<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: VoIP]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/voip</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'voip']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Gizmo5 Update Available, Brings Better Google Voice Support]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Good news for those who snagged a Gizmo5 account before <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5403663/gizmo5-currently-closed-to-new-users">it closed its doors to new users</a>: It appears that the Gizmo5 4.0 v 269 update is available and along with "various bug fixes" it bring "improved support for <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #googlevoice" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #googlevoice" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/googlevoice/">Google Voice</a>." [<a href="http://www.coolgeex.com/gizmo5-update-for-better-google-voice-support/">Cool Geex</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5416564/gizmo5-update-available-brings-better-google-voice-support]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5416564]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[google voice]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gizmo5]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[telephony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:14:59 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5416564&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Remainders - Stuff We Didn't Post (and Why)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p>Apple Patent Describes iPod UI "Pushed" to Other Devices...Philips Announces Very Pretty Pro LCD Line...NYTimes Columnist Proposes Boycott of "Pro-Communist China" Bing...Ooma Adds New Handsets and International Plan...</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/110925-gui_pushing_accessory_500.png" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>Apple Patent Describes iPod UI "Pushed" to Other Devices</h2>
<p>An Apple patent filed in May 2008 describes a way of pushing whatever UI Apple wants to non-Apple hardware, for consistency's sake. That non-Apple hardware could include car stereos or something like the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5403517/chumby-one-review-totally-frivolous-but-totally-adorable">Chumby One</a> (which has iPod functionality, but with a lookalike UI). It's a nice idea for Apple, but could be tricky given the myriad different hardware that might want to take advantage. What if the hardware has a resistive touchscreen, or a shitty processor? Might it just be better to use a custom interface for iPod integration? Regardless, it's in Remainders because it's not really that unexpected or interesting in its implications. [<a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2009/11/19/apple-researching-methods-for-pushing-user-interfaces-to-accessories-from-media-devices/">MacRumors</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/philipsledpronovember09.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>Philips Announces Very Pretty Pro LCD Line</h2>
<p>Philips' new high-end LCD line looks pretty fantastic, with two important caveats. First, let's drool a little: The two models (40- and 46-inch) have a 5,000,000:1 contrast ratio, 1ms response time, 5 HDMI ports (not sure why you'd need that many, but whatever) and a 200Hz refresh rate, with a nice brushed-aluminum look. Now, the caveats. First, they're UK only, and second, they're prohibitively expensive at about $3,000 and $4,100, respectively. Still, drool-worthy. [<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/20/philips-launches-9704-led-pro-televisions-in-the-uk/">Engadget</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/051201_tiananmen-square_ex.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>NYTimes Columnist Proposes Boycott of "Pro-Communist China" Bing</h2>
<p>NY Times columnist Nicholas Kristof has proposed a boycott of Microsoft's Bing search engine due to its supposed pro-Chinese-government censorship of search terms like "Dalai Lama" and "Tienanmen" when searched in simplified Chinese characters. In English and other non-Chinese languages, the results you'd expect from "Tienanmen" show up, but in Chinese, apparently it returns sanitized results (no massacre, in that case). Since I'm not really sure how to type simplified Chinese characters on an all-Amurrican MacBook Pro keyboard, I haven't tested it myself&mdash;but if true, it's a little underhanded on Microsoft's part, although certainly paling in comparison to, you know, the Chinese government. What's odd is that Google's Chinese search also returns censored results, but "to a much lesser extent," so I guess it's okay. Weird stuff. [<a href="http://www.techflash.com/seattle/2009/11/nyts_kristof_calls_for_bing_boycott.html">TechFlash</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/oomatelo-lg.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>Ooma Adds New Handsets and International Plan</h2>
<p>Internet phone company Ooma began shipping its new Telo handset as well as offering a very cheap international calling plan (500 minutes for $5 per month). Ooma, for those who don't know (I assume this includes everyone) varies from other VoIP services like Vonage by cutting out the monthly fees, instead packing them into a fairly expensive set-top box, at $250. So this international plan requiring a monthly fee is a big deal for them, but it winds up in Remainders because I honestly had not even heard of Ooma until this morning. Oops. [<a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/09/11/20/ooma.telo.adds.handsets.international.plan/">Electronista</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5409786/remainders-+-stuff-we-didnt-post-and-why/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5409786]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gizmodo remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ooma]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[philips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5409786&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Screw the Voice Plan: The Rumored Google Phone May Be Data/Voip Only]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500px-android-logosvg.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Mike Arrington's following up yesterday's rumor of the Google Phone with an interesting angle: That it may be VOIP and data only, having no traditional voice plan. Sounds like the telcos worst nightmare.</p>

<p>But Mike notes that AT&T is already ok with setting up Windows and Blackberry phones with data only plans (but not iPhones) and that a data/voip-only phone is what Google proposed to the FCC when bidding on wireless spectrum back in the day.</p>
<p>The initial post that there would be a Google phone&mdash;an in-house, top-to-bottom Google developed handset running android&mdash;was met with skepticism by the press. Most people quoted previous statements from Google's Andy Rubin stating that they would not "compete with their own customers" by releasing a handset of their own. That mimes microsoft's strategy with PCs and Phones, versus their in house designed Xbox and Zune hardware. But there is a difference here, despite the quote from Rubin: Google does not charge for Android, so are these people customers or beneficiaries of the only real modern mobile operating system that they can license. And Free. I mean, Win Mo is currently terrible and costs money and symbian is a joke. Blackberry isn't up for grabs. And does Google care if they lose a few points of market share? I don't think so. This isn't even close to their core business, except that whenever someone gets on the internet, Google stands to make money. In this case, Google wins not by licensing more OSes to be used on phones, but in the very act of getting more phones in the world, no matter what the OS or platform. Now that's scary power. [<a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/18/the-google-phone-may-be-data-only-voip-driven-device/">Techcrunch</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5407660/screw-the-voice-plan-the-rumored-google-phone-may-be-datavoip-only]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5407660]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[handsets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:44:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5407660&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Gizmo5 Currently Closed To New Users]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>We knew that <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5400548/are-google-voice-calls-to-and-from-your-computer-coming">Gizmo5 was acquired by Google</a>, but now we're seeing the first effect of that merger as Gizmo5 has closed its doors to new users until the Google-powered re-launch. [<a href="http://www.coolgeex.com/gizmo5-closed-for-new-user-signup/">Cool Geex</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5403663/gizmo5-currently-closed-to-new-users]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5403663]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[calling]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gizmo5]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google voice]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voice]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:32:11 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5403663&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Are Google Voice Calls To and From Your Computer Coming?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/Screen_shot_2009-11-09_at_10.17.29_AM_01.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_Screen_shot_2009-11-09_at_10.17.29_AM_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Google's bought Gizmo5, a VOIP company. They've got <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #googlevoice" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/googlevoice/">Google Voice</a>, but no way to use Google voice for calls to and from your computer&mdash;only redirecting calls to existing physical and mobiles. Not anymore.</p>
<p>The scoop by TechCrunch suggests Gizmo5 and Google Voice could join forces to create a skype like service. (Although many readers have noted that Gizmo5 and Google Voice already work together well enough as separate services.) We look forward to better integration. [<a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/09/exclusive-google-has-acquired-gizmo5/">Techcrunch</a> via <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5400534/google-acquires-gizmo5-voip-service-voip-coming-to-google-voice">lifehacker</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5400548/are-google-voice-calls-to-and-from-your-computer-coming]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5400548]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[calling]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gizmo5]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google voice]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voice]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:17:51 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5400548&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[1.4 Million People Have Google Voice, But Not That Many Actually Use It]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The reason your friends aren't begging you for a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #googlevoice" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #googlevoice" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/googlevoice/">Google Voice</a> invite is probably 'cause they've got one by now. <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/oct2009/tc20091030_329665.htm">BusinessWeek got a hold</a> of the redacted user numbers Google <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5378394/can-google-voice-really-block-calls-to-some-numbers-the-fcc-investimagates">gave to the FCC</a>, and they're higher than I'd expect: 1.419 million users, only 570,000 of whom actually use it everyday. </p>
<p>Maybe the more interesting, number though, is how many companies it takes to make Google Voice happen: </p>
<blockquote><p>In its correspondence with the FCC, Google also reveals several companies that help it provide Google Voice. The list includes fiber-optic network operators Level 3 Communications (LVLT) and Global Crossing (GLBC). It also mentions Broadvox Communications, Bandwidth.com, and Pac-West Telecomm. IBasis (IBAS) is responsible for connecting outbound international calls on Google Voice and Neustar (NSR) provides "porting and carrier lookup services," Google says in the letter. Syniverse Technologies (SVR) provides the free text-messaging service. </p></blockquote>
<p> That's eight, not counting Google itself. [<a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/oct2009/tc20091030_329665.htm">BusinessWeek</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5395151/14-million-people-have-google-voice-but-not-that-many-actually-use-it]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5395151]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[google voice]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 02 Nov 2009 09:51:31 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5395151&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Bang & Olufsen BeoCom 5 Home Phone Also Does VoIP]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/BeoCom1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_BeoCom1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Though many of us ditched landlines long ago, <a href="http://us.gizmodo.com/search/Bang%20&%20Olufsen">B&O</a> still pushes out cordless phones for those who can afford its designer wares. The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #beocom5" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/beocom5/">BeoCom 5</a> handles two-landlines plus PC-based VoIP calls, and its portable speaker can double as a charger.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5386723,5,'BeoCom 5 Gallery');
</script></p>
