Today Western Digital announced that it has achieved 520 Gb/in2 areal density in an actual demonstration using its own perpendicular magnetic recording (PMR)/tunneling magneto-resistive (TuMR) head technology. For those of you who are counting, that makes it the highest density ever reached using continuous media. A density of this magnitude produces a 3.5-inch hard drive storing 640 GB-per-platter and single hard drive capacities as large as 3 TB. Compare that to the current leading density of around 200 Gb/in2 being shipped high volume products like WD's 250 GB Scorpio(R) 2.5-inch drive. That's all well and good, but it looks like you will have to wait to get your hands on this technology. Current estimates put the release at around 2010.
WD(R) Demonstrates Highest Hard Drive Density Company Achieves 520 Gb/in2 Areal Density in Demonstration; Result of Ongoing Technology Investments TOKYO and FREMONT, Calif., Oct. 17 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ — Western Digital Corp. (NYSE: WDC) today announced that it has achieved 520 Gb/in2 areal density — the hard drive industry's highest demonstrated density to date using continuous media. The company revealed the milestone this week at the Perpendicular Magnetic Recording Conference in Tokyo after an earlier demonstration in California . Following WD's growing investments in technology the past five years, the company achieved 520 Gb/in2 using its own perpendicular magnetic recording (PMR)/tunneling magneto-resistive (TuMR) head technology. This level of density produces a 3.5-inch hard drive storing 640 GB-per-platter and single hard drive capacities as large as 3 TB. Based on the industry's current density growth rate of more than 40 percent per year, those capacities are expected to be available in the 2010 timeframe. Current industry-leading hard drive densities shipping in high volume are about 200 Gb/in2, as featured in WD's 250 GB WD Scorpio(R) 2.5-inch drive for notebooks and mobile applications, which began shipping in May 2007. "WD was the first hard drive manufacturer to ship in volume the 250 GB capacity point in the 2.5-inch form factor," said Hossein Moghadam, chief technology officer for WD. "Our technology investments position WD with our customers as a leading choice for the highest, cutting-edge capacities. Our top priority will be to remain keenly focused on providing the highest quality and reliability, which customers have come to expect from WD after years of relying on our products." WD demonstrated 520 Gb/in2 density in its Magnetic Head Operation labs in Fremont, Calif., earlier this month. Moghadam added, "The milestone was realized using our current-technology MgO reader, illustrating the extendibility of PMR-TuMR head technology generations into the future." About WD WD, one of the storage industry's pioneers and long-time leaders, provides products and services for people and organizations that collect, manage and use digital information. The company produces reliable, high-performance hard drives that keep users' data accessible and secure from loss. WD applies its storage expertise to consumer products for external, portable and shared storage applications.WD was founded in 1970. The company's storage products are marketed to leading systems manufacturers, selected resellers andretailers under the Western Digital and WD brand names. Visit the Investor section of the company's Web site (http://www.westerndigital.com) to access a variety of financial and investor information.
This press release contains forward-looking statements, including statements relating to density growth rates, dates certain capacities are expected to be available based on those growth rates and the extendibility of PMR-TuMR head technology generations into the future. These forward-looking statements are based on current management expectations, and actual results may differ materially as a result of several factors, including: technical and manufacturing challenges related to changes in areal density; changes in technology; business conditions generally; and other risks and uncertainties listed in WD's recent SEC filings, including its form 10-K for fiscal 2007. WD undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect new information or events or for any other reason.
Western Digital, WD and the WD logo are registered trademarks of Western Digital Technologies, Inc. All other trademarks herein are property of their respective owner. One gigabyte (GB) = 1 billion bytes. Total accessible capacity varies depending on operating environment.













Comments
Thats fantastic, now if my Western Digital Hard Drives would just stop breaking I could actually give a damn.
damnit!! why can't technology move FASTER?? i'm already 30 and i ain't getting any younger.
@Neil.Will:
Thats funny, I only buy Western Digital HDDs because they've always been the most reliable for me. Every Seagate or Maxtor I've bought has died way too fast for my liking.
I'm with WEAK_PIG. I want some big, short-term revolutions...I want great stuff tomorrow. I also don't want it to be expensive, but that's just me.
Also: I don't really understand why manufacturers even bother to announce these technological "revolutions" that basically show that the current trend of technological advancements will continue for a few more years. This isn't unexpected. I could have predicted it.
I can just make estimates based on the percentage increases in hard drive capacity in the past few years.
Looky here:
2005: 500 GB 3.5" hard drives
2006: 750 GB (add 50%)
2007: 1000 GB (add 33%)
2008: oh, about 1400 GB (add 40%)
2009: I'll guess, 2000 GB (added 41%)
2010: booyah: 3 TB. (added 50%, just like 2006)
Oooo, everybody look at Western Digital! They expect to plod along at the current pace of technology! Everybody lavish them with praise!
I've had more WD drives fail on me, but then again I have a good track record with Maxtor, which people tend to hate.
So I go Seagate when I can.
Never any problems with those.
Of course, your mileage may vary.
@Knight: Seagate breaking on you? Really? I worked at EMC and tested hard drives for 5 years and we consistently went with Seagate for reliability. (Albeit Fibre Channel drives)
Western Digital on the other hand, the only thing worse is an IBM Deathstar, um I mean Deskstar
Yawn... wake me up when Drexel University's 13 petabytes per cc material is implemented into consumer hard drives.
I have a Western Digital 500GB Network Hard Drive. On the box it says:
"The WD Promise. WD Understands the importance of the information you save to your hard drive and we are committed to protecting that data with exceptionally reliable products, advanced data protection technology, and superior customer support. No one does more to safeguard your data than WD. PUT YOUR LIFE ON IT."
My drive failed on Tuesday evening this week with 400Gb of my data on it. About 300GB was backup and I have a duplicate, but about 100 GB was video that I made that was being stored there as there was no space on my PC.
The drive is getting replaced under warranty, but who replaces the lost data?
They say "PUT YOUR LIFE ON IT". I'm not so sure...
It's not a TuMR!
Western Digital's labs has achieved an areal density of 520 Gbits per square inch in testing, beating the old record of 420 Gbits for hard-disk magnetic technology.
Call me when i can buy one for a hundred bucks
I went through Maxtors like toilet paper at a stage...
@DivZero:
Me too--then I stopped wiping my ass with them.
I always thought that once Hitachi took over the IBM drives they were good to go (ie no longer deathstar)... so is that wrong?
i have no data to support either way.
Oh, and someone around here knows which manufacturers make the good drives (here's lookin at you Google)...but they wont tell
Start a discussion:
Login with your username and password below. Or comment on this post via email.
Forgot your username or password? New User?