable, functional-yet-adaptable antenna. The best part? Based on a successful call to the "Netherlands from their headquarters in Finland by using the prototype antenna," they've succeeded.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/fabricpatch.JPG"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_fabricpatch.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>How do they work? Apparently the flexible antennas connect "to Iridium satellites (whose low-altitude operations do not require large antennas)" for outgoing calls. As it stands, they can't take incoming calls. This leaves me a bit baffled, since if I'd only want to call people with other patch communicators, if I had one. Also a bit confusing is exactly <i>where</i> the actual phone and GPS portion of this device is kept (the patch is only the antenna, after all).</p>
<p>Aside from those oddities, these flexible antennas sound fantastic: They're supposedly able to "maintain a strong radio signal, even when the patch is bent vertically, horizontally or diagonally" and "send location information to a remote user" (great because a device in your pocket or wherever might have trouble sending a GPS signal). All that seems to be missing is the option to get beamed up.</p>
<p>And in case you're wondering: no, I won't share my number one Star Trek fantasy (though you're free to guess). [<a href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/45768">Network World</a> via <a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/10/01/0322235/Communicator-Clothing">Slashdot</a> via <a href="http://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2009-10/fabric-antenna-inches-closer-star-trek-clothing-phone">PopSci</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5372521/fabric-antenna+based-personal-communicator-makes-most-of-my-star-trek-fantasies-reality]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5372521]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[personal communicator]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[antenna]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[esa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[european space agency]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fabric]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fabric antenna]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Patria Aviation Oy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek communicator]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 02 Oct 2009 00:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5372521&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Navy's Future Command Center Makes Star Trek a Reality]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/enterprise1_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_enterprise1_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center Pacific (SPAWAR) is the Navy's new command center designed to create an "unfair advantage" over enemy forces. And I'll be damned if they didn't set it up to look like the USS Enterprise.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/enterprise2_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_enterprise2_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Spaceship-like setups include a 135-inch viewscreen, huge multi-touchscreen desks and fancy equipment and screens being scattered all over the damned place. Essentially, it looks like the <i>future</i>.</p>
<p>All this stuff is designed to tackle things like network-enabled warfare and management and systems designs, somewhat boring stuff compared to laser guns and the like, but probably way more important in future conflicts. In any case, I look forward to the time when they put all this stuff on a spaceship.</p>
<p><object width="364" height="280"><param name="movie" value="http://www.cnet.com/av/video/flv/universalPlayer/universalSmall.swf">
<param name="wmode" value="transparent">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<param name="FlashVars" value="playerType=embedded&type=id&value=50077563">
<embed src="http://www.cnet.com/av/video/flv/universalPlayer/universalSmall.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="364" height="280" allowfullscreen="true" flashvars="playerType=embedded&type=id&value=50077563"></object>[<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13772_3-10362933-52.html?tag=rtcol;txt">CNET</a> via <a href="http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/kit-eaton/technomix/navys-command-centre-future-inspired-star-trek">Fast Company</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5371198/navys-future-command-center-makes-star-trek-a-reality]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5371198]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[navy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[spawar]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:46:49 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5371198&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Warning: Don't Die Around Geeks or This Might Happen]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/3961372594_4d6fe366a9.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_3961372594_4d6fe366a9.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>We're sure it was meant as a loving gesture, but when a man puts his brother's cremated remains into a SPARCstation case, even we begin to question our geek sensibilities.</p>

<p>Strangely enough, the eccentric urn does not seem to have been a request of the deceased, but an earnest and loving gesture by family. From brother/flickr user sam 3.14:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>His friends and family were able to leave their final good-byes on post-notes. Anyone who wanted to keep their words private could just slip their note into the case through the floppy slot. All notes will be sealed in plastic and placed within the case. There has been one complication. His daughters like the look of it so much they aren't now sure if they want to bury him.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Apparently "Beam Me Up Scotty. I'm done here" were among the departed's final words.<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/3961372582_beba223042.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_3961372582_beba223042.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>And while years of browsing the internet has forced me to question the validity of this tale, that same experience has also convinced me that, yes, this probably actually happened. [<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/26445696@N04/3961372594/">flickr</a> via <a href="http://news.slashdot.org/story/09/09/29/193234/A-Geek-Funeral">Slashdot</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5371067/warning-dont-die-around-geeks-or-this-might-happen]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5371067]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[death]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[SPARCstation]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5371067&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Gene Roddenberry's 1984 Original Macintosh for Sale]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/mac-gene.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_mac-gene.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Would you like to write a saga about a spaceship with a womanizing captain, an awkward scientist/philosopher, a maniacal doctor, a drunk engineer, a voluptuous communications officer, a communist pilot, and a gay helmsman? Well, this Macintosh 128 won't help.</p>
<p>If your name were <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GENE RODDENBERRY" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/gene-roddenberry/">Gene Roddenberry</a>, however, that would have been a piece of cake. Still, if you are an <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged STAR TREK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/star-trek/">Star Trek</a> fan, you may be interested in bidding for this original Macintosh 128 with serial number F4200NUM0001, owned by the sci-fi genius himself. According to that number, it was the 776th Mac 128, manufactured during the 20th week of 1984 in Fremont, California.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/firstmacplus-thumb-550x367-24309.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_firstmacplus-thumb-550x367-24309.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>It's exactly <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5269088/what-to-do-with-an-original-1984-macintosh">like the one I have</a>&mdash;including the Macintosh team signatures etching inside&mdash;except mine was manufactured on the 28th week of 1984.</p>
