<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: T-Mobile]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/t-mobile</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 't-mobile']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[AT&T Comes in Last in Consumer Reports Study That Surprises No One]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/cellsurvey1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_cellsurvey1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Here's some news anyone with an iPhone could have told you: AT&T delivers crappy service that its customers hate. But this news comes from a reputable source, <i>Consumer Reports</i>, instead of the usual whiny friends.</p>
<p>Yes, in 19 of the 26 cities surveyed, AT&T was ranked dead last in every category. Verizon was ranked the best, followed by T-Mobile, then Sprint and then, of course, bringing up the rear is our friend AT&T. You can compare their results to the results of <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5111989/the-definitive-coast+to+coast-3g-data-test">our own nationwide 3G test here</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/cellsurvey2.jpg" width="700" height="525">You've got to wonder if Apple can afford to stick this exclusivity contract out another year, what with decent competitors such as the Droid and the Pre now available. AT&T is as big a black mark on Apple's customer service reputation as they've ever had. And hell, for AT&T's sake it'd be nice to see some other carriers share the burden of iPhone data hogs. [<a href="http://www.9to5mac.com/AT-T-consumer-reports-carriers-642754">9 to 5 Mac</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5416389/att-comes-in-last-in-consumer-reports-study-that-surprises-no-one]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5416389]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[schadenfreude]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sprint]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:45:04 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5416389&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Best Smartphones on Every Carrier]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/smartphoooones.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_smartphoooones.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>For the first time ever, every major carrier in the US actually has smartphones worth buying, meaning you don't have to break up to get a good phone. Here's the best phones on each one, along with the best deals.</p>

<p>If you hate the gallery format, click <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5411351/the-best-smartphones-on-every-carrier/">here</a>.</p>
<p><em>All pricing shown is with a new 2-year contract, and some deals may be temporary.</em></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/topshot2.jpg" width="804" height="565"></p>
<h1>AT&T</h1>
<p><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #iphone3gs" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphone3gs/">iPhone 3GS</a></strong><br>
The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5293388/iphone-3gs-review">iPhone 3GS</a> is the best overall smartphone you can buy. It's really that simple. Best user interface, best internet, best apps, best media support&mdash;the list goes on. Okay, not the best network, but nothing's perfect. <a href="http://www.wireless.att.com/cell-phone-service/packages/packages-details.jsp?q_package=sku3790236&amp;_requestid=120494">$199</a></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/bbold9700__088.jpg" width="804" height="537"><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #blackberrybold9700" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/blackberrybold9700/">BlackBerry Bold 9700</a></strong><br>
I miss the original BlackBerry Bold's king-sized keyboard, but <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5397391/blackberry-bold-9700-impressions-small-and-chirpy-like-a-black-hummingbird">the Bold 9700</a> squeezes the best of the BlackBerry for CEOs into an impressively tight form factor&mdash;faux leather back included&mdash;making it very possibly the best BlackBerry you can buy. <a href="http://walmart.letstalk.com/product/product.htm?prId=35946">$10</a></p>
<p><strong>Bonus: <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #nokiae71x" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/nokiae71x/">Nokia e71x</a></strong><br>
It's free, and an actually good smartphone&mdash;my favorite Nokia phone on the planet. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Nokia-E71x-Phone-Black-AT/dp/B0027A7XWE/ref=amb_link_84232451_4?pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_s=auto-sparkle&pf_rd_r=03BG5E6P2DMXF74VG9M6&pf_rd_t=301&pf_rd_p=475996731&pf_rd_i=e71x">Free</a></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/drooooooid__002.jpg" width="804" height="536"></p>
<h1>Verizon</h1>
<p><strong>Droid</strong><br>
It's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5396168/motorola-droid-review">a terminator</a>. A huge, disgustingly high-res screen, Batman-worthy industrial design, and the full power <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5395801/android-20-review-almost-human">of Android 2.0</a> make it the best phone on Verizon&mdash;and the fact that it's running on arguably the best network in the US make it the second best smartphone you can buy, period. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Motorola-Droid-A855-Verizon-Wireless/dp/B002UUTCKC/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=wireless&qid=1259070645&sr=1-2">$150</a></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/bbtour.jpg" width="504" height="482"><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #blackberrytour" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/blackberrytour/">BlackBerry Tour</a></strong><br>
Sure, it's notorious for trackball problems and it's missing Wi-Fi, but this is the BlackBerry of choice for email warriors if they're not on AT&T or T-Mobile&mdash;and it sure as hell beats anything running Windows Mobile. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/BlackBerry-Tour-Phone-Verizon-Wireless/dp/B002GJTS3I/ref=sr_1_13?ie=UTF8&s=wireless&qid=1259070717&sr=8-13">$50</a></p>
<p><strong>Bonus: <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #droideris" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/droideris/">Droid Eris</a></strong><br>
If you're desperate to save $100 over the Droid, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5401220/droid-eris-review">Droid Eris</a> will run Android 2.0 soon enough, and is smoother, smaller, and friendlier, if a little blander. <a href="http://www.verizonwireless.com/b2c/store/controller?item=phoneFirst&action=viewPhoneDetail&selectedPhoneId=5070">$100</a></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/bodysmall.jpg" width="504" height="399"></p>
<h1>Sprint</h1>
<p><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #palmpre" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/palmpre/">Palm Pre</a></strong><br>
<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5277499/palm-pre-review">The Pre</a> offers one of the best user experiences of any smartphone with Palm's webOS, and it's probably the best phone on Sprint, hardware build issues and comparatively dinky App Catalog aside. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Palm-Pre-100-Phone-Sprint/dp/B002JIO4JY/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&s=wireless&qid=1259070251&sr=8-4">$80</a></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/DSC_1100.jpg" width="1024" height="683"><strong>HTC Hero</strong><br>
The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5361245/sprint-hero-review-faster-stronger-uglier">best Android phone</a> not running Android 2.0, HTC's Sense UI makes the sometimes confusing Android interface more digestible and has a few nifty tricks of its own, like integrated social networking. <a href="http://wireless.bestbuy.com/specialoffer.aspx?cid=34308_a5abbe52b26b4c05afe33717acc0697f">$100</a></p>
<p><strong>Bonus</strong>: There is none. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5406001/palm-pixi-review">The Pixi's</a> close (<a href="http://wsf0-walmart.letstalk.com/product/product.htm?prId=35990">$25</a>), but the fact that you can get the Pre for nearly as cheap undercuts a lot of the value, as much as we like the design and form factor.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/thescreen.jpg" width="800" height="533"></p>
<h1>T-Mobile</h1>
<p><strong>Motorola Cliq</strong><br>
<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5381995/motorola-cliq-review">Motorola's other Android phone</a> is gussied up with Blur, a custom interface that's bright and friendly, with widgets for keeping track of everything happening on your social network. It's our favorite Android phone on T-Mobile. <a href="http://wsf0-walmart.letstalk.com/product/product.htm?prId=35848">$100</a></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/IMG_4739.jpg" width="804" height="536"><strong>Unlocked iPhone</strong><br>
No, I'm not kidding. A <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5302123/jailbreak-and-unlock-iphone-30/gallery/">jailbroken and unlocked</a> iPhone, even without 3G powers, is the second best smartphone you can use on T-Mobile.</p>
<p><strong>Bonus: BlackBerry <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #bold9700" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/bold9700/">Bold 9700</a></strong><br>
The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5397391/blackberry-bold-9700-impressions-small-and-chirpy-like-a-black-hummingbird">BlackBerry Bold 9700 is</a> the first BlackBerry with 3G on T-Mobile, which is reason enough, really, but it's good the reasons listed above, too. <a href="http://wsf0-walmart.letstalk.com/product/product.htm?prId=35982">$130</a></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5411351/the-best-smartphones-on-every-carrier/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5411351]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry bold 9700]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry tour]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bold]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bold 9700]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cliq]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[droid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[droid eris]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[e71x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gift guide]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gift Guide 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone 3gs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nokia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nokia e71x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm pixi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm pre]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pixi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pre]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sprint]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tour]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5411351&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Why U.S. Wireless Pricing Sucks]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/wireless_industry_small.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />The New York Times ran a story today that helps explain why the American cellular industry is so screwy. In short: It's our fault.</p>
<p>There are two main problems: We like bills to be consistent, and we're risk-averse consumers.</p>
<p>To the first point, Sprint tried to offer a plan in 2004 where 300 minutes cost $35, and $2.50 for each additional 50 minutes. Seems great to me, no outrageous overage charges. But customers didn't like it because their bills would vary so much from month-to-month, so Sprint switched back to age-old tiered minutes plans.</p>
<p>Because we like consistent billing, the carriers institute ridiculous overage charges to convince us to spend up. That way we don't have to worry about any unforeseen costs, even if the fixed price plan ends up costing more than a variable pricing structure would.</p>
<p>The article also goes into how stupid expensive text message rates are subsidizing falling voice revenues, how wireless carriers would love to stop subsidizing phones, and more.</p>
<p>I know the average Gizmodo reader would like nothing more than to pay as little per minute as possible, but the average consumer thinks differently.</p>
<p>What's interesting is that this wholesale mentality does work, at least in terms of raw pricing. One minute of talk time costs 5 cents, and the average text message costs 1 cent. According to the article, that's the lowest average pricing in the developed world. The minutes do come at a bulk discount, it's just a matter of whether or not you use all of them.</p>
