<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: Waterproof]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/waterproof</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'waterproof']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 Waterproof Camera Review: The One That Says Bad MotherF*cker On It]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/IMG_9212.JPG"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_IMG_9212.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>If there's a tougher waterproof camera, I haven't seen it before. That's not to say it's perfect, but it's the point and shoot I'd take to cover an Aquaman vs Red October brawl.</p>

<h1>The Price:</h1>
<p>$379</p>
<h1>The Waterproofing and Toughness:</h1>
<p>It's rated to 10 meters, or 33 feet, without a case, making it just as pressure resistant as the Powershot D10. And there's a <a href="http://www.olympusamerica.com/cpg_section/product.asp?product=1448&fl=5&acccategory=45">30 meter case</a>, optional, for deeper excursions, too, which the Canon doesn't have. It is the only periscoping internal zoom lens with a mechanized metal cover. Like the Pentax W80 and Canon Powershot D10, it can operate at down to 14 degrees F, making it ideal for winter sports. It's shock rated to a drop of 6.6 feet and crushproof to 220 pounds. It's heavy and almost completely metal. The screen and lens are coated with a water resistant substance, keeping droplets from getting in the way of clean shots. It's a monster. All it needs is a damn turret and you could send it into a warzone.</p>
<h1>The Pictures:</h1>
<p>Now for the slightly sad part. Relative to other test shots by other waterproof cameras, the photos were, well, middling and grainy. I don't believe that picture quality is necessarily a main concern on waterproof cameras&mdash;water quality is a bigger determination here&mdash;but as an above water camera, there are better choices. I did find the multiple underwater modes for surf/snow on the ground (pumps exposure), the high speed and landscape under the sea, and video modes to be a nice touch. The camera is also dual stabilized using optical and high ISO to reduce shakes. The biggest problem I had was the focus lag which caused plenty of missed action shots. That was a negative thing for me in an otherwise great user experience. Oh, there's a beauty mode, which combines face detection with softening algorithms on camera&mdash;there's a cool animation with sparkles that it plays while it renders&mdash;that take wrinkles and shadows out of faces. Kind of works!<br>
<script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5354055,12,'');
</script></p>
<h1>The Video-ooh No:</h1>
<p>What the shit: The 640x480 pixel video looked kind of jittery at times and was washed out all the time and&mdash;the worst part&mdash;limited to 10 second clips. This, for me, is somewhat of a deal breaker. When you're outside, motion shots are a given. I need better video on this camera!</p>
<h1>Quirks:</h1>
<p>Yes, it uses XD cards, and a variation of ye old mini and micro USB, so I had to hunt for some gear to transfer shots.</p>
<h1>The Bottom Line:</h1>
<p>As tough as it gets, but photos are a little underwhelming and video fall way short. I'm definitely conflicted here.</p>
<p><br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/gizplus3.jpg" height="20" width="20">The toughest point and shoot in the world.<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/gizminus.jpg" height="20" width="20">Video sucks<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/gizminus.jpg" height="20" width="20">Photos a bit soft<br>
<br clear="all">
<br>
[<a href="http://www.olympusamerica.com/cpg_section/product.asp?product=1448">Olympus</a>, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5125931/olympus-stylus-tough+8000-camera-has-a-blunt-name-can-survive-blunt-force">Gizmodo</a>]</p>
<p><em><a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/summermodo">Summermodo</a> is a chance for Giz to get outside and test our gear where it belongs.</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5354083/olympus-stylus-tough-8000-waterproof-camera-review-the-one-that-says-bad-motherfcker-on-it]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5354083]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ocean]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[olympus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[olympus stylus tough 8000]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sea]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[stylus tough 8000]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[summermodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[underwater]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 07 Sep 2009 14:04:10 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5354083&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Panasonic SDR-SW21 Waterproof Camera Non-Review: NO NO NO NO NO!]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_panasonic_sdr-sw21d.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />This camera doesn't deserve a review; it deserves a warning. It is one of the most expensive rugged cams, but takes only 640x480 SD video and 0.3MP stills as bad as the worst camphones. Miserable!</p>

<p>Sure, the standard def video was serviceable, but when cheaper point and shoots do the same or HD video, a purpose built camcorder has no excuse for not blowing them out of the water for cheaper. And it's only waterproof to 6 feet. Miserable! Also, the camera liked to focus on the water droplets on its lens like a cross-eyed idiot. Unlike the very presentable Lumix DMC-TS1 from the same company, please avoid this piece of defunct technology. One nice thing: It comes with a floating strap. But, again, if you buy this, you are dumb. [<a href="http://www2.panasonic.com/consumer-electronics/shop/Cameras-Camcorders/Camcorders/SD-Camcorders/model.SDR-SW21D_11002_7000000000000005702">Panasonic</a>]</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5354106,8,'');
</script></p>
<p><br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/gizminus.jpg" height="20" width="20">The fact that it exists.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/summermodo">Summermodo</a> is a chance for Giz to get outside and test our gear where it belongs.</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5354107/panasonic-sdr+sw21-waterproof-camera-non+review-no-no-no-no-no]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5354107]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ocean]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[panasonic sdr-sw21d]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sea]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[summermodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[underwater]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[worstmodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 07 Sep 2009 13:24:11 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5354107&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS1 Waterproof Camera Review: My Favorite So Far, Oddly]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/Panasonic_Lumix_DMC-TS1.JPG"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_Panasonic_Lumix_DMC-TS1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>It's not the most rugged, waterproof, or compact of its kind. And its photos aren't the best. But for some reason I really like this camera. Maybe I'm wrong.</p>

<h1>The Price:</h1>
<p>$400</p>
<h1>The Toughness:</h1>
<p>It's rated to about 10 feet and for drops of 5 feet, which places it at the lower end of the spectrum of waterproofing. Well, it's not the lower end, but given the shock and dust proofing and the lens reinforcement system, I'd expect the makers of the Toughbook to best cameras like the fluffy <a href="http://gizmodo.com/search/fuji%20z33/bydate/?timerange=all">Fuji z33</a> and the slimmer <a href="http://gizmodo.com/search/pentax%20w80/bydate/?timerange=all">Pentax w80</a> waterproofs for depth. Again, I wouldn't call this a weakness, but if the DMC-TS1 had one, this would be it. Update: Wow, there's an external dive case for this camera which <a href="http://www2.panasonic.com/consumer-electronics/shop/Supplies-Accessories/Cameras-Camcorders/Digital-Camera-Accessories/Camera-Cases/model.DMW-MCFT1_11002_7000000000000005702">extends the depth rating to 130 feet</a>. It's rated down to 32 degrees, which isn't quite as low as the Pentax W80, Canon Powershot D10 and Olympus Tough 8000's 14 degrees F op temps.</p>
<h1>The Visuals:</h1>
<p>The photos were among the best in low light, high ISO and daylight. There was a simple beach/surf macro mode which worked well enough. Colors were accurate, and I only noticed a slight distortion around the edges while zoomed out. (Many periscoping internal zoom cameras have this issue.) The lens went pretty wide at a 28mm equivalent and the zoom was almost top of the class at 128mm (only the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/search/w80/bydate/?timerange=all">Pentax</a> did better). Images, overall, were second best to the Canon with its traditional lens system, but this camera doesn't have that problem of a protruding snout which makes it a lot more pocketable. The camera has optical stabilization, which is pretty kick ass. The uncovered lens caused some photos to look smudged, which is perhaps the rule, not the exception in these cameras. Shots are at 12.1MP, but you can get variations of that in 16:9 mode. (My favorite!) As usual, waterphotos are generally limited in quality by water clarity and color, so, well, above the sea shots work fine.<br>
<script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5352282,6,'');
</script></p>
<p>The TS1's video recording happens at a high res of 720p, stabilized and recordable in motion jpg or AVCHD lite, giving you more recording time and quality. It looks better than good.</p>
<h1>The Design:</h1>
<p>I'm into the spartan, square design. And the camera's responsive shooting, burst modes, and menus made it the easiest to use without being overly simple like the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/search/d10/bydate/?timerange=all">Canon D10</a>.</p>
<h1>Yeah, I don't know yet:</h1>
<p>The Lumix is a fantastic all-around camera that is somewhat tough and waterproof. I'd originally gone into this review thinking it would be king, but given the shallow depth rating, I may have to wait 'til I see the new Olympus in action before I give a stronger rating. Especially at $400. At that price, the smaller, Pentax w80, rated to 16 feet with decent shots and shitty video looks like a lot better of a deal. And the super cheap and small Fuji z33 does, too. I don't know. I'm not giving up on this camera yet. Strong video playback is an important thing these days. I guess its my camera of choice and should be yours too (for now) if you don't go beyond 10 feet down and image quality and relative pocketability is a priority. Until I check out that Olympus Stylus Tough-8000 which has some really solid stats all-around and cost a bit less.</p>
<p><br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/gizplus3.jpg" height="20" width="20">Great images<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/gizplus3.jpg" height="20" width="20">Great case design and menus<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/gizplus3.jpg" height="20" width="20">Great video at 720p<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/giznormal_05.jpg" height="20" width="20">Despite the all-around toughness of the device, only waterproof to a middling (not poor) 10 feet</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/Q209waterproofgroup/page8.asp">DP Review</a>, <a href="http://www2.panasonic.com/consumer-electronics/shop/Cameras-Camcorders/Digital-Cameras/Lumix-Digital-Cameras/model.DMC-TS1S.S_11002_7000000000000005702#tabsection">Panasonic</a>, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5232843/toughcam-battle-canon-powershot-d10-vs-panasonic-lumix-dmc+ts1">Giz</a>]</p>
<p><em><a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/summermodo">Summermodo</a> is a chance for Giz to get outside and test our gear where it belongs.</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5352296/panasonic-lumix-dmc+ts1-waterproof-camera-review-my-favorite-so-far-oddly]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5352296]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dmc-ts1]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[h20]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lumix]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lumix dmc-ts1]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ocean]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[panasonic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[summermodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[underwater]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 03 Sep 2009 21:30:26 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5352296&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[DXG-U579VS $150 Waterproof HD Camcorder Review]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/dxg_waterproof_camera.JPG"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_dxg_waterproof_camera.JPG" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>This is one of the worst waterproof cameras I have ever used, even if its the cheapest and does 720p video. Maybe you can recommend it to a merman you hate?</p>

<h1>Price</h1>
<p>$150</p>
<h1>Waterproofness</h1>
<p>Because it lives in its own magic bubble housing, its good for 15-feet. That's good, but not great. The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5342210/canon-powershot-d10-waterproof-camera-review-dive-dive-dive">Canon D10</a> is good for 30 feet, and most other waterproof cameras are good for this depth without a housing.</p>
<h1>The Photos</h1>
<p>I won't go too in depth here as the photos speak for themselves:<br>
<script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5349873,6,'');
</script><br>
Barfy color, contrast and grain. It's really a video camera that can record at 1280x720 (or, 720p) at 30 frames per second in h.264. There's 4x zoom, and it starts fairly zoomed in, making me wish it had image stabilization. It has an LED for lighting videos, though. The stills were 5MP, for whatever that's worth.</p>
<p><object width="502" height="377" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=6370175&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=6370175&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="377" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/6370175.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_6370175.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display: none;"/></a></p>
<h1>The Designs</h1>
<p>Inside of its case, you can't do much. You can't power it down and up, either, so I ended up getting a bit of moisture in the case. No biggie, since its no loss if this thing drowns. Oh, you know what else is terrible? The thing is, like many camcorder housings, permanently stuck in a flipped out screen position, so packing this thing is a chore.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/gizplus3.jpg" height="20" width="20">720p video<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/gizplus3.jpg" height="20" width="20">Cheap, but only a few bucks less than the much nicer <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5341317/fujifilm-finepix-z33wp-waterproof-cam-review-small-and-smooth-like-a-sea-stone">Fuji Waterproof</a>. So...<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/gizminus.jpg" height="20" width="20">External housing<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/gizminus.jpg" height="20" width="20">Worst images of any underwater camera<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/gizminus.jpg" height="20" width="20">Not very waterproof considering the bulky housing</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.dxgusa.com/products/high-definition-camcorders/dxg-u579vs.html">DXG</a>]</p>
<p><em><a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/summermodo">Summermodo</a> is a chance for Giz to get outside and test our gear where it belongs.</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5349882/dxg+u579vs-150-waterproof-hd-camcorder-review]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5349882]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dxg waterproof camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dxg-u579vs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ocean]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sea]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[summermodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waves]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 31 Aug 2009 22:40:08 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5349882&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sonim XP3 Review: Boiled Alive]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/top.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_top.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>You might not know it, but you've heard about the XP3: It's that phone that's always getting <a href="http://gizmodo.com/331049/videoworlds-toughest-phone-christened-with-car-wheels-and-beer-baths">drenched</a>, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5306480/land-rover-s1-phone-tested-by-elephants-it-really-is-the-strongest-phone">elephant-smooshed</a> or <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5161033/can-the-sonim-xp1-cellphone-really-survive-a-9mm-shot">shot</a>, and surviving. Well, I finally got one, and the timing <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/taste-test">couldn't be better</a>. XP3, <em>I'm going to eat you.</em></p>

<h1>The Price</h1>
