<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: The Onion]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/the onion</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'the onion']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Gifts for Retro-holics Who Yearn for the Old Days]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p>Are you trying to find a gift for one of those crazies who's always going on about the superiority of vinyl, or who dresses like a character on <em>Mad Men</em>? Here are some ideas for the retrophile in your life.</p>
<p>BTW, if you hate the gallery format as much as the Grinch hated Christmas, click <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5409565/gift-guides-for-retro+holics-who-yearn-for-the-old-days/">here</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_leica-m7-p1010675.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
<strong>Leica M7:</strong> DSLR <em>schmee</em>SLR. Digital photography still can't match the old-school beauty of film, and Leica's M7 35mm camera is one of the best and most gorgeous out there. It's the kind of gift you'd hand down to your grandkids, partly because it'll last forever and partly because it costs enough that you need several lifetimes to get your money's worth. The M7 also has an even-more-decadent Hermes edition which clocks in at $14,000, but the normal M7 is available now and would send any prosumer DSLR-owner into fits of jealousy. <strong>$5,500</strong> [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5406164/leica-m7-hermes-edition-your-bank-account-cant-handle-this-gorgeousness">Link</a>; <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Leica-10546-Rangefinder-Camera-Viewfinder/dp/B0002KTYAA">Amazon</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_504x_sega-handheld-06-26-09.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
<strong>Retro-Gen:</strong> Modern videogames are so complicated, so expensive, so...3D. A true retrophile isn't interested in <em>Modern Warfare 2</em>, but could be persuaded to play a little <em>Sonic the Hedgehog 2</em>, <em>Streets of Rage 2</em> or <em>Toejam and Earl 2: Panic on Funkotron</em>. The Retro-Gen, a little sorta-legal handheld emulator, will play either original Genesis cartridges or ROMs that you've loaded onto an included SD card. Plus, the entire system costs less than some modern DSi or PSP games. <strong>$38</strong> [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5303315/retro+gen-plays-dusty-old-sega-genesis-cartridges-and-digital-roms">Link</a>; <a href="http://store.videogamecentral.com/sega-genesis-portable-retrogen.html">Video Game Central Store</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_frenchpresscoffee-main_full.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
<strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #frenchpress" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/frenchpress/">French Press</a>:</strong> Here's one where an irrational fear of the new is <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5345785/giz-explains-how-to-actually-make-coffee">totally justified</a>. Your typical fancy, electronic drip coffee-maker spits out watery, bitter brown liquid only technically identifiable as coffee, while the French press (basically a glass jug with a mesh screen plunger) produces rich, delicious coffee, retaining the essential oils that give a true depth of flavor. Not only is it older, simpler, and cheaper, it's flat-out better. <strong>$20</strong> [<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000KEM4TQ/ref=pd_lpo_k2_dp_sr_1?pf_rd_p=486539851&pf_rd_s=lpo-top-stripe-1&pf_rd_t=201&pf_rd_i=B00005LM0S&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_r=0NZRP7DWWVET5Z5Q1H37">Bodum French Press</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_screen_shot_2009-11-20_at_1.00.51_pm.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
<strong>Set of 11 <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #kennyloggins" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/kennyloggins/">Kenny Loggins</a> Albums on Vinyl:</strong> You know what, this is a great gift for anyone, retrophile or not. Even if you don't have a turntable, 11 of these albums would make excellent wall art. Matter of fact, I might just buy these myself. Go find your own Kenny Loggins vinyl collection! <strong>$10</strong> [<a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=370214401756&rvr_id=&crlp=1_263602_263622&UA=M*F%3F&GUID=2f555ae41220a0aad345b745ffde515f&itemid=370214401756&ff4=263602_263622">eBay</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_ipod_classic.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
<strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #ipodclassic" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ipodclassic/">iPod Classic</a>:</strong> Multitouch? OLED? Wi-Fi? Widescreen video? What about the good old days, when convergence was a crazy futuristic concept and PMPs were called MP3 players, because, well, that's all they did. The iPod Classic is just about the only traditional hard-drive-based PMP left on the market, and while it's better than ever (thin, long battery life, spacious 160GB hard drive), it's still a relic of the past. I mean, seriously, a click wheel? What is this, 2007? <strong>$250</strong> [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5355697/ipod-classic-gets-more-storage-shuffle-gets-colors-and-a-special-edition">Link</a>; <a href="http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/shop_ipod/family/ipod_classic?afid=p219|GOUS&cid=OAS-US-KWG-iPodBrandTerms">Apple Store</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_screen_shot_2009-11-20_at_4.16.56_pm.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
<strong>Classic Prints From <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #theonion" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/theonion/">The Onion</a>:</strong> The comedy gods over at The Onion have their very own gifts for retro-minded buyers, creating "classic" Onion front pages from times in the publication's fictional history (what, you didn't know it was founded in the mid-18th century as "The Mercantile Onion" by Friedrich Siegfried Zweibel?). The all-time classic is "Holy Shit: Man Walks on Fucking Moon," but "Whites Invent 'Rock and Roll'" and "Mr. T Releases 'Pity List '86'" are both pretty amazing things to hang on your wall, too. Guaranteed to stop passersby and give them the giggles. <strong>$33 each, framed and matted</strong> [<a href="http://store.theonion.com/category/front-page-prints,29/">Onion Store</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_computer_history_museum.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