<p>When "docked" on the speaker (or its second, smaller charger), the phone is held in place via magnets. An aluminum scroll wheel control also adds to the metallic chic. It's all very elegant and European, but no word on the price yet. A (not so) wild guess: it won't be cheap. [<a href="http://www.bang-olufsen.com/beocom5-pr">Bang and Olufsen</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5386725/bang--olufsen-beocom-5-home-phone-also-does-voip]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5386725]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[b&o]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bang & olufsen]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Bang & Olufsen BeoCom 5]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[BeoCom 5]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[home phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[landlines]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:55:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5386725&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Skype Might Buy Gizmo5 To Power Its VoIP Calling]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_skypephone.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_500x_skypephone.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Skype might have been <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5350338/ebay-sells-off-65-percent-of-skype-for-19-billion">sloughed off of eBay</a> into its own entity, but lawsuits, regarding its core Skype to Skype technology, might put them in trouble unless it has a backup plan of new VoIP tech.</p>
<p>TechCrunch is saying that Skype is looking to buy Gizmo5, a SIP-based service that isn't quite as popular as the former, but works pretty well. SIP is an open standard that works with many, many devices&mdash;Gizmo 5 works with <a href="http://www.google.com/support/voice/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=115104">Google Voice even</a>&mdash;so this could be a pretty good move even if Skype gets out of legal trouble. Imagine piping your free Google Voice number through Skype to get free calls like you <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5323632/make-free-outgoing-calls-with-google-voice--gizmo5">can now with Gizmo5</a>. [<a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/13/skype-in-negotiations-to-acquire-gizmo5/">TechCrunch</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5380957/skype-might-buy-gizmo5-to-power-its-voip-calling]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5380957]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[skype]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[calling]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gizmo5]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[skype gizmo5]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:53:03 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5380957&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Google Says They Gotta Block Some Numbers to Keep Google Voice Free]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/340x_google_voice.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Here's one way for Google to keep people on their side in <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5378394/can-google-voice-really-block-calls-to-some-numbers-the-fcc-investimagates">their tussle with the FCC</a>, egged on by AT&T: Say that <a href="http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2009/10/sex-conference-calls-and-outdated-fcc.html">the only way to keep Google Voice free</a> is to block those pricey calls to certain numbers.</p>
<p>A brief recap: <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #googlevoice" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/googlevoice/">Google Voice</a> doesn't allow calls to some rural numbers, sexy talk lines or conference call services because the access and termination fees to them are pricey. AT&T has oh-so-kindly asked the FCC to investigate them for not following <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #netneutrality" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/netneutrality/">net neutrality</a> rules (hilarious, since <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5377347/why-the-fccs-got-att-and-verizon-scared-shitless">AT&T is quite pissy about the FCC's serious desire</a> to apply them to mobile broadband networks), largely because AT&T got smacked for doing the same thing back in 2007. The FCC these days, headed by Mr. Neutrality Julian Genaschowski, is all about <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5327640/hallelujah-fcc-investigating-apple-for-google-voice-app-rejection">investigating stuff</a>, so they're dutifully asking Google <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5378394/can-google-voice-really-block-calls-to-some-numbers-the-fcc-investimagates">WTF is up with that</a>.</p>
<p>Google says they're not providing a phone service like AT&T, but a free software/web service that's a supplement to your phone, emphasis on the free part:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Google Voice is a free application and we want to keep it that way for all our users &mdash; which we could not afford to do if we paid these ludicrously high charges.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Given that Google Voice isn't even a VoIP service and runs on top of your actual phone service&mdash;not to mention, is invite-only&mdash;they sorta have a point. Plus, um, free is good. [<a href="http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2009/10/sex-conference-calls-and-outdated-fcc.html">Google Policy Blog</a> via <a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/10/att-accused-of-regulatory-capitalism-as-fcc-probes-google-voice.ars">Ars</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5379740/google-says-they-gotta-block-some-numbers-to-keep-google-voice-free]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5379740]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google voice]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 12 Oct 2009 12:44:42 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5379740&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Can Google Voice Really Block Calls to Some Numbers? The FCC Investimagates]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/340x_googlevoice.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Remember AT&T's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5368114/now-att-wants-the-fcc-to-investigate-google-voice">hilariously ironic request</a> for the FCC to investigate <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #googlevoice" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/googlevoice/">Google Voice</a> for not following <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #netneutrality" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/netneutrality/">net neutrality</a> rules? The FCC is <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/09/fcc-probes-google-voice-restrictions/?src=twt&twt=nytimesbits">all over it</a>, and has sent a letter to Google asking why and how Google Voice blocks certain calls.</p>
<p>The FCC's interested in part because some lawmakers <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE59746O20091008">jumped on its ass</a>, but also because it's very interested in making some <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5377347/why-the-fccs-got-att-and-verizon-scared-shitless">new rules for telecoms</a>. Currently, Google Voice blocks calls to some rural carriers, conference call services and naughty talk lines because they have pricey access fees.</p>
<p>You can read the full letter <a href="http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2210A1.pdf">here</a> (PeeDeeEff), but basically the FCC asks Google to describe how calls are routed with Google Voice, how it decides what numbers to block, what exactly Google means by saying the service is "invitation-only," whether or not it plans to charge money for GV (!), and some other stuff.</p>
<p>Google <a href="http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2009/09/response-to-at-letter-to-fcc-on-google.html">insists</a> Google Voice is software, not subject to common carrier laws. We'll see, the new FCC is mighty feisty. [<a href="http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2210A1.pdf">FCC</a> (PDF via <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/09/fcc-probes-google-voice-restrictions/?src=twt&twt=nytimesbits">Bits</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5378394/can-google-voice-really-block-calls-to-some-numbers-the-fcc-investimagates]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5378394]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[google voice]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voice]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 09 Oct 2009 18:01:25 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5378394&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apocalypse Nigh, AT&T Opens Network for VoIP Over 3G on iPhone]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/skypephone.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_skypephone.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Holy keee-rist. The apocalypse approaches, because AT&T has opened their network up to VoIP applications running over the air on the iPhone. In other words, AT&T is now totally cool with using Skype over 3G.</p>
<p>AT&T supposedly just told Apple and the FCC this afternoon that their network is ready for VoIP over 3G for the iPhone, meaning it might take a bit to show up in apps, but the floodgates are open now. And yeah, whoa. Skype over 3G has been okay on other phones that <em>weren't</em> the iPhone before this, but AT&T's now "taken the steps necessary so that Apple can enable VoIP applications on iPhone to run on AT&T's wireless network." Since there's no cap on iPhone data&mdash;and AT&T says it's still unlimited with VoIP&mdash;that means you can get the cheapest possible voice plan and talk as much as you want through VoIP apps like Skype.</p>
<p>We wouldn't be totally surprised if AT&T suddenly discovering their network is ready for VoIP over 3G is at least partially motivated by the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5364343/fcc-wants-to-ban-internet-traffic-screening-anti+torrent-measures">FCC's recent crowing about net neutrality</a>&mdash;even for mobile providers&mdash;and in reaction to the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5342954/apple-and-att-answer-fcc-about-google-voice-rejection-its-all-apple">FCC's investigation as to</a> what exactly when down between AT&T, Apple and Google with Google Voice. This is AT&T showing Mr. FCC that they play nice and fair, and pretty please, don't drop some government regulation on their head, like mandated neutrality. It also makes them look better as they <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5368114/now-att-wants-the-fcc-to-investigate-google-voice">point the finger at Google Voice</a> for not following net neutrality conventions.</p>
<p>A couple of points to add: This is specifically about VoIP (very likely because of the FCC's Google Voice curiosities), so there's nothing to fapfapfap about on the SlingPlayer or tethering front. While Skype is the most immediate woohoo context that comes to mind, we're actually more interested now in the possibility of an app that is even more targeted to letting you get over on AT&T and replace your voice minutes with data for phone calls.</p>
<p>Whatever the cause or motivations, we're just glad to see it happen, finally. Now we've just gotta wait for the apps to catch up.</p>

<blockquote>AT&T EXTENDS VOIP TO 3G NETWORK FOR IPHONE
<p>DALLAS, October 6, 2009 - AT&T* today announced it has taken the steps necessary so that Apple can enable VoIP applications on iPhone to run on AT&T's wireless network. Previously, VoIP applications on iPhone were enabled for Wi-Fi connectivity. For some time, AT&T has offered a variety of other wireless devices that enable VoIP applications on 3G, 2G and Wi-Fi networks. AT&T this afternoon informed Apple Inc. and the FCC of its decision.</p>
<p>In late summer, AT&T said it was taking a fresh look at VoIP capabilities on iPhone for use on AT&T's 3G network, consistent with its regular review of device features and capabilities to ensure attractive options for consumers.</p>
<p>"iPhone is an innovative device that dramatically changed the game in wireless when it was introduced just two years ago," said Ralph de la Vega, president and CEO, AT&T Mobility & Consumer Markets. "Today's decision was made after evaluating our customers' expectations and use of the device compared to dozens of others we offer."</p>
<p>AT&T allows customers to download or launch on their wireless devices a multitude of compatible applications directly from any lawful Internet website. Additionally, because AT&T uses GSM technology, the most pervasive and open wireless technology platform in the world, we support customers using any GSM phone that works on AT&T's frequencies.</p>
<p>*AT&T products and services are provided or offered by subsidiaries and affiliates of AT&T Inc. under the AT&T brand and not by AT&T Inc.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5375674/apocalypse-nigh-att-opens-network-for-voip-over-3g-on-iphone]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5375674]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[breaking]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[skype]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:38:10 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5375674&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Mercy Killing: Verizon Deletes the Unpopular Hub]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/09/custom_1254261226891_Verizon_Hub_RIP.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />The bizarrely anachronistic <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5224070/verizon-hub-phone-review">Verizon Hub</a> has been killed off, <a href="http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-09/the-verizon-hub-has-been-discontinued/">says Dave Zatz</a>. Hard to tell if this happened <em>before</em> everybody decided not to buy it, or after.</p>
<p>The idea seems like a good one from a decade ago: A cordless (not cellular but VOIP) phone with a little computer screen in its base from which you could order pizza, send messages to Verizon mobile phones and (eventually) program your Verizon DVR. It required the rarest of customer: An early adopter with cellular, landline and TV all from Verizon, who wanted no part of ever switching to a different carrier for any variation of service or handset, and who didn't mind organizing their life solely around Verizon-branded apps, including proprietary picture-mail, calendar and VZNavigator.</p>