<p>Profiles in History&mdash;who got <i>all</i> their facts wrong in their press release, hopefully not the bit about this being Roddenberry's computer&mdash;is going to auction the computer and the extra floppy drive at the beginning of October. It has an estimated sale price of $800 to $1200, which seems quite cheap, knowing who the owner was. [<a href="http://dvice.com/archives/2009/09/own-the-first-a.php">Dvice</a>]</p>

<p><b>Gizmodo Gallery 2009</b><br>
<a href="http://www.16sur20.com/">Groupe</a><br>
<a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=267+Elizabeth+Street+New+York&sll=37.0625,-95.677068&sspn=33.847644,62.666016&ie=UTF8&ll=40.724966,-73.993864&spn=0.007903,0.015299&z=16&iwloc=A">267 Elizabeth Street</a><br>
New York, NY 10012</p>
<p>Gallery Dates:<br>
September 23rd-27th</p>
<p>Times:</p>
<p>9/22 Tuesday<br>
Media Day by appointment only. For info please contact <a href="mailto:gallery@gizmodo.com">gallery@gizmodo.com</a>.</p>
<p>9/23 Wednesday<br>
12-8</p>
<p>9/24 Thursday<br>
12-8</p>
<p>9/25 Friday<br>
12-8</p>
<p>9/26 Saturday<br>
11-8<br>
9-? - Live KCRW Show</p>
<p>9/27 Sunday<br>
11-6</p>
<p><em>Read more about our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5350574/gizmodo-gallery-2009-were-back-for-another-year">Giz Gallery 09 here</a>, follow <a href="http://twitter.com/gizgallery">@gizgallery</a> on Twitter and see what else we'll be <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/giz-gallery-09/">playing with</a> at the event. And special thanks to Toyota's Prius &mdash; without their sponsorship, there would be no Gizmodo Gallery.</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5361983/gene-roddenberrys-1984-original-macintosh-for-sale]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5361983]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gene roddenberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[giz gallery 09]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macintosh]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5361983&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Star Trek Returns to IMAX this Friday]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/startrek11.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_startrek11.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The latest <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged STAR TREK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/star-trek/">Star Trek</a></em> was a great movie (indisputable fact), but it only had a two-week run at most IMAX theaters because of the summer blockbuster schedule. So it's returning for two more weeks to these 85 IMAX theaters, Friday:</p>

<blockquote>Mesa , AZ – Gateway 12 + IMAX Theatre<br>
Phoenix , AZ – Deer Valley 30 with IMAX<br>
Aliso Viejo , CA – Aliso Viejo Stadium 20 with IMAX<br>
Camarillo , CA – Camarillo 12 with IMAX<br>
El Dorado Hills , CA – El Dorado Hills Stadium 14 with IMAX<br>
Emeryville , CA – Bay Street 16 with IMAX<br>
Escondido , CA – Escondido Stadium 16 with IMAX<br>
Fairfield , CA – Fairfield Stadium 16 + IMAX<br>
Fresno , CA – Fresno Stadium 21 + IMAX<br>
Ontario , CA – Ontario Palace Stadium 22 + IMAX<br>
San Diego , CA – Palm Promenade 24 with IMAX<br>
Santa Clara , CA – Mercado 20 with IMAX<br>
Simi Valley , CA – Civic Center Stadium 16 + IMAX<br>
South Gate , CA – South Gate Stadium 20 with IMAX<br>
Stockton , CA – Downtown Stockton 16 + IMAX<br>
Universal City , CA – Citywalk Stadium 19 with IMAX<br>
Westchester , CA – Bridge De Lux 18 + IMAX<br>
Altamonte Springs , FL – Altamonte Mall 18 with IMAX<br>
Aventura , FL – Aventura Mall 24 with IMAX<br>
Cape Canaveral , FL – IMAX Theater<br>
Fort Myers , FL – Gulf Coast Town Center Stadium 16 + IMAX<br>
Jacksonville , FL – Regency 24 with IMAX<br>
Orange Park , FL – Orange Park 24 with IMAX<br>
Orlando , FL – Pointe Orlando Stadium 20 + IMAX<br>
Orlando , FL – Waterford Lakes Stadium 20 with IMAX<br>
St Petersberg , FL – Baywalk 19 + IMAX<br>
Tallahassee , FL – IMAX Theatre Tallahassee<br>
Tampa , FL – Museum of Science and Industry (MOSI)<br>
Tampa , FL – Veterans 24 with IMAX<br>
Tampa , FL – Channelside Cinemas Stadium 9 + IMAX<br>
Augusta , GA – Augusta Exchange Stadium 20 + IMAX<br>
Kennesaw , GA – Barrett Commons 24 with IMAX<br>
Morrow , GA – Southlake Pavilion 24 with IMAX Honolulu , HI – Dole Cannery 18 with IMAX<br>
Boise , ID – Boise Stadium 21 + IMAX<br>
Batavia , IL – Randall 14 + IMAX<br>
Lincolnshire , IL – Lincolnshire Stadium 20 + IMAX<br>
Woodridge , IL – Cinemark 16 + IMAX<br>
Noblesville , IN – Hamilton 16 IMAX<br>
Portage , IN – Portage 15 + IMAX<br>
Louisville , KY – Stoney Brook IMAX<br>
Newport , KY – Newport Levee 20 with IMAX<br>
Harahan , LA – Elmwood Palace 20 with IMAX<br>
Boston , MA – New England Aquarium<br>
Saco , ME – Cinemagic Saco 12 with IMAX<br>
Detroit , MI – Detroit Science Center IMAX Theatre<br>
Grand Blanc , MI – NCG Trillium Cinema + IMAX<br>
Lansing , MI – Celebration – Lansing 19 + IMAX<br>
Sterling Heights , MI – Forum 30 with IMAX<br>
Ypsilanti , MI – Showcase Ann Arbor 20 + IMAX<br>
Roseville , MN – Rosedale 14 with IMAX<br>
Saint Louis , MO – Ronnies Cinemas 19 + IMAX<br>
Charlotte , NC – Stonecrest At Piper Glen Stadium 22 with IMAX<br>
Concord , NC – Concord Mills 24 with IMAX<br>
Council Bluffs , IA – Star Cinema 16 with IMAX<br>
Henderson , NV – Sunset Station Stadium 13 with IMAX<br>
Las Vegas , NV – Brenden Palms 13 + IMAX<br>
Las Vegas , NV – Red Rock Stadium 15 + IMAX<br>
North Las Vegas , NV – Aliante Station 16 with IMAX<br>
Brooklyn , NY – Sheepshead Bay 14 with IMAX<br>
Deer Park , NY – Deer Park Stadium 16 and IMAX<br>
New Rochelle , NY – New Roc City Stadium 18 + IMAX<br>
Williamsville , NY – Transit Center Stadium 18 +IMAX<br>
Columbus , OH – Easton Town Center 30 with IMAX<br>
Springdale , OH – Showcase Springdale 18 IMAX<br>
Bensalem , PA – Neshaminy 24 with IMAX<br>
Homestead , PA – Waterfront 22 with IMAX<br>
Philadelphia , PA – Tuttleman IMAX – Franklin Institute<br>
Tarentum , PA – Pittsburgh Mills Mall 17 + IMAX<br>
Myrtle Beach , SC – IMAX Discovery Theatre<br>
Chattanooga , TN – Tennessee Aquarium<br>
Knoxville , TN – Pinnacle Stadium Cinemas 17 + IMAX<br>
Colleyville , TX – Colleyville Cinema Grille & IMAX<br>
Garland , TX – Firewheel 18 with IMAX<br>
Houston , TX – Gulf Pointe 30 with IMAX<br>
Mesquite , TX – Mesquite 30 with IMAX<br>
Sugarland , TX – First Colony 24 with IMAX<br>
Sandy , UT – Jordan Commons 16 + IMAX<br>
Midlothian , VA – Commonwealth Stadium 20 with IMAX<br>
Virginia Beach , VA – Lynnhaven 18 with IMAX<br>
Woodbridge , VA – Potomac Mills 18 with IMAX<br>
Kent , WA – Kent Station 14 with IMAX<br>
Lacey , WA – Martin Village Stadium 16 + IMAX<br>
Hull , QC – Canadian Museum Of Civilization<br>
Victoria , BC – National Geographic Theater</blockquote>