<p>I'll leave it to you commenters to discuss, but it's a good read into how <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #wirelesspricing" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/wirelesspricing/">wireless pricing</a> in America got so complicated. [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/15/business/15price.html?partner=rss&emc=rss">New York Times</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5404824/why-us-wireless-pricing-sucks]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5404824]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cell phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[service]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sprint]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wireless pricing]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 14 Nov 2009 19:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5404824&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[BlackBerry Bold 9700 Impressions: Small and Chirpy, Like a Black Hummingbird]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/bbold9700__088.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_bbold9700__088.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5386509/blackberry-bold-9700-on-t+mobile-and-att-in-november">BlackBerry Bold 9700</a> in a word? Compact. It's efficient, almost cramped, like a Japanese car from the 80s.</p>

<p>Succinctly, it's the new BlackBerry to buy if you're on T-Mobile or AT&T. Doubly so on T-Mo, since it's their first 3G BlackBerry.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/bbold9700__099.jpg" width="804" height="536">It's not very much like <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5075236/att-blackberry-bold-review-best-blackberry-yet">the original Bold</a> at all, which was the Escalade of BlackBerrys: big, obnoxious, but seriously comfortable to drive because it gave you tons of room to spread your legs (err, thumbs). If you're used to that, at first the 9700&mdash;which is even smaller and lighter than the Tour on Sprint and Verizon&mdash;feels like you've been shoved inside of a clown car because the keyboard and screen, while retaining the same shape and resolution, respectively, have been shrink-rayed. (<strong>Update</strong>: Actually, the resolution's been bumped up 40 pixels, to 480x360, from 480x320.)</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/bbold9700__090.jpg" width="804" height="536">But, then you realize you're not typing any slower, or less precisely. The 9700's keyboard isn't as flat out <em>comfortable</em> as the original Bold&mdash;purely a matter of physics&mdash;but it's a minor marvel of ergonomics that RIM has recession-sized the keyboard this effectively. They're simply brilliant at building keyboards. The screen has the same resolution as the Bold's, but in a smaller size, meaning it has a higher pixel density. Despite that extra clarity, I felt a bit constrained by it, especially browsing the web.</p>
<p>It's the second BlackBerry to ditch all-too-easily-slain-by-lint trackball for an optical trackpad, and the first that's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5331885/blackberry-curve-8520-lightning-review-cheap-not-just-the-good-kind">not built for Walmart</a>. You'll miss the trackball for about 15 seconds. Like I said before, the trackpad's 90 percent as good as the ball. You might miss the physical feedback, and it sometimes doesn't totally accurately interpret a diagonal swipe that you know wouldn't be a problem with the ball but it's good enough, and by far the most accurate and responsive trackpad I've used on a phone.</p>
<p>It's running BlackBerry OS 5.0 which isn't <em>tons</em> different than the OS that shipped on the original Bold or Curve 8900, but it's definitely springier and it has a few brushstrokes of added polish here and there. One place you notice is the browser&mdash;while not as fast as the iPhone 3GS or Android, it has some extra zip to it, and it even sped past the Storm 2 loading pages, despite racing on T-Mobile's 3G network vs. Verizon's.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5397352,12,'');
</script><em>Note: In the gallery, the T-Mobile one is the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #bold9700" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/bold9700/">Bold 9700</a>, the AT&T phone is the original Bold.</em></p>
<p>Basically, barring any major bugs that pop up over the next couple of days, this is the BlackBerry you probably wanna bug your corporate overlords to handcuff to your pants if you're on AT&T or T-Mobile, since it'll slide into them easier than any BlackBerry yet. I just hope you enjoy the feel of faux leather. [<a href="http://www.blackberry.com/">BlackBerry</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5397391/blackberry-bold-9700-impressions-small-and-chirpy-like-a-black-hummingbird]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5397391]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry bold]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry bold 9700]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bold]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bold 9700]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:01:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5397391&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[T-Mobile's Super Speedy 7.2Mbps 3G Rollout Has Begun]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/HSPA_7_2_Wireless.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_HSPA_7_2_Wireless.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Some good news follows <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5396460/t+mobile-confirms-nationwide-service-outage">T-Mobile's recent outages</a>: reports are coming in that some customers are experiencing download speeds above 2Mbps, meaning that the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/380379/mobile-term-madness-lte-wimax-ev+do-and-more-explained">HSPA 7.2Mbps</a> rollout may have begun. Is anyone here seeing increases in download speed?</p>
<p>Android and Me is suggesting that T-Mobile customers try checking their data speed using <a href="http://www.androlib.com/android.application.com-xtremelabs-android-speedtest-jpAp.aspx">Xtreme Labs Speedtest</a> or <a href="http://www.mobilespeedtest.com/">Mobile Speed Test</a>. I encourage you to do so and post the results after a few tries along with your region. In the meantime, we're waiting on official word from T-Mobile to confirm this potentially great news. [<a href="http://androidandme.com/2009/11/carriers/t-mobile-news/has-the-t-mobile-hspa-7-2-rollout-begun-help-us-find-out/">Android and Me</a>&mdash;<i>Thanks, Slacker!</i>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5397471/t+mobiles-super-speedy-72mbps-3g-rollout-has-begun]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5397471]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hspa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hspa 7.2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile hspa 7.2 rollout]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:43:48 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5397471&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[T-Mobile Blames Nationwide Service Outage On Software Error]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5396460/t+mobile-confirms-nationwide-service-outage">nationwide T-mobile service outage</a> may have been due to a system <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #softwareerror" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #softwareerror" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/softwareerror/">software error</a> according to a statement from a T-Mobile spokesperson:</p>
<blockquote><p>On Tuesday, some T-Mobile customers may have experienced service disruptions impacting voice and messaging services.  We restored full service to all affected customers later in the day.   After investigating the cause, we have determined that a backend system software error had generated abnormal congestion on the network.  T-Mobile has since implemented additional measures to help prevent this from happening in the future.  We again apologize to those customers who were affected and may have been inconvenienced.</p></blockquote>
<p>Basically, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5396635/t+mobile-says-voice-and-messaging-service-is-restored">everything should be back to normal</a>, but if you're still experiencing service issues outside of the ordinary, please let us know in the comments.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5397370/t+mobile-blames-nationwide-service-outage-on-software-error]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5397370]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[tmobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[error]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nationwide tmobile outage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[outage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[outages]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software error]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:10:43 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5397370&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[T-Mobile Says Voice and Messaging Service Is Restored]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Yep, you should be all good&mdash;if you're not, let us know ASAP. Check out the full story including the carrier's most recent statement <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5396460/t+mobile-confirms-nationwide-service-outage">here</a>.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396635/t+mobile-says-voice-and-messaging-service-is-restored]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396635]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[tmobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nationwide tmobile outage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[outage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[outages]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 04 Nov 2009 01:58:01 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396635&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[T-Mobile Confirms Nationwide Service Outage]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_T-Mobile_Service_Disruption.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />There's a confirmed T-Mobile service outage affecting users nationwide. People are reporting that all calls are failing with busy tones or getting dropped instantly, despite full signal bars. <b>Updated: T-Mobile says that voice and messaging service is restored.</b></p>
<p>As <a href="http://twitter.com/#search?q=T-Mobile">Twitter</a> and <a href="http://forums.t-mobile.com/tmbl/board/message?board.id=General&thread.id=6168">forums</a> are filled with annoyance over the issue, T-Mobile is assuring us that they are aware of the problem and working on it:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>T-Mobile customers may be experiencing service disruptions impacting voice and data. Our rapid response teams have been mobilized to restore service as quickly as possible. We will provide updates as more information is available.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>We're waiting on further information from T-Mobile and will update as we learn more.</p>
<p><b>Update 1:</b> Several commenters are reporting that both incoming and outgoing calls are working if routed through Google Voice.</p>
<p><b>Update 2:</b> Many reports that T-Mobile @Home is out as well.</p>
<p><b>Update 3:</b> We got a note from a T-Mobile spokesperson:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>We're making good progress restoring voice and messaging service to affected customers. At this time, approximately 5 percent of T-Mobile customers are experiencing service disruptions. Issues began at approximately 5:30 p.m. Eastern time. Our rapid response team is working continuously to fully resolve this disruption. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience that this has caused our customers</p>
</blockquote>
<p><b>Update 4:</b> The latest word from T-Mobile:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>We continue to work on restoring full services for the small percentage of affected Customers. Please stay tuned for the latest updates. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience that this has caused our customers.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><b>Update 5:</b> T-Mobile says the fix is in, but the cause is still a mystery:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>T-Mobile confirms it has fully restored voice and text/picture messaging services for customers affected by intermittent service disruptions on Tuesday. About five percent of our customers across various geographies were affected for much of Tuesday evening, and by late Tuesday PST their service was restored. Our sole focus has been restoring full services for all customers; we are now investigating the root cause of the incident. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience that this has caused our customers.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396460/t+mobile-confirms-nationwide-service-outage]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396460]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[tmobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nationwide tmobile outage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[outage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[outages]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:29:15 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396460&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Dutch Hacker Holds Jailbroken iPhones Hostage For €5 Ransom While Exposing Security Vulnerability]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/jailbroken_iphone_hacked_intro.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Many of us have jailbroken our iPhones, but did everyone remember to change the default root password? Those guilty of that oversight are vulnerable to the simple intrusion method this guy used to hold iPhones hostage in the Netherlands.</p>