<strong>Trip to the Computer History Museum:</strong> You can be a retrophile and still love tech, and the Computer History Museum in Mountain View, California is the best place in the country to revel in the fascinating history of technological advancement. Right now, they're celebrating the 50th anniversary of the integrated circuit, examining the history of computer chess and visible storage, and remembering Charles Babbage, inventor of the first automatic computing engine. Among those constantly rotating exhibits are jewels like the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5316221/cray+1-the-super-computer">Cray 1 supercomputer</a>, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5317247/the-network-before-the-internet">world's first ethernet cable</a> and a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5316227/tandy-trs+80-the-budget-computer">Tandy TRS-80</a>. <strong>Free admission</strong> [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5306644/the-first-integrated-circuit-chip-celebrating-the-50th-anniversary">Link</a>; <a href="http://www.computerhistory.org/">CHM Site</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_droid_pre_iphone_copy.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
<strong>DON'T BUY A Modern Smartphone:</strong> Anybody who yearns for the old days is going to find the idea of a powerful, always-connected pocket computer pretty threatening. Today's smartphones are as powerful as the best desktop computers from ten years ago, and are only getting better. An iPhone, Droid or Palm Pre might well explode a retrophile's mind all over his face. But if he's submitted to peer pressure and allowed a thoroughly modern iPhone into his classic-rock life, we do have one recommendation: The iRetroPhone iPhone app, which simulates an old rotary phone. <strong>$1</strong> [<a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/iretrophone-rotary-dialer/id284700702?mt=8">iTunes</a>]</p>
<p><i>Don't forget to recommend your own favorite retro-centric gift in comments-include pics and pricing if possible.</i></p>
<p><i><a href="http://gizmodo.com/t/giftguide2009">All Giz Wants</a> is our annual round-up of favorite gift ideas, including amazing attainable objects and a few far-out fantasies. We'll be popping guides catered to different interests several times per day for the next week, so keep checking back.</i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5409565/gifts-for-retro+holics-who-yearn-for-the-old-days/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5409565]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[giftguide]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[french press]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[giftguide2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod classic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[kenny loggins]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[retro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the onion]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5409565&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Moronic Newspapers Reprint Onion's Neil Armstrong Conspiracy Article as Fact]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/omission_control2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_omission_control2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>I thought some "readers" were joking when they claimed they believed <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged THE ONION" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/the-onion/">the Onion</a>'s story on a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5349736/moon-conspiracy-theorist-makes-neil-armstrong-realize-obvious-truth">conspiracy theorist finally convincing Neil Armstrong about how the Moon landings were faked</a>. They weren't. Like these two newspapers, who reprinted it as fact.</p>
<p>Not one&mdash;The New Nation, a newspaper from Bangladesh&mdash;but two&mdash;the Daily Manab Zamin, who ran the story in Bengali&mdash;published the whole story quoting the "Onion News Network, Lebanon, Ohio." They reprinted the whole thing, starting with the headline: Conspiracy Theorist Convinces Armstrong Moon Landing Was Faked.</p>
<p>Their excuse: "We thought it was true so we printed it without checking."</p>
<p>Frankly, I understand them. After all, if it is in in the internet, it <i>must</i> be real.</p>
<p>What is even more worrying is that there are a couple of Gizmodo readers&mdash;now banned&mdash;who actually believed the whole thing when <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5349736/moon-conspiracy-theorist-makes-neil-armstrong-realize-obvious-truth">we published it as a joke</a>, <i>and</i> then used it as an argument in the story of <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5352410/indian-probe-takes-clear-photo-of-apollo-15-hopefully-smashing-conspir%20acy-theories-forever">Chandrayaan-1's image on the Apollo 15 landing site</a>. [<a href="http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2009-09/04/onion-story-reprinted-as-fact.aspx">Wired UK</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5352887/moronic-newspapers-reprint-onions-neil-armstrong-conspiracy-article-as-fact]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5352887]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apollo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[conspiracy theorists]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Moon Landings]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the onion]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 04 Sep 2009 14:44:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5352887&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Facebook "Revolutionizes How Parents Stalk College-Aged Kids"]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/facebookonion.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_facebookonion.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged THE ONION" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/the-onion/">The Onion</a></em> has drafted another startlingly important report examining how parents can use Facebook and Twitter to stay involved with their otherwise reluctant children.</p>

