<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: Western Digital]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/western digital</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'western digital']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Western Digital Advanced Format Gives You 11 Percent More Hard Drive Space]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/hdhead.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_hdhead.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #westerndigital" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/westerndigital/">Western Digital</a>'s come up with a <a href="http://www.wdc.com/en/products/advancedformat/">fancy new way</a> to format <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #harddrives" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/harddrives/">hard drives</a>&mdash;changing sector sizes to 4KB that use a pooled Sync/DAM header and ECC blocks&mdash;that promises to give back 7 to 11 percent of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #harddrive" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/harddrive/">hard drive</a> space.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/wdadvancedformat.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_wdadvancedformat.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>If that description doesn't make sense, here's <a href="http://www.wdc.com/wdproducts/library/whitepapers/en/2579-771430.pdf">what the structure looks like</a>. The catch is that if you wanna use this new hard drive format, it requires you performing a clean install of your OS. Other drive manufacturers are looking at this up, so everybody might get to benefit from Advanced Formatting and the extra space. Hoo-ray. [<a href="http://www.wdc.com/en/products/advancedformat/">WD</a>, <a href="http://www.wdc.com/wdproducts/library/whitepapers/en/2579-771430.pdf">WD</a> (PDF) via <a href="http://macnn.com/rd/147997==http://www.pcper.com/comments.php?nid=8113">PC Perspective</a> via <a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/09/12/11/wd.advanced.format.expands.capacity/">Electronista</a>, <em>Image via <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Hdhead.jpg">Wikipedia</a></em>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5424631/western-digital-advanced-format-gives-you-11-percent-more-hard-drive-space]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5424631]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[advanced format]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:55:03 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5424631&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Now Available]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/wdtvgen21.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_wdtvgen21.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged WESTERN DIGITAL" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/western-digital/">Western Digital</a>'s update to the TV Live adds support for some essential streaming standards.</p>

<p>• Western Digital's TV HD Live got a slight update today. Besides the revamped casing, the biggest news here is the addition of DLNA and Bonjour support. Just like the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5073693/western-digital-wd-tv-hd-media-player-streams-from-hard-drives-on-the-cheap">previous generation</a>, there's no onboard storage to speak of, but the better streaming support makes that much less of an issue. You can grab one at Best Buy now for $120. [<a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/09/10/12/wd.ships.second.gen.tv.live.media.player/">Electronista</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5379938/now-available]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5379938]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[now available]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dlna]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[now shipping]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[streaming]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:32:19 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5379938&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Quick Test: Seagate's 1TB Portable FreeAgent Go]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/Seagate_1TB_USB_drive_top.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_Seagate_1TB_USB_drive_top.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The season of the 1TB bus-powered USB drive is upon us. <a href="http://www.wdc.com/en/company/releases/PressRelease.asp?release=1339ccf4-bfd1-4163-8903-f2b0abddb738">WD was first</a>; now Seagate is shipping the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged FREEAGENT GO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/freeagent-go/">FreeAgent Go</a>, a chunky SOB&mdash;three platters worth of storage powered and connected by one skinny cable.</p>
<p>The good news is that these things work well, despite the larger drive and lower power. They're not about performance&mdash;5400 rpm only&mdash;but when I tested moving a 1GB file to and from, I got it in under 30 seconds, just a hair slower than the same file moved to and from faster FireWire 800 drives. I didn't do any <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5373379/computer-benchmarking-why-getting-it-right-is-so-damn-important">real benchmarking</a>, but I am convinced that the USB is going to be the bottleneck, not the bigger drive (shown below with a 320GB USB-only and a 500GB FW800/USB combo). The FreeAgent was even designed to fit the USB dock and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5368202/seagate-freeagent-theater%252B-review-an-hd-video-decoder-that-actually-works">FreeAgent Theater+</a>, though not subtly.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5378468,4,'');
</script></p>
<p>That brings us to the bad news, which many of you already know: Despite being portable bus-powered 2.5" drives, the three-platter HDDs inside these casings are not capable of being ripped out and stuck into your laptop, at least, not without some hackery I am not qualified to endorse. So, in lieu of a full review, I offer this: It works, it's not noticeably sluggish given the added weight, and it feels really good to be able to carry a whole terabyte wherever I want. [<a href="http://www.seagate.com/www/en-us/products/external/freeagent/freeagent_go/">Seagate</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5378476/quick-test-seagates-1tb-portable-freeagent-go]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5378476]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[1tb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[1tb portable drive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[1tb seagate freeagent go]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[1tb usb drive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[freeagent go]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[my passport]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[seagate]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 10 Oct 2009 10:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5378476&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[WD Puts E-Labels on My Book Elite and Studio, Includes Dock With My Passport Elite Portable Drive]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/New_WD_Drives.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_New_WD_Drives.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged HARD DRIVES" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/hard-drives/">Hard drives</a> have become so generic and commoditized, manufacturers are always trying to draw attention to their products in new ways. WD's My Book desktop drives now get an ebook-like screen, while the portable My <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged PASSPORT ELITE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/passport-elite/">Passport Elite</a> gets a dock.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5374995,4,'');
</script></p>
<p>As cool as the e-labels concept is&mdash;soon to be found on <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MY BOOK ELITE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/my-book-elite/">My Book Elite</a> (USB only, up to 2TB for $280) and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MY BOOK STUDIO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/my-book-studio/">My Book Studio</a> (FW800 and USB, up to 2TB for $300)&mdash;I don't know how profound a single 12-character label on the face of such a massive drive can be. Then again, maybe you're supposed to buy them in identical pairs. The label, which, like the E-Ink found on Amazon's Kindle, stays visible when there's no power going to it, could in that case save you from embarrassment, possibly even job loss/misdemeanor charges/etc. Below the label is a status indicator&mdash;how many GB are left, plus a rough visual estimate.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5374998,8,'');
</script></p>
<p>The My Passport Elite line gets a visual refresh that first appeared in the less feature-bestowed Passport Essential. Slimmer and more rounded at the edges, the Elite line gets a metallic red, blue or charcoal finish and a dock&mdash;top price is $170 for a 640GB 2.5" USB 2.0 bus-powered drive. The dock thing makes sense in one particular situation: You have a laptop and a desktop that you regularly shuttle between. The Elites will show capacity status on an LED indicator, and will indicate encryption with a light-up key icon on the side, so you <em>feel</em> extra safe. Speaking of safe, all of the hard drives also come with 256-bit hardware encryption. [<a href="http://www.wdc.com/en/products/index.asp?cat=5">WD</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5374989/wd-puts-e+labels-on-my-book-elite-and-studio-includes-dock-with-my-passport-elite-portable-drive]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5374989]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[my book elite]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[my book studio]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[passport elite]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 06 Oct 2009 08:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5374989&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[WD's Ever-Smaller External Hard Drives Bring Better Security and Incremental Backups]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/wdfMP_EssentialSE.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_wdfMP_EssentialSE.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged WESTERN DIGITAL" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/western-digital/">Western Digital</a>'s new line of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged HARD DRIVES" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/hard-drives/">hard drives</a> have the expected upgrades (higher capacity, smaller size) but also feature tough-as-nails hardware security and incremental backups.</p>
<p>The lines are still separated by size, with the My Passports being portable 2.5-inch drives and the My Books taking the larger-capacity 3.5-inch size. <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MY PASSPORT" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/my-passport/">My Passport</a> now goes up to a 1TB capacity in a portable, USB-powered drive, and because of a few innovations they're remarkably small. Essentially, WD removed the USB-to-SATA-to-drive connection and made them direct to USB, which saves space&mdash;and WD promises there've been no compromises on speed.</p>
<p>Other changes: Security has been bumped up several notches. The security is now hardware-based, rather than merely software-encrypted, so WD actually has to warn users that if they forget their passwords, even WD can't access the drives. They also do incremental backups, so if for example you want to save a couple versions of a document and accidentally overwrite one of them, these drives will have saved all versions of your progress.</p>
<p>My favorite has to be that teeny 1TB 2.5" My Passport Essential SE. The triple platter drives (plus the direct-to-USB connection) make it much smaller than I expected. It'll cost $250 when it's released later this month (the 750GB version will cost $180). Others:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>• My Passport Essential: 320/500/640GB ranging from $100 to $150, released this month with equivalent Mac version<br>
• <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MY BOOK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/my-book/">My Book</a> Essential: 0.5/1/1.5/2TB from $99 to $250, with lighted capacity gauge and equivalent Mac version</p>
</blockquote>
<p>We'll let you know when we have precise release dates, but you can expect all of these drives to be showing up in stores very soon. [<a href="http://www.wdc.com/">WD</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5355189/wds-ever+smaller-external-hard-drives-bring-better-security-and-incremental-backups]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5355189]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[external hard drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[my book]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[my passport]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5355189&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Leaked Western Digital TV-2 Media Player Reveals Modest Upgrades, Codec Support]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/3785282244_92bd4e9a44_b.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_3785282244_92bd4e9a44_b.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged WESTERN DIGITAL" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/western-digital/">Western Digital</a>'s decent <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged WD TV" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/wd-tv/">WD TV</a> was a moderately priced 1080p-pumping media player at $130. WD, apparently content to not mess with success, is preparing a slight feature update in the upcoming TV-2.</p>

<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/3784471675_959b508666.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_3784471675_959b508666.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Topping the list of new features are network playback over Ethernet, DTS audio encoding and a component plug (for better picture quality on SD displays).</p>
<p>No price or availability info arrived with the leaked pic and specs sheet, but from the looks of the case this thing is all but ready for retail shelves. [<a href="http://www.avsforum.com/">AVS Forum</a> via <a href="http://electric-echoes.blogspot.com/2009/08/wd-tv-2.html">Electric Echoes</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/16/wd-tv-2-spruces-up-western-digitals-already-attractive-media-pl/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5338415/leaked-western-digital-tv+2-media-player-reveals-modest-upgrades-codec-support]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5338415]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[media players]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[TV-1]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wd tv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wd tv-2]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 16 Aug 2009 13:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Loftus]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5338415&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[WD Scorpio Blue Drive Is First One Terabyte Mobile Drive Ever&mdash;Yes, 1TB]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/wdfScorpioBlue_BEVT.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_wdfScorpioBlue_BEVT.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></a>I seriously need the new WD Scorpio <i>one terabyte</i> drive. I want to be able to tote around all my desktop data, without any external drives hanging around, and $250 seems like a little price to pay for that.</p>

<blockquote>
<p>LAKE FOREST, Calif., July 27 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ &mdash; WD (NYSE: WDC) today announced two new mobile hard drives that reach new capacity extremes. The highlight is a one terabyte model &mdash; the industry's highest-capacity 2.5-inch drive available. Industry-leading 333 GB-per-platter technology enables the new WD Scorpio® Blue(TM) SATA 2.5-inch hard drives to offer mobile storage device and notebook users an enormous 1 TB capacity. A 750 GB WD Scorpio Blue model also will be available.</p>
<p>The WD Scorpio Blue 750 GB and 1 TB hard drives have a 12.5 mm form factor(1) and are ideally suited for use in portable storage solutions, such as the newly released My Passport(TM) Essential(TM) SE Portable USB Drives. Other applications include select notebooks and small form factor desktop PCs, where quiet and cool operation are important. Both WD Scorpio Blue drives deliver high-performance with a 3 gigabits per second (Gb/s) transfer rate.</p>
<p>"The convergence of the growing mobile computing and digital media trends produces demand for desktop-like capacities in portable devices," said Jim Morris, senior vice president and general manager of client systems at WD. "Our new WD Scorpio Blue drives enable people to take even more of their digital collections with them wherever they go and, realizing the value of their data, back up their notebooks on their My Passport drives."</p>
<p>WD Scorpio Blue hard drives offer high-performance, low power consumption and cool operation in portable applications. They are designed with WD features to be reliable and shock resistant while also delivering industry-leading capacity and performance.</p>
<p>WD Scorpio Blue Features</p>
<p>WhisperDrive(TM) - WD's exclusive WhisperDrive technology combines state-of-the-art seeking algorithms to produce one of the quietest 2.5-inch drives available.</p>
<p>ShockGuard(TM) - Leading-edge ShockGuard technology combines firmware and hardware advancements to meet the highest combined shock tolerance specifications required for mobile and notebook applications.</p>
<p>SecurePark(TM) - Parks the recording heads off the disk surface during spin up, spin down and when the drive is off. This ensures the recording head never touches the disk surface, resulting in improved long-term reliability due to less head wear and improved shock tolerance.</p>
<p>Price and Availability</p>
<p>WD Scorpio Blue 750 GB drives (model WD7500KEVT) are available now through select distributors and resellers; the 1 TB capacity (model WD10TEVT) is available now configured into My Passport Essential SE USB drives. The manufacturer's suggested retail price (MSRP) for the WD Scorpio Blue 1 TB drive is $249.99 USD and for the 750 GB version it is $189.99 USD. WD Scorpio Blue hard drives are covered by a three-year limited warranty.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5323594/wd-scorpio-blue-drive-is-first-one-terabyte-mobile-drive-everyes-1tb]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5323594]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blue]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[drive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[scorpio]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[WD Scorpio Blue Drive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 27 Jul 2009 08:05:38 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5323594&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[My Book World Edition II (4TB) Lightning Review]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_IMG_4767.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"><strong>The Gadget</strong>: <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MY BOOK WORLD EDITION II" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/my-book-world-edition-ii/">My Book World Edition II</a>, a 4TB NAS in RAID configuration&mdash;in other words, a small networked hard drive with a ton of secure storage.</p>