<p>Apparently all that it took to terrify many Dutch iPhone users was a "trivial" port scanning technique and "a modicum of networking know-how." After the hacker gained access to the jailbroken phones with unchanged root passwords and SSH enabled, he sent the pictured message which led to a demand for a €5 PayPal payment and words of caution:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>If you don't pay, it's fine by me, but remember, the way I got access to your iPhone can be used by thousands of others-they can send text messages from your number (like I did), use it to call or record your calls, and actually whatever they want, even use it for their hacking activities! I can assure you, I have no intention of harming you or whatever, but, some hackers do! It's just my advice to secure your phone.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This particular gentleman was almost kind. He didn't inflict any serious harm, only demanded a small optional payment, and limited his activity to the Netherlands. Whoever learns from his approach might not be as nice. The lesson, my darlings? Change your root passwords or disable SSH if you've got a jailbroken iPhone. I finally did. [<a href="http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2009/11/dutch-hacker-holds-jailbroken-iphones-hostage-for-5.ars">Ars Technica</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5395645/dutch-hacker-holds-jailbroken-iphones-hostage-for-5-ransom-while-exposing-security-vulnerability]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5395645]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hack]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hacker]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hostage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone jailbreak hack]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jailbreak]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ransom]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:23:56 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5395645&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[T-Mobile UK Gets the HTC Touch HD2 November 9, Now What About the U.S?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/htc-hd2-1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_htc-hd2-1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Current <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5381327/rumor-htc-hd2-arriving-on-t+mobile-in-the-us">rumors</a> suggest the HD2 won't hit the States until early <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5375232/htcs-only-actually-interesting-windows-mobile-65-phone-isnt-coming-to-the-us-update-it-is">next-year</a>, probably on T-Mobile. But now that T-Mo UK has locked-in November 9, will the uber <a href="http://gizmodo.com/search/WinMo%206.5">WinMo 6.5</a> handset arrive sooner? <strong>Update:</strong> HD2 launch event in Taipei this week...</p>
<p>As you can see on the invite, the HD2 will be getting all official like on Wednesday. No doubt we'll hear something about U.S availability and pricing then. Stay tuned. [<a href="http://www.t-mobile.co.uk/shop/coming-soon/htc-touch-hd2/detail/av">T-Mobile UK</a> and <a href="http://pocketnow.com/tech-news/htc-hd2-product-launch-on-november-4">PocketNow</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_HTCHD2Event.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5395050/t+mobile-uk-gets-the-htc-touch-hd2-november-9-now-what-about-the-us]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5395050]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hd2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc hd2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc touch hd2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[HTC Touch HD2 UK U.S November 9]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[touch hd2]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 02 Nov 2009 08:15:19 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5395050&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sony Ericsson Equinox 3G Clamshell Phone: Exclusive to T-Mobile on October 28]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/Equinox1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_Equinox1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5186006/the-gesture-reading-sony-ericsson-t707-meh-cellphone">Equinox</a> (aka <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5196452/sony-ericsson-t707-who-says-more-of-the-same-is-a-bad-thing">T707</a>) may be a mid-range quad-band dumbphone...but it's pretty. It's got trippy light effects for incoming calls, GPS, 3.2-megapixel camera, FM radio, and Bluetooth. A motion sensor also controls certain functions. $50 (with 2-year contract). [<a href="http://www.t-mobile.com/">T-Mobile</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Size:</strong> 93 x 50 x 14.1 mm (approx.)<br>
<strong>Weight:</strong> 95 grams (approx.)<br>
<strong>Available colors:</strong> Carbon<br>
(Custom light features come in Amber, Sapphire, Beryl, Diamond, and Amethyst.)<br>
<strong>Main screen:</strong> 2.2"(5) QVGA 262K TFT<br>
<strong>Resolution:</strong> 240 x 320 pixels<br>
<strong>Networks:</strong> GSM/ EDGE 850/900/1800/1900 + HSDPA 2100/1700</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/SonyEricssonEquinox.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_SonyEricssonEquinox.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5390729/sony-ericsson-equinox-3g-clamshell-phone-exclusive-to-t+mobile-on-october-28]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5390729]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[equinox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony ericsson]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sony Ericsson Equinox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile Equinox]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 27 Oct 2009 07:51:06 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5390729&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[T-Mobile Project Dark Pricing Plans Go Live Today]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/tmobile31.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />According to documents procured by the folks at Fone Frenzy, T-Mobile's incredibly appealing <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5386951/leaked-details-on-t+mobile-project-dark">Project Dark pricing plans</a> begin today. Long story short, those leaked plans we brought you earlier this week are completely, totally true. Also, Catherine Zeta-Jones: <strong>Updated.</strong></p>

<p>The new T-Mobile <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #unlimitedplans" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/unlimitedplans/">Unlimited plans</a> match Sprint's all-you-can eat $99 deal with its unlimited $99 voice/text/voice plan (as seen in the image, with discounted handsets). <strong>Update:</strong> The $79 price point comes into play with regular priced handsets, two-year agreements, as seen in T-Mobile's marketing materials:</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/tmobile11.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />As a fellow iPhone owner I'm <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5386951/leaked-details-on-t+mobile-project-dark">with Jesus on this one</a>. Apple, please drop this exclusivity BS in the US. I completely understand that all cell phone companies are guilty of bending over their customers with overpriced text messages and fees and the like. I really do. I accept that. It's just that I'd love to be bent over for <em>less</em>.</p>
<p><em>Editor's Note:</em> Pardon the pun, but hold the phone. Fresh from the comments, Gizmodo's own Brian Lam <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5389406/t+mobile-project-dark-pricing-plans-go-live-today#c16256667">weighs in</a> on whether the "deal" here carries with it some not-so-hidden baggage:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>No one is mentioning that you can't compare TMO's 3g network to ATT's. TMO's isn't rolled out very thoroughly and it would get crushed if more people used it.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>A fair point. It's also been mentioned that deals like this one exist specifically because T-Mobile doesn't have the iPhone (again, from the comments). T-Mobile users, care to weigh in, one way or another? [<a href="http://fonefrenzy.com/2009/10/24/exclusive-t-mobile-takes-on-verizon-att-and-sprint-on-1025-full-pricing-breakdown/">Fone Frenzy</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5389406/t+mobile-project-dark-pricing-plans-go-live-today]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5389406]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[project dark]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sprint]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[unlimited plans]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 25 Oct 2009 10:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Loftus]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5389406&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Waiting for a Nokia N900? Keep Waiting]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/Nokia_N900_48_lowres.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_Nokia_N900_48_lowres.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Apparently the handset has been delayed until November. The good news, as BGR points out, is that the n900 supports T-Mobile 3G. So assuming <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5386951/leaked-details-on-t+mobile-project-dark">Project Black means cheap plans</a>, the timing could actually work out well for prospective buyers. [<a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/10/24/nokia-n900-delayed-until-november-tests-our-patience/">BGR</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5389075/waiting-for-a-nokia-n900-keep-waiting]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5389075]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nokia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[maemo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[n900]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nokia n900]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[project black]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 24 Oct 2009 10:10:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5389075&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Leaked Details on T-Mobile Project Dark]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/t-mobile-even-more-even-more-plus-1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_t-mobile-even-more-even-more-plus-1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>I like the idea of an $80 all-you-can eat pre-paid plan, with the possibility of buying a new smartphone&mdash;like the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5356590/motorola-cliq-android-smartphone-everything-you-need-to-know">Motorola Cliq</a>&mdash;in four easy payments. That seems to be one of the plans of <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5378270/t+mobile-project-dark-a-hyperfast-21mbps-3g-rollout-update-its-much-more">T-Mobile's Project Dark</a>.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/t-mobile-even-more-even-more-plus-2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_t-mobile-even-more-even-more-plus-2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>If these leaked documents are real, here's what T-Mobile will offer:</p>
<p><b>Even More plan</b><br>
• $100 for voice/SMS/data, <i>everything</i> unlimited.<br>
• $70 for unlimited talk and SMS.<br>
• $60 for unlimited voice only.<br>
• Requires two year contract.</p>
<p><b>Even More Plus plan</b><br>
• $80 for voice/SMS/data, <i>everything</i> unlimited.<br>
• $60 for unlimited talk and SMS.<br>
• $50 for unlimited voice only.<br>
• Pre-paid.</p>
<p>The weird thing is that the Even More Plus plan is pre-paid and gives you the FlexPay option, which allows to buy a phone in four payments. The Even More will probably give you a "free" cellphone, but it's not specified at this point.</p>