<p><object width="480" height="430"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true">
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.theonion.com/content/themes/common/assets/onn_embed/embedded_player.swf?image=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theonion.com%2Fcontent%2Ffiles%2Fimages%2FE-Mom_article.jpg&videoid=97699&title=Facebook%2C%20Twitter%20Revolutionizing%20How%20Parents%20Stalk%20Their%20College-Aged%20Kids">
<param name="wmode" value="transparent">
<embed src="http://www.theonion.com/content/themes/common/assets/onn_embed/embedded_player.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="transparent" width="480" height="430" flashvars="image=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theonion.com%2Fcontent%2Ffiles%2Fimages%2FE-Mom_article.jpg&videoid=97699&title=Facebook%2C%20Twitter%20Revolutionizing%20How%20Parents%20Stalk%20Their%20College-Aged%20Kids"></object><br>
My favorite line on Twitter: "You just pick a name that's very common and after it you add the year your son or daughter was born...just make sure that you spell everything wrong and swear a lot." [<em>Thanks Cameron!</em>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5350303/facebook-revolutionizes-how-parents-stalk-college+aged-kids]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5350303]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the onion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 01 Sep 2009 13:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5350303&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Google Offers Users Total Privacy (In an Airless, Deadly Mountain Prison)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/Picture_1_04.png" class="left image340" width="340" />Today's Onion News Network video attacks Google's scary-if-you-think-about-it access to all our browsing habits and personal data. If you want privacy, no problem: Just relocate to a giant boxlike mountain prison, and you'll be secure (and dead). Zing!</p>
<p><object width="480" height="430"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true">
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.theonion.com/content/themes/common/assets/onn_embed/embedded_player.swf?image=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theonion.com%2Fcontent%2Ffiles%2Fimages%2FGOOGLE-VILLAGE_article-V2.jpg&videoid=97279&title=Google%20Opt%20Out%20Feature%20Lets%20Users%20Protect%20Privacy%20By%20Moving%20To%20Remote%20Village">
<param name="wmode" value="transparent">
<embed src="http://www.theonion.com/content/themes/common/assets/onn_embed/embedded_player.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="transparent" width="480" height="430" flashvars="image=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theonion.com%2Fcontent%2Ffiles%2Fimages%2FGOOGLE-VILLAGE_article-V2.jpg&videoid=97279&title=Google%20Opt%20Out%20Feature%20Lets%20Users%20Protect%20Privacy%20By%20Moving%20To%20Remote%20Village"></object><br>
<a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/video/google_opt_out_feature_lets_users?utm_source=videoembed">Google Opt Out Feature Lets Users Protect Privacy By Moving To Remote Village</a></p>
<p>Like all the best Onion pieces, this video takes the bizarre and scary concepts we ignore despite being right in front of our faces, and spells them out in blunt, hilarious language. As the "Google Exec" says, "If you don't want to give us complete access to your most private thoughts and feelings, that's fine! You can just toil on the hinterlands, and die young."</p>
<p>But my favorite part has to be the consistent juxtaposition of Google's bright happy basic colors on all the terrifying privacy guards and equipment. On the other hand, even if this horrible airless prison was real, I'd probably still get excited about the next Android phone. You win, Google. You win everything, ever. [<a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/video/google_opt_out_feature_lets_users">The Onion</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5335288/google-offers-users-total-privacy-in-an-airless-deadly-mountain-prison]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5335288]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[satire]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mountain]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[onion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[prison]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the onion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the onion google]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 11 Aug 2009 20:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5335288&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sanyo's Fate Rests In the Hands of One Man and a Rebate Form]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/Sanyo-Praying-R.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/504x_Sanyo-Praying-R.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></a><a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/news/sanyo_praying_area_man_doesnt_send"><i>The Onion</i> delivers again</a>, this time reporting on how badly Sanyo doesn't want a guy to mail in the rebate that came with his cordless phone.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Executives at Sanyo-which employs more than 85,000 people worldwide-said they were initially overjoyed that someone had actually purchased one of their products. The celebration was short-lived, however, as it soon dawned on board members that their organization would face financial ruin if forced to honor Cinelli's rebate.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>[<a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/news/sanyo_praying_area_man_doesnt_send">The Onion</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5330012/sanyos-fate-rests-in-the-hands-of-one-man-and-a-rebate-form]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5330012]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[parody]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sanyo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the onion]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 04 Aug 2009 20:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5330012&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[iPhone 3GI Delivers True Multitasking, But Only to People Who Really Deserve It]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/iphone3gi.