<p><strong>The Price</strong>: $700 (4TB), $400 (2TB)</p>
<p><strong>The Verdict</strong>: It's a NAS for normal people. With a simple curved white design highlighted by a single hypnotic bar of white LED, the diminutive <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MY BOOK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/my-book/">My Book</a> plugs in to your router via ethernet to give you up to 4TB of networked storage. You plug it in, it shows up on your network, and that's that. (There's a more advanced CD installation that allows you to auto-backup your PC hard drive should you want the software.)<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_IMG_4758.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;">We tested the large, 4TB RAID 1 (mirrored drive) version of the My Book. In other words, you have about 2TB of recordable space that's backed up to another drive so that if one drive fails, you don't lose any data. If you wanted more speed/space, the drive can be reconfigured to RAID 0 (Striped) mode allowing you to access all 4TB. And it's easy to forget, if you choose to mainline the My Book right into your computer's ethernet jack, transfer speeds are fast. Gigabit ethernet reaches 1000Mbps, which is easily faster than USB but also quicker on paper than even Firewire 800. Still, transferring a 700MB file took 1:32. Transferring 8.2GB in files took 18:49. Not so fast in practice. (In other words, you won't actually be copying files at 1000Mbps, but the installed system has no trouble streaming HD media over Wi-Fi.)</p>
<p>You feel a bit of warmth dissipating out of the My Book's large top to rear vent panel (that we wish were metal instal of plastic), but system runs cool enough, offers easy access to the drives (you just pop the lid) and operates with very little noise. Quite simply, it works pretty well and makes a cute little media server (if you've got the scratch).</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/gizplus3.jpg" height="20" width="20">It's As Simple as RAIDs Get<br clear="all">
<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/gizplus3.jpg" height="20" width="20"> Small, Quiet Formfactor<br clear="all">
<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/gizplus3.jpg" height="20" width="20"> Mega Storage<br clear="all">
<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/giznormal_01.jpg" height="20" width="20"> Venting Could Feel More Durable, But It's Flexible and Thereby Easy to Pop Off</p>
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5302903/my-book-world-edition-ii-4tb-lightning-review"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/smallish_IMG_4771.jpg" alt="
" title="
" align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2"/></a><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5302903/my-book-world-edition-ii-4tb-lightning-review"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/smallish_IMG_4774.jpg" alt="
" title="
" align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2"/></a><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5302903/my-book-world-edition-ii-4tb-lightning-review"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/smallish_IMG_4772.jpg" alt="
" title="
" align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2"/></a><br clear="both" /><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5302903/my-book-world-edition-ii-4tb-lightning-review"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/smallish_IMG_4748.jpg" alt="
" title="
" align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2"/></a><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5302903/my-book-world-edition-ii-4tb-lightning-review"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/smallish_IMG_4756.jpg" alt="
" title="
" align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2"/></a><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5302903/my-book-world-edition-ii-4tb-lightning-review"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/smallish_IMG_4750.jpg" alt="" title="" align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2"/></a><br clear="both" /></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5302903/my-book-world-edition-ii-4tb-lightning-review]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5302903]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ethernet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gallery]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[my book]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[my book world edition II]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nas]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital my book world edition II]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5302903&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Western Digital's My Book World Edition II Offers 4TB of RAID Network Storage]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p>WD's new NAS drives, the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MY BOOK WORLD EDITION II" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/my-book-world-edition-ii/">My Book World Edition II</a>, packs either 2 or 4TB of storage in a dual-drive RAID array. It seems like a pretty solid system for those dangerously paranoid about the safety of their data.</p>
<p>The My Books can connect either as an NAS through ethernet or simply as an external drive through USB, and both the 2TB and 4TB versions contain two drives to watch each other's backs in case one fails. So really, you're getting either 1TB or 2TB of space, respectively, since one drive is used as backup. They're available now and retail for either $400 (2TB) or $700 (4TB). Press release to follow. [<a href="http://www.shopwd.com/">Western Digital</a>]</p>
<blockquote>
<p>WD'S NEW DUAL-DRIVE MY BOOK® WORLD EDITION™ II <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged NETWORK STORAGE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/network-storage/">NETWORK STORAGE</a> SYSTEM ADDS EXTRA LEVEL OF PROTECTION<br>
FOR A FAMILY'S VALUABLE DATA</p>
<p>Offers an Easy, Double-Safe Way to Backup Computers and Share Media<br>
Throughout the Home</p>
<p>LAKE FOREST, Calif. - June 24, 2009 - WD® (NYSE: WDC), the world's leader in external storage solutions, today introduced its newly redesigned My Book® World Edition™ II dual- drive network storage system in capacities of up to 4 TB. With the double protection of two Mirrored (RAID 1) drives and continuous backup software, the My Book World Edition II network storage system provides an extra-safe place for users to back up and store the data and digital media from all the computers on their network in one central location. Available now at select retailers and the WD online store, the new dual-drive systems join the recently introduced (Feb. 2009) My Book World Edition and are compatible with PC and Mac® computers.</p>
<p>According to a July 2008 report by research firm Parks Associates, the number of households worldwide with data networks will grow from around 170 million in 2008 to 240 million by year-end 2012. The firm also reports that the average broadband household will see its digital media storage needs grow to nearly 900 GB by year-end 2012. In addition, consumers indicate that the most important feature for a network-attached storage (NAS) device is the amount of available storage. With its massive 4 TB capacity, the My Book World Edition II network storage system will serve this rapidly growing need for home data storage.</p>
<p>The My Book World Edition II network storage system uses RAID 1 (Mirrored1) technology to automatically and continuously maintain a second copy of user's data. If one drive in the two-drive system ever fails, the system continues to run and the data is safe. In addition, the new<br>
My Book World Edition II network hard drive includes software that simplifies the task of setting up automatic and continuous data backup for all the PCs in the home. The My Book World Edition II storage systems ship in Mirrored mode and use half the capacity for file redundancy.</p>
<p>With its media server capabilities and fast transfer speeds, this high-capacity system makes it simple to build a centralized digital media library that everyone can easily share. Music, photos and videos can be streamed directly from the My Book World Edition II storage system to any PC, Mac or connected DLNA® media player (such as TVs, Microsoft® Xbox 360 and Sony® PlayStation®3 game consoles or wireless digital pictures frames) using the integrated UPnP (Universal Plug and Play) media server and iTunes® Music server software. Users can also securely access their files from anywhere in the world through the Internet using the free MioNet® remote access service included with every My Book World Edition II storage system.</p>
<p>"Families have more and more digital media like movies, photos and music to store, share and protect. Having two drives inside the My Book World Edition II network storage system, instantaneously and automatically duplicating data, offers consumers the peace of mind of double safe, real-time protection of their valuable content," said Dale Pistilli, vice president of marketing for WD's branded products group. "Families can relax knowing their valuable media is backed up while enjoying the ability to stream their content to a plethora of different devices from PCs and Macs to PS3s, Xbox 360s and the latest connected TVs."</p>
<p>Price and Availability</p>
<p>The new My Book World Edition II network storage systems are available now in 2 TB and 4 TB capacities at select retailers and WD's online store (www.shopwd.com). MSRP for the My Book World Edition II dual-drive storage system with 4 TB is $699.99 USD and 2 TB is $399.99 USD.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/wdbook2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_wdbook2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></a><br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/wdbook1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_wdbook1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></a><br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/wdbook4.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_wdbook4.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></a><br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/wdbook3.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/06/504x_wdbook3.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></a></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5301925/western-digitals-my-book-world-edition-ii-offers-4tb-of-raid-network-storage/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5301925]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[my book world edition II]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nas]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[network storage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[raid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital my book world edition II]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 24 Jun 2009 08:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5301925&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Western Digital's SiliconDrive III Lineup Are Their First SSD Offerings]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5293038/western-digitals-silicondrive-iii-lineup-are-their-first-ssd-offerings">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a><a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/tag/western-digital">Western Digital</a> just made their first move into the SSD world by announcing that their now shipping the <a href="http://www.wdc.com/en/products/index.asp?cat=21">SiliconDrive III</a> lineup (presumably to OEMs), promising storage capacities up to 120 GB and read/write speeds of 100 and 80 MB/sec, respectively.</p>
<p>This announcement comes on the heels of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged WESTERN DIGITAL" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/western-digital/">Western Digital</a>'s acquisition of SiliconSystems back in March, and the company is now coming through with drives in 1.8-inch and 2.5-inch sizes. The 2.5-inch drive use SATA/PATA transfer interfaces, while the 1.8-inch drive opts for the MicroSATA standard (its capacity also maxes out at 60 gigabytes).</p>
<p>Mums the word on pricing and retail availability, but I'm sure this will all make it's way to the general public soon enough.</p>
<p>WD(R) Begins Shipping New SATA/PATA SSDs Featuring Higher Speeds and Capacities for Embedded Systems and Data Streaming Applications</p>
<blockquote>
<p>New Products Based on Third-Generation SiliconDrive Platform</p>
<p>LAKE FOREST, Calif., June 16 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ &mdash; WD® (NYSE: WDC) today announced that it has begun shipping its new SiliconDrive® III SSD product family based on technology from its March 2009 acquisition of SiliconSystems. The company's new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SILICONDRIVE III" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/silicondrive-iii/">SiliconDrive III</a> products feature faster read/write speeds and increased capacities, and offer mechanical scalability, making them a perfect storage solution for embedded system and data streaming applications such as multimedia content delivery systems and data center media appliances.</p>
<p>SiliconDrive III SSDs include 2.5-inch Serial ATA (SATA) and Parallel ATA (PATA) and 1.8-inch Micro SATA products featuring native SATA 3.0 gigabits per second (Gbps) or ATA-7 interfaces with target read speeds up to 100 megabytes per second (MBps) and write speeds to 80 MBps in capacities up to 120 gigabytes (GB).</p>
<p>"SiliconDrive III is the first example of how WD plans to productize solid state technology developed by SiliconSystems. The launch of SiliconDrive III will also enable WD to leverage its global sales and distribution channels to accelerate the adoption of SSD technology beyond SiliconSystems' traditional embedded systems OEM customer base into data streaming applications such as multimedia content delivery systems and data center media appliances," said Michael Hajeck, senior vice president and general manager of WD's solid state storage business unit. "SiliconDrive III is an ideal solution for OEMs that require increased performance, capacity, reliability and data throughput in their applications."</p>
<p>SiliconDrive III has been designed and optimized for high performance and high reliability in demanding 24x7 applications in the embedded systems, media appliance and data streaming markets. Performance and reliability is achieved through the integration of the company's patented and patent-pending advanced storage technologies in every SiliconDrive III product. The company's patented and patent-pending PowerArmor®, SiSMART® and SolidStor® technologies address critical OEM design considerations such as the elimination of drive corruption due to power anomalies, the ability to monitor a SiliconDrive's useable life in real-time and integrated advanced storage technologies that ensure data integrity and SSD life for multi-year product deployments.</p>
<p>Web site at http://www.wdc.com/en/products/index.asp?cat=21.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5293038/western-digitals-silicondrive-iii-lineup-are-their-first-ssd-offerings]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5293038]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flash storage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[silicon drive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[silicondrive 3]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Silicondrive iii]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Western Digital SiliconDrive III ssd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Covert]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5293038&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[WD My Book Studio Edition II: 4 Terabytes + 4 Interfaces]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5284746/wd-my-book-studio-edition-ii-4-terabytes-%252B-4-interfaces">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a>WD's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MY BOOK STUDIO EDITION II" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/my-book-studio-edition-ii/">My Book Studio Edition II</a> now comes with a pair of 2TB drives and a choice of four interfaces: USB 2.0, eSATA, FireWire 400 and FW800. Having 4TB plus all those options'll cost you, though: $650 MSRP. [<a href="http://store.westerndigital.com/store/wdus/en_US/DisplayProductDetailsPage/categoryID.13093600/parid.13092300/catid.13092800">Western Digital</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5284746/wd-my-book-studio-edition-ii-4-terabytes-%252B-4-interfaces]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5284746]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[esata]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[firewire 800]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[four interface]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[my book studio edition ii]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[quad-interface]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 09 Jun 2009 16:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5284746&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[TiVo Will Not Approve (or Even Test) Seagate Showcase and Other DVR Expanders]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/05/Seagate_Showcase_front.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/Seagate_Showcase_front.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>I don't know if this is a pro-<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged WESTERN DIGITAL" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/western-digital/">Western Digital</a> story or an anti-TiVo story, but I just learned that the companies are so cozy together, DVR expanders from Seagate or others are officially blocked.</p>
<p>Am I pissed off? Yes, because Seagate just sent over this beautiful, whisper-quiet 1TB eSATA drive that's compatible with quite a few cable-co DVRs. Well, I don't want to test it with my crappy Motorola DVR, I want to test it with my <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged TIVO HD" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/tivo-hd/">TiVo HD</a>, which, with a tiny built-in 160GB drive, is in dire need of extra space. I guess you could say I'm mad because I love TiVo. Oh TiVo, why did you have to go and complicate our beautiful relationship?</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/Seagate_Showcase_back.jpg" width="804" height="537" style="display:block;float:none;"></p>
<p>All I get on screen is a message saying the drive is "unsupported," despite it being a relatively generic eSATA configuration designed for CE products, currently supported by DVRs from Scientific Atlanta, Motorola, DirecTV and Dish, and even runs, though technically unsupported, on the original TiVo Series3. I followed up and TiVo said this:<br></p>
<blockquote>Western Digital has gone through our testing and certification process. We know it will work 100% of the time, something we cannot guarantee with other expanders.</blockquote>
<p>The irony there is that when I did have a WD drive on a TiVo about a year ago, it actually malfunctioned once and I had to reset it, losing TV shows in the process. I pressed TiVo for a list of other companies it was testing. Turns out, there isn't one. This is all I could get:<br></p>
<blockquote>The class of Western Digital drive in the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged DVR EXPANDER" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/dvr-expander/">DVR expander</a> is designed specifically for 24/7 use in a CE device. It is optimized for constant read/write cycles and is designed to last much longer when used in a DVR application. Un-optimized or unknown drives add risk to system stability and would reduce expected lifetime.</blockquote>
<p>I have to say, this logic only works when we're talking about drives intended for something other than DVRs, or drives from companies that do not have a reputation as a great hard drive maker, as Seagate does. The question is, why did TiVo <i>stop</i> testing CE eSATA drives after falling in love with WD's? I can only think of two reasons, sheer laziness or cash money dolla dolla bills, and of course, I'm not going to get a confirmation of either.</p>
<p>I have absolutely nothing against WD (even though that one did fail in my TiVo back in 2008). I like a lot of their products. I just can't believe that there's any merit to this exclusive partnership. When I buy an electronic toothbrush from Braun or Philips, am I restricted to using a particular kind of toothpaste? No. The understanding is that I will use toothpaste, but not what kind. Ditto here. There's an eSATA port, so the understanding is that I will use it. But, within reason, the brand choice should be up to me.</p>
<p>I will continue talking to both companies about this issue, because I feel strongly that the ban on Seagate drives be lifted here, especially for a totally legitimate means of adding extremely necessary additional storage. All this does is promote hackery. Speaking of which, anybody got any good tips for hacking a Seagate DVR expander onto my otherwise awesome TiVo HD? [<a href="http://www.seagate.com/www/en-us/products/home_entertainment/showcase/">Seagate Product Page</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5254823/tivo-will-not-approve-or-even-test-seagate-showcase-and-other-dvr-expanders]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5254823]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[tivo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dvr expander]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dvr extender]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[seagate]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[seagate showcase]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tivo hd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 14 May 2009 18:20:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5254823&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Best Buy Sells Egregiously Crappy, 9-Year-Old Hard Drive As New, Then Refuses Refund]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/04/thumb160x_948e93d8d0285ad48f1f3927c4dc021a.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged BEST BUY" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/best-buy/">Best Buy</a> customer Jon purchased a brand-new <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged WESTERN DIGITAL" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/western-digital/">Western Digital</a> <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged HARD DRIVE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/hard-drive/">hard drive</a> for store pickup, but when he opened the (sealed) package at home, he found a 30GB, near-decade-old product instead. Best Buy's reaction? "Tough luck."</p>
<p>Instead of the nice, new Western Digital VelociRaptor he ordered, Jon received an ancient 30GB Quantum Fireball, a product discontinued by Maxtor <em>nine years ago</em>. Best Buy told Jon that WD must have packaged the oddball drive, and he should take it up with them. He stayed in the store and was shunted back and forth between Western Digital's and Best Buy's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged CUSTOMER SERVICE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/customer-service/">customer service</a> lines, with nobody willing to refund his $225. Said Jon:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Finally, I spoke to a third-level Customer Service rep, who told me nothing could be done since 'it is Western Digital's responsibility', however the best he could do would be to offer me a gift card for half the value of the drive (the total purchase price was $225). I told him this was unacceptable, and that all I wanted was either the actual drive I had (tried) to purchase, or a refund so I could buy it elsewhere. He told me that was 'not going to happen'. I told him that Best Buy was, in effect, stealing my money, to which he replied 'yep, that's basically right'. I told "John" that I would be filing a police report and pursuing help from my credit card company, and left.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>He's currently working through his credit card company to get his money back, but it's looking like he might have to take Best Buy to small claims court (!).</p>
<p>Best Buy has been known in the past to package <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5178476/nsfw-best-buy-customer-gets-free-hilariously+titled-porno-with-purchase-of-dvd-player">clearly used, bizarre items</a> as new, but this is taking it to a whole new level of abhorrent customer service. [<a href="http://consumerist.com/5206541/best-buy-sells-9+year+old-discontinued-hard-drive-as-brand-new-western-digital-refuses-refund">Consumerist</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5208387/best-buy-sells-egregiously-crappy-9+year+old-hard-drive-as-new-then-refuses-refund]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5208387]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[customer service]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[best buy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 11 Apr 2009 18:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5208387&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Western Digital 2TB My Book World Drive Uses One Single 2TB Disk]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/03/wdmybook.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/wdmybook.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged WESTERN DIGITAL" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/western-digital/">Western Digital</a>'s hit 2TB on their external drives before, but this is the first time they've done it using one single 2TB disk.</p>
<p>By using a 2TB disk instead of, say, two 1TB disks, the drives take up less space on your desk and are generally simpler (one instead of two). These will hit the My Book Studio, My Book Mac, My Book Home and My Book Essential editions of Western Digital's lineup.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>My Book Studio Edition & My Book Mac Edition<br>
Formatted[1] for Mac computers, these drives are an ideal solution for creative professionals and video editors. The My Book Studio Edition is equipped with high speed FireWire® 400/800 and eSATA interfaces as well as the popular USB 2.0 interface and a 5-year limited warranty. My Book Mac Edition external drives feature a USB 2.0 interface and a 1-year limited warranty.</p>
<p>My Book Home Edition<br>
Equipped with continuous backup software and high-speed eSATA and FireWire 400 as well as USB 2.0 interfaces, My Book Home Edition carries a 3-year limited warranty. My Book Home Edition is designed for PC users that need an effortless way to preserve digital pictures.</p>
<p>My Book Essential Edition<br>
My Book Essential Edition offers an easy way to add storage capacity to home or office computers. The drives are equipped with a USB 2.0 interface that provides convenience and compatibility among multiple computers.<br>
The entire family of My Book external <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged HARD DRIVES" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/hard-drives/">hard drives</a> features:<br>
- New 2 TB capacities allowing users to store and backup all their data in one central location;<br>
- Elegant, small footprint design;<br>
- Capacity gauge to see at a glance how much capacity is available on the drive (not available on the My Book Essential Edition drive);<br>
- Environmentally friendly design that saves power by going into standby mode after 10 minutes of inactivity;<br>
- SmartPower™ features that turns the drive on and off with the computer and Safe Shutdown™ that prevents the drive from being powered down until all the data has been written[2];<br>
- Kensington® Security Slot that allows users to secure drive to their desk with the separate purchase of a Kensington lock kit; and,<br>
- 1-year limited warranty.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>They're all available now between $330 and $380.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5187329/western-digital-2tb-my-book-world-drive-uses-one-single-2tb-disk]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5187329]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[2tb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital 2TB]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:39:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5187329&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Western Digital's 8TB ShareSpace NAS is One Beast of a Storage Hub]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/wdsharespace8tb.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged WESTERN DIGITAL" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/western-digital/">Western Digital</a>'s new 8TB ShareSpace NAS is a monster of a storage system for you media hoarders who want to share your good between multiple computers.</p>