<p>I'm not going to pretend that anyone reading this story would be seeing JJ Abrams' <em>Star Trek</em> for the first time. Or even the second. But in case you didn't get to see Star Trek 3-?? times in the theater, this is probably your best, last chance...ever. Starting September 18th, <em>Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs</em> will most likely replace Star Trek. So like we said up top, you have two weeks to see it until the film is rereleased as a Disney classic in 2050. [<a href="http://trekmovie.com/">Trek Movie</a> via <a href="http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/09/01/star-trek-returns-to-imax/">SlashFilm</a> via <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/09/02/star-trek-to-return-to-imax-theaters-starting-this-friday/">CrunchGear</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5351082/star-trek-returns-to-imax-this-friday]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5351082]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[films]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek imax]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5351082&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Boldly Going and Digging Up Gardens Where No Dog Has Dug Before]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/Enterprise_dog.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_Enterprise_dog.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Well, this is pretty incredible. Yes, it's a dog in a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged USS ENTERPRISE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/uss-enterprise/">USS Enterprise</a> costume made out of cardboard and Bud Light cans. <i>His</i> prime directive is to ruin this costume when he takes a leak. [<a href="http://scifiwire.com/2009/08/this-dog-goes-where-no-do.php">SciFi Wire</a> via <a href="http://www.geekologie.com/2009/08/sure_hes_happy_enterprise_dog.php">Geekologie</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5347198/boldly-going-and-digging-up-gardens-where-no-dog-has-dug-before]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5347198]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[pets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[awesome things]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dogs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[uss enterprise]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 27 Aug 2009 19:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5347198&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[I'm Enrolling in Starf Leet Clown College]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/5QyqAglaojY&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/5QyqAglaojY&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo"></object>Here are altered clips from four of the year's biggest movies, made infinitely better by the insane geniuses at <a href="http://www.fatalfarm.com">Fatal Farm</a>. Oh how I wish all of these movies were all like this.</p>
<p>Fatal Farm made these for the MTV Movie Awards, but they were apparently a bit too insane for their tastes. I guess I can see why, but these are just so good.</p>
<p>And if you haven't yet, be sure to check out the other stuff on Fatal Farm's site, such as the alternate TV themes (Designing Women is my favorite). [<a href="http://www.fatalfarm.com">Fatal Farm</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5340916/im-enrolling-in-starf-leet-clown-college]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5340916]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dark knight]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wolverine]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5340916&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Real Star Trek Tricorder Media Player Goes Where No PMP Has Gone Before]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/PMP-09-1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_PMP-09-1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>We've seen plenty of <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/tricorder/">Tricorder-styled</a> gizmos, but the PMP-09 is the best I've seen, and a functional gadget in its own-right. The flip-up PMP has a 2.8-inch display, 8GB storage, and provides 12 hours of music/4 hours of video playback.</p>
<p>It has 12 different <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged STAR TREK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/star-trek/">Star Trek</a> LCARS (Library Computer Access/Retrieval System) interface themes, and the site says more will be available for download. File format support is listed as MP3, MP4, AVI JPG, BMP, and WAV.</p>
<p>What gave me goosebumps: Seeing that beyond the TR-590 Tricorder X-style design, there are also Medical, Borg, Marine, Workbee and Troi-styled models available. The starting price of $349 might bring you back down to earth, though. [<a href="http://www.ameralisgrafx.com/tricorders.html">AmeralisGrafx</a> &mdash; Thanks Junior!]</p>
<p><object width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/eo-WGwdSu_w&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/eo-WGwdSu_w&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo"></object></p>
<p><object width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_1"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/mk-NQkkciD4&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/mk-NQkkciD4&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo"></object></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5339636/real-star-trek-tricorder-media-player-goes-where-no-pmp-has-gone-before]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5339636]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcars]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mp3]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[player]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pmp-09 workbee  troi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pmps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star Trek Media Player]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star Trek PMP]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star-trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tri-corder]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tricorder]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tricorder ameralisgrafx tr-590]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Tricorder Media Player]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 18 Aug 2009 02:29:40 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5339636&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
					
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Build Your Own Battlestar Galactica Viper Rocket!]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/GalacticaRocket.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/504x_GalacticaRocket.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></a>Estes may have discontinued its wicked Battlestar and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged STAR TREK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/star-trek/">Star Trek</a> replica rockets almost 20 years ago, but some clever hobbyists have info on how you can still build one today.</p>
<p>Verna Rockets has a full debrief on its own builds, complete with links to several sites with parts and instructions. You'll find everything you need to build a flying model rocket that looks like a Recon Viper, the U.S.S. Enterprise, even The Black Hole Space Probe from "The Black Hole"</p>
<p>Confession: I always get psyched by rocket kits. Have any pics of your own launches that you'd like to share? [<a href="http://www.vernarockets.com/id26.html">Verna Rockets</a> via <a href="http://www.hobbymedia.it/17300/razzimodellismo-star-trek-galactica&sl=it&tl=en&history_state0=&swap=1">Hobby Media</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5332106/build-your-own-battlestar-galactica-viper-rocket]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5332106]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rockets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[battlestar]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[battlestar galactica rocket]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[diy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hobbies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[projects]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star-trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[viper]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 07 Aug 2009 02:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5332106&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Smell Like No Man Has Smelled Before with Star Trek Cologne]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/thumb160x_9e4bc90dd379dba5a5574d0e14ca49a2.jpg" class="left image158" width="158">When we <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5145695/love-jealousy-passionstar-trek-cologne-for-men">originally heard</a> about <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged STAR TREK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/star-trek/">Star Trek</a> cologne, we were a bit skeptical that the musk would actually come to fruition. Now, it's with the greatest joy that we report "<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged RED SHIRT" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/red-shirt/">Red Shirt</a>" <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged STAR TREK COLOGNE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/star-trek-cologne/">Star Trek Cologne</a> cologne is available for purchase.</p>