<p>The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SONIM XP3" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/sonim-xp3/">Sonim XP3</a> is <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/sonim">by no means</a> a new phone, either as a product or a piece of technology. For the US, though, it's still semi-fresh: It's just been announced on regional carriers around the country, and as of last week you <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5342669/sonims-absurdly-tough-xp3-lands-in-the-us-400-unlocked">can pick one up unlocked</a> for about $400 at Best Buy.</p>
<h1>The Verdict</h1>
<p>As you can see, this thing is a <em>brick</em>. It's a heavy, Tonka-yellow slab of plastic and rubber that sometimes makes calls, sends texts and visits a website or two. In a way it's the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5279250/dumb-cellphones-must-die">ultimate dumbphone</a>: It's not <em>annoyingly</em> dumb&mdash;it's actually got a decently attractive UI, and it's worlds easier to use than the not-as-tough <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5154786/casio-verizon-boulder-gzone-waterproof-cellphone-snowmodo-review">Casio G'zOne</a>&mdash;and the battery life is conversely related to the phone's feature set, just like it should be. (I've been playing with this thing on and off for more than a week, and I still don't need to charge it.) Also, of course, it's tough, like all my favorite dumb people. It's the anti-iPhone, and not necessarily in a bad way.</p>
<p>When I say tough, I don't mean to say this is a phone for people who go through a lot of handsets, or hate that their Pre's backplate keeps getting scratched&mdash;this is in a different league, for a different type of human: Do you work on an oil rig? As a stuntman? Underwater, sometimes? Did you sign a 100-page insurance waiver before starting your current job? Have you ever watched a coworker get crushed to death, along with his phone? No?</p>
<p>Ok, but would you like the option to occasionally cook your phone?</p>
<h1>Spaghetti con Tele</h1>
<p>Gallery or video, take your pick:<br>
<script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5347088,4,'Cooking With the XP3');
</script></p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("/sonimxp3.flv", 506, 376,"");
</script><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/stills/sonimxp3.flv.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_sonimxp3.flv.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display: none;"/></a></p>
<p>Sonim never claimed this wouldn't kill the phone, and the battery clearly states that it shouldn't be heated past 130 degrees. After a brief speaker fritz that solved itself, though, the XP3 works perfectly.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/gizplus_01.jpg" width="20" height="20">You can boil it, like pasta, for at least three minutes<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/gizplus_01.jpg" width="20" height="20">It's surprisingly pleasant to use, for what it is<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/gizplus_01.jpg" width="20" height="20">Battery lasts forever<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/giznormal_03.jpg" width="20" height="20">It's not terribly huge, but not thin either<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/giznormal_03.jpg" width="20" height="20">It's fundamentally ridiculous, though necessary for a select group of people<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/gizminus_03.jpg" width="20" height="20">No 3G, or major carriers (yet)<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/gizminus_03.jpg" width="20" height="20">Extremely hard to chew, even harder to pass<br clear="all"></p>
<p><i><a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/taste-test/">Taste Test</a> is our weeklong tribute to the leaps that occur when technology meets cuisine, spanning everything from the historic breakthroughs that made food tastier and safer to the Earl-Grey-friendly replicators we impatiently await in the future.</i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5347148/sonim-xp3-review-boiled-alive]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5347148]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dumbphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rugged]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rugged phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sonim]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sonim xp3]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sonim xp3 review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[taste test]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tough phones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xp3]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[yum]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 27 Aug 2009 20:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5347148&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Pentax W80 Camera Review: Waterproof and Now Slightly Ruggedized]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/pentax_optio_w80.JPG"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_pentax_optio_w80.JPG" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5302206/pentaxs-optio-w80-can-take-a-serious-beating">Pentax W80</a> is their latest in a long line of waterproof cams that take decent shots, but have always been my favorite because of their compact size. This one is a bit bigger, but gains ruggedization and depth.</p>

<p><strong>The Price:</strong> $300</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5336053,6,'');
</script></p>
<p><strong>The Photos and Video:</strong> In sample shots on our kiteboarding trip and at the local beach, the W80 was not the best but sill surprisingly good. Compared to periscoped lens setups, the traditional internal 5x zoom lens made the 12mp shots look sharper than most other waterproof cameras. The 28mm-140mm equivalent lens was sharp edge to edge with a touch more zoom than others in the roundup. Color was good, too.</p>
<p>But I noticed the lens was a little too slow to capture sharp motion underwater where light is rarer than on the surface. (The first sample shot I took in dim light triggered the flash where other models didn't need one.) Colors and exposure was fine, but the grunge resisting lens and lcd were only marginally helpful in combating substances like suntan lotion, grime and surfboard wax. Video is captured at up to 720p, but it didn't look so great. Face detection locked on pretty quickly, and there are several shake reduction capabilities, including digital and movie modes.</p>
<p><strong>The Design:</strong> The casing is still one of the smallest and is by far the most pocketable ruggedized model around, but its only good for drops up to 3.3 feet. Models by Lumix and Olympus are far more rugged, although more Hummer-esque, too. Pentax's various scene modes are amongst the most useful around, and there's an simple button to switch between them, but that button and menu is also the only way to easily switch between video and still mode. Quite a chore.</p>
<p>The camera could use a design refresh, in all honesty, and more metal. But it's also good for winter sports, rated to function down to 14 degrees. I liked Pentax's <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Pentax-88206-Floating-Wrist-Strap/dp/B001Q5Q62Y">optional floating wrist strap</a>, too.</p>
<p><strong>The Waterproofness:</strong> Good down to 16 feet, up from 13 feet in the last generation. Good enough for light to medium beach duty.</p>
<p><strong>The Recommendation:</strong> My favorite rugged-ish waterproof camera when size is a consideration.</p>
<p><br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/gizplus3.jpg" height="20" width="20">Compact considering its quasi-rugged chassis.</p>
<p><br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/gizplus3.jpg" height="20" width="20">Decent shot quality.</p>
<p><br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/gizminus.jpg" height="20" width="20">There are tougher cams out there that take better photos, but only slightly so in all regards.</p>
<p><br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/gizminus.jpg" height="20" width="20">Could use a redesign, since the W60, W40 and W20 had similar cases.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5302206/pentaxs-optio-w80-can-take-a-serious-beating">Giz</a>, <a href="http://www.pentaximaging.com/digital-camera/Optio_W80_-_Cardinal_Red/">Pentax</a>]</p>
<p><em><a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/summermodo">Summermodo</a> is a chance for Giz to get outside and test our gear where it belongs.</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5336015/pentax-w80-camera-review-waterproof-and-now-slightly-ruggedized]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5336015]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[lightning review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ocean]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[optio]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pentax]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Pentax W80 Review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sea]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[summermodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[underwater]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[w80]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5336015&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Laird Hamilton: Why I Surf With Music]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/LairdHamilton_WaterproofHeadphones_board_waxing_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/504x_LairdHamilton_WaterproofHeadphones_board_waxing_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></a><i><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged LAIRD HAMILTON" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/laird-hamilton/">Laird Hamilton</a> is as tech savvy as surfers get, using jet skis, kites and hydrofoils to have more fun on the waves. Here are his first experiences with waterproof music, and his discovery of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged H2O AUDIO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/h2o-audio/">H2O Audio</a> earphones and iPod cases:</i></p>
<p>The thing about the water is that a lot of times you have other people out so having music to listen to is a way to block out people's questions. Kidding aside, it's one way to be in your own little world.</p>
<p>I use music in my regimen when it involves anything with long distances&mdash;if I'm doing a really long crossing, or something that's going to take me a while, music is a good distraction. It's a way to kinda let time go by.</p>
<p>Then I found that surfing with the right song creates a whole other situation that you don't have when you're not listening to the music. It's almost like you use a different part of your brain than you normally would without music. Sometimes I feel like things slow down, and I have more time to do maneuvers and to observe what's happening. (I'm not sure if there's any scientific research on that.)</p>
<p>Obviously, when waves are at 80 feet and our lives are on the line, we're not listening to music. We need to hear what's going on and, being put in a demanding situation, we need to be able to communicate. But we do it a lot on our foil boards&mdash;those hydrofoil boards that we ride&mdash;and again, with the right song, it's a little bit like a movie with a soundtrack. Music just really turns it into a whole different experience.</p>
<p>Before H2O Audio and the iPod, we had music. We were hungry in the early days, so we had the Walkman. They made a little case for a Walkman, with some earphones. We've been using music in surfing and paddling since it first became available in any form.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/Laird_Standup_paddling_with_H2O.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/504x_Laird_Standup_paddling_with_H2O.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></a></p>
<p><i><a href="http://www.lairdhamilton.com/">Laird Hamilton</a> has been a surfing hero since the 1980s, solidifying his reputation as the king of big wave surfing when <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laird_Hamilton">he conquered Tahiti's Teahupo'o Reef</a> at its most perilous in August 2000. As an innovator, he pioneered many new activities including kitesurfing, tow-in surfing and hydrofoil boarding. He's on the board of directors at <a href="http://h2oaudio.com/">H2O Audio</a>, makers of pro-level waterproof iPhone and iPod cases, and has his own signature line of <a href="http://h2oaudio.com/waterproof_headphones.php">Surge waterproof earphones</a>, proceeds of which are donated to the <a href="http://www.beautifulsonfoundation.org/">Beautiful Son foundation</a> for autism education.</i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5331941/laird-hamilton-why-i-surf-with-music]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5331941]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[surfing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[h2o audio]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[headphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laird hamilton]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[summermodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[surfblogger]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[surge headphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laird Hamilton]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5331941&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Accidentally Take Your Gadget Swimming? Rice Might Be Your Best Friend]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/thumb160x_201c493fe2fefe2a54d7b91bc4cc4dff.png" class="left image158" width="158">Who hasn't accidentally left a phone, camera or MP3 player in a swimsuit pocket and gone swimming? It's a harrowing experience, but there's hope: Dunking the gadget in rice is a somewhat surprising yet very effective drying method.</p>
<p>We've all soaked a not-so-waterproof gadget or two, and we know that lots of them can come back to life after a few days of drying, albeit sometimes with some unfortunate damage. But dunking a wet gadget in a container of rice (provided the surrounding environment is humidity-free) can absorb excess moisture and reduce the possibility of damage, which can come in handy in these glorious summer months that are so fraught with danger for our beloved gadgetry. Not that we're suggesting you take your iPhone along with you for a surf, but if you do, this (and more suggestions at <a href="http://lifehacker.com/269427/dry-out-your-soaked-gadgets-in-rice">Lifehacker</a>) might save your gadget's life. [<a href="http://lifehacker.com/269427/dry-out-your-soaked-gadgets-in-rice">Lifehacker</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5331913/accidentally-take-your-gadget-swimming-rice-might-be-your-best-friend]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5331913]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[summermodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[drying]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[moisture]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rice]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rice gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[soak]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[swimming]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wet]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 06 Aug 2009 22:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5331913&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Waterproof Conductive Earbuds Vibrate Your Skull]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/003.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/504x_003.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></a>Thanko's new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged EMP-708LITE VONIA" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/emp_708lite-vonia/">EMP-708LITE Vonia</a> earbuds work by actually vibrating the bones of your skull, which is then picked up by your brain and processed as recognizable music. They are, quite literally, skull-rattling 'buds.</p>
<p>What's remarkable (and remarkably Thanko-like) about these is the price: Similarly designed headphones, often not waterproof at all, run for <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Zelco-Industries-Inc-3312-Earphone/dp/B0014KM2EW/ref=pd_cp_e_1">well over $100</a>, while these are only 4280 Yen (about $45). They're waterproof down to 5 meters, which makes them great for workout swimmers (or snorkelers, I guess). Unfortunately, they're Japan-only for now, so we'll have to keep making due with significantly less cool waterproof 'buds. [<a href="http://www.thanko.jp/product/voniaearphone_lite/">Thanko</a> via <a href="http://www.newlaunches.com/archives/thanko_bone_waterproof_conduction_earphones.php">New Launches</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5330914/waterproof-conductive-earbuds-vibrate-your-skull]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5330914]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[audio]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[earbuds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[emp-708lite vonia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[thanko]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vibrate]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vonia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof conductive earbuds]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 05 Aug 2009 19:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5330914&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Pentax's WS80 Budget Waterproof Camera Kind of Can't Swim]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/WS80_1_LR.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/504x_WS80_1_LR.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></a>Pentax's Waterproof cameras are <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5038693/review-pentax-w60-waterproof-camera-catching-whale-sharks">super pocketable</a>, and so I love them, but the WS80 is only rated for 5 feet. That's no better than their first gen w10 model and far worse than their W80 model rated at 16 feet.</p>