<p>The new 8TB model is available as of this week for $1,700, which is a lot of money for a networked storage device until you do the math: 12 cents per GB. That ain't too shabby.</p>
<p>The ShareSpace is DLNA Certified for media streaming to devices like the Xbox 360 and PS3, and features improved read/write speeds of up to 30% for large media files. Current ShareSpace owners can download a <a href="http://www.wdc.com/en/products/products.asp?driveid=584">firmware patch</a> to get these improvements for themselves.</p>
<p>It's pricey, yes, but if you get this thing configured as a RAID array and load it up with all of your music and video, it'd be the ultimate centralized streaming storage box for your home. I want one. [<a href="http://www.wdc.com/en/products/products.asp?driveid=584">Western Digital</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5164500/western-digitals-8tb-sharespace-nas-is-one-beast-of-a-storage-hub]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5164500]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nas]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[raid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sharespace]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 04 Mar 2009 18:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5164500&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Western Digital WD20WEADS Is the First 2TB Internal Drive]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/01/340x_big_wd20eads-2tb-hd-front.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Remember when 1TB, 3.5-inch drives were all the rage? Well those days are over, as Western Digital has released their 2TB Caviar Green, available now for $299.</p>

<p>The 3.5-inch SATA drive features a 32 MB cache and about 1.8TB of actual space once you get things up and running. When Hot Hardware tested the WD drive against its 1TB, 7200RPM peers, the 2TB Caviar more than held its ground in general testing. Read more about those results in the second link. [<a href="http://wdc.com/en/company/releases/PressRelease.asp?release={01D0EF49-E149-410A-A173-F872D0E6C335}">Western Digital</a> via <a href="http://hothardware.com/News/WD-2TB-Caviar-Green-Monster-Drive-Preview/">Hot Hardware</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5139958/western-digital-wd20weads-is-the-first-2tb-internal-drive]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5139958]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[2tb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[2tb caviar green]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[2tb hard drive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[caviar green]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[peripherals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[WD20WEADS]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital caviar green]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Western Digital WD20WEADS]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:42:23 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5139958&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Giz Explains: Everything You Need to Know About Hard Drives]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/12/harddrive.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/harddrive.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a></p>
<div style='float:right; margin-left:-9px;'><script type="text/javascript">
digg_skin = 'compact'; digg_bgcolor = '#f1f8fa'; digg_url = 'http://digg.com/hardware/Giz_Explains_Everything_You_Need_to_Know_About_Hard_Drives'; 
</script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript">
</script></div>
<p>Some say that the end of the trusty hard drive is near, killed by SSD. But let's not be so quick to give up on a technology that stores a whole terabyte for $100.</p>