<p>Named after the brave red-shirted men to appear on one episode of Star Trek only to take a vaporizer in the chest for Captain Kirk, ThinkGeek describes the new cologne's scent as "bright, clean and direct with top notes of green mandarin, bergamot and a hint of lavender, finishing with base notes of leather and grey musk." The 100ml bottle runs $30. And we're guessing it could be somewhat effective in your dating life should you wear it in substitute of your typical Star Trek uniform. [<a href="http://www.thinkgeek.com/homeoffice/gear/bcdc/">ThinkGeek</a> via <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/07/29/mothers-lock-up-your-daughters-star-trek-cologne-is-here/">CrunchGear</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5325413/smell-like-no-man-has-smelled-before-with-star-trek-cologne]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5325413]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[red shirt]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek cologne]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5325413&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The 1979 Klingon Happy Meal]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/UvRyBRVpJGw&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/UvRyBRVpJGw&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo"></object>You may think the weird <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged HAPPY MEAL" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/happy-meal/">Happy Meal</a> bundling came during the '80s, but McDonalds was already busy making sure kids got their fix of movie-promotion McNuggets by 1979. Today is a good day to supersize.</p>
<p><i><a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/gizmodo-79/">Gizmodo '79</a> is a week-long celebration of gadgets and geekdom 30 years ago, as the analog age gave way to the digital, and most of our favorite toys were just being born.</i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5313764/the-1979-klingon-happy-meal]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5313764]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gizmodo 79]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[happy meal]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[klingon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[klingon happy meal]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[klingons]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mcdonalds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[retromodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek happy meal]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5313764&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Star Trek Review]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_trekreview.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged STAR TREK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/star-trek/">Star Trek</a>: The Motion Picture isn't just a film that should be important to original series fans, but it's a film that's influenced media (Star Trek or otherwise) for the next 30 years. Here's our review.</p>
<p>The plot could be described in one sentence: "The new Enterprise goes out to investigate an alien being that's threatening to destroy the Earth." That's it. But how Roddenberry executed such a simple premise shows why this man was a visionary that George Lucas couldn't even dream of comparing himself to.</p>
<p>Since it's been years since you've last seen the movie&mdash;about 15 years for me&mdash;I'll give a short recap. Admiral Kirk comes back to take command of the Enterprise, a ship that's spent the last 18 months being retrofitted, in order to intercept a giant gas cloud that demolished three Klingon Warbirds with ease. The film spends the first half of the movie assembling the cast, showing off the Enterprise exterior, and basically letting everyone settle in to their roles. It then spends the entire second half of the movie journeying from the outer edge of the gas cloud into the center. What's there? The Voyager 6 space probe. (There's no actual Voyager 6 probe in our reality, in case you're wondering.)</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/vger.jpg" class="left image160" width="160" />Turns out V'ger (Voyager 6 with space dirt on its nameplate) was lost after it hit a black hole, which dumped it in the vicinity of a "machine planet". That planet? The Borg fucking homeworld circa 300 years ago. (The Borg aren't mentioned by name, but material deemed canon claims Roddenberry designated the species as the Borg.) The Borg fitted V'ger with "advanced" technology and sent it back to Earth to fulfill its mission of relaying information back to its creator.</p>
<p>Kirk manages to stop this thing by connecting V'ger with Voyager 6, recognizing that the now-sentient machine is looking for HUMANS as its creator, and tries to send the proper codes for V'ger to finish its mission instead of killing everyone on Earth. Kirk fails until the handsome Captain Decker, who was demoted to Commander because both he, Kirk and Kirk's ego couldn't fit into the same chair, merged with V'ger and created a new advanced life form. The life form explodes into another dimension and the movie ends.</p>
<p>So what the hell is this movie about? Quite a lot of things, but none of these plot lines or themes are satisfactorily concluded. Besides the obvious religious analogies that involve the creator and God and meeting the maker and somehow finding a purpose to life, there are a few weird subplots that all end as abruptly as V'ger does.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_trek2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500">There was the Decker/Ilia relationship, which symbolized a man finally being able to "physically" be with a woman&mdash;the avowed celibate woman&mdash;who tormented him years before by not allowing his photon torpedoes anywhere near her docking bay. Then there's Spock's journey to find out the meaning of life, trying to decide whether he's going to go with Logic or Emotion (big L, big E). A mindmeld with a sentient machine that has the entire knowledge of the universe makes the decision for him, and it's the latter. No real explanation of this either; Spock just wakes up from swapping minds with a robot to realize that he's not one.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_trek1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500">And of course, there's the theme of growing old and obsolete. Everyone's 10 years older than when the series ended, carrying around a little more paunch and a little less muscle. Even Kirk has been replaced by a younger, better looking version of himself. Only by strongarming his way back into the hot seat does he manage to prove that yes, he IS out of touch, and needs someone younger to save his ass repeatedly.</p>
<p>All of this is buried under $49 million of special effects. That's $139 million in today's money. In comparison, the similarly effects-laden Star Trek 2009 movie cost $150 million. Both were pretty good LOOKING for their time, with Star Trek 1979 spending (what seemed like) a larger percentage of the film just flying around and looking at stuff. The influence of 2001: A Space Odyssey weighs heavily on the way the movie-makers did things, even 11 years later.</p>
<p>But what's the <em>point</em> of this movie? Like I said, it was in part a big thank-you to long time fans, as evidenced by old characters popping up to say hello. Nurse (now Dr.) Chapel, played by Roddenberry's wife, who also was the voice of the computer in TNG and JJ Abram's Star Trek movie, makes a few appearances. Yeoman Rand, the blonde sexpot from the first season of the series, also pops up in order to screw up a transportation sequence and kill two people. She may hold the record for longest time without a promotion in Star Trek history.</p>
