<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: US Patent & Trademark Office]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/us patent & trademark office</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'us patent & trademark office']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Patent to Prevent Thieves from Lifting iPhone]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/06/dirtysteve.jpg"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/06/dirtysteve.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>The brains over in Cupertino seem to have been doing some thinking vis-à-vis security for the iPhone, as an application submitted by Apple to the US patent office shows. Given that the iPod's arrival heralded an epidemic of white-earphone muggings, it is safe to assume that the same thing will happen once people start clamping the shiny loveliness of the iPhone to their ears in public.</p>
<p>What are they proposing? Well, they're not giving away a man-mountain bodyguard free with every iPhone...</p>

<p>The application, entitled <i>Protecting Electronic Devices from Extended Unauthorised Use</i>, suggests a few ways to deter would-be thieves by preventing the iPhone/Pod from recharging once it has been stolen. Apparently it's all to do with authorization codes. (God, not <i>more</i> things for my poor overtaxed, underpaid brain to remember, eh?)</p>
<p>So, in the words of the patent, if "a timer expires, device is connected to a power-supply or another device, device is outside a determined geographical boundary," and then the device's password isn't inputted in time, then no power for the missing iPhone.</p>
<p>As Apple puts it: "Normal use and enjoyment of the device can be significantly reduced by disabling the recharger." And that, they hope, will act as a deterrent to would-be attackers. It's a good idea but, as we all know, everything is eventually hackable. I'd have gone with the bodyguard scheme, myself. <span class="byline">&ndash; Ad Dugdale</span></p>
<p><a href="http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PG01&s1=apple.AS.&OS=AN/apple&RS=AN/apple">United States Patent Application 0070138999</a> [<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #uspatenttrademarkoffice" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/uspatenttrademarkoffice/">US Patent & Trademark Office</a> via <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/security/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=199906147&cid=RSSfeed_TechWeb">Information Week</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/271270/apple-patent-to-prevent-thieves-from-lifting-iphone]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-271270]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[clint eastjobs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[us patent & trademark office]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 22 Jun 2007 07:22:15 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Addy Dugdale]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=271270&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