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_iphone3gi.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></a>The sad thing is, if Apple did release the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged IPHONE 3GI" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphone-3gi/">iPhone 3GI</a> and claim only the <em>truly worthy</em> could see it, I'm sure it would go down exactly like <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged THE ONION" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/the-onion/">The Onion</a> <a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/news/apple_claims_new_iphone_only?utm_source=a-section">says it would</a>.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"Oh my God, I can't believe how much faster you can get online with this," said Delaney, who exited the store holding a cupped hand up to her ear and yelling into her wrist about how wonderful the new phone was. "The reception is so clear, and you can pretty much get a signal no matter where you go."</p>
<p>"Hold on a sec," continued Delaney, suddenly shaking her hand up and down. "I think my battery is dying."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Like I said, <em>exactly</em>. [<a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/news/apple_claims_new_iphone_only?utm_source=a-section">The Onion</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5325358/iphone-3gi-delivers-true-multitasking-but-only-to-people-who-really-deserve-it]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5325358]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone 3gi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[satire]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the onion]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5325358&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[So Mean But Maybe True (NSFW)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/02/340x_Onion_News_Sony_POS.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged THE ONION" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/the-onion/">The Onion</a> pisses on pretty much the entire gadget-making game with this fake news piece. Lots of cursing, do not watch unless you have a mouth like a Gizmodian.</p>

<p><br clear="all">
<br>
<embed src="http://www.theonion.com/content/themes/common/assets/videoplayer2/flvplayer.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" wmode="transparent" width="400" height="355" flashvars="file=http://www.theonion.com/content/xml/93143/video&autostart=falseℑ=http://www.theonion.com/content/files/images/SONY_FUCK_article.jpg&bufferlength=3&embedded=true&title=Sony%20Releases%20New%20Stupid%20Piece%20Of%20Shit%20That%20Doesn%27t%20Fucking%20Work"></p>
<p>They mention Sony by name, but I don't think Sony is worse than the majority of the industry. I mean, Sony's better off under Sir Howard Stringer than they have been in terms of software and formats, so they shouldn't take it personally. Sony aside, if this piece doesn't have a ring of truth around it regarding the majority of the gadget-making industry, I don't know what does. [<a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/video/sony_releases_new_stupid_piece_of">The Onion</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5150189/so-mean-but-maybe-true-nsfw]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5150189]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nsfw]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[onion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the onion]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:20:18 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5150189&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Kim Jong Il's Plan to Bring the Moon to North Korea Isn't Actually Real...Right Guys?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object width="506" height="311" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/bZIgda01k6o&hl=en&fs=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/bZIgda01k6o&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="506" height="311" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object>Breaking news from <em>The Onion</em>: Kim Jong Il will transport the moon to North Korea by 2015. And it's a plan that's so damn crazy that it just might work. [via <a href="http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2009/01/27/kim-jong-il-to-drag.html">bbGadgets</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5140275/kim-jong-ils-plan-to-bring-the-moon-to-north-korea-isnt-actually-realright-guys]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5140275]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[parody]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[kim jong il]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[moon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nasa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[north korea]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[north korea space program]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the onion]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5140275&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Ultimate Portable Sewing Machine to Make Clothing Companies Margins Increase]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/12/340x_smartstitch.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/>At last, good news for worldwide economy. A Bangladeshi company has released the SmartStitch, a portable sewing machine that will allow clothing factory workers to produce 24/7, with obvious benefits.</p>

<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("/onionstitch_gizmodo.flv", 506, 423,"");
</script><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/stills/onionstitch_gizmodo.flv.jpg" style="display:block;display: none;"></p>
<p>Think about it. The more all these people work in all those weird countries, the more clothes there will be, and the cheaper the manufacturing will result. That means <i>increased</i> profit margins for manufacturers, free entertainment for those workers/slaves/kids slaves no matter where they are, and exactly the same quality for your jeans, shirts, jackets, and sneakers, at the <i>same price</i>.</p>