<p>Our own Matt Buchanan, who I happen to know <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5224070/verizon-hub-phone-review">tried very hard to say something nice</a>, in the end dismissed its hardware as "shitty," its timing as "unfortunate," its content as "useless" and its OS as "not particularly a joy."</p>
<p>So what went wrong? "Probably a failure of marketing and pricing," said Zatz. "Requiring the Hub to be purchased solely via Verizon Wireless at $200 plus $35/month with a two year contract is pretty steep barrier to entry when introducing a new product category to the mainstream." You mean a shitty, anachronistic new product category, don't you Dave? [<a href="http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2009-09/the-verizon-hub-has-been-discontinued/">ZatzNotFunny</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5370573/mercy-killing-verizon-deletes-the-unpopular-hub]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5370573]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon hub]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip phone]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:59:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5370573&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Palm Adds Unofficial Google Voice Client to App Catalog]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/gdialPro.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_gdialPro.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Apple may have issues with <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/google-voice">Google Voice</a>, but <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5346367/google-and-palm-cant-get-their-google-voice-stories-straight">Palm likes it</a>. And it's now approved <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GDIAL PRO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/gdial-pro/">gDial Pro</a>, a free third-party client that lets you call and text contacts using a Google Voice number instead of your cell-phone number. [<a href="http://blog.palm.com/palm/2009/09/a-few-new-goodies.html">Palm Blog</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5357124/palm-adds-unofficial-google-voice-client-to-app-catalog]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5357124]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[palm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[App Catalogue]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[App Ctalog]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[app store]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gdial pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Palm Google Voice gdial pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[web os]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[webos]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[WebOS catalog]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[WebOS catalogue]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 11 Sep 2009 04:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5357124&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Approves Vonage Mobile VoIP App]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/chickenshit.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_chickenshit.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Did our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5325539/apples-chickenshit-approval-process-has-gone-too-far">ranting</a> and the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5327640/hallelujah-fcc-investigating-apple-for-google-voice-app-rejection">FCCs investigation</a> have an effect on Apple's app approval process? First they <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5347141/apple-actually-approves-awesome-streaming-service-spotifys-iphone-app">approved Spotify's streaming app</a>, now they've approved Vonage's Mobile <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged VOIP APP" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/voip-app/">VoIP app</a>? How about revisiting the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5324268/apple-rejects-official-google-voice-iphone-app">Google Voice app</a> while Apple's feeling nice?</p>

<p>According to CNET, Vonage is currently beta testing the Mobile VoIP app and expects to announce availability soon. Reports say that Apple is working with Vonage to settle a few technical issues with the software which made us curious. There have been statements from AT&T <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-10318791-37.html">in the past</a> that Apple may not actively assist developers in building a VoIP app:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Both parties (AT&T and Apple) required assurances that the revenues from the AT&T voice plans available to iPhone customers would not be reduced by enabling VoIP calling functionality on the iPhone."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This sounds more like Apple may not assist in VoIP over 3G, so will the soon-to-be-released <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged VONAGE APP" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/vonage-app/">Vonage app</a> allow for VoIP over wi-fi instead? We'll be waiting to see what happens, especially since "approved" doesn't exactly mean "available" just yet in this case. [<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-10323581-37.html">CNET</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5350575/apple-approves-vonage-mobile-voip-app]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5350575]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[vonage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod touch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[telephony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[touch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[VoIP app]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vonage app]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vonage mobile voip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vonage mobile voip app]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 01 Sep 2009 22:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5350575&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[EBay Sells off 65 Percent of Skype for $1.9 Billion]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>EBay acquired <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/skype/">Skype </a>back in 2005 for over 3 billion buckaroos, but apparently it wasn't the best investment. It didn't seem to know what to do with the Internet calling company so it did what it knows best and put it up for auction. It is selling 65 percent of its stake in the company for 1.9 billion dollars to a small group of VC funds. The deal values Skype at $2.75 billion. </p>
<p>Chances are this acquisition won't impact the day-to-day Skype experience on your computer or phone or pricing. Though here is hoping that the new guys at the helm will figure out ways to make Skype calling available on, you know, in-flight Wi-Fi, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5198594/fcc-pressed-to-investigate-apple-att-regarding-skype-over-3g">AT&T's 3G network</a> and <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/updated-google-not-blocking-full-featured-skype-from-android-phones/">Android phones</a>. [<a href="http://share.skype.com/sites/en/2009/09/a_new_chapter.html">Skype</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5350338/ebay-sells-off-65-percent-of-skype-for-19-billion]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5350338]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[skype]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ebay]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Skype app]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 01 Sep 2009 12:22:02 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joanna Stern]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5350338&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Cloud Telecomputers' Glass Platform Puts Android in a Desktop Phone]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/android.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_android.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>This isn't the first <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5126620/nimble-300-android-desktop-phone-designed-by-iphone-engineer">Android desktop phone</a> we have seen, but Cloud Telecomputers' 8-inch touchscreen Android Glass phone keeps the old corded handset intact and bakes in a load of communications functions.</p>

<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/android-1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_android-1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a> Why put Android in a desktop phone? For one, plenty of apps, including visual voicemail, calendars, SMS, and email. Cloud Telecomputers also expects lots of third party <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged ANDROID APPS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/android-apps/">Android apps</a> to be built especially for the business phone platform. And as it supports landlines and various VoIP and SIP clients you will be able to set up a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GOOGLE VOICE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/google-voice/">Google Voice</a> app with a Gizmo5 SIP account to make it the ultimate phone booth. The start-up company also throws in HD audio and Bluetooth.</p>
<p>Cloud Telecomputers expects the Glass to be available in the first quarter of 2010 with a price tag somewhere in between $600 and $700. [<a href="http://www.cloudtelecomputers.com/">Cloud Telecomputers</a> via <a href="http://www.electricpig.co.uk/2009/08/20/android-for-landlines-lands/">Electricpig</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5341732/cloud-telecomputers-glass-platform-puts-android-in-a-desktop-phone]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5341732]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Android desktop phone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cloud telecomputer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cloud telecomputer glass android phone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Glass Android Phone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google voice]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joanna Stern]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5341732&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Active Military Personnel Getting Priority, 24 Hour Google Voice Activation]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/google_voice.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Google is pushing active military personnel to the front of the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/google-voice/">Google Voice</a> waiting list. That means if you have a .mil email address, an invite will go out inside 24 hours of your request.</p>
<p>The move is intended to assist servicemen and women abroad that would otherwise have difficulty directly contacting loved ones. Army SGT Dale Sweetnam explains on Google's Official Blog:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>When you deploy, your life is put on hold. While you live and work in a different world, everyone else moves on with life back home. Your family and friends keep moving, and this sometimes means it's just not possible for them to stay awake until 2 a.m. to receive a phone call. Calling Iraq or Afghanistan is seldom an option.</p>
<p><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GOOGLE VOICE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/google-voice/">Google Voice</a> provides a solution to some of these problems. Service members can set up an account before they deploy. Or if they're already deployed, families can now set up an account for their service member. Loved ones can call to leave messages throughout the day, and then when that service member visits an Internet trailer, all the messages are right there. It's like a care package in audio form.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Even if you have never been in the military, it is easy to understand how your sanity could revolve around messages from home. If you or someone you know could benefit, head on over to <a href="https://services.google.com/fb/forms/googlevoicemilitary/">Google's dedicated military invitation site</a>. You should be up and running in no time. [<a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/08/audio-care-packages-for-service-members.html">Google Blog</a> and <a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/08/04/google-voice-offering-active-serviceman-and-women-instant-invites/">BGR</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5330017/active-military-personnel-getting-priority-24-hour-google-voice-activation]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5330017]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google voice]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:00:59 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5330017&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Like, Official Skype Headset]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_skypeheadset2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500">Everybody's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/kindle">getting into</a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/crunchpad">hardware</a> lately, so it's not shocking Skype has its own headset. The idea is that it's cheap (under $25) and USB powered, so your Skype calls don't sounded like blended kitties. [<a href="http://share.skype.com/sites/en/2009/07/a_headset_for_everyone.html">Skype</a> via <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/22/skype-unleashes-a-super-secret-project-a-cheap-headset/">TechCrunch</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5320650/the-like-official-skype-headset]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5320650]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[skype]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[everyman]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[freetalk]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[freetalk everyman headset]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[headphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[headset]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[headsets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:57:33 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5320650&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Skype 2.8 Integrates Screen Sharing for Better Procrastination Across Platforms]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/skypescreen.