<p>It's good enough for a casual splash in a pool or a river swim, but not worthy of a lake or ocean jaunt. The camera has a 10mp rating, and does 720p video at 30fps, which is good news. It also has face detection and some forms of shake reduction including a movie version, and an ISO equivalent of 6400 (but like all high ISO point and shoots, I wouldn't count on that being very grain free.) The lens is a 35mm equivalent of 35-175mm.</p>
<p>Huh, weird. It also has a small face filter, that makes people with big faces look more attractive.</p>
<p>At $250, I might go up to a higher end waterproof camera or buy last year's model used.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>PENTAX UNVEILS NEW WATERPROOF COMPACT WS80:<br>
Dunkable, Affordable Optio WS80 Sports Bold Colors</p>
<p>GOLDEN, CO. (August 5, 2009)…A bold, new waterproof digital camera jumped into the swimming pool today. PENTAX Imaging Company announced the Optio WS80, the newest contender in the durable, affordable digital camera category.<br>
Available in two bold, his-and-her's designs, the water and dustproof Optio WS80 is a perfect choice for travel, outdoor activities and families. Featuring a 10 megapixel CCD and a 5X internal optical zoom housed in a slim, palm-sized body that is less than an inch thick, the Optio WS80 has a large 2.7 inch LCD with 230,000 dot resolution for easy composition. With waterproof construction that can withstand depths up to five feet (1.5 meters), the Optio WS80 captures underwater photos and video including high resolution, widescreen, HD video up to 720p at a full-speed 30 frames per second. Other features include:<br>
• Fast Face Detection technology sees up to 32 faces in as little as 0.03 of a second for easy portrait photography.<br>
• Smile Capture automatically releases the shutter when a subject smiles and Blink Detection alerts the photographer if the subject's eyes are closed during the exposure.<br>
• PENTAX Shake Reduction (SR) technology features Pixel Track SR, Digital SR, and Movie SR, stabilizing your images and video for beautiful, blur-free results.<br>
• PENTAX Auto Picture mode automatically selects from eight shooting modes for beautiful images in any setting.<br>
• Sensitivity up to ISO 6400 boosts shutter speeds to freeze subject movement for blur-free images even in low lighting.</p>
<p>Available in two eye-catching color options, black with orange accents or white with purple accents, the PENTAX Optio WS80 will ship in September 2009 for $249.95 USD.<br>
More information is available here: www.pentaximaging.com.<br>
Product images are available here: http://www.pentaximaging.com/press/pressfiles.html<br>
PENTAX Imaging Company is an innovative leader in the production of a variety of digital cameras including weather resistant digital SLRs and compact, waterproof cameras, as well as lenses, flash units, binoculars, scopes, and eyepieces. For 90 years, PENTAX has developed durable, reliable products that meet the needs of consumers and businesses.  With headquarters in Golden, Colorado, PENTAX Imaging Company is a division of PENTAX of America, Inc.<br>
# # #</p>
<p>Consumer contact:<br>
pentaxinfo@pentax.com<br>
1-800-877-0155<br>
http://www.youtube.com/pentaxian1</p>
<p>PENTAX Optio WS80 Major Features<br>
Exceptional waterproof performance for underwater shooting and adventure The palm-sized Optio WS80 assures reliable waterproof performance that allows underwater photography up to five feet for up two hours (JIS Class 8 standard). The WS80 also features the PENTAX-exclusive, highly water-repellent SP (Super Protect) coating on the protective glass panel that covers the zoom lens. As a result, the Optio WS80 may be rinsed clean with fresh water if it becomes covered with dirt or sand. Coupled with remarkable dustproof capabilities equivalent to JIS Class 6, the Optio WS80 may be used without worry in many different situations where water or dirt is a major concern.  High-quality images delivered by 10.0 effective megapixels Combining 10.0 effective megapixels with the PENTAX-developed imaging engine and high-performance PENTAX zoom lens, the Optio WS80 produces brilliant, high-resolution prints with edge-to-edge sharpness even when images are enlarged.<br>
High-performance optical 5X zoom lens The slim, palm-sized Optio WS80 features an optical 5X zoom lens covering focal lengths from 35mm to 175mm in the 35mm format. The camera offers an Intelligent Zoom function that extends the zoom range up to approximately 28.5X for even tighter zooming in on the subject.<br>
High-quality, widescreen, HD movie recording The Optio WS80 captures beautiful, flawless HD movie clips at 16:9 aspect ratio (1280 x 720 pixels)* at a frame rate of 30 frames per second. The camera also comes equipped with advanced, user-friendly features designed to facilitate movie recording: the Movie SR (Shake Reduction) mode, which automatically compensates for camera shake during movie shooting; and the Underwater Movie mode, which automatically optimizes color settings for underwater movie shooting. *When the Optio WS80's AV output terminal is used, movie clips are output as normal image-size data. If the user wishes to play back movie clips at high-definition-TV proportions (1280 x 720 pixels), the data must be transferred to a personal computer for playback.<br>
High-speed Face Detection, with a range of user-friendly features The Optio WS80's advanced Face Detection AF & AE function captures 32 faces in sharp focus and perfect exposure in a mere 0.03 seconds. It also accurately detects a subject facing the camera at an angle or with a tilted head. The Optio WS80 offers other user-friendly features, including:<br>
• A Smile Capture mode automatically releases the shutter the moment the camera detects the subject's smile.<br>
• A Blink Detection function warns the photographer when a subject's eyes close at the time of shutter release.<br>
• A Small Face filter helps reduce a subject's face so that it appears smaller in proportion to the body to produce more flattering well-balanced portraits.</p>
<p>PENTAX OPTIO WS80 FACT SHEET CONTINUED</p>
<p>Triple anti-shake protection to prevent different types of camera shake Pixel Track SR mode<br>
When recording still images, the Optio WS80's Pixel Track SR (Shake Reduction) mode effectively compensates for camera shake by processing affected images.<br>
High-Sensitivity SR mode*<br>
When it detects low-lighting conditions in still-image shooting, the Optio WS80 automatically raises its sensitivity to as high as ISO 6400, making it possible to use a higher shutter speed. This effectively minimizes the adverse effects of camera shake and subject motion blur under poor lighting conditions.<br>
Movie SR mode**<br>
During movie recording, the Optio WS80 prevents blurry images by effectively minimizing annoying camera shake.<br>
* When the High-Sensitivity SR mode is selected, the recorded size is fixed to 5M (2592 x 1944 pixels). ** When the Movie SR mode is selected, the angle of view becomes narrower than normal shooting.  Large 2.7 inch LCD monitor for effortless image viewing The Optio WS80 features a large 2.7 inch extra bright color LCD monitor so photographers may view on-screen images, menus and mode-settings with ease while shooting and during playback. <br>
Additional Features:<br>
• Interval shooting mode, convenient for fixed-point observation of starry skies, flowers and plants<br>
• High-speed 9 point AF system, with Auto-Tracking function, to maintain constant focus on a moving subject<br>
• Auto Picture mode automatically selects one of eight shooting modes for the optimum results in a wide variety of shooting conditions<br>
• A variety of digital filters including Toy Camera and Retro to add distinctive visual effects to recorded images<br>
• Dynamic Range adjustment prevents overexposed and underexposed areas in images<br>
• Digital Wide function creates a panoramic, extra-wide-angle image (equivalent to an image taken with an approx. 25.4mm lens in 35mm format) from two images<br>
• Digital Panorama mode creates a single panoramic picture from as many as three images<br>
• Style Watch function displays the time with pushbutton operation, even when the camera's power is turned off<br>
• Image recovery function recovers accidentally erased images<br>
• Frame composite function (with 90 frames stored in the camera) shoots or composes images with decorative photo frames</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5330991/pentaxs-ws80-budget-waterproof-camera-kind-of-cant-swim]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5330991]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pentax]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pentax ws80]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[summermodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ws80]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 05 Aug 2009 18:49:44 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5330991&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[GoPro Hero Wide Helmet Cam Gets Upgraded With 1080p, 720p Slo-Mo]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_gopro_hd.jpg" class="left image500" width="500">Brian enthusiastically called the original SD Hero helmet camera, an easy-to-use wide-angle shooter, "<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5181155/gopro-hero-wide-sports-camera-lightning-review">cheap and amazing</a>." With 1080p recording and 720p slow motion capability, GoPro's new Hero sacrifices a little of that first adjective for a <em>ton</em> of the second.</p>

<p>Cosmetically, the HD Hero is basically indistinguishable from the previous version, and the similarities run deep: it's got the same 170° field of view, an identical 5MP still shooting mode and the same water-resistant credentials. But hardware performance has been bolstered elsewhere, with support for 30fps shooting in 1080p mode and 60fps shooting in 720p, all powered by a larger 1100mAh Li-Ion battery for up to three hours of recording per charge.</p>
<p>For such a large performance jump on such a new camera a price hike is inevitable, but it's really not <em>that</em> bad. The $300 price is at least in the same <em>range</em> as the $200 base model, and judging by the previous model, I'd expect the footage&mdash;especially in the 720p slo-mo mode&mdash;to be fairly spectacular. [<a href="http://helmetcameracentral.com/2009/07/22/gopro-hd-high-def-helmet-cam-announce/">HelmetCameraCentral</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/23/gopro-offers-1080p-high-def-in-a-little-helmetcam-with-the-hd-he/">Engadget</a>&mdash;<em>Image from <a href="http://freeskier.com/">Freeskier Mag</a></em>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5321155/gopro-hero-wide-helmet-cam-gets-upgraded-with-1080p-720p-slo+mo]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5321155]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[helmet cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gopro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gopro hd hero wide]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gopro hero]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sports]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5321155&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Does the S in iPhone 3GS Stand for Submarine?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_qbWjaW25mQ&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_qbWjaW25mQ&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5302655/does-the-s-in-iphone-3gs-stand-for-submarine">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a>Sure, this video <i>must</i> be fake, but the sound is so clear I find hard to believe that it is inside a case. Then again, I find even harder to believe that any iPhone can survive this.</p>
<p>There's only one way to know the truth: Get your <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged IPHONE 3GS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphone-3gs/">iPhone 3GS</a> to the pool today, submerge it for a few seconds, and tell us. Come on. You know you want to do it. Send me your test video to jesus@gizmodo.com.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5302655/does-the-s-in-iphone-3gs-stand-for-submarine]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5302655]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone 3gs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[submarine]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[submersible]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[swimming pool]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[water proof]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 25 Jun 2009 19:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5302655&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Toughcam Battle: Canon PowerShot D10 vs. Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS1]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/04/toughcams-TOP-.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/toughcams-TOP-.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>Both <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5163883/panasonic-lumix-ts1-would-be-iron-mans-tough-camera">Panasonic</a> and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5163875/canon-d10-submarine-toughcam-love-it-but-hate-it">Canon</a> announced their first water- and shock-proof compact toughcams earlier this year, and we've taken them underwater for a test. Which is better for capturing your summertime antics both wet AND wild?</p>
<p>Let me say first that I did not use either of these cameras in their ideal conditions&mdash;namely, outside, underwater while swimming. For some reason, Canon and <a class="tagautolink autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged PANASONIC" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/panasonic/">Panasonic</a> did not tailor the release dates of these cameras to coincide with my trip to Egypt a few months ago, which is where I wanted to test them out (why not guys??). Back here in New York, any outdoor body of water is way too frigid right now, and there's something pretty creepy and ultimately unacceptable about taking an underwater camera to the YMCA for test shots. So, instead of the verdant coral reefs of the Red Sea off the Sinai coast, which were straight out of <em>Planet Earth</em>, our test shots are of me playing with a Kraken Attackin' Lego Pirates playset in my kitchen sink. Which is a cool playset, but, you know, not the same.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('toughcamsprod', 16, '');
</script></p>
<p>But still, we've gathered enough data I think to inform your decision, if you're thinking of picking up a waterproof toughcam for this summer. Here are the main points of differentiation I see:</p>
<p><strong>Form Factor/Interface</strong><br>
Both cameras are waterproof, but the Canon D10 is protected up to 10 meters (around 32 feet), where the Panasonic TS1 is only protected up to three meters (around 10 feet). And that's immediately apparent in their shapes:</p>
<p>The D10 looks like it was designed by Ringo on the set of <em>Yellow Submarine</em>&mdash;its bulbous shell and porthole-like screws drive home the fact that this baby is going underwater. But on land, it'll be tough to fit it into a pants pocket without some serious bulging.</p>
<p>It does have some nice, easy-to-press buttons for changing into video mode, for instance, and the icons on the LCD screen are nice and big, easily spotted through a snorkeling mask. There are some superfluous button presses to lock in settings which could be tedious underwater, but the UI is not horrible, and you'll easily get used to it. The D10 also has come big screw-mounts on each corner for mounting various underwater grips and other accessories that you can buy from Canon.</p>
<p>The TS1 takes a totally different approach, with a sleek rectangular slab shape that at first glance is hard to distinguish from regular non-tough weeniecams. The buttons are a bit smaller, but not prohibitively so, and shootings modes are selected with a thumb dial instead of dedicated buttons&mdash;I didn't see anything I couldn't operate with a bit of practice while snorkeling. A basic locking wrist-strap comes in the box.</p>
<p>The important thing is that the TS1 is not at all out of place in non-toughcam situations, where the D10 may be. But if you're a deep snorkeler, three meters may not be enough for you compared to the D10's 10 meters (I imagine if you're a serious SCUBA diver, you'll need something beefier than either of these), but where you lose usability under water with the TS1 you will gain it on land. Consider that.</p>
<p><strong>Video</strong><br>
Another big difference, if not the biggest, is that the Panasonic TS1 shoots 720p in the AVCHD format, where the Canon only does 640x480 VGA vids. The TS1 video recording mode isn't the most polished&mdash;there's a good two to three second delay from when you hit the dedicated video button to when recording actually starts and stops, and it's unclear exactly when everything does start, but if you're OK with that, the HD video mode is awesome. I mean, underwater HD in such a tiny package&mdash;that's a no-brainer right? I would kill to have some HD clips of my friends and I swimming around in crazy schools of neon fish in Egypt.</p>
<p>Here are some sample clips from the sink:</p>
<p>TS1 720P Clip:<br>
<object width="506" height="380" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=4399968&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=4399968&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="506" height="380" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object><br clear="all"></p>
<p>Note: There is a current bug with the TS1 that makes video imported into iMovie '08 and '09 play at double speed. I had to do some conversion to avoid this, which is a pain. Panasonic says they're working with Apple on this to include a fix in future versions of iMovie.</p>