<p>See? Everyone wins! [<a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/video/new_portable_sewing_machine_lets?utm_source=embedded_video">The Onion</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5105852/ultimate-portable-sewing-machine-to-make-clothing-companies-margins-increase]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5105852]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[fake]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[machine]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[onion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sewing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Smartstitch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the onion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[videos]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 09 Dec 2008 19:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5105852&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Onion Unleashes New Fake Gift Boxes for 2008, As Awesome as Ever]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/12/ifeast.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/ifeast.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a>Every year, The Onion sells boxes for <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/exclusive/the-onions-new-gotchaboxes-for-2007-even-more-hilarious-than-last-year-323726.php">fake, horrible-looking products</a> to prank unsuspecting gift-receivers with. They've got two new one's this year: the iFeast and Kleen-Stride.</p>

<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/kleenstride.jpg" width="528" height="535" style="display:block;">What makes these so great is just how close to real they look. Trust me, I've seen plenty of absolutely idiotic products with iPod docks in them, and the iFeast isn't the dumbest. As for the Kleen-Stride, well, aren't there slippers designed to clean your floors? In any case, these are awesome and a good way to gauge just how your fiancé will react to your legitimately crappy gifts in the future. [<a href="http://store.theonion.com/kleenstride-personal-debris-removal-system-gift-box-p-383.html">Kleen-Stride</a> and <a href="http://store.theonion.com/ifeast-pet-feeding-mp3-docking-station-gift-box-p-373.html">iFeast</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5101533/the-onion-unleashes-new-fake-gift-boxes-for-2008-as-awesome-as-ever]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5101533]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gifts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[christmas]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[holidays]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pranks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shopping]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the onion]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 03 Dec 2008 17:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5101533&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA["Blockbuster" Living History Museum Offers Insight Into the Past]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><embed src="http://www.theonion.com/content/themes/common/assets/videoplayer/flvplayer.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowScriptAccess="always" wmode="transparent" width="494" height="438" flashvars="file=http://www.theonion.com/content/xml/79397/video&autostart=false&image=http://www.theonion.com/content/files/images/VIDEO_STORE_article.jpg&bufferlength=3&embedded=true&title=Historic%20%E2%80%98Blockbuster%E2%80%99%20Store%20Offers%20Glimpse%20Of%20How%20Movies%20Were%20Rented%20In%20The%20Past"></embed>I don't want to spoil anything here more than the headline already has, but the visually hilarious Onion News Network has a biting critique of the movie rental chain Blockbuster. We actually like Blockbuster because of our grandfathered unlimited in-store exchanges and two free game rentals a month, but this is still pretty funny. [<a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/video/historic_blockbuster_store_offers">The Onion</a>]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/390185/blockbuster-living-history-museum-offers-insight-into-the-past]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-390185]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blockbuster]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[onion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rentals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the onion]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 13 May 2008 23:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=390185&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Diebold Accidentally Leaks 2008 Election Results Early]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><embed src="http://www.theonion.com/content/themes/common/assets/videoplayer/flvplayer.swf" allowScriptAccess="always" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" flashvars="file=http://www.theonion.com/content/xml/74800/video&amp;debugging=true&amp;autostart=false&amp;image=http://www.theonion.com/content/files/images/DIEBOLD_article.jpg&amp;bufferlength=3&amp;embedded=true&amp;title=Diebold%20Accidentally%20Leaks%20Results%20Of%202008%20Election%20Early" height="411" width="463" ></embed><br />