<p>It'll be years before solid-state flash-memory disks (in this case usually referred to as SSDs) let us cheaply bank the same amounts of data as trusty old hard disk drives for a reasonable price. So, you might as well know how they work, 'cause honestly, they'll have a place on or next to your desk holding all the crap that won't fit on daintier solid state drives&mdash;HD movies, huge pictures, music and who knows what else if you're Jason Chen.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/hdhead.jpg" class="center" width="800" height="566" style="display:block;float:none;"><strong>What Goes on Inside</strong><br>
The reason hard drive is abbreviated as HDD is that it's really a hard disk drive. Inside you've got <a href="http://computer.howstuffworks.com/hard-disk2.htm">what's called a "platter," which is a magnetized recording surface</a> that spins around really really fast, with a head that zooms across the disk to read and write data, think kinda like a record player, except that the head never actually touches the disk except, as you will see below, when bad things happen. [Image via <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Hdhead.jpg">Wikipedia</a>]</p>
<p>Hard drives also come in a few different sizes, with 1.8", 2.5" and 3.5" being the most common, but they've been bigger (and smaller). 3.5" is for desktops, 2.5" is for notebooks (or obsessively quiet desktops), and 1.8" is what goes in classic iPods, MacBook Airs and other small portable devices.</p>
<p>The more platters a drive has, the more data it can hold, but most advances in storage have focused on increasing storage density. A really high-capacity drive <a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/Seagate-Barracuda-1-5-TB,2032.html">can have four platters</a>, while many 3.5" desktop models and some elite laptop 2.5" drives have three platters. Most laptop drives and all the 1.8" portable-device drives that we know of are <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5047611/toshibas-18+inch-120gb-and-240gb-drives-appear-uh-wheres-the-240gb-ipod">limited to two platters</a>.</p>
<p>The real catalyst for those 1TB and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5024044/seagates-15+terabyte-barracuda-desktop-hard-drive">1.5TB monster drives</a> pooped out by Hitachi and Seagate wasn't platter stacking, though. It was <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpendicular_recording">perpendicular magnetic recording</a>, which allows for triple storage density by storing data vertically (or perpendicularly) along the platter's recording layer, rather than spreading it out across it horizontally (parallel-ly?). However, data is more fragile and susceptible to erasure when stored vertically, hence the slow creep in precision allowing for greater storage densities and capacities.<br>
<object width="506" height="417" class="left"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-xPvD0Z9kz8&hl=en&fs=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/-xPvD0Z9kz8&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="506" height="417" class="left"></embed></object><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/-xPvD0Z9kz8_03.jpg" style="display: none;" class="embeddedVideoThumbnail"></p>
<p><strong>What All Those Numbers and Letters Mean</strong><br>
You might've noticed hard drives are often labeled as IDE or SATA or PATA or PITA (kidding), with specs like 5400RPM or 7200RPM, plus they come in various sizes, like 1.8, 2.5 or 3.5-inches. Confusing, no? So here's all that crap means.</p>
<p>RPM means the same thing it does in cars, <strike>rotations</strike> revolutions per minute. In hard drives it's important because the faster the disk spins, the faster it can read and write data. 7200RPM is the standard for desktop drives, but performance models run at <a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/sas-hard-drives,1702.html">10,000RPM or 15,000RPM</a>. Notebook drives typically run at 5400RPM, because they're smaller, but recently, you can order them with 7200RPM to get more performance at the cost of battery life.</p>
<p>A higher RPM is the <a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/understanding-hard-drive-performance,1557-3.html">single greatest performance variable</a>, since the faster it spins, the more data it can read or write within whatever time frame&mdash;it also makes access faster, since the head doesn't have to wait as long to pass over the right data once it's moved to the right spot. And a faster (lower) <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seek_time">seek time</a>, basically, refers to how long it takes for the drive to move its head where it needs to go to read or write data. High end drives have a seek time of just 2ms, while typical consumer drives are close to 9ms. Also, the higher the buffer&mdash;most typically 8, 16 or 32MB&mdash;the more data it can pre-cache, though Tom's Hardware found that you get<a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/understanding-hard-drive-performance,1557-3.html">diminishing returns there</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/hdcables.jpg" class="center" width="807" height="324" style="display:block;float:none;"><strong>How They Connect</strong><br>
The various kinds of drives essentially refers to <a href="http://www.geeks.com/techtips/2005/techtips-010605.htm">how it interfaces or connects</a> with your computer's motherboard. There are a bunch, but only a few worth knowing. Up until the last few years, the dominant standard was <a href="http://www.pcguide.com/ref/hdd/if/ide/over.htm">ATA, or Advanced Technology Attachment</a>. Once SATA, or serial ATA, came onto the map (more on that in a sec), regular ATA picked up the alternative name parallel ATA.</p>
<p>Further revisions to the ATA spec allowed for hard drives with greater storage and faster transfer speeds, and you might see drives using the later spec revisions called "Ultra ATA" or something similar, and they can transfer data at 133MBps (which is slooooow). ATA drives are commonly called IDE (integrated drive electronics), but ATA is more precise. If you've ever messed around inside a computer, you'd recognize them because they connected to fatass ribbon cables that take up a lot of room. The third major interface, which you should know of, but not necessarily about, is <a href="http://computer.howstuffworks.com/scsi1.htm">SCSI (pronounced "scuzzy")</a>, which was primarily used in the enterprise or high-end space when ATA was still king. The ATA/IDE interface also confused some with its master/slave assignations, which, as you'll see, is no longer a problem.</p>
<p>Okay, so the current hard drive standard in consumer PCs as of a few years ago is SATA, which is worlds better than ATA. For one, it's faster&mdash;first-gen devices ran at 1.5Gbps, but now they're up to 3Gbps, and are on the road to hitting 6Gbps. Also, their cables are way thinner, for better air flow and less tangly crap inside your case. And because they're smarter and don't depend on a lot of configuration, they're easy to work with, and are even hot-swappable. Newer external drives use a variant of SATA, eSATA (e for external) that essentially just moves the port to the outside of the computer case, delivering SATA speed for peripherals. Soon, eSATA will come in a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/345524/self+powered-esata-on-the-way-power-bricks-everywhere-shudder-in-fear">bus-powered format</a>, much like the smaller portable USB drives you see today.</p>
<p>Fast seek times are different than fast transfer times from a good interface&mdash;one pertains to how quickly the data can be located on the disk, and the other is how fast it can be sent over. To describe it in somewhat oversimplified terms, you can see how a slow interface on a fast seek drive would be better for a system that's constantly shifting tiny bits of data, where a fast interface on a relatively slower drive is good for moving really large files around.</p>
<p><object width="506" height="417" class="left"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/8hSHBO-yZRg&hl=en&fs=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/8hSHBO-yZRg&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="506" height="417" class="left"></embed></object><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/8hSHBO-yZRg_01.jpg" style="display: none;" class="embeddedVideoThumbnail"><strong>Why They Die</strong><br>
Remember how I said the head usually never touches the drive's platter surface? When the head actually does touch the drive platter, it's what's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Head_crash">called a head crash</a> (check out the video above), and it means you're skee-rewed. Normally the head flies on a tiny pocket of air, but a single particle can make the head bounce on the disk, totally hosing the magnetic layer, especially at higher RPMs. And it just gets worse from there, because stuff scraped away by a head crash making it more likely that more head crashes will happen. More mundanely, the delicate mechanical parts eventually just wear out over time, which is typically measured by the the drive's rated mean time between failures. Unfortunately, there's not a whole lot you can do to predict when your drive is gonna go down in flames, unless you bought a drive from a series suffering manufacturing defects.</p>
<p>So what is really the single most important thing you should know about hard drives? Back your crap up, they may be awesome, but that doesn't mean they're without weakness.</p>
<p><em>Something you still wanna know? Send any questions about drives, personal storage or other hard things to tips@gizmodo.com, with "Giz Explains" in the subject line.</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5106129/giz-explains-everything-you-need-to-know-about-hard-drives]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5106129]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[giz explains]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[desktops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[giz explains]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hitachi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[maxtor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[seagate]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:01:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5106129&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Hard Drive Failure Soundboard Guarantees Debilitating Flashbacks]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/11/340x_img_9253_barracuda_es.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Data recovery service <a href="http://datacent.com">Datacent</a> has put together an <a href="http://datacent.com.nyud.net:8090/hard_drive_sounds.php">extensive collection</a> of recordings of popular hard drives failing. This might sound pretty boring, but it isn't just bunch of typical of <em>click-click-bzzzzz</em> heartbreakers &mdash; a lot of these sounds are downright bizarre. Who knew that Maxtor drives play a song when their spindles fail? Or that failing Hitachi Deskstars wrote every Autechre track, ever? Or that Toshiba laptop drives are actually screeching Helldemons with an acute sense of pain? [<a href="http://datacent.com.nyud.net:8090/hard_drive_sounds.php">Datacent</a> via <a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/11/12/004220">Slashdot</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5084118/hard-drive-failure-soundboard-guarantees-debilitating-flashbacks]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5084118]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ptsd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[backup]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[datacent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[had drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drive failure]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drive failure sounds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hitachi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[maxtor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sounds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[toshiba]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 12 Nov 2008 08:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5084118&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Western Digital WD TV HD Media Player Streams from Hard Drives on the Cheap]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/wd_hd.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #westerndigital" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/westerndigital/">Western Digital</a>, better known for storage than HD video equipment, looks to have thrown their hat into the video streaming ring with the WD TV HD Media Player. With two USB 2.0 drives working simultaneously, you can plug in your USB storage and stream to your HDTV in 1080p over HDMI or composite. The diminutive box comes with a remote control and what seems to be proprietary browsing software. It's available now from <a href="http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?skuId=8993217&type=product&id=1218008588808">Best Buy</a> for a competitive $130, which is a solid price for an HD streamer even if it's snuck in under the rader a bit. [<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/01/western-digital-quietly-intros-wd-tv-hd-media-player/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5073693/western-digital-wd-tv-hd-media-player-streams-from-hard-drives-on-the-cheap]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5073693]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[1080p]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[definition]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[high]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[stream]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 01 Nov 2008 20:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5073693&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[How To Choose the Best Network Storage for a Mac/PC Home]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/10/freenas_howto_top2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/freenas_howto_top2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<div style='float:right; margin-left:-9px;'><script type="text/javascript">
digg_skin = 'compact';
digg_bgcolor = '#f1f8fa';
digg_url = 'http://digg.com/hardware/How_To_Choose_the_Best_Network_Storage_for_a_Mac_PC_Home_2';
</script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript">
</script></div>
<p>Network-attached storage options are more abundant than ever, but jumping into the copious bush of NAS can be quite a task, especially if you want a system that plays nice with both PC and Mac. Macs have historically been an unreasonably complex challenge for many networking products, and NAS was no exception. Here I've assessed the usefulness of three different cash-conscious strategies for setting up a Mac-and-PC-friendly NAS: Building a NAS out of an old PC, using a router with an external USB drive and buying a dedicated product.</p>