<p>Canon D10 VGA Clip:<br>
<object width="506" height="380" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=4400044&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=4400044&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="506" height="380" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object><br clear="all"></p>
<p>Keep in mind that the AVCHD format is kind of annoying, in that you might have to install special codecs and import video straight into your video editing software of choice and then export it in friendlier formats, rather than just grabbing an AVI or MOV clip from the memory card and uploading it to YouTube.</p>
<p>And yeah, the quality of these videos is pretty bad, but the difference in the actual output is clear: 720p underwater rules.</p>
<p><strong>Shooting</strong><br>
Both cameras are 12-megapixels, for full-res shots at 4000x3000. Both have the same size CCD sensor, but the TS1's ISO goes up to 6400 where the Canon D10's only to 1600. I didn't do a thorough sensitivity test with either camera, but I would imagine you don't want to go much higher than 800 on either one, so the difference is probably fairly moot.</p>
<p>A difference that does matter is the TS1's wider-angle lens: it's a 28mm-128mm f/3.3-f/5.9 effective focal length zoom, compared to the D10's 35mm-105mm f/2.8-f/4.9.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('ts1testshots', 9, 'TS1 Sample Shots');
</script></p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('d10testshots', 9, 'D10 Sample Shots');
</script></p>
<p>As you can see, color reproduction via the TS1's Leica lens is far better than the D10s, which has to fight through a bit more protective plastic. Also, the TS1 tends to autofocus underwater with much greater ease&mdash;important, because you won't always be able to look at the LCD when composing shots while snorkeling.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion</strong><br>
Like I said, I only played with these cameras in the sink, so I didn't push their waterproof capabilities to their max. But having a waterproof and shockproof camera around the house is kind of cool in its own right&mdash;imagine taking bath time photos of your kid without having to worry about getting the camera wet, or taking shots with dirty hands while you're barbecuing, or anything like that. You can always dunk these cameras underwater to clean them off. It's nice. You don't have to be a snorkeler to use them and have fun with them.</p>
<p>Which is why for me, the balance shifts heavily toward the Panasonic TS1. Its form factor makes using it on land a lot more convenient, and the added HD video option is a huge plus. And my ears hurt if I go down much further than three meters underwater anyway. At a premium of only $70 ($400 list vs. $330 for the D10), I'd say it's well worth spending up for.</p>
<p><strong>Panasonic Lumix DSC-TS1</strong><br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/gizplusplus.jpg">HD video capture<br clear="all">
<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/gizplusplus.jpg">Unobtrusive form factor good for both land and sea<br clear="all">
<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/gizplus3.jpg">28mm wide-angle lens<br clear="all">
<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/giznormal.jpg">Buttons perhaps more difficult to use underwater<br clear="all">
<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/gizminus.jpg">Only waterproof up to 3 meters<br clear="all"></p>
<p><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged CANON POWERSHOT D10" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/canon-powershot-d10/">Canon PowerShot D10</a></strong><br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/gizplus3.jpg">Super-rugged body waterproof up to 10 meters<br clear="all">
<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/gizplus3.jpg">Big, simple buttons and LCD icons<br clear="all">
<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/gizminus.jpg">Only shoots video at 640x480<br clear="all">
<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/gizminus.jpg">Very bulky</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5232843/toughcam-battle-canon-powershot-d10-vs-panasonic-lumix-dmc+ts1]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5232843]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[battlemodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[canon powershot d10]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[d10]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dmc-ts1]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[leica]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lumix]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[panasonic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[panasonic lumix DMC-TS1]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[summer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[toughcams]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ts1]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Mahoney]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5232843&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 Waterproof Camera: Snowmodo Review]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/02/Olympus_Stylus_6000_Tough_in_snow_sm.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/Olympus_Stylus_6000_Tough_in_snow_sm.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a><b>The Gadget:</b> Olympus' waterproof, shockproof, coldproof&mdash;and hot-tubproof&mdash;10-megapixel pocket cam with new controls that work when you are gloved and freezing, as I discovered over the past weekend in Park City, UT.</p>

<p><b>The Price:</b> $300</p>
<p><b>The Verdict:</b> The Stylus Tough 6000 is waterproof to 10 feet, shockproof to 5 feet, can withstand temperatures as low as 14 degrees Fahrenheit. In this camera, Olympus even acknowledges the fact that its xD format is pretty much useless, and includes a MicroSD adapter, so you can buy a much more useful MicroSD card instead. (I used a 4GB SDHC one for this test, and didn't notice any performance holdbacks.)</p>
<p>As much as the puke yellow finish didn't really go over well with the rest of my ski party, it's easy to see in the snow, one of many characteristics that jive with Blam's <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5151091/snowmodo-the-secret-to-making-good-snow-gadgets">key requirements for a good snow gadget</a>. It did get a little scratched up as you can see in the gallery, but the scratches were superficial, and kinda made it look tough.</p>
<p>Besides sheer durability, Oly added some great UI enhancements. I typically don't give Olympus much credit for UI, but the main controls are straightforward and the icon-based menu is less confusing than the menu on most cameras.</p>
<p>I didn't have much trouble controlling the camera with heavy gloves on&mdash;the zoom buttons and scroll wheel are laid out correctly for that&mdash;but the UI addition that makes this a real Snowmodo contender is the tap control: You toggle between shooting and reviewing, and change flash and macro settings, just by tapping the sides and top of the camera. It sounds weird, and at first it's a little confusing, but it takes just minutes to figure out, and once you do, you'll love it.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('olytough6000', 6, '');
</script></p>
<p>One big problem I ran into was that video resolution and frame rate were both set, as a default, to the lowest specs (QVGA, 15fps). So the video you see below is a little choppy and low-res, in spite of the fact that I could've shot 30fps VGA. I didn't realize how bad my video was&mdash;and how much better it could have been&mdash;until after our days on the slopes had ended. The fact that there's no HD sucks in this day and age, but I am sure Oly will get there soon. BTW, someone a lot better (at skiing) than me shot this:</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("/olydownhillrun_giz.flv", 475, 376,"");
</script><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/stills/olydownhillrun_giz.flv.jpg" style="display:block;display: none;"></p>
<p>Camera wise, there were some great things and some not-so-good things. It's a basic 10-megapixel 3.6x optical zoom with a <i>great</i> wide-angle setting for one-armed self portraits and shooting in tight areas. I am partial to including the sun in outdoor shots because I like lens flares, but in this case, the optics were a little weird: During video shooting, the lens flare was a blinding bar, straight up and down, and in the still shot, I got the mushy pink flare you can in one of the following four sample shots:</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('olytough6000shots', 4, '');
</script></p>
<p>And though the 6000 is good for most daytime outdoor shooting, it's no good indoors without a flash or tons of ambient light, meaning it's not the best choice for everyday use. To pay $300 for a camera you only use on vacations might sting a bit, but hey, if you're into destination-oriented pursuits like snorkeling and snowboarding, $300 for a great beat-around camera might sound pretty reasonable. [<a href="http://www.olympusamerica.com/cpg_section/product.asp?product=1446">Olympus Product Page</a>]</p>
<p><em><a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/snowmodo">Snowmodo</a> is our snow sport winter meet up at Lake Tahoe, with prizes, discounts, tons of fun snow activities, a party and GADGETS. If you can make it (and people are coming from TEXAS) please <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5143084/gizs-snowmodo-reader-meetup-april-4th-northstar-at-tahoe">RSVP</a>. I'll let you wear my hat (below).</em> <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5143084/gizs-snowmodo-reader-meetup-april-4th-northstar-at-tahoe"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/snowmodo2009.jpg" width="804" height="264" style="display: block; float: none;"></a></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/newhat.jpg" height="240" width="320"></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5155279/olympus-stylus-tough-6000-waterproof-camera-snowmodo-review]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5155279]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[6000]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[olympus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[olympus stylus tough 6000]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rugged]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ruggedized]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shockproof]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[snowmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[stylus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tough]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5155279&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Waterproof Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS1 is the Toughbook of Digital Cameras]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/ft1_02.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Built by a company with some experience at <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5019770/what-doesnt-break-a-toughbook-makes-it-stronger-how-they-test-the-hell-out-of-them">making things that aren't flimsy</a>, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS1 is a waterproof, dustproof and shockproof point-and-shoot camera for the outdoorsy and/or clumsy type.</p>
<p>Nearly every aspect of the TS1 was designed with rugged use in mind: the airtight shell, reinforced with rubber padding, glass and carbon resin is purported to protect the camera during underwater use at depths of up to ten feet and falls onto a hard surface from five.</p>
<p>Now for the spec pile: the TS1 shoots stills at 12.1 megapixels and video at 720p. effective lens length is an ample 28mm-128mm, the aperture opens to a 3.3-5.9 maximum size, ISO notches all the way up to 6400 and the maximum shutter speed is 1/1300. A 2.7-inch, 230,000-dot LCD adorns the back of the slim(ish) 3.87 x 2.49 x 0.91 body, and the standard facial recognition, image stabilization and creative mode features are all present.</p>
<p>The TS1 will ship in April for $400, which doesn't sound so bad considering what a solid travel camera this could make. See the whole presser below. <em>Note: Panasonic hasn't yet released press images for this product, <a href="http://www.letsgodigital.org/nl/21218/panasonic-lumix-dmc-ft1/">but the FT1</a>, pictured above, is the European equivalent to the TS1 and is, for all intents and purposes, identical. Picture from <a href="http://www.letsgodigital.org/nl/21218/panasonic-lumix-dmc-ft1/">LetsGoDigital</a>.</em> [<a href="http://www.panasonic.com/lumix">Panasonic</a>]</p>
<blockquote>
<p>PANASONIC INTRODUCES WORLD'S FIRST*1 WATERPROOF, SHOCKPROOF AND DUSTPROOF DIGITAL CAMERA<br>
WITH AVCHD LITE HD VIDEO RECORDING CAPABILITIES*2</p>
<p>New LUMIX DMC-TS1 Digital Camera Features Tough and Rugged Design for Capturing Still and Motion Images In Outdoor Activities</p>
<p>MIAMI, FL (January 27, 2009) – Panasonic today introduced the LUMIX DMC-TS1, the world's first*1 waterproof, shockproof and dustproof digital camera*2 to also feature AVCHD Lite High Definition (HD) video recording capabilities*3. The TS1's tough and rugged design makes it the ideal choice for active users needing the ultimate hybrid for capturing both still and motion images during outdoor activities. The LUMIX TS1, with a 12.1 megapixel resolution, features a 28mm wide-angle LEICA DC VARIO-ELMAR lens, a 4.6x optical zoom and Panasonic's proprietary iA (Intelligent Auto) mode, making this an easy-to-use, yet powerful camera that packs advanced imaging features.</p>
<p>"Many consumers are hesitant to take their digital cameras on outdoor activities like skiing, hiking, boating or even a day at the beach, for fear it will be damaged. With the introduction of the LUMIX TS1, we offer a digital camera with a rugged design that consumers can feel confident using in these tough environments," said David Briganti, National Marketing Manager, Imaging, Panasonic Consumer Electronics Company. "Even more, with the ability to take both beautiful high-quality still images and High Definition video, with AVCHD Lite, the TS1 offers a powerful one-two punch to capture memories that can later be shared with friends and family."</p>
<p>The TS1 is waterproof to a depth of 10 feet, shockproof from falls up to 5 feet, and dustproof. With its rubber padding, reinforced glass and carbon resins inside the camera, the TS1 features an airtight body protected against water immersion, dust and sand.</p>
<p>Starting at the 28mm wide angle, and zooming up to a useful 128mm in telephoto, the TS1 gives users the flexibility for a variety of shooting environments – especially underwater, where movement is often restricted and the angle of view becomes important for composing shots. The TS1 also features a 2.7-inch, 230,000-dot Intelligent LCD with a wide viewing angle, enhancing visibility during recording and playback by automatic brightness control according to the environment's lighting conditions. Plus, the TS1's LCD panel is deliberately thickened for protection against pressure, allowing the display to operate with clear visibility even underwater.</p>
<p>The TS1 records AVCHD Lite HD video, allowing almost double the recording time in HD quality compared with the conventional Motion JPEG format. The TS1 also features Dolby Digital Creator to record high quality audio to match the high-quality motion images.</p>
<p>Also new in 2009, the TS1 features iA mode for both still images and in Movie Mode. For iA in Movie Mode, the TS1 features Optical Image Stabilization (O.I.S.), which helps prevent handshake when using high-powered zoom. Face Detection automatically detects a face in a frame and adjusts focus, exposure, contrast, and skin complexion on the face. Intelligent Exposure continually checks the ambient light level and adjusts the exposure setting as conditions change to prevent blown highlights and blocked shadows. And Intelligent Scene Selector automatically switches between Normal, Portrait, Macro, Scenery, and Low Light modes according to the situation to optimize visual quality. A Wind Cut function is also available to block out most of the noise from background wind. Optical zoom can be used in motion image recording. Users can start video recording by simply pressing a dedicated button on the camera's back panel.</p>
<p>The TS1's iA for still image adds Face Recognition*4 – a feature that "remembers" faces from previous shots. When a registered face appears in the frame, the camera will prioritize focus and exposure to capture it beautifully. With Face Recognition, when a familiar face is recorded several times, the camera will prompt you to register the face. Once registered, if the face appears into the frame again, the camera will display the name specified for that person and prioritize focus and exposure so that the registered face is bright and sharply focused.</p>
<p>The imaging power of LUMIX has further evolved with the Venus Engine HD, which boasts two CPUs to provide approx. 2.4x processing capability and support for Face Recognition, AVCHD Lite and HDMI output. It integrates the numerous advanced functions with high performance, and low-power consumption. Thanks to the Venus Engine HD, it's easy to view photos or movies recorded in AVCHD Lite. Simply insert the SD Memory Card from the camera in the Panasonic VIERA® HDTV's Image Viewer SD Memory Card slot to start playback, or connect the camera via an optional HDMI mini cable to a VIERA Link™-equipped Panasonic VIERA HDTV and use the TV's remote control to run slideshows*5.</p>