<p>That was half the reason. The other half was because Roddenberry had more to say, and now he had the money to say it with. Gone were the cheap purple sets and cardboard rocks of the '60s series; in are the clean, sterile lines we've seen in many "traditional" space operas of the last 30 years. You may think that the only reason why the movie eschewed the lived-in, half-assed quality of the original was because they finally had money, but you'd only be half right. They also did this for a reason; because space needs orderliness. Why? Because space is fucking scary.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_trek4.jpg" class="left image500" width="500">The movie is littered with reasons why space is "the final frontier". Kirk rushes a jump to warp&mdash;normally an everyday occurence in the Star Trek universe&mdash;before Scotty says it's ready and creates a temporal wormhole where the ship almost eats it in a near-hit with an asteroid. The villain is a piece of technology <em>we</em> sent out, basically telling us that even benign actions like the search for information may come back (by way of the Borg) to shoot us up the ass. Transporting, a relatively safe way of traveling, won't just kill you, it'll turn you into a disgusting, screaming blob of tissue if there's just ONE circuit board malfunctioning. Hell, the seductively bald female Lieutenant that V'ger abducts, kills, and machine-clones was doing nothing more than <strong>just standing there</strong>. In order to combat all the chaos <strong>out there</strong>, outside your raised shields, you need to make sure your system <strong>in here</strong> runs with military precision.</p>
<p>The Next Generation, arguably the best iteration of Star Trek, continues the train of thought started by Star Trek: The Motion Picture. There wouldn't be that without this. No Picard, Data, Riker or Geordi without a movie that basically amounts to as a dealer test drive of the new Enterprise. No more romping around the galaxy having your way with this or that alien. It's judgement time; time to prove that Humanity actually belongs in space and is capable of handling what's out there. <em>Encounter at Farpoint</em>, here we come.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_trek5.jpg" class="left image500" width="500">So go back and watch the movie again, this time on <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001TH16DI">Blu-ray</a> in the comfort of your own home. Hell, if you've put a little bit of money into your home theater it may be <i>better</i> than the actual theater you saw this in in 1979. But this time, watch with the knowledge of the last three decades of Star Trek with you. [<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001TH16DI">Star Trek Movie Collection</a>]</p>
<p><em><a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/gizmodo-79/">Gizmodo '79</a> is a week-long celebration of gadgets and geekdom 30 years ago, as the analog age gave way to the digital, and most of our favorite toys were just being born.</em></p>
<p><i>Iimage credit <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:V%27ger.JPG">Wikipedia</a>, <a href="http://movies.trekcore.com/gallery/index.php?cat=43&page=3">Trekcore</a></i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5313577/star-trek-review]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5313577]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blu-ray]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets in 1979]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gizmodo 79]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movie]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[retromodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5313577&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[USS Enterprise Bong Follows My Prime Directive Precisely]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_Enterprise_bong_02.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;">Some intrepid Trekkie/stoner decided to combine his two favorite things, creating this awesome USS Enterprise bong. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5226460/star-trek-review">The movie didn't need any help being entertaining</a>, but this certainly won't <i>hurt</i>. [<a href="http://whatabong.com/2009/06/24/star-trek-bong/">What-a-Bong</a> Via <a href="http://io9.com/5302559/to-boldly-toke-where-no+one-has-toked-before">io9</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5302603/uss-enterprise-bong-follows-my-prime-directive-precisely]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5302603]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[weed]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bongs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[enterprise]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5302603&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Yes! Star Trek Is Cool Because a Pie Chart Says So!]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_startrekpiechart-thumb-550x362-19494.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;"><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SCI FI" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/sci-fi/">Sci Fi</a> Wire makes a convincing argument, in both authoritarian pie chart form and debatable exposition, as to why <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged STAR TREK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/star-trek/">Star Trek</a> is cool (again). But what's missing from the chart? Two words: <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5226460/star-trek-review">Lens flare</a>.</p>

<p>Man has long marveled at the bright and shiny. He obsesses over soft metals, like gold, because of their luster. And diamonds, while hardened for industry, are more just as often if not more reserved for rings representing sacred vows.</p>
<p>So hats off to the writers, actors, set designers and special effects team. But <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged JJ ABRAMS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/jj-abrams/">JJ Abrams</a>' simple mantra of "aim those four-story mirrors at the camera, dammit!" deserves, at minimum, a bar graph constructed of Borg ships. [<a href="http://scifiwire.com/2009/06/9-reasons-star-trek-is-no.php">Sci Fi Wire</a> via <a href="http://www.geekologie.com/2009/06/chart_why_star_trek_is_so_cool.php">Geekologie</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5295495/yes-star-trek-is-cool-because-a-pie-chart-says-so]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5295495]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jj abrams]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sci fi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science fiction]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star wars]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 18 Jun 2009 20:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5295495&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Star Radio Communicator iPhone App is NOT AT ALL Like Anything from Star Trek]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_3614439675_82baae2fb5_o.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;">Sure the <a href="http://www.iphonesavior.com/2009/06/star-trek-communicator-for-iphone-is-spot-on.html">Star Radio Communicator</a> iPhone app looks kinda like that other communicator&mdash;you know, retro-futuristic design, flip door, 3 button layout&mdash;but last time I checked, Captain K's communicator absolutely did not make calls on Earth's phone system.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/06/custom_1244695433270_6a00d8341bfa6953ef01156ffc1e48970c-800wi.jpg" width="64" height="94">iPhoneSavior says the 99 cent app gives you a dialing interface to place calls from within the app, making you feel like you're about five seconds away from bitch-slapping a couple of Klingons. But I can't imagine Paramount is at all happy with this. [<a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=314914444&mt=8">iTunes Store</a> via <a href="http://www.iphonesavior.com/2009/06/star-trek-communicator-for-iphone-is-spot-on.html">iPhoneSavior</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5286709/star-radio-communicator-iphone-app-is-not-at-all-like-anything-from-star-trek]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5286709]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[communicator]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Star Radio Communicator]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek communicator]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Covert]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5286709&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Mystery Solved: This is Where R2-D2 Is in Star Trek]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_rs2d.png" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;">The mystery is over. After all, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5261285/is-r2+d2-driving-the-enterprise">R2-D2 wasn't the astromech</a> calculating the warp trajectories for the Enterprise. Here you have the exact timing of his stellar cameo&mdash;and <s>the frame capture to prove it</s> <b>Updated</b></p>