<p>Maybe you're wondering why you need a NAS at all. The answer is that you have too much stuff to <i>not</i> have one. How do I know? Because even my parents have a billion photos on their hard drive, and they know nothing of BitTorrent and Handbrake. An NAS sits there in a corner, a blinking, quietly purring guardian of all those song, video and photo files. It holds it all, streams it to just about anything else on the network, and even keeps a redundant copy safe on a separate mirrored RAID drive in case the shit really hits the fan. So yeah, you need one.</p>
<p>Here are the three systems I pieced together:<br>
&bull; My DIY system was concocted using FreeNAS software and an older ThinkPad I had lying around. This was technically the cheapest of the bunch.<br>
&bull; My router-based system was an <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #airportextreme" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/airportextreme/">AirPort Extreme</a> with attached WD and LaCie USB drives, which was also "recycling" but cost a bit more.<br>
&bull; The dedicated NAS appliance I tested was a two-drive Synology DS207+, $330 for the box but the drives themselves are sold separately.</p>
<p>To evaluate the usefulness of each financial step up, I used three main criteria: Overall performance, availability of redundant data via RAID 1, and whether it's possible to add in features like media streaming, remote access or integrated BitTorrent.</p>
<p>In a mixed Mac/Windows environment, the main performance factor for Macs is support for Apple File Protocol for connecting network shares. AFP support is becoming more and more common in nicer NAS rigs, but it is still not a given in the cheaper range—every NAS alive supports SMB/CIFS, the more Windows-friendly protocol, so PCs generally don't have a problem. While Macs can connect to NAS using SMB&mdash;and also NFS Unix, which you may also run across&mdash;performance wise, OS X's SMB implementation is still shoddy compared to the apparently seamless AFP. (SMB also includes foibles such as filename length restrictions that can throw a Mac into fits.) If you're using an NAS to its highest potential, moving a lot of data around, SMB will cause more spinning death wheels and system hangs in OS X than AFP will.</p>
<p>It's up to you whether you want to go RAID 1 or not—you can also merge or stripe the drives for more storage but less protection. For me, redundancy is a must. I want to be able to give a NAS's drives a workout and still breathe easy in the not entirely unlikely event of a drive blow-out. NAS add-ons like BitTorrent, remote access and integrated UPnP are nice higher-end features, but they may not be as important to you.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/NAShowto_freenas494.jpg" width="494" height="367" class="center"><strong>DIY NAS With FreeNAS</strong><br>
I took an old IBM ThinkPad X31 I had lying around and installed <a href="http://www.freenas.org/">FreeNAS</a>—an open-source operating system based on FreeBSD that is similar to the OS you'll find in most NAS boxes. It offers similar features like RAID if the machine it's installed on has multiple drives, and can do UPnP, FTP access and the like via a web-based admin panel just like most dedicated rigs.</p>
<p>Initial installation is actually not too tough—just burn the FreeNAS live CD and boot it, then follow the install instructions. FreeNAS will re-format your drives to the somewhat obscure UFS file system it prefers (don’t try to run it on already-formatted drives, it’s not worth the immense hassle). I was up and running with AFP and SMB sharing without too much sweat. Like Linux, FreeNAS runs on a ton of hardware, so unless you’ve got something obscure you’ll likely be in business.<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('freenasweb2', 3, '');
</script><strong>Verdict</strong>: If you're heavy on outdated PCs and you derive pleasure from thrift and tinkering, you should give FreeNAS a try. That said, don't expect your pig in lipstick to be a screamer. Most aging desktops would be an improvement over my 5-year-old laptop with its slow 2.5” disk, obviously, but even considering that, my real-world tests were pretty rough. Browsing large folders of files hung the system on numerous occasions, and streaming of video files (especially seeking) was choppy. As far as extras go, my PS3 recognized FreeNAS's UPnP server but could not read any media, which would probably take some serious hackery to diagnose. Extras like an integrated BitTorrent client are available as well as open-source add-ons, but again, expect some <a href="http://www.lifeessay.com/it/nas/freenas-now-ships-with-bittorrent/">heavy tinkering</a>. Still, if you have unused hardware, try this option first.</p>
<p><strong>Total Cost</strong>: Free, ideally; factor in $150 bucks for a few new drives.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/NAShowto_aex494.jpg" width="494" height="320"><strong>Router with Shared External USB Drive</strong><br>
I've had bad luck in my previous, brief attempts at attaching USB storage to routers—rough performance and dropped connections abounded. This was with a few older non-Apple 802.11g routers, but naturally, I assumed the AirPort Extreme base station's AirPort Disk feature for connecting external drives was going to suck as bad. I was wrong.<br>
<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('airportint', 3, '');
</script></p>
<p><strong>Verdict</strong>: In day-to-day use for media storing, sharing and streaming, the AirPort Disk works pretty much without a hitch. I connected both a WD MyBook Mirror with RAID 1 and an older LaCie 300GB single-disk drive. In both cases, setup took literally 15 seconds after plugging in the drive&mdash;there are only a few config options to deal with in the AirPort Utility app to set access controls&mdash;and after that, it appeared as a shared volume source on Windows machines and Macs automatically. Browsing files and loading music in iTunes loaded without any noticeable difference from when my library was connected via USB, and streaming large video files to a PS3 with UPnP was skip-free.</p>
<p><strong>Total Cost</strong>: $200 <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822136282">WD MyBook Mirror 1TB</a> + $165 for <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Apple-AirPort-Extreme-Station-MB053LL/dp/B000UZCR56/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1224778297&sr=1-2">AirPort Extreme on Amazon</a>, so you're looking at $365. Chances are, you already have a USB drive and maybe even the AirPort, so the cost goes down considerably. (I do recommend acquiring a RAID 1 dual-drive, though.) Keep in mind, part of this sunk cost includes a solid 802.11n router, which you need anyway. There are, of course, several other 802.11n routers from the networking biggies that offer a USB connection for sharing. If you've had a good experience with any of these when connecting via <i>both</i> PCs and Macs, let us know in the comments.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/NAShowto_syno494.jpg" width="494" height="357" class="center"><strong>Dedicated NAS</strong><br>
A ready-to-go NAS is the most obvious choice for adding network storage, but it can also be the most perilous. Go too cheap, and your box probably won’t support the Mac-tastic AFP. And even if it does, its performance may still be under par and its add-on features may not be good enough to warrant the added expense.</p>
<p>One of the most affordable AFP-equipped, well-reviewed NAS devices is the <a href="http://www.synology.com/enu/products/DS207+/index.php">Synology DS207+</a> which, at $330 before you even buy the drives, isn't cheap at all. (If you don't have some drives lying around, the total cost will approach $500.) I picked it because, according to NAS aficionados like the folks at Small Network Builder with their handy <a href="http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/component/option,com_nas/Itemid,190/">NAS Charts</a>, it yielded the best value in what I was looking for. Above the improved compatibility, it throws in tasty perks like a BitTorrent manager for downloading directly to the NAS, UPnP for streaming to a compatible TV or PS3, and a nice web-based control interface you can access from anywhere. <script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('synologyweb', 3, '');
</script><br>
<strong>Verdict:</strong> Performance was the sour note here, surprisingly. While a large file transfer took roughly same amount of time as it did on the other configurations, doing things that required many quick reads, like opening my iTunes music folder with thousands of artist subfolders in Finder, took days on either a MacBook Pro via AFP, or a PS3 via UPnP. Using iTunes to locate the source MP3 file of a song playing hung up the Finder for so long it crashed. Loading a photo library in Aperture or Lightroom was equally painful, with frequent stalls.</p>
<p>I shouldn’t fully write-off an unseen quirk with my particular network setup. The folks at Synology thought everything sounded kosher, but did point out that the AirPort Extreme router I used for testing does not support jumbo frames (a way of optimizing gigabit ethernet traffic) so some gains could be reaped there with a different router. Also, much of my testing was done over 802.11g—browsing on a wireless N connection may fare better, although slowness was apparent on both the PS3 and my laptop when both were connected via gigabit ethernet, which should be blazing.</p>
<p>Dedicated NAS systems do provide extras such as UPnP, remote access via FTP or SSH, a built-in web server, and more. Still, your computer can already handle those just as well. With the drive attached as a network volume, your computer can act as the conduit even if it’s got nothing stored locally, serving media via a local UPnP server (like <a href="http://tversity.com/">Tversity</a> for Windows or <a href="http://www.nullriver.com/products/medialink">MediaLink</a> for OS X) and giving remote access to a local drive. A built-in Torrent client is the one I could see being useful, so if you’re a heavy Torrenter, consider that.</p>
<p><strong>Total Cost</strong>: <a href="http://www.provantage.com/synology-ds207~7SYNO007.htm">$330 for the NAS</a> + approximately $160 (2 x 500GB drive) = $490. Yes, you can go cheaper (especially if you only need a single drive), but you will likely lose the Mac's AFP speed advantage.</p>
<p><strong>Final Verdict</strong><br>
The quickest and simplest route out of the three is definitely an AirPort Disk, and it’s also, somewhat surprisingly, a performance winner in my real-world testing. Still, on a different network setup&mdash;if your primary machines are wired, for instance&mdash;the results could swing heavily back toward a dedicated box like the DS207+, so this isn't to say dedicated rigs should be written off completely. It’s important to pick the best performing NAS for your setup, but do it while sticking to our strategy: Start by spending as little as possible; if you’re unsatisfied, move up in baby steps.</p>
<p>And yes, Windows-only networks don’t have to jump through quite so many hoops when it comes to network storage, since SMB/CIFS support is the default in low-cost boxes, which works just fine in a Windows-only environment. If you don’t have a network with both Macs and PCs, there are a number of different routes you can take here that may be cheaper or more suited to what you need. Our three options offer a good balance of performance while keeping both platforms (and Linux, too) relatively happy.</p>
<p><i>NAS-land can get pretty crazy, and subject to the particular interactions of each person's own gear, so by all means throw in your own experiences and recommendations in the comments, and further help folks who are jumping into the NAS game for the first time.</i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5067201/how-to-choose-the-best-network-storage-for-a-macpc-home]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5067201]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[how to]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[airport extreme]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[disk station]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[DS207+]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[freenas]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[guide]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mybook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nas]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[network attached storage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[raid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[synology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Mahoney]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5067201&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Western Digital ShareSpace 4TB Gigabit NAS Lightning Review]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/10/340x_wdsharespace.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><strong>The Gadget</strong>: <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #westerndigital" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/westerndigital/">Western Digital</a>'s <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #sharespacestorage" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/sharespacestorage/">ShareSpace Storage</a> is a steely, cubular vault of NAS with fast Gigabit ethernet that brings enterprise-level centralized storage down to the small business and deathcore nerd space, with 2TB or 4TB capacities in multiple RAID configurations out of the box. <script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('wdsharespace2', 3, '');
</script></p>
<p><strong>The Price</strong>: $699 for 2TB, $999 for 4TB (tested)</p>

<p><strong>Verdict</strong> It's a cubular vault of 4TB of basically enterprise-class networked storage that sits on your desk and feels like it could stop a round from <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5055163/xm25-carbine-kills-bad-guys-behind-walls-beyond-hills-below-trenches">the world's deadliest carbine</a>&mdash;what's not to like?</p>
<p>It's basically impossible to test actual drive reliability in the short span of review time (though everyone <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5017604/question-of-the-day-which-hard-drives-have-crashed-on-you">has their own opinion</a> about which companies they love or loathe), so really what it comes down to here is ease of installation&mdash;which WD is touting heavily, so you won't need an IT geek&mdash;and features.</p>
<p>Western Digital's software walks you through most of the setup, though I still had to manually map the network drives in Vista, and Bonjour didn't automatically pick it up on my roommate's Mac. More frustrating is that despite having a gigabit router and using gigabit cables, I did not see gigabit speeds out of the box&mdash;or at all, with transfer speeds hovering around 10.5MB/s writing and 12MB/s pulling data. The default RAID5 configuration in the 4TB model (which balances redundancy against eating whole hard drives, leaving you with 2.66TB actually free) is noted for its relatively poor write performance compared to RAID1, and you'd be better off performance-wise with the latter if you're planning on doing a lot of write-intensive stuff, but that still doesn't explain the gap here.</p>
<p>It also comes with their automatic backup and remote access programs, Anywhere Backup and Mionet, though they annoyingly only give you three licenses for the latter, so if you've got four computers you want to continuously back up, you'll have to get another license. But whatever, the best feature is the built-in iTunes music server, which worked flawlessly. Dump a whole bunch of music into the shared music folder and it automatically shows up as a networked source in iTunes and showed up like magic on my PC and roommate's Mac.</p>
<p>Another (small) aggravation is that it's not hot swappable, so if you want to pop out one of the drives and maybe drop in a 1.5TB drive, you have to power the whole thing down. But I can almost forgive that since three USB ports let you plug other external drives into the box to expand storage even further.</p>
<p>While it's definitely overkill for average home usage, if you're that serious about centralized storage (like if you're if prosumer photographer) or you know, actually running a small business, despite its handful of flaws, if you've got the cash, it's definitely worth looking at. [<a href="http://www.westerndigital.com/en/company/releases/PressRelease.asp?release={607F2EAF-5048-42FB-9A39-3CBC6E006506}">Western Digital</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5057625/western-digital-sharespace-4tb-gigabit-nas-lightning-review]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5057625]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA["*lightning]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nas]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[review*]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sharespace]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sharespace storage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital sharespace]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 02 Oct 2008 10:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5057625&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Lightning Review: Western Digital's 320GB 7200RPM Scorpio Black Laptop Drive]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/06/340x_IMG_5920.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/><strong>The Product:</strong> <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged WESTERN DIGITAL" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/western-digital/">Western Digital</a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/394509/wd-joins-7200rpm-club-with-320gb-25+inch-scorpio-black-drives">Scorpio Black</a>—A 2.5" SATA laptop drive that runs at 7200RPM in sizes up to 320GB. It's the best combination of speed and size of any notebook drive on the market today. And it's got a really cool name.</p>