<p>This multi-task image-processing engine also enables a fast response time. The TS1 starts up quickly in 1.3 seconds and shutter release time lag is approximately 0.005 seconds, making it easy to capture sudden, spur-of-the-moment photo opportunities. The Flash Burst mode makes it possible to take consecutive shots with continuous emissions of the flash*6. The Venus Engine HD also supports a High Sensitivity mode that lets the TS1 record up to ISO 6400*7, sensitive enough to capture subjects in near-total darkness without using a flash. Despite its outstanding performance, the high performance engine is also more energy efficient, extending the battery life up to 340 shots (CIPA) per a single charge.</p>
<p>Other features of the LUMIX DMC-TS1 include:<br>
New Scene Modes for Still Images: Beach & Surf mode gives users a single mode with optimized auto white balance for optical shooting on the beach and in shallow water.<br>
New Panorama Assist scene mode allows users to shoot a number of consistent photos, either vertically or horizontally, by aligning them according to a guide that overlaps the screen. Then using those photos and the bundled PanoramaMaker software, users can create dramatic panoramic images.<br>
Increased Scene modes for both still and motion image shooting – optimized for a variety of situations. There are 26 scene modes for still image and 17 for motion image (Portrait, Soft Skin, Transform, Self portrait, Scenery, Low light, Food, Party, Candle light, Sunset, High sensitivity, Beach & Surf, Snow, Aerial, Pin hole, Film grain and Underwater)<br>
LED Illumination is available in motion image recording.<br>
High-Speed Burst (Speed Priority) that fires off approximately10 shots per second*8.<br>
Menus are clearer and easier to navigate with the Display Size option.<br>
Macro Zoom function lets users pull subjects even closer to capture dramatic close-up shots by using the 3x digital zoom in the wide-angle.<br>
Bundled Software: The latest version of PHOTOfunSTUDIO 3.0 HD Edition allows users to view, edit and archive captured content with greater ease and fun. Still and motion images can be transferred to the computer via a USB cable for viewing and archiving. Using PHOTOfunSTUDIO 3.0 HD Edition, users can edit and remove unwanted portions of video clips recorded in AVCHD Lite. Contents recorded in AVCHD Lite can be burned directly onto a DVD disc or converted to MPEG2 format. The software also incorporates the Face Recognition function, which recognizes registered faces in photos stored on the computer, making organizing and archiving photos with a specific person much easier. Additionally, motion pictures can be uploaded directly to YouTube.</p>
<p>The Panasonic LUMIX DMC-TS1 will be available in silver, green or orange models in April 2009 for a suggested retail price of $399.95. For more information, please visit www.panasonic.com/lumix.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5139949/waterproof-panasonic-lumix-dmc+ts1-is-the-toughbook-of-digital-cameras]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5139949]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dmc-ts1]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[panasonic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[panasonic dmc-ts1]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[panasonic ts1]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[point and shoot cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rugged]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ts1]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof cameras]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5139949&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Golden Shellback's Waterproofing Voodoo Magic Now Available For Purchase]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><object width="494" height="281"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="movie" value="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=1402875&server=www.vimeo.com&show_title=1&show_byline=1&show_portrait=0&color=&fullscreen=1" /><embed src="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=1402875&server=www.vimeo.com&show_title=1&show_byline=1&show_portrait=0&color=&fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="494" height="281"></embed></object><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #goldenshellback" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #goldenshellback" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/goldenshellback/">Golden Shellback</a> started <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5027545/waterproof-gadget-coating-is-invisible-mystifying-mind-boggling-witchcraft">circulating videos</a> of their extraordinary gadget waterproofing treatment in action way back in July, and it took us a while (<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5028927/golden-shellback-hands+on-phones-can-make-calls-while-underwater">and a live demo</a>) to really believe that it works. Well, it does, and now you can buy it. That is, if you're willing to send the company your gadget to be treated with their mysterious "vacuum deposited film." All of the coatings come with a warranty, but its modest 30 day duration raises some concerns about the coating's durability. But really, warranties? Longetivity? <em>Whatever,</em> tell me about it on my underwater BlackBerry. Amphibian-able gadget list, with prices, after the jump. [<a href="http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/11/26/golden-shellback-splashproof-coatings-now-available/">OhGizmo</a>]</p>
<blockquote><p>Devices:</p>
<p>Blackberry Pearl $120.00 per unit coated</p>
<p>Apple IPod Shuffle $60.00 per unit coated</p>
<p>Apple IPod Touch $120.00 per unit coated</p>
<p>Lansing IPod Speaker Orbit M $60.00 per unit coated</p>
<p>Garmin GPS etrex $75.00 per unit coated</p>
<p>West Marine Vhf 55 Radio $120.00 per unit coated</p>
<p>Speakers (no enclosures) up to 8 inches in diameter $100 each $180 pair </p></blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5099093/golden-shellbacks-waterproofing-voodoo-magic-now-available-for-purchase]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5099093]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproofing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Golden Shellback]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shellback]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[slashproof]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[underwater]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 26 Nov 2008 06:07:46 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5099093&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[iDive iPod Case and Speakers Are Waterproof Up to 300 Feet]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/10/thumb160x_iDive.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />If you simply can't go anywhere without listening to your iPod, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #h2oaudio" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/h2oaudio/">H2O Audio</a>'s new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #idive300" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/idive300/">iDive 300</a> system will ensure that the tunes keep coming even as your lifeless body sinks into Davy Jones' locker. Features include a polycarbonate casing that uses a locking cam knob to ensure a watertight seal up to a 300 foot depth, an integrated microprocessor for complete control of touch-screen and click wheel iPods and over ear speakers that can be attached to mask strap or tucked under a dive hood. The iDive retails for $350 which is steep for a case, but at least H2O Audio has a reputation for <a href="http://gizmodo.com/349796/tub-test-how-waterproof-is-a-waterproof-ipod-case">making decent products</a>. [<a href="http://www.h2oaudio.com/">H2O Audio</a> via <a href="http://blastmagazine.com/the-magazine/technology/2008/10/wanna-go-diving-with-your-ipod/">Blast</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5066436/idive-ipod-case-and-speakers-are-waterproof-up-to-300-feet]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5066436]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[diving]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[h2o audio]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[idive 300]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod case]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod touch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[scuba diving]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterprood ipod case]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5066436&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sony's XDV-W600 Portable TV Does Something Like No Other Bravia: Goes Bathing]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/09/340x_XDV_W600_1.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Sony's XDV-W600 is no 60-inch high-contrast plasma TV, for sure: no, it'll sell for a different reason... it's waterproof. In fact, it meets IPX 7 and IPX 6 specs, and can safely go three feet under for half an hour. Clearly designed to go in the bathroom, it looks a smidge like a bar of soap, and has a 4-inch screen, recording function to its own 2GB internal memory, and runs for 23 hours from its own batteries supplemented by AAs. Bathing TV fans may be disappointed though: it's a oneseg digital unit, so we're unlikely to see this weirdness in the US. [<a href="http://66.102.9.104/translate_c?hl=en&sl=ja&u=http://av.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/20080902/sony2.htm">AVWatch</a> and <a href="http://www.akihabaranews.com/en/news-16636-Take+Your+Bravia+TV+Along+Anywhere%2C+Even+to+Your+Bathroom.html">Akihabaranews</a>]<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('braviawaterproof', 4, '');
</script></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5044119/sonys-xdv+w600-portable-tv-does-something-like-no-other-bravia-goes-bathing]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5044119]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof tv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bravia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital tv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[oneseg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony bravia waterproof]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xdv-w600]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 02 Sep 2008 04:35:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kit Eaton]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5044119&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Olympus Hazard-Proof Tap-To-Snap Stylus 1050 SW and Its Skinny Sidekick, the 1040]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/08/stylus1050.jpg"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/08/stylus1050.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Olympus' tough-as-nails Stylus 1050 SW updates the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/376339/lightning-review-waterproof-shockproof-freezeproof-olympus-stylus-1030sw">1030 SW</a> with a tap-control feature that makes it easy to take pictures in extreme environments. While the specs are nearly identical to the 1030&mdash;10.1MP, 5 feet shockproof, 10 ft. waterproof, 14°F freezeproof&mdash;he 1050 uses an accelerometer to allow button-free control. Tapping the top, back or sides of the camera cycle through different options, so you can make adjustments to your pictures even if you're wearing gloves. It'll be out in October, and for $300, I'd tap that. The Stylus 1040, one of the best looking Olympus point-and-shoots we've seen, down below.</p>
<p><img alt="stylus1040.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/08/stylus1040.jpg" width="600" height="198" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2">The 1040 is a super-slim cam, and in fact, the thinnest Stylus yet. It ditches the big zoom lens typical of other Olympus cameras for a more common slick, boxy style with flat controls on the back. As far as specs go, it's basically the 1050 SW without the <em>huevos</em>, a 10.1MP point-and-shoot with 3x optical zoom and a 2.7" LCD screen. Also out in October, the 1040 will run $200. [<a href="http://www.olympusamerica.com">Olympus</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5041148/olympus-hazard+proof-tap+to+snap-stylus-1050-sw-and-its-skinny-sidekick-the-1040]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5041148]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[1040]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[1050]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[freezeproof]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[olympus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[olympus stylus 1040]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[olympus stylus 1050 sw]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shockproof]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[stylus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sw]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benny Goldman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5041148&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Build Your Own Waterproof iPod Video Boombox]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/08/340x_ipod-boombox-1-0908.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><a href="http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/how_to/4278895.html?page=1">Popular Mechanics</a> has a great DIY feature, showing you how to build a waterproof video boombox for your iPod. Making use of an iPod touch, some old speakers, an 8" personal video player screen, video cables, gorilla tape and a hard camera case, Anthony Verducci has created a waterproof video case for the iPod that he believes is the first to float.</p>
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/08/ipod-boombox-2-0908.jpg" width="470" height="393" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2">It seems the hardest part of the process was getting all the cables to interface with eachother. Working with Apple's composite cables, an old AV iPod dock, and the inputs for the video player, soldering was required to get them all on the same page. The rest was mostly handiwork and a bit of elbow grease. Sure, the final product isn't exactly practical, but it is fun and imaginative. Check out the full video <a href="http://video.popularmechanics.com/services/link/bcpid1745093425/bctid1747213017">here</a>. [<a href="http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/how_to/4278895.html?page=1">Popular Mechanics</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5040910/build-your-own-waterproof-ipod-video-boombox]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5040910]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[diy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bigpic=true]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cases]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod waterproof case]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 23 Aug 2008 14:45:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Covert]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5040910&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Review: Pentax W60 Waterproof Camera Catching Whale Sharks]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><object width="494" height="278"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="movie" value="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=1542314&server=www.vimeo.com&show_title=1&show_byline=1&show_portrait=0&color=00ADEF&fullscreen=1" /><embed src="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=1542314&server=www.vimeo.com&show_title=1&show_byline=1&show_portrait=0&color=00ADEF&fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="494" height="278"></embed></object>I had the perfect backdrop to review this <a href="http://gizmodo.com/392864/pentax-optio-w60-extreme-weather-cam-good-for-dips-not-dives">Pentax W60 waterproof camera</a> while vacationing in Hawaii last week. It's 10mp, has a 5x zoom, and does HD level video, but the only reason to buy such a point and shoot is that it's rated to 13 feet of underwater depth for two hours, and is the smallest waterproof camera of its kind. It would prove to be a fortuitous addition to my travel gear, catching some great shots of some of my first surf lessons and some rare aquatic life while other tourists fumbled with crappy disposable film cams.</p>
<p>The video above was shot on a generic snorkeling tourist water-bus. We took the boat out from Maui to Molokini, helmed by some hooligans who did donuts and told canned (but funny) jokes for the rich, bleached tourists, Lisa and I counted ourselves among. I suppose we were no different, as much as we'd like to think so, but I did have that camera ready to go when the captain peeled back the throttle, started shouting with excitement and pointing at something moving slowly towards us under the surface. None of us could see past the glare, but the captain's polarized sunglasses, he said, revealed a whale shark, the biggest he'd ever seen in his life on Hawaii, as big as our 30-foot boat. He urged us to jump into the water, promising that this was a rare thing to find on what was supposed to be a pedestrian look at some small, colorful reef fish. I can't say I was very comfortable with the idea of jumping over the side, despite the Museum of Natural History's tutelage so many years ago that the whale shark only ate microscopic schmeg in the water. But the captain asked twice and over I went, after putting the camera in underwater movie mode. Others soon joined with the disposable wind up cameras that the crew joked, "used to cost $15, but after the shark showed up, cost $100." The whale shark made several passes, perhaps curious about the strange hairy fish as pale as the undersides of a flounder, splashing around ineffectively and groping at its dorsal fin. After awhile, I normalized my breathing &mdash; the water almost always makes me panic a bit &mdash; and could grab enough breath to chase the fish below the surface and grab on for a few seconds. I felt safe, but we were not all lucky enough to escape unharmed. One man cut his finger on the fish's denticles, rubbing it the wrong way. I shot a photo of the man. Professional marine biologists might disagree, but I suppose that's technically the first whale shark attack to draw blood in recent history.</p>