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Skype 2.8 for Mac, which integrates iChat-style, cross platform/OS <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SCREEN SHARING" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/screen-sharing/">screen sharing</a>, Wi-Fi access through Boingo, and improved audio/video quality is out. Seems perfect for sharing <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/image-cache/">amusing pictures</a> while accidentally flashing someone. [<a href="http://www.skype.com/download/skype/macosx/">Skype 2.8</a> via <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/skype_for_mac_28_screenshare_status_pings_wifi_pur.php">ReadWriteWeb</a> via <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5318857/skype-28-for-mac-adds-screen-sharing-wi+fi-access-and-more">Lifehacker</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5319917/skype-28-integrates-screen-sharing-for-better-procrastination-across-platforms]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5319917]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[skype]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac os x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[screen sharing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5319917&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Skype 3.0 for Windows Mobile Shares Files, Sends Texts, Skypes]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5304440/skype-30-for-windows-mobile-shares-files-sends-texts-skypes">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a>Skype's finally dropped a brand new version of their app for <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged WINDOWS MOBILE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows-mobile/">Windows Mobile</a>. Three dawt oh brings file sharing and SMS texting, for free. Weeeeeeeee. [<a href="http://www.skype.com/download/skype/windowsmobile/">Skype</a> via <a href="http://jkontherun.com/2009/06/30/skype-3-0-for-windows-mobile-gets-file-sharing/">jkontherun</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5304440/skype-30-for-windows-mobile-shares-files-sends-texts-skypes]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5304440]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[windows mobile apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[skype]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[skype windows mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows mobile]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:45:28 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5304440&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Google Voice Coming VERY Soon?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>There has been lots of chatter about <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GOOGLE VOICE" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GOOGLE VOICE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/google-voice/">Google Voice</a> being on the verge of being released, so keep an eye out tomorrow and early next week to see if it hits. You'll probably have to sign up early to get a number in an area code you like. </p>
<p>This tweet by <a href="http://twitter.com/cwalker123/status/2215076417">cwalker123</a>, a Google Voice developer, says not today (the 18th). And if you need to know why we're such big fans of Google Voice, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/google-voice">check out our coverage</a>. [<a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/06/18/google-voice-close-to-public-launch-but-not-today/">BGR</a>]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5295533/google-voice-coming-very-soon]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5295533]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[google voice]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[calling]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[services]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voice]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5295533&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Google Voice About to Get More Amazing By Letting You Port Your Number]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5290292/google-voice-about-to-get-more-amazing-by-letting-you-port-your-number">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a>If you call Jason, his iPhone, Pre, Ion and pants all ring because he has <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5168592/grandcentral-sputters-back-to-life-as-google-voice-adds-voicemail-transcription-sms-support">Google Voice</a>. The service's biggest downside is that you have a new number to deal with&mdash;but TechCrunch <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/14/google-voices-secret-weapon-number-portability">says number porting is coming</a>.</p>
<p>That means you'll be able to port the phone number you've had for 5 or 10 or 100 years to <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GOOGLE VOICE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/google-voice/">Google Voice</a> and use whatever phone you want, whenever you want, on whatever carrier you want, with your current number&mdash;meaning you'll never have to worry about your phone number again. Right now, you can kinda hack it by forwarding calls from your current number to your Google Voice number, but you're stuck with pitfalls like texts not being forwarded. Google's also got an app cooking that'll route outbound calls through Google Voice as well, so the service is more seamless&mdash;currently, your outbound caller ID is whatever's actually assigned to the phone you're using. <strong>Update</strong>: Lifehacker <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5180717/google-voice-to-allow-number-porting">pointed out a few months ago</a> that Google mentioned the possibility in their support pages, but TechCrunch specifies Google is testing it now and that it'll roll out later this year.</p>
<p>I have to say, it's been interesting watching carriers become more and more irrelevant over the last two years. Their fears of becoming a "dumb pipe" are certainly coming true, and cutting the core of your mobile identity&mdash;your phone number&mdash;completely out of their hands has to be at least a little bit scary for them.</p>
<p>Now if Google would just solve GV's other major flaw&mdash;actually letting people in. [<a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/14/google-voices-secret-weapon-number-portability/">TechCrunch</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5290292/google-voice-about-to-get-more-amazing-by-letting-you-port-your-number]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5290292]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[google voice]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[grandcentral]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mobile apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 14 Jun 2009 17:22:03 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5290292&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[How to Hack the iPhone to Use SlingPlayer and Skype Over 3G]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/05/sling3gdammit.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/sling3gdammit.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>AT&T's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5251464/att-uses-semantics-to-justify-locking-down-slingplayer-for-iphone">impotent network</a>&mdash;and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5253135/network-use-not-the-only-reason-for-att-to-hate-3g-iphone-slingplayer">good ol' fashioned greed</a> make it do douchey things sometimes, like lock down <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5250885/slingplayer-mobile-for-iphone-review-wi+fi-only-30">SlingPlayer</a> and Skype for the iPhone. But you can unlock their <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5250885/slingplayer-mobile-for-iphone-review-wi+fi-only-30">true 3G powers</a>.</p>

<p><strong>Step 1: Free Your Phone</strong><br>
There are lots of reasons to jailbreak your phone. Skype and SlingPlayer over 3G is just one of them. Luckily, we've <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5166029/how-to-install-unofficial-apps-on-your-iphone-3g-or-ipod-touch-easily-and-safely">got a comprehensive guide</a> to easily jailbreak your iPhone 3G (or iPod touch). Follow it.</p>
<p><strong>Step 2: Trick Your Phone</strong><br>
Welcome back! If you're just interested in using Skype, SlingPlayer and Fring's VoIP over 3G we're already at the end&mdash;search for <a href="http://www.ihackintosh.com/2009/05/use-sling-player-over-3g-without-wifi-with-tricker-threeg/">Tricker Three3G in Cydia</a>, install it, and you're good to go. SlingPlayer, Skype and Fring will think they're running on Wi-Fi, no matter what connection you're on. Right now, Tricker Three3G only fools those three apps. There's a more involved process if you want to fool other apps too.</p>
<p><strong>Step 2b: The Long Way</strong><br>
In Cydia, the app <a href="http://www.iphonedownloadblog.com/2008/10/27/voipover3g/">you want to search for and install is VoIPover3G</a>, which tricks any app into thinking a 3G connection is actually Wi-Fi. You also need to grab OpenSSH or DiskAid and the latest version of MobileSubstrate. From there, <a href="http://www.ihackintosh.com/2009/05/use-sling-player-over-3g-without-wifi-with-tricker-threeg/">you have to tap into phone</a> and install some custom text files for <a href="http://www.iphonedownloadblog.com/2009/05/13/slingplayer-3g/">every app</a> that you want VoIPover3G to trick. But you do have the power to trick any app with it, unlike Tricker ThreeG. If you're completely new to the game, I'd start with <a href="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/skype/how-to-use-skype-over-3g-on-iphone.asp">this guide</a> to getting Skype to work over 3G and then just substitute the final steps for the relevant Sling parts from <a href="http://www.iphonedownloadblog.com/2009/05/13/slingplayer-3g/">this guide</a>. They're laid out pretty well, so fairly easy to follow. [<a href="http://www.modmyi.com/forums/iphone-news/603051-sling-out-jailbreakers-can-haz-3g.html">ModMyi</a>, <a href="http://www.ihackintosh.com/2009/05/use-sling-player-over-3g-without-wifi-with-tricker-threeg/">iHackintosh</a>, <a href="http://www.iphonedownloadblog.com/2009/05/13/slingplayer-3g/">iPhone Download Blog</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5254810/how-to-hack-the-iphone-to-use-slingplayer-and-skype-over-3g]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5254810]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fring]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jailbreak]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[skype]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[slingplayer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[slingplayer 3g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wi-fi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 14 May 2009 17:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5254810&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Verizon Hub Phone Review]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/04/IMG_4083.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/IMG_4083.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>The <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5138025/verizon-hub-widget-phone-is-the-amazing-desktop-phone-we-always-wanted">Verizon Hub</a> is unstuck in time. It's a 2006 device that's just getting here, now, in 2009, begging the question, "Is it better to be late than never?"</p>
<p>The Hub is a landline slayer launched in a wireless world, where the landline is almost dead. It's a fertile garden behind a red-painted wall&mdash;red 'cause it's Verizon, har har&mdash;found when most people are trying to break down those walls. It's a Verizon <em>Wireless</em> VoIP phone coming about at a time when AT&T is killing their VoIP service entirely. It's the phone we imagined before the iPhone, tethered to our home broadband connection for instant-pizza-ordering awesomeness. In other words, it's a lot of interesting things, appearing in the wrong place and at the wrong time.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/IMG_4064.jpg" width="804" height="535" style="display:block;float:none;">That's not to say it's bad. It's just unfortunate. The Hub makes sense in a very specific context: If you're a lock, stock and barrel Verizon customer, from wireless to TV to internet to, obviously, landline phone service. That's where the "Hub" name comes in&mdash;it brings a bunch of different Verizon services together in one spot: You can monitor cellphone locations using Verizon's Chaperone, send maps and directions from the Hub to phones running VZ Navigator, and manage a central calendar that your entire family's phones sync to. Eventually, you'll be able to do more, like manage your Verizon FiOS TV DVR. While a minor point, in a sense it's a very sore point with the Hub, since you can already do that from many Verizon <em>cellphones</em> this very second. Why do I need a Hub again?</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/interface_01.jpg" width="804" height="535" style="display:block;float:none;">The garden walls reach their greatest heights when you try to text or picture message to a non-Verizon phone&mdash;you can't. The calendar isn't open, using a standard like CalDAV for easy export&mdash;it's squarely in Verizonland. A surprising amount of managing the Hub actually takes place on Verizon's website, like uploading contacts (via CSV files) and photos. Thankfully, the Hub's pages are better designed than the rest of Verizon's website&mdash;there's legit eye candy in the photo gallery, for instance. And nearly anything you can do on the Hub itself, you can do from the website remotely, like manage voicemail or check your call history. But it's odd you <a href="http://support.vzw.com/faqs/Equipment/hub.html#item21">can't do something very simple</a> like upload photos via the Hub's USB port.</p>