<p>Apple, please, let's drop this whole exclusivity thing with the iPhone in the US. I don't want to keep paying $160 to those AT&T thieves every single month. I would rather pay $100 to the T-Mobile thieves. [<a href="http://www.tmonews.com/2009/10/project-dark-pricing/">TmoNews</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/21/t-mobiles-project-dark-99-99-unlimited-on-even-more-79-99-o/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5386951/leaked-details-on-t+mobile-project-dark]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5386951]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[4g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hspa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[project dark]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile project dark]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:01:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5386951&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Hurray, Sidekick Owners, You Can Get Your Contacts Back Now]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/500x_sidekicklxsmall.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_500x_sidekicklxsmall.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>In today's edition of the "<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5384990/microsoft-making-steady-progress-on-sidekick-data-recovery">steady progress</a>" being made in recovering the data lost in the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5378805/t+mobile-sidekick-outrage-your-datas-probably-gone-forever">Great Sidekick Out(r)age of 2009</a>, contacts&mdash;and just contacts&mdash;are back, after you run a retrieval tool. The rest's coming! Eventually? [<a href="http://tech.yahoo.com/news/ap/20091020/ap_on_hi_te/us_tec_t_mobile_sidekick_data_recovery">Yahoo</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5385719/hurray-sidekick-owners-you-can-get-your-contacts-back-now]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5385719]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[sidekick]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[danger]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:02:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5385719&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Microsoft "Making Steady Progress" On Sidekick Data Recovery]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Last week it seemed the Danger/Microsoft team was on the verge of sorting out the fiasco that <a href="http://gizmodo.com/search/sidekick">saw widespread data loss for Sidekick customers</a>. Unfortunately, completing this process is taking longer than expected:</p>
<blockquote><p>
The Danger / Microsoft team is continuing to work around the clock on the data restoration process.  We apologize that this is taking so long, but we want to make sure we are doing everything possible to maintain the integrity of your data.</p>
<p>We continue to make steady progress, and we hope to be able to begin restoring personal contacts for affected users this week, with the remainder of the content (photographs, notes, to-do-lists, marketplace data, and high scores) shortly thereafter. </p>
<p>This data restoration effort is only necessary for customers who lost data from their Sidekick devices.  We appreciate your ongoing patience.</p></blockquote>
<p> So, in a nutshell, if your data has not been recovered soooooo sooooorry.  <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5382208/most-if-not-all-sidekick-data-recovered">Please don't sue</a>. [<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2009/oct09/10-18sidekickupdate.mspx?rss_fdn=Press%20Releases">Microsoft</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5384990/microsoft-making-steady-progress-on-sidekick-data-recovery]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5384990]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[tmobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[danger]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[data loss]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[data outage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sidekick]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tmobile sidekick]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:58:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5384990&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[T-Mobile Project Dark Rumor Update: Financed Phones, Tiered Unlimited Plans]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/tmodark_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_tmodark_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>We've heard plenty about <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #projectdark" href="http://gizmodo.comhttp://gizmodo.com/tag/projectdark/">Project Dark</a> lately, including <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5378270/t+mobile-project-dark-a-hyperfast-21mbps-3g-rollout-update-its-much-more">new unlimited plans, 21Mbps HSPA</a>, and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5381852/rumor-t+mobile-project-black-isnt-a-phone--its-a-rescue-plan">new handsets</a>. The newest rumors, courtesy of Boy Genius Report, are whispers of Rent-A-Center style, contract-free unsubsidized phone purchasing and tiered unlimited plans. <b>Updated</b>.</p>

<p>Obviously T-mobile is attempting to expand their customer base through Project Dark, and part of the approach is to entice customers who would normally be forced to prepay monthly dues as well as full retail for a device:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"Even More Plus" will give those who would otherwise qualify for FlexPay the option to finance a phone. [...] Our sources tell us that the phones will not be subsidized and so there won't be contracts for the devices, which means you pay the full retail price over the course of a set amount of time (up to 20 months is what we're told). Not bad - for a $500 device over that time is just $25/month, as an example.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The next step is offering the "Most Affordable Unlimited Rate Plans" in three flavors:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>[U]nlimited voice, unlimited voice and text, and unlimited voice/text/data all priced at $40, $50 and $60, respectively.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>All unconfirmed rumors, of course, but moves like this could definitely help T-mobile <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5377678/expectations-of-t+mobiles-mysterious-project-black-are-sky+high">leap up from fourth place in the Great Battle of the Carriers</a>.</p>
<p><b>Update:</b> The folks at Boy Genius now have some screenshots showing the tiered unlimited plan and the FlexPay options.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/projectdarkconf.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_projectdarkconf.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/10/17/more-t-mobile-project-dark-rumors-financed-phones/">Boy Genius Report</a> and <a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/10/17/project-dark-confirmed-to-include-unlimited-plans-flexpay/">Boy Genius Report</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5384048/t+mobile-project-dark-rumor-update-financed-phones-tiered-unlimited-plans]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5384048]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[4g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hspa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[project black]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[project dark]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tmo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tmobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tmobile project black]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tmobile project dark]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 17 Oct 2009 16:43:21 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5384048&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA["Most, if Not All" Sidekick Data Recovered]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/500x_500x_sidekicklxsmall.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_500x_500x_sidekicklxsmall.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Good news: It looks like <a href="http://gizmodo.com/search/sidekick">Sidekick data fiasco</a> is finally coming to an end. Over on T-Mobile's Sidekick forums, an official Microsoft statement confirms "most, if not all, customer data" will return "as soon as possible", starting with personal contacts.</p>
<p>The statement goes on to say they will "work around the clock to restore data to all affected users, including calendar, notes, tasks, photographs and high scores, as quickly as possible."</p>
<p>The data loss was apparently caused by a system failure that created data loss in the core database and the back-up. I'm not sure if that means <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5381081/the-cause-of-the-great-sidekick-fiasco-all-signs-point-to-sabotage">sabotage</a> or not.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, we now hear that a number of pissed off users have <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-10375240-56.html">filed lawsuits</a>. Maybe this isn't the end to this after all. [<a href="http://forums.t-mobile.com/tmbl/?category.id=Sidekick">T-Mobile</a>]</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Dear <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged T-MOBILE SIDEKICK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/t_mobile-sidekick/">T-Mobile Sidekick</a> customers,<br>
On behalf of Microsoft, I want to apologize for the recent problems with the Sidekick service and give you an update on the steps we have taken to resolve these problems.</p>
<p>We are pleased to report that we have recovered most, if not all, customer data for those Sidekick customers whose data was affected by the recent outage. We plan to begin restoring users' personal data as soon as possible, starting with personal contacts, after we have validated the data and our restoration plan. We will then continue to work around the clock to restore data to all affected users, including calendar, notes, tasks, photographs and high scores, as quickly as possible.</p>
<p>We now believe that data loss affected a minority of Sidekick users. If your Sidekick account was among those affected, please continue to log into these forums for the latest updates about when data restoration will begin, and any steps you may need to take. We will work with T-Mobile to post the next update on data restoration timing no later than Saturday.</p>
<p>We have determined that the outage was caused by a system failure that created data loss in the core database and the back-up. We rebuilt the system component by component, recovering data along the way. This careful process has taken a significant amount of time, but was necessary to preserve the integrity of the data.</p>
<p>We will continue working closely with T-Mobile to restore user data as quickly as possible. We are eager to deliver the level of reliable service that our incredibly loyal customers have become accustomed to, and we are taking immediate steps to help ensure this does not happen again. Specifically, we have made changes to improve the overall stability of the Sidekick Service and initiated a more resilient backup process to ensure that the integrity of our database backups is maintained.</p>
<p>Once again, we apologize for this situation and the inconvenience that it has created. Please know that we are working all-out to resolve this situation and restore the reliability of the service.</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br>
Roz Ho<br>
Corporate Vice President<br>
Premium Mobile Experiences, Microsoft Corporation</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5382208/most-if-not-all-sidekick-data-recovered]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5382208]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[danger]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sidekick]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sidekick data recovered]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile sidekick]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:49:43 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5382208&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Rumor: T-Mobile Project Black Isn't a Phone &mdash; It's a Rescue Plan]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/T-Mobile-Project-Dark-Project-Black-header-image.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />This unconfirmed memo from <a href="http://nexus404.com/">Nexus404</a> says what <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged PROJECT BLACK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/project-black/">Project Black</a> isn't: A phone. It also claims Black is a turnaround plan with "blazing speeds" "3x" the competition and phones from hot makers ("Nokia #1 and Samsung #2"). WTF.</p>

<blockquote>All the employees who received the information were required to sign confidentiality agreements. Each sector has received it at different times, the bulk of them actually received it the 13th, after most of the information was already leaked (Although it's not entirely accurate…)
<p>That said, the Project Dark is not any ONE thing..its a term for a company TURNAROUND; Last to First is what some like to say. It's an all inclusive "package" that includes blazing speeds, 3 times faster than anyone will have on the market for years. Phones people actually WANT, using top of the line models from the top 2 cellphone manufacturers in the world (Nokia #1, and Samsung #2). Hot software like Android. And European priced packages.</p>
<p>And all of this will make Verizon, AT&T, and Sprint's head spin when its released faster than anyone can have time to finishing reading any official press releases.</p>
<p>330 Million in new networks Verizon? Try nearly 10 billion.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>First of all, assuming this email is real, I don't want&mdash;and I am guessing you don't want&mdash;any Nokia or Samsung handset. Second of all, I doubt that TMO of all companies, mr late to the game, can deliver speeds that fast, either. But suppose it's true. Then what's that "10 billion" number at the end for? Femtocells everywhere? Who knows! It's a rumor! You're not supposed to know yet!</p>