Diebold, the company run by unscrupulous Republicans that manufactures <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/diebold/diebold-voting-machines-secure-as-never-231321.php">crappy, easily-hacked voting machines</a>, has done a bang-up job of pretty much destroying many people's confidence in the legitimacy of the democratic process. No one is better at calling out such depressing aspects of our country with biting humor like <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #theonion" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #theonion" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/theonion/">The Onion</a>, who here tell us about how all the fun of the election this year was ruined because Diebold accidentally leaked the results ahead of time. It's funny because it could be true! Ha&<a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/8230/" class="posthashtag">#8230</a>; ha? [<a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/video/diebold_accidentally_leaks">The Onion</a>]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/361858/diebold-accidentally-leaks-2008-election-results-early]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-361858]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[diebold]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the onion]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:05:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=361858&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Onion 'Reports' on Virgin Galactic, Gets it All Wrong]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/02/galacticship.jpg"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/01/galacticship.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #theonion" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/theonion/">The Onion</a> has finally gotten around to reporting on <a href="http://gizmodo.com/348092/virgin-galactic-unveils-spaceships-thatll-take-passengers-up-in-2009">Virgin Galactic unveiling its new spaceship</a>, and I'm pretty sure they got most of the facts wrong. Personally, I think The Onion could use a little bit more serious reporting. Will passengers <i>really</i> get "awesome robot sex" in space? I somehow doubt it, but if so why don't you quote your sources, Onion? Hello, fact checking! Let's try to take things more seriously Onion, shall we? Your reputation is at stake. [<a href="%20http://www.theonion.com/content/infograph/virgin_unveils_new_spaceship">The Onion</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/352461/the-onion-reports-on-virgin-galactic-gets-it-all-wrong]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-352461]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[bad journalism]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the onion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[virgin galactic]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 04 Feb 2008 17:30:16 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=352461&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo Sues The Onion for Libel, Asks Drew Curtis for Legal Advice]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2007/12/giz-theonion3.jpg"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/giz-theonion3.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>LAKE TAHOE, Nevada (Agencies) &mdash; Popular technology blog and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/search/booze">cocktail bar guide</a> Gizmodo has sued leading international newspaper <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #theonion" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/theonion/">The Onion</a> for libel, following the latter recent article on Microsoft Corp.'s (<a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/microsoft">MFST</a>) <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/zune">Zune 2</a> MP3 player's roaring success.</p>

<p>In declarations to the Reno Gazzette Journal this morning, Gizmodo's editor-in-chief <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #brianlam" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/brianlam/">Brian Lam</a> categorically denied that he referred to the second-generation Zune as having "great design." "The Onion just made that whole thing up" Mr. Lam said, "what I <i>really</i> said was that the Zune 2 is an amazing piece of innovative engineering, a technological breakthrough that will affect all technology breakthroughs to come. The design, however, is a <i>little</i> bland." Visibly angry, Mr. Lam accused The Onion of systematically "getting things wrong."</p>
<p><img alt="onion-quote.png" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/onion-quote.png" width="606" height="101" class="center"><i>Excerpt from The Onion's article on the second-generation Zune massive adoption</i></p>
<p>"The thing about Gates is true, though" the tech publication's mercurial leader added, "and I love his taste in pants and wool jumpers too. Specially that stripy one he wore at last year's CES. So cute. No, really, I love it. I know Chen is on the fence on that one but personally, I think his attire make him <i>the</i> fashion force in the industry. Like the Coco Chanel of tech, if you will" Later, he left the room bumping into a chair, spilling some of the contents from the bottle in a brown paper bag that he carried around all morning, which he referred to as "my coffee."</p>
<p>Speaking on condition of anonymity, the owner of popular news reference site Fark, amateur lawyer and fly fishing aficionado Drew Curtis said that he was going to give special legal counsel to Gizmodo and Brian Lam to stop what he referred to as "that bad bad <i>bad</i> source of news." "It's completely unacceptable" he said "I know that Gizmodo and me had <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/fark/drew-curtis-says-nfsw-trademark-application-is-a-prank-333341.php">our differences regarding the use of NSFW</a> in the past, but The Onion's faulty reporting has to be stopped at once."</p>
<p>Gizmodo's publisher Nick Denton was unavailable for comment, having margaritas at a party somewhere in Manhattan. [<a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/news/thousands_wait_overnight_at">The Onion</a>]</p>
<p><i>(Notice: While this should come as obviously fake to 99% of the people out there, for the 1%, yes, this post is fake fake <b>FAKE</b>. F-A-K-E. This one you just read and, like everything they do, the Onion's)</i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/337063/gizmodo-sues-the-onion-for-libel-asks-drew-curtis-for-legal-advice]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-337063]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gizmodo sues the onion for libel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[breaking]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[brian lam]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fake]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fakemodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[onionmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the onion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[zune]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 23 Dec 2007 16:00:14 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=337063&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Onion's New GotchaBoxes for 2007: Even More Hilarious Than Last Year]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/11/Visorganizer_front.