<p>It doesn't really matter if there are walls around the garden if you're never tempted to leave. Unfortunately, the Hub isn't enough of an attraction. Pretty much anything you can do on it&mdash;buy movie tickets, send text messages, check traffic or watch videos, you can do faster or better on your computer or cellphone. The virtually useless selection of VCAST videos make the average YouTube video feel like HD in comparison, and the "traffic report" isn't a map with live traffic info, but a canned audio briefing from Traffic.com that you have to sit through an ad to hear.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/IMG_4068.jpg" width="804" height="504" style="display:block;float:none;">The Linux OS itself isn't particularly a joy. God knows, Verizon's committed some horrible user interface atrocities over the last few years, but at least the Hub's is alright&mdash;usable, not mind-blowing. I wish it moved faster. The keyboard is annoying to type on, but it'll get better in the next software update, which adjusts the spacing and adds pop-up letters. A persistent set of buttons on the left gives you constant, instant access to the two main menus: The phone and the uh, menu, where you get to your apps. In the top right corner is the home button, which takes you to the desktop, where your widgets, like for weather, time, voicemail, etc. hang out. Applications tend to have a two-pane layout that's framed by buttons on three sides, which doesn't <em>sound</em> like a problem, but it becomes one since the touchscreen is not so responsive around the edges. I've accidentally called two people at 3 in the morning while trying to press the menu button. Not cool.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/IMG_4035.jpg" width="804" height="522" style="display:block;float:none;">Actually, that's one of my more concrete frustrations with this phone: The hardware feels cheap and shitty. The handset, which costs $80 a pop, is a plastic piece of garbage with a shoddy build quality and terrible screen. (It doesn't help that you can't do much from the handset either, like send text messages.) The touchscreen isn't as responsive as it should be, and it distorts with even the slightest bit of pressure, adding to the whole crappy feeling. A screen designed to be touched shouldn't freak out when you touch it. The speakers really harsh, crappy and tinny too. I couldn't stand using it for loudspeaker calls.</p>
<p>There are a few bright points. While the directory isn't as precise as say, MenuPages, it is fairly painless to find a nearby pizza place and call them in a single stroke. The synergistic&mdash;I know, that word provokes a gag reflex&mdash;stuff works well. Directions quickly went to the Samsung Sway test phone I got with it, which promptly fired up VZ Navigator and pointed to wherever I pointed it. (Too bad VZ Navigator is slow and sucky, but that's somewhat besides the point.) And the call quality itself is pretty good&mdash;or at least I sounded "loud and clear" to the people I called.</p>
<p>The brightest light may end up being the proverbial <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5213358/the-verizon-hub-widget-phone-just-got-a-lot-more-exciting">light at the end of the tunnel</a>&mdash;the promise that developers will be able to create their own apps for this thing in the future. The included ones, for the most part, just aren't that hot, and some of the newer ones in the pipeline are definitely more head-turning. But it's hard to see how this product can sustain itself long enough to engender a solid third-party developer community. More likely, it'll get slightly better, then go extinct.</p>
<p>It's pretty ballsy to charge $200 for a landline phone with $35/month VoIP service right now, one that does the same thing you can do on an iPhone or G1, but is tied to your desk. Which is a lot of the reason I like it. But it's just as ridiculous to ask that much for a phone that's built with subpar hardware and doesn't live up to its full potential in a world where it's already horribly outmoded. Time was up two years ago. <script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('verizonhubreview2', 3, '');
</script>[<a href="http://verizonwireless.com/hub">Verizon</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5224070/verizon-hub-phone-review]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5224070]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[desktop]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hub]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[landline]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon hub]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon hub review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon wireless]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[widget]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[widgets]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5224070&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Skype 'Technically Possible' on DSi, But Does This Include Video?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/04/dsitop_01_02.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/dsitop_01_02.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a>A spokesman for Skype says that it's technically possible to port Skype onto Nintendo's <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5197200/nintendo-dsi-review">multi-camera-enabled DSi</a>, but does that mean video?</p>
<p>Skype's been on cellphones and portable devices for a while, but it wasn't until recently that they included video. Problem is, Nintendo's DSi&mdash;although equipped with a front camera that captures video&mdash;only has a 133MHz CPU. The weak processor is enough for games, but is it enough for <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged VIDEO CHAT" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/video-chat/">video chat</a>? Perhaps Skype only meant that it could support audio chats, which would be disappointing, what with that camera always staring you in face while you talk. [<a href="http://www.techradar.com/news/gaming/handhelds/skype-heading-to-nintendo-dsi-593284">TechRadar</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5219762/skype-technically-possible-on-dsi-but-does-this-include-video]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5219762]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[DSI]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chat]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nintendo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[skype]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[skype on dsi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[skype video]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video chat]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5219762&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Skype To Be Spun Off From eBay in 2010]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Skype, the most popular VoIP application/network/platform out there now, is going to be spun off in 2010 with its own IPO. eBay seems to not know what the hell to do with Skype. Who knew that an auction company and a VoIP company didn't belong together? Oh yeah, everybody. [<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10219358-93.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-20">CNET</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5212122/skype-to-be-spun-off-from-ebay-in-2010]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5212122]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[skype]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ebay]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[skype ipo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[skype spinoff]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:18:56 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5212122&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[European Union Considering a Ban on Carrier VoIP Filtering]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/04/euskype.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/euskype.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a>The EU's next technological crusade could be against traffic-blocking cellular carriers, according to a <a href="http://translate.google.co.uk/translate?hl=en&sl=de&u=http://www.wiwo.de/unternehmer-maerkte/mobilfunker-wollen-skype-in-funknetzen-verbieten-393506/&ei=EwfjScPQBseMjAejnYnVDQ&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=1&ct=result&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dhttp://www.wiwo.de/unternehmer-maerkte/mobilfunker-wollen-skype-in-funknetzen-verbieten-393506/%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26hs%3DyCy">German newspaper</a>. Brussels be warned: you should expect a <em>hell</em> of a fight over this one.</p>

<p>A proposal has already been drafted, challenging carriers who disallow VoIP traffic over their 3G networks. Deconstructed, this kind of selective connection seems fundamentally wrong: these carriers are choosing to block certain data not for traffic management reasons, but to sabotage competing services. But the sheer magnitude of the competitive threat&mdash;the possibility that VoIP over cellular data could completely destroy conventional voice services&mdash;at least explains <em>why</em> companies do this, and why regulatory bodies have been so reluctant to touch the issue.</p>
<p>At this stage, it's a distant issue for US carriers, much less cell users. But an EU/Trade Commission intervention into the European wireless industry could at least remind US regulators that, yes, filtering wireless data for anticompetitive purposes is actually <em>kind of a dick move</em>. [<a href="http://translate.google.co.uk/translate?hl=en&sl=de&u=http://www.wiwo.de/unternehmer-maerkte/mobilfunker-wollen-skype-in-funknetzen-verbieten-393506/&ei=EwfjScPQBseMjAejnYnVDQ&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=1&ct=result&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dhttp://www.wiwo.de/unternehmer-maerkte/mobilfunker-wollen-skype-in-funknetzen-verbieten-393506/%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26hs%3DyCy">Handelsblatt</a> via <a href="http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/42003/118/">TGDaily</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5209609/european-union-considering-a-ban-on-carrier-voip-filtering]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5209609]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellular VoIP]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[european union voip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voice over ip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wireless carriers eu regulations]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 13 Apr 2009 04:55:53 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5209609&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Skype For iPhone Now Available in the US, Has VoIP over 3G With 3.0 Firmware]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/03/skypephone.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/skypephone.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a>Apple's just about finished rolling out <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5190080/skype-coming-to-iphone-tuesday-blackberry-in-may">Skype for iPhone</a>, and now US residents can go download the VoIP app for themselves.</p>
<p>Our quick test showed that voice quality is quite good&mdash;definitely on par or better than actual 3G calling over AT&T's network&mdash;and connects rather quickly. It's unfortunate that 2.2.1 doesn't have background notifications, so there's no way somebody could Skype you unless you had the app open all the time.</p>
<p>In an iPhone to iPhone Wi-Fi call test, Phone A heard Phone B perfectly clear, but the person on Phone A sounded like a robot with enunciation problems from Phone B's side. iPhone to Laptop worked perfectly fine, however.</p>
<p>What's also interesting is that voice calling only works when you're on Wi-Fi in the 2.2.1 firmware, popping up a restriction message if you're on 3G, but <a href="http://9to5mac.com/skype-works-on-3G-3.0">9to5Mac</a> says it works just fine in the 3.0 firmware. Not sure whether that's because the 3.0 developer's beta is less locked down, but it's one pretty good reason to risk the upgrade. We suspect that this hole is going to be locked down REAL soon, lest AT&T lose out on a bunch of minutes. [<a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=304878510&mt=8">App Store</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5191538/skype-for-iphone-now-available-in-the-us-has-voip-over-3g-with-30-firmware]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5191538]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dialing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[skype]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[skype for iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wi-fi]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:57:17 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5191538&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Skype Coming to iPhone Tuesday, BlackBerry in May]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/03/skypeiphone.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/skypeiphone.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>Landing a day earlier than <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5185636/rumor-skype-for-iphone-to-be-released-as-early-as-next-week">predicted</a>, Skype's official iPhone client will show its green 'n' white face in the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged APP STORE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/app-store/">App Store</a> <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10206786-2.html?part=rss&tag=feed&subj=Webware">tomorrow</a>. The other conspicuously neglected market, BlackBerry owners, can <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/30/technology/internet/30skype.html?_r=1&ref=technology">expect a client by May</a>.</p>

<p>The iPhone client feature set is more or less what we've come to expect from Skype mobile apps: free Skype-to-Skype calls, SkypeOut support, pretty interface integration (they went with the iPhone aesthetic over the Skype desktop aesthetic, thankfully) and instant messaging to other users. You can even snap a profile picture from within the app. The app will also support 2G iPod Touches with external mics.</p>