<p><strong>The Price:</strong> $250 as tested (320GB, 16MB cache and freefall sensor)</p>
<p><strong>The Verdict...</strong></p>
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/06/IMG_5922.jpg" class="center" style="display:block;">I swapped out my stock Seagate 5400RPM 120GB drive from my <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MACBOOK PRO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbook-pro/">MacBook Pro</a>. Running some benchmarks, here's the before and after between the Seagate and the WD <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SCORPIO BLACK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/scorpio-black/">Scorpio Black</a>.<br>
<img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/06/scorpio.jpg" style="display:block;"><br>
What we see here is that the Scorpio is much faster for sequential reading and writing (dealing with big files and stuff organized physically close on your hard drive) but actually slightly slower for some random reading and writing (dealing with smaller chunks of data floating more freely on your hard drive).</p>
<p>But isn't the WD model supposed to be faster? Sure. But it's also <em>over twice the size</em> of my old Seagate. Such a test supports the classic ideology that an OS should be stored on a smaller drive quarantined from your other data to keep running quickly. Laptops rarely have that luxury.</p>
<p>That said, I haven't noticed anything running slower since the upgrade, but have noticed a few things running faster (that I don't think can be contributed to hard drive placebo effects). My 500+ site RSS reader loads quicker. And within Final Cut Pro, scrubbing the timeline is completely effortless.</p>
<p><strong>Potential downsides:</strong> The drive makes an almost inaudible whir and seems to vibrate ever so slightly more than the old Seagate. This could have to do with the drive or the fact that my hands are less precise than the army of deft children's fingers piecing together Macbook Pros. As for battery life, WD claims it sucks no more power than their 5400 drives, but I can't test the theory with my aging lithium ions.</p>
<p><strong>Final Verdict:</strong> Overall, for $250 (or less), it seems like a no-brainer upgrade to store more media...given how much this fancy machine cost me in the first place.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.wdc.com/en/products/Products.asp?DriveID=482">Western Digital</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5019263/lightning-review-western-digitals-320gb-7200rpm-scorpio-black-laptop-drive]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5019263]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[scorpio black]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5019263&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Question of the Day: Which Hard Drives Have Crashed On You?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/06/23/19/thumb160x_6bc8a8c49f3912646e2a30c671c7290c.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Today when I wrote up a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5017527/wd-mybook-mirror-edition-nothing-says-safe-like-a-personal-2tb-raid-drive">WD RAID drive</a>, the comment boxes were flooded with WD gripes. The funny thing is, the reverse happened when we wrote about Seagate a while ago. And Buchanan won't shut up about Hitachi's infamous "Death Star" drives. Are all drives equally prone to fail, or are there some makers who get it right more often than others? Yes, we <i>would</i> like you to share your most heart-wrenching drive crash stories, if you've finally got up the courage to talk about it. But first:</p>
<p><script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript" src="http://polls.gawker.com/poll.js.php?key==MTMwUTM">
</script><noscript>
<p><b>Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.</b></p>
</noscript></p>
<p><i>Update: By now, most of you have figured out that Iomega and LaCie only make the housings, so if the drive itself fails, you have to unscrew the box to see who the real culprit is. Also, anyone voting for IBM can just vote for Hitachi, which bought the whole IBM storage division a number of years ago.</i></p>
<p><i>I will say that, after reading the comments, I feel bad that I didn't divide Seagate and Maxtor, but then again, there is only one company to blame now&mdash;let's just hope they're not merging all of their manufacturing!!! My guess is that Maxtor may have ended up the biggest loser, at least proportionately, and Seagate, solo, would have looked a lot better than WD.</i></p>
<p><i>As for those of you who complain that this poll is not scientific, you are TOTALLY RIGHT!!! It's not scientific. Go back to your</i> Science <i>and your</i> Nature <i>for the raw research, cuz over here we're talking about life experiences.</i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5017604/question-of-the-day-which-hard-drives-have-crashed-on-you]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5017604]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[question of the day]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fujitsu]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hitachi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[maxtor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[seagate]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[toshiba]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5017604&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[WD MyBook Mirror Edition: Nothing Says "Safe" Like a Personal 2TB RAID Drive]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/06/7f/b9/thumb160x_7482122903a78c5e95a94a5aeffb0501.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /> WD just launched a drive that looks awfully familiar: Because the WD <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #mybookmirror" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/mybookmirror/">MyBook Mirror</a> Edition houses two 3.5" GreenPower drives&mdash;in this case either 500GB or 1TB each&mdash;it uses the same case as the networked MyBook World Edition. But this one is just for you, and you alone. The Mirror, which costs $550 for 2TB version and $290 for a single TB, has only a USB 2.0 jack on the back. It comes Windows-formatted (though there's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/375174/western-digital-my-book-studio-edition-ii-has-esata-better-mac-support">also one for Macs</a>). As its name suggests, it comes <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #raid1" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/raid1/">RAID 1</a> (mirror) configured, but it can be set for striping instead, if that's how your geek flag flies. [<a href="http://wdc.com/en/products/products.asp?driveid=466">Western Digital</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5017527/wd-mybook-mirror-edition-nothing-says-safe-like-a-personal-2tb-raid-drive]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5017527]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[2tb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mybook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mybook mirror]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[raid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[raid 1]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wd]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:54:53 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5017527&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Western Digital Researching 20,000RPM Hard Disk to Fight Solid State Drives]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/06/9d/65/340x_9d657923783e0cf21e6f5d47bc1dde71.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />According to blog Bit-Tech.net, sources in the hard drive industry say that <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #westerndigital" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/westerndigital/">Western Digital</a> (maker of the old <a href="http://gizmodo.com/382013/western-digital-velociraptor-is-new-fastest-hard-drive-ever">world's fastest hard drive</a>) "is working on a 20,000RPM Raptor hard drive to combat" Solid State Drives, since these are going to "be affordable in the next 12 or 18 months." The new Raptor will be a 2.5-inch drive inside a 3.5-inch custom box designed to make it "silent," since a 20,000RPM HD could probably make your ears bleed after a few minutes at fulll speed. But can a mechanical drive compete against solid state?</p>
<p>Even while the new 20,000RPM Raptor could be engineered to be ultra-fast and more or less silent at the same time, the challenges for a mechanical design are too many to ignore. Mainly, there's is the issue of power consumption: this rotation speed will require a lot of extra energy compared to normal drives, which is a bad spot in a market that is claiming for greener technology, and is moving away from the desktop into the mobile space, where power consumption is a make or break issue. The reliability of such a complex mechanical design would be another potential problem.</p>
<p>Everything to try to match Solid State Drives, which also will keep evolving, getting faster and even more efficient down the line. [<a href="http://www.bit-tech.net/news/2008/06/06/western-digital-working-on-20-000-rpm-raptor/1">Bit-Tech</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5013807/western-digital-researching-20000rpm-hard-disk-to-fight-solid-state-drives]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5013807]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[000Rpm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[20]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[peripherals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[raptor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Jun 2008 07:59:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5013807&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[WD Joins 7200rpm Club with 320GB 2.5-Inch Scorpio Black Drives]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2008/06/340x_WD_Scorpio_Black.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Today <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #westerndigital" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/westerndigital/">Western Digital</a> announced its <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #scorpioblack" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/scorpioblack/">Scorpio Black</a> 2.5" drive line, which reach 7200rpm, though at 5400rpm power demands. Like certain <a href="http://gizmodo.com/371368/fujitsus-7200rpm-25+inch-drives-first-to-hit-320gb">Fujitsu</a> and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/387878/hitachis-25+inch-hdd-does-7200rpm-speeds-with-5400rpm-power">Hitachi</a> drives announced earlier this year, the speedy drives will ship in capacities from 80GB up to 320GB. The top model, with built-in free-fall sensor for drive protection, costs $250. [<a href="http://www.wdc.com/en/products/Products.asp?DriveID=482">WD</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/394509/wd-joins-7200rpm-club-with-320gb-25+inch-scorpio-black-drives]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-394509]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[2.5]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[320gb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[7200rpm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[scorpio]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[scorpio black]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 02 Jun 2008 08:21:59 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=394509&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Western Digital Velociraptor Is New "Fastest Hard Drive Ever"]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/04/western-digital-velociraptor.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #westerndigital" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/westerndigital/">Western Digital</a> has announced the Velociraptor ($300 retail), their latest and greatest in speedy storage. Connecting through 3GB/s SATA, the 300GB, 10,000RPM Velociraptor is actually a 2.5" hard drive with a massive "Icepack" heatsink that makes it large enough to fit in a 3.5" bay. Maximum PC already got their hands on a preproduction unit. So how fast was it? Real fast.</p>