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />The witty pranksters at <cite><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #theonion" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/theonion/">The Onion</a></cite> are at it again, creating a whole new set of four GotchaBox containers for Christmas, 2007. Get one of these fake boxes ($7.99, or $17.99 for a three-pack, available November 19) and wrap it up with a real (or shitty) gift inside. Then watch their faces as they try to get all excited about a non-existent gadget such as an auto power strip, a smoke alarm that plays sounds of the rain forest, or this "Visor.ganizer" that can supposedly carry up to seven pounds of crap in the visor of your hat. These are even better than <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/the-onions-gotchabox-plays-mind-games-with-greedy-fools-212172.php">last year's batch</a>, which included our favorite, the USB Toaster. Hilarious. Check out the gallery below for the mirth and madness in all its glory. [<a href="http://store.theonion.com/">The Onion Store</a>]<br>
<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('fakeboxes07', 4, '');
</script></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/323726/the-onions-new-gotchaboxes-for-2007-even-more-hilarious-than-last-year]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-323726]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[exclusive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[christmas]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gift giving 2007]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gotchabox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[presents]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the onion]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie White]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=323726&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Onion Does iPhone Parody]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/06/onioniphone.png" class="left image340" width="340" /><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #theonion" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/theonion/">The Onion</a>&mdash;who's really hit or miss nowadays&mdash;just did a parody on some of the iPhone features. We're going to have to put this into the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/cellphones/steve-jobs-appears-on-saturday-night-live-to-talk-iphone-228640.php">SNL iPhone</a> and MadTV iPhone pile as unfunny parodies, unlike the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/good-point/iphone-commercial-spoof-shows-potential-downside-of-touchscreen-270574.php">iPhone Commercial spoof, which made us chuckle a bit. <span class="byline">&ndash; Jason Chen</span></a></p>
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/good-point/iphone-commercial-spoof-shows-potential-downside-of-touchscreen-270574.php"></a><a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/infograph/apples_new_iphone">The Onion</a></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/270813/onion-does-iphone-parody]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-270813]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[parody]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[onion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the onion]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:31:33 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=270813&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Onion: Even CEO Can't Figure Out How RadioShack Still In Business]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/04/RadioShack-Revenues_0.jpg" class="right image158" width="158" /></p>
<blockquote>The retail outlet boasts more than 6,000 locations in the United States, and is known best for its wall-sized displays of obscure-looking analog electronics components and its notoriously desperate, high-pressure sales staff. Nevertheless, it ranks as a Fortune 500 company, with gross revenues of over $4.5 billion and fiscal quarter earnings averaging tens of millions of dollars.
<p>"Have you even been inside of a RadioShack recently?" Day asked. "Just walking into the place makes you feel vaguely depressed and alienated. Maybe our customers are at the mall anyway and don't feel like driving to Best Buy? I suppose that's possible, but still, it's just...weird."</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #theonion" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/theonion/">The Onion</a> is funny, but I have an answer &mdash; where else are you going to go other than <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #radioshack" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/radioshack/">Radio Shack</a> for DIY project parts and AV cables that aren't 10x more expensive than they're supposed to be?<span class="byline">&ndash;Brian Lam</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/node/60924?utm_source=onion_rss_daily">Even CEO Can't Figure Out How RadioShack Still In Business</a> [The Onion]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/255034/the-onion-even-ceo-cant-figure-out-how-radioshack-still-in-business]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-255034]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[radio shack]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the onion]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:57:47 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=255034&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple iLaunch: The Product-Unveiling Product]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/03/Apple-Unveils.article.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />In a big media event yesterday, which we unfortunately missed, Apple unveiled the iLaunch, according to <a href="http://www.theonion.com"><b>The Onion</b></a>.</p>
<blockquote>"Get ready for the future of product introduction," said Jobs, looking resplendent in a black turtleneck and faded jeans. "The iLaunch will be able to make announcements from this, or any other stage, making human participation in generating consumer awareness almost entirely unnecessary."