<p>But! For those of you who held onto the vain hope that an official client might be able to somehow skirt the universal App Store ban on voice over IP over 3G (VoIPo3G?), forget it&mdash;you won't be able to Skype unless you're connected to a wireless network, and text messaging has been entirely excluded. You can't even top up your SkypeOut account or purchase other services like voicemail, which, by the way, can't be accessed from the app.</p>
<p>Not to poop on Skype's party, but this announcement leaves me with questions&mdash;specifically, <em>why should I download this</em>? Third party apps like <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/fring">Fring</a> picked up Skype's slack a long time ago, and lump in multiprotocol IMing, something which gives them a distinct advantage over this official client on the one-app-at-a-time-please iPhone. Skype told CNET that their app will have better voice quality (and probably lower latency), but aside from that was unable to offer many significant advantages over other apps. [<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10206786-2.html">CNET</a> and <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/30/technology/internet/30skype.html?_r=1&ref=technology">NYT</a> &mdash;<em>Images from <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10206786-2.html">CNET</a></em>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5190080/skype-coming-to-iphone-tuesday-blackberry-in-may]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5190080]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[skype]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[app store]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ctia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ctia 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fring]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone voip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[skype blackberry app]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[skype for blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[skype for iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[skype iphone app]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 30 Mar 2009 05:20:06 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5190080&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Rumor: Skype for iPhone To Be Released As Early As Next Week]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/skype-lite_01.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/>A tipster GigaOM is calling "very reliable" has revealed that Skype for the iPhone will arrive as early as next week&mdash;perhaps at the CTIA Wireless show kicking off on Wednesday. Stay tuned. [<a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/03/26/skype-for-iphone-to-be-released-next-week/">GigaOM</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5185636/rumor-skype-for-iphone-to-be-released-as-early-as-next-week]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5185636]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[skype]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[skype iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:55:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5185636&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[GrandCentral Sputters Back To Life as Google Voice, Adds Voicemail Transcription, SMS Support]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><object width="506" height="311" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/oFVXAqFNgic&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/oFVXAqFNgic&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="506" height="311" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object>Google really took their time on this one, leaving GrandCentral sitting dormant ever since they purchased it in 2007. But nonetheless, it's back, and now it's called&mdash;wait for it&mdash; <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/03/here-comes-google-voice.html">Google Voice</a>. </p>
<p>For those of you who haven't heard of it, GrandCentral/<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GOOGLE VOICE" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GOOGLE VOICE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/google-voice/">Google Voice</a> is an online phone consolidation service. Basically, you pick a single phone number for your account, and have Google Voice&mdash;which can manage calls, voicemail and now SMS&mdash;route contact to that number to any number of other <em>phones</em>. It's sort of like a web-based switchboard for all your devices.</p>
<p>Google has preserved GrandCentral's functionality, and added a few features to their web client. For example, now you can see your voicemails collected on your PC and transcribed, or have a voicemail transcription sent to your phones via SMS. Speaking of SMS support, that gaping hole that blighted the old GrandCentral, it is now included and logged accordingly. Conference calling and cheap international rates are also available through the client.</p>
<p>Google Voice is in beta, but it's one of those trademark soft, open, indefinite Googly betas. It's closed to everyone except previous GrandCentral users, and the company says that the beta will open to the rest of us "soon". [<a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/03/here-comes-google-voice.html">Google</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5168592/grandcentral-sputters-back-to-life-as-google-voice-adds-voicemail-transcription-sms-support]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5168592]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[google voice]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google grandcentral]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google voice sms]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[grand central]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[grandcentral]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 12 Mar 2009 05:55:25 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5168592&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Hands-On With JaJah's iPod touch VoIP App]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/02/IMG_7367.JPG"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/IMG_7367.JPG" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a><a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/jajah">Jajah</a> isn't the first VoIP app for the iPhone/<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged IPOD TOUCH" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ipod-touch/">iPod touch</a>, but it's the first that let's you <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5147282/jajah-app-now-turns-your-ipod-touch-into-a-voip-phone">send/receive SMS messages</a> over wi-fi. I got a brief look at it, and so far, so good.</p>
<p>Previously, the JaJah app for the iPhone was used as a middleman to connect people on VoIP to your cellphone, but it still required a mobile plan, and used minutes. Now, the Jajah app works entirely over wi-fi, meaning you can use the iPod touch, and make calls without a mobile plan. It also works on the iPhone, but won't work over 3G or EDGE, because then AT&T wouldn't make any money.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('jajahipod', 6, '');
</script></p>
<p>The strength of this Jajah app is simplicity, and that is a good thing. It doesn't try to work with a million different communication services (such as Fring or IM+), and it maintains much of Mobile OS X's design DNA. This makes the app extremely easy to use.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("/jajah_text.flv", 506, 305,"");
</script>Placing a call is as simple as selecting a contact from your list, or bringing up the dialpad and entering a number. Similarly, sending a text over IP (handy for international SMS) looks like it's pretty much the same as sending a normal SMS, except that you're inside the JaJah app. I got to see the UI for sending an SMS, but because the service isn't set up yet, I didnt get to see it go through.</p>
<p>As for call quality, voices sounds a tad on the tinny side, but not to the extent that I would say it's bad quality. There's also a few seconds of lag while the data passes through JaJah's servers, yet that's no huge surprise either.</p>
<p>The cool thing is that JaJah would like to work with Mobile Carriers on branded solutions, and expect carriers to offer flat rate VoIP service using the JaJah technology. This means you wouldn't need to buy minutes, you'd just pay one dollar amount every month for unlimited use. In any case, VoIP junkies should look at JaJah when it comes out in a few weeks.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5148607/hands+on-with-jajahs-ipod-touch-voip-app]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5148607]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hands-on]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[internet calls]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod touch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jajah]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jajah ipod touch]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Feb 2009 21:20:14 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Covert]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5148607&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[USB Star Trek Communicator Lets You Do VoIP Over USB]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/02/star_trek_usb_communicator_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/star_trek_usb_communicator_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a>There have been <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/029939/another-star-trek-bluetooth-communicator">Bluetooth versions</a> of the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged STAR TREK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/star-trek/">Star Trek</a> communicator in the past, but as of this moment the new VoIP version is as close as nerds can get to the real thing.</p>
<p>When hooked up via USB, this speakerphone can make calls over Skype for anyone running XP, Vista, Tiger or Leopard. It also features its own volume control and mute function as well as velcro backing for mounting in an easy-to-reach area. And, of course, it comes with the prerequisite sound bytes that have become a staple of all Trek communicator replicas. A price has not been announced, but it is expected to arrive sometime in April. [<a href="http://www.dreamcheeky.com/">Dream Cheeky</a> via <a href="http://www.everythingusb.com/star-trek-usb-communicator-16046.html">Everything USB</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5147502/usb-star-trek-communicator-lets-you-do-voip-over-usb]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5147502]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[peripherals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[replica]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[skype]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star trek voip communicator]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[usb communicator]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:39:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5147502&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[JaJah App Now Turns Your iPod touch Into a VoIP Phone]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/02/thumb160x_jajah-ipod-touch.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />JaJah is readying their <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/330956/jajah-gives-iphone-international-callers-a-voip-alternative">VoIP calling app</a> for the second-gen <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged IPOD TOUCH" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ipod-touch/">iPod touch</a>, offering cellphone-esque functionality free of SIM cards and contracts, and provide mobile carriers the JaJah technology to use under their own brand.</p>
<p>To use JaJah on your iPod touch, all you need is a wi-fi connection, and a <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5102091/lightning-review-new-apple-in+ear-headphones">compatible headset</a> so you can talk. Calls can be placed to any phone, anywhere, you can send and recieve SMS messages over IP, and you can even have a real number assigned to your iPod touch that let's you receive calls from any phone.</p>
<p>As for service, you can either purchase call minutes through JaJah, or soon enough, they'll make their service available to mobile carriers, letting them use the technology under their own name, letting customers deal with a company they already know. JaJah says pricing for the iPod touch service will be the same as the rest of their devices, which is to say about 3 cents/minute to other people in the US, and as low as 3.4 cents/minute in parts of Europe.</p>
<p>The App isn't out quite yet, but JaJah expects to have it ready as a free download in the coming weeks. [<a href="http://jajah.com">JaJah</a>]</p>
<blockquote>
<p>JAJAH Turns iPod Touch Into an iPhone<br>
White Label Solution Enables Any Carrier to Provide High Quality Calls and text Messaging via the iPod Touch</p>
<p>MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA &mdash; February 5, 2009 &mdash; JAJAH, the leading IP telecommunications company, today announced a complete revamp of the iPod touch, turning the device into a fully functioning mobile phone for consumers. The new capability, available as a white label solution, enables carriers as well as non-carriers to launch the service under their own brand and provide their customers with the ability to make low-cost phone calls and send SMS text messages to any phone in the world from their iPod touch. To use the service, end users only require an iPod touch and a Wi-Fi connection, with no need for a SIM card or contract.</p>
<p>Move over, iPhone<br>
The iPod touch is one of the most popular consumer devices in the world for music, entertainment, Web-browsing and now, making phone calls.</p>
<p>"Millions of people around the world already have an iPod touch in their pocket. With JAJAH's solution, any company can turn their customers' iPod touch into a fully functioning mobile phone," said Trevor Healy, CEO, JAJAH. "The device is particularly popular amongst students, who live in a world where Wi-Fi access is always available and, like everyone, they are looking to save costs, so this is a perfect solution."</p>