<blockquote>
<p>During the Drill Machine sequence as the Enterprise comes out of its barrel role amidst destruction of the other Federation ships above Vulcan, we cut to an interior Enterprise bridge over the shoulder of Kirk that is looking out through the front viewscreen. In space, R2-D2 is floating in the debris from about the top middle of the screen to the bottom right.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Poor R2. [<a href="http://community.livejournal.com/ohnotheydidnt/36069720.html#cutid1">Oh No They Didn't</a>]</p>
<p><b>Update:</b> The scene is that but that is <b>not</b> R2-D2 according to one ILM <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged STAR TREK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/star-trek/">Star Trek</a> effects supervisor. Unfortunately, he and Paramount can't show the scene yet.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5286649/mystery-solved-this-is-where-r2+d2-is-in-star-trek]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5286649]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[enterprise]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[r2-d2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star wars]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5286649&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
					
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Atom Pinhole Camera Is The First Step Towards a Real Star Trek Replicator]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5277744/the-atom-pinhole-camera-is-the-first-step-towards-a-real-star-trek-replicator">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a>Researchers at the Russian Academy of Sciences are developing a technology that could lead to a real-life <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged STAR TREK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/star-trek/">Star Trek</a> replicator. They have demonstrated that it is possible to manufacture an array of identical atomic nanostructures in controlled shapes and sizes.</p>
<p>In their <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged ATOM PINHOLE CAMERA" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/atom-pinhole-camera/">atom pinhole camera</a>, the atoms act like photons in an optical pinhole camera, but instead of light traveling through a lens, it travels through a pinhole on a mask and creates a high-res inverted image on a silicon substrate. This camera is capable of resizing nanostructures down to 30 nm&mdash;10,000 times smaller than the original. So, a camera with say 10 million pinholes could produce large numbers of identical (or diverse) nanostructures simultaneously.</p>
<p>It all sounds very promising, but the real question is will I be getting instant food, clothing and gadgets in my lifetime? Maybe&mdash;but chances are the "gadgets" will be a <a href="http://www.rascalscooters.com/">Rascal</a> and the "clothing" will be Depends. [<a href="http://www.physorg.com/news163074546.html">Physorg</a> via <a href="http://www.kurzweilai.net/news/frame.html?main=/news/news_single.html?id%3D10678">KurzweilAI</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5277744/the-atom-pinhole-camera-is-the-first-step-towards-a-real-star-trek-replicator]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5277744]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotechnology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[atom pinhole camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[atoms]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nanostructures]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[replicator]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek replicator]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5277744&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Triangle Keys May Be Ideal for LCD Keyboards But Look Vaguely Klingon]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5276169/triangle-keys-may-be-ideal-for-lcd-keyboards-but-look-vaguely-klingon">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a>A Brit named David Baker wants you to believe that his <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged CROCODILE KEYBOARD" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/crocodile-keyboard/">Crocodile Keyboard</a> concept&mdash;for which he's submitted a patent application&mdash;is the best way for big fat fingers to type on LCDs, because there's more dead space to absorb accidental taps. Good idea, secret Trek shoutout or both? [<a href="http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2009/06/02/crocodile_keyboard/">Register</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5276169/triangle-keys-may-be-ideal-for-lcd-keyboards-but-look-vaguely-klingon]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5276169]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[crocodile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[crocodile keyboard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[keyboards]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[klingons]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software keyboards]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[triangles]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 02 Jun 2009 16:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5276169&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Spaceship Wrecks Are So Much Worse Than Car Crashes]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/05/504x_thumb800x800_3575939609_46e37273d0_o.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;">I've survived a 100mph car crash&mdash;the floating shrapnel confetti that used to be Federation's armada shows no one survives space wrecks. You can see more stunning concept art James Clyne did for <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged STAR TREK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/star-trek/">Star Trek</a></em>, <em>The Fountain</em> and <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MINORITY REPORT" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/minority-report/">Minority Report</a></em> and more at his site: [<a href="http://www.jamesclyne.com/projects.php?gallery_id=297">James Clyne</a> via <a href="http://io9.com/5272855/the-enterprise-versus-a-black-hole-in-new-star-trek-concept-art">io9</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5273053/spaceship-wrecks-are-so-much-worse-than-car-crashes]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5273053]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[image cache]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[minority report]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star wreck]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 29 May 2009 22:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5273053&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Is R2-D2 Driving the Enterprise?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/05/r2d2-a_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/r2d2-a_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>We know JJ Abrams is a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged STAR WARS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/star-wars/">Star Wars</a> fan. He now says he included R2-D2 in <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged STAR TREK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/star-trek/">Star Trek</a>, and Paramount is running a contest for astromech spotters. We think we got him in two places:</p>