<p>But if anyone has any more information on TMO's project black, please drop me a line. We'd love to help you tell the world. [<a href="http://nexus404.com/Blog/2009/10/14/t-mobile-project-dark-project-black-insider-details-obtained-by-tfts-project-darkproject-black-is-the-term-for-a-company-turnaround-says-our-source/">Nexus404</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5381852/rumor-t+mobile-project-black-isnt-a-phone--its-a-rescue-plan]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5381852]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[black]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[project black]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tmo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tmo project black]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tmobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tmobile project black]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:21:11 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5381852&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Rumor: HTC HD2 Arriving on T-Mobile in the U.S?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/htc-hd2-1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_htc-hd2-1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>HTC's HD2 is probably the most interesting <a href="http://gizmodo.com/search/WinMo%206.5">WinMo 6.5 phone</a> out there, but won't hit the U.S until <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5375232/htcs-only-actually-interesting-windows-mobile-65-phone-isnt-coming-to-the-us-update-it-is">early next year</a>. Now a leaked image may indicate that the 4.3-inch multi-touch screen handset could arrive on T-Mobile. Take a look:</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/TMoHD2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_TMoHD2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>As you can see, the image doesn't mention the HD2 by name, but the image and specs sure match up: massive capacitive touchscreen, 1GHz Snapdragon processor, Wi-Fi, GPS, and Bluetooth.</p>
<p>E-Reader content? TV/Movies at your fingertips? Sounding pretty sweet. Of course, this one stays in the rumor basket until we hear more. We'll let you know when we do. [<a href="http://www.tmonews.com/2009/10/windows-mobile-midnight-madness/">TmoNews</a> via <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/htc-hd2-confirmed-for-t-mobile-usa-1460296/">SlashGear</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5381327/rumor-htc-hd2-arriving-on-t+mobile-in-the-us]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5381327]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hd2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc hd2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[HTC HD2 Arriving on T-Mobile in the U.S]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Windows Mobile 6.5]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[winmo 6.5]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5381327&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Cause of the Great Sidekick Fiasco? “All Signs Point to Sabotage”]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/500x_500x_sidekicklxsmall.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_500x_500x_sidekicklxsmall.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>This past week's Sidekick data disaster was so extraordinary, you would think that either T-mobile or Microsoft would issue an explanation. There's one insider who might have the reason why one hasn't come yet: it was an inside job.</p>
<p>An anonymous tipster with seemingly extensive knowledge about the Danger/Pink team has this to say to Apple Insider as to what caused the massive data outage:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>...someone with access to the servers at the datacenter must have inserted a time bomb to wipe out not just all of the data, but also all of the backup tapes, and finally, I suspect, reformatting the server hard drives so that the service itself could not be restarted with a simple reboot (and to erase any traces of the time bomb itself)... If this was an ordinary sort of failure, the service would have come back within a day, so once again, all signs point to sabotage.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>After all the reports we've been hearing about the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5380011/microsofts-project-pink-probably-killed-off-the-sidekick-and-itself">troubled state of the Danger/Pink team</a>, it's certainly plausible that there are more than a few disgruntled employees who could cause such a catastrophic failure. Whether or not anyone would is another question, but this whole thing is so waaaay out of the ordinary, I'm willing to believe it. [<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/10/12/microsofts_sidekick_pink_problems_blamed_on_dogfooding_and_sabotage.html">Apple Insider</a> via <a href="http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/chris-dannen/techwatch/microsoft-sidekick-team-bunch-clueless-idiots">Fast Company</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5381081/the-cause-of-the-great-sidekick-fiasco-all-signs-point-to-sabotage]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5381081]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blockquote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[danger]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pink]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sidekick]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 14 Oct 2009 01:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5381081&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sidekick Data Fiasco: Some Users' Contacts Returned]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/500x_500x_sidekicklxsmall.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_500x_500x_sidekicklxsmall.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>I wouldn't get too excited yet, but this could be promising news. A few users over at the T-Mobile forums have reported that their <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5380117/the-great-sidekick-data-outage-of-2009-t+mobile-offers-100-in-apology-money">lost address book contacts</a> have come back. Here's what they had to say:</p>
<p>What's interesting is that the three posters all have one thing in common: they switched-off their phones. That goes against T-Mobile's <a href="http://forums.t-mobile.com/tmbl/?category.id=Sidekick">official warning</a>: "During this service disruption, please DO NOT remove your battery, reset your Sidekick, or allow it to lose power."</p>
<p>Unfortunately, some users still tried what the Sidekick users below did, and now their phones won't even turn on.</p>
<p>Tommyd2107 says:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>I turned off my phone a couple times over the course of the outage. Last night I began manually importing all my numbers back into my phone, then today when I went out on my phone and after I hung up… all 396 of my contacts returned.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Generalblue says:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Got my contacts back too! My phone froze up on me and since I have already lost everything anyways, I just took the battery out and put it back in. Once my phone was on about 5 minutes later I checked my address book for some reason and they were all there. I saved all my contacts to my SIM card.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Dariahna says:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The same thing happened to me...I shut my phone off several times without removing the battery...voile'! My contacts returned!</p>
</blockquote>
<p>At that point, a T-Mobile rep jumped into the conversation: "We would like to collect some examples of this." I bet they would. Meanwhile, the Sidekick LX is marked "temporarily out of stock" over at <a href="http://find.t-mobile.com/controller?N=0&Ntk=primary&Ntx=mode+matchpartial&Ntt=sidekick">T-Mobile</a>. [<a href="http://forums.t-mobile.com/tmbl/board/message?board.id=Sidekick2&message.id=15234">T-Mobile Forums</a> and <a href="http://www.infoworld.com/d/mobilize/some-sidekick-users-report-data-has-been-restored-526">InfoWorld</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5380569/sidekick-data-fiasco-some-users-contacts-returned]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5380569]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sidekick]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile sidekick]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile sidekick data outage]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:15:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5380569&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Great Sidekick Data Outage of 2009: T-Mobile Offers $100 in Apology Money]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/500x_500x_sidekicklxsmall.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_500x_500x_sidekicklxsmall.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>T-Mobile sent out an update regarding <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5378805/t+mobile-sidekick-outrage-your-datas-probably-gone-forever">the first great tragedy of the 21st century</a> (involving Sidekicks): They're still holding out hope for data recovery, but if they can't, they'll show how sorry they are with a $100 credit.</p>
<p>T-Mo seems really sorry about this, you guys. Of course, they did lose a ton of customer data that's unlikely to be found, but at least they're properly apologetic. They're doing their best to get the data back, and both they and Microsoft/Danger seem sort of optimistic about it, so it may not be a lost cause quite yet. The full statement:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>T-MOBILE STATUS UPDATE ON SIDEKICK DATA DISRUPTION, MON., OCT. 12</p>
<p>Dear valued <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged T-MOBILE SIDEKICK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/t_mobile-sidekick/">T-Mobile Sidekick</a> customers:</p>
<p>We are thankful for your continued patience as Microsoft/Danger continues to work on preserving platform stability and restoring all services for our Sidekick customers. We have made significant progress this past weekend, restoring services to virtually every customer. Microsoft/Danger has teams of experts in place who are working around-the-clock to ensure this stability is maintained.</p>
<p>Regarding those of you who have lost personal content, T-Mobile and Microsoft/Danger continue to do all we can to recover and return any lost information. Recent efforts indicate the prospects of recovering some lost content may now be possible. We will continue to keep you updated on this front; we know how important this is to you.</p>
<p>In the event certain customers have experienced a significant and permanent loss of personal content, T-Mobile will be sending these customers a $100 customer appreciation card. This will be in addition to the free month of data service that already went to Sidekick data customers. This card can be used towards T-Mobile products and services, or a customer's T-Mobile bill. For those who fall into this category, details will be sent out in the next 14 days – there is no action needed on the part of these customers. We however remain hopeful that for the majority of our customers, personal content can be recovered.</p>
<p>Sidekick customers can continue to visit T-Mobile Sidekick Forums (http://www.t-mobile.com/sidekick) on a regular basis to access the latest updates, as well as FAQs regarding this service disruption. The Forums also offers tips and suggestions for rebuilding content on your device.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5380117/the-great-sidekick-data-outage-of-2009-t+mobile-offers-100-in-apology-money]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5380117]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sidekick]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile sidekick]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile sidekick data outage]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 12 Oct 2009 21:06:29 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5380117&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Microsoft's Project Pink Probably Killed Off the Sidekick and Itself]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_500x_500x_web1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_500x_500x_500x_web1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5378805/t+mobile-sidekick-outrage-your-datas-probably-gone-forever">crazy Sidekick data mess</a> might be the least troubling thing to happen to fans of the platform. The latest rumors, which build off of <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/pink">previous Pink rumors</a>, say that the platform is pretty much dead. Dead, dead, dead, dead.</p>
<p>According to Channelweb, the Premium Mobile Experiences (PMX) team has caused, either by layoffs or by pissing them off, a large chunk of the Danger team to leave Microsoft. Danger is the team that actually built the Sidekick, and Roz Ho was siphoning off their resources into the Pink camp in order to make sure the latter could survive. By doing so, it seems like she's killed off both groups, which might be why <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5375547/microsoft-on-phone-hardware-no-were-not-going-to-do-that">Microsoft keeps denying that they're going to make phone hardware</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.crn.com/software/220600334;jsessionid=INTP2HSK3MTNTQE1GHPSKHWATMY32JVN?pgno=1">Channelweb's tipster</a> sounds similar to the tipster <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5374973/danger-for-microsofts-project-pink">last week</a> that talked to <a href="http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/10/05/microsofts-project-pink-might-be-dead-in-the-water/">MobileCrunch</a> about management ineptitude and lousy business choices. To summarize, Roz Ho, Microsoft's "head of mobile experiences", seems to be making so many bad choices that naming the project after <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5378080/how-screwed-up-is-microsoft-pink-hint-its-named-after-pink-the-singer">Pink, the angry singer</a>, seems like one of her best choices.</p>