<p>The W60 is the third or fourth generation waterproof camera from Pentax, and earlier ones were only safe to use to a depth of 5 feet for 30 minutes. So the W line has graduated, in the W60, from the wading pool to more earnest underwater endeavors only short of full on diving. The W60 is also rated to shrug off dust and dirt and temperatures down to 14 degrees F, but this is not nearly as rugged as the larger Olympus waterproof cameras. </p>
<p>The shots, above water, were solid, aided by the multiple modes for portraits (with multiple face detection), flowers (macro), etc. Shots were sometimes adequate color and saturation and sharpness, sometimes would be foiled by flat contrast or washed out colors or a droplet of water it could not focus past. There were also amazing frames that made photos look like those from little sticker picture booths in Tokyo. I didn't like how long it took to switch between these modes, but one could make due with almost anything by leaving it in auto mode. (Note: I shot everything at 3MP, which suited my needs for memory preservation and online presentation of shots.) But underwater, away from a pool and off the shallows of Hawaii, modes tended to not color shift out enough of the blue as you can see in the shots above. This is sad, and you can only recapture so much color in post processing.</p>
<p>Other gripes: The USB cable is non-standard on the mini side, and the screen was sometimes hard to see in the bright sun or underwater. Also, my unit was supposed to record sound underwater but only ticked and buzzed and you could sometimes hear the zoom motors functioning.</p>
<p>I tested the W10, a W60 predecessor, a few years ago, and lost it <a href="http://gizmodo.com/382921/problem-waterproof-rugged-cameras-are-too-easy-to-lose">while almost being washed down the coast over some shallow reef</a>. Pentax's press people send along two terrific accessories, a bright orange foam float with the logo surf camera on it that looped through the wrist strap, and a rubber case. Having a camera float in the ocean is a great, great comfort. And although the rubber case needed to be taken off every time to rinse the camera after a salt water swim, the added protection made my experience in the surf even more carefree. Both are highly recommended. And the camera isn't bad, either.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">galleryPost('hawaii2008pentaxw60', 3, '');</script></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5038693/review-pentax-w60-waterproof-camera-catching-whale-sharks]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5038693]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cams]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ocean]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pentax]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sea]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[w60]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 19 Aug 2008 06:45:15 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5038693&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[iPhone 3G + Rain = Disaster ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/08/iphonerain.jpg"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/08/iphonerain.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>In case you needed any extra warning, do not leave your <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #iphone3g" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphone3g/">iPhone 3G</a> in the rain. It's not waterproof. According to routine testing by the Fédération Romande des Consommateurs:<br></p>
<blockquote>After a few minutes in the rain the device showed a whole array of technical problems: The battery drained rapidly, the iPhone overheated, the touchscreen and the speakers malfunktioned. And that's not all: even when the cellphone was dry again the problems persisted.</blockquote>

<p>I know what you're thinking&mdash;of course leaving an iPhone to get soaked will ruin it. But apparently only two smartphones have failed the rain test, the Nokia N95 and the iPhone 3G.</p>
<p>The FRC believes that the culprit is the iPhone's new plastic case. We believe the culprit is the idiot who left his phone in the rain. [<a href="http://www.20min.ch/tools/suchen/story/18371769">20min</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5036220/iphone-3g-%252B-rain--disaster-]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5036220]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone 3g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Aug 2008 19:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5036220&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[AMPHIBX Waterproof Armbands: iPhone 3Gs and Nip-Slips Collide]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/08/340x_waterproof-armband.JPG" class="left image340" width="340" />With the Olympics in full-swing, and the watersports getting so intense that <a href="http://deadspin.com/5035552/this-is-the-problem-with-live+streaming-female-water-polo-photos">both balls and boobs are flying</a> (NSFW link), there was no better time for <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #h2oaudio" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/h2oaudio/">H2O Audio</a> to unveil their new AMPHIBX watersports armband. According to a recent press release, it provides 100% waterproof protection up to depths of 12 feet for both the original iPhone and the 3G version as well as almost every iPod, MP3 player and cellphone under the sun.</p>
<p>A ClearTouch window allows the user to freely operate the device underwater and it is buoyant enough to float to the surface when a device is inside. The armband is retailing at $70 and $80 for medium and large sizes respectively, and a companion set of headphones dubbed "Surge" is also available for an additional $60. [<a href="http://h2oaudio.com/products.php">H2O Audio</a> via <a href="http://www.coolest-gadgets.com/20080811/h2o-audio-releases-amphibx-line/">Coolest Gadgets</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5035674/amphibx-waterproof-armbands-iphone-3gs-and-nip+slips-collide]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5035674]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[portable media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[amphibx]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[armbands]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[h2o audio]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone 3g]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mp3]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:50:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5035674&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Lancer's Laqa3 Waterproof MP3 Player Takes Design Simplicity to New Levels]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/07/340x_lancer.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Maybe I'm not a slope-wise skier, but when I'm hurtling down a mountain I love to hear wind sounds&mdash;not music from my iPod. Other people are different, and this <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #waterproofmp3player" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/waterproofmp3player/">waterproof MP3 player</a> from Lancer certainly fits the "rugged enough for big snowboard crashes" bill. The Laqa3's design is a plain metal tube. And... well, that's it. There's a headphone connector, and presumably controls somewhere, but other than that it's a plain metal tube. You may dig its industrial-look, or not, but it weighs just 25g, has IPX7 waterproofing so it's good for swimming, and comes with IPX7 silicon ear buds. It plays MP3s and WMAs, has an eight-hour lithium battery. It's released July 25th in Japan for about $185, which is lots considering it's 1GB. [<a href="http://66.102.9.104/translate_c?hl=en&sl=ja&u=http://www.watch.impress.co.jp/av/docs/20080725/lancer.htm">AVWatch</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5029020/lancers-laqa3-waterproof-mp3-player-takes-design-simplicity-to-new-levels]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5029020]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[mp3]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipx7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lancer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laqa3]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[personal audio]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof mp3 player]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 25 Jul 2008 04:49:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kit Eaton]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5029020&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Golden Shellback Hands-on: Phones Can Make Calls While Underwater]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><object width="494" height="281"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="movie" value="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=1402875&server=www.vimeo.com&show_title=1&show_byline=1&show_portrait=0&color=&fullscreen=1" /><embed src="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=1402875&server=www.vimeo.com&show_title=1&show_byline=1&show_portrait=0&color=&fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="494" height="281"></embed></object>I just got to play with a phone that had been waterproofed using the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5027545/waterproof-gadget-coating-is-invisible-mystifying-mind-boggling-witchcraft">Golden Shellback</a> technology, and it was pretty amazing, not to mention legit. In the video above, <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GOLDEN SHELLBACK" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GOLDEN SHELLBACK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/Golden-Shellback/">Golden Shellback</a> inventor Sid Martin took a Golden Shellbacked BB Pearl, started a call, dropped it in a glass of ice water, and it all worked without a hitch.<br />
<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">galleryPost('shellbacked', 3, '');</script></p>
<p>The amazing thing about <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GOLDEN SHELLBACK" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GOLDEN SHELLBACK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/Golden-Shellback/">Golden Shellback</a> is how normal the modified phone looked and felt. There was no trace of residue, or added bulk because of the waterproofing process. The only way to tell it's been Shellbacked is to drop it in water. </p>
<p>Martin elaborated on the Shellbacking process a little more, explaining that a liquid is heated up into a gas, and is applied to the gadget in a vacuum. The gas reforms and bonds on the gadget surfaces as a deposit. But that's as far as Martin would explain, because of patents that hadn't been finalized.</p>
<p>That said, the process still has a couple of kinks. Temperature still seems to be a factor as the scroll ball on the BB Pearl wonked out upon removal from ice water. But Martin emphasized that despite the water submersion demos, <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GOLDEN SHELLBACK" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GOLDEN SHELLBACK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/Golden-Shellback/">Golden Shellback</a> is meant more as a splashproofing solution, rather than an all-out waterproofer. Aside from the scroll ball, everything else worked fine.</p>
<p>Martin also spoke on a few of the reader concerns, such as how they work around connections like the headphone jacks and the apparent "bubbling" seen on the screen of the iPod touch demo. When a gadget is Shellbacked, ports and connectors are masked, and therefore aren't protected by <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GOLDEN SHELLBACK" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GOLDEN SHELLBACK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/Golden-Shellback/">Golden Shellback</a>. Martin says its not crucial to waterproof those areas, since the focus is more on splashproofing, and that the gadget should still work underwater anyways.</p>
<p>As far as the iPod touch demo where the screen looked like it had a covering on it, Martin didn't have a definite answer. His only theories were that the iPod touch was an early test unit, and finger oils left from touching could have played a role.</p>
<p>Looking into the future, <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GOLDEN SHELLBACK" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GOLDEN SHELLBACK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/Golden-Shellback/">Golden Shellback</a> has big plans. Outside of consumer electronics, they're talking with researchers in medical fields who are looking to waterproof things such as cochlear implants. In terms of availability, they'd like to have the service available to consumers in less than six months, but it all depends on finding the right distribution model. They've been in talks with retailers, and are also interested in working directly with handset manufacturers. </p>
<p>Eric Dawicki, present of <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GOLDEN SHELLBACK" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GOLDEN SHELLBACK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/Golden-Shellback/">Golden Shellback</a>'s parent company, Northeast Maritime Communications, also expressed interest in creating their own rugged cellphone that would utilize <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #goldenshellback" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #goldenshellback" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/goldenshellback/">Golden Shellback</a> technology. I think Golden Shellback is something to keep your eyes on in the coming months. [<a href="http://www.golden-shellback.com">Golden Shellback</a>]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5028927/golden-shellback-hands+on-phones-can-make-calls-while-underwater]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5028927]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Invisible Waterproofing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Golden Shellback]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Covert]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5028927&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Garmin's New Nuvi 500 GPS Does Driving, Walking, Boating Nav in One Unit]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/07/thumb160x_nuvi501.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Garmin has just announced a new member of the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/nuvi/">Nuvi</a> GPS range, the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #500series" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/500series/">500 series</a>. In a first for Nuvi, the rugged, waterproof 500 units are specifically designed to be multipurpose, with maps for driving, walking, cycling and boating built in. For out-doorsy types, there's a shaded digital elevation map option, and a dedicated compass page and tracklog. Plus the battery is a swappable 8-hour Li-ion type, so you can carry a spare for extended trips away from a power source. The 500 comes with City Navigator, and topographic maps of the US, while the 550 has highway coverage of the US and Canada, but no topographic data. The units are on show at the British International Motor show in London form today, and go on sale soon in the US for $499. Press release below.</p>

<blockquote>
<p>SOUTHAMPTON, England, July 22</p>
<p>Garmin the global leader in satellite navigation, today announced its first multi-use nüvi portable navigation device (PND) dedicated to walking, cycling, scootering, driving and boating in one rugged easy-to-use unit. The nüvi 500 series comes equipped with the latest technology from Garmin including NavTeq sophisticated mapping data and the ability to accept different types of mapping including TOPO for outdoor navigation and Blue Chart cartography for marine usage.</p>
<p>Clive Taylor, Garmin's Director of Product, said, "The nüvi 500 series is a true chameleon in the gadget world, it extends the use of GPS across the range, from walking to cycling to driving to boating. It's ideal for individuals or families who want to go and explore the great outdoors in every way they can. With the built-in compass and integrated Wherigo(TM) and Geocaching player the sat-nav's use is extended beyond just navigating: Users can enjoy the fun of the many family treasure hunts and adventures available online."</p>
<p>The new waterproof nüvi 500 series combines the latest Garmin navigation technology including Hotfix(TM), detailed NavTeq mapping, millions of points of interest (POIs) and traffic avoidance compatibility, for the times when sitting in a traffic jam is not an option. In addition, the nüvi 500 series comes standard with Garmin's popular "Where am I?" safety feature. At any time, with a single tap of the car icon, drivers can display their exact latitude and longitude coordinates, the nearest address and intersection, and the closest hospitals, police stations, fuel stations and recovery service telephone number. In addition, with Garmin Connect Photos, users can choose from millions of geo-located images provided by Google's Panoramio to photo-navigate on land or water.</p>
<p>With one touch, the nüvi 500 transitions between walking, biking, driving or boating mode;</p>
<p>Walking and outdoor pursuits</p>
<p>Ready for the great outdoors, the nüvi 500 models display shaded digital elevation mapping on the 3.5" water-proof touchscreen. This series comes standard with a compass page, track log and a removable, rechargeable battery for extended outdoor use. The integrated Wherigo(TM) and Geocaching player means the nüvi 500 series is ideal for getting the family to enjoy the great outdoors with the many downloadable 'adventures and treasure hunts' available online. Optional TOPO mapping will give additional detailed maps.</p>