<p>The iLaunch runs Keynote-formatted presentations in high definition through a built-in projector while displaying a 3-D rotating image of the product. Voice-recognition software, Apple's most advanced to date, can recite a speech highlighting the features of the device while injecting several clever digs at competitors. Should a product demonstration experience a glitch or malfunction, the iLaunch boasts a complex algorithm that can automatically produce humorous and distracting quips.</p>
</blockquote>
Oh, Stevey. What will you think of next? <i>Thanks, Ari</i> <span class="byline">&ndash;Travis Hudson</span>
<p><a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/news/apple_unveils_new_product">Apple Unveils New Product-Unveiling Product</a> [<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #theonion" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/theonion/">The Onion</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/242260/apple-ilaunch-the-product+unveiling-product]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-242260]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ilaunch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[parody]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the onion]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 07 Mar 2007 11:45:07 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Travis Hudson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=242260&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Onion Reports on iPhone 2.0]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/02/onioniphone2.png" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;float:none;"/><a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged THE ONION" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/the-onion/">The Onion</a>'s satire piece on the development of iPhone 2.0, due out only months after the first rev, is only too close to the truth.</p>
<blockquote>"When the second-generation iPhone comes out this fall, we want iPhone users to feel not just jealous, but downright foolish for owning such laughably primitive technology." Jobs also hinted that the second iPhone device would not be compatible with existing Mac computers, third-party peripherals, or any future Apple products.</blockquote>
The lack of backwards compatibility thing? Hmm. Sounds more like a Zune/Plays for Sure kind of move. Also noteworthy, is <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #theonion" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/theonion/">The Onion</a>'s Palm sponsorship (see image above).<span class="byline">&ndash;Brian Lam</span>
<p><a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/news_briefs/apple_hard_at_work_making">Apple Hard at Work Making iPhone 2</a> [Thanks Kevin M.]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/237522/the-onion-reports-on-iphone-20]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-237522]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the onion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:07:47 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=237522&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Onion Poops on Sirius Radio]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/12/onionpoopsirius.png" class="right image158" width="158" />Yeah, mostly everyone I know hates <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #satelliteradio" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/satelliteradio/">satellite radio</a>. If they don't hate satellite radio, they don't care about it. If they don't care about it, it's because they don't recognize its existence. Which is why <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #theonion" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/theonion/">The Onion</a> is reporting on the new Sirius lineup, to help fight its negative and/or non-existent image. Here are some new shows and channels Sirius is rolling out to gain new listeners:</p>
<p>&bull;BBC's "Cricket Roundup" with Natasha Kaplinsky<br>
&bull;Channel that plays "I Have A Dream" speech on continuous 24-hour loop<br>
&bull;Guy Reads The Dow Ticker Like Eddie Murphy Channel<br>
&bull;Station dedicated to capturing first words of Sirius CEO Mel Karmazin's granddaughter<br>
&bull;"The Convincing You To Like Zappa Hour"<br>
&bull;Hour-long program titled "Would XM Satellite Radio Play This?"<br>
&bull;"Test Answers To Mr. Taylor's Sixth-Grade Biology Finals"<br>
&bull;Better oldies station</p>
<p><span class="byline">&ndash;Brian Lam</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/node/56439">New Sirius Radio Programs</a> [The Onion]<br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/221680/the-onion-poops-on-sirius-radio]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-221680]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[portable media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[satellite]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[satellite radio]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sirius]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the onion]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:40:03 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=221680&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Onion's GotchaBox Plays Mind Games With Greedy Fools]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/11/GotchaBox.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />If you're sick and tired of all the Christmas greed, now you can start fucking with your gift recipients, giving them a faked-up GotchaBox with an old pair of socks inside. Who better to make up fraudulent packaging than those merry pranksters at <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #theonion" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/theonion/">The Onion</a>? They're jerking around everybody with a $20 set of three realistic boxes printed with slick graphics promising absurdities such as a USB Toaster, a Salt-of-the-Month Club membership or a Make-Your-Own-Umbrella Kit.</p>
<p>We're boxing up all of our gifts in these GotchaBoxes this year. Hope those chumps don't read this site. Too bad there's not a box for our favorite product, <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/usb-igrill-for-when-leaving-your-seat-to-make-a-burger-is-too-much-of-a-hassle-205830.php">the USB iGrill</a>. <span class="byline">&ndash; Charlie White</span></p>
<p><a href="http://store.theonion.com/product_info.php?products_id=214">Product Page</a> [The Onion Store]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/212172/the-onions-gotchabox-plays-mind-games-with-greedy-fools]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-212172]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[christmas]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gifts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gotchabox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[holiday gifts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[holidays]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the onion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wrapping]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 03 Nov 2006 08:56:26 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie White]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=212172&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