<p>One is on board of the Enterprise, doing his thing. Yes, it may be a stretch to put R2 reprising his role onboard the X-Wing, but it would be a great way to pay homage to the movies and an awesome Easter Egg.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/05/custom_1242755644883_r2d2-b_01.jpg" width="804" height="359" style="display:block;float:none;"></p>
<p><iframe src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http://digg.com/movies/R2_D2_Driving_the_Enterprise_IMAGE" align="right" frameborder="0" height="82" scrolling="no" width="55"></iframe>The other is an R2-D2 passing by on a lift fork, while Kirk and Bones are talking. If you want to participate, send the scene you think he is in to <a href="mailto:facebook@paramount.com">Paramount</a> or go to <a href="http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=80929709882&ref=mf">Facebook's Star Trek group</a> before the May 25. The sweepstakes prize is an original prop from the film.</p>
<p><i>Andi Wang donated her eyes to get this screenshots. She's not Bothan.</i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5261285/is-r2+d2-driving-the-enterprise]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5261285]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[contest]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star wars]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 19 May 2009 14:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5261285&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Gyrating Star Trek Tribble For Sale]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/05/Tribbles.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/Tribbles.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>Either there's a legitimate <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged STAR TREK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/star-trek/">Star Trek</a></em> Tribble for sale at eBay today, or someone is about to make $5,000 off a large multi-colored cotton ball.</p>

<p>The auctioneer states that this ball of fur is, indeed, a Tribble from <em>Star Trek: The Original Series</em>. Episode? The Trouble With Tribbles, obviously.</p>
<p>The 42-year-old prop takes two AA batteries, still works, and could be vibrating madly on your desktop in six days if you beat the lofty current purchase price of $5,000.</p>
<p>A certificate of authenticity signed by Scotty's son Chris Doohan makes this all legit, but man... for that price I kind of want to buy some cotton balls, color them, and make my own "rare collectible" for less than a buck. Won't smell like Kirk though, I know. [<a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/STAR-TREK-TOS-VERY-RARE-SHOW-USED-WALKING-TRIBBLE_W0QQitemZ330331001090QQcmdZViewItemQQptZLH_DefaultDomain_0?hash=item4ce9431102&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14&_trkparms=72%253A1205%7C66%253A2%7C65%253A12%7C39%253A1%7C240%253A1307%7C301%253A1%7C293%253A1%7C294%253A50#ebayphotohosting">eBay</a> - Thanks, Doguez]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5258128/gyrating-star-trek-tribble-for-sale]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5258128]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ebay]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[props]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tribbles]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 17 May 2009 11:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Loftus]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5258128&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Astronauts Watching New Star Trek In Space]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/05/shuttle-trek_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/shuttle-trek_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>According to NASA, the three astronauts in the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/international-space-station/">International Space Station</a> have been chilling out watching J.J. Abrams' <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged STAR TREK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/star-trek/">Star Trek</a>. Watching <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5253324/how-big-is-the-new-enterprise-compared-to-galactica">the Enterprise <i>in</i> the ISS</a>, people. It doesn't get any better than this:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>They just ended their crew day, so they're watching it now, or just finishing it up. They can go all day without seeing each other, so this is a good chance to get together.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>You know, pop some corn, open some beers, and then go to the Unity node to hang out with the buddies watching a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5226460/star-trek-review">damn good space movie</a>. All thanks to one of the astronauts, Michael Barratt, a Trekkie who requested to see the film when it came out. He didn't want to miss it, so NASA encoded it and beamed it up for them, Scotty-style. [<a href="http://carpetbagger.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/15/real-live-astronauts-are-watching-star-trek-in-outer-space-right-now/?hp">NYT</a>&mdash;Thanks Genevieve]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5257724/astronauts-watching-new-star-trek-in-space]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5257724]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[international space station]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iss]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nasa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 16 May 2009 19:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5257724&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Do You Like The New Star Trek Movie Better Than The Old Ones?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/05/340x_kirks.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/>I'm planning on seeing the Trek movie this weekend, so it's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5255924/10-examples-of-summer-movie-merchandising-run-amok">been on the brain today</a>. Reviews have been positive, but I have to ask: do you like the new film better than old ones?</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5256407/do-you-like-the-new-star-trek-movie-better-than-the-old-ones]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5256407]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[question of the day]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[qotd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 15 May 2009 17:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5256407&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[10 Examples of Summer Movie Merchandising Run Amok]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/05/star-trek-mower.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/star-trek-mower.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>The summer movie season is getting heated up, and the recent release of <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/star-trek/"><em>Star Trek</em></a> has me thinking about all of the absurd merchandise that has come out over the years.</p>
<p><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged STAR TREK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/star-trek/">Star Trek</a> certainly isn't the only franchise that has gone way too far in the quest to make a buck&mdash;it's bitter rival <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged STAR WARS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/star-wars/">Star Wars</a> also comes to mind. The battle between the two franchises has been fought on many fronts, but the question about who has the stupidest merchandise has yet to be debated.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('moviemerchandise', 10, '');
</script></p>