<p>- Wherigo is a toolset for creating and playing GPS-enabled adventures in the real world. Use GPS technology to guide you to physical locations and interact with virtual objects and characters. http://www.wherigo.com</p>
<p>- Geocaching is an entertaining adventure game where individuals and organizations set up caches all over the world and share the locations of these caches on the internet. GPS users can then use the location coordinates to find the caches. Once found, the visitor may be provided with a wide variety of rewards, all a visitor has to do is ensure that if rewarded, they leave a gift for the next person who finds the cache. http://www.geocaching.com</p>
<p>Cycling/scootering</p>
<p>Where the nüvi 500 series stands out is in its ability to fit comfortably on a scooter or bicycle. Its user interface is easy to control and, with directions via Bluetooth and a scooter mount as standard in select European markets or optional extra everywhere else, it's a great fit for getting around the busy town centres of Europe. The nüvi 500 series has a rugged design with UVA/B & fuel resistant material and bright clear screen that can be seen even in strong sunlight. If the weather turns and the rain comes down, its waterproof body ensures that the turn-by-turn directions get you to your destination using the most direct route and in the quickest time.</p>
<p>Driving</p>
<p>The nüvi 500 series' intuitive interface greets you with two simple questions: "Where To?" and "View Maps." Touch the colour screen to easily look up addresses and services and get voice-prompted turn-by-turn directions to your destination. It comes preloaded with City Navigator(R) NT map data European region or individual country. It's packed with millions of POIs and features digital elevation maps that show you shaded terrain contours at higher zoom levels. With the nüvi 500 series, you can also upload custom POIs such as 'The Good Pub Guide' and 'Falk-Marco Polos Travel Guide' offering thousands of great places to drink, eat and visit.</p>
<p>Boating</p>
<p>When loaded with optional BlueChart(R) g2 Vision marine cartography, the nüvi 500 series is great on the water, providing detailed chart-specific information, spot soundings, inter tidal zones, wrecks, port plans, restricted areas and more. The nüvi 500 is ideal for the occasional boating enthusiast who wants one navigational device for foot, car, bike or boat.</p>
<p>The nüvi 500 and 550 for Europe come preloaded with either country-specific City Navigator NT Map Data (500) or full European City Navigator NT Map Data (550) with detailed street and topographic mapping.</p>
<p>The nüvi 550 will be available in the UK in September at a RRP of GBP299</p>
<p>See the Garmin nüvi 500 series on Stand N118 - British International Motor Show at ExCel, London - 23 July - 3 August 2008: http://www.britishmotorshow.co.uk</p>
</blockquote>
<p>[<a href="http://gpstracklog.typepad.com/gps_tracklog/2008/07/garmin-nuvi-5-1.html">GPStracklog</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5027627/garmins-new-nuvi-500-gps-does-driving-walking-boating-nav-in-one-unit]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5027627]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[500]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[500 series]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[550]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[all-purpose]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[garmin]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[multi-use]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[navigation]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nuvi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rugged]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kit Eaton]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5027627&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Waterproof Gadget Coating is Invisible, Mystifying, Mind Boggling Witchcraft]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><object width="494" height="278"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="movie" value="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=1381538&amp;server=www.vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" /><embed src="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=1381538&amp;server=www.vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="494" height="278"></embed></object><a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GOLDEN SHELLBACK" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GOLDEN SHELLBACK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/Golden-Shellback/">Golden Shellback</a> is a coating that lets you spill, pour, or submerge your gadget in a liquid and have it survive. <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GOLDEN SHELLBACK" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GOLDEN SHELLBACK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/Golden-Shellback/">Golden Shellback</a> says it will protect against oils, water-based liquids, synthetic fluids, dust and dirt. <a href="http://revision3.com/tekzilla/">Tekzilla's</a> Patrick Norton shot a segment on <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GOLDEN SHELLBACK" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GOLDEN SHELLBACK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/Golden-Shellback/">Golden Shellback</a> and has footage of cellphones and CB radios functioning normally under a foot of water (<a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GOLDEN SHELLBACK" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GOLDEN SHELLBACK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/Golden-Shellback/">Golden Shellback</a> claimed the CB sat underwater for 455 consecutive hours).  </p>
<p>Apparently, the coating is applied in a vacuum and covers both the inner and outer components of a gadget, which doesn't conduct electricity. <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GOLDEN SHELLBACK" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GOLDEN SHELLBACK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/Golden-Shellback/">Golden Shellback</a> hopes the protective coating will be available soon, and expect the service to cost between $50-$75 depending on the size of the gadget. But seeing is believing, so you should watch the video, which is borderline mindblowing. [<a href="http://www.golden-shellback.com/">Golden Shellback</a> via <a href="http://revision3.com/tekzilla/">Tekzilla</a> via <a href="http://gcaptain.com/maritime/blog/gcaptain-exclusive-shellbacked-ipod-touch-video/">gCaptain</a>]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5027545/waterproof-gadget-coating-is-invisible-mystifying-mind-boggling-witchcraft]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5027545]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[Technological Trickery]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cases]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Golden Shellback]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[protection]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:23:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Covert]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5027545&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[MarineAV's 70-Inch, Waterproof LCD TV]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/06/lcd70.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/350468/aquavision-avf-57+4lcd-is-worlds-largest-waterproof-tv-lacks-vibrating-remote">57-inch Aquavision</a> is a definitely a big waterproof television, but it falls well short of the 70-inch beast that MarineAV is packin'. Outside of its size and rugged exterior, the LCD70 also features full 1080p resolution, a 1,500:1 contrast ratio, 600cd/m2 brightness, 8ms response time, 178 degree viewing angle, and AV, S-Video, Component, HDMI, PC (VGA) inputs. Not bad...until you see the £27,995.95 ($55,500) price tag that is. [<a href="http://www.marine-audio.com/Products/TV%27s,-LCD%27s,-Tuners-&-Brackets/LCD70.htm">MarineAV</a> via <a href="http://www.hdtvuk.tv/2008/06/marineavs_70_in.html">HDTV UK</a> via <a href="http://www.bornrich.org/">Born Rich</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5020064/marineavs-70+inch-waterproof-lcd-tv]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5020064]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof tvs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdmi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[home entertainment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd70]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[marineav]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[outdoors]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 26 Jun 2008 19:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5020064&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA["No-Key" Glass Touch-Keyboard is Antithesis of Steampunk]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/06/3e/c6/340x_3ec6b7081feb3061acb298bcd7506591.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />This concept from designer <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #kongfanwen" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/kongfanwen/">Kong Fanwen</a> lies somewhere between minimalist Apple keyboards, and projecting <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/keyboards/laser-keyboard-getting-usb-update-still-hard-to-use-289427.php">laser touch</a> ones. The No-Key is very simple: just a light source, a camera and an etched sheet of glass, showing the key positions. You just type, the cam sees your contact with the glass and sends appropriate commands to your PC. It really is the antithesis of the clunky, complex <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5015492/datamancer-steampunk-keyboard-reviewed-verdict-very-ibm-clacky">steampunked</a> one we showed the other day. And one image suggests it'd be waterproof, so... blogging from the bath? I want one please! [<a href="http://www.yankodesign.com/index.php/2008/06/12/lights-camera-glassaction/">Yanko Design</a>]<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('nokey', 3, '');
</script></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5015723/no+key-glass-touch+keyboard-is-antithesis-of-steampunk]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5015723]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[glass keyboard concept]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[keyboards]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[concept]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gallery]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[keyboards]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[kong fanwen]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[touch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[touch keyboard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 12 Jun 2008 05:10:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kit Eaton]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5015723&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sega Updates HomeStar Planetarium to Fit the Bathroom]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/06/66/b4/66b47e43d9be9edab2c2660fbf2c8516.jpg"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/06/homestar-spa-sega-toys.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Sega's HomeStar planetarium has been around for aeons and aeons, in a raft of different versions. Its latest incarnation is the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #homestarspa" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/homestarspa/">HomeStar Spa</a>, which basically means it's ripe for the bathroom. As before, you sit the newly-waterproofed little globe in the corner of your (bath)room and throws crazy shapes onto the walls. New projections include "Flowers" and "Kaleidoscope." The HomeStar Spa will be launched at the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #tokyotoyfair" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/tokyotoyfair/">Tokyo Toy Fair</a>, at the end of this month. [<a href="http://www.kilian-nakamura.com/blog-english/index.php/homestar-spa-planetarium-from-sega-toys/">Trends In Japan</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5013797/sega-updates-homestar-planetarium-to-fit-the-bathroom]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5013797]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[toys]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[homestar]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[homestar spa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[japan]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sega]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tokyo toy fair]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Jun 2008 05:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[AddyDugdale]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5013797&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA['Really Cool' Keyboard Is Silent, Waterproof For Underwater Spy-Typing Adventures]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/06/d5/74/d57440f4ba6bf8b8170f3e1979fb9c2a.jpg"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/06/really_cool_keyboard.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>This "<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #reallycool" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/reallycool/">Really Cool</a>" keyboard mixes two things we really love about keyboards: the ability to type quietly and the ability to withstand a glass of milk being poured on it. It's completely sealed in a silicone outer shell with "no" moving parts, which explains its waterproof-ness. If our experience with silicone keyboards is worth anything, these things are pretty hard to type on, making this a silent, waterproof and awkward keyboard. [<a href="http://www.man-machine.com/reallycool.htm">Man Machine</a> via <a href="http://dvice.com/archives/2008/06/reallycool_keyb.php">DVICE</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5012690/really-cool-keyboard-is-silent-waterproof-for-underwater-spy+typing-adventures]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5012690]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[keyboards]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[keyboard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[really cool]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[silent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[silent keyboard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[spy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[underwater]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof keyboard]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Jun 2008 14:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5012690&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Pentax Optio W60 Extreme Weather Cam Good for Dips, Not Dives]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/05/340x_optioblue494.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />The Optio W60 is the most waterproof Pentax cam yet. A step up from the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/digital-cameras/pentax-optio-w30-waterproof-shooter-dives-deeper-than-ever-238627.php">W30</a>, it's a 10MP point-and-shoot that will survive at depths up to 13 feet for two hours, good enough for the pool, beach and most non-competitive snorkeling. It also handles freezing temps (14°F) and is certified dustproof against dirt, sand and dust. The Optio features 5x optical zoom, 28mm wide-angle shooting, and HD video recording. It comes in silver and blue and will be out in July for $330. Maybe this summer I'll test it against the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/376339/lightning-review-waterproof-shockproof-freezeproof-olympus-stylus-1030sw">Olympus 1030SW</a> and others in a Bathtub Battlemodo. Additional picture after the jump. [<a href="http://www.pentax.com/">Pentax</a>]</p>
<p><img alt="optiosilver494.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/05/optiosilver494.jpg" width="494" height="340" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/392864/pentax-optio-w60-extreme-weather-cam-good-for-dips-not-dives]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-392864]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[optio]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pentax]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[underwater]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[w60]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[weatherproof]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 22 May 2008 18:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benny Goldman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=392864&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Light-Up LED Furniture is Sticky, Disco, But You Can Call It Stardust]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/05/stardust_main.jpg"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/05/stardust_main.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>This lightweight furniture by Meritalia is so light you can pick it up with one hand, and so light that you can probably read by it. Designed by <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #mariobellini" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/mariobellini/">Mario Bellini</a>, and made of plastic "ravioli," the stuff often found in packaging, LEDs and inox wire, Stardust furniture can be used by the pool, in the pool (well, it says that on the fact sheet) as well as in the house. And I love the name&mdash;Stardust makes me think of all sorts of lovely things, such as Bowie, as well as one of the best French house tunes ever, <i>Music Sounds Better With You</i>.<br>
<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('stardust', 2, 'Stardust');