<p>In fact, the Velociraptor bested the competition (Western Digital's old Raptor and the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/366490/seven-one+terabyte-hard-drives-enter-seven-leave-but-only-one-is-the-best">Samsung HD103UJ</a>) in every test they threw at it. Plus it worked great in a RAID setup as well.</p>
<p>So then Maximum PC decided to pull out an SSD to see what the Velociraptor could <em>really</em> do. Of course, the $300 Velociraptor was thwarted by the more affluent $1,950 Mtron Pro-series 64-gigabyte SSD.</p>
<p>Still, in terms of bang for your buck, you aren't going to do any better than Western Digital's new chosen one. And besides, it's just a matter of time before someone rips off that heatsink and fits this 2.5" monster into a laptop.</p>
<p>Here's the full press release:</p>
<blockquote>WD(R) Announces WD VelociRaptor(TM) - The World's Fastest SATA Hard Drive
<p>Next-generation 10,000 RPM, 2.5-inch, 300 GB SATA Hard Drive, WD VelociRaptor is 35 Percent Faster and Twice the Capacity of the Previous Performance King<br>
<br>
LAKE FOREST, Calif., April 21 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ &mdash; WD(R) (NYSE: WDC) announced today that it is now shipping WD VelociRaptor(TM) <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #harddrives" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/harddrives/">hard drives</a>, the next generation of its 10,000 RPM SATA "Raptor" series of drives. Designed with an enterprise-class foundation, the new WD VelociRaptor hard drive is modified specifically for PC and Mac(R) enthusiasts and professional workstations. Destined to become the new high-performance favorite of these groups, the WD VelociRaptor hard drive comes packed with twice the capacity and a 35 percent performance increase over the previous generation.<br>
From the bloodlines of the WD Raptor, the most popular hard drive for high-performance enthusiasts who demand the ultimate SATA drive, the WD VelociRaptor hard drive is built with enterprise-class mechanics and packs 300 GB of storage capacity into a 2.5-inch enterprise form factor. The 2.5-inch WD VelociRaptor drive is enclosed in the IcePack(TM), a 3.5-inch mounting frame with a built-in heat sink &mdash; a customization that fits the drive into a standard 3.5-inch system bay and keeps this powerful drive extra cool when installed in a high-performance desktop chassis.<br>
"Demand for ever-higher PC performance continues to increase and WD is the leader in this category with the WD Raptor. We created WD VelociRaptor hard drives to lead PC enthusiasts into the next era of PC and Mac storage performance and satisfy their insatiable thirst for computing speed," said Tom McDorman, vice president and general manager of WD's enterprise business unit. "The new WD VelociRaptor delivers the greatest performance and reliability of all SATA hard drives currently on the market."<br>
WD VelociRaptor is the next step up for the speed-craving PC enthusiast, and as with all WD drives, attention to detail in features, performance and reliability is a top priority. Features of the new WD VelociRaptor hard drives include:</p>
<p><br>
Killer Speed &mdash; Built on the performance of the WD Raptor, these 10,000</p>
<p>RPM drives, with SATA 3 Gb/s interface, and 16 MB cache deliver mind-<br>
bending performance.<br>
<br>
Rock-solid Reliability &mdash; WD VelociRaptor drives are designed and<br>
manufactured to business-critical, enterprise-class standards to provide<br>
enterprise reliability in high duty cycle environments. The design<br>
results in the highest available reliability rating of any SATA drive at<br>
1.4 million hours MTBF.<br>
<br>
IcePack Mounting Frame &mdash; The 2.5-inch WD VelociRaptor drives are<br>
enclosed in a 3.5-inch enterprise-class mounting frame with a built-in<br>
heat sink that keeps this powerful little drive extra cool when installed<br>
in high-performance desktop chassis.<br>
<br>
Rotary Acceleration Feed Forward (RAFF(TM)) &mdash; Optimizes performance when<br>
the drives are used in vibration-prone, multi-drive chassis.</p>
<p>SecurePark(TM) &mdash; Parks the recording heads off the disk surface during<br>
spin up, spin down and when the drive is off. This ensures the recording<br>
head never touches the disk surface, resulting in improved long-term<br>
reliability and increased drive protection when the chassis is moved.</p>
<p>Price and Availability<br>
WD VelociRaptor (model WD3000GLFS) hard drives will be available on Alienware's high-performance ALX gaming desktop by the end of April. At launch, Alienware will offer maximum performance with two 300 GB WD VelociRaptor hard drives in RAID 0 configuration on www.alienware.com. WD VelociRaptor hard drives will be shipping exclusively through Alienware this month and will be available through the company's online store (http://www.shopwd.com) and at select distributors and resellers mid-May. Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) for the WD VelociRaptor 300 GB is $299.99 USD. More information about WD VelociRaptor hard drives may be found on the company's Web site.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/382013/western-digital-velociraptor-is-new-fastest-hard-drive-ever]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-382013]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[components]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[velociraptor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 21 Apr 2008 09:43:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=382013&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Western Digital My Book Studio Edition II Has eSATA, Better Mac Support]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/04/wdmystudio2.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #westerndigital" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/westerndigital/">Western Digital</a>'s been churning out these <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #mybook" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/mybook/">My Book</a> external hard drives in all sorts of configurations, but this 1 and 2TB <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #studioedition" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/studioedition/">Studio Edition</a> IIs seem to be the most feature rich yet. It's got FireWire 400/800, eSATA, USB 2.0, RAID 0 or 1, and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #macsupport" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macsupport/">Mac support</a> (you can also reformat it for PCs). Looking at Western Digital's <a href="http://www.wdmybook.com/en/editions/">Editions</a> page, these come equipped with all the features except for remote sharing and networking, because there's no network port.</p>
<p>On the other hand, the $399 and $599 price tag for the 1 and 2TB versions seem way higher than the $200-300 you're normally paying for drives of that size&mdash;but those usually don't have all these connectivity options. To round out the features, there's an external capacity-indicating LED and Western Digital's GreenPower technology. It's also silver to match your MacBook Pros. Wee! [<a href="http://www.wdmybook.com/en/editions/">Western Digital</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/375174/western-digital-my-book-studio-edition-ii-has-esata-better-mac-support]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-375174]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[peripherals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[esata]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fireware]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac support]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[my book]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[my book studio edition ii]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[studio edition]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 02 Apr 2008 13:15:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=375174&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Dealzmodo: 500GB Western Digital Hard Drive for $100, a Sign of Things to Come?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/03/wdHD.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Buy.com has the 500GB <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #westerndigital" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/westerndigital/">Western Digital</a> Elements external hard drive for $100 shipped, marked down from $140. (Around the web, this drive sells for $115-$140.) Now that <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #timemachine" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/timemachine/">Time Machine</a> is compatible with <a href="http://gizmodo.com/369973/apple-time-machine-now-works-with-airport-disk">any hard drive networked to an Airport Extreme</a>, some of you might be interested in picking up something. This is the best deal that we could find, but we're sure you've seen better. See any deals?? [<a href="http://deal.dealhack.com/d2.php?d1=ZGhodHRwOi8vYWZmaWxpYXRlLmJ1eS5jb20vZ2F0ZXdheS5hc3B4P2FkaWQ9MTc2NjImYWlkPTEwNDY3MTk1JnBpZD0xNzk4NDc2JnNpZD1ERUFMJnNVUkw9aHR0cCUzQSUyRiUyRnd3dyUyRWJ1eSUyRWNvbSUyRnJldGFpbCUyRnByb2R1Y3QlMkVhc3AlM0Zza3UlM0QyMDQ0MjA1MzFoZA==">Dealhack</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/370411/dealzmodo-500gb-western-digital-hard-drive-for-100-a-sign-of-things-to-come]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-370411]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[dealzmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[500gb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[airport]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[airport extreme]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[elements]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[time machine]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:16:18 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benny Goldman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=370411&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Seven One-Terabyte Hard Drives Enter, Seven Leave (But Only One is the Best)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/03/samsungharddrive.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />ExtremeTech just compared seven one-terabyte <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #harddrives" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/harddrives/">hard drives</a> with varying platter sizes and architectures and discovered that the drives are actually all quite similar, but with minor variations in power, noise and speed. If you're looking for a low power, low noise drive that's lightly slower than the rest&mdash;perhaps for a media center box&mdash; <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #westerndigital" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/westerndigital/">Western Digital</a>'s GreenPower (WD1000FYPS) drives could be for you. If you're looking for the absolute best in performance, then <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #samsungspinpoint" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/samsungspinpoint/">Samsung Spinpoint</a> HD103UJ won most of the tests ExtremeTech ran. And at $260, it's actually the second cheapest drive they tested. [<a href="http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,2275009,00.asp">ExtremeTech</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/366490/seven-one+terabyte-hard-drives-enter-seven-leave-but-only-one-is-the-best]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-366490]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[greenpower]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hd103uj]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[samsung spinpoint]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[spinpoint]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[terabyte]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital greenpower]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:00:16 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=366490&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Western Digital 320GB My Passport Essential Drives: Pretty and Priced Right]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/01/WD_MyPassport_Essential.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Today <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #westerndigital" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/westerndigital/">Western Digital</a> introduced its newly redesigned <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #mypassport" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/mypassport/">My Passport</a> Essential drives, in capacities of 160, 250 and 320GB, that last one priced at a very pleasant $200. The shiny bus-powered drives don't pack anything unusual, but they do come with WD Sync for easy Windows backup and 128-bit encryption. [<a href="http://www.westerndigital.com/en/products/Products.asp?DriveID=391">WD</a>] <script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('WDMyPassportEssential', 3, '');
</script><br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/350503/western-digital-320gb-my-passport-essential-drives-pretty-and-priced-right]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-350503]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[essential]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[my passport]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[my passport essential]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[peripherals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 30 Jan 2008 08:22:35 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=350503&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Secret of the Time Machine-Assisted Hard Drive Swap]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/Restore_System_Time_Machine.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;float:none;"/><iframe src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http://digg.com/apple/The_Secret_of_the_Time_Machine_Assisted_Hard_Drive_Swap" align="right" frameborder="0" height="82" scrolling="no" width="55"></iframe>There's never been a better time to void the warranty on your <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MACBOOK PRO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbook-pro/">MacBook Pro</a> and upgrade to one of those sweet <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/notag/western-digital-ships-320gb-25+inch-drives-for-laptops-317153.php">2.5" WD Scorpio 320GB drives</a>. That was what made me throw caution to the wind and attempt a Time Machine-assisted swap. The good news is, it works as billed. You get a bit-for-bit transfer to the virgin drive with minimal fuss. The bad news is, if you don't use a little trick we discovered today, you probably won't get it to work at all.</p>
<p>I said "void the warranty" and I meant it. The process I went through today means it'll be harder for me to complain to Apple if things get weird, so <b>be cautious</b>! Given the experience I've had, I think it will get easier and easier to swap HDDs, like RAM, because on the software side, at least as far as Apple goes, <b>installing a fresh 2.5" SATA turns out to be straightforward, and ready for novices</b>.</p>
<p>The key here is that there's no preparation needed for the new drive. As long as you've <b>backed up your old drive to an external disk</b> using Time Machine, you can prepare for the grand opening. I won't bore you with gory details, except to say that I found a good bit of guidance from <a href="http://www.richardsnotes.org/archives/2006/12/26/macbook-pro-hard-disk-replacement/">this dude's blog</a>. <img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/MacBook_Pro_Guts.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="463" height="381" style="display:block;float:none;"><br>
<b>The Process</b><br>
From here on in, this issue may just as well apply to MacBooks and even iMacs as well as MacBook Pros, so everyone should take note.</p>
<p>Once you open up the system and swap out the drives, you can set the old drive aside, hopefully never to use it again. Assuming all went well, you restart the system and insert an OS X Leopard installation DVD. <b>You won't need the OS installer on it, but you will need it to act as mediator between the Time Machine backup drive and the newly installed blank drive</b>. Once it boots up (you may need to manually restart to get it to work right) follow these instructions CAREFULLY:</p>
<p>1. Choose your language.</p>
<p>2. At the main screen, choose Disk Utility from the Utilities pull-down menu.</p>
<p>3. Select the drive itself and click on Partition.</p>
<p>4. In the Partition menu, select 1 Partition and Options... where you choose GUID Partition Table. Click OK then Apply, then say "yes" to whatever warning comes up.</p>
<p>5. Once you have reformatted the drive, close the Disk Utility window.</p>
<p>6. <b><i>Do Not Go Forward.</i> Instead, when you see the main Welcome screen, click the Back button, which takes you to the language select page. It sounds silly but DO IT. This shakes the system into action.</b></p>
<p>7. Once you have reselected your language and are back on the Welcome screen, click Utilities and select Restore System From Backup...</p>
<p>8. The process should go smoothly from that point on. You simply select appropriate disks to copy your chosen backup data from your Time Machine drive to the new internal drive, as shown in the following sequence:<br>
<img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/Restore_1.jpg" width="463" height="318" style="display:block;float:none;"><br>
<img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/Restore_2.jpg" width="463" height="278" style="display:block;float:none;"><br>
<img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/Restore_3.jpg" width="463" height="345" style="display:block;float:none;"><br>
<img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/Restore_4.jpg" width="463" height="354" style="display:block;float:none;"><br>
<img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/Restore_5.jpg" width="463" height="332" style="display:block;float:none;"></p>
<p><b>The Back Story</b><br>
Originally I tried my swap without first clicking back to the language page, and <b>the installer could not find my new hard drive</b>. Disk Utility saw it and happily formatted it with the GUID partition, but even on the second pass, the installer wouldn't show it as a target option. All I got was this hollow emptiness:<br>
<img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/Searching_for_Disks.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="463" height="358" style="display:block;float:none;">I spoke with Jeerun Chan at <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged WESTERN DIGITAL" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/western-digital/">Western Digital</a> and asked him to try the same process, which yielded the same results. Then I tried it with another virginal hard drive, this time a 160GB SATA from Seagate. <b>Between the two of us, we ran this test on three different configurations, with the same negative results.</b></p>
<p>The obvious but depressing solution was to <b>just run the Leopard system installer, then use the migration tool to back up from my Time Machine drive</b>. It's fairly smooth, and smart if you want a clean install on your new drive, but it's boring: it takes a few steps, and they're all obvious. I wanted a bit-for-bit dump from backup to new drive, fully automatic.</p>
<p>As I was installing Leopard on my second drive, the phone rang: it was Jeerun with the crazy back-button technique. I don't know how he thought to do it&mdash;I don't even think he knows, but the fact remains: <b>when you have formatted your destination drive and are on the Welcome screen, click the back button and the process will work</b>. If you don't click it, well, in our experience, it seems you will fail in your objective.</p>
<p>Obviously, <b>this won't work if you don't regularly do a full system backup</b> in Time Machine. If the omitted folders in your Time Machine options include system files, you won't be able to do this.</p>
<p>In truth, it might make sense to backup only personal files, especially since this process requires a Leopard install disk even to write the whole image back onto the new drive. Chen swears by <a href="http://www.shirt-pocket.com/SuperDuper/SuperDuperDescription.html">SuperDuper</a>, which is <b>perhaps a better pro technique</b>, one that doesn't require a system-install DVD. Still, I wanted to see if this major boast of Time Machine was all that it was cracked up to be. It is, and the end result will be tasty, as long as you don't forget that one little catch.</p>
<p>As with my <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/apple/leopard-disk-utility-format-issue-screws-with-time-machine-but-theres-an-easy-fix-316573.php">last Time Machine HDD discovery</a>, this one involves a little hocus pocus. While this method works, <b>you may have your own trick, or a more scientific approach</b>. If so, please share it in the comments below, and spare any fellow Mac users a frustrating afternoon.</p>
<p><i>Thanks to Jeerun and Heather at WD!</i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/333319/the-secret-of-the-time-machine+assisted-hard-drive-swap]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-333319]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[time machine hdd swap]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[320gb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[leopard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[peripherals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[scorpio]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizonbestmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 13 Dec 2007 00:00:01 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=333319&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Western Digital Finally Pops 320GB USB-Powered Passport Drive]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/12/WD_Passport.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />When you <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/storage/western-digital-ships-320gb-25+inch-drives-for-laptops-317153.php">saw the news</a> that WD launched a 320GB Scorpio laptop drive, you knew it was only a matter of time before a bus-powered Passport external version showed up. It'll come with WD Sync software (featuring 128-bit encryption; Windows only of course), deliver 480Mbps transfer speeds, and you can pick from five colors: glossy black, glossy white, metallic red, vibrant(?) green and metallic pink. Here's the best part: the 320GB Passport will only set you back $230&mdash;or less. [<a href="http://westerndigital.com/en/products/Products.asp?DriveID=387">WD</a>]<br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/329069/western-digital-finally-pops-320gb-usb+powered-passport-drive]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-329069]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[320gb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[passport]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[peripherals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 03 Dec 2007 08:34:12 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=329069&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Western Digital's Greenpower Eco-Drives Go 500GB]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>If those <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/peripherals/western-digital-launches-efficient-greenpower-drives-from-320gb-to-1tb-281251.php">1TB Greenpower</a> eco-friendly low-powered <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #harddrives" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #harddrives" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/harddrives/">hard drives</a> from <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #westerndigital" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #westerndigital" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/westerndigital/">Western Digital</a> were too much space for you, they're now shipping 500GB models that conform to their Greenpower standards. At $149, they're not all that much more expensive compared with regular drives, either. [<a href="http://wdc.com/en/products/Products.asp?DriveID=338">WD</a>]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/326644/western-digitals-greenpower-eco+drives-go-500gb]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-326644]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[500gb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[greenpower]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:51:09 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=326644&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Western Digital Ships 320GB 2.5-Inch Drives for Laptops]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/10/WD_Scorpio_320GB.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />It's official: you can now buy a 320GB drive from WD for your laptop, and for just $200. The WD Scorpio SATA drive spins at 5400rpm and has a 8MB cache. The press release says it's "extraordinarily quiet while running at cool operating temperatures." I hope that doesn't mean it's extremely loud while running at super high temperatures. The important thing is, this timing coincides with the arrival of Mac's Time Machine and the Windows Home Server, two easy ways to offload your laptop's entire contents, swap out the internal drive, then restore your old image without a lot of tinkering. I know some of you like tinkering, but this is the future. [<a href="http://www.wdc.com/en/products/Products.asp?DriveID=377">WD</a>]<br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/317153/western-digital-ships-320gb-25+inch-drives-for-laptops]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-317153]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[2.5]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[320gb]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[scorpio]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 31 Oct 2007 09:41:33 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=317153&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Western Digital Confirms 500GB My DVR Expander Drive Works With TiVo]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/10/WD_My_DVR_Expander.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Today <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #westerndigital" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/westerndigital/">Western Digital</a> confirmed that its My DVR drive, which had previously been marketed for Scientific Atlanta boxes, was "verified compatible" with TiVo HD and TiVo Series3 DVRs. It's already for sale at Best Buy, and can now be found at TiVo.com/store, too. A 500GB <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #mydvrexpander" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/mydvrexpander/">My DVR Expander</a> drive lists for $200. And <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/tivo/another-tivo-update-brings-official-esata-support-and-better-amazon-unbox-downloads-311697.php">according to reports</a>, TiVo's eSATA port is ready for Western Digital's drive. (Press release after jump.)</p>