<p>If Microsoft somehow manages to push Pink out the door, CRN says that it won't even include a calendar app or an alarm clock app. That's a feature that if you saw was missing on a dumb phone, you'd politely hand it back to the salesman while asking him to show you something in a <i>less shitty</i> variety. Not only that, it won't ship with a mobile app marketplace&mdash;which makes sense, since it's also rumored that they're <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5366906/turtle-and-pure-pink-phones-may-be-just-next+gen-sidekicks">not really smartphones anyway</a>.</p>
<p>The bottom line is that massive data outages might be just the kind of early warning users need to abandon the Sidekick and get on another device before the decision gets knocked out of your hands like the punchline to a standup's retort. [<a href="http://www.crn.com/software/220600334;jsessionid=INTP2HSK3MTNTQE1GHPSKHWATMY32JVN?pgno=2">CRN</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5380011/microsofts-project-pink-probably-killed-off-the-sidekick-and-itself]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5380011]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[sidekick]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[danger]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pink]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[project pink]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sidekick data]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sidekick dead]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:18:58 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5380011&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[T-Mobile Lets Furious Sidekick Users Ditch Their Contracts for Free]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/500x_sidekicklxsmall.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_500x_sidekicklxsmall.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>T-Mobile's initial apologia to Sidekick users grieving their <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5378805/t+mobile-sidekick-outrage-your-datas-probably-gone-forever">lost data</a> was a joke. A month of free data service? <em>To access what?</em> Now they've manned up, giving affected customers something they might actually want: A way out of their contracts.</p>

<p>An exasperated tipster who just spent some quality time on the phone with an equally exasperated T-Mobile rep told us what he was offered:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>• I'm released from the contract if I want (Yeesh, of course I better be. I can't believe I had to ask).<br>
• I can get a G1 for $129 (not sure if that's the normal contract renewal pricing or not; doesn't sound like a great deal to me).<br>
• They also suggested Blackberries etc, but I didn't get the pricing (since those are design disasters compared to SK or iPhone).</p>
</blockquote>
<p>So to break it down, your options are to accept about $20 off of a G1, which you, an avid Sidekick user, probably didn't want anyway, move onto a BlackBerry (?), or to <em>leave</em>. Sidekick users are a dedicated bunch&mdash;there's a good chance they came to T-Mobile just to use a particular Danger handset&mdash;so I wouldn't be surprised if people take that last offer pretty seriously.</p>
<p>I also wouldn't be surprised to see some kind of official announcement from T-Mobile regarding how they plan on dealing with their angry mass of Sidekick subscribers, but it'll be interesting to see how this shakes out: Remember, even though these people all bought their phones and service From T-Mo, and therefore expect to be helped by their carrier, the actual <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged DATA LOSS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/data-loss/">data loss</a> was Danger's (read: Microsoft's) fault. It's already clear that T-Mobile' is going to bear the brunt of the angry mob, but aside from getting <em>very sternly talked to</em> by their carrier partners, is Microsoft going to get out of this scot-free? <em>&mdash;Thanks, guy!</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5379703/t+mobile-lets-furious-sidekick-users-ditch-their-contracts-for-free]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5379703]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[customer service]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[danger]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[data loss]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sidekick]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sidekick data loss]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile sidekick]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the cloud]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tmo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:54:40 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5379703&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[T-Mobile Sidekick Out(r)age: Your Data's Probably Gone Forever]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/sidekicklxsmall.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_sidekicklxsmall.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged T-MOBILE SIDEKICK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/t_mobile-sidekick/">T-Mobile Sidekick</a> users have been holding out hope that their data might be recovered after T-Mo issued <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5373946/the-great-t+mobile-sidekick-data-outage-of-2009-could-end-monday-maybe">an optimistic message of hope</a>. But the carrier just updated users and admitted the truth: Your shit's <a href="http://forums.t-mobile.com/tmbl/?category.id=Sidekick">gone</a>. Sorry, guys.</p>
<p>It's been more than two weeks without data for Sidekick users, and T-Mobile finally bit the bullet and announced that it probably isn't coming back. The quote:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Regrettably, based on Microsoft/Danger's latest recovery assessment of their systems, we must now inform you that personal information stored on your device - such as contacts, calendar entries, to-do lists or photos - that is no longer on your Sidekick almost certainly has been lost as a result of a server failure at Microsoft/Danger. That said, our teams continue to work around-the-clock in hopes of discovering some way to recover this information. However, the likelihood of a successful outcome is extremely low.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This is pretty crappy of T-Mobile and Danger, and while it's probably unfair to make this connection, doesn't give us any new confidence in Project Pink, developed by the remnants of Danger after Microsoft acquired it. (After all, Microsoft bought Danger specifically because of their software services. And now, it just goes kablooey?) Renowned Sidekick user and a-hole <a href="http://perezhilton.com/2009-10-09-t-mobile-seriously-screws-their-customers">Perez Hilton</a>, while normally hysteric about just about everything, has the right tone here:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>To add insult to injury, the ONLY thing T-Mobile is offering their customers, whom they obviously don't value or respect, is one month of free data service.</p>
<p>That's shit!</p>
<p>One month of free data service (which is not the same thing as one month of free phone use) for SEVEN DAYS of heartache and no access to contacts????</p>
<p>That's fucked!!!!</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Really, that's kind of putting it lightly. [<a href="http://forums.t-mobile.com/tmbl/?category.id=Sidekick">T-Mobile</a> via <a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/10/10/t-mobile-admits-your-sidekick-data-is-gone-like-the-wind/">Boy Genius Report</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5378805/t+mobile-sidekick-outrage-your-datas-probably-gone-forever]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5378805]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[outages]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sidekick]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sidekick outage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile sidekick]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 10 Oct 2009 16:55:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5378805&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[T-Mobile Project Dark: A Hyperfast 21Mbps 3G Rollout? (Update: It's Much More)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/tmodark.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_tmodark.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Boy Genius hears T-Mobile's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged PROJECT DARK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/project-dark/">Project Dark</a> (<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5377678/expectations-of-t+mobiles-mysterious-project-black-are-sky+high">aka Black</a>) contains two things: a bunch of phones launch, like the Cliq and BlackBerry 9700, and more importantly, a "very, very rapid expansion" of T-Mobile 3G network&mdash;the 21Mbps HSPA one. <strong>Update</strong>:</p>
<p>There's actually more to it, possibly: A new "Everything Unlimited" plan that'll be $50 for all-you-can-eat voice, SMS, MMS and data. Watch out, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5356228/sprint-any-mobile-official-unlimited-calls-to-all-mobile-numbers-unless-youre-roaming">Sprint</a>. Plus, T-Mobile employees will be getting a snazzy new uniform consisting of a black shirt and grey pants. We'll see. [<a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/10/09/t-mobiles-rumored-project-black-handsets/">BGR</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5378270/t+mobile-project-dark-a-hyperfast-21mbps-3g-rollout-update-its-much-more]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5378270]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[4g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hspa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[project dark]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile project dark]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:19:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5378270&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Expectations of T-Mobile's Mysterious "Project Black" Are Sky-High]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/2-22-09-t-mobile-store.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_2-22-09-t-mobile-store.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Rumors surrounding T-Mobile's very mysterious "<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged PROJECT BLACK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/project-black/">Project Black</a>" have been swirling around, and those in the know are claiming it's going to blast T-Mo out of fourth place in the carrier wars. What do we know about Project Black?</p>
<p>T-Mo News claims it's not a phone or a promotion, which suggests it might be some kind of coverage rollout&mdash;T-Mo certainly could use a more widespread network, since they've already got some sweet phones to take advantage of one. Apparently T-Mobile staff are being trained for an imminent release or rollout of Project Black starting this week, but again, we have no idea what this actually is (or if it even exists, really). Rumors have been bubbling from a couple different sources (<a href="http://www.phonearena.com/htmls/Big-announcement-coming-soon-from-T-Mobile--Project-Black-to-shake-things-up-article-a_7349.html">Phone Arena</a> and <a href="http://www.tmonews.com/2009/10/big-t-mobile-annoucements-the-mysterious-project-black/">T-Mo News</a>, mostly), so the rumor may have something real behind it, but we don't know much for sure yet. We'll keep you updated as soon as we figure out what this secret project actually is. [<a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/09/10/07/t.mobile.may.have.game.changer.news/">Electronista</a> and <a href="http://www.tmonews.com/2009/10/big-t-mobile-annoucements-the-mysterious-project-black/">T-Mo News</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5377678/expectations-of-t+mobiles-mysterious-project-black-are-sky+high]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5377678]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[project black]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[unconfirmed]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 09 Oct 2009 02:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5377678&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Something Not Quite Right About Limited Edition Fender MyTouch 3G]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/T-Mobile-myTouch_3G_Fender_LE.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_T-Mobile-myTouch_3G_Fender_LE.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>I am as much a fan of the silky Strat as the next person raised on classic rock&mdash;especially Mark Knopfler's modified one&mdash;but this Fender finish on the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/t/mytouch-3g">MyTouch 3G Android phone</a> doesn't seem very rock 'n' roll.</p>