<p>JAJAH's next generation IP communications platform gives its partners everything they need to launch the service immediately. This includes the application itself, plus the entire suite of management services, from termination of the calls and quality control, right through to billing and processing payments in 200 countries around the world.</p>
<p>Given the economic downturn, consumers are seeking ways to make calls on any mobile device they own, as inexpensively as possible. "Offering a turnkey solution provides iPod touch users with added value," said Jon Arnold, principal analyst of J Arnold & Associates. "This is a prime example of how JAJAH's innovative platform helps carriers differentiate their services."</p>
<p>Connection made easy ...<br>
Anyone with the latest version of the iPod touch will be able to download the service from the Apple App Store. With a microphone headset (available from Apple), users will immediately be able to make calls and send SMS messages from their device from any Wi-Fi network in the world. Calling costs will be up to 98 percent cheaper than existing rates on mobile networks, and in many cases could be free.</p>
<p>A platform for everyone (else)<br>
JAJAH's plug-and-play IP platform is the only service that provides the full suite of services required to develop, deploy and monetize IP communication services anywhere in the world. The JAJAH platform is used by a number of the world's largest companies including Intel, Yahoo! and Comcast, and allows any company to offer value-added-services (VAS) to their customer base with no upfront payment or development work, saving millions for its customers and ensuring partners are prepared for the next generation of service provision.</p>
<p>JAJAH continues to develop innovative communications services. In the coming months the company will announce a range of new data communication services, applications and partnerships. For more information, please visit: www.jajah.com.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5147282/jajah-app-now-turns-your-ipod-touch-into-a-voip-phone]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5147282]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod touch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jajah]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jajah ipod touch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones"]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[touch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:39:11 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Covert]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5147282&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Dealzmodo Hack: Revitalize Your Windows Mobile Phone]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/01/winmowhat_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/winmowhat_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>For the legions of helpless Windows Mobile users, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/pre">Pre</a> is just the latest in an endless, corrosive barrage of ego-draining next-gen phones. But living with Windows Mobile doesn't have to be so bad.</p>

<p><a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5130922/obamas-blackberry-may-be-replaced-with-a-giant-windows-mobile-brick">Work rules</a>, lame carriers, prohibitive contracts&mdash;whatever the reason you're shacked up with a WinMo phone, you've been through the same experience. You toil with the layers of menus, hidden device settings, poor browsing and crashy, inconsistent performance. Surrounded by fancy, shiny phones with even fancier, shinier OSes, you're even getting a bit jealous, and feel like you have a genuinely last-gen device. Well, as Windows Mobile enthusiasts (who are out there in droves) will tell you, it's not <em>that terrible</em>. With the right apps you can get quite a lot of utility and&mdash;yes&mdash;enjoyment out of your aging phone.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/browsers.jpg" width="500" height="222" style="display:block;"><strong>For God's sake, get a new browser</strong><br>
Internet Explorer Mobile, even in its latest incarnation, has rarely been described as "good." In fact, it's pretty much the <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5106121/windows-mobile-browser-battlemodo-can-you-get-the-real-internet">complete opposite</a>. No worries though&mdash;Windows Mobile, through third parties, has the broadest and most versatile collection of browsers of any of its competitors.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.opera.com/mini/"><strong>Opera Mini/Mobile</strong></a>: A Java-based browser, Opera Mini is a free download that will immediately give your phone a new lease on life. Fancy this: Now, with your phone, you can visit <em>actual</em> websites, rendered to a reasonable degree of accuracy! OH MY GOD!</p>
<p>There's also <a href="http://www.opera.com/mobile/">Opera Mobile</a>, a native app with a few more advanced features, which has recently shifted its emphasis to a relatively narrow set of touchscreen devices (mostly from HTC and Samsung), on which it performs as a reasonable counterpart to Safari Mobile or Chrome Mobile. It's free when it's in beta, but will cost you for long term use.</p>
<p><strike>Both browsers</strike> Opera Mini routes content through Opera's servers for optimization and compression, which can occasionally break formatting. <strong>Update:</strong> Opera Mobile runs independently of Opera's servers, though there is noticeable compression performed&mdash;presumably locally&mdash;on some images.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.skyfire.com/"><strong>Skyfire</strong></a>: This upstart company has produced a phenomenal browser, dedicated to bringing a full desktop browsing experience to Windows Mobile phones. This powerhouse app is now available to the public, and lives up to most of its claims.</p>
<p>Skyfire routes web content through its servers like Opera Mini does, but with a greater emphasis on exact page reproduction. For the end user, that means fully optimized streaming Flash video, which will allow you to watch everything from Hulu to Megaporn&mdash;all automatically transcoded into a lower, EDGE or 3G-appropriate bitrate. Skyfire works wonderfully on most WinMo phones, touchscreen or not, but its version for VGA-resolution phones needs better visuals.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.torchmobile.com/"><strong>TorchMobile Iris</strong></a>: This is another browser that claims to bring the "desktop experience" to your phone, and for the most part it does, assuming your phone has a touchscreen. It got its start on the LG Dare, where it performed <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5106121/windows-mobile-browser-battlemodo-can-you-get-the-real-internet">relatively well</a>. In short, this WebKit-based browser render quite well, but it's not terribly fast and the navigation paradigm isn't the most intuitive of the lot. But! It's free and it's not Mobile IE, and for this I am grateful.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/winmoui.jpg" width="500" height="222" style="display:block;"><strong>Give your old phone a new look</strong><br>
This is where Windows Mobile feels the most out of date; its interface is a classic example of design by committee, only this time the committee was made up primarily of the visionaries responsible for Windows Bob, Windows ME, Windows Vista and possibly the Pontiac Aztec. The solution? Skin it.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.handango.com/catalog/ProductDetails.jsp?storeId=2218&productId=218624"><strong>PointUI</strong></a>: About a year ago, our own Jason Chen <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/339835/pointui-skins-windows-mobile-makes-it-usable-best-wm-skin-app-ever">raved about PointUI</a>, and not much has changed&mdash;it's still fantastic. This layer, not unlike those designed by HTC, Samsung and Sony to mask WinMo, will provide pretty, finger-friendly navigation to a touchscreen Windows Mobile phone. It looks like the project is on temporary hiatus, but the app is still available <a href="http://www.handango.com/catalog/ProductDetails.jsp?storeId=2218&productId=218624">here</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.spbsoftwarehouse.com/products/mobileshell/"><strong>SPB Mobile Shell</strong></a>: This one isn't free ($30, actually) but does provide a fairly complete conversion. It reaches deeper into layers of the interface than PointUI does, is a bit more friendly for QWERTY-based phones and offers a load of user skins.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.throttlelauncher.com/portal/">ThrottleLauncher</a></strong>: HTC's TouchFlo 3D is a wonderful Windows Mobile shell, but unfortunately can be difficult to port due to its 3D acceleration requirement. ThrottleLauncher is a TF3D replacement, which works on most Windows Mobile touchscreen phones. It looks like TF3D, and offers skins to look like Android, iPhone OS and others. There are a fair number of bugs present, but they're tolerable.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/winmoothers.jpg" width="500" height="222" style="display:block;"><strong>Fill out your app list</strong>:<br>
Most of those things that modern smartphones have&mdash;the swank maps, the messaging services, the productivity apps&mdash;you can have too. They may not be as polished, but they work very, very well.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.google.com/mobile/winmo/">Google Apps</a></strong>: Aside from plethora of mobile web apps offered by Google, there are a few native ones as well. <a href="http://www.google.com/mobile/winmo/">Google Maps</a> is a must-download, and provides almost all of the functionality of its iPhone/G1 brother, including GPS integration. <a href="http://www.google.com/mobile/winmo/">Google Mail</a> provides a nice, speedy interface for your Gmail account, offering relief from Windows Mobile's occasionally frustrating mail app, and allowing for relatively easy switching between accounts.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.skype.com/intl/en/download/skype/windowsmobile/"><strong>Skype</strong></a>: Here's an area where Windows Mobile generally trumps all others OSes&mdash;voice over IP. The native Skype app is <em>lovely</em>, functioning well over Wi-Fi and cellular data connections, provided your carrier allows the latter.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.palringo.com/">Palringo</a></strong>: Palringo is a multiprotocol IM app, which enables messaging on many networks at once in a single program. AIM, MSN, Yahoo, ICQ&mdash;they're all there. Like any decent IM app it works with the WinMo notification system <em>and</em> runs in the background, so you can be constantly apprised of your new messages, just like those smug BlackBerry users. In fact, I think it's fair to say that in the area of messaging, Windows Mobile shines. Similar, also good: <a href="http://www.fring.com/">Fring</a>.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://picard.exceed.hu/tcpmp/test/">TCPMP Media Player</a></strong>: Its development has been discontinued, but the app is perfectly usable as is. What is it? It's a barebones media player that'll handle almost any codec, audio or video, that you throw at it. In other words, you can encode video for mobile consumption however you like, something that can't be said of most other OSes (cough*Apple*cough).</p>
<p><a href="http://apps.sourceforge.net/mediawiki/pocketscrobbler/index.php?title=Getting_started"><strong>Pocket Scrobbler:</strong></a> An unofficial client for the fantastic Last.fm internet radio/social network service, this app will handily stream endless, personally catered internet radio over a cellular data connection or Wi-Fi. Windows Mobile actually has a distinct advantage with this type of programs: the ability to run apps in the background!</p>
<p><em><a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/dealzmodo-hacks">Dealzmodo Hacks</a> are intended to help you sustain your <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5059598/zero+cost-gadget-upgrades-for-the-next-great-depression">crippling gadget addiction through tighter times</a>. If you come across any on your own that are particularly useful, send it to our tips line (Subject: Dealzmodo Hack). <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/dealzmodo-hacks">Check back</a> every other Thursday for free DIY tricks to breathe new life into hardware that you already own.</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5131905/dealzmodo-hack-revitalize-your-windows-mobile-phone]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5131905]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[dealzmodo hacks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core media player]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dealzmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[diy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gmail]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google maps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hacks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iris]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palringo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pointui]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[skyfire]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[skype]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[spb mobile shell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[torchmobile iris]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows mobile apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows mobile shells]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[winmo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5131905&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Hands On: iRiver's Crazy Wave-Home Video VoiP/Web Console And Its Beautifully Designed Friends]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/01/iriver_21.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/iriver_21.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>The Wave Home is primarily a touch-screen video VoiP phone, but with a web browser and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/chumby">Chumby-like</a> widgets built-in. It also looks like it was designed for a German modernist millionaire's night stand.</p>

<p>It stands arched in white plastic, with a 7" LCD touch screen looking out at you; a wireless handset tucked into the back is for when you don't want to use the video speakerphone.</p>