<blockquote>WD(R) Delivers Hundreds More Hours to High Definition TiVo(R) DVRs
<p>My DVR Expander(TM) External Hard Drives Verified Compatible with TiVo Series3(TM) HD And TiVo HD DVRs</p>
<p>LAKE FOREST, Calif., Oct. 23 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ &mdash; Expanding consumers' TV recording capabilities by as many as hundreds of hours, WD(R) (NYSE: WDC) today announced that its My DVR Expander(TM) external hard drives are verified compatible with TiVo(R) HD and TiVo Series3(TM) DVRs (digital video recorders). Available now at Best Buy retail stores and online at TiVo.com/store, the My DVR Expander external hard drive is capable of storing up to 300 hours of digital standard-definition (SD) or up to 60 hours of high-definition (HD) television programming based on 500 GB of hard drive storage(1). Users can instantly expand their recording capacity by simply attaching the My DVR Expander drive to their TiVo HD and TiVo Series3 HD DVRs. The My DVR Expander external hard drive is designed for TiVo subscribers who want even more room to store not only broadcast content, but also broadband content that TiVo makes available through TiVoCast partners, including movie and TV downloads via Amazon Unbox(TM) on TiVo.</p>
<p>"We're thrilled to team up with WD to enhance the personal viewing experience on TiVo by providing subscribers with an easy-to-use solution that allows them to get even more out of their DVR with extra hours of space for more of the content they enjoy," said Jim Denney, vice president of product marketing, TiVo. "With the growth in HD content available today, DVR capacity becomes more important to our subscribers who do not want to miss a minute of their favorite TV shows."</p>
<p>"As the adoption of storage-hungry HDTV continues to grow, the demand for additional storage becomes increasingly important to consumers," said Jim Welsh, vice president and general manager of WD's branded products and consumer electronics businesses. "WD's My DVR Expander external hard drive enables consumers to have greater control and convenience over their entertainment options."</p>
<p>Compatibility</p>
<p>The My DVR Expander external hard drive, a TiVo Verified(TM) product, has been tested for compatibility with TiVo HD and TiVo Series3 HD DVRs. It is certified compatible with Scientific Atlanta 8300 Series digital video recorders (including models 8300 HD, 8300 MR and 8300 HD-MR). Further compatibility of the My DVR Expander drive is planned as other cable and satellite DVR manufacturers enable the eSATA (external SATA) ports on their currently-deployed DVRs.</p>
<p>Availability and Pricing</p>
<p>WD's My DVR Expander external hard drive is available now in the United States from Best Buy retail stores and by ordering online from TiVo.com/store. MSRP for the My DVR Expander drive with 500 GB is $199.99 USD.</p>
<p>More information on the My DVR Expander external drive may be found at http://www.tivo.com/expand.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/313880/western-digital-confirms-500gb-my-dvr-expander-drive-works-with-tivo]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-313880]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[tivo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dvrs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[esata]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[harddrives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[my dvr expander]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 23 Oct 2007 08:13:43 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=313880&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Best Buy Leaks First TiVo External HDD?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/10/TivoHDDGI.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Earlier last week we brought you news of a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/tivo/another-tivo-update-brings-official-esata-support-and-better-amazon-unbox-downloads-311697.php">TiVo update</a> that provides eSata support with officially licensed HDDs. Well, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #bestbuy" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/bestbuy/">Best Buy</a> seems to have done the dirty once again, leaking what appears to be the first TiVo supported hard drive.</p>

<p>Other than a 500GB capacity, a $219.99 price point, a telltale name of My Book (<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #westerndigital" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/westerndigital/">Western Digital</a>) TiVo DVR Expander and an expected shipping time of 1-2weeks, there is little other information available here. What more information do you need? [<a href="http://www.bestbuybusiness.com/bbfb/en/US/adirect/bestbuy?cmd=catProductDetail&showAddButton=true&productID=BB10805982&websrc=FRBB10805982">Best Buy</a> via <a href="http://www.zatznotfunny.com/2007-10/is-this-the-first-tivo-approved-external-drive/">ZNF</a>]<br></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/313287/best-buy-leaks-first-tivo-external-hdd]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-313287]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[tivo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[best buy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[my book tivo dvr expander]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 21 Oct 2007 15:50:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haroon Malik]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=313287&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Western Digital Announces Record Breaking Hard Drive Density]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/10/western_digtal.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Today <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #westerndigital" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/westerndigital/">Western Digital</a> announced that it has achieved 520 Gb/in2 areal density in an actual demonstration using its own perpendicular magnetic recording (PMR)/tunneling magneto-resistive (TuMR) head technology. For those of you who are counting, that makes it the highest density ever reached using continuous media. A density of this magnitude produces a 3.5-inch hard drive storing 640 GB-per-platter and single hard drive capacities as large as 3 TB. Compare that to the current leading density of around 200 Gb/in2 being shipped high volume products like WD's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/biggus-smallus-diskus/wd-scorpio-250gb-25+inch-hd-for-notebooks-now-shipping-262403.php">250 GB Scorpio(R) 2.5-inch drive</a>. That's all well and good, but it looks like you will have to wait to get your hands on this technology. Current estimates put the release at around 2010.<br></p>

<blockquote>WD(R) Demonstrates Highest Hard Drive Density Company Achieves 520 Gb/in2 Areal Density in Demonstration; Result of Ongoing Technology Investments TOKYO and FREMONT, Calif., Oct. 17 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ &mdash; Western Digital Corp. (NYSE: WDC) today announced that it has achieved 520 Gb/in2 areal density &mdash; the hard drive industry's highest demonstrated density to date using continuous media. The company revealed the milestone this week at the Perpendicular Magnetic Recording Conference in Tokyo after an earlier demonstration in California . Following WD's growing investments in technology the past five years, the company achieved 520 Gb/in2 using its own perpendicular magnetic recording (PMR)/tunneling magneto-resistive (TuMR) head technology. This level of density produces a 3.5-inch hard drive storing 640 GB-per-platter and single hard drive capacities as large as 3 TB. Based on the industry's current density growth rate of more than 40 percent per year, those capacities are expected to be available in the 2010 timeframe. Current industry-leading hard drive densities shipping in high volume are about 200 Gb/in2, as featured in WD's 250 GB WD Scorpio(R) 2.5-inch drive for notebooks and mobile applications, which began shipping in May 2007. "WD was the first hard drive manufacturer to ship in volume the 250 GB capacity point in the 2.5-inch form factor," said Hossein Moghadam, chief technology officer for WD. "Our technology investments position WD with our customers as a leading choice for the highest, cutting-edge capacities. Our top priority will be to remain keenly focused on providing the highest quality and reliability, which customers have come to expect from WD after years of relying on our products." WD demonstrated 520 Gb/in2 density in its Magnetic Head Operation labs in Fremont, Calif., earlier this month. Moghadam added, "The milestone was realized using our current-technology MgO reader, illustrating the extendibility of PMR-TuMR head technology generations into the future." About WD WD, one of the storage industry's pioneers and long-time leaders, provides products and services for people and organizations that collect, manage and use digital information. The company produces reliable, high-performance <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #harddrives" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/harddrives/">hard drives</a> that keep users' data accessible and secure from loss. WD applies its storage expertise to consumer products for external, portable and shared storage applications.
<p>WD was founded in 1970. The company's storage products are marketed to leading systems manufacturers, selected resellers andretailers under the Western Digital and WD brand names. Visit the Investor section of the company's Web site (http://www.westerndigital.com) to access a variety of financial and investor information.<br>
<br>
This press release contains forward-looking statements, including statements relating to density growth rates, dates certain capacities are expected to be available based on those growth rates and the extendibility of PMR-TuMR head technology generations into the future. These forward-looking statements are based on current management expectations, and actual results may differ materially as a result of several factors, including: technical and manufacturing challenges related to changes in areal density; changes in technology; business conditions generally; and other risks and uncertainties listed in WD's recent SEC filings, including its form 10-K for fiscal 2007. WD undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect new information or events or for any other reason.<br>
<br>
Western Digital, WD and the WD logo are registered trademarks of Western Digital Technologies, Inc. All other trademarks herein are property of their respective owner. One gigabyte (GB) = 1 billion bytes. Total accessible capacity varies depending on operating environment.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/312156/western-digital-announces-record-breaking-hard-drive-density]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-312156]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:20:16 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=312156&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Mechanical Patent Dispute Could Result in Hard Drive Ban]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2007/10/importhdd.jpg"><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/10/importhdd.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Hot on the heels of yesterday's potential <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/hdtvs/australia-to-ban-all-plasmas-309279.php">Australian plasma ban</a>, comes news of the U.S. possibly banning many popular hard drives due to a patent dispute. The issue involves a patent for "<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #dissipativeceramicbondingtips" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/dissipativeceramicbondingtips/">dissipative ceramic bonding tips</a>," also known as wire bonding tips, which <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #westerndigital" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/westerndigital/">Western Digital</a>, Seagate, Toshiba, HP, and Dell either use in their own foreign manufacturing process or sell in products that were built, in countries other than the U.S., using them. According to <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20071011-hard-times-for-hard-drives-us-may-ban-popular-imports.html">Ars Technica</a>, the problem at hand resides under Section 337 of the Tariff Act.</p>

<p>Section 337 bans all product importation when they infringe upon U.S. patents. Which if the International Trade Commission judge sides with the patent holder, the aforementioned companies will be subject to. Although this will only be a problem for the companies if the court sides in favor of the patent holders, Steven and Mary Reiber. Even then, they can still appeal that ruling as well, and if history gives us any clues (Remember Qualcomm?), then the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #harddrive" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/harddrive/">hard drive</a> manufacturers just might get off this time. Otherwise Samsung looks like it will be getting a lot of new business[<a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20071011-hard-times-for-hard-drives-us-may-ban-popular-imports.html">Ars Technica</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/309885/mechanical-patent-dispute-could-result-in-hard-drive-ban]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-309885]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[international]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dissipative ceramic bonding tips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hp]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[seagate]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[toshiba]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:10:30 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[blongo3]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=309885&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Western Digital follows up last Thursday's...]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #westerndigital" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #westerndigital" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/westerndigital/">Western Digital</a> follows up <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/storage/western-digital-releases-new-slimmer-1tb-my-books-301865.php">last Thursday's My Book announcement</a> with 1TB <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #mybook" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #mybook" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/mybook/">My Book</a> Studio edition for Macs with Firewire 400/800, USB 2.0 and eSATA. [<a href="http://www.wdc.com/en/company/releases/PressRelease.asp?release=%7B9E4D5B9D-64F7-4950-9194-2CA82C938CE8%7D">Western Digital</a>]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/303476/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-303476]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[hard drives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[drive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[my book]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mybook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[western digital]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:54:24 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=303476&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