<p>The phone itself was, alas, not on display at CTIA in San Diego, a phone convention increasingly known for its lack of actual new phones. But in these studio shots, it looks really good. If it <em>didn't</em> have the Fender logo, I'd be like, "Hey, look at my sweet phone. Doesn't it kind of remind you of a guitar?" But emblazoned as it is, the bearer is forced to apologize for it, like, "Yeah, I really liked how it looked, even though I know how corny it is to have a phone with my guitar's logo on it. Will you forgive me?"</p>
<p>And the ghost of Les Paul played on... [<a href="http://www.thenewsmarket.com/Releases/StoryDetailPage.aspx?GUID=7193c1f0-8ec1-4f9a-8693-d38168917454&alertid=9b5a7b47-6dce-4cc6-a3ef-58412820bac0&bhcp=1#">T-Mobile</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5376665/something-not-quite-right-about-limited-edition-fender-mytouch-3g]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5376665]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fender]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fender mytouch 3g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[guitars]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mytouch 3g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 07 Oct 2009 20:27:18 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5376665&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[You Always Wanted a Cell Tower in Your Backyard, Right?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/Cell_Tower_Visit.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_Cell_Tower_Visit.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>While disappointing carriers by reiterating the FCC is <em>all about</em> net neutrality, chairman Julius Genachowski also offered them some consolation: To get more 4G goodness in the air, the <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-12261_7-10369871-10356022.html">FCC's going to a "shot clock" style rollout</a> for <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #celltowers" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/celltowers/">cell towers</a>.</p>
<p>That means when a new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #celltower" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/celltower/">cell tower</a> site is proposed, there's <a href="http://www.ctia.org/blog/index.cfm/2008/9/23/Set-the-Shot-Clock">just a short period</a> for a community to protest it&mdash;the idea being more towers going up even faster will help speed up the rollout of crazyfast 4G wireless. The FCC's also working to free up more spectrum for carriers to use for 4G, though that's not exactly easy, since wireless spectrum, while invisible, is a pretty limited resource. (It's why Verizon <a href="http://gizmodo.com/376103/verizons-936-billion-700mhz-plans-high+speed-4g-lte-network-up-and-running-before-att">paid a kabillion dollars</a> for a chunk of it.)</p>
<p>Even if you're not happy about the shot clock timing for towers, on the upside, the FCC's committed to having net neutrality apply to mobile internets as well as the stuff your cable company provides, the wireless carriers won't be able to terribly restrict what you do with all of that mobile broadband, beyond very basic network management to keep it all running. [<a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-12261_7-10369871-10356022.html">Cnet</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5376507/you-always-wanted-a-cell-tower-in-your-backyard-right]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5376507]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[4g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cell tower]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cell towers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sprint]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 07 Oct 2009 18:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5376507&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Samsung Behold II Hits T-Mobile, Pairs Android with TouchWiz Interface]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/SamsungBeholdII.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_SamsungBeholdII.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Wow, <em>another</em> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/search/t-mobile%20android">T-Mobile Android phone</a> (<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5361245/sprint-hero-review-faster-stronger-uglier">Sprint's HTC Hero</a> is the only Android-handset on another carrier). The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged BEHOLD II" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/behold-ii/">Behold II</a> has a 3.2-inch AMOLED touchscreen, 5-megapixel camera, and TouchWiz UI (now with 3D cube menu for quick access to multimedia).</p>
<p>Those multimedia features include music, photos, videos, the Web, YouTube, and Amazon MP3 for music downloads. The phone's other key specs include 3G, Wi-Fi, GPS, Bluetooth, microSD card expandable memory (up to 16GB), and support for Google services and Exchange ActiveSync.</p>
<p>With a completely new OS compared to the original <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5097677/t+mobile-samsung-behold-lightning-review">Behold</a> (and even the upgraded <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5159832/samsung-memoir-8+megapixel-cameraphone-lightning-review">Memoir</a>), it's kind of strange that Samsung kept the Behold name. Especially when it resembles the Android powered <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5293244/hands-on-samsungs-galaxy-i7500-android-haptic-smartphone">Samsung Galaxy</a>. Still, there you have it. T-Mobile hasn't gone into pricing, but did say the Behold II would arrive "before the start of the holidays."</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5374186/samsung-behold-ii-hits-t+mobile-pairs-android-with-touchwiz-interface]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5374186]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Behold 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[behold ii]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[galaxy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[memoir]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung behold]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung behold 2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Samsung Behold II T-Mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung galaxy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung memoir]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 05 Oct 2009 02:10:38 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5374186&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Great T-Mobile Sidekick Data Outage of 2009 Could End Monday, Maybe]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/thumb160x_t-mobile-tweet-300x239.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Apparently, every T-Mobile Sidekick user from sea to shining sea has been without data access on their mobiles this weekend. Unfortunately, word on the wire is access should have returned yesterday (but it didn't).</p>

<p>How do we know this outage is serious business? Because it's a trending topic <a href="http://twitter.com/#search?q=T-Mobile">on Twitter right now</a>, that's how.</p>
<p>Celebrity blogger Perez Hilton, a Sidekick aficionado, is also <a href="http://twitter.com/PEREZHILTON">on the warpath</a> over this today, but in T-Mobile's defense we've learned from his frantic blogging that the carrier issued he (and others) bill credits ranging from $35 to three full months of data access.</p>
<p>The most recent update is an official response from T-Mobile, posted on Saturday, which reads like your standard customer service boilerplate:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"T-Mobile and Danger/Microsoft are urgently working to restore impacted services to Sidekick, and deliver them to you as quickly as possible. Following is a status update for our valued customers:</p>
<p>* We expect data services to begin gradually returning in the next couple of hours (Saturday evening)</p>
<p>* Web browsing capabilities should be first accessible first; additional functions such as IM, social networking applications and email will then follow.</p>
<p>While we anticipate a significant portion of data services to be restored by Monday, some richer data services may lag. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience, and appreciate your patience as we work hard with Danger/Microsoft to resolve this issue. We will continue to keep you updated as we have news to share. Thank you."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>If you happen to have a Sidekick (I don't, sorry tweens!), why don't you let us know how awful your day has been thus far? [<a href="http://www.phonenews.com/nationwide-t-mobile-sidekick-data-outage-9160/">Phone News</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5373946/the-great-t+mobile-sidekick-data-outage-of-2009-could-end-monday-maybe]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5373946]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[sidekick]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[danger]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 04 Oct 2009 14:55:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Loftus]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5373946&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Elusive BlackBerry 9700 (Onyx) Spotted Posing On Hardwood]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/BlackBerry-9700-Onyx-06-500x375.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_BlackBerry-9700-Onyx-06-500x375.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The 3G capable <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged BLACKBERRY 9700" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/blackberry-9700/">BlackBerry 9700</a>, rumored to have a completely unconfirmed <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5362192/remainders-+-things-we-didnt-post/gallery/">November 11 launch date</a> on T-Mobile, was recently spotted lounging around on some bloke's floor.</p>

<p>And that's pretty much it for now. Last we reported on this phone the release date was unconfirmed but realistic (November 11), the touch-based track pad was interesting, and it was T-Mobile's first 3G BlackBerry.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/BlackBerry-9700-Onyx-03.JPG"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_BlackBerry-9700-Onyx-03.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Also, the rumored specs are below, should you choose not to Google them:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>• New Trackpad<br>
• Quad-band GSM/GPRS/EDGE<br>
• UMTS/HSDPA<br>
• 480×360 resolution screen<br>
• OS 5.0<br>
• QWERTY keyboard<br>
• 3.2 megapixel AF camera<br>
• Bluetooth</p>
</blockquote>
<p>And there's also the ever-important wifi to consider as well. [<a href="http://dailymobile.se/2009/10/04/pictures-blackberry-9700-onyx/">DailyMobile</a> - Thanks, Daniel]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5373856/elusive-blackberry-9700-onyx-spotted-posing-on-hardwood]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5373856]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[9700]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry 9700]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 04 Oct 2009 13:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Loftus]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5373856&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Best Buy Employee Holiday Guide Pseudo-Reveals BlackBerry, Nokia, Android Launches]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Today's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #bestbuy" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #bestbuy" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/bestbuy/">Best Buy</a> leak takes the form of a who's who of holiday hardware releases for the retailer's mobile department:</p>
<blockquote><p>Nokia Booklet netbook - October 25th launch (AT&T activation)<br />
Sprint HTC Hero - October 11th<br />
Sprint Palm Pixi - launch date TBD<br />
Verizon Storm II - launch date TBD<br />
Verizon Android device - launch date TBD<br />
T-Mobile CLIQ - launch date TBD</p></blockquote>
<p>Also of note are two cryptic quotes regarding BlackBerry and Android devices. "New BlackBerry devices across multiple carriers" are set to launch this holiday season, and a "host of devices launch in late October and November for all carriers."</p>