<p>Video quality looks good for the camera, and the UI is almost as beautifully done as the iRiver says it will run under $400, and availability is pending negotiations with VoiP carriers—they want to bundle it with service, because right now, it doesn't run Skype or any similar services. Bringing such a unique device into a big VoIP partnership might pose some problems, but we hope not, because this thing is beautiful.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('iriverwavehome', 8, '');
</script></p>
<p>iRiver also brought out a similarly <a href="http://gizmodo.com/343641/1960s-braun-products-hold-the-secrets-to-apples-future">Braun-inspired</a> D50N, a wi-fi "communicator" with a full Qwerty keyboard for IM, browser, and translation dictionaries:</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('iriverd50n', 3, '');
</script></p>
<p>And the P7, a Spinn-inspired PMP with a 4.3-inch WQVGA (480 x 272) touchscreen that comes in 8/16GB sizes with a microSD expansion slot:</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('iriverp7', 5, '');
</script></p>
<p>Both of these models were in a mix of Korean and English, so it was hard to get the full flavor, but the screen on the P7 looks great for video and its nice, magazine-layout-like UI, which is navigable via touch and a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/spinn">Spinn-like</a> analog scroll wheel.</p>
<p>All are taking major cues from Dieter Rams, the German design legend who was <a href="http://gizmodo.com/343641/1960s-braun-products-hold-the-secrets-to-apples-future">doing smooth white plastic and hard-edged minimalism</a> before Jonathan Ive was a twinkle in Steve Job's eye. In short, this stuff is beautiful, so we hope pricing and availability solidifies soon.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>iriver Brings a Hot New Look and Feel to Networking With the All-Inclusive WAVE-HOME Multimedia Communication Device</p>
<p>Next Generation Networking Base Station and Handset Keep You Connected<br>
and In Control Of Your Home and Office Life</p>
<p>Las Vegas, NV – iriver, a global leader in innovative digital devices, is bringing its award-winning ingenuity to the networking space with the game-changing WAVE-HOME. More than a home networking device, the WAVE-HOME is the ultimate all-in-one solution that provides advanced multimedia, web and phone capabilities – a comprehensive communications hub that keeps you totally connected and in control at home, at the office and in your life. Featuring a sleek and minimal base station and portable handset, the WAVE-HOME manages and integrates all your phone, Internet, home entertainment and lifestyle needs.</p>
<p>iriver’s WAVE-HOME and all of its new networking devices will be on display at the iriver booth (#7935, Central Hall) during the 2009 Consumer Electronics Show at the Las Vegas Convention Center, January 8-11, 2009.</p>
<p>Kuno Kim, President, iriver, said, "The WAVE-HOME is a milestone introduction for iriver as we expand our product innovation and design into exciting new areas such as life and home networking. Our mission has always been to help consumers easily connect with the things they value most in life. Our new networking devices take this concept to the next level by providing a stylish and powerful way to stay completely connected to every aspect of your home and business life and relationships."</p>
<p>The WAVE-HOME comes with a stylish base station with a 7" color LCD touch screen and is designed to integrate all of your personal digital content such as music, photos, movies, digital photo frame, hand drawing, Internet and phone services. Music, video, and FM radio can all be enjoyed in pristine sound thanks to the WAVE-HOME’s built-in, high-quality stereo speakers.</p>
<p>WAVE-HOME is not just a simple VolP telephone, it’s an internet multimedia communication device that combines a wide variety of activities at home or in the office. It can be used privately or in a broader context, such as creating new business opportunities via broadband internet such as VoIP. When connected to broadband Internet, the WAVE-HOME offers Web surfing, and also supports Internet phone service at home and in the office with VoIP Phone, VoIP Video Phone, SMS/MMS, MMCID/MMRB, live Phonebook sync, and more. Phone calls can be made by using either the internal speaker phone or the wireless handset that also supports a remote controller. WAVE-HOME also features a 1.3M pixel CMOS camera for taking sharp photos that can be instantly presented via the photo viewer.</p>
<p>Another exciting feature is the intelligent Widget that provides instant weather, stock and traffic updates, as well as web and multimedia services that users can enjoy without a computer since the device is connected to broadband internet. The Widget utilizes a graphical user interface (GUI) and displays an individual information window or a text box. The defining characteristic of a Widget is to provide a single interaction point for the direct manipulation of a given kind of data. Therefore, the user can arrange his or her data with several Widget functions such as Widget Connector, Widget Icon, Widget Manager and Widget Gallery. It provides endless options on the 7” color touch screen. Due to its simplified navigation, it creates an intuitive and easy-to-use interface.</p>
<p>WAVE-HOME catches the eye with its sleek, minimalist design that enhances any interior and creates style at home while changing the way we communicate.</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>iriver Shows Off Sleek and Style-Savvy Multimedia Players For ‘09</p>
<p>Trend-Setting PMP, MP3 and MP4 Players on Display at CES 2009</p>
<p>Las Vegas, NV – iriver, a leading innovator of stylish digital devices, shows off its signature style at CES 2009 with a hot new selection of Multimedia Players, including the compact yet powerful P7 NAND flash player with a new intuitive user interface and large 4.3" touch screen. Also on display are the slick new E50 MP4 Player with 52 hours of continuous playback, the E100 Season II, a revamped version of the original E100 Multimedia MP3 Player, and the truly eye-catching Mplayer Eyes MP3 player.</p>
<p>All of iriver’s Multimedia Players will be on display at the company’s booth (#7935, Central Hall) during the 2009 Consumer Electronics Show at the Las Vegas Convention Center, January 8-11, 2009.</p>
<p>P7 PMP Offers Sleek Design & Smart Performance<br>
Iriver’s sleek new P7 is the perfect on-the-go media companion for any trend-setter. The P7 will be available in 4, 8 and 16GB Nand flash models, making the player slimmer and lighter than HDD-type PMPs, and also more durable. Functions include Video, Music, Photo viewer, FM and Voice Recording. The compact P7 delivers up to 50 hours of audio playback time and full movie CODEC support for enjoying the latest films or videos. The intuitive new user interface and brilliant 4.3” LCD touch screen make the player a snap to use and control, Enhanced features include SRS WOW HD and 7 Preset EQ settings, plus micro SD slot.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5126774/hands-on-irivers-crazy-wave+home-video-voipweb-console-and-its-beautifully-designed-friends]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5126774]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ces 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gallery]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iriver]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iriver D50N]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iriver P35]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iriver p7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iriver wave-home]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pmps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Mahoney]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5126774&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Skype Lite Heading to Android, iPhone Not Far Off]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/01/340x_skype-lite_01.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/>T-Mobile G1 users will soon be able to enjoy the benefits of Skype with the addition of the "lite" version to the Android Marketplace&mdash;and an iPhone version may not be far behind.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, you are still subject to your standard carrier rates when calling with Skype Lite (no Wi-Fi or 3G required), but it does provide power users mobile access to their contact lists while on the go. The app should appear in the Android markeplace sometime in the next few days, while versions for other Java-enabled handsets from carriers like Motorola, Sony Ericsson, Nokia, LG, and Samsung should be available starting today. As for the iPhone, it seems that Skype reps at CES hinted that it is in development, but when we might actually see it is anyone's guess. [<a href="http://www.skype.com/download/skype/mobile/">Skype</a> via <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/156654/skype_lite_headed_to_android_phones.html">PC World</a> and <a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/T/TEC_GADGET_SHOW_SKYPE?SITE=AZTUS&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT">azstarnet</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5126693/skype-lite-heading-to-android-iphone-not-far-off]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5126693]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ces 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[skype lite android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile g1]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5126693&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Skype 2.5 Beta For Windows Mobile Now Available]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/12/thumb160x_skype-wm.JPG" class="left image158" width="158" />Skype claims to have overhauled their VoIP client for Windows Mobile with their 2.5 beta release. Improvements include: better sound quality, better stability and friendlier interface. Hit the link to give it a whirl. [<a href="http://www.skype.com/download/skype/windowsmobile/">Skype</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5105561/skype-25-beta-for-windows-mobile-now-available]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5105561]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[skype]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[beta]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[skype 2.5 beta]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wm]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 09 Dec 2008 14:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5105561&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Ooma Releasing New 'Unlimited' Phone, Still Exists]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/11/340x_ooma.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Last year Ooma, the only VoIP provider <a href="http://go.ooma.com/company/newsarticles/articledetails.php?month=2007-12&articleID=instyle">starring Ashton Kutcher</a>, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/cheap-calls/400-ooma-gives-you-free-voip-and-landline-calls-for-life-280087.php">announced</a> an unlimited VoIP calling package, available for a one-time fee of $400. It sounded crazy then, and it sounds crazy now &mdash; but they're somehow still at at. Now the price is $250, and they've got a new phone and router on the way. Details are slim for the time being, but considering that this one is at least <em>wireless</em> &mdash; unlike the first retro-handset &mdash; I'd say it's an improvement. [<a href="http://www.gearlog.com/2008/11/ooma_adds_style_handset_to_fre.php">Gearlog</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5085272/ooma-releasing-new-unlimited-phone-still-exists]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5085272]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ooma]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ashton kutcher]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[unlimited calling]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip phones]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 13 Nov 2008 06:45:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5085272&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Motorola Embeds CDMA Femtocell into Digital Photo Frame]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><object width="494" height="400"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/atruI8jaSsc&rel=0&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/atruI8jaSsc&rel=0&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="494" height="400"></embed></object>I have to hand it to the guys at Motorola for coming up with the idea to integrate a femtocell and a VoIP soft phone into a digital photo frame. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/femtocell/">Femtocells</a> help cover weak spots in a cellular network by sending calls over the internet&mdash;which is a good idea except that it would involve yet another device cluttering up your workspace. The choice of a frame as the focal point for the system is a clever solution to this problem because it already utilizes a touchscreen and it blends in well with the surrounding environment. Femtocells have yet to make a big impact on our <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #wirelessnetworks" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #wirelessnetworks" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/wirelessnetworks/">wireless networks</a>, but I can see devices like this helping to speed up adoption. [<a href="http://connectedhome2go.com/2008/09/19/femtocell-in-a-photo-frame/">connectedhome2go</a> via <a href="http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2008-09/digital-media-bytes-71/">ZatzNotFunny</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5054362/motorola-embeds-cdma-femtocell-into-digital-photo-frame]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5054362]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[femtocell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cdma]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital frames]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital photo frames]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wireless networks]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5054362&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