<p>[Original Image via <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/srcurran/133701242/">Flickr</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5255924/10-examples-of-summer-movie-merchandising-run-amok]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5255924]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[tgif]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movie merchandising]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star wars]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[stupid movie merchandise]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[thank giz it's friday]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 15 May 2009 16:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5255924&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Classic Star Trek Remastered According to JJ Abrams' Vision]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object width="506" height="311" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/iAaX8Aq6smQ&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/iAaX8Aq6smQ&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="506" height="311" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object>I'm happy to report that no amount of flares will fix the lovely campiness and <i>amazing</i> performances of William Shatner and Ricardo Montalbán in <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged STAR TREK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/star-trek/">Star Trek</a>. And thank the gods for that. [Thanks Genevieve]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5252478/classic-star-trek-remastered-according-to-jj-abrams-vision]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5252478]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jj abrams]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lens flare]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 13 May 2009 16:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5252478&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Space Week Roundup: The Right Stuff]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/05/thumb160x_8b134381431f43fc10e50267380053ba.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Well, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/get-me-off-this-rock/">last week's space theme</a> was exciting for readers and staff alike, not least of all because we had a real actual NASA astronaut baring his soul daily. Here are the highlights:</p>
<p>&bull; 15-year veteran <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/astroblogger">NASA astronaut Leroy Chiao's column</a> about flying in the Space Shuttle and Soyuz, and living on the International Space Station for six months. The little things matter most, and Leroy described the minutiae of zero-g daily life in a way that was both charming and shocking at once. Here are all of his <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/astroblogger">Astroblogger</a> entries.</p>
<p>&bull; In Carmel Hagen's thrilling heist story about a guy and a girl and a locked-up pile of moon rocks, we learned <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5242736/how-an-intern-stole-nasas-moon-rocks">how an intern stole NASA's most treasured possession</a>.</p>
<p>&bull; We had a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5244224/this-is-what-im-about-to-eat-for-lunch">teaser</a> and then a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5245797/eating-like-an-astronaut-our-six+course-space-food-taste-test">real honest-to-God taste of spaceman food</a> (without the benefit of floating forks and knives).</p>
<p>&bull; We looked back, on heroes like <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5244563/in-honor-of-yuri-gagarin-the-first-human-in-space">Yuri Gagarin</a> and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5241910/space-fact-1-astronauts-have-cojones-the-size-of-manhattan">Alan Shepard</a>, mistakes like the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5239848/how-not-to-launch-a-rocket-the-nedelin-disaster">horrifying Nedelin disaster</a>, and all kinds of memorable phenomena ranging from <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5242801/animal-astronauts-the-unsung-heroes-of-space-travel">space chimps</a> to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5241294/lego-space-timeline-brings-back-my-best-childhood-memories">space Lego</a> to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5244564/confessions-of-a-space-camp-alum">Space Camp</a>.</p>
<p>&bull; More importantly, we looked ahead to the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5241686/the-next-space-shuttles">next space shuttles</a>, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5239883/virgin-galactics-boss-says-space-travel-will-never-be-cheap">development of space tourism</a>, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5246059/from-earth-to-moon-redux-how-the-next-moonshot-will-happen">next moon mission</a> and our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5247705/why-we-need-to-reach-the-stars-and-we-will">ultimate destiny as interstellar pioneers</a>.</p>
<p>Where didn't we go? Maybe where no man has gone before&mdash;we left that to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5226460/star-trek-review">JJ Abrams</a> and the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/star-trek">ghost of Gene Roddenberry</a>. God speed, Giz readers. And stay tuned for the next thrilling theme week. Any guesses? [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/get-me-off-this-rock/">Get Me Off This Rock</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5249872/space-week-roundup-the-right-stuff]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5249872]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Get Me Off This Rock]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[astronaut]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[leroy chiao]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nasa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[roundup]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 May 2009 11:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5249872&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Is the New Star Trek Film Scientifically Sound?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/05/enternewnew.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/enternewnew.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>Discover has an excellent piece that dissects the new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged STAR TREK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/star-trek/">Star Trek</a> movie by its major scenes and examines the scientific validity behind <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5114714/can-young-kirk-really-survive-the-car-jump-in-the-new-star-trek">the admitted pseudoscience</a>. There are <strong>SPOILERS</strong>, but passages like this make it great:</p>

<blockquote>
<p><strong>The Scene:</strong><br>
Kirk and McCoy are on a shuttle about to head up to orbit. McCoy, true to form, gripes about space travel, saying that if there's a hull breach, "… our blood will boil in 12 seconds."</p>
<p><strong>The Science:</strong></p>
<p>I swear, every movie ever gets this all wrong...The temperature at which a liquid boils depends on the atmospheric pressure; at lower pressures liquids boil at lower temperatures. That's why there are high-altitude variations for some recipes...</p>
<p>This effect is so strong that in a vacuum, water boils at room temperature! Blood has things dissolved in it, which raises its boiling point, but even with that, at a body temperature of 37 Celsius blood would boil in a vacuum.</p>
<p>But if you're blown into space, your blood's not exposed to a vacuum! It's in a nice air-tight system, your circulatory system. The pressure inside your arteries and veins is kept relatively constant (unless I watch the news or Oprah, and then it skyrockets), so your blood won't boil.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>There are so many more great scene analyses over at Discover. It's a solid waste of your unofficial afternoon break (or one of them, at least). [<a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/05/08/ba-review-star-trek/">Discover</a> via <a href="http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2009/05/11/bad-astronomy-on-sta.html">bbGadgets</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5249295/is-the-new-star-trek-film-scientifically-sound]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5249295]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[films]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek science]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 11 May 2009 18:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5249295&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