<p>Then there's the launch of "new technology which doesn't exist today" line to top things off. I'm crossing my fingers that means "flying car." [<a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/10/04/best-buy-mobiles-holiday-playbook-upcoming-android-launches-blackberry-devices-nokia-booklet/">BGR</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5373850/best-buy-employee-holiday-guide-pseudo+reveals-blackberry-nokia-android-launches]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5373850]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[best buy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nokia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sprint]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 04 Oct 2009 10:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Loftus]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5373850&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[T-Mobile Pushing Android 1.6 Donut Update Right Now]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/MBRFkLKRwFw&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/MBRFkLKRwFw&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object>Alas, not for everyone: Having sent the update to Ion developer phones just a few days ago, T-Mobile is commencing a gradual rollout that should finish up in the next few days. Here's what you'll get, with this Donut:</p>

<p>• Universal-ish search with an updated "Quick Search" box</p>
<p>• Much fast camera performance, with a refreshed interface, and easier switching between video/still modes</p>
<p>• Support for VPNs, corporate or otherwise</p>
<p>• A battery monitoring center that lets you see what apps are sucking inordinate amounts of power, and also lets you kill them.</p>
<p>• Multiple resolution support, for all the wild'n'crazy Android devices coming down the pike</p>
<p>• A new Market UI, with app screenshots</p>
<p>• Text-to-speech for any app that wants it, built into the main search widget by default</p>
<p>• A gesture framework for developers</p>
<p>• CDMA support, because, you know, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/sprint-hero">Hero</a>.</p>
<p>Let us know when your updates hit in the comments; reports are thin for now, but I have a feeling the floodgates are about to open. [<a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=YPd&q=motorola+s305+review+pug&aq=f&oq=&aq">CNET</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5372390/t+mobile-pushing-android-16-donut-update-right-now]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5372390]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android 1.6]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android donut]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android update]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[donut]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mytouch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mytouch 3g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile g1]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile mytouch 3g]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:35:44 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5372390&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[T-Mobile Launches 21Mbps 3G Service in Philadelphia]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/love_park_philadelphia.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />While <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5355470/att-bumping-its-3g-to-hspa-72-in-six-more-cities">AT&T says</a> 7.2Mbps is as fast as their 3G service will go before they roll out 4G, T-Mobile began rolling out HSPA+ 3G service in Philadelphia at the insane speeds of 21Mbps, ahead of their <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5357444/t+mobile-3g-data-will-hit-21mbps-in-2010">2010 predictions</a>.</p>
<p>Though <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5357444/t+mobile-3g-data-will-hit-21mbps-in-2010">as John said</a>, this HSPA+ is a stopgap and may leave T-Mobile in the dust when the other carriers migrate to LTE, it's definitely the fastest speed around at the moment. On a personal note, it's good to see my hometown in the news for something other than Michael Vick, but having moved out west I can't test how accurate those numbers really are. Any Philadelphians want to bust out their T-Mobile handsets and see what HSPA+ can do? [<a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/09/19/t-mobile-rolls-out-21-mbps-hspa-in-philadelphia/">Boy Genius Report</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5363254/t+mobile-launches-21mbps-3g-service-in-philadelphia]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5363254]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[3g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[21mbps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[philadelphia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile hspa+]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 19 Sep 2009 14:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5363254&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Motorola Cliq Review: Most Customizable Android Phone Yet]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/dextr_lead_w500.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_dextr_lead_w500.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>T3 got an <a href="http://www.t3.com/reviews/phones/mobile-phones/exclusive-motorola-dext-android-mobile-phone-review">exclusive review</a> on the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5356590/motorolas-motoblur-android-smartphone-everything-you-need-to-know">Motorola Cliq</a>&mdash;in Europe, Dext&mdash;and they seem quite impressed. They go as far as saying it's a "new dawn" for Motorola. Here are the basic points:</p>
<h2>The good</h2>
<p>• <b>Motoblur:</b> Motorola's combination of user interface and social service seems to be the winner. They say the widgets that allow you to customize the home screen are useful and quick, always updating live. For example, there is a messaging widget show the latest mails or texts right on the home screen, as they come in. The news widget collects information from several RSS at the same time.</p>
<p>• <b>"Happenings":</b> It is the most interesting widget-connects to social networking sites and puts all status updates together in one single feed. It's not without problems, though, as it shows the updates from <i>all</i> your Facebook friends. You know, all the 457 you really don't know at all.</p>
<p>• <b>Contact book:</b> Apparently, the address books collects information&mdash;addresses, emails, phones, photos, status, birthdays, dates, events&mdash;from all your contacts, adding the latest info from the social sites you are connected to. This sounds rather cool, as it seems you won't have to update your contact book ever again.</p>
<h2>The bad</h2>
<p>• <b>The hardware quality:</b> It doesn't seem very good, according to them. Apart from the boring design, the touchscreen is "occasionally hit-and-miss," and the phone feels cheap. The 320x480 screen quality is good, however.</p>
<p>• <b>QWERTY Keyboard:</b> The physical keyboard isn't good. Bad layout, and not enough spring keep them going back to the virtual one, which is accurate and feels good.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>Despite the bad points, Katherine seems happy with the Motorola Cliq, saying it's a "rock-solid" performer, extremely customizable, fast, and great for social networkers. Go read her full review at T3. [<a href="http://www.t3.com/reviews/phones/mobile-phones/exclusive-motorola-dext-android-mobile-phone-review">T3</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5361063/motorola-cliq-review-most-customizable-android-phone-yet]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5361063]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motoblur]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola blur]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t3 review]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5361063&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Motorola Cliq to See October Release, Maybe]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/t-mobile-roadmap-cliq.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_t-mobile-roadmap-cliq.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Boy Genius Report has a source claiming Motorola's Android savior, the Cliq, will be coming to T-Mobile in mid-October. Interestingly, the only pictorial proof he has is a roadmap slide showing a November release.</p>
<p>BGR has a good track record with carrier leaks, and after seeing the Cliq in person I can confirm that it seemed like a finished product&mdash;Moto reps were using it to communicate with each other and the phone wasn't buggy at all. So it's definitely possible that Moto and T-Mobile are busting ass to get the Cliq out the door before November. We'll keep you updated if we hear anything else, since the story seems to be evolving. [<a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/09/12/yep-motorola-cliq-definitely-launching-in-october-to-t-mobile/">Boy Genius Report</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5358085/motorola-cliq-to-see-october-release-maybe]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5358085]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[unconfirmed]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cliq]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[leaks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola cliq release date]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[roadmap]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 12 Sep 2009 16:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5358085&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[T-Mobile 3G Data Will Hit 21Mbps In 2010]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/500x_charttest_04.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_500x_charttest_04.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>AT&T <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5355470/att-bumping-its-3g-to-hspa-72-in-six-more-cities">just announced</a> they're starting a national 7.2Mbps 3G rollout, and T-Mobile now says they're <a href="http://moconews.net/article/419-t-mobiles-cole-brodman-says-subscribers-text-more-than-anyone-else-aggr/">about to do the same</a>. But what comes next? For <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5155882/verizon-lte-wireless-clocking-60mbps-in-us-tests-confirmed-to-launch-in-2010">most</a>, it's 4G wireless data. For T-Mobile, it's steroid-pumped 3G, to the tune of <em>21Mbps.</em></p>
<p>AT&T and others are kicking 3G to the curb after it <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5271329/atts-network-state-of-the-union-its-getting-faster-if-not-better">hits the 7.2Mbps barrier</a>, and moving over to <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5168035/giz-explains-why-wimax-and-lte-wireless-4g-data-will-blow-your-mind">zany 4G technologies</a>. T-Mobile, though, says they're sticking with 3G HSPA <a href="http://moconews.net/article/419-t-mobiles-cole-brodman-says-subscribers-text-more-than-anyone-else-aggr/">for the foreseeable future</a>, and that the network will carry near-4G speeds in 2010.</p>
<p>This is good news for T-Mo subscribers in the short term, and I can see why the company would want to incrementally push past all their competitors while they all toil with next-gen hardware and infrastructure. But what happens when everyone else is finished rolling out their LTE networks? Where does that leave T-Mobile, besides three years behind? [<a href="http://moconews.net/article/419-t-mobiles-cole-brodman-says-subscribers-text-more-than-anyone-else-aggr/">MocoNews</a> via <a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/09/09/11/t.mobile.plans.21mbps.hspa.in.2010/">Electronista</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5357444/t+mobile-3g-data-will-hit-21mbps-in-2010]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5357444]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[4g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellular data]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hsdpa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hspa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hspa+]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lte]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile 3g]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5357444&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Oprah's Got a $100 Off Code For The T-Mobile myTouch 3G With Your Name On It]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/oprah_mytouch.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_oprah_mytouch.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>If you already purchased a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/t_mobile-mytouch-3g/">myTouch 3G</a> for the full $200 retail price (with contract), it officially sucks to be you. That's because Oprah is gifting everyone a $100 discount on the Android handset through September 24th.</p>
<p>All you have to do is type KICKOFF24 in the promotion box when you order and bada bing&mdash;50% discount. Seriously, Oprah is worth watching if only for the stuff she gives away. [<a href="http://www.t-mobile.com/promotions/pcmtemplate.aspx?PAsset=Pro_Pro_OprahShow&WT.mc_id=620m3">T-Mobile</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/10/save-100-on-a-t-mobile-mytouch-3g-thanks-to-oprah/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5356667/oprahs-got-a-100-off-code-for-the-t+mobile-mytouch-3g-with-your-name-on-it]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5356667]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[dealzmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mytouch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mytouch 3g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[oprah]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile mytouch 3g]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:52:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5356667&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