</script></p>

<p>[<a href="http://www.meritalia.it/scheda.php?cat=2&id=91">Meritalia</a> via <a href="http://dvice.com/archives/2008/05/hightech_style.php?p=10&cat=undefined#more">DVICE</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/391588/light+up-led-furniture-is-sticky-disco-but-you-can-call-it-stardust]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-391588]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[stardust]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[furniture]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gallery]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[home furnishings]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[led]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mario bellini]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[meritalia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[plastic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 19 May 2008 07:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[AddyDugdale]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=391588&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[EP2502 Cellphone Watch: Surprisingly Stylish, and Waterproof]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/05/340x_EP2502_1.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />There's something about the idea of cramming a cellphone into a wristwatch that keeps <a href="http://gizmodo.com/377840/van-der-led-wm2-cellphone-watch-actually-looks-good-enough-to-strap-on">the designs</a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/377658/cool-g108-watch-phone-wont-make-you-cool">rolling out</a>, but is this the first one with a touch of style? Possibly, with that metal case and strap, and looking not too horrifically fat to wear. The EP2502 even has a 1.3-inch OLED touchscreen, a 2-megapixel camera, tri-band and Bluetooth support and claims to be shockproof. It's also supposedly the World's first waterproof cellphone, though we don't know to what waterproofing standard.<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('ep2502', 3, '');
</script></p>

<p>Here's the full run-down:</p>
<p>&bull;OLED screen: 1.3 inch OLED 260k; resolution:128 x 160px touching panel.<br>
&bull;Water proof, Shock-proof<br>
&bull;Languages: English, Spanish, Italian, Arabic, turkish, portuguese, french, chinese<br>
&bull;Standby english, thailand, dutch, german, russian,vietnamese,chinese,rabbinic,etc.<br>
&bull;Ring tone: 64 polyphonic; support format:mp3/midi/wav<br>
&bull;Incoming ring tone, incoming photo, incoming movie<br>
&bull;Music format: mp3<br>
&bull;Movie format: mp4,full screen<br>
&bull;Camera: 2.0m pixels<br>
&bull;T-flash support: free 512 tf card. extend to 2gb<br>
&bull;Bluetooth function: supported<br>
&bull;Picture format: jpg/gif</p>
<p>Its battery will give you about three hours of talk time and around 160 hours of standby, which seems fairly decent actually. The best bit about this piece of Dick Tracy tech, though, is the price: it's just $299, and is available from May 10th. [<a href="http://surprisinggift.com/Mobile-Phones-%3E-Watch-Phones/c111_108/p989/EP2502-OLED-WaterProof-Triband-Watch-Phone-2M-Camera/product_info.html">Surprising Gift</a> via <a href="http://www.howardforums.com/showthread.php?p=11025391#post11025391">Howardforums</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/387538/ep2502-cellphone-watch-surprisingly-stylish-and-waterproof]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-387538]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphone watch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ep2502]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gallery]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[oled]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[portable media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 06 May 2008 11:30:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kit Eaton]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=387538&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Waterproof PSP Bath Bag Is Every 9-Year-Old's Wet Dream]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/04/pspbath.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />As Adrian pointed out, if we had these PSP bath bags when we were nine, we'd be a whole lot cleaner and a whole lot wrinklier than we are now. It's a bag. It holds your PSP. It goes into baths. That's pretty much all you need to know. It's unclear to us why you couldn't just get a sandwich bag from Target that would do the same thing, but sandwich bags don't have that fancy pants cord at the top. Does the PSP camera work with Skype video? Because we have an idea... [<a href="http://www.watch.impress.co.jp/game/docs/20080422/ggl.htm">Impress</a> via <a href="http://www.pspfanboy.com/2008/04/23/another-waterproof-baggie-keeps-psp-safe-in-t%20he-shower/">PSP Fanboy</a> via <a href="http://kotaku.com/383483/want-to-bathe-with-your-psp-not-really-thanks">Kotaku</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/383735/waterproof-psp-bath-bag-is-every-9+year+olds-wet-dream]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-383735]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[accessories]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bag]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bath]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bath bag]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[peripherals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[psp]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=383735&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Problem: Waterproof Rugged Cameras Are Too Easy to Lose!]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/04/IMGP0198.jpg"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/04/IMGP0198.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Rugged and waterproof cameras are great, but they've got a lot of improving to do in general design before they'll be good in the outdoors. I mean, someone just keep me from losing these things.</p>
<p>The first waterproof camera I used was a Pentax W10 in 2006, one of the first simple cams that didn't need a case. It was only guaranteed to a depth of 5 feet, but it shot video, and that's all I needed for some snorkeling on a Kauai's north shore. I still have shorts of fish and turtles I took then. A year later, I used the same camera and lost it off some reef near a friend's house in Oahu. The current was strong and I was not, and when I swam to a safe spot the camera's lanyard had slipped off my wrist. The shiny little Pentax wasn't so shiny below the waves.</p>
<p>The second rugged, water resistant camera I used was a pistol gripped Sanyo E1. It was a lot more powerful of a camera, shooting DVD quality vids and 6 megapixel shots, but a lot bulkier than the Pentax. I called it in to use for the winter, during the snowboarding season. I couldn't use it but on the first day I used it, I noticed I couldn't toggle the buttons without removing my gloves, and mounting it on my strap as I rode wouldn't be a great idea anyhow. I lost it after not zipping a pocket after taking some shots and making a blistering run.</p>
<p>I'd chalk up these loses to my own user error to some extent, but if these cameras are waterproof and rugged enough to withstand the elements, shouldn't they also be fitted with accessories that assume the worst? Straps that can be fitted to gloves, neck lanyards, neoprene arm bands, or even orange buoys that can keep the cams from sinking during water adventures. I don't know. I just think that there has to be a better solution to keeping these cameras secured in the outdoors than the simple lanyards you find on your average point and shoot.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/382921/problem-waterproof-rugged-cameras-are-too-easy-to-lose]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-382921]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[e1]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[outdoor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pentax]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rugged]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sanyo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[w10]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:01:52 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=382921&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sanyo Xacti DMX-CA8 Waterproof Camcorder has 8 Megapixels]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/04/dmxca81.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Sanyo's new Xacti isn't much of a change over the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/watercam/sanyo-xacti-e1-worlds-first-waterproof-camcorder-262461.php">previous</a> version: mainly a new 8 megapixel CMOS sensor (versus the previous 6) and a "face chaser" mode. This maintains exposure and focus settings on people you're videoing or snapping. There's a new underwater shooting mode too, which corrects for blue-color light effects, and seems sensible for a cam that can be taken down to five feet underwater for an hour. The rest of the camera remains the same, including the case and 5x optical zoom. Next time give us a waterproof HD version, eh Sanyo? Available in Japan at first, mid-May, for around $490. [<a href="http://www.akihabaranews.com/en/news-15856-The+All+New+Sanyo+DMX-CA8+Waterproof.html">Akihabaranews</a> and <a href="http://209.85.135.104/translate_c?hl=en&u=http://www.watch.impress.co.jp/av/docs/20080418/sanyo.htm&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dimpress%2Bav%2Bwatch%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dsafari%26rls%3Den-us%26sa%3DG">Impress</a>]<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('dmxca8', 3, '');
</script></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/381320/sanyo-xacti-dmx+ca8-waterproof-camcorder-has-8-megapixels]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-381320]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[camcorder]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[audio]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dmx-ca8]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sanyo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xacti]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xacti dmx-ca8]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 18 Apr 2008 05:10:54 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kit Eaton]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=381320&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Lightning Review: Waterproof Shockproof Freezeproof Olympus Stylus 1030SW]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/04/olympushands.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><strong>The Gadget</strong>: The Stylus <a href="http://gizmodo.com/350874/hands-on-olympus-stylus-1030-sw-indestructo+point-and-shoots">1030SW</a>, Olympus' semi-indestructible 10.1MP point-and-shoot, is designed for fairly extreme conditions. Olympus claims the camera is shockproof (to 2 meters), waterproof (to 10 meters), freezeproof (to 14°F), and crushproof (to 220 lbs.) We've seen other cameras with features like this, but it's rare that they're all combined into one.</p>
<p><strong>The Price</strong>: $400 retail, we've seen it as low as $340.</p>
<p><strong>The Verdict</strong>: It's tougher than Glass Joe, but it's no Mike Tyson.<br>
<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost("1030swreview2", 3, "1030SW Review");
</script><br></p>

<p>I tested the 1030SW under fairly rigorous conditions, and for the most part it stood up to the challenge. After dropping the camera to the ground from around six feet, it took pictures without any problem. Next was the underwater test. I didn't take it to the limit, but I did bring it with me <a href="http://gizmodo.com/374775/benny-bathes-for-giz-kohler-vibracoustic-tub-is-t+tastic">in the tub</a>. The camera works under water, and there are options designed for capturing images of sea life. The pictures didn't come out too well, but that could be my fault as it is likely designed to shoot fish in clear water and not sitting in a bathtub, taking pictures of my...er...feet.</p>
<p>Things got a little trickier during the freeze and crush tests. I left it in the freezer for about two hours, and when I took it out I had a "Battery Empty" message. Worried that I damaged the camera, I let it thaw and it came back to full power after 10-15 minutes. For the crush test, I placed all 170+ pounds of myself on top of the camera. At first I heard a little unnerving crunch, and when I picked it up, I saw what looked like a crack in the LCD screen. However, after about 15 seconds, it went away and I was left with the same crack-free screen I had when I started.</p>
<p>As for the pictures, they came out well for the most part. In optimal conditions, they looked great. When I was under water, or in a dimly lit room the snapshots left a little something to be desired. I was able to correct some of the shots with the various exposure options, but it's still a point-and-shoot.</p>
<p>If you are going on an outdoor adventure and looking for a light, easy camera to take, this is a good bet. I wouldn't recommend pushing it to the advertised limits, but it's definitely sturdier than other cameras in its price range. [<a href="http://www.olympusamerica.com/cpg_section/product.asp?product=1363">Olympus</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/376339/lightning-review-waterproof-shockproof-freezeproof-olympus-stylus-1030sw]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-376339]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[digital cameras]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[1030sw]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[crushproof]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[freezeproof]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lightning review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[olympus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shockproof]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[stylus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[stylus 1030sw]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 04 Apr 2008 22:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benny Goldman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=376339&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[PQI's Intelligent Stick Flash Drives are Tiny, Waterproof, Dust-Proof]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/03/PQIwaterproof.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />PQI's new Intelligent Stick USB flash drives may be a boon for those clumsy people, like myself, who often spill coffee on their electronics or get them soaking wet in pockets that let the rain in. I can't think of a time when I've got a gadget too <i>dusty</i> to use, but these tiny flash drives can even cope with that. Manufactured with a special COB process, they're available in 2GB and 4GB in a number of colors, and are due to be unveiled at CeBIT this week.<br>
[<a href="http://www.7gadgets.com/2008/02/28/pqi-waterproof-usb-flash-drive/4963">7Gadgets</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/362901/pqis-intelligent-stick-flash-drives-are-tiny-waterproof-dust+proof]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-362901]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[flashdrives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cebit2008]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dust-proof]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flash drive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[peripherals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pqi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 03 Mar 2008 04:55:20 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kit Eaton]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=362901&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[XZABADY iPod Dock is Waterproof, Thinks It's a Picture Frame]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/02/xzabady-1.jpg"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/02/xzabady-1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Shrink-wrapping your MP3 player has suddenly become reality, thanks to the guys at Twinbird. The XZABADY (crazy name, eh, crazy guys?) is a frame-shaped <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #ipoddock" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ipoddock/">iPod dock</a> with FM radio that you can park your player in to make it waterproof. The player connects via an audio jack, and you can customize the background with a picture of your loved one&mdash;maybe they look better with an iPod superimposed on top of them&mdash;and then press down on the silicon rubber sheet to seal. XZABADY: truly a byword for fugtional; where fug meets function. [<a href="http://www.kilian-nakamura.com/blog-english/index.php/xzabady-waterproof-ipod-speaker-from-twinbird/">Trends in Japan</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/361240/xzabady-ipod-dock-is-waterproof-thinks-its-a-picture-frame]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-361240]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[shrink wrapping]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[docks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fugtional]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod dock]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[peripherals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[portable media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[twinbird]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[waterproof dock]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xzabady]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 27 Feb 2008 06:25:57 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[AddyDugdale]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=361240